CORONA Main Coronavirus thread

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Morbidly Obese White House Reporter Urges Biden Admin to Pressure CDC to Reverse Updated Mask Guidance (VIDEO)

By Cristina Laila
Published May 17, 2021 at 1:46pm
IMG_1209-1.jpg

Morbidly obese White House reporter, Yamiche Alcindor urged the Biden Admin to put pressure on the CDC to reverse the updated mask guidance.

In March, the CDC is finally admitted what we’ve known all along: the overwhelming majority of people who were hospitalized or died from Covid were obese or overweight.

“As clinicians develop care plans for COVID-19 patients, they should consider the risk for severe outcomes in patients with higher BMIs, especially for those with severe obesity,” the agency wrote.

Last Thursday the CDC updated its guidance on masks and said fully vaccinated people do not need to wear masks indoors.

This greatly upset the morbidly obese and Covid cultists who are suffering from a myriad of severe mental illnesses.

The hypochondriacs suffering from a fear of breathing fresh air, want to cling to their masks and they want everyone else to wear masks too.

Yamichie Alcindor (who wasn’t wearing a mask during the White House briefing) also made mask wearing about race, because why not?

VIDEO:
View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1394332543294623745
.29 min
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

BOOM! CDC Director Finally Admits that COVID Cases are Hugely Over-Counted — Just as Gateway Pundit and Donald Trump Reported in August

By Jim Hoft
Published May 17, 2021 at 9:27am
FCF1F746-B342-4FC1-BA9C-FA1859B9C63E-scaled.jpeg

In August 2020 The Gateway Pundit’s Joe Hoft posted an article about COVID-19 that sent shockwaves throughout the internet — The CDC website admitted that only around 6% of COVID recorded deaths were due entirely to the Coronavirus-

SHOCK REPORT: This Week CDC Quietly Updated COVID-19 Numbers – Only 9,210 Americans Died From COVID-19 Alone – Rest Had Different Other Serious Illnesses

The gist of the reporte was that COVID-19 is not nearly as deadly as first projected by the WHO and then by Dr. Tony Fauci and Dr. Debra Birx. Based on CDC numbers in Ausust only 6% of all deaths attributed to COVID-19 were instances where the only factor in the individual’s death was due to COVI9-19.

From the CDC website.

cdc-numbers-covid-.jpg


For all the other deaths reported by the CDC linked to COVID-19, the individuals who passed away had 2-3 other serious illnesses or co-morbidities.

This came from actual data from the CDC and was tweeted by Mel Q on Twitter.

Twitter user Mel Q shared a calculation which showed that 6% of all COVID-19 deaths as reported by the CDC turned out to be 9,201 deaths at the time.

Only 9,201 people died in the US according to August numbers where COVID-19 was the only cause of death.


Tweet-by-Mel-Q-385x600.jpg

We used Mel Q’s tweet in our report and the President of the United States retweeted Mel Q’s tweet as well.

But Twitter took down the tweet claiming fake news. They notified Mel Q that the tweet that used actual CDC data “violated their policy on misleading information about COVID-19.” Her account was suspended from posting for 12 hours.


Then the far left hacks at CNN wrote an article about this calculation, the President’s retweet and our article entitled – Twitter removes QAnon supporter’s false claim about coronavirus death statistics that Trump had retweeted. They refused to look at the science.

On Sunday CDC Director Rochelle Walensky finally admitted that “many, many hospitals” were counting COVID deaths to include cases that were not COVID deaths.

The Gateway Pundit was right.

Trump was right.

The tech giants and CNN were wrong again pushing fake news.


But we were the ones who were punished.

We see this a lot.

The Epoch Times reported:
Of the people who died after being fully vaccinated, 42 were asymptomatic or not related to COVID-19, according to the CDC. Additionally, 342 of the hospitalizations were asymptomatic or not related to COVID-19.

“Many, many hospitals are screening people for COVID when they come in, so not all of those 223 cases who had COVID actually died of COVID. They may have had mild disease, but died, for example, of a heart attack,” CDC Director Rochelle Walensky said on CNN’s “State of the Union” on Sunday.

Under the usual counting program, people who have not been vaccinated but who die of heart attacks or other causes are typically listed as a COVID-19 death.
Here is the video of CDC Director Walensky on CNN.

View: https://youtu.be/r7GJHUh4Nto
11:01 min
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Watch: Fauci Declares Pandemic Has Highlighted How Racist America Is

MONDAY, MAY 17, 2021 - 03:05 PM
Authored by Steve Watson via Summit News,

The White House Senior Medical Advisor Anthony Fauci stated Sunday that the coronavirus pandemic has revealed that the US is a fundamentally racist country.

Speaking to graduates of Emory University, Fauci declared that the virus has revealed the “undeniable effects of racism in our society.”

“Covid-19 has shone a bright light on our own society’s failings,” said Fauci, arguing that African Americans, Hispanics, and Native Americans are all more susceptible to the virus because of pre-existing health conditions stemming directly from social factors including “access to healthcare” and “availability of an adequate diet.”

“Very few of these comorbidities have racial determinants,” Fauci claimed, further stating “Almost all relate to the social determinants of health dating back to disadvantageous conditions that some people of color find themselves in from birth regarding the availability of an adequate diet, access to healthcare and the undeniable effects of racism in our society.

Watch:
View: https://youtu.be/w6EkSceuErQ
2:54 min

Meanwhile, Senator Rand Paul has continued to criticise Fauci, urging Friday that he is a “little dictator” who “acts like an ignoramus every day” where mask mandates are concerned.

Appearing on Fox News, Paul stated that Fauci “probably has the highest IQ for someone who actually acts like an ignoramus every day of the week.”

After Fauci decreed that kids should keep wearing masks, leading to the CDC head echoing his calls, Paul countered “Kids don’t get this disease. When they do get it, it’s a mild form.

They don’t transmit it well. We’ve got two years worth of evidence on this.”

“They [the CDC] still have their camp provision. They want them going around camp wearing a mask, doing the 6-foot stuff,” Paul continued, adding “There’s no science behind it. It’s all conjecture, it’s all Tony Fauci, his way or the highway.”
“Mr. Little Dictator . . . If Fauci wants kids to mask up and wear masks everywhere, he should show us the science,” Paul emphasised.
Watch:
View: https://youtu.be/np5X-x2ACJ8
4:38 min

[COMMENT: No mention of the fact that skin color effects the amount of D3 absorbed into a person's system from solar exposure (e.g. effecting their immunity to disease.)]
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Vaccine Passports And Medical Paternalism

MONDAY, MAY 17, 2021 - 03:30 AM
Authored by Birsen Filip via The Mises Institute,

Vaccine passports have been implemented, or are being developed, in a number of countries around the world. In February 2021, Israel introduced its "Green Pass," which becomes "effective the week after receiving the second dose" of the vaccine and expires after six months. It was followed by China, which launched its digital "International Travel Health Certificate" in March. Subsequently, in April, Denmark implemented its "Coronapas" and Estonia introduced its "VaccineGuard." Although the United States government recently dismissed the idea of a national vaccine passport, the state of New York has already launched its own "Excelsior Pass," and several other states are developing similar programs, whereas South Dakota, Montana, Idaho, Utah, Florida, Texas and Arizona have banned the use of COVID-19 immunity passports within their borders. Other countries have also announced their intentions to launch vaccine passports in the near future, including: the United Kingdom, which will be using an NHS (National Health Service) phone app as its COVID-19 vaccine passport starting on May 17th; and, the European Union, which is planning to "facilitate free movement inside the EU" with its "Digital Green Certificate" as of June.



In addition to prohibiting unvaccinated people from travelling (e.g., boarding airplanes, staying at hotels, etc.), these electronic documents are already being used to prevent them from attending social and cultural events at stadiums, theaters, and museums. Unvaccinated citizens are also not being permitted to enter a variety of other venues and businesses like gyms, dance clubs and studios, swimming pools, hair salons, wedding halls, tattoo parlours, restaurants, and coffee shops, among others. Essentially, the implementation of vaccine passports has led to a situation where governments protect the rights and freedoms of vaccinated citizens, while infringing upon those of their unvaccinated counterparts.

The ultimate goal of vaccine passports, which are based on the notion of "health paternalism," is to coerce people into accepting injections of the experimental vaccines that have been incessantly promoted by politicians, mainstream news, and unelected medical experts for many months. However, those individuals that are not persuaded to submit themselves to unwanted medical procedures by sophisticated propaganda techniques will be forced to live a "life worse than death" through the suspension of their freedom, as well as the reasonable enjoyment of their lives within their private spheres. James M. Buchanan warned about coercive government measures that abolished liberty, as he argued that state regulations designed to protect individuals based on "scientific grounds" were "highly deceiving," because the state is essentially using scientific authority to impose a single moral value on society. Similarly, Robert D. Tollison and Richard E. Wagner argued that allowing the state to impose regulations on the premise of protecting the health of its citizens presented "an open invitation to tomorrow’s arguments about the social cost of sugar, sunbathing, saturated fat, recreational injuries, obesity, and on and on. Down this road lies not a free society but a totally regulated society with only one acceptable lifestyle as prescribed by the health paternalists." Milton Friedman was also opposed to "the health paternalists," as he argued that if the government was given the responsibility to protect our health, "the logic surely calls" for protecting "us from using dangerous bicycles and cap guns, the logic calls for prohibiting still more dangerous activities such as hang-gliding, motorcycling, and skiing." In his own opposition to "health paternalism," Mises asked:
why limit the government’s benevolent providence to the protection of the individual’s body only? Is not the harm a man can inflict on his mind and soul even more disastrous than any bodily evils? Why not prevent him from reading bad books and seeing bad plays, from looking at bad paintings and statues and from hearing bad music?
Vaccination passports support the idea that people can and should be coerced into making healthy choices, which would be condemned as "a form of health fascism" by Hayek, Buchanan, Friedman, Mises, and many other contributors to liberal theory across history. In fact, they would likely argue that vaccine passports eliminate freedom, because they allow an external authority to deliberately interfere in the lives of unvaccinated people in ways that prevent them from attaining their goals, and pursuing their personal interests. For instance, Hayek, Buchanan, Friedman, and Mises defined freedom as "the absence of coercion of a man by his fellow men." With that in mind, they warned that the primary danger to freedom was any form of strong central power that intervenes in the private spheres of individuals and implements policies aimed at achieving a predetermined end based on expert scientific opinion.

Freedom from coercion, known as the negative concept of freedom ("freedom from"), was highly valued by Locke, Constant, Tocqueville, Hobbes, Bentham, Hayek, Mises, Friedman, and Buchanan, in addition to many other liberals. All of these prominent thinkers were preoccupied with answering one question: "How much am I to be governed?" In doing so, they were largely reacting against despotic and tyrannical rulers and governments. Proponents of the concept of negative freedom believed that ‘there should be always a frontier between public and private spheres, and that individuals should always be free to do as they please and live as they like when they are in their private spheres,’ where no one would be permitted to intervene. However, the implementation of vaccine passports would essentially mean that protected individual private spheres do not exist for governments and their so-called health experts. This is something that Hayek warned about when he argued that coercion would "be much more common" if there were no protected private spheres.

Based on the concept of freedom advocated by Hayek, Buchanan, Friedman, and Mises, vaccine passports also violate economic freedom, which basically refers to the freedom to consume, produce, exchange, and cooperate spontaneously and voluntarily. They believed that "if one abolishes man’s freedom to determine his own consumption, one takes all freedoms away." In other words, if coercive state actions violated or abolished economic freedom, then general freedom would essentially be taken away from individuals, including freedom of speech, freedom of expression, freedom of religion, freedom of assembly, freedom of the press, and intellectual freedom.

The concept of freedom defended by Hayek, Buchanan, Mises, and Friedman aimed to safeguard "the maximum degree of freedom for each individual separately that is compatible with one man’s freedom not interfering with other men’s freedom." For them, a wider the area of non-interference and a broader the range of choices available to individuals corresponded to a greater degree of freedom. On countless occasions, these prominent liberals warned that in order to have freedom, the coercive power of any entity had to be limited, especially that of the government. They had faith that the legal system would be enough to avoid heading down "the road to serfdom" (road to unfreedom) by preventing state authorities from possessing unlimited powers that they could use to coerce as they please. However, since the onset of the pandemic, legal systems in country after country have failed to safeguard the private spheres of individuals from interference or coercion on the part of the state.

During this pandemic, much of the world has been subjected to the sudden and rapid implementation of poorly thought-out rules and policies, based on the incompetent and inexperienced central planning and design of the state. These decisions were often made by consulting only a handful of medical advisors who are not trained in areas like political science, economics, sociology, finance, history, demographics, psychology, philosophy, ethics, anthropology, and law, all of which offer important considerations for decisions that affect the whole society and the common good. In essence, politicians, in cooperation with their unelected health advisors, have managed to gain control over entire societies and reshape them in a failed effort to achieve the common good, while disregarding centuries of progress made by prominent liberal thinkers when it comes to protecting the rights and freedoms of individuals. Now, these same politicians are determined to impose vaccine passports, which will vastly expand oppressive state powers, while marginalizing unvaccinated people by suppressing their rights and freedoms, and robbing them of their ability to achieve happiness and self-development. Moreover, these oppressive governments and leaders that are pushing for vaccine passports will not forewarn those people who do not want to be injected with experimental substances about what awaits them:
You will think like me or die; he says: You are free not to think as I do; your life, your goods, everything remains with you; but from this day on you are a stranger among us. You will keep your privileges as a citizen, but they will become useless to you. If you aspire to be the choice of your fellow citizens, they will not choose you, and if you ask only for their esteem, they will still pretend to refuse it to you. You will remain among men, but you will lose your rights to humanity. When you approach your fellows, they will flee from you like an impure being. And those who believe in your innocence, even they will abandon you, for people would flee from them in turn. Go in peace; I spare your life, but I leave you a life worse than death.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

‘If the truth comes out on Wuhan biolab, people will go to jail’…
Posted by Kane on May 17, 2021 3:03 pm
war room.JPG Rumble video 1:42 min

Dr. Lawrence Sellin this morning on War Room

Rumble video 2:06 min

‘It’s Really Widespread’ — U.S. Collaborating with Chinese Military to Weaponize Other Viruses
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

[UK] Report: Government Scientific Advisors Admit They Used ‘Totalitarian’ Fear Tactics To Control People During Pandemic

“The way we have used fear is dystopian”

17 May, 2021
Steve Watson
GettyImages-1214266712.jpg

SEAN GLADWELL / Getty Images


Scientists in the UK working as advisors for the government have expressed regret for using what they now admit to be “unethical” and “totalitarian” methods of instilling fear in the population in order to control behaviour during the pandemic, according to a report.

The London Telegraph reports the comments made by Members of the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behaviour (SPI-B), a sub-committee of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage) the government’s chief scientific advisory group.

The report quotes a briefing from March 2020, as the first lockdown was decreed, that stated the government should drastically increase “the perceived level of personal threat” that the virus poses because “a substantial number of people still do not feel sufficiently personally threatened”.

One scientist with the SPI-B admits that “In March [2020] the Government was very worried about compliance and they thought people wouldn’t want to be locked down. There were discussions about fear being needed to encourage compliance, and decisions were made about how to ramp up the fear.”

The unnamed scientist adds that “The way we have used fear is dystopian.”

The scientist further confessed that “The use of fear has definitely been ethically questionable.

It’s been like a weird experiment. Ultimately, it backfired because people became too scared.”

Another separate scientist on the subcommittee professed “You could call psychology ‘mind control’. That’s what we do… clearly we try and go about it in a positive way, but it has been used nefariously in the past.”

Another scientist warned that “We have to be very careful about the authoritarianism that is creeping in,” adding “people use the pandemic to grab power and drive through things that wouldn’t happen otherwise.”

According to the report, another researcher with the group acknowledged that “Without a vaccine, psychology is your main weapon,” adding that “Psychology has had a really good epidemic, actually.”

Yet another scientist on the subcommittee stated that they have been “stunned by the weaponisation of behavioural psychology” over the past year, and warned that “psychologists didn’t seem to notice when it stopped being altruistic and became manipulative.”

“They have too much power and it intoxicates them”, the scientist further warned.

The comments were collected by author Laura Dodsworth, for her book A State of Fear, out today, that explores the government’s actions during the pandemic.
1621286650099.png1621286695299.png
When the Telegraph asked the subcommittee for comment on the findings, SPI-B psychologist Gavin Morgan replied “Clearly, using fear as a means of control is not ethical. Using fear smacks of totalitarianism. It’s not an ethical stance for any modern government.”

Morgan added that “By nature I am an optimistic person, but all this has given me a more pessimistic view of people.”

Commenting on the revelations, Conservative Steve Baker, a member of a group of anti-lockdown MPs said “If it is true that the state took the decision to terrify the public to get compliance with rules, that raises extremely serious questions about the type of society we want to become.”

“Do I fear that Government policy today is playing into the roots of totalitarianism? Yes, of course it is,” Baker urged.
1621286744513.png1621286789970.png
The government state of fear continues minute by minute as government ministers are now suggesting that so called ‘freedom day’ in the UK (a situation where the government permits people to have basic rights is not freedom) on June 21st is under threat because a sizeable portion of the population is refusing to take the vaccine:
1621286830887.png1621286938184.png
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Embattled California Governor Gavin Newsom Will Keep Mask Mandate in Place Until June 15, Because Science

By Cristina Laila
Published May 17, 2021 at 3:40pm
1
Gavin-Newsom-Coronavirus-California-Lockdown-03192020.jpg

Embattled California Governor Gavin Newsom (D) will keep his state’s mask mandate in place until June 15, because science.

Out of no where the CDC last Thursday announced fully vaccinated people will no longer be required to wear masks indoors.

CDC Director Rochelle Walensky said she’s just following the evolving science.

“We now have science that has really just evolved even in the last two weeks that demonstrates that these vaccines are safe, they are effective,” Walensky told Martha Raddatz.

Many Democrat governors caved following the CDC’s updated guidance on masks and lifted their state’s mask mandates.

But not California.

Newsom, who is facing a recall election for his disastrous lockdown policies and hypocrisy, is digging in his heels and keeping California’s mask mandate in place for another month.
Starting June 15, fully vaccinated people in California will not need to wear masks indoors or outdoors.

It is unclear how people will prove they are vaccinated, or if they will need to prove it.
1621287432554.png

Noted attorney Harmeet Dhillon said if anyone tries to make her show papers of her private health status in order to move about freely in public spaces, she will sue.
1621287367560.png
 

Troke

On TB every waking moment

BOOM! CDC Director Finally Admits that COVID Cases are Hugely Over-Counted — Just as Gateway Pundit and Donald Trump Reported in August

By Jim Hoft
Published May 17, 2021 at 9:27am
FCF1F746-B342-4FC1-BA9C-FA1859B9C63E-scaled.jpeg

In August 2020 The Gateway Pundit’s Joe Hoft posted an article about COVID-19 that sent shockwaves throughout the internet — The CDC website admitted that only around 6% of COVID recorded deaths were due entirely to the Coronavirus-

SHOCK REPORT: This Week CDC Quietly Updated COVID-19 Numbers – Only 9,210 Americans Died From COVID-19 Alone – Rest Had Different Other Serious Illnesses

The gist of the reporte was that COVID-19 is not nearly as deadly as first projected by the WHO and then by Dr. Tony Fauci and Dr. Debra Birx. Based on CDC numbers in Ausust only 6% of all deaths attributed to COVID-19 were instances where the only factor in the individual’s death was due to COVI9-19.

From the CDC website.

cdc-numbers-covid-.jpg


For all the other deaths reported by the CDC linked to COVID-19, the individuals who passed away had 2-3 other serious illnesses or co-morbidities.

This came from actual data from the CDC and was tweeted by Mel Q on Twitter.

Twitter user Mel Q shared a calculation which showed that 6% of all COVID-19 deaths as reported by the CDC turned out to be 9,201 deaths at the time.

Only 9,201 people died in the US according to August numbers where COVID-19 was the only cause of death.


Tweet-by-Mel-Q-385x600.jpg

We used Mel Q’s tweet in our report and the President of the United States retweeted Mel Q’s tweet as well.

But Twitter took down the tweet claiming fake news. They notified Mel Q that the tweet that used actual CDC data “violated their policy on misleading information about COVID-19.” Her account was suspended from posting for 12 hours.


Then the far left hacks at CNN wrote an article about this calculation, the President’s retweet and our article entitled – Twitter removes QAnon supporter’s false claim about coronavirus death statistics that Trump had retweeted. They refused to look at the science.

On Sunday CDC Director Rochelle Walensky finally admitted that “many, many hospitals” were counting COVID deaths to include cases that were not COVID deaths.

The Gateway Pundit was right.

Trump was right.

The tech giants and CNN were wrong again pushing fake news.


But we were the ones who were punished.

We see this a lot.

The Epoch Times reported:





Here is the video of CDC Director Walensky on CNN.

View: https://youtu.be/r7GJHUh4Nto
11:01 min
Why this campaign to get Cuomo off the hook? (Metaphor there)
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Report: China’s Military Weapon COVID-19 Was Constructed Completely Under the Command and Control of the Chinese Military

By Joe Hoft
Published May 18, 2021 at 8:02am
IMG_8975-600x374.jpg

Guest post by Lawrence Sellin

The COVID-19 virus may have been released in Wuhan, but like all modern military weapons, it was jointly developed and manufactured.

There are still gaps in the story, but here is what is presently known.

The creation of the COVID-19 virus was entirely under the command and control of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA), led by presumed head of China’s biowarfare program, Major General Wei Chen, while under the day-to-day supervision of key members of the Academy of Military Medical Sciences.

AMMS.jpg

The scientists and resources accessed to advance the project included both Chinese and U.S. universities and research institutions.

Finding a bat coronavirus backbone for the COVID-19
Largely based on an examination of Chinese-language documents and scientific publications, one can state that the Military Veterinary Research Institute and the Institute of Zoonotic Diseases in Changchun, Jilin Province, China, led by People’s Liberation Army General Ningyi Jin and retired General Xianzhu Xia, are core elements of China’s biowarfare program.

vets.jpg

At least four subordinates of Xianzhu Xia and Ningyi Jin have been engaged in a massive domestic and international virus collection effort for over eight years: Biao He, Quanshui Fan, Changchun Tu and Zhiqiang Wu.

Biao He, together with Changjun Wang of the Third Military Medical University, played a key role in the isolation of bat coronaviruses ZC45 and ZXC21, claimed by Chinese whistleblower Dr. Li-Meng Yan to be the viral backbones for COVID-19.

Ningyi Jin has extensive experience in experimentation with coronaviruses.

In addition to his research connections, some of which can be traced back to the United States, there are two aspects of Ningyi Jin’s research activities that raise red flags.

Not only does he use genetic engineering extensively, but Ningyi Jin is one of a number of scientists in China, who, since 2007, have conducted experiments with a transgenic mouse model containing the human receptor for coronaviruses.

That is, any one of those Chinese laboratories could have quickly pre-adapted a coronavirus for human infection using that mouse model and a technique called “serial passaging.”

Inserting the furin polybasic cleavage site, the “smoking gun” for the laboratory origin of COVID-19
Monobasic furin cleavage sites represented by a R-S or arginine-serine sequence are common in coronaviruses, where arginine is the chemically basic amino acid.

In contrast, the furin polybasic cleavage site, PRRARS (proline-arginine-arginine-alanine-arginine-serine) found in the COVID-19 virus is not present in any of its close bat coronavirus relatives and whose presence cannot be explained by a natural evolutionary process.

The artificial insertion of the furin polybasic cleavage site into a bat coronavirus backbone was likely done under the supervision of Shibo Jiang in coordination with his military-trained colleague Shuwen Liu and others at the School of Pharmaceutical Science, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China

In 2013, Shibo Jiang and Shuwen Liu, published the methods for artificially inserting a furin polybasic cleavage site similar to that found in the COVID-19 virus.

Shibo-Shuwen.jpg

The innocuous title of that scientific article “Simultaneous Expression of Displayed and Secreted Antibodies for Antibody Screen,” belied its true nature.

That study was supported by a grant to Shibo Jiang from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (#81173098), which was entirely devoted to viral entry via a membrane fusion process, known to be facilitated by furin polybasic cleavage sites and enhancing viral infectivity and pathogenicity.

At the same time Shibo Jiang was conducting those experiments, he was also being funded by Dr. Anthony Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID).

Before returning to China as a professor at Fudan University in Shanghai, Shibo Jiang had been employed by or associated with the Lindsley F. Kimball Research Institute of the New York Blood Center for nearly twenty years.

During that time, he developed an extensive network of collaborative research with other major U.S. virus research laboratories and received more than $17 million in U.S. research grants, the vast majority coming from Fauci’s NIAID.

At the same time, Shibo Jiang maintained extensive collaborative research with People’s Liberation Army laboratories, described in detail here, while simultaneously inviting into his U.S. laboratory and training scientists linked to the Chinese military.

After the onset of the November 2002 SARS pandemic originating in Foshan, Guangdong, China, the People’s Liberation Army and Shibo Jiang would play an outsized role in human coronavirus research.

Much of his work, starting from the first SARS pandemic in 2002-2004, has focused on the coronavirus spike protein, in particular, the junction of the S1 and S2 segments, where the COVID-19 furin polybasic cleavage site is found.

Pre-adapting COVID-19 for human infection
The COVID-19 virus binds to human cells 10-20 times better than the 2002-2004 SARS virus.

From the beginning, the COVID-19 virus appeared to be well-adapted even pre-adapted for binding to human cells.

The COVID-19 virus did not undergo the same mutation and adaptation to humans over time as did the 2002-2004 SARS virus, but was already, from the beginning, resembling late-stage SARS infections, suggesting pre-adaptation.

Such pre-adaption for human infection can be accomplished in the laboratory by repeatedly exposing coronaviruses to genetically-engineered mice that have the human receptor, a process known as serial passage.

Since 2007, Chinese scientists have used humanized mouse models to experiment with coronaviruses starting with the 2002-2004 SARS virus.

It is here where the work of Ningyi Jin of the Military Veterinary Research Institute and the Academy of Military Medical Sciences intersect, in the use of animal models for serial passaging to increase virulence or to pre-adapt coronaviruses for human infection.

Serial passaging is the repeated re-infection within an animal or human population, which allows a virus to specifically adapt to the infected species.

That process occurs in nature, but it can be greatly accelerated in the laboratory by deliberate serial passaging of viruses in cell culture systems or animals, potentially leaving few or no traces as to whether the adapted viruses are naturally-occurring or laboratory-manipulated.

Dr. Chuan Qin is considered China’s foremost expert in animal models for increasing viral virulence and the use of humanized animals for testing natural or man-made viruses.


Chuan-Qin.jpg


The Wuhan Institute of Virology
It is yet unclear the precise role played by the Wuhan Institute of Virology in this scenario or exactly the manner in which the COVID-19 virus was released.

It is likely that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was involved in experiments transitioning a bat coronavirus to the human-infecting COVID-19 virus.

Based on the scientific evidence collected, one indication of its role is RaTG13, a coronavirus sequence, which some claim is the closest bat coronavirus relative to COVID-19, but, being neither fully bat- nor human-infecting, it is likely an intermediate in an artificial synthetic pathway.

To be continued
Analysis of the laboratory origin of the COVID-19 virus is still a work in process, but the above information provides a foundation upon which to build a more complete picture.

It is important to note that U.S. scientists, laboratory resources and funding from the U.S. federal government contributed significantly to China’s virus research program, a topic which will be covered in more detail in the future

Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. is retired from an international career in business and medical research with 29 years of service in the US Army Reserve and a veteran of Afghanistan and Iraq. His email address is lawrence.sellin@gmail.com.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Raheem Kassam is joined by authors Peggy Grande and Mike McCormick on breaking down some of the revelations about the relationship between Dr. Fauci and Biden Chief of Staff Ron Klain. The question of the day: can America ever be a reunited country?

Exposing Fauci, Klain, and Division (ft. Peggy Grande & Mike McCormick) podcast 50:54 min

1621376099851.png
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

White House Visitor Logs Reveal Fauci-Klain Situation Room Meeting After Gain Of Function Moratorium

TUESDAY, MAY 18, 2021 - 04:45 PM
Authored by Mike McCormick via The National Pulse

A National Pulse review of White House Visitors Logs from November 2014 reveals a meeting in the White House Situation Room, chaired by then-Ebola Czar Ron Klain. The meeting appears to have been coordinated by Dr. Anthony Fauci, and included several high-level U.S. government agency heads.



The high profile summit came just weeks after the Obama administration issued a moratorium on the same “gain of function” experiments that Dr. Fauci now claims were never directly funded by his government agency to take place at the Wuhan lab in China.

Fauci’s insistence, however, is betrayed by new analysis of the sequence of events and examples of his own staff headlining gain of function events in Wuhan.

President Obama and other senior White House officials – potentially including then-Vice President Joe Biden – may also have been present.



The Situation Room Summit, 2014.
On the morning of November 17th, 2014, Dr. Anthony Fauci made his way to the Eisenhower Executive Office Building (EEOB), otherwise known as the Old Executive Office Building (OEOB).

The meeting was confirmed in the White House logs by Department for Homeland Security administrator Drew Cramer.

At 10am, he met with the man who would become known 7 years later as Joe Biden’s “prime minister,” Ron Klain. Four others joined Dr. Fauci, including former Walmart executive-turned-Health and Human Services staffer Leslie Dach.

David J Horowitz, who headed the legal side of the Ebola crisis; the Center for Disease Control’s Mitchell Wolfe; and the founding director of the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), Robin Robinson, were all present.

BARDA is described as being “responsible for the procurement and development of medical countermeasures, principally against bioterrorism, including chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (CBRN) threats, as well as pandemic influenza and emerging diseases.”

Included on the roster for the Situation Room were then Centers for Disease Control Director Thomas Frieden and Rear Admiral Stephen Redd of the U.S. Public Health Service. In other words: a top team discussion.

Visiting government officials are, as a matter of routine, noted in the official records. White House employees, including the President and Vice President, are never logged in this manner.

But the summit was clearly an important one, and appears to have prompted a subsequent discussion later that day in the White House Situation Room, suggesting the involvement of President Obama, or at least then-Vice President Joe Biden.

A new appointment was made on November 17th for later that day, as the above graphic reveals.

Infectious Diseases.
Less than a week before the Situation Room summit, President Obama had declared a new vision for the United States and China in the arena of infectious diseases.

A now archived “Fact Sheet” reads:

The United States expresses appreciation for China’s approximately $130 million in contributions to the international Ebola response. The United States and China are working together to provide needed equipment, supplies, and treatment facilities in Liberia, and our health personnel are working side-by-side to address the Ebola epidemic at its source. The two sides call on all members of the international community to step up their efforts in support of the UN Mission for Ebola Emergency Response. Together, the United States and China are committed to working jointly with partners through the Global Health Security Agenda to develop long-term capacity to prevent, detect, and respond to infectious diseases.

Just ahead of the Obama-Xi agreement, Fauci ushered two additional groups into Rooms 230 and 210 of the Eisenhower Executive Office Building (OEOB) to meet Klain. The dates of these meetings were November 6th and 10th, 2014.

These details may go some way to helping uncover the truth behind the National Institute for Health (NIH) and its alleged funding of gain-of-function experiments at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The information puts Klain and Obama at the head of the table for the decision to green-light what Fauci has been ferociously denying as of late.

Tony and Ron.
Dr. Fauci and Ron Klain would go on to enjoy a close, working relationship, and these meetings underscore their collaboration on the future of U.S.-CCP collaborative research. Critics may also suggested Dr. Fauci had a political conflict of interest when advising President Trump in the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic. His own party affiliation and his family’s donation history seem to confirm this.

One challenge they faced was to craft a more robust public relations campaign to counter growing media criticism of Obama’s lame Ebola response, the worst of it coming as a result of Donald Trump’s tweets.

Trump Hit Obama Hard Over Ebola.
As a political operative, Klain was an unusual pick as Ebola Czar. But he was effective.
A Joe Biden loyalist, he did one thing fabulously well, he made Dr. Fauci a media darling and began reversing the Obama administrations public relations misfortunes on their handling of the matter.

Two days after Klain’s appointment to the role on October 17, 2014, Fauci appeared on every television network’s Sunday show to tamp down criticism of the Klain as an Ebola czar. And it worked well for both men.

For Fauci, multiple meetings with Obama would soon follow, including a high-profile hug-fest in the Oval Office on October 24, 2014, in which Fauci introduced Ebola survivor Nina Pham to Obama. The media was enthralled with the “Tony Fauci Healthcare Hero” narrative.

A few years later, Pham sued her employer – Texas Health Resources – and slammed a video featuring her and her doctors as “a public relations stunt and an invasion of privacy.”

Denial over Wuhan.
Fauci and Klain were on the same page in their early assessments of the outbreak in Wuhan.

In a January 21, 2020 interview with Greg Kelly on Newsmax, Fauci said: “This is not a major threat to the people of the United States and this is not something that the citizens of the United States should be worried about right now.”

This was followed by several more weeks of obfuscations and contradictions.

Coming in behind Fauci’s bewildering and unhelpful advice was Ron Klain’s own public statements, such as those made on January 30th 2020, in article in The Atlantic.

The piece by Klain opened with Chinese Communist Party talking points, and went on to parrot Fauci’s downplaying of the virus while more hawkish types such as Steve Bannon and Dr. Peter Navarro banged the drum for immediate action.

“We do not know yet how grave a threat the new coronavirus will turn out to be. On the one hand, scientists have quickly sequenced the virus and are working on a vaccine. China has imposed draconian quarantines to slow the virus’s spread, and is rapidly building massive new hospitals to treat its victims. To date, the U.S. has seen only a handful of cases, all of them the product of travel to China, not transmission here. These are causes for concern, but not overwrought fear,” Klain wrote.

He added:

“Ultimately, the question may never be called on the coronavirus, which could be less of a threat than early indications suggest…”

His conclusion needs no explainer:

“Five presidents—liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans—have looked to Tony Fauci for advice; it is not impossible to imagine Trump being the first to angrily dismiss the counsel he offers if it does not fit with his own poor instincts.”

Trump, in fact, heeded Fauci – to his and the world’s detriment.

Now the world needs to know what was discussed in these critical 2014 meetings, and how Fauci and Klain’s relationship progressed through to the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Raheem Kassam contributed to this article.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

40 Million Fake Masks, 200,000 Counterfeit COVID Tests Seized.
mask
Customs and Border Protection officials seized nearly 40 million masks and 200,000 COVID-19 test kits over the course of the last four months.

The staggering numbers come from the agency’s April report, which notes that between January 1, 2020, and April 30, 2021, CBP seized “more than 38 million counterfeit face masks seized in 770 incidents.” The figure works out to roughly 320,000 fake masks being caught by U.S. officials per day.

Customs and Border Protection also collected “more than 183,000 FDA-prohibited COVID-19 test kits in 423 incidents,” noting “these items were either prohibited for not meeting legal requirements, or they were potentially unlicensed.”

Approximately 450,000 containers of hand sanitizer were also seized in 37 incidents and 37,000 EPA-prohibited anti-virus lanyards were unearthed in 118 incidents.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Senior Member of CCP Think Tank Claims China Won Unprecedented Biological War Against the US in 2020 and “Put the US Back in its Place” (VIDEO)

By Cristina Laila
Published May 18, 2021 at 8:29pm
IMG_1255.jpg


A senior member of a Chinese Communist Party think tank claimed China won a biological war against the United States in 2020.

The mainstream media is finally catching up with conservative media and reporting that Covid-19 originated in a Wuhan lab.

Covid-19 was then unleashed on the world to cripple western nations, especially the United States.

Ping Chen, a professor of National Development at Peking University in Beijing said China “put the US back in its place.”

The video authenticity and translation was confirmed by New York-based Chinese blogger Jennifer Zeng.

“In 2020, China won the trade war, science and technology war, and especially the biological war. The achievement is unprecedented. This is an epoch-making historical record. So for the liberal, America-worshiping cult within China, their worship of the US is actually unfounded.

After this trade war and biological warfare, the US was beaten back to its original shape,” Chen Ping said.

“So I think Trump’s attempt to restore the declining international status of the US during his 4 years has failed. This failure is not only the failure of Trump’s personal campaign for re-election as president, but also the failure of the neo-liberalism-led globalization of the past four decades led by the US and the UK. Therefore, the development and modernization model of the US and Europe is not worthy of China’s imitation and repetition,” Peng added.

Via Jennifer Zeng’s blog:
Chen Ping (his bio here), Senior Researcher at China Institute, Fudan University, professor at Peking University, recently said the #CCP won the trade war, science & technology war, and especially the biological war in 2020. “The achievement is unprecedented. This is an epoch-making historical record.”
His main argument is that the Western model has failed, the 500-year maritime civilization is doomed, the CCP has won and “will lead the way of the modernization in the new era after the biology revolution” after the 2020 CCPVirus (COVID19) pandemic.
VIDEO:

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1394691764741627907
.33 min
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

COVID ground zero? The Wuhan lab-leak theory and the Fauci connection

U.S. government funding, bat coronavirus research, reports of sick workers, alleged involvement with gain-of-function experiments.

By Daniel Payne
Updated: May 19, 2021 - 8:08am

As the SARS-Cov-2 pandemic continues into its second year, few aspects of it have become as politically charged as the theories swirling around the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

That lab has been a focus of suspicion since the earliest days of the COVID-19 crisis, primarily because it's a high-level coronavirus research lab that sits just a few miles from where the Chinese government said the first known outbreak of the disease occurred in an outdoor wet market.

The seemingly improbable coincidence has led to suspicions that a risky coronavirus experiment may have been the source of an accidental leak of the virus from the lab into, first, Wuhan itself, then the wider world.

Leaders from across the globe are calling for a thorough investigation into the lab's experiments, its security protocols and its internal records. Here's what is known about the Wuhan Institute of Virology so far.

For years the lab was funded by federal research funds
Among the most controversial aspects of the Wuhan Institute of Virology's coronavirus research has been its funding from the U.S. government. In the years leading up to the pandemic, the U.S.-based nonprofit EcoHealth Alliance funneled hundreds of thousands of dollars in taxpayer funds to the WIV to study coronaviruses.

Those funds originally came from the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases. That agency, part of the National Institutes of Health, has for several decades been headed up by Anthony Fauci, one of the chief architects of the federal government's response to the coronavirus pandemic.

The federal government pulled the Wuhan funding last year at the outset of the pandemic amid the earliest fears that the WIV may have played a role in the outbreak. The Chinese government has denied that the lab had anything to do with the pandemic.

Workers at the lab reportedly became sick with COVID-like symptoms prior to pandemic
A State Department memo released just prior to the end of the Trump administration claimed that workers at the Wuhan lab became sick with hallmark COVID-19 symptoms weeks before the outbreak was first identified.

"The U.S. government has reason to believe that several researchers inside the WIV became sick in autumn 2019, before the first identified case of the outbreak, with symptoms consistent with both COVID-19 and common seasonal illnesses," the memo declared.

The memo noted that, for over a year at that point, the Chinese Communist Party had "systematically prevented a transparent and thorough investigation of the COVID-19 pandemic's origin."

The lab allegedly supplied COVID material to be used in 'gain-of-function' research
One of the key questions surrounding the Wuhan lab is whether or not it was conducting, or has ever conducted, "gain-of-function" research, a risky virological procedure in which scientists increase a virus's pathogenicity or transmissibility in order to study its pandemic potential.

The Chinese government has denied that the WIV was conducting those experiments. But at least one prominent virological expert has claimed the lab was involved with supplying coronavirus genome sequence information to be used in gain-of-function research.

Vincent Racaniello, a 40-year veteran of academic virology and a professor at Columbia University, told Just the News recently that the lab supplied bat coronavirus spike sequences to Dr. Ralph Baric, a virologist working at the University of North Carolina. Racaniello claimed that Baric was performing gain-of-function experiments with that information.

Baric did not respond to queries on the matter. His work, meanwhile, has also been funded lavishly by Fauci's NIAID over the years.

EcoHealth Alliance and Peter Daszak at the center of the puzzle
Perhaps the most prominent piece of the puzzle is the role that EcoHealth Alliance and Peter Daszak have played in funding the Wuhan lab.

Daszak, the president of EcoHealth, oversaw the funneling of the NIAID funds to the Wuhan lab for years. In a December 2019 interview with Racaniello, meanwhile, he alluded to having some undetermined role in gain-of-function research, including working with Baric at UNC, though Racaniello said the two did not collaborate directly in those experiments.

Daszak has been involved in numerous efforts to discourage or dispute claims of COVID-19's potential laboratory origin. He was one of several scientists who signed a February 2020 letter "strongly condemn[ing] conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin."

Most notably, Daszak was the only U.S. representative on the team of international researchers that led the World Health Organization's COVID-19 origin investigation. That team concluded that the lab-leak theory was "unlikely." The investigators reportedly spent just one day at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Bipartisan effort to shine light on Wuhan lab
In recent weeks and months, a bipartisan effort in Washington has pushed for more investigation into the Wuhan lab's potential role in the pandemic.

Republicans in the House of Representatives in recent weeks asked both Fauci and Secretary of State Anthony Blinken for documentation and information related to the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, meanwhile, aggressively questioned Fauci at a Senate hearing last week, demanding to know to what extent the federal government has funded gain-of-function research in both Wuhan and in North Carolina. Fauci denied both.

Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines, meanwhile, recently suggested that the U.S. intelligence community is still considering the lab-leak theory a viable hypothesis, with officials "continuing to work on this issue and collect information."

The State Department has also signaled its unwillingness to accept the WHO's conclusion at face value, promising to do its own intel research into the matter.

Even WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus himself has indicated that the organization still considers the lab-leak theory viable, stating after the release of the WHO investigation's conclusions: "All hypotheses remain open."
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

A 15-year-old receives the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine against the CCP virus in Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, on May 13, 2021. (Jeff Kowalsky/AFP via Getty Images)
A 15-year-old receives the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine against the CCP virus in Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, on May 13, 2021. (Jeff Kowalsky/AFP via Getty Images)

600,000 Children From 12 to 15 Have Been Vaccinated Against COVID-19: CDC

BY MIMI NGUYEN LY
May 19, 2021 Updated: May 19, 2021

In the United States, around 600,000 children aged 12 to 15 have been vaccinated against COVID-19 as of May 18, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The figures come after the COVID-19 vaccine from Pfizer-BioNTech became the first to be cleared for that age group in the United States earlier this month, CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky said in a media call.

rochelle Walensky
CDC Director Rochelle Walensky at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, on May 11, 2021. (Greg Nash/Pool/Getty Images)

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) declared on May 10 that the Pfizer vaccine is safe and offers strong protection for younger teens, based on testing of more than 2,000 U.S. volunteers aged 12 to 15. Two days later, the CDC officially recommended the shot for the age group.

President Joe Biden has asked states to make the vaccine available to younger adolescents immediately. Most states began issuing shots to children on May 13, but some, including Georgia, started sooner.

“Now, it’s time to get your shot. We have the vaccine. We’ve secured enough supply to vaccinate all adults and children above the age of 12. I repeat: Now is the time to get your vaccine shot,” Biden said on May 17 in an update on the federal vaccination program.
The Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine has been available under an emergency use authorization to people as young as 16 in the United States since December.

The CDC acknowledges that fewer children have been infected with the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus compared to adults. The agency notes, however, that children can still be infected and get sick from the CCP virus, as well as spread it to others.

As of May 15, its website issued a message recommending that “everyone 12 years and older” be vaccinated “to help protect against COVID-19,” characterizing widespread vaccination as a “critical tool to help stop the pandemic.”

“Getting your child or teen vaccinated can bring you one step closer to enjoying the activities you miss. Children 12 years and older are able to get the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine,” the CDC message reads.

Vaccine manufacturers are immune from liability for any adverse reactions unless there’s “willful misconduct” involved. Vaccine providers are required to report any serious adverse effects or vaccination administration errors to VAERS, hosted by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

The federal government has a countermeasures program that can compensate eligible persons who suffer serious injury from approved vaccines. But the burden of proof has proven a challenging process.

Reuters contributed to this report.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

House Intel Republicans: “Under the Leadership of Dr. Anthony Fauci” US Likely Engaged in Dangerous Research in China, Covid-19 Escaped Wuhan Lab

By Joe Hoft
Published May 19, 2021 at 8:25pm
Shi-Zhengli-4-in-Wuhan-Lab-600x292.jpg

US House Representatives led by Devin Nunes released a report showing that the US likely engaged in dangerous research in China and that the China coronavirus (COVID-19) likely escaped from a Wuhan lab. This is consistent with what we have been reporting for a year.

The Washington Times reported on the House report: GOP House Intel says ‘overwhelming circumstantial evidence’ points to Wuhan lab as COVID origin
House Intelligence Committee Republicans released a report on the coronavirus pandemic on Wednesday and pointed the finger directly at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, arguing there is “overwhelming circumstantial evidence” supporting the hypothesis COVID-19 originated in the lab.


The report states;

Possible U.S. Funding of Gain of Function Research in China
Under the leadership of Dr. Anthony Fauci, 19 between Fiscal Years 2014 and 2019, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) awarded more than $3.7 million in grants to EcoHealth Alliance to examine the “risk of future coronavirus (CoV) emergence…in China.”20 EcoHealth Alliance has also reportedly received funding from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID).21 The President of EcoHealth Alliance, Dr. Peter Daszak, has been an outspoken opponent of the lab leak hypothesis since the outbreak of the pandemic.22 Dr. Daszak was the only American scientist to participate in the WHO’s 28-day investigation into the origins of COVID-19.23

Officials from both the Trump and Biden administrations have said the Chinese government worked for over a year to thwart an independent investigation into the origins of the virus. Both administrations cast doubt on the manner in which a joint study from China and the World Health Organization was conducted earlier this year. Though the WHO-China report said a jump from animals to humans was most likely, numerous Trump officials have pointed to an accidental escape from the Wuhan lab as a highly plausible, or the most likely, origin for the pandemic.

Led by Rep. Devin Nunes, the ranking member on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, the 21-page Republican report, In Focus: COVID-19 and the Wuhan Institute of Virology, laid out what the congressmen saw as the case for considering a leak from a Wuhan lab.

One year ago we reported that Dr. Fauci likely broke the law when he funded COVID related research in Wuhan:

1621482346948.png

It actually appears that Fauci and Obama gave the China lab millions for research into COVID:

1621482292920.png

We’ve reported extensively on this subject for a year. Recently we reported on one theory where China intentionally attempted to infect US military – athletes visiting Wuhan in October 2019:

1621482234511.png

Also, we now know China’s military was involved in the research at all time:


1621482097749.png

China is now targeting Lawrence Sellin PhD who has shared numerous pieces at The Gateway Pundit on this subject:

1621482161155.png

The Republican House report appears thorough and fare but realistically they have a ways to go to catch up to our reporting on this matter.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

We Know COVID-19 Was Created in a Laboratory – New Revelations from Inside China Indicate Actual Location of its Military Origin

By Joe Hoft
Published May 20, 2021 at 8:15am
Wuhan-University.jpg

Guest post by Lawrence Sellin

Information obtained within the last 24 hours from a source inside China challenges the popular narrative about the laboratory origin of COVID-19.

There is now no doubt that the COVID-19 virus was created in a laboratory since our reporting in February:

1621544495480.png

Although, most believe it leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The “bat woman” Zheng-Li Shi of the Wuhan Institute of Virology denies that her institute was the source.
Zheng-Li Shi claims that she and her colleagues discovered the virus in late 2019, in samples from patients who had a pneumonia of unknown origin.

“Before that, we had never been in contact with or studied this virus, nor did we know of its existence,” Shi wrote.

“U.S. President Trump’s claim that SARS-CoV-2 was leaked from our institute totally contradicts the facts,” Zheng-Li Shi added.

She may be partially correct.

I have long said that the creation of the COVID-19 virus was a collaboration among a number of Chinese military centers, not the sole result of “gain of function” experiments conducted exclusively at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

The new information from inside China is consistent with that conclusion.

Although still a developing story, here is a summary:
  1. A fully-formed or nearly fully-formed COVID-19 virus arrived at the Wuhan Institute of Virology from the Chinese People’s Liberation Army Eastern Theater Command in the early months of 2019.
  2. Contrary to the popular narrative, the COVID-19 virus was sent to the Wuhan Institute of Virology primarily for testing.
  3. The testing was assigned to a group of young virologists. The name of the leader of that group is known and the leader’s scientific background is consistent with that role.
  4. Testing was done on non-human primates.
China-Theater-Commands.jpg


The following comments are based on that information.

The Biosafety Level 4 laboratory of the Wuhan Institute of Virology is in Jiangxia District of Wuhan, which is about 12 miles south of Wuchang District, the early epicenter of the COVID-19 outbreak.

It is not clear that the Biosafety Level 4 laboratory in Jiangxia District had the capability to conduct experiments using non-human primates.

The Chinese Academy of Sciences’ own website states:
The National Biosafety Laboratory, Wuhan (NBL4) has 2 cellular biosafety labs, 1 small-sized animal lab, 1 medium-sized animal lab, and 1 culture (virus) collection & use lab.”
In contrast, the Wuhan University Animal Experiment Center and the Animal Biosafety Level 3 Laboratory does have the capability to conduct non-human primate experiments.

The following photos are from a Chinese-language publication showing the inside of the restricted Wuhan University Animal Experiment Center and the Animal Biosafety Level 3 Laboratory, specifically the non-human primate facility.

Wuhan-University.jpg

That research facility is inside the epicenter of the early COVID-19 outbreak and nearby a major Chinese People’s Liberation Army hospital complex.


Epicenter.jpg

It is possible that the COVID-19 virus was released while undergoing tests in Wuhan.

In a previous TGP article, I speculated that the furin polybasic cleavage site, the “smoking gun” for the laboratory origin of COVID-19, was inserted by Chinese People’s Liberation Army scientists connected to the PLA Southern Medical University in Guangzhou.

Multiple infections, that is. “serial passaging” through non-human primates could have partially pre-adapted the COVID-19 virus for human infection. Alternatively, the COVID-19 could have been pre-adapted by serial passaging through genetically-altered mice strains expressing human receptors for the COVID-19 virus.

To be continued.
Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. is retired from an international career in business and medical research with 29 years of service in the US Army Reserve and a veteran of Afghanistan and Iraq. His email address is lawrence.sellin@gmail.com.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Nunes, top Republican on House Intel committee, says ‘everything is pointing to the Wuhan lab’

"We have a lot of circumstantial evidence that points to a lab leak," Nunes said.

By Nicholas Sherman
Updated: May 20, 2021 - 2:00pm

California Rep. Devin Nunes, the top Republican on the House Intelligence committee, said Thursday the COVID-19 virus origins most likely point to the Wuhan Institute of Virology lab in China.

"We have a lot of circumstantial evidence that points to a lab leak," Nunes said on "Just the News AM." "Obviously, we have our suspicions that everything is pointing to the Wuhan lab."

His committee's report, released Wednesday, compiled evidence from the State Department and media sources detailing how U.S. diplomats in China referenced unsafe conditions in the Wuhan lab, a possible blackout at the lab in 2019 and several researchers getting sick with COVID-like symptoms.

The report also mentioned another incident in 2004 about a viral leak in a lab in Beijing similar to the coronavirus.

He told show host Sophie Mann there was very little evidence pointing to "some Chinese dude that ate a bat at a wet market," referring to the Chinese government's explanation about how the virus that has killed roughly 3.4 million people worldwide started.

Nunes said that it's time to end the politicization of the coronavirus, arguing that when the pandemic started in March 2020, Democrats like Nancy Pelosi and the mainstream media accused Republicans of racism of claiming the virus originated from China.

"Right when this virus had started and the accusations that somehow Republicans were racist, and that we were going against people that happened to be from Asia, Nancy Pelosi was in San Francisco encouraging people to come out to the streets to not be afraid, well, wow how times have changed."
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Authorities Seize $Millions In Counterfeit Designer Face Masks From China.
mask
Officials seized thousands of fake face masks worth over $1,300,000 entering the U.S. from China.

“U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers in Indianapolis halted a shipment arriving from China that contained more than 4,500 designer face masks,” the agency’s press release notes.

Destined for Puerto Rico, the shipment contained face masks from luxury brands including Dior and Louis Vuitton:

“Inside officers found 4,550 counterfeit medical face masks from fashion designers such as Dior (1,150), Louis Vuitton (1,100), Gucci (1,400), Burberry (400), and Fendi (500). The face masks were reviewed by an import specialist who determined the items were counterfeit. If these items were real, the total MSRP for these would have been more than $1.36 million.”
Masks
MASKS SEIZED BY OFFICIALS.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

IT BEGINS: Fully Vaccinated People in Oregon Must Show Proof of Vaccination Status in Order to Enter Businesses Without a Mask

By Cristina Laila
Published May 20, 2021 at 3:56pm
CFDBC42E-DA67-4DBC-9FA8-FDE9644A4C6D.jpeg

Oregon has gone from a liberal hell hole to 1930s Germany overnight.
The Oregon Health Authority is now requiring businesses and religious institutions to enforce mask mandates by forcing people to show proof of vaccination.

The CDC last week updated its mask guidance and said fully vaccinated people no longer need to wear masks indoors.

In order to prevent the unvaccinated from walking around unmasked, Oregon health officials are now creating a caste system by marking the unvaxxed lepers.

“Businesses, employers and faith institutions now have the option to adjust their masking guidance to allow fully vaccinated individuals to no longer wear a mask in their establishments,” OHA’s website said. “Businesses, employers and faith institutions doing so must have a policy in place to check the vaccination status of all individuals before they enter their establishment.

Businesses, employers and faith institutions who do not create such policies will maintain the same masking guidance listed below, regardless of an individual’s vaccination status.”

1621553634730.png
 

TammyinWI

Talk is cheap
Oh, the drama!

Nervous Workers Struggle to Adjust to New Mask Policies
May 20, 2021

(Associated Press) An abrupt relaxation of mask policies has left workers at some retail and grocery stores reeling as they try to sort out what the new environment means for their own safety and relationship with customers.

Kroger, the country’s largest grocery chain, became one of the latest to announce that, starting Thursday, workers and customers can stop wearing masks in states where mandates are no longer in effect. Other companies that have adopted similar changes include Amazon, Walmart, Best Buy, Macy’s, Costco, Home Depot, Trader Joe’s and Target, following updated guidance from the Centers for Disease Control.

Some workers have taken to social media to cheer, but many others protested. Some don’t trust customers — or their co-workers — to be truthful about their vaccination status since most companies are not requiring proof. Others fear they will be judged if they leave their own masks on, even though their reasons for doing so are varied.

William Stratford, 29, won’t be fully vaccinated until next month, but shoppers and co-workers at the home improvement store where he works have been coming in without a mask even before his store relaxed mask guidelines this week.

He has complained to management and eats lunch in his car to avoid mask-less people in the breakroom. He gets stares from shoppers and co-workers.

“I know for a fact people have a negative opinion of me,” said Stratford, who asked that the store where he works not be named out of fear of reprisal. “It’s become a divisive issue in the workplace.”

The CDC last week said fully vaccinated people — those wh
o are two weeks past their final dose of a COVID-19 vaccine — can stop wearing masks outdoors and in most indoor settings. The guidance still calls for people who are not fully vaccinated to continue wearing masks indoors, and for everyone to wear them in crowded indoor settings like buses, planes, hospitals, prisons and homeless shelters.

That has left retailer, grocery stores, restaurants, hospitals and other employers scrambling to decide whether and how to adjust their own policies. Some companies, including Trader Joe’s and Macy’s, are allowing vaccinated customers to drop their masks but not employees. Meanwhile, some grocery chains like Safeway are leaving their mask requirements in place.

Some workers worry they have been left to bear the fallout of a confusing jumble of policies. John Bartlett, a meat manager at a Safeway in Steamboat Springs, Colorado, said he is personally relieved that, for now, his store is still requiring masks for everyone but he worries that the policy will make dealing with anti-mask customers even more difficult.

“We have customers who literally cuss at us,” said Bartlett, recalling an incident where a man stormed out of the store shouting obscenities after Bartlett pleaded with him to wear a mask. “The country should just have one policy. It would make it easier because we wouldn’t have deal with customers who are so rude and awful to us.”

The Biden administration had faced pressure to ease restrictions on vaccinated Americans, in part to show the benefits of getting the shot at a time when vaccine demand has started to plateau. Companies are also trying to incentivize their employees to get vaccinated with measures ranging from bonus payments to on-site vaccination drives.

It’s unclear if the relaxed mask restrictions will motivate unvaccinated workers to now get their shot. Some may feel more at risk of contracting COVID-19 but others may believe they can enjoy the same privileges as vaccinated workers because no one is checking.

Amazon is among the few companies that is requiring employees to show proof they got the shot before going mask-less, asking them to upload a picture of their vaccine card by mid-June. At Walmart, workers who don’t wear masks must confirm they are vaccinated by filling out a daily questionnaire, though it is not requiring proof. Still, the company will have some insight into who is vaccinated because workers must show documentation to get a $75 bonus offered to those who get the shots.

Marc Perrone, president of the United Food and Commercial International Union, said about 40% of workers who participated in a recent union survey said they were vaccinated. He acknowledged that some many never get the shots, but he said the CDC and companies should have waited a few months to give people more time before shifting the guidance for indoor settings.

Workplace experts warn that a two-tiered mask policy risks sowing resentment and suspicions if not properly implemented.

Kristin White, a workplace safety attorney at law firm Fisher & Phillips LLP, in Cleveland, Ohio, believes employers should request workers to show proof of vaccination and says that many don’t realize they are legally permitted to do so.

“The honor system carries more risk,” said White, who has been advising companies on masks during the pandemic.

Interrogating workers on why they are or aren’t wearing masks raises privacy concerns.

“Some of those employees may be wearing a mask because they have a disability and they can’t get vaccinated; someone may be wearing a mask that is vaccinated but they feel more comfortable wearing a mask,” White said.

She is recommending that her clients have a written policy for employees to not ask their peers why they’re wearing a face covering. She also says that workers should be trained not tell on each other.

For Bill Easton, the concern is around customers. Easton has been working as a cashier at a Safeway in Aurora, Colorado, for 27 years and he already feels helpless when customers defy his store’s mask policy. He fears they will become more emboldened now that mask policies are being relaxed around the country, even though they remain in place in his store.

On the other hand, some of his friendlier, longtime customers announce to him that they are fully vaccinated and give him a big hug. Easton, too, is vaccinated and even though he appreciates the show of affection, it makes him nervous.

“You wonder, do they really have their COVID shot?” he said.

 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

California County Requires Businesses to Submit Covid-19 Vaccination Status of All Employees

By Cristina Laila
Published May 20, 2021 at 9:00pm
vaccines.jpg

Businesses in Santa Clara County, California are required to submit vaccination status of all employees.

According to the county’s public health order, “All businesses and government entities must ascertain the vaccination status of personnel and must comply with the rules for personnel who are not fully vaccinated, as required under section 9(c) and 9(d) of the County Health Officer’s May 18, 2021 Order.”

Under the health order, the employee can decline to provide their vaccination status to their employer.

If the employee declines to offer the information, the employer “should assume the employee may be unvaccinated and follow State and local requirements for unvaccinated employees.”

In other words, if an employee refuses to get the vaccine or declines to disclose this private information to their employer, they will be treated like a second class citizen and will be forced to wear a face mask.

The employers are not required to provide the vaccine information to the County, but they are required to collect it and “have it available to demonstrate their compliance with this requirement” (struggle session).

The health order argues that HIPPA does not apply when an employer asks an employee for their vaccination status.

“No. HIPAA applies to certain entities, such as healthcare providers and health plans, and what protected health information they can share about their patients or members under what circumstances. HIPAA does not govern what information employers may request from their employees.” – the health order read.

It gets worse…

Employees are told to document and snitch on fellow co-workers if they won’t tell fellow colleagues whether they are vaccinated – then treat them like dirty virus bags and stay away from them.

“You must document that the worker declined to disclose his or her vaccination status, assume that they are not fully vaccinated, and follow all the rules that apply to workers who are not fully vaccinated.” the order said.

The deadline for determining the vaccination status of workers is June 1, 2021, however employers are instructed to harass employees who have declined to disclose their vaccination status every 14 days.

The employers must ask employees every 14 days what their vaccination status is so they can update their records.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Gosar Champions Resolution To Terminate COVID-19 Emergency Declaration In Effect Since March 2020
Gosar and other House Republicans have introduced a resolution to debate whether the emergency declaration should continue.
Tom Pappert
by TOM PAPPERT
May 20, 2021
1
ARIZONA: Gosar Slams Establishment Republicans For Labeling #StopTheSteal Push For Election Integrity ‘Sedition’

Rep. Paul Gosar (R-AZ) is championing a joint resolution to end the state of emergency declared by President Donald Trump on March 13, 2020, officially declaring the COVID-19 pandemic an emergency and giving the White House unique powers meant to curb the threat posed by the China-originated virus.

In a press release, Gosar’s office explained, “After over a year of living under an emergency declaration with Congress failing to do its due diligence to decide if the emergency should continue, this resolution will force Congress to debate and vote on termination.”

Alongside Gosar are Reps. Matt Rosendale (R-MT), Thomas Massie (R-KY), Chip Roy (R-TX), Ralph Norman (R-SC), Brian Mast (R-FL), and Randy Weber (R-TX). Massie was sharply criticized by both Republicans and Democrats for being the only member of the House of Representatives to vote against the original COVID-19 relief package in 2020.

Gosar explained that “Over a year later, with cases failing, vaccine rates rising, and states reopening, it is prudent for Congress to consider the merit of this emergency continuation. I have always said, good process, makes good policy, which makes for good politics. Ensuring Congress adhere to good process is the foundation for an effective government, and I am proud to introduce this resolution to restore Congressional role in emergency powers.”

“The National Emergencies Act was never intended to give the President endless and unlimited authority over Americans’ lives,” said Roy. Rosendale added, “Too often, government policy and basic reality don’t align. The vaccine is here, it is available, and the emergency is over, but on paper, the emergency continues.”

Gosar’s office explained that the NEA, passed in 1974, was designed to “reign in presidential emergency powers” by allowing Congress to “enforce checks and balances on these unique powers by determining whether or not to terminate the emergency six months after it is declared.” The statement adds, “Congress has lazily interpreted the law to mean that if no member motions to terminate the emergency, then there is no opposition to it. This blatantly ignores good process, keeping representatives from debating and voting on the merits of continuing the emergency and the unusual powers it gives the President.”

Gosar has repeatedly questioned government policies in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. After it became clear that the Biden administration sought to use the influence of the private sector to push controversial COVID-19 vaccine passports, Gosar was one of the first House Republicans to oppose the plan. “Vaccine passports but no voter ID,” wrote Gosar on March 29. “Clown country.”
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

The Government's Emergency Powers Myth
By Judge Andrew P. Napolitano
May 20, 2021 7 Min Read

"The Constitution of the United States is a law for rulers and people, equally in war and in peace, and covers with the shield of its protection all classes of men, at all times and under all circumstances. No doctrine involving more pernicious consequences was ever invented by the wit of man than that any of its provisions can be suspended during any of the great exigencies of government." — Ex Parte Milligan, Supreme Court of the United States, 1866.

Last week, the media in New Jersey began to ask Gov. Phil Murphy when he would surrender his emergency powers. He claimed emergency powers in March 2020, and he also claimed that those powers are not limited by the Constitution when he said on Fox that the Bill of Rights is above his pay grade. His reply to the media inquiries was that he will surrender them when he surrenders them!

I am using the example of Murphy in order to address the concept of emergency powers, but there is no hyperbole here. Murphy quite literally issued executive orders barring folks from doing what the Constitution guarantees them the right to do, and he imposed criminal penalties for violating his orders, and he had folks who defied him arrested and prosecuted. Stated differently, he assumed the powers of the state legislature — which is to write the laws — and he violated his oath to uphold the Constitution.

He claimed that somehow he can interfere with the exercise of basic human freedoms — like going to church, going to work, shopping for food, operating a business, assembling and traveling — because he declared a state of emergency.

If the government declares an emergency, can it thereby acquire the lawful power to interfere with constitutionally guaranteed freedoms? In a word: No.

Here is the backstory.

When the states formed the federal government in 1789, they did so pursuant to the Constitution. The Constitution was written to establish and to limit the federal government. In 1791, just two years later, the Constitution was amended to add the Bill of Rights. The original understanding of the Bill of Rights was that it restrained only the federal government by articulating negative rights.

A negative right restrains the government from interfering with the exercise of a preexisting right. Thus, the First Amendment does not grant the freedom of speech — because it comes from our humanity — but it does prohibit Congress from infringing upon it.

After the War Between the States, Congress sent the 14th Amendment to the states for ratification. Its history is tortuous, and in part repellant, but it was ratified, and it is the law of the land. It has been interpreted and applied by the courts as imposing the Bill of Rights upon the states. Thus, any right expressly or arguably protected from federal interference by the Bill of Rights is protected from state interference as well.

The Ninth Amendment — which today restrains the feds and the states — is the work of James Madison's genius. Madison, who chaired the House of Representatives committee that wrote the Bill of Rights, wrestled along with his colleagues about the best way to protect unenumerated rights.

The big-government crowd in Congress did not want any enumerated rights to be expressed. They argued that by listing a few, the unlisted rights would be subject to government assault.

The small-government crowd argued that by listing no rights as immune from government interference, the Constitution would invite the government to assault whatever rights it wished.

Madison's solution to all this was to add a Bill of Rights and include the Ninth Amendment. That amendment recognizes that we all have pre-political, fundamental, natural rights — too numerous to enumerate — and prohibits all government from disparaging them.

During the War Between the States, Abraham Lincoln did more than disparage them. He ordered the military to arrest newspaper editors and even public officials in the North and confine them without trial because he disapproved of their criticism of him. One of them, Lambdin P. Milligan, sued for his freedom, and he won.

In a unanimous decision, cited hundreds of times, the Supreme Court rejected the concept that "emergency" somehow creates or increases government power. The court condemned "emergency" as a doctrine the fruits of which none is "more pernicious." This condemnation is still the law of the land today, and it applies to the states as well as to the feds.

Thus, no matter the exigency — war, floods, pandemic, fear, myth — individual natural rights, protected from government interference by the Ninth Amendment, trump the unconstitutional words of government officials and invalidate their efforts to enforce compliance. Murphy's orders contain empty words because they do not have the force of law since they were not legislatively created and they directly contradict the Constitution and the Supreme Court's most definitive interpretations of it.

When Murphy became the governor of New Jersey, he took an oath to enforce the Constitution. Whatever personal ignorance or mental reservations he may have had, the Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and every public official, federal and state, is bound by it.'

If government officials could declare an emergency whenever they wished and thereby be relieved of the obligation to defend the Constitution — and the rights it guarantees — then no liberty is safe.

Because our rights are natural and individual and because we did not all consent to their suspension, no government may morally or constitutionally suspend them, and we must resist all efforts to do so. Of course, there is a dark side to this. The government that has destroyed liberty and property has also immunized itself from financial liability for the consequences of those destructions.

Yet, as Thomas Jefferson wrote in the Declaration of Independence, whenever any government destroys liberty and property, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

Antibody Testing Is Not Currently Recommended to Assess Immunity After COVID-19 Vaccination: FDA Safety Communication

Date Issued: May 19, 2021

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is reminding the public and health care providers that results from currently authorized SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests should not be used to evaluate a person’s level of immunity or protection from COVID-19 at any time, and especially after the person received a COVID-19 vaccination.

While a positive antibody test result can be used to help identify people who may have had a prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, more research is needed in people who have received a COVID-19 vaccination. Currently authorized SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests have not been evaluated to assess the level of protection provided by an immune response to COVID-19 vaccination. If antibody test results are interpreted incorrectly, there is a potential risk that people may take fewer precautions against SARS-CoV-2 exposure. Taking fewer steps to protect against SARS-CoV-2 can increase their risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and may result in the increased spread of SARS-CoV-2.

The FDA is providing additional information and recommendations to the public and health care providers about the use of antibody tests in people who received a COVID-19 vaccination.

Recommendations for People Who Had or May Have a SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Test
  • Be aware that SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests help health care providers identify whether someone has antibodies to SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, indicating a prior infection with the virus. However, more research is needed to understand the meaning of a positive or negative antibody test, beyond the presence or absence of antibodies, including in people who received a COVID-19 vaccination, in people who have been exposed and have SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, and in people who are not fully vaccinated.
  • If you have not been vaccinated: Be aware that a positive result from an antibody test does not mean you have a specific amount of immunity or protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection. If you have a positive test result on a SARS-CoV-2 antibody test, it means that it is possible you were previously infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Talk with your health care provider about the meaning of your SARS-CoV-2 antibody test results.
  • If you received a COVID-19 vaccination: Continue to follow the CDC’s recommendations for fully vaccinated people. Be aware that if you have a positive test result on a SARS-CoV-2 antibody test, it is possible you were previously infected with SARS-CoV-2. A COVID-19 vaccination may also cause a positive antibody test result for some but not all antibody tests. You should not interpret the results of your SARS-CoV-2 antibody test as an indication of a specific level of immunity or protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection. Talk to your health care provider or your state and local health departments if you have questions about whether an antibody test is right for you.

Recommendations for Health Care Providers

  • At this time, do not interpret the results of qualitative, semi-quantitative, or quantitative SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests as an indication of a specific level of immunity or protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection after the person has received a COVID-19 vaccination. While a positive antibody test can indicate an immune response has occurred (seroconversion), and failure to detect such a response may suggest a lack of immune response, more research is needed. Currently authorized SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests are not validated to evaluate specific immunity or protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection. SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests should be ordered only by health care providers who are familiar with the use and limitations of the test. For more information about antibody tests for SARS-CoV-2, see Serology/Antibody Tests: FAQs on Testing for SARS-CoV-2.
  • Be aware that vaccines trigger antibodies to specific viral protein targets. For example, currently authorized COVID-19 mRNA vaccines induce antibodies to the spike protein and not to nucleocapsid proteins that are likely detected only after natural infections. Therefore, COVID-19 vaccinated people who have not had previous natural infection will receive a negative antibody test result if the antibody test does not detect the antibodies induced by the COVID-19 vaccine. If you are considering antibody testing in vaccinated individuals, follow the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s guidelines for antibody testing. For more information about antibody test performance visit EUA Authorized Serology Test Performance.

Potential Risks of Improperly Using SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Test Results

Antibodies are proteins created by your body’s immune system soon after you have been infected or vaccinated. SARS-CoV-2 antibody or serology tests look for antibodies in a blood sample to determine if an individual has had a past infection with the virus that causes COVID-19. These types of tests cannot be used to diagnose a current infection. For more information about antibody testing, see Antibody (Serology) Testing for COVID-19: Information for Patients and Consumers.

Test results from currently authorized SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests should not be used to evaluate a person’s level of immunity or protection from COVID-19. If the results of the antibody test are interpreted as an indication of a specific level of immunity or protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection, there is a potential risk that people may take fewer precautions against SARS-CoV-2 exposure. Taking fewer precautions against SARS-CoV-2 exposure can increase their risk of infection and may result in increased spread of SARS-CoV-2.

FDA Actions

The FDA will continue to monitor the use of authorized SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests for purposes other than identifying people with an immune response to SARS-CoV-2 from a recent or prior infection.

The FDA provided updated information about SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests and will continue to keep health care providers and the public informed if new additional information becomes available. The FDA also provides information on Antibody (Serology) Testing for COVID-19: Information for Patients and Consumers and will update the page if new additional information becomes available.

Reporting Problems

If you think you had a problem with a SARS-CoV-2 antibody test, the FDA encourages you to report the problem through the MedWatch Voluntary Reporting Form.

Health care personnel employed by facilities that are subject to the FDA's user facility reporting requirements should follow the reporting procedures established by their facilities.

Questions?

If you have questions, email the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) at DICE@FDA.HHS.GOV or call 800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

2F0E4E1D-2598-4A69-A7EB-E804903C1F36.jpeg


WATCH: CCP Advisor Declares Trade And Biological Warfare Victory, Claims America Has Been ‘Beaten Back’.
A Chinese Communist Party adviser and professor has asserted that the regime “won” the “biological warfare” battle against the U.S. in an unearthed video while bragging about how the U.S. has been “beaten back to its original shape.”

The stunning video admission comes just days after more news outlets in the Western world back-peddled on their initial, unfounded claims that the COVID-19 virus developed naturally.

Ping Chen, a Professor of Economics at Peking University, and Senior Research Fellow at Fudan University, commented that “in 2020, China won the trade war, science & technology war, and especially the biological war.”

His resume also reveals he “served as an expert advisor to China’s Ministry of Labor and Social Security, China Development Bank, Shanghai City government, and Fengyang County in Anhui Province.”

“The achievement is unprecedented. This is an epoch-making historical record. So for the liberal, America-worshiping cult within China, their worship of the US is actually unfounded. After this trade war and biological warfare, the US was beaten back to its original shape,” he added in an unearthed video later translated into English.

“So I think Trump’s attempt to restore the declining international status of the US during his 4 years has failed,” the Chinese Communist Party adviser also noted.

“This failure is not only the failure of Trump’s personal campaign for re-election as president, but also the failure of the neo-liberalism-led globalization of the past four decades led by the US and the UK. Therefore, the development & modernization model of the US and Europe is not worthy of China’s imitation and repetition,” the research fellow at Columbia University’s Center of Capitalism and Society revealed.

The remarks follow continued reporting – and even acknowledgments from mainstream media outlets – on how COVID-19 likely came from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

WATCH:
View: https://youtu.be/ZdkVHNyRY7o
1:22 min
 

Dozdoats

On TB every waking moment
If you have not seen this one yet, you really ought to ...

ETA - at about the 30 minute mark he speaks briefly about the prions that are part of the spike proteins causing Lewy Bodies in the brain - makes my blood run cold.
===================

IS COVID-19 A BIO-WEAPON?
RT 52:51
The HighWire with Del Bigtree Published May 13, 2021 20,832 Views

The origins of #Covid19 are becoming increasingly clear, and Dr. Richard Fleming, cardiologist and researcher walks Del through a shocking paper trail surrounding the SARS-CoV2 virus and its link to Tony Fauci and US funded gain-of-function research.

#FireFauci #GainOfFunction #GOF #FlemingProtocol #Covid19 #LabCreated #WuhanLab #CovidOrigins #TheHighwire #DelBigtree
 
Last edited:

marsh

On TB every waking moment

SHOCK VIDEO: Colorado Bus Driver Arrested For Slapping 10-Year-Old Girl Across the Face Over a Mask Dispute
By Cristina Laila
Published May 21, 2021 at 3:24pm
IMG_1340-1.jpg

Colorado – A Freemont School District bus driver has been arrested on charges of child abuse causing injury, harassment, and third degree assault for slapping a 10-year-old girl across the face over a mask dispute.

Bertram Jaquez was caught on video slapping the young child so hard that her head whipped back and hit the seat.

According to KKTV, the child’s mask slipped down under her nose prompting the bus driver to get in her face and demand she pull up her mask.

The little girl is seen cowering in her seat before the bus driver slaps her hard on the side of her face.

The child is okay and her family told KKTV that they are appalled and shaken up.

VIDEO:

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1394482165358862341
.12 min

The child abuser bonded out of jail and has been released!

1621640020798.png
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Dr. Janci Lindsay Sounds the Alarm: “Halt the Vaccine IMMEDIATELY” (AUDIO)

By Cristina Laila
Published May 21, 2021 at 4:30pm
vaccines.jpg

Dr. Janci Lindsey sounded the alarm and said it’s time to halt the experimental Covid vaccine (gene therapy).

Dr. Lindsay exposed the “great deception” coming from the Fauci-worshipping media claiming antibodies for Covid-19 somehow disappear after a certain number of months.

Big Pharma is scaring the public with this big lie in order to convince people to get Covid booster shots every 6 months.

“This idea that we haven’t already obtained herd [immunity] is absurd,” Dr. Janci told Rose Unplugged on 1320 AM WJAS.

“That’s the great deception that you actually go around your entire life with your veins full of antibodies for everything you’ve ever developed antibodies to. That’s a purposeful deception. We do not keep antibodies flowing through our bloodstream for everything that we’ve been exposed to our entire lives…it is natural for your antibodies to go away…but our body maintains a memory for them,” Dr. Lindsey said.

Dr. Lindsey also discusses how the vaccine can affect fertility, and over all health.

AUDIO:
Rumble audio 19:51 min

Check out Rose Unplugged on WJAS 1320 AM – The Talk of Pittsburgh 1320 AM

1621640429416.png
******************************************
[COMMENT: Reminds me of the 2020 Amazon video Utopia

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y2QNnoqc3XU
5:35 min ]
 

TammyinWI

Talk is cheap
A New Reason to Swipe Right? Dating Apps Adding Vax Badges

May 21, 2021

(Associated Press) The White House is pushing a new reason to swipe right: vaccination badges and “super swipes” for people who’ve gotten their coronavirus shots.

The Biden administration said Friday it’s teaming up with dating apps to showcase the benefits of getting a shot.

Apps like Hinge, Tinder, Match and Bumble are offering special incentives to people who roll up their sleeves, including badges showing vaccination status and free access to premium content.

BLK and Chispa will boost profiles of those who are vaccinated, to make them more visible to potential matches.

And OkCupid will even let users filter out potential partners based on whether they’ve gotten a vaccine.

The White House says the apps will also direct users to learn how to get vaccinated, including connecting them with educational materials and information on how to find the nearest vaccination site.

The administration is stepping up its efforts to sustain demand for COVID-19 shots as President Joe Biden looks to meet his goal of delivering at least one dose to 70% of adult Americans by July 4. The nation is now at 60.5%.

Other promotional efforts include free rides to and from vaccination sites from ride-sharing companies Uber and Lyft, corporate giveaways and state lotteries that offer potential cash prizes to lucky vaccinated individuals.

Incentives have helped the rate of first vaccinations tick up from a low of about 551,000 per day to more than 630,000, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Miami Dade Father Slams Mask Theatrics At Public School Board Meeting (VIDEO)

By The Scoop
Published May 21, 2021 at 7:19pm
1080-X-650-SINGLE-BAR-THUMBNAIL-19.jpg

A parent of the Miami-Dade County Public School district showed up on Wednesday to demand that mask mandates be removed.

Manning Sumner’s speech was part of an ‘Unmask The Children’ protest in Miami-Date County Florida to liberate children from mandatory mask wearing in schools.

Sumner is a fitness expert who operates his own gym in Florida and had to shutdown his business during the COVID lockdowns.

Sumner shared his frustrations of the stupidity behind putting a mask back on before getting up. He also recalled before entering the building for the meeting, he was harassed outside by the security guards to put on a mask but noticed that once he walked inside, board members did not have their masks on.

The Miami-Dade County parent slammed the mask wearing as theater because people wear their masks with their noses sticking out, under their chin which he called ‘wearing chin diapers.’

“I’ve been wearing a mask since September. I own businesses in Miami. No one tells me what to do with my face. I can breathe the fresh air. I’m not a super spreader. I’m not asymptomatic. All of this stuff has been debunked! All of this stuff! Every single bit. And then also, let me be clear.

I have empathy and sympathy for the people that want to wear masks. If you guys want to wear a mask, wear a mask,” Sumner stated.

If you want to wear a mask, I have no problem with it
Sumner said he is okay with people wanting to wear” a mask and he doesn’t go around demanding people to remove their masks.

“I don’t look at you and say, take off your mask. But if I don’t wear a mask, I’m some kind of killer. And that narrative has to stop!” Sumner stated.

“I’m a healthy individual that eats right and exercises every day. It takes care of my family, wakes up at 4am and goes to bed at midnight! And the narrative has to stop. You guys can make a difference. And I see a lot of leadership in you. I see you standing there. I see smart men. You are some good. You’re the most, best-looking superintendent I’ve ever seen. Take off your mask.

I can’t even see your hands and face without your mask. It’s time for you as a man remove your man! Talk without the mask to lead these children with some respect. And that’s what I’m asking for, common sense. And men and women stop asking for permission!” Sumner also shared.

MDCPS Superintendent reinstates mask mandate for all children for remainder of school year

Earlier in the week Superintendent Alberto Carvalho announced that masks would be optional for students outside which the United Teachers of Dade President Karla Hernandez-Mats did not like but Carvalho now says mask will be mandatory for everyone on school campuses for the rest of the year, according to WSVN.

The United Teachers of Dade President Karla Hernandez-Mats did not like this announcement as well as to say this board meeting held made her feel, “Flabbergasted at the circus at @MDCPS school board meeting today.”

“Our educators believe it would be more prudent and less disruptive to have our students continue wearing face masks on our school campuses. As we wrap up the school year and children are already in the habit of following safety protocols, regardless of their location or activity, wearing face masks continues to provide another layer of protection,” read a portion of her statement. “Young children, who are also not yet eligible for the vaccine and have a harder time staying socially distant, are much more prone to losing items such as a mask during times of recess, which would then present unnecessary challenges and additional stress to our teachers and staff upon them needing to reenter our buildings and classrooms,” CBS Miami reported a statement made by Hernandez-Mats.

“1-This alt-right group has baseless claims & their arguments should be dismissed (check out their website) 2-The audacity to compare masks that protect our students to the tragedy of #GeorgeFloyd is disgusting,” the Hernandez-Mats wrote to Twitter.

1621658945311.png

An unverified page called UnMaskMSCPS on Twitter responded to the post calling out Hernandez for “Rules for thee, but not for me,” after not following the CDC guidelines when it came to mask wearing after Hernandez attended a “First open air concert.”

@Colleen_Wright Also, thank you for pointing out the hypocrisy from the @MDCPS school board & even UTD President’s inability to follow CDC guidelines when it comes to mask wearing. This is precisely what parents were/are fighting against. “Rules for thee, but not for me,” the post continued.

1621658835506.png1621658882117.png

“This was you back in April. NOT following CDC guidelines at the time. Pls do tell us which science you believe in…,” another post by UnMaskMDCPS posted.

1621658725980.png1621658769741.png

Watch Father & Gym Owner Gives Epic speech About Removing Mask Mandates below:

View: https://youtu.be/9wrK_JGXrAs
3:25 min
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

"Mask Up To Keep It Up" - Study Finds Links COVID To Erectile Dysfunction

FRIDAY, MAY 21, 2021 - 11:00 PM

A new study published in The World Journal of Men's Health says aftereffects of contracting COVID-19 could cause erectile dysfunction in men.

"Our research shows that COVID-19 can cause widespread endothelial dysfunction in organ systems beyond the lungs and kidneys. The underlying endothelial dysfunction that happens because of COVID-19 can enter the endothelial cells and affect many organs, including the penis," said Ranjith Ramasamy, M.D., associate professor and director of the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine's Reproductive Urology Program.

"In our pilot study, we found that men who previously did not complain of erectile dysfunction developed pretty severe erectile dysfunction after the onset of COVID-19 infection," Ramasamy continued.


Ramasamy and researchers from UMiami discovered long after recovery, the virus may stay in mens' penises for months on end. And if that wasn't scary, researchers further hypothesize that the "widespread blood vessel dysfunction" caused by COVID could contribute to erectile dysfunction.

"The blood vessels themselves malfunction and are not able to provide enough blood to enter the penis for an erection," Ramasamy said. "We found that the virus affects the blood vessels that supply the penis, causing erectile dysfunction."

The virus has been associated with damaging other organs, such as the lungs, kidneys, and brain. But now, after collecting penile tissue samples from two men with a history of COVID infections, UMiami researchers believe erectile dysfunction "could be permanent."

This isn't the first study that has claimed COVID can cause erectile dysfunction.

In March, researchers from the University of Rome published a study in the medical journal Andrology titled ""Mask up to keep it up": Preliminary evidence of the association between erectile dysfunction and COVID‐19," which said those who contracted the virus were 5.6x more likely to have erectile dysfunction.

Ramasamy said more data is needed to understand better how widespread erectile dysfunction is post-COVID infection.

Both studies come as one of the biggest deflationary threats looms over the global economy: US birth rates have fallen to their lowest level in a generation.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Giroir: ‘Circumstantial Evidence Is Overwhelming’ that Coronavirus Originated from Lab
93

IAN HANCHETT21 May 2021141

On Thursday’s broadcast of the Fox Business Network’s “Evening Edit,” former HHS Assistant Secretary Adm. Brett Giroir stated that he believes the Wuhan Institute of Virology is “the most likely origin” of the coronavirus, and that the circumstantial evidence in favor of that theory is “overwhelming and the lack of another explanation is equally overwhelming.”

Giroir said, “I do share the assessment of the Republican security committee that the most likely origin of this virus was the Wuhan Insitute of Virology. There is no specific smoking gun, but the circumstantial evidence is overwhelming and the lack of another explanation is equally overwhelming.”
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic

OSHA Tells Employers They May Be Liable For 'Any Adverse Reactions' If They Mandate Covid Shots

Chris Menahan

InformationLiberation
May. 12, 2021
space.gif


The Occupational Safety and Health Administration is informing employers that it's possible they could be held liable for "any adverse reactions" if they mandate employees take COVID-19 vaccines "as a condition of their employment."

From LifeSite, "Employers may be liable for 'any adverse reaction' from mandated coronavirus shots: OSHA":

This is just common sense but common sense is in short supply these days.

OSHA has a disclaimer at the bottom of their FAQ stating that their guidance "is not a standard or regulation, and it creates no new legal obligations."

"The recommendations are advisory in nature, informational in content, and are intended to assist employers in providing a safe and healthful workplace."

The notion employers could require their employees to get experimental shots at all is outrageous.



More on this:
(fair use applies)
OSHA Imposes New Guidance For Employer-Required COVID-19 Vaccines
Contractors criticize mandate to classify adverse reactions as recordable safety incidents

Jeff Yoders
May 3, 2021

New guidance from the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration is causing contractors to change their COVID-19 vaccine requirements, and many of them criticize the guidance as diametrically opposed to the Biden administration's stated desire to increase vaccinations.

On April 20, OSHA released the new guidance in the frequently asked questions section of its website for COVID-19 safety compliance.

The question asks whether an employer should record adverse reactions to COVID-19 vaccination if the employer requires the vaccine. OSHA states that if a vaccine is required, then any adverse reaction is considered work-related and therefore it must be recorded. Under OSHA rules, most employers with more than 10 employees are required to keep a record of serious work-related injuries and illnesses. Recorded injuries and illnesses become part of a contractors safety record.

This is the actual text of the new question and answer on the OSHA website:

"If I require my employees to take the COVID-19 vaccine as a condition of their employment, are adverse reactions to the vaccine recordable?

"If you require your employees to be vaccinated as a condition of employment (i.e., for work-related reasons), then any adverse reaction to the COVID-19 vaccine is work-related. The adverse reaction is recordable if it is a new case under 29 CFR 1904.6 and meets one or more of the general recording criteria in 29 CFR 1904.7."

In response, several large contractors said they have changed or will change their vaccination policy to only recommend—not require—a vaccine.

"We, sadly, had to back off our (employee vaccination) mandate because OSHA did something I don't understand at all," said Bob Clark, founder and executive chairman of Clayco in a recent ENR Critical Path podcast. "I side with OSHA frequently, we're in its VIP program, but on this they're just wrong. It's a terrible decision they've made and I think it'll be overturned."

Clark said Clayco, which participated in crafting the initial Centers for Disease Control guidance on construction site safety during the pandemic, would be communicating with OSHA through members of congress to seek changes to the guidance. A spokeswoman for OSHA did not immediately return messages asking for clarification of the new guidance. Construction industry groups universally panned the guidance and said it would hurt their efforts to encourage employees to get vaccinated.

"What they put forward could potentially discourage employers from supporting their workers getting the vaccine," said Kevin Cannon, senior director of safety and health services at the Associated General Contractors of America. "AGC is not in support of any mandate, however we participated, April 19th through 23rd, in vaccine awareness week. We had a lot of members who were in chapters that supported the event. We even had some who hosted vaccine clinics on an active job site or in their offices."

Cannon said some member contractors may have changed their approach to those events had they known, at the time, they could potentially "be on the hook for recording these potential adverse reactions."

AGC is also concerned the rule puts contractors working on projects such as hospital expansions, where vaccination could potentially be an owner condition of being present on the site, in a difficult position.

Cannon said AGC has reached out to OSHA as part of the Construction Industry Safety Coalition, a group of 30 industry groups from all major types of construction, to give OSHA more context as to the burden the guidance places on contractors. AGC plans to submit a letter to the agency with chapter input to the agency.
'Caused Significant Confusion'

Donna Reichle, senior director of public affairs at the Associated Builders and Contractors said, "We agree OSHA has caused significant confusion with this guidance. Industry groups will be seeking clarification from the agency."

OSHA has been working for weeks on an all-industries COVID-19 emergency safety standard, which is now being reviewed by the Biden administration's Office of Management and Budget. Release of the final rule is believed to be coming soon. It is possible the new safety standard could preempt or replace the April 20 guidance to employers. It's unclear, at this point, if separate rules will be made for industries such as construction, where liability and risk are defined differently than in industries where work takes place in a company facility.

The number of overall COVID-19 hospitalizations and fatalities also greatly affects the recommendations CDC, OSHA and the various states have released. Cannon said the current guidance, if left unchanged, has the potential to undo months of industry work to encourage vaccination of construction workers.

"It's almost like they haven't talked to the rest of the Biden administration about the goal of getting as many people vaccinated as possible," said Brian Turmail, AGC vice president of public affairs.


LOOKS LIKE OSHA IS RETREATING.

(fair use applies)

OSHA won't enforce ruling on counting vaccine reactions as 'recordable injuries'
Steph Kukuljan
10 hrs ago

ST. LOUIS — The federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration will not enforce its ruling on requiring companies who mandate COVID-19 vaccines to treat adverse reactions as “recordable injuries.”

OSHA said it reversed its ruling in order to avoid "the appearance of discouraging workers" from getting the vaccine as well as deterring companies’ vaccination efforts, according to the agency's website.

The reversal could help the construction industry's push to vaccinate more of its workers, though many company leaders were opposed to mandates.

Construction companies, labor unions and others have launched a website to encourage workers to get vaccinated.

Initially, OSHA said companies would have to treat adverse reactions to the COVID-19 vaccine as “recordable injuries,” if they mandate the vaccine. Bob Clark, executive chairman of construction firm Clayco, said he worried that would harm a company’s safety record and cause higher workers’ compensation costs. Clayco was one of the leading companies to mandate the vaccine before OSHA's initial ruling.

Clark called the reversal "great news" and said he plans to reinstate his company's mandate, though he did not know when that would occur.

~~~~~~~

AND FROM OSHA'S PAGE:

(fair use applies)

Are adverse reactions to the COVID-19 vaccine recordable on the OSHA recordkeeping log?

DOL and OSHA, as well as other federal agencies, are working diligently to encourage COVID-19 vaccinations. OSHA does not wish to have any appearance of discouraging workers from receiving COVID-19 vaccination, and also does not wish to disincentivize employers’ vaccination efforts. As a result, OSHA will not enforce 29 CFR 1904’s recording requirements to require any employers to record worker side effects from COVID-19 vaccination through May 2022. We will reevaluate the agency’s position at that time to determine the best course of action moving forward.
 
Last edited:

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
I don't agree with the conclusions in this article but I am posting it anyway because it's something that should be archived on the thread with all the other news this thread has done such a good job of archiving. As such, here you go:


(fair use applies)

Pediatric Infectious Disease Expert Guidance: Should My Child Get the COVID-19 Vaccine?
By Debbie-Ann Shirley, University of Virginia
May 21, 2021

The Food and Drug Administration expanded emergency use authorization of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine to include adolescents 12 to 15 years of age on May 10, 2021. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention followed with recommendations endorsing use in this age group after their advisory group meeting on May 12. The American Academy of Pediatrics also supports this decision.

Dr. Debbie-Ann Shirley is an associate professor of pediatrics at the University of Virginia specializing in pediatric infectious diseases. Here she addresses some of the concerns parents may have about their teen or preteen getting the COVID-19 vaccine.

1. Does the vaccine work in adolescents?


Yes, recently released data from Pfizer-BioNTech shows that the COVID-19 vaccine seems to work really well in this age group. The COVID-19 vaccine was found to be 100% efficacious in preventing symptomatic COVID-19 in an ongoing clinical trial of children in the U.S. aged 12 to 15. Adolescents made high levels of antibody in response to the vaccine, and their immune response was just as strong as what has been seen in older teens and young adults 16-25 years of age.

2. How do I know whether the vaccine is safe for my child?

So far, the COVID-19 vaccine appears to be safe and well tolerated in adolescents. All of the COVID-19 vaccines authorized for use in the U.S. have undergone rigorous study, but we don’t want to assume that children are little adults. This is why it is so important to study these vaccines just as carefully in children before health authorities could recommend use. Ongoing studies will continue to follow vaccinated children closely and robust safety monitoring will help rapidly identify rare or unexpected concerns if they emerge.

3. I thought children were low-risk – do they still need to get the vaccine?


Currently, children represent nearly one-quarter of all new reported weekly COVID-19 cases in the U.S. While serious illness from COVID-19 is rare in children, it does occur – thousands of children have been hospitalized and at least 351 children have died from COVID-19 in the U.S. Some children who get seriously ill from COVID-19 may have underlying health conditions, but not all do. Vaccination will help protect children from developing serious illness.

Additionally, since adolescents can transmit COVID-19 to others, vaccinating children may prove to be an important part of safely getting back to normal activities of life, including attending school in person, participating in team sports and spending time with friends. A large survey of school-aged children showed that children in full or partial virtual school reported lower levels of physical activity, less in-person time socializing with friends and worse mental or emotional health compared with those receiving full in-person schooling. Children are experiencing unprecedented increases in indirect adverse health and educational consequences related to the pandemic, and we need to find ways to help them get quickly and safely back to normal life. Vaccination is one of them.

4. What side effects might I expect for my child?

Nonsevere side effects may be experienced following vaccination. The most commonly reported side effects have been pain and swelling at the injection site. Other common side effects include tiredness and headache. Similar to young adults, some adolescents have experienced fever, chills, muscle aches and joint pain, which may be more common after the second dose. These effects are short-lived, however, and most resolve within one to two days.

Some adolescents may faint when receiving an injection. If this is a concern for your child, let your vaccine administration site know ahead of time – your child can be given the vaccine while they’re seated or lying down to avoid injuries from falling.

5. Have there been any severe reactions among children?

No serious adverse events related to vaccination were reported in the Pfizer-BioNTech clinical trial. Serious allergic reactions have rarely been reported in older people. Anyone with a known severe or immediate allergy to the vaccine or any component of the vaccine should not get the vaccine. If your child has a history of any severe allergic reactions or any type of immediate allergic reaction to a vaccine or injectable therapy, let the vaccine site administrator know so that your child can be monitored for at least 30 minutes after getting the vaccine.

Parents should talk to a trusted health care provider or allergist if they have specific questions about the possibility of an allergic reaction in their child.

6. When will a COVID-19 vaccine be authorized for children younger than 12 years?

COVID-19 vaccine makers have begun or are planning to begin testing COVID-19 vaccines in younger children. As more information becomes available, the authorized age recommendations may change. Children ages 2-11 years old could potentially be eligible as early as the end of this year.
7. If I’ve been vaccinated but my child hasn’t, could I still give the virus to them?

The COVID-19 vaccines do not contain live COVID-19 virus, so they cannot cause COVID-19. Rather, getting vaccinated will help protect both you and your children from COVID-19. Studies have shown that vaccinated pregnant and lactating mothers can pass protective immunity on to their young infants across the placenta and in breast milk – one more benefit of vaccination.

Though researchers are still learning how well the vaccine can help prevent spread, vaccination is still an important way to limit infecting people who are not yet eligible for the vaccine, like younger children.

Written by Debbie-Ann Shirley, Associate Professor of Pediatrics, University of Virginia.
Originally published on The Conversation.The Conversation
 

inskanoot

Veteran Member
If you have not seen this one yet, you really ought to ...

ETA - at about the 30 minute mark he speaks briefly about the prions that are part of the spike proteins causing Lewy Bodies in the brain - makes my blood run cold.
===================

IS COVID-19 A BIO-WEAPON?
RT 52:51
The HighWire with Del Bigtree Published May 13, 2021 20,832 Views

The origins of #Covid19 are becoming increasingly clear, and Dr. Richard Fleming, cardiologist and researcher walks Del through a shocking paper trail surrounding the SARS-CoV2 virus and its link to Tony Fauci and US funded gain-of-function research.

#FireFauci #GainOfFunction #GOF #FlemingProtocol #Covid19 #LabCreated #WuhanLab #CovidOrigins #TheHighwire #DelBigtree

This might be the best explanation of the COVID mess that I have listened to so far. All 52 minutes. Dr Fleming’s website is flemingmethod.com.

You are either part of the experimental group or the control group. The stats indicate that the vaxxes do not reduce the risk of infection or death. Doctors and others are reporting that the VAERS system is bouncing back reports, so it is under-reporting the reactions.

Even people who have spent hundreds of hours sifting through this topic will probably come up with something new. He mentioned that simply having a lot of antibodies is not always good and that proper allopathic treatment often seeks to reduce antibodies and the damage they can cause in the body. Of course, he mentions brain damage from the vaxxes that were pretty universal in the animal studies.

Dr. Fleming mentioned that he will be doing a 3 - 4 hour presentation in Dallas on June 5, 2021.

He will discuss options for:

1) preventing infection
2) treating infection
3) treating COVID
4) treating vaxxed people. *

*This is my primary focus, now.
 
Last edited:

marsh

On TB every waking moment

BUSTED: CDC Caught Manipulating Data to Hide New COVID Cases Among those Who Were Already Vaxxed

By Jim Hoft
Published May 22, 2021 at 11:45am
1621712487444.png

Chile has one of the world’s most ambitious and successful coronavirus vaccination schemes. One-third of the population has received either one or both jabs.

But for some strange reason, Chile is experiencing a surge in Coronavirus cases.

That’s weird?

View: https://youtu.be/zBAfnNKkJAU
2:41 min

Two weeks ago, Seychelles announced a new surge in COVID cases despite being the most vaccinated country on Earth.

35% of the new COVID cases were those who were already vaxxed.
1621712693706.png

This appears to be a trend.

Now the CDC is manipulating data to hide new COVID cases among those who were already vaxxed.

This is a crime.

They are willfully lying to the American public.

And they got caught.


New policies will artificially deflate “breakthrough infections” in the vaccinated, while the old rules continue to inflate case numbers in the unvaccinated.

The Off-Guardian reported:
The US Center for Disease Control (CDC) is altering its practices of data logging and testing for “Covid19” in order to make it seem the experimental gene-therapy “vaccines” are effective at preventing the alleged disease.

They made no secret of this, announcing the policy changes on their website in late April/early May, (though naturally without admitting the fairly obvious motivation behind the change).

The trick is in their reporting of what they call “breakthrough infections” – that is people who are fully “vaccinated” against Sars-Cov-2 infection, but get infected anyway.
Essentially, Covid19 has long been shown – to those willing to pay attention – to be an entirely created pandemic narrative built on two key factors:
  1. False-postive tests. The unreliable PCR test can be manipulated into reporting a high number of false-positives by altering the cycle threshold (CT value)
  2. Inflated Case-count. The incredibly broad definition of “Covid case”, used all over the world, lists anyone who receives a positive test as a “Covid19 case”, even if they never experienced any symptoms.
Without these two policies, there would never have been an appreciable pandemic at all, and now the CDC has enacted two policy changes which means they no longer apply to vaccinated people.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Caught Red-Handed: CDC Changes Test Thresholds To Virtually Eliminate New COVID Cases Among Vaxx'd

FRIDAY, MAY 21, 2021 - 11:20 PM
Authored by Kit Knightly via Off-Guardian.org,

New policies will artificially deflate “breakthrough infections” in the vaccinated, while the old rules continue to inflate case numbers in the unvaccinated.


The US Center for Disease Control (CDC) is altering its practices of data logging and testing for “Covid19” in order to make it seem the experimental gene-therapy “vaccines” are effective at preventing the alleged disease.

They made no secret of this, announcing the policy changes on their website in late April/early May, (though naturally without admitting the fairly obvious motivation behind the change).
The trick is in their reporting of what they call “breakthrough infections” – that is people who are fully “vaccinated” against Sars-Cov-2 infection, but get infected anyway.

Essentially, Covid19 has long been shown – to those willing to pay attention – to be an entirely created pandemic narrative built on two key factors:
  1. False-positive tests. The unreliable PCR test can be manipulated into reporting a high number of false-positives by altering the cycle threshold (CT value)
  2. Inflated Case-count. The incredibly broad definition of “Covid case”, used all over the world, lists anyone who receives a positive test as a “Covid19 case”, even if they never experienced any symptoms.
Without these two policies, there would never have been an appreciable pandemic at all, and now the CDC has enacted two policy changes which means they no longer apply to vaccinated people.

Firstly, they are lowering their CT value when testing samples from suspected “breakthrough infections”.

From the CDC’s instructions for state health authorities on handling “possible breakthrough infections” (uploaded to their website in late April):
For cases with a known RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) value, submit only specimens with Ct value ≤28 to CDC for sequencing. (Sequencing is not feasible with higher Ct values.)
Throughout the pandemic, CT values in excess of 35 have been the norm, with labs around the world going into the 40s.

Essentially labs were running as many cycles as necessary to achieve a positive result, despite experts warning that this was pointless (even Fauci himself said anything over 35 cycles is meaningless).

But NOW, and only for fully vaccinated people, the CDC will only accept samples achieved from 28 cycles or fewer. That can only be a deliberate decision in order to decrease the number of “breakthrough infections” being officially recorded.

Secondly, asymptomatic or mild infections will no longer be recorded as “covid cases”.

That’s right. Even if a sample collected at the low CT value of 28 can be sequenced into the virus alleged to cause Covid19, the CDC will no longer be keeping records of breakthrough infections that don’t result in hospitalisation or death.

From their website:
As of May 1, 2021, CDC transitioned from monitoring all reported vaccine breakthrough cases to focus on identifying and investigating only hospitalized or fatal cases due to any cause. This shift will help maximize the quality of the data collected on cases of greatest clinical and public health importance. Previous case counts, which were last updated on April 26, 2021, are available for reference only and will not be updated moving forward.
Just like that, being asymptomatic – or having only minor symptoms – will no longer count as a “Covid case” but only if you’ve been vaccinated.

The CDC has put new policies in place which effectively created a tiered system of diagnosis. Meaning, from now on, unvaccinated people will find it much easier to be diagnosed with Covid19 than vaccinated people.

Consider…
Person A has not been vaccinated. They test positive for Covid using a PCR test at 40 cycles and, despite having no symptoms, they are officially a “covid case”.
Person B has been vaccinated. They test positive at 28 cycles, and spend six weeks bedridden with a high fever. Because they never went into a hospital and didn’t die they are NOT a Covid case.
Person C, who was also vaccinated, did die. After weeks in hospital with a high fever and respiratory problems. Only their positive PCR test was 29 cycles, so they’re not officially a Covid case either.
The CDC is demonstrating the beauty of having a “disease” that can appear or disappear depending on how you measure it.

To be clear: If these new policies had been the global approach to “Covid” since December 2019, there would never have been a pandemic at all.

If you apply them only to the vaccinated, but keep the old rules for the unvaccinated, the only possible result can be that the official records show “Covid” is much more prevalent among the latter than the former.

This is a policy designed to continuously inflate one number, and systematically minimise the other.

What is that if not an obvious and deliberate act of deception?
 
Top