gawarriorqueen
WWG1WGA
x1000
Is THIS the face you want to see coming to you from the WH every day?
- Thread starter Dennis Olson
- Start date
x1000
ElevenO
Veteran Member
I just saw this pic of Romney. I wanted to post it, and ask that question. Look at the man's face. Closely. Look into his eyes. His vacant eyes. Look at his bland, mindless smile. Really, is THIS the guy you're going to support? What kind of job do you really think he'll do if he gets elected....?
No and that's why I didn't vote for him during georgia's primary last week.
bbkaren
Veteran Member
I abhor that glib little grin he gets after he makes a clever statement during the debates, and he's listening to the other person respond.
I want to slap it right off his face.
Countrymouse
Country exile in the city
You know, I was thinking about this this morning:
I heard on the news there is a good likelihood that Romney will ask Ron Paul to be his running-mate.
Now--you purists out there, who seem to think (by accusing us of voting for the "lesser of 2 evils"--
(and by the way, so far I've voted for Cain--then the libtard media falsely tarred him -- because O was scared to DEATH of him---and then for Gingrinch, who I've known forever, being a native Georgian myself, and know that what the media is saying about HIM is EQUALLY a LIE---but of course now he's losing, too)--
what you're saying, by inference, is there is "no evil" in Ron Paul---he is a perfect candidate and utterly without fault.
(which I don't believe, by the way----unless you're voting for JESUS CHRIST then you ARE voting for "the lesser of two evils"--because one "human" man can only be "less sinful" than another sinful "human man"--no one is perfect and free of "evil" except Jesus Christ)---
Well, if that is so, and your "perfect" and "free from evil" Ron Paul DOES decide to go and team himself with the man you have all been castigating as "Obama-lite" and an expression of "evil"--
WHAT DOES THAT MAKE RON PAUL?
Think about that a minute.
You are saying you are too "pure" to compromise.
THEN your "pure" candidate compromises.
WHAT will you do then?
(I will be laughing so hard)
I heard on the news there is a good likelihood that Romney will ask Ron Paul to be his running-mate.
Now--you purists out there, who seem to think (by accusing us of voting for the "lesser of 2 evils"--
(and by the way, so far I've voted for Cain--then the libtard media falsely tarred him -- because O was scared to DEATH of him---and then for Gingrinch, who I've known forever, being a native Georgian myself, and know that what the media is saying about HIM is EQUALLY a LIE---but of course now he's losing, too)--
what you're saying, by inference, is there is "no evil" in Ron Paul---he is a perfect candidate and utterly without fault.
(which I don't believe, by the way----unless you're voting for JESUS CHRIST then you ARE voting for "the lesser of two evils"--because one "human" man can only be "less sinful" than another sinful "human man"--no one is perfect and free of "evil" except Jesus Christ)---
Well, if that is so, and your "perfect" and "free from evil" Ron Paul DOES decide to go and team himself with the man you have all been castigating as "Obama-lite" and an expression of "evil"--
WHAT DOES THAT MAKE RON PAUL?
Think about that a minute.
You are saying you are too "pure" to compromise.
THEN your "pure" candidate compromises.
WHAT will you do then?
(I will be laughing so hard)
bbkaren
Veteran Member
First, please stop saying anyone thinks Paul is perfect; he's not.
Second, it's not gonna happen. That rumor is weeks old and has been debunked several times, specifically by the RP campaign.
If it were to happen, people would drop their support for him in droves.
Glad you got a chuckle, though.
Second, it's not gonna happen. That rumor is weeks old and has been debunked several times, specifically by the RP campaign.
If it were to happen, people would drop their support for him in droves.
Glad you got a chuckle, though.
Countrymouse
Country exile in the city
time will tell.
Well, if that is so, and your "perfect" and "free from evil" Ron Paul DOES decide to go and team himself with the man you have all been castigating as "Obama-lite" and an expression of "evil"--
Your speculation is just that. He won't. And thumping your chest over the possibility won't make it happen.
Your speculation is just that. He won't. And thumping your chest over the possibility won't make it happen.
enigmaYmee
Contributing Member
I am under no delusions that RP is a perfect candidate. But he is the only one who thinks of the Constitution before he votes and speaks. Both the R's and the D's want(and have made) a Govt. that doesn't follow it at all, letter or spirit. That is the real issue.
How is it any better for RomTorGrich be in office than Obama when they all want policies in place that are UNCONSTITUTIONAL?
timbo
Deceased
Right on the money CM. Straight thinking.
what you're saying, by inference, is there is "no evil" in Ron Paul---he is a perfect candidate and utterly without fault.
What YOU'RE saying, by inference, is that RP is "just like the rest of them, so why not vote for one of them who can win."
What YOU'RE saying, by inference, is that RP is "just like the rest of them, so why not vote for one of them who can win."
dimensiondancer
Inactive
RP has all these "sounds real good" sort of ideas, but has anyone taken the time to think through how they would work? Has he told you how he would do it exactly? Did it make sense? Any repercussions you can think of?
Getting rid of the Federal Reserve. Yeah, just how would that work and what would happen?
Stopping Social Security? I'm 61 and this doesn't sound too great for me, especially after this crash you say is coming. See, that is where my IRA is, this will leave me with no SS or no IRA at 61. Sucks to be me should Paul win. He thinks he can pull the young ones out of SS and keep the old ones in? Just how will that work? How can it be funded and what if it cannot?
All these words sound nice, but anyone can spout words. Obama promissed lots of hope and insurance for all. And we know what he has done, just as we all thought he would.
I don't trust any of them to any full degree. We just have varied degrees of thoughts, promises, ideas and spew of whatever they chose to say so it will get them elected. Then the real party starts, well for them anyway. Vacations, vacations and whatever.
I'd rather have anyone else in there who could beat out Obama, so we can watch another family take nice vacations and forget their promises. And don't tell me it won't happen because it just will. No one can fix this mess we are in, but they can shuffle some of it to make the fall a little less harsh.
And if Paul doesn't take vacations or fall back on his promises, will he even live long enough to accomplish anything except YOUR chest thumping (i.e He has Risen!)? I doubt any of the puppet masters would let him change a damn thing.
But at least, the Commie Kenyan Clown would be gone.
Getting rid of the Federal Reserve. Yeah, just how would that work and what would happen?
Stopping Social Security? I'm 61 and this doesn't sound too great for me, especially after this crash you say is coming. See, that is where my IRA is, this will leave me with no SS or no IRA at 61. Sucks to be me should Paul win. He thinks he can pull the young ones out of SS and keep the old ones in? Just how will that work? How can it be funded and what if it cannot?
All these words sound nice, but anyone can spout words. Obama promissed lots of hope and insurance for all. And we know what he has done, just as we all thought he would.
I don't trust any of them to any full degree. We just have varied degrees of thoughts, promises, ideas and spew of whatever they chose to say so it will get them elected. Then the real party starts, well for them anyway. Vacations, vacations and whatever.
I'd rather have anyone else in there who could beat out Obama, so we can watch another family take nice vacations and forget their promises. And don't tell me it won't happen because it just will. No one can fix this mess we are in, but they can shuffle some of it to make the fall a little less harsh.
And if Paul doesn't take vacations or fall back on his promises, will he even live long enough to accomplish anything except YOUR chest thumping (i.e He has Risen!)? I doubt any of the puppet masters would let him change a damn thing.
But at least, the Commie Kenyan Clown would be gone.
But at least, the Commie Kenyan Clown would be gone.
Yes CM, because "our scum is better than their scum". Ah yes, the mantra of the sheep. That's how brainwashed you are. I understand how hard it can be to actually start thinking for one's self. BTDT...
Yes CM, because "our scum is better than their scum". Ah yes, the mantra of the sheep. That's how brainwashed you are. I understand how hard it can be to actually start thinking for one's self. BTDT...
Yes, your point is to get out the guns and start taking the country back by force of arms.
Walrus Whisperer
Hope in chains...
This is the SAME stare that McCain. Thats why I voted for Sarah, not McCain.
Frankly thats the look of someone who is hostile and that smile is pasted on, NOT genuine.
Frankly thats the look of someone who is hostile and that smile is pasted on, NOT genuine.
dimensiondancer
Inactive
CM is brainwashed because you quoted me? At least if I sass someone, I know who I am sassing? LOL
If CM and myself are considered "brainwashed", then I think it's quite fair to call you and the other Paulites "mesmerized by fantasy". I'll accept my insult if you accept yours.
dimensiondancer
Inactive
WW, If you judge people by their faces, how do you judge Steven Hawking, as an idiot? How do you judge Satan, who was the most beautiful of all angels? And how do you judge Dennis Olson? By his looks? What do they say? I am trying to get a point across and judgement and how they don't all pass the test.
Superficial features are hogwash in my book.
But that is just me.
Superficial features are hogwash in my book.
But that is just me.
peetar
Inactive
Im trying to make the point that if the voting is rigged, there is no point in voting at all.
Why aren't the guns out already? Because people are not on 1100 or less calories per day...yet.
Until that day arrives, it is a pipe dream. I don't see anyone here doing it. Im certainly not going to.
nharrold
Deceased
How on earth did he ever con the Irish into electing him???
Chair Warmer
Membership Revoked
If Obama were to win maybe that would be best, because then the public wouldn't have such a false sense of security like they would with Romney. At least with Obama they know it's in-your-face ugly and there's no denying the doom.
The Cub
Behold, I am coming soon.
Of the Colonists during the 1770's....only 1/3 fought against the British.....1/3 remained loyal to the British.......and the other 1/3 knew and wanted to fight against the British (or at least support the Contiential Army) but were afraid to as "they could not prevail".
Well they did prevail.
The banksters continue to finance the campaigns of their whores on both sides of the aisle.....and convince limmings that they should not vote for a 3rd candidate as "he is not electible".
THE TIME FOR THIS NONSENSE OVER.
The only chance that the Republic has is to elect Dr. Paul.....and as many Congressmen like him that can be elected. i.e. throw them all out and start over.....start over using the US Constitution as a guide.
Is Dr. Paul the Savior? No, and as has been explained above, the US economy (and that of the world will indeed collapse). Dr. Paul has a plan to deal with that as painlessly as possible to re-vive and save the republic.
The other whores will do what they are told and merge the former USA into the North American Union with Canada and Mexico as is planned. Step two will be to merge all of these economic unions together under the United Nations.
Essentially, what is being said above is "If you think that you might like to continue to live in a republic.......VOTE RON PAUL." The alternative is fascism on a scale never seen before.
Well they did prevail.
The banksters continue to finance the campaigns of their whores on both sides of the aisle.....and convince limmings that they should not vote for a 3rd candidate as "he is not electible".
THE TIME FOR THIS NONSENSE OVER.
The only chance that the Republic has is to elect Dr. Paul.....and as many Congressmen like him that can be elected. i.e. throw them all out and start over.....start over using the US Constitution as a guide.
Is Dr. Paul the Savior? No, and as has been explained above, the US economy (and that of the world will indeed collapse). Dr. Paul has a plan to deal with that as painlessly as possible to re-vive and save the republic.
The other whores will do what they are told and merge the former USA into the North American Union with Canada and Mexico as is planned. Step two will be to merge all of these economic unions together under the United Nations.
Essentially, what is being said above is "If you think that you might like to continue to live in a republic.......VOTE RON PAUL." The alternative is fascism on a scale never seen before.
If my fantasy is to restore the Republic and get rid of rat bastard scum-sucking elitists running this country, than I too wear my label with pride. You should be wearing MY label instead of the treasonous one you wear...
Chair Warmer
Membership Revoked
Because it gives TPTB a barometer of the people's will and how far off track they're veering from it. If they had a conscience, which they don't, then they may just feel an inkling of guilt. But since they don't feel any guilt, maybe they can feel a bit nervous or maybe a little fear. At least it cuts down their confidence level by a notch or two.
PotatoKid
Senior Member
Ugggh I just don't know anymore. Every single candidate EXCEPT Ron Paul just seems skeezy and bad bad bad, and although I do disagree with a few of Pauls ideas for the most part, I think it's time to have a someone independent of this right/left/corporate crap in office. Plus I like many of his ideas, although I reaaaallly hope he still intends to help out Israel if she needs it.
dimensiondancer
Inactive
I'd like to say right back at cha, but I won't because I am not a name caller, labeller and a forceful "do as I say" person! If I don't have the right to say so, this is no longer a discussion board, it is a forced against your free will to do as I say board as you are now acting as the new thought police. And we are supposed to play nice here, right?
So please be nice and say it isn't so, because I am not a treasonist. Voting of your own free will isn't Treason Dennis. Before long, you will have members thinking that they are no longer welcome here because you've become quite a dictator in your demands of how others think, act or obey.
You can get your point across without calling names. So I guess I'll be the next to be banned, and if so, I'd like to tell everyone bye, nice knowing you.
And if not, great. Everyone should vote as they see fit, just as I will.
Voting of your own free will isn't Treason Dennis.
Voting for scum who YOU KNOW will destroy America certainly IS treasonous, but of course you already know that...
Voting for scum who YOU KNOW will destroy America certainly IS treasonous, but of course you already know that...
dimensiondancer
Inactive
And exactly who is it that *I* know will destroy America? Can you sit here and say you can tell me what I know, really?
Who exactly is it that I've studied and know so well?
Who exactly is it that I've studied and know so well?
dimensiondancer
Inactive
Oh wait, last year it McCain who was going to destroy America. Lucky us, we got Obama to do it instead.
You know. You just won't say it out loud...
dimensiondancer
Inactive
Yes I will......... O B A M A THE COMMIE KENYAN CLOWN.......
hold your applause, thank you very much!
hold your applause, thank you very much!
That's Kommie Kenyan Klown (homage to Killer Klowns from Outer Space)
Look DD, I understand EXACTLY how bad His Holiness is. I just can't understand the OBA meme on the part of so many people, especially if the "A" is just another Obama. that makes ZERO sense to me, and is why I absolutely CANNOT get behind RomTorGrich.
Look DD, I understand EXACTLY how bad His Holiness is. I just can't understand the OBA meme on the part of so many people, especially if the "A" is just another Obama. that makes ZERO sense to me, and is why I absolutely CANNOT get behind RomTorGrich.
dimensiondancer
Inactive
You mean as you say, aka Chocolate Messiah? I want his butt out now as I see there is no time for fooling around, the world is getting serious and it just about can't be fixed.
I'd just about vote for Mickey Rooney, hell, I'd vote for Andy Rooney who is dead, if either were running, emphasis on "running" and on the final ballot to defeat Obama.
Final countdown, final show, assclown to assclown, bag of wind to bag of wind - November 2012, but they must be on the ballot.
But that's just me and that's how I roll.
I'd just about vote for Mickey Rooney, hell, I'd vote for Andy Rooney who is dead, if either were running, emphasis on "running" and on the final ballot to defeat Obama.
Final countdown, final show, assclown to assclown, bag of wind to bag of wind - November 2012, but they must be on the ballot.
But that's just me and that's how I roll.
Jeff Allen
Producer
Rustic Rose
Contributing Member
So explain to me why we even have an election since the electoral college selects our presidents.
I'm not aware that they are mandated to choose according to popular vote or according to who's on the ballot.
In fact it would take quite a study of each state to know how the electoral college is selected. I don't believe there's a constitutional mandate as to how they are selected is there.
I'm not aware that they are mandated to choose according to popular vote or according to who's on the ballot.
In fact it would take quite a study of each state to know how the electoral college is selected. I don't believe there's a constitutional mandate as to how they are selected is there.
Dobbin
Faithful Steed
The electoral college is described in glorious (and understandable) detail at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electoral_College_%28United_States%29
The founding fathers did not trust the population to vote for many offices directly, hence the creation of an electoral college. Also, the original mindset of the founders was that STATES would be more individual horses and the FedGov would be simply the "traces" holding the various states together.
More and more the various states are tending to "meld" to a common system of determining electoral votes. But this is a creation of the various state governments - and some - like Cow Hampshire wanting to be the FIRST primary election (Not related but relevant) - tend to be resistant.
Hope this helps. I see this is covered in 10th Grade History and Government classes. It's not exactly on the "A" list of most teen-aged human's mind I imagine.
Joe
I see you're new here Rustic R. Welcome aboard. Dennis will eventually have a session for "newbies" - perhaps you've already done this?
The founding fathers did not trust the population to vote for many offices directly, hence the creation of an electoral college. Also, the original mindset of the founders was that STATES would be more individual horses and the FedGov would be simply the "traces" holding the various states together.
More and more the various states are tending to "meld" to a common system of determining electoral votes. But this is a creation of the various state governments - and some - like Cow Hampshire wanting to be the FIRST primary election (Not related but relevant) - tend to be resistant.
Hope this helps. I see this is covered in 10th Grade History and Government classes. It's not exactly on the "A" list of most teen-aged human's mind I imagine.
Joe
I see you're new here Rustic R. Welcome aboard. Dennis will eventually have a session for "newbies" - perhaps you've already done this?
Last edited:
undead
Veteran Member
Giskard
Only human
Troll.
