CORONA Main Coronavirus thread

Pinecone

Has No Life - Lives on TB
I feel so badly for the nurses who just can't leave their patients, but who are killing themselves in the process because of administrative choices. It's a hard enough job without all this crap.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

“The Drug Does Not Appear to Qualify for Release” – EXCLUSIVE: Post Office Holds Woman’s Foreign Shipment of Ivermectin at the Request of the FDA

By Jim Hoft
Published January 9, 2022 at 7:07pm
1E6AD1CB-7983-470B-89F5-6B11946A02D4-scaled.jpeg


The Gateway Pundit previously reported that Customs and Border officials captured two small packages of Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine at Chicago’s O’Hare Airport recently. The two drugs would not have raised an eyebrow before the COVID pandemic. But since the Democrats and media politicized the completely safe, inexpensive, and effective medications the Customs agents are on the lookout for these cheap drugs. Meanwhile, Mexican cartels continue to smuggle record amounts of fentanyl into the country this year.

Now, a Gateway Pundit reader has received a letter from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regarding a shipment containing Ivermectin that she bought from a foreign country is being held by the post office.

Here’s the excerpt from the email:
“I read about this but now have experienced it. I just want the word out of what they are doing. Every friend and family member that I have that was unvaccinated and has had covid and used Ivermectin or Hydroxychloroquine along with Zinc, vitamin C, and D did not have to be hospitalized. I am so angry that they are making it almost impossible to get. I have an arthritis condition that I have been prescribed 400 mg of Hydroxychloroquine daily. I have been taking it for more than 6 months with no adverse side effects whatsoever.”
The shipment contains 1 Ziverdo Kit: Kit of Zinc Acetate Tablets, Doxycycline Capsules Ip & Ivermectin Dispersible Tablets and 2 Covimectin-12 Ivermectin Tablets.

According to the letter, the items mentioned above are subject to refusal of admission into the United States because they do not appear to be in compliance with the requirements of the law as indicated below:

Ziverdo Kit: Kit of Zinc Acetate Tablets, Doxycycline Capsules Ip & Ivermectin Dispersible Tablets

UNAPPROVED NEW DRUG – The article is subject to refusal of admission pursuant to Section 801 (a)(3) in that it appears to be a new drug within the meaning of Section 201 (p) without an approved New Drug Application (NDA).

Screen-Shot-2022-01-09-at-6.57.24-PM.jpg


Covimectin-12 Ivermectin Tablets
MISBRANDING – The article has been determined to lack adequate directions for use. The drug is available in the US; therefore is
is not permitted for personal importation.

Screen-Shot-2022-01-09-at-6.58.42-PM.jpg


The letter stated that IVERMECTIN is an unapproved drug and does not appear to qualify for release.

“The policy is intended to make available, through the exercise of enforcement discretion, unapproved drugs used to treat serious medical conditions for which no equivalent treatment exists in the United States, and unapproved drugs used to continue treatment begun in a foreign country. This drug does not appear to qualify for release. All products of this kind must meet the requirements of the Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act or other laws enforced by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. These laws are designed to protect you from, among other things, unsafe or misrepresented foods, drugs, biologics, cosmetics, devices, and other articles.”

Screen-Shot-2022-01-09-at-7.11.07-PM.jpg


Here’s a copy of the letter from the FDA:

8C6AB1AC-CD5A-47E3-A7E1-F76D2C258FA3-scaled.jpeg

787CD439-FC7F-43DF-82A8-DFF74FA5366B-scaled.jpeg

6F1BA9EC-767E-4932-A50B-A6563385622B-scaled.jpeg


Despite all the stories, testimonies, and studies showing Ivermectin as effective early treatment of COVID-19, the Food and Drug Administration has refused to authorize the drugs — that have been saving lives for decades– for Covid treatment, claiming, “Ivermectin has not been shown to be safe and effective for these indications.”

Yet, more people have died and suffered adverse side effects from Covid vaccines than any other vaccine in recorded history, data from the Center for Disease Control’s underreported VAERS report confirms.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
This sounds promising. But no MRNA, no big pharma - Fauci and co aren't going to be interested - I see only uphill battles for these people unfortunately. Which is too bad for those who would consider a vaccine if it was the old fashioned type.


(fair use applies)

A Texas team comes up with a COVID vaccine that could be a global game changer
Joe Palco
January 5, 202212:47 PM ET


A vaccine authorized in December for use in India may help solve one of the most vexing problems in global public health: How to supply lower-income countries with a COVID-19 vaccine that is safe, effective and affordable.

The vaccine is called CORBEVAX. It uses old but proven vaccine technology and can be manufactured far more easily than most, if not all, of the COVID-19 vaccines in use today.

"CORBEVAX is a game changer," says Dr. Keith Martin, executive director of the Consortium of Universities for Global Health in Washington, D.C. "It's going to enable countries around the world, particularly low-income countries, to be able to produce these vaccines and distribute them in a way that's going to affordable, effective and safe."

The story of CORBEVAX begins some two decades ago. Peter Hotez and Maria Elena Bottazzi were medical researchers at George Washington University in Washington, D.C., where they worked on vaccines and treatments for what are called neglected tropical diseases, such as schistosomiasis and hookworm.

When a strain of coronavirus known as SARS broke out in 2003, they decided to tackle that disease. After moving to Houston to affiliate with Baylor College of Medicine and the Texas Children's Center for Vaccine Development, they created a vaccine candidate using protein subunit technology. This involves using proteins from a virus or bacterium that can induce an immune response but not cause disease.

"It's the same technology as the hepatitis B vaccine that's been around for decades," Hotez says.

Their SARS vaccine candidate looked promising, but then the SARS outbreak petered out. No evidence of disease, no need for a vaccine.

When a new strain of coronavirus triggered the COVID-19 pandemic, Hotez and Bottazzi figured they could dust off their old technology and modify it for use against COVID-19. After all, the virus causing COVID-19 and the virus causing SARS are quite similar.

Hotez says they tried to interest government officials in the vaccine, but they weren't impressed.

"People were so fixated on innovation that nobody thought, 'Hey, maybe we could use a low-cost, durable, easy-breezy vaccine that can vaccinate the whole world,' " Hotez says.

"We really honestly couldn't get any traction in the U.S., but our mission is always to enable technologies for low- and middle-income countries production and use," Bottazzi recalls.

So they turned to private philanthropies. A major donor early on was the JPB Foundation in New York.

"The rest were all Texas philanthropies: the Kleberg Foundation, the [John S.] Dunn Foundation, Tito's Vodka," Hotez says. The MD Anderson Foundation also chipped in.

"When people say, 'Why did we move [from Washington, D.C.] to Texas?' Well, we knew that this was a great philanthropic environment. So this is really very much a Texas vaccine," although there were other, smaller donors from all over the country.

Hotez says that unlike the mRNA vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna, and the viral vector vaccine from Johnson & Johnson, protein subunit vaccines like CORBEVAX have a track record. So he and Bottazzi were relatively certain CORBEVAX would be safe and effective.

"And it's cheap, a dollar, dollar fifty a dose," Hotez says. "You're not going to get less expensive than that."

Clinical trials showed they were right to be confident CORBEVAX would work. An unpublished study conducted in India involving 3,000 volunteers found the vaccine to be 90% effective in preventing disease cause by the original COVID-19 virus strain and 80% against the delta variant. It's still being tested against omicron.

But CORBEVAX is already entering the real world. Last month, the vaccine received emergency use authorization from regulators in India. An Indian vaccine manufacturer called Biological E Ltd is now making the vaccine. The company says it is producing 100 million doses per month and has already sold 300 million doses to the Indian government.

"The real beauty of the CORBEVAX vaccine that Drs. Hotez and Bottazzi created is that intellectual property of this vaccine will be available to everybody," Keith Martin says. "So you can get manufacturers in Senegal, and South Africa and Latin America to be able to produce this particular vaccine."

By contrast, the makers of Pfizer and Moderna, for example, are not sharing their recipe.

One drawback to the CORBEVAX technology is that it can't be modified as quickly as mRNA vaccines can to adjust to new variants.

That forces public health officials to make difficult choices.

"Something which can be adapted the fastest versus something that can be adapted relatively quickly, but then more importantly can be manufactured at a large global capacity and at a cost of production which is much lower," says Prashant Yadav, senior fellow at at the Center for Global Development in Washington, D.C. The thought is some protection may better than no protection.

Of course, the ideal vaccine would have both qualities, and Hotez is at work trying to develop technologies that can do that.

"There's no issue with pushing innovation," he says. "I think that's one of the really positive features of the U.S. vaccination program for COVID. The problem was it wasn't balanced with a portfolio or oldies but goodies."

Hotez is hoping his oldie but goodie will usher in a brighter future for the world.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Biden Admin Cuts Florida's Weekly Monoclonal Shipment In Half

SUNDAY, JAN 09, 2022 - 12:30 PM
Authored by Jannis Falkenstern via The Epoch Times,

The federal government slashed in half the number of doses of the monoclonal antibodies therapy shipped to Florida from 30,000 to 15,000 this week, according to Gov. Ron DeSantis (R).

DeSantis said the 15,000 dozen received would be “immediately utilized to support new monoclonal antibody sites.”

“But for the federal government’s decision to restrict supply of monoclonal antibody treatment to Florida, my administration would have already opened additional monoclonal antibody treatment sites throughout the state,” DeSantis said in a press release.

The governor said that before the Biden administration “seized control of the monoclonal supply” Florida was administering 30,000 doses per week to infected patients. The treatment saved “countless lives,” he said.
“The Biden Administration is still obstructing the state of Florida’s ability to manage our own supply of monoclonal antibodies and I will continue to seek additional doses for Floridians,” he said.

The Epoch Times reported Jan. 3 that the U.S. Health and Human Services Administration had relaxed its policies on limiting the monoclonal antibody drugs paving the way for Florida to receive 30,000 treatments. The plan for those doses was to set up new treatment centers in high-need areas throughout south and central Florida.

DeSantis alleged the limits the HHS had set for Florida were “political.”

“The federal government has cornered the entire market of monoclonal,” he said in a press conference on Jan. 3.

“We’ve got the infrastructure in place. It’s just a matter of the federal government giving us more doses … for the Floridians who need it.”

The governor asked the state legislature to set aside almost $1 billion to aid in fighting COVID-19 and making monoclonal antibodies available to “every Floridian who needed it.”

But because the federal government has a contractual agreement with the makers of the monoclonal antibody treatments, it has “locked out” anyone else from buying the product, the governor said.

“We will rapidly deploy the 15,000 doses that we now have secured,” he said.

“The Biden Administration commandeered the supply and distribution of monoclonal antibodies following Florida’s successful deployment of the treatment last summer and drastically cut shipments of the treatments to the state.”


Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis speaks at the opening of a monoclonal antibody site in Pembroke Pines, Fla., on Aug. 18, 2021. (Marta Lavandier/AP Photo)

The announcement of the shortfall in monoclonal antibody treatments comes one day after the governor made remarks about the Jan. 6 anniversary and how “corporate media” and Washington would celebrate the day as “their Christmas.”

“They are going to take this and milk this for anything they could to try to be able to smear Donald Trump,” he told reporters on Jan. 6.

Requests from the governor’s office on why they think Florida was shortchanged on the treatment drug were not answered by press time.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

California Folds; Says Asymptomatic COVID-Positive Health Workers Can Get Back To Work Amid Shortages

SUNDAY, JAN 09, 2022 - 10:00 PM
Authored by Jack Phillips via The Epoch Times,

The California Department of Public Health issued guidance that allows health care networks to enable COVID-19-positive employees to keep working if they don’t show any symptoms.
“The department is providing temporary flexibility to help hospitals and emergency services providers respond to an unprecedented surge and staffing shortages. Hospitals have to exhaust all other options before resorting to this temporary tool. Facilities and providers using this tool, should have asymptomatic COVID-19 positive workers interact only with COVID-19 positive patients to the extent possible,” the Department of Public Health said in a statement to news outlets over the weekend.
The Epoch Times has contacted the agency for comment.


Health care workers in the state now don’t have to isolate or show a negative COVID-19 test, the guidance said, before coming back to work if they are asymptomatic. The guidance, which remains in effect until Feb. 1, stipulates that staff wear N95 respirator masks while on the job.

After the guidance was handed down, several unions that represent nurses and other hospital staff expressed alarm.
“Healthcare workers and patients need the protection of clear rules guided by strong science. Allowing employers to bring back workers who may still be infectious is one of the worst ideas I have heard during this pandemic, and that’s really saying something,” Bob Schoonover, the head of union SEIU California, told CBS Sacramento.
Schoonover added that while his union supports “supplemental paid sick leave,” the latest guidance imperils a “critical piece of the protection that workers and the public need.”

The president of the California Nurses Association, Sandy Reding, told local media that the California health department’s guidance will put patients at risk.
“We are very concerned,” she told KNTV news.
“If you have health care workers who are COVID positive care for vulnerable populations, we can spread the COVID virus inside the hospital as well.”
Union officials did not mention the rampant staffing issues that have plagued hospitals across the United States and California in recent days.

Mandates that were put into effect last year by California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, required health care workers to get COVID-19 vaccines or face termination—despite studies showing that natural immunity conferred by a previous COVID-19 infection shows lasting immunity to the virus. Critics of vaccine mandates have questioned why governments and businesses would impose vaccinate or fire policies for “essential workers”—such as nurses and doctors—in the midst of staff shortages during a viral pandemic.

Health giant Kaiser Permanente suspended more than 2,000 employees who were not vaccinated in October. Other California systems such as Santa Clara Valley Medical Center and Sutter Health also terminated or suspended their employees who weren’t vaccinated in the fall of 2021.

Meanwhile, Dr. George Rutherford, professor of Epidemiology at the University of California San Francisco, told KNTV that the guidance revision isn’t anything new.
This is about having infected people taking care of infected people. We did this with Ebola in South Africa. We’ve done it before. It’s not the first play option in our playbook. I think staffing issues are such that it led the state to put this guidance out,” he told the outlet.
It comes days after the Newsom administration mandated that booster shots be given to certain health care staffers by Feb. 1. On Friday, New York Gov. Kathy Hochul, a Democrat, issued said she would issue a directive for all health care workers in the state if signed off by a public health advocacy board.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
(France)


Well played, French citizens…
Posted by Kane on January 9, 2022 11:32 pm

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1480296666792173569
.06 min
Freedom fighters on the French island of Saint-Pierre-et-Miquelon in the North Atlantic throw pieces of algae and dirt at MP Stéphane Clairvaux while he stands in front of his home.

Clairvaux supports Vaccine Passports to participate in public life.

Assault charges were filed for throwing dirt.

TRANSLATION FROM FRENCH — The demonstrators formally contest the accusations of willful assault on the deputy Stephane Claireaux . They confirm that the latter did indeed “provoke” them with a middle finger and would even have come “to harass them even in the street.”

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1480337544869040129
.53 min
 
Last edited:

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Massive 145-Country Study Shows Sharp INCREASE of Transmission and DEATH After Introduction of COVID Vaccines

By Julian Conradson
Published January 9, 2022 at 9:17pm
diana-polekhina-ZBstHWt9vLc-unsplash-scaled.jpg


Instead of bringing an end to this pandemic as promised, the widespread rollout of the experimental vaccines has actually caused a sharp increase in Covid-19 cases and deaths across the world, according to a recently published preprint study that looked at data from the 145 of the most vaccinated countries in the world.

The 99-page study titled Worldwide Bayesian Causal Impact Analysis of Vaccine Administration on Deaths and Cases Associated with COVID-19: A BigData Analysis of 145 Countries” found that in the US specifically, the jab has caused a whopping 38% more Covid cases per million – and an even more astonishing 31% increase in deaths per million.

Screenshot_20220109-185128_Samsung-Notes.jpg

Screenshot_20220109-185142_Samsung-Notes.jpg


In total, researchers found that almost 90% (89.84%) of the 145 countries experienced this negative effect from the vaccines after they were made available.

From the study:
“Results indicate that the treatment (vaccine administration) has a strong and statistically significant propensity to causally increase the values in either y1 [variable chosen for deaths per million] or y2 [variable chosen for cases per million] over and above what would have been expected with no treatment.
y1 showed an increase/decrease ratio of (+115/-13), which means 89.84% of statistically significant countries showed an increase in total deaths per million associated with COVID-19 due directly to the causal impact of treatment initiation [vaccines].

y2 showed an increase/decrease ratio of (+105/-16) which means 86.78% of statistically significant countries showed an increase in total cases per millionof COVID-19 due directly to the causal impact of treatment initiation.”
Researchers performed a causal analysis comparing both pre- and post-treatment periods to come up with the difference in cases and deaths since the implementation of the vaccine by analyzing publicly available COVID-19 data to determine the effect of their widespread rollout. After eliminating all results from countries with low vaccination rates or incomplete data, there were 128 countries with sufficient data on deaths (y1) and 103 countries to examine total cases (y2), which comprised a total of 145 unique countries.

Perhaps the most telling part of the study’s results is that the countries which recorded the fewest Covid deaths in 2020 were the ones to experience the largest increases in cases and deaths once the vaccine was introduced, with some of them seeing increases as high as over a thousand percent.
“Countries with few COVID-19 deaths in the year 2020 appear to have fared the worst of all countries after vaccine administration (e.g Thailand, Vietnam, Mongolia, Taiwan, Seychelles, Cambodia, etc.).
The causal impact results from vaccine administration seen in these countries [is] hundreds or thousands of percentage increases in total deaths and cases per million.

we can be most statistically confident in due to the direct increase of COVID-19 associated deaths and cases after vaccine administration, where prior to vaccine administration there were few or none.”
In the study’s conclusion, researchers warned that the substantial increase in deaths and cases should be “highly worrisome” for the policymakers around the world who have been promoting the experimental vaccines as the “key to gain back our freedoms.”
“The statistically significant and overwhelmingly positive causal impact after vaccine deployment on the dependent variables total deaths and total cases per million should be highly worrisome for policy makers. They indicate a marked increase in both COVID-19 related cases and death due directly to a vaccine deployment that was originally sold to the public as the ‘key to gain back our freedoms.’The effect of vaccines on total cases per million and its low positive association with total vaccinations per hundred signifies a limited impact of vaccines on lowering COVID-19 associated cases.

These results should encourage local policy makers to make policy decisions based on data, not narrative, and based on local conditions, not global or national mandates. These results should also encourage policy makers to begin looking for other avenues out of the pandemic aside from mass vaccination campaigns.”
In short, this is just the latest evidence that we have been lied to throughout the entire manufactured pandemic.

These experimental, rushed vaccines have done nothing but make things worse and have only spurred the transmission of new variants that have prevented the world from putting this virus in the rearview mirror.

Several studies have come to similar conclusions as this one, with two recently coming out that confirmed essentially the same thing – these vaccines actually are causing more illness than they prevent.


And that’s just referring to Covid illness, it’s to say nothing of the substantial increase of other ailments and life-threatening conditions that have been sweeping the country.

Hospitals are currently ‘overwhelmed’ with patients that are ‘sicker than ever,’ and it’s not Covid.

 
Last edited:

marsh

On TB every waking moment

It Is Time to Face Reality About the “Vaccines”

by Vinay Prasad
January 9, 2022

A number of studies are converging on the fact that 2 doses of vaccination has poor vaccine effectiveness against Omicron. 3 doses does slightly better, but the effect will rapidly wane as antibody titers fall, and infection is certain as the number of exposures increase.

These studies have immediate implications for vaccine and health-care policies.
First, Kaiser Southern California. Here are data for 2 doses of mRNA for effectiveness against Omicron. Follow the red line. Over time, it is 0%.

0-800x672.png


3 doses does better, for now. But look at the confidence interval of the red line. We have no idea if it will be preserved.

1-800x697.png


Now, let’s turn to the Province of Ontario, vaccine effectiveness 2 dose or 3 dose is in the toilet; Note the y axis, and broad confidence interval post dose 3. Here dose 3 would fail to meet the FDA standard of at least 50% VE, with lower bound CI >30%— the standard for EUA.

1.2-800x581.png


Now let us examine Denmark; here are the raw probabilities of secondary attack in a household.

1.3-800x582.png


Putting these 3 studies together: what is the conclusion? Two doses of vaccine does nothing or almost nothing to stop symptomatic sars-cov-2. Three doses barely does anything, and the effect will likely attenuate over time. Finally, as the number of exposures increase from 2 to 22 to 202, the cumulative probability of infection will approach 1.

NOTE: This is not an argument about the benefits of vaccination for the individual— vaccines likely (and evidence shows they) still have great protection against severe disease; instead this is an argument about the effects of vaccination on symptomatic diseases, and (some good portion of) transmission.

Conclusion: you cannot contain the viral spread of omicron by boosting.

The moment we see that, the policy conclusions start to fall into place.

Booster mandates make no sense for young people/ working people/ hospitals/ anywhere. Young people will only be, at best, slightly less likely to spread for a short period of time, but the epidemic waves will eventually over take them.

Boosting should happen in populations where it further reduces severe disease and death— aka older and vulnerable people. Focus on that and let college kids off the hook.

Some argue there is still a justification to boost because you can help prevent hospitals from being overwhelmed. Sadly, that argument fails in several ways.

First, you have no evidence boosting younger people will slow hospitalizations.

A vaccinated younger person already has very low risk of being hospitalized.

Boosting may not further lower what is already very low. We simply have no evidence. Event rates are sparse at those ages.

Second, this argument would mean the state could tell people what to eat and how much to exercise, and how much to drink. Food, drink and obesity are drivers of hospitalizations. Instead, we have not accepted these infringements in the past. The justification for vaccine mandates is that it helps curb population spread. The latest vaccine effectiveness figures show that effect is now nearly gone, and transient at best. Ergo, the mandates are unjustified.

Firing nurses and other health care workers for being non-compliant with mandates is now defeating. We are better off having them work. Time to bring them back.

Draconian avoidance of omicron is not tenable. Omicron or a future variant will eventually find us all. It may even be preferable to encounter omicron a few weeks or months after your last vaccine than a year or two later, as the infection may be milder. As I explain in a prior post, wearing an n95 makes no sense.

It is time to face reality.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
(Czech Republic)

Thousands Rally in Prague Against Vaccination Mandate

'Prague's protest followed similar but smaller demonstrations in several Czech cities on Saturday...'

ByEditor 2
January 9, 2022
AP22009507007831_1_1000x-696x385.jpg

People wave flags and banners as they gather to protest against the governments restrictions to curb the spread of COVID-19 in Prague, Czech Republic, Sunday, Jan. 9, 2022. (AP Photo/Petr David Josek)

(Headline USA) Thousands of people marched through the Czech Republic’s capital this weekend to protest against compulsory COVID-19 vaccination for certain groups and professions.

The protesters gathered at Wenceslas Square in central Prague, questioning the effectiveness of the current vaccines and reject the vaccination of children before marching through the capital, chanting “Freedom, freedom.”

Prague’s protest followed similar but smaller demonstrations in several Czech cities on Saturday.

The previous government released an order in early December, making vaccination mandatory for the 60 and over age group, as well as medical personnel, police officers, firefighters and medical students.

The order is due to take effect in March, but it still might end up being overturned.

Prime Minister Andrej Babis’ administration was replaced later in December by a new government formed by five parties that won October’s parliamentary election, led by Prime Minister Petr Fiala.

The new administration opposed a vaccination mandate for older people and was ready to cancel it, but didn’t rule out it might still be compulsory for some, depending on the development of the pandemic. The government should announce its decision about it by the middle of February.

The omicron variant of the coronavirus was expected by health authorities to become dominant in the country next week.

In the nation of 10.7 million, 6.7 million are considered fully vaccinated, while over 2.8 million have received a booster shot.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
(Austria)


Authoritarian Austria: 40,000 Protest in Vienna as ‘Corona Apartheid’ Continues
133
Policemen look on as people carry Austrian flags as they demonstrate against the Austrian government's measures taken in order to limit the spread of the coronavirus during a protest on January 8, 2022 in Vienna, amid the novel coronavirus / COVID-19 pandemic. - Austria OUT (Photo by FLORIAN WIESER / …
FLORIAN WIESER/APA/AFP via Getty Images
PETER CADDLE9 Jan 202294

Around 40,000 people took the streets of Vienna on Saturday to protest COVID-19 restrictions in Austria, as a system of “Corona Apartheid” continues to operate in the EU country.

The German-speaking nation — which is still threatening to implement mandatory vaccination for the entirety of its population — is currently restricting the movements and activities of its unvaccinated population in a way previously described as a system of “Corona Apartheid“.

While being described as mostly peaceful by Kronen Zeitung, a number of demonstrators were arrested on suspicion of resisting police, according to the paper.

There were also reports of firecrackers being thrown into the crowd of protesters, with the mood at the rally reportedly being quite tense.

Interior Minister Gerhard Karner commended the police for having “once again proven their professionalism” and that their “consistent intervention against violent criminals” showed “what great challenges the police have to overcome in the context of such demonstrations.”

“Above all, the different field of participants — families with children, but also soccer hooligans and identities marching next to each other — demands top performance from the officers,” Karner continued.

A further demonstration is to be held in Innsbruck on Sunday, with speeches from a number of senior members of the Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs, or Freedom Party of Austria.

Unvaccinated individuals in Austria are currently under rolling lockdowns, which the government has promised to keep going indefinitely ahead of plans to make vaccination against the Chinese coronavirus mandatory.

As a result, Austria’s unjabbed face the future possibility of hefty fines and possible prison time should they remain unvaccinated.

The government’s plans to implement a vaccine mandate are suddenly experiencing significant difficulties, however.

While so-called “broad” controls will come into force as planned in early February, the use of the national vaccination register will not be legally possible until after April 1st as a result of apparent miscommunication on the part of the government.

Other measures the government planned to implement cannot be implemented at all, according to a Kronen Zeitung report, including the expansion of the nation’s central patient index “to include people who are registered in Austria but do not have a social security number”.

While the country’s Health Minister has defended the government’s actions regarding the botched measures, one top politician in the country has suggested that it may be time to rethink the mandate entirely.

“What if the Constitutional Court said in one year that it was unconstitutional?

That would be a disaster,” said the governor of the Austrian state of Burgenland, Hans Peter Doskozil, adding that “ultimately this form of compulsory vaccination polarizes further and leads to division.”

The governor went on to suggest a system of chargeable PCR tests for unvaccinated individuals be put in place instead of mandatory vaccination.

“I would rather have an indirect vaccination requirement, in which PCR tests for unvaccinated people are subject to a fee,” Doskozil said.

“The money that comes in would have to flow into the health system for a specific purpose.”
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

1641800359329.png
Can Mouthwash Kill the Coronavirus?

By Penn State
January 9, 2022 Updated: January 9, 2022

Certain oral antiseptics and mouthwashes may offer a way to inactivate human coronavirus, according to a new study.

The findings indicate that some of these products might help reduce the viral load, or amount of virus, in the mouth after infection and may help reduce the spread of SARS-CoV-2, the coronavirus that causes COVID-19.

Researchers tested several oral and nasopharyngeal rinses in a laboratory setting for their ability to inactivate human coronaviruses, which are similar in structure to SARS-CoV-2. The products evaluated included a 1% solution of baby shampoo, a neti pot, peroxide sore-mouth cleansers, and mouthwashes.
a woman using a neti pot

Nasal irrigation can be done safely and inexpensively at home via a Neti pot and may help prevent severe COVID-19 by stopping coronavirus infections from reaching our lower respiratory tract. (nullplus/Shutterstock)

The researchers found that several of the nasal and oral rinses had a strong ability to neutralize human coronavirus, which suggests that these products may have the potential to reduce the amount of virus spread by people who are COVID-19-positive.

“The products we tested are readily available and often already part of people’s daily routines,” says Craig Meyers, professor of microbiology and immunology and obstetrics and gynecology at Penn State.

Meyers and colleagues used a test to replicate the interaction of the virus in the nasal and oral cavities—major points of entry and transmission for human coronaviruses—in the rinses and mouthwashes.

They treated solutions containing a strain of human coronavirus, which served as a readily available and genetically similar alternative for SARS-CoV-2, with the baby shampoo solutions, various peroxide antiseptic rinses, and various brands of mouthwash.

They allowed the solutions to interact with the virus for 30 seconds, one minute, and two minutes, before diluting the solutions to prevent further virus inactivation. The outer envelopes of the human coronavirus tested and SARS-CoV-2 are genetically similar, Meyers says, so the research team hypothesizes that exposure to the solution may inactivate a similar amount of SARS-CoV-2.

To measure how much virus was inactivated, the researchers placed the diluted solutions in contact with cultured human cells. They counted how many cells remained alive after a few days of exposure to the viral solution and used that number to calculate the amount of human coronavirus that was inactivated as a result of exposure to the mouthwash or oral rinse that was tested.

The 1% baby shampoo solution, often used by head and neck doctors to rinse the sinuses, inactivated greater than 99.9% of human coronavirus after a two-minute contact time.

Several of the mouthwash and gargle products also were effective at inactivating the infectious virus. Many inactivated greater than 99.9% of virus after only 30 seconds of contact time and some inactivated 99.99% of the virus after 30 seconds.

The results with mouthwashes are promising and add to the findings of a study showing that certain types of oral rinses could inactivate SARS-CoV-2 in similar experimental conditions, Meyers says.

In addition to evaluating the solutions at longer contact times, the researchers studied over-the-counter products and nasal rinses not evaluated in the other study. As a next step to expand on their results, the researchers will design and conduct clinical trials that evaluate whether products like mouthwashes can effectively reduce viral load in COVID-19-positive patients, Meyers says.

“People who test positive for COVID-19 and return home to quarantine may possibly transmit the virus to those they live with,” says Meyers, a researcher at Penn State Cancer Institute.

“Certain professions including dentists and other health care workers are at a constant risk of exposure. Clinical trials are needed to determine if these products can reduce the amount of virus COVID-positive patients or those with high-risk occupations may spread while talking, coughing, or sneezing. Even if the use of these solutions could reduce transmission by 50%, it would have a major impact.”

Future studies may include a continued investigation of products that inactive human coronaviruses and what specific ingredients in the solutions tested inactivate the virus.

The results appear in the Journal of Medical Virology. Additional coauthors are from Brigham Young University and Penn State. This article was republished via Futurity.org under Creative Commons License 4.0. The Penn State Huck Institutes for the Life Sciences supported the work. The researchers declare no conflict of interest.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
(France)

It Worked: Over 100,000 French Protest Vax Pass After Macron Vowed to ‘Piss Off’ Unvaxed

418
TOPSHOT - Demonstrators gather during a protest against the health pass and Covid-19 vaccines after the call of leader of French nationalist party Les Patriotes (The Patriots) Florian Philippot, at Place du Palais-Royal, Paris, on January 8, 2022. (Photo by Christophe ARCHAMBAULT / AFP) (Photo by CHRISTOPHE ARCHAMBAULT/AFP via Getty …
CHRISTOPHE ARCHAMBAULT/AFP via Getty Images
PETER CADDLE9 Jan 2022359

Over 100,000 took to the streets on Saturday to protest France’s impending vaccine pass regime days after President Macron said he wanted to “piss off” the unjabbed.

Macron seems to have succeeded in his desire to “piss off” a segment of the French population, with over 100,000 turning up to demonstrations across France in protest of the President’s incoming regime of vaccine passes.

The new measures, which were approved by the French National Assembly earlier in the week, will see the unvaccinated and those without recently acquired natural immunity barred from pubs and restaurants, as well as a host of other venues.

According to a report by Le Monde, French police counted around 18,000 demonstrators in Paris alone, with large turnouts in places such as Montpellier and Toulouse.

Florian Philippot, head of the eurosceptic Les Patriotes party, spoke to those gathered, saying that he was waiting for “the government to give up, to withdraw this crazy law”, as well as for Macron to apologise for the “filthy and divisive remarks he made”.

Also at the rally was the head of the French police association Policiers en Colère, Bruno Attal, who said that officers within the organisation had no intention of “pissing off” parts of the population who may be targetted by restrictions.

“We are here to piss off thugs and delinquents, not citizens who have become ‘sub-citizens'”, Attal said.

Organisers claim that over 400,000 French turned out to protests across the country on Saturday, though they emphasised that their headcount was done independently of the government’s Ministry of the Interior, whose estimate of 100,000 people is supposedly the “only precise and real count”.

1641800795286.png

France’s regime of vaccine passes was originally due to commence on January 15th, but that date will likely be moved back after the government experienced a number of setbacks due to controversy surrounding legislation corresponding to the measure.

A bill that would bring the measures into force was delayed multiple times in the French National Assembly, with debate on the legislation having been postponed twice due to issues raised by sceptical representatives.

This intense controversy was only heightened after an interview emerged earlier in the week describing President Emmanuel Macron as saying that he wished to “piss off” unvaccinated people in France.

“Me, I’m not for pissing off the French,” the president reportedly said. “But as for the unvaccinated, I really want to piss them off.”

Macron went on to describe how the government wanted to “up pressure” on the unjabbed in the country by limiting their social activities, lambasting the “the immense moral fault of antivax”.

“When [the individual’s] freedom threatens the freedom of others, [the individual is] irresponsible,” Macron said, asserting that “An irresponsible person is no longer a citizen”.

Despite this controversy, however, the bill eventually passed in the assembly with a comfortable margin of 214 to 93, with just 27 abstaining from the vote.

The legislation surrounding the vaccination pass is to be debated by the French Senate this coming Monday.

1641800938491.png
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Nearly 700 Days Into ‘2 Weeks to Flatten the Curve’ and the Only Thing That’s Reduced Is Your Freedom

by Matt Agorist
January 9, 2022
in Opinions

Nearly 700 Days Into '2 Weeks to Flatten the Curve' and the Only Thing That's Reduced Is Your Freedom


Editor’s Note: At first glance, the headline will likely strike many of our readers as, “duh.” Generally those who read our articles or listen to our shows are extremely well aware of the draconian nature of practically all decisions being made about Covid in the United States and around the world. I chose to publish it anyway after reading it because I realized something. We all know the overarching issues, but Matt’s article breaks it down concisely into separate components of the same master plan. In short, this is well worth the read even if only as a reminder of the various angles from which we’re being attacked.
On March 16, 2020, the Trump administration released a 15-day plan to slow the spread of the coronavirus in the US. That was 663 days ago. We are now nearly two years, 2 presidents, 6 trillion dollars, and countless stolen rights into slowing the spread.

Over the last two years, one of the largest power grabs in the history of the world has taken place as fearful citizens willingly surrendered their rights to the state for the promise of safety. But that safety never came and it never will.

What did come, however, was a slew of arbitrary and often ridiculous mandates and decrees from politicians who think that government force can stop a pandemic. Despite the economically devastating draconian lockdowns that killed countless small businesses, vaccine passports, and mask mandates, COVID-19 returned — with a vengeance.

One of the most heavily vaccinated places on the planet, with the strictest vaccine mandates in the country, New York City, accounted for nearly 10% of all cases in the U.S. But that is not all. Even as states across the country continue to close schools, force citizens to wear masks and fire people for refusing the jab, the U.S. set a record for the highest daily case count in the entire world — at 1 million.

As TFTP has reported, we predicted this. Several studies have shown that the lockdowns were not effective at stopping the virus. In June, we reported on the study from the National Bureau of Economic Research which analyzed data from 44 countries and all 50 states. The study from the NBER found that these restrictions not only failed to save lives, and greatly exacerbated the destruction of the working class — but have in fact resulted in an increase of excess mortality. At the end of the day, they cost more lives than they saved.

Also in June, TFTP covered the findings of an MIT scientist who reported a data analysis of the economic impact of the lockdown — noting that whilst it played a key contributing role to the sharp rise of unemployment, it did not make a significant reduction in deaths.

And on June 22, a Harvard University study reiterated the fact that while this policy did not save lives it decimated the economy; while modern robber barons such as Zuckerberg, Gates, and Bezos saw their portfolios expand exponentially.

This was yet another report, as TFTP’s Don Via Jr. pointed out, that much like the aforementioned, did not receive national headlines from the corporate media.

While many folks, including those in government, have begun to open their eyes to the data and realize that locking people in their homes, shutting down society, and forcibly medicating people against their will does not stop Covid, others are still pressing on.

Despite experts, world wide, weighing in on the harms of school closures and masking children, bureaucrats across the country are beating that dead horse.

Countries across Europe, with the highest vaccination rates in the world, are now going into yet another round of lockdowns as cases hit record numbers.

The floundering bureaucracy is seemingly unconcerned with actual science and continues to implement policies which have had no effect on slowing the virus: masks, jabs, and lockdowns.

Now, after their policies have failed, they need someone to blame. Predictably, they have ramped up the scapegoating of the unvaccinated. The virus is spreading, were are told, including widely throughout the vaccinated population, because of the unvaccinated — who are now dirty “non-citizens.”

On Tuesday, French President Macron gave an interview to the La Parisien, in which he dehumanized the unvaccinated and urged other citizens to hate them, likening them to their “worst enemies.”

“I am not about pissing off the French people,” Macron told the readers of Le Parisien. “But as for the non-vaccinated, I really want to piss them off. And we will continue to do this, to the end. This is the strategy.”

He declared that “worst enemies” of “democracy” are “lies and stupidity,” then declared that his government is “putting pressure on the unvaccinated by limiting, as much as possible, their access to activities in social life.”

Canadian PM Trudeau followed suit the following day and told the citizens of Canada that they need to be “angry” at the unvaccinated for spreading covid, using his pulpit to dehumanize and threaten people for their personal medical choices.

Not wanting to be left out, President Biden also spoke up, once again falsely claiming that we are in a pandemic of the unvaccinated and telling vaccinated people that there is nothing to worry about — despite the recent surge in hospitalizations among the vaccinated population. But then again, it is likely the fault of the people who didn’t take the shot.

“You can still get COVID, but it’s highly unlikely that you’ll become seriously ill,’’ Biden said. “If you’re vaccinated and boosted, you are highly protected. Be concerned about omicron, but don’t be alarmed. And if you’re unvaccinated, you have some reasons to be alarmed. You’ll experience severe illness in many cases.’’

Biden then went on to encourage children to stay away from the unvaccinated, further stoking hatred, fear, and divide.

This mass dehumanization by the establishment against people for their personal medical choices cannot be ignored or understated. This is the type of rhetoric that always lead to a two-tiered society in which the dehumanized sect suffers immensely under the authoritarians. Indeed, this mass suffering has already begun in many parts of the world.

This is why anti-lockdown protesters have taken to the streets across the planet to protest the lockdown tyrants. And how do the lockdown tyrants respond?

They impose more restrictions. Clearly we can no longer rely on them to make decisions which benefit freedom and liberty.

It is time Americans and the rest of the world realize that freedom is not some commodity to be traded in exchange for our obedience. Freedom, true freedom, is inalienable. It’s time we act that way.

Image by Pete Linforth from Pixabay. Article cross-posted from The Free Thought Project.
 

Hi-D

Membership Revoked

Cacheman

Ultra MAGA!
Kyle Becker


@kylenabecker
·
50m

So, if I've got this right, we are finally being "allowed" to discuss the flawed "Covid-related deaths" data the CDC fed us for two years to drive up hysteria over a pandemic with a 99.7% survival rate (w/ inflated numbers) because it's now... making Biden look bad? Seems legit.





CDC Finally Admits 75 Percent of COVID Deaths Happen in Patients "With at least Four or More Comorbidities" - The Last Refuge


2 minutes


This issue has always been at the heart of the internal data that was never turned over for review. For two years people have wanted to know the distinction and general health position of the people who were categorized as dying from COVID. What was their previous health status?

For reasons that can only be reconciled by admitting it was purposeful to their objectives, the CDC never released any information showing the background health status of those who were categorized as dying from COVID. However, recently the CDC said they were going to assemble those various subsets of key data for the public.

On January 7th, only being discussed today, CDC Director Rochelle Walensky made the admission on a CBS morning broadcast that 75% of those who are classified as dying from COVID had at least four underlying pre-conditions: “over 75 percent had at least four comorbidities, so really these are people who were unwell to begin with”… WATCH:


.
Meanwhile, this same institution is pushing another set of booster jabs upon healthy people with no preconditions. Madness !

Obviously, all of these recent admissions are because the politics of COVID has become a liability to the same people who were exploiting it. The reality of COVID is now harder to hide… the narrative must adapt accordingly.
 

Pinecone

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Why the hell is the US government funding bio-labs in questionable countries! This is one . . . ahem, theory. Because we KNOW we can trust the science (scientists). Sigh.


This U.S.-Backed Lab Is Meant to Keep Talented Kazakh Scientists From Making Biological Weapons
The unassumingly-named Central Reference Laboratory is slotted to open in 2015 and will securely store and study highest risk diseases

Rachel Nuwer

Rachel Nuwer
September 25, 2013
Almaty, Kazakhstan, will be home to a new $102 million dollar biosecurity lab.
Almaty, Kazakhstan, will be home to a new $102 million dollar biosecurity lab. ru:Участник:Rock

The U.S. is investing in a $102 million dollar biosecurity lab to study some of the most deadly pathogens that could potentially by used in bioterrorism attacks. Rather than locating the new facility in Washington, D.C., or some secure tract of land in Nevada, however, the lab will be built near Almaty, a Soviet-era outpost in Kazakhstan, National Geographic reports.

The unassumingly-named Central Reference Laboratory is slotted to open in 2015 and will securely store and study highest risk diseases such as plague, anthrax and cholera. Having contained samples of those pathogens readily available will speed the process of diagnosing and treating potential outbreaks, NatGeo writes.

The U.S. also hopes the facility will get scientists in that region of the world off the streets, so to speak. Giving gainful employment to talented researchers in the region may make them less likely to sell their services to groups who want to create biological weapons, a source form the United States Defense Threat Reduction Agency told NatGeo.

The Agency has just under two dozen offices and facilities scattered around the world to keep an eye out for would-be biological weapons, including in Georgia (the Caucasus rather than deep South one), Armenia, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, Azerbaijan and Russia. Before the USSR broke up, the Soviets were known to have weaponized plague and were tinkering with other potential biological weapons, though what became of those deadly cultures remains unclear.

As such, biological weapons expert Raymond Zilinskas told NatGeo, “There’s a real biosecurity threat in countries of the former Soviet Union, and the Russian government is remarkably uncooperative in this area.”
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Scientific Study — Vaccine causes changes to menstrual cycles…
Posted by Kane on January 10, 2022 2:29 pm

1641852517165.png


OBGYN STUDY

The analysis found vaccinated women experienced a slight change in the length of their menstrual cycle as compared with those who were unvaccinated.

The study, published in the Obstetrics and Gynecology journal, examined 4,000 people — vaccinated and unvaccinated — data that individuals entered through an app called Natural Cycles.

Continue reading…

1641852594125.png

1641852630365.png
1641852660167.png

1641852698482.png

NPR glossed it over…
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

LAWRENCE SELLIN: U.S. University Laboratories have Opened Their Doors to China’s Military and No One in the U.S. Government is Challenging It

By Joe Hoft
Published January 10, 2022 at 8:15am
georgia-state-university-gsu.jpg

Georgia State University
Guest post by Lawrence Sellin


Georgia State University is now a de facto research outpost for China’s military

Do U.S. government and U.S. university officials have a death wish for the America people?

Lanying Du has an extensive, over 15-year history of collaborative research with scientists from China’s People’s Liberation Army and was a key figure in the experiments on coronaviruses leading up to the creation of COVID-19.

Lanying Du is now fully funded by Anthony Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and a faculty member at the Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Georgia State University, which houses one of the country’s few high containment Biosafety Level-4 laboratories for experiments using the world’s most deadly viruses.

doctors-china-ga.jpg


Lanying Du is the widow of Yusen Zhou from the People’s Liberation Army’s State Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity in Beijing, who was a long-time coronavirus research collaborator with Shibo Jiang.

Shibo Jiang brought Lanying Du to the United States, acted as her mentor and eventually turned over leadership of his Lindsley F. Kimball Research Institute laboratory to her.

Shibo Jiang’s connections with China’s People’s Liberation Army have been exhaustively detailed in Gateway Pundit articles, here, here and here.

Briefly, Shibo Jiang obtained his MS and MD degrees from the People’s Liberation Army’s First Military Medical University and the Fourth Military Medical University, respectively.

During his over 20 years working in the United States, Shibo Jiang developed an extensive network of collaborative research with other U.S. virus research laboratories and received more than $17 million in U.S. research grants, the vast majority coming from Anthony Fauci’s NIAID.

During that entire period, Shibo Jiang actively collaborated with People’s Liberation Army laboratories, while simultaneously inviting into his U.S. laboratory and training scientists linked to the Chinese military.

The 2016 scientific article shown below, clearly illustrates Lanying Du’s links to Shibo Jiang, Yusen Zhou and other scientists from the People’s Liberation Army’s State Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity in Beijing, in particular, Wanbo Tai.

China-Military-involved-in-Covid.jpg


It also demonstrates the U.S. institutional links to China’s military, namely, the Lindsley F. Kimball Research Institute in New York, the University of Minnesota and the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston, which is the home of the Department of Defense-funded Center for Biodefense and Emerging Infectious Diseases, housing another Biosafety Level-4 high containment facility for research on dangerous viruses.

Chinese military infiltration of the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston is described in Gateway Pundit articles here, here and here.

Even as recently as November 19, 2021, Lanying Du of Georgia State University continued her research collaboration with Wanbo Tai, who has been an employee of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s Academy of Military Medical Sciences.

China-military-and-Georgia-State-involved-in-Covid.jpg


Lanying Du may not be the only China-trained scientist at Georgia State University with links to China’s military.

Huang Zhen, a tenured professor at Georgia State University (2004-2020), was selected by the Chinese Communist Party to be a member of China’s Thousand Talents Program. He is currently employed by Sichuan University in China and is the chief scientist of Sichuan Junke Life Science Group Co., Ltd., which has published links to the Chinese military.

Georgia-Statae-University-professors.jpg


Like Lanying Du, Baozhong Wang was trained in China and is now a faculty member at the Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Georgia State University.

Because Chinese scientists working in the United States often hide their affiliations with China’s military, it is unclear if the Chao Wang and Yuan Luo, who worked in Baozhong Wang’s laboratory, are those employed by the People’s Liberation Army’s State Key Laboratory of Toxicology and Medical Countermeasures, Academy of Military Medical Sciences in Beijing.

What is clear, however, is that U.S. university laboratories have opened their doors to China’s military and no one in the U.S. government is challenging it.

(hat tips to @DrLiMengYAN1, @dawniscoming22 and @dezying)
Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. is retired U.S. Army Reserve colonel and a veteran of Afghanistan and Iraq. He had a civilian career in international business and medical research. His email address is lawrence.sellin@gmail.com.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Whites Need Not Apply: Biden Regime COVID Policy Prioritizes Race in Administering COVID Drugs

By Jim Hoft
Published January 10, 2022 at 7:29am

As The Gateway Pundit previously reported medical professionals across the country have discriminated against white patients for COVID monoclonal antibody treatments.

This isn’t by accident, this is the policy of the Biden regime — to discriminate against COVID patients due to their race or ethnicity.

It’s not supposed to work that way in America – but here we are.

FOX News reported:
Guidance issued by the Biden administration states certain individuals may be considered “high risk” and more quickly qualify for monoclonal antibodies and oral antivirals used to treat COVID-19 based on their “race or ethnicity.”

In a fact sheet issued for healthcare providers by the Food and Drug Administration, the federal agency approved emergency use authorizations of sotrovimab – a monoclonal antibody proven to be effective against the Omicron variant – only to patients considered “high risk.”
The guidance, updated in December 2021, says “medical conditions or factors” such as “race or ethnicity” have the potential to “place individual patients at high risk for progression to severe COVID-19,” adding that the “authorization of sotrovimab under the EUA is not limited to” other factors outlined by the agency.

Older age, obesity, pregnancy, chronic kidney disease, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease are among the multiple medical conditions and factors associated with what are considered “high risk” individuals by the FDA.

Some states, including New York and Utah, have made it clear they will prioritize certain racial minorities over other high-risk patients when it comes to the distribution of particular COVID treatments.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Dr. Robert Malone Fires Off Warning Shot on The War Room: Latest Disease Spreading Across China an “Ebola-Like Hemorrhagic Fever Virus” (VIDEO)

By Jim Hoft
Published January 10, 2022 at 10:47am
malone-war-room.jpg

Dr. Robert Malone joined Steve Bannon on The War Room to discuss the latest viral outbreak in China. The communist regime is hiding the nature and spread of this latest disease.

This has many experts worried including Dr. Malone who is the inventor of the mRNA vaccines. Dr. Malone today told the War Room audience that he is hearing the current disease that is spreading across China is reportedly an “Ebola-like hemorrhagic fever virus.” The regime is hiding the true nature of this disease from the public and from the global community — Just like last time!
Today there are 5.5 million people dead (and counting) from the last China pandemic.

Now we could be talking about an “Ebola-like hemorrhagic fever virus.”

Dr. Malone:
“They are using language that this is a hemorrhagic fever virus. If that’s the case then it would be very odd that this would be something caused by the Coronavirus. That terminology is usually used for viruses in the family of Ebola. So this is something that many people have feared is the development of a rapidly spreading Ebola-like hemorrhagic fever virus. But we have not knowledge of whether that is going on here or not.”

Via The War Room:

Dr. Robert Malone: Latest Disease Spreading Across China an "Ebola-Like Hemorrhagic Fever Virus" 5:38 min

Dr. Robert Malone: Latest Disease Spreading Across China an "Ebola-Like Hemorrhagic Fever Virus"
The Gateway Pundit Published January 10, 2022
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Important Omicron/COVID Research
The preprint landscape, January 10, 2022
Robert W Malone MD, MS
Jan 10
A number of significant preprint articles came out recently with good scientific design and important conclusions. Below are a few:

Protection afforded by prior infection against SARS-CoV-2 reinfection with the Omicron variant
medRxiv Jan 6, 2022

BACKGROUND Natural SARS-CoV-2 infection elicits strong protection against reinfection with the Alpha (B.1.1.7), Beta (B.1.351), and Delta (B.1.617.2) variants. However, the Omicron (B.1.1.529) variant harbors multiple mutations that can mediate immune evasion. We estimated effectiveness of prior infection in preventing reinfection (PES) with Omicron and other SARS-CoV-2 variants in Qatar.

HIGHLIGHTS
  • Protection afforded by prior infection in preventing symptomatic reinfection with Alpha, Beta, or Delta is robust, at about 90%.
  • While such protection against reinfection with Omicron is lower, it is still considerable at nearly 60%.
  • Prior-infection protection against hospitalization or death at reinfection appears robust, regardless of variant.
Although this study is not a head to head comparison of natural immunity versus vaccine induced immunity, it does suggest that protection afforded by natural infection is superior to vaccine induced immunity.

Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against Omicron or Delta infection medRxiv Jan 1, 2022 doi: Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against Omicron or Delta infection

Methods Applying the test-negative design to linked provincial data, we estimated vaccine effectiveness against infection (irrespective of symptoms or severity) caused by Omicron or Delta between November 22 and December 19, 2021. We included individuals who had received at least 2 COVID-19 vaccine doses (with at least 1 mRNA vaccine dose for the primary series) and used multivariable logistic regression to estimate the effectiveness of two or three doses by time since the latest dose.

(The study included 3,442 Omicron-positive cases, 9,201 Delta-positive cases, and 471,545 test-negative controls).

HIGHLIGHTS:
  • In contrast, receipt of 2 doses of COVID-19 vaccines was not protective against Omicron.
  • Vaccine effectiveness against Omicron was 37% (95%CI, 19-50%) ≥7 days after receiving an mRNA vaccine for the third dose.
Updated projections for COVID-19 omicron wave in Florida. medRxiv Jan 6, 2022 doi:
https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.06.22268849

Abstract
In this report, the authors use a detailed simulation model to assess and project the COVID-19 epidemic in Florida. The model is a data-driven, stochastic, discrete-time, agent based model with an explicit representation of people and places.
Highlights:

  • Using the model, the authors find that the omicron variant wave in Florida is likely to cause many more infections than occurred during the delta variant wave.
  • Due to testing limitations and often mild symptoms, it is anticipated that omicron infections will be underreported compared to delta.
  • They project that reported cases of COVID-19 will continue to grow significantly and peak in early January 2022
  • That the number of reported COVID-19 deaths due to omicron may be 1/3 of the total caused by the delta wave.
Lifestyle changes during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic impact metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease. Liver International. 07 January 2022 (peer reviewed)
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic precipitated lifestyle changes. The authors aimed to clarify whether COVID-19–induced lifestyle changes affected the development of metabolic dysfunction–associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD).

Metabolic associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) affects 20-30% of the worldwide population and is becoming the most common cause of chronic liver disease, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MAFLD is the hepatic expression of metabolic dysfunction correlated with a variety of metabolic comorbidities including obesity, dyslipidemia, hypertension and type 2 diabetes (T2DM).:

Methods
This retrospective longitudinal study included 973 participants who underwent health checkups between 2018 and 2020. Participants’ clinical characteristics and lifestyle habits were investigated. Independent lifestyle predictors of MAFLD development before the pandemic (2018–2019) and during the pandemic (2019–2020) were identified using logistic regression analysis.

Results
  • In 2018, 261 (27%) patients were diagnosed with MAFLD. Before the pandemic, 22 patients developed new MAFLD. During this time,
  • Routine late-night meals were identified as an independent lifestyle predictor of MAFLD development (hazard ratio
    2.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02–6.36,

    P=0.046). In contrast, 44 patients developed new MAFLD during the pandemic.
    [*]During this time, higher daily alcohol intake was identified as an independent lifestyle predictor of MAFLD development (HR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01–1.05, P=0.008).
    [*]In participants aged <60 years, daily alcohol intake and the proportion of participants who ate 2 times/day were significantly higher in patients who developed MAFLD during the pandemic than in those who did not.


Conclusions
New MAFLD diagnoses increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. Changes in lifestyle factors, particularly in those aged <60 years, must be monitored and addressed as the pandemic continues.
Basically, this study suggests that people are eating and drinking more - leading to unhealthy lifestyle changes. What was not answered was whether this was due to remote employment, lock downs, stress or some other cause.

The risk between morbid obesity and severe COVID-19 outcomes is real. More public education and research is needed in this topic area.

Other interesting news items on the web:

The Wall Street Journal has an excellent opinion piece, written by my good friends Dr. Luc Montagnier and Jed Rubenfeld

Omicron Makes Biden’s Vaccine Mandates Obsolete
There is no evidence so far that vaccines are reducing infections from the fast-spreading variant.

1641856392963.png


Jan. 9, 2022 5:20 pm (Illustration: David Gothard)











 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
eugyppius: a plague chronicle (Germany)

Are the vaccines doomed, or are we?
eugyppius
Jan 10
In Germany, in the period from 6 December to 2 January (Table 5 on p. 25), double (but not triple) vaccinated teenagers and adults were substantially over-represented in Omicron infections across Germany.

About 45% of teenagers aged 12–17 are vaccinated but unboosted, but they accounted for almost 55% of symptomatic Omicron cases. Only 37% of adults aged 18–59 are vaccinated but unboosted, but they accounted for 66% of symptomatic Omicron cases. Finally, a mere 21.8% of adults aged 60 or over are vaccinated but unboosted, but they accounted for 46% of Omicron cases.

Yes, these data might be called “unadjusted.” You might hope that population density, or differences in treatment-seeking behaviour, or relative risk perception – anything but properties inherent to the vaccines – can explain them away. But Germany is not alone in these numbers; preliminary evidence for negative vaccine efficacy against Omicron every day grows more abundant. There was also evidence of negative efficacy against Delta; the effect was merely pronounced and took longer to emerge. Omicron, which has immune escape properties, simply gets further into negative efficacy, faster.

It seems clear the problem is related to vaccine fade. The older double-vaccinated, whose vaccinations happened earliest of all, are experiencing worse negative efficacy than the younger double-vaccinated, whose vaccinations are much more recent. Of 797 Omicron cases in children aged 5 to 11, only two are in the (disgracefully) double vaccinated. These are very recent vaccinations indeed. For the moment, the boosted are doing very well against Omicron, but I doubt anybody believes that will last. In all likelihood, the third dose will fade just like the first two, and then negative efficacy will come back.

On balance, this strikes me as a bad thing, and urgently worthy of investigation. It throws the entire doctrine of maximum vaccination into confusion. Against the advantage of substantial protection against severe outcome, must be weighed the substantial disadvantage of indefinitely heightened transmission, which can only be mitigated temporarily by vaccinating the whole population all over again. In a rational world, this phenomenon would be met (at the very least) with a halt in most or all vaccinations, but that is very far from the world we inhabit.

Omicron is a much milder variant, it is true. Official sources now widely acknowledge this property, although it is not terrifying, and so not discussed as eagerly as the alleged greater virulence of Alpha or Beta or Delta. Nevertheless, even mild viruses can cause serious disruptions if everyone gets them at once, and the possibility that we may have condemned large segments of our population to suffer repeated reinfection or accept quarterly vaccination is disturbing.

For this and other reasons, I think the vaccines are doomed and will probably be discredited in even in the medium term. My learned friend @Astuages, however, disagrees, and it’s worth considering his perspective (here reformatted and lightly edited):
… I am not, by nature, an optimist about the right side being rewarded in the end. … To begin with, the media discussion landscape for vaccination was already poisoned by the autism debate, and the vast majority of people are simply never going to grasp the idea that there is any difference between an mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and the smallpox vaccine.

There are (at least) two counterfactual assumptions that justify vaccine approval for low-risk groups, and even mandates. They are important counterfactuals because the FDA/CDC has used them to justify their decisions to date:

1) The vaccine is sterilizing.
2) The vaccine provides long-term protection from disease (either total protection from infection or amelioration of symptoms).

If either of these are true, then the vaccine can be justified on either public health grounds (get rid of the virus) or personal risk grounds.

Counterfactual 1, sterilization: Of course the vaccine is non-sterilizing. In fact, the negative efficacy for omicron should be causing people to freak out. Vaccine amplified infection is pandemic scifi level bad. Vax negative efficacy for omicron means that over the next few years there is the very high probability of even more vaccine-amplified variants. There is the possibility (how high I can’t guess) that some of these will be severe instead of mild. Maybe they’ll kill the vaccinated and be a win for anti-vax. But maybe they’ll kill the unvaccinated and be a win for pro-vax, even though it’s actually the fault of the pro-vax side. It’s even possible that omicron itself could be like this. Very early days.

Counterfactual 2: Long-term protection: If the vaccine really protected you forever from covid, it makes a lot of sense for many groups, even lowish risk groups. It still wouldn’t make sense for healthy kids, but it might be the sort of thing that your doctor recommends when you turn 30. But in the real world scenario where the vaccine does not protect you for very long, it begins to make negative sense from a personal risk standpoint.

That is, should someone who is 45 and obese—at small, but non-trivial risk of death from covid—get vaccinated now for x number of years of protection? Maybe infinite boosters work out over the next decade and he’s okay.

Maybe there are no more vaccine-amplified variants.

More likely, things aren’t quite that perfect, and he gets covid when he’s 55 and dies because he didn’t get the wild-type infection that would have granted him more protection when he was younger and safer from it. Basically, even apart from side effects, these vaccines, under what we now know to be true, only make sense for a much smaller, higher-risk, group of people than initially thought. Unfortunately, there is no process for the FDA/CDC—or the media—to revisit those basic counterfactuals. They can stay wrong forever, and Pfizer will be happy to rake in the cash.

But what about side effects? The myocarditis side effect is enough to demonstrate that we shouldn’t be vaxxing under-40s under the realistic scenario (the one where we already know we shouldn’t be vaxxing them) but not enough under the counterfactual scenario FDA/CDC operates under.

The problem for “anti-vax” is that the rate of hospitalization and death remains minuscule. I personally think these myocarditis side effects are legitimately scary in an infinite booster scenario given how risk jumps on the 3rd shot. But that’s just not the scenario that FDA (or Pfizer, lol) is evaluating it by. They are still operating under their two counterfactuals. And they will continue to do so, and they will get plenty of media cover.

If anybody thinks the side effects are enough to cause a serious re-evaluation of vaccine policy all on their own: there is not nearly enough hospitalization and death yet. I’ve watched all-cause mortality graphs like a hawk looking for it. There are some minuscule signals. But nothing that can’t be easily ignored. For real public attention, we’ll need orders of magnitude (at least 2, but possibly 3) more vaccine injuries than we’ve currently got or likely to get. Maybe in 10 years, if there’s enough booster uptake and injuries because too much to ignore (but don’t bet against the power of wilful ignorance), we may see a serious re-evaluation of vaccine injury.

Anti-mandate political positioning sidesteps the entire medical muck, and I suspect that it is where the savvy politicians will gravitate. People may not be able to tell the difference between an mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and a smallpox vaccine, but they don’t like being mandated. They don’t like their children being mandated. And really don’t like being fired. The FDA and drug companies don’t evaluate personal freedom.'

But most normal people do. Personal autonomy in medical decisions is a vital freedom. Pfizer can release whatever poison they want, as long as people have the personal freedom not to take it (for themselves and their families), and as long as they have the speech freedom to criticize Pfizer about it. Take away those freedoms, and even if it’s some sort of magical healing elixir (lol, right), a lot of people get upset. Or at least I do.
These are very good reasons to doubt that vaccine side effects, whether at the individual or the population level, can bring the vaccination regime down by themselves. Establishment propaganda has successfully defended these oversold and misused products in the eyes of millions of people.

It is, however, hard for me to see how this can last. To begin with, there is the old point of mine, that propaganda is expensive.

Setting up and promoting dishonest worldwide messaging campaigns costs a lot of money, energy and attention. These are resources that can’t be spent on other things. The more obvious the lies become, the more expensive it will get to maintain them. I am not sure how long our governments, our public health establishments, and our pharmaceuticals can remain committed to this project, or how long they will even remain that interested in it.

Corona is constantly threatening to become unimportant, and when that happens, who will even care about maintaining this entire rotten morass? If Pfizer’s profits are all that matter, the government can just give them money, or buy vaccine doses and fire them off into space, in case the aliens want them.

The vaccines have also benefited, over the past year, from enormous bureaucratic and public enthusiasm, not all of it seeded from on high. It feels bizarre to type this, but lockdowns enjoyed much the same dynamic at first. They very quickly burnt through most of their public support, as everyone but a few crazy people realised that house arrest wasn’t very much fun. In the northern hemisphere they are now consigned to the dustbin and studiously ignored almost everywhere. The vaccines must follow the same trajectory. For most people, who suffer only mild side effects, they cost far less than lockdowns, but there is the constant, exhausting rhetoric; the near-daily rule changes; the disquieting prospect of infinite boosters; and, in places like Germany, the constant postponement of a return to normal life, regardless of how many people are vaccinated, or boostered, or infected.

Every day that Corona does not go away in heavily vaccinated populations, is a day that the vaccines are further discredited. As the absurdities continue, the risk emerges that our mRNA vaccines will begin to pollute in the minds of many the broader notion of vaccination, and there are powerful people who don’t want that to happen – people with political power, who are not just internet crazies like me.

It is hard to predict the future, and what follows will probably turn out to be substantially wrong. Nevertheless, this is my best guess about what will come: Omicron is a bad cold, and it appears to infect the vaccinated preferentially. This will make it harder for the vaccinators to maintain their fear campaign, without which eternal boosting will prove possible. With each further dose, enthusiasm for the entire project of mass vaccination will wane, as will tolerance for maintaining the rest of the pandemic circus. A lot of incentives will align for people in charge to wind down the containment regime over the course of the coming months. It won’t happen evenly everywhere, but by 2023, I think this will be over most everywhere. Some kind of green pass system will linger in the Eurozone, at least for travel; vestigial masking rules might continue in some countries for a very long time, but they will gradually be made less onerous and everyone will lose interest in enforcing them. The vaccinators will come out with updated vaccines, and these will be urged on the population, but no longer overtly mandated. Nobody will want to talk about this period of vaccination hysteria for a very long time, perhaps not until I am an old man. Nobody will allow us to be right for a few decades, but everyone will know that we were.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
Mass Formation: Deployed on You After Over 200 Years of Study
Junior academics cited by "Forbes", AP, Reuters and "The Independent" have not done their homework

Robert Malone MD, MS Jan 10

Today in “factchecking the factcheckers”, junior academics cited by Forbes, Associated Press, Reuters and The Independenthave just not done their homework concerning the work of Professor Dr. Mattias Desmet of the University of Ghent in Belgum. All I can say about this is that I hope that their naive, ignorant, grandstanding statements to the press are brought up during their future Academic Tenure and Advancement reviews.

But there has been an amazingly coordinated effort to shoot the messenger and actively character assassinate (or “defenstrate”) me as a surrogate while avoiding any reference to the highly credentialed academic Professor Dr. Mattias Desmet who actually developed the theory and has documented the extensive evidence in an upcoming academic book. So, what can we learn from this in the short term?

Clearly, Google was not the only corporation triggered by Joe Rogan podcast # 1757 which previously reached #1 podcast ranking worldwide, has been referred to as “the most important interview of our time” and has been seen by over 50 million viewers. But what absolutely has been generated by all of the coopted reactionary press and Big Tech titans metaphorically tripping over their shoelaces is a massive trove of real time data validating the brilliant Mass Formation intellectual synthesis developed by Professor Desmet over the last two years.

In this coordinated propaganda and censorship response, we can clearly see the hands of the BBC-led Trusted News Initiative, the Scientific Technological Elite, the transnational investment funds and their World Economic Forum allies which control Pfizer and most of Big Pharma, Legacy Media and Big Tech (and many national governments) acting in real time to suppress a growing awareness by the general public of having been actively manipulated using crowd psychology tools to generate clinically significant fear and anxiety of COVID-19 (otherwise known as “Coronaphobia”) to advance their agendas on a global scale. Multiple governments have now admitted to actively using fear and 'Mass Formation'-related theories as a tool for totalitarian population control during this outbreak. This is occurring at the same time that Omicron is destroying the legitimacy of government and WHO propaganda concerning the “Safe and Effective” mRNA vaccines and associated mandates.

But what confuses me is why the western press is all following the same narrative as Forbes, which is now owned by a Chinese media holding company. Is this all really just about China wanting to advance a New World Order agenda, and working in a coordinated fashion together with captured western legacy media and their transnational fund overlords?

Break out the popcorn, because we have an “approved narrative” dumpster fire in progress.
“Mass formation has been studied for over 200 years, beginning with such scholars as Gustave Le Bon, Freud, McDougal, Canetti, Hannah Arendt, etc. In the twentieth century, psychologists such as Ash and Sheriff have studied mass formation experimentally.
These scholars did not always call it “mass formation”, but what they studied was basically the same: the way in which individual’s mental states is influenced by their tendency to conform to group thinking. I myself have over 130 publications on Web of Science, a large part of them focusing on how individuals’ personality structures is influenced by their relationships with other people.
In my upcoming book: The psychology of totalitarianism, I analyze and describe the way in which the psychological process of mass formation got stronger and stronger throughout the last two centuries.”

Mattias Desmet, Professor of Clinical Psychology at Ghent University in Belgium

Please follow this link for Professor Dr. Desmet’s Prior Academic Works
Abridged from M. Desmet: “The Psychology of Totalitarianism”

Mass Formation – brief summary
• Totalitarianism requires the total obedience of the mass
• This obedience is been created via mass formation process inside the population
• Four conditions are needed:
  1. The masses must feel alone and isolated.
  2. Their lives must feel pointless and meaningless.
  3. The masses then must experience constant free floating anxiety, and
  4. They must experience free-floating frustration and aggression.
With these conditions met, people are now ripe for hypnosis.
•No matter how stupid, senseless or even harmful the “solution”, people are made to feel solidarity, which validates the whole thing for them
• They are now changed, no longer rational. This automatically excludes analyses based on mathematical approaches like Nash’s game theory, where all agents are assumed to act completely rationally.
• People who are consumed by the mass formation process become intolerant and cruel.

Development of mathematical models to describe this process are currently in progress in a collaboration between Professor Desmet and Dr. rer. nat. habil. Norbert Schwarzer. This work is building upon prior academic modeling work including the following volumes:

1641859487245.png

Part 1 of 3
 
Last edited:

marsh

On TB every waking moment
Part 2 of 3

Earlier seminal academic works regarding mass formation upon which Professor Desmet has based his theory include the following

 
Last edited:

marsh

On TB every waking moment
Part 3 of 3

A State of Fear by Laura Dodsworth
1641859979900.jpeg
A State of Fear: how the UK government weaponised fear during the Covid-19 pandemic
This is a book about fear. Fear of a virus. Fear of death. Fear of losing our jobs, our democracy, our human connections, our health and our minds. It’s also about how the government weaponised our fear against us – supposedly in our best interests – until we were the most frightened country in Europe.

Fear is the most powerful emotion. Hardwired into humans, fear is part of our evolutionary success. But that also makes it one of the most powerful tools in the behavioural psychology toolbox and it has been used to manipulate and control people during the pandemic.

In one of the most extraordinary documents ever revealed to the British public, the behavioural scientists advising the government said that a substantial number of people did not feel threatened enough by Covid-19 to follow the rules. They advised the government to increase our sense of ‘personal threat’, to scare us into submission.

But why did the government deliberately frighten us, and how has this affected us as individuals and as a country? Who is involved in the decision-making that affects our lives? How are behavioural science and nudge theory being used to subliminally manipulate us? How does the media leverage fear? What are the real risks to our wellbeing?
Ahead of any official inquiry into the handling of the Covid-19 pandemic, Laura Dodsworth explores all these questions and more, in a nuanced and thought-provoking discussion of an extraordinary year in British life and politics. With stories from members of the general public who were impacted by fear, anxiety and isolation, and revealing interviews with psychologists, politicians, scientists, lawyers, Whitehall advisers and journalists, A State of Fear calls for a more hopeful, transparent and effective democracy.
 
Last edited:

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Update: Experts Now Say ‘Deltacron’ Variant Likely Due to Lab Processing Error

By Cristina Laila
Published January 10, 2022 at 12:05pm
9EBFFABA-21DB-4C9E-BD1C-98B8DE8E490B-scaled.jpeg

Experts are now casting doubt on the new ‘Deltacron’ strain discovered by a researcher in Cyprus.

Over the weekend it was reported Leondios Kostrikis, professor of biological sciences at the University of Cyprus, has discovered a new strain of Covid that combines Omicron and Delta dubbed “Deltacron,” according to Bloomberg News.

“There are currently omicron and delta co-infections and we found this strain that is a combination of these two,” Kostrikis said in an interview with Sigma TV Friday.

Now the so-called experts are saying the ‘Deltacron’ variant is likely due to a lab error.

CNBC reported:
Global health experts are casting doubts over reports of a new possible Covid-19 mutation that appeared to be a combination of both the delta and omicron variants, dubbed as “deltacron,” saying it’s more likely that the “strain” is the result of a lab processing error.
Deltacron ‘not real’

Some experts have since cast doubt over the findings, with one World Health Organization official tweeting Sunday that “deltacron,” which was trending on the social media platform on the weekend, is “not real” and “is likely due to sequencing artifact,” a variation introduced by a nonbiological process.

WHO Covid expert Dr. Krutika Kuppalli said on Twitter that, in this case, there was likely to have been a “lab contamination of Omicron fragments in a Delta specimen.”

Other scientists have agreed that the findings could be the result of a lab error, with virologist Dr. Tom Peacock from Imperial College London also tweeting that “the Cypriot ‘Deltacron’ sequences reported by several large media outlets look to be quite clearly contamination.”

“Flurona” is likely fake too.

1641860317686.png
 
Last edited:

marsh

On TB every waking moment

‘They’re Just Ignoring Everything and Living Their Lives’ – CNN Worried People Are Tuning Out Covid Fear Porn Being Churned Out by Fake News (VIDEO)

By Cristina Laila
Published January 10, 2022 at 12:55pm
IMG_8978.jpg


CNN’s Oliver Darcy is worried that many people have moved on with their lives and no longer paying attention to the Covid fear porn being churned out by the fake news media.

CNN wants everyone living in fear, huddled at home…watching CNN.

“I think this is an issue because if people are tuning out what’s going on in cable news…the general population ..you know, they’re just, you know, ignoring everything and living their lives and we’re not really getting the information that they need to them,” Oliver Darcy said.

Oh no! How will this country survive without CNN??

VIDEO:
View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1480594054622679041
.52 min
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

New York Times Blocks Ad for “The Real Anthony Fauci” Book — Says It’s ‘Misinformation’ Because It Opposes Their Leftist Dogma (VIDEO)

By Jim Hoft
Published January 10, 2022 at 2:30pm

tony-lyons-skyhorse-publishing-war-room.jpg

Tony Lyons, the president of Skyhorse Publishing, joined Steve Bannon on The War Room on Monday morning.

Skyhorse Publishing recently purchased an ad to run in The New York Times on their massive best-seller “The Real Anthony Fauci” by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

But, The New York Times wouldn’t run their ad. They said it was misinformation. It went against their leftist orthodoxy.

The NY Times is so radical that a book by Robert F. Kennedy is now too controversial.
Tony Lyon: So I’m the publisher of The Real Anthony Fauci by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. I tried to place an ad at The New York Times. A full-page ad for the book. And they came back to me and said that their standards management people had determined that they could not place the ad because it included ‘misinformation.’ So, what we started seeing more and more is that anything is misinformation if it contradicts the narrative of The New York Times.
For the record, Skyhorse Publishing is NOT a conservative publisher.

Via The War Room:

Rumble video 7:02 min
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Shaoxing Shows Horrors of China's Zero COVID Policy
blueapples's Photo

BY BLUEAPPLES
MONDAY, JAN 10, 2022 - 13:44

Despite being the origin of SARS-COV-2, China has been able to evade inquisition into the role the CCP has played in the development of the virus itself as well as the scope of its effects on the insulated nation. The integral importance of verifiable data on everything from infections to the efficacy of vaccines and other COVID response efforts from China has been callously overlooked by global NGO's like the WHO as well as from diplomatic inquisition levied by other nation's. China's track record of offering manipulated and inaccurate statistics is nothing new, as this has been especially proven regarding by delving into the economic data it provides to the world. With that track record of dishonesty, the tacit acceptance of China's narrative on its response to COVID-19 demonstrates the illusion it has been able to cast across the world.

The emergence of videos from Shaoxing, Zheijiang Province lifts the veil on this deception. The city of nearly 5 million reveals the horrific enforcement of China's zero COVID program. Shaoxing now hosts the largest COVID quarantine facilities to have been uncovered. The camp has a reported capacity of 5,500 who would be detained. The current occupancy rate of the facility has yet to be discovered, the horrific conditions its prisoners will be subject to has.

While the extent of the development of other camps has been obfuscated by media control, scenes in Shaoxing clearly convey the accelerated development of quarantine infrastructure in China. Video evidence that has managed to emerge details additional camps, apparently in other locations, which show the horrific conditions that prisoners are subjected to.

View: https://youtu.be/T8khQKXeJuI
.26 min

The existence of quarantine camps is one of numerous instances of supposed "conspiracy theories" which has been factually proven. Even in nations like Australia, efforts to develop quarantine camps have been undertaken incontrovertably. While the difference in the conditions of Australia's facilities is clear, the authoritarian direction of its pandemic response demonstrates the extent that the continuity of those operations can lead to.

View: https://youtu.be/9bfCspuVS40
.09 min

View: https://youtu.be/pyShyLAu6RM
.14 min

Inevitably, China will tout its zero COVID policy to a global audience, acting as if it is the framework for an effective pandemic response. Without acknowledging its horrors, iterations of its authoritarian design are sure to be applied in other countries across the world. With variant after variant providing justification for new policy measures, revealing the horrors scene in Shaoxing and elsewhere in China must be done to keep government's around the world from putting heir citizens on this trajectory.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Worldwide Bayesian Causal Impact Analysis of Vaccine Administration on Deaths and Cases Associated with COVID-19: A BigData Analysis of 145 Countries
  • November 2021
DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.34214.65605
Authors:
Kyle Beattie at University of Alberta
Kyle Beattie

Preprints and early-stage research may not have been peer reviewed yet.

Download file PDF
Read file

Citations (1)
Abstract and Figures
Policy makers and mainstream news anchors have promised the public that the COVID-19 vaccine rollout worldwide would reduce symptoms, and thereby cases and deaths associated with COVID-19. While this vaccine rollout is still in progress, there is a large amount of public data available that permits an analysis of the effect of the vaccine rollout on COVID-19 related cases and deaths. Has this public policy treatment produced the desired effect? One manner to respond to this question can begin by implementing a Bayesian causal analysis comparing both pre- and post-treatment periods. This study analyzed publicly available COVID-19 data from OWID utlizing the R package CausalImpact to determine the causal effect of the administration of vaccines on two dependent variables that have been measured cumulatively throughout the pandemic: total deaths per million (y1) and total cases per million (y2). After eliminating all results from countries with p > 0.05, there were 128 countries for y1 and 103 countries for y2 to analyze in this fashion, comprising 145 unique countries in total (avg. p < 0.004). Results indicate that the treatment (vaccine administration) has a strong and statistically significant propensity to causally increase the values in either y1 or y2 over and above what would have been expected with no treatment. y1 showed an increase/decrease ratio of (+115/-13), which means 89.84% of statistically significant countries showed an increase in total deaths per million associated with COVID-19 due directly to the causal impact of treatment initiation. y2 showed an increase/decrease ratio of (+105/-16) which means 86.78% of statistically significant countries showed an increase in total cases per million of COVID-19 due directly to the causal impact of treatment initiation. Causal impacts of the treatment on y1 ranges from -19% to +19015% with an average causal impact of +463.13%. Causal impacts of the treatment on y2 ranges from -46% to +12240% with an average causal impact of +260.88%. Hypothesis 1 Null can be rejected for a large majority of countries. This study subsequently performed correlational analyses on the causal impact results, whose effect variables can be represented as y1.E and y2.E respectively, with the independent numeric variables of: days elapsed since vaccine rollout began (n1), total vaccination doses per hundred (n2), total vaccine brands/types in use (n3) and the independent categorical variables continent (c1), country (c2), vaccine variety (c3). All categorical variables showed statistically significant (avg. p: < 0.001) postive Wilcoxon signed rank values (y1.E V:[c1 3.04; c2: 8.35; c3: 7.22] and y2.E V:[c1 3.04; c2: 8.33; c3: 7.19]). This demonstrates that the distribution of y1.E and y2.E was non-uniform among categories. The Spearman correlation between n2 and y2.E was the only numerical variable that showed statistically significant results (y2.E ~ n2: rho: 0.34 CI95%[0.14, 0.51], p: 4.91e-04). This low positive correlation signifies that countries with higher vaccination rates do not have lower values for y2.E, slightly the opposite in fact. Still, the specifics of the reasons behind these differences between countries, continents, and vaccine types is inconclusive and should be studied further as more data become available. Hypothesis 2 Null can be rejected for c1, c2, c3 and n2 and cannot be rejected for n1, and n3. The statistically significant and overwhelmingly positive causal impact after vaccine deployment on the dependent variables total deaths and total cases per million should be highly worrisome for policy makers. They indicate a marked increase in both COVID-19 related cases and death due directly to a vaccine deployment that was originally sold to the public as the “key to gain back our freedoms.” The effect of vaccines on total cases per million and its low positive association with total vaccinations per hundred signifies a limited impact of vaccines on lowering COVID-19 associated cases. These results should encourage local policy makers to make policy decisions based on data, not narrative, and based on local conditions, not global or national mandates. These results should also encourage policy makers to begin looking for other avenues out of the pandemic aside from mass vaccination campaigns. Some variables that could be included in future analyses might include vaccine lot by country, the degree of prevalence of previous antibodies against SARS-CoV or SARS-CoV-2 in the population before vaccine administration begins, and the Causal Impact of ivermectin on the same variables used in this study.

(See link for the rest) (PDF) Worldwide Bayesian Causal Impact Analysis of Vaccine Administration on Deaths and Cases Associated with COVID-19: A BigData Analysis of 145 Countries
 
Top