POL November 3: The 2020 U.S. ELECTION DAY MAIN THREAD

marsh

On TB every waking moment

DC Attorney General Files Lawsuit Against Proud Boys, Oathkeepers — Compares Jan. 6 to 9/11

By Cassandra Fairbanks
Published December 14, 2021 at 12:47pm
00-321.jpg

DC Attorney General Karl Racine has filed a federal lawsuit against the Oathkeepers, Proud Boys, and dozens of individuals involved in the January 6 protest.


During a press conference announcing the lawsuit, Racine compared the protest to the terrorist attack on September 11.

“The images of that shameful and contemptible day can never be erased,” Racine said at a press conference announcing the lawsuit. “It was like 9-11, a planned terrorist attack, but this time, our own citizens were hell bent on destroying the freedoms and ideals on which our country was founded, and continues to aspire to achieve.”

1639524883301.png

The lawsuit uses a statute stemming from the 1871 Ku Klux Klan Act that “makes it illegal to use force or threats to prevent federal officers from carrying out their official duties,” according to a report from The Hill.

The complaint states that “the January 6th Attack on the Capitol was not a protest or a rally. It was a coordinated act of domestic terrorism.”

The AG is seeking unspecified “restitution and recompense” from the defendants.

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1470804949936185345
.44 min

“I can guarantee you that as we proceed, we are going to seek the maximum level of financial penalty,” Racine told a reporter during the press conference.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
war room.JPG
How Votes Were Embedded To Steal A State 7:53 min

How Votes Were Embedded To Steal A State
December 14, 2021

Heather Mullins of Real America’s Voice tells Steve Bannon about what she heard in Monday’s election hearing in Arizona held by Mark Finchem, a MAGA candidate for secretary of state. The hearing focused on an email sent by a whistleblower to the Department of Justice laying out a scheme that was supposedly used by Democrats in Arizona to add fake votes to the election. The state’s attorney general hasn’t shown any interest yet. Big surprise.
 

Dobbin

Faithful Steed

DC Attorney General Files Lawsuit Against Proud Boys, Oathkeepers — Compares Jan. 6 to 9/11

By Cassandra Fairbanks
Published December 14, 2021 at 12:47pm
00-321.jpg

DC Attorney General Karl Racine has filed a federal lawsuit against the Oathkeepers, Proud Boys, and dozens of individuals involved in the January 6 protest.


During a press conference announcing the lawsuit, Racine compared the protest to the terrorist attack on September 11.

“The images of that shameful and contemptible day can never be erased,” Racine said at a press conference announcing the lawsuit. “It was like 9-11, a planned terrorist attack, but this time, our own citizens were hell bent on destroying the freedoms and ideals on which our country was founded, and continues to aspire to achieve.”

View attachment 307732

The lawsuit uses a statute stemming from the 1871 Ku Klux Klan Act that “makes it illegal to use force or threats to prevent federal officers from carrying out their official duties,” according to a report from The Hill.

The complaint states that “the January 6th Attack on the Capitol was not a protest or a rally. It was a coordinated act of domestic terrorism.”

The AG is seeking unspecified “restitution and recompense” from the defendants.

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1470804949936185345
.44 min

“I can guarantee you that as we proceed, we are going to seek the maximum level of financial penalty,” Racine told a reporter during the press conference.
Racine is the shill who today indicted Oathkeepers en-masse today - but conveniently left out leader Stewart Rhodes and a couple of other "influencers" who occupy leadership positions in the group formerly known as "Oathkeepers" (but likely created by the FBI simply as a "honey pot" for those of patriot tendency to entrap themselves in.)

This whole thing stinks of a "Whitmer Exercise" repeating the entrapment modus of those who would kidnap Wisconsin Governor Whitmer. Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping plot - Wikipedia More than half those initially apprehended in the case were proven out to be Federal Informants - and later quietly released. Including the now infamous Ray Epps - who was later connected to the J6 Riot as an "influencer" - over two days and six video recordings thereof.

Note that in the Wikipedia entry above, there is NO mention of any Federal Informants, or their arrest, or investigation into potential entrapment.

There USED to be laws against entrapment. It may even be written into the Constitution.

Not Constitution, and actually more 20th century "developed case law."


This whole thing stinks so bad. It puts agricultural amendment in the category of "attar of roses."

Dobbin
 
Last edited:

marsh

On TB every waking moment

The US Post Office Worked on Project to Build and Test Secret Voting System Before the 2020 Election

By Joe Hoft
Published December 14, 2021 at 6:00pm
Washington-Post-HQ.jpg

The far-left Washington Post, which is often the mouthpiece for deep state actors, released a report that the United States Postal Service developed and tested an election application before the 2020 Election.

The Washington Post reported yesterday:
The U.S. Postal Service pursued a project to build and secretly test a blockchain-based mobile phone voting system before the 2020 election, experimenting with a technology that the government’s own cybersecurity agency says can’t be trusted to securely handle ballots.

The system was never deployed in a live election and was abandoned in 2019, Postal Service spokesman David Partenheimer said. That was after cybersecurity researchers at the University of Colorado at Colorado Springs conducted a test of the system during a mock election and found numerous ways that it was vulnerable to hacking.

The project appears to have been conducted without the involvement of federal agencies more closely focused on elections, which were then scrambling to make voting more secure in the wake of Russian interference in the 2016 contest. Those efforts focused primarily on using paper ballot so the voter could verify their vote was recorded accurately and there would be a paper trail for auditors — something missing from any mobile phone or Internet-based system.

The secrecy of the Postal Service’s mobile voting project alarmed election security officials and advocates who fear it could spark conspiracy theories and degrade public faith in the democratic process. Those concerns have grown immensely since the 2020 election, bolstered by baseless claims of election fraud by former president Donald Trump and his supporters.

Matt Masterson, who was then a senior adviser to the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency and the federal government’s chief liaison to state and local election officials, said he was never aware of the Postal Service program while in office…

…The Postal Service plays no role in administering elections, but is responsible for managing ballots sent by mail, a category that has grown substantially during the past decade. The agency declined to share any long-range plans for the blockchain-based voting system. Such a system might reduce the burden of mail balloting, especially for military voters overseas. But it would also reduce a revenue boost the agency typically gets for election season mail.

The Postal Service was awarded a public patent for the concept in August 2020, but had not previously revealed that it built a prototype system or tested it. The patent application predated the administration of Postmaster General Louis DeJoy, who came under fire from congressional Democrats and election administration experts over mail-slowing procedures implemented in the run-up to the November 2020 vote.
This effort was kept top-secret:
The Colorado researchers were made to sign a nondisclosure agreement that prevented them from identifying the organization that built the prototype voting system, they said. In a paper describing the testing and presented at an academic conference, they said it was built by “a U.S. government organization, that has requested to remain unnamed [and] plays an important role in national elections.”

The ‘WaPo’ is known for its long and deep relationship with the Deep State.


Based on this relationship it’s difficult to take the above article as the honest truth without some caution. What does appear to be the case is that the USPS was involved in the 2020 Election, and it is likely deeper than we know.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Biden Says the Quiet Part Out Loud: “The Struggle is No Longer About Who Gets to Vote… It’s About Who Gets to Count the Vote” (VIDEO)

By Cristina Laila
Published December 14, 2021 at 8:04pm
IMG_8256.jpg


Joe Biden Tuesday evening delivered remarks at a holiday celebration for the Democrat National Committee.

Biden put the Republicans on notice: “Now we look at 2022. I want to tell my Republican friends, get ready pal, you’re in for a problem.”

Then Joe Stalin Biden said the quiet part out loud: “The struggle is no longer just who gets to vote, or making it easier for eligible people to vote – it’s who gets to count the vote and whether your vote counts at all!”

VIDEO:

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1470915056783216646
.10 min

It’s about who gets to count the vote:

5A3ED6CE-9493-44A9-9F58-58921E8B1619.jpeg


Image by Sovereign Insurgent

3-191.jpg


IMG_6660-1.jpg


CoboDetroit2020a.jpg
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

BREAKING: Karen Fann, Sonny Borelli, Vince Leach, and Warren Peterson to hold Arizona Election Integrity Panel at Turning Point USA AmericaFest – Kyle Rittenhouse Also To Speak

By Jordan Conradson
Published December 14, 2021 at 9:37pm
64273887-3ECA-46EB-9A39-F25F13D62DDF.jpeg


Turning Point USA’s America Fest event is this weekend in Phoenix, Arizona.

Turning Point will feature an Arizona election integrity panel chaired by Karen Fann, Sonny Borelli, Vince Leach, and Warren Peterson.

TPUSA provided the following information on this event.
5D57A668-476A-4A4A-8F92-9521BAEB6375.jpeg


This December 18-21, in Phoenix, Arizona, Turning Point USA is excited to be hosting our brand new event: AMERICAFEST. This four day event is set to be the largest celebration of our constitutional rights and freedoms – featuring the best and brightest speakers in the country, dozens of like minded sponsoring organizations, thousands of freedom loving patriots, and the introduction of musical talent with a number of very special concerts. As our events and organization continue to grow we are so excited to launch this new event and welcome all ages, all walks of life, and celebrate the greatest country – the United States of America. AmericaFest is going to be an event unlike the movement has ever seen by creating an experience that breaks the traditional norms of a political conference as we continue to bridge the gap between politics and entertainment to win America’s culture war.
sign up to attend this event at TPUSA.com.

The epic list of speakers includes TPUSA founder Charlie Kirk, Tucker Carlson, Greg Gutfeld, Jesse Waters, Kaleigh Mcenany, Kyle Rittenhouse, and many more fantastic speakers.


AmericaFest will also feature musical performances will full concerts by the following artists.

D5C4F304-656E-4997-95FE-A1535CF14B4A.jpeg


Jack Posobiec tweeted breaking news that Arizona State Senators Karen Fann, Sonny Borelli, Vince Leach, and Warren Peterson will chair an Arizona election integrity panel during AmericaFest.

1639541159281.png


Posobiec will also speak during the event.

The Gateway Pundit reported that Sonny Borrelli chaired the Pima County election integrity panel on Monday, where devastating evidence of voter fraud statewide was presented.


AZ State Representative Mark Finchem read an email from a whistleblower, who alleged a plot was executed by the Democrats to insert 35,000 fictitious votes into the Pima County 2020 Election, at the hearing.


Biden was declared the winner of the 2020 Election by less than 10,500 votes.


Maricopa County’s full forensic election audit found hundreds of thousands of potentially fraudulent votes on top of this determinative evidence from Pima County.

All evidence has been delivered to Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich’s office.

It has now been 81 days since the clear evidence of fraud in Maricopa County was delivered, and still, no action.


TGP will cover AmericaFest and the election integrity panel.

Contact Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich to demand justice for the stolen 2020 Election.

6D3BF5CB-1F7F-4473-BAF6-6CA8352BEEDD.jpeg

Contact AG Mark Brnovich
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Democrat push for ballot drop boxes faces boomerang: key Georgia senator moves to outlaw them

GOP State Sen. Butch Miller, author of election reform law, introduces legislation to end drop boxes made popular by 2020 election and activist Stacey Abrams.
Updated: December 14, 2021 - 10:52pm

In the summer before the contentious November 2020 election, the Democrats' most influential election lawyer, Marc Elias, used the pandemic to urge liberal grassroots groups to press for the deployment of mass drop boxes to collect an expected wave of absentee ballots.

"Local libraries, church groups and civic associations should explore with local election officials setting up secure ballot drop boxes," he wrote in an op-ed. "There may even be a role for businesses to play in preserving our right to vote through drop box placement and security.”

The Democrats prevailed, as all but 10 states allowed drop boxes. And key battlegrounds like Georgia deployed them widely, especially in large blue counties like Fulton and Dekalb, where as many as 25% to 50% of absentee voters used them, according to media analyses.

But now that movement is facing pushback from influential Georgia Republican state Sen. Butch Miller. He authored the state election integrity law passed in March that tightened the rules for, but did not eliminate, ballot drop boxes.

Now, Miller says, he believes the drop boxes are too ripe for abuse and should be eliminated, introducing Senate Bill 325 this month to change the election integrity law to eliminate the authority for drop boxes.

"Drop boxes were introduced as an emergency measure during the pandemic, but many counties did not follow the security guidelines in place, such as the requirement for camera surveillance on every drop box," he said. "Moving forward, we can return to a pre-pandemic normal of voting in person.

"Removing drop boxes will help rebuild the trust that has been lost. Many see them as the weak link when it comes to securing our elections against fraud. For the small number of Georgians who need to vote absentee, that will remain as easy and accessible as it was before 2020."

Miller's bill comes as he prepares to run for lieutenant governor of Georgia next year, and his position on drop boxes is certain to pit him in opposition to the leading Democratic candidate for governor, voting rights activist Stacey Abrams.

Abrams has been an unabashed supporter of drop boxes, cheering them on in other states like Colorado while arguing they are key to increasing access to minority voters. In last November's election, she tweeted a video of herself placing her absentee ballot in a drop box and urged others to do so on Twitter.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

During January 6 Hearing, Schiff Doctored Text Messages Between Mark Meadows And Rep. Jim Jordan

Democrat Adam Schiff doctored text messages between Mark Meadows and Jim Jordan during Monday's Jan. 6 hearings, an investigation by The Federalist shows.

Sean Davis

By Sean Davis
DECEMBER 15, 2021

Oops, he did it again. After leaking fake Donald Trump, Jr. emails, fabricating the transcript of a 2019 phone call between former President Donald Trump and Ukraine’s president, and lying about his interactions with the so-called whistleblower behind House Democrats’ first impeachment of Trump, Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., is now running the same con against a fellow lawmaker. During a hearing Monday night on the riot at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, Adam Schiff claimed to have proof that a member of Congress texted former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows to instruct former Vice President Mike Pence to overturn the 2020 presidential election results.

Not only did Schiff misrepresent the substance of the text message and its source, he even doctored original text messages, which were obtained and reviewed by The Federalist in their entirety.

View: https://youtu.be/Ar4RWEcOo7Q
1:50 min

“I want to display just a few of the message he received from people in Congress,” Schiff said, referring to Meadows. “The committee is not naming these lawmakers at this time as our investigation is ongoing. If we could cue the first graphic.”

The following graphic, purportedly of the text message between a member of Congress and Meadows, then appeared on screen at Schiff’s direction:

Text-To-Meadows-Deceptively-Edited-By-Schiff.jpg


“This one reads, ‘On January 6, 2021, Vice President Mike Pence, as President of the Senate, should call out all electoral votes that he believes are unconstitutional as no electoral votes at all,’” Schiff continued. “You can see why this is so critical to ask Mr. Meadows about. About a lawmaker suggesting that the former vice president simply throw out votes that he unilaterally deems unconstitutional in order to overturn a presidential election and subvert the will of the American people.”

Not only did Schiff lie about the substance of the text message and its source, he even doctored the message and graphic that he displayed on screen during his statement. The full text message, which was forwarded to Meadows from Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, on the evening of Monday, Jan. 5, was significantly longer than what Schiff read and put on screen, but Schiff erased significant portions of the text and added punctuation where there was none to give the impression that Jordan himself was tersely directing Meadows to give orders to Pence on how to handle the electoral vote certification.

The original text was written by Washington attorney and former Department of Defense Inspector General Joseph Schmitz and included an attachment of a four-page draft Word document drafted by Schmitz that detailed Schmitz’s legal reasoning for suggesting that Pence had the constitutional authority to object to the certification of electoral votes submitted by a handful of states. The piece that Schmitz had sent to Jordan was published at the website everylegal.vote the next day and even included the same “DISCUSSION DRAFT” heading and timestamp on the document that Schmitz sent to Jordan.

“Good luck tomorrow!” Schmitz texted Jordan on the evening of Jan. 5, including the Word document as an attachment. Schmitz then texted to Jordan a three-paragraph summary of his Word document, which Schiff sliced and diced and then attributed to Jordan:

“On January 6, 2021, Vice President Mike Pence, as President of the Senate, should call out all the electoral votes that he believes are unconstitutional as no electoral votes at all — in accordance with guidance from founding father Alexander Hamilton and judicial precedence,” Schmitz texted. In his graphic, Schiff erased the final clause and the em dash preceding it and added a period to the first clause without disclosing that he or his staff had chopped up the text and created a fake graphic misrepresenting the actual contents of the text message.

Schmitz continued: “‘No legislative act,’ wrote Alexander Hamilton in Federalist No. 78, ‘contrary to the Constitution, can be valid.’ The court in Hubbard v. Lowe reinforced this truth: ‘That an unconstitutional statute is not a law at all is a proposition no longer open to discussion.’ 226 F. 135, 137 (SDNY 1915), appeal dismissed, 242 U.S. 654 (1916).”

“Following this rationale, an unconstitutionally appointed elector, like an unconstitutionally enacted statute, is no elector at all,” Schmitz wrote.

In his statement and on-screen graphic, Schiff erased the final two paragraphs and the final clause of the first paragraph of the text message before inserting punctuation that was never there, all without disclosing what he was doing. The graphic displayed by Schiff, which was doctored to look like an exact screenshot, was similarly doctored, as it contained content that was never in the original message and eliminated content that was.

“Is anyone surprised that Adam Schiff is again rifling through private text messages and cherry-picking information to fit his partisan narrative and sow misinformation?” asked Jordan spokesman Russell Dye.

According to a source familiar with the matter, Schiff never approached Jordan to discuss the text messages prior to chopping them up and misrepresenting them during Monday night’s hearing. Had he done so or bothered asking Jordan about the text message, Schiff would have known that Jordan was merely relaying to Meadows, without comment, an attorney’s summary of that attorney’s own legal argument as to what Pence should or shouldn’t do.

Multiple sources who regularly communicate with Jordan also scoffed at the idea that Jordan, who’s known for writing only brief, one- or two-word texts, if at all, would sit down and type out a multi-paragraph narrative with precise, legal citations akin to a lengthy court brief.

“The idea that Jordan would sit down and punch out a long-winded legal argument via text is absurd,” one individual who regularly talks to Jordan told The Federalist. “That’s just not how he works.”

One Republican colleague of Jordan laughed out loud when asked by The Federalist if Jordan was known for sending lengthy texts.

“If he texts at all, it’s usually something like ‘yes’ or ‘call me,’” that colleague said.

Another GOP lawmaker echoed those sentiments about Jordan’s tech habits.

“That’s just not Jim’s style,” one lawmaker close to Jordan told The Federalist. “Long, nerdy paragraphs might be my style, but that’s not Jim’s style at all.”

“Plus, you have to remember what was going on at that time,” the lawmaker noted. “People were sending around these law review articles and debates left and right because we had an interest in learning the facts and getting them right. And if it’s somehow seditious in this country to debate or share a law review article on Alexander Hamilton’s view on things, that’s not really a country I want to be a part of anymore.”

Schiff and his team have a long history of doctoring and fabricating evidence to show their political enemies in the worst possible light. While Trump, Jr. was testifying during a 2017 congressional hearing on the Russian collusion hoax, Schiff’s committee leaked to CNN and NBC emails purportedly from Trump, Jr. that showed he had communicated with someone about hacked WikiLeaks documents prior to their public release.

In reality, despite each network claiming that it had verified the claims about the emails (CNN even falsely claimed that Trump, Jr.’s own attorney had “verified” the network’s reporting), each network botched the dates on the document. Rather than prove that the president’s oldest son had been privately colluding with WikiLeaks about documents the organization had illegally obtained, the real emails — not those doctored by Schiff or his committee — showed only that a random person with no connection to Trump, Jr. had found his email address and sent the information to him after the documents were already publicly available.

During 2019 impeachment hearings against Trump, Schiff went back to that same playbook and doctored a transcript of a telephone call between Trump and Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky. After getting skewered for fabricating the transcript of a phone conversation between two world leaders, Schiff later claimed, without evidence, that his version of the call was only meant to be a parody, rather than a verbatim account of the phone call.

1639609495493.png

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1177211952344510465
1:26 min

Schiff also lied about his interactions with the so-called whistleblower whose leak of the phone call between Trump and Zelensky was used by House Democrats as a pretext for impeaching Trump and overturning the 2016 election results.

Coincidentally, Schiff’s lie came in response to a question during a November 2019 hearing from Jordan about interactions between Schiff and his staff and the so-called whistleblower.

“First, as the gentleman knows,” Schiff lectured, “that’s a false statement. I do not know the identity of the whistleblower.” However, according to a report from The New York Times, the so-called whistleblower personally contacted Schiff’s office before the so-called whistleblower ever even filed his complaint against Trump with the inspector general that is supposed to oversee the country’s federal spy agencies.

“Schiff, House Intel Chairman, Got Early Account of Whistle-Blower’s Accusations,” The New York Times headline noted.

Schiff’s office did not respond to multiple requests for comment about the doctored text messages from Jordan.
 
Last edited:

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Read Michigan & other state details of AP's review of potential voter fraud cases

items.[0].image.alt

Voting stations are set up for the primary election at the Kentucky Exposition Center, Monday, June 22, 2020, in Louisville, Ky. With one polling place designated for Louisville on Tuesday, voters who didn’t cast mail-in ballots could potentially face long lines in Kentucky’s unprecedented primary election. (AP Photo/Piper Blackburn)

Posted at 5:46 AM, Dec 15, 2021

(AP) — Details from The Associated Press review of potential voter fraud cases in the six political battleground states where former President Donald Trump and his allies disputed his loss to Democrat Joe Biden.

MICHIGAN
2020 RESULT: Biden won by 154,188 votes.

HOW IT WAS REPORTED: Via phone or email, four AP reporters contacted the elections office in each of Michigan’s 83 counties, along with the secretary of state and state attorney general’s office. The AP requested information about all instances of potential voter fraud they had identified and whether they were referred for further investigation to local or state prosecutors.

WHAT AP FOUND: In all, 71 of the 83 counties reported no suspicious activity. Six counties did not respond, while Isabella County declined to answer. The remaining five counties identified about 56 potential instances of voter fraud, representing 0.04% of Biden’s margin of victory in the state. Four people have been charged.

HIGHLIGHTS: Most of the 56 potential cases involved two people suspected of submitting about 50 fraudulent requests for absentee ballots in Macomb, Wayne and Oakland counties. All the suspicious applications were flagged by election officials and no ballots were cast improperly. The two individuals are facing charges. Separately, officials in Ionia County said law enforcement investigated two instances and determined neither were attempts to commit fraud. No charges were filed. One potential case in Ottawa County involved a voter who requested a ballot for an address where the person no longer lives. Two instances in Wayne County involved voters suspected of signing ballots for relatives. “All of us take fraud very seriously and we’ve got secure protocols in place to catch it,” Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson said. “When we do, we prosecute it.”

CASE DETAILS: One of the Wayne County cases involves a grandmother who has pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor after authorities say she returned her grandson’s absentee ballot despite his decision to vote in person. Authorities say the woman told investigators she was concerned her grandson would not have time to vote on Election Day. The absentee ballot was flagged after a signature review determined the signature did not match the voter’s signature on file and records showed he had also voted in person.
___
ARIZONA
2020 RESULT: Biden won by 10,457 votes.

HOW IT WAS REPORTED: An AP reporter submitted public records requests to Arizona’s 15 counties, along with requesting information from the state attorney general’s office, which has been reviewing potential cases as part of an Election Integrity Unit created in 2019 to identify potential cases of fraud.

WHAT AP FOUND: In all, 198 instances of potential fraud were identified in six counties, representing 1.9% of Biden’s margin of victory. The vast majority of the potential instances of fraud identified were in Pima County, which includes Tucson. Nine counties reported no suspicious activity. Nine people have been charged so far, including six cases pursued by the state attorney general’s office, which has an election integrity unit that is reviewing an undisclosed number of additional cases.

HIGHLIGHTS: Many of the cases involved allegations of people casting multiple ballots, felons voting despite being ineligible and ballots received in the name of voters who are dead.

CASE DETAILS: Of the 176 instances of potential fraud identified in Pima County, 151 were referred to prosecutors. The county has a practice of referring every effort to cast a second ballot to prosecutors for review, something other offices don’t do. Election officials said 25 instances involved voters over the age of 70 and were not referred since there was a greater chance those were the result of memory lapses or confusion and not criminal intent. None of the Pima County cases involved a voter successfully voting twice. Four of the charged cases involved a relative successfully mailing in their dead relative’s ballot, which was counted. One was charged by the attorney general and three by county prosecutors. Five of the state’s six cases involve Pima County felons accused of voting while being ineligible.
___
GEORGIA
2020 RESULT: Biden won Georgia by 11,779 votes.

HOW IT WAS REPORTED: Via phone or email, an AP reporter contacted the elections office in all of Georgia’s 159 counties. The AP requested information about all instances of potential voter fraud they identified and whether they were referred for further investigation to local or state prosecutors or to the secretary of state’s office. Officials in 11 counties did not respond to numerous inquiries or declined to provide information.

WHAT AP FOUND: In Georgia, 124 counties reported no suspicious voter activity surrounding the 2020 election. This included Democratic counties such as Fulton, swing counties such as Gwinnett and Republican counties such as Cherokee. In all, 64 instances of potential fraud were identified in 24 counties, representing 0.54% of Biden’s margin of victory in Georgia. Most of the counties that did not respond to the AP inquiries or declined to answer were rural counties that largely backed Republicans. The state attorney general’s office is reviewing about 20 cases referred so far by the state election board related to 2020 elections, including the primary. Officials said these were not referred as criminal cases and will likely be resolved with civil penalties. It’s unknown how many may overlap with instances identified by local election officials in AP's review.

HIGHLIGHTS: Of the 64 potential cases identified by the counties, 31 were determined to be the result of an administrative error or some other mistake. The rest are being investigated. Nearly half the instances reported by Georgia counties stemmed from inquiries made by state investigators. In several instances, county officials said their research conducted for the state did not indicate fraud. For instance, Camden County officials said they researched the voting history of three people at the request of the state and found nothing unusual.

CASE DETAILS: Cobb County election officials said they had flagged eight instances of potential fraud, but an exhaustive review determined none were actual fraud. Five cases involved names sent by the state of possible dead voters, said Janine Eveler, the county’s election supervisor. It turned out that two were not deceased, according to the county’s records, while the rest appeared to involve ballots sent in by individuals who later died. One case involved a person who was reported to have moved to another county, but research indicated the voter had moved to another residence in the same county, Eveler said. The other two cases involved voters who cast provisional ballots on Election Day because they were unsure whether their absentee ballots had been fixed after initially being flagged for a problem, Eveler said.
___
NEVADA
2020 RESULT: Biden won by 33,596 votes.

HOW IT WAS REPORTED: Via phone or email, an AP reporter contacted the elections office in Nevada’s 16 counties and Carson City, the state capital, which is its own government entity and not part of a county. The AP requested information about all instances of potential voter fraud they identified and whether they were referred for further investigation to local or state prosecutors or to the secretary of state’s office.

WHAT AP FOUND: Ten Nevada counties, all rural and all won by Trump, reported no suspicious voter activity following the 2020 election. Between 93 and 98 potential cases were identified by election officials in six counties and Carson City. Clark County, where Las Vegas is located, provided a range of 10 to 15 potential fraud cases. In all, the number of possible voter fraud cases represents less than 0.3% of Biden’s margin of victory in the state.

The statewide total does not include thousands of fraud allegations submitted to the state by local Republicans. Republican Secretary of State Barbara Cegavske has said many of those were based “largely upon an incomplete assessment of voter registration records and lack of information concerning the processes by which these records are compiled and maintained.” It’s not known how many of those remain under investigation.

HIGHLIGHTS: Most of the cases involve allegations of double voting. At least one person, a Las Vegas businessman, pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor after voting a ballot that had been mailed to his wife, who was deceased. Most of the potential cases of voter fraud were in Washoe County, home to Reno. This included 42 allegations of voters casting two ballots, three instances in which a ballot was cast in the name of a dead voter and 12 ballots suspected of being signed by another person. There was one instance of an administrative error in which a person under age 18 was permitted to cast a ballot.

CASE DETAILS: In White Pine County, election officials said a voter attempted to cast a ballot after voting earlier in Clark County. Under the state’s same-day registration rules, the voter was required to cast a provisional ballot when she showed up to vote in person; election officials were required to do a statewide check to ensure the voter had not cast a ballot anywhere else, according to Clerk Nichole Baldwin. That check indicated the person had voted in Clark County a few days earlier. Baldwin said the provisional ballot was rejected and not counted, ensuring the voter was unable to vote twice.
___
PENNSYLVANIA
2020 RESULT: Biden won by 80,555 votes.

HOW IT WAS REPORTED: Via phone or email, two AP reporters contacted the elections office in all 67 of Pennsylvania’s counties. The AP requested information about all instances of potential voter fraud they identified and whether they were referred for further investigation to local or state prosecutors or to the secretary of state’s office. One county, Blair, did not respond to AP’s request.

WHAT AP FOUND: Election officials in 11 of the state’s 67 counties identified a total of 26 possible cases of voter fraud, representing 0.03% of Biden’s margin of victory. Philadelphia’s elections office declined to provide AP with any information, so AP contacted the county district attorney’s office and was told no cases had been referred to them for review. So far, six people have been charged.

HIGHLIGHTS: Most of the cases involved allegations of ballots being cast for voters who were deceased. In one instance, charges were not filed against an Adams County man suspected of returning the ballot of his recently deceased wife. But in Allegheny County, a man was suspected of casting a ballot for his dead wife and was allowed to enter a diversion program to resolve the case. Instances of ballots received on behalf of two dead voters have been referred to prosecutors in Bucks County. One of three cases in Lehigh County and one of four cases in Luzerne County also involved dead voters. Statewide, no prosecutor, judge or election official in Pennsylvania has raised a concern about widespread fraud.

CASE DETAILS: In Delaware County, a 70-year-old man pleaded guilty after authorities say he illegally voted for Trump on behalf of his long-dead mother. Bruce Bartman was sentenced to five years of probation. Prosecutors said Bartman used the driver’s license number for his mother, who died more than a decade ago, to register her to vote, obtain a mail-in ballot, return that ballot and fraudulently vote in her name.
___
WISCONSIN
2020 RESULT: Biden won by 20,682 votes.

HOW IT WAS REPORTED: Unlike the other states in the AP review, Wisconsin collects information on potential voter fraud cases at the state level. AP relied on this report issued by the Wisconsin Election Commission, which identified 27 potential cases. The AP then filed public records requests for the details of those cases. Four additional cases were identified through media reports or press releases.

WHAT AP FOUND: Twelve of the state’s 72 counties accounted for the 31 cases of potential voter fraud identified in the state report. The total represents just shy of 0.15% of Biden’s margin of victory. In 26 of the 31 cases, prosecutors declined to bring charges after conducting a review.

HIGHLIGHTS: The five cases in which charges have been filed are distributed across Wisconsin geographically. One person was living in Florida and tried unsuccessfully to vote in Wisconsin. He did not cast a ballot. Two are felons and not eligible to vote. One man voted both in person and absentee and said he didn’t recall sending in his absentee ballot. In another case, a woman is charged with submitting an absentee ballot in November for her partner, who had died in July.

CASE DETAILS: About half the possible cases -- 16 of 31 -- involved voters in La Crosse County who had listed a UPS store as their residence. Prosecutors said no charges would be brought because those involved were all eligible voters who did not intend to break the law, which requires people to register with the address where they live. Officials said most of the cases involved retirees who use the UPS store to have their mail forwarded to them while on vacation. Local election clerks take the responsibility of preventing voter fraud “incredibly seriously,” said Meagan Wolfe, administrator of the Wisconsin Elections Commission.

When they identify someone who may have committed fraud, clerks refer it for review: “Those clerks have a really close connection with their voters,” Wolfe said. “These are their neighbors, their friends, their family.

And so when there is some type of anomaly, our clerks are even more well-situated because of their deep connections with their municipal community to be able to identify these instances.”
 

et2

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Racine is the shill who today indicted Oathkeepers en-masse today - but conveniently left out leader Stewart Rhodes and a couple of other "influencers" who occupy leadership positions in the group formerly known as "Oathkeepers" (but likely created by the FBI simply as a "honey pot" for those of patriot tendency to entrap themselves in.)

This whole thing stinks of a "Whitmer Exercise" repeating the entrapment modus of those who would kidnap Wisconsin Governor Whitmer. Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping plot - Wikipedia More than half those initially apprehended in the case were proven out to be Federal Informants - and later quietly released. Including the now infamous Ray Epps - who was later connected to the J6 Riot as an "influencer" - over two days and six video recordings thereof.

Note that in the Wikipedia entry above, there is NO mention of any Federal Informants, or their arrest, or investigation into potential entrapment.

There USED to be laws against entrapment. It may even be written into the Constitution.

Not Constitution, and actually more 20th century "developed case law."


This whole thing stinks so bad. It puts agricultural amendment in the category of "attar of roses."

Dobbin

I wish Wisconsin would take that bitch off our hands !!
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Wisconsin GOP Rep. Kathy Bernier Wants to End All Election Integrity Investigations in the State

By Jim Hoft
Published December 15, 2021 at 12:28pm

biden-votes-drop-cheating.jpg


Joe Biden took the lead in Wisconsin after a late-night ballot dump of 143,379 votes for Joe Biden.

President Trump was comfortably ahead in the state until the mysterious ballot dump took place that still cannot be explained.


This has never been explained or investigated.

Wisconsin-Data-Pic-Showing-Dump-600x468.jpg


There were thousands of votes “in pristine condition” cast in Wisconsin like other swing states Georgia and Michigan.

This has also never been explained or investigated.

But this week Wisconsin Republican Kathy Bernier told reporters the election investigation is “riling up the voters” and needs to end.

This was after Bernier issued a subpoena in November for Madison election records as part of an ongoing investigation into the 2020 election.

GM Today reported:
The Wisconsin Republican who leads the Senate Elections Committee said Monday that the GOP-ordered review of the 2020 election is riling up people who don’t understand elections and that it needs to end.
State Sen. Kathy Bernier, of Lake Hallie, said the investigation led by former state Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman contains “made-up things” meant to play to the Republican base and she will be on hand when he comes to Chippewa County.

“Mr. Gableman is coming to my county and I will attend that meeting along with my concealed carry permit, to be perfectly honest, because it keeps jazzing up the people who think they know what they’re talking about — and they don’t,” Bernier said.

Bernier spoke at a panel discussion at the state Capitol Monday that included Ben Ginsberg, who spent nearly four decades representing Republicans in election disputes, and Bob Bauer, the White House counsel during Barack Obama’s presidency. Bernier and Ginsberg said attacks on the election will hurt Republicans in the long run because their voters will be less likely to cast ballots if they think elections are rigged.

“And so I think my advice would be to have Mr. Gableman wrap up sooner rather than later, because the longer we keep this up, the more harm … we’re going to do for Republicans,” Bernier said.

Said Ginsberg, “There is a need for an off ramp.”

Gableman has claimed without evidence that the election was stolen. More recently, he said he does “not have a comprehensive understanding or even any understanding of how elections work,” the Journal Sentinel reported.

Bauer said Gableman’s comments “and the partisan context in which he received this assignment” show Gableman is not right for the job.
Former Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Hon. Michael Gableman testified earlier this month in front of the Wisconsin Committee on Campaign and Elections. Gableman told the committee, “It’s very clear that Mark Zuckerberg’s Goal Was to Defeat Donald Trump and Elect Joe Biden.” Gableman also threatened to jail two Wisconsin Democratic Mayors if they continue to avoid his interview.

But Republican Bernier does not want this to happen.

These horrible RINOs are the worst.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

House Votes 222-208 to Refer Trump Chief of Staff Mark Meadows to Justice Department for Potential Criminal Charges

By Cristina Laila
Published December 15, 2021 at 11:57am
mark-meadows.jpg


The House of Representatives late Tuesday evening voted 222-208 to refer Trump’s Chief of Staff Mark Meadows to the Justice Department for potential criminal charges.

Representatives passed the contempt measure 222-208 with RINOs Cheney and Kinzinger voting with the Democrats.

“The select committee’s report referring Mr. Meadows for criminal contempt charges is clear and compelling,” Committee Chairman Bennie Thompson said on Tuesday. “As White House chief of staff, Mr. Meadows played a role in or was witness to key events leading up to and including the January 6th assault on the United States Capitol.”

Mark Meadows previously informed the committee he would no longer appear before the sham committee for a deposition because they weren’t respecting boundaries concerning executive privilege.

“We agreed to provide thousands of pages of responsive documents and Mr. Meadows was willing to appear voluntarily, not under compulsion of the Select Committee’s subpoena to him, for a deposition to answer questions about non-privileged matters. Now actions by the Select Committee have made such an appearance untenable,” the letter from George J. Terwilliger II stated.

Liz Cheney read Mark Meadows’ private text messages with Fox News hosts out loud as the panel voted to recommend contempt charges to the House.

The text messages showed that there was absolutely no ‘insurgency’ on the part of the Trump team.

Cheney then went on to hint that President Trump will face federal charges.

Rep. Jim Jordan defended his friend and former colleague Mark Meadows in a rebuke from the House floor.

VIDEO:

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1470889587857842184
.53 min
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

LIVE -STREAM VIDEO Starting at 11 AM ET: VoterGA and Garland Favorito Sue Georgia to Ban Dominion Voting Machines — VIDEO

By Jim Hoft
Published December 15, 2021 at 9:37am
garland-favorito-3.jpg


In August VoterGA and co-founder Garland Favorito announced they were joining with State House Representative Philip Singleton in a legal petition against the State of Georgia to ban Georgia’s Dominion Democracy Suite 5.5 voting system.

The voting system has already been declared in violation of Georgia law by the U.S. District Court of Northern Georgia [Pg. 81-82].

Georgia law requires a voting system to “print an elector verifiable paper ballot;” and “… produce paper ballots which are marked with the elector’s choices in a format readable by the elector.”

After reviewing extensive evidence in the Curling v. Raffensperger case, Judge Amy Totenberg concluded: “Plaintiffs and other voters who wish to vote in-person are required to vote on a system that does none of those things.” [O.C.G.A. § 21-2-2(7.1); O.C.G.A. § 21-2-300(a)(2)]

The petition Seeks Temporary and Permanent Injunctions.

** Here is video of the announcement.

Today at 11 AM Eastern Garland Favorito and VoterGA will present their case in Georgia Court.
What: A remote motion hearing has been set for the complaint filed by VoterGA and Rep. Philip Singleton against the State of Georgia to ban the Dominion Democracy Suite 5.5 voting system
Why: The state will attempt to have the case dismissed although the U.S. District Court already ruled the voting system does not comply with Georgia laws
When: Wednesday, December 15, 2021 at 11:00 a.m.
Where:
Fulton County Superior Court
Remote hearing link: Judge Kimberly Esmond Adams
Who: VoterGA is a non-partisan, 501(c)3 registered non-profit organization created by a coalition of citizens working to restore election integrity in Georgia. We advocate for independently verifiable, auditable, recount capable and transparent elections.
Here is livefeed from the virtual hearing starting at 11 AM Eastern.

View: https://youtu.be/EUvgv8xX4_U
2:43:10 min
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Liz Cheney Reads Text Messages in Front of Jan 6 Committee that Prove There Was NO Planned Insurgency – The Corrupt Committee Ignores and Moves On

By Joe Hoft
Published December 15, 2021 at 7:45am
Liz-Cheney-3.jpg

Setting the record straight.

On November 3rd, 2020, the Presidential Election was stolen by a cabal of bad actors who had prepared for months for that day. The same cabal, after successfully stealing the election, then like typical communists and usurpers went after the people they had just stolen from – the President, his allies, and the American people.

This culminated in an event in Washington DC at the Ellipse on January 6th and the protest-riot that followed the planned event at the US Capitol. While the stolen election was certified by Congress a group of individuals decided to break windows and enter the US Capitol building. A number of Trump supporters were killed that day and many more have been imprisoned by the same people who overthrew the 2020 Election.

Next, after attempting to impeach the President who was then out of office (something the US Constitution does not provide for) the same gangsters running the government created a commission to harass and further attempt to damage the rightful President and the American people.

This commission ignores the mountains of evidence showing the 2020 Election was stolen and instead goes after President Trump. The commission is made of Trump haters with a disproportionate number of individuals from the corrupt Democrat Party, and only two Trump-hating Republicans on the committee.

The makeup of the Committee is not even consistent with the directives that Congress used to set up the Committee (i.e. the Republican presence on the committee is limited).

This past week the committee proved again that it is not after the truth. We knew this by the fact that crazy Liz Cheney read some texts in front of the corrupt Jan 6 Committee which proved President Trump’s innocence.


The messages showed that there was absolutely no ‘insurgency’ on the part of the Trump team.

The Western Journal reports:
Did… did Liz Cheney just accidentally own herself and the entire Jan. 6 House panel by trying to own team Trump?

Yes. It appears she did.

The Wyoming congresswoman, who I suppose we still have to say is a Republican even though she is no longer considered one by the GOP in her home state, has gone full turncoat since the 2020 election after previously presenting herself as a staunch loyalist to former President Donald Trump.

Cheney just accidentally proved there was no insurrection.
Here are some of the texts Cheney read before the committee.

1639619774398.png

Jack Posobiec responded to the texts released by crazy Liz Cheney with the obvious:

1639619720315.png

Don’t expect the crooks in Congress to quickly end this charade. They are not after the truth. Never were.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Jan. 6 committee admits another blunder as Jordan rips Schiff for doctoring text messages

Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) and committee misrepresented exchange between Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) and former Trump Chief of Staff Mark Meadows at Jan. 6 hearing.

Updated: December 15, 2021 - 3:42pm

Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) on Wednesday excoriated Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) for doctoring his text messages after the Democrat-led congressional committee investigating the Jan. 6 Capitol breach admitted to misrepresenting Jordan's communications.

This is the second time in less than a month that the Jan. 6 committee has acknowledged a major blunder for pushing a false narrative of events.

"It was doctored," Jordan told Just the News in his first public comments on the matter. "It was a text message that was forwarded on to Mark [Meadows]. This again shows how partisan, biased, and wrong this [Jan. 6] committee is. Who can trust anything they do? If they're willing to doctor a document and mislead the American people, who can trust anything they do?"

Jordan was referring to what transpired at a hearing of the Jan. 6 select committee on Monday night. Schiff claimed to have evidence showing Jordan on the eve of the Capitol breach pushing Meadows, who was serving as White House chief of staff at the time, to instruct then-Vice President Mike Pence to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election.

However, the text messages in question, which Just the News obtained, reveal that Schiff painted a distorted picture of the conversation.

At the hearing, Schiff said he wanted to display some of the messages that Meadows received from members of Congress, noting the committee isn't naming the lawmakers while its investigation is ongoing.

The California Democrat then displayed a graphic of one such message, which read, "On January 6, 2021, Vice President Mike Pence, as President of the Senate, should call out all electoral votes that he believes are unconstitutional as no electoral votes at all."

Schiff described the message as proof that some members of Congress were working with President Trump's White House to thwart the democratic process.

"You can see why this is so critical to ask Mr. Meadows about," Schiff said. "About a lawmaker suggesting that the former vice president simply throw out votes that he unilaterally deems unconstitutional in order to overturn a presidential election and subvert the will of the American people."

The actual text message that Schiff claimed to display tells a different story, however.

The original text was written not by Jordan but, rather, by Joseph Schmitz, an attorney and a former inspector general for the Department of Defense. Schmitz sent the message to Jordan, who in turn forwarded it to Meadows.

Here is what Schmitz wrote in full:

"Good luck tomorrow!

On January 6, 2021, Vice President Mike Pence, as President of the Senate, should call out all the electoral votes that he believes are unconstitutional as no electoral votes at all — in accordance with guidance from founding father Alexander Hamilton and judicial precedence.

'No legislative act,' wrote Alexander Hamilton in Federalist No. 78, 'contrary to the Constitution, can be valid.' The court in Hubbard v. Lowe reinforced this truth: 'That an unconstitutional statute is not a law at all is a proposition no longer open to discussion.' 226 F. 135, 137 (SDNY 1915), appeal dismissed, 242 U.S. 654 (1916).

Following this rationale, an unconstitutionally appointed elector, like an unconstitutionally enacted statute, is no elector at all."

Schmitz attached to his text a four-page draft document detailing his legal reasoning for arguing Pence had constitutional standing to object to the certification of electoral votes submitted by some states.

Schiff failed to note that the original text message was written by an attorney rather than any lawmaker or that Jordan relayed the information to Meadows without any additional comment.

The graphic displayed by Schiff didn't include most of the original message, omitting the last two paragraphs. The graphic also altered punctuation, causing the message to come off as a terse directive from a lawmaker rather than a legal argument from a lawyer.

A spokesperson for the Jan. 6 committee acknowledged the error.

"The Select Committee on Monday created and provided Representative Schiff a graphic to use during the business meeting quoting from a text message from 'a lawmaker' to Mr. Meadows," the spokesperson told Just the News. "In the graphic, the period at the end of that sentence was added inadvertently. The Select Committee is responsible for and regrets the error."

The spokesperson then pasted the text of the full message, noting that the committee is doing so "in the interests of transparency."

The Federalist was the first to report on Schiff doctoring the text messages. Sources familiar with the matter and who communicate regularly with Jordan also told the Federalist that the congressman is always quite brief when he texts and would never send an in-depth, multi-paragraph message via text.

This is not the first time that the Jan. 6 committee has owned up to a blunder.

Just last month, the committee acknowledged it made an error in a subpoena that falsely accused former New York Police Commissioner Bernard Kerik of attending a secret meeting in Washington allegedly to discuss overturning the results of the 2020 election on behalf of then-President Trump. The admission followed a Just the News investigation, which found that Kerik could not have attended the meeting in Washington on Jan. 5, as alleged in the subpoena, because he was in New York City for a family emergency.

This is also not the first time that Schiff had come under fire for doctoring evidence to make his political opponents look bad. During the 2019 impeachment proceedings against President Trump, for example, Schiff misrepresented the contents of a telephone call between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Schiff also lied about his communications with a so-called whistleblower, who leaked the phone call between Trump and Zelensky that House Democrats used to impeach Trump.

Schiff's office didn't respond to a request for comment for this story.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Rumble video 17:17 min

IO Episode 84 – Interview With Garland Favorito Of VoterGA.org
by CD Media StaffDecember 14, 202122039

Information Operation Host L Todd Wood talks with Garland Favorito of VoterGA.org on the multiple lawsuits for election integrity going on in the state.
“What the Heck is going on in Georgia?”

direct link
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Why Is the Left Suddenly Worried About the End of Democracy?
.
By Victor Davis Hanson
December 16, 2021
(Ben Garver/The Berkshire Eagle via AP)

What is behind recent pessimistic appraisals of democracy's future, from Hillary Clinton, Adam Schiff, Brian Williams and other elite intellectuals, media personalities, and politicians on the Left? Some are warning about its possible erosion in 2024. Others predict democracy's downturn as early 2022, with scary scenarios of "autocracy" and Trump "coups."

To answer that question, understand first what is not behind these shrill forecasts.

They are not worried about 2 million foreign nationals crashing the border in a single year, without vaccinations during a pandemic. Yet it seems insurrectionary for a government simply to nullify its own immigration laws.

They are not worried that some 800,000 foreign nationals, some residing illegally, will now vote in New York City elections.

They are not worried that there are formal efforts underway to dismantle the U.S. Constitution by junking the 233-year-old Electoral College or the preeminence of the states in establishing ballot laws in national elections.

They are not worried that we are witnessing an unprecedented left-wing effort to scrap the 180-year-old filibuster, the 150-year-old nine-person Supreme Court, and the 60-year tradition of 50 states, for naked political advantage.

They are not worried that the Senate this year put on trial an impeached ex-president and private citizen, without the chief justice in attendance, without a special prosecutor or witnesses, and without a formal commission report of presidential high crimes and misdemeanors.

They are not worried that the FBI, Justice Department, CIA, Hillary Clinton, and members of the Obama Administration systematically sought to use U.S. government agencies to sabotage a presidential campaign, transition, and presidency, via the use of a foreign national and ex-spy Christopher Steele and his coterie of discredited Russian sources.

They are not worried that the Pentagon suddenly has lost the majority support of the American people. Top current and retired officers have flagrantly violated the chain-of-command, the Uniform Code of Military Justice, and without data or evidence have announced a hunt in the ranks for anyone suspected of "white rage" or "white supremacy."

They are not worried that in 2020, a record 64 percent of the electorate did not cast their ballots on Election Day.

Nor are they worried that the usual rejection rate in most states of non-Election Day ballots plunged - even as an unprecedented 101 million ballots were cast by mail or early voting.

And they are certainly not worried that partisan billionaires of Silicon Valley poured well over $400 million into selected precincts in swing states to "help" public agencies conduct the election.

What then is behind this new left-wing hysteria about the supposed looming end of democracy?

It is quite simple. The Left expects to lose power over the next two years - both because of the way it gained and used it, and because of its radical, top-down agendas that never had any public support.

After gaining control of both houses of Congress and the presidency - with an obsequious media and the support of Wall Street, Silicon Valley, higher education, popular culture, entertainment and professional sports - the Left has managed in just 11 months to alienate a majority of voters.

The nation has been wracked by unprecedented crime and nonenforcement of the borders. Leftist district attorneys either won't indict criminals; they let them out of jails or both.

Illegal immigration and inflation are soaring. Deliberate cuts in gas and oil production helped spike fuel prices.

All this bad news is on top of the Afghanistan disaster, worsening racial relations, and an enfeebled president.

Democrats are running 10 points behind the Republicans in generic polls, with the midterms less than a year away.

Joe Biden's negatives run between 50 and 57 percent - in Donald Trump's own former underwater territory.
Less than a third of the country wants Biden to run for reelection. In many head-to-head polls, Trump now defeats Biden.

In other words, leftist elites are terrified that democracy will work too robustly.

After the Russian collusion hoax, two impeachments, the Hunter Biden laptop stories, the staged melodramas of the Kavanaugh hearings, the Jussie Smollett con, the Covington kids smear, and the Rittenhouse trial race frenzy, the people are not just worn out by leftist hysterias, but they also weary of how the Left gains power and administers it.

If Joe Biden were polling at 70 percent approval, and his policies at 60 percent, the current doomsayers would be reassuring us of the "health of the system."

They are fearful and angry not because democracy doesn't work, but because it does despite their own media and political efforts to warp it.

When a party is hijacked by radicals and uses almost any means necessary to gain and use power for agendas that few Americans support, then average voters express their disapproval.

That reality apparently terrifies an elite. It then claims any system that allows the people to vote against the Left is not people power at all.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Exclusive Whistleblower Video: Pennsylvania Election Workers Discuss Hiding ‘Derogatory’ Records
A new whistleblower video shows Pennsylvania election workers discussing ways to hide derogatory information about the management of the November 2020 election.


Margot Cleveland

By Margot Cleveland
DECEMBER 10, 2021

A new whistleblower video obtained by The Federalist shows Delaware County, Pennsylvania election workers discussing ways to hide from the public “derogatory” information about the management and administration of the November 2020 election. The video is further evidence of fraud undertaken to conceal the widespread violations of Pennsylvania election law that occurred during last year’s presidential election, according to a source familiar with the recording.

The video, surreptitiously recorded by whistleblower Regina Miller, is one of many Miller took while working as a contract employee for the county. Miller began secretly recording the behind-the-scenes conduct after witnessing concerning behavior by several election officials, a person with knowledge of a lawsuit filed last month against county election officials, based in part on the recordings, told The Federalist.

In that lawsuit, Delaware County residents Ruth Moton, Leah Hoopes, and Gregory Stenstrom, as well as the Friends of Ruth Moton campaign, alleged former Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar, Delaware County, the Delaware County Board of Elections, and more than a dozen individual election officials destroyed election records and conspired to do so, to hide violations of election law.

Among the election law violations, according to the lawsuit, was the failure of the defendants to reconcile the votes after the close of the polls, as required by Pennsylvania’s election code. However, unlike the other lawsuits that followed the November 2020 election and alleged claims under the U.S. Constitution or state election codes, the petition in Moton v. Boockvar focuses instead on the defendants’ alleged fraud to cover up those purported violations.

In fact, four of the five counts set forth in the court filing were premised on Pennsylvania’s civil law of fraud and misrepresentation. The fraud and misrepresentation, according to the petition, involved the defendants’ alleged destruction of evidence and their purported representation of compliance with a May 21, 2021 Right to Know Request filed with Delaware County.

That request, according to sources with knowledge of the lawsuit, sought documentation from the county to confirm the November 2020 election results that were certified. According to the Moton lawsuit, the Right to Know request specifically requested the “final certified return sheets from the November 3, 2020 general election” for all Delaware County precints, along with the attached machine tapes from the voting machines. Significantly, as we will see, the request also asked for “any additional notes written on the back of the return sheet, as well as any attached notes that are related to each return sheet.”

The latest video obtained by The Federalist appears filmed soon after the Right to Know request, displaying a June 3, 2021 date. The recording shows two men identified by a source close to the matter as Delaware County election official James Ziegelhoffer and Delaware County lawyer Tom Gallagher.

The video captures the duo flipping through a box marked November 2020 “return sheets,” with the individual identified to The Federalist as Gallagher saying: “When we Xerox these return sheets there are notes on these return sheets and we are going to have to cover them over with paper. Somebody wrote on there ‘this is an outrageous example.”

The man identified by sources as Ziegelhoffer, whom county records show held the position of “Judge of Election” for the Western Precinct in the Media Borough, is heard on the recording saying, “So, like, any derogatory or whatever.”

“Right,” the tape records the apparently more senior election official responding, then adding that “most of the stuff is written on the back so we’re alright.”

The two then finger through the return sheets, appearing to discuss the markings, with Gallagher heard saying, “Okay that’s fine. But you know what I’m saying, ‘refused to come in,’” an apparent reference to a note he wanted covered when copies were made in response to the Right to Know request.

This latter exchange seems to confirm that Delaware County’s concern was only the derogatory handwritten notes and that in providing the responsive documents to the Right to Know request the officials left unobstructed any benign writing when making the copies.

Videos previously obtained by The Federalist provide further evidence of this apparently troubling conduct, as well as some hints to the type of “derogatory” information related to the management and administration of the November 2020 election the plaintiffs allege Delaware County officials attempted to hide.

In one of those earlier videos, the whistleblower filmed a conversation she had with the individual identified to The Federalist as Ziegelhoffer, according to a source with knowledge of the lawsuit. Ziegelhoffer, also known as Ziggy, is the man shown on this tape saying, “What we have here . . . is evidence. Right? Let them figure that out.”

The whistleblower responds: “Yes, but what I don’t understand and this makes—honestly this makes me nervous. Is why tapes were being thrown away?”

After Ziggy begins to deny the claim, “No, no tapes were,” Miller cuts him off: “No, you guys have been throwing away tapes… so what tapes are you throwing away? Like why?” After another short exchange in which Miller reminds him that “you have to save it for 22 months,” a reference to federal retention mandates, Ziegelhoffer acknowledges, “Yes, there are tapes that are being tossed,” but he then justifies their disposal by stressing, “They are of no audit value.”

That video then ends with a shot of various paperwork related to the November 2020 election, including torn documents shown in a large garbage can. A close-up of some of the paperwork captures some of the notes attached to, or written on, the election sheets, seen below:

margotdec5.jpg
margotdec4.jpg
margotdec3.jpg
margotdec2.jpg
margotdec1.jpg


The latest video appears filmed in the same room as another video obtained last month by The Federalist.

That video depicts the man identified by sources as Gallager tearing up tapes from the voting machines and tossing them in a garbage can.

“Tom, why do you have to rip it up? Makes you feel better?” the whistleblower is heard saying.

Gallager replies, “At this point, I don’t want anybody to pick it up, and thinking we threw stuff away.”
“We’re gonna have a little campfire going,” Ziggy adds.

Attempts to contact Ziegelhoffer and Gallager proved unsuccessful and Adrienne Marofsky, the public relations director for Delaware County, told The Federalist, “This matter is pending litigation and therefore the County is not responding to press questions.” However, Marofsky added that “the County is confident that the elections in 2020 and 2021 were conducted fairly and fully complied with state and federal laws.”

But with the video evidence that continues to emerge, that pronouncement seems in doubt: After all, if there were no violations of state or federal law, why seek to hide “derogatory” evidence or destroy the very tapes that could prove compliance with the law?

Rumble video .39 min

James Ziggelhoffer and Tom Gallagher Try To Dodge FOIA
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

HR1 Is the Democrat Party’s Coup de Grâce in Their Complete Takeover of the United States – Will Codify Their Election Fraud In Perpetuity

By Joe Hoft
Published December 16, 2021 at 8:10am
democrats-communists-.jpg


The Democrats announced they were going to table the horrible US ‘Build Back Broke’ bill yesterday.

This news came as Senator Manchin continued to show his hesitation in supporting the economically suicidal legislation.


Instead, they are going to again focus on their national election bill – HR1. This is a complete communist takeover of America’s election system.

Steve Bannon noted this on the War Room:


Speaker Nancy Pelosi first pushed the HR1 bill soon after Joe Biden’s inauguration:


Here is what we reported on the legislation back in January.

The Populist Press reported the first bill put together by this Pelosi-led Congress will eliminate free and fair elections forever. Fraud will be the mandate and Democrats, the kings of fraud, will win every election henceforth. The bill is labeled by the Communist Democrats – “For the People Act of 2021“.


Below are the key aspects of the bill as noted by the Populist Press:
Democrats introduce their first bill in the House: H.R.1 – The bill that will destroy America. Nationwide mail-in voting, banning restrictions on ballot harvesting, banning voter ID, criminal voters,DC Statehood roadwork, it’s all in here.
1) Internet-only registration with electronic signature submission.
“(a) Requiring Availability Of Internet For Online Registration.—Each State, acting through the chief State election official, shall ensure that the following services are available to the public at any time on the official public websites of the appropriate State and local election officials in the State, in the same manner and subject to the same terms and conditions as the services provided by voter registration agencies under section 7(a):
“(1) Online application for voter registration.

2) Banning the requirement to provide a full SSN for voter registration.
SEC. 1005. PROHIBITING STATE FROM REQUIRING APPLICANTS TO PROVIDE MORE THAN LAST 4 DIGITS OF SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER. (a) Form Included With Application For Motor Vehicle Driver’s License.—Section 5(c)(2)(B)(ii) of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (52 U.S.C. 20504(c)(2)(B)(ii)) is amended by striking the semicolon at the end and inserting the following: “, and to the extent that the application requires the applicant to provide a Social Security number, may not require the applicant to provide more than the last 4 digits of such number;”.

3) Nationwide ‘Motor Voter’ registration.
Note that motor voter registration is how thousands of illegal became registered voters in California and Nevada.
(2) DEFINITION.—The term “automatic registration” means a system that registers an individual to vote in elections for Federal office in a State, if eligible, by electronically transferring the information necessary for registration from government agencies to election officials of the State so that, unless the individual affirmatively declines to be registered, the individual will be registered to vote in such elections.

4) 16 year olds required to be registered to vote.
(d) Treatment Of Individuals Under 18 Years Of Age.—A State may not refuse to treat an individual as an eligible individual for purposes of this part on the grounds that the individual is less than 18 years of age at the time a contributing agency receives information with respect to the individual, so long as the individual is at least 16 years of age at such time. Nothing in the previous sentence may be construed to require a State to permit an individual who is under 18 years of age at the time of an election for Federal office to vote in the election.

5) Nationwide same-day registration.
“(1) REGISTRATION.—Each State shall permit any eligible individual on the day of a Federal election and on any day when voting, including early voting, is permitted for a Federal election—
“(A) to register to vote in such election at the polling place using a form that meets the requirements under section 9(b) of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (or, if the individual is already registered to vote, to revise any of the individual’s voter registration information); and
“(B) to cast a vote in such election.

6) Grants ($25M) for using minors in election activities.
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Election Assistance Commission (hereafter in this section referred to as the “Commission”) shall make grants to eligible States to enable such States to carry out a plan to increase the involvement of individuals under 18 years of age in public election activities in the State.

7) More children voters.
“(k) Acceptance Of Applications From Individuals Under 18 Years Of Age.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—A State may not refuse to accept or process an individual’s application to register to vote in elections for Federal office on the grounds that the individual is under 18 years of age at the time the individual submits the application, so long as the individual is at least 16 years of age at such time.

8) Prohibiting attempts to clean voter rolls of non-residents.
It’s this whole section, but in particular, this part below basically says nobody is allowed to request voter rolls to be cleaned up. ie: making it illegal to do what Tom Fitton was doing.
“(1) REQUIREMENTS FOR CHALLENGES.—No person, other than a State or local election official, shall submit a formal challenge to an individual’s eligibility to register to vote in an election for Federal office or to vote in an election for Federal office unless that challenge is supported by personal knowledge regarding the grounds for ineligibility which is—

9) Murderers and rapists can vote.
(1) NOTIFICATION.—On the date determined under paragraph (2), each State shall notify in writing any individual who has been convicted of a criminal offense under the law of that State that such individual has the right to vote in an election for Federal office pursuant to the Democracy Restoration Act of 2021 and may register to vote in any such election and provide such individual with any materials that are necessary to register to vote in any such election.

10) Mandatory early voting.
Note that I personally like early voting in Florida, but putting it here anyway.
“(1) IN GENERAL.—Each State shall allow individuals to vote in an election for Federal office during an early voting period which occurs prior to the date of the election, in the same manner as voting is allowed on such date.

11) THE BIG ONE – NATIONWIDE VOTE BY MAIL, BAN ON BALLOT PROTECTION MEASURES, LEGALIZED LIMITLESS BALLOT HARVESTING.
“SEC. 307. PROMOTING ABILITY OF VOTERS TO VOTE BY MAIL.
“(a) Uniform Availability Of Absentee Voting To All Voters.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—If an individual in a State is eligible to cast a vote in an election for Federal office, the State may not impose any additional conditions or requirements on the eligibility of the individual to cast the vote in such election by absentee ballot by mail.
“(2) ADMINISTRATION OF VOTING BY MAIL.—
“(A) PROHIBITING IDENTIFICATION REQUIREMENT AS CONDITION OF OBTAINING BALLOT.—A State may not require an individual to provide any form of identification as a condition of obtaining an absentee ballot, except that nothing in this paragraph may be construed to prevent a State from requiring a signature of the individual or similar affirmation as a condition of obtaining an absentee ballot.
“(B) PROHIBITING REQUIREMENT TO PROVIDE NOTARIZATION OR WITNESS SIGNATURE AS CONDITION OF OBTAINING OR CASTING BALLOT.—A State may not require notarization or witness signature or other formal authentication (other than voter attestation) as a condition of obtaining or casting an absentee ballot.
“(2) PERMITTING VOTERS TO DESIGNATE OTHER PERSON TO RETURN BALLOT.—The State—
“(A) shall permit a voter to designate any person to return a voted and sealed absentee ballot to the post office, a ballot drop-off location, tribally designated building, or election office so long as the person designated to return the ballot does not receive any form of compensation based on the number of ballots that the person has returned and no individual, group, or organization provides compensation on this basis; and
“(B) may not put any limit on how many voted and sealed absentee ballots any designated person can return to the post office, a ballot drop off location, tribally designated building, or election office.

12) Banning voter ID.
“(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subsection (c), if a State has in effect a requirement that an individual present identification as a condition of receiving and casting a ballot in an election for Federal office, the State shall permit the individual to meet the requirement—
“(A) in the case of an individual who desires to vote in person, by presenting the appropriate State or local election official with a sworn written statement, signed by the individual under penalty of perjury, attesting to the individual’s identity and attesting that the individual is eligible to vote in the election; or

13) Roadwork for DC statehood and territory statehood.
The whole subtitle.
Subtitle C—Findings Relating To District Of Columbia Statehood

14) COMPLETE CONGRESSIONAL TAKEOVER OF REDISTRICTING.
Subtitle E—Redistricting Reform
(B) ENSURING DIVERSITY.—In appointing the 9 members pursuant to subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1), as well as in designating alternates pursuant to subparagraph (B) of paragraph (3) and in appointing alternates to fill vacancies pursuant to subparagraph (B) of paragraph (4), the first members of the independent redistricting commission shall ensure that the membership is representative of the demographic groups (including racial, ethnic, economic, and gender) and geographic regions of the State, and provides racial, ethnic, and language minorities protected under the Voting Rights Act of 1965 with a meaningful opportunity to participate in the development of the State’s redistricting plan.
I am running out of time and space, but please look at this section:
SEC. 3201. NATIONAL STRATEGY TO PROTECT UNITED STATES DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS. (a) In General.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President, acting through the Secretary, in consultation with the Chairman, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, the Secretary of Education, the Director of National Intelligence, the Chairman of the Federal Election Commission, and the heads of any other appropriate Federal agencies, shall issue a national strategy to protect against cyber attacks, influence operations, disinformation campaigns, and other activities that could undermine the security and integrity of United States democratic institutions.
(b) Considerations.—The national strategy required under subsection (a) shall include consideration of the following:
(1) The threat of a foreign state actor, foreign terrorist organization (as designated pursuant to section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1189)), or a domestic actor carrying out a cyber attack, influence operation, disinformation campaign, or other activity aimed at undermining the security and integrity of United States democratic institutions.
(3) Potential consequences, such as an erosion of public trust or an undermining of the rule of law, that could result from a successful cyber attack, influence operation, disinformation campaign, or other activity aimed at undermining the security and integrity of United States democratic institutions.
Literally forming a commission to effectively freeze anyone who says that the election was rigged.
This is not America – this is a communist takeover by domestic enemies of the US Constitution.

It will be end of the United States — The coup de grâce by Democrats in their final act of destroying this great nation.
 

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
That reality apparently terrifies an elite. It then claims any system that allows the people to vote against the Left is not people power at all.
And Molly Ball (Time Magazine author of the expose on accomplished institutional Election Fraud) continues free.

No Contempt of Congress for not answering an official Commission's questions for her.

Dobbin
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Following Wednesday Hearing Georgians Not Hopeful Judge Will Ban Dominion Voting Systems from State – Same Judge Ruled Drop Boxes Could Stay Open 24 Hours

By Joe Hoft
Published December 16, 2021 at 12:35pm

Yesterday VoterGA in Georgia presented at a hearing to determine if Dominion voting machines should be eligible in the state after issues identified prior to the 2020 Election.


There’s no response yet from Judge Adams to the request by VoterGA to ban Dominion Voting Systems in Georgia. A response is expected on Monday.

The Georgia record reports:
Judge Kimberly Esmond Adams in Georgia was seemingly allied from the beginning with the GA Attorney General’s office in arguments before the court on a motion to dismiss the VoterGA case requesting relief from a finding from Judge Totenberberg in Oct 2020 the Dominion machines violated GA law as the ballots were not verifiable via a QR code that could be nefariously changed.

A local TV station reported that the judge appeared apprehensive to any efforts to prevent Georgia Voting machines from being used in the state.

Controversial Judge Kimberly Adams has ruled on previous voter-related cases and ruled with the left. In December 2020 before the senate runoff elections Adams ruled the unattended drop boxes could remain open at all hours of the day and night.

Obviously, Judge Adams is not concerned with election integrity.

Who even knows if drop boxes are legal in Georgia?

 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

J6 Committee Member Has Business Ties to China and the Chinese Communists

By Jacob Engels
Published December 16, 2021 at 1:40pm

With the January 6th Committee giving us a Mueller Witchunt2.0, this GP journalist believes that the American people deserve to know that one of the key members of the J6 Committee may be compromised by the Chinese Communist Party.

For years, this journalist has covered Congresswoman Stephanie Murphy of Central Florida, who co-chairs the allegedly moderate Blue Dog Coalition. While Murphy has consistently argued that she is a “moderate” problem solver that Independent and Republican voters can trust, the truth paints a very different picture.

She voted for both smamp sham impeachments of President Donald J. Trump, supports the radical BLM movement, backs unconstitutional gun-grabbing laws, is in favor of open borders, and votes with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi 95% of the time. Murphy has even advocated for the banning of anyone who attended the 2020 “Stop The Steal” rallies or shared “Qanon” content from serving in the military or obtaining security clearances.


However, it is Murphy who should be questioned for her top-secret clearances or prevented from access to briefings on matters of national security. Here’s why…

When the Chinese Communist Party unleashed the Coronavirus pandemic on the world, Murphy openly called on President Trump to be investigated for the effects of the pandemic, not the CCP.

Congresswoman Murphy even argued that we should remove tariffs on Chinese imports, rewarding the Chinese Communist Party for the deadly global pandemic.


What would motivate her to fight so fervently on behalf of the CCP? As usual, it’s all about the money. As the Tampa Bay Times reported in 2017, Murphy has sought to support legislation to “strengthen” US manufacturing, yet her husband’s company 3n2, which produces sports apparel, manufactures their products in China-based factories.

Congresswoman Murphy even holds a patent on a product she designed for her husband’s company, according to financial disclosures reviewed by Matthew Boyle of Breitbart News for an article highlighting the hypocrisy of Murphy’s involvement in 3n2.

The 1993 Company Law in China requires that all companies based in China, both foreign and domestic, “allow the establishment of units to carry out the activities of the party”,
and the very strong hand of the CCP in the private sector has only gotten stronger in recent years as President Xi Jinping has been actively jailing, seizing funds, or “disappearing” prominent billionaires who have crossed his regime.

As far as Murphy’s company is concerned, her husband has continued to admit that some of their most popular products, including cleats and the pants designed by Congresswoman Murphy, are cheaper to produce in China.

Angeli Datt, a Senior Research Analyst on China, wrote in April of this year about how the CCP’s control of clothing and apparel manufacturing, in particular the Xinjiang region where China and the Middle East are linked along the ancient Silk Road trading route.

This area is known to use the forced labor of the Uyghurs and Turkic Muslims who are the subject of gross human rights violations at the hands of the CCP and President Xi Jinpang, which have been called crimes against humanity. According to Datt, 20% of the world’s cotton comes from this region, at the hands of slave labor, to fuel international companies.

Major companies like Adidas, Lacoste and H&M have condemned the crimes against humanity in those forced labor camps in Xinjiang.

Breitbart’s Matthew Boyle rightfully notes
that Congresswoman Murphy likes to talk tough on the Chinese Communist Party, just like she talked tough on “strengthening” US manufacturing.
What’s more, the fact that Murphy’s husband’s company is manufacturing a product, for which she is at least partially responsible for inventing, in China runs counter to her public rhetoric claiming she is tough on China, wrote Boyle.

1639694648845.png
The fact that Congresswoman Murphy and her husband have not halted the production of products in China really tells you all you need to know. It’s cheaper for them, no matter what human rights abuses might be occurring in their Chinese facilities.

Murphy was asked about this in 2017, but remained silent as she scurried away.

View: https://youtu.be/Brr7rLu_R68
.44 min

Yet, we are supposed to believe that neither Congresswoman Murphy, nor her husband, have been influenced by the Chinese Communist Party. Without a doubt, the CCP knows that Congresswoman Murphy has access to top-secret and classified information crucial to protecting the national security of the United States.

And when you look at how she advocated for the removal of tariffs on Chinese products at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, it should become increasingly clear that her “tough talk” on China and the CCP is a manufactured ruse. Instead of investigating the CCP for leaking the Coronavirus, she wanted to investigate President Donald J. Trump.

There should be real concerns about when Murphy’s husband was last in China and the type of regular contact he has with the CCP members who are required by law to work at his company’s facility.

Furthermore, what kind of security measures are in check to make sure that the CCP hasn’t compromised Congresswoman Murphy through her husband?

Murphy serves on the House Armed Services Committee, which is responsible for the strengthening of our military and security of our nation against our main adversaries like Communist China.

Murphy’s involvement in the sham impeachments against President Donald J. Trump, history of wanting to give tax cuts to China, her family’s Chinese manufacturing interests and support of the globalist agenda showcases her commitment to the weakening of America.

Her position on the politically motivated January 6th Committee is just the latest in a series of performances that signal her willingness to divide the American people, something that is almost certainly happily received by the CCP.

Murphy’s access to top-secret materials, intelligence briefings, and information relating to matters of national security should be immediately revoked until a full investigation has been completed into her family business.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Forbes: Where Were The U.S. Capitol Police When Protestors Stormed The Capitol On January 6th?

By Adam Andrzejewski/OpenTheBooks.com
December 16, 2021



Some United States Capitol Police (USCP) officers were teleworking, some riot gear was locked in a bus or shattered upon impact after being improperly stored, and only a couple hundred of the 1,879 sworn officers were inside the Capitol Building, despite intelligence showing the protests might get heated on January 6th, 2021.

Even with a $464 million-a-year budget and nearly 2,000 officers, the USCP was unable to stop a breach of the Capitol by protestors who carried no guns. The USCP’s budget is greater than many large metropolitan cities, including Detroit, Minneapolis, St. Louis, and Columbus, Ohio.

Today, Congress plans to give the USCP — which has admitted to a lack of preparation, training, communication, and equipment—an additional ~$150 million, bringing its budget to over $600 million for fiscal year 2022.

Some of that money will no doubt go to the USCP’s diversity office, which was little use on January 6th but has nonetheless grown in staff and budget since 2016.

Showing Up Is Half the Battle

Despite employing 1,879 sworn officers as of September 2020, a congressional inquiry forced USCP to admit that on January 6th, only 195 officers were deployed to interior or exterior posts at the U.S. Capitol and 276 more were assigned to the Department’s seven civil disturbance unit platoons.

USCP documents show that at 2pm on that day, only 1,214 officers were “on site” across the Capitol complex of buildings. Congressional investigators concluded, however, that USCP could only account for 417 officers and could not account for the whereabouts of the remaining 797 officers.

Only 1,457 of its 1,879 sworn officers were ever “on site” over the entire 24-hour period of January 6th. That leaves 422 officers who were never even on site – 23-percent or nearly 1 in every 4 officers.

Some officers didn’t show up because they were “teleworking.” The USCP Inspector told Congress that 43 sworn officers were “at alternative facility/travel” and “teleworking.” (See footnote 358.)

Responding to our request for comment the Capitol Police spokesperson provided this context:

“The Department has off-site locations, which also must continue to operate. Fewer than 50 sworn employees were working off-site on January 6. Many of the sworn employees who did not work on January 6 were unavailable due to injuries, COVID-19, or leave such as Family Medical Leave or Military Leave. While the Department restricted leave for this event, it did not cancel leave for sworn employees who had submitted leave requests that were approved months in advance of January 6.”

The U.S. Capitol Complex consists of approximately 20 buildings spread across roughly two square miles, including House of Representatives and Senate office buildings, the Library of Congress, and the U.S. Supreme Court, as well as various parks and the U.S. Botanic Garden.

USCP, in 2018, screened 11.2 million individuals at building entrances and interior checkpoints, according to USCP Congressional testimony.

As the sole federal law enforcement agency with jurisdiction over the Capitol Complex, the USCP is the first and last line of defense protecting Members of Congress, their staff, and visitors to the nation’s Capitol buildings.

Riot Shields Shattered on Impact, Some Locked in a Bus, Officers Not Dressed for Success
According to a bipartisan, bicameral Congressional report, the USCP did not authorize its special tactical unit officers to wear protective gear at the beginning of their shift, but “pre-stage[d]” it in various locations.

In at least once instance, “USCP protective shields were locked in a bus during the riot so that a CDU platoon was unable to access them, and as a result, the platoon was required to respond to the crowd without the protection of their riot shields.”

But even those officers who had riot shields faced problems. USCP officers reportedly “were given defective riot shields that had been improperly stored and, as a result, “shatter[ed] upon impact.”

Inclusion, Diversity, Equity and Action (IDEA) Office of Little Use on January 6

Our auditors at OpenTheBooks.com reviewed what little is available on Capitol Police spending, and uncovered the previously unreported USCP “Inclusion, Diversity, Equity and Action (IDEA) Office.”

In 2016, the USCP hired Natalie Holder to be its “Chief Diversity Officer” and lead the USCP’s IDEA Office, an office she said she founded. Her salary is not public, though she bragged on her publicly accessible LinkedIn page that she grew the office to five people and “grew the budget by 70%[.]”

Interestingly, Holder was public about her anti-Trump biases. On Twitter and Instagram, Holder admitted to showing up for work late to walk an extra eight minutes for a Starbucks not sold at the Trump International Hotel. “#LateToWorkButOnTheRightSideOfHistory” she posted, alongside a photo of the hotel.

A little over five months before the security breach at the U.S. Capitol, the USCP Chief Steven Sund testified to Congress about the department’s diversity training:

“We have also strengthened our relationships with Asian-American, African American, Latinx, LGBTQIA, and women-focused professional associations in law enforcement through our involvement in conferences, meetings, and recruiting events.”

Weeks before he would resign following the massive breach in Capitol Hill security, Chief Sund released his Human Capital Strategic Plan for the USCP employees for 2021-2025, which listed the second highest goal for USCP employees as “diversity,” “inclusion,” and “equity.”

“Anybody have a plan?” USCP leadership was AWOL on January 6th

Congressional investigators reported:

Despite incident commanders being overwhelmed, USCP leadership never took control of the radio to communicate with responding officers. Officers did not recall hearing [Chief] Mr. Sund on the radio at any point during the attack and only recalled hearing Ms. Pittman once—when she ordered a lockdown of the Capitol Building at 2:00 p.m.

…Neither Mr. Sund nor Ms. Pittman provided an explanation for why USCP leadership did not directly communicate with officers. One officer attributed this failure to a lack of operational experience among USCP leadership and suggested that the promotion process at USCP should be reevaluated. In the absence of communication, officers lacked clarity about whether to respond to calls for “all available units.” An officer reported hearing a Lieutenant repeatedly ask over the radio, “[d]oes anybody have a plan?”

See FULL STORY at OpenTheBooks.com.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Zuckerberg-funded nonprofit heavily favored Dems in allotting millions in election aid: IRS filings

Form 990 for 2020 reveals Chicago-based Center for Technology and Civic Life dished out big private money to local election offices.

Updated: December 16, 2021 - 6:19pm

AChicago-based nonprofit funded by Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg funneled hundreds of millions of dollars to local election offices in what critics charge was a bid to elect Democrats in the 2020 elections, newly released IRS filings show.

The Center for Technology and Civic Life's IRS Form 990 filing for 2020, which Just the News obtained, reveals thousands of grants to election offices across the country. IRS 990s detail where organizations received and spent money.

Zuckerberg funneled some $328 million through the Silicon Valley Community Foundation, a grant-making organization with billions in assets that donates to left-wing causes. According to the Capital Research Center, an investigative think tank that's digging through the 990 filings, the tech billionaire has pushed nearly $2 billion through the foundation since 2010.

The foundation's massive grant to the Center for Technology and Civic Life (CTCL) was its second largest of 2020.

In another big transfer, the New Venture Fund gave a $25 million grant to CTCL.

Defenders of CTCL argue that the group is nonpartisan because it gave more grants to counties which voted for President Trump than for President Biden. However, the nonprofit gave significantly more to Democratic areas on a per-capita basis.

As the Capital Research Center notes, CTCL grants to Pennsylvania counties where Biden won averaged $3.11 per capita compared to $0.57 in counties where Trump won. In Arizona, the figures were $5.83 per capita in counties where Biden won and $1.29 in counties where Trump won.

CTCL, which was founded by Democratic campaign operatives, received federal COVID-19 relief funds. The nonprofit says the funds were spent in an effort to make voting safer amid the pandemic, without any political preference. However, House Republicans found in an investigation that less than 1% of the funds were spent on personal protective equipment.

In some states, such as Wisconsin, there are ongoing probes to find out what officials did with money they received from CTCL. One now-retired elections clerk in a key Wisconsin county told Just the News in June that election management was turned on its head after a massive injection of cash from CTCL.

Critics say the CTCL money, ostensibly meant to shore up voting systems and infrastructure amid the pandemic, was actually used to fuel efforts by Democratic politicians to change voting rules and create an unprecedented flood of mail-in ballots.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Here’s Why Georgia Senate Didn’t Decertify the Obviously Corrupt 2020 Election Results in the State

By Joe Hoft
Published December 16, 2021 at 5:30pm
georgia-senate-republicans.jpg

If you were wondering why the Georgia Senate didn’t decertify the obviously corrupt 2020 Election results, we now have an answer.

Daily Mail reported today:
A majority of Georgia’s Republican state senators sent former Sen. David Perdue a letter to request that he not enter the 2022 gubernatorial race before he launched his campaign, Axios reported.

“Our GOP and state must be unified behind our governor with a positive message to keep Georgia conservative and moving forward,” 25 of the state Senate’s 34 Republicans told Perdue in the letter obtained by Axios. They said that he “made us proud” during his tenure in Congress but said victory in November was more important.

Despite the letter, Perdue announced he would challenge incumbent Gov. Brian Kemp on Dec. 6. Former President Trump has criticized Kemp for not helping to overturn President Joe Biden’s victory in the state in the 2020 election.

Thirty-one state senators had already endorsed Kemp in September, Axios reported. Perdue acknowledged he received the request when asked, but he said it did not factor into his decision to run.
Governor Kemp certified the corrupt results in the state of Georgia despite numerous obvious acts of corruption. Despite the entire country knowing he certified fraudulent results, Kemp still wanted to run for reelection.


But the people in the state don’t want him in office now.


President Trump has backed Senator David Perdue who has the courage to challenge the 2020 election results in Georgia’s Fulton County.


Let’s hope that every single corrupt Georgia politician backing Kemp is primaried out of their seat along with Kemp. These people had the chance to show courage and make history and they failed.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

It Isn't An Accident That Joe Biden Quoted Stalin to Make His Push to Institutionalize Vote Fraud

By streiff | Dec 16, 2021 2:30 PM ET

8467d9ef-df32-4c87-9e38-e2a0f4bfb665-860x475.png
Screenshot via YouTube
As “Brokeback Better,” I mean “Build Back Better” goes down in flames (see Biden’s Worst Nightmare Comes True: ‘Build Back Better’ Just Hit That Iceberg), Joe Biden, Joey freakin’ SoftServe, is cranking up a new campaign to pass his “voting rights” bill. This story is via Politico.
The White House wants to mark the new year with a forceful push for voting rights, portraying the protection of the ballot as a battle for democracy itself. But despite a renewed emphasis from an increasingly impatient and frustrated base, prospects for legislative success still look grim.

The White House has been considering connecting the voting rights drive with the upcoming first anniversary of the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol, making the case that the most sacred tenant [“tenant,” lolololol, the next time you want to complain about our copyediting, remember this] of America’s democracy remains under siege one year after the insurrection fueled by the election fraud lies told by former President Donald Trump.
To strongly make that case, the president and his team had been hoping to clear the legislative deck by the Jan. 6 anniversary. But the president’s social spending bill, known as the Build Back Better Act, appears stalled for the foreseeable future in the Senate, with Manchin’s refusal to commit to the $1.75 trillion legislation seemingly certain to push the measure into early 2022.
Biden signaled on Wednesday that he’d be fine with prioritizing election reform for the time being, saying: “If we can get the congressional voting rights done, we should do it. … There’s nothing domestically more important than voting rights.” But, previously, White House aides had consistently signaled that they wanted the social spending bill first and voting rights second.
Two days ago, Biden meandered his way into trying to make a case for overturning the US Constitution in favor of a monstrous and illegal Democrat bill that will centralize control of voting within the most Democrat-infested parts of the federal government. The full speech is below, and the full remarks are at the end of this post.

Video on website 40:39 min

At around 36:34 of the clip, we have this jewel.

Video on website .09 min
The struggle is no longer just who gets to vote or making it easier for eligible people to vote. It’s about who gets to count the vote and whether your vote counts at all.
If that line sounds familiar to you, it should. One of Joe Stalin’s personal secretaries, Boris Bazhanov (not to be confused with Boris Badenov), fled the USSR in 1928 and wrote a book about his experiences. He quoted Stalin as describing elections this way. ‘I regard it as completely unimportant who in the party will vote and how, but it is extremely important who will count the votes and how.’

Bingo. That is precisely what is at stake in the so-called “John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act.” The first rule in this game is that you need to pay attention to what they are saying when they tell you what they are planning to do.

The reforms to voting instituted by various GOP state legislatures have two things in common. First, they all try to ensure that all the votes cast are by actual voters. Second, they all try to ensure that all votes are counted by a regular and transparent means that is established before the first vote is cast, not made up willy-nilly by rogue Democrat election “professionals” and partisan judges.

The Democrats are going in the opposite direction for exactly the reasons articulated by Stalin. If you ever wondered why George Soros invested in electing state secretaries of state, this is it. They are adulterating the poll books with hundreds of thousands of voters who no longer reside in the precinct where they are registered; sometimes, they live in no precinct at all (Virginia Man Sentenced to Prison for Registering Core Democrat Constituency to Vote). They want to send activists into assisted living facilities and collect “absentee ballots.” They want ballots to be counted without regard to when they arrive. They want “voter intent” to be a real thing. They want to keep partisan and third-party observers away when votes are counted. They want us all to ignore massive blocks of single-party ballots dumped into the system at critical times. The Democrats and their “voting rights” bill aspire to make elections meaningless. The idea is that you vote, and then the Democrats tell you the outcome.

Biden’s Remarks at the DNC Holiday (they can’t bring themselves to say Christmas) Celebration

THE PRESIDENT: Hello, everybody. (Applause.) Well, good evening.

Thank you, Kamala, for that introduction and for your partnership — and it is a partnership. And Doug — he’s been a fantastic Second Gentleman, and he also — he’s a first-rate lawyer.
(Applause.) And Jill, the amazing First lader [sic] — Lady. I — I don’t know how she does it; I can’t keep up with her. (Laughter.) She teaches, she does all the job as a First Lady.

And I also want to thank Nancy Pelosi, who’s been a good, close friend for a long, long time. I think she may be the best Speaker we’ve ever had. (Applause.)

Congressman Jim Clyburn. Jim, are you here? I don’t know whether Jim is here or not, but if he — I tell you what: Tammy Duckworth, I’m told, is here. Incredible leaders in Congress.

And we see so many friends as we close out the first year of office and head into a new year. And I want to thank you all.

I have to admit to you, I have one serious regret — and we talked about this, Jill and I, and so did we talk with the Vice President and the First [Second] Gentleman: I had hoped by now each one of you, who helped us get to where we are, would have had full access to the White House. I mean that sincerely. We would — we had all kinds of plans; we thought we were going to be in a position because of the change — we hoped people had moved on to getting all their vaccines.

We would have been in a position to change the way in which this takes place. But next year — and this year, before it’s over: in the White House. In the White House. (Applause.)

It’s a genuine regret we haven’t had a chance to personally thank so many of you who broke your neck for us — broke your neck for us when things didn’t look good at all.

And, folks, a little over a year ago, we were all part of the most consequential presidential election in American history — not because we won, but it was the largest turnout in American history: 81 million people showed up to vote — (applause) — 81 million. In the middle of a pandemic, 81 million people showed up. (Applause.) And it is because of all of you.

Now, a year later, we have a lot to be proud of. We’ve passed two historic pieces of legislation.

The American Rescue Plan delivered immediate relief to millions of people and rescued the economy from the brink. We’re growing faster than any other nation in the world, in terms of our growth rate. Since its passage, we have a record number of jobs. We’ve created over 6 million jobs since January 20th. (Applause.)

No — no new presidency ever created that many jobs this quickly.

And we’ve seen the extraordinary drop in unemployment. It’s at 4.2 percent nationally, and we’re heading towards below 4 percent unemployment. (Applause.)

And, look, economic experts had predicted it would take another two years before we’d see a drop in unemployment rate at that level.

And we have gone from just 2 million Americans [fully] vaccinated to over 203 million Americans — (applause) — [fully] vaccinated, and 240 million with at least one shot.

And what is probably the thing I’m most proud of: We’re on track, as was mentioned earlier, to end child poverty by 40 percent. (Applause.) Think of what that means. Think about what that means.

No matter what their — anyway, I — I don’t want to get going on — (laughter) — look, that’s with the refundable —

AUDIENCE MEMBER: Keep going, Joe!

THE PRESIDENT: — tax credit, No, I really mean it, man. (Laughter.)

I — look, I told you all I ran for one reason: Not to do anything other than do what I thought was the right thing to do, come hell or high water.

The refundable tax credit helped us accomplish that. And that’s why we’re fighting so hard to make sure the tax credit is extended.

And after year one of “Infrastructure Week” — now, by the way — (laughter) — I tell you what: I don’t know how many times did we hear “Infrastructure Week. Infrastructure Week.” Holy God, I couldn’t stand another. (Laughter.)

But, look, we passed the most important piece of infrastructure legislation that’s ever been passed — or since the — at least, the Eisenhower administration that built the Interstate Highway System.

This legislation is going to rebuild our nation’s roads, bridges, highways, ports, airports.

It’s going to remove lead pipes, as you’ve heard before, all over America so our kids and families can drink clean water.

It’s going to make high-speed Internet a reality in every part of the country.

Never again are you going to have to sit out in front of a McDonald’s in a parking lot to be able to tap into their Internet so you — your child can do your homework. (Applause.)

Look, this is the United States of America, for God’s sake. And this law is going to create millions of jobs — good-paying jobs you can raise a family on — union jobs, not paying $17 an hour. (Applause.)

And the Build Back Better plan — people ask me why I’m so insistent on the elements of that plan. Here’s the deal: I’m not worried about me. I’m worried about young people — whether they can get kids daycare — can they do that.

You know, a lot of you are paying 14,000 bucks a year for childcare. The cost is crushing. Under our plan, the cost will be cut in half.

I’m worried about families and elderly grandparents and what — their lives at stake. Every one — every one — every one is a little harder. So, you know — so mom can — grandmom can walk out without having — out of her porch — without worrying about falling, can take care of herself, can be left alone. They’re going to keep working to pay the bills.

Look, my plan is simple: We’re going to make sure we take care of mom, we’re going to take care of the child. You — those of you in the sandwich generation, you’re dealing with both. You’re dealing with both.

Look, and families can save money. They have — just to have, as my dad used to say, “just a little piece of mind.” Just a little piece of mind.

I’m worried about that mom whose daughter has diabetes and don’t have insurance. And that insulin, it costs 10 bucks to del- — to make, and they’re charging up to $1,000 a month.

Guess what? Imagine being that parent, looking at a child who can’t get the insulin they need. Deprived of her health and your dignity, what do you do? That’s outrageous. What the hell are we doing? We’re going to make sure that’s no more than $35 a month. (Applause.)

We just saw one of the most devastating tornados in the history of this country. Our weather is getting more extreme, more destructive. Look at the lives being destroyed.

I proposed a way to deal with this in the biggest investment we’ve ever proposed in our country’s history.

I worry about the next town that’s destroyed, the next family that loses a home, the next person who drowns in a once-in-a-century flood.

These are the people I’m worried about. This is why we all got engaged.

We can’t affo- — we can afford to do all this without raising taxes — not a single penny — on anyone making less than $400,000 a year.

And experts acknowledge if we do this, we’re going to reduce inflation, not increase it. Reduce inflation.

In fact, I got — unsolicited — a letter from 17 Nobel laureates in economics who looked at our plan and said they see long-term inflationary — they — they will — it will save and serve against long-term inflationary pressures.

The bottom line is: We’re helping working-class and middle-class people spend less money on the things they badly need. So if you’re worried about rising cost, nothing will cut costs for American families more than the Build Back Better plan. That’ll give them a shot. (Applause.)

And, folks, as my partner said, we have to focus on the single-most sacred right we have: the right to vote. (Applause.) The right to vote.

Today, the right to vote and the rule of law are under unrelenting assault from Republican governors, attorney generals, secretaries of state, state legislators. They’re following my predecessor deep into the abyss. The struggle is no longer just who gets to vote or making it easier for eligible people to vote. It’s about who gets to count the vote and whether your vote counts at all. It’s a sinister combination of voter suppression and election subversion. It’s un-American, it’s un-democratic, it’s unpatriotic. And, sadly, it is not unprecedented now.

The Vice President has been leading our administration’s effort, and we’ve supported Democrats pressing to enact critical voting rights bills since day one of this administration, making sure we have unanimous support.

Look, but each and every time, Senate Republicans have blocked the way. They’re afraid even just to debate the bills in the United States Senate, even on a bill that includes provisions that have traditionally been supported by a Republican.

This battle is not over. This door is not closed. We have to keep up the fight and get it done, because our democracy depends on it. (Applause.)

And, folks, there’s so much more to do: police reform, criminal justice reform, immigration, gun violence, the courts, protecting a woman’s right to choose. All these critical issues.

And as we fight to make progress on all of them, I hope you remember what got us to the White House in the first place. In 2020, we won as a unified Democratic Party — more unified than ever.

(Applause.) Now we look at 2022. I want to tell my Republican friends: Get ready, pal. You’re going in for a problem.

And we need to stay unified. Jaime Harrison is here and he’s doing an outstanding job as the DNC chair. And I also want to thank the DNC vice chairs and the leadership as well.

The DNC has been a critical partner in all of our work this year. As Democrats, we know what we’re for, while Republicans don’t seem to be for anything. Name me something they are for.

They’re against everything.

I just mentioned that we’d reduce the cost for American families. We have to keep making the case. And if we do, I believe we’re going to win. Let me say this again for the press: We’re going to win in 2022. (Applause.) I really mean it.

But we’ve got to explain to the American people what’s in each of these pieces of legis- — what have we done for them. That’s where the DNC comes in. That’s for all of you who support the DNC, for all of you who allow to give them the wherewithal to go out and make the case, the advertisements, and all the things we’re doing. We have to let people know what we’ve done.

So let me close where I began: by thanking you. You were with us when we were behind, when we were ahead, and every moment in between. It’s been an incredible journey. But it’s not about Jill and I or Kamala and — it’s not about us. It’s about America and the immense possibilities within our reach as a nation.

I’ve now met with almost every major world leader, many of whom I knew in advance. I say this for everybody to listen: I don’t know a single, solitary world leader who wouldn’t trade the problems the President of the United States has for their problems. I don’t know a single one. Not one. (Applause.)

And, folks, that’s why, as difficult as the work is, I can honestly say I’ve never been more optimistic about America’s future. There’s not a single thing we’re unable to do when we do it together as the United States of America. That’s who we are. (Applause.)

So, Merry Christmas. Happy Holidays. God bless you all. And let’s go get them and win in 2022! Thank you. (Applause.)

I just said to Jill, “You guys should have walked off this stage.” She said, “You were so scincila-…” —
THE FIRST LADY: Scintillating. (Laughs.)

THE PRESIDENT: Yeah. Can you — what do you think? Eh? (Applause.)

All right, anyway, maybe we get a chance to hang around a little bit. Thank you all so, so, so very much. Thank you. (Applause.)
7:29 P.M. EST

1639705683666.png
 
Last edited:

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
Biden’s Remarks at the DNC Holiday (they can’t bring themselves to say Christmas) Celebration
Um that is Holiday, which is modern-speak for "Holy-day."

Do Democrat head explode if they know that?

I think only if they pay attention. But Dems are good at not paying attention.

It's called "selective sentience."

It made Hunter Biden's Laptop disappear for almost a year at the FBI.

Dobbin
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
and the Clinton Foundation's pay-to-play scheme, as well as the Clinton/Bush Haiti Relief fund. Oh, don't forget Di Fi's husbands cozy development contracts and Gramma Nan's husband's inside trades.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=obhzYxqkpaw
36:06 min

Grand Jury Underway To INDICT Donald Trump On Fraud, Liberals Say Indictment Will END Trump 2024 Run

Dec 17, 2021


Tim Pool


Grand Jury Underway To INDICT Donald Trump On Fraud, Liberals Say Indictment Will END Trump 2024 Run. Democrat operatives, the January 6th committee and private actors are doing everything to stop Trump 2024 from happening. Meanwhile Ron DeSantis is floated as a potential front runner for 2024 should Trump be unable to run. Republicans heavily favor trump but Desantis wins if Trump is out of the picture. Meanwhile Democrats mostly want Biden to run again but Biden 2024 seems increasingly unlikely to happen.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Jan 6 Committee Subpoenas Col Waldron For ‘Playing a Role in Promoting Claims of Election Fraud,’ Communicating with Trump White House

By Cristina Laila
Published December 16, 2021 at 7:10pm
waldron-IT-witness.jpg

The sham January 6 Committee on Thursday subpoenaed retired Colonel Phil Waldron for records and testimony.

Last November Rudy Giuliani’s first witness at the Arizona election hearing was information warfare officer Retired Army Colonel Phil Waldron.

The Marxists on the J-6 panel are targeting Waldron because he worked with Trump’s lawyers and testified before state lawmakers on the rampant Democrat 2020 election fraud.

“According to public reporting, you claim to have visited the White House on multiple occasions after the election, spoken to Mark Meadows “maybe 8 to 10 times” and briefed several members of Congress on election fraud theories,” Jan 6 Chairman Bennie Thompson wrote in a letter to Waldron. “You have also publicly acknowledged contributing to the creation of a PowerPoint presentation that was given to, or described for, Republican members of Congress on the eve of January 6th.”

Recall, Col Waldron spoke at election hearings in Arizona, Pennsylvania and Michigan last December.

Waldron claimed truckloads of ballots for Joe Biden were inserted into the 2020 election.

Waldron told the Arizona election committee that they have witnesses who delivered truckloads of ballots for Joe Biden from New York to Pennsylvania. Waldron said they likely did the same thing in Wisconsin.

Colonel Waldron also spoke about the voting machines used in US elections.

The Dominion systems were connected to the Internet as well, despite Dominion’s claims to the contrary. The records within the system can be manipulated by outside parties and insiders as well.

Bennie Thompson called Waldron’s PowerPoint presentation an “alarming blueprint for overturning a nationwide election.”

“Mr. Waldron reportedly played a role in promoting claims of election fraud and circulating potential strategies for challenging results of the 2020 election. He was also apparently in communication with officials in the Trump White House and in Congress discussing his theories in the weeks leading up to the January 6th attack. The document he reportedly provided to Administration officials and Members of Congress is an alarming blueprint for overturning a nationwide election. The Select Committee needs to hear from him about all these activities.

We expect him to comply with the law and provide records and testimony as the Select Committee continues its work to get answers for the American people about January 6th, make legislative recommendations to strengthen our democracy, and help ensure nothing like that day ever happens again,” Jan 6 Chairman Bennie Thompson said.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

All Roads Lead to Mark Zuckerberg: Newest Liberal Group EOLDN Organized to Defend Shady Election Officials for Free has Zuckerberg Roots

By Jim Hoft
Published December 16, 2021 at 10:18pm

All roads lead back to Mark Zuckerberg.

On Monday, Decemter 13, several lawyers stepped forward to announce they were going to work for election officials in Wisconsin and represent them at no cost to diffuse the threats and voter fraud claims from the 2020 election.


david-becker.jpeg

The lawyers, led by Attorney David Becker, announced the formation of the Wisconsin Election Official Legal Defense Network (EOLDN).

In just three months since the formation of EOLDN in Septembert hundreds of liberal attorneys have signed on to assist the group.

On Thursday Wisconsin Republican State Representatives released the following statement regarding Monday’s news conference.

The Republicans questioned the ethics and legality of the EOLDN providing free legal defense attorneys to election officials. The group also pointed out that this group is also tied to Zuckerberg money.

The GOP representatives point out that David Becker, who was at the Monday press conference and is the founder of EOLDN, was also the founder of the Center for Election Innovation and Research (CEIR) a group Zuckerberg funded with $69.5 million during the 2020 election. David Becker announced at the press conference there was “no evidence of fraud” in the 2020 election.
In 2005, an ethics complaint was filed against him for being partisan in a non-partisan role against Republicans as a trial lawyer in the Voting Section in the U.S. Department of Justice. He left that role shortly thereafter and became a senior staff attorney of the left-wing activist group People for the American Way in 2006, and became director of their campaign in 2007. Afterward, he became director of election initiatives at PEW Charitable Trusts and created the Electronic Registration and Information Center (ERIC), a national computer voter registration system in 2008 which currently shares voting data in 30 states.”
“We find it interesting and most concerning that this individual, who happens to be the founder of the ERIC system and the CEIR, would need to create EOLDN to offer pro-bono attorneys to defend election officials. We find it further concerning that Kevin Kennedy, former director of Wisconsin’s Government Accountability Board, who also led on the John Doe investigation against the Walker campaign, is also on the board of directors for CEIR.”
The Wisconsin Representatives concluded with this:
“It appears the press conference panel’s answer for those who question the integrity of an election influenced by Zuckerberg money, is to bring in more Zuckerberg money from CEIR and EOLDN to protect those who took Zuckerberg money from the CTCL.”
Here is the letter from Republican Representatives:
Rep. Timothy Ramthun
Rep. Janel Brantjen
Rep. Chuck Wichgers
Rep. Scott Allen
Currently, there are several Wisconsin officials under investigation linked to Mark Zuckerberg’s money in the 2020 election.

Screenshot-2021-12-16-224214.jpg
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

TODAY at 4 PM: AZ Legislators To Headline Election Integrity Rally Outside Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich’s Office

By Jordan Conradson
Published December 17, 2021 at 2:57pm
F8548D59-C0E3-4CF9-B8BF-DF037166FBFC.jpeg


The damning Maricopa County full forensic election audit results were delivered to Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich nearly three months ago.

The election was stolen and Brnovich has done nothing to protect Arizona voters or our US Constitution.


Legislators in Arizona are calling for decertification and arrests.

Arizona State Rep. Mark Finchem, Sen. Wendy Rogers, and Sen. Kelly Townsend will join Gubernatorial Candidate Kari Lake, and others today at 2 pm, for an Election Integrity Rally at Brnovich’s Phoenix office, at 2005 N Central Avenue, Phoenix.


The audit discovered over 700,000 ballot discrepancies and Joe Biden stole the Arizona election by less than 10,500 votes.


It has been over one year of inaction from the Attorney General.
Arizona is tired of waiting.

Sign Arizona State Senator Wendy Rogers’ nationwide petition to decertify the election.

Contact Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich and demand justice.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Hard Questions Raised On Jan 6 Panel's Legality In Meadows Contempt Vote

FRIDAY, DEC 17, 2021 - 03:09 PM
Authored by Mark Tapscott via The Epoch Times,

A serious challenge to the House Select Committee on the January 6 Attack on the United States Capitol is growing via former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows’ suit against subpoenas for information he claims the panel has no legal authority to seek.


In his suit filed Dec. 8 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, Meadows asks for “declaratory and injunctive relief to invalidate and prohibit the enforcement of two overly broad and unduly burdensome subpoenas from a select committee of the U.S. House of Representatives (the ‘Select Committee’) issued in whole or part without legal authority in violation of the Constitution and laws of the United States.”


Then-White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows at the White House in Washington, on Oct. 21, 2020. (Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images)

Meadows further argues that “the Select Committee wrongly seeks to compel both Mr. Meadows and a third-party telecommunications company to provide information to the Select Committee that the Committee lacks lawful authority to seek and to obtain.

“The Select Committee acts absent any valid legislative power and threatens to violate longstanding principles of executive privilege and immunity that are of constitutional origin and dimension.”

The Meadows suit thus challenges both the scope of the subpoenas—which demand stacks of White House documents and both official and personal text and email messages to and from him—and the legal standing of the select committee.


President Donald Trump, next to White House chief of staff Mark Meadows, speaks to reporters upon arrival at Andrews Air Force Base in Maryland on Sept. 3, 2020. (Mandel Ngan/AFP via Getty Images)

Challenges to congressional subpoenas as overly broad and unduly burdensome aren’t unusual, but the context of the Meadows claims invites the federal courts to decide, among much else, whether Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) abused her office by steering the committee away from legitimate legislative purposes through her power of appointment.

The select committee was established by the House of Representatives with passage of H.Res. 503 on a 228-190 vote. Pelosi introduced the measure and all Democrats but only two Republicans voted for the measure. It stipulated a 13-member panel, with five appointed by Pelosi in consultation with House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.).

But Pelosi objected to McCarthy’s selections and instead appointed the two GOP members—Rep. Liz Cheney of Wyoming and Rep. Adam Kinzinger of Illinois—to join seven Democrats.


House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) speaks at her weekly press conference at the U.S. Capitol Building in Washington on Dec. 8, 2021. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

All nine of the panel members—including Chairman Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.)—voted to impeach President Donald Trump and have publicly held him responsible for the Jan. 6 incursion at the Capitol.

McCarthy’s statement condemning Pelosi’s actions described them as “the unprecedented step of denying the minority party’s picks for the Select Committee on Jan. 6. This represents an egregious abuse of power and will irreparably damage this institution.”

Her actions, McCarthy added, robbed the select committee of “all legitimacy and credibility and shows the Speaker is more interested in playing politics than seeking the truth.”

The argument that the select committee lacks legitimacy was heard again during Tuesday’s House debate on holding Meadows in contempt and referring his case to the Department of Justice for prosecution. Meadows could face a year in prison and fines of up to $100,000 if convicted.


Rep. Jim Banks (R-Ind.) on Capitol Hill on March 27, 2019. (York Du/NTD)

Republican Study Committee Chairman Rep. Jim Banks (R-Ind.) told the House that:

“According to the select committee’s charter, H.Res. 503, ‘the Speaker shall appoint 13 members to the select committee, five of whom shall be appointed in consultation with the Minority Leader.’ But the committee has zero members appointed in consultation with Leader McCarthy, and it doesn’t have 13 members, it has nine.

“According to the committee’s charter, if Mr. Meadows had come in for a deposition, the minority must have been allowed to question Mr. Meadows for the same amount of time as the majority. Except no members of the committee were named by the minority.

“This isn’t nit-picking. The Supreme Court has found that a select committee must follow its own rules to act with legal force. So we have the select committee as it exists legally and on paper. And then we have something completely different. I don’t know what to call it but it doesn’t resemble the select committee that Democrats voted to pass on the House floor. It’s just nine members picked by Speaker Pelosi.”


The Supreme Court is seen in Washington, in a file photograph. (J. Scott Applewhite/AP Photo)

In his suit, Meadows went into great detail in describing why he contends the select committee lacks authority to issue the two subpoenas and indeed to conduct any of its activities, including a deposition of the former White House Chief of Staff.

“The Select Committee, however, is not an authorized congressional committee because it fails to comport with its own authorizing resolution, House Resolution 503. Congress’ failure to act in accordance with its own rules is judicially cognizable. Yellin v. United States, 374 U.S. 109, 114 (1963). This is particularly significant where a person’s fundamental rights are involved,” the Meadows suit argues.

Chief Justice Earl Warren said in his summary statement of the High Court’s opinion in the Yellin case that “the [House Committee on Un-American Activities] prepared the groundwork for prosecution in Yellin’s case meticulously. It is not too exacting to require that the Committee be equally meticulous in obeying its own rules.”


A crowd is seen at the U.S. Capitol in Washington on Jan. 6, 2021. (Jose Luis Magana/AP Photo)

The Meadows suit applied the same logic on the question of depositions, claiming that “the Select Committee chairman may not order the taking of depositions without consultation with the ranking minority member of the Select Committee.”

But, Meadows points out, “the Select Committee has no ranking minority member, Chairman Thompson failed to make the requisite consultation before issuing the subpoena that compelled Mr. Meadows to appear for a deposition.”

As a result, the Meadows suit argues, “the ordering of Mr. Meadows’ deposition runs afoul of the Select Committee’s authorizing resolution, making it invalid and unenforceable.”
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Bombshell Report: IRS Confirms Election Cash Dump Was Sourced from Zuckerberg Grantee


By Andrew Jose December 17, 2021 at 7:17am

A left-wing election advocacy group funded by Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg sent hundreds of millions of dollars to election offices nationwide, according to a Capital Research Center report Thursday.

The conservative think tank said the Center for Tech and Civic Life doled out the money in “an effort to privatize the 2020 election and put Joe Biden in the White House” in place of President Donald Trump.

The CTCL, according to its 2020 IRS Form 990 filing, distributed more than $332 million in grants. A significant portion of the money, according to the CRC, went to “elections offices across the country.”

“We’re still combing through them, but it’s already clear that our key findings from nine state reports earlier this year — Arizona and Nevada, Georgia, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Texas, Michigan and Wisconsin, and Virginia — will be confirmed in the coming weeks,” CRC researchers Parker Thayer and Hayden Ludwig wrote in their report.

The CTCL describes itself on its website as “a team of civic technologists, trainers, researchers, election administration and data experts working to foster a more informed and engaged democracy, and helping to modernize U.S. elections.”

The organization was founded by former Democratic campaign operatives Tiana Epps-Johnson, Donny Bridges and Whitney May, according to the CRC.

The trio worked together at the New Organizing Institute for multiple years.

That organization — considered a “Democratic Party’s Hogwarts for digital wizardry” — trained several Democratic digital activists before shutting down, the CRC reported.

According to the CRC, Zuckerberg channeled $328 million to the CTCL through the Silicon Valley Community Foundation.

The foundation’s grant to the Center for Tech and Civic Life “was the second-largest it paid out in 2020,” according to the CRC.

The CTCL’s website lists tech behemoth Facebook as one of its key funders.

Zuckerberg had given the organization such a significant amount of money that NPR reported last year that it “saved the election” for the Democrats.

According to the CRC, Zuckerberg’s money helped set up “private drop-boxes across key cities to hoover up mail-in ballots, bypassing the U.S. Postal Service in what was effectively the country’s first mail-in election — thanks to last-minute election law changes by Democratic secretaries of state and endless pressure from activist groups like the National Vote At Home Institute.”

Sandy Juno, retired clerk of Brown County, Wisconsin, told Just the News in June that after CTCL poured money into Green Bay, “the mayor’s office and chief of staff began to take over election functions.”

“And that is not something under state statutes they have the authority to do,” Juno said, “because under Wisconsin law, municipal clerks, the county clerk and the Wisconsin Elections Commission are the individuals charged with running elections.”

“As we got closer to the November election, we found out that this outside group had come in and was basically trying to redo our forms and documents that we use statewide,” she said.

“And these people were from out of state and had no business doing that.”

“They were working primarily with our five major Democratic base cities. So they were breaking the consistency of documents and processes and procedures used statewide,” Juno told the outlet.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

“I Have to Call to Decertify” – AZ State Senator Wendy Rogers Demands Update On Election Investigation Outside AZ Attorney General’s Office (Video)

By Jordan Conradson
Published December 18, 2021 at 3:54pm
3C6E8BFB-5E28-4130-984F-33152BB26008-scaled.jpeg

On Friday, hundreds of Arizona Patriots rallied outside of the Arizona Attorney General’s office in protest of the stolen 2020 Presidential Election.


The Gateway Pundit reported on the damning evidence of election fraud that was presented in Maricopa County and Pima County, Arizona, and delivered to Attorney General Mark Brnovich nearly three months ago.


Arizona is waiting for answers, yet we have heard nothing from his office.
The recent Pima County election integrity hearing provided evidence of fraudulent voter registrations with one town having over 200% voter registration rate.

It is clear after what was found statewide in Arizona, multifaceted election fraud took place in every part of the state.

Thousands of potentially fraudulent voter registrations were discovered in both counties.


The Gateway Pundit correspondent Jordan Conradson spoke to Arizona State Senator Wendy Rogers outside of Attorney General Brnovich’s office to get her thoughts on the hearing and Mark Brnovich’s stalling of justice.
Conradson: We just had another bombshell hearing right out here in Pima County, Arizona and there was one town that had over 200% voter registration numbers. What were your thoughts on the hearing?
Rogers: It was my honor to be on that hearing board even though I’m from Northern Arizona, and there were revelations after revelations of misdoing, and what I consider to be fraud. So, we’re here at General Brnovich’s office and I just have one really overriding thought: There is a first of October submittal that Katie Hobbs gave of the election pamphlet and now general Brnovich’s office has marked that up completely, red-marked it, as of yesterday. Well, that was looked at and turned in a week after the reveal on the 24th of September of our deep-dive audit. Yet, we don’t have any updates that are being told to us by General Brnovich. And I think that’s a problem because when you’re a commanding officer in the military, you keep your people updated. When you’re a head of an incident response team, when there’s a crisis, or something that people are really interested in, you keep people up to date with weekly briefings maybe every other week, update briefings. We’ve had none of that and I’m tired of it. My constituents are tired of it. We need to be kept up to date on the fraud and corruption that was presented at the Arizona audit. And if the election handbook can be marked up and worked on, which was turned in a week later, I think we have some information coming too.

Conradson: It looks like nothing’s happening. But as we can see from out here, we’re not losing faith. We are we’re still out here powerful, ready to see some people get indicted. Do you think that Attorney General Brnovich is taking this seriously?

Rogers: Well, it appears that he wants to string things out and not really say anything or do anything yet. And I understand that criminal investigations are nuanced and full of detail, and I understand that we’ve added more to it now. But none of us has the impression that anything is being done. So if something is being done, they should be giving us updates.

Conradson: So does the Arizona legislature look to decertify in January?

Rogers: We shall see. As you know, I have called to decertify. We go back in session here on the 10th of January and we will proceed. We will get legislation done. I’m very excited about it. It’s going to be a turbulent year, tumultuous if you will. But I stand ready to serve.
State Senator Rogers told us that she already has about 200 state legislators nationwide who have signed her ‘Audit 50 States Letter‘.

This letter is a declaration of States’ Rights to the federal government, calling for nationwide full forensic audits, decertification where necessary, and a U.S. congressional session to address the fraud.

State legislators who are strong on election integrity need to email team@wendyrogers.org to “get on the right side of history”.

The nationwide petition to decertify the fraudulent Arizona election has now received over 1.3 million signatures and more are needed to launch action for decertification next January.

Sign the nationwide petition to decertify the fraudulent 2020 election, here.
Contact Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich and demand justice.

Rumble video 4:23 min

1639868215962.png
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Who Really Benefitted from the Jan 6 Protests? One Reader Shares Their Observations

By Joe Hoft
Published December 18, 2021 at 10:00am
ellipse-crowd-jan-6.jpg


A reader provides some observations on the real beneficiaries of the Jan 6 Capitol protests.

I’ve been looking at a CSpan video (“Joint Session of Congress for Counting of Electoral College Ballots”) from Jan 6 of what was actually going on in Congress when the incursion took place. This 11 hour and 55-minute video is history. It agrees with my memory of what was happening at the time: that the Trump supporters in Congress had fulfilled a requirement that at least one congressman and one senator be willing to debate the validity of the election results in the six states in contention. And this is what they started doing that morning, the first day of the new session of Congress.

You may recall that they’d been provided up to two hours for each of the 6 contended states, which means that this debate could have gone on for days.

Because the lying media had blocked all discussion of how Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution had been violated in these states (which was later admitted to in Molly Ball’s Time Magazine article), and those facts had been censored on social media, this debate would have put the issue before the American people.

At 1 hr & 19 minutes into the video, Paul Gosar of Arizona was presenting the case for the election steal there. (They were taking the states in alphabetical order, and Arizona, starting with an “A”, was first.) That’s when everything was stopped.

But, when they returned several hours later, it appears that most of Congress used the disruption (either consciously or unconsciously) as a handy excuse to bypass the debates and get to the “business at hand”, which was to count the electoral votes and declare Biden the winner. In fact, shortly after they returned, at 7 hrs and 16 minutes into this video, Mitch McConnell stated, “We’ll complete the process the right way – by the book.” (!)

That tells me a lot.

In their remarks during the interlude, while order in the Capitol was being restored, CSpan reported that Josh Hawley had expressed his desire to go forward with the debate about the legality of the election in Pennsylvania but was being put under intense pressure by other senators to let it go under the circumstances.

At 9:22:10 Matt Gaetz says, “We came here today to debate.” He also mentioned in that 5-minute speech that through facial recognition it had been determined that some of the “protesters”, who were dressed in MAGA outfits, were actually Antifa people. (So they knew that as early as Jan. 6th!)

Shortly thereafter they had a vote on the Arizona objection, and then immediately counted the electoral ballots. That was the end of it. How convenient for the Biden people!

The only conclusion we can reach here is that Biden (and the Dems) were the true beneficiaries of the incursion, since the Trump supporters had lost their momentum of the debate they had been anticipating, and truly had had the wind knocked out of their sails. Whoever planned that false flag achieved their objective.

This to me is also solid evidence that Trump could not have planned a Capitol break-in, as he is being accused of. Because no one in his right mind would ever want to do something to interrupt a debate from which they could stand to benefit. Any assertion to the contrary is hogwash.

The corrupt and cowardly politicians in DC have used the Jan 6 protests to cover for the stolen elections ever since.
Hat tip LB
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

The Ray Epps Breach
December 18, 2021



Darren Beattie of Revolver.News talks about his new investigative piece on Ray Epps, the unindicted riot leader from January 6. Despite having his fingerprints all over the “insurrection,” Epps has been scrubbed by the FBI from their investigation. Why? Beattie speculates that it’s because Epps was working for the FBI in a massive false flag operation. zIn the new article, Revolver-News lays out the entire war plan of those who led the raid on the Capitol, and notes that most of the leaders have been ignored by the FBI.

Rumble video 11:12 min

Meet Ray Epps, Part 2: Damning New Details Emerge Exposing Massive Web Of Unindicted Operators At The Heart Of January 6
December 18, 2021

in Elections, Newsroom
0 0

0


Six weeks ago, Revolver News published a blockbuster investigative report on Ray Epps — a man who, more than any other individual, appears to be the key unlocking the question of active federal involvement in the so-called “Capitol Siege” of January 6th.

Out of all of the thousands of January 6’s protesters, and the thousands of hours of publicly available footage from that fateful day, Ray Epps has turned out to be perhaps the only person nailed dead to rights confessing on camera to plotting a pre-planned attack on the Capitol. On both January 5 and January 6, Epps announced multiple times, at multiple locations, his upcoming plot to breach the US Capitol. He then spent hours attempting to recruit hundreds of others to join him. On top of it all, Epps was seen leading key people and managing key aspects of the initial breach of the Capitol grounds himself.

It would be one thing if Epps’s repeated calls on January 5 to “go into the Capitol” had simply amounted to bluster. But Epps followed through on his stated mission to shepherd others inside. In clips 4-6 of the above compilation, we see Epps actively orchestrate elements of the very first breach of the Capitol barricades at 12:50 p.m, while Trump still had 20 minutes leftin his rally speech.

It is noteworthy that this Ray Epps breach occurs just one minute after Capitol Police began responding to reports of two “pipe bombs” located at DNC and GOP headquarters, respectively. Rather conveniently, the already-handicapped Capitol Police thus had still-fewer resources with which to respond to the barricade breach in question.

While the “pipe bombs” turned out to be a dud, the Ray Epps breach proved fateful. Today, the official stories told by the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and the US Justice Departmentall depict the apparent Ray Epps-orchestrated 12:50 p.m. initial breach of metal barricades as the “Big Bang” event of January 6.

In large part, this description is hardly an exaggeration. Indeed, it was the 12:50 p.m. breach of the Capitol grounds, in conjunction with a handful of suspicious individuals ripping down fencing and signage, that set in motion the conditions allowing for 1/6 to turn from a rally into a riot.

In this report, we will blow open this network of still-unindicted key operators who appear to have been at work either with or around Ray Epps during the initial Capitol grounds breach. You, dear reader, will be scandalized — though perhaps unsurprised — to learn that none of the actors covered in this report have received attention in the mainstream press, despite their active and indispensable roles in the events of 1/6.


As we explained in detail in our previous report, the FBI originally put Ray Epps’s face on its Capitol Violence “Most Wanted List” on January 8, 2021, just two days after 1/6. They offered a cash reward for information leading to his arrest. In fact, rank-and-file FBI agents initially deemed Epps’s role as an apparent riot organizer so important that they named him Suspect #16—one of the first 20 high-profile FBI targets in a database now packed with more than 500 suspects.

Then, six months later on June 30, 2021, both Revolver News and The New York Times published inconvenient stories that encouraged a more aggressive interrogation of the “Ray Epps third rail,” leading reasonable people to wonder why this publicly identified man on the Most Wanted List still had no charges filed against him.

The FBI responded to these important media stories the very next day. But their response was to quietly purge all online Ray Epps files from their website, then switch to a posture of “What? Who? Ray Epps? Never heard of him.”

Agents of the FBI Field Office in Phoenix (where Epps lives) have gone so far as to explicitly deny knowledge that Ray Epps even exists. Instead of pursuing Epps, FBI agents have instead pursued journalistswho had the temerity to ask Epps in person if he was a government operative. “I understand that, but I can’t say anything,” is all Epps would tell them.

The sham Congressional January 6 Commission seems to be going along with the charade of Ray Epps denialism. For all of its recent gesticulations about Mark Meadows’s benign text messages, the Commission has yet to express even a basic interest in Ray Epps or his communications leading up to and on January 6.

But the specter of Ray Epps, and the ominous questions his immunity raises, loom too large to be memory-holed by poorly coordinated efforts of government denial. In light of the above, it is both amusing and symbolically appropriate that despite the FBI’s attempt to purge Epps’s face from its “Wanted” database (and public denials of his existence from authorized agents), the FBI DC Field Office still features Ray Epps as a “Wanted” man in its current pinned Twitter image (look closely and you’ll find it).

If Epps turns out to have been some kind of government operative, which at present is the only clean and simple explanation for his immunity, it is game over for the official “MAGA insurrection” narrative of 1/6. Epps was the day’s loudest riot recruiter, and its apparent leader of the very first breach of Capitol grounds.

If Ray Epps is a Fed, the “Insurrection” becomes the “Fedsurrection” in one fell swoop.

These are the stakes at play in unraveling the Ray Epps enigma.
But it is imperative to note that if Epps was just a cog in a much larger federal operation, he would not have been deployed alone. Historically speaking, when Feds have orchestrated fake mobs of fake protesters, or contrived fake conspiratorial plots, the Feds’ own assets have commonly comprised between 16% to 25% of the plot’s participants, at least in its key respects. Indeed, the FBI once flew in 1,600 rowdy spooks to infiltrate a single convention with just 10,000 protesters.

See FULL STORY at Revolver.News.
 
Top