POL November 3: The 2020 U.S. ELECTION DAY MAIN THREAD

marsh

TB Fanatic

January 6th Victim Rosanne Boyland’s Sister Speaks out ON VIDEO for first time! MUST SEE Our in Depth EXCLUSIVE Interview!

By Cara Castronuova
Published December 1, 2021 at 8:05am

The proof continues to emerge that a woman named Rosanne Boyland was possibly killed by DC Metropolitan Police on January 6th and the government is still refusing to acknowledge it.

The fake news continues to ignore surmounting evidence that justifies in the very least a fair investigation by our government and the January 6th Committee.


Boyland’s sister Lonna Cave spoke to us in an exclusive interview. She is speaking out for the first time via video appearance with a news organization and asking for help. See the full in depth interview here:

Rumble video on website 28:03 min

The family is crowdsourcing to sue the Government for Rosanne’s full autopsy records. They are also suing for police bodycam footage showing her death on the Capitol Steps on January 6th where she was seen on video being beaten brutally by a DC Metro Police Officer named Lila Morris.

See video here of DC Metro Police beating a seemingly unconscious Boyland on January 6th:

We here at The Gateway Pundit have been investigating Rosanne Boyland’s death because no one else will- and that includes the government, the Department of Justice, the FBI, the police, the mainstream media and almost all other news sources.

Boyland’s immediate family have been trying for eleven months to get answers– and have been denied pertinent information regarding her death. Her parents have been denied her full autopsy report by the government and the body cam/Capitol surveillance camera video that exists showing her death.


Rosanne Boyland with her parents Cheryl and Bret on a family road trip.

Ashli Babbit has become a household name in America, rightfully so, but not many have heard of Roseann Boyland. Of course that is by design, as her story does not fit the narrative the government and the Main Stream Media want us to believe about January 6th. They want us to believe that Trump Supporters were attacking the Capitol and police unprovoked, but the story is not truthful, and evidence continues to emerge that shows the opposite.

The Government, DC Medical Examiner and Mainstream Media reported that Boyland died of a drug overdose but since then evidence has emerged that suggests otherwise. Video has been discovered showing a DC Metropolitan Police Officer brutally beating Boyland with a stick on Capitol stairs around the time of her death, and multiple eyewitnesses have come forward and sworn that Boyland’s death was due to police brutality.



Officer Lila Morris of the DC Metropolitan Police 6th District was seen on video brutally beating Rosanne Boyland as she lay unresponsive with a large stick.

“We knew she did not die of a drug overdose like the DC Medical Examiner told us, it made no sense,” said Cave. “Now that we want to conduct our own investigation, they will not release the full report to us. My parents and I cannot have closure, we need to find out what happened to my sister Rosanne.”



Rosanne Boyland marching on January 6th. She wears an “I Voted” sticker. President Trump was the first person Boyland ever voted for.

According to Cave, her family has been threatened and shamed since January 6th and she was afraid to speak out.

“They call us a family of terrorists,”
said Cave. “It has been so difficult. Please understand that my sister Rosanne was the sweetest person I have ever met and was the opposite of a terrorist. We have to do right by her and find out the truth.”

Rumble video on website 1:12 min

We at Gateway Pundit helped bring video to the light that showed Boyland being beaten viscously on the Capitol steps by a DC policewoman named Lila Morris when it was brought to our attention by video forensics analyst Gary McBride of The People’s January 6th Commission.

We have interviewed many eyewitnesses who say she was allegedly killed by police. These witnesses say she was brutalized by police who beat her with weapons and shoved people on top of her. They teargassed and beat anyone that tried to save her life. The men that tried to save her by fighting off DC and Capitol Police languish in prison to this day with no bail, being charged for attacking the very police who were allegedly seen in video and by eyewitnesses killing Roseann Boyland.

What stands out most in this reporter’s mind after multiple interviews with the Boyland family is how much they truly adored Rosanne and how completely loved she was. This heartbroken family has since tried to get answers- her full autopsy report, the body cam footage of the police woman seen bludgeoning her as she lay dying on Capitol steps, the closed circuit footage from inside the Capitol after she was dragged inside, or any records whatsoever pertaining to their daughter’s death. They have been denied all information by the government, and been virtually ignored by their political representatives to whom they have reached out.

The government, DOJ, January 6th Committee and DC Metro Police continues to refuse them a formal investigation.


Rosanne with her parents on a family vacation before January 6th.

In this exclusive first-time interview, Rosanne’s sister has finally stepped forward to ask for America’s help in finding answers. If you can find it in your heart to help this family in any way you can, they deserve answers, justice and closure. We The People also need answers about our fellow citizen Rosanne Boyland, and for all Americans to finally begin to understand the real truth behind January 6th.



Sisters Rosanne Boyland and Lonna Cave.



Roseann “Aunt RoRo” Boyland with her older sister Lonna Cave and her nieces.
——————————————
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: DOJ Is Trying to Prevent Funding to Attorneys and Cripple the Defense of J6 Defendants (AUDIO)

By Joe Hoft
Published December 1, 2021 at 5:45pm

Earlier today we reported on Sidney Powell’s non-profit being attacked by the DOJ. We now know why the DOJ is going after Sidney Powell.

Earlier today we reported on the DOJ announcing they had an investigation ongoing into the nonprofit created by Sidney Powell after the 2020 Election. Then we reported on how the attorney at the DOJ overseeing this case is the same person overseeing the January 6 capitol protesters case.

After sharing our message we next heard from an attorney who is working for two individuals sitting in jails awaiting trials not scheduled till next year. Attorney Jon Moseley shared that he is the attorney for Oath Keeper Kelly Meggs and Proud Boys Chapter leader Zachary Rehl. He has a friend representing another Oath Keeper.

Moseley says that he knows that Sidney Powell’s non-profit, Defending the Republic, is spending its donations paying for attorneys because “I am one of them”.

This is why the DOJ is going after Sidney Powell’s non-profit Defending the Republic because she is funding the legal fees for the political prisoners the DOJ is holding in jails across the country. The DOJ knows that if the legal fees are gone, the Jan 6 political prisoners will lose their funding and then will agree to plea deals, not in their best interest and pushed on them by the corrupt DOJ. Also, by investigating Powell’s non-profit, and announcing they are doing it, the DOJ knows that the non-profit will have a hard time gaining new donations from concerned citizens.

Listen to a short discussion with attorney Jon Moseley from today’s Joe Hoft Show on RealTalk93.3 below.

Attorney for Jan 6 Political Prisoners Claims Sidney Powell's Nonprofit Paying for Legal Fees 14:49 min
Attorney for Jan 6 Political Prisoners Claims Sidney Powell's Nonprofit Paying for Legal Fees
JoeHoft Published December 1, 202
 

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
Attorney Jon Moseley shared that he is the attorney for Oath Keeper Kelly Meggs and Proud Boys Chapter leader Zachary Rehl. He has a friend representing another Oath Keeper.

Moseley says that he knows that Sidney Powell’s non-profit, Defending the Republic, is spending its donations paying for attorneys because “I am one of them”.
I might suggest that Moseley is a government "plant" designed to promote this information with the purpose of discouraging activist lawyers who might present a credible defense to the J6 crowd.

Hoft does well to expose this via Moseley (who knew any of this, although one might suspect Powell would be a target similar to Giuliani) but I suspect Hoft might do some more investigating of this "proud boy/Oath Keeper" lawyer - and hitch up to a higher ring on the plow and cut a little deeper. We all know that a good sector of the membership of these organizations are "government plants." Why not their lawyers? Yunno - optics?

Dobbin
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

Election workers sue conservative site over fraud claims
Two Georgia election workers have filed a defamation lawsuit against a conservative website

By KATE BRUMBACK Associated Press
December 2, 2021, 9:35 AM

ATLANTA -- Two Georgia election workers filed a defamation lawsuit Thursday against a conservative website, accusing it of knowingly publishing and spreading false stories saying they engaged in ballot fraud during the 2020 general election.

Fulton County elections workers Ruby Freeman and Wandrea “Shaye” Moss, a mother and daughter, filed the lawsuit against The Gateway Pundit, its owner Jim Hoft and his brother Joe Hoft, a contributor to the site. Among other things, the lawsuit says the website and the Hofts conducted a “campaign of lies” that led to online and in-person harassment against the two women.

The falsehoods “have not only devastated their personal and professional reputations but instigated a deluge of intimidation, harassment, and threats that has forced them to change their phone numbers, delete their online accounts, and fear for their physical safety,” the lawsuit says

In response to a call to a cellphone number listed for Jim Hoft, The Associated Press received a text message saying, “Sorry, I can't talk now.” No one responded to a voicemail or text message sent to that number. A working number for Joe Hoft could not be located. No one responded immediately to a request for comment sent through an online form on The Gateway Pundit's website.

Angered by his narrow loss in a traditionally Republican state, former President Donald Trump focused intense scrutiny on Georgia, making unproven claims that widespread fraud there led to his loss in the state.

A representative from Trump's legal team, Jacki Pick, spoke before a Georgia state Senate committee on Dec. 3, 2020, and showed part of a surveillance video from the room where ballots were counted at State Farm Arena in Atlanta. She said Republican observers were asked to leave the room late on election night and that once they were gone, election workers pulled out and counted hidden, fraudulent ballots, the lawsuit says.

Pick did not name the election workers in the video "but said ‘one of them had the name Ruby across her shirt somewhere,’” the lawsuit says. Later that day, The Gateway Pundit was the first outlet to publish Freeman's full name, and in a subsequent story it also identified Moss, the lawsuit says.

The allegation that “suitcases” of ballots were pulled from under tables away from the eyes of observers was almost immediately debunked. But it continues to circulate among supporters of the former president and others who say the election was marred by fraud.

The Gateway Pundit and the Hofts perpetuated the debunked narrative, publishing stories and promoting them on social media even after they were aware it had been disproven, the lawsuit says. Among other things, the suit says, their stories accused Freeman and Moss of conspiring to get observers out of a room where ballots were being counted, adding illegal ballots to the count and running the same ballots through scanners multiple times.

In a phone call with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger on Jan. 2, Trump pressed the Republican official to “find” votes for him and mentioned Freeman by name, calling her “a vote scammer, a professional vote scammer and hustler.”

Freeman worked as a temporary election worker during the 2020 election, verifying signatures on absentee ballots and preparing them to be counted and processed. Moss has worked for the Fulton County elections department since 2012 and supervised the absentee ballot operation during last year's election.

As the allegations against her began to spread, Freeman received hundreds of emails, dozens of text messages and threatening phone calls, and strangers showed up at her house, the lawsuit says. The FBI concluded on Jan. 6 that she wouldn't be safe in her home, and she relocated for two months. She had to abandon her pop-up clothing boutique because she had to close its social media accounts and couldn't attend events in person.

Moss' teenage son was bombarded with threatening and racist messages after harassers found her old phone number, which he had taken over, the lawsuit says. Because she had previously lived with her grandmother, the suit says, strangers showed up at her grandmother's house at least twice and tried to enter to make a “citizen's arrest.” Moss used to enjoy the parts of her job that involved interacting with the public but now becomes anxious if they ask her name, the lawsuit says.

The lawsuit filed in circuit court in St. Louis, where The Gateway Pundit is based, seeks compensatory and punitive damages, as well as legal costs. It also asks a judge to declare that the statements published by the website and the Hofts and mentioned in the suit are false and to order the false and defamatory statements removed from any website or social media accounts they control.
 

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
The allegation that “suitcases” of ballots were pulled from under tables away from the eyes of observers was almost immediately debunked.
By who? In my observation those boxes of ballots were "correlated" to step changes in the vote totals - and have been traced down to the actual ballots used (ballots incompletely filled out but showing "Biden" - and done on a computer.)

Dobbin
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

"Justice Is Coming": QAnon Shaman Is Appealing The Result Of His Guilty Plea

THURSDAY, DEC 02, 2021 - 06:20 PM

Appeals don't really see too much of the light of day when you plead guilty to begin with, as the “QAnon Shaman”, Jacob Chansley, did.

Chansley, who etched his mark in history by roaming through the halls of the U.S. Senate chamber bare-chested and cloaked in a coyote-skin headdress with his face painted red, white and blue on January 6th, is hoping to change that.

He was recently sentenced to more than three years in prison for his role in the "riot", which mostly included walking around the halls of the U.S. Senate Chamber with an American flag.

This week he filed a notice of appeal on Tuesday “from the judgment and sentence” of the court, according to Bloomberg.


He also has a new lawyer, John Pierce, who filed the appeal on his behalf in federal court in Washington. Pierce replaced Chansley's former lawyer, Albert Watkins, this Monday. He is appealing to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

Chansley has so far filed a two page notice that is going to be "followed by a memo laying out his arguments".

We're guessing the appeal is slightly more complex than the note Chansley left (while "rioting") on then-VP Mike Pence's dais in the U.S. Senate Chambers on January 6.

That note simply read: “It’s only a matter of time. Justice is coming!”

We will continue to follow the details of his appeal as more information hits the docket.
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

Ruby Freeman and Daughter Sue Gateway Pundit for Posting Video of Her Shoving Ballots Through Voting Machines Numerous Times – PLEASE HELP US Fight This Latest Lawsuit

By Jim Hoft
Published December 2, 2021 at 12:42pm


On Wednesday Georgia election operatives Ruby Freeman and her daughter Wandrea “Shaye” Moss sued The Gateway Pundit, Jim Hoft and Joe Hoft for allegedly conducting a “campaign of lies” against the two women that led to online and in-person harassment against the two women.

We learned this news earlier today from The New York Times, Washington Post, NBC News, Yahoo, Reuters and several others who were tipped off on the news before it went public.

The organization behind the lawsuit is called Protect Democracy, a large far-left political organization.

This was taken from their announcement.

Truth is the foundation of a healthy democracy. Disinformation threatens that foundation, especially when it targets election officials.
Two women who served as election workers in Fulton County, Georgia during the 2020 election today filed a landmark defamation lawsuit against The Gateway Pundit, a website based in St. Louis which the complaint calls “among the leading purveyors of false information in the United States.” The lawsuit, filed in circuit court in St. Louis, charges The Gateway Pundit, along with its founding editor Jim Hoft and contributor Joe Hoft, with knowingly fabricating and disseminating blatantly false stories about the election night conduct of Ruby Freeman and her daughter, Shaye Moss. Protect Democracy, through its Law for Truth project, represents Ms. Freeman and Ms. Moss, in partnership with the law firms DuBose Miller LLC, Dowd Bennett LLP, and Kastorf Law, LLC and the Yale Law School’s Media Freedom and Information Access Clinic.
The two women and their far-left funders targeted The Gateway Pundit after we were the first to identify the women in the late night ballot counting at the State Farm Arena in Atlanta Georgia on November 3rd and the morning of the November 4th.

The Gateway Pundit was also first to report that Ruby Freeman was caught on video shoving stacks of ballots through the voting machines numerous times late at night after all of the election observers were sent home.

The anti-Trump officials in Georgia insisted that this was normal procedure in the state of Georgia. We disagree.

So today we were sued by Ruby, Shae and the Protect Democracy leftist group.

** If you can — PLEASE HELP The Gateway Pundit defend ourselves from this latest assault by donating HERE.
Thank you!
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

Wisconsin’s Election Integrity Investigator Seeks to Jail Two Democrat Mayors If They Continue to Avoid Official Interview – Threatens to Subpoena Zuckerberg Operative

By Jim Hoft
Published December 2, 2021 at 6:42pm



Former Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Hon. Michael Gableman testified Wednesday in front of the Wisconsin Committee on Campaign and Elections.

The former Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice has been investigating the 2020 election in the state of Wisconsin.

Gableman told the committee, “It’s very clear that Mark Zuckerberg’s Goal Was to Defeat Donald Trump and Elect Joe Biden.”

Zuckerberg, a committed leftist, went into five Wisconsin cities and spent $8.8 million dollars and gave it to the Democrat Mayors of those cities. Then switched it mid-stream from a COVID safety plan to a get out the vote campaign. Gableman said Zuckerberg’s actions, “Looks an awful lot like David Plouffe’s roadmap to defeating Donald Trump.”

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1466126593546358784
1:13 min

Gableman threatened to subpoena former Facebook employee Michael Spitzer Rubenstein to testify.

Gableman also threatened to jail two Wisconsin Democratic Mayors if they continue to avoid his interview.

Yahoo reported:
An attorney for Assembly Republicans is seeking to jail the mayors of Madison and Green Bay if they don’t sit for depositions soon — even though the two say he never gave them a final date for when they were supposed to meet with him.
A lawyer for Green Bay’s mayor fired back Thursday, saying he planned to pursue legal sanctions against Michael Gableman, the former state Supreme Court justice who is overseeing the Republican review of the election.
Gableman this week sought court orders requiring Madison Mayor Satya Rhodes-Conway and Green Bay Mayor Eric Genrich to answer his questions or be jailed if they decline to do so.
In his filings, he contended the pair had defied his request that they meet with him in November. The two have disputed they were required to meet with him then.
Jeffrey Mandell, a lawyer for Green Bay, sent a letter to Waukesha County Circuit Judge Ralph Ramirez saying Gableman’s legal work was so shoddy that he would seek legal sanctions against Gableman.
Mandell argued Gableman had filed the wrong kind of lawsuit in the wrong court. The type of case Gableman brought should only be used when private individuals have disputes over money, Mandell contended.
There was a formal complaint filed against the Green Bay Mayor in November after he turned over the 2020 elections to the Zuckerberg operatives.


If they can’t cheat, they can’t win.
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

EXCLUSIVE: DOJ Arrested Members of the Oathkeepers for Conspiring to Commit Crimes on Jan 6 Yet Had Evidence This Wasn’t True

By Joe Hoft
Published December 2, 2021 at 1:30pm


Our corrupt DOJ is a runaway politically-motivated train indicting innocent Americans on crimes they know these Americans never committed.

The Gateway Pundit has uncovered damning information with the DOJ’s Jan 6 indictments.

On February 19, the DOJ arrested six individuals who were members of the Oathkeepers related to the Capitol protest on Jan 6.

Here is a portion of what the government claimed [emphasis added].

Graydon Young, 54, of Englewood, Florida, was arrested on Monday in Tampa, Florida; Kelly Meggs, 52, and Connie Meggs, 59, both of Dunnellon, Florida, were arrested on Wednesday in Ocala, Florida; Laura Steele, 52, of Thomasville, North Carolina, was arrested on Wednesday in Greensboro, North Carolina; and Sandra Ruth Parker, 62, and Bennie Alvin Parker, 70, both of Morrow, Ohio, were arrested yesterday.

These six individuals were added as co-defendants to a superseding indictment filed today in United States v. Thomas Caldwell, Donovan Crowl, and Jessica Watkins, 21-cr-28-APM. The superseding indictment alleges that Kelly and Connie Meggs, Young, Steele, and Sandra Parker donned paramilitary gear and joined with Watkins and Crowl in a military-style “stack” formation that marched up the center steps on the east side of the U.S. Capitol, breached the door at the top, and then stormed the building. The indictment charges all nine defendants with one count of conspiring to commit an offense against the United States, in violation of Title 18, United States Code Section 371, that is, to corruptly obstruct, influence, or impede an official proceeding, in violation of Title 18, United States Code Section 1512(c)(2); one count of depredation against federal government property, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1361; and unlawful entry, disorderly conduct, or violent conduct in restricted buildings or grounds, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1752(a). The indictment also charges Bennie Parker and Caldwell with obstructing the investigation in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1512(c)(1).
Note that the government is charging these individuals with “conspiring to commit an offense against the US”. The problem with this and many of the government’s charges is that the government claims these people conspired with an intent to commit a crime or crimes.

But the problem for the government is that to date we are unaware of any information the government has released to confirm these individuals or any others intended to do any harm to the Capitol or to obstruct any proceeding of Congress. The evidence just isn’t there. It didn’t happen.

In May, the DOJ interviewed an individual we’ll refer to as ‘person 10’. This individual was a ‘higher up’ with the oath keepers and he responded negatively to the following questions:
  • To your knowledge, was there was ever any discussion, by you or anyone you know, to take violent action on January 6, 2021, or after, if the Presidential election did not produce the desired result?
  • Was there ever any pre-planning, or planning on January 6th, by the OKs to incite riots at the U.S. Capitol?
  • Was there ever any pre-planning, or planning on January 6th, by the OKs to forcibly enter to U.S. Capitol?
  • Was there ever a pre-planning, or planning on January 6th, by the OKs to disrupt the transition of the Presidency?
  • Regarding these questions, did you take any of these actions on January 6th?
  • To your knowledge, did any members of the Oathkeepers take any of these actions on January 6th?
The fact is that the DOJ has these answers which destroy the government’s case. We are unaware of any evidence the government has that shows that there was an intent to do harm to the Capitol on Jan 6 by the Oathkeepers or to disrupt any government meetings.

There were people that damaged the Capitol on Jan 6 but there is little information that they were Trump supporters. Also, planning to go to DC is not a crime. That does not show the intent of the government’s exaggerated charges. Despite lacking evidence the government has continued its attack on the Oathkeepers related to Jan 6.

In June the government was still arresting Oathkeepers knowing that they had no evidence of a conspiracy or any intent by any Oathkeepers to destroy the capitol or interrupt Congress.

Why are these people not set free since the government has no evidence to suggest that the Oathkeepers intended any harm on the Capitol on that day?
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

January 6 Committee Chairman Bennie Thompson Says if You Exercise Your Constitutional Right by Pleading the 5th, You’re Guilty (VIDEO)

By Cristina Laila
Published December 2, 2021 at 1:22pm


Bennie Thompson, Chair of the sham January 6 committee Wednesday evening told MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow that Americans who exercise their 5th Amendment right are guilty of crimes.

The Marxists on the January 6 committee have subpoenaed Trump associates in an ongoing harassment campaign.

Roger Stone and Alex Jones say they will likely plead the Fifth in response to the subpoenas.

On Wednesday, the sham committee voted to hold former Trump DOJ official Jeffery Clark in contempt for defying a subpoena.

Bennie Thompson said pleading the Fifth is an admission of guilt.

“The implications is we will give Mr. Clark his right to assert his Fifth Amendment before the committee if he chooses,” Thompson said. “We’re doing everything we can to show we’re not partisan.”

“But you know, if you say you haven’t done anything wrong but on the other hand you want to assert the Fifth Amendment in terms of self-prosecution, it says that you have something to hide. So we’re going to give him an opportunity to do it.”

“He can do it and it will be under oath and he is still subject to certain penalties should he decide to not tell us anything,” Thompson added.

“If he is saying, ‘I’ll come but I’ll plead the Fifth,’ in some instances that says you are part and parcel guilty to what occurred,” he said.
Insanity.

VIDEO:

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1466420120075575312
.27 min
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

Vicious Liz Cheney Threatens President Trump with “Criminal Penalties” if He Debates Election Results with J6 Committee (VIDEO)

By Jim Hoft
Published December 2, 2021 at 8:14am

Vicious Liz Cheney is now openly threatening President Trump.

The turncoat Republican and serial liar warned President Trump that any “lying” about the election results could result in criminal penalties.


Cheney hopes that if she gaslights the American public long enough they will excuse the fraud in the 2020 election.

Weakling GOP House Leader Kevin McCarthy allows this from Republican Caucus members.
They both need to go.

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1466200958803660801
.42 min

The Washington Examiner reported:
Wyoming Republican Rep. Liz Cheney, vice chairwoman of the House select committee tasked with investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol, issued a warning to former President Donald Trump amid his posturing that he wanted to debate members of the committee: Lie, and there will be criminal penalties.
Cheney made the comment in a statement before the committee voted to recommend that the House hold former Justice Department official Jeffrey Clark in contempt of Congress and refer him for criminal prosecution.
“President Trump continues to make the same false claims about a stolen election, with which he has misled millions of Americans. These are the same claims he knows provoked violence in the past. He has recently suggested that he wants to debate members of this committee,” Cheney said.
“This committee’s investigation into the violent assault on our Capitol on Jan. 6 is not a game. When this committee convenes hearings, witnesses will be called to testify under oath,” she continued. “Any communication Mr. Trump has with this committee will be under oath. And if he persists in lying then, he will be accountable under the laws of this great nation and subject to criminal penalties for every false word he speaks.”
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

Corrupt Politicians Overseeing Jan 6 Committee Are Afraid of the Truth – Bannon’s Subpoenas Scare Them to Death

By Joe Hoft
Published December 2, 2021 at 8:30am


Steve Bannon is pressuring the corrupt Jan 6 committee to open their books. All of America wants to know why the corrupt committee is not looking into the 2020 Election and ignores the thousands of crimes committed in the election to frame Trump loyalists as violent.

The Daily Beast, a far-left publication, put out a piece this morning about Steve Bannon and the strategy behind not showing up before the Jan 6 Committee. The article starts off in the right direction.
Steve Bannon—the right-wing media personality turned adviser to Donald Trump turned right-wing media personality again—became the first person in nearly 40 years to be indicted on a charge of criminal contempt of Congress last month after he refused to cooperate with the House committee investigating the Jan. 6 insurrection. Now, Bannon appears to be using his criminal case to go after the committee that went after him.
Bannon is attempting to force investigators to potentially expose who they’ve talked to and what they’ve said, peek into secret communications on the committee, and create a playbook for other resistant witnesses, according to several legal experts.

“There’s no cost to opposing Congress if you can give Congress a black eye for even daring to ask you questions,” said Kel McClanahan, an attorney who specializes in national security matters.
As Bannon faces criminal charges, he’s entitled to the evidence against him. And in a typical galaxy-brain, Bannon countergambit, Trump’s former senior adviser is trying to make some of that evidence public.
According to a Sunday night court filing by federal prosecutors, that includes secret witness interviews by law enforcement and internal communications between House committee staff members. The Justice Department claims this material that, were it exposed to the public, would cause “specific harms” like “witness tampering” or making it impossible to find impartial jurors at a future trial.
In a court filing on Tuesday, Bannon’s lawyers said the government’s argument was “festooned with hyperbole… perhaps designed to score points with the media.” That same day, a “press coalition” of 15 news organizations—including Buzzfeed, CNN, and The Washington Post—sided with Bannon and asked the judge overseeing the case to make documents available and reject what it called “this broad gag order.”
From there the Daily Beast goes left in its reporting insinuating what Bannon is doing is illegal. But is it?

Americans deserve to know what actions Congress took before, during, and after the January 6th protest at the Capitol.

** Why were Trump’s calls for the National Guard ignored by Pelosi?
** How many FBI informants were at the rally that day? Did they foment the violence? How long were these informants working with patriot groups beforehand?
** Who is Ray Epps? Why was this government informant leading calls to ransack the US Capitol?
** Why did the Capitol Police walk away and leave the door unguarded before Ashli Babbitt was murdered in cold blood?
** Why was Babbitt’s killer allowed to walk free?
** Why are they ignoring Rosanne Boyland’s murder by Capitol Police?
** Will AG Merrick Garland face justice for lying about a Boyland investigation that never took place?
** When will Philip Anderson be called in to testify after Capitol Police nearly killed him along with Boyland?
** Why were the 1,000+ legal affidavits of fraud ignored following the 2020 election?
** Why did the FBI and DOJ ignore all accusations of fraud?
** Why is the government withholding 14,000 hours of security videotape from that day?
** What are they hiding?

And why are Congress and the DOJ withholding information from those they prosecute who have every right to this information?

Americans deserve the truth. Bannon is right to ask for it and to make it transparent.


Congress was wrong to create a corrupt committee whose only purpose is to destroy Trump loyalists while ignoring the truth.
 
Last edited:

marsh

TB Fanatic

Mike Pence: 'There were irregularities' in 2020 election, feels he made right decision Jan. 6

"I know in my heart of hearts that on that day, we did our duty, under the Constitution," former VP tells CBN's David Brody.

Updated: December 1, 2021 - 10:43pm

Former Vice President Mike Pence said he believes "there were irregularities" in the 2020 election, but felt that his decision to not overturn the results was part of his "oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States."

In an interview partially released Wednesday with CBN’s David Brody, Pence would not say that the election was "rigged" or "stolen," but said, "I believe there were irregularities about which I was concerned, and I wanted them to have a fair hearing before the Congress."

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1466205147546193924
2:14 min

While some in the conservative movement are angry at Pence for not voting to overturn the results of the election, the former VP said, "I've been very moved at the level of support that I’ve been met with."

"Ours is a movement that cherishes the Constitution," Pence stated, believing that he performed his constitutional duties as Vice President on Jan. 6 – a day he calls "tragic."

"From the founding of this nation forward, it's been well established that elections are to be governed at the state level and that the only role that Congress has is to open and count the electoral votes that are submitted by states across the country," Pence explained.

"I know in my heart of hearts that on that day, we did our duty, under the Constitution," Pence, who is an attorney by trade, said. "I don't know if President Trump and I will ever see eye to eye on that day – or that many of our most ardent supporters will agree with my decision that day – but I know I did the right thing."

"The last thing you would ever want is for our elections to be managed in Washington, D.C.," he added.

Focusing on the future, Pence said, "I'm not going to let the Democrats or the national media to use one tragic day in January to demean the intentions of 76 million people who stood with us in our cause. I'm not going to allow the Democrats to use one tragic day in January to distract attention from their failed agenda and failed policies in the Biden administration."

The former VP reiterated the need for greater election integrity. "I think it's extremely important in the days ahead that we continue this movement to pass election reforms," he said.

Pence also would not rule out a 2024 presidential run.

"I will tell you that for right now, my focus is entirely on doing everything in my power to support the conservative cause and win back Congress and statehouses all across this country in 2022. We’ll let the future take care of itself after that," he stated.
 

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
Bennie Thompson, Chair of the sham January 6 committee Wednesday evening told MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow that Americans who exercise their 5th Amendment right are guilty of crimes.
The only alternative for the J6 Committee when someone pleads the 4th protection against self-incrimination is to file a "contempt of Congress" citation.

THEN a grand jury has to be assembled and when presented with facts prepare an indictment. A determination has to be made did the Contempt of Congress involve ALL of the three following: Wikipedia: Contempt of Congress

As announced in Wilkinson v. United States (1961),[13] a congressional committee must meet three requirements for its subpoenas to be "legally sufficient." First, the committee's investigation of the broad subject area must be authorized by its chamber; second, the investigation must pursue "a valid legislative purpose" but does not need to involve legislation and does not need to specify the ultimate intent of Congress; and third, the specific inquiries must be pertinent to the subject matter area that has been authorized for investigation.
Then the case is adjudicated before a judge - and possibly a jury.

Note that the second requirement above is the stickler. Does Congress "need" the information for the design of better laws?

So there are at least two steps beyond Contempt of Congress before someone might serve time or pay a fine.

Dobbin
 

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
Mike Pence: 'There were irregularities' in 2020 election, feels he made right decision Jan. 6
Nancy Pelosi thought she made the right decision for Jan 6 too when with the help of her DOJ and FBI she designed a "honey pot" to attract and hold the most ardent of Trump supporters - and keep them hostage as disincentive for others who might claim fraud - and decide to act on it.

"Welcome to my web said the spider to the fly."

I'm sure even the "pipe bomb" plant person thought he was making the right decision the night of January 5. As of yet he has not been identified, even with facial recognition.

That is FBI Facial Recognition.

Dobbin
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

Republicans quietly conduct counterinvestigation into Jan. 6 and promise to release report

by Emily Brooks, Political Reporter |
| December 02, 2021 05:09 PM


As the select committee formed to investigate the Jan. 6 riot continues to interview witnesses and issue subpoenas, House Republicans who were originally submitted to sit on the panel are quietly working on their own counterinvestigation and plan to release a report on their findings.

“Republicans, at the direction of Leader McCarthy, are conducting our own investigation,” Indiana Rep. Jim Banks said on Wednesday.

“I can’t go into many of the specifics of what we’ve done or what we are doing,” Banks said. “But I will tell you that we will be releasing our findings publicly in the future.”

The resolution to create the select committee allowed House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy to “recommend” five members to sit on the committee but allowed House Speaker Nancy Pelosi the final say on the picks. Pelosi, in a never-before-seen move, blocked Banks (who was set to be ranking member) and Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio from sitting on the committee. That prompted McCarthy to pull his other three appointments in protest unless all five were seated.

The two Republicans who do sit on the committee, Vice Chairwoman Liz Cheney of Wyoming and Rep. Adam Kinzinger of Illinois, were appointed by Pelosi rather than McCarthy.

After pulling his picks, McCarthy declared: “We will run our own investigation … Why was the Capitol so ill-prepared for that day when they knew on Dec. 14 they had a problem? And what have we done to make sure that never happens again?”

This effort, led by Banks, is fulfilling that pledge. He said that the Jan. 6 committee is based on a "conspiracy theory" that "Jan. 6 was an inside job ... secretly orchestrated by President Trump and his closest advisers."

Cheney had already exposed some of what Banks had been working on in a countereffort.

During debate on whether to hold former President Donald Trump’s adviser Steve Bannon in contempt of Congress for refusing to comply with a congressional subpoena, she revealed that Banks sent letters to executive branch agencies identifying himself as the original ranking member of the committee and requesting that they provide him with the same information that it gave the committee.

Banks argues that an effort controlled by the minority party should have access to those records. Because McCarthy declined to seat any Republicans on the committee, the minority does not have access to materials that the committee receives from government agencies or the ability to object to majority questioning in deposition interviews.

That effort has not been particularly successful. A response from the FBI said: "We respectfully refer you to the Select Committee regarding issues of access to records and information."

The Republicans are focusing on Capitol security failures, which were also the focus of a joint Senate committee report on Jan. 6. But they are also focusing in on any role that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi had in failing to secure the Capitol.

“They don't want to get to the main question, which is why wasn't the Capitol properly secured that day? And the only one who can answer that question is Speaker Pelosi,” Jordan said on Wednesday. “In fact, I still believe the reason Mr. Banks and I were not permitted to be on the committee is because Speaker Pelosi knew we were going to focus on that fundamental question.”

Pelosi and Mitch McConnell, who was then the Senate majority leader, had technical control over two key figures in charge of Capitol security and two of the three members of the Capitol Police Board: The House and Senate sergeants-at-arms.

The then-Capitol Police chief asked on Jan. 4 that the board authorize that he request for National Guard support in advance of Jan. 6, but the House sergeant-at-arms said he was concerned about the “optics.” He testified that he did not alert leadership in Pelosi’s office about the possibility of National Guard troops, though, until Jan. 6.

“The committee is ignoring this obvious and crucial fact: A mob of rioters — that, according to the FBI was unorganized and acted spontaneously — somehow managed to break into the United States Capitol,” Banks said. “We know that there was an internal security breakdown on Jan. 6.”

Pelosi, he charged, showed that by blocking him and Jordan from sitting on the committees, she “doesn’t intend to fix” the security problems. “The Capitol remains as vulnerable today as it was on Jan. 6,” Banks said.
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

John Eastman’s Lawyers Just Destroyed the Jan 6 Committee and Its ‘Subpoenas’.

You're going to want to read this letter in full.

by Raheem J. Kassam
December 2, 2021

Lawyers acting for constitutional law professor John Eastman have picked apart the raison d’etre for the January 6th Congressional committee, as well pointing out the potential for abuse of power and breaches of House rules.

Eastman – a target of the commission – is held up as guilty of insurrection by the political left for having the constitutional opinion that Vice President Mike Pence had no obligation to count ballots for states where political and legal proceedings were underway regarding election fraud.

The fisking of the committee will irk the already enfeebled group of Democrats, fresh off their latest round of embarrassments at the hands of another target: former Trump advisor Stephen K. Bannon.

Lawyer Charles Burnham wrote to committee chairman and violent black nationalist supporter Rep. Bennie Thompson:

We also have several objections to the legal propriety of your subpoena. These objections are important in their own right and as relevant context for Dr. Eastman’s assertion of his Fifth Amendment right. First, your committee lacks a ranking minority member, which makes it impossible to comply with relevant House Rules, including those applicable to subpoenas and depositions. Secondly, your extraordinarily broad subpoena goes far beyond even the most expansive reading of the Committees authorizing resolution in asking for materials bearing no reasonable relation to the events of January 6. Finally, the lack of true minority representation combined with your decision to take testimony in secret proceedings creates an extreme risk of gross unfairness to the subjects of your investigation. As I already stated, these are serious issues, both in their own right and as critical context for Dr. Eastman’s invocation of the Fifth Amendment.

The full letter, which deals with a number of critical flaws with the committee’s existence and understanding of the law, can be read below.

Pointing to critical technical details concerning the creation of committees, Burnham said:
…contrary to consistent historical practice and the express language of the authorizing resolution, none of the members of the J6 committee were appointed after consultation with the minority leader. All of the members were appointed by the Speaker, and all of the staff have been hired by those appointed by the Speaker.
In other words, Democrats pieced a committee together against the rules and under false pretenses in order to persecute their political opposition.

He added:

This Committee’s disregard of House Rules is no mere legal technicality. The lack of meaningful minority representation leaves the majority free to exercise its vast investigative authority unchecked, creating serious potential for abuse. One of its very first acts was to direct social media and telecommunication companies to preserve communications of private citizens, not just those who entered the Capitol on January 6 but a much larger group of those who were in Washington, D.C. simply to exercise their First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and association and to petition their government for redress of grievances. The letters sent by the committee specifically requested that these companies preserve information about individuals who were listed on permit applications or otherwise involved in organizing, funding, or speaking at the January 5, 2021, or January 6, 2021, rallies in the District of Columbia relating to objecting to the certification of the electoral college vote; and individuals potentially involved with discussions of plans to challenge, delay, or interfere with the January 6, 2021, certification.

The letters identified not just metadata, but the content of communications, including all emails, voice messages, text or SMS/MMS messages, videos, photographs, direct messages, address books, contact lists, and other files or other data communications stored in or sent from the account, id. (emphasis added)and all of this without a search warrant based upon probable cause. The threat to First Amendment freedoms and Fourth Amendment rights inherent in such a demand is palpable.

Read in Full: (Scribd doc. on website.)

1638510042560.png

Download this PDF
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

Georgia Governor Releases Explosive Memo — Confirms Citizen Group’s Findings in Fulton County Rendering Results of 2020 Hand Recount Worthless

By Joe Hoft
Published December 3, 2021 at 8:15am


Georgia’s Governor Brian Kemp confirms issues identified with the 2020 Election audit in Fulton County, rendering the audit worthless.

The hand-count, also called an audit, was used as support that everything was fine when this was far from the truth.


Governor Brian Kemp is no friend to election integrity. He certified the 2020 Election results in his state despite a plentitude of unanswered issues surrounding the election. So it means something when this public official suddenly agrees with a list of 36 issues identified in Fulton County related to a 2020 Election audit.

Governor Kemp released this memo on November 17th.

Note that Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger was included on this letter.

page 1

page 2

Brian Kemp Georgia SEB Letter Joe Rossi 11.17.2021 by Jim Hoft on (Scribd doc on website)

1638550516204.png
Download this PDF

Kevin Moncla at UncoverDC reported on this shocking admission by the Georgia Governor.

Georgia citizen Joseph Rossi wouldn’t take no for an answer which eventually led to the Georgia governor’s office getting involved and eventually confirming Rossi’s analysis.

The thing is the analysis renders the 2020 Election audit in Fulton County worthless.

This audit was used by the Secretary of State’s office to claim the results in the county and state were legit when they were not.


Moncla shares:
Mr. Rossi was only successful in the pursuit of having these issues addressed because he didn’t settle for excuses and simply expected results. He explained that if something comparable were to happen in the corporate world, for example, an annual report with similar deficiencies, the CEO and COO would be held to account by the shareholders and forced to resign.
In the end, Mr. Rossi’s findings, which the Georgia Secretary of State’s office ignored, attempted to diminish and then summarily dismissed, were investigated and confirmed by the office of the Governor. This bears repeating. The same exact list of 36 allegations excused and rejected by the Secretary of State, were investigated and confirmed by the Georgia Governor’s office.

Governor Kemp released this memo on November 17th.

Brian Kemp Georgia SEB Letter Joe Rossi 11.17.2021 by Jim Hoft (Scribd doc on website)

1638550319383.png

Download this PDF

Per Kevin Moncla at Uncoverdc, Georgia citizen Joseph Rossi wouldn’t take no for an answer which eventually led to the Georgia governor’s office getting involved and eventually confirming Rossi’s analysis. The thing is the analysis renders the 2020 Election audit in Fulton County worthless. This audit was used by the Secretary of State’s office to claim the results in the county and state were legit when they were not.

Moncla shares:

Mr. Rossi was only successful in the pursuit of having these issues addressed because he didn’t settle for excuses and simply expected results.

He explained that if something comparable were to happen in the corporate world, for example, an annual report with similar deficiencies, the CEO and COO would be held to account by the shareholders and forced to resign.

In the end, Mr. Rossi’s findings, which the Georgia Secretary of State’s office ignored, attempted to diminish and then summarily dismissed, were investigated and confirmed by the office of the Governor. This bears repeating. The same exact list of 36 allegations excused and rejected by the Secretary of State, were investigated and confirmed by the Georgia Governor’s office.

The confirmation further discredits the Secretary of State’s office and renders the results of the hand count unreliable. Because the hand-count results have been used as the reason to dismiss all other challenges, those problems are now more relevant and important to resolve than ever before.

Such as those raised by VoterGA, which include thousands of duplicate ballot images and the tens of thousands of missing ballot images. VoterGA is an election integrity organization led by Garland Favorito. In fact, some of the now-validated Rossi findings were separately and independently discovered by VoterGA, lending credence to those that have not yet been reviewed by the state.

Read more at Moncla’s article at Uncoverdc.

There is no way President Trump lost the election in Georgia based on legitimate ballots counted. This results in Georgia never ever should have been certified.
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

REPORT: Three Billionaires with Foreign Roots Financed the 2020 Democrats Dark Money Machine

By Joe Hoft
Published December 3, 2021 at 7:45am


In a recent report from FrontPage Mag, three billionaire donors were mentioned as donating nearly $200 million to the Democrats to stop President Trump.

Daniel Greenfield at FrontPage Magazine put together an in-depth analysis of three billionaire donors to the Democrat Party. He shares many shocking points.

Daniel recently appeared on The War Room with Steve Bannon.

The Dangerous Dem Dark Money Machine 6:33 min
The Dangerous Dem Dark Money Machine
Bannons War Room Published December 1, 2021

Via FrontPage Mag.
Politico recently reported that the Sixteen Thirty Fund, the leading dark money machine of the Left, had pumped $410 million into Dem 2020 efforts to defeat Trump and Republicans.
The Sixteen Thirty Fund had raised a record $390 million that year and half the money came from just 4 donors. While the names of the donors are secret, the article did note the names of three major known STF backers: Pierre Omidyar, Hansjörg Wyss, and George Soros.
These men have issues even with their citizenship status.
Hansjörg Wyss, the richest man in Switzerland, may not even be a United States citizen. The article notes that his $135 million in STF dark money donations were “earmarked for non-electoral purposes”.
George Soros illegally immigrated to the United States in the 1950s. Aside from his history of Nazi collaboration which should have barred his entry and made him deportable, an account states that his visa was based on a false affidavit filed on his behalf.
His Open Society Foundations have invested an estimated $17 million into STF in 2020.
Pierre Omidyar, an Iranian immigrant, currently the richest man in Hawaii, is a Big Tech billionaire born to wealthy foreign students in Paris, who brought him here as a child. His mother, a Berkeley academic, heads a pro-Iran group financed by her son’s fortune.
Omidyar injected an estimated $45 million into an STF fund.
The billionaires handled their own initiatives related to this past election.
Omidyar finances both Black Lives Matter and Never Trumpers. The eBay billionaire is the hidden hand behind the fake “Facebook whistleblower” advocating censoring conservatives. He has a project to “reimagine capitalism” while funding The Intercept which openly touts Marxism.
Soros is equally devious, having secretly funded J Street so that the anti-Israel group could pretend to be moderate opponents without being associated with a noted enemy of the Jewish State. Publicly, he bashes Xi and China, while his Quincy Institute defends the People’s Republic of China and advocates alongside the “Squad” against any anti-China measures.
Wyss has plowed a fortune into American politics without ever even going on the record as to whether he holds American citizenship. Meanwhile Wyss’ Hub Project, operating out of STF, set up fronts like Floridians for a Fair Shake, Keep Iowa Healthy, and North Carolinians for a Fair Economy that went after Republicans. This isn’t politics: it’s a hostile foreign takeover.
Most shocking is the fact that at least two of these men have some horrible activities in their past.
The two old men of the group, Soros and Wyss, have been accused of paving their path to wealth through horrifying crimes, whether it was Soros’ participation in the seizure of Jewish properties in Hungary, or the illegal medical experimentation on patients that sent multiple executives of the company that serves as the source of Wyss’ wealth to prison.
While Republicans rely on small donations under $100 for funding, the Democrats rely on billionaires to fill their pockets.
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

Corrupt DC Obama Judge Amy Berman Jackson Tells Jan 6 Protester: “In 1776, the People Who Went on to Form a Democracy Didn’t Do that at the Urging of a Single Head of State”

By Joe Hoft
Published December 3, 2021 at 11:15am

This woman should not be a judge anywhere in this country. She is vile when it comes to justice.

Amy Berman Jackson somehow was assigned to oversee the Paul Manafort case in DC and the Roger Stone case as well. Jackson, an Obama judge, had no problems placing Manafort in solitary confinement during his trial. Manafort was charged with not filling out a government form and making a minor mistake on his taxes. For this, he received time in solitary and prison, something the average American would never face. He was eventually pardoned by President Trump and removed from the overzealous punishment from Judge Jackson.

Next, she was assigned to the Roger Stone case. Jackson did too many things to count in the Stone case to list here, however, there was one action where Jackson showed her true colors.

The Stone legal team requested information regarding their case after dirty cop Mueller completed his Russia collusion reports. Some items related to Stone were redacted. They may have been redacted to keep them from Stone. When Stone’s team requested access to the unredacted text from Mueller’s report regarding Stone, Jackson refused to give it to Stone.

Instead, she said she would look over the unredacted report and share any pertinent information related to Stone with his legal team. Eventually, she basically told Stone’s team that there was nothing there.

Ironically, the text in the Mueller report related to Stone was FOIA’ed by some unrelated media parties. On the evening of November 3rd, 2020, when the whole world was focused on the 2020 Election, the DOJ released the text from the Mueller report related to Stone. The Floridian reported:

As Americans express their right to vote in the general election, the Department of Justice has released unredacted sections of the Mueller report, which show that the Department of Justice did not pursue a prosecution because there was lack of evidence.
During the investigation, Julian Assange, WikiLeaks and Roger Stone were investigated, but the Special Counsel is reported to have found no evidence for Stone and Assange to be prosecuted after the Democratic National Committee servers were hacked ahead of the 2016 presidential election.
In response to the release, which happened at midnight, Roger Stone released a statement, commenting that “the midnight release by the Department of Justice of the unredacted sections of the Mueller report tonight not only vindicates me and proves what I have been saying since the very beginning of this investigation, that I did not engage in any illegal activity around the emails hacked from the DNC and that I in no way knew the source, content or timing of their release.”
Moreover, Stone expressed that “no matter how hard the illegally constituted Mueller team tried, they could not make the case they tried to pin on me from the start,” adding that “these newly unredacted sections are full of euphemisms for the ultimate conclusion that evidence simply did not exist of my involvement.”
Ultimately, Stone argued that “the timing of the release of these redacted sections of the Mueller Report – midnight on the day of the Presidential election – only underlines the entirely corrupt and political nature of this entire witch hunt.”
Corrupt Judge Jackson withheld this information from Roger Stone and his jury.
(It’s now proven that the entire Russia collusion fairy tale was made up by Hillary Clinton’s team and the corrupt Deep State Justice Department ran with it for four years in their attempt to have President Trump removed from office. No one has been punished for this coup attempt.)

Recently Jackson has been assigned to cases involving Jan 6 protesters. In one case she released a protester from jail after the protester denounced President Trump.

Yesterday, Jackson further confirmed her Trump-hating bias by insinuating in court that the only reason another Jan 6 protester was protesting was because that person wanted a single head of state. Jackson said these things in court per far-left CNN:
“This isn’t a good analogy,” Jackson said. “… In 1776, the people who went on to form a democracy didn’t do that at the urging of a single head of state. …”
“The point of 1776 was to let the people to decide who would rule them,” Jackson continued, contrasting it with January 6, where “the point was to substitute the will of the people with the will of the mob… It was not under the banner of 1776.”
“You were a participant, albeit a minor one, in an effort to subvert and overturn the democratic process,” Jackson said. “That day didn’t just cost you a lot, it cost our country a lot.”
Judge should never oversee a court in a free and fair country. Her actions and verdicts are biased to the point of corruption.
 

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
Judge should never oversee a court in a free and fair country. Her actions and verdicts are biased to the point of corruption.
Done in the highest tradition of "Secret Tribunal." Next Roger Stone will be sent to the Gulag - or possibly the DC Jail alongside the rest of the J6 Protesters? "The American Guantanamo?"

They don't waterboard you there - they break your jaw to keep you from talking.


Dobbin
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

Interesting. FBI Investigated Alleged Threats to Ruby Freeman but There Is No Record of FBI Investigating the Illicit Late Night Actions at State Farm Center

By Jim Hoft
Published December 3, 2021 at 12:02pm

1638556921416.png
On Wednesday Georgia election operatives Ruby Freeman and her daughter Wandrea “Shaye” Moss sued The Gateway Pundit, Jim Hoft and Joe Hoft for allegedly conducting a “campaign of lies” against the two women that led to online and in-person harassment against the two women.

The organization behind the lawsuit is called Protect Democracy, a large far-left political organization.

This was taken from their announcement.
Truth is the foundation of a healthy democracy. Disinformation threatens that foundation, especially when it targets election officials.

Two women who served as election workers in Fulton County, Georgia during the 2020 election today filed a landmark defamation lawsuit against The Gateway Pundit, a website based in St. Louis which the complaint calls “among the leading purveyors of false information in the United States.” The lawsuit, filed in circuit court in St. Louis, charges The Gateway Pundit, along with its founding editor Jim Hoft and contributor Joe Hoft, with knowingly fabricating and disseminating blatantly false stories about the election night conduct of Ruby Freeman and her daughter, Shaye Moss. Protect Democracy, through its Law for Truth project, represents Ms. Freeman and Ms. Moss, in partnership with the law firms DuBose Miller LLC, Dowd Bennett LLP, and Kastorf Law, LLC and the Yale Law School’s Media Freedom and Information Access Clinic.
The two women and their far-left funders targeted The Gateway Pundit after we were the first to identify the women in the late-night ballot-counting video at the State Farm Arena in Atlanta Georgia on November 3rd and the morning of the November 4th.

The Gateway Pundit was also first to report that Ruby Freeman was caught on video shoving stacks of ballots through the voting machines numerous times late at night after all of the election observers were sent home.
The anti-Trump officials in Georgia insisted that this was normal procedure in the state of Georgia.

We disagree.

ABC News, a lapdog outlet for the Democrat regime, reported on the lawsuit on Thursday.

ABC News said the suitcase scandal was “debunked.” It wasn’t. And 9 of 10 people who view the video and hears the entire story KNOWS this was suspicious activist — to be kind.

ABC News then goes on to say the FBI got involved — not to investigate the suspicious activity at the State Farm Center but to investigate threats to Ruby and her daughter Shaye.
Freeman worked as a temporary election worker during the 2020 election, verifying signatures on absentee ballots and preparing them to be counted and processed.
Moss has worked for the Fulton County elections department since 2012 and supervised the absentee ballot operation during last year’s election.
As the allegations against her began to spread, Freeman received hundreds of emails, dozens of text messages and threatening phone calls, and strangers showed up at her house, the lawsuit says. The FBI concluded on Jan. 6 that she wouldn’t be safe in her home, and she relocated for two months. She had to abandon her pop-up clothing boutique because she had to close its social media accounts and couldn’t attend events in person.
The Gateway Pundit NEVER condones threats or violence but it is interesting that the FBI did not investigate the late night activities at the State Farm Center just like they didn’t investigate ANY of the alleged affidavits of fraud or video evidence of fraudulent activity.

This tells you everything you need to know about the FBI.

It also explains why The Gateway Pundit is such a big target for the far left today.

** If you can — PLEASE HELP The Gateway Pundit defend ourselves from this latest assault by donating HERE.
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

Will the Public Finally See What Happened in the Capitol Tunnel?
When Americans finally view the surveillance footage, January 6 will make alleged police abuse at LaFayette Square look like a day in the (federal) park.

By Julie Kelly

December 2, 2021

For months, Merrick Garland’s Department of Justice has tried every trick in the law books to conceal from Americans a massive trove of video evidence that captured all the activity at the Capitol complex on January 6. Federal judges have played along, approving hundreds of protective orders to keep video clips—particularly footage recorded by the Capitol Police’s extensive closed-circuit television system—out of the public eye.

Time, however, is running out for the government.

Despite numerous discovery delays, Garland’s prosecutors are gradually turning over video evidence to defense attorneys as they prepare for trial. All surveillance video from the Capitol’s security system is designated “highly sensitive” government material; strict rules apply to the handling of every slice of footage.

There’s a reason why. As we have reported at American Greatness for months, one of the most scandalous untold stories about January 6 is egregious police misconduct that, in some instances, amounted to brutality by D.C. Metro and U.S. Capitol police. Had these attacks by law enforcement occured in any other public or private setting against leftist protesters, the national outrage would have resulted in mass firings and immediate calls for criminal investigations.

For example, the House of Representatives held two hearings last year related to its investigation into allegations of excessive force by members of the U.S. Park Police in LaFayette Square, located across the street from the White House, on June 1, 2020. Rioters protesting the death of George Floyd occupied the federal park for days, attacked law enforcement, set fires, and looted nearby property, which prompted the Secret Service to move President Trump to a safe location. An inspector general report later confirmed rioters assaulted federal officers with “bricks, rocks, caustic liquids, frozen water bottles, glass bottles, lit flares, rental scooters, and fireworks.”

But LaFayette Square rioters were portrayed as victims rather than perpetrators of the violence. One activist, Kishon McDonald, a 39-year-old Navy veteran, testified to the House Natural Resources Committee in June 2020 that “police started throwing tear gas and flash-bang grenades at us for no reason . . . We were retreating. Using weapons on us was ridiculous. It just made the situation dangerous.” Officers also were accused of hitting protesters with riot shields and batons.

A similar yet more violent situation played out on Capitol Hill on January 6. Open-source video and testimonial evidence show Capitol and D.C. Metro police officers using flashbangs, “sting balls” filled with rubber projectiles, and excessive amounts of tear gas against peaceful protesters assembled outside the building an hour before the building even was breached.

Other first-hand accounts describe physical assaults by police; one clip circulated on Twitter in late November shows several D.C. Metro police officers taking down and beating a protester who apparently breached a security line.

At least one protester, Ashli Babbitt, was shot and killed by Capitol Police Officer Michael Byrd, although she was unarmed and posed no lethal threat.

Hearing from the Defense
Democrats, most Republicans, and the entire corporate news media not only have ignored provable instances of police brutality on January 6 but suggest “insurrectionists,” including Babbitt, deserved their fate. The same news organizations that for years have covered every angle of alleged police misconduct are selectively quiet when it comes to the egregious behavior by law enforcement during the Capitol protest.

But defense attorneys now are prepared to present their evidence about what the police did on January 6 in the court of public opinion, which matters as much as the legal proceedings underway in the D.C. court system. Joseph McBride, a New York-based attorney representing some January 6 defendants, prepared a motion last month that detailed an horrific account of what happened in the lower west terrace tunnel, the site of the most vicious brawls between police and protesters.

In his filing on behalf of Ryan Nichols—a decorated Marine charged with several offenses including assaulting law enforcement that day—McBride, based on his viewing a three-hour segment of surveillance footage, described police officers punching, kicking, macing, and beating with sticks and their fists several protesters trapped inside the tunnel.

One D.C. Metro Police supervisor was especially abusive, repeatedly beating an unidentified woman. “The weapon this officer appears to be using is a collapsible stick, designed to break windows in emergency situations,” McBride wrote of the supervisor. “This stick is neither designed nor to be used against another human being.”

The woman was punched numerous times in the face; blood was pouring out of her face, according to McBride’s motion. When Nichols, who wanted to keep an eye on the targeted woman, sees her attempting to leave the tunnel, “she gets kicked and stomped in the head by an officer. She is screaming, and so are others.”

This still unidentified woman is not Rosanne Boyland, the 34-year-old Trump supporter from Georgia who also died on January 6. The D.C. coroner attributed her death to overdosing on her daily medication of Adderall. But new revelations about the circumstances prior to her death cited in court documents and witness statements raise disturbing questions. Boyland apparently died outside the tunnel around 4:30 p.m. on January 6 amid a fierce battle between police and protesters.

Her body was then dragged through the tunnel by Sergeant Aquilino Gonell, one of the January 6 select committee’s star witnesses, according to his own testimony. Gonell met up with Officer Harry Dunn inside the building; they kept her body at the House Majority Leader’s office until paramedics arrived. Boyland was transported to an area hospital and officially pronounced dead after 6 p.m.

Public Video Evidence Is Crucial
Releasing the footage that McBride cites in his motion is crucial to the public’s full understanding of what happened on January 6. In a separate motion this week, McBride urged the presiding judge to remove protective orders on eight separate video clips associated with his client’s case.

Arguing that the public only has seen cherry-picked videos produced by the government, McBride wrote that “the time has come for the complete tale of January 6th to be told. America will never know the truth about Mr. Nichols or any January Sixer until the sensitivity designations are removed.”

Ironically, the same corporate-media complex that has promoted any number of falsehoods about January 6 and defamed Capitol defendants agrees with McBride. An application filed this week by the Press Coalition—a group representing 16 major news companies including CNN, the Washington Post, and the Wall Street Journal—also asked the D.C. District Court to release the videos in Nichols’ case.

“Because the Video Exhibits are judicial records subject to an unrebutted presumption of public access, the Court should grant this Application and direct the Government to release the Video Exhibits to the Press Coalition,” the group’s lawyers wrote on November 30.

Judge Thomas Hogan ordered the Justice Department to respond to the coalition’s request by December 10.

It is nearly impossible to underscore how devastating the release of surveillance video from the “Gates of Hell,” as McBride described the scene inside the west terrace tunnel, will be to the accepted narrative about January 6. Coupled with other instances of police misconduct that day, including the random and unnecessary use of explosive crowd control devices before any violence took place, January 6 will make LaFayette Square look like a day in the (federal) park.
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

Capitol Police Officers Who Were Hailed as Heroes – Were Involved in Much More That Day….

By Jim Hoft
Published December 3, 2021 at 12:55pm
Officers Michael Fanone and Lila Morris, and Officer Harry Dunn with Nancy Pelosi. Morris was filmed beating Rosanne Boyland with a stick before her death.

In July Trump supporter and activist, Philip Anderson confirmed to The Gateway Pundit that Capitol Police killed Trump protester Rosanne Boyland on January 6.

Philip knows this because he was next to her when she died. He was holding her hand. And Philip nearly died himself.


Activist Philip Anderson spoke with The Gateway Pundit about the Jan. 6 protests at the US Capitol and how the Capitol police murdered Rosanne Boyland and nearly took his life too.

The January 6 Commission will NEVER call in Philip Anderson to testify. It would blow up their narrative.

** We have reported on the tragic death of Rosanne Boyland several times.

This was an amazing eyewitness report that has been ignored by the fake news media because it does not fit their narrative. A black Trump supporter was gassed with clouds of pepper spray, pushed down, and then nearly trampled to death as police officers continued to push people on top of a pile outside the US Capitol.

Anderson described how Rosanne Boyland was the first woman killed by Capitol police that day.

Ashli Babbitt was the second woman killed by Capitol Hill police.



This photo shows Philip Anderson nearly unconscious being dragged away by Trump supporters after being crushed under a pile on Jan. 6. Roseanne Boylan was next to him when she died.

Philip Anderson fell and was being smothered as police officers continued to push Trump supporters on top of him. Philip told The Gateway Pundit how he was holding Rosanne’s hand when she died.

Philip posted this on social media before his account was taken down.

Via Make America Stop Hate on Instagram.



A second eye-witness also contacted The Gateway Pundit following our interview with Philip and confirmed his account.

A third eye-witness then contacted The Gateway Pundit last weekend and told her story on how the Capitol Police pushed Trump supporters down the stairs. She was also afraid she would die that day by the actions of the police.

Now there is video of this…



And here is a photo of the Trump supporters being shoved down the stairs by Capitol police.



In this video posted at Make America Stop Hate you see Rosanne Boyland being trampled and beat with sticks. You see the Capitol Police DO NOTHING to save her. You see Trump supporters attempted CPR to save her life. And you see Trump supporters shoved down the steps at the US Capitol.

TGP contributor Cara Castronuevo identified the Capitol Hill Police Officer who was beating Rosanne before she died as she lay unconscious.

And Cara spoke with Rosanne’s sister recently in an exclusive video.

Here is the rest of the story the fake news media refuses to report on.

Via Make America Stop Hate.
Video on website 7:36 min

American Greatness author Julie Kelly wrote about Rosanne’s death and what happened to her body.
Officers Dunn and Gonell filled in some of the gaps during their opening remarks to the first hearing of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s January 6 select committee.
“In the Crypt, I encountered Sergeant Gonell, who was giving assistance to an unconscious woman who had been in the crowd of rioters on the west side of the Capitol,” Dunn said in his prepared remarks on July 27. “I helped to carry her to the House Majority Leader’s office, where she was administered CPR.”
Gonell testified that around 4:26 p.m. on January 6, he gave “CPR to one of the rioters who breached the Capitol in an effort to save her life.” He did not elaborate and committee members, including alleged truth-seeking Representatives Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) and Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.), didn’t ask any follow-up questions.
But Gonell’s timeline jibes with a timestamp on body camera footage showing Boyland stretched on her side, not moving, near the tunnel’s entrance. Her friend, Justin Winchell, desperately screams her name. “Roseanne! Roseanne!” He repeatedly asks for help. “She’s dead! She’s dead!”
For the next few moments, unidentified individuals tried to give Boyland CPR.
“[R]ioters . . . attempted but failed to resuscitate her,” a New York Times investigative report disclosed on January 28. “They then carried her back to the police battling rioters at the doorway, who moved her into the Capitol Rotunda, where paramedics eventually reached her.” One eyewitness said, “by the time that they decided to pick the person up and give them to a police officer, she had blue lips and blood was coming out of her nose.”
When paramedics arrived, according to a January 15 Times article, “two Capitol Police officers in the Rotunda [were] performing CPR on Ms. Boyland.” Gonell was one.
Boyland was transported to a local hospital and pronounced dead at 6:09 p.m.
Previously:

** Philip Anderson: Capitol Police Killed Rosanne Boyland on Jan. 6 – “She Was Holding My Hand When She Died” (AUDIO)
** EXCLUSIVE: Second Eye-Witness Steps Forward — CONFIRMS Capitol Hill Police Killed Trump Supporter Rosanne Boyland Then Attacked Those Who Tried to Save Her (VIDEO)
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

Supporters of Donald Trump protest inside the Capitol in Washington on Jan. 6, 2021. (Roberto Schmidt/AFP via Getty Images)

Supporters of Donald Trump protest inside the Capitol in Washington on Jan. 6, 2021. (Roberto Schmidt/AFP via Getty Images)

Jan. 6 Defendant Fingers Four Possible Undercover Agents
By Ken Silva

December 2, 2021 Updated: December 2, 2021

A Jan. 6 defendant has moved for the U.S. government to release Capitol Hill footage that purportedly reveals police brutality and the activities of four suspected undercover agent provocateurs.

Ryan Nichols, a 30-year-old Texas man who served in the U.S. Marine Corps, said in a Dec. 1 motion that footage deemed sensitive by the Department of Justice (DOJ), in fact, contains exonerating evidence for him and other Jan. 6 defendants. Nichols has been jailed in Washington, D.C., since Jan. 18 on numerous charges, including civil disorder, disorderly conduct, and unlawful possession of a dangerous weapon on Capitol grounds.

Investigative reports and congressional hearings have claimed that undercover law enforcement agents may have participated in the Jan. 6 riots, but the Dec. 1 filing marks the first time such allegations have been made in court records against specific people, according to Nichols’s attorney, Joseph McBride.

“We have more than a good-faith basis to make these allegations,” McBride told The Epoch Times. “We don’t have conclusive findings, but this is based on months of investigation.

“This is a call for answers.”

According to Nichols and McBride, unreleased Jan. 6 footage shows the activities of four suspected government agents: unidentified men whom McBride nicknamed “RedFace45,” “GogglesMan,” “PippiLongScarf,” and “BirdMan.”

“Several members of this group circulated weapons and sprays throughout the crowd. Some members of this group were present in the now-infamous fight inside the tunnel,” McBride’s filing reads. “Additionally, other members of this group can first be seen on January 6th at the ellipse, then again during the march to the Capitol, and then in highly strategic places on the Western Terrace.”

RedFace45 (RF45) is purportedly seen in footage designated “highly sensitive” of the West Terrace, where he allegedly “reaches into a uniformed officer’s supply bag and removes an item” around 2:15 p.m.

“Yet he is never once hit or maced for his actions,” the filing said. “RF45 is seen passing weapons through the crowd on multiple occasions, and is seen communicating with other suspicious persons through use of military hand signals. All this suggests that he is indeed an undercover agent.”

Throughout the footage, RedFace45 can purportedly be seen working with PippiLongScarf, who appears in the tunnel during the infamous “heave-ho” chant.

“Mr. Nichols is accused of participating in the tunnel fight. [PippiLongScarf] participated in the tunnel fight. Nichols is accused of spraying mace in front of the tunnel. PLS sprayed mace in front of the tunnel,” the filing reads. “Clearly, Mr. Nichols will be able to raise cognizable claims of outrageous government conduct, entrapment, or estoppel by invitation if PLS is a government agent.”

Multiple other videos capture the actions of GogglesMan (GMAN). Defense attorney McBride said in the filings that this footage is of particular importance because his client is charged with using a bottle of pepper spray that originated with GMAN.

“Specifically, these videos clearly show GMAN walk up behind Mr. Nichols and hold a bottle of what is alleged to be OC Spray,” the filings say. “GMAN keeps the bottle held up until it is grabbed by a protestor and circulated into the crowd. GMAN then begin furiously pointing toward the tunnel’s entrance and appears to be saying ‘pass it up!’”

According to Nichols and McBride, GMAN is “at best” an undercover law enforcement agent trying to take the bottle of OC spray out of circulation. At worst, he is an agent provocateur arming unsuspecting protestors, they said.

As for BirdMan, Nichols and McBride said in their filing that he can be seen interacting with uniformed police.

“Each time something material happens at the tunnel entrance he descends from the area atop the tunnel and interacts with uniformed police,” the filing states. “Additionally, on multiple occasions, Birdman takes coordinated actions with #PippiLongScarf.”

Also among the footage is a video that “shows multiple occurrences of police brutality, including a vicious beating given by a Metropolitan Police Department officer of an unarmed civilian woman,” the filing states.

The filing doesn’t name the woman, but is likely referring to Rosanne Boyland, who died at the Capitol on Jan. 6.

Nichols’s Nov. 1 motion for bail reconsideration describes him allegedly watching police beat Boyland, and he’s made similar statements about what happened in an interview with Newsmax. Reporter Julie Kelly at American Greatness has also written multiple exposés casting doubts on the D.C. Medical Examiner’s Office conclusion that Boyland died of a drug overdose.

Nichols’s filing states that BirdMan had a “bird’s eye view” of everything that took place in front of the Capitol Hill tunnel, including Boyland’s death.

With Nichols already labeled in numerous major media outlets as a domestic terrorist or insurrectionist, McBride said in the filing that his client has concerns that his right to a fair trial “has been poisoned beyond repair.” Releasing the secret footage detailed above is vital to show the world what really happened on Jan. 6, according to McBride.

“America will never know the truth about Mr. Nichols or any January Sixer until the sensitivity designations are removed,” the attorney said. “As such, we respectfully ask this Court to release the tapes, and let truth have its day in court.”

The DOJ hasn’t responded to allegations of undercover agents, although prosecutors did criticize some of the defendant’s other claims in a Nov. 29 opposition to his motion for bond reconsideration.

According to the prosecution, Nichols is attempting to defend his Jan. 6 conduct by “casting himself as a hero who was merely fighting back against officers who were ‘terrorizing’ civilians.”

“Indeed, Nichols now presents himself as, in essence, a political prisoner who is the subject of a ‘desperate and disgraceful’ prosecution,” U.S. Attorney Matthew Graves wrote. “These claims, which are preposterous, appear to reflect the same anti-government, conspiratorial views that motivated Nichols’ violent conduct on Jan. 6, 2021.”

The motions for bail reconsideration and to make the videos public are both scheduled to be heard on Dec. 20 by District Judge Thomas Hogan. The motion to make the videos public is joined by several media outlets, including ABC News, The Wall Street Journal, Buzzfeed, and The New York Times.

The DOJ has argued that making the thousands of hours of secret Jan. 6 footage public would compromise the security of the Capitol Hill building by revealing “information less likely to be obtained through other means.”

In a separate case involving Jan. 6 defendant Ethan Nordean, U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly rejected that argument in an Oct. 11 order and made some footage of the West Terrace public.

Kelly’s decision followed a similar decision on Sept. 21, when District Judge Beryl Howell ordered Jan. 6 footage to be made public in the case of defendant Eric Torrens.
 

marsh

TB Fanatic
war room.JPG


Deep Dive Into The Legality Of Pelosi’s Jan.6 Committee
December 2, 2021

Trump attorney Jon Eastman talks about being under investigation by the corrupt congressional Jan. 6 committee. According to Raheem Kassam at National Pulse, Eastman’s lawyers have “destroyed” the committee’s credibility.

“I was subpoenaed to come testify to the Jan. 6 committee, but also to produce documents, communications spanning a period of 19 months, everything I’ve every written or said or communicated to anyone about election integrity, including my contact lists. I mean, this is the most far-reaching intrusion on First Amendment and Fourth Amendment rights I’ve ever seen.”

Rumble video on website 7:04 min
 

marsh

TB Fanatic
war room.JPG


Justice Department Rapidly Collapsing On Jan. 6 Investigation
December 3, 2021

Julie Kelly is the leading reporter on the government’s overreach in prosecuting the case against the Jan. 6 protesters. She is followed in the next segment by Darren Beattie, whose Revolver.News has broken major stories about how the feds set up much of the destruction and violence on Jan. 6, and refuses to take responsibility. Beattie also discusses the new report at Revolver.News on how “wokeness” is embedded in the federal government as part of a strategy of fundamental transformation of the American republic.

Rumble video on website 4:06 min
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

Obama Judge Orders Sidney Powell and Fellow Attorneys to Pay $175,000 for Daring to Challenge Michigan’s 2020 Election Results

By Jim Hoft
Published December 3, 2021 at 6:54pm


Obama Judge Linda Parker ignored Trump’s case on the integrity of the 2020 Election in Michigan raised by attorney Sidney Powell. It’s not clear if she ever looked at it. Then Judge Judge Linda V. Parker threw the case out last December. There were over 100 legal affidavits from Michigan citizens alleging fraud in the 2020 election received in Michigan.

The Gateway Pundit recorded numerous riveting testimonials after the election from Michigan election workers who witnessed what they perceived were fraudulent acts during the election last November.


The judge’s opinion was a disgrace and it’s possible she didn’t even review the data from Powell supplied in the case.

She couldn’t have reviewed Powell’s support to come up with her judgment.


Judge Parker then ordered attorneys Sidney Powell and Lin Wood be punished for daring to bring the case to court that she threw out.

Democrat tyrants will not allow dissent or challenges.


On Friday Judge Linda Parker charged Sidney Powell and eight other attorneys $175,000 for daring to bring the lawsuit against the Michigan election.

Again – dissent will not be allowed.

Judge Parker argued that Sidney Powell collected donations so she should be able to pay her fine.

Via the AP.
Nine lawyers allied with former President Donald Trump were ordered Thursday to pay Detroit and Michigan a total of $175,000 in sanctions for abusing the court system with a sham lawsuit challenging the 2020 election results.
The money, which must be paid within 30 days, will cover the legal costs of defending against the suit, which were more than $153,000 for the city and nearly $22,000 for the state.
U.S. District Judge Linda Parker, who agreed to impose sanctions in August in a scathing opinion, rejected most of the attorneys’ objections to Detroit’s proposed award, but she did reduce it by about $29,000. Those sanctioned include Sidney Powell, L. Lin Wood and seven other lawyers who were part of the lawsuit filed on behalf of six Republican voters after Joe Biden’s 154,000-vote victory over Trump.
“Plaintiffs’ attorneys, many of whom seek donations from the public to fund lawsuits like this one … have the ability to pay this sanction,” Parker wrote.
America truly becomes more lawless by the day.
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

ARIZONA: ELECTION INTEGRITY RALLY – December 17th at Arizona Attorney General’s Office

By Jordan Conradson
Published December 3, 2021 at 7:57pm


70 days ago, Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich was presented with all evidence of voter fraud from the full forensic audit of Arizona’s 2020 election.

Arizona State Legislators Rep. Mark Finchem and Sen. Kelly Townsend will join Gubernatorial Candidate Kari Lake, and others on Friday, December 17th for an Election Integrity Rally at Brnovich’s Phoenix office.

The rally will start at 2 pm at 2005 N Central Avenue, in Phoenix.

The audit discovered over 700,000 ballot discrepancies and Joe Biden stole the Arizona election by less than 10,500 votes.


-ballot-issues-arizona/

Auditors also obtained videographic evidence of two individuals deleting elections files from the Elections Management Server days before delivery to the Senate — a violation of the law and clear obstruction of the audit.


All of this and more evidence statewide has been delivered to Attorney General Mark Brnovich.
It has now been 70 days.

What has Mark Brnovich done?

Nothing.

OANN correspondent Christina Bobb calls Brnovich’s special delivery a “gift of an audit”. Auditors could not have made his job easier!

1638585311073.png

He has been a regular guest on Fox News, where they stay absolutely silent about the stolen election and the results of the full forensic audit.

Brnovich has instead turned his attention toward youth vaping in the midst of this stolen election crisis, exacerbated by the tyrannical regime that currently occupies DC.

1638585396343.png

As Arizona waits tirelessly on Brnovich to arrest those involved, the Arizona legislature looks to decertify the fraudulent election once called back into session.

AZ State Senator Wendy Rogers’ nationwide petition to decertify the election has gathered far over one million signatures from across the country. All eyes are on Mark Brnovich and the Arizona legislature.

Rogers has also drafted an “Audit 50 States Letter”, which calls for full forensic audits in all 50 states and decertification where necessary, in order to ensure all of our votes were counted.

All citizens need to email the names of their legislators to team@Wendyrogers.org so that they may sign this letter to show where they stand on election integrity.

America is tired of waiting and it is time to seriously start holding Brnovich’s feet to the fire.

No matter where you live, sign Arizona State Senator Wendy Rogers’ petition to decertify the fraudulent 2020 election, send names of strong state legislators to team@Wendyrogers.org, and contact Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich to demand election fraud indictments.


Contact AG Mark Brnovich
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

Judges Confirm GOP Win in Virginia Beach House Seat, Cementing Republican Majority

By Cristina Laila
Published December 3, 2021 at 8:29pm

A three-judge panel on Friday upheld a GOP win in a close Virginia Beach House race, AP reported.

The decision by the judges cemented the GOP’s new majority after Democrats tried derailing the Republican victory with recounts.

Democrats requested recounts in two races which left open the possibility of a 50-50 legislature, however the judges overseeing the recount reaffirmed the GOP majority in the House after making a decision on 85th District.

The other recount in the 91st District is still ongoing, however the Democrats have no shot at taking the majority in the House.

Democrats still hold a slim majority in the Senate.

Republicans won the governor’s race, the state Attorney General, the state Lieutenant Governor’s race in last month’s election.
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

Biden’s DOJ Releases Memo that Totally Blows Away the ‘Trump Incited an Insurrection’ Narrative

By Joe Hoft
Published December 4, 2021 at 10:30am

President Trump didn’t incite riots on January 6th at the Capitol and Biden’s DOJ knows it.

Julie Kelly has done a masterful job of reporting on the January 6th protests at the Capitol and the arrests of American political prisoners since that day.

The Gateway Pundit put together a site that lists the many Americans arrested for their actions on that day. Here is our site that shares details about the American prisoners being held in captivity since that day.


Many of these individuals did nothing wrong. Some didn’t even go into the Capitol. We’re unaware of any information on a conspiracy contrived before that day to stop the proceedings of Congress. We’re also unaware of any intent to cause harm going into that day from Trump protesters.


Now Julie Kellly has uncovered text from Biden/Obama’s DOJ that blows up the ‘Trump incited a riot’ narrative.

In the document from the DOJ, they claim:
It is objectively unreasonable to conclude that President Trump could authorize citizens to interfere with the Electoral College proceedings…”
Knowing that President Trump could not authorize citizens to interfere in the Electoral College proceedings, why would any person with integrity seek evidence that this was the case?
 

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
why would any person with integrity seek evidence that this was the case?
As dry leaves that before the wild hurricane fly, when they meet with an obstacle, mount to the sky. So up to the house-top the integrity it flew, with the sleigh full of payola, and St. Schiff too.

Dobbin
 

Calhounshd

Senior Member

Election workers sue conservative site over fraud claims
Two Georgia election workers have filed a defamation lawsuit against a conservative website

By KATE BRUMBACK Associated Press
December 2, 2021, 9:35 AM

ATLANTA -- Two Georgia election workers filed a defamation lawsuit Thursday against a conservative website, accusing it of knowingly publishing and spreading false stories saying they engaged in ballot fraud during the 2020 general election.

Fulton County elections workers Ruby Freeman and Wandrea “Shaye” Moss, a mother and daughter, filed the lawsuit against The Gateway Pundit, its owner Jim Hoft and his brother Joe Hoft, a contributor to the site. Among other things, the lawsuit says the website and the Hofts conducted a “campaign of lies” that led to online and in-person harassment against the two women.

The falsehoods “have not only devastated their personal and professional reputations but instigated a deluge of intimidation, harassment, and threats that has forced them to change their phone numbers, delete their online accounts, and fear for their physical safety,” the lawsuit says

In response to a call to a cellphone number listed for Jim Hoft, The Associated Press received a text message saying, “Sorry, I can't talk now.” No one responded to a voicemail or text message sent to that number. A working number for Joe Hoft could not be located. No one responded immediately to a request for comment sent through an online form on The Gateway Pundit's website.

Angered by his narrow loss in a traditionally Republican state, former President Donald Trump focused intense scrutiny on Georgia, making unproven claims that widespread fraud there led to his loss in the state.

A representative from Trump's legal team, Jacki Pick, spoke before a Georgia state Senate committee on Dec. 3, 2020, and showed part of a surveillance video from the room where ballots were counted at State Farm Arena in Atlanta. She said Republican observers were asked to leave the room late on election night and that once they were gone, election workers pulled out and counted hidden, fraudulent ballots, the lawsuit says.

Pick did not name the election workers in the video "but said ‘one of them had the name Ruby across her shirt somewhere,’” the lawsuit says. Later that day, The Gateway Pundit was the first outlet to publish Freeman's full name, and in a subsequent story it also identified Moss, the lawsuit says.

The allegation that “suitcases” of ballots were pulled from under tables away from the eyes of observers was almost immediately debunked. But it continues to circulate among supporters of the former president and others who say the election was marred by fraud.

The Gateway Pundit and the Hofts perpetuated the debunked narrative, publishing stories and promoting them on social media even after they were aware it had been disproven, the lawsuit says. Among other things, the suit says, their stories accused Freeman and Moss of conspiring to get observers out of a room where ballots were being counted, adding illegal ballots to the count and running the same ballots through scanners multiple times.

In a phone call with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger on Jan. 2, Trump pressed the Republican official to “find” votes for him and mentioned Freeman by name, calling her “a vote scammer, a professional vote scammer and hustler.”

Freeman worked as a temporary election worker during the 2020 election, verifying signatures on absentee ballots and preparing them to be counted and processed. Moss has worked for the Fulton County elections department since 2012 and supervised the absentee ballot operation during last year's election.

As the allegations against her began to spread, Freeman received hundreds of emails, dozens of text messages and threatening phone calls, and strangers showed up at her house, the lawsuit says. The FBI concluded on Jan. 6 that she wouldn't be safe in her home, and she relocated for two months. She had to abandon her pop-up clothing boutique because she had to close its social media accounts and couldn't attend events in person.

Moss' teenage son was bombarded with threatening and racist messages after harassers found her old phone number, which he had taken over, the lawsuit says. Because she had previously lived with her grandmother, the suit says, strangers showed up at her grandmother's house at least twice and tried to enter to make a “citizen's arrest.” Moss used to enjoy the parts of her job that involved interacting with the public but now becomes anxious if they ask her name, the lawsuit says.

The lawsuit filed in circuit court in St. Louis, where The Gateway Pundit is based, seeks compensatory and punitive damages, as well as legal costs. It also asks a judge to declare that the statements published by the website and the Hofts and mentioned in the suit are false and to order the false and defamatory statements removed from any website or social media accounts they control.


The Gateway Pundit and the Hofts perpetuated the debunked narrative, publishing stories and promoting them on social media even after they were aware it had been disproven, the lawsuit says. Among other things, the suit says, their stories accused Freeman and Moss of conspiring to get observers out of a room where ballots were being counted, adding illegal ballots to the count and running the same ballots through scanners multiple times.

When was it disproved? How was it disproved? I guess Ruby forgot the video of her running the same ballots multiple times. Did the rule that all votes counted after observers were told to leave are ineligible?

Accuse your opponents of breaking the same rules that you are breaking is tried and proven tactic. The dems have mastered it.
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

Facebook co-founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg (L) testifies before the House Financial Services Committee in the Rayburn House Office Building on Capitol Hill in Washington, on Oct. 23, 2019. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Facebook co-founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg (L) testifies before the House Financial Services Committee in the Rayburn House Office Building on Capitol Hill in Washington, on Oct. 23, 2019. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
ELECTION INTEGRITY
North Carolina Senate Passes ‘Zuck Bucks’ Bill to End Private Donations to Local Election Boards

By Matt McGregor
December 4, 2021 Updated: December 4, 2021

The North Carolina Senate passed a bill that proposes to ban private funding of state and county election boards.

The push for Senate Bill 724, also known as “Zuck Bucks,” came from what some have described as a record amount of private funds flooding into the 2020 election.

If the bill is not signed or vetoed after ten days of reaching Gov. Roy Cooper’s desk it becomes law.

Among those private organizations donating funds to local election boards was the Chicago nonprofit Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL).

Before the 2020 election, Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and his wife, Priscilla Chan, put $350 million into CTCL to fund local election boards throughout the United States for the stated purpose of creating a voting environment that reduced the spread of the coronavirus.

According to the Capital Research Center, Martin Oakes, a former Lincoln County commissioner in North Carolina, traced up to $5.4 million of CTCL’s “Zuck Bucks” to North Carolina, which included a $1 million grant to the state board of elections.

The founders of CTCL, according to Influence Watch, were co-workers at the New Organization Institute (NOI), which was described by a Washington Post reporter as “the Democratic Party’s Hogwartz for digital wizardry.”

According to Influence Watch, NOI was a “major training center for left-of-center digital activists over the decade of its existence.”

Appearance of Impropriety
Republican state Sen. Paul Newton, a primary sponsor of the bill, told The Epoch Times that private funding, whether it be from the left or right, compromises the integrity of the election.

“As a policymaker, I believe legislatures have a responsibility to give North Carolinians confidence in the outcome of the election regardless of who wins,” Newton said. “But this notion of private funding coming in erodes confidence in the outcome.”

When he began practicing law, Newton said there was a code of conduct to avoid the appearance of impropriety, which Newton said should apply to elections.

However, he said, the people counting the votes were getting paid by a left-leaning organization.

“So, the question then becomes, for whom are they working?” Newton asked. “Are they working for the local election board, or are they working for the Zuckerberg foundation?”

Election funding and administration is a governmental function, like public safety, he said, not to be interfered with by private interest groups.

“Elections should not be brought to you by Facebook,” Newton said.

Democrats have criticized the bill, saying it would prevent needed funding to local election boards.

The Carolina Journal reported Democrat state Sen. Jay Chaudhuri to have asked his colleagues to vote against the bill because it “continues to traffic the big lie pushing this idea that last year’s election was somehow unduly influenced in 2020.”

However, Newton said the need for private funding is an “untrue premise.”

“We fully fund the election process through the state board of elections, and it gives money to the counties, and the counties raise their own money,” Newton said. “That’s not new, but we actually put about $5.5 million additional dollars to the state board of elections in part just to take this issue off the table, so they are fully funded.”

No county commissioners had come before the legislature asking for funds reflecting the amount CTCL had given in private donations, Newton added.

Newton challenged that if the Koch family of Koch Industries, one of the largest privately-owned companies in the United States with right-leaning political activism, had donated to local elections, Democrats would be just as apprehensive.

“The fact that they are not supporting eliminating private funds to elections is a tell that they see a partisan advantage in these private dollars,” Newton said.

Whether Democrat or Republican, Newton said one should be concerned that less than half of voters polled in North Carolina believe the 2022 election will be “free and fair.”

“Regardless of party, that should trouble everyone,” Newton said.

Partisan Intent and Effect
According to Dr. Andy Jackson, director of the Civitas Center for Public Integrity at the John Locke Foundation—an independent research institute in North Carolina that examines issues of freedom, personal responsibility, and limited constitutional government—partisan intent and effect in private election funding can’t be ignored.

“While CTCL gave both to Democratic-leaning and Republican-leaning counties in North Carolina, the 33 counties that CTCL funded backed Democrat U.S. Senate candidate Cal Cunningham 52.7 percent to 47.3 percent, while the other 67 counties, which were not provided ‘Zuck Bucks,’ supported Republican U.S. Senate incumbent Thom Tillis 54.6 percent to 46.4 percent,” Jackson told The Epoch Times.

“Regardless of whether the partisan bias in CTCL funding during the 2020 election in North Carolina was intentional, it existed.”

Jackson said former California Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s USC Schwarzenegger Institute had funded Republican-leaning counties in the 2020 election.

According to The North State Journal report, the amount the institute donated to North Carolina election boards comes to $116,624.

“Because most Republican-leaning counties tend to be small, there wasn’t a discernable partisan trend there,” Jackson said.

Jackson said he’s not seen any evidence that shows counties that didn’t get private funding performed worse than counties that did.

No matter what an organization’s intentions are, Jackson said it’s “bad practice” for one side or the other “basically making decisions about levels of funding in local elections.”

“That’s an arms race we do not want North Carolina to get into,” he said.

[COMMENT: "Jackson said former California Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s USC Schwarzenegger Institute had funded Republican-leaning counties in the 2020 election." - Schwarzenegger is a RINO Green globalist.]
 

marsh

TB Fanatic
As dry leaves that before the wild hurricane fly, when they meet with an obstacle, mount to the sky. So up to the house-top the integrity it flew, with the sleigh full of payola, and St. Schiff too.

Dobbin
Bravo! Dobbin, the clever! A wreath for your handsome neck! ... and bells, there must be bells!
 

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
MTG News Conference will get ABSOLUTELY no traction in legacy media.

You won't hear about it, you won't see it, you won't even hear it mentioned on anyplace not "Alternative Internet" based.

This is how they control the narrative. When you own the control, it's easy.

Dobbin
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

Dilbert Creator Scott Adams Drops Another Truth Bomb on 2020 Election

By Joe Hoft
Published December 5, 2021 at 8:30am


The man behind the Dilbert cartoon, Scott Adams, is at it again.

Dilbert’s creator Scott Adams is a Trump supporter who had the courage to stand up before the 2016 Election and argue his position on Twitter and elsewhere.

Before the 2016 Election, Adams explained to Bill Maher why candidate Trump would win.


Others shared his tweets.


After the 2020 Election, Adams shared the obvious:


On Friday Adams shared another honest and obvious tweet on the 2020 Election:

1638745914311.png

We are shocked Twitter allowed this to be shared.
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

Who Says You Can’t Overturn Fraudulent Elections? The Results of a Local 2020 Election in Florida Were Just Overturned and Decertified

By Joe Hoft
Published December 5, 2021 at 8:45am

Who says elections can’t be decertified? A 2020 local election in Florida just was.

According to a report, in a recent court ruling, a judge overturned the results of a 2020 town council election in Florida.

The attorney for the man who eventually won the election claimed that there were illegal votes cast and fraudulent votes cast and the judge agreed. The man who won the race was awarded the win.

The race was in Eatonville, Florida.

Via Click on Orlando.
More than 19 months after Tarus Mack was certified the winner of an Eatonville Town Council election, a judge has ordered Mack to be removed from his position due to evidence uncovered by his opponent suggesting votes were illegally cast or procured.
“I was very ecstatic,” Marlin Daniels said, who learned this week he had prevailed in his lawsuit challenging the election results. “Immediately I said, ‘Let’s get to work.’ We have to fix things that have been going wrong in this historic town and make things right, not for me, but for the people.”
Days after a judge ruled Daniels was entitled to the Eatonville Town Council seat, Mack filed a motion asking for a new trial.
View: https://youtu.be/wkH6-GsHjBs
3:38 min
 

marsh

TB Fanatic

“If We do Not Expose, and Peacefully Stand Against this Tyranny and Persecution, Your Life Will Soon Look like That of My Family” – Wife of J6 Political Prisoner Speaks Out

By Jim Hoft
Published December 5, 2021 at 11:27am

Gissela Minuta, the wife of January 6 political prisoner Roberto Minuta, spoke out for her husband and the other J6 defendants who are still locked away in solitary confinement.

Gissela is also speaking out for those innocents killed in cold blood on January 6 with no justification, and no justice.

The Gateway Pundit previously reported about her husband, Roberto Minuta, who was arrested in January after he volunteered to offer security for top Trump advisors at the January 6th protests.


Roberto walked through the US Capitol and was arrested weeks later and thrown in jail.

And after the liberal media wrote horrible inflammatory reports about Roberto, Antifa vandalized and destroyed his business in New York state.



Antifa leftists smashed the windows, broke the doors, spray-painted the building with hateful words, and branded the walls with Antifa/BLM stickers.



Here is the latest update from Gissela Minuta.
From the wife of a Jan. 6 political prisoner, the world needs to know what the future looks like for fellow patriots if we stay on this current trajectory.
Make no mistake, If we do not expose, and peacefully stand against this tyranny and persecution, your life will soon look like that of my family. I have had enough of the lies, intimidation, and defamation, and will not be silent anymore. I am not only speaking out for my husband, but also for those J6 defendants who are still locked away in solitary confinement… abused and suffering in egregious conditions.
I’m speaking out for those slain in cold blood on J6 with no justification, and no justice.
My husband Roberto Minuta was arrested earlier this year by the FBI for peacefully protesting in Washington DC on January 6th. Once he was in custody, the FBI came to our home with a battering ram, terrifying my children and I, separating my children and I while they ransacked my home. After a short time in solitary confinement, Rob was released on bail. He was then indicted by a grand jury and faces over 25 years in prison.
Rob selflessly put his love for God and country above all, volunteering for security detail for top Trump advisors including General Flynn, Roger Stone and Alex Jones. He provided security for all of these great patriots, who were speakers on different dates in DC leading up to, and including the day of January 6th. Because of Rob’s affiliations with these high-profile individuals, my whole family has become a major target.
Since my husband’s arrest, the physical and spiritual attack on our family has been close to unbearable. Constant death threats, vandalism of our business, stalkers at our home, people following & photographing me while picking my children up from school just to name a few. The concerted efforts of the media, and my husband’s accusers to vilify, slander, and defame our family is certainly responsible for these attacks. Our 2nd Amendment has been revoked (due to J6), and I sincerely fear for our family’s lives.
The violent destruction of our business, the in-person death threats at our shop, and the relentless media slander has destroyed our livelihood. We have lost employees out of fear of violence, and customers are afraid to enter the shop because of the events that have occurred. Our business of 10 years is hanging on by a thread, and to be honest, it might not survive much longer. BLM and ANTIFA claim responsibility for many of the threats, and physical attacks on our N.Y. business. They regularly leave their stickers around the shop just to make sure we know it’s them. They show up in taxis, enter with masks on, and make threats directly to my husband while he is working. They have literally said “We’re gonna shoot you in the head” more than once.
Recently, a group of 5 gentlemen came to our business for their scheduled tattoo appointments. They spent over 4 hours there, getting tattoos done, eating, hanging out, and even bought themselves an 18 pack of beer. My husband spoke in great detail about the events of J6 with all of them, as he does with everyone because he has nothing to hide. One of the men was an “off duty” FBI agent from Washington DC, he never disclosed his status.

Days later, he filed a 302 (FBI investigative supplemental report form) documenting every detail my husband spoke about. What a complete violation of my husband’s fundamental rights. Is there no limit to the infringement on our constitutional rights anymore? I don’t understand how this can be tolerated in the USA of all places. The 302 filed of my husband’s words said in private was unsealed, and is now out there for the world to see.
This legal battle is projected to cost over $250,000 and there are very few lawyer options due to the politicization of this case. Many gracious, God-loving patriots donated to help with legal expenses earlier this year. We did raise $60k, but unfortunately it’s not enough to acquire the proper legal representation for such charges. Rob will be going to trial with my full support. My husband will not plead guilty to crimes he did not commit.
We have the truth on our side, most importantly we have God on our side. If God is for us, who can be against us!
The outcome of these J6 defendants’ trials will set the precedent for the future of this country. If Americans can be jailed for decades over non-violent peaceful protest, America is literally dead and gone. This is not a hyperbolic statement, this is cold hard truth. We can not let our liberty slip away that was only granted through centuries of brave, selfless Americans making the ultimate sacrifice.
My husband, Roberto Minuta, has relinquished his freedom attempting to protect the freedoms of all other Americans. He is a true patriot, a loving husband, and a great father. Please find it in your heart to assist with this legal battle, this is a pivotal time for the future of America.

Your prayers are even more powerful than any monetary contribution and give us the strength to push through. My husband and I turn to Psalm 109 in this time of spiritual warfare, and we know no matter what the future holds, GOD WINS. God bless all of you, and God bless the USA!
 
Top