The only explanation that makes sense is that Russian forces are retreating and extracting revenge via a scorched earth policy by destroying Ukraine infrascucture they can no longer exploit.Why would Russia blow it? If they are in a strong footing, unless the intent was to destroy any good river bank emplacements and dwellings...
Or Ukraine could be doing the same and they are trying to confuse things with the response...The only explanation that makes sense is that Russian forces are retreating and extracting revenge via a scorched earth policy by destroying Ukraine infrascucture they can no longer exploit.
Strategically, Russia would never have done this if they could advance further in to Ukraine.
We'll see in a few days.Or Ukraine could be doing the same and they are trying to confuse things with the response...
Good points.The only explanation that makes sense is that Russian forces are retreating and extracting revenge via a scorched earth policy by destroying Ukraine infrascucture they can no longer exploit.
Strategically, Russia would never have done this if they were able to advance further in to Ukraine.
This points more to Ukraine causing the damage...Crimea would need that water, no? Why would the Russians destroy a dam that supplied Crimea’s drinking water?
Somebody over there, one side or the other, appears to be getting desperate.
The Russian Wall:Statement of the Ministry of Defense on the offensive of the enemy on the South-Donetsk Front
During June 5, the enemy continued to conduct the offensive, concentrating the main efforts on the Vremevsky ledge of the South-Donetsk direction.
- Having suffered heavy losses the day before, the Kiev regime reorganized the remnants of the 23rd and 31st mechanized brigades into separate consolidated units, which continued offensive operations in the areas of the settlement. Novodarovka and Levadnoe. In addition, a fresh brigade was brought into battle in this area.
- At the same time, the enemy launched an offensive in the direction of the Oktyabrsky state farm and Novodonetskoye with the forces of the 37th Marine Brigade with reinforcements, the basis of which was the units of the 68th Mountain Jaeger Brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine .
- The enemy was inflicted a complex fire defeat by the forces of army, assault and operational-tactical aviation, missile forces and artillery, as well as heavy flamethrower systems.
- As a result of the active and selfless actions of the units of the Vostok grouping of troops, who showed courage and heroism , the enemy was stopped and did not achieve the assigned tasks. The attacking formations and military units of the Armed Forces of Ukraine suffered significant damage .
- The total losses of the enemy in the South-Donetsk direction amounted to more than 1,500 militants, 28 tanks, including 8 "Leopards" made in Germany, three wheeled tanks AMX-10 made in France and 109 armored fighting vehicles.
View: https://twitter.com/djuric_zlatko/status/1665830703039225856?cxt=HHwWgIC96dmMnJ4uAAAA
Russia built that dam in 1956.Or those russin idiots are sitting on land and infrastructure that they have no idea how to maintain and this dam failed as a result from prior damage.
Too bad the 1956 Russians aren't part of the special operation then.Russia built that dam in 1956.
Self scrapping airplanes Red Baron. I'm sure zippy will be impressed they might have a misson left before the wings fall off.
I'm sure that Ukraine can get more use out of those planes. Aircraft are scrapped for a number of reasons besides being worn out. Obsolescence is a big reason, as well as aircraft exceeding take off and landing cycles and other safety considerations. None of which means that they can't fly, only that they're getting elderly.
But that's not the point, really. Those aircraft will be extremely limited by Russian anti-aircraft technology. Many of the pilots flying those old planes will effectively be flying one way suicide missions. The Russians have far better AA than do the Ukrainians and the Russian Air Force is still very, very reluctant to fly missions over Ukraine because the Ukrainian AA is still a threat. The Russians have been using glide bombs - which can travel a very considerable distance - because it allows their planes to deliver their payloads while still out of range of Ukrainian AA. For the same reason, both sides are using aircraft-borne smart missiles which can be fired from considerable standoff distances.
For the above reasons, I can't see the F16s that Ukraine has been begging for being a game changer in the Ukrainian skies. By all accounts the F16 is still a very capable aircraft, but is was designed and first fielded in the 1970s. Just like the Hornets, they are relatively elderly aircraft and to the best of my knowledge don't have any special AA protection.
This war is proving that manned aircraft are having an increasingly smaller role - for all sides - in modern warfare. AA technology is getting progressively better and making it ever easier to shoot planes out of the skies. Aircraft are very fragile machines compared to tanks and we've all been seeing how smart missiles have been taking out tanks in Ukraine.
In closing I was just struck by an interesting concept for an anti-aircraft weapon. I'm sure you all remember how "Sully" had his aircraft's engines disabled by bird strikes and then had to land in the Hudson River. As we've been seeing the extensive use of drones (of varying capability) in this war, I think it's a possibility that in the future we might see swarms of AI "bird" drones designed to navigate to and fly into an aircraft's engines. Such mini drones could carry small explosive charges designed explode upon contact with an aircraft's skin or when ingested into an engine.
Best
Doc
The Soviet Union built the dam originally in the 1930s. It was rebuilt in them in the 1950s after being destroyed by them in WW2, the impede the German advance.Russia built that dam in 1956.
From a long and picture-heavy article in the UK Daily Mail - very much worth looking at the link for the entire article and the many astonishing photos. It turns out hundreds of thousands of people COULD be affected by this. Then there is the nuclear power plant that may melt down....Melodi
'Catastrophe' fears as major dam is blown up near Kherson: Ukraine blames Russia as explosion causes massive breach, sparking floods and putting nuclear power plant at risk
Shocking aerial footage shows major floods amid Ukraine dam attack
Ukrainian authorities have previously warned that the dam's failure could unleash 18 million cubic meters (4.8 billion gallons) of water and flood Kherson and dozens of other towns and settlementswww.dailymail.co.uk
Kakhovka dam near Kherson in southern Ukraine has suffered severe damage
Thousands have been told to abandon their homes amid fears of heavy flooding
The dam provides critical cooling to the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant
By ELIZABETH HAIGH and DAVID AVERRE
PUBLISHED: 05:46, 6 June 2023 | UPDATED: 08:22, 6 June 2023
View comments
Ukraine has accused Russian forces of blowing up a major dam and hydroelectric power station, threatening a 'catastrophic' flood that could displace hundreds of thousands of people and cause a nuclear disaster by cutting off cooling to a nuclear power plant.
The Ukrainian Interior Ministry confirmed this morning that the Kakhovka dam over the Dnieper river in the south of the country was damaged in an explosion and water had begun flooding through.
The ministry called for residents of 10 villages on the river's right bank and parts of the city of Kherson downriver to evacuate their homes.
Ukrainian authorities have previously warned that the dam's failure could unleash 18 million cubic meters (4.8 billion gallons) of water and flood Kherson and dozens of other towns and settlements, home to hundreds of thousands of people.
Environmental security expert Maksym Soroka warned the potential damage the flooding could cause 'can easily be compared to [an] atomic bomb explosion', given the devastation that could occur if the dam is broken completely.
President Volodymyr Zelensky will now urgently convene his Security Council on Tuesday after the explosion at the dam which provides vital cooling at the Russian-occupied Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant.
The explosion at the dam has sparked concerns of a possible meltdown at the plant if the reactors cannot be cooled.
Ukraine and Russia have previously accused each other of targeting the dam with attacks, and last October Zelensky predicted that Russia would destroy the dam in order to cause a flood.
The dam and the hydroelectric power station were captured by Putin's forces as a priority at the start of the Russian invasion on February 24 last year. Russian officials claimed the dam was attacked by Ukrainian military strikes.
[Continue long article at link with video an images]
Yea, like we already sentGee and I left out the part about Estonia's request being a DEFACTO clause 5 WAR REQUEST. Now you ask for NATO troops due to Russian military threats of invasion.
Yep? Sssszzzzzzz. Buzz. ROTFLMAO Yep a clause 4.98 for sure.
Ukraine blew up the dam to deprive the Crimea of water. As their front collapses they will go scorched earth on their population and infrastructure. All the while blaming it on Russia.
Do you honestly think that there would be lights on in Kiev if Russia where not trying to preserve as much of the infrastructure as is possible?
This was on MSN by ABC News, and may relive some worry.If the Russians can adapt this will backfire.
I have more concerned as to how many civilians were injured and killled as a result of this action of destroying the dam...
At this point, NOTE: AT THIS POINT: Everyone is on the band wagon in blaming Russia. "The Voice of Ukraine" (donate to support their voice) is unequivocal in their condemnation of Russia and has the backing of ALL the NATO countries. Note "The voice of Ukraine" which has got to be one of the most trusted news sites on earth, maybe even in the quadrant of the Universe.Crimea would need that water, no? Why would the Russians destroy a dam that supplied Crimea’s drinking water?
Somebody over there, one side or the other, appears to be getting desperate.