CORONA Main Coronavirus thread

Valann

Contributing Member
"After several people had apparent allergic reactions at one California clinic, state health officials on Sunday told providers across the state to pause administering doses from one COVID-19 vaccine lot that arrived from Moderna."

 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6IPEtys8D1w
6:16 min

Thousands of Internal Documents Disclose CCP’s Pandemic Cover-up | Epoch News | China Insider
•Premiered 73 minutes ago


The Epoch Time

Many people may think that the COVID-19 outbreak in mainland China is not serious. However, the thousands of leaked documents suggest that this may not be the case. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has spared no expense to control all public opinion about the outbreak.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
Study shows extremely low rate of coronavirus transmission in school, 0% from child to adult

by Andrew Mark Miller, Social Media Producer |
| January 16, 2021 03:55 PM

A study of almost a dozen North Carolina school districts found an “extremely limited” rate of coronavirus transmission and no transmission from children to adults.

The study, conducted over a nine-week period, tracked 100,000 people across 11 school districts and found that only 32 coronavirus cases were acquired at school, and none of those instances involved child-to-adult transmission, according to ABC 11 News Raleigh-Durham.

“Over 9 weeks, 11 participating school districts had more than 90,000 students and staff attend school in-person; of these, there were 773 community-acquired SARS-CoV-2 infections documented by molecular testing,” the study’s abstract reads. “Through contact tracing, NC health department staff determined an additional 32 infections were acquired within schools. No instances of child-to-adult transmission of SARS-CoV-2 were reported within schools.”

The study focused primarily on hybrid instruction, which combines in-person and remote learning, and took place between Aug. 15 and Oct. 23.

"As the community rates took off, their plans and procedures were in place, and they toed the line. And the differences were really outstanding, and in fact, the worse things get in the community, paradoxically, the greater the advantage to be in a high compliance area like a school," Dr. Daniel Benjamin, a Duke School of Medicine professor of pediatrics and the lead author of the report, said about the results crediting the schools’ adherence to social distancing policies.

Last year, a German study concluded that children do not play a major role in spreading the coronavirus in schools and may even serve as a “brake” on the disease.

A study in Scotland published in September came to a similar conclusion and suggested that individuals who spent significant amounts of time around children were less likely to contract the coronavirus.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w7_Xr81lTiw
17:01 min
235 - COVID-19 and Senior Housing
•Jan 19, 2021


Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

There are more than two million federally-subsidized apartments, units, and homes designated for senior housing. These communities, which tend to serve lower-income racial and ethnic minorities, have unique opportunities and challenges compared to assisted living and nursing care facilities and have been largely overlooked in the COVID-19 response. Juliana Bilowich, director of Housing Operations and Policy at Leading Age, and Shanna Dell, the lead infection control adviser on the outbreak team of the Baltimore City Health Department talk with Dr. Josh Sharfstein about these challenges and about a new, free course available on Coursera developed to help assisted living facilities to keep their residents safe
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Now That Universal Basic Income Checks Have Started, The American People Will Go Mad If They Don't Continue

TUESDAY, JAN 19, 2021 - 15:15
Authored by Michael Snyder via The Economic Collapse blog,

We crossed a line that should have never been crossed when we sent “stimulus payments” directly to the American people during the very early stages of the COVID pandemic. Even many Republicans that supported the measure acknowledged that what they were doing was pure socialism, but they defended the payments by insisting that we were in the middle of a major national emergency. At the time, I warned that once the government started issuing such checks, the American people would always keep demanding more. When it was announced that the latest round of “stimulus payments” would only be $600 per person, angry activists vandalized Nancy Pelosi’s house. Of course they got Mitch McConnell’s house too. In both cases, the vandals made it exceedingly clear that they wanted more government money.

Sadly, it wasn’t just a handful of activists that went ballistic. Literally millions of enraged Americans posted angry messages on social media that expressed how “insulting” the $600 figure was.


But prior to this pandemic, the U.S. government had never sent out “universal basic income” checks in the entire history of our country.

So you would think that most people should be grateful for an extra $600, but instead there was a tremendous amount of rage.

President Trump wanted the payments raised to $2000 and many Democrats did as well. But Republicans still had control of the Senate, and Mitch McConnell initially blocked that effort.

But now Democrats will shortly have control of the White House, the Senate and the House of Representatives, and one of the first things they plan to do is to deliver $2,000 checks to the American people
Even while $600 stimulus checks are being deposited in tens of millions of bank accounts, congressional Democrats are laying the groundwork for even greater stimulus payments, which some call “survival checks.” As Senate democratic leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) recently said, “One of the first things that I want to do when our new senators are seated is deliver the $2,000 checks to the American families.” With Democrats preparing to take power in Washington, a critical question will be whether such survival checks will be one-time payments or recur each month “for the duration of the pandemic,” as Senator Ed Markey (D-MA) and others have suggested.
That may pacify the socialist mobs for a month or two, but eventually they will be back for even more payments.

As the voices get angrier and angrier, do you think that anyone in Washington will be willing to stand up and say no?

The incoming Vice-President, Kamala Harris, previously proposed giving out monthly $2,000 checks for the duration of this pandemic
Recurring monthly $2,000 checks would mirror the payments proposed in the “Monthly Economic Crisis Support Act” that Vice President-elect Kamala Harris (D-CA) introduced in the Senate in May 2020.
If you are married with three kids, you would have gotten $10,000 every month under her plan.

Considering where we are as a society today, I think that most Americans would have been very eager to sign up for that.

Of course the price tag for such a plan would be nightmarish. It would have been approximately $600 billion every month, and that would mean that it would add more than 7 trillion dollars to our national debt over the course of an entire year.

But since we are liquidating the Republic anyway, who really cares?
Harris insisted that her plan would end once the crisis was over.

Other politicians, however, are ready to start giving citizens “universal basic income” checks on a permanent basis starting right now. For example, Andrew Yang is making this the signature promise of his campaign as he runs for mayor of New York City…
Former 2020 Democratic presidential candidate Andrew Yang has officially started his run to succeed Bill de Blasio as Mayor of New York City with a call for a universal basic income for half-a-million of the city’s poorest residents.
Yang insists that by giving everyone free money every month he can “eradicate poverty” in NYC…
“We can eradicate extreme poverty in New York City,” Yang said. “If you put just a little money in their hands it can actually be what keeps them in their home and, again, avoids them hitting city services that are incredibly expensive.”
That sounds good, but who is he going to tax in order to pay for it?
After all, hundreds of thousands of wealthy people already left the city during 2020.

The truth is that it is a pipe dream, but that pipe dream is going to win him a whole lot of votes.

Benjamin Franklin once made the following statement
“When the people find that they can vote themselves money that will herald the end of the republic.”
Sadly, we have now reached that point.

And this comes at a time when tens of millions of Americans are in desperate need because the real economy continues to implode all around us.

For example, we just learned that Christopher & Banks has gone belly up
Apparel retailer Christopher & Banks, which caters to women over 40, is the latest clothing chain to file for bankruptcy protection amid the coronavirus pandemic.

The Minneapolis-based company announced Thursday it filed for Chapter 11 in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey. Christopher & Banks said in a news release it “expects to close a significant portion, if not all, of its brick-and-mortar stores.”
Thousands of businesses have been dying every month. As I discussed the other day, the U.S. has lost more than 110,000 restaurants alone.

And to make sure that most of the businesses that have died can never possibly make a comeback, Joe Biden wants to institute “a national minimum wage of $15 an hour”.

Promising people more money is a great way to win elections, but at the end of the day someone always has to pay.

As the U.S. economy continues to come apart at the seams, finding sources of tax revenue will become increasingly difficult.

Perhaps the big tech companies can step up and offer to dramatically enlarge their contributions to the U.S. Treasury.

After all, they were quite instrumental in giving control of the federal government to the Democrats, and so you would think they should be quite willing to help pay for their promises.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Moderna "Does Not Know How Many Doses Went Into Arms" In California Adverse Vax-Reaction Cluster
TUESDAY, JAN 19, 2021 - 13:01
Update (1300ET): Moderna has issued a statement addressing the disturbing number of severe reactions to a batch of its COVID vaccine:
Moderna acknowledges receiving a report from the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) that several individuals at one vaccination center in San Diego were treated for possible allergic reactions after vaccination from one lot of Moderna’s COVID-19 Vaccine. The Company is fully cooperating with CDPH in investigating these reported adverse events. Consistent with the statement from CDPH, at this point
Moderna is unaware of comparable clusters of adverse events from other vaccination centers which may have administered vaccines from the same lot, or from other Moderna lots. Moderna confirmed that a total of 1,272,200 doses were produced in batch number 041L20A, with nearly a million doses (964,900) already distributed to approximately 1,700 vaccination sites in 37 states. According to CDPH, that includes more than 330,000 doses from this lot distributed to 287 providers across the state of California. A total of 307,300 doses remain in storage and not yet distributed.
While Moderna said it does not know how many doses may have ended up in arms of people, it did report that the lot was shipped between January 4th and January 8th, and thus it expects that a significant portion of the distributed doses have been already used.
This investigation is still ongoing and Moderna is working closely with FDA and CDC to understand the clinical cases and whether the broad pause in use of the lot is warranted.
Moderna's share price is down around 4% after this news...


We wonder how the Biden administration will respond to this.

* * *
As the suspected death toll attributed to COVID-19 vaccines rises around the world, with dozens already reported in the US and Norway, California health officials have asked health-care providers in the state to immediately stop administering a batch of Moderna COVID-19 jabs after an "unusually high number" of adverse reactions were linked to it, according to RT.

On order of State epidemiologist Dr. Erica S. Pan and the California Department of Public Health, the vaccines should be shelved until a proper investigation can be conducted. The lot in question is Moderna Lot 041L20A.
Message to #CovidVaccine providers:

"This week, a higher-than-usual number of adverse events were reported with a specific lot of #Moderna vaccine administered at one community vaccination clinic. Fewer than 10 individuals required medical attention over the span of 24 hours." pic.twitter.com/RsaIzd1Gap
— Shawna Khalafi (@ShawnaKhalafiTV) January 18, 2021
More than 330,000 doses from this lot have been distributed to 287 providers across the state.

The shipments arrived in California between Jan. 5 and 12.

All of the reactions appear to be tied to a single community clinic that was administering the batch. The clinic reportedly closed for several hours after a string of adverse reactions occurred.

California has confirmed nearly 3MM COVID cases as of Monday morning,
California COVID-19, By The Numbers:

Confirmed cases to date: 2,942,475
Note: Numbers may not represent true day-over-day change as reporting of test results can be delayed

More information at COVID-19. pic.twitter.com/bYSD41PQRL
— CA Public Health (@CAPublicHealth) January 18, 2021
Officials on Wednesday announced a major expansion of vaccination eligibility guidelines, allowing all residents 65 and older to more quickly qualify for COVID-19 vaccinations. As far as numbers go, more than 330K doses from the same Moderna vaccine batch have been distributed to 287 providers across the state, but this is the first time that health authorities have received reports detailing adverse reactions associated with the lot.

While acknowledging that "less data exists on adverse reactions related to the Moderna vaccine," the state epidemiologist insisted that it’s still rare for vaccines to trigger serious side effects. Moderna, the CDC, and the FDA are reviewing the batch and all relevant medical data.

The COVID-19 jab has been linked to other cases of serious medical emergencies, not just in the US, but in Europe and elsewhere around the world.
In December, a physician in Boston said he suffered one of the worst allergic reactions he’s ever experienced after receiving Moderna’s vaccine, describing the episode as potentially life-threatening, while a doctor in Miami actually died due to a reaction from the vaccine.

Similar cases linked to the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine have been referred to the CDC and FDA for review. According to other reports, Hong Kong’s government-appointed vaccine advisory panel is seeking more data from the Norwegian and German governments on the reported deaths of elderly people after they received.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

"People Are Nearing Rock Bottom": Fed's COVID Response Rewards Wealthy While Brutalizing Nation's Poorest

TUESDAY, JAN 19, 2021 - 5:35
Newsflash: Federal Reserve policy is making the rich much richer.
Certainly that's not something we need to harp upon for most of our readers, who understand exactly how the Fed printing trillions of dollars over the course of months has further bifurcated the wealth gap in the United States. But, what is worthy to point out is that the mainstream media now appears to be getting wise to the concept - and all it took to realize what was going on was billionaires reaping another collective $1.3 trillion while the rest of the country suffered from agonizing depression.

For example, over the weekend, Bloomberg published a piece called "The Rich Are Minting Money in the Pandemic Like Never Before". The sub-heading of the article simply said: "Country’s most well-off benefit from Federal Reserve policies".

The report wonders how it is possible that some people are struggling for food, shelter and jobs while the rich cash in. "It's a difficult thing to fathom," the piece starts, but "there’s a whole class of people -- at least the top 20% or so of earners -- who’ve had to worry little about such matters."

Clearly, the report's authors don't read Zero Hedge - because it's not that difficult to fathom. In fact, it's been going on for decades.


The report goes on to note how mortgage refinancing, working from home and the stock market has helped along the "haves" while the "have nots" continue to struggle. These wealth gains "obscure" the plight of the middle and lower class, which has seen hundreds of thousands of businesses shut down and more than 10 million unemployed.

Peter Atwater, an adjunct professor at William & Mary, said: “There has probably not been a better time to be wealthy in America than today. So much of what policy makers did was to enable those that were wealthiest to rebound fastest from the pandemic.”

Employment for the bottom quartile of workers, making less than $27,000 per year, remains 20% lower than January 2020 levels. 30 million adults lived in households where there wasn't enough to eat, according to the report - up 28% since prior to the pandemic. In Louisiana, 1 in 5 citizens faces food scarcity.

Meanwhile, employment for the top quartile of workers earning over $60,000 per year has "already recovered to levels from a year ago". Many of Americans were also able to redirect money they would have used on entertainment and travel to savings and investments. Thanks to the Fed, these types of redirections have paid off well.



Hilariously, Bloomberg places blame on the bifurcation to "challenges" regarding money distribution: "By easing credit conditions via the Fed, lawmakers were able to quickly prop up large corporations and wealthier individuals. But distributing aid to smaller firms and low-income workers has turned out to be a lot more challenging." But, the truth is that it isn't more challenging - the Fed and the government choose to distribute newly printed money disproportionately. The government doesn't seem to understand the problem and the Fed simply doesn't seem to care.

Jerome Powell said in December: “The Fed cannot grant money to particular beneficiaries. Elected officials have the power to tax and spend and to make decisions about where we, as a society, should direct our collective resources.”

Amanda Fischer, policy director at the Washington Center for Equitable Growth, commented: “If your wealth is captured by financial assets, you were back up and running in no time. It’s the lowest income folks who don’t even have to file taxes that have the highest barrier to climb.”

She continued, alluding to what sounds like eventual direct payments from the Fed: “Congress did a pretty good job of getting money to people, but we didn’t manage to fix decades of rusted plumbing. The fact that the Fed has infrastructure to do a bond-buying program but not do to anything else is a choice, not an inevitability.”



Heidi Shierholz of the Economic Policy Institute said: “Without more aid they will have to make more cuts, and cut services and that will disproportionately affect lower income families and communities. You cannot have a sustainable economy and political system where you have a small population who believe they are invincible and a growing population who feel defeated. It’s in capitalism’s best interest to close this gap.”

And while it does sound a bit like more socialism on top of socialism, she isn't terribly wrong about the idea of at possibly returning to some semblance of normalcy by attempting to close this gap and right some wrongs that have been perpetrated by the Fed over the last several decades, before turning things back over to the free market.

But time is not on the side of the middle and lower class. Bradford Botes, a principal at bankruptcy law firm Bond & Botes in Birmingham, said: “People simply feel that they are nearing or at rock bottom. We are hearing a lot more hopelessness. [Stimulus] money was used by people just to get by. The additional stimulus has not been sufficient to make any type of difference for average Americans.”
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
Some in Migrant Caravan Carry Fake COVID-19 Test Results, Say Guatemalan Officials
3,021
An officers of the National Institute of Migration of Mexico (INM) checks documentation of people who cross the Suchiate River from Guatemala to Mexico on January 16, 2021 as a new migrant caravan is expected to get to the Mexican border with Guatemala. - The Mexican government said it would …
Photo by ISAAC GUZMAN/AFP via Getty Images
BOB PRICE19 Jan 20212,097

Guatemalan officials report that some of the migrants in this weekend’s caravan carried fake COVID-19 test results. Others actually tested positive for the potentially deadly virus.

Guatemalan Foreign Affairs Secretary Pedro Brolo Vila told reporters that some of the thousands of migrants who violently crossed their border from Honduras over the weekend are carrying fake COVID-19 test results indicating negative findings, according to Fox News.
EL FLORIDO, GUATEMALA - JANUARY 16: Migrants enter Guatemala after breaking a police barricade at the border checkpoint on January 16, 2021 in El Florido, Guatemala. The caravan departed from Honduras to walk across Guatemala and Mexico to eventually reach the United States. Central Americans expect to receive asylum and most Hondurans decided to migrate after being hit by recent hurricanes Eta and Iota. Honduras recently asked to U.S. to extend their Temporary Protected Status. (Photo by Josue Decavele/Getty Images)

Migrants enter Guatemala after breaking a police barricade at the border checkpoint on January 16, 2021 in El Florido, Guatemala. (Photo by Josue Decavele/Getty Images)

Brolo’s comments came after Guatemalan security forces dealt with thousands of violent, mostly Honduran, migrants forcing their way into the country and ultimately, the United States. Officials report the violent migrant caravan threw rocks at security forces. Others pushed their way through the human barricade of security forces, Breitbart Texas reported.

Guatemalan health officials said 21 of the migrants tested positive for Coronavirus, the Fox News article continued. These 12 men and nine women are being held in quarantine before being returned to Honduras.

Brolo criticized the government of Honduras for not honoring their agreements on immigration and caravan migrants.

He charged that Honduran security forces actually accompanied the caravan “toward our borders where regrettably we saw how they entered violent, violating Guatemala’s territorial sovereignty.”
SAN PEDRO SULA, HONDURAS - JANUARY 15: A member of the migrant caravan searches his backpack for his identity document at a Honduran police checkpoint as the caravan heads to the Guatemalan border on January 15, 2021 in San Pedro Sula, Honduras. The caravan plans to walk across Guatemala and Mexico to eventually reach the United States. Central Americans expect to receive asylum and most Hondurans decided to migrate after being hit by recent hurricanes Eta and Iota. Honduras recently asked to U.S. to extend their Temporary Protected Status. (Photo by Milo Espinoza/Getty Images)

Honduran security forces stand by and migrants prepare to illegally force their way into Guatemala. (Photo by Milo Espinoza/Getty Images)

Officials estimate as many as 9,000 may have forced their way into Guatemala. That country’s security forces blocked mountain-locked roadways to keep the caravan from proceeding north to the Mexican border.

Mexican officials praised the work of Guatemalan security forces, NPR reported. The Mexican Secretary for Foreign Affairs called upon Honduras to do more to stop the “irregular flow” of citizens through the region.
National Police riot police officers observe Honduran migrants moving to Agua Caliente, on the border between Honduras and Guatemala, on their way to the United States, on January 15, 2021. - Hundreds of asylum seekers are forming new migrant caravans in Honduras, planning to walk thousands of kilometers through Central America to the United States via Guatemala and Mexico, in search of a better life under the new administration of President-elect Joe Biden. (Photo by Orlando SIERRA / AFP) (Photo by ORLANDO SIERRA/AFP via Getty Images)

National Police riot police officers observe Honduran migrants moving to Agua Caliente, on the border between Honduras and Guatemala, on their way to the United States, on January 15, 2021. (Photo by ORLANDO SIERRA/AFP via Getty Images)

The statement from Mexico reads:
The Government of Mexico recognizes the outstanding work of the Government of Guatemala, which has acted in a firm and responsible manner in the comprehensive care of contingents of migrants who violated their sovereignty, enforcing compliance with the immigration law and its health protocols to guarantee income. orderly and regular, safeguarding the integrity and life of migrants and their population.
Likewise, it makes a respectful exhortation to the Honduran authorities to attend, in a timely manner, this irregular flow of migrants, in such a way as to prevent further displacements.
Migrant Policy Institute analyst Ariel Ruiz Soto told Fox News he doesn’t believe many of these migrants will successfully make their way to the U.S. southern border.

“I suspect that if this caravan actually made it to the Guatemalan/Mexico border that there would be even the heavier presence of (Mexican) National Guard to try to detain the migrants,” he explained. “We saw this again in October. That caravan really stopped in Guatemala at that time. So I don’t foresee them getting to the U.S./Mexico border in large numbers.”

An unidentified senior Biden transition team member told NBC News that the migrants should not come to the U.S. — at this time.

“There’s help on the way, but now is not the time to make the journey,” the official said.
 

TammyinWI

Talk is cheap
Wuhan scientists admit to being bitten by COVID-19 infected bats
Scientists working at the Wuhan lab confessed to being bitten by COVID-19 infected bats in a cave while collecting samples.
twitter-logo BusinessToday.In | January 17, 2021 | Updated 14:20 IST

1611197195296.png
Evidence: Researchers in thin coveralls and rubber gloves handle bats while gathering samples in a clip filmed by a Chinese television crew

Scientists working at the Wuhan lab confessed to being bitten by COVID-19 infected bats in a cave while collecting samples.

 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5lVi6t-a5w
35:32 min
TWiV 710: COVID-19 clinical update #46 with Dr. Daniel Griffin
•Jan 23, 2021


Vincent Racaniello

In COVID-19 clinical update #46, Daniel Griffin discusses the BinaxNow rapid antigen test, efficacy of Bamlanivimab in nursing homes, associations of serum vitamin D concentrations with in-hospital mortality and need for invasive mechanical ventilation, trials of IL-6 receptor antagonists, effects of anticoagulants on in-hospital mortality, and symptom persistence in outpatients. Show notes at https://www.microbe.tv/twiv/twiv-710/

______________________________________\

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FPo2BAq4H-8
1:49:00 min
TWiEVO 64: Seeing the lineages for the variants

•Jan 23, 2021


Vincent Racaniello
Nels and Vincent consider evolution of antibody immunity to SARS-CoV-2, and update the situation on novel virus variants of concern with potentially altered fitness and reactivity with antibodies. Show notes at https://www.microbe.tv/twievo/twievo-64/
 

jward

passin' thru
Kyle Griffin
@kylegriffin1

5m

Dr. Birx to CBS: "I saw the president presenting graphs that I never made. I know that someone — someone out there or someone inside — was creating a parallel set of data and graphics that were shown to the president. I know what I sent ... What was in his hands was different."
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fw3OYf0W7x4
18:32 min
Coronavirus Update 120: Anticoagulants (Blood Thinners) Improve Hospital Outcomes (Full Dose)
•Jan 24, 2021


MedCram - Medical Lectures Explained CLEARLY

Professor Roger Seheult, MD explains new data from large trials that demonstrate full dose anticoagulants may improve outcomes for patients hospitalized with COVID 19. This is important news because we've learned over the past year that thromboembolic (blood clot) complications from COVID-19 contribute significantly to morbidity (pulmonary embolism, stroke, myocardial infarction, etc.) and mortality (This video was recorded on January 24, 2021).

Roger Seheult, MD is the co-founder and lead professor at https://www.medcram.com He is Board Certified in Internal Medicine, Pulmonary Disease, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine and an Associate Professor at the University of California, Riverside School of Medicine.

LINKS / REFERENCES: Pulmonary Vascular Endothelialitis, Thrombosis, and Angiogenesis in Covid-19 (NEJM) | https://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/... Therapeutic versus prophylactic anticoagulation for severe COVID-19: A randomized phase II clinical trial (Thrombosis Research) | https://www.thrombosisresearch.com/ar... International trials of blood thinners in critically ill COVID-19 patients pause due to futility (University of Manitoba) | https://news.umanitoba.ca/internation... Researchers test effects of full doses of anticoagulants in COVID-19 patients (News Medical) | https://www.news-medical.net/news/202... COVID-19 and VTE/Anticoagulation: Frequently Asked Questions (American Society of Hematology) | https://www.hematology.org/covid-19/c... Full-dose blood thinners decreased need for life support and improved outcome in hospitalized COVID-19 patients (NIH) | https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-...
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Moderna Vaccine Not Effective Against "Mutant" South African COVID Strain, But Works With UK Variant

MONDAY, JAN 25, 2021 - 9:31
Moderna's latest trial data includes some good news...and some bad news.
The good news is that the biotech company's original COVID jab is effective against two mutations of SARS-CoV-2 which were first isolated in the UK and South Africa, respectively.

The bad news is that, at least when it comes to the South African variant, Moderna's jab is much less effective than scientists had expected. That's a bad sign, because it suggests the vaccines might not perform as well, particularly in elderly patients, or that the immunity they provide might not last as long, as various strains of the virus continue to mutate.

However, perhaps due to the optimistic tone of the press release, investors took the news as a positive and bid Moderna shares higher.

Here's some more details from the FT:
Laboratory tests show Moderna’s Covid-19 jab still works against the variant named 501.V2, which emerged in South Africa, and B.1.1.7, which was first discovered in the UK, the company said. But it warned that the neutralising antibody response to 501.V2 was sixfold lower than to the original variant, raising concerns that immunity to it may wane significantly, particularly in older people.
Moderna has launched a series of trials intended to test its vaccine's efficacy against several different mutant strains.

But don't worry, because even though Moderna's CEO acknowledges that this is an extremely serious situation and the company is preparing for the worst-case scenario, everything is going to be okay.
Stéphane Bancel, Moderna CEO, said the company was preparing for a "worst-case scenario," even though he had “zero concerns” about the vaccine’s efficacy in the coming months. “If something needs to be done in the summer, we'll do something, but we cannot be late,” he told the Financial Times. “We don’t want the virus to win, we want the human race to win.”
That doesn't exactly sound reassuring. As it turns out, Moderna is the first vaccine maker in the West to announce a trial for a booster against a new variant, after having its initial jab authorised across the world including in the US, the EU and the UK. Its messengerRNA technology can be quickly adapted for new variants.
The company is working with the US National Institutes of Health on the trials. Mr Bancel said a few thousand trial participants would be given a booster shot, divided into two groups: one to receive the original vaccine again, and another to get a new vaccine formulated to target 501.V2. The trial will also test to see what dose is needed for a booster.
Read the full press release below:
CAMBRIDGE, Mass.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jan. 25, 2021-- Moderna Inc. (Nasdaq: MRNA), a biotechnology company pioneering messenger RNA (mRNA) therapeutics and vaccines, today announced results from in vitro neutralization studies of sera from individuals vaccinated with Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine showing activity against emerging strains of SARS-CoV-2. Vaccination with the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine produced neutralizing titers against all key emerging variants tested, including B.1.1.7 and B.1.351, first identified in the UK and Republic of South Africa, respectively. The study showed no significant impact on neutralizing titers against the B.1.1.7 variant relative to prior variants. A six-fold reduction in neutralizing titers was observed with the B.1.351 variant relative to prior variants. Despite this reduction, neutralizing titer levels with B.1.351 remain above levels that are expected to be protective. This study was conducted in collaboration with the Vaccine Research Center (VRC) at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The manuscript has been submitted as a preprint to bioRxiv and will be submitted for peer-reviewed publication.
The two-dose regimen of the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine at the 100 µg dose is expected to be protective against emerging strains detected to date. Nonetheless, Moderna today announced its clinical strategy to proactively address the pandemic as the virus continues to evolve.
First, the Company will test an additional booster dose of its COVID-19 Vaccine (mRNA-1273) to study the ability to further increase neutralizing titers against emerging strains beyond the existing primary vaccination series. Second, the Company is advancing an emerging variant booster candidate (mRNA-1273.351) against the B.1.351 variant first identified in the Republic of South Africa. The Company is advancing mRNA-1273.351 into preclinical studies and a Phase 1 study in the U.S. to evaluate the immunological benefit of boosting with strain-specific spike proteins. Moderna expects that its mRNA-based booster vaccine (whether mRNA-1273 or mRNA-1273.351) will be able to further boost neutralizing titers in combination with all of the leading vaccine candidates.
“As we seek to defeat the COVID-19 virus, which has created a worldwide pandemic, we believe it is imperative to be proactive as the virus evolves. We are encouraged by these new data, which reinforce our confidence that the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine should be protective against these newly detected variants,” said Stéphane Bancel, Chief Executive Officer of Moderna. “Out of an abundance of caution and leveraging the flexibility of our mRNA platform, we are advancing an emerging variant booster candidate against the variant first identified in the Republic of South Africa into the clinic to determine if it will be more effective to boost titers against this and potentially future variants."

First detected in September 2020 in the United Kingdom, the SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 variant has seventeen mutations in the viral genome with eight mutations located in the spike (S) protein. The B.1.351 variant, first detected in South Africa, has ten mutations located in the spike (S) protein. Both variants have spread at a rapid rate and are associated with increased transmission and a higher viral burden after infection1,2.

The in vitro study assessed the ability of mRNA-1273 to elicit potently neutralizing antibodies against the new SARS-CoV-2 variants, using sera from eight Phase 1 clinical trial participants (aged 18-55 years) who received two 100 µg doses of mRNA-1273, and separately using sera from non-human primates (NHPs) immunized with two doses of 30 µg or 100 µg of mRNA-1273.

For the B.1.1.7 variant, neutralizing antibody titers remained high and were generally consistent with neutralizing titers relative to prior variants. No significant impact on neutralization was observed from either the full set of mutations found in the B.1.1.7 variant or from specific key mutations of concern. Although these mutations have been reported to lessen neutralization from convalescent sera and to increase infectivity, sera from the Phase 1 participants and NHPs immunized with mRNA-1273 were able to neutralize the B.1.1.7 variant to the same level as prior variants.
For the B.1.351 variant, vaccination with the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine produces neutralizing antibody titers that remain above the neutralizing titers that were shown to protect NHPs against wildtype viral challenge. While the Company expects these levels of neutralizing antibodies to be protective, pseudovirus neutralizing antibody titers were approximately 6-fold lower relative to prior variants. These lower titers may suggest a potential risk of earlier waning of immunity to the new B.1.351 strains.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cihO6EPEPaI
11:49 min

ENOUGH IS ENOUGH: The politics of COVID-19 is DESTROYING our children
•Jan 25, 2021


Glenn Beck

A recent New York Times article detailed the horrifying struggles one Nevada school district is experiencing due to the COVID-19 pandemic: students are suffering from mental health issues more than ever, and the district described has lost 18 children to suicide. But this isn't happening just in Las Vegas. It's happening throughout our nation. In fact, in this clip, Glenn details his own kids’ struggles with the lockdowns — like not wanting to leave the house and finding it hard to be around other people. He says enough is enough. The politics of this pandemic is destroying not only the mental health of our children, but it’s destroying their lives as well.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Newsom Lifts Strict Stay-at-Home Order From All CA Regions Even Though Covid Cases Are Higher Than When Order Started in December

By Cristina Laila
Published January 25, 2021 at 11:38am
Gavin-Newsom-Coronavirus-California-Lockdown-03192020.jpg

It’s a Biden miracle!

California Governor Gavin Newsom (D) lifted the strict regional stay-at-home order from all regions across the state even though Covid cases and deaths are soaring.
BREAKING: California’s Department of Public Health makes it official.
The stay at home order is lifted from all regions.
The department noting all meet the required ICU projection threshold to exit the order.
— Ashley Zavala (@ZavalaA) January 25, 2021
The 7 day average of new cases is higher now than it was in early December when Gavin Newsom imposed the regional lockdowns and curfew.
California closes outdoor dining (left), California reopens outdoor dining (right). [Obama shrugging confused gif here] pic.twitter.com/RXUAEUgSzS
— Karol Markowicz (@karol) January 25, 2021
In December Newsom introduced regional stay-at-home orders which is triggered when ICU capacity falls below 15%.

ICU capacity is still below 15%, Covid cases and deaths are still soaring but Newsom just lifted the lockdown order anyway.

What data is Newsom using to justify opening up California even though Covid is still surging?

Newsom is hiding the key information and said the data is just too complex and would confuse and potentially mislead the public.

The effort to recall Newsom has attracted more than 1.2 million signatures.

Do not sign the petition to recall Newsom online. You must physically sign the petition in order for it to count.

Click here for a petition locator tool to find a recall location near you.
 

naegling62

Veteran Member
Holy Batvirus y'all. Just found out the person we know of that had the lung transplant may have caught SARS CoV-2 for the 3rd time. He's been moved to a Covid unit and NIH and wait for it.... Department of Defense has been called in. Hmm.

Prayers for this man and his family.
 
Last edited:

jward

passin' thru
Ardern Says New Zealand Won’t Open Border to The World This Year
By
Matthew Brockett

January 25, 2021, 9:50 PM CST

  • Vaccine uncertainty prompts conservative approach to arrivals
  • Safe travel zone with Australia looks ‘increasingly difficult’

Jacinda Ardern on Jan. 26. Ardern said mass immunization will not begin until midyear and she was taking a “conservative” approach to letting foreigners into the country again.


Jacinda Ardern on Jan. 26. Ardern said mass immunization will not begin until midyear and she was taking a “conservative” approach to letting foreigners into the country again.
Photographer: Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images


In this article
PFE
PFIZER INC
37.31
USD
+0.03+0.08%


New Zealand is likely to keep its border closed to the world through most of 2021 amid uncertainty over the rollout of Covid-19 vaccines, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern said.

“We can expect our borders to be impacted for much of this year,” Ardern told a news conference Tuesday in Wellington. “We will continue to pursue travel bubbles with Australia and the Pacific, but the rest of the world simply poses too great a risk to our health and our economy to take a risk at this stage.”
New Zealand’s success in combating the virus has allowed it to lift restrictions and get its economy moving again much sooner than initially expected, but the closed border is decimating its tourism industry. While the government today announced it expects to give regulatory approval for the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine next week, Ardern said mass immunization will not begin until midyear and she was taking a “conservative” approach to letting foreigners into the country again.

“For travel to restart we need one of two things,” she said. “We either need the confidence that being vaccinated means you don’t pass Covid-19 on to others -- and we don’t know that yet -- or we need enough of our population to be vaccinated and protected that people can safely re-enter New Zealand. Both possibilities will take some time.”

Ardern sounded pessimistic on the possibility of a safe travel zone with Australia any time soon. While talks would continue, “it does look increasingly difficult at a country-by-country level,” she said, adding “we haven’t ruled out the possibility of state-by-state.”

More from



Biden Team to Buy 200 Million More Doses, Speed Up Vaccinations

Aetna Expands Coverage to Include a Gender-Affirming Procedure

Britain Faces Up to Painful Lessons After 100,000 Covid Deaths

Global Cases Top 100 Million; N.J. May Relax Curbs: Virus Update

Australia started allowing quarantine-free travel for New Zealanders last year but suspended that this week when New Zealand reported one case of Covid-19 in the community. Ardern expressed disappointment at Australia’s decision. The case involving a woman who tested positive after leaving managed isolation is “well under control,” she said.

“If we are to enter into a Trans-Tasman bubble, we will need to be able to give people confidence that we won’t see closures at the borders that happen with very short notice over incidents that we believe can be well managed domestically,” she said.
New Zealand aims to begin immunizing workers at its managed isolation facilities this quarter, but Ardern was unable to say when the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine will arrive in the country. The vaccine is expected to get to New Zealand around the same time as it gets to Australia, which is slated for mid-to-late February, she said.

“New Zealand will have its house in order so we will be ready to receive, but ultimately we will be in the hands of pharmaceutical companies’ delivery timelines,” Ardern said.
 

TammyinWI

Talk is cheap
Aggressive lockdowns do more harm than good, NEW Stanford study warns
by: Sara Middleton, staff writer | January 25, 2021

(NaturalHealth365) The mandatory COVID lockdowns, business closures, and stay-at-home orders implemented in California and elsewhere have had catastrophic effects on American individuals, families, businesses, and communities. Many are left with an unpleasant question – has it even been worth it?

While some economists claim the economy would actually be doing better right now had earlier lockdowns been more aggressive, the same might not be true for the spread of COVID-19 itself – at least not according to a recent study.

Just how effective are mandatory lockdowns? Let’s see what studies say

The international peer-reviewed study was published this month in the European Journal of Clinical Investigation. Stanford researchers assessed whether countries that used the most restrictive “non-pharmacological interventions” for curbing COVID-19 had lower rates compared to countries that used less restrictive and voluntary measures.

The most restrictive non-pharmacological interventions include mandatory stay‐at‐home and business closures. These questionable social policies were used within the following countries:
  • United States
  • England
  • France
  • Germany
  • Iran
  • Italy
  • Netherlands
  • Spain
In contrast, Sweden and South Korea have had less restrictive measures throughout the pandemic.

Using a mathematical model to compare these different nations, the Stanford researchers concluded that there was “no clear, significant beneficial effect of more restrictive [non-pharmaceutical interventions] on case growth in any country.”

SHOCKING revelation: Lockdowns may have the opposite effect, study reveals

Incredibly, the effect of mandatory lockdowns and business closures in France appeared to actually promote COVID spread when compared with South Korea, according to the researchers’ calculations. This is consistent, the study says, “with a recent analysis that identified increase transmission and cases in Hunan, China during the period of stay-at-home orders from increased intra-household density and transmission.”

“In other words,” the authors state, “it is possible that stay-at-home orders may facilitate transmission if they increase person-to-person contact where transmission is efficient such as closed spaces.”

This study does have limitations, and other existing data contradict the Stanford authors’ findings. For example, a recent study from Nature claimed that 495 million coronavirus cases were avoided due to early lockdowns in the US, China, France, and elsewhere. Interestingly, this research included South Korea — suggesting that lesser restrictive lockdowns could indeed contribute to the prevention of COVID-19 spread.

Even so, the question of whether lockdowns and business closures “work” at slowing disease spread is only part of the predicament. As the Stanford researchers note, many interventions to curb COVID-19 are projected to cause serious harm. For instance, a November 2020 paper from JAMA Network Open estimates that US school closures — in spring 2020 alone — “could be associated with more eventual [years of life lost] than would be observed if these schools had remained open.” Understandably, “the analysis favored schools remaining open.”

Job loss and economic despair can’t be ignored, either. As of January 8, 2021, the Bureau of Labor Statistics notes that the U.S. unemployment rate is 6.7 percent. That’s down from a tragic and nearly unprecedented rate of 14.8 percent back in April 2020, but still worse than the 4 percent unemployment rate of December 2018.

These days, we’re starting to see even staunch lockdown supporters like Governor Cuomo begin to call for their states’ re-opening. Time will tell how long it will take (and how many hoops will have to be jumped) to get things back up and running.

Sources for this article include:
Wiley.com
Nature.com
COVID19.ca.gov
Newsweek.com
BBC.com
BLS.gov
FAS.org

 

Attachments

  • 1611711986131.png
    1611711986131.png
    85 KB · Views: 1

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Biden sparks new immigration surge, many with coronavirus

by Paul Bedard, Washington Secrets Columnist |
| January 26, 2021 04:15 PM

Illegal immigrants from around the world, spurred by President Biden’s promises to open the border, are storming through and spreading the coronavirus to U.S. officials, according to an investigation on the border.

And those turned back are growing angry and agitated and some, notably Cuban immigrants, are mapping new crossing plans where the border is lightly staffed.

Todd Bensman, a senior national security fellow for the Center for Immigration Studies, said on Tuesday from the border that illegal immigrants started to surge even before Biden took office and have increased their efforts since he replaced Trump.

“A lot of them are getting through,” he said in a CIS Zoom conference hosted by Inside Sources.

But since the new policies and suspension of Trump rules have been slow to get to the border officials, many caught crossing are being returned, and they are growing angry.

“Sometimes, they fight. They are so mad that they are not being welcomed in,” said Bensman. “It’s not very Biden-like,” he said is how they feel.

Biden has signed five immigration-related executive orders so far and plans to release more on Friday. Only one so far, ending deportations from inside the United States, has been delayed by a court. The rest include stopping construction of the border wall and ending Trump’s policy of keeping illegal immigrants in Mexico until their papers clear.

Bensman, who is the author of the forthcoming America's Covert Border War: The Untold Story of the Nation's Battle to Prevent Jihadist Infiltration, also said that many border officials have caught the virus or had to quarantine after interacting with the migrants.

Illegal immigrants, he said, “don’t seem particularly concerned about carrying COVID into the next country.”

As he’s investigated the border situation in recent days, Bensman said, “I was speaking with … a number of Border Patrol last night who said everybody they know have COVID or are in quarantine and/or have COVID and have been taken off the line. So, the ranks are pretty thin out there.”

He added, “There are a lot of sick people, migrants, coming in with COVID, infecting our people.”
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

‘Never Out Of The Woods’: COVID Study Finds Disease Remains In Brain After Recovery
covid
COVID-19 may remain in people’s brains after infection and trigger relapses in patients who believed they recovered, according to a new, peer-reviewed study published in the journal Viruses.

The Georgia State University study found that mice, when infected with the virus through their nasal passages, developed severe illnesses due to brain infections, even after the virus departed their lungs.

“It’s scary,” the study’s lead author and researcher Mukesh Kumar noted before adding that “a lot of people think they got COVID and they recovered and now they’re out of the woods. Now I feel like that’s never going to be true. You may never be out of the woods.”

Kumar also noted how the virus primarily affected the brain, as the study found COVID-19 to be concentrated at a level that was 1,000 times greater than in any other part of the body:

“The brain is one of the regions where virus likes to hide. That’s why we’re seeing severe disease and all these multiple symptoms like heart disease, stroke and all these long-haulers with loss of smell, loss of taste. All of this has to do with the brain rather than with the lungs.”

The study also notes that “COVID-19 survivors whose infections reached their brain are also at increased risk of future health problems, including auto-immune diseases, Parkinson’s, multiple sclerosis and general cognitive decline.”
 
  • OMG
Reactions: bev

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

Could a homegrown coronavirus strain be partly to blame for California’s surge?
By Melissa Healy, Rong-Gong Lin II
Jan. 23, 2021 5 AM

California scientists have discovered a homegrown coronavirus strain that appears to be propagating faster than any other variant on the loose in the Golden State.

Two independent research groups said they stumbled upon the new strain while looking for signs that a highly transmissible variant from the United Kingdom had established itself here. Instead, they found a new branch of the virus’ family tree — one whose sudden rise and distinctive mutations have made it a prime suspect in California’s vicious holiday surge.

As they pored over genetic sequencing data in late December and early January, the two teams saw evidence of the new strain’s prolific spread leap off their spreadsheets. Though focused on different regions of the state, they uncovered trends that were both remarkably similar and deeply worrying.

Researchers at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles found that although the strain had been barely detectable in early October, it accounted for 24% of roughly 4,500 viral samples gathered throughout California in the last weeks of 2020.

In a separate analysis of 332 virus samples culled mostly from Northern California during late November and December, 25% were of the same type.

“There was a homegrown variant under our noses,” said Dr. Charles Chiu, a laboratory medicine specialist at UC San Francisco who examined the samples from the northern part of the state with collaborators from the California Department of Public Health. Were they not on the hunt for the U.K. strain and other viral variants, he said, “we could have missed this at every level.”

The new strain, which scientists have dubbed B.1.426, bears five mutations in its genetic code. One of them, known as L452R, alters the virus’ spike protein, the tool it uses to infiltrate human cells and turn them into virus-making factories.

Over multiple generations, even a small improvement in this ability will help a virus propagate more easily through a population, driving up infections, hospitalizations and deaths.

Spotty surveillance efforts that use genetic sequencing to track changes in the virus had detected a single instance of B.1.426 in California way back in July. As far as scientists can tell, it lay low for the next three months.

Then it got busy.

The team at Cedars-Sinai collected 192 viral samples from patients at the medical center between Nov. 22 and Dec. 28. At 11 p.m. on New Year’s Eve, they uploaded those samples to their genetic sequencer, which began to spit out the data over the first weekend of the new year. The strain’s sudden prominence elicited both wonder and sorrow.

“We said, ‘Wow! There’s something different, something we didn’t expect to find,’” said Dr. Eric Vail, a pathologist who usually sequences genes in search of cancer drivers. “All of a sudden, your brain starts going a mile a minute.”

All thoughts quickly turned to the state’s calamitous COVID-19 surge — a run-up in illness and death that stressed hospitals to their limit, killed more than 18,000 Californians and doubled the state’s total death toll in the space of less than three months.

Had they found the culprit?

The preliminary evidence seemed damning. It was certainly found at the scene of the crime. Flummoxed health officials working to contain the outbreak had hypothesized that they were up against a new coronavirus strain with enhanced transmission capabilities.

But there were several other suspects to consider as well, including chilly weather, restaurant dining, holiday gatherings and a growing disregard for public health measures.

To clarify B.1.426’s role in the surge, investigators will need to determine just how much devastation it is capable of producing. That inquiry will focus on its transmissibility as well as its ability to circumvent the tools — including masks, drugs and vaccines — that can be used to bring the pandemic under control.

For now, both sets of researchers doubt they have found a lone actor. But they may have caught an accomplice.

Chiu said his skepticism stems in part from the fact that the surge in cases across the state seems to have begun before the new strain saw its steepest growth. “It may have contributed to this surge, or simply gone along for the ride,” he said.

In addition, the strain’s sudden prominence among viral samples in Northern California could be due in part to its role in an unusually large outbreak at Kaiser Permanente San Jose Medical Center that infected at least 77 staffers and 15 patients, and resulted in one employee death. Officials are investigating whether an infected but asymptomatic employee was able to spread the virus widely with the help of a battery-powered fan that was part of an inflatable Christmas tree costume.

“It seemed to spread quite fast,” said Dr. Sara Cody, the health officer for Santa Clara County, where the hospital is located. “We are trying to understand whether the features of that outbreak are because of this variant — does this variant of the virus behave in some different way — or does it have to do with other factors that were present at the hospital?”

In Southern California, where the timelines of the surge and B.1.426’s emergence seem better aligned, researchers are more inclined to blame the virus.

“It probably helped to accelerate the number of cases around the holiday season,” Vail said. “But human behavior is the predominant factor in the spread of a virus, and the fact that it happened when the weather became colder and in the midst of the holidays when people gather is not an accident.”

Scientists in Chiu’s lab have already begun cultivating armies of the new strain, derived from four patients recently infected with it. Creating large batches under controlled conditions is a first step in testing whether the any of its mutations enhance its ability to latch onto, invade and hijack human cells.

Those early efforts have raised cause for concern.

“It grows pretty robustly,” Chiu said.

Adding to his concern are the findings of other researchers at Howard University who engineered and tested a version of the coronavirus with the L452R mutation, which rose to prominence in a strain that surfaced in Denmark in March. The Howard team found that the mutation helps the virus attach more firmly to human cells, potentially enhancing its transmission.

In Chiu’s lab, as well as at Cedars-Sinai, scientists will put the new strain through its paces to look for signs that B.1.426’s mutations have enhanced its performance.

Other experiments will explore whether the antibodies generated by the immune systems of people who have been infected by or vaccinated against the coronavirus will recognize this new strain.

Some damning evidence has already come to light. State health officials reported this week that a patient in Monterey County who had tested positive for an infection in April and recovered has now been infected with B.1.426.

That suggests that the new strain may be able to hide its presence from antibodies created after exposure to other versions of the virus — a phenomenon known as “immune escape.” If that’s the case, it might undermine the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines and antibody-based treatments.

“The takeaway is that this is a variant that’s becoming more prevalent and we need to lean in and understand more about it,” Cody said.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Biden Administration Considering Allocating COVID-19 Funds to Climate Change Programs

January 27, 2021 Admin
climate-change-covid-recovery_840x480.jpg


by Kaylee Greenlee

The Biden administration is considering authorizing the Federal Emergency Management Agency to allocate COVID-19 funding for climate change projects, The New York Times reported Monday.

The plan would reallocate part of the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA) overall disaster budget to projects designed to preemptively address damage from climate disasters, The Times reported. The agency wants to build seawalls and elevate or relocate homes in flood planes with the reallocated funds.

FEMA plans to include funding allocated for COVID-19 response in its restructuring of the budget, according to The Times. FEMA Acting Deputy Associate Administrator for Disaster Mitigation Michael M. Grimm said that an initial estimate found $3.7 billion that could go to the program to address climate change with the potential for more later on.
We are currently facing four converging crises — COVID-19, the resulting economic crisis, climate change, and racial inequity. Today, President Biden took actions to combat these challenges. pic.twitter.com/091jmvCukk
— The White House (@WhiteHouse) January 21, 2021
The total amount of funding could reach $10 million if COVID-19 resources are directed towards the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program, though Grimm said the decision to include pandemic relief funds has not yet been made, The Times reported. The proposal would give FEMA access to draw from the government’s dedicated disaster fund and would not necessarily mean reducing available funding for COVID-19 response.

The plan would need approval from the White House budget office, according to The Times. The proposal focuses less on reducing greenhouse gas emissions and is more concentrated on protecting homes and people from severe storms, flooding and fires.

President Joe Biden signed an order requiring higher construction standards for federally constructed buildings in flood zones during his first days in office, The Times reported. If the proposal is approved by the White House, it will likely receive bipartisan support after a previous report found that the government saved money by providing funding for disaster preparation.

FEMA was given $19.4 billion for the Disaster Relief Fund and $2.3 billion for grant funding for 2020, according to the Department of Homeland Security.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

TRUMP THERAPEUTIC: Regeneron’s Antibody Cocktail Is 100 Percent Effective Against COVID
A pre-emptive ‘passive vaccine’ is proving tremendously effective in preventing and treating COVID
Frank Salvato
by FRANK SALVATO

January 26, 2021

Regeneron COVID Cocktail

An antibody cocktail in phase three trials produced by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, is emerging as a game-changer in the fight against the COVID virus, and much more effective than any of the vaccines that have been fast-tracked.

On Tuesday, Regeneron announced that its phase 3 trial antibody cocktail has evidenced a 100 percent prevention of symptomatic COVID infections.

Results to date also show an approximate 50 percent lower overall rate of infection across all patients. In infections that did occur, crest virus levels were diminished and had a rapid duration of viral shedding.

None of the study participants in the test group that received the cocktail had high viral loads. Sixty-two percent of those infected who were treated with a placebo.

“These data using REGEN-COV as a passive vaccine suggest that it may both reduce transmission of the virus as well as reduce viral and disease burden in those who still get infected,” George Yancopoulos, president and chief scientific officer at Regeneron, said in a statement.

“Even with the emerging availability of active vaccines, we continue to see hundreds of thousands of people infected daily, actively spreading the virus to their close contacts. The REGEN-COV antibody cocktail may be able to help break this chain by providing immediate passive immunity to those at high risk of infection, in contrast to active vaccines which take weeks to provide protection.”
Regeneron's antibody cocktail effective in preventing COVID-19 infection: study Regeneron study shows antibody cocktail effective in preventing COVID-19 infection

— Greta Van Susteren (@greta) January 26, 2021
Regeneron, a US-based company, said negative events occurred approximately 12 percent of the study group that took the cocktail, as opposed to 18 percent who were administered the placebo.

One person in the placebo group died and another was hospitalized. No deaths or hospitalizations occurred in the treatment group.

“It’s notable that the few infections that did occur after receiving REGEN-COV were all asymptomatic and associated with markedly lower viral load and duration of viral shedding, potentially further reducing transmission,” David Weinreich, head of global clinical development at the company, said in a statement. “We look forward to seeing the full dataset early next quarter and will discuss the current results with regulatory authorities, including the potential to expand the Emergency Use Authorization.”
Regeneron ( $REGN ) says its Covid-19 antibody cocktail could be used as a 'passive vaccine' to protect those living with infected patients.Regeneron Sees Positive Results From Antibody Cocktail

— TheStreet (@TheStreet) January 26, 2021
In November of last year, shortly after the 2020 General Election, federal drug regulators issued emergency authorization to the cocktail. It is unclear whether this authorization was politically timed.

The cocktail, containing two monoclonal antibodies named casirivimab and imdevimab, is meant to boost the immune system against COVID.

Former President Donald Trump was administered the cocktail after he contracted the China originated COVID virus last year. He recovery time was short and complete.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

IT BEGINS: Biden May Use COVID-19 Funding For Climate Change Programs

by Jonathan Davisabout 14 hours ago
600184e15109310-biden-758x427.jpg


Leftists and their deep state allies were livid when then-President Donald Trump repurposed non-earmarked Defense Department funds for the construction of a border wall during a national emergency he was forced to declare in order to stop endless caravans of migrants attempting to enter the U.S. illegally.

By any application of sanity and logic, the former president was not only acting within his authority, he acted in the first place because the country he was sworn to protect was being threatened.

Fast-forward to the present time.

After Trump was denied his reelection thanks to pre-election legal gerrymandering by Democrats in key battleground states, Joe Biden is now president — and he, too, wants to repurpose taxpayer funds for what he sees as a priority for the country: Climate change.

No leftist has ever explained how the expenditure of money will alter the climate in any appreciable way, but then no one has ever forced them to explain, either.

Now, Biden may well be within his authority to have his administration repurpose these funds — or he may not be (certainly legal challenges will have to sort it out). But it’s where the money is coming from that is so galling.

Biden wants to take money away from COVID-19-related expenditures and guide it towards something experts can’t agree is real: ‘Human-caused’ global warming.

And he wants to do it at a time when the pandemic is still taking its toll — on lives, on businesses, on economies.

The Daily Caller reports:
The plan would reallocate part of the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA) overall disaster budget to projects designed to preemptively address damage from climate disasters, The Times reported. The agency wants to build seawalls and elevate or relocate homes in flood planes with the reallocated funds.
FEMA plans to include funding allocated for COVID-19 response in its restructuring of the budget, according to The Times. FEMA Acting Deputy Associate Administrator for Disaster Mitigation Michael M. Grimm said that an initial estimate found $3.7 billion that could go to the program to address climate change with the potential for more later on. …

The plan would need approval from the White House budget office, according to The Times. The proposal focuses less on reducing greenhouse gas emissions and is more concentrated on protecting homes and people from severe storms, flooding and fires.

We are currently facing four converging crises — COVID-19, the resulting economic crisis, climate change, and racial inequity. Today, President Biden took actions to combat these challenges. pic.twitter.com/091jmvCukk
— The White House (@WhiteHouse) January 21, 2021
Right now, COVID-19 is real and pressing; the economic fallout from the pandemic is real and pressing. We can have a discussion about alleged “racial inequity” (most libs don’t really know what that term means, anyway) and ‘climate change’ when the other two, far more pressing, issues are resolved.

Or not. Guess it’s Biden’s call these days, huh?

This decision to forego prioritizing Americans’ health and financial well-being fits in well with Biden’s other orders dismantling tens of thousands of jobs with the stroke of a pen.










Conversation42 Comments
 

Pinecone

Has No Life - Lives on TB
What could possibly go wrong with this? I guess if you had one of the severe reactions to the vaccine, you were just out of luck. Stuck in the snow.


Oregon health officials hand out leftover vaccines on the roadside after snow closure
by KTVL Staff
Wednesday, January 27th 2021
AA
(Josephine County Health Department via KTVL)
(Josephine County Health Department via KTVL)


3
VIEW ALL PHOTOS
View All Photos

(Josephine County Health Department via KTVL)
Facebook Share Icon Twitter Share Icon Email Share Icon

JOSEPHINE COUNTY, Ore. (KTVL) — County health officials in Oregon were able to save some doses of the coronavirus vaccine from spoiling by giving them to drivers who were stuck on the side of the road during a snowstorm Tuesday.
Josephine County Health Department officials had six doses that were close to expiration with them when they got caught in traffic due to inclement weather.

To avoid wasting the doses, the vaccine was administered to other drivers who were also caught in the snowstorm.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ufPiF8RQzqM
2:56 min

Chinese Suffer Starvation Under Draconian Lockdown | Epoch News | China Insider
•Premiered 3 hours ago


The Epoch Times

Suihua City of Heilongjiang Province is currently one of the six areas designated in China as “high-risk” for pandemic control. Heilongjiang is a northeastern province bordering Russia, and as China battles a resurgence of the CCP virus this winter, the people living there are being hit particularly hard.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: bev

marsh

On TB every waking moment
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rxg01L6Hh2E
12:23 min

NEW COVID 19 Variants (How Concerned Should We BE?)

•Jan 27, 2021


Doctor Mike Hansen


NEW COVID 19 Variants (How Concerned Should We BE?)

Genetic variants of COVID 19 are expected as viruses mutate all the time. Coronaviruses mutate slower than most RNA viruses, with an average rate of two nucleotide changes per month. A random mutation may make a virus more fit leading to an evolutionary advantage, as in what happens with natural selection, survival of the fittest.. from the viruses standpoint. …or the mutation could have no impact on its survival. Eventually, a viral variant with an evolutionary advantage will become the dominant form of the virus. Worldwide there are twelve key clades or variants of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

Sometimes the increased spread of a viral variant can only be attributed to chance. If a virus with a new mutation is carried by a super-spreader, moves to a new uninfected location, or is introduced to a new segment of the population, its rate of spread will increase. The U.K. variant has become the dominant variant in multiple regions of the world, which means it’s less likely a coincidence.

Each time scientists identify a new variant. It raises the questions: does the mutation increase the viral transmission rate, does it cause more severe disease, and will the current vaccines or a previous infection still provide protection?

Viruses can be sloppy with their replication process. Proofreading to ensure that there are minimal errors in the genetic code takes time. Organisms usually reproduce slowly and with fewer errors or reproduce quickly and make more errors. Multiple variants of a virus with slight changes in the genetic code are then replicating in an environment that encourages survival of the fittest.
Viral variants that are more deadly or more transmissible win out over those with a lower ability to survive and flourish.

The only way to slow the development of new viral variants is to hinder their ability to replicate. The best way to slow the replication process is vaccination. Achieving herd immunity by vaccinating 80% of the population is what will get this done.

The COVID 19 strain called B.1.1.7 identified in the U.K. has spread across the country, with studies out of London suggesting that the U.K. variant is 55% more infectious, which raised the reproduction rate, a measurement of how contagious an infectious disease is, to an estimated range of 1.5 to 1.7 and prompted the lockdowns in London. The reproduction rate has since decreased to around 0.8 to 1.0. The prevalence of the U.K. variant has essentially doubled, which means more infections, which means more hospitalizations and deaths. Also it means more long-haulers, the often overlooked group of people still suffering the effect of COVID 19 long after they came down with the infection. The U.K. viral variant has been identified in Canada and 20 states in the U.S. Scientists so far are not sure how the new viral variant increases its infectivity. One possibility is that people who are infected with the new variant may shed more virus. Higher viral loads in the nose can increase infection risk when an infected droplet lands on your eyes, mouth, or nose. Another possibility is that the new variants increase the time someone may shed the virus and, therefore, are contagious. Another possibility is that the virus is more stable in the environment. But the most likely explanation is that it binds better to the human ACE2 receptor, and so far, this is what the evidence is suggesting. In the U.K., PCR tests can distinguish the old variant from the B.1.1.7 variant. Mathematicians compared the death rates between those who have died from the old variant and those who have died from the new variant. This analysis led to a statement that the new variant, besides being more contagious, may also be more deadly. The New and Emerging Virus Threats Advisory Group (Nervtag) says that there is a realistic possibility that the virus had become more deadly, but this was far from certain. They report that there are hints that the U.K. variant is 30% more deadly, raising the deaths per 1000 from 1% to 1.3%. Both the Pfizer and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines are expected to work against the U.K. variant, as there is no biologically significant difference in neutralization activity, based on the evidence so far.

Mutations in the spike protein can weaken the expected antibody response after an infection with a previous variant of the SARS-CoV-2 virus or vaccination. When the immune system is first exposed to the viral antigen by means of either an infection or vaccination, it activates a response from both arms of the immune system producing antibodies and cellular response. Memory cells are held in reserve to mount a quicker and more substantial immune response to neutralize a repeat infection.

In the laboratory, the Pfizer vaccine has demonstrated the ability to neutralize the N501Y mutation found in the U.K. variant. - Doctor Mike Hansen
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KVLndvFlvEI
7:51 min

Your COVID Vaccine Questions Answered
•Premiered 7 hours ago


JAMA Network

Millions of people are now being immunized with the new Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna mRNA vaccines. Are they effective? Are they safe? Infectious disease and global health expert Carlos del Rio, MD, of Emory University answers your questions. 0:00 Introduction 0:20 Can I take the vaccine if I have immune disease, cancer, or am on immunosuppressive drugs? 0:44 Can I take the vaccine if I'm pregnant or breastfeeding? 1:16 Can I take the vaccine if I have allergies? 1:38 What if I have a history of severe allergic reactions? 2:16 Can I take the vaccine if I already had COVID-19? 2:55 Is either of the vaccines better than the other, and can I switch between doses? 3:42 Can I take only take 1 dose to minimize risk? 4:20 I had the first dose and still got COVID-19. Should I take the 2nd dose? 5:15 I missed my appointment for the 2nd dose. How late can I still get it? 5:54 Are there natural ways to improve my immunity? 6:30 Will virus mutations make the vaccine less effective? 7:09 How long does protection last?
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

First Cases Of South African COVID Mutant Discovered In The US: Live Updates

THURSDAY, JAN 28, 2021 - 12:48

Summary:
  • South African variant arrives in US
  • NYC vaccine logjam eases
  • AstraZeneca battle with EU intensifies
  • Germany recommends AZ shot only for people 18-64
  • US cases near 26MM
  • Global cases near 101MM
  • WHO team ready to start investigation in China
  • Cuomo lifts restrictions on hot spots
  • CCP tightens security in Beijing
  • Russia offers vaccine help
  • South Africa's first vaccines arrive Feb. 1
  • Africa secures another 400MM doses
  • Vietnam reports outbreak
  • Mexico's AMLO recovering from COVID infection
  • Malaysia sees cases top 4.1K
  • South Korea starts emergency vaccination program next month, while most will wait until Oct.
* * *
Update (1150ET): After Germany cast doubt on the efficacy of AstraZeneca's COVID vaccines when public health authorities said it shouldn't be given to patients over the age of 64, NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio announced Thursday that the shortage of COVID vaccines is finally starting to ease up.


In other New York-related news, state officials warned Thursday that the true tally of patients who died in nursing homes due to COVID is closer to 8.7K, according to AG Letitia James, nearly 2x the tally from before.

But the biggest news in the US on Thursday morning is confirmation that the COVID-19 mutant strain first identified in South Africa has finally been confirmed in the US. Two cases have been identified in South Carolina, according to the Associated Press.

The two cases don't appear to be connected, a phenomenon that one doctor described as "frightening" because...it means there could be more undetected cases within the state...said Dr. Krutika Kuppalli, an infectious diseases physician at the Medical University of South Carolina in Charleston. "It’s probably more widespread."

Dr. Krutika's comments notably follow by just a few days remarks from Gov. Cuomo and others who said for the first time that they would soon be forced to start reopening "non-essential" businesses.

* * *
The battle between Brussels and AstraZeneca intensified Thursday due to the shortage of AstraZeneca vaccine doses, as the company (which developed the vaccine with the help of the UK's Oxford University) doesn't have enough doses to supply all of Europe during the first three months of the year. Talks held last night were apparently not very constructive, according to the FT, as they did little to resolve the dispute over whether AstraZeneca should distribute tens of millions more doses to the EU than it had planned, depriving other countries (including the UK) of promised doses.


The dispute between AZ and the 27 remaining EU governments (now that the UK has left the bloc) escalated last night, as the pharma company continued to insist that its contract with the EU doesn't require it to stick to this original delivery schedule. It must only make its "best effort" to do so. EU Health Commissioner Stella Kyriakides said late on Wednesday that the European bloc remained "united and firm" in its belief that "contractual obligations must be met”.

"We regret the continued lack of clarity on the delivery schedule and request a clear plan from AstraZeneca for the fast delivery of the quantity of vaccines that we reserved for Q1," she tweeted after the talks with AZ CEO Pascal Soriot and other executives. "We will work with the company to find solutions and deliver vaccines rapidly for EU citizens." The EU says AstraZeneca will only be able to deliver roughly 25% of the 100MM or more doses expected during the first three months of the year, dealing a heavy blow to the European bloc’s already lagging vaccine rollout.

While the EU panics about the shortage of vaccine supplies, the Russian team behind the vaccine developed by the Gamaleya has offered to send the bloc doses of "Sputnik V", warning that the EU deserves "diversified" doses of the vaccine, RT reports.

Germany has recommended that AstraZeneca vaccine shots be used only for 18 to 64-year-olds, just days after the country pushed back against plans to export the vaccine. The German group of researchers, which evaluates vaccines for the German government, said there was insufficient information on the shot’s effectiveness for people 65+.

Whether AZ manages to ramp up supplies, or not, the EMA (The EU's pharma regulator) is expected to approve the AstraZeneca vaccine as soon as Friday.
Globally, at least 100.97MM people have tested positive, while 2.2MM have died. In the US, 25.6MM have tested positive, while 429K have died.



Across the US, cases and hospitalizations have continued to decline. Deaths are more mixed, with some states seeing deaths rise, while others are seeing deaths fall.



In New York, Gov. Andrew Cuomo lifted restrictions in most hot spots across the state, declaring an end to the post-holiday surge in cases and hospitalizations.
Finally, Beijing is ratcheting up requirements needed to enter the capital city ahead of the biggest CCP political meeting of the year. Now that their two week quarantine period is over, WHO investigators will soon begin their inspection of Beijing, according to Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian.

After becoming the first EU member to approve Russia's "Sputnik V" vaccine, Prime Minister Viktor Orban is planning an order that will "automatically" approve vaccines in emergencies if the shots are already being used in another country. The Philippines version of the FDA, meanwhile, has approved AstraZeneca's vaccine the second to be approved in the Philippines after Pfizer.

Here's some more COVID news from overnight and Thursday morning:
  • South Africa’s first vaccines will arrive in the country on Feb. 1, signaling the start of an inoculation program that has been criticized for its tardiness (Source: Bloomberg).
  • Vietnam reported a coronavirus outbreak in two northern provinces, triggering movement curbs and prompting a plunge in stocks (Source: Bloomberg).
  • The Africa Centres for Disease Control has secured an additional 400m doses of the Covid-19 vaccine through the Serum Institute of India, as the continent undergoes a surge in cases during a second wave that is far worse than the first (Source: FT).
  • Mexican President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador is resting and in isolation after testing positive for Covid-19, his spokesman said in an interview (Source: Bloomberg).
  • Malaysia reports 4,094 coronavirus cases, raising the cumulative total in the country to 198,208 infections.The health ministry also conforms 10 new deaths (Source: Nikkei).
  • South Korea will start "emergency" candidate vaccinations shortly, before moving on to vaccinate members of the general public some time during the third quarter (Source: Nikkei)
* * *
Now that officials have apparently brought the Beijing in and around outbreak under control with a heavy hand, China revealed that 54 new cases were confirmed on Wednesday, down from 75 cases reported a day earlier. Of these, 41 were locally transmitted infections compared with 55 a day earlier.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

All Hail The Reopening!

THURSDAY, JAN 28, 2021 - 11:32
Authored by Jeffrey Tucker via The American Institute for Economic Research,
What a glorious thing the reopening is! After nearly a year of darkening times, the light has begun to dawn, at least in the US.


Given how incredibly political this pandemic has been from the beginning, many people smell a rat. Is it really the case that the reopening of the American economy, particularly in blue states, is so perfectly timed? Do the science and politics really line up so well?

These are questions for another day. And for the record, my own opinion is that the loosening of restrictions is timed well with the relaxing of public disease fear, from whatever source, political or through exhaustion or through a shift in the media narrative. In any case, it doesn’t matter for now. What matters right now is that the astonishing destructiveness of lockdowns might be coming to an end.

For those of us inveighing against lockdowns for a full year, it’s truly been a remarkable week. Restrictions are being loosened or are going away. We are finally getting some truth about the carnage. And we are even starting to see some elected officials being honest with us.

Let’s start in the most locked down state on the mainland: Massachusetts. Governor Charles Baker, whose pandemic management has wrecked so many businesses in his state, has decided it’s time to open up restaurants and businesses.

A hospital epidemiologist at Tufts Medical Center admits that the lockdowns didn’t achieve their goal. Shira Dorn said: “Businesses and restaurants have not been shown to be a significant source of spread of infection, and it’s not clear that the additional measures that were instituted in November and December actually helped.”

So sorry we ruined your holidays and lives.

The egregious limits on gatherings will persist for a few more weeks, but the tone of the argument here has shifted. It is the most significant change in state policy in a very long time. Perhaps people can begin soon to get their human rights back?

The same is happening in other states.
  • Washington, D.C. will resume indoor dining.
  • Maryland’s governor has decided that the state needs to reopen schools now and no later than March 1.
  • Gov. Gretchen Whitmer of Michigan says Michigan restaurants can reopen for indoor dining on February 1. Her health adviser decided to resign. Let us hope it is the beginning of many.
  • Chicago’s mayor is now demanding an immediate opening of restaurants and bars. Chicago is also threatening teachers unions that they must return to work.
  • New York Governor Cuomo has dramatically reversed his rhetorical course and demanded a reopening of the city. More announcements are expected in the coming days.
  • California Governor Gavin Newsom, incredibly, has lifted all stay-at-home orders across the state and is permitting dining to open up. Many restaurants have defied orders for months now, and good for them. This new announcement shows that their defiance had an influence.
  • Montana’s new governor has lifted some Covid restrictions.
National Public Radio has decided to announce that the virus has peaked.

The WHO is insisting that the PCR cycle threshold must change.
If nations adjust, it should make a big difference in the case trend.

And perhaps in the most honest statement uttered by any elected official in twelve months, Joseph Biden said the following:
“There’s nothing we can do to change the trajectory of the pandemic in the next several months.” He didn’t need to qualify that statement. He could have stopped after pandemic.
CNN has removed the death tracker from its main page, while the New York Times has reported a 33% decline in new cases in the past two weeks. Plus, the Times, which arguably made the most profound contribution to the public panic over the virus, is finally reporting on the terrible carnage.

In an incredibly heartbreaking article, the Times chronicles the unspeakable deaths of despair from young children denied schooling over the past year. It’s an absolutely shocking article, one that should echo unto the ages, given what happened this last year. It’s worth a read.

As for the astonishingly anti-scientific blather dished out by the media over the last year, even that is starting to change. The Washington Post has published a helpful introduction to immunological basics, as written by JHU Professor Marty Makary:
Having the infection activates both antibodies as well as memory B- and T-cells, which teach your immune system to recognize the same virus in the future to swiftly eradicate it.
Natural immunity after covid-19 infection appears to last for at least the one year in which the virus has been circulating at large.
Extrapolating from research on the SARS and MERS coronaviruses, it could be much longer. In one study of 176 people infected with SARS, immunity lasted for an average of two years. Another long-term analysis of health-care workers previously infected with SARS found antibodies up to 12 years later. Protective antibodies for the MERS coronavirus have similarly been documented to last for at least three years. And while the 1918 pandemic was caused by an influenza virus, the immune systems of those infected were able to make antibodies to the virus nearly nine decades later, a 2008 Nature study found.
Even mild infections appear to elicit a persistent and functional immune response. One recent European study found that people who had mild or asymptomatic covid-19 mounted a “robust T-cell immunity” afterward. A separate French study affirmed this, noting that some people who lived with a confirmed covid-infected person developed T-cell immunity even when they did not test positive for covid.
The article goes even further to openly admit what many of us have noticed since March:
“Many medical experts have been dismissive of natural immunity due to prior infection, but there is overwhelming data showing that covid-19 reinfections are rare, and when they do occur, the infection is often mild.”
These basic facts fundamentally change the rationale for locking down. We’ve evolved with viruses without locking down. Starting in the late 19th century, once we got smarter about viruses, we realized that protection of the vulnerable and exposure among the non-vulnerable, in the framework of a functioning society, was the best approach to dealing with pandemics. We pursued that policy for a full century until last year. The unprecedented experiment with lockdowns will end up causing more death than if we had maintained a functioning society while treating disease as a medical and not a political problem.

We are also getting some truth telling on track-and-trace, courtesy of Holman Jenkins in the Wall Street Journal:
Top of the list is magic solution X, a national test and trace program. I won’t mince words. A 9-year-old could see the math didn’t work. Covid spreads more easily than the flu. An overwhelming share of cases are asymptomatic or indistinguishable from ailments that millions of Americans suffer every day. In a country as big, mobile and open as the U.S., there was zero chance of catching and isolating enough spreaders to matter.
Many experts said so at the time, but quietly. Anthony Fauci eventually said so, but quietly. All implicitly knew not to get between the media and its imperative that every big misfortune be played as a failure of inadequate government.
Even when the testing data shouted the truth, the press couldn’t hear it. Our testing misses 70% to 90% of Covid cases and yet 91% of the people being tested for Covid tested negative and were suffering from something else. We were never going to make a dent in the epidemic this way. It was a distraction.
Finally, we have actual experiments in openness right here in the US. Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, and South Dakota have all been open since the spring of last year, with life continuing on more or less as normal. The results have been no worse and most often better than what we see in lockdown states. It’s almost as if the virus doesn’t care about your political solutions.

One final data point. I watched the AFC Championship football game last night. Gone were the dreary ads of 2020 that all began “In these challenging times.”

Instead we were treated to pictures of happy parties, friends socializing, people living life normally and happily. Even the masks are going away. True the stadium was only half full due to preposterous regulations but it felt much more normal.

Are our governments getting wise? Doubtful but many are feeling pressure to start recognizing the rights of human beings again. The new variant (viruses naturally mutate and the NYT is trying to bring calm) might frighten them again. Biden has already imposed new international travel restrictions. We aren’t out of the woods yet.

Will they admit error and apologize? That will take longer if it happens at all. At this point, right now, other things matter more. The priority must be to emancipate us from bad science and destructive policy so we can put our lives back together again.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

U.S. Billionaires Boost Their Wealth by 40 Percent During Coronavirus Crisis
1,817
billionaires
Getty Images for Global Citizen/Britta Pedersen-Pool/MANDEL NGAN/GRAEME JENNINGS/POOL/AFP via Getty Images
JOHN BINDER28 Jan 2021277

Billionaires in the United States have increased their wealth by nearly 40 percent since the start of the Chinese coronavirus crisis, new analysis finds.

The nation’s 660 billionaires have grown their collective net worth by $1.1 trillion since March 2020, when economic lockdowns closed small and medium-sized businesses, according to analysis by Americans for Tax Fairness.

In March 2020, U.S. billionaires had a combined net worth of just under $3 trillion. Today, that net worth has jumped to $4.1 trillion — a 38.6 percent increase in wealth for the nation’s richest one percent of earners.

At the same time, 18 million Americans remain jobless, 6.2 million are underemployed, and hundreds of thousands of small businesses have been forced to close.

The wealth growth among billionaires has been so vast that 46 former millionaires have become billionaires since the start of the crisis. Their $4.1 trillion combined wealth means that they have more money than the bottom half of earners — 165 million Americans — whose combined wealth stands at $2.4 trillion.

Specifically, Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos has grown his wealth by more than 60 percent since March 2020 while Tesla CEO Elon Musk has boosted his wealth by 628.5 percent. Similarly, Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates has raked in 23 percent more during the crisis than before and Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has increased his wealth by nearly 70 percent.

The analysis shows the massive gap in economic gains and losses between the nation’s wealthiest and working and middle class Americans who have disproportionately been impacted by the crisis and the subsequent economic lockdowns various state governments have imposed.

Pew Research Center analysis from 2018 found that between the year 2000 and 2016, median household income for middle class Americans has been stagnant while the median household income for working class Americans is less than it was 16 years prior.
 
Top