WHITE HOUSE INSIDER: Emergency All Call At Obama White House!

Kadosh

Kadosh

Membership Revoked
dark-clouds-white-house.jpg

:siren: Got word an all-call went out at the WH A.M. today.
That means they are doing what’s called “huddling”. Has to be related to the Benghazi news now hitting. Have good source in Chicago saying their office is acting very odd today as well. Can’t say if this will break out all the way now, but we are getting very close to an all out WH red alert scenario. Not there yet but very close.

Significant activity from Ruemmler’s office over the last 24.

In this situation there will likely be 1 of 2 responses from WH.


-Highly controlled briefing response. Attempt explanation, then hope story gets buried over weekend and race to election day.

-Announced resignation of someone inside administration. President apologizes for mistakes by some in his administration. That deal could be under negotiation at this very moment.

Second scenario not as likely. Not yet. But the Ruemmler activity makes me believe there’s more damaging information out there to the administration on Benghazi than has already come out today. They are trying to assess what will and will not get out to determine response. To have a potential scandal of this magnitude so close to an election is unprecedented. Priority for them will be to insulate the president. Got to try and cut that off. Get someone inside go public and point the finger at Obama.

Now I do what I do best.

-INSIDER
http://theulstermanreport.com/2012/...ider-emergency-all-call-at-obama-white-house/
 
T

TorahTips

Membership Revoked
I don't see Libya as the issue simply because the MSM is ignoring it. And, that's where most people get their info. Could the all call be due to the weather and that fact that everyone is going to bug out for a while? I'm just wondering. I do agree that the reports out of Libya are getting bad, but the MSM is just not covering it -- unless it will become a criminal issue. Now that would be totally different and may take out Obama "Nixon style" after the election....
 
Dobbin

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
I think Hillary will be thrown under the hay wagon.

She did claim responsibility.

Dobbin
 
Kadosh

Kadosh

Membership Revoked
TorahTips said:
I don't see Libya as the issue simply because the MSM is ignoring it. And, that's where most people get their info. Could the all call be due to the weather and that fact that everyone is going to bug out for a while? I'm just wondering. I do agree that the reports out of Libya are getting bad, but the MSM is just not covering it -- unless it will become a criminal issue. Now that would be totally different and may take out Obama "Nixon style" after the election....
Click to expand...
Oh, it's criminal alright! It's TREASON!
 
T

TorahTips

Membership Revoked
Kadosh said:
Oh, it's criminal alright! It's TREASON!
Click to expand...

If they have information that there will be criminal charges post election, that would be a reason for the call. It all depends how much Obama had to do with denying help when they called for it three times. If he was directly involved, that will become a real issue. If he was not involved, then Hillary goes down for it.
 
bw

bw

Fringe Ranger
Perhaps the new information is that they're losing the leash on the media. Now THAT would be cause for panic. If the media says that this is too good to ignore, Zero is toast. Big if.
 
T

Troke

On TB every waking moment
My take. The weather is going to crowd off all other news. The meeting is to decide what is the best reaction at the WH level for the oncoming disaster.

Remember G. Bush just flying over Katrina. How much better for him if he had gone with a 20+ car caravan, SS agents battalion deep, all the functionaries hanging around him rather than doing their jobs etc. blocking critical traffic etc. He would have been a goat anyway because the MSM would have documented the tie-up. With the MSM in their pocket, what is the best way for O to gain the few votes still hanging to be picked.
 
TXKajun

TXKajun

Veteran Member
Seems like I read something in the last day or so that Hillary has some documents that would exonerate her completely....at O's expense. I understand Bill's been telling her to go public with them. Just have to wait and see.

Kajun
 
BertaBurtonLake

BertaBurtonLake

Inactive
Now that would be totally different and may take out Obama "Nixon style" after the election....

Nixon resigned while IN office, not after the election.
 
D

Dozdoats

On TB every waking moment
MOST of what this crowd does is TREASON. Getting an ambassador killed is relatively small potatoes for them.
 
BertaBurtonLake

BertaBurtonLake

Inactive
I don't think the Clintons will be 'thrown under the bus'. I could be wrong, but (unless 'something' happens to change it) those arms won't be 'cut off'.
 
Last edited:
homepark

homepark

Resist
I have read that Hillary does not want to be viewed as hurting the party. However, I can't see the Clintons going under the bus quietly. She could wait until after the election. Only a week or so.
 
Blastoff

Blastoff

Veteran Member
When I read those emails from Benghazi had gone to 300-400 government officials, I knew this could not be kept quiet.

Now today I read that military was on tarmacs, waiting for a go signal, and were told to stand down. How many more people is that who knew something needed to be done but wasn't happening?

Enough people were involved at some level of the incident to make this situation impossible to ignore.
 
bw

bw

Fringe Ranger
Blastoff said:
When I read those emails from Benghazi had gone to 300-400 government officials, I knew this could not be kept quiet.
Click to expand...

Hence my point re the media. If it's going to come out anyway, then each network or newspaper wants to be reporting it. This is a chance to rebuild some credibility. It would be intolerable to be the one voice saying nothing when all other media voices are reporting it.

So perhaps the WH has been getting some hints along the lines "We're going to have to go public with this". The only thing to do then is a major speech.

Remember Nixon and the stack of blue binders after Watergate? "Here's the whole story, we researched it all, this finishes it." Then, of course, it all imploded.

This could be the Hail Mary pass coming up.
 
R

Rabbit

Has No Life - Lives on TB
homepark said:
I have read that Hillary does not want to be viewed as hurting the party. However, I can't see the Clintons going under the bus quietly. She could wait until after the election. Only a week or so.
Click to expand...

Too bad she isn't as concerned about hurting the country.
 
dstraito

dstraito

TB Fanatic
I don't think people will be too forgiving once they find out American's could have been saved but were not because of a No Go from the top.
 
I

imaginative

keep your eye on the ball
mbabulldog said:
She's too smart for that, she isn't taking the fall for that guy...
Click to expand...

Absolutely. Her and Bill will do a scorched earth on this admin long before they ever allow that amateur to tarnish their aspirations of future political clout. Hillary would hang obama and that Valerie Jarett long before taking the fall for this imo
 
BH

BH

. . . .
I put this on another thread, but.... This was a comment left on CBSNEW.COM in their lame story about Libya....


I have said this before, but with the Benghzi fiasco unfolding to show more perceived incompetence, I'll say it again.

President Obama's campaign advisor or Chief of Staff advised Obama to NOT go in and attempt a rescue becuase of the potential for a Carter-like military disaster too close to en election or the increased American death count forcing it into the news. This was a politcal stunt to shelter and protect Obama. The blood of dead American Heroes is on his hands forever.

The account of that Navy Seal (Tyrone Woods) found slumped and dead over his machine gun, firing until the rounds ran out, reminds me of a redux of Somalia when Clinton refused (for again political reasons) to rescue that downed Blackhawk. Those Americans held off al Qaeda until their ammo ran out. And to add insult to injury, VP Biden has the coarseness and uncaring attitude to ask Tyrone's father, saying to him "in an extremely loud and boisterous voice," "Did your son always have balls the size of cue balls?"

This is a shameful administration that will cavalierly spill American blood to keep their power. There is no greater commission of treason in my book than to sacrifice heroes for personal gain.
Click to expand...
 
workerbee

workerbee

* Winter is Coming *
Un****ingfortunately it looks like Petraeus may be implicated along with Leon Panetta.

Heads need to roll.

RFN!!!
 
bw

bw

Fringe Ranger
I suspect the conversations at the WH revolve around who has to be sacrificed in order to make it believable, and what does it take to keep the sacrifice quiet. The first part is business as usual; the second part is fraught with risks from varied directions.
 
B

Berean

Veteran Member
Regardless why the meeting was called, it means O is in trouble. A cornered animal is very dangerous.
 
D

Dozdoats

On TB every waking moment
Just a rest stop on the road from "Hope and Change" to "Shock and Awe" while traveling "Fast and Furious."

Better get your heads on straight, folks - otherwise you'll get led someplace you don't wanna go.
 
T

TorahTips

Membership Revoked
It appears that there was an air response ready and on the runway. I believe that calling that off would fall to the responsibility of the commander in chief. Whether or not he was the one who ultimately called it off is still a question. Whoever did should be in trouble. If it was not him and he didn't have knowledge of it, then the person who did call it off is in big trouble. If he called it off, I think that is enough to get impeachment charges started.

Waiting to see who called it off....
 
Dennis Olson

Dennis Olson

Chief Curmudgeon
_______________
Here, let me help some of you, who are harboring a delusion:

OBAMA WILL NEVER BE IMPEACHED, EVEN IF RE-ELECTED, AND IF NOT RE-ELECTED, THE POINT IS MOOT. AND EVEN IF IMPEACHED BY THE HOUSE, HE WOULD NEVER BE CONVICTED AND REMOVED FROM OFFICE BY THE SENATE.

So my suggestion is to cease bloviating on this issue, and move on.
 
W

WalknTrot

Veteran Member
Every thinking American will believe that the final decision rested ultimately with Obama. It's in his lap and his alone.

That's why they call it "Commander in CHIEF".

Added: Dennis, this is resignation material. No need for impeachment. But he will probably lose the election because of it anyway, so the problem will be moot in a couple of months. I was fully aware politically and paying attention during Watergate. This, and the cover-up is MUCH worse.
 
J

Jeep

Veteran Member
The obamabots do not care how many Americans were killed. They would deny it and still vote for the jug-eared idiot. Maybe the news media has seen the writing on the wall, (maybe) and are going to desert obozo.
 
bw

bw

Fringe Ranger
Dennis Olson said:
OBAMA WILL NEVER BE IMPEACHED, EVEN IF RE-ELECTED, AND IF NOT RE-ELECTED, THE POINT IS MOOT.
Click to expand...

Hadn't even thought about impeachment. If he's in trouble, the trouble is that those who put the turtle on the post may have no more use for him. And that could be trouble for all of us.

Impeach? Trivial.
 
Speckled Trout1

Speckled Trout1

Senior Member
Uhhhhmmm-

Ruemmler left government practice in 2007 to return to Latham & Watkins as a partner handling mainly white-collar defense. Clients included Lehman Bros. and The Carlyle Group. Two years later, she went back to the U.S. Department of Justice as principal associate for then-Deputy Attorney General for David Ogden. When Ogden stepped down in December 2009, Ruemmler became deputy counsel to the President Obama.

White House counsel generally deals with judicial nominations, congressional investigations and defending the president's constitutional powers. She is the third woman to hold the job. Harriet Myers served as counsel to President George W. Bush and Beth Nolan served as counsel to President Bill Clinton.
 
BertaBurtonLake

BertaBurtonLake

Inactive
one4freedom said:
Wrong: Nixon resigned after the 1972 re-election campaign (which he won) on August 8th, 1974 during his second term.
Click to expand...

Right. In-office during his second term, not 'after the election'. 'After the election' connotes shortly after (especially wrt this discussion) NOT 9 months after inauguration to his second term, as in Nixon's case.

At least this is the way I was speaking of it.
 
Dennis Olson

Dennis Olson

Chief Curmudgeon
_______________
WalknTrot said:
Added: Dennis, this is resignation material. No need for impeachment. But he will probably lose the election because of it anyway, so the problem will be moot in a couple of months. I was fully aware politically and paying attention during Watergate. This, and the cover-up is MUCH worse.
Click to expand...


Yes, but Nixon had dignity and a sense of shame. Neither of those qualities is present in our current generation of politicians in general, or His Holiness in particular. Obama would NEVER resign, because, well, he's just Too Important.... :kk1:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top