BRKG Master Twitter thread. Elon Musk now owns Twitter, post 144. Heads roll for real

Knoxville's Joker

Has No Life - Lives on TB
If you recall, I’ve been saying for years now that conservatives would need an entirely separate infrastructure in order to survive. I can’t help but hope that this is the first step in implementing something like that, and that Musk is a true “white knight.” If he is, May God sustain and assist him in his efforts.
And the kicker is that since Musk has a space based setup, he can literally burn the posteriors of the government if they really start getting ugly, setup shop in a neutral country.

I also believe they are starting to comprehend if they cut him off they will create a system they will be unable to control. Utterly unable. The fact that the company is no longer listed means that even less control can be exerted over the company as well.

Plus Musk is the only rocket company in town that has re-usable rockets that have performed very well...
 

kyrsyan

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Another thing is, they have to be very careful in "investigating". Any new guidelines they try to create will affect all social media and possibly all news sources. And if they make it too specific, then it can be overturned as using the government to harass one specific business.
What they are more likely to do is stay on his butt for everything. There will be a tax audit every year. Every unemployment claim will be fully investigated. Yada, yada, yada. And because he owns other businesses, they will likely do the same thing for those other businesses in order to bring more pressure to bear on him. And they will, are doing an extensive smear campaign.
The biggest problem with the smear campaign is something that they are already running into, people are used to Twitter. And as long as it continues to provide useful function, they aren't going to switch. Look at how many are still on FB, even though there are now other options. Heck, I tried to switch to one of those other options but most of the family won't.
 

Dennis Olson

Chief Curmudgeon
_______________
What they are more likely to do is stay on his butt for everything. There will be a tax audit every year. Every unemployment claim will be fully investigated. Yada, yada, yada. And because he owns other businesses, they will likely do the same thing for those other businesses in order to bring more pressure to bear on him. And they will, are doing an extensive smear campaign.
Oh, you mean like, ummm, DONALD TRUMP.
 

vector7

Dot Collector

Cacheman

Ultra MAGA!

Elon Musk triggers liberals, sends them into wartime footing over free speech​


Jonathan Turley

7–8 minutes




Washington this week is in full wartime footing. No, it's not over the Russian invasion of Ukraine or North Korean missiles or even Chinese expansionism. It is about Twitter and the threat of Elon Musk to restore free speech protections to social media.

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has emerged as the bellicose general rallying others to the "censor or die" pressure campaign against Twitter.

The problem is that citizens are flocking to Twitter and signing up in record numbers. They want more, not less, free speech. The over two million new sign-ups per day represent a 66% increase over the same period last year, according to figures released by Musk.

A reporter this week was so alarmed that she asked the White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre about the concern that millions are still signing up at Twitter and demanded to know who is "keeping an eye on this" for possible federal action.

Unable to convince users to embrace censorship, Clinton and others are pressuring corporations and foreign governments to deter Musk from restoring free speech. Since users are embracing the new Twitter, the campaign has focused on preventing them from signing up by removing the app from the Apple and Google stores. In the meantime, Apple is joining the boycott by withholding advertising revenue to coerce Musk to reverse his free-speech pledge.

Musk, however, is sitting on the ultimate weapon to bring this war to an end: free speech itself. However, it will require more than rhetorical recriminations like Musk asking why Apple executives "hate free speech in America?"

The fact is that these media and political figures are becoming more and more alarmed as Musk threatens to release files on the past censorship of stories like the Hunter Biden laptop.

Musk has reason to wonder why Apple CEO Tim Cook would join this anti-free speech campaign. The reason is as obvious as it is craven. These boycotts are not about corporations or shareholders. If anything, they are more likely to diminish profits. It is about the executives themselves. Many are allies of figures like Clinton. Others are yielding to these demands to avoid being attacked or tagged by the left.

Cook is betting that, while the public wants more free speech, enough will also want Apple watches. Moreover, Apple has acquired the market power of a true monopoly. It does not have a serious competitor and, as shown with such attacks on sites like Parler, it can literally strangle the life out of competing or disfavored products.

The real question is why the political, business, and media establishment is ramping up this campaign. The answer is power. With President Biden and Democratic senators supporting investigations, the message could not be clearer: proceed at your own peril. That message was brought home by Politico's Sam Stein when he warned Musk that it is "[a]lways risky to attack members of congress. Especially risky with Dems assured of Senate power."

For years, Democratic politicians and their allies have exercised an enormous degree of control over political discourse through allies in the media and social media.

The problem is that censorship only works if it is complete. If there are alternative sources for information, free speech is like water . . . it finds a way out. That is why Democratic members pressured cable carriers to drop Fox News, the most popular cable news network on television. (For the record, I appear as a Fox News legal analyst). Having an echo chamber on every other news channel means little if alternative views or stories are just a click away.

The same is true for print media. With the Wall Street Journal, the New York Post, and a few other newspapers, the effort to kill stories like the Hunter Biden laptop could not be completely successful. The truth found a way out and now the same outlets that peddled the false "Russian disinformation" claim are admitting that the laptop is authentic.

The threat is an even greater on social media, the area of greatest success for those seeking to control political discourse. If Musk carries through on his pledge, the public will have a free speech alternative and they are already speaking loudly by signing up with the company in record numbers. Despite a creepy Facebook advertising campaign to convince the public to embrace censorship, it has not worked.

The public is not buying. They are buying Free Twitter.

So, the only way to regain control is to prevent people from getting the app or threaten to force Twitter into insolvency. The problem is Musk, an eccentric billionaire who is not easy to intimidate.

Musk now stands against a massive alliance of governments, corporations, celebrities, and politicians. He has only the public and free speech on his side.

He needs to use both.

Musk cannot remain on defense and just take political and economic hits. The campaign is growing because the risk is growing for these various interests.

The way to end this is simple: release everything. This is an effort to force Musk not only to resume censorship but to protect the censors. So, open the files. Allow the public to see not just communications on censorship (including subjects beyond Hunter Biden) but how Twitter may have used verification, throttling, algorithms, or other methods to control speech.

By embracing total transparency, Musk can force Apple and other companies to face the ugly realities of censorship. The anti-free speech alliance has declared total war on Twitter. It is time for Twitter to get into this fight and realize that free speech is not just its guiding principle but its greatest weapon.
When Musk threatened to restore free speech protections, Hillary Clinton and others went public to "Cry 'Havoc!' and let slip the dogs of war."

So be it.

The Musk purchase has forced people to pick sides in this fight for free speech. However, Musk can leave the dogs at home and just unleash the truth.

Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro professor of public interest law at George Washington University and a practicing criminal defense attorney. He is a Fox News contributor.
 

Tristan

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Catturd ™
@catturd2
·
13m
Just in case you want to know what real fascism is …

If @elonmusk
was on Jeffrey Epstein’s client list - he’d be hidden and protected by our government.

- but since he wants free speech - he’s a government target.

Evil forces are at work here.


Can't be much clearer than that...
 

jward

passin' thru
BNO News Live
@BNODesk

NEW: Twitter's relaunch of Twitter Blue has again been postponed - Platformer

7:17 PM · Nov 29, 2022
·TweetDeck
 

jward

passin' thru

Twitter enables Elon’s hidden agenda for humanity​


Ravi Kant




“Towering genius disdains a beaten path. It seeks regions hitherto unexplored.” – Abraham Lincoln
The above quote was uttered by Lincoln, then a local lawyer, in 1838 in his famous speec to the Young Men’s Lyceum in Springfield, Illinois.

Great minds always prefer to choose a path different from the crowd and love to go where other people haven’t been yet. Distinction will always be the paramount object for such men. But sometimes it’s the thirst for distinction that discourages them from taking a beaten path.

Such people are born with a desire to have a unique place in the history. Alexander, Caesar and Napoleon are a few examples in history. They deny any obligation to serve under anyone. They refuse to tread in the footsteps of any predecessor, however illustrious. They will promise anything and do anything, as long as it advances their ambitions and unhidden agendas.
In the Lyceum address, Lincoln emphasized the idea that it’s necessary to hold the ambitions of geniuses or great minds in check. Today it is just as true as it was then.
In recent times, one man who has redefined the human qualities of ingenuity, fearlessness, innovation, confidence, and ruthlessness to the max in business is Elon Musk.

Musk is known for taking unconventional paths, whether it’s creating a profitable enterprise on a relatively new technology (electric vehicles) through Tesla, or transforming the future of transportation that would end traffic congestion by digging tunnels, working with the Boring Company.
To have a hand in the conscientious development of artificial intelligence (AI), he’s involved with OpenAI. To boost space tourism and giving humankind a chance at becoming a multi-planetary species, he is working with SpaceX. And to augment the human brain’s capabilities, he has put up Neuralink.

He is at the helm of a number of companies, and each of one is going to play a critical role in the evolution of human society in the near future. Apart from that, Musk’s ventures have created a strong public image of an engineering and managerial genius, who wants to solve the world’s problems.
But for the past few months, he has been in news for taking over the social-media giant Twitter. After months of waffling, lawsuits, verbal mudslinging, and the near miss of a full-blown trial, Elon Musk completed a US$44 billion deal to own Twitter on October 27.
India ranks third in the world in terms of the Twitter user base. Most political or social debates happen through Twitter, as we know that India’s traditional media languish in 150th position in the Press Freedom Index.
Twitter serves as a more credible source of news for the people of the world’s largest democracy. So any changes made on the platform without proper transparency will impact the nature of Indian democracy.

Free speech is the cornerstone of democracy and it cannot be decided or guaranteed by one man but by communities with proper checks and validation. So changing the core of the Twitter platform without much transparency will mean changing the core of democracy.
Musk posted a message saying “the bird is freed” just minutes before the midnight deadline to close the Twitter deal. In his message to advertisers, he emphasized that Twitter is a cornerstone of civilization and he was buying it to help humanity. But is it so?

Access to data​

During his visit on October 26 to Twitter headquarters, Musk reportedly told the employees that he didn’t plan to lay off 75% of the 7,500-strong workforce. But on October 28, after taking control of the social-media company, he immediately fired the company’s chief executive officer Parag Agrawal, policy chief Vijaya Gadde, chief financial officer Ned Segal, and later on the entire board of directors, to take full control of the company.
In India, under Musk’s leadership Twitter has fired more than 90% of its staff.

Twitter is unique in the social-media space. It is centered on news (and particularly political news) in a way that other outlets are not. That’s in part because it is a place that many journalists have come to rely on for sourcing and community. Certainly, Musk’s actions are simply an effort to disrupt the institutional power of traditional media. In the much longer term, there is increasing evidence that Twitter as we know it will cease to exist.
In his statements about his intent to buy Twitter, Musk espoused the importance of free speech to democracy, calling the social-media platform “the digital town square where matters vital to the future of humanity are debated.” But he didn’t mention how he envisages creating that town square.

More so, Twitter after Musk’s purchase will be loaded with debt; interest alone will be billions of dollars each year. It’s hard to believe that someone spent $44 billion and fought a hard battle, only for providing free speech. But the answer may lie with what he could do with our data.
AI achieves accuracy through deep neural networks. For example: Alexa and Google are based on deep learning. Elon Musk can use all of our data that is housed in Twitter’s servers and algorithms for Neuralink AI. Neuralink is building the first brain-machine interface (BMI), which now mimics consciousness and can be used to build the most advanced and responsive robots ever created. Twitter can be used as a massive input to train AI/ML models for Neuralink.
Before the Twitter deal, on October 1, Musk had already launched a prototype of a humanoid robot, Optimus, being developed for his Tesla electric cars. A video of the robot carrying a box, watering plants, and moving metal bars in the automaker’s factory was shown during the launch.

Musk has said that in the near future robots could be used in homes, making dinner, mowing the lawn and caring for the elderly. “It is a fundamental transformation of civilization as we know it,” he said.
Now, with Neuralink as a BMI interface, Optimus as a humanoid robot, and Twitter as a source for deep learning, he has the potential to create a totally new different or digital world based on automated and intelligent machines without any threat of AI outsmarting humans.
All Musk wants from humanity is their data, and which is what makes the Twitter deal worth the cost. But it’s easy to get lost within the multifarious goals that Musk has across this smorgasbord of companies, until they correlate with one another to serve a common agenda or purpose.

A fantasy-like future, but at a price​

If you want to understand the fantasy-like future that Musk is building, it is essential to understand the past that shaped him. “I was raised by books, books, and books,” Elon said in one of his media interviews. He spoke bitterly about his abusive father and childhood loneliness.
Some of those books help explain the world Musk is building, particularly Isaac Asimov’s Foundation series. The billionaire has in the past argued that we need a Plan B if Earth finds itself irreversibly damaged through climate change, overpopulation, a Third World War, or an eventual mass extinction event.
In an April 2022 interview with TED curator Chris Anderson, the billionaire stated his goal of wanting to transport a million people to Mars by 2050. Musk’s vision remains aligned with a series of tweets from 2020, in which he articulated a plan to build 100 starships each year over a 10-year period. He sees 2029 as the earliest date humans might first step on Mars.

Five Musk companies are now creating a perfect ecosystem to help in the Mars colonization project. All his companies are running around-the-clock operations to develop the spacecraft and technology that will enable humans to become a multi-planet species as soon as possible.
The role of AI (Open AI), robots (Optimus), automated vehicles (Tesla), SolarCity, and satellites (Starlink) will be vital in the project. These technologies make much more sense on Mars than on Earth. But Earth can be a perfect testing ground. He wants humans to participate in the larger project of colonizing Mars. Humanity can only accomplish this by giving their data and buying his product and services.

If his space colonization plans prove successful, he will certainly find a prominent mention in the history books forever. But if he fails, humanity will face an existential crisis.
Up to now, he has managed to sell the world on his capability to achieve objectives that appear so lofty that they could be mistaken for fantasies. But can humans take a leap of faith into the unknown, both in terms of engineering and social evolution, with Elon Musk?
 

mzkitty

I give up.

Twitter enables Elon’s hidden agenda for humanity​


Ravi Kant




“Towering genius disdains a beaten path. It seeks regions hitherto unexplored.” – Abraham Lincoln
The above quote was uttered by Lincoln, then a local lawyer, in 1838 in his famous speec to the Young Men’s Lyceum in Springfield, Illinois.

Great minds always prefer to choose a path different from the crowd and love to go where other people haven’t been yet. Distinction will always be the paramount object for such men. But sometimes it’s the thirst for distinction that discourages them from taking a beaten path.

Such people are born with a desire to have a unique place in the history. Alexander, Caesar and Napoleon are a few examples in history. They deny any obligation to serve under anyone. They refuse to tread in the footsteps of any predecessor, however illustrious. They will promise anything and do anything, as long as it advances their ambitions and unhidden agendas.
In the Lyceum address, Lincoln emphasized the idea that it’s necessary to hold the ambitions of geniuses or great minds in check. Today it is just as true as it was then.
In recent times, one man who has redefined the human qualities of ingenuity, fearlessness, innovation, confidence, and ruthlessness to the max in business is Elon Musk.

Musk is known for taking unconventional paths, whether it’s creating a profitable enterprise on a relatively new technology (electric vehicles) through Tesla, or transforming the future of transportation that would end traffic congestion by digging tunnels, working with the Boring Company.
To have a hand in the conscientious development of artificial intelligence (AI), he’s involved with OpenAI. To boost space tourism and giving humankind a chance at becoming a multi-planetary species, he is working with SpaceX. And to augment the human brain’s capabilities, he has put up Neuralink.

He is at the helm of a number of companies, and each of one is going to play a critical role in the evolution of human society in the near future. Apart from that, Musk’s ventures have created a strong public image of an engineering and managerial genius, who wants to solve the world’s problems.
But for the past few months, he has been in news for taking over the social-media giant Twitter. After months of waffling, lawsuits, verbal mudslinging, and the near miss of a full-blown trial, Elon Musk completed a US$44 billion deal to own Twitter on October 27.
India ranks third in the world in terms of the Twitter user base. Most political or social debates happen through Twitter, as we know that India’s traditional media languish in 150th position in the Press Freedom Index.
Twitter serves as a more credible source of news for the people of the world’s largest democracy. So any changes made on the platform without proper transparency will impact the nature of Indian democracy.

Free speech is the cornerstone of democracy and it cannot be decided or guaranteed by one man but by communities with proper checks and validation. So changing the core of the Twitter platform without much transparency will mean changing the core of democracy.
Musk posted a message saying “the bird is freed” just minutes before the midnight deadline to close the Twitter deal. In his message to advertisers, he emphasized that Twitter is a cornerstone of civilization and he was buying it to help humanity. But is it so?

Access to data​

During his visit on October 26 to Twitter headquarters, Musk reportedly told the employees that he didn’t plan to lay off 75% of the 7,500-strong workforce. But on October 28, after taking control of the social-media company, he immediately fired the company’s chief executive officer Parag Agrawal, policy chief Vijaya Gadde, chief financial officer Ned Segal, and later on the entire board of directors, to take full control of the company.
In India, under Musk’s leadership Twitter has fired more than 90% of its staff.

Twitter is unique in the social-media space. It is centered on news (and particularly political news) in a way that other outlets are not. That’s in part because it is a place that many journalists have come to rely on for sourcing and community. Certainly, Musk’s actions are simply an effort to disrupt the institutional power of traditional media. In the much longer term, there is increasing evidence that Twitter as we know it will cease to exist.
In his statements about his intent to buy Twitter, Musk espoused the importance of free speech to democracy, calling the social-media platform “the digital town square where matters vital to the future of humanity are debated.” But he didn’t mention how he envisages creating that town square.

More so, Twitter after Musk’s purchase will be loaded with debt; interest alone will be billions of dollars each year. It’s hard to believe that someone spent $44 billion and fought a hard battle, only for providing free speech. But the answer may lie with what he could do with our data.
AI achieves accuracy through deep neural networks. For example: Alexa and Google are based on deep learning. Elon Musk can use all of our data that is housed in Twitter’s servers and algorithms for Neuralink AI. Neuralink is building the first brain-machine interface (BMI), which now mimics consciousness and can be used to build the most advanced and responsive robots ever created. Twitter can be used as a massive input to train AI/ML models for Neuralink.
Before the Twitter deal, on October 1, Musk had already launched a prototype of a humanoid robot, Optimus, being developed for his Tesla electric cars. A video of the robot carrying a box, watering plants, and moving metal bars in the automaker’s factory was shown during the launch.

Musk has said that in the near future robots could be used in homes, making dinner, mowing the lawn and caring for the elderly. “It is a fundamental transformation of civilization as we know it,” he said.
Now, with Neuralink as a BMI interface, Optimus as a humanoid robot, and Twitter as a source for deep learning, he has the potential to create a totally new different or digital world based on automated and intelligent machines without any threat of AI outsmarting humans.
All Musk wants from humanity is their data, and which is what makes the Twitter deal worth the cost. But it’s easy to get lost within the multifarious goals that Musk has across this smorgasbord of companies, until they correlate with one another to serve a common agenda or purpose.

A fantasy-like future, but at a price​

If you want to understand the fantasy-like future that Musk is building, it is essential to understand the past that shaped him. “I was raised by books, books, and books,” Elon said in one of his media interviews. He spoke bitterly about his abusive father and childhood loneliness.
Some of those books help explain the world Musk is building, particularly Isaac Asimov’s Foundation series. The billionaire has in the past argued that we need a Plan B if Earth finds itself irreversibly damaged through climate change, overpopulation, a Third World War, or an eventual mass extinction event.
In an April 2022 interview with TED curator Chris Anderson, the billionaire stated his goal of wanting to transport a million people to Mars by 2050. Musk’s vision remains aligned with a series of tweets from 2020, in which he articulated a plan to build 100 starships each year over a 10-year period. He sees 2029 as the earliest date humans might first step on Mars.

Five Musk companies are now creating a perfect ecosystem to help in the Mars colonization project. All his companies are running around-the-clock operations to develop the spacecraft and technology that will enable humans to become a multi-planet species as soon as possible.
The role of AI (Open AI), robots (Optimus), automated vehicles (Tesla), SolarCity, and satellites (Starlink) will be vital in the project. These technologies make much more sense on Mars than on Earth. But Earth can be a perfect testing ground. He wants humans to participate in the larger project of colonizing Mars. Humanity can only accomplish this by giving their data and buying his product and services.

If his space colonization plans prove successful, he will certainly find a prominent mention in the history books forever. But if he fails, humanity will face an existential crisis.
Up to now, he has managed to sell the world on his capability to achieve objectives that appear so lofty that they could be mistaken for fantasies. But can humans take a leap of faith into the unknown, both in terms of engineering and social evolution, with Elon Musk?

I said this before, if everybody remembers, he tried to back out of buying Twitter, but he was forced to. So people should just STFU now. He was given the keys, let him drive. If he crashes and burns that's one thing, but if he doesn't, there is a different future ahead. I don't like the idea of living on Mars, but some people might. I don't like the idea of AI, but others do. I don't like the idea of robot slaves waiting on people, but others may. Have to wait and see now. As for free speech and using Twitter as THE news source, hell I've been doing that for years.

Also, the Indians really do take over Twitter at night since that's their work day. I watch them somewhat too, and they seem to use it the same ways we do. I don't know what they're worried about.

I don't think Musk is the antichrist or anything, but I watch him too. So far, I don't think he's let it all go to his head.
 

Melodi

Disaster Cat
Well looks like at least in Ireland, firing people via a generic memo saying if they won't agree to non-defined works standards like the one Musk sent out to his employees is not legal. The High Court (like the Supreme Court) ordered Twitter to reinstate their chief executive in Ireland after she refused to answer the e-mail which didn't define in any concrete way what she would be agreeing to (in terms of hard work/whatever).

The Court rules she had not resigned and that Twitter could not "resign" her and lock her out of her accounts and place of doing business.

Twitter has backed down and reinstated her for now, I mean they probably can fire her "without cause" but would have to pay some contractual penalties or they could lay her off with 60 days' notice (I think). But they can't say she "resigned," which would result in no responsibility on Twitter's part.

Nice try to get out of paying unemployment and following other lay-off requirements Musk, at least here it isn't working and may cost you more in legal fees than just a proper round of legal layoffs would have. For now, this lady has her job back.


Twitter tells High Court it has restored Dublin-based senior executive to her position

The executive said she was treated as a former employee for not replying to an email sent by Musk to all staff.
1 hour ago 7,686 Views 0 Comments Share22 Tweet Email
Sinead McSweeney, Twitter's Global VP for Public Policy.Sinead McSweeney, Twitter's Global VP for Public Policy.
Image: Rollingnews.ie
TWITTER HAS TOLD the High Court that it has restored Irish-based senior executive Sinead McSweeney to her position with the company.

Last week McSweeney, who is Twitter’s Global Vice President for Public Policy, secured a temporary High Court injunction preventing the social networking giant from terminating her employment.

She claimed that by not responding to a generic and vague e-mail sent to all of Twitter employees by its owner multi–Billionaire Elon Musk earlier this month, she was treated as if she was no longer employed by the company.


She said that she never resigned from her job but had been locked out of Twitter’s IT system and was unable to access the firm’s Dublin office.

When the matter returned before Justice Brian O’Moore today Mark Connaughton SC, appearing with Rosemary Mallon Bl, for Twitter said that the company was offering undertakings to restore McSweeney’s access to all aspects of the company’s IT system and Twitter’s Irish premises at George’s Quay in Dublin 2.

Counsel said that it was also Twitter’s intention to “turn the noise down” to allow Human Resources with the organisation enter into negotiations with McSweeney aimed at resolving the dispute.

Counsel said that while his client was prepared to offer the undertakings, Twitter was also seeking to have the matter adjourned to allow his side to formally reply to the claims against it.

Frank Beatty SC, instructed by solicitor Adrian Twomey for McSweeney said while what was being said to the court on Twitter’s behalf was welcomed his client remained concerns about her employment status, and if the undertakings would be fully complied with.

McSweeney had been concerned by the Twitter’s initial response to her claims, and counsel expressed a view that her application to have the temporary orders extended until the full hearing of the action be heard by the court.

Noting the company’s response, the judge told the court that he was “not touchy feely” nor was “a HR manager” and was going to deal with the matter before him in accordance with the law.

He put in a timetable for the exchange of legal documents in the case, adjourned the case to a date in late December.

The orders previously granted, along with the undertakings offered by Twitter to remain in place, he directed.

The judge also recommended that the sides enter into discussions in “a forthright matter”.

Any failure to do so, the judge added would see the parties back before the court “in January, Febuary or March of next year.”

In her action McSweeney said that by not responding to an email sent by Musk to the company’s employees, Twitter then informed her that she had accepted an exit package.

Despite not resigning she said she was then locked out of Twitter’s Dublin office and its internal IT systems, including her company e-mail account.

The court heard that solicitors’ letters on her behalf were sent to Twitter.

She claimed that Twitter’s lawyers acknowledged to her that she had no intention to resign, confirmed that her commitment to her work “had never been questioned,” that said her access to the IT systems would be restored.

McSweeney claimed that she was concerned about her job because of the “mixed messages” she had been getting from both Musk himself and his senior US-based associates since the company was taken over.

She says that despite the communication from the company she remained locked out of both the IT systems and Twitter’s Dublin office.

She was also unable to attend a scheduled meeting at the Dublin, as she was unable to access the building, leaving her embarrassed, humiliated and upset.

She claimed that she was “unable to work” and expressed a fear that the company had “resigned me” contrary to the terms of her employment.

Musk, she claimed, has been running the company “in an unorthodox manner” and has been rehiring and firing “with no apparent logic”, and said she did not trust the company.

Arising out of that McSweeney applied for and secured an interim court order preventing Twitter International Unlimited Company from terminating her contract of employment.

The injunction, which was granted on an ex-parte basis, also restrained Twitter from applying the terms of an email sent to her on 16 November last by Elon Musk, to her contract or condition of employment.

She further secured an order restraining Twitter from communicating to any third party or publishing any information to convey that her employment with the company has been in any way altered since the 15 November last.
 

CaryC

Has No Life - Lives on TB
If she doesn't trust the company, she should find another job. But they can suspend her and lock her out if they want. Or just straight fire her. It's rocky waters, she needs to decide what she wants to do.
Exactly, you can't be part of the company and try to undermine the company, and thumb your nose at the company, while getting paid by the company, to do the job the company wants you to do, and then not do it..................

I'm sorry I've been looking at to many Cackle meme's, and it's showing.
 

Melodi

Disaster Cat
If she doesn't trust the company, she should find another job. But they can suspend her and lock her out if they want. Or just straight fire her. It's rocky waters, she needs to decide what she wants to do.
OK, the thing is Twitter is saying by not answering the E-mail she resigned. If she had just accepted that it would be "all on her."

Twitter would be under no obligation to pay her the mandatory 60 days' worth of salary and other legally mandated things that Twitter signed on for when they contracted to do business in Ireland. I suspect it is the same for employees in the US, in terms of not being eligible for anything, including unemployment if they "resign."

Someone on the forum pointed out when the memo came out that it was unlikely an employment judge in the US would see not answering a vaguely worded memo with no definition of what they were saying "yes" to would not be considered either resignation or "fired for cause" even in most US States. Instead, the unemployment panels or judges would view it as a layoff, which in fact is what it is.

This woman was absolutely right to demand that she not be listed as "resigning" from her job at Twitter because she never signed anything or declared herself to be resigning. So legally, the courts here considered her to still be employed by Twitter.

Now Twitter chose to rehire her for now (they may have decided that was the easier way around this) they can still lay her off or fire her without cause, but they still have to pay her all the benefits due her and probably back pay from when they locked her out as well.

She can then get unemployment if needed and can place "laid off" on her resume for her next job rather than "resigned." This is a case where the terminology and legal finer points really matter.
 

kyrsyan

Has No Life - Lives on TB
OK, the thing is Twitter is saying by not answering the E-mail she resigned. If she had just accepted that it would be "all on her."

Twitter would be under no obligation to pay her the mandatory 60 days' worth of salary and other legally mandated things that Twitter signed on for when they contracted to do business in Ireland. I suspect it is the same for employees in the US, in terms of not being eligible for anything, including unemployment if they "resign."

Someone on the forum pointed out when the memo came out that it was unlikely an employment judge in the US would see not answering a vaguely worded memo with no definition of what they were saying "yes" to would not be considered either resignation or "fired for cause" even in most US States. Instead, the unemployment panels or judges would view it as a layoff, which in fact is what it is.

This woman was absolutely right to demand that she not be listed as "resigning" from her job at Twitter because she never signed anything or declared herself to be resigning. So legally, the courts here considered her to still be employed by Twitter.

Now Twitter chose to rehire her for now (they may have decided that was the easier way around this) they can still lay her off or fire her without cause, but they still have to pay her all the benefits due her and probably back pay from when they locked her out as well.

She can then get unemployment if needed and can place "laid off" on her resume for her next job rather than "resigned." This is a case where the terminology and legal finer points really matter.
Got that. I was referring to her take on the work environment. She needs to make a decision. And Musk isn't going to allow her the luxury of just floating on top of peaceful waves to wait it out. It's either bail out or put on a life jacket and hang on.
 

Melodi

Disaster Cat
Got that. I was referring to her take on the work environment. She needs to make a decision. And Musk isn't going to allow her the luxury of just floating on top of peaceful waves to wait it out. It's either bail out or put on a life jacket and hang on.
Oh, I totally agree with you on that, if it were me I'd have my resume out to every other tech company or job I qualified for in Ireland. But I'd want to leave either because I got another job and choose to actually and legally resign; or because Twitter had to make Musk put on his Big Boy pants and do a normal layoff and pay the normal mandated corporate business expenses that go with it.

As I've said before, Twitter is also free to leave Ireland but they have to have an EU hub to legally do full business in the EU. Most tech companies want a location with a large English-speaking population and with BREXIT, which usually means a choice of Ireland, Sweden, or Denmark. Sweden and Denmark are not officially English speaking but schools start in the first grade and many University Classes are all in English.

But Sweden and Denmark have a lot more regulations and higher taxes than Ireland, and so are not very attractive to lower budget high tech operations.

I've mentioned before how the Irish Government basically already told Twitter that they could either let their employees continue to work from home or the rural "hubs" (high-speed computer offices set up with taxpayer money in the rural areas), build a company town (might take a few years) or probably have to leave Ireland. The reason being the housing shortage in Dublin is so dire that Ukrainian refugees ended up sleeping on the streets a few weeks ago, and some weeks there are only one or two rental properties listed for the entire city and surrounding areas.

In other words, there is no place for Twitter employees hired under the old contract to work from home or the hubs in the rural areas to move to, so they can "get back to the office."

Musk didn't sign these contracts but Twitter did, and I think he is discovering that he can't just change everything with a mark of the pen. New ownership can bring a broom, but a hatchet may get them into hot water. That is even more true in Europe than it is in the United States, but even in the US, there are labor and contract laws.
 

jward

passin' thru

Elon Musk Furious After White House Says It Is Monitoring Twitter​


Carmine Sabia​





OPINION: This article may contain commentary which reflects the author's opinion.

The media has traditionally been a champion of free speech, but Twitter CEO Elon Musk believes that that has changed. On Monday during a White House press briefing a reporter asked White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre if the administration was monitoring the situation at Twitter for “misinformation.”

“Just a question about Twitter. You know, there’s a researcher at Stanford who says that this is a critical moment, really, in terms of ensuring that Twitter does not become a vector for misinformation. I mean, are you concerned about the — you know, Elon Musk says there are more and more subscribers coming online? Are you concerned about that? And what tools do you have? Who is it at the White House that is really keeping track of this?” Reuters reporter Andrea Shalalsaid.

“So, look, this is something that we’re certainly keeping an eye on. And, look, we — you know, we have always been very clear and — that when it comes to social media platforms, it is their responsibility to make sure that when it comes to misinformation, when we — when it comes to the hate that we’re seeing, that they take action, that they continue to take action,” the press secretary said.
“Again, we’re all keeping a close eye on this. We’re all monitoring what’s — what’s currently occurring. And we see — you know, we see it with our own eyes of what you all are reporting and, just for ourselves, what’s happening on Twitter,” she said.

“But again, social media companies have a responsibility to prevent their platforms from being used by any user to incite violence, especially violence directed at individual communities, as we have been seeing. And the President has been very clear on calling that out. He’ll continue to do that. And we’re going to continue to monitor the situation,” she said.
Advertisement
This caught the attention of Musk who appeared to be furious with it.
“Absolutely insane watching The Machine go after @elonmusk for defending free speech. This whole exchange is kabuki theater, from the ridiculous leading question by the ‘journalist’ to KJP’s obviously pre-planned response,” journalist Dave Rubin said.
“Why are so many in the media against free speech? This is messed up,” the Twitter CEO said.
Why are so many in the media against free speech? This is messed up.
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) November 28, 2022
Musk has made a habit of making liberals furious in recent months and it appears he loves to troll them.
His most recent tweet is near certain to set them into a frenzy as he shared a photo of his “bedside table” and it included 4 caffeine free Cokes, a painting of George Washington crossing the Delaware and a futuristic looking revolver.
My bedside table pic.twitter.com/sIdRYJcLTK
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) November 28, 2022
There were also rings from glasses that were seen on the table which prompted Musk to say “There is no excuse for my lack of coasters.”
There is no excuse for my lack of coasters
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) November 28, 2022
And in an apparent reference to the gun he said, “Greetings, I’m Musket, Elon Musket.”
Greetings, I’m Musket, Elon Musket
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) November 28, 2022
Conservatives were certain that liberals would be triggered by Musk’s tweet.
“LOL – This is going to trigger the Left more than anything you’ve ever tweeted. Let the tears start falling like rain,” one Twitter user said.
LOL – This is going to trigger the Left more than anything you've ever tweeted. Let the tears start falling like rain.
— Catturd ™ (@catturd2) November 28, 2022
“The people who want to ban handguns are going to lose it over this,” Robby Starbuck said.
The people who want to ban handguns are going to lose it over this.
— Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck) November 28, 2022
“Trigger tweet of the year,” another said.
Trigger tweet of the year lol
— Col. Rob Maness ret. 1776 (@RobManess) November 28, 2022
“Hey! I thought I was the only one who drank this stuff!” former national spokesperson for former President Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign, Katrina Pierson, said as she shared a photo of four fiet coke bottles and a gun on a table.
Hey! I thought I was the only one who drank this stuff! #drinkchamps #matchmadeinheaven pic.twitter.com/lfaNPtzldE
— Katrina Pierson (@KatrinaPierson) November 29, 2022
Advertisement
“If you can’t translate this Tweet, you’re asleep. And he’s not wrong,” another said.
If you can’t translate this Tweet, you’re asleep. And he’s not wrong https://t.co/qSXhKgSoXE
— Monica Matthews On Air (@monicaonairtalk) November 28, 2022
“Oh no he likes guns! And General Washington,” Sebastian Gorka said.
Oh no he likes guns!
And General Washington. https://t.co/zOA2ZPAMMA
— Sebastian Gorka DrG (@SebGorka) November 28, 2022
Musk announced on Monday that Apple has mostly stopped advertising on Twitter, which would make it one of the most high-profile companies to pull ads from the social media platform.
“Apple has mostly stopped advertising on Twitter. Do they hate free speech in America?,” Musk said in a tweet. He later tagged Apple Chief Executive Officer Tim Cook’s Twitter account in another tweet, asking “what’s going on here?”

“The move aligns the iPhone maker with a rising list of firms from General Mills Inc to luxury automaker Audi of America that have stopped or paused advertising on Twitter since the billionaire’s $44 billion buyout last month,” Reuters reported.
“Musk said ‘yes’ in response to a user question on whether Apple was threatening Twitter’s presence in the App Store or making moderation demands. Apple did not immediately respond to a request for comment,” the outlet added.
What’s going on here @tim_cook?
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) November 28, 2022
Apple has also threatened to withhold Twitter from its App Store, but won’t tell us why
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) November 28, 2022
Musk continues to make changes to the platform, including unbanning previously suspended users and implementing free speech policies, he is also laying down the law, so to speak.
 

jward

passin' thru
Charlie Kirk
@charliekirk11

BREAKING: Elon Musk confirms that Twitter has interfered with elections.

11:29 AM · Nov 30, 2022
·Twitter Web App
Elaborated upon in a stand alone thread:
 

Granny Franny

Senior Member
This caught the attention of Musk who appeared to be furious with it.
“Absolutely insane watching The Machine go after @elonmusk for defending free speech. This whole exchange is kabuki theater, from the ridiculous leading question by the ‘journalist’ to KJP’s obviously pre-planned response,” journalist Dave Rubin said.
“Why are so many in the media against free speech? This is messed up,” the Twitter CEO said.

Musk has made a habit of making liberals furious in recent months and it appears he loves to troll them.
I don't actually see anything that indicates Musk is furious about anything. Most of his tweets seem to express amusement. I do see that he's making liberals furious though, which I also find amusing.
 

jward

passin' thru

energy_wave

Has No Life - Lives on TB
I would imagine Elon has Gigabytes of great lintel on all of these treasonous scumbags, all backed up several times over.

Direct Messages are the private side of Twitter. You can use Direct Messages to have private conversations with people about Tweets and other content.

 

jward

passin' thru
Reuters
@Reuters
Official

Elon Musk said a wireless device developed by his brain chip company Neuralink is expected to begin human clinical trials in six months Elon Musk expects Neuralink to begin human trials in six months

 
Top