CRIME Main Rittenhouse trial thread - NOT GUILTY ON ALL COUNTS

O

Oreally

Right from the start
Illini Warrior said:
they enacted allll kinds of associated FED charges during & after the BLM trouble out West - crossing state borders for terrorist activities is a possibility - Civil Rights violations will get him into one of their prisons >>> arresting Rittenhouse and wanting more bad publicity with an actual trial are two different things ....
Click to expand...
but...even with federal charges , he still needs to be convicted by a jury of 12 citizens from that district and i just can't see that..
 
vector7

vector7

Dot Collector
vector7

vector7

Dot Collector
WOW! only 59% of Democrats.

Rittenhouse Trial:
Guilty? Yes:
Democrats - 59%
Republicans - 22%
Independents - 25%

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1458498398341013504
View: https://twitter.com/catturd2/status/1458498398341013504?t=bCBHtfe9EBhGHvu_yRG5lA&s=19


Facebook and Twitter censored anyone from defending Kyle Rittenhouse and labeled him a mass murderer

His legal team wasn’t even allowed to crowdsource their defense fund

This is why a National Divorce is needed. When a case like this is so clear, even from the very start, there are still people hoping he gets locked up and calling him a murderer. Objectivity is gone, and we will never be united again. We need to break up.
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1458508509788704779
View: https://twitter.com/toastyJ/status/1458508509788704779?t=EbjHf1fZaRCBmIpfZf89Hw&s=19
 
bw

bw

Fringe Ranger
Actually, getting a mistrial with prejudice is a great outcome for the prosecution at this point. They can claim he was let go on a technicality. Much better than being simply found not guilty.
 
Macgyver

Macgyver

Has No Life - Lives on TB
bw said:
Actually, getting a mistrial with prejudice is a great outcome for the prosecution at this point. They can claim he was let go on a technicality. Much better than being simply found not guilty.
Click to expand...
Good for Kyle as well because he can't be tried again.
 
vector7

vector7

Dot Collector
BUBBAHOTEPT

BUBBAHOTEPT

Veteran Member
vector7 said:
This is why a National Divorce is needed. When a case like this is so clear, even from the very start, there are still people hoping he gets locked up and calling him a murderer. Objectivity is gone, and we will never be united again. We need to break up.
Click to expand...
Yes we do. Because as bad as that would be, the alternative would be a walk into the mouth of madness. Again, the stupidity, hypocrisy, and denial of reality from the other side, can only be settled on a biblical scale… :kaid:
 
vector7

vector7

Dot Collector
Judge’s phone goes off in Rittenhouse trial. His ringtone is “Proud to be an American”
RT 11secs
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1458518142708240392
View: https://twitter.com/DailyCaller/status/1458518142708240392?t=Jfgp-HtzOVVEz_HUpqIytA&s=19


LMFAO wait until these people start saying that his ringtone is an indication of white nationalism or some bullshit

Already happening
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1458519793150144520
View: https://twitter.com/TheTrex48/status/1458519793150144520?t=lxFEN6Eroj1t7qTD1P6m5w&s=19
 
Macgyver

Macgyver

Has No Life - Lives on TB
www.thegatewaypundit.com

Rittenhouse Lawyer Will Ask For Mistrial Over Prosecutor's Line of Questioning, Attempt to Introduce Inadmissible Evidence | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila

Kyle Rittenhouse’s lawyers say they will ask for a mistrial over the prosecutor’s line of questioning.
www.thegatewaypundit.com www.thegatewaypundit.com

Rittenhouse Lawyer Will Ask For Mistrial Over Prosecutor’s Line of Questioning, Attempt to Introduce Inadmissible Evidence

By Cristina Laila
Published November 10, 2021 at 1:37pm
Comment
IMG_7194.jpg

Kyle Rittenhouse’s lawyers say they will ask for a mistrial over the prosecutor’s line of questioning.
“Rittenhouse’s lawyer cites prosecutor’s attempt to introduce inadmissible evidence as reason to call for mistrial” – Reuters reported.
Rittenhouse’s lawyer says he is going to be making a motion for a mistrial pic.twitter.com/Mfgovc9XMz
— Reuters Legal (@ReutersLegal) November 10, 2021
Click to expand...


Circuit Court Judge Bruce E. Schroeder on Wednesday ripped Kenosha County Assistant District Attorney Thomas Binger just one day after the prosecution rested its case in the trial of Kyle Rittenhouse.
Rittenhouse’s lawyer asked the Court to strongly admonish Binger and warned he will be filing a motion for a mistrial with prejudice.
Kenosha prosecutor Thomas Binger tried to go around the judge’s ruling and introduce inadmissible evidence and Judge Schroeder RIPPED into him.
“Don’t get brazen with me!” the judge said. “Why you would think that you can go into it without any advance notice to the court, I don’t understand that and as the defense is pointing out, you’re an experienced trial lawyer and this should not have been gone into,” he added.
WATCH:
The prosecutor is now arguing with the judge after bringing up a Rittenhouse statement that the judge previously ruled was inadmissible
Judge: “Why you would think that you could go into that without any advance notice, I don’t understand … you’re an experienced trial lawyer.” pic.twitter.com/VSo7bCe42x
— Washington Free Beacon (@FreeBeacon) November 10, 2021
Click to expand...
 
Sicario

Sicario

The Executor
WalknTrot said:
I don't get why Rittenhouse is on the stand.
If anything could possibly screw him at this point, that could.
Click to expand...
Typically, I would agree with that. A defendant usually only stands to harm his case by testifying. But in this case, I think his counsel was wise to put him on. He's articulate, calm, and the jury will see the mean prosecutor badgering a "child." I do wish his counsel would ask him why he only shot so few shots at each attacker though. Both his marksmanship and his shot discipline were remarkable. He only shot until the threat was eliminated. And NO collateral damage? WOW!
 
Last edited:
The Snack Artist

The Snack Artist

Membership Revoked
Sicario said:
Typically, I would agree with that. A defendant usually only stands to harm his case by testifying. But in this case, I think his counsel was wise to put him on. He's articulate, calm, and the jury will see the mean prosecutor badgering a "child." I do wish his counsel would ask him why he only shot so few shots at each attacker though. Both his marksmanship and his shot discipline were remarkable. And NO collateral damage? WOW!
Click to expand...
You are forgetting my feelz. Thanks for nothing.
 
Jez

Jez

Veteran Member
With as bad as the prosecution has blown the case I'm curious if they will be facing some kind of legal censure with the court after the trial is over. It's seems like they are pissing off the judge with their hijinks and judges don't usually take well to being mocked.
 
Dennis Olson

Dennis Olson

Chief Curmudgeon
_______________
Hfcomms said:
A real judge and one that I can respect. Your going to get a fair shake in his courtroom instead of a rubber stamped kangaroo court.
Click to expand...
This is what puts his life in grave peril IMO. The Marxists will come after him. If a mistrial is granted, they’ll try to have the judge replaced with a Marxist. Failing that, expect him to die in a “traffic accident.”
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top