CORONA Main Coronavirus thread

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

Italy’s national birth rate declared a national emergency
23 hours ago

Italy’s national birth rate has fallen to its lowest level on record.

New figures reveal 400,000 births were recorded last year, which has attributed to an overall decline in population numbers.

The ailing numbers have been declared a national emergency, prompting reassurance from the Prime Minister to try to boost the population in coming years.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)


Indian Researchers Warn That Emerging Mutations On XBB Sublineages In India Could Totally Undermine All Immunity Protections
Thailand Medical News
April 9, 2023

Indian scientists discovered new mutations like A27S and T747I along with mutations like T981S, I1998V, T323I, 306 G252V, A653V on circulating and emerging XBB sub-lineages in India with clinical evaluations confirming that multiple booster doses or a history of SARS-CoV-2 previous infection in the pre-Omicron era did not protect from these currently circulating recombinant sub-lineages and disease severity and morbidity were rather related to an individual's age, underlying comorbidities and genetic factors.


As the global vaccination efforts against COVID-19 continue, the emergence of new variants has raised concerns about their potential impact on vaccine efficacy. The recent identification of novel mutations in the XBB variant of SARS-CoV-2 has been linked to high rates of morbidity among COVID-19 patients in South India

A new study lead by scientists from the Directorate of Public Health and Preventive Medicine - State Public Health Laboratory-India and the Central University of Tamil Nadu-India investigated the mutational patterns of the XBB Omicron sub-variant and the possible association between the rise in cases, disease severity and mortality and these novel mutations in the southern state of Tamil Nadu, India.

Despite India's high vaccination rates, breakthrough infections and the spread of the B.1.1.529 Omicron variant have become increasingly common. With the emergence of the recombinant XBB variant, there remains a significant lack of information on its role in community transmission.

The study team collected nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs from symptomatic and asymptomatic COVID-19 patients (n=98), which were subjected to commercial RT-PCR tests followed by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) to identify mutations in the virus.

The study identified 43 mutations in the S gene across 98 sequences, including two novel mutations (A27S and T747I) not previously reported in XBB sub-variants. Additionally, the XBB sequences exhibited more significant mutations than the Omicron B.1.1.529 variant. Phylogenetic analysis revealed convergent evolution of XBB among the cohort, with disease outcomes more closely associated with age and comorbidities than vaccination status or prior exposure.

Many vaccinated individuals experienced breakthrough infections with XBB.3 as the predominant variant in the study population.

The various emerging XBB sub-lineages' ability to evade current vaccines raises concerns about their potential to become the next predominant variant, possibly overwhelming the active Omicron variants.

Previous research on the mutational epidemiology of XBB variants in India has been limited, but this study offers a comprehensive analysis of the different mutational and epidemiological aspects of the emerging XBB sub-variant of Omicron in southern India.

The study showed that despite multiple booster doses of vaccines or prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, protection against the currently circulating recombinant variants remains elusive.

However, disease severity and morbidity are primarily influenced by individual age and underlying comorbidities.

The study's findings highlight the importance of continued su rveillance of viral mutations to develop effective vaccination and treatment strategies.

The Omicron variant and its many sub-variants have been characterized by a significantly high number of mutations in the spike protein (S protein), leading to concerns about increased transmissibility and evasion of vaccine-mediated or infection-induced immune responses. Early clinical findings with the Omicron variant showed mild symptoms, but the emergence of variants like BA.1.1, BA.2, and BA.3 has demonstrated their ability to evade immunity generated by vaccination or prior infection.

Nicknamed the 'stealth Omicron,' the BA.2 lineage contrasts with standard Omicron lineages by not having the SGTF-causing deletion (H69del and V70del).

The recent discovery of Omicron sub-lineages with increased resistance to vaccine-induced neutralization suggests that these novel sub-lineages could become the predominant lineage in circulation.

These reports and past COVID-19 News coverages align with the findings of the current study that the XBB variant may have the upper hand in infectivity compared to the other strains mainly due to the accumulation of mutations from the two parental strains BA.2.10.1 and BA.2.75 and due to novel mutations in the strain.

However, whether the new XBB variant can cause significant loss of life cannot be effectively deduced with at this time due to limited data.

But current data shows that there is an increased disease burden even among the vaccinated and or prior infected population.

In conclusion, the study's observations indicate the identification of highly immune evasive virulent sub-lineages of the XBB variant. Previous infection or vaccination does not guarantee protection due to the high frequency of mutations in its genome. Vaccination remains the most practical option for protecting the population at large by conferring herd immunity, especially for vulnerable populations. The findings underscore the importance of understanding viral evolution in relation to disease transmission and the need to revamp current treatment options in response to the continuous evolution of viral strains.

The study findings also advocate for the development of bivalent or multivalent booster vaccinations to protect the entire population from emerging variants of concern (VOCs).

The emergence of the new XBB sub-lineages, with their novel mutations and ability to evade current vaccines, underscores the need for continuous monitoring and research on new variants. This will aid in the timely development of improved vaccines and treatment strategies that can effectively combat these evolving threats. Moreover, it is crucial for governments and healthcare systems to remain vigilant and responsive to the changing landscape of COVID-19.

Public health measures, such as wearing masks, maintaining social distancing, and practicing good hygiene, remain essential tools in curbing the spread of the virus. As new variants continue to emerge, it is crucial to maintain these preventative measures to minimize the risk of transmission and further mutation of the virus.

Collaborative efforts between researchers, healthcare providers, and governments worldwide are essential in sharing information and resources to better understand and combat the emerging XBB sub-lineages and other future variants. Ensuring equitable access to vaccines and treatments, regardless of geographical location or economic status, will be key to controlling the spread of COVID-19 and ultimately overcoming the pandemic.

In summary, the identification of novel mutations in the emerging XBB sub-lineages in India and their potential to evade current vaccines is a cause for concern. The study highlights the need for continued surveillance of viral mutations, development of more effective vaccines and treatments, and sustained public health measures to combat emerging variants. With a collaborative and adaptive approach, the global community can successfully navigate the ever-changing landscape of COVID-19 and protect the population from the threats posed by emerging VOCs.

The study findings were published on a preprint server and are currently being peer reviewed.


Besides scientists from Directorate of Public Health and Preventive Medicine - State Public Health Laboratory-India and the Central University of Tamil Nadu-India, the study also comprised of researchers from:

-Xiamen University - Laboratory Centre, China

-Universiti Malaya - Department of Medical Microbiology, Malaysia

-Royal College of Medicine Perak - Preclinical Department, Malaysia

-Government Theni Medical College - Department of Microbiology, India

-Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) - National Institute of Epidemiology, India

-University Putra Malaysia - Department of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, Malaysia

-Emory University - Department of Pathology, USA

-Linkoping University - Department of Biomedicine and Clinical Sciences, Sweden

-University of Missouri at Columbia - Bond Life Science Center, USA

University of Nebraska at Omaha - Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Neuroscience,USA

For the latest COVID-19 News keep on logging to Thailand Medical News.

Read Also:



 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)


Huge Veterans Study: COVID and Flu Vaccines are Useless at Preventing Hospitalization
Snake oil would work just as well as those "vaccines" but would be far safer

Igor Chudov
3 hr ago

SUMMARY: This post will show that both flu and Covid vaccines are utterly useless at preventing hospitalization for Covid AND flu. This conclusion is based on a recent large study of US veterans. Their health data is available to researchers from the Veterans Administration medical database.


The same VA study also shows that repeat COVID infections are not milder in hospitalized veterans.

Flu Vaccines are Useless​

A fascinating study of US veterans hospitalized with COVID or flu is out.

\
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2803749

This one piqued my interest, like all previous VA studies comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated patients. There is always something one can find in those. These studies involve large numbers of people with well-known health and vaccination histories.

This JAMA study examines VA patients hospitalized with respiratory illnesses (COVID or the flu). It shows the proportions of COVID and flu-vaccinated persons among both flu and Covid patients. It looks at relatively recent hospitalizations:
Methods | We used the electronic health databases of the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). Between October 1, 2022, and January 31, 2023, we enrolled all individuals with at least 1 hospital admission record between 2 days before and 10 days after a positive test result for SARS-CoV-2 or influenza and an admission diagnosis for COVID-19 or seasonal influenza. We removed 143 participants hospitalized with both infections. The cohort was followed up until the first occurrence of death, 30 days after hospital admission, or March 2, 2023.

Let’s take a look. Here’s the vaccination status of hospitalized veterans:



Take a look at the line underlined in BLUE (last line). 64% of patients hospitalized with COVID were vaccinated against the flu. 63% of patients hospitalized with flu were vaccinated against the flu.

We know that the influenza vaccine does not prevent Covid hospitalizations. But if the influenza vaccine prevented influenza hospitalizations, there would be fewer influenza-vaccinated people hospitalized for influenza than influenza-vaccinated people hospitalized for Covid.

If the influenza vaccine were 100% effective at preventing hospitalization with influenza, in the table above, we would have ZERO patients who had an influenza vaccine hospitalized for influenza. Instead of zero, 64% of people hospitalized for influenza are vaccinated for influenza, the same as the percentage of influenza-vaccinated people among Covid hospitalizations.

I apologize for the heavy language above. I felt that it was important to be precise.

Scientists refer to the above comparison as a “test-negative design,” which is used to evaluate the effectiveness of the influenza vaccine. This article published in Vaccine magazine describes test-negative study designs.



Test-negative design is explained further:

The test-negative design has a notable strength in controlling for afore-mentioned health care-seeking behavior (Fig. 2). Typically, study subjects are patients who visit medical institutions due to ILI during the influenza season. Subjects with positive test results for influenza are classified into cases, while subjects with negative results are classified as controls, and then vaccination status during the season can be compared between cases and controls. As the subjects are likely to visit a medical institution soon after ILI onset, both cases and controls are considered to be similar in their health care-seeking behavior. Therefore, the test-negative design can minimize confounding by health care-seeking behavior in evaluating influenza VE even though the outcome measure is laboratory-confirmed influenza, which is expected to resolve the dilemma in cohort studies.
So, the data in the above table lets us compare the flu vaccination status of influenza cases and controls (COVID cases). The result is that the same proportion of influenza-vaccinated people are hospitalized for the flu as the influenza-vaccinated people are hospitalized for COVID.

In other words, the flu vaccine does NOT help prevent flu-related hospitalizations!

Again, if the flu vaccine were 100% effective against the flu, ZERO — 0% of flu-vaccinated people would be hospitalized for influenza.

COVID Vaccine is Similarly Ineffective​

We can apply the same logic we applied to flu-vaccinated patients and look at Covid-boosted patients. We can compare the percentage of Covid-boosted patients hospitalized for Covid to the percentage of Covid-boosted patients hospitalized “not for Covid.”

Look at the same table as above, but consider the line underlined with GREEN.



55% of persons hospitalized with Covid were Covid-boosted. 55% of persons hospitalized with flu were Covid-boosted.

If the Covid vaccine had been 100% effective at preventing hospitalizations with Covid, ZERO hospitalized Covid patients would have been Covid-boosted. Instead, regardless of the type of illness (Covid or the flu), the percentage of Covid-boosted patients is the same for both illnesses.

This, again, is a test-negative design comparison: look at the percentage of Covid-boosted people hospitalized for Covid, and compare it with the percentage of Covid-boosted people hospitalized for “not Covid.”

This comparison shows that Covid boosters do not reduce Covid hospitalizations.

Whoops!

This finding is similar to what I found in the CDC’s own VISION network study, showing ineffectiveness of Covid vaccines when looking at patients with known vaccination status:


Covid Reinfections are Almost as Deadly as First Infections​

Another interesting finding of the VA study, unrelated to the above, is that repeat Covid infections lead to approximately the same fraction of hospitalized reinfection patients succumbing to death as first infections. Look at this table:



Six out of 100 veterans hospitalized with Covid as their first infection die within 30 days of admission.

Compare that to five out of 100 veterans who die with a Covid reinfection - a comparable number.

So, again, are we acquiring “robust hybrid multilayer immunity” with all these shots and reinfections? It does not look like it!

So, if you or your loved ones ever have a Covid reinfection, take it as seriously as you did your first infection and have good medications, like vitamins and Ivermectin, stocked up in your home pantry.


Do Covid Vaccines Protect from Death?​

But, Covid vaccines protect against death, would be the reaction of vaccine advocates, and they would point out the following:


8.75% of unvaccinated hospitalized people die compared to 5.18% of boosted hospitalized patients. Some would suggest that boosters provide 1-5.18/8.75 = 41% protection against death.

Such an observation is interesting; however, “death protection” should be calculated for all people, whether hospitalized or not. Some people die at home without ever being hospitalized. Both Bob Saget (a vaccinated entertainer), as well as Kelly Ernby (an unvaxed antivaccine activist), died within 30 days of their Covid infections without ever being in a hospital:


Therefore, looking at the death rates of only hospitalized people does not allow us to calculate “vaccine death protection.” Further, UK data shows a disturbing 30% increase in “deaths at home” (as opposed to hospitals where the VA study took place):



In any case, hospitalization data for Covid and flu-vaccinated people shows that “protection against hospitalization” does not exist for Covid and flu vaccines as of the dates of the study (late 2022-early 2023).

What do you think? Any recent observations or COVID experiences involving you or your friends?
.
 
(fair use applies)


Gilead details promising early COVID antiviral data, setting up larger studies
Deena Beasley
Tue, April 4, 2023, 6:34 PM EDT·

(Reuters) - Gilead Sciences Inc on Tuesday unveiled data from the first human study of its experimental oral COVID-19 antiviral, saying the results in healthy volunteers cleared the way for two large Phase III trials of the drug that have begun enrolling patients.

The drug, obeldesivir and previously known as GS-5245, is designed to keep the coronavirus that causes COVID from replicating in the body and overwhelming a patient's immune system. Once metabolized, it works in the same way as Gilead's older intravenous COVID treatment Veklury (remdesivir), which targets virus replication through inhibition of the viral RNA polymerase.

For standard risk patients, Gilead believes the new drug could help resolve symptoms earlier and is evaluating any association with symptoms of long COVID, Anu Osinusi, who oversees clinical research for hepatitis, respiratory and emerging viruses at Gilead, told Reuters.

"The WHO still calls this a global health emergency ... We are not seeing a surge, but the numbers are holding steady," she said of the World Health Organization.

The Phase I trial, which involved 70 healthy adults, showed that obeldesivir reached sufficient concentrations in the blood and supports taking it without regard to food, according to Gilead.

Two obeldesivir patients reported headache, as did one placebo patient. No serious side effects were reported.

The most common laboratory abnormality was grade 2 creatinine clearance decrease, which can be an indication of impaired kidney function and occurred in 31% of treated participants and 25% of placebo participants.

Gilead has advanced obeldesivir into two late-stage global studies for treating non-hospitalized COVID patients. One trial is enrolling vaccinated people with at least two risk factors for developing serious COVID and unvaccinated patients with at least one risk factor.

The other is enrolling COVID patients at standard risk of serious illness regardless of vaccination status.

Osinusi declined to comment on timing of results from the Phase III trials, noting that progress will depend on the course of the pandemic.

The dosing regimen for both studies is a twice-daily tablet for five days, which would be a big advantage over currently available oral COVID antivirals if obeldesivir is proven to be effective.

Pfizer Inc's Paxlovid consists of three pills taken twice a day for five days, while Merck & Co's Lagevrio is four capsules taken twice a day for five days.

Paxlovid also can interact with a large number of medications, forcing patients to temporarily go off their other medicines or doctors to refrain from prescribing it for some. Lagevrio was shown in clinical trials to be less effective than Paxlovid in separate studies.

Gilead's data is being presented later this month at the European Congress of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases in Copenhagen.
I think IVM is still better.
 
I am posting this to document that in the winter of 2023, they are still publishing articles like this in the MSM. :mad:


(fair use applies)

Fact check: COVID-19 vaccines are safe during pregnancy, contrary to viral claim
Isabella Fertel, USA TODAY
Tue, April 4, 2023, 5:42 PM EDT


The claim: Posts imply miscarriages and stillbirths drastically increased in 2021 due to COVID-19 vaccines​

A March 23 Instagram post (direct link, archived link) features a graph showing an apparent spike in miscarriages and stillbirths in 2021 and 2022.

“Miscarriage/stillbirth by year….probably climate change #fauciforprison,” reads the post's caption.

Some social media users took this graph as evidence that COVID-19 vaccines are behind the apparent uptick in miscarriages and stillbirths.

“COVID-19 VAX is what’s goin’ on,” wrote one commenter. “Or should I say WENT IN.”

The post garnered more than 1,600 likes in less than two weeks. Several other versions of the post have circulated on Instagram and Twitter since October 2022.

Our rating: Missing context

The implied claim here is wrong. The graph is based on data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System that is unverified and cannot determine if a vaccine caused a particular outcome. Scientists say a growing body of evidence shows COVID-19 vaccines do not cause an increased risk of miscarriage or stillbirths.

No link between COVID-19 vaccines and miscarriages or stillbirths, scientists say​

Since the release of COVID-19 vaccines, researchers have monitored VAERS as well as two other systems: the COVID-19 Vaccine Pregnancy Registry and the Vaccine Safety Datalink.

"The totality of evidence from these monitoring systems indicates that COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy is not associated with an increased risk of miscarriage or stillbirth," said Dr. Tom Shimabukuro, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Immunization Safety Office.

Multiple studies conducted in the U.S. and abroad found no significant safety concerns for pregnant people who received COVID-19 vaccines or their babies.

COVID-19, on the other hand, can have severe consequences in pregnancy.

Researchers have found substantial evidence that pregnant people infected with the COVID-19 virus are more likely to experience certain health complications, including delivering a preterm or stillborn infant.

"COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy is safe and effective," Shimabukuro said. "There is substantial evidence that vaccination during pregnancy protects pregnant women, protects their pregnancies and protects their developing fetuses."

Graphs misuse unverified reporting system data​

The posts cite their source as VAERS, which is jointly managed by the CDC and the Food and Drug Administration.
VAERS collects reports of possible side effects, or “adverse events,” in people who have recently received vaccinations.
The system was created to detect “unusual or unexpected patterns" of symptoms, which can indicate possible vaccine safety issues.

But the VAERS website states multiple times that reports cannot be interpreted as evidence that a vaccine caused a health problem. Anyone can submit a report, and the system encourages people to report adverse events even if it is not clear the vaccine is related to their symptoms.

Entries in the reporting system are not automatically verified or authenticated, according to Dr. Kawsar Talaat, an associate professor at Johns Hopkins University.

“Just because an event is reported to the system does not necessarily mean the event has anything to do with a recent vaccination,” Talaat said. “If you fall and break your leg after getting a vaccination, you can report it.”

A singular adverse event may also be reported several times in the system due to reporting requirements for vaccine manufacturers and healthcare providers, Talaat said.

The reporting system’s website notes its data is often misinterpreted by the public and states “numbers of reports may increase in response to media attention and increased public awareness.”

VAERS data has been frequently taken out of context and misused since the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines, according to Talaat. USA TODAY has debunked previous attempts to use VAERS data to prove "COVID-vaccine injuries" and COVID-19 vaccine death reports.

The 2021 figure shown in the graph also does not match the current tally in VAERS.

The graph shared with some posts making this claim includes a numerical scale that indicates more than 3,500 miscarriages and stillbirths were reported to the system in 2021. But the database lists about 2,600 reports.

No national data on miscarriages​

Experts say there is no statistic for the aggregate number of miscarriages per year because miscarriages are so common.

Shimabukuro also noted that some miscarriages, especially miscarriages that happen in the early weeks of gestation, are not brought to medical attention.

Miscarriages are relatively common overall, according to Dr. Andrea Sharma, an epidemiologist and maternal health expert at the CDC. She said approximately 10% to 15% of clinically identified pregnancies end before 20 weeks of gestation.

Stillbirths, or the loss of a pregnancy after 20 weeks, are less common. The CDC estimates that 1 in 175 pregnancies in the U.S. is affected by stillbirth. USA TODAY was unable to locate data on stillbirths that covered the 2021 and 2022 period cited in the claim.

USA TODAY reached out to users who shared the post for comment.

Reuters also debunked this claim.

Our fact-check sources:​

Thank you for supporting our journalism. You can subscribe to our print edition, ad-free app or electronic newspaper replica here.

Our fact-check work is supported in part by a grant from Facebook.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY
: Fact check: COVID-19 vaccines are safe during pregnancy, studies show
Well, I feel better now.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)


Takoda, a black bear at the Oregon Zoo, dies unexpectedly
By The Oregonian/OregonLive.com
Published: Apr. 08, 2023, 1:06 p.m.

A black bear sits on a tree branch overhead.


Takoda, the youngest black bear at the Oregon Zoo, died Friday from a heart attack while under anesthesia for a routine health check, according to a news release from the zoo.

“Our vet staff did everything possible to bring him back,” said Travis Koons, who oversees the zoo’s Great Northwest area. “They were performing CPR for more than a half hour, but they couldn’t revive him.”

Takoda was well known for climbing a 50-foot Douglas fir in the zoo’s Black Bear Ridge habitat. When he was younger, he would feed on the new growth near the top of the tree each spring while the other bears would wait below for whatever he dropped.

“It was breathtaking to see a 400-pound bear so high up in one of those giant trees,” Koons said. “A little scary for us, to be honest, but black bears are natural climbers.”

“Takoda brought so much joy. He was the life and spirit not only of the group of black bears but also the care staff. He was loved by everyone — from the older bears who adopted him into their group to the keepers who cared for him every day to thousands of fans on social media. It is heartbreaking,” said Koons.

Takoda arrived at the Oregon Zoo in 2010. A Montana rancher found him abandoned, hungry, dehydrated and weighing less than 3 pounds. After he was nursed to health, wildlife officials determined he couldn’t be safely released to the wild and he was transferred to the Oregon Zoo.

— The Oregonian/OregonLive
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
Did you think I posted the above post in error to this thread? I didn't.


FROM MARCH 2021 - two years ago:

(fair use applies)

Oregon Zoo pre-orders coronavirus vaccines for its animals
by KATU Staff
Fri, March 19th 2021, 8:49 PM EDT


PORTLAND, Ore. — The Oregon Zoo confirmed Friday that it has pre-ordered coronavirus vaccines for its animals.

The San Diego Zoo has already given doses of an experimental vaccine to its apes. Now, almost three dozen zoos have put in orders for the vaccine, including the Oregon Zoo.

The vaccine should be available in a few months.

Many zoo animals, including gorillas, tigers, and lions have all had confirmed coronavirus cases.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)


Biden ends COVID national emergency after Congress acts
By ZEKE MILLER
today

WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. national emergency to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic ended Monday as President Joe Biden signed a bipartisan congressional resolution to bring it to a close after three years — weeks before it was set to expire alongside a separate public health emergency.

The national emergency allowed the government to take sweeping steps to respond to the virus and support the country’s economic, health and welfare systems. Some of the emergency measures have already been successfully wound-down, while others are still being phased out. The public health emergency — it underpins tough immigration restrictions at the U.S.-Mexico border — is set to expire on May 11.

The White House issued a one-line statement Monday saying Biden had signed the measure behind closed doors, after having publicly opposed the resolution though not to the point of issuing a veto. More than 197 Democrats in the House voted against it when the GOP-controlled chamber passed it in February. Last month, as the measure passed the Senate by a 68-23 vote, Biden let lawmakers know he would sign it.

The administration said once it became clear that Congress was moving to speed up the end of the national emergency it worked to expedite agency preparations for a return to normal procedures. Among the changes: The Department of Housing and Urban Development’s COVID-19 mortgage forbearance program is set to end at the end of May, and the Department of Veterans Affairs is now returning to a requirement for in-home visits to determine eligibility for caregiver assistance.

Legislators last year did extend for another two years telehealth flexibilities that were introduced as COVID-19 hit, leading health care systems around the country to regularly deliver care by smartphone or computer.

More than 1.13 million people in the U.S. have died from COVID-19 over the last three years, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, including 1,773 people in the week ending April 5.

Then-President Donald Trump’s Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar first declared a public health emergency on Jan. 31, 2020, and Trump declared the COVID-19 pandemic a national emergency that March. The emergencies have been repeatedly extended by Biden since he took office in January 2021, and he broadened the use of emergency powers after entering the White House.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)


U.S. spending $5 billion to speed up development of new COVID vaccines
by Ahmed Aboulenein in Washington and Sriparna Roy in Bengaluru
Mon, April 10, 2023, 6:50 PM EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. government is spending over $5 billion on an effort to speed up the development of new COVID-19 vaccines and treatments, a Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) spokesperson and a Biden administration official said on Monday.

The investment, dubbed "Project NextGen" and first announced by White House and HHS officials in an interview with the Washington Post, aims to provide better protection from coronaviruses, including the one that causes COVID-19, that might become future threats.

"While our vaccines are still very effective at preventing serious illness and death, they are less capable of reducing infections and transmission over time," the HHS spokesperson said.

"New variants and loss of immunity over time could continue to challenge our healthcare systems in the coming years."

President Joe Biden's administration will spend a minimum of $5 billion in collaborations with the private sector, an approach similar to that of the "Operation Warp Speed" project under former President Donald Trump that accelerated the development and distribution of vaccines in 2020.

"Project NextGen will accelerate and streamline the rapid development of the next generation of vaccines and treatments through public-private collaborations," said the administration official.


"The infusion of a $5 billion investment, at minimum, will help catalyze scientific advancement in areas that have large public health benefits for the American people, with the goal of developing safe and effective tools for the American people."

The project, set to be based at HHS, will coordinate across the government and with the private sector on advancing a pipeline of new vaccines and treatments, the HHS spokesperson said. It will cover all phases of development from lab research and clinical trials to delivery.

It will focus on creating long-lasting monoclonal antibodies resistant to new COVID-19 variants as well as broader vaccines that can protect against several different coronaviruses.

The project also seeks to speed up the development of vaccines that produce mucosal immunity and can be administered through the nose, in hopes they can dramatically reduce infection and transmission rates.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)


Game-Changing COVID-19 Nasal Vaccine Passes Initial Tests
By Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association
April 10, 2023

Since the outbreak of COVID-19, scientists have been exploring the development of mucosal vaccines that can be delivered through the nasal route. Recently, researchers in Berlin have successfully created a live attenuated vaccine for the nose. In a recent study, they detail the unique immune response it elicits.

The spread of coronaviruses primarily occurs through the air when infected individuals expel droplets of saliva containing the virus through speaking, coughing, sneezing, or laughing. These airborne pathogens are then inhaled by others, leading to infection. In an effort to combat the virus that causes COVID-19, a research team in Berlin has decided to target the initial point of entry, the mucous membranes of the nose, mouth, throat, and lungs.

To do so, the scientists developed a live attenuated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine that is administered through the nose. In the latest issue of the journal Nature Microbiology, the interdisciplinary team describes how this live attenuated vaccine confers better immunity than vaccines injected into muscle.

Already in the fall of last year, two nasal vaccination formulations were approved for use in India and China. These contain modified adenoviruses – which typically cause respiratory or gastrointestinal illnesses – that are self-attenuating, meaning they either replicate poorly or stop replicating altogether, and therefore never trigger disease. Other live nasal vaccines are currently undergoing development and testing around the world.


Protection at the site of infection

The benefits of a nasal vaccine go far beyond just providing an alternative for people afraid of needles. When a vaccine is injected, it infers immunity primarily in the blood and throughout the entire body. However, this means that the immune system only detects and combats coronaviruses relatively late on in an infection, as they enter the body via the mucous membranes of the upper respiratory tract. “It is here, therefore, that we need local immunity if we want to intercept a respiratory virus early on,” explains the study’s co-last author Dr. Jakob Trimpert, a veterinarian and research group leader at the Institute of Virology at Freie Universität Berlin.

“Nasal vaccines are far more effective in this regard than injected vaccines, which fail or struggle to reach the mucous membranes,” emphasizes Dr. Emanuel Wyler, another co-last author. He has been researching COVID-19 since the start of the pandemic as part of the RNA Biology and Posttranscriptional Regulation Lab, which is led by Professor Markus Landthaler at the Berlin Institute for Medical Systems Biology of the Max Delbrück Center (MDC-BIMSB).

In an ideal scenario, a live intranasal vaccine stimulates the formation of the antibody immunoglobulin A (IgA) directly on site, thus preventing infection from occurring in the first place. IgA is the most common immunoglobin in the mucous membranes of the airways. It is able to neutralize pathogens by binding to them and preventing them from infecting respiratory tract cells. At the same time, the vaccine stimulates systemic immune responses that help provide effective overall protection from infection.

“Memory T cells that reside in lung tissue play a similarly useful role to antibodies in the mucosa,” explains Dr. Geraldine Nouailles, an immunologist and research group leader at the Department of Pneumology, Respiratory Medicine, and Intensive Care Medicine at Charité. “These white blood cells remain in affected tissue long after an infection has passed and remember pathogens they have encountered before. Thanks to their location in the lungs, they can respond quickly to viruses that enter through the airways.” The co-first author draws attention to one of the observations the team made during their study: “We were able to show that prior intranasal vaccination results in the increased reactivation of these local memory cells in the event of a subsequent SARS-CoV-2 infection. Needless to say, we were particularly pleased with this result.”


Local immunity impedes viral infection

The scientists tested the efficacy of the newly developed intranasal COVID-19 vaccine on hamster models that had been established by Trimpert and his team at Freie Universität Berlin at the beginning of the pandemic. These rodents are currently the most important non-transgenic model organisms for research into the novel coronavirus, as they can be infected with the same virus variants as humans and develop similar symptoms. They found that after two doses of the vaccine, the virus could no longer replicate in the model organism. “We witnessed strong activation of the immunological memory, and the mucous membranes were very well protected by the high concentration of antibodies,” Trimpert explains. The vaccine could therefore also significantly reduce the transmissibility of the virus.

In addition, the scientists compared the efficacy of the live attenuated vaccine with that of vaccines injected into the muscle. To do so, they vaccinated the hamsters either twice with the live vaccine, once with the mRNA and once with the live vaccine, or twice with an mRNA or adenovirus-based vaccine. Then, after the hamsters were infected with SARS-CoV-2, they used tissue samples from the nasal mucosa and lungs to see how strongly the virus was still able to attack the mucosal cells. They also determined the extent of the inflammatory response using single-cell sequencing. “The live attenuated vaccine performed better than the other vaccines in all parameters,” Wyler summarizes. This is probably due to the fact that the nasally administered vaccine builds up immunity directly at the viral entry site. In addition, the live vaccine contains all components of the virus – not just the spike protein, as is the case with the mRNA vaccines. While spike is indeed the virus’s most important antigen, the immune system can also recognize the virus from about 20 other proteins.


Better than conventional vaccines

The best protection against the SARS-CoV-2 was provided by double nasal vaccination, followed by the combination of a muscular injection of the mRNA vaccine and the subsequent nasal administration of the live attenuated vaccine. “This means the live vaccine could be particularly interesting as a booster,” says the study’s co-first author Julia Adler, a veterinarian and doctoral student at the Institute of Virology at Freie Universität Berlin.

The principle of live attenuated vaccines is old and is already used in measles and rubella vaccinations, for example. But in the past, scientists generated the attenuation by chance – sometimes waiting years for mutations to evolve that produced an attenuated virus. The Berlin researchers, on the other hand, were able to specifically alter the genetic code of the coronaviruses. “We wanted to prevent the attenuated viruses from mutating back into a more aggressive variant,” explains Dr. Dusan Kunec, a scientist at the Institute of Virology at Freie Universität Berlin and another co-last author of the study. “This makes our live vaccine entirely safe and means it can be tailored to new virus variants,” stresses Kunec, who was instrumental in developing the vaccine.

The next step is safety testing: The researchers are collaborating with RocketVax AG, a Swiss start-up based in Basel. The biotech company is developing the live attenuated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and preparing a phase 1 clinical trial in humans. “We are thrilled to be at the forefront of developing and manufacturing the live attenuated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine as a nasal spray at RocketVax. Our goal is to rapidly scale up production and advance clinical development towards market access to provide protection against post-COVID symptoms for all. We see great potential in the market for seasonal nasal vaccines”, says Dr. Vladimir Cmiljanovic, CEO of RocketVax.

The future will show which nasal vaccine will ultimately provide better protection. The manufacturers of the nasal adenovirus vaccines developed in India and China have not yet applied for approval in Europe. But one thing is clear to the scientists: since they are administered as nasal sprays or drops, nasal vaccines are a good option for use in places with limited access to trained medical staff. They are also inexpensive to produce and easy to store and transport. Last but not least, live attenuated vaccines such as this one have been proven to provide cross-protection against related viral strains, and thus presumably also against future SARS-CoV-2 variants.

Reference: “Live-attenuated vaccine sCPD9 elicits superior mucosal and systemic immunity to SARS-CoV-2 variants in hamsters” by Geraldine Nouailles, Julia M. Adler, Peter Pennitz, Stefan Peidli, Luiz Gustavo Teixeira Alves, Morris Baumgardt, Judith Bushe, Anne Voss, Alina Langenhagen, Christine Langner, Ricardo Martin Vidal, Fabian Pott, Julia Kazmierski, Aileen Ebenig, Mona V. Lange, Michael D. Mühlebach, Cengiz Goekeri, Szandor Simmons, Na Xing, Azza Abdelgawad, Susanne Herwig, Günter Cichon, Daniela Niemeyer, Christian Drosten, Christine Goffinet, Markus Landthaler, Nils Blüthgen, Haibo Wu, Martin Witzenrath, Achim D. Gruber, Samantha D. Praktiknjo, Nikolaus Osterrieder, Emanuel Wyler, Dusan Kunec, and Jakob Trimpert, 3 April 2023, Nature Microbiology.
DOI: 10.1038/s41564-023-01352-8

The study was funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG). The Berlin researchers are collaborating with the Swiss company RocketVax AG on the further development of the vaccine.
 

Tristan

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Dr. Campbell's review of a post-mortem in Japan of a young girl who died soon after her 3rd 'jab'.

eta: Keep in mind the reports of 'Guidance' from somewhere on high about not doing Autopsies...

Japan pathology​

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2llYtAVsxHY

rt: 18:81

From the Description:

28,384 views Apr 11, 2023
Free download posters and my text books, https://drjohncampbell.co.uk/

A case of fatal multi-organ inflammation following COVID-19 vaccination https://www.sciencedirect.com/science...
14-year-old Japanese girl Healthy and active, athletic team Died unexpectedly Two days after receiving the third dose of the BNT1262b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, (10th August 2022)

Autopsy findings Congestive edema of the lungs T-cell lymphocytic and macrophage infiltration Lungs Pericardium Myocardium (left atria and left ventricle)

Atrial myopericarditis Liver Kidneys Stomach Duodenum Bladder Diaphragm No preceding Infection Allergy Drug toxicity exposure

Diagnosis Post-vaccination Pneumonia Myopericarditis Hepatitis Nephritis Gastroenteritis Cystitis Myositis

Proximal cause of death Atrial myopericarditis probably caused fatal arrhythmia, Leading to cardiac failure and death.

More details Post-vaccination myocarditis and pericarditis have been increasingly reported Male adolescents Higher incidence of pericarditis with a good prognosis

Middle-aged and older patients More likely to have severe myocarditis

The day after vaccination Developed a fever of 37.9 °C Some breathing difficulties The following morning Not breathing, pale appearance In cardiopulmonary arrest when paramedics arrived Resuscitated

Died 45 hours after the third vaccination. After the first dose of vaccine on 12th September 2021 Arm pain without fever Day after the second dose on 3rd October 2021

Fever less than 38 °C Autopsy findings No superficial injuries were observed Heart showed no degeneration or scarring Both lungs showed severe pulmonary edema and congestion.

A COVID-19 antigen quantification test, negative Numerous internal organ COVID-19 antigen tests, negative Serum, negative for adenovirus, cytomegalovirus, influenza A and B, RSV, EBV, enterovirus, parvovirus, HIV

Histological findings Lymphocyte cellular infiltrates observed in the lungs, pericardium of both atria and adjacent myocardium, liver, kidneys, stomach, duodenum, and diaphragm Brain showed congestion Hippocampus a slight lymphocytic infiltrate Biochemical analysis Elevated SARS-CoV-2 antibody (43600 U/mL, normal less than 0.80) Elevated IL-6 (226 pg/mL, normal ≦4.0)

Diagnosis Vaccine-related multiple-organ inflammation Vaccine-related myopericarditis, which led to severe arrythmias and progressive heart failure. Discussion However, adverse events caused by vaccines have been a problem.
 
Last edited:

Tristan

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Dr. John analyzes the situation in Great Britain, where and finds some concerning gaps in understanding of the data; wonders out loud about why the obvious questions seem to be ignored...

Excess deaths high, covid symptoms mild​

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pzhI0FobVtQ

rt: 13:27

There is a significant amount of data in the description block on youtube, but cutting and pasting creates a mess.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)


Is the COVID pandemic really over?
Alexander Nazaryan·Senior White House Correspondent
Tue, April 11, 2023, 7:46 PM EDT

WASHINGTON — There was no ceremony, as there had been two years ago, when President Biden declared on Independence Day that independence from the coronavirus was at hand. There was no bonfire of vaccination cards on the South Lawn, no celebratory shedding of face masks in Times Square.

Instead, the national emergency proclaimed by President Trump on March 13, 2020, quietly came to a conclusion after 1,124 days, with a Monday evening notice from the White House announcing that Biden had signed a resolution putting the emergency to an end.

The bill Biden signed originated in the Republican-controlled House but also passed in the Senate with the support of 11 Democrats. The White House said the measure was pointless, because the president was preparing to imminently end both the national emergency and the public health emergency. Still, a spokesman said he would sign the bill.

And so, on Monday, he did.

The president did so without a ceremony. On other occasions, he has sought to highlight bipartisan legislation. But not this time. Instead, he was eager to get on with things, to put the virus into the rearview mirror.

The next day, he was heading to Ireland, his ancestral homeland.

Biden’s move was largely symbolic, since the national emergency had little impact on how hospitals and doctors operated (the emergency declaration had mostly to do with waivers for hospitals and health systems).

A parallel health emergency is slated to end next month, cutting off federal funding for some public health measures, including the cost of diagnostic tests and vaccines. “People will have to start paying some money for things they didn’t have to pay for during the emergency,” Jen Kates of the Kaiser Family Foundation explained to CNN.

New restrictions will be imposed on telehealth, a practice that exploded at the start of the pandemic. An estimated 15 million will also lose Medicaid coverage, though most of the disenrolled should be able to qualify for health care through the Affordable Care Act.

Officially, the coronavirus will cease to be a “pandemic” when the World Health Organization (WHO) drops the designation. There are now clear guidelines for doing so, but WHO Director-General Tedros Ghebreyesus is clearly moving in that direction. “I am confident that this year we will be able to say that COVID-19 is over as a public health emergency of international concern,” he said at a briefing last month.

Next month will also see the dissolution of the White House pandemic response team, which used to brief reporters several times each week. There has been no briefing for months. Dr. Anthony Fauci, once the president’s top pandemic adviser, is now retired. Jeff Zients, who once led the pandemic response team, is now the White House chief of staff.

Not that the pandemic is really over, with about 120,000 people across the United States contracting the coronavirus each week and about 1,700 dying weekly from the disease, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

“We need to be very clear that just because the national emergency around COVID is coming to an end, that doesn't mean that COVID is no longer an ongoing threat,” public health expert Dr. Leana Wen told Yahoo News. “There are many other diseases that aren't considered pandemics, but are extremely serious — including infectious diseases like HIV and influenza and noninfectious diseases like heart disease and cancer.”

To proponents of the billions that poured into federal relief efforts for the first two years of the pandemic, the winding down of the two emergency declarations reflects a loss of crucial supports to people and communities that had been devastated by the coronavirus.

Some public health officials charge that the Biden administration ceased to take the coronavirus seriously once the cost of doing so became too great. They warn against excessive confidence about what the future may hold. Then there are the millions who suffer from a debilitating, little-understood set of symptoms known as long COVID, which looms as a public health challenge of its own.

“The need for active management of the virus continues. Many thought the pandemic was over in the spring of 2021,” Boston University public health professor Julia Raifman told Yahoo News. “Unfortunately, we were not prepared for new variants, and we lost hundreds of thousands of lives in the following months. By actively tracking COVID, continuing the work to help people get vaccinated and boosted, and having policies and supplies in place to address new variants, we can help ensure we do not see such a high preventable toll again.”

Even the most cautious of Democratic governors had dropped pandemic-related restrictions near the start of 2022, sensing a shift in the public’s mood that could have electoral consequences.

If the administration still has an overarching pandemic policy, it is that the “tools” required to combat the coronavirus — masks and tests, treatments and vaccines —are widely available, to be used at Americans’ own discretion. Many elderly and vulnerable people continue to mask. Booster shots are expected to become an annual rite. Earlier surges have left many households with stockpiles of tests, to be deployed at the first sign of a new infection.

But these are all now a matter of choice — and have been for some time.

To critics, extending the emergencies into 2023 was little more than a means to perpetuate excessive government spending for as long as possible. “The pandemic is over and has been for some time,” said Rep. Mike Gallagher, R-Wis., in a statement that accused the Biden administration of “gross abuses of executive power” that allowed for the spending of “massive sums of taxpayer dollars.”

Trump spent billions on coronavirus relief, too, but he benefited, however briefly, from widespread fears about the damage the coronavirus would do: how many people it would kill, how many workers it would leave without jobs.

By the time the 2020 presidential election approached, the coronavirus had become the razor-edged political and cultural issue it was perhaps always fated to become in a country as divided as the United States. Biden’s own massive coronavirus relief bill received no support from Republicans in Congress. At every level of government, mask and vaccine mandates became the subjects of intense courtroom fights, with the president growing increasingly exasperated at Republican recalcitrance to what was widely believed at the time to be sound public health policy.

The records of governors and presidents, as well as doctors and public health experts, will likely be dissected for years to come, even as most people return to normal. Last year, the Brown University economist Emily Oster, who wrote frequently about the coronavirus, proposed a “pandemic amnesty” that would allow for a measure of grace for all the mistakes and lapses made in the midst of crisis.

“Let’s acknowledge that we made complicated choices in the face of deep uncertainty, and then try to work together to build back and move forward,” she wrote. But the intense pushback her argument received suggested that even as masks come off and vaccine cards fade, bitterness over how the United States handled one of its worst crises will remain.

Much of that accounting will begin with Biden’s predecessor in the Oval Office. Three years to the day before the end of the national emergency, Trump entered the White House press briefing room, for what was, at the time, one of his regular updates to the nation and the press.

As he had done from the start, Trump fulsomely praised his administration’s response. “We’re saving so many lives compared to what it could have been,” Trump said.

Referring to a recent estimate of coronavirus fatalities, Trump predicted that the total number of American fatalities from COVID-19 would be “substantially below 100,000.”

To date, the pandemic has killed 1.1 million Americans.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

Hand and surface viral load strongly correlated with COVID-19 infection risk in UK households
by Justin Jackson , Medical Xpress
April 11, 2023

hand-and-surface-viral.jpg

Measured SARS-CoV-2 RNA viral load in PCR-positive environmental samples, stratified by contacts' URT PCR status and baseline serological status. Only contacts linked to one or more PCR-positive environmental samples are depicted. (A) Primary cases' hand-swab RNA viral load (median 82·09 copies per mL, IQR 46·09–1082·29). (B) Household surface-swab RNA viral load (226·58, 101·38–602·51). (C) Contacts' hand-swab RNA viral load (117·66, 21·75–244·39). The measured environmental viral loads do not differ by contacts' URT PCR status, as shown by the p values in each panel (Mann-Whitney U test). All positive primary case hand swabs and surface swabs were collected on day 0, whereas contacts' hand swabs were positive on day 0 (n=16) and day 7 (n=6). Environmental samples with more than 5 RNA copies per mL were considered PCR positive. URT=upper respiratory tract. Credit: The Lancet Microbe (2023). DOI: 10.1016/S2666-5247(23)00069-1

A National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London study has confirmed that hands and surfaces could potentially transmit SARS-CoV-2 in a household setting. Published in The Lancet Microbe, the study, "Risk factors and vectors for SARS-CoV-2 household transmission: a prospective, longitudinal cohort study," focused on pathways of physical and surface contact. Aerosol transmission was not investigated and was not in any way excluded as a means of transmission.

In the study, researchers recruited participants (contacts) who shared a household with newly diagnosed COVID-19 individuals (primary cases) in London, U.K. Frequent testing of upper respiratory tract swabs and blood samples were collected. Swabs were also taken from frequently touched household surfaces and primary cases' and contacts' hands to test for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA.

Viral load samples of the upper respiratory tract from primary cases did not correlate with contacts' risk of infection. Viral load in these samples did, however, predict their risk of having a SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive hand swab, which in turn was associated with transmission to their respective contacts.

The results found that levels of SARS-CoV-2 RNA on primary cases' and contacts' hands and frequently-touched household surfaces were strongly correlated with contacts' risk of infection, identifying these as potential vectors for the spread of COVID-19 within the households.

Timing is a significant obstacle in conducting viral research in the field (households in this case). Over the course of the study, SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected on hands and surfaces, yet only one sample, a contact's hand swab, was positive for viral culture. There were frequent SARS-CoV-2 RNA-positive detections by PCR back at the lab. However, the researchers report a 36–72 h interval to transport the swabs from participants' homes to laboratory storage before they were subjected to in vitro cell culture. In this time frame, RNA degrades, and the encapsulated virus, while still detectible, is no longer functional.

Because the study took place in actual households and not in a lab setting, researchers could not systematically collect information on touch behaviors, hygiene practices or physical distancing. Lab settings are much more controlled environments, which is where previous studies have made determinations about how long SARS-CoV-2 RNA can persist on different surfaces. Because those previous studies were in controlled lab settings, they can tell us very little about what takes place in an actual household environment, which is why the current study is so informative.

The investigation covers the period when the pre-alpha lineages were dominant in London and continued until the alpha variant became dominant. The researchers point out that the results should not be extrapolated to more recent and more infectious variants.

Recent evidence cited in the paper suggests that the omicron variant BA.1 is significantly more stable on different surfaces and has an increased likelihood of aerosol transmission relative to earlier variants.

The authors state that study results "have practical implications and support interventions such as frequent handwashing, surface cleansing, physical distancing, reducing direct contact, and use of masks to curb transmission in households" in preventing COVID-19 transmission.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)


Higher-dose corticosteroids linked to increased risk of death in some hypoxic COVID-19 patients

by European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
April 12, 2023

A new study to be presented at this year's European Congress of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases (ECCMID 2023, Copenhagen April 15-18), and published in The Lancet, shows that compared with standard care that included low-dose corticosteroid use, treating hypoxic COVID-19 patients needing only oxygen therapy or no breathing support with higher-dose corticosteroids is associated with a 60% increased risk of death.

This study, conducted by the RECOVERY Collaborative Group and led by Prof Sir Peter Horby and Prof Sir Martin Landray (both of the University of Oxford, UK), had already identified that low-dose corticosteroids reduce mortality for patients with COVID-19 requiring oxygen or ventilatory support. Since May 2021, the RECOVERY trial has evaluated the use of a higher dose of corticosteroids in this patient group. However, in May 2022, the independent Data Monitoring Committee advised that this treatment assessment be stopped for those patients receiving oxygen alone or no breathing support. The trial continues to study the effects of high-dose corticosteroids for those needing non-invasive or invasive mechanical ventilation.

Eligible and consenting adult patients with COVID-19 and clinical evidence of hypoxia (i.e., receiving oxygen or with oxygen saturation <92% in normal room air) were randomly allocated (1:1) to either usual care with higher-dose corticosteroids (dexamethasone 20 mg once daily for 5 days followed by 10 mg dexamethasone once daily for 5 days or until discharge if sooner) or usual standard of care alone (which included dexamethasone at the lower 6 mg, once-daily dose for 10 days or until discharge if sooner). The primary outcome was 28-day mortality among all randomised participants.

Between May 25, 2021, and May 13, 2022, 1,272 patients with COVID-19 and hypoxia receiving no oxygen (8 [1%]) or simple oxygen only (1,264 [99%]) were randomly allocated to receive usual care plus higher dose corticosteroids (659 patients) versus usual care alone (613 patients, of whom 87% received low-dose corticosteroids during the follow-up period). Of those randomly assigned, 745 (59%) were in Asia, 512 (40%) in the UK, and 15 (1%) in Africa. Of the patients, 248 (19%) had diabetes and 769 (60%) were male. Overall, 123 (19%) of 659 patients allocated to higher-dose corticosteroids versus 75 (12%) of 613 patients allocated to usual care died within 28 days—meaning a 60% increased risk of mortality for the higher dose corticosteroid group.

There was also an excess of pneumonia reported to be due to non-COVID infection in the higher-dose corticosteroid group: 64 cases (10%) vs. 37 cases (6%); and an increase in hyperglycemia (high blood sugar episode) requiring an increased insulin dose: 142 [22%] vs. 87 [14%].

The authors conclude, "Among hospitalized patients with COVID-19 who require oxygen or ventilatory support, low-dose corticosteroids reduce the risk of death. However, among patients requiring simple oxygen only, higher doses of corticosteroids increase the risk of death compared with low-dose corticosteroids. It remains unclear whether using a higher dose of corticosteroids is beneficial among patients requiring non-invasive or invasive ventilation—the RECOVERY trial continues to study this."
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)


Arcturus is already in more than HALF of US states with California, New Jersey and Virginia emerging as hotspots — after strain sent infection rates skyrocketing in India

By Luke Andrews Health Reporter For Dailymail.Com
Updated: 13:53 EDT, 12 April 2023
  • Health chiefs first detected 'Arcturus' in New York circulating in late January
  • But it has since spread to 26 other states across all five regions of the US
A new Covid variant that has sent cases skyrocketing in India has already reached more than half of states in the US, data suggests.

Health chiefs first detected 'Arcturus', a highly infectious spin-off of Omicron, in New York in late January. But it has since spread to 26 more states and triggered 235 cases, with hotspots emerging in California, New Jersey and Virginia.

The variant — known scientifically as XBB.1.16 — is believed to be the most infectious version of Omicron to date, but there is no evidence that it is more deadly than other currently circulating strains.

In India, it is believed to have single-handedly driven a 13-fold surge in cases within a month. Hospitals in the country are on red alert and some states have even brought back masking restrictions.

The US data is available on the global genome sequencing database GISAID, which monitors the spread of Covid variants.

It shows that in total, XBB.1.16 has been detected in 27 states with a total of 235 cases recorded to date.

These are likely an underestimate because only a handful of positive tests are analyzed for variants.

California is the hotspot for the new variant in the United States, with 54 sequences recorded to date.

Rounding out the top five are New Jersey, 38 cases, Virginia (25) Texas (23) and New York (21).

The other states where the strain has been detected are: Washington, Illinois, Florida, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Utah, Ohio, Minnesota, Maryland, North Carolina, Nevada, Iowa, Indiana, Hawaii, Delaware, Connecticut, Wisconsin, Oregon, Michigan, Massachusetts, Louisiana and Colorado.

Dr Paul Hunter, an infectious diseases expert at the University of East Anglia in England, said he was not worried about the strain.

'Yes, this variant does appear to spread more readily than other currently circulating variants,' he told DailyMail.com.

'But, on the other hand, it has been around for some time, first being seen in the UK in early February.'

He added: 'Although in India it has taken off in the past few weeks so far it has not been increasing rapidly globally.

'From what I can gather in reports from India, there is currently no evidence that it causes more severe disease.

'I suspect we will see a wave of infections with this variant, but I doubt it will cause a big wave probably not even as great as [previous ones].'

Internationally, XBB.1.16 has been detected in 28 countries and Aruba — including the United Kingdom, Australia and Canada.

But India has been hit hardest by its emergence.

Officials there believe the variant is single-handedly driving the latest wave.

The nation's ministry of health this week ran mock drills to check how prepared its hospitals were for another potential influx of patients.

And some states have brought back face masks in public settings, the first time for more than a year in some areas.

India's Ministry of Health said there were 40,215 active Covid cases on April 12, up by 3,122 in just one day.

These Covid cases can include those who test positive while unwell at home as well as those in hospital.

The World Health Organization (WHO) is currently monitoring Arcturus, scientifically known as XBB.1.16 but which was named by variant trackers.

It is yet to be added to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) weekly update on circulating Covid variants.

It was first detected in late January, with officials saying it has some mutations of concern.

Dr Maria Van Kerkhove, the WHO's Covid technical lead, said: 'It's been in circulation for a few months.

'We haven't seen a change in severity in individuals or in populations, but that's why we have these systems in place.

'It has one additional mutation in the spike protein which in lab studies shows increased infectivity as well as potential increased pathogenicity.'

Dr Van Kerkhove added that while XBB.1.16 had been detected in other countries, most sequences were from India, where it had replaced other variants.

She also said that thus far, there had been no reported change in disease severity in XBB.1.16 infections.

At present, the XBB.1.5 variant is dominant in the US, accounting for about 88 percent of cases according to estimates.

Omicron spin-offs have proven highly infectious and good at evading immunity when they have emerged.

But Covid has now become a background issue for many Americans.

The US is currently recording about 1,773 Covid deaths every week, compared to the 17,480 fatalities at the peak of the last wave last February.

It is also registering about 120,000 cases a week, but this is likely to be a major underestimate because many people with the disease are not getting tested.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)


Warning over new Covid variant 'Arcturus' that is causing carnage in India with infections surging 13-fold in the past month
By Emily Craig Senior Health Reporter For Mailonline and John Ely Senior Health Reporter For Mailonline
Updated: 09:53 EDT, 12 April 2023

  • New type of Omicron has mutations that could increase cases and disease

A new Covid strain is wreaking havoc in India, with hospitals now on red alert and compulsory face masks being brought back.

'Arcturus', a spin-off of Omicron, is thought to be the most contagious variant yet.

However, top scientists don't expect it to be more lethal than other types currently circulating, which cause a much milder disease that closely resembles the flu.

Officials believe it is single-handedly driving India's latest wave, with cases having exploded 13-fold within a month.

The nation's ministry of health this week ran mock drills to check how prepared its hospitals were for another potential influx of patients.

And some states have brought back face masks in public settings, the first time for more than a year in some areas.

69739413-11964113-image-a-1_1681291613421.jpg


69739417-11964113-image-a-2_1681291625715.jpg

While the rise is of some concern, it is still far below the devastating wave of cases the country experienced in 2021 from the Delta wave

India's Ministry of Health said there were 40,215 active Covid cases on April 12, up by 3,122 in just one day.

These Covid cases can include those who test positive while unwell at home as well as those in hospital.

Separate figures from the Oxford University-run platform Our World in Data show that new daily cases hit 3,108 on April 4, up from 242 one month earlier.

The World Health Organization (WHO) is currently monitoring Arcturus, scientifically known as XBB.1.16.

It was first detected in late January, with officials saying it has some mutations of concern.

Dr Maria Van Kerkhove, the WHO's Covid technical lead, said: 'It's been in circulation for a few months.

'We haven't seen a change in severity in individuals or in populations, but that's why we have these systems in place.

'It has one additional mutation in the spike protein which in lab studies shows increased infectivity as well as potential increased pathogenicity.'

Dr Van Kerkhove added that while XBB.1.16 had been detected in other countries most sequences were from India, where it had replaced other variants.

She also said that thus far there had been no reported change in disease severity in XBB.1.16 infections.

Meanwhile, a study by Japanese scientists has suggested Arcturus is 1.2 times more infectious than the closely-related Kraken Covid strain.

Uploading their findings to the biology research website bioRxiv, they wrote that this advantage suggests the new variant will 'spread worldwide in the near future'.

They attributed this to mutations that could make it more difficult for the immune system to tackle and increase its growth rate.

However, they said there is no evidence that Arcturus had any greater ability to evade the protection offered by vaccines or prior infection compared to Kraken.

Kraken was the dominant strain in the UK by the end of February, causing 50.4 per cent of cases, according to ONS data.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


What is 'Arcturus' and should we be worried? A new Covid variant dubbed 'Arcturus' has sparked some concern after causing a surge of cases in India.

What is 'Arcturus'?

'Arcturus' is the name that has been given to Omicron subvariant XBB.1.16.

It is a spin-off strain, similar to that of the Kraken variant (XBB.1.5).

Where has it been spotted?

It emerged in March and has been spotted since in 22 countries, but the largest outbreak by far is in India.

Why has it sparked concern?

'Arcturus' has led to a surge in cases in India with infections soaring 13-fold within the last month.

This has prompted the nation's health authorities to run hospital drills and reintroduce mask mandates in some areas.

Is it dangerous?

'Arcturus' has mutations on its spike protein that the Word Health Organisation says could increase its ability to infect people as well as trigger disease.

Japanese researchers have suggested it is 1.2 times more infectious than the already super transmissible Kraken.

However, there is no evidence it increases severity of disease.

But a rise in cases could put health services under pressure.

Do vaccines still work?

Early results suggest 'Arcturus' does not have any increased ability to evade protection from vaccines compared to other Omicron spin-offs
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)


Arcturus is already in the UK: Warning over new Covid variant causing carnage in India - and it may have been in Britain for a month
By John Ely Senior Health Reporter For Mailonline
Updated: 12:49 EDT, 12 April 2023
  • New type of Omicron has mutations that could increase cases and disease
A new Covid variant wreaking havoc in India is already in Britain, MailOnline can reveal.

Health chiefs announced 'Arcturus' had been detected in the country last month. Almost 50 cases have now been spotted.

Hospitals in India are now on red alert, with compulsory face masks being brought back in some states to curb exploding infection rates which have soared 13-fold in the last month.

'Arcturus' is a spin-off of Omicron, and is thought to be the most contagious variant yet.

However, top scientists don't expect the variant — scientifically called XBB.1.16 — to be more lethal than other types of Covid currently circulating.

Nowadays the illness caused by the coronavirus closely resembles that of flu, unlike during the earliest days of the pandemic.

The UK Health and Security Agency said the variant was already in the UK in its final variant report issued last month.

Separate data collected from variant trackers report that the UK has now sequenced almost 50 samples of Arcturus.

Professor Paul Hunter, an expert in infectious diseases from the University of East Anglia, said it was too early to tell if XBB.1.16 would cause a significant surge in cases in the UK but noted that it thankfully did not appear to cause more severe disease.

'Although in India it has taken off in the past few weeks so far it has not been increasing rapidly globally,' he said.

'I suspect we will see a wave of infections with this variant but I doubt it will cause a big wave probably not even as great as the one we have just had in the UK and so probably not put as great a pressure on health services than recently.'

But he added that a spike in cases in the US at the start of April, with XBB.1.16 accounting for almost 6 per cent of samples tested, could give a hint of what was in store for countries like the UK.

Officials in India believe the variant is single-handedly driving the latest wave.

The nation's ministry of health this week ran mock drills to check how prepared its hospitals were for another potential influx of patients.

And some states have brought back face masks in public settings, the first time for more than a year in some areas.

India's Ministry of Health said there were 40,215 active Covid cases on April 12, up by 3,122 in just one day.

These Covid cases can include those who test positive while unwell at home as well as those in hospital.

Separate figures from the Oxford University-run platform Our World in Data show new daily cases hit 3,108 on April 4, up from 242 one month earlier.

The World Health Organization (WHO) is currently monitoring Arcturus, scientifically known as XBB.1.16.

It was first detected in late January, with officials saying it has some mutations of concern.

Dr Maria Van Kerkhove, the WHO's Covid technical lead, said: 'It's been in circulation for a few months.

'We haven't seen a change in severity in individuals or in populations, but that's why we have these systems in place.

'It has one additional mutation in the spike protein which in lab studies shows increased infectivity as well as potential increased pathogenicity.'

Dr Van Kerkhove added that while XBB.1.16 had been detected in other countries most sequences were from India, where it had replaced other variants.

She also said that thus far there had been no reported change in disease severity in XBB.1.16 infections.

Meanwhile, a study by Japanese scientists has suggested Arcturus is 1.2 times more infectious than the closely-related Kraken Covid strain.

Uploading their findings to the biology research website bioRxiv, they wrote that this advantage suggests the new variant will 'spread worldwide in the near future'.

They attributed this to mutations that could make it more difficult for the immune system to tackle and increase its growth rate.

However, they said there is no evidence that Arcturus had any greater ability to evade the protection offered by vaccines or prior infection compared to Kraken.

Kraken was the dominant strain in the UK by the end of February, causing 50.4 per cent of cases, according to ONS data.

Technically XBB.1.5, the Omicron spin-off was at the time considered the most infectious Covid variant yet and sparked concern after triggering a surge in cases in several countries.

However while triggering more cases, the new strain did not cause more severe disease than its ancestor Omicron, already considered a 'milder' version of Covid.

The rise in cases triggered by Arcturus has led the Indian state of Haryana, in the north of the country, to reintroduce masks in public places due to the 'significant upsurge' in Covid cases.

Veena George, Health Minister of southern state Kerala, on Saturday reintroduced masks for pregnant women, the elderly and those with underlying conditions.

On Monday and Tuesday, hospitals across India took part in mock drills to test their preparedness.

69077181-11898503-image-a-2_1679670243548.jpg

Office for National Statistics analysts estimate almost 1.7million Brits were carrying the virus on any given day in the week to March 13. This a jump of almost 14 per cent on the week before

67556907-11964113-An_Office_of_National_Statistics_analysis_has_calculated_how_eac-a-1_1681300876942.jpg

Office for National Statistics analysis has calculated how much of each Covid wave infected the population of England. The latest, Omicron BA.4/5, was the biggest, infecting 46.3 per cent of the population. Individuals could be represented twice in the data having, for example, caught Covid once at the start of the pandemic, then again during the Omicron surge

Officials have also told states to ramp up testing for the virus.

The drills and return of masks are a grim reminder of how the country was devastated by the Delta wave in 2021 with a total of 4.7million excess deaths according to WHO estimates.

India's health system was overwhelmed by a surge of cases triggered by that Covid variant, with some hospitals even running out of oxygen.

Like similar new Covid variants, virus trackers online decided to call XBB.1.16 'Arcturus' following a pattern of naming new strains after mythological entities.

Arcturus means 'Guardian of the Bear' and is related to the constellation called the Great Bear.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
This makes total sense when you take into account that the new top 5 causes of death are what some say are the 5 types of death from the vaccine and/or long covid. Just saying...:whistle:


(fair use applies)


Covid drops out of top five causes of death in England and Wales for first time since start of the pandemic - as dementia and Alzheimer’s becomes most common cause of mortality
By James Callery
Updated: 17:05 EDT, 11 April 2023
  • In both 2020 and 2021 Covid-19 was the leading cause of death
  • In 2022 coronavirus was recorded as the sixth leading cause overall
Covid-19 has dropped out of the top five leading causes of death in England and Wales for the first time since the start of the pandemic, figures show.

Coronavirus was recorded as the main cause of death for 22,454 people in 2022, or 3.9% of all deaths registered, making it the sixth leading cause overall.

In both 2020 and 2021 Covid-19 was the leading cause of death, with 73,766 deaths (12.1% of the total) and 67,350 (11.5%) respectively.

By contrast, dementia and Alzheimer's disease was the leading cause in England and Wales in 2022, with 65,967 deaths registered (11.4% of the total), up from 61,250 (10.4%) in 2021.

The other causes in the top five were ischaemic heart diseases (59,356 deaths and 10.3% of the total); chronic lower respiratory diseases (29,815 deaths, 5.2%); cerebrovascular diseases such as strokes and aneurysms (29,274 deaths, 5.1%); and trachea, bronchus and lung cancer (28,571 deaths, 5.0%).


The figures have been published by the Office for National Statistics (ONS).

Covid-19 levels among the population of England and Wales reached record highs last year, as new variants of the virus saw the estimated number of weekly infections hit 3.9 million in early January and 4.4 million at the end of March.

The fact that 2022 saw a fall in Covid-19 deaths, not a rise, reflects the success of the vaccination programme, which has reduced sharply the number of infected people who go on to become seriously ill or die.

Vaccines were first rolled out across the country in early 2021, with booster doses subsequently made available to older and vulnerable groups.

Sarah Caul, ONS head of mortality analysis, said the figures represent a 'significant change' in the leading causes of death since the beginning of the pandemic.

'For the third year in a row, we've seen more males than females dying, a reversal of the trend since the 1980s,' she added.

Some 292,064 male deaths were registered in England and Wales last year, compared with 285,096 female deaths.

The leading cause of death in males was ischaemic heart disease, with dementia and Alzheimer's the leading cause in females.

This is 'probably due to females living longer on average than males,' Ms Caul said.

When the data for 2022 is broken down by age and sex, Covid-19 was the third leading cause of death among males aged 80 and over - but this is the only group in which the virus appeared in the top five.

The overall number of deaths registered last year in England and Wales (577,160) was lower than in 2021 (586,334) and 2020 (607,922).

However, the total was 6.2% above the five-year average, with 33,747 'excess' or extra deaths.

High levels of excess deaths have been recorded in all three years of the pandemic, but Covid-19 is likely to have played only a minor role in the figures for 2022.

Health experts have suggested that other factors contributing to last year's excess deaths could include seasonal viruses such as flu, the impact of the summer heatwave, pressures on the NHS, and access to medical services.
 

Walkin' Away

Senior Member
Hey All,
Happy Thursday!

Thanks for the articles.

There is something ripping through our area right now…lots of respiratory distress calls and it is affecting all age groups. Maybe it’s this new variant?

Seems the “vid” has fallen off the radar lately, but I wonder how long that will last?

One last comment, I keep reading that statement by Dr. VanKerkhove about the mutation in the spike protein of this variant and that this mutation showed an increase in infectivity and the possibility for increase in pathogenicity. Could we be seeing the ongoing evolution of the Geert-variant?

Only time will tell…

W. A.
 

psychgirl

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Hey All,
Happy Thursday!

Thanks for the articles.

There is something ripping through our area right now…lots of respiratory distress calls and it is affecting all age groups. Maybe it’s this new variant?

Seems the “vid” has fallen off the radar lately, but I wonder how long that will last?

One last comment, I keep reading that statement by Dr. VanKerkhove about the mutation in the spike protein of this variant and that this mutation showed an increase in infectivity and the possibility for increase in pathogenicity. Could we be seeing the ongoing evolution of the Geert-variant?

Only time will tell…

W. A.
Good Lord I HOPE not!!

Just when I’ve started to relax a bit, too.
Are you in medical field?
I did get a weather alert for our county this morning about our air quality as well as high pollen counts.

This is central Indiana
I feel crappy myself, tbh. :(
It’s gotta be in the air.
 

Walkin' Away

Senior Member
Gee Zoner that was fast. I thought what I am seeing and hearing here in our little corner of the world was mere paranoia on my part. Guess not!

All this, just after the administration‘s cancelling the vid emergency stuff earlier this week. Potentially dangerous variants emerging and cases on the rise again…Yep, another brilliant move by our leaders.

Well guys, another example of we are truly on our own. Keep taking your stuff, this ain’t over.

Yes Psychgirl, I am.

Take Care,
W. A.
 

psychgirl

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Gee Zoner that was fast. I thought what I am seeing and hearing here in our little corner of the world was mere paranoia on my part. Guess not!

All this, just after the administration‘s cancelling the vid emergency stuff earlier this week. Potentially dangerous variants emerging and cases on the rise again…Yep, another brilliant move by our leaders.

Well guys, another example of we are truly on our own. Keep taking your stuff, this ain’t over.

Yes Psychgirl, I am.

Take Care,
W. A.
JUST as I was forming a little theory of mine….boom.
Here you all are
I’ll type it later, getting dinner for DH
 

Zoner

Veteran Member
Looks like HD may be prescient. Geert remains open to Science. We shall see...

Q&A #26 : I understand that the virus may evolve the way Geert has predicted. However, is it also possible that the situation calms down?​


Geert Vanden Bossche
Apr 13, 2023

Answer:

Of course, after a huge wave of severe morbidity and death, the situation will calm down and the virus could even be eradicated for sufficient transmission. I don’t think this is the scenario you’re referring to. You probably refer to the evolutionary path of the virus abating rather than escalating. I don’t think we can fully rule out that possibility for the following reason:

In highly vaccinated populations, viral transmission is currently hampered by reduced shedding in vaccinees. As described in my book, The Inescapable Immune Escape Pandemic, this is inextricably linked to enhanced immune selection pressure on viral virulence exerted by polyreactive, non-neutralizing antibodies (PNNAbs).Provided this condition persists long enough, a highly virulent variant capable of lifting the blockade on viral virulence could ultimately be selected and cause severe C-19 disease (thereby ensuring viral perpetuation!).

However, there is always a possibility that viral transmission in highly vaccinated populations becomes dramatically reduced before such a highly virulent variant emerges (and could therefore be selected). This could happen if vaccine-induced, potentially neutralizing antibodies (pNAbs) decline rather rapidly. Low concentrations of pNAbs that have largely lost their neutralizing capacity towards the circulating virus (Omicron descendants) will result in relatively low concentrations of PNNAbs (see book)and therefore, rapidly abrogate immune pressure on viral virulence. In this case, reduced viral transmission would not result in prolonged PNNAb-mediated immune pressure on viral virulence, and viral transmission could fall below the threshold required for viral perpetuation before a more virulent mutant gets selected. This might happen in countries with a relatively low vaccination or booster rate. However, there is also some uncertainty about the percentage of vaccinees who effectively develop measurable pNAb titers. As the vast majority of C-19 vaccinees in highly vaccinated countries are in the higher age groups (> 60Y), a substantial part of the population may not optimally respond to the vaccines (there are currently no detailed studies available on the % of non-responders in the elderly for lack of systematic serological surveys). Of course, if this is the case, many ‘highly vaccinated’ populations may not prove to be ‘highly vaccine-immunized’ and their impact on the evolution of the virus might be considerably overestimated.

In other words, a ‘simmer down’ effect might occur in vaccinated countries with a relatively low vaccination/ booster rate, or even more widely in ‘highly vaccinated’ industrialized countries because of the relatively high percentage of older age groups (comprising the majority of non-responders).

I am not ruling out the possibility that other scenarios for a ‘simmer down’ effect could also occur, but the two described above are those that came to my mind.

As for the second part of the question, how likely is this to happen? I don’t know! The problem is that we have no clue about the percentage of vaccinees that were effectively primed by those vaccines for lack of population-level serological data. This question is particularly valid given that this mass vaccination campaign has been focusing on the use of mRNA vaccines, primarily in elderly people.

It has also been shown that diminished neutralizing capacity elicits polyreactive non-neutralizing Abs[1]but nobody seems to care about measuring those, let alone performing large-scale testing on the presence of these Abs.

These are the unknowns, simply because the situation is unprecedented (we’ve never been massively immunizing before our elderly people with mRNA-based vaccines and especially data on the latter type of vaccines are missing). Of course, everyone is focused on the virus, not realizing that the suboptimal immune pressure it gets exposed to is what’s driving its evolution.

So the question really is this: Will this immune pressure persist for long enough to allow selection of a more virulent (but also a more elaborated [glycan decoration!] virus) before enhanced CTL responses in vaccinees will have reduced viral shedding down to a level where viral transmission is no longer sufficient?

One cannot rule out that this may occur when high titers of pNAbs are rapidly falling on a background of highly infectious virus circulation. It doesn’t invalidate my hypothesis (catastrophic scenario); it simply indicates that the proposed scenario may not unfold if vaccines do not meet the usual requirements for a vaccine to be marketable (e.g., due to poor and/ or short-lived immune response as a result of poor immunogenicity in the target population). I am not even sure whether repeated boosters would improve, or rather deteriorate, the immune response in the case of poor immunogenicity. But again, ‘ other’ doses could be very immunogenic in ‘other’ people under ‘other’ conditions.

People also tend to forget that mRNA is very fragile, and that stability thereof in the vaccine formulation may be problematic if not frozen, conserved, or thawed properly (see Jessica Rose’s reports on missing QC data on the physical integrity of the mRNA strand) . Again, where are the systematic serological surveys (on neutralizing anti-S Abs) in vaccinees?? The fact that some vaccinees continue to have repetitive episodes of C-19 disease may indicate that the vaccine ‘take’ in these people has been lousy.

My key message is that my predictions should be taken very seriously. To make this message strong enough, it’s better and reasonable to assume that these vaccines are sufficiently immunogenic in the target population. Potential assumptions suggesting that these vaccines may not properly immunize the target population would flaw the message and make it even more likely that it won’t be taken seriously (as it sounds quite incredible to people anyway)

[1] as documented by research conducted by prof. Fantiniet al.; Infection-enhancing anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies recognize both the original Wuhan/D614G strain and Delta variants. A potential risk for mass vaccination? - PubMed

 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
Looks like HD may be prescient. Geert remains open to Science. We shall see...

Q&A #26 : I understand that the virus may evolve the way Geert has predicted. However, is it also possible that the situation calms down?​


Geert Vanden Bossche
Apr 13, 2023

Answer:

Of course, after a huge wave of severe morbidity and death, the situation will calm down and the virus could even be eradicated for sufficient transmission. I don’t think this is the scenario you’re referring to. You probably refer to the evolutionary path of the virus abating rather than escalating. I don’t think we can fully rule out that possibility for the following reason:

In highly vaccinated populations, viral transmission is currently hampered by reduced shedding in vaccinees. As described in my book, The Inescapable Immune Escape Pandemic, this is inextricably linked to enhanced immune selection pressure on viral virulence exerted by polyreactive, non-neutralizing antibodies (PNNAbs).Provided this condition persists long enough, a highly virulent variant capable of lifting the blockade on viral virulence could ultimately be selected and cause severe C-19 disease (thereby ensuring viral perpetuation!).

However, there is always a possibility that viral transmission in highly vaccinated populations becomes dramatically reduced before such a highly virulent variant emerges (and could therefore be selected). This could happen if vaccine-induced, potentially neutralizing antibodies (pNAbs) decline rather rapidly. Low concentrations of pNAbs that have largely lost their neutralizing capacity towards the circulating virus (Omicron descendants) will result in relatively low concentrations of PNNAbs (see book)and therefore, rapidly abrogate immune pressure on viral virulence. In this case, reduced viral transmission would not result in prolonged PNNAb-mediated immune pressure on viral virulence, and viral transmission could fall below the threshold required for viral perpetuation before a more virulent mutant gets selected. This might happen in countries with a relatively low vaccination or booster rate. However, there is also some uncertainty about the percentage of vaccinees who effectively develop measurable pNAb titers. As the vast majority of C-19 vaccinees in highly vaccinated countries are in the higher age groups (> 60Y), a substantial part of the population may not optimally respond to the vaccines (there are currently no detailed studies available on the % of non-responders in the elderly for lack of systematic serological surveys). Of course, if this is the case, many ‘highly vaccinated’ populations may not prove to be ‘highly vaccine-immunized’ and their impact on the evolution of the virus might be considerably overestimated.

In other words, a ‘simmer down’ effect might occur in vaccinated countries with a relatively low vaccination/ booster rate, or even more widely in ‘highly vaccinated’ industrialized countries because of the relatively high percentage of older age groups (comprising the majority of non-responders).

I am not ruling out the possibility that other scenarios for a ‘simmer down’ effect could also occur, but the two described above are those that came to my mind.

As for the second part of the question, how likely is this to happen? I don’t know! The problem is that we have no clue about the percentage of vaccinees that were effectively primed by those vaccines for lack of population-level serological data. This question is particularly valid given that this mass vaccination campaign has been focusing on the use of mRNA vaccines, primarily in elderly people.

It has also been shown that diminished neutralizing capacity elicits polyreactive non-neutralizing Abs[1]but nobody seems to care about measuring those, let alone performing large-scale testing on the presence of these Abs.

These are the unknowns, simply because the situation is unprecedented (we’ve never been massively immunizing before our elderly people with mRNA-based vaccines and especially data on the latter type of vaccines are missing). Of course, everyone is focused on the virus, not realizing that the suboptimal immune pressure it gets exposed to is what’s driving its evolution.

So the question really is this: Will this immune pressure persist for long enough to allow selection of a more virulent (but also a more elaborated [glycan decoration!] virus) before enhanced CTL responses in vaccinees will have reduced viral shedding down to a level where viral transmission is no longer sufficient?

One cannot rule out that this may occur when high titers of pNAbs are rapidly falling on a background of highly infectious virus circulation. It doesn’t invalidate my hypothesis (catastrophic scenario); it simply indicates that the proposed scenario may not unfold if vaccines do not meet the usual requirements for a vaccine to be marketable (e.g., due to poor and/ or short-lived immune response as a result of poor immunogenicity in the target population). I am not even sure whether repeated boosters would improve, or rather deteriorate, the immune response in the case of poor immunogenicity. But again, ‘ other’ doses could be very immunogenic in ‘other’ people under ‘other’ conditions.

People also tend to forget that mRNA is very fragile, and that stability thereof in the vaccine formulation may be problematic if not frozen, conserved, or thawed properly (see Jessica Rose’s reports on missing QC data on the physical integrity of the mRNA strand) . Again, where are the systematic serological surveys (on neutralizing anti-S Abs) in vaccinees?? The fact that some vaccinees continue to have repetitive episodes of C-19 disease may indicate that the vaccine ‘take’ in these people has been lousy.

My key message is that my predictions should be taken very seriously. To make this message strong enough, it’s better and reasonable to assume that these vaccines are sufficiently immunogenic in the target population. Potential assumptions suggesting that these vaccines may not properly immunize the target population would flaw the message and make it even more likely that it won’t be taken seriously (as it sounds quite incredible to people anyway)

[1] as documented by research conducted by prof. Fantiniet al.; Infection-enhancing anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies recognize both the original Wuhan/D614G strain and Delta variants. A potential risk for mass vaccination? - PubMed


Thank you for posting this. It's technical, I had to read it really slowly to fully understand what he's saying but it boils down to him, for the first time I can see, hedging his prediction. He gets technical as to why - I think he's saying that if the vaccinees lose their non-neutralizing antibodies over time, or if less of the population acquired them due to the vaccines not really working, there is less immune pressure on the variants - so the stronger variant may not take hold. Let's hope and pray that's the outcome. The other one is too ugly to contemplate. I'm not sure how optimistic he is about this possibility, but it's the first 'out' he's given us to a catastrophe, so that's going in the right direction. PS - Every time I read something from him now I have in the back of my mind that he has the (non-spoken about) history of MRNA research that guides his thinking and reasoning.

HD
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
One of my issues with Geert saying 'let everyone get infected and have natural immunity' is that it doesn't take into account the damage the bio-weapon spike protein has on the body. Getting a natural infection (while of course better than turning your body into a spike making machine) still exposes you to these horrible spike proteins that, it seems, never go away. It's a true horrific bio weapon, which, for me, explains the initial panic when it escaped from the lab (just one theory, of course, but the one I subscribe to).

(fair use applies)

bioRxiv posts many COVID19-related papers. A reminder: they have not been formally peer-reviewed and should not guide health-related behavior or be reported in the press as conclusive.

SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Accumulation in the Skull-Meninges-Brain Axis: Potential Implications for Long-Term Neurological Complications in post-COVID-19


Zhouyi Rong, Hongcheng Mai, Saketh Kapoor, Victor G. Puelles, Jan Czogalla, Julia Schädler, Jessica Vering, Claire Delbridge, Hanno Steinke, Hannah Frenzel, Katja Schmidt, Özüm Sehnaz Caliskan, Jochen Martin Wettengel, Fatma Cherif, Mayar Ali, Zeynep Ilgin Kolabas, Selin Ulukaya, Izabela Horvath, Shan Zhao, Natalie Krahmer, Sabina Tahirovic, Ali Önder Yildirim, Tobias B. Huber, Benjamin Ondruschka, Ingo Bechmann, Gregor Ebert, Ulrike Protzer, Harsharan Singh Bhatia, Farida Hellal, Ali Ertürk
doi: SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Accumulation in the Skull-Meninges-Brain Axis: Potential Implications for Long-Term Neurological Complications in post-COVID-19

This article is a preprint and has not been certified by peer review


ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has been associated mainly with a range of neurological symptoms, including brain fog and brain tissue loss, raising concerns about the virus’s acute and potential chronic impact on the central nervous system. In this study, we utilized mouse models and human post-mortem tissues to investigate the presence and distribution of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in the skull-meninges-brain axis. Our results revealed the accumulation of the spike protein in the skull marrow, brain meninges, and brain parenchyma. The injection of the spike protein alone caused cell death in the brain, highlighting a direct effect on brain tissue. Furthermore, we observed the presence of spike protein in the skull of deceased long after their COVID-19 infection, suggesting that the spike’s persistence may contribute to long-term neurological symptoms. The spike protein was associated with neutrophil-related pathways and dysregulation of the proteins involved in the PI3K-AKT as well as complement and coagulation pathway. Overall, our findings suggest that SARS-CoV-2 spike protein trafficking from CNS borders into the brain parenchyma and identified differentially regulated pathways may present insights into mechanisms underlying immediate and long-term consequences of SARS-CoV-2 and present diagnostic and therapeutic opportunities.

Figure
Short Summary The accumulation of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in the skull-meninges-brain axis presents potential molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets for neurological complications in long-COVID-19 patients.

~~~~~~~~

Please everyone - go to this link and watch the videos.

They are listed here:


LINK TO FULL ARTICLE: SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Accumulation in the Skull-Meninges-Brain Axis: Potential Implications for Long-Term Neurological Complications in post-COVID-19

ONE OF THE IMAGES FROM THE FULL ARTICLE:
F2.large.jpg

Spike protein exhibits multi-organ binding capacity
(A) 3D reconstructions of whole mouse body after spike protein (WT), spike S1 (N501Y), and HA injection, imaged with light-sheet microscopy. (B) 3D reconstruction of main internal organs and representative high-resolution optical section view with spike S1 (N501Y) protein and dextran labeled vasculature. Arrow heads and arrows indicate regions with and without spike S1 protein, respectively. (C) Optical section of whole-body images after spike protein (WT), spike S1 (N501Y), and HA injection. The white box area was zoomed in to check the brain. (D) Visualization of spike S1 (N501Y) protein in the intact mouse head and representative sagittal images of the skull bone marrow, SMCs and meninges. Arrow heads indicate spike S1 protein in SMCs. (E) Representative images of spike S1 (N501Y) protein in the brain.
 

Zoner

Veteran Member
One of my issues with Geert saying 'let everyone get infected and have natural immunity' is that it doesn't take into account the damage the bio-weapon spike protein has on the body. Getting a natural infection (while of course better than turning your body into a spike making machine) still exposes you to these horrible spike proteins that, it seems, never go away. It's a true horrific bio weapon, which, for me, explains the initial panic when it escaped from the lab (just one theory, of course, but the one I subscribe to).

(fair use applies)

bioRxiv posts many COVID19-related papers. A reminder: they have not been formally peer-reviewed and should not guide health-related behavior or be reported in the press as conclusive.

SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Accumulation in the Skull-Meninges-Brain Axis: Potential Implications for Long-Term Neurological Complications in post-COVID-19


Zhouyi Rong, Hongcheng Mai, Saketh Kapoor, Victor G. Puelles, Jan Czogalla, Julia Schädler, Jessica Vering, Claire Delbridge, Hanno Steinke, Hannah Frenzel, Katja Schmidt, Özüm Sehnaz Caliskan, Jochen Martin Wettengel, Fatma Cherif, Mayar Ali, Zeynep Ilgin Kolabas, Selin Ulukaya, Izabela Horvath, Shan Zhao, Natalie Krahmer, Sabina Tahirovic, Ali Önder Yildirim, Tobias B. Huber, Benjamin Ondruschka, Ingo Bechmann, Gregor Ebert, Ulrike Protzer, Harsharan Singh Bhatia, Farida Hellal, Ali Ertürk
doi: SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Accumulation in the Skull-Meninges-Brain Axis: Potential Implications for Long-Term Neurological Complications in post-COVID-19

This article is a preprint and has not been certified by peer review


ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has been associated mainly with a range of neurological symptoms, including brain fog and brain tissue loss, raising concerns about the virus’s acute and potential chronic impact on the central nervous system. In this study, we utilized mouse models and human post-mortem tissues to investigate the presence and distribution of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in the skull-meninges-brain axis. Our results revealed the accumulation of the spike protein in the skull marrow, brain meninges, and brain parenchyma. The injection of the spike protein alone caused cell death in the brain, highlighting a direct effect on brain tissue. Furthermore, we observed the presence of spike protein in the skull of deceased long after their COVID-19 infection, suggesting that the spike’s persistence may contribute to long-term neurological symptoms. The spike protein was associated with neutrophil-related pathways and dysregulation of the proteins involved in the PI3K-AKT as well as complement and coagulation pathway. Overall, our findings suggest that SARS-CoV-2 spike protein trafficking from CNS borders into the brain parenchyma and identified differentially regulated pathways may present insights into mechanisms underlying immediate and long-term consequences of SARS-CoV-2 and present diagnostic and therapeutic opportunities.

Figure
Short Summary The accumulation of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in the skull-meninges-brain axis presents potential molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets for neurological complications in long-COVID-19 patients.

~~~~~~~~

Please everyone - go to this link and watch the videos.

They are listed here:


LINK TO FULL ARTICLE: SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Accumulation in the Skull-Meninges-Brain Axis: Potential Implications for Long-Term Neurological Complications in post-COVID-19

ONE OF THE IMAGES FROM THE FULL ARTICLE:
F2.large.jpg

Spike protein exhibits multi-organ binding capacity
(A) 3D reconstructions of whole mouse body after spike protein (WT), spike S1 (N501Y), and HA injection, imaged with light-sheet microscopy. (B) 3D reconstruction of main internal organs and representative high-resolution optical section view with spike S1 (N501Y) protein and dextran labeled vasculature. Arrow heads and arrows indicate regions with and without spike S1 protein, respectively. (C) Optical section of whole-body images after spike protein (WT), spike S1 (N501Y), and HA injection. The white box area was zoomed in to check the brain. (D) Visualization of spike S1 (N501Y) protein in the intact mouse head and representative sagittal images of the skull bone marrow, SMCs and meninges. Arrow heads indicate spike S1 protein in SMCs. (E) Representative images of spike S1 (N501Y) protein in the brain.
Yes being a bio weapon makes this virus is a totally different animal
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
Yes being a bio weapon makes this virus is a totally different animal

Exactly. Being casual about having Covid, even the more mild Omicron version, is wrong thinking (imvho). It's still a spike protein introduction into your body, ie: you've been attacked by a bio-weapon. Any way you look at it. And there's going to be an issue with that, for everyone. Not just the vaxxed. :shk:

(fair use applies)

EMPHASIS IN ORIGINAL ARTICLE (not added by me)


Shocking Discovery- Northwestern University Study Finds That Mild COVID-19 Infections Triggers Enhanced Autoantibody Production Despite Vaccination
Thailand Medical News
Apr 14, 2023

New study findings are raising alarm bells as scientists have discovered that even mild cases of COVID-19 can lead to long-term autoimmune issues in patients, whether they suffer from long COVID or not. Furthermore, vaccination doesn't seem to help in reducing autoantibody levels in these individuals. These discoveries call for an urgent reassessment of vaccination and infection prevention strategies.

Long COVID, or post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC), affects about one-third of COVID-19 survivors and is characterized by persistent symptoms like fatigue, brain fog, and muscle pain. While mRNA vaccines have been successful in preventing severe acute COVID-19 cases, they haven't made a significant dent in the prevalence of long COVID.

Previous studies have associated humoral autoimmunity with severe acute COVID-19 and long COVID. However, it remained unclear whether mild cases of the virus could provoke autoantibody responses and if vaccination could reduce these responses in long COVID patients.

In this news study by scientists from Northwestern University-USA, the researchers observed three critical findings:

-First, mild COVID-19 infections led to a significant increase in autoantibody levels in long COVID patients and, to a lesser extent, in COVID convalescents without persistent symptoms.

-Second, antibodies associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and inflammatory myopathies were not reduced after receiving mRNA vaccine booster doses.

-Lastly, higher autoantibody levels in long COVID patients correlated with cognitive dysfunction and increased severity of neurological symptoms.

Alarmingly, the study revealed that over 88% of long COVID patients and 85% of convalescent controls had significant elevations in multiple autoantibodies after infection, which didn't decrease even after vaccination. This highlights the importance of preventing infection in the first place, as vaccines may not protect against autoimmune sequelae if a person contracts the virus.

Interestingly, high levels of the dermatomyositis antibody MDA5 were found exclusively in long COVID patients, suggesting that MDA5 could be a potential biomarker for long COVID. However, further research is needed to understand the common pathogenic mechanisms between long COVID and severe acute COVID-19.

Additionally, the study found that booster vaccine doses did not decrease autoantibody responses in long COVID patients or convalescent controls.

This implies that vaccination alone cannot combat autoimmunity resulting from exposure to SARS-CoV-2. Moreover, high levels of SLE autoantibodies were associated with a lower vaccine-elicited Spike IgG response in long COVID patients, indicating that the shift towards autoimmunity might reduce the protective effect of vaccination against subsequent infections.

These study findings underscore the need for additional strategies to curb the spread of SARS-CoV-2, including the development of vaccines that can prevent infection instead of merely reducing the severity of acute disease. Longitudinal studies are also necessary to determine if autoimmune responses in COVID convalescents could lead to long COVID symptoms after recurrent infections despite vaccination.

In conclusion, this groundbreaking study emphasizes the urgent need for more public health measures to reduce the spread of SARS-CoV-2 in communities, as mild COVID-19 infections can have long-lasting autoimmune consequences, regardless of vaccination status.

The study findings were published on a preprint server and are currently being peer reviewed.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)


Hilarious! COVID-19 Over? COVID-19 Now Endemic? We Must learn To Live With the Virus! Lol! COVID-19 Cases Rising Globally!
Thailand Medical News
Apr 13, 2023

I still cannot phantom how in this modern and technologically advanced age we can let entities like the WHO, the U.S. CDC, US.NIH, various elected politicians and government leaders around the world (many with no medical backgrounds!) and also the so-called medical experts whose daily advice is to simply get vaccinated or get a booster,….simply control all the COVID-19 narratives with the help of garbage mainstream media and also the social media giants.

A majority of the masses are simply ignorant and are assuming that COVID-19 is over or that it is now mild…. oblivious of the fact that COVID-19 cases are now rising globally and despite the narratives that the new XBB or XBC sub-lineages are not driving disease severity or increased deaths, we still have lots of people being hospitalized in many countries while healthcare staff are beginning to get worried again. The same goes for deaths. These days people are getting desensitized or ‘immunized’ to the fact that if there are about 400 plus people dying a day from COVID-19 in their country ..its seems ok as long as it does not happen to them or their loved ones!

The so-called COVID-19 mRNA shots that many medical experts are advocating are beginning to raise serious debates as to whether or not they are truly effective to deal the hundreds of new SARS-CoV-2 sub-lineages that have emerged in the last eight weeks. (We do not even want to touch on their adverse effects or dangers!). Many of these new sub-lineages are not only evolving to evade previous infection or vaccine induced immunity, but are evolving to evade all last remaining immunity protection conferred by the innate immune system and also by the T Cells!

Below are simply some details on the new daily COVID cases in some countries in the last 24 hours. Generally, due to lack of testing and also due to many countries trying to downplay the real COVID-19 situation, the real numbers are typically much higher. It is interesting that with ‘COVID-19 now over and it now being ‘endemic’…we are actually in a far worse situation than in the first six months of when the pandemic first broke out! Looking at the figures and kinetics of the current onslaughts, rest assured we are in for worse times.

India Logs In 10,158 New COVID-19 Cases In The Last 24 hours.

India has reported 10,158 new cases in 24 hours, highest in nearly 8 months, the Union health ministry data updated on Thursday stated. The active caseload stands at 44,998. The daily positivity rate was recorded at 4.42 per cent while the weekly positivity rate was 4.02 per cent. The nationwide COVID-19 recovery rate now stands at 98.71 per cent, according to the ministry. Deaths rates were not released yet as they are still being compiled but a spokesman at the Ministry said that it was much higher than the previous day with most deaths being reported in Kerala.

Japan Reports 9,162 New COVID-19 Cases And 19 Deaths With Tokyo Reporting 1,181 New Cases In 13th Day Of Uptrend

Japan health authorities reported 9,162 new COVID-19 cases and 19 deaths in the last 24 hours.

Local Japanese COVID-19 News outlets reported that Tokyo alone confirmed 1,181 n ew cases of COVID-19 on Thursday, up by about 70 from a week before.

Thursday’s daily count in the capital marked the 13th straight day of week-on-week increases, with the nationwide figure also having been on an uptrend.

The seven-day average of new cases in Tokyo came to 1,116.1, compared to 960.6 a week before.

The number of severe cases under Tokyo Metropolitan Government criteria fell by one from Wednesday to six, while two deaths linked to the virus were reported on Thursday.

On Wednesday, 10,068 new cases were confirmed across the country, in an increase of about 550 from a week before.

Sixteen new deaths linked to COVID-19 were reported nationwide, while the number of severe cases rose by one from Tuesday to 63.

Australia COVID-19 Cases And Hospitalizations Rising.

Reports have emerged that COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations and deaths have been rising for the week especially since after the easter break but consolidated figures have not been released yet.

In the week ending 7th of April, there was a total of 27,469 New COVID-19 infections and 77 deaths and 1,715 new hospitalizations with 48 new ICU admissions in that week for COVID-19.

COVID-19 Cases Rising In South Korea.

South Korea's new COVID-19 caseload stayed above 10,000 for the second straight day Wednesday, as public gatherings rise amid warmer weather.

The country reported 13,926 cases, including nine cases from overseas, bringing the total caseload to 30,944,430, the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (KDCA) said.

Wednesday's tally is a slight increase from 12,444 a day earlier but around 500 lower than the same day a week ago.

The country added 14 COVID-19 deaths, raising the death toll to 34,356. The number of critically ill patients came to 129, up from 128 a day earlier.

The weekly average number of infections rose 6.2 percent from the previous week, the KDCA said.

Health authorities have been closely monitoring the daily tally after the government lifted most COVID-19 restrictions, including the mask mandate on public transportation. The mask mandate remains in place for medical facilities, pharmacies and other infection-prone places.

COVID-19 Cases Rising In the United States While Trans Issues Are More Important

In the United States, COVID-19 data obtained from 25 out of 50 states showed about 16,023 new COVID-19 cases in the last 24 hours and 497 COVID-19 deaths with 1027 new COVID-19 hospitalizations and 138 new ICU admissions for COVID-19 in the last 24 hours. The real figures countrywide could be massive but Americans are being denied that data due to policies by the Biden administration which is more focused on Trans issues at the moment.

COVID-19 Cases Rising Elsewhere

COVID-19 cases are also rising in Singapore, Indonesia and in Europe, France is seeing a new rise in COVID-19 cases and in the Middle east, Iran and Kuwait are see new rise in COVID-19 cases and also hospitalizations.

We will be providing more detailed updates in coming hours.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)


California church must pay $1.2M for breaking COVID rules
today

SAN JOSE, Calif. (AP) — A California church that defied safety regulations during the COVID-19 pandemic by holding large, unmasked religious services must pay $1.2 million in fines, a judge has ruled.

Calvary Chapel in San Jose was fined last week for ignoring Santa Clara County’s mask-wearing rules between November 2020 and June 2021.

The church will appeal, attorney Mariah Gondeiro told the San Jose Mercury News.

Calvary was one of several large California evangelical churches that flouted state and local mask-wearing and social distancing rules designed to prevent the spread of COVID-19 during its deadliest period.

That has led to a tangled web of court rulings and challenges.

Calvary Chapel sued the county, arguing the health orders violated its religious freedom. Various courts have ruled either in favor the church or the county.

The church and its pastors were previously held in contempt of court and fined for violating limits on indoor public gatherings. But a state appellate court reversed those decisions last year, saying that the restrictions on indoor worship services were stricter than for secular activities such as going to grocery stores.

The county continued to seek fines for violations of mask-wearing regulations.

“It should appear clear to all — regardless of religious affiliation — that wearing a mask while worshiping one’s god and communing with other congregants is a simple, unobtrusive, giving way to protect others while still exercising your right to religious freedom,” Superior Court Judge Evette D. Pennypacker wrote in the April 7 ruling imposing the fines.

The church, she said, flouted public health orders “and urged others to do so ‘who cares what the cost,’ including death.”

County Counsel James Williams said the ruling showed the court “once again saw through Calvary’s unsupported claims and found them meritless.”

“The county’s response to the pandemic, including the health officer’s public health orders and enforcement against entities that refused to follow the law, saved thousands of lives and resulted in one of the lowest death rates of any community in the United States,” Williams said.

More than 101,000 Californians have died from COVID-19, according to state public health figures. Death and infection rates have fallen since the height of the virus’ spread, and Gov. Gavin Newsom officially ended the state’s coronavirus emergency several months ago.

Last week, the California Department of Public Health ended masking and coronavirus vaccination requirements in high-risk settings, including health care facilities and prisons.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)


VSS Scientific Updates During Pandemic Times #54
Geert Vanden Bossche

April 13, 2023

1. US Energy Department Assesses Covid-19 Likely Resulted from Lab Leak

“The latest assessment further adds to the divide in the US government over whether the Covid-19 pandemic began in China in 2019 as the result of a lab leak or whether it emerged naturally. The various intelligence agencies have been split on the matter for years. In 2021, the intelligence community declassified a report that showed four agencies in the intelligence community had assessed with low confidence that the virus likely jumped from animals to humans naturally in the wild, while one assessed with moderate confidence that the pandemic was the result of a laboratory accident.”



2. Stroke Consultations Shoot Up by 25% Since Vaccine Rollout

“The data suggest that something is going on with blood clotting within the population of the U.K., resulting in an increase in strokes and presumably other conditions such as deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Although the U.S. FDA and CDC claim (without offering supporting data) that there isn’t really a net increase in strokes associated with the vaccines, the data available from the NHS suggest that there might well be a non-trivial increased risk. Our population deserve a comprehensive study into the risks associated with blood clotting in this post-Covid and post-vaccine age.”


6437c202c2af0010246d748a_Afbeelding2.png



3. Creating Social Beauty in Response to Abusive Silence

“The silence on the part of the promoters of the COVID-19 mass vaccination campaign—i.e., their refusal to comment on the thoughtful analyses of challenging scientists/physicians and their refusal to enter into any scientific dialogue—represents an abusive tactic, especially when used as a deliberate tactic, but also when more innocently used by the most passive promoters of the campaign. It represents a powerful form of psychological abuse that can adversely affect not only those who challenge the prevailing COVID-19 narrative but also the Public.”


4. Forgotten “Primum Non Nocere” and Increased Mortality after Covid-19 Vaccination

Vaccinated infected groups appear to have higher average mortality than their non-vaccinated infected counterparts. The findings suggest the legitimacy of extending the statistic between vaccinated living and vaccinated dead individuals for different age groups. Calculating the impact of Covid-19 vaccination on the mortality rate is a necessary step toward satisfying the first principle of medicine: “Primum non nocere”, “Do no harm”.


5. The Canaries in the Human DNA Mine

“Decades of sophisticated and detailed legislation created to safeguard Humanity from exposure to Genetically Modified Organisms, was ignored or legislated away in an instant when SARS-CoV-2 arrived. This was done with intention, and not for the good of Humanity.”

 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Posted for fair use.....

Covid in India: New variant causes unique symptom in children, say reports​

Expert says apart from high fever, cold and cough, the Arcturus variant causes eye disease, which was not seen in earlier waves​

By Web Desk​

Published: Sat 15 Apr 2023, 12:09 AM
As Covid-19 cases in India has been rising after an interval, a new variant is causing unique symptom in children, experts have said.

Symptoms of the XBB 1.16 variant, also known as Arcturus, causes high fever, cold, cough and itchy conjunctivitis with sticky eyes, news reports quoted Vipin M Vashishtha, former convenor of the Indian Academy of Paediatrics.

“For the last 2 days, have started getting pediatric Covid cases once again after a gap of 6 mo! An infantile phenotype seems emerging—treated infants w/ high fever, cold & cough, & non-purulent, itchy conjunctivitis w/ sticky eyes, not seen in earlier waves,” Vashishta tweeted on April 6.

ALSO READ:

India recorded 11,109 new cases of Covid-19 infection in the last 24 hours, the country’s health ministry said on Friday. On Thursday, India recorded 10,158 new Covid-19 cases, 30 per cent more than Wednesday.



"All eyes should be on India! If XBB.1.16 aka #Arcturus could succeed in wading through the 'sturdy' population immunity of Indians that successfully resisted the onslaught of variants like BA.2.75, BA.5, BQs, and XBB.1.5, then the whole world must be seriously worried!!" Vashishta said in another tweet.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)


‘Arcturus,’ a COVID variant sweeping India, is now in the U.S., the CDC says—and it’s coming in hot. What it means for the future of the pandemic

Erin Prater - FORTUNE
Fri, April 14, 2023, 12:57 PM EDT

A new Omicron spawn fueling a surge of cases in India—considered the most transmissible COVID variant yet—has reached reportable levels in the U.S., the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said Friday.

And it’s coming in hot. XBB.1.16, dubbed “Arcturus” by variant trackers, is estimated to be behind 7% of COVID cases in the country this week, according to the CDC’s Nowcast, a viral forecast released each Friday by the national public health agency. The variant doesn’t look to cause more severe disease, according to a COVID situation report released Thursday by the World Health Organization.
Raj Rajnarayanan@RajlabN
#SARSCoV2 #VariantProportions - #USA |04/14/23
New @CDCgov #Nowcast estimates:
>> XBB.1.16, XBB.1.9.2 and FD.2 make an entry! <<
Top circulating lineages:
XBB.1.5 (78%)
XBB.1.16 (7.2%)
XBB.1.9.1 (6.5%)
XBB.1.9.2 (2.5%)
--
FD.2 (1.7%)COVID Data Tracker
1/n pic.twitter.com/AjAusZVYS2
11:10 AM April 14, 2023


Friday was the first time the CDC had assigned XBB.1.16 its own category. Before then, cases had been lumped under XBB.

XBB variants hold the top six spots in the U.S. when it comes to variant frequency. XBB.1.5, also known as “Kraken,” rose to U.S. and global prominence during a winter wave of cases. It’s still thought to represent more than three-quarters of U.S. cases, though levels are waning.

XBB.1.9.1, XBB.1.9.2, and XBB.1.5.1 hold the third, fourth, and fifth spots, respectively, each representing an estimated 2.4% to 6.5% of cases.

FD.2—a shortened name for another XBB spawn, XBB.1.5.15—comes in at No. 6, and is estimated to fuel nearly 2% of U.S. cases this week.

XBB.1.5 is still technically “top dog” in the U.S., but it “looks spent,” Raj Rajnarayanan, assistant dean of research and associate professor at the New York Institute of Technology campus in Jonesboro, Ark., and a top COVID variant tracker, tells Fortune.

While XBB.1.16 looks to be on the path for eventual U.S. dominance, other up-and-coming Omicron spawn could provide competition, Rajnarayanan says—like XBB.2.3 and descendants, and XBC.1.6 and descendants.

In the U.S., levels of XBB.1.16 are highest in the south central region, where they are projected to represent more than 20% of cases, and on the West Coast, where they hover around 10%, according to the CDC. They’re lowest in the Northeast, where they’re estimated to fuel less than 2.5% of cases.


Rising cases in India, with a possible new symptom


Reported COVID cases are on the decline in much of the world, as is testing. But reported cases are increasing in the WHO’s Southeast Asia region, which includes India, Indonesia, Thailand, Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Maldives, Bhutan, and Timor-Leste, according to the international health organization’s latest epidemiological update.

In fact, they’re up nearly 500% month over month in the region, with cases in India responsible for much of the rise. Reported cases are also trending upward in the organization’s Eastern Mediterranean region—there, they’ve increased slightly more than 100% month over month.

COVID deaths are also rising in both regions, up 109% month over month in Southeast Asia and 138% in the Eastern Mediterranean, according to the report.

India’s health ministry is holding mock drills to ensure that hospitals are prepared for a groundswell of COVID cases, the BBC reported Monday, noting that some states have again made mask-wearing in public mandatory.

Levels of XBB.1.16 are also rising in the U.S., Singapore, and Australia, among other countries, according to data from GISAID, an international research database that tracks changes in COVID and the flu virus. The variant has so far been identified in 29 countries, and reported sequences of it more than doubled from the last full week of March to the first partial week of April, according to the WHO’s Thursday update.
Raj Rajnarayanan@RajlabN
XBB.1.16 has the potential to outcompete all other circulating lineages.
Everyone is closely watching XBB.1.16 hotspots for clues
Tracker: https://t.co/VaSl5Y3js3…
5/n
10:32 PM April 14, 2023

Reports from India indicate that the variant’s symptom set may be changing—at least slightly, and at least in children. Cases of conjunctivitis, or pink eye, without pus, but causing “sticky eye” are on the rise among children in the country. It’s a symptom that hasn’t often been noted with other COVID variants, Dr. Vipin Vashishtha—a pediatrician in India and former head of the Indian Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Immunization—tweeted last week.

There are “lots of anecdotals of pediatric conjunctivitis in India” right now, Rajnarayanan told Fortune on Monday. Richard Reithinger, an infectious disease epidemiologist at the nonprofit research institute RTI International, told Fortune on Monday that he’s also heard such reports, but that it’s “probably too early to tell” if the virus’s symptom set has truly shifted.

Cases of adenovirus in children are also reportedly on the rise in India. Adenovirus can also cause conjunctivitis—and it’s impossible to distinguish the two viruses from each other without testing.


Pandemic now in an ‘age of recombinants’


The pandemic is now in the “age of recombinants”—or existing variants that have combined with each other to potentially wreak more havoc—Ryan Gregory, a biology professor at the University of Guelph in Ontario, Canada, told Fortune earlier this week. He has spearheaded efforts to assign “street names” like Arcturus and Kraken to variants when the WHO chose not to assign new Greek letters to them, in an effort to make some sense out of the COVID alphabet soup.

XBB.1.16 is a recombinant of two descendants of so-called stealth Omicron BA.2. A preprint study updated Sunday from scientists at the University of Tokyo suggests that the variant spreads about 1.17 to 1.27 times as efficiently as relatives XBB.1 and XBB.1.5, the latter of which still dominates U.S. cases.

XBB.1.16’s increased ability to outpace other variants suggests that it “will spread worldwide in the near future,” researchers wrote, adding that the variant is “robustly resistant” to antibodies from a variety of COVID variants, including “stealth Omicron” BA.2 and BA.5, which surged globally last summer.

That means it could cause cases to rise again, even in areas that have recently seen increased COVID infections—and especially if those infections stemmed from either BA.2, BA.5, or their descendants.

New variants may not always cause “waves” of cases anymore. That’s because a continual parade of new Omicron variants creates a baseline of infections that remains “unsustainably high,” Gregory says.

For most people, severe disease from COVID isn’t an issue right now—especially not for the vaccinated. In that regard, XBB.1.16 may not change much, if anything. But with its record-setting growth advantage, and continued breakneck evolution, the variant is indicative of a concerning trend, experts say.

A surge of even a supposedly mild COVID variant should be avoided “because every new infection provides the virus an opportunity to evolve and create new recombinants to further evade immunity,” Vashishtha tweeted Wednesday.

Why even a surge of a supposedly a ‘mild’ variant should be avoided? Because every new infection provides the virus an opportunity to evolve & create new recombinants to further evade immunity. This case is more worrying for a virus like SARS2. 1/
— Vipin M. Vashishtha (@vipintukur) April 13, 2023

Because spread of the virus fuels the evolution of new, potentially concerning variants, it’s a mistake to ignore infections and worry only about rates of hospitalizations and deaths, he added.

Rajnarayanan says his level of discomfort with the virus will increase all the more if Omicron spawn begin to pick up mutations that enhance their usage of TMPRSS2, an enzyme that helps COVID gain access to the cells it infects.

Such mutations could result in a variant with the highly transmissible nature of Omicron and the more severe symptom set of Delta, including a potential return to lung involvement—a development scientists have anticipated for months.

Such a scenario, while not a “nightmare,” would be “a problem,” he says.

With so much about COVID up in the air less than a month away from May 11, the day the U.S. public health emergency (PHE) is set to expire, Rajnarayanan questions whether it’s the right time for such a move—especially if it threatens viral surveillance.

“If you end the PHE, make sure the virus gets the memo too,” he says.
 
Top