Well!!BREAKING: The Minister of Defense of Ukraine resigns!
The new Minister of Defense of Ukraine will be Alexander Vindman Do you remember him?
View: https://twitter.com/GregRubini/status/1622699598925139968?s=20&t=O7j0AaFFIssu24Gz8VIyIg
2) in case you don't believe it...
Vindman says Ukrainian officials offered him defense minister position
View: https://youtu.be/FybdZFulJ5w
3) here you have another photo of Vindman (with another uniform): .
RT 5min
View: https://twitter.com/GregRubini/status/1622720007523237889?s=20&t=O7j0AaFFIssu24Gz8VIyIg
5) The REAL name of Alexander Vindman is: Aleksandr Semyonovich Vindman
He was born in the Communist Soviet Union.
His family was INFILTRATED in the US in 1979 by the USSR Communists.
View: https://twitter.com/GregRubini/status/1622728003124969472?s=20&t=O7j0AaFFIssu24Gz8VIyIg
There's no such thing as a "coincidence" in this case.....BREAKING: The Minister of Defense of Ukraine resigns!
The new Minister of Defense of Ukraine will be Alexander Vindman Do you remember him?
View: https://twitter.com/GregRubini/status/1622699598925139968?s=20&t=O7j0AaFFIssu24Gz8VIyIg
2) in case you don't believe it...
Vindman says Ukrainian officials offered him defense minister position
View: https://youtu.be/FybdZFulJ5w
3) here you have another photo of Vindman (with another uniform): .
RT 5min
View: https://twitter.com/GregRubini/status/1622720007523237889?s=20&t=O7j0AaFFIssu24Gz8VIyIg
5) The REAL name of Alexander Vindman is: Aleksandr Semyonovich Vindman
He was born in the Communist Soviet Union.
His family was INFILTRATED in the US in 1979 by the USSR Communists.
View: https://twitter.com/GregRubini/status/1622728003124969472?s=20&t=O7j0AaFFIssu24Gz8VIyIg
Good points - especially the twitter video - this is an entirely new way/method of attacking troops that the Russians have been using and enhancing over this last year. US troops in this conflict would not only not have the traditional advantage of 100% air cover and support but would have to face massive effective Russian artillery - something I am not sure they have trained for. With the Russian use of numerous small drones (each artillery unit has their own) to ID targets and adjust artillery fire. The drone provides the artillery teams real-time feedback on the impact of their rounds and allow for fast corrective adjustments. This is even more effective (and cheaper) than the US GPS guided artillery. GPS guidance is excellent for a fixed target (supply's, HQ. fixed AA batteries) but the Russian systems allow for the targeting of fast moving targets. With their massive artillery advantage and real-time targeting data this system almost makes the use of aircraft unnecessary.A dose of salts and reality for anyone thinking US/NATO is going to go in, kick ass and take names.
I think it would be hard to disagree that Ukraine and Russians are at this moment the most experienced troops in the world fighting a war with a modern army. Ukraine using western/Russian weapon capabilities and Russia with their own. Beside "trainers" and mercs, US/NATO troops have no experience with this type of fighting.
The following is what our troops will be facing. Not some insurgents fighting a lopsided war against us. Our boys and girls will be getting blown to bits with precision fire being directed by drone. They will be killed with every type of vision capability that we have ourselves.
They will be like these Ukraine troops below. This is war where mistakes are made all the time, by all sides, and people die as a result.
This is NOT our fight.
@@@
View: https://twitter.com/bigrussianshop/status/1622666146137743375?cxt=HHwWnoC92eeQ74QtAAAA
Actually the US has had UAVs attached to "fires" brigades for quite a while (ETA: and they've been re-re-named as field artillery brigades or Division Artilleries (DIVARTY)).....Good points - especially the twitter video - this is an entirely new way/method of attacking troops that the Russians have been using and enhancing over this last year. US troops in this conflict would not only not have the traditional advantage of 100% air cover and support but would have to face massive effective Russian artillery - something I am not sure they have trained for. With the Russian use of numerous small drones (each artillery unit has their own) to ID targets and adjust artillery fire. The drone provides the artillery teams real-time feedback on the impact of their rounds and allow for fast corrective adjustments. This is even more effective (and cheaper) than the US GPS guided artillery. GPS guidance is excellent for a fixed target (supply's, HQ. fixed AA batteries) but the Russian systems allow for the targeting of fast moving targets. With their massive artillery advantage and real-time targeting data this system almost makes the use of aircraft unnecessary.
And we have numbers - best estimates are that the US could field around 50k combat troops from Europe to Ukraine - this is while no one is quite sure how many combat troops Russia has - the numbers run up and down by 100's of thousands - from maybe 300k to 500k to maybe up to a million? - who knows - but against that many an additional 50k US troops (as good as they are and KNOWING how to operate their equipment) will make little differences.
The best outcome for the people of Ukraine and Russia is if the US / NATO keeps out of this final phase. The sooner - and it is happening - the Ukrainian army collapses and they are forced to settle this via negotiation the more lives saved.
But on the positive side our MIC has made 10's of Billions - and no one was hurt in the process.
Good points - especially the twitter video - this is an entirely new way/method of attacking troops that the Russians have been using and enhancing over this last year. US troops in this conflict would not only not have the traditional advantage of 100% air cover and support but would have to face massive effective Russian artillery - something I am not sure they have trained for. With the Russian use of numerous small drones (each artillery unit has their own) to ID targets and adjust artillery fire. The drone provides the artillery teams real-time feedback on the impact of their rounds and allow for fast corrective adjustments. This is even more effective (and cheaper) than the US GPS guided artillery. GPS guidance is excellent for a fixed target (supply's, HQ. fixed AA batteries) but the Russian systems allow for the targeting of fast moving targets. With their massive artillery advantage and real-time targeting data this system almost makes the use of aircraft unnecessary.
And we have numbers - best estimates are that the US could field around 50k combat troops from Europe to Ukraine - this is while no one is quite sure how many combat troops Russia has - the numbers run up and down by 100's of thousands - from maybe 300k to 500k to maybe up to a million? - who knows - but against that many an additional 50k US troops (as good as they are and KNOWING how to operate their equipment) will make little differences.
The best outcome for the people of Ukraine and Russia is if the US / NATO keeps out of this final phase. The sooner - and it is happening - the Ukrainian army collapses and they are forced to settle this via negotiation the more lives saved.
But on the positive side our MIC has made 10's of Billions - and no one was hurt in the process.
Actually the US has had UAVs attached to "fires" brigades for quite a while (ETA: and they've been re-re-named as field artillery brigades or Division Artilleries (DIVARTY)).....
Last week, I was reading about the newly-deployed Russian counterbattery system. It's an interesting application of some well-established oilfield technology which the oil patch undoubtedly picked up from some defense research somewhere (think Schlumberger, et al).All modern militaries have drone capability in their TOE.
The point Abert and I are making is that only Russia and Ukraine forces have actually done this in practice against an opposing force that can hit back using the same capabilities.
As for the US/NATO being able to do this..... how many tubes will they bring in? Not UK as they have none now. How long before the Russians over whelm the small amount we can get in theater? And how many do you think Russia will allow to get in the theatre at all? Where do we get the amount of shells to even try and fight for a bit against what Russia has sustained for so long now? Counter battery fire will be a nightmare for us.
And as for drones .... I've seen them being used at the squad level to direct machine gun fire and grenade/rocket attacks by that squad.
Our troops are not prepared to fight this war.
The Russians will not give them time to learn.
Artillery has always been the Queen of battle, and the biggest death dealer.
Urban shot-spotter scaled up. Probably not enough money in it to spur investment by our side. No glory in managing the project. Pity.their new system is using acoustic technology to passively "listen" for launch signatures, flight paths, trajectories, etc.
Understand that if NATO, i.e. US and Polish forces (since everyone else are pretty much spent/cadre forces at this point) take the field, it will be a combined arms force, both air and ground with satellite recce support. The amount of potential fire that could be laid upon Russian forces is such that the moment that threat becomes flesh, the Russians will have to start resorting to nuclear weapons to have a chance at creating a version of a "frozen conflict" where they can either keep a stalemate like in Korea or negotiate a peace they can live with. That's a huge version of chicken that only works if they get lucky in reading the current cabal in DC. If any of those players, both in front of or behind the curtain, changes that results in the destruction of the Rodina in a manner that even the Mongols couldn't accomplish, never mind what happens to everyone else.All modern militaries have drone capability in their TOE.
The point Abert and I are making is that only Russia and Ukraine forces have actually done this in practice against an opposing force that can hit back using the same capabilities.
As for the US/NATO being able to do this..... how many tubes will they bring in? Not UK as they have none now. How long before the Russians over whelm the small amount we can get in theater? And how many do you think Russia will allow to get in the theatre at all? Where do we get the amount of shells to even try and fight for a bit against what Russia has sustained for so long now? Counter battery fire will be a nightmare for us.
And as for drones .... I've seen them being used at the squad level to direct machine gun fire and grenade/rocket attacks by that squad.
Our troops are not prepared to fight this war.
The Russians will not give them time to learn.
Artillery has always been the Queen of battle, and the biggest death dealer.
Last week, I was reading about the newly-deployed Russian counterbattery system. It's an interesting application of some well-established oilfield technology which the oil patch undoubtedly picked up from some defense research somewhere (think Schlumberger, et al).
Instead of using radar systems for counterbattery detection and guidance - which are vulnerable just like any radar system when it's radiating - their new system is using acoustic technology to passively "listen" for launch signatures, flight paths, trajectories, etc. There's no technology signature which is giving away their presence but they apparently are proving to be quite deadly. I have noticed since then what seems to be an increasing knockdown ratio of HIMARS rockets, for instance, but that's a non-scientific observation with no hard data backing it up.
Someone like Minnesota Smith could undoubtedly explain the technology better than me, but just think of common downhole logs such as acoustic (sometimes called sonic logs but that's a bit misleading as there are sonic logs which bounce sound waves and record the reflections, such as cement bond logs or seismic projects).
Understand that if NATO, i.e. US and Polish forces (since everyone else are pretty much spent/cadre forces at this point) take the field, it will be a combined arms force, both air and ground with satellite recce support. The amount of potential fire that could be laid upon Russian forces is such that the moment that threat becomes flesh, the Russians will have to start resorting to nuclear weapons to have a chance at creating a version of a "frozen conflict" where they can either keep a stalemate like in Korea or negotiate a peace they can live with. That's a huge version of chicken that only works if they get lucky in reading the current cabal in DC. If any of those players, both in front of or behind the curtain, changes that results in the destruction of the Rodina in a manner that even the Mongols couldn't accomplish, never mind what happens to everyone else.
That's just it, those forces are now arrayed in Poland, both the US enhanced Forward Presence (eFP) Battle Group and the Polish armed forces are waiting for a go signal.We will just have to agree to disagree.
Russia is not as dumb as Iraq and would not allow a belligerent force to take more than 6 months to deploy forces next to them in order to attack.
Any ground attack by the current US/NATO force against Russia in Ukraine will fail.
The US/NATO would be the ones resorting to nuclear force as they could not sustain a combat force in Ukraine against Russia.
That's just it, those forces are now arrayed in Poland, both the US enhanced Forward Presence (eFP) Battle Group and the Polish armed forces are waiting for a go signal.
The other read is that the PTB in the EU and US are fighting the Russians to the last Ukrainian so that they can make more money on the back end of this fiasco as well as now and gambling that it won't get "out of hand".Yep, those are the ones I'm talking about and even including anything US/NATO can scrounge up from the rest of Europe to join in the action.
Being in Poland is no good when the line of hostilities is located in east Ukraine. All that nice pre-positioned equipment is not driving to eastern Ukraine. It would all have to be taken by RR or highways, providing nice opportunities of taking out this equipment with missile strikes. The more important targets getting hyper-sonic attention. Bridges also a nice target if needed as well as any airports that could support US/NATO aircraft.
US/NATO have never faced a fully activated Russian air defense zone. I'm sure Russia has it's own capabilities as they planned for their way or war, not ours. That is why they have the ability to support massive artillery expenditure and massive missile attacks. They planned for it. We can't even support Ukraine with the artillery ammunition they need and have to go cap in hand begging other countries for help.
Russia has already won any conventional altercation. The only question is how much blood does US/NATO need to lose to find out as well, and not go nuclear instead out of desperation.
At that point, IMHO, the conflict is likelier than not to accelerate logarithmically way past a "limited war".....And you can also bet the minute our forces are in direct confrontation with Russia in their own backyard our satellites will be neutralized in short order. We are almost totally reliant on satellite targeting, satellite navigation, and satellite communications.
Works great fighting goat herders and anyone wearing sandals.We are almost totally reliant on satellite targeting, satellite navigation, and satellite communications.
So as to leave no doubt.No.
"We" do not.
I reserve the right to speak for myself.
Sounds radical. Why now?“Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy announced that officials with military experience will be appointed in a number of border and frontline regions.
It's called leading with your chin.US warship operating in the Black Sea for the first time since the Russian invasion
EndGameWW3
@EndGameWW3
44m
US warship operating in the Black Sea for the first time since the Russian invasion
View: https://twitter.com/EndGameWW3/status/1622811977113341952?s=20
It's called leading with your chin.
interesting. You should send them your corrections. I did my part o' fact checker already this week, when correcting someone publishing that we'd sent out a battle carrier to the downed balloon site.
glad u like..I hoped that putting big nuff boom-boom makers on er would entice sweet boy into warming up to the idea o' protectin' the barn babies.Nice meme and great link to browse!