Did you read where it said “unconfirmed” not once but twice?We would never know this. BS
So someone made it up. Even if true, even with this screwed up administration, nobody would be talking about it to anyone.Did you read where it said “unconfirmed” not once but tw
I hope notDon't do it Joe
Is anyone else besides me starting to feel like this whole thing is starting to resemble a runaway train…with no conductor aboard?
Conductor is on strike.
4 or 5 people that work for an agency may well keep a secret. I agree. 300 guys on a us navy submarine? Maybe less soOh boy! I could not disagree with you more.
I mean look at existing facts: 1. Someone did follow that order. 2. It is being kept a secret. 3. Most countries intel agencies are really great at keeping secrets. 4. Most countries have people in their inventory that will carry out such orders. 5. Not everyone are attention whores that just gotta tell all.
better not be before 5PM Friday "Prime Rib Buffet" or I am gonna be pissed.
4 or 5 people that work for an agency may well keep a secret. I agree. 300 guys on a us navy submarine? Maybe less so
More Forward Positioning...Trudeau is using hard core CCP tactics on his own people. Can it get any worse.
U.S. Approves United Nation’s Use of Military Force on American Soil AmericanIntelligenceReport / July 13, 2016 / Conspiracy, politics, united nations, video, videos
United States Politicians Gleefully Approve of United Nations Invasion of America
Kristan T. Harris | American Intelligence Report
United Nation military troops may soon arrive and see action on American soil following the United States’ announcement of support for “a set of principles that give a green light for U.N. peacekeeping troops and police to use force to protect civilians in armed conflicts,” Military Times reports.
U.S. Ambassador Samantha Power told attendees at an important U.N. meeting that the United States was “proud” and “humbled” to be a included in the new agenda and promised to follow by the 18 pledges, Fox News reports.
The arrival of the United Nations requires federalization of police in order to set a global standard of law enforcement. President Barrack Obama has pounced on the opportunity to exploit recent shootings to push for the federalization of local police forces.
More federalization of local police, collaborated with the arrival of the United Nations military presence, could mean big trouble for liberty and freedom of speech in America.
Videos are flooding the internet documenting the slow-moving invasion of United Nations military-like vehicles across America...
Obama Administration and UN Announce Global Police Force to Fight ‘Extremism In U.S.
Anthony Behar-Pool/Getty Image
Pamela Geller
2 Oct 2015
On Wednesday, Attorney General Loretta Lynch announced at the United Nations that her office would be working in several American cities to form what she called the Strong Cities Network (SCN), a law enforcement initiative that would encompass the globe.
This amounts to nothing less than the overriding of American laws, up to and including the United States Constitution, in favor of United Nations laws that would henceforth be implemented in the United States itself – without any consultation of Congress at all.
The United Nations is a sharia-compliant world body, and Obama, speaking there just days ago, insisted that “violent extremism” is not exclusive to Islam (which it is). Obama is redefining jihad terror to include everyone but the jihadists. So will the UN, driven largely by the sharia-enforcing Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) and the pro-Islamic post-American President Obama, use a “global police force” to crush counter-jihad forces?
After all, with Obama knowingly aiding al-Qaeda forces in Syria, how likely is it that he will use his “global police force” against actual Islamic jihadists? I suspect that instead, this global police force will be used to impose the blasphemy laws under the sharia (Islamic law), and to silence all criticism of Islam for the President who proclaimed that “the future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.”
What is a global police force doing in our cities?
What the hell sub has 300 people and where the hell they going to sleep???You think something like this involving 300 personnel would not remain a secret for good?
It all depends on who is selected. Operations like this pick people who will not talk to anyone about this for the rest of their life. A known quality.
Do you think we, the public, know everything that we did in Nam, or the ME, or even during the "cold war" years? Not by a long shot, And we will never find out about the vast majority of these "things", which is good as it would be very damaging to our national interests bringing it into the light now.
All countries do it. Either themselves, or they hire trusted mercenaries to do the task. It only takes a small group with in the proper channels and the authorization to get it done.
What sub has 300 personnel onboard? I know a lot of retired and active submariners and they are very tight lipped about what they did in the service.4 or 5 people that work for an agency may well keep a secret. I agree. 300 guys on a us navy submarine? Maybe less so
Sounds like it is a case of hyperbolation. Or perhaps it could be 300 submariners on 6 different boats. Who can say, we are all friends here да?What sub has 300 personnel onboard? I know a lot of retired and active submariners and they are very tight lipped about what they did in the service.
What the hell sub has 300 people and where the hell they going to sleep???
The 300 number was not meant literally. I should have said something like dozens or a hundred. But the point being it’s not 4 or 5 guys. The more people that know, the more potential for a leakWhat sub has 300 personnel onboard? I know a lot of retired and active submariners and they are very tight lipped about what they did in the service.
And, often only a few of the participants know what they are participating in.You think something like this involving 300 personnel would not remain a secret for good?
It all depends on who is selected. Operations like this pick people who will not talk to anyone about this for the rest of their life. A known quality.
Do you think we, the public, know everything that we did in Nam, or the ME, or even during the "cold war" years? Not by a long shot, And we will never find out about the vast majority of these "things", which is good as it would be very damaging to our national interests bringing it into the light now.
All countries do it. Either themselves, or they hire trusted mercenaries to do the task. It only takes a small group with in the proper channels and the authorization to get it done.
they won't talk. they will have tragic military accidentsYou think something like this involving 300 personnel would not remain a secret for good?
It all depends on who is selected. Operations like this pick people who will not talk to anyone about this for the rest of their life. A known quality.
Do you think we, the public, know everything that we did in Nam, or the ME, or even during the "cold war" years? Not by a long shot, And we will never find out about the vast majority of these "things", which is good as it would be very damaging to our national interests bringing it into the light now.
All countries do it. Either themselves, or they hire trusted mercenaries to do the task. It only takes a small group with in the proper channels and the authorization to get it done.
No offense, just saw an opportunity to tweak. It’s what I do.The 300 number was not meant literally. I should have said something like dozens or a hundred. But the point being it’s not 4 or 5 guys. The more people that know, the more potential for a leak
i Didn’t mean to offend anyone
they won't talk. they will have tragic military accidents
In the case of flight 800 the government denied any involvement. However, the whistleblower protections were waived for all of the servicemen involved. Telling...The vast majority don't talk because of duty and honor to their sworn oath.
A very few have unfortunately had loose lips, but they did not suffer tragic military accidents.
They did however spend some time as quests of the government, some quite long and still ongoing.
It was only in retrospect that people eventually realized that the assassination of the Archduke in Sarajevo Ignited WW1...He's not the only one who could. He probably did issue the order, but other countries have this capability, as well.
ETA: Please don't misunderstand. If Team Brandon did this, we need to have solid proof. This has, IMHO, a better than 50% chance of being the thing that starts WWIII. If so, it also has the chance of being something that starts regime change here, because the dishonor required to have done this is off the scale, and the unnecessary peril to our country will enrage people at all levels of the power structure.
But this is only viable if we KNOW that Biden and the DS puppeteers are behind it.
I hear you, and agree with most of what you're saying here. Any disagreement leaves very little sunlight between our opinions.Ir was onlyin retrospect that pele eventually realized that the assassination of the Archduke in Sarajevo Ignited WW1...
it may well be that we never find out who did the deed on the pipeline, nor even survive to be able to ask the question. All we can do is amass what passes for evidence and surmise the likely dimwit who thought that it was a good idea to destroy the Russian investment to provide Europe with natural gas... Biden had already said that he “would” do it. Someone just posted above that a US warship was seen in that very location recently. US engineered coup in Kiev in 2014, Nazi’s shelling Russian speaking Ukrainians ever since, UD funding Ukraine with an endless supply of checks and weapons, sure looks like the US wants a war very badly in a part of the world we have very little business in...
If it were not for US money, weapons, intelligence, targeting info there would be no war...Not NATO? The US is blamed directly? That's a helluva thing. Shit.
The U.S. doesn't want war (We, The People® ARE "the U.S.").. . . sure looks like the US wants a war very badly in a part of the world we have very little business in...
Let's just hope this is CNN doing what they are known for, fake news.Faytuks News Δ
@Faytuks
1h
CNN intelligence and security analyst: The Russians I keep in touch with in Russia are convinced that Putin will go nuclear