POL November 3: The 2020 U.S. ELECTION DAY MAIN THREAD

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Democrats Block Amendment Requiring States to Remove Foreign Nationals from Voting Rolls…
Posted by Kane on December 10, 2021 1:31 am

View: https://youtu.be/7wjLcDMdJ6o
4:06 min

Democrats Block Amendment Requiring States to Remove Foreign Nationals from Voter Rolls

House Democrats blocked an amendment on Thursday offered by Rodney Davis (R-IL), that would have updated the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require states to remove foreign nationals from their voter rolls as part of their regular voter list maintenance program.

In total, 217 House Democrats voted against the amendment.

“If we were really here to talk about protecting our democracy then we would focus on the importance of voter rolls list maintenance to ensure only eligible citizens are able to vote in federal elections. If Democrats were really focused on protecting our democracy, the Biden Justice Department would investigate states like California where the number of registered voters far exceeds the number of adults in the state,” Davis continued.

New York City Council voted last night to give local election voting rights to one million foreign nationals.

Read the amendment…
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

BREAKING BIG: Former Senator David Perdue Sues Fulton County for “Absentee Ballots…Scanned Multiple Times” and “16,000 Ballots” Not Counted in 2020 Election

By Joe Hoft
Published December 10, 2021 at 7:25am
David-Perdue-1.jpg


Former Senator David Perdue is suing Fulton County’s Elections Director, the Fulton County Elections Board, and the Fulton County Commissioners regarding their actions in the 2020 Election.


The case filed on Thursday in Georgia begins as follows:
Fulton County Board of Registration Elections Director Richard Barron and his agents including the other Respondents negligently, grossly negligently or intentionally engaged in and/or permitted multiple unlawful election acts and omissions by their failure, inter alia, to competently oversee the actions of the Fulton County Board of Registration and Elections employees, staff, agents, and/or contractors in the acceptance and tabulation and counting of absentee ballots, thousands of which were unlawfully marked by machines rather than legally registered Georgia voters.
These acts and omissions, inter alia, circumvented the majority vote of the people of the State of Georgia and thereby affected the outcome of the statewide General Election on November 3, 2020 in several races including the United States Senate race of Petitioner Perdue
Fulton County Elections Board Members and Fulton County Board of Commissioners and their agents failed in their duty of oversight of the Elections Director, who was appointed to his position by the Fulton County Board of Commissioners and Fulton County Board of Registration and Elections. Together, the Respondents’ actions and inactions violated, and will continue to violate, the constitutional rights of one citizen, one vote, just as they violated the equal protection and due process rights of Senator David A. Perdue, an election candidate, and Elizabeth Grace Lennon, a voter, on November 3, 2020.

Under Section 12 of the filing it reads:
The unlawful, erroneous, negligent, grossly negligent, willful, malicious, corrupt, deceitful, and intentional manipulation of votes by Respondents violates the principles of democracy and the foundation of the Georgia Republic and is what Georgia’s founding fathers sought to prohibit when they thoughtfully crafted the Georgia Constitution to guarantee all citizens the right to one vote and the right to seek relief from the judiciary to protect their one vote from dilution, discrimination, and debasement.
Under Section 17 it reads:
Georgia law requires “Superintendents, poll officers, and other officials engaged in the conducting of primaries and elections . . . [to] perform their duties in public.”

O.C.G.A. § 21-2- 406. Respondents violated this provision of Georgia law as it relates to observers during the scanning of absentee ballots for Fulton County at State Farm Arena during the General Election.
Look at Sections 43 and 44:
43.
From November 3, 2020 to November 4, 2020, several batches of absentee ballots were scanned multiple times, and those votes corrupt and erroneous totals were unlawfully included in the certified number of votes submitted by Fulton County to the Georgia Secretary of State’s Office.
44.
Additionally, about 161 batches of ballots representing approximately 16,000 ballots cast were withheld by Respondents from the certified results that were submitted to the Georgia Secretary of State’s Office.
(Reminder, Biden was awarded Georgia by around 12,000 votes.)

The entire filing is attached below:

Purdue Case GA 12-9-21 by Jim Hoft on Scribd (Scribd doc on website)

1639176515287.png
Download this PDF
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Christina Bobb Reports: Wisconsin GOP Group Demands Full Investigation of Wisconsin Election Commission’s Voting System

By Joe Hoft
Published December 10, 2021 at 9:41am
Wisconsin-2020-Election-Results.jpg


A GOP Group in Wisconsin is demanding an investigation into the Wisconsin Election Commission’s database system.

Christina Bobb released a report showing that a GOP group in Wisconsin is demanding an investigation into the Wisconsin database system.

Bobb shared the following documents in a tweet yesterday:

Christina-Bobb-WI-1.jpg
Christina-Bobb-WI-2.jpg


1639176915605.png

Let’s hope and pray this is done soon.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

“Happy Faces” Frowns – Stacey Abrams Related Employment Company Identified in Senator Perdue’s Fulton County Lawsuit

By Joe Hoft
Published December 10, 2021 at 10:00am
Sad-emoji.jpg


We reported that Stacey Abrams profited from the 2020 elections from her firm connected to employment company Happy Faces. Now Happy Faces is listed in yesterday’s suit by former Senator David Perdue against Fulton County.

We previously reported that Stacey Abrams made millions in the 2020 Election. Stacey Abrams, former Georgia State Rep, nonprofit czar, Hillary Clinton darling, and 2020 board member of John Podesta’s uber-powerful, “charitable” nonprofit, the Center for American Progress think tank, has been revealed by CD Media as being an owner of ‘NowAccount,’ the firm financing Happy Faces Personnel Group, the temp agency used in Fulton County, Georgia’s elections in November 2020 and January 2021. We reported on her profiteering:

Abrams’s firm was used across the country in the 2020 Election.

We also reported that the individuals hired for the election were weak and uninspired:

We shared on June 25, 2021, that the hiring and training, and actions of the election workers in Atlanta and across the state of Georgia should be investigated for any wrongdoing in the 2020 Election.

Yesterday this recommendation was addressed. In Senator David Perdue’s case against Fulton County individuals and entities, Happy Faces is noted in the case. Here are the actions cited that were performed by individuals recruited by Happy Faces employment firm (42-45):
42
During the General Election, Happy Faces workers and Fulton County employees, staff, and independent contractors, worked at the English Street Warehouse and State Farm Arena processing, scanning, and tabulating absentee ballots.
43.
From November 3, 2020 to November 4, 2020, several batches of absentee ballots were scanned multiple times, and those votes corrupt and erroneous totals were unlawfully included in the certified number of votes submitted by Fulton County to the Georgia Secretary of State’s Office.
44.
Additionally, about 161 batches of ballots representing approximately 16,000 ballots cast were withheld by Respondents from the certified results that were submitted to the Georgia Secretary of State’s Office.
45.
Thousands of unlawful counterfeit ballots were scanned, tabulated, and included in the certified total of votes submitted by Respondents to the Georgia Secretary of State’s Office as established by the sworn testimony of Voyles and photographs of absentee ballots, which ballots show no creases or folds as would be required if the ballots had been placed inside absentee ballot envelopes and mailed. Respondents’ actions in this regard were ministerial.
(Reminder, Biden was awarded Georgia by around 12,000 votes.)

The entire filing is attached below:

Purdue Case GA 12-9-21 by Jim Hoft on Scribd (scribd doc on website)

1639177187760.png
Download this PDF

It looks like Happy Faces may be frowning today.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Turley: Is New York's Voting Rights For Non-Citizens Legal?
BY TYLER DURDEN
FRIDAY, DEC 10, 2021 - 01:00 PM
Authored by Jonathan Turley,

This week, New York became the latest city to grant voting rights to non-residents – a move that could give voting rights to 800,000 non-citizens in city elections. There are roughly a dozen such cities granting voting rights across the country but there are major questions over the legality of this measure in New York.



The purpose of these laws is to enfranchise non-citizens who pay taxes and are part of these communities. The New York law only extends to permanent residents. Critics argue that it is part of a trend toward erasing the distinctions between citizens and non-citizens.

The law, however, faces a credible challenge in the absence of action from the state legislature in Albany.

The first stumbling block is the state constitution itself. N.Y. Const. art. II, § 1 provides that “Every citizen shall be entitled to vote at every election for all officers elected by the people and upon all questions submitted to the vote of the people provided that such citizen is eighteen years of age or over and shall have been a resident of this state, and of the county, city, or village for thirty days next preceding an election.”

Proponents would have to establish that non-citizens can be treated as citizens “entitled to vote at every election.” It is possible that a court could interpret the language broadly in a non-exclusionary way. Proponents note that noncitizens have previously voted in some New York city elections.

The second barrier is the New York state election law, which limits the franchise “in any election” to US citizens:
No person shall be qualified to register for and vote at any election unless he is a citizen of the United States and is or will be, on the day of such election, eighteen years of age or over, and a resident of this state and of the county, city or village for a minimum of thirty days next preceding such election.
However, there is a savings clause that says that if a conflict exists between state election law and “any other law,” the latter prevails absent a specific prohibition in the election law. The New York City law could be argued as such “other law” that prevails in a conflict.

Finally, there is Section 23(2)(e) of New York’s Municipal Home Rule Law, along with § 38 of New York City’s charter, which provides that a local law shall be subject to mandatory referendum if it “[a]bolishes an elective office, or changes the method of … electing … an elective officer, or changes the term of an elective office, or reduces the salary of an elective officer during his term of office.”

This is a measure coming from the City Council itself, not a referendum.

It is clear that the law will be challenged and there are credible claims to be made in court. Even Mayor de Blasio has expressed doubts over the legality of the law.

What is clear is that various Democratic cities are moving to adopt similar laws, though much will depend on their state constitutions and laws. In New York, the Constitution raised a challenging interpretive task as does the Home Rule law. In the end, this would seem a matter for the state legislature to resolve. The addition of 800,000 votes in New York City alone is a major shift in the voting population. The resulting policy changes impact that whole state and obviously citizens travel and change residences between these cities. It is a matter that should be addressed by the whole state on the whether voting should remain a right exclusive to citizens.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Wisconsin Elections Commission vote on Zuckbucks not unanimous, commissioners missed email

If there aren't at least two objections to a decision, which allows the chair to call a meeting, then the decision is automatically released.

Updated: December 10, 2021 - 10:53pm

The Wisconsin Elections Commission decision that Zuckerbucks weren't illegal wasn't unanimous, as two of the commissioners missed the email with the draft of the decision.

("Zuckerbucks" refers to an estimated $400 million in private funds Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg donated to local election officials in the 2020 election, heavily favoring Democratic over Republican jurisdictions, in what critics say was a carefully targeted attempt to gain control of public election administration machinery in key districts to sway the election outcome.)

According to Commissioner Bob Spindell, both he and Commissioner Dean Knudson would've called for a meeting to discuss the decision, but they missed the initial email, which was sent on Nov. 29.

Knudson explained to Just the News that since outside counsel sent the "draft copy of their proposed decision letter" and he didn't recognize it, he treated it as spam. He said he "will seek changes in procedure to help avoid a repeat of my mistake in future similar cases."

Spindell shared with Just the News an email he sent saying the "final decision" letters sent out Wednesday evening weren't seen by him or Knudson "until much later." The next morning, Spindell sent an email requesting all five decisions the WEC had before them to be discussed in a meeting.

What Spindell didn't initially realize was that the Wednesday email had also sent the final decisions to attorney Eric Kaardal of conservative public interest law firm the Thomas More Society, which is representing the Wisconsin Voter Alliance, which is challenging the $8.8 million the Center for Tech and Civic Life, funded by Mark Zuckerberg, donated to local election managers in Milwaukee, Madison, Green Bay, Racine, and Kenosha.

The commissioner added that if there are at least two objections to a decision, then it is up to the chair to call a meeting. Otherwise, the decisions are released. Spindell told Just the News that he is still requesting a meeting on the decision that has already been adopted.

If the commission had met and split 3-3 on the decision (the commission is made up of three Democrats and three Republicans), nothing would have happened, and litigation would've been delayed, Spindell explained. As things now stand, he acknowledged, at least Kaardal is able to appeal the commission decision to circuit court judges, Spindell said.

He added that he was going to work with administration today to make sure this doesn't happen again, saying that with important matters like this, the commission should wait for confirmation that all the commissioners receive the decisions before making them final.

Neither the chair of WEC nor Kaardal immediately responded to requests for comment.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

David Perdue sues Georgia's Fulton County over claims of election 2020 fraud

Perdue, who announced his campaign for governor this week, lost reelection to the Senate in Georgia in 2020

Updated: December 10, 2021 - 12:16pm

Georgia Republican David Perdue, who recently jumped into the upcoming GOP primary field for the state governorship, has joined a lawsuit claiming that fraudulent ballots were counted in Fulton County during the 2020 election.

The former senator has maintained that, had he been governor, he would not have certified Georgia's 2020 results. Former President Trump is backing Perdue's bid, which is a direct challenge to GOP incumbent GOP Brian Kemp, who Trump has repeatedly admonished for being "very weak" on "election integrity."

Elizabeth Grace Lennon, a Fulton County voter, and Perdue have filed to examine paper ballots and other voting materials that they say will prove there was fraud. Though, the suit does not seek to overturn the results of the election, which saw Georgia give its 16 electoral votes to Joe Biden.

"I want to use my position and legal standing to shine light on what I know were serious violations of Georgia law in the Fulton absentee ballot tabulation. We are asking a judge to consider the evidence after our forensic examination of the absentee ballots is completed and hold those persons responsible who engaged in this wrongful conduct," said Perdue via his attorneys.

The suit is similar to the one dismissed in October by Henry County Superior Court Judge Brian Amero because, he argued, the plaintiffs had not alleged a "particularized injury." Lennon and Perdue, who have requested Judge Amero, believe they have standing to pursue particularized injury claims.

Perdue claims that he was a candidate for reelection who failed to earn a majority of the vote, forcing him into a runoff with now-Senator John Ossoff, which Perdue lost. Lennon says she attempted to cast an in-person early vote in October of 2020 and was told she had already voted by mail.

"David Perdue is so concerned about election fraud that he waited a year to file a lawsuit that conveniently coincided with his disastrous campaign launch. Keep in mind that lawsuit after lawsuit regarding the 2020 election was dismissed in part because Perdue declined to be listed as a plaintiff," said Kemp spokesperson Cody Hall.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

STILL UNKNOWN: Where Did the Mysterious 298,000 Absentee Ballots in Georgia Come from After Election Day?

By Joe Hoft
Published December 10, 2021 at 8:05pm
1-686-600x361.jpg


One year ago we reported on the unexplained 2020 Election results in Georgia reported by state officials. A similar review was reported today at UncoverDC.

We reported the following on December 20, 2020, almost a year ago to the date:
A review of Georgia results from the 2020 election indicates more corruption than reported to date in the the Peach State.
  1. On election night at 7:20 pm, Ralph Jones (of pull the Biden ballots out from under the table fame) reports a total of 130,517 absentee ballots received with 86,191 counted. That would leave 44,326 absentee ballots remaining to count plus any other ballots received on 11/3. Although, note that when Jones reports his totals it is past the cut-off time to legally accept any new absentee ballots and one would assume they had been collecting ballots from drop off boxes and the mail room throughout the day.
  2. The Secretary of State’s website reported 146,994 total absentee ballots received. That equals 16,477 additional ballots were received sometime late on election day and should never have been counted.
  3. At a rate of 3,000 ballots processed per hour times five machines at the State Farm Center, 15,000 ballots could have been processed per hour. Ralph Jones said there were only 44,326 ballots remaining to count on election night. At a rate of 15,000 per hour, that should have taken three hours to complete. But instead this went on for days!
  4. On the next day at 1:25 pm, Jessica Corbitt, the Public Information Officer for Fulton County, reported that Fulton had counted 74,000 absentee ballots which is 12,191 less ballots than Jones had reported the previous evening?
  5. Corbitt also reported that 67,000 ballots were remaining to be counted. This is 22,674 more ballots left to count than was reported by Jones the night before. The ballots all should have been counted by this time if workers were counting ballots from the night before. They only needed an estimated three hours after Ralph Jones reported ballots left but they were still counting mid-day on November 4th.
  6. Assuming Corbitt’s 74,000 number of absentee ballots counted is accurate, 74,000 + 67,000 ballots remaining to be counted equals 141,000 absentee ballots which of course doesn’t match either Jones’s totals of 130,517 or the Secretary of State’s number reported of 146,994.
  7. Sometime shortly after midnight on November 5th, hours later, the AJC reports Barron as saying there were 128,000 total absentee ballots and that 96% had been adjudicated (122,880) . This of course doesn’t make sense because Jones had reported 130,517 on 11/3 at 7:20 pm and Corbitt had reported 141,000 at 1:25 pm on 11/4. The SOS final reported 146,994. There were four different amounts of total absentee ballots reported in two days, 128,000, 130,517, 141,000 and 146,994!
  8. At 4:30 am on 11/5, Barron stated there are 10,000 absentee ballots remaining to be counted.
  9. At 7:27 am on 11/5, Barron stated there are approximately 140,000 total absentee ballots. Seven hours earlier, he had said there were 128,000.
Here was our post:


Kevin Moncla at UncoverDC shared more information on Georgia’s impossible results today.

Moncla shared:
The Secretary of State appeared on the Today Show the day after the election. The hosts were asking about the not-yet-determined Georgia election results. At the time, the presidential race stood like this:


Raffensperger then appeared on the show and answered questions as to the state of the election. Raffensperger explains that there were 4.7 million total votes in Georgia.
Then he specifically says:

“We have about 2% left to go, and you can see where we are right now with the results that have been reported. I don’t think they’ll change any outcomes, but that’s what those people that make those predictions do. What we’ll do….”

The call is dropped. A few minutes later, Raffensperger is back on, and the host asks:
“You said you have 2% left to count. You didn’t think, however, that it would be changing the outcome. Is that based on your analysis of where those votes are outstanding, or are you just guessing it because of the fact that it’s only 2%?


We don’t guess. What we do is report. We just see where the candidates are right now in both Presidential, Congressional, and Senatorial, and you look at how many votes are out there. Even if one of the candidates got 100%, it wouldn’t be enough to move it one way or the other.

Raffensperger is right. The difference was 103,705 votes, with Trump in the lead. The 2% remaining was only approximately 94,000 votes. If you add the totals reported, plus the 94,000 outstanding, the total comes to 4,759,119 votes, or 4.75 Million (Exactly what Raffensperger claimed).

But the election ended with much more:

Moncla writes that CNN reported on November 4th at 8:54 p.m., that according to Secretary of State Raffensperger, there are now 122,535 left to count with 26,815 counted in the last 30 minutes alone:

GA-Uncounted-Votes.jpg


Moncla concludes:
However, they didn’t finish the count until November 7th, three days later. With all votes for election day and early voting uploaded on election night, it only leaves the absentee ballots to finalize. So the question remains—where did all these extra absentee ballots come from? All 298,000 of them!
As we said a year ago, nothing in Georgia’s election makes any sense.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Mark Meadows Case Against the Jan 6 Committee May End Up Shutting Down Pelosi’s Kangaroo Court

By Joe Hoft
Published December 10, 2021 at 6:30pm
mark-meadows-600x450.jpg


Former Trump Chief of Staff Mark Meadows announced Tuesday that he would no longer work with the US House’s Jan 6 Committee because they were not respecting Executive Privilege and the separation of powers.


The next day the corrupt and partisan committee moved forward with criminal contempt charges against Meadows.


Later that day (Wednesday), Meadows sued corrupt Speaker Pelosi and the Jan 6 Committee and each member of the corrupt committee.


Today Breitbart’s Joel Pollak reported that Meadow’s suit may actually win and shut down the corrupt committee at the same time.
The lawsuit makes some familiar arguments, such as that the committee is violating the Constitution’s separation of powers by encroaching on executive privilege.
Former Trump aide Stephen K. Bannon, who is being prosecuted by the supposedly apolitical Department of Justice for contempt of Congress, is making the same case against his subpoena in federal court.

But Meadows goes further, pointing out that the January 6 committee violates the terms of its own enabling resolution.

The resolution, H. Res. 503, provides that the committee “shall” consist of 13 members, five of which “shall be appointed after consultation with the minority leader.”

But the committee only has nine members, seven of whom are Democrats, and only two of whom are hand-picked anti-Trump Republicans. Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) rejected the five members chosen by House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (D-CA), an unprecedented step to ensure a one-sided inquiry.

Furthermore, Meadows’s lawsuit points out that while the chair of the committee can order subpoenas, that authority is not absolute. H. Res. 503 requires the chair of the committee to consult with the ranking member before issuing a subpoena for a deposition. But the committee has no ranking Republican member, which could make the committee’s subpoenas invalid.

If Meadows’s lawsuit is successful, he could not only block his own subpoena, but could see the entire committee declared invalid. Pelosi and the Democrats would have to start over — this time, obeying the rules, with five Republican members.
Let’s hope there is some justice left in the DC court system.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

The Wisconsin Assembly hosted two back-to-back hearings on Dec. 8, showing aggressive coordination between Democrat operatives and city and state election officials in the months running up to the Nov. 2020 election. Voter rolls and election abuse were the expressed subjects of the hearings. However, the real story here is the evidence showing the alleged influence of Democrat groups like the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL) in what has been called the Wisconsin 5 (WI5)—the five key cities in Wisconsin that helped Biden win his narrow margin of around 20,000 votes.

Rep. Brandtjen, Chair of the Assembly Committee on Campaigns and Elections, led the hearing to discuss issues associated with the ongoing 2020 election fraud investigation by former Justice Michael Gableman and evidence from other sources like the Wisconsin Elections Administration Legislative Audit Bureau (LAB) Report.

The Dec. 8 hearing revealed a series of emails obtained through open records requests showing various organizations, including Mark Zuckerberg’s well-funded CTCL, were, for all intents and purposes, allegedly allowed to hijack many of the mechanisms used for get-out-the-vote (GOTV) initiatives in the WI5. The coordination targeting Democrat voters was made possible because of nearly $9 million in Zuckerberg funding allegedly to help make things safer for voters because of the pandemic.

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1468699598063554567
1:30 min

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1468716488873885701
1:16 min

The CTCL contract in response to the Wisconsin Safe Voting Plan 2020 can be viewed here. The Wisconsin Safe Voting Plan requested funds for four areas of need, as seen in the screenshot below. The final monies received were closer to $9 million for the state:

Screen-Shot-2021-12-10-at-10.54.39.png


WI Safe Voting/CTCL

Screen-Shot-2021-12-10-at-10.54.50.png

CTCL Funding Requests Wisconsin

Representative Janel Brandtjen Opens With Emails
Rep. Brandtjen’s presented in her opening remarks the series of emails which she described as a “disturbing process” of discussions about “how they (CTCL and other Democrat organizations) can build a template for a computer program.” The organizations worked closely with the Wisconsin Election Commission (WEC) staff to track almost every facet of election and voter data in order to get the vote out in heavily Democrat areas of the cities. While such activity may be questionable on its own, it was the unequal application of the funds and targeting that hurt and disenfranchised voters in Wisconsin. Not all areas in the state were afforded the same level of support before and during the election. Additionally, Brandtjen admonished that, in the process of building the database, those participating were using “government time and resources for a database for CTCL” to potentially help only a certain class of voters.

A New Yorker and former Obama campaign guru, Michael Spitzer-Rubenstein with National Vote At Home, was evidently coordinating a website build called Quickbase in coordination with election commission officials and government employees for the CTCL to track ballots, the placement of dropboxes, and other GOTV mechanisms that were somewhat unique to the 2020 election—using the pandemic as a pretense.

Brandtjen said there were allegedly many more points of contact like zoom calls and phone calls from not only Spitzer-Rubenstein but also other political consultants and organizations who were “inserting themselves” into the 2020 election. There are emails indicating he and others worked with the cities of Madison, Green Bay, Milwaukee, Kenosha, Racine, Eau Claire, and Wauwatosa—and were interested in “other jurisdictions, as well.” Claire Woodall-Vogg, the Executive Director for Milwaukee’s election commission, apparently recommends Vote At Home to other election commissions.

OtherJurisdictions.png

Spitzer-Rubenstein/Wisconsin Infiltration

One of the more stunning emails actually shows Democrat operative Michael Spitzer-Rubenstein asking if Woodall-Vogg knows if “WisVote has an API or anything similar so that it can connect with other software apps? That would be the holy grail (but I’m not expecting that to be easy).” The request came in the same email whose opening request explained his organization was “bringing on US Digital Response to help with the Quick Base dashboard project—also a CTCL technical assistance partner.”

While Woodall-Vogg does not seem to give him direct access to the database, she says she will go into the database “every night” and run the report sending the information to Vote At Home staff. Thus, as Brandtjen explained, Woodall-Vogg ends up providing “a real-time system of the U.S. parcel service of when these ballots are coming in” anyway. On Oct. 19, Woodall-Vogg receives news she is no longer needed for daily reports. She receives an email from Spitzer-Rubenstein saying, “through partners, we should be able to access the voter file and pull the data from WisVote.”

Screen-Shot-2021-12-09-at-15.34.56.png


Vogg/Rubenstein Emails

Spitzer-Rubenstein-Request-to-See-WisVote.png


Spitzer-Rubenstein Request to See WisVote

Woodall-Vogg-Answer-916.png


Woodall-Vogg Answer 916

The 1419 pages of Milwaukee/Woodall-Vogg emails can be found here. Brandtjen has provided the full trove of election documents under the “Election Documents” tab of her website.

There is also correspondence between Woodall-Vogg and the CTCL mentioning the Brennan Center. One of the emails speaks of plans for a “roundtable conversation to [share] strategies with each other for the November election, including the possibility of delayed results.”

Special Counsel Gableman’s probe discusses the emails and the many ways Zuckerberg’s funding—with the help of CTCL and other organizations—was allegedly used to aggressively target Democrat voters during the election on multiple fronts with the private funding of get-out-the-vote activities. Those activities include bussing voters, paying for dropboxes in strategic Democrat areas, and other targeted activities amounting to a “swap of 8.8 million dollars in cash” to get out the vote.

Because of the real-time coordination with voter databases, there were, according to Brandtjen, real opportunities for ballot harvesting. She spoke of an app that was given to certain parties that tracked “where ballots were being delivered.” That type of information would be enormously expensive for the average person to obtain, she explained. However, National Vote at Home and CTCL made it easy and inexpensive to quickly obtain “real-time U.S. Postal tracking” of absentee ballots.

“So the information from the map of Milwaukee—if you wanted that real-time system every day the updated list of absentee ballots, it would still be two to three days behind,” said Brandtjen.

“But this app allows them to have a real-time U.S. postal tracking service every day and if you were to buy that service would probably cost you about $10,000 a day.”

The American Voters Alliance Report
The American Voters Alliance published a damning and extensive report on the subject of “The Legitimacy and Effect of Private Funding in the Federal and State Electoral Processes.” In painstaking detail, the report lays out how private/public funding partnerships under cover of the pandemic allegedly put the “government’s thumb” on the scale in key swing states to favor a party in the election. The Executive Summary excerpt below confirms the grant-related coordination in Wisconsin:

“Funded by hundreds of millions of dollars from Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and other high-tech interests, activist organizations created a two-tiered election system that treated voters differently depending on whether they lived in Democrat or Republican strongholds. Private monies dictated city and county election management contrary to both federal law and state election plans endorsed and developed by state legislatures with authority granted by the United States Constitution.”

“Moreover, executive officials in swing states facilitated, through unique and novel contracts, the sharing of private and sensitive information about citizens within those states with private interests, some whom actively promote leftist candidates and agendas. This data sharing allowed direct access to data of unique political value to leftist causes, and created new vulnerabilities for digital manipulation of state electronic poll books and counting systems and machines.”

“This public-private partnership in these swing states effectively placed government’s thumb on the scale to help these private interests achieve their objectives and to benefit the candidates of one political party.

“Soon after, we witnessed the rumblings of a previously sleepy 501(c)(3) organization entitled the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL) whose previous annual revenues never exceeded $1.2 million.

“CTCL began sending agents into states to recruit certain Democrat strongholds to prepare grants requesting monies from CTCL.”

For example, CTCL inked a $100,000 grant to the Mayor of Racine, WI in May of 2020 directing the Mayor to recruit four other cities (Green Bay, Kenosha, Madison, and Milwaukee) to develop a joint grant request of CTCL. This effort results in these cities submitting a “Wisconsin Safe Election Plan” on June 15, 2020 to CTCL and, in turn, receiving $6.3 million to implement the plan. This privatization of elections undermines the Help America Vote Act (HAVA), which requires state election plans to be submitted to federal officials and approved and requires respect for equal protection by making all resources available equally to all voters.”

“The provision of Zuckerberg-CTCL funds allowed these Democrat strongholds to spend roughly $47 per voter, compared to $4 to $7 per voter in traditionally Republican areas of the state.”


The ElectionFraud20.org website shows how the grant money was distributed to 6 Wisconsin cities in his graph below. Their report on Wisconsin is informative and corroborates much of what was presented in the Dec. 8 hearing. The graph below shows Milwaukee received a large share of the funds. As seen in the emails, the election commissioner from that city was a key player in the alleged cash for votes scheme:

KeshelGraphElectionFraud20.png

ElectionFraud20.org

Part 1 of 2
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
Part 2 of 2

Data Presented In the Hearing
With mail-in and absentee ballots being at an all-time high for the 2020 election, it would have been very easy to use phantom voters and dead voters to pad the votes. Real-time access to data combined with the many anomalies found in the voter rolls and with Wisconsin’s voter registration made the system vulnerable to the potential of hiding nefarious activity.

Jeff O’Donnell, ALoneRaccoon on Telegram and whose website is MagaRaccoon.com, presented evidence of major anomalies in the voter registration data and voter rolls. A screen capture from his Rumble video shows just a small snippet of his findings:

Screen-Shot-2021-12-10-at-11.36.00.png

A Lone Raccoon/Jeff O’Donnell

Media personality Debbie Georgatos posted an expanded version of O’Donnell’s results with editorial comments explaining the implications in red. She took the data from the Liberty Overwatch Telegram channel, which provides a wealth of information on election integrity activity. O’Donnell also presented evidence that 157,000 voters allegedly have the same registration number, making it very difficult to “make a comparison on voter information.”
The hearing also revealed that the state does not remove deceased voters from its rolls but, rather, merely marks them as inactive. 64K individuals were switched to inactive right after the election. O’Donnell stated that “highly suspicious issues were found and need to be investigated further.”

“The Wisconsin election Commission site lists the number of Wisconsin citizens registered at the time of the 2020 election as a little over 4.5 million.

Of those in the voter file, a little over 3.5 million are listed as active voters, and that means that approximately 60% of Wisconsin citizens are registered as active voters in the 2020 election according to the voter file. Slightly over 1.9 million Wisconsin citizens voted absentee. Slightly over 1.3 million voted at the polls—totaling over 3.3 million votes. That calculates to a turnout of 72.9%, which is also the number that has been published.

I find it interesting that if you just do the percent of active voters who cast a vote, that’s actually 93.7% of all active voters did cast a vote in the 2020 general election.”


When voter rolls are padded, it allows for a change in the denominator. Dr. Frank explains the concept using his Wisconsin data:

“So I think your official number of that you reported for your state was something close to the low 70s was the turnout. The official number, it’s 90%. So, in other words, 90% of your active voters voted. If [you] say that to people who have been in the business for a while—they will say, wait a minute, that sounds suspicious! 90% of our people didn’t turn out. So one big advantage of inflating the database is it makes the turnout look lower! It is a very simple way to do that because people will believe 70% turn out! Will people believe in 90% turn out? Maybe not. So, it disguises [an improbable] high turnout.”

Dr. Frank’s presentation later in the hearing showed wild and seemingly coordinated state-wide inflation of the rolls before and during the election and then the same kind of apparent coordination in massive purges of the rolls after the elections. Frank mentioned Mike Lindell’s lawsuit as a source for evidence of algorithmic manipulation in the 2020 election. Notably, other swing states also showed similar activity with the purging of their voter rolls immediately after the election. Dr. Frank explains:

“The point is this; you notice that there is a fluctuation before the election the rolls increase and then afterward there’s a purging. And then before the election, they increase and then are purged after. It’s in all the counties! So here I’m showing you all 69 counties and you notice you got some big counties and small counties—there’s a pattern. Now, some of that’s normal if you talk to the clerks—and I have talked to many clerks and they’ll say, hey Dr. frank, it’s normal for us after the election to remove inactive voters and for us to remove people that have moved away or people have died or things like that.”

WisconsinAddsandPurges.png

[The difference here, however] is that all of your counties are following the same pattern. What’s really suspicious is that even the little bumps along the way in between the major corrections all track each other, so that suggests it’s an obvious conclusion that all the registration rolls are centrally controlled.

They all follow that same pattern. They all inflate before the election and deflated afterward inflate. Before and afterward! They all travel in sync, so you know that it’s not the individual counties doing the work individually because they would be moving independently. It is centrally controlled somehow and that needs to be explained.”


At about an hour and fifteen minutes into the hearing, Frank says that when he asked for a list of voters who voted in the 2020 election, clerks across the country were unable to provide him with a list. Without such a list, he explains it is impossible to verify who is being added or purged. And, he said, “it makes your voter registration system very vulnerable to manipulation.” Frank also emphasized the problem of the delayed updates by county clerks:

“Just take one county that had a five percent loss. The clerks don’t back up their database every day! So what happens is people get added into the database who do same-day registration! They vote and then they’re taken off the rolls before they’ve sent the roll to the Secretary of State or before it’s backed up. So they’ve got a bunch of people in there who voted. They have no record of who they are!”

So this simple question—this one simple question. If they can’t answer this question about the lists, it begs for an investigation. But, also, it changes that your system is very vulnerable—very vulnerable to manipulation. And, another word for that is reconciliation. They simply can’t reconcile and that because the voters are removed from the rolls before the counties even have a chance to record.”


Frank says they need to provide lists every time they add or purge voters.

ListsNeededDrFrank.png
ListsNeededDrFrank

It may not be that far-fetched to deduce that the alleged coordination with organizations like CTCL, who had real-time access to all manner of voter and election-related data, would strategize a win for their chosen candidate. At least, that seemed to be the consensus of the three independent presenters who attended the hearing.

We Must Change Legislation, Not Rely Upon The Courts
Erick Kaardal with the Wisconsin Voter Alliance (WVA), which is affiliated with the Amistad Project, was the last presenter. His organization, he said, “represents the people” in its investigation of election abuses. His organization has sued the state for records. The WVA press release and the complaint can be found here. The group attempted to overturn certification of the election in December of 2020, but the Wisconsin Supreme Court rejected the request. A thread on Kaardel’s three election lawsuits and ensuing complaints against each of the Wisconsin 5 cities can be found below:

1639215341170.png

WVA says it has evidence that there was an unholy alliance between private entities like CTCL and government officials and election commissioners, which caused election abuses. The Wisconsin Election Commission has denied any wrongdoing.

During the hearing, Kaardel reviewed the entire CTCL contract and the state’s Wisconsin Safe Voting Plan, commenting on the myriad ways the funding allegedly disenfranchised voters who were not Democrats. He said there were “a dozen or so non-profit partners” who inserted themselves into the state’s elections.

One of Kaardal’s aims is to effect legislation so that private-public contracts of this nature never again grace elections in Wisconsin. He also said reliance on the courts alone is a path to failure for election integrity.

Some of what he found is explained below:

“Racine acted as a CTCL recruiting agent when it got $100,000 to recruit the other mayors. And, they ended up getting those five cities to join—the largest five cities. Mayors and their staff had virtual meetings on May 16th, 2020, June 13, 2020, and August 14, 2020. The mayors and staff are invited to the meetings, but common council members apparently were not informed of meetings, nor was the public informed of the meetings.”

RacineCTCL.png

Kaardal

The biggest issue, Kaardal explained, was the unequal distribution of grant funds. Some cities, he said, “received $20 or $25 per voter; others received .50 a voter.” CTCL was directing the funds.

So “non-Wisconsin 5 cities don’t get any of the resources, don’t get any of this extra access to voting and data.” Wisconsin 5 cities got more strategically placed dropboxes, more help with filling out ballots, funds for poll workers, more information “inducing people to go to the polls and vote,” among other advantages.

“And documents show that cities weren’t allowed to reduce their budgets without approval from CTCL—effectively, nonprofits were calling the shots in the Nov. 2020 election,” added Kaardel.

“This was an $8.8 million swap for turning out the vote in these cities,” he said.

Kaardal also confirmed Brandtjen’s assertions that CTCL and other out-of-state nonprofits had unparalleled “access to the ballot box” in Wisconsin with their private-public partnerships. He wants to “ensure that 2022 is not the same. The government shouldn’t run GOTV,” said Kaardal.

“I came here representing 1100 people,” continued Kaardel, “and they have a concern that this is going to happen in 2022 and their perspective is that when government officials are taking money to induce people to go to the polls. We want to make sure that election officials aren’t being financed by left-wing or right-wing organizations to get out the vote.”

Eighty-seven percent of the CTCL money went to Wisconsin-5 cities, according to Kaardal. The Wisconsin Election Commission’s efforts to have the complaints dismissed on behalf of the five cities are documented in the following memo.
 
Last edited:

marsh

On TB every waking moment

“They Counted Batches of Ballots Multiple Times … with No Poll Watchers Present – All of which Violated Georgia Law” – Liz Harrington on David Perdue’s Explosive Fulton County Lawsuit

By Joe Hoft
Published December 11, 2021 at 6:15pm
Liz-Harrington.jpg

Liz Harrington, Chief spokeswoman for President Trump, released a Twitter thread where she highlights points in former Georgia Senator David Perdue’s case against Fulton County Georgia’s 2020 Election leadership.


Former Senator David Perdue filed a case on Thursday against Fulton County Georgia election leaders. Here is the entire filing:


Liz Harrington addressed key points in the filing. Clearly fraudulent absentee ballots were counted.

1639282241934.png

1639282281164.png

Harrington then addresses employment company Happy Faces and their activities during the election. We noted these yesterday as well.


Harrington shared the same observations.

1639282797622.png

1639282850238.png

Some fraudulent ballots didn’t have any creases indicating they had never been mailed out or returned via the mail.

1639282889148.png

1639282927563.png

The County was responsible for the hiring of individuals involved in the train wreck of an election in the county.

1639282966676.png

1639283023946.png

Petitioners show that at least 36 batches were scanned and tabulated multiple times (this is not good news for Ruby and her daughter who are claiming they did nothing wrong in their suit with the Gateway Pundit).

1639283062600.png

1639283103098.png

There were thousands of ballots scanned multiple times.

Part 1 of 2 due to number of images
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
Part 2 of 2

1639283249517.png

1639283383058.png

They counted batches of ballots multiple times between 11:00 PM and 1:00 AM with no poll watchers present “all of which violated Georgia law”. (More bad news for Ruby.)

1639283423282.png

What a mess the election in Fulton County Georgia was due to the actions of some very bad people.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Deputy Warden at DC Gulag Where Pro-Trump Political Prisoners Are Violently Beaten and Abused Deletes Twitter Page After She Is Exposed as Toxic Trump-Hater

By Jim Hoft
Published December 11, 2021 at 9:54pm

There are currently dozens of Trump supporters indefinitely detained without trial at the DC Gulag in Washington DC.

The corrupt DC judges will not allow these men to post bail and many are beaten and regularly abused by the DC prison guards.



The J-6 protesters have been beaten by the Trump-hating guards to within an inch of their lives.

This is part of the Biden legacy — Where America surrenders and then arms the enemy and where Americans are held indefinitely in prison with trial.

Democrats are determined to turn America into a Marxist sh*thole.

This is how it begins.

The vast majority of Republican lawmakers are too weak to stand up to this inhumanity.
Now we know why the January 6 prisoners are treated like terrorists. The Deputy Warden is a raging leftist who regularly tweets vicious attacks at Trump supporters.

She is Deputy Warden at the DC Gulag.
kathleen-landerkin-deputy-warden.jpeg


Marjorie Taylor Greene first tweeted out on Deputy Warden Landerkin.

1639284050258.png1639284104818.png1639284149250.png

Alex Bruesewitz saved a few of her toxic tweets before she deleted her account.

This is truly amazing.

The prisoners are being abused under her watch.
1639284203487.png1639284244395.png

The National File has much more on this sick woman who serves as Deputy Warden where Trump supporters to this day are viciously abused.

This woman should be fired and charged for neglect and abuse.
 

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
Hakeem Jeffries should have kept his mouth shut…
Actually, I want to hear more of what he has to say.

"Better to be quiet and be thought the fool, than to open the mouth and confirm the fact."

I truly imagine with his claim and support of a "mostly honest election" he will confirm the fool irrevocably.

Go on. Tell us more. Please. For the record.

I want to hear more about how "Authoritarian" Trump and MAGA are going to "Destroy Democracy." So do the J6 Protesters. So does James O'Keefe. So does Rudy Giuliani. So does Marilyn Hueper (Alaskan woman whose door was mistakenly broken down in an FBI raid connected to J6.) So does Tina Peters (Arizona Mesa County Election Clerk raided by the FBI) So does Stacy Langton (Virginia CRT Concerned Parent raided by the FBI) So does the Arizona Senate (Who were "dissuaded" to include "canvassing" as part of the Cyber-Ninja Audit.) So do seniors returned to elder care homes in NY State while infected with Covid that ultimately caused 10K deaths - while Trump's "USS Comfort" ship sat empty in a NYC Pier 90.

And - I imagine that Ray Epps would be curious to know what you know for his self interest. And Adam Schiff. And Tony Fauci. These will certainly want your assistance to know which papers to retain against their coming legal issues.

And certainly Aaron Danielson would want to know the progress of destruction - that is if he were not DEAD - killed at the hands of a lawless Marxist Michael Reinoehl, who saw opportunity and 15 minutes of fame as a trade for HIS worthless life. (City of Portland, OR being sued by Danielson estate claiming damage due to "passive policing." They certainly can use information showing the difference between "authoritarian" and "passive.") I'm sure Rep. Jeffries knows and can help.

"The unexamined life is not worth living." We're here for your examination. As you stand, you're hardly worth talking about. So elucidate to us. Fill the room with your intelligence.

kingsfield.jpg


We'll have plenty to say back to you - and possibly more to do (to you.)

Dobbin
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

THEY’RE SCARED: Fulton County Commissioner Robb Pitts Tells Auditors: ‘Stay the Hell Out of Fulton County”

By Jim Hoft
Published December 12, 2021 at 10:36am

What are they hiding?
robb-pitts-fulton-county.jpg


In January, Robb Pitts, the Fulton County Georgia Board of Commissioners Chairman, lashed out at President Donald Trump over his claims of election fraud in Fulton County Georgia.

Fulton County elections workers are now famous for removing GOP observers on Election night and rolling out hidden “suitcases” of ballots to begin counting. There is also video, first reported at The Gateway Pundit, of election workers running the same stack of ballots through the voting machines several times while no election observers were in the room.


Then in July after Fulton County readied to hold an audit of the absentee ballots, County Commissioner Robb Pitts asked that all counties be investigated.

Via CD Media:
pitts-fulton-georgia.jpg


But this week after former Senator David Perdue filed his lawsuit against Fulton County for access to the absentee ballots Robb Pitts reacted with fury.

Pitts told Perdue and the auditors to, “Stay the hell out of Fulton County!”

Atlanta Intown reported:
Fulton County Commission Chairman Robb Pitts has sent a very direct message to GOP gubernatorial candidate David Perdue, who filed a lawsuit Friday seeking to inspect absentee ballots from the November 2020 election: “Stay the hell out of Fulton County.”

“My advice to him would be to concentrate on his upcoming election and leave Fulton County alone,” Pitts said in a statement.

The lawsuit, filed just four days after Perdue launched his campaign to unseat fellow Republican Brian Kemp, echoes the failed legal challenges by supporters of former President Donald Trump, who claim massive election fraud put President Joe Biden in office…

…Pitts called the lawsuit “baseless.”

“It’s disheartening to see former Senator Perdue engage in this desperate attempt to appeal to believers of the Big Lie,” Pitts said, referring to the ongoing conspiracy theory that Trump lost the election due to voter fraud. “The 2020 election is over – the votes have been counted three times, including once by hand, and no evidence of wrongdoing has ever been found. It’s clear that the former Senator is only doing this to play dirty politics and try to get out of a tough primary.”
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

HUGE: Pennsylvania Democrats Scared of Ongoing 2020 Election Audit in State – Crooked AG Is Freaking Out

By Joe Hoft
Published December 12, 2021 at 7:15am
IMG_6348-600x344.jpg

Democrats in Pennsylvania are complaining about the forensic audit being performed there.

If the Democrats were confident with the results of the 2020 Election they would welcome audits in their states.

They don’t.


Not much has been said to date about the forensic audit taking place in Pennsylvania. We reported a couple weeks ago on November 21 that a firm had been chosen by Republicans in the Pennsylvania Senate to perform a forensic audit of the 2020 Election results in the state.


Now the corrupt Democrat Attorney General in Pennsylvania is complaining and trying to muddy up the audit that has just started.

1639351126415.png

Corrupt AG Shapiro called the Pennsylvania election for Biden before the election took place.


Shapiro then ignored the hundreds and thousands of complaints, some with supporting affidavits, that notified public officials like Shapiro of massive fraud in the state. Yet Shapiro did nothing.

 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Exclusive — Perdue: Stacey Abrams Wants to Give Illegal Aliens the ‘Right to Vote’; Democrats Would Control Georgia ‘Forever’
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA - OCTOBER 24: Former Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams waits to speak at a Democratic canvass kickoff as she campaigns for Joe Biden and Kamala Harris at Bruce Trent Park on October 24, 2020 in Las Vegas, Nevada. In-person early voting for the general election in the …
Ethan Miller/Getty Images
ASHLEY OLIVER12 Dec 2021141
6:17
Former Sen. David Perdue (R-GA) believes Democrats would have perpetual control over Georgia should Stacey Abrams be elected governor, he said during an interview on SiriusXM’s Breitbart News Saturday.

Perdue, who announced this week he is running for governor, warned frontrunning Democrat candidate Abrams’ push to loosen voting restrictions would translate into Georgia law if she were to win the race, and that her new laws would open the state to never-ending Democrat election victories.

“We need to understand, we will not get Georgia back if she wins this governor’s race. She has talked about opening our borders. She’s talking about opening our elections to have no voter ID. She wants illegal immigrants to have the right to vote — anybody can vote. This would put them in power forever,” Perdue said.

Listen:

https://soundcloud.com/breitbart%2Fdavid-perdue-december-11-2021 View: https://soundcloud.com/breitbart/david-perdue-december-11-2021?utm_source=www.breitbart.com&utm_campaign=wtshare&utm_medium=widget&utm_content=https%253A%252F%252Fsoundcloud.com%252Fbreitbart%252Fdavid-perdue-december-11-2021
21:00 min


Abrams has been hyper-focused on voting laws since 2018, when she lost to Gov. Brian Kemp (R) in her first run for governor by less than two percent. She claimed her loss was a result of “voter suppression,” and she has notoriously never conceded the race.

Abrams also became an outspoken voting rights activist that year, launching the group Fair Fight, which has raked in more than $100 million in fundraising since its launch, per federal election records.

In the midst of her ongoing activism, the Georgia Democrat has conveyed somewhat muddled positions on voter ID laws specifically, appearing to compromise on the issue at one point this year as Congress sought to pass an election overhaul bill that would, in part, federalize aspects of the voting process but maintain voter ID requirements, per an analysis published by the Washington Post in June.

The Post report settles on Abrams’ position being that she does not oppose voter ID requirements but that she opposes “restrictive” voter ID requirements.

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1406696354831810562
.33 min

Perdue recalled of Abrams’ behavior in the 2018 election aftermath, “She’s immediately claimed that she had been cheated and there’s voter suppression, and now she’s gone around and made a lot of money, millions of dollars, over the last three years telling the country that she’s really the governor of Georgia and that she was she was cheated out of it by voter suppression.”

Perdue, a wealthy businessman and cousin to former Georgia Gov. Sonny Perdue (R), won his election for U.S. Senate in 2014. In his bid for reelection in 2020, he beat now-Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-GA) but did not meet the 50 percent threshold required by Georgia election law to clinch the victory. The race moved to a runoff, where he and former Sen. Kelly Loeffler (R-GA) — who was competing in her own runoff — both narrowly lost in blockbuster races that resulted in Democrat control over the U.S. Senate.

The defeats followed President Joe Biden being certified the winner of the presidential election in Georgia by around 12,000 votes out of five million cast — the first Democrat presidential candidate to take the state in nearly 25 years.

Abrams has been largely credited with the Democrat victories because of her aggressive activism with ballot measures and get out the vote efforts during the last election cycle. However, former President Donald Trump has also been the leading voice in blaming Kemp for the Republican losses, and Perdue — who was quickly endorsed by Trump when Perdue launched his campaign — has echoed similar concerns about Kemp.

SAVANNAH, GEORGIA - DECEMBER 04: Sen. David Perdue (R-GA) attends a rally with Vice President Mike Pence in support of both he and Sen. Kelly Loeffler (R-GA) on December 04, 2020 in Savannah, Georgia. The Defend the Majority Rally with the senators comes ahead of a crucial runoff election for Perdue and Loeffler on January 5th which will decide who controls the Unite States senate. Loeffler was unable to attend the rally due to a serious accident one of her staff members was involved in. (Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images)
Sen. David Perdue (R-GA) attends a rally with Vice President Mike Pence in support of both he and Sen. Kelly Loeffler (R-GA) on December 4, 2020 in Savannah, Georgia. (Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

Perdue said Saturday he decided to run for governor “against an incumbent Republican governor who I think gave away the election process to Stacey Abrams in 2020 and has lost confidence of our party, and I just don’t see any way that he can beat Stacey Abrams.”

One point of criticism against Kemp was over a consent decree his secretary of state, Brad Raffensperger (R), signed off on in March 2020. The consent decree was a settlement between the Georgia Democrat Party and Raffensperger that elaborated on the state’s process of signature verification on absentee ballots. The settlement was published on the website of Mark Elias’s then-law firm, Perkins Coie, a firm heavily involved nationally in fighting to loosen election laws in 2020. The settlement required a total of three election officials to sign off on absentee ballots that could not be signature verified. The settlement also specified the timeframe within which a voter must be notified of their rejected absentee ballot so that the voter had a reasonable opportunity to “cure” the signature issue.

Perdue acknowledged Kemp did not sign the settlement but argued the governor was complacent in the pre-election signature fight.

“By the way, the governor actually didn’t sign the consent decree. My argument with the governor is he didn’t stop it. They didn’t. They didn’t bring it public. They didn’t make this open,” Perdue said.

In this image provided by the Georgia Port Authority, Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp speaks during the Georgia Ports Authority's Savannah State of the Port event, Thursday, Sept. 12, 2019, in Savannah, Ga. The GPA plans to double capacity at Garden City Terminal to 11 million twenty-foot equivalent container units per year. In Fiscal Year 2019, port-related industries announced $5 billion in new investment and 12,000 new jobs coming to Georgia. (Stephen Morton/Georgia Port Authority via AP)
Gov. Brian Kemp speaks during the Georgia Ports Authority’s Savannah State of the Port event, September 12, 2019, in Savannah, Georgia. (Stephen Morton/Georgia Port Authority via AP)

Another point of criticism against Kemp made by Trump and others was that Kemp did not call a special session after the November election but before the January 5 runoffs so that the state legislature could choose its own separate set of electoral college electors. Kemp argued at the time that the move would have been unconstitutional and “immediately enjoined by the courts.”

Perdue said he too asked Kemp for a special session in November and that he has also asked courts multiple times about the legalities of the special session.

“I asked for a special session in November. I was denied that by our governor. I went to court on three different occasions, was told I didn’t have legal standing. I have filed another suit just yesterday to see if I had legal standing because I want to get at the truth, and we have not done that yet here in Georgia,” Perdue said on Saturday.

The former senator also acknowledged that in “some areas” — such as coronavirus — “I think [Kemp’s] done an okay job,” less Kemp reopening the state after shutdowns a week earlier than Perdue believes the governor should have.

Perdue added, “This is not personal. … I like Brian. It’s just that he can’t win. He has not brought our party together, and if he were going to do that, he would have done it already.”
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Chris Christie: Trump Would Not Concede — January 6 Riot Was ‘Driven from the Top’

Video on website 7:25 min
PAM KEY12 Dec 2021739

Former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie (R) said Sunday on ABC’s “This Week” that the January 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol “was driven from the top” by former President Donald Trump.

Anchor George Stephanopoulos said, “It seems like every single day, Chris Christie, we’re learning more about what was going on inside the White House in those days leading up to January 6. Most recently this week, this PowerPoint presentation that was sent to Mark Meadows detailing all the ways the White House could interfere in the investigation. It may explain why the former president and his allies are working so hard not to cooperate.”

Christie said, “Well, look, all the things that you see were driven from the top. I mean, the president made it very clear that he did not want to concede the election, that he would not concede the election. And you had a bunch of people around him by the time he got to the end with very few exceptions that were C-team players at best, on their best day.”

He continued, “So C-team players get in there, and they tell the boss what he wants to hear.”

Christie added, “In the end, the facts are going to come out. But let’s not kid ourselves, this was a driven-from-the-top process executed by C-team players, and that’s why it looks like a Keystone Cops operation because it was.”
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

AMAZING FLASHBACK: Issues and Evidence of Election Fraud from November 2020 Never Investigated and Questions Still Unanswered

Published December 12, 2021 at 6:00pm
By Jim and Joe Hoft
election-fraud-2020-ballots-ga-tcf.jpg

2020 Fraud (left to right): Late night hidden ballot delivery in Georgia, Late night ballot dump in Michigan, Blocking GOP observers in Detroit

Below is a list of articles to date from November 8, 2020, where potential fraud was identified in the 2020 presidential election. The list includes the actions recommended to address the issues at the time.

The issues and recommendations were categorized by state with an overall section first identifying all the actions to be taken across the states followed with additional actions to be taken at each specific state.

This list was ignored by the FBI, DOJ, state officials, including Republican officials.

To this day there are hundreds of questions unanswered regarding the stolen 2020 election.

The staff at The Gateway Pundit will never concede that the 2020 election was fair, free or legitimate.

We will always fight for you and fight for the truth.

It is quite stunning that we recognized these issues by November 8th while Democrats were still working diligently to steal President Donald Trump’s landslide victory.
Overall:
  1. Manually recount any state results where Dominion Vote Machines were used to tally results
  2. Focus on closely contested and swing states
  3. Focus on cities (i.e. Milwaukee, Detroit, Pittsburgh, Philadelphia, Atlanta, Las Vegas, Phoenix, Minneapolis, etc…)
  4. Focus on absentee and mail-in Ballots
  5. Investigate Biden only votes
  6. Identify dead people who voted
  7. Identify felons who voted
  8. Identify illegal aliens who voted
  9. Identify children who voted
  10. Identify individuals who voted more than once
  11. Identify newly registered individuals over 90 years old
  12. Identify non-registered voters and review
  13. Identify who made the call to stop counting in certain states, the rationale for doing so and the timing of the call
Extremely Long article. Please see the website for the rest. AMAZING FLASHBACK: Issues and Evidence of Election Fraud from November 2020 Never Investigated and Questions Still Unanswered
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

A federal judge threw out Mike Lindell's defamation lawsuit against the Daily Mail for a story alleging he had a secret affair with actress Jane Krakowski
Azmi Haroun
Dec 10, 2021, 5:45 PM

lindell krakowski mypillow

Adam Bettcher/WireImage/NBC/NBCU Photo Bank/Getty Images
  • A federal judge dismissed My Pillow CEO Mike Lindell's defamation lawsuit against the Daily Mail.
  • Lindell sued the outlet for publishing a story claiming he had a secret affair with actress Jane Krakowski.
  • The judge said the lawsuit did not identify any statements "that a reasonable person would view as defamatory."
A federal judge dismissed MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell's defamation lawsuit against British tabloid the Daily Mail on Friday, according to court documents.

In January, Lindell sued the Mail for defamation and libel after the tabloid published a piece claiming that he and "30 Rock" actress Jane Krakowski had a secret affair.

The British tabloid had reported that Lindell courted Krakowski and that they started secretly dating in 2020 for nine months, based on a tip from "an anonymous friend." Days after the article was published, both Krakowski and Lindell denied the story, and in his suit, Lindell claimed that he had never heard of Krakowski.

In the Friday ruling, US District Court Judge Paul Crotty wrote that Lindell had not attached the full article to his lawsuit, but that the Mail had as part of their defense.

"Dating an actress — secret or not — would not cause 'public hatred,' 'shame,' 'ridicule,' or any similar feeling towards Lindell," Crotty wrote, adding that Lindell's lawsuit "has not identified any statements in the Article that a reasonable person would view as defamatory."

In the lawsuit, Lindell claimed that the story caused him "personal harm and emotional distress," largely because the piece alleges that Lindell sent Krakowski alcohol.

The article said Lindell had "wooed Krakowski with flowers and champagne," and in his lawsuit, he mentioned the Lindell Recovery Network, a substance abuse recovery platform he created, alleging that the story has hurt his reputation and ability to provide services.

"As a recovering addict and alcoholic, who frequently writes and speaks about his spiritual triumphs over substance abuse, Mr. Lindell is horrified by the defendants' fabricated and very public accusations," his lawsuit said.

Crotty found Lindell's claims to be insufficient to qualify as defamatory, according to the ruling.

"The purchase of alcohol is a legal and ordinary act," Crotty wrote. "If even more problematic depictions of alcohol consumption, such as underage drinking or alcoholism, routinely fail to qualify as defamatory in New York courts surely no reasonable reader could find it offensive to exchange champagne or other bottles of liquor as gifts between romantic partners."

The judge added that he "declines to test the Article's statements by asking how they would be understood by an amorphous subset of evangelical Christian readers."

Insider reached out to the attorneys representing the Daily Mail and Mike Lindell for comment.

A representative for Krakowski did not immediately respond to Insider's request for comment on the dismissal.
 

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
(Wisconsin Committee on Campaigns and Elections hearing highlight)

Most Secure Election in History 1:03 min

MOST SECURE ELECTION IN HISTORY
Administered by those who have no interest in accuracy, no interest in veracity, and no interest in correction.

Sounds like a recipe for election fraud.

If this is the most secure, can we put these people in charge of the banks?

We'll be rich - but only if we vote Democrat.

Dobbin
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

EXCLUSIVE: Georgia Asst AG Claims that SOS Raffensperger Is Not Responsible for Errors Exposed in Fulton County (Doesn’t Challenge Multiple Errors Identified)

By Joe Hoft
Published December 13, 2021 at 7:45am
Georgia-Brad-Raffensperger.jpg


Raffensperger and Team Just Blinked
Material information for this article provided by Kevin Moncla

Ten days ago The Gateway Pundit reported that Georgia Governor Kemp agreed with a report from a Georgia citizen where he had identified 36 issues in Fulton County’s 2020 Election results posted on the Georgia Secretary of State’s (SOS’s) website.


Unable to dispute the facts surrounding the errors posted on the SOS’s website for the Fulton County Risk Limiting Audit (RLA) Report (hand audit noted in article above), Raffensperger and team resorted to intimidation tactics.

As you may recall Joseph Rossi and Attorney Jack James, presented 36 errors posted on the SOS’s website for the Fulton RLA report to Governor Kemp’s team. Subsequently, the Governor’s team, after an extensive investigation of their own, verified the data presented as “factual,” and recently called upon the State Elections Board (SEB) to open an investigation “swiftly,” into this grave matter.

We spoke with Mr. Rossi, and during our interview, he told us that on Friday, December 3rd, [the same day we posted the article above at The Gateway Pundit] the Attorney General’s office called Attorney Jack James. The sole purpose of the call was to convince Mr. James (and also Mr. Rossi), that the SOS is not responsible for the errored data posted on his website.

Mr. James, being an experienced litigator, failed to succumb to the pressure.

In a summary note of the call, Mr. James wrote, “The purpose of her call was apparently to convince me that the SOS has no responsibility for the errors exposed in Fulton County. I said Mr. Rossi and I believe the SOS has the ultimate responsibility; thus we disagree on the issue of responsibility.”

In addition, Mr. James called our attention to Code Section. OCGA 21-2-499(a) “…requires the SOS to notify a county if an error is found in the county’s certified returns and direct the county to correct the error and recertify the results.”

The SOS’s shield of armor now has a crack. Mr. Rossi and Mr. James are gathering support for:
  1. The State Election Board to publicly announce per the Governor’s request that an investigation has been opened regarding the errored data posted on the SOS’s website regarding the RLA Report for Fulton County.
  2. The SOS’s office immediately footnote the errored data…(1) data contained in this report is under investigation.
  3. Determine which entity is responsible for the generation of the errors.
  4. Determine what was the root cause of the errors.
  5. Determine what is the net vote impact for the errors.
  6. Determine if the SOS’s office checked the RLA report posted on their website.
  7. If they did check this RLA report, did they not find any errors = incompetence?
  8. If they did check this RLA report , did they find errors and did nothing = cover up?
Mr. James provided his summary of the call with the attorney from the Attorney General’s office:
Notes-between-SOS-GA-and-Rossi-Attorney.jpg


Mr. Rossi made it very clear that his efforts to seek the truth will not be thwarted by intimidation tactics or otherwise. He also stated that he and his team are continuing to investigate the election results.

It is well-known that the Secretary of State is the chief election officer of the state and the responsibility for the election results is squarely his to answer for.

Of note, last Thursday former US Senator David Perdue sued Fulton County for their 2020 Election reporting which “affected the outcome of the statewide General Election”:

 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

John Fredericks: Election Integrity Cases Are Proceeding in Georgia – Vernon Jones Clearly a Grassroots Favorite for Governor (VIDEO)

By Jim Hoft
Published December 13, 2021 at 10:28am
09AB397C-61EE-4947-AAEF-AFF61AA68BCA.jpeg

Talk radio host John Fredericks joined Steve Bannon on The War Room on Monday morning.

John Fredericks reported on the recent court case by former Senator David Perdue against Fulton County officials. Perdue sued last week for the release of Fulton County absentee ballots from the 2020 election. Perdue waited a year to file this lawsuit against Fulton County. Better late than never.

President Trump endorsed Perdue in the race for Georgia governor. But Fredericks pointed out that this has not put a dent in the grassroots support for Vernon Jones. According to John Fredericks he is receiving 650 calls of support for Vernon Jones to 3 for David Perdue.

Rumble video on website 13:16 min
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

HAPPENING NOW – LIVE FEED: Arizona Election Integrity Hearing In Pima County (VIDEO)
By Jordan Conradson
Published December 13, 2021 at 10:29am
Comment
ShareTweetShare to Gab Telegram Telegram Clouthub Share
2DA8D0BA-3C86-4815-BB1E-9792E2C4E8B2.jpeg

Arizona State Representative Mark Finchem, Majority Whip Leo Biasiucci, and Senator Sonny Borrelli are currently holding an Election Integrity Hearing in Pima County, Arizona.


The Gateway Pundit reported that precincts in Pima County were reporting over 100% voter turnout for mail-in-ballots and many others were reporting 99% or 97% turnout for mail-in ballots in the 2020 election.


Mark Finchem recently revealed that 35,000 fictitious votes were inserted into the election system in Arizona. Mark Finchem is running for Secretary of State in Arizona.


The panel members are as follows.

1639442371637.png

The Gateway Pundit reported that the Arizona audit has already spread beyond Maricopa County and witnesses will provide data from their analysis.

Rumble video on website LIVE
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

BREAKING: A Complaint to Ban Dominion Voting Machines’ System from Being Used in Georgia to be Held Wednesday

By Joe Hoft
Published December 13, 2021 at 10:54am

dominion-voting-systems-michigan-600x381.jpg

Voter GA’s complaint in the state of Georgia to have a Motions Hearing to ban Dominion Voting Machines Democracy Suite 5.5 system in the state of Georgia has been granted. The hearing will be held on Wednesday, December 15, per a media press release today from Voter GA.

Voter-GA-Ban-Dominion.jpg


The complaint filed on October 27, 2021, to ban Dominion Voting Machines Dominion Democracy Suite 5.5 System from use in the state of Georgia is below:

VoterGA and Philip Singleton v. State of Georgia Case No. 2021CV353604 RESPONSE 10-27-2021 by Jim Hoft on Scribd (Scribd doc on Website)

1639442664182.png
Download this PDF

Here is the ruling from the Georgia Court dated October 11, 2020:
GA Curling v Raffensperger Rulling 101120 by Jim Hoft on Scribd (Scribd doc on website)

1639442863052.png
Download this PDF

Let’s see what the courts are going to do now. Unfortunately, this should have been addressed more than a year ago.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Dr. Peter Navaro Tells Corrupt Pelosi COVID Committee He Will Not Comply with Subpoena Request

By Joe Hoft
Published December 13, 2021 at 9:30am
peter-navarro-six-guns.jpg


The Pelosi and Cheney gang just won’t stop. This corrupt Congress will do anything to harass Americans and members of President Trump’s team.

Newsmax reports:

Former White House trade adviser Peter Navarro has refused to comply with a subpoena for documents related to the Trump administration’s response to the coronavirus, saying the former president ordered him not to, according to his response to a congressional request released on Saturday.

The subpoena was issued in November by the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis as part of its probe of whether former Trump administration officials mishandled the federal response to the pandemic by interfering with its own health agency’s work. Nearly 800,000 people have died in the United States from the pandemic.

Navarro, a Republican, also served as one of former President Donald Trump’s pandemic response advisers and was responsible for procurement in the coronavirus response, among other things. Navarro said in a letter to the subcommittee he would not cooperate because Trump told him to “protect executive privilege.”

“It is a direct order that I should not comply with the subpoena,” Navarro said in a letter to the committee, a copy of which was seen by Reuters.
Navarro isn’t the only member of the Trump team being harassed by this corrupt Pelosi Congress with subpoenas. Numerous other individuals close to the President have also been asked to provide unreasonable and protected information to Congress’s corrupt committees. Steve Bannon, is another American attacked by this anti-American Congress.


This Congress wants to obtain information only to use it against President Trump and his allies. They also don’t want the information regarding their actions to be made public. Even the far-left media is with Bannon on this one.


This Congress is still behind the holding of ‘political prisoners’ related to the Jan 6 debacle that Congress clearly was part of. Hundreds of Americans have been jailed on made-up crimes with no court dates insight.

 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Progressive lawmakers offer unwitting path for Jan. 6 prisoners to sue federal government

Bill sponsored by Democratic Reps. Hank Johnson, Jamie Raskin would allow citizens to recover damages for constitutional violations.

Updated: December 12, 2021 - 11:26pm

Some of the most progressive Democrats in Congress are supporting new legislation that could help an unexpected group: those who were arrested and imprisoned without trial for playing a role in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot.

Democratic Reps. Hank Johnson (Ga.) and Jamie Raskin (Md.) on Wednesday reintroduced the Bivens Act, which would allow citizens to recover damages for constitutional violations committed against them by federal law enforcement officials.

The bill, which the lawmakers first introduced last year, seeks "to provide a civil remedy for an individual whose rights have been violated by a person acting under federal authority." It would do this by adding five words — "of the United States or" — to a longstanding provision enacted in 1871, known as Section 1983, which gives individuals the right to sue state or local officials who violate their civil and constitutional rights. The additional words would include federal officials in the statute.

The FBI, Justice Department, Transportation Security Administration (TSA), U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and federal prison officials are among the law enforcement entities that would be held accountable under the legislation.

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) introduced a companion bill in the Senate this week.

Supporters of the legislation argue that no statute, including Section 1983, currently gives individuals the right to sue federal officials who violate the Constitution. Johnson and Raskin said as much in a press release, pointing to the former Trump administration as reason to pass their bill.

"Victims of constitutional violations by federal officers too often have no legal recourse,"

Johnson said. "From ICE officers who conduct illegal searches and seizures and Bureau of Land Management officials who intimidate property owners into providing easements to the peaceful protesters who were violently dispersed from Lafayette Square with teargas and rubber bullets last summer so [President] Trump could get his Bible photo op — they are all too often immunized from damages for their constitutional wrongs."

Raskin also focused on last year's incident at Lafayette Square in Washington, D.C. Neither congressman mentioned the report from the Department of the Interior's inspector general, who found that U.S. Park Police was unaware of President Trump's impending visit and had instead cleared the area to allow a contractor "to safely install the anti-scale fencing in response to destruction of property and injury to officers" that had occurred there days before.

"The Bivens Act will finally codify the people's right to seek damages from the federal government when their constitutional rights have been violated," Raskins said. "Just last year, we watched then-Attorney General Barr unleash a ragtag paramilitary squad of federal law enforcement officers to deploy tear gas, pepper spray, and rubber bullets against peaceful protestors in Lafayette Square.

"Many of those injured that day, including several of my constituents, may find themselves without an effective legal remedy. This bill will right that wrong by allowing affected citizens to recover damages and hold federal law enforcement officials accountable for misconduct."

While Johnson and Raskins framed their bill as a way to protect against the overreaches of the Trump administration, the legislation would incidentally offer a path to civil remedy for those imprisoned without trial for alleged involvement in the Jan. 6 Capitol breach who say they've been mistreated by federal authorities to sue.

Several Jan. 6 prisoners allege the FBI, Justice Department, and federal prison officials under the Biden administration have violated their civil and constitutional rights.

Thomas Caldwell, 66, for example, says he was arrested at his Virginia farm in January and interrogated for hours without being told what he was being charged with. Caldwell, a military veteran, never entered the Capitol building on Jan. 6 but spent well over a month in solitary confinement.

George Tanios, 40, says he had a similar experience at his West Virginia home in March, claiming federal agents wouldn't answer him when he asked why they were arresting him. He was imprisoned on charges related to the death of Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick and remained in jail for months, despite the District of Columbia's chief medical examiner concluding Sicknick died of unrelated natural causes. According to Tanios, his business was devastated as a result of his arrest and imprisonment.

Christopher Worrell was also arrested and imprisoned for his involvement in the Capitol riot despite never entering the building. In October, a federal judge found D.C. Jail Warden Wanda Patten and D.C. Department of Corrections Director Quincy Booth in contempt of court for refusing to turn over records related to the care of Worrell, who suffers from non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and had a broken hand. The judge referred the matter to the attorney general "for appropriate inquiry into potential civil rights violations of Jan. 6 defendants, as exemplified in this case."

Worrell's lawyer said his client was subjected to "cruel and unusual punishment" in the jail that houses most of the Jan. 6 prisoners. The D.C. jail has come under heightened scrutiny in recent weeks over its conditions and treatment of inmates.

The U.S. attorney for D.C. is the federal official primarily leading the prosecution of Jan. 6 defendants. The position is appointed by the president.

It's unclear whether Johnson, Raskins, or Whitehouse were aware their bills would potentially provide legal recourse for Jan. 6 prisoners. Raskins's office had no comment when asked whether he'd considered this possibility before cosponsoring the legislation and whether he had any problem with the prospect of Jan. 6 prisoners using his bill as a way to sue the Biden administration for alleged mistreatment.

Johnson and Whitehouse's offices didn't respond to requests for comment.

Some of the most outspoken progressives in Congress are supporting the Bivens Act, including Democratic Reps. Ted Lieu (Calif.), Andre Carson, (Ind.), Rashida Tlaib (Mich.), Sheila Jackson Lee (Texas), and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (N.Y.), among others.

In the Senate, Democratic Sens. Alex Padilla (Calif.), Ed Markey (Mass.), and Ron Wyden (Ore.) have cosponsored Whitehouse's bill.

It remains to be seen whether the bill will receive bipartisan support. However, the idea of giving citizens greater ability to sue the federal government has backing among many Republicans as well as Democrats.

"The problem with the current lack of recourse for citizens whose constitutional rights are violated by government officials is that there is no legal recourse for them — meaning innocent victims exclusively bear the brunt of errors that should be borne by taxpayers," said Harmeet Dhillon, an attorney and CEO of the Center for American Liberty who currently serves as chair of the Republican National Lawyers Association.

"The principle that those who cause harm should be held accountable is something that all Americans should be able to get behind," Dhillon continued. "As a civil rights lawyer who has sued the government countless times for violating the civil rights of ordinary Americans, I think it is high time that we not only institute statutory remedies for injured Americans, but also that we revisit the overbroad, unjust, and impossible to meet standard of qualified immunity with a clear norm that more reasonably balances the interests of society in hiring and retaining good public servants, with the accountability that must come when mistakes — or worse — are made."Dhillon didn't comment on the specifics of the Bivens Act.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S6Ji1zvHMyc
37:32 min

NYT Article WARNS Civil War Is Close As Media Claims PROOF Trump Planned Military Coup On Jan 6th
Dec 13, 2021

Tim Pool

NYT Article WARNS Civil War Is Close As Media Claims PROOF Trump Planned Military Coup On Jan 6th. Charles m. Blow And Ray Dalio have both recently suggested a second Us civil war could be upon us. As democrats embrace a worldview completely at odds with republicans and tribalism matters more than principle or the very system in the US then civiol war becomes increasingly more likely. Of course this refers to kinetic civil war, that is to say direct physical combat. But in terms of Democrats, Republicans, the 2020 election, the 2022 midterms and Trump running in 2024 it seems obvious we are in a cold civil war already. The catalyst could be abortion, or maybe even inflation under Biden and democrat policy. It could be Trump winning in 2024
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

SMOKING GUN: Emails Show Facebook Connected Non-Profit Built Direct Connection to Wisconsin State Voter Database in 2020 Election Vote Harvesting Operation

By Joe Hoft
Published December 13, 2021 at 7:48pm
wisconsin-ballots-voter-fraud.jpg


The Wisconsin Election Hearing that occurred last week exposed criminal conduct across the state.

We previously reported on the hearing last week in Wisconsin that uncovered numerous shocking criminal actions that occurred in the 2020 Election. One action that was startling was the development of a database with up-to-the-minute reports of who voted and who didn’t in the 2020 Election.


A key element identified in the work related to the hearing was that local Wisconsin officials were working with Michael Rubenstein to build this database that was connected to Wisconsin data on a real-time basis. We reported on this in October.


But we reported on the emails related to this activity first in May 2021.


In an interview with OAN’s Christina Bobb, Wisconsin Senator Brandtjen says:
They built interactive programs that really became probably the largest ability to harvest ballots in Milwaukee…you give this kind of information to a non-profit from the city of Milwaukee, and we have their IT Department involved, the United States Postal Service had to be able to scan the ballots and know exactly when they’re coming back to Milwaukee that’s certainly an advantage that was given only to these communities that recevied CTCL dollars…As you see as you go into these emails here, they had a direct connection into the Wisvote system.
See the explosive interview below.

Rumble video on website .43 min

The people of Wisconsin need to demand all election-related IT records for before, during, and after the the 2020 Election and have them analyzed by an independent IT audit group. Records showing all activity into and out of the state’s voter database should be the focus.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

“The Mob Was Summoned to Washington by President Trump” – BREAKING: Unhinged Demon Liz Cheney Hints Federal Charges Against President Trump

By Jim Hoft
Published December 13, 2021 at 8:33pm
cheney-meadows.png

Liz Cheney read subpoenaed text messages from FOX News personalities to Mark Meadows tonight during the sham January 6 Committee hearing.

So these leftists subpoenaed Mark Meadows text messages from AT&T or another carrier, or maybe he turned them over to the sham committee.

Now they are releasing them publicly.

This was during the hearing on Monday where the committee discussed charging Trump Chief of Staff Mark Meadows.

Liz Cheney attacked Trump supporters, the one-million who showed up on January 6th at the Ellipse to hear President Trump. Liz Cheney described Trump voters this way, “The mob was summoned to Washington by President Trump.”

This demon!

Cheney read text messages from FOX personalities Laura Ingraham, Sean Hannity, Brian Kilmeade and others.


View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1470554323251875852
8:56 min

Cheney then went on to hint that President Trump will face federal charges.

1639454166453.png

They are scared to death of a three-peat.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Sham Jan. 6 Panel Votes 9-0 to Hold Trump Chief of Staff Mark Meadows in Contempt – Cheney Reads Meadows’ Private Text Messages Out Loud! (VIDEO)

By Cristina Laila
Published December 13, 2021 at 8:32pm
IMG_8221-1.jpg


The Marxists on the January 6 Committee Monday evening recommended Trump’s former Chief of Staff Mark Meadows face contempt charges.

Mark Meadows informed the committee he would no longer appear before the sham committee for a deposition because they weren’t respecting boundaries concerning executive privilege.

“We agreed to provide thousands of pages of responsive documents and Mr. Meadows was willing to appear voluntarily, not under compulsion of the Select Committee’s subpoena to him, for a deposition to answer questions about non-privileged matters. Now actions by the Select Committee have made such an appearance untenable,” the letter from George J. Terwilliger II stated.

Liz Cheney and Bennie Thompson responded by moving forward with contempt charges against Meadows.

“These text messages leave no doubt…multiple Fox News hosts knew the president needed to act immediately. They texted Mr. Meadows.” Cheney said as the panel voted to recommend contempt charges.

Cheney proceeded to read Mark Meadows’ private text messages with Fox News hosts out loud.

The illegitimate panel voted 9-0 to send the measure to the full House of Representatives.
The House is expected to vote on the contempt charges on Tuesday.

VIDEO:
Cheney then went on to hint that President Trump will face federal charges.
 

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
This Trump staff issue is growing so big I would not blame them for not showing up at all...

...Lest they get swept up by the Capital Police and brought down to celebrate Christmas with the incarcerated J6 Protesters.

There may be reason that recently the Capital Police was expanded to include all major US Cities - a branch office certainly, but also a "center of operations/center of detainment" should it be necessary. Capitol Police's Expansion Plans Have Law Enforcement Watchdogs Worried - Zenger News

Consider this similar to Obama's "National Army." But so far relatively small.

I was surprised that Steve Bannon was allowed to leave after a court appearance of less than an hour - but he was only an "outlier" at the time of the riots. They're more hassling Bannon because he has made himself the voice of MAGA - and they are trying to stifle that voice.

But Trump and his staff - that's OPTICS for the peanut gallery.

Hurry hurry hurry, come see the disgraced President and his heinous staff clan held for the People's Tribunal.

Hangings scheduled for 9 a.m. tomorrow in the Capital Ellipse.

Dobbin
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
Liz Cheney really triggers me. I am having difficulty posting things from that committee. After the battering Trump took from Hillary's dossier and the two impeachments, Cheney insults my tolerance.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

(VIDEO) More Than DOUBLE Registered Voters than Town Population – Pima County 2020 Election Integrity Hearing Provides Evidence Of Thousands Of Fraudulent Votes

By Jordan Conradson
Published December 13, 2021 at 9:48pm
CAC1B59F-0CB5-442D-B35B-B67CEA44F5D7.jpeg

The Pima County Election Integrity Hearing built another strong case for a stolen election in Arizona.


Following the Maricopa County full forensic 2020 Election audit, Arizona State Representative Mark Finchem is pushing to audit the entire state of Arizona.

The Gateway Pundit reported on the massive irregularities and outright fraud that was found in Maricopa County, and the pending criminal investigation by the Arizona Attorney General’s office.


On Monday, Rep. Mark Finchem was a key player in hosting another 2020 election hearing in Pima County, Arizona to discuss the anomalies, discrepancies, and reports of election fraud.

The panel members included State Senator Sonny Borrelli, Senator Wendy Rogers, Senator Kelly Townsend, State Rep. Mark Finchem, Rep. Leo Biasiucci, Rep. Theresa Martinez, Rep. Neal Carter, and Rep. Judy Burges.


The mission of this hearing is to “receive evidence and testimony that could serve to prove or disprove alleged discrepancies in the 2020 General Election.”

Liz Harrington shared the major key findings, including people that do not live where they voted from, “frat boys” averaging 45-years-old, Third World voter registration numbers, and in conclusion a fraudulent election.


Canvassers in Pima County found 62 early ballots were turned into the elections department from a home where the “voter” is not a resident. They concluded that 45% of the people surveyed did not know the person that voted from their address.

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1470538913127313409
1:30 min

In addition, a college frat house was found to have 27 registered voters but their average age was 45.

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1470534145436786700
.43 min

Other towns in Pima County were found to have Third World voter registration numbers. One town has over 200% of the voting-age population and another has a 158% registration rate.

One location in Topawa, Arizona had 173 registered “voters” and what appeared to be a Border Patrol office had 40 registered voters. Were they illegal immigrants?

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1470516237205925889
1:21 min
View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1470530984424706054
.51 min
View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1470532804727513090
.19 min

Leftists in the media, utterly blinded by their corruption, are working overtime to discredit the election hearing.

1639481469954.png

It’s amazing how much liberals will flaunt evidence of criminality as “conjecture”.

Voting is our most sacred right and we need to take our country back before it is too late.

Contact Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich immediately and demand that he arrest the people who stole the 2020 election!

395D41D9-65AC-4D90-97DE-A28CF8FF25A1.jpeg

Contact Arizona AG Mark Brnovich

^^^^^^^^^^

[COMMENT: Let's face it, the AG isn't going to do a damned thing and the Legislature isn't going to decertify. They are all just flipping the bird to the Arizona and American voter. ]
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

WATCH: AZ State Rep. Mark Finchem Reads Whistleblower’s Email Dated 11/10/2020 Disclosing Plot By Dems To “Embed” Thousands of Fraudulent Votes Into Pima County’s Election

By Jordan Conradson
Published December 14, 2021 at 7:00am

Members of the Arizona Legislature met yesterday near Tucson, Arizona, to hold a public hearing on election integrity in Pima County.


The panel desired to “receive evidence and testimony that could serve to prove or disprove alleged discrepancies in the 2020 General Election.”

The Gateway Pundit reported on some of the major findings, including Third World voter registration numbers, a frat house with “voters” averaging 45 years of age, and 172 ballots that came from the same address.


The Gateway Pundit also reported that two precincts in Pima County had over 100% turnout for mail-in ballots and 40 precincts had over 97% returned.

This strange anomaly can be explained by an email that Rep. Mark Finchem read to the audience, alledging a plot by Democratic officials to insert 35,000 fraudulent votes into the Pima County 2020 Election.


In October, Finchem spoke at President Trump’s Save America Rally in Des Moines, Iowa where he hinted at this finding.


Yesterday, Rep. Finchem read the evidence out loud.

The IP address that this email was sent from has been identified as a computer in Tucson, Arizona.

Finchem: On November 10th of 2020, we received an email that was actually included in some of the testimony and evidence from the November 30th hearing, last year in Maricopa County. It’s important for me to read the email in its entirety because that is what sets the stage for what is happening over the last 10 months, the investigation that we have engaged in, private sourcing, a few legislators, and pulling public records and records we could get access to. This email is, as I said, dated November 10th, and it is addressed to the criminal division at the U.S. Department of Justice.

This is anonymous reporting and I do not want to be included in this investigation.

Thank you.

Please be advised the Pima County Recorder, located at 240 N. Stone Avenue in Tucson, Arizona, 85701 in Pima County, Arizona, and the Democrat Party added fraud votes. In the initial count of the vote by mail (VBM) totals released at 8 pm on November 3, 2020, There are approximately 35,000 fraud votes added to each Democrat candidates’ vote totals. Candidates impacted include County, State, and Federal Election candidates. Through the utilization of the automated ballot count machines in Pima County Elections, My understanding is that 35,000 was embedded into each Democrat candidates’ total votes. Below are the meeting notes.

In a meeting I was invited to by the Democrat party in Pima County, Arizona on September 10, 2020, no phones or recording devices were allowed. A presentation was given including detailed plans to embed 35,000 votes in a spread configured distribution to each Democrat candidate’s vote totals. When I asked, “How in the world would 35,000 votes be kept hidden, or from being discovered?” It was stated that spread distribution will be embedded across the total registered vote range and will not exceed the registered voter count. And the 35,000 was determined allowable for Pima county based on our county registered voter count. It was also stated total voter turnout versus total registered voters determined how many votes we can embed. The embedding will also adjust based on voter turnout. Because the embedded votes are distributed sporadically, all embedded votes will not be found if audited because embeds are in groups of approximately 1,000. This is so the County Recorder can declare an oversight issue or error, as a group of 1,000 is a normal and acceptable error. Maricopa County’s embed totals will be substantially larger than Pima, due to embeds being calculated based on the total number of registered voters. When I asked, “Has this ever been tested, and how do we know it works?” the response was, yes, this has been tested and has shown significant success in Arizona judicial retention elections, since 2014. Even undetectable in post audits because no candidate will spend the kind of funds needed to audit and contact voters to verify votes and the full potential of the total registered voters, which is more than 500,000 registered voters. This year our Secretary of State has removed precinct level detail from election night releases, so candidates can’t see precinct over-votes. This is what I have from this meeting. Just thought I’d report this. Not sure if you can do anything since I was unable to have a recording device at this meeting. Thank You.

One additional piece of information about this, Mr. Chairman, is that we were able to identify the IP address where the email came from. It is a computer in Tucson.

However, that’s as far as we could go.
Rep. Mark Finchem recently told the Frank Speech audience that the Arizona Legislators who have undertaken this mission are waiting on indictments and pushing to audit Pima County’s 2020 Election.


In September, Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich received a gift containing the damning and determinative evidence of fraud that was found in the Maricopa County full forensic audit and vote canvass.

81 days later, Mark Brnovich has filed no indictments. Instead, he focuses on his U.S. Senate campaign and articulating conservative platitudes in his Fox News appearances.

WATCH:

Rumble video on website 5:00 min


Contact Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich immediately to demand indictments for election fraud, and sign AZ State Rep. Mark Finchem’s petition to audit Pima County!

6D3BF5CB-1F7F-4473-BAF6-6CA8352BEEDD.jpeg

Contact AG Mark Brnovich
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

“The Communists Here are Abusing the Constitution” – Marjorie Taylor Greene BRINGS FIRE to House Floor and Calls out the Marxist Left and Their “Kangaroo Court”

By Jim Hoft
Published December 14, 2021 at 3:10pm

mtg-house-floor.jpg


Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) brought THE FIRE today to the House floor calling out Democrats for who they are — Communists running a Kangaroo Court out to get Republicans and Trump supporters.

MTG went to the floor and BLASTED AWAY–
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene: I rise in opposition to this resolution to hold Mark Meadows in contempt of Congress because it’s being held by nothing but a Kangaroo Court. Congress’s job is to make laws, not enforce them. that’s the role of the executive and the judicial branch of this government. But somehow the Communists here in charge have forgotten, no have not forgotten, are purposely abusing the Constitution and what this body of Congress is supposed to do. You see, when we go to this level to the point where we’re forgetting and abusing what our power is, then the American people will trust us no more. And that is exactly what the January 6th Committee is doing.
MTG continues to win over the hearts and minds of the American people.

Well done, Representative!

View: https://youtu.be/5ypLtPmVAHY
1:30 min
 
Top