GOV/MIL DEVOLUTION, parts 1-6

[Knoxville's Joker]

Thanks for the working link. 65 screen shots are my limit. This 2 hour live reading had me cringing at how many screen shots this would take. I'm passing on bringing this one over.

Get him over here and maybe he can post the material himself...

 

[rob0126]

Is this a supposed secret narrative?

And like ractivist said, who has time to write all of this stuff?

Im hard pressed to believe any of this will save america.

Would make for a good novel though.

 

[intothatgoodnight]

Get him over here and maybe he can post the material himself...

Likely set up the way it is so that it can be monetized, "properly."

Somebody's got to foot the hosting bill, etc.

"Number of eyeballs" viewing the textual info versus viewing a video - much easier for folks to copy/paste text elsewhere, with monetization opportunity lost - or present the info via video - much tougher for most to download to other servers while avoiding author's intended revenue gate.


intothegoodnight

 

[Knoxville's Joker]

Likely set up the way it is so that it can be monetized, "properly."

Somebody's got to foot the hosting bill, etc.

"Number of eyeballs" viewing the textual info versus viewing a video - much easier for folks to copy/paste text elsewhere, with monetization opportunity lost - or present the info via video - much tougher for most to download to other servers while avoiding author's intended revenue gate.


intothegoodnight

I bet if we can coax him properly he can have an exclusive deal setup with us to boost himself and his pockets and screw the copy cats even better...

 

[artichoke]

What if, instead of being a honeypot for the FBI, CIA, Antifa, etc. it was mainly a honeypot for Chris Miller, EKW and the patriots, to force them into action?

Then "Devolution" is a storyline intended to keep the illusion up as long as possible. Recall, Q did tell us "you are watching a movie."

 

[Knoxville's Joker]

What if, instead of being a honeypot for the FBI, CIA, Antifa, etc. it was mainly a honeypot for Chris Miller, EKW and the patriots, to force them into action?

Then "Devolution" is a storyline intended to keep the illusion up as long as possible. Recall, Q did tell us "you are watching a movie."

Yeah, a repeat of the rise of another reich. And I say that is not reigh...

 

[Knoxville's Joker]

OK, I heard from a gamer a family member was discharged from the military and it was signed by president trump, not biden. So there may be credence to Trump still being president...

 

[intothatgoodnight]

OK, I heard from a gamer a family member was discharged from the military and it was signed by president trump, not biden. So there may be credence to Trump still being president...

How long ago was the discharge paperwork started? While Trump was still in office?


intothegoodnight

 

[Knoxville's Joker]

How long ago was the discharge paperwork started? While Trump was still in office?


intothegoodnight

Past week I was told. Not sure if anyone else has seen similar discharge paperwork...

 

[rob0126]

OK, I heard from a gamer a family member was discharged from the military and it was signed by president trump, not biden. So there may be credence to Trump still being president...

what?

If true, this changes everything.

And I dont mean necessarily a good thing

 

[Knoxville's Joker]

what?

If true, this changes everything.

And I dont mean necessarily a good thing

What the crux is that the military is basically running things until another valid election occurs. It is very odd, but I have no way to vet or verify the source, but everything else it does explain a few oddities. And raise even more concerns.

 

[Buick Electra]

(Post 1 of 5)

Devolution - Part 12

If you haven’t read the previous installments of my Devolution series, you can do here: Devolution - Part 1 - by Patel Patriot Devolution - Part 2 - by Patel Patriot Devolution - Part 3 - by Patel Patriot Devolution - Part 4 - by Patel Patriot Devolution - Part 5 - by Patel Patriot

patelpatriot.substack.com

Devolution Part 12

In my previous articles I have discussed the larger battle ongoing between Donald Trump and the political establishment. The “swamp,” the “deep state,” whatever you want to call this enemy, we know they are entrenched throughout all of our major institutions. They did everything they could to prevent Trump from being elected in 2016 and blatantly stole an election in 2020.

Just how deep does the Swamp go? I intend to figure that out to the best of my abilities. This article is going to be the first of at least two articles solely focused on the “deep state” and the tactics they have used throughout Trump’s presidency which culminated in the theft of the 2020 election. Everything from the Russia hoax to installing Biden as president is connected.

The Playbook
The focus of this article is going to be all about providing the proper context that we will need for Devolution - Part 13. It’s incredibly important to understand who the political establishment is and their history of manipulating the political landscape to their benefit. The 2020 United States election wasn’t the first time the political establishment ousted a leader they didn’t want or couldn’t control. Having only followed politics since 2018, what I’ll be covering in this article was new information to me but may not be new to those reading. Either way, it’s important to better understand this topic before we move forward.

Let’s talk about “Color Revolutions,” how the political establishment has mastered them, and how they used their Color Revolution playbook domestically during Trump’s presidency.

What is the definition & purpose of a Color Revolution?

As we go further, you’ll see exactly what is meant by “state destabilization,” but the biggest take away here is knowing all Color Revolutions closely follow the same template. We will be closely examining that template shortly, but first we need to discuss the ideology behind Color Revolutions.



Some major statements are made in the above screenshot. “It is not content with alternative ideological and value systems and must steamroll over them in its pursuit of global dominance.” Doesn’t that sound exactly like what the democratic party has been doing to conservatives for years?

“The state (and society as a whole) must combat a part of itself that is ‘rising up’ against the status quo, leading to a conflict of interest and a social civil war.” Think back to the summer of 2020 and all the violent protesters. Can you think of any instances of mismanagement by the state in dealing with the protests? How many blue state governors did almost nothing to shut down the protests? Was it done on purpose to follow the Color Revolution playbook?

Now that we have a basic understanding of what a Color Revolution is, we will need to go a bit deeper. Revolver news has put out a series of 3 well-researched articles on the topic. Each one is fascinating and worth the full read, but I will be breaking down the main points below.

• EXCLUSIVE - The Curious Case of George Kent: State Department's Belarus "Color Revolution" Expert And "Never Trump" Impeachment Witness - Revolver
• Transition Integrity Project: Is this Soros Linked Group Plotting a "Color Revolution" Against President Trump? - Revolver
• Meet Norm Eisen: Legal Hatchet Man and Central Operative in the "Color Revolution" Against President Trump - Revolver

These articles help outline how our United States government has been using color revolutions over the years to implement regime changes without having to use an actual military “coup.” Instead, they use street protests, disputed elections and a favorable media.

When you read through these articles, you’ll notice that some familiar names start popping up. The people considered to be “Color Revolution Experts” are the same people that were involved in trying to take down Trump during his 1st impeachment.

Norm Eisen is of particular interest. Here is a small sample of what Revolver news had to say.




Now before we get too far, we need to reflect on something from that last screenshot.

…the very same regime change professionals who run Color Revolutions on behalf of the US Government in order to undermine or overthrow alleged ‘authoritarian’ governments overseas, are running the very same playbook to overturn Trump’s 2016 victory and to pre-empt a repeat in 2020.

I’d like to provide some information to substantiate that statement. Let’s look at the “criteria needed for a successful Color Revolution” and compare it to Donald Trump’s presidency.

Let’s break it down. From the above article:

1. “The incumbent leader of the regimes must be very unpopular and face the so-called ‘Lame Duck Syndrome.’”

Even though it was never true, the political establishment started to build this narrative before Trump even entered office.



This narrative was created from the get-go and the authors of it never relented throughout Trump’s first term. Poll after poll, one fake news story after the next, all used to create a narrative that Trump was very unpopular. The first criterion “needed for a successful Color Revolution” is met.

1. “The anti-regime forces are enforced by mass-media and foreign influences.” Here is how E-International Relations explained it:

(Cont'd)

 

[Buick Electra]

(Post 2 of 5)



How much money has George Soros pumped into liberal organizations over the years? How many lies and fake news stories has the media pushed on us during Trump’s first term? The second criterion “needed for a successful Color Revolution” is met.

1. “The revolution must not be ideological; it must be for the sake of better national integration, freedom, democracy and economic development.”

How many times did the democrats say that Trump is a “threat to our Democracy”? That he was a dictator? That removing him from office was needed for the sake of saving America? The third criterion “needed for a successful Color Revolution” is met.

1. “he anti-regime forces should also be motivated by the grievances on the corrupted government which is supported by a foreign state which the people do not desire.”

The Democrats and the media have been trying to paint Donald Trump as a Russian agent since before he took office. We’re starting to see more evidence come out from Durham’s investigation showing us just how big that conspiracy is. It’s all part of the Color Revolution plan that the political establishment used against Trump. The fourth criterion “needed for a successful Color Revolution” is met.

Just the TIP
One of the more interesting and sinister developments that took place in 2020 was creation of the Transition Integrity Project (TIP). On August 3rd of 2020, the Transition Integrity Project released a report titled “Preventing a Disrupted Presidential Election and Transition.” This 22 page document outlined a series of four “war game” election night scenarios. Here is what Revolver news had to say about the Transition Integrity Project.



Participants got too choose whether their involvement would be publicly disclosed or not so we don’t have a full list, but wikipedia listed of some of the participants. Note that Revolver news also reported that Norm Eisen participated in the event.

Remember that they claim that the Transition Integrity Project is “bi-partisan.” Back to Revolver News:





Here are the four scenarios that were “war-gamed” by the Transition Integrity Project:

The following screenshots are how Revolver news broke down and analyzed the Transition Integrity Project’s report. Remember, the TIP report was released in August of 2020, well before the November 3rd election. Compare this to what actually unfolded during the 2020 election.




(Cont'd)

 

[Buick Electra]

(Post 3 of 5)









You can clearly see a picture emerging that the report released by the Transition Integrity Project wasn’t just some war gaming by political figures. This was right out of the playbook they used to steal the the 2020 election and they put it out there for the world to see. Why would they do that?

Here is what American Mind had to say:

This is how the fake-news works, as you might recall from the Russia Hoax. The political establishment fabricated evidence of “Russia, Russia, Russia,” fed it to their puppets in the fake MSM, and those stories were the seeds used to justify further investigation.

Their planted stories are key in their effort to paint their lies as somehow legitimate.



Try to think about this from Donald Trump’s point of view. Trump and his team are not stupid. They knew exactly what was coming. The TIP report sent a clear message that even if Trump wins the election, the political establishment would sow chaos and turmoil for as long as it took until Trump was removed from office.

I’ve said before that Trump had a choice to make leading up to January 20th, 2021. He could either reveal the fraud and remain in office, or “walk away.” What would have happened if Trump made the moves to prevent Joe Biden from taking office? The report from the Transition Integrity Project gave us the answer. There would have been violence in the streets. With tensions as high as they were, we would have had a civil war in our country. The exact type of brief civil war where civilians actually die and Trump would have been forced to act. This would have placed him squarely in a situation where he would undoubtedly be condemned no matter how he responded…that’s how color revolutions work.

Trump really only had one option to save the country from that turmoil; he had to walk away in order to save lives.

When we start really digging into the Transition Integrity Project, it quickly becomes apparent that this group is just the “TIP” of the iceberg of who has been involved in trying to remove Trump from office. As such, it’s important to look at who created the TIP and who paid for it.

The Transition Integrity Project report tells us who the founders are:

Here is what the National Pulse had to say about the two founders:




So the TIP already has ties to George Soros and the CCP through the project’s co-founders. The National Pulse also reported that the TIP is funded by “United to Protect Democracy.” This fact was on the original TIP website which was subsequently taken down and relaunched after having removed that connection. It will become obvious here shortly as to why they didn’t want that connection out there. Thankfully the original site was archived.

(Cont'd)

 

[Buick Electra]

(Post 4 of 5)



The connection to United to Protect Democracy is massive. The first thing to note is the connection between United to Protect Democracy and the Protect Democracy Project. From their website:

“Protect Democracy” was founded by Ian Bassin and Justin Florence, both former Associate Counsels to President Barrack Obama.





Here is the list of organizations who have given money to “Protect Democracy”:



Each one of these organizations almost exclusively donate to left-leaning causes. Let’s look at a few of these organizations more closely. First up, the Bauman Family Foundation.

The Bauman Family Foundation is a member of two coalitions; the Democracy Alliance Conferences and the Funders Committee for Civic Participation.

First, the Democracy Alliance:



Yes, the Democracy Alliance was co-founded by George Soros and the above list of names is a “who’s who” of America haters. Now the Funders Committee for Civic Participation:



Another Soros connection. Are you as shocked as I am? (Insert eye roll here.)

Now let’s look at this interesting connection found within the Joyce Foundation:

The Silicon Valley Community Foundation consists of “Big Tech” players and those who censored Trump and conservatives during the “Color Revolution” that took place during the 2020 election:




When considering those who founded and paid for the Transition Integrity Project, it becomes glaringly obvious that we are witnessing the 2nd criterion to a successful Color Revolution:

“The anti-regime forces are enforced by mass-media and foreign influences.”

Foreign and domestic influences (NGOs) funding a project with the sole intention of creating and planting a narrative: that anything other than a Biden victory will not be accepted and is therefore not possible.

(Cont'd)

 

[Buick Electra]

(Post 5 of 5)

We can go even further here and connect “Protect Democracy” to other aspects of the 2020 election. You might recall that during the summer of 2020, the Democrats were going all over the country filing lawsuits in order to change election laws to their benefit using the pandemic as a pretext. Remember that Marc Elias is at the center of the political establishment’s fight to implement a color revolution domestically. He played a major role in the Russia Hoax and he is anticipated to be one of the individuals on Durham’s unfolding list of indictments. He was also their “go to guy” for many of their pre and post election legal battles.



I didn’t spend the time to dig through all the lawsuits from prior to the 2020 election, but here is one specific example of a Soros funded group (Priorities USA), using Marc Elias as their attorney to change election signature matching laws in Michigan:






If we fast forward to after Biden’s “inauguration,” we see Elias enter the picture again in the fight against forensic audits. The Soros-funded Protect Democracy (who funded the Transition Integrity Project) hired Marc Elias to challenge the Arizona Forensic Audit.



How many other election laws were illegally changed based on lawsuits funded by George Soros or other NGOs?

What Now?
So how could Trump possibly go about defeating the political establishment-- specifically a character like George Soros-- who has been successfully influencing United States politics for years while carefully avoiding “crossing the line” into prosecutable interference?

My initial thought process led me to re-examine Executive Order 13848 - Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States Election. I have covered this EO extensively in previous articles, but up until this point, I had been looking at this EO specifically at the cyber aspect of altering the vote count. For the record, I am still convinced that the military has evidence of direct foreign interference in the cyber arena and that is all they would need to justify devolution as a continuity of government plan. But there is more to EO 13848 and it is worth examining if only to serve as a thought experiment.

EO 13848 mentions interfering or undermining public confidence in United States elections through “the covert distribution of propaganda and disinformation.” The EO then goes on to give us some important definitions, including “foreign interference,” with respect to an election, as well as what constitutes a “foreign government.”

Does the Transition Integrity Project report fit the definition of foreign interference? I think it could be considered “a deceptive action undertaken with the purpose or effect of influencing and/or undermining public confidence in election processes or institutions” but the foreign aspect is a tough one to definitively nail down. Nils Gilman, co-founder of the TIP, has ties to the CCP through the Berggruen Institute but is that connection strong enough or direct enough?

The mentioning of “political party” certainly is interesting. Could George Soros and his Open Society fit that definition? Could the lawsuits that illegally changed election laws be considered foreign interference? I’m not sure it’s possible to legally make those connections but it is definitely interesting to ponder.

Closing
Clearly, the same people from our own government who have implemented color revolutions abroad have also attempted to implement one here, as well.

When you look at Trump’s presidency from a 40,000 ft. view, the massive scope of the swamp comes into focus. This is how one begins to see the picture of what Trump was up against.

Every single move made by the political establishment-- from before Trump took office up until they stole the presidency for Joe Biden, and the subsequent events that have unfolded during Biden’s time in “office”-- have all been part of the “playbook.” Everything from Spygate to the Transition Integrity Project to current events…they are all clearly connected.

Devolution is just one aspect of Trump’s plan to save America. Trump knew well before taking office how corrupt and entrenched the political establishment is. How do you defeat an enemy like that? How do you destroy it so it never returns?

It’s one thing to “cut the head off” but how do you make sure another doesn’t grow in its place?

In order to obtain a total victory, you must first arm yourself with the proper “weapons” with which to do battle.
Buckle up. In my next installment, I’ll be discussing Trump’s “weapon” of choice:

Executive Order 13818: Blocking the Property of Persons Involved in Serious Human Rights Abuse or Corruption
THE BEST IS YET TO COME

 

[Buick Electra]

Part 13 came out yesterday. I just noticed the email. It's 1:30 in the morning. I'M SKIPPING MOST OF THE ATTACHMENTS Patel Patriot loves to include, because he most often explains them after the picture. (I stopped counting at the 53rd attachment!!!) Go to the link to read the attachments

Devolution - Part 13

Shadow Government

patelpatriot.substack.com

Devolution - Part 13
Shadow Government

My original plan for Devolution - Part 13 was an article to serve as a continuation of Devolution - Part 12. I am still working on piecing together the aspects of that article but I felt it was necessary to put that work on hold and put forth this article instead.

This article will outline one of Trump’s key executive orders that I truly believe spells out that we are no doubt in the middle of some sort of Continuity of Government plan that I believe to be a plan of devolution. I briefly touched on this executive order in Devolution - Part 3, but it deserves its own article and detailed breakdown.

I’ve said many times throughout my series that we need to start thinking bigger. I always thought I was thinking bigger but researching for this article led me to the realization I was wrong. I’ve spent a majority of my series focused on the Department of Defense and the military, and they still are very important to what is unfolding, but devolution is much bigger than just the DoD and the military. Just how much bigger?

Let’s find out.

The Executive Order
Governance and Integration of Federal Mission Resilience
On December 7th, 2020, Donald Trump signed Executive Order 13961: Governance and Integration of Federal Mission Resilience (FMR EO). This Executive Order was released simultaneously with the Federal Mission Resilience Strategy 2020 (Strategy). I believe that by the end of this article, you will see that between the FMR EO and the Strategy, the entire framework for devolution has been sitting in the federal register for everybody to see since December 7th, 2020.

Allow me to prove it to you: [skip]

This executive order begins by telling us under what authority Trump has issued it. In addition to the Constitution and laws of the United States, the National Security Act of 1947 is mentioned specifically. The National Security Act of 1947 is found in Chapter 44 of United States Code, Title 50 - War and National Defense. [Skip]

In the very first paragraph, we are made aware of the context that this EO is being issued in. Throughout the entire FMR EO, the phrase “natural disaster” is never mentioned, yet the context of “War and National Defense” is immediately clarified. This is very important. The entire basis for this EO is discussing continuity of government during war and you will see more proof of this as we continue. [Skip]

Presidential Policy Directive-40 (PPD-40) is a classified directive that was issued by Barack Obama. Here is some further background: [Skip]

PPD-40 itself is still classified. As such, we have no way of figuring out the full specifics within that document, but we are still able to learn a few important things about it from documents put forth by FEMA through Federal Continuity Directive 1 & Federal Continuity Directive 2. Both were created based on what is in PPD-40.

• Federal Continuity Directive 1 (FCD-1) - Establishes the framework, requirements, and processes to support the development of executive department and agencies continuity programs by specifying and defining elements of a continuity plan.
• Federal Continuity Directive 2 (FCD-2) - This directive implements the requirements of FCD-1 and provides direction and guidance to all departments and agencies.

The Federal Continuity Directive create the framework for implementation for all continuity programs for the executive branch. FCD-1 even has an entire annex dedicated to Devolution: [Skip]

The above annex tells us that the focus of any continuity of government operation is to sustain the performance of National Essential Functions. The FCDs also define and list exactly what those National Essential Functions are: [Skip] [Skip]

So, let’s breakdown what’s already been established just by the end of the very first section of the FMR EO:

• On December 7th, 2020, Trump issued the FMR EO using Presidential powers based in the context of War & National Defense
• The Section 1 of the FMR EO explains that it is the policy of the United States to perform the NEFs as defined by PPD-40, in a continuity environment, regardless of threat or condition.
• The Federal Continuity Directives gave us those NEFs

Back to the executive order: [Skip]

As I mentioned at the beginning of this article, Trump released this Executive Order in conjunction with the Federal Mission Resilience Strategy (Strategy). I will cover the Strategy in detail in the second part of this article but the whole purpose of the Executive Order and the Strategy is to “increase the resilience of the executive branch.” To “ensure the continuity of operations, continuity of government, and enduring constitutional government.”

This section indicates a clear goal of moving from a reactive posture to a proactive posture when it comes to continuity of government and maintaining the NEFs. What I find most interesting here is what’s required to make such a transition. In order to shift into a proactive posture, you must specifically know, or at least strongly suspect, exactly what might be coming to cause a disruption.

I was a baseball player so forgive me for this imperfect metaphor. Hitting a baseball is not easy, especially if the pitcher has multiple different pitches to choose from (fastball, curveball, slider, etc.) If you don’t know what type of pitch is coming your way as a hitter, you are in a reactive posture. You’re left guessing. However, if you know your pitchers well enough, you can anticipate exactly which balls might be thrown your way, allowing you to hit way more home-runs.

The FMR EO and the Strategy consistently mention trying to get to a proactive posture regarding continuity. To me, that means they already have a pretty clear idea of what “pitch” is coming their way. Trump and those planning the devolution operation knew that the political establishment was going to follow through with stealing the election and as we get further along, you’ll see that the FMR EO and Strategy was Trump’s direct response.

Federal Mission Resilience Executive Committee
Section 3 of the FMR EO established an Executive Committee: [Skip]

Let’s look at who each member of the Executive Committee would have been at the time of this executive order. This Executive Committee will be implementing the Strategy with a goal of ensuring “the continuity of operations, continuity of government, and enduring constitutional government.” These are the brains behind devolution, and consist of some very important names.

Members of the Executive Committee
Secretary of Defense: Christopher Miller

Secretary of Homeland Security: Chad Wolf

Director of National Intelligence: John Ratcliffe

Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs (APNSA) - Also known as National Security Advisor: Robert O’Brien

Assistant to the President and Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations: Tony Ornato

Director of the Office of Management and Budget: Russell Vought

Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy: Kevin Droegemeir - Kevin would only attend when issues concerning science and technology, including communications technology are on the agenda. I’m including him here because he plays a major role in the execution of the FMR EO and therefore plays a major role in devolution. We’ll go over that in detail later on.

Executive Committee Responsibilities
Here we get to see what the FMR Executive Committee will actually be doing and it’s very important to understand this.




This means that the FMR Executive Committee would be the group responsible for not only developing a plan of continuity but also facilitating the execution of that plan of continuity. It allows the Executive Committee to establish subordinate groups responsible for operating and implementing that continuity plan in support of the FMR Executive Committee. Finally, it allows them the flexibility to create their own “interagency framework” to assess and essentially re-prioritize the NEFs based on the continuity environment. We’ll discuss this in detail later.

Implementation



This section is important because not only does it outline how the continuity plan would be implemented but it also gives us a look at an under-the-radar yet key player in the devolution process. That key player is Mark Meadows. Meadows may not be on the Executive Committee, but he clearly plays an important role in facilitating and implementing the FMR EO and Strategy.

If you go back and watch Donald Trump’s final speech before “leaving” the Presidency from Joint Base Andrews on Jan 20th, 2021, you’ll notice that Meadows was the only member of the FMR Executive Committee to see him off on January 20th. Read the transcript of his speech and you’ll see Meadows is actually the only member of Trump’s entire cabinet that was publicly acknowledged. I think that is significant because this Executive Order has established Meadows as the back channel to President Donald Trump.

Knowing that makes this story from early August much more intriguing:

 

[Buick Electra]

(Dev 13- Post 2)

Let’s briefly review what we just went over to make sure we understand the importance of what we have covered so far. This Executive Order stemming from Trump’s war powers is outlining the implementation and execution of a continuity plan. It describes to us the Executive Committee who is responsible for implementing and executing that plan. It also tells us there are subordinate bodies and working groups involved in supporting the Executive Committee and their work in implementing and executing that plan. It also tells us exactly who would serve as the back-channel to the President for this plan.

Let’s continue with the EO: [Skip]

So the APNSA (AKA National Security Advisor), which would be Robert O’Brien, is designated as the new National Continuity Coordinator (NCC) which would make sense since he is the Chair of the FMR Executive Committee and that Committee is responsible for implementing and executing a continuity plan. But it also states it could be “his or her designee.” As crazy as this sounds, literally anybody could be the NCC. Whether the NCC is Robert O’Brien or somebody he designated, it’s becoming clear O’Brien plays a major role in devolution and Trump’s battle against the political establishment.

Here is an article from NPR from January of 2020: [Skip]

Then there is this RedState article from Feb of 2020. [Skip]

Remember this from Devolution - Part 1?



Interesting, isn’t it? At around the same time as the military was preparing plans for continuity of government, Trump and the head of the NSC were in the process of “streamlining the team” at the NSC by removing those that NPR had mockingly characterized as “the deep state.” Gaslight much?

In order for devolution to work effectively, having the right people in place is a necessity as is making every effort to minimize the chance of any leaks or resistance as the plan is set in motion. There were clearly necessary steps being taken to remove known leakers and those likely to interfere. We will touch on the NSC again later on because they actually played an important role in the creation of the FMR Executive Order and the Strategy.

Let’s do another recap quick:

• On December 7th, 2020, Trump issued the FMR EO using his Presidential powers based in the context of War & National Defense.
• The FMR EO explains that it is the policy of the United States to perform the NEFs as defined by PPD-40, in a continuity environment, regardless of threat or condition.
• The Federal Continuity Directives gave us those NEFs.
• The FMR EO explains the switch from a reactive posture to a proactive posture when it comes to continuity planning, making it seem like they may have know what was coming.
• The FMR EO established an Executive Committee to implement and execute a continuity plan.
• The FMR EO has detailed the roles of the Executive Committee and established that the Executive Committee could establish subordinate bodies and working groups to support their work in implementing and executing the continuity plan.
• The FMR EO detailed the back channel to the President: Mark Meadows.
• The FMR EO showed us who the new NCC is: Robert O’Brien.

Now let’s discuss an one of the most important aspects of any top-secret plan Secure communications?

Secure Communications
This is where things start to get even more interesting. [Skip]

So the FMR Executive Order is amending sections of Executive Order 13618 which was issued by Obama. In order to understand the significance of these amendments, we need to fully understand what Executive Order 13618 entails so we know what is actually being amended. Here is a fantastic summary of EO 13618 from the Congressional Research Service: [Skip]

The aspect to focus on here is that during national security and emergency situations, such as those that would cause a continuity of government situation, there were numerous entities involved in carrying out the responsibilities for secure communication. [Skip]

Executive Order 13618 essentially provided for every single agency in our government to play a role in secure communication during emergency situations. 13618 even goes on to say “All agencies”: [Skip]

Now that we know Executive Order 13618 is all about, let’s look at how it was actually amended by the FMR Executive Order.

Obama’s EO 13618 Section 2.3: [Skip]

Amended by Trump’s FMR EO Section 6: [Skip]

The difference here is important. Instead of using an interagency policy process to make recommendations to the President with respect to the use of authorities assigned to the President under the Communications Act of 1934, the FMR EO set things up to outright delegate the President’s authority to the Director of the OSTP “if the President takes the actions, including issuing any necessary proclamations and findings, required by that section to invoke those authorities.”

Let’s look at the Communications Act of 1934 “as amended (47 U.S.C. 606(a), and (c) through (e))” and figure out what authorities they are even talking about. It should be noted that the title of the entire section in our united states code is “War powers of the President.” Here is the full text of those authorities but I will a screenshot of the summary: [Skip]

It could just be a coincidence but I think this is worth examining regardless. Look at the language being used in Trump’s FMR Executive Order:

“…if the President takes the actions, including issuing any necessary proclamations and findings, required by that section to invoke those authorities.”

Now notice the language used from the text of the Communications Act of 1934:

“During the continuance of a war in which the United States is engaged…” & “Upon proclamation by the President that there exists war or a threat of war…” & “Upon proclamation by the President that there exists a state or threat of war involving the United States.”

Where have we seen language like this before?



This executive order is once again referencing the war powers of the President. As I’ve said so many times before, we are in a state of war and this FMR Executive Order has alluded to that fact multiple times now. If Trump has used PEADs to proclaim a state of war, the FMR Executive Order triggers the delegation of authority to take over priority communications, suspend or amend rules relating to certain emission stations or devices, suspend rules and regulations regarding wire communications, close any facilities deemed necessary, and/or have the government take over the use of any such facility, station, or apparatus as described. They would have the legal authority to essentially take over any and all forms of communications required.

If President Trump and his FMR Executive Committee were going to implement a continuity of government plan like devolution, they would need to be able to securely communicate as the operation unfolds. The first step he took to ensure they had proper communication was to delegate his authority to direct such use of the secure communications networks.

Now lets look at one more thing from the FMR Executive Order that really shows the true genius of Trump and those involved in the devolution plan regarding secure communications.

Here is the very next section of the FMR EO: [Skip]

So the FMR EO revoked section 3 of Obama’s EO 13618. Here is that Section 3 that was revoked:



Not only did this executive order delegate authority to prioritize defense and security communications, but it also consolidated involvement away from all those extra agencies and placed it solely within the Federal Mission Resilience Executive Committee. So the same Committee that is implementing and executing the devolution plan has the sole authority, access, and responsibility to perform the National Security and Emergency Preparedness communications.

Obama’s EO 13618 created a process for emergency communication involving all sorts of red-tape through deep state agencies and Trump shred that order to pieces and consolidated it into the hands of those implementing and executing the devolution plan.

I know this has been a lot to take in already so let’s do another recap before diving into the strategy:

• On December 7th, 2020, Trump issued the FMR EO using his Presidential powers based in the context of War & National Defense.
• The FMR EO explains that it is the policy of the United States to perform the NEFs as defined by PPD-40, in a continuity environment, regardless of threat or condition.
• The Federal Continuity Directives gave us those NEFs.
• The FMR EO explains the switch from a reactive posture to a proactive posture when it comes to continuity planning, making it seem likely those involved would have known what was coming.
• The FMR EO established an Executive Committee to implement and execute a continuity plan.
• The FMR EO has detailed the roles of the Executive Committee and established that the Executive Committee should establish subordinate bodies and working groups to support their work in implementing the continuity plan.
• The FMR EO detailed the back channel to the President: Mark Meadows.
• The FMR EO showed us who the new NCC is: Robert O’Brien.
• The FMR EO outlined the delegation of legal authority to use secure communications during a continuity event if the President had proclaimed a state of war.
• The FMR EO consolidated responsibilities for secure communications away from every agency and into the FMR Executive Committee.

Everything I’ve seen from the FMR EO tells me this is their devolution plan.

(cont'd)

 

[Buick Electra]

(Dev 13- Post 3)

The Strategy
Federal Mission Resilience Strategy - Introduction
Now let’s take a look at the Federal Mission Resilience Strategy that was released in conjunction with the FMR EO. As I stated, the FMR EO established the framework for implementing and executing a continuity plan. The finer details of that plan are found in the Strategy. [Skip]

We will first look at the introduction letter from Donald Trump himself:




This entire introduction is Trump’s way of telling us what he was about to do. Remember that this happened after the election was stolen from Trump. He was supposedly an outgoing President. Why would he even bother with some sort of continuity plan and strategy at this point of his Presidency unless there was something meaningful he was going to use it for. That alone is proof that devolution is real. It doesn’t make sense for him to issue the FMR EO and the Strategy this late in the game unless they were going to use it. Trump is telling us that they are implementing the proper “National Continuity Policy” to fight back against those who seek to destroy our country. Trump is telling us he is implementing devolution. It’s all here.

There is one quote from that introduction that I would like you to keep in the back of your mind: “The government and private sector must work together to reduce vulnerabilities and design infrastructure that addresses preparedness and resilience from the start.” You will see at the end why I mention that.

Let’s dig in:

Executive Summary & the NSC [Skip]

This is a very interesting revelation and it comes 1 paragraph into the executive summary. “The Strategy was developed in response to direction from the National Security Council Principals Committee.” Time for a mini dive into what Trump did with the NSC and who is on the NSC Principals Committee.

On April 4th, 2017, President Trump issued National Security Presidential Memorandum - 4. This memo laid out how Trump would implement his national security policy and decision making during his presidency. Here is a good summary from the memo: [Skip]

Here again we have mention of the National Security Act of 1947. As previously mentioned, the National Security Act of 1947 is found in Chapter 44 of United States Code, Title 50 - War and National Defense. The entire purpose of the NSC is to advise the President on matters relating to domestic, foreign, and military policies relating to national security. Keep in mind what we have already discussed regarding the NSC and how Trump and Robert O’Brien appeared to be cleaning out the “deep state” from the NSC in February of 2020.

The Strategy was developed in response to direction from the NSC Principals Committee, so let’s find out who that is: [Skip]

To clarify what is happening here, the Strategy and the FMR EO simultaneously issued created the entire framework needed for devolution, and were developed in response to direction from the NSC’s Principals Committee. That committee is a “Cabinet-level senior interagency forum for considering policy issues that affect the national security interests of the United States.” (Emphasis mine)

Not only did Trump draw on his authority from the National Security Act of 1947 (War & National Defense) to issue the EO and Strategy, but he did so based on the direction from the highest-level policy making group regarding national security interests for the United States.

I know I keep repeating this, but only because it bears repeating:

Everything we are seeing points to a military operation in the form of a continuity of government plan, and that plan is specifically written to ensure the resilience of the executive branch in a national security crisis…specifically, a wartime situation.

Let’s look a little closer at who was part of the NSC Principals Committee at the time the FMR EO was issued. This list comes from National Security Presidential Memorandum - 4. There are some individuals who may at times attend the meetings but I am only going to list those designated as “regular attendees.” The ones in bold are also members of the FMR Executive Committee that we discussed above.

• National Security Advisor - Robert O’Brien - Chair of Committee
• Secretary of State - Mike Pompeo
• Secretary of the Treasury - Steve Mnuchin
• Secretary of Defense - Christopher Miller
• Attorney General - William Barr
• Secretary of Energy - Dan Brouillette
• Secretary of Homeland Security - Chad Wolf
• Chief of Staff to the President - Mark Meadows
• Director of National Intelligence - John Ratcliffe
• Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff - Mark Milley
• Director of the Central Intelligence Agency - Gina Haspel
• Homeland Security Advisor - Julia Nesheiwat
• Representative of the U.S. to the United Nations - Kelly Craft

So, if we assume that the FMR EO and the Strategy are the framework of devolution, then the committee and the members listed above (at minimum) were the ones who provided the direction leading to the execution of devolution.

What that means to me is that I cannot write off anybody on this list as being a “black hat.” The FMR EO and Strategy clearly lays out the implementation and execution of a continuity of government plan and this group set the entire thing in motion so we cannot definitively conclude any are “black hats.”

It’s also interesting to me that the four members from the NSC Principals Committee that are also on the FMR Executive Committee all have roles having to do with either war, national security, or intelligence.

Let’s continue on with some of the Strategy: [Skip]

This section has some great information. Not only does it specifically mention the word “devolution,” but it tells us that each of the Federal executive branch Principals are to increase their capability and capacity to continuously perform essential functions and that they may not have any notice in doing so.

Their focus is to use a holistic risk management approach and continuity principles relating to the NEFs. This means in using their continuity plan, they will not be able to focus on any individual NEF but rather they would look at the “bigger picture” and manage the risk across a broad framework. This is a critically important part. Remember what devolution truly means. They let the Biden administration assume office, by doing so, they did risk losing total control of every possible “node” and that requires them to be flexible yet prepared as to not let any of their prioritized NEFs fail.

It also echoes the same focus on a reactive vs. proactive posture that we first heard in the FMR EO, This time prioritizing a “proactive posture of distribution” over a “reactive relocation of personnel.” We see that mentioned again in the very next section: [Skip]

The FMR EO mentioned subordinate bodies and working groups that would support the FMR Executive Committee in the implementation and execution of the continuity plan. The picture that I’m starting to see forming is that the framework for devolution that we find throughout the FMR EO and the Strategy was to have working groups ready with the capability and capacity of performing essential functions once the plan was initiated.

If you don’t quite see that picture forming yet, you will as we continue. [Skip]

Again, in the Strategic Context section we see a move toward a proactive posture, this time relating to the performance of essential functions during “disruptive incidents” and while essentially spelling out what those “disruptive incidents” might be. Critical infrastructure and its vulnerability to kinetic and non-kinetic attacks or disruptions that could prevent the ability to preserve our form of government.

We already know that election infrastructure is classified as critical infrastructure. We also know that there was foreign interference in our elections based on comments Trump has made. So think about what interference in our election infrastructure and the theft of an election results in. It leads to everything we are seeing playing out today. The stolen election has prevented the ability to preserve our form of government and so much more.

Another important statement from above is this one:

“We must take full advantage of existing authorities related to risk and preparedness Frameworks. We cannot allow the successes of our past to preclude implementation of innovative approaches to address current threats.”

I’ve said before that if you understand who Donald Trump is as a person and who he was as a President in his first term, then nothing makes sense about him walking away from an obviously stolen election. If he knew there was going to be fraud, then Donald Trump would have been derelict in his duties as President of the United States and Commander in Chief of our armed forces to let them get away with it. I think that statement tells us that President Trump didn’t let them get away with it. He took full advantage of his authorities (War Powers & PEADs) related to risk and preparedness frameworks (Continuity of Government). I believe the FMR EO and the Strategy are the innovative approach mentioned and I’ll show you soon what I think that approach is exactly.

(Cont'd)

 

[Buick Electra]

(Dev 13- Post 4)

The Planning Model [Skip]

The planning model is another part of the Strategy the mentions the shift from a reactive posture to a more proactive one and even describes it as a cultural shift. Rather than continuity being an over-complicated afterthought set up for failure when it’s truly needed, continuity through this Strategy would become prioritized and ready for a seamless transition to operating the prioritized NEFs without interruption.

The Strategy explicitly states that it “requires the Federal executive branch to logically distribute risk to the performance of essential functions” and that this “distributed system will need technology and communications infrastructure to enable secure and reliable communications.” This could be referencing the secure communications from the FMR EO, but it’s not impossible that this is also referencing what Trump is doing with his recent acquisition group. Could the IP addresses that left the DoD 3 minutes before the end of Trump’s term have anything to do with the communications infrastructure?

This set up for seamless transition is exactly what was described in the FMR EO through the established subordinate bodies and working groups used to support the FMR Executive Committee,

Lines of Effort
The three lines of effort focused on the Federal executive branch mentioned in this next section are fairly self-explanatory, but I need to stress that going through this strategy in its entirety is time well-spent. I will only be commenting on a few aspects, but the entire document is incredibly relevant. [Skip, Skip, Skip]

This is important. I mentioned the picture that was starting to form and this very clearly outlines it for us. The devolution plan that we are currently experiencing has multiple nodes with senior officials retaining responsibility for assuming risk in executing their essential functions. Do you see where I’m going with this yet? [Skip, Skip]

Here we have more discussion of distributed assets and using technological advancements to enable governance in a distributed environment. This also mentions exercising the transfer of leadership roles and responsibilities without relocating personnel. All of this is pointing to devolution. [Skip]

Again: discussing the distributed environment and apportioning authority and responsibility among multiple stakeholders through geographic diversity. [Skip]

The Strategy outlines the context, planning model, and steps necessary to ensure the resilience of the Federal executive branch. It includes:

• Re-prioritization of essential functions.
• Increasing possible nodes available to perform those re-prioritized essential functions.
• Mentions throughout the distributed environment of operations across geographic areas.

The FMR EO and the Strategy paint a clear picture of devolution. A plan to create an Executive Committee of senior level officials and subordinate bodies or working groups that would be proactively ready to take on the authority and responsibility of performing the re-prioritized essential functions required to preserve our American way of life.

Executing the Plan
The Distributed Environment
Now that we have gone through the FMR EO and the Strategy, I’d like to once again revisit the Executive Committee established by Executive Order 13961: Governance and Integration of Federal Mission Resilience and see if we can make any connections. [Skip]

Recall the quote I told you to remember from Trump’s introduction:

“The government and private sector must work together to reduce vulnerabilities and design infrastructure that addresses preparedness and resilience from the start.”

It’s time to look at the members of the Executive Committee and see what they are up to now in the “private sector”?

Assistant to the President and Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations: Tony Ornato

Tony Ornato has an interesting story. He went from working for the Secret Service, to working as Trump’s Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations. After Joe Biden was inaugurated, Ornato went back to the Secret Service serving as the assistant Director, a prestigious role. The Biden administration had concerns:




It’s very interesting that somebody from the FMR Executive Committee is now embedded withing the United States Secret Service in a very prominent role.

Director of the Office of Management and Budget: Russell Vought

After leaving office in on January 20th, 2021, Russell went on to found the Center for Renewing America. The CRA focuses on the following issues:



The CRA has multiple former Trump administration officials from various agencies. My personal favorite team member of the CRA: [Skipped picture of Kash Patel]

(Reminder: I am not Kash Patel. I am just a big fan and he is my pseudo-namesake)

The CRA is essentially continuing the work of implementing Donald Trump’s policy and agenda in some of the most key areas.

Secretary of Homeland Security: Chad Wolf

On March 23, it was reported by MSN that in addition to joining the America First Policy Institute, Chad Wolf would be launching Wolf Global Advisors. [Skip]

The website is virtually dormant and there is hardly any news about anything they are actually doing. Wolf Global advisors could be considered as a small-scale Department of Homeland Security.

Secretary of Homeland Security: Chad Wolf &

Director of National Intelligence: John Ratcliffe

Both Chad Wolf & John Ratcliffe went on to join the America First Policy Institute.

The America First Policy Institute was formed not long after the stolen election on 11/20/2020 by Brooke Rollins. Brooke is the former Director of the Domestic Policy Council and Chief Strategist at the White House under Donald Trump. There are a ton of names associated with this organization and everything single name is pro-Trump. If you click through each name on the list, you will notice something. Of the 72 individuals who are listed as part of the America Fist Policy Institute team, only 12 did not work for Trump at some point. 60 of the individuals actually worked for Trump in some capacity in the last 4 years.

Some were tapped by Trump for his 2016 election, some for the 1776 commission, some on his re-election campaign, but a majority served in his during his actual Presidency in his administration. Here is what The Hill said about the group:





The America First Policy Institute is essentially continuing the work of implementing Donald Trump’s policy and agenda. They fill in a lot of key areas that the Center for Renewing America isn’t focusing on. Here you can see their “Areas of Interest” as described on their website:



Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs (APNSA) - Also known as National Security Advisor: Robert O’Brien

On January 21st, 2021, Robert O’Brien co-founded American Global Strategies LLC. This organization is another organization that seems almost dormant. There is hardly any news on them and the website doesn’t have much to it. This is what they claim to do and who is on their team: [Skip]

(Cont'd)

 

[Buick Electra]

(Dev 13- Post 5)

What is most interesting is who else is part of the BCP team alongside Christopher Miller:






Every single member (except for Ms. Barbara Hayley) of this seemingly dormant organization has prior experience working in Trump’s administration in some very important roles, including a few key names already known to the devolution story (Miller and Tata). This group might even be considered a small-scale version of Trump’s Department of Defense.

Conclusion
Look at the Executive Order and the Strategy we covered in this article and add it to the rest of the circumstantial evidence presented throughout Devolution Series. Consider everything you know about Donald Trump himself. Add in the utter dysfunction of Biden and his administration.

Devolution can no longer be considered just another theory.

We can now see the full picture starting to come into focus. On December 7th, 2020, Donald Trump issued Executive Order 13961: Governance and Integration of Federal Mission Resilience and Federal Mission Resilience Strategy and set his plan in motion. We can now point to the exact group of people who were responsible for “implementing and executing” that plan.

Everybody responsible for implementing and executing devolution has gone on to either form or join organizations that closely align with what the Trump administration was doing during his first term in office. There are simply too many coincidences to ignore.

Have you noticed that Trump is becoming more relevant and is putting himself even further into the spotlight? The MAGA movement is only growing and there is nothing stopping it. We the people are taking out country back from the grassroots level as we should be. We are doing our part. Trump has already done his.

It’s no longer a question of if devolution is real, but rather when and how it is revealed.

THE BEST IS YET TO COME!

 

[Buick Electra]

Bumping for morning crowd

 

[Buick Electra]

Bumping for the evening crowd.

 

[Grounded Idealist]

Wow BE! What a huge body of work to bring over! Thank you for your efforts.

I must say that I find devolution very interesting, though complex. It makes my head hurt. Nonetheless, it seems that this may be “The Plan” that we are all waiting to unfold. It’s a bit of hopium in that way.

I’ll need to read much of this again so that it sinks in. I pray that this is all in alignment with or evidence of God’s plan!

 

[Buick Electra]

 

[night driver]

INCREDIBLY SATISFYING SERIAL INTELLECTUAL MASTURBATION. With well-timed orgasms.

Which requires a lot LESS suspension of disbelief than other incidences of the same.

 

[Buick Electra]

I just got notification of Devolution - Part 15, which means I missed part 13 but just bringing one part over is a lot of work so I'm not hunting down and bringing over parts14 and 15. Someone else can do this or you can read on your own.

(Post 1 of 3)

eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjo0MjI3MjAwMSwicG9zdF9pZCI6NDU4ODU3NDksIl8iOiIzSE9XMiIsImlhdCI6MTY0MDYxNDk1NiwiZXhwIjoxNjQwNjE4NTU2LCJpc3MiOiJwdWItMzk2NzY0Iiwic3ViIjoicG9zdC1yZWFjdGlvbiJ9.6wq0j8rJEhfrPSeQClz_

Devolution - Part 15
Vaccine Bewilderment

I’ve said from day one that I wanted to stay away from discussing the vaccine because it’s such a divisive topic and there is still so much we don’t know. I’m finally going to discuss this topic in my devolution series because there was a bombshell dropped in the news recently. I’m not saying I have all the answers, but there is a picture starting to emerge.

One thing I will state for certain: Trump’s pro-vaccine stance is directly related to devolution and his dismantling of the Deep State.

How is it possible for a regime to successfully steal an election, only to fail so completely at implementing their agenda?

I certainly didn’t coin the term, but it’s appropriate to use it now: Trump and his team have installed Judas Goats among the enemy. What is a Judas Goat?

The idea that Trump’s Judas Goats have infiltrated the enemy helps us to understand some of Trump’s actions. Not only do Judas Goats guide the enemy into poor decisions, but they can also provide intel to the good guys. Judas Goats or no, Trump and his team have been ten steps ahead of the enemy. They always seem to know what the enemy is going to do next. COVID is a perfect example of this orchestrated foreknowledge.

I’m going to prove to you that Trump knew the enemy’s pandemic plans in advance. That advanced knowledge made Trump and team able to make appropriate countermoves. Let’s see what we can piece together.

Foreshadowing
On January 9th of 2017, while still under the leadership of Barack Obama, the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) released their “Recommended Policy Guidance for Departmental Development of Review Mechanisms for Potential Pandemic Pathogen Care and Oversight (P3CO).” Here is a screenshot of what I wrote on this topic in Devolution - Part 14:

Just two days later, during a forum on pandemic preparedness at Georgetown University, Anthony S. Fauci, MD, made this statement:

It’s obviously the timing between the lifting of the moratorium on gain-of-function research and Fauci’s statements that are intriguing to me but this isn’t the only instance of foreshadowing we have seen. Here are just a few of the many examples of our medical experts “preparing and planning” for a pandemic:

• Harvard Global Health Institute - “The theme for the Fall 2017 seminar series was “Pandemic Preparedness: Improving Science, Technology, & Access.”
• Clade X - “Clade X was a day-long pandemic tabletop exercise conducted by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security on May 15, 2018, in Washington, DC.”
• Event 201 - “The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation hosted Event 201, a high-level pandemic exercise on October 18, 2019”

We have also recently seen some direct evidence of the United States government funding gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology based on this article from The Intercept published September 9th 2021. The article shows that money used to fund the gain-of-function research originated from the Anthony Fauci-led National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID):

Trump and team would have known all of these publicly available facts. Couple this information with the likely idea that Trump has Judas Goats among the enemy, and I have no doubt they anticipated the release of some sort of virus. So naturally, if Donald Trump and his team anticipated the release of a virus, they would have taken steps of their own to counter it. Let’s look at what steps they took.

The Countermoves
National Security Strategy
On December 18th of 2017, Donald Trump released his National Security Strategy.

There is one section of the National Security Strategy that gives us our first glimpse of Trump addressing the potential threat of a pandemic. Notice how prescient this section is:

This screenshot from the December 2017 NSS describes the COVID pandemic we have been living through almost perfectly - “demonstrated the impact of biological threats on national security by taking lives, generating economic losses, and contributing to a loss in confidence in government institutions.” It’s as if Trump knew then that a pandemic would be used to steal an election and contribute to the loss in confidence in our government.

National Biodefense Strategy
On September 18, 2018, Donald Trump issued National Security Presidential Memorandum 14 (NSPM 14): Support for National Biodefense:

(Cont'd)

 

[Buick Electra]

(Devolution - Part 15 - Post 2 of 3)

There are 2 things from NSPM 14 that stand out to me. Please keep these in mind as we move forward:

• The role given to the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs (APNSA) also known as the United States National Security Advisor. This is important because the National Security Advisor is who Donald Trump named as the National Continuity Coordinator - or his or her designee - as well as the chair of the Federal Mission Resilience Committee when he issued Executive Order 13961: Governance and Integration of Federal Mission Resilience on December 7th, 2020. EO 13961 is the proof of Devolution that I break down in Devolution - Part 13. Let’s look at the role the National Security Advisor has for Bio-defense as laid out by NSPM 14:

• The second thing to note is that NSPM 14 established a Biodefense Steering Committee. The responsibilities of this committee, and its chairman, are important to remember:

So the Biodefense Steering Committee will be chaired by the Secretary of Health and Human Services. We’ll see the Secretary of HHS come up again later so just keep it in mind. The Committee is responsible for monitoring and coordinating the implementation of the Strategy. The Strategy being referred to is the National Biodefense Strategy which was issued in conjunction with NSPM 14. Here are a few key screenshots from the National Biodefense Strategy:




The National Biodefense Strategy discusses the following:

• Deliberate biological threats
• Pathogens stored in laboratories that lack appropriate security
• Intentional misuse of advances in science and technology
• The support and preservation of Continuity of Operations, including appropriate devolution

Before we move on, let’s do a quick summary of what we’ve put together so far.

• Two days after the moratorium on gain-of-function research was lifted, Fauci made the statement that “no doubt Trump will face surprise infectious disease outbreak”
• There are multiple examples of NGOs and the political establishment holding “pandemic exercises”
• The United States Government was funding gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology through grant money originating from the Anthony Fauci led NIAID
• Trump’s December 2017 National Security Strategy specifically mentions pandemics that “Take lives, generate economic losses, and contribute to the loss of confidence in government institutions”
• Trump’s September 2018 NSPM 14 was specifically geared toward supporting national biodefense and was issued in conjunction with the National Biodefense Strategy
• The National Biodefense Strategy discusses deliberate biological threats and outlines support and preservation of continuity of operations
• NSPM 14 established a committee chaired by the Secretary of Health and Human Services that was tasked with implementing the National Biodefense Strategy
• NSPM 14 established the National Security Advisor as the lead for policy coordination and review to provide strategic input and facilitate policy integration for Federal biodefense efforts

Now this is where things get really interesting.

Modernizing Influenza Vaccines
Since the beginning of his Presidency, Donald Trump and our military have viewed China as the biggest threat to not just America, but Democracy everywhere. This fact has been mentioned by Trump numerous times but was also laid out in the previously mentioned National Security Strategy:

Remember what we have already discussed. There were “hints” of a pandemic that might arise During Trump’s administration. NGO’s and universities with sketchy ties to the “Deep State” were running “pandemic exercises”. There are interesting ties between the WIV and our own Anthony Fauci (among others). Trump was already taking steps to beef up our biodefense in the face of a pandemic and deliberate biological threats. He also likely has “Judas Goats” among the enemy which could provide intel. Knowing all of that and knowing how Trump viewed China based on his National Security Strategy, I can guarantee you that a large focus of our military surveillance and intelligence was on the WIV in China. I believe some of the actions he took can around the time that Covid began nearly prove that.

Before I show you those actions there is one more interesting thing we need to look at. As I have already stated, we don’t yet have all the facts surrounding the Covid-19 pandemic but there are some interesting details we can look at as we’re piecing things together. In August of 2021, the House Foreign Affairs Republicans issued a report that provides us with some important information on the origins of Covid-19.

The report concludes that Covid originated from the Wuhan Institute of Virology and also gives us some dates we can look at:

• Covid originated from the WIV sometime before September 12, 2019
• The WIV’s virus and sample database was removed in the middle of the night on September 12, 2019
• The World Military Games took place from the 18th to 27th of October 2019 in Wuhan, China and was the first “super-spreader” of Covid
• The United States has satellite imagery of Wuhan

Now is when we need to recall what I told you about the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs (APNSA) also known as the National Security Advisor. Not only was the position of National Security Advisor given a lead role for Federal biodefense efforts, but it was also given one of the most important roles in the implementation and execution of devolution laid out by EO 13961. I can’t stress enough how important it is for you to read Devolution - Part 13 to understand the importance of EO 13961.

On September 10, 2019, President Trump fired John Bolton as the National Security Advisor:

On September 18, 2019, Robert O’Brien took office as the National Security Advisor:

The very next day, on September 19th, 2019, Donald Trump issued Executive Order 13887: Modernizing Influenza Vaccines in the United States to Promote National Security and Public Health:

Section 3 of EO 13887 established the National Influenza Vaccine Task force which is co-chaired by the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Health and Human Services (remember I told you to keep the position of Secretary of Health and Human services in mind). The task force was created to “achieve the objectives identified in section 2” of EO 13887.

(Cont'd)

 

[Buick Electra]

(Devolution - Part 15 - Post 3 of 3)

Let’s look at a few more very interesting details within EO 13887.

The task force created by EO 13887 and co-chaired by the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Health and Human services was to submit a report to the President through some very key positions. Let’s look closer at those positions as each one has a role in the devolution that we have previously discussed. There is only one of these that needs some further explanation. The rest you should have sufficient background of their significance if you have read Devolution - Part 13:

• Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs (Also known as the National Security Advisor): Robert O’Brien
  • Keep in mind that NSPM 14 established the National Security Advisor as the lead for policy coordination and review to provide strategic input and facilitate policy integration for Federal biodefense efforts
• Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy: Joe Grogan & Brooke Rollins
  • Joe started in this position at the time EO 13887 was issued however he resigned in May of 2020 and was replaced by Brooke Rollins:
• After Trump’s first term ended, Brooke went on to form a key organization I discussed in Devolution - Part 13:

• Director of the Office of Management and Budget: Russel Vought
• Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy: Kevin Droegemeir

The final interesting thing within EO 13887 is what it tasked to the Secretary of Defense:

So not only did EO 13887 establish a National Influenza Task Force that reported to the President through key people we know to be involved in devolution, but it also allowed for the Department of Defense to collaborate with the HHS to design and evaluate influenza vaccines.

This is massively important when we look at some news that just recently came out related to the Army and Vaccines. On December 21, 2021, Defense One published a bombshell of an article:

So in early 2020 (With Trump as President) the DOD began research on a vaccine that was effective against not just Covid-19 but all “previous SARS-origin viruses” and all future variants. They have been working on this for almost two years and nearly all of Walter Reed’s 2,500 staff have had some role in the development and this is the first we heard about it. This vaccine would be the death blow to the NWO plans.

The fact that this type of research was even happening was because of the door opened to the DOD from EO 13887. We need to look at this from a 40,000 ft view because the implications here are truly stunning.

Let’s recap our previous summary and add a brief timeline surrounding the release of Covid:

• Two days after the moratorium on gain of function research was lifted, Fauci made the statement that “No Doubt Trump will face surprise infectious disease outbreak”
• There are multiple examples of NGO’s and the political establishment holding “Pandemic exercises”
• The United States Government was funding gain of function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology through grant money originating from the Anthony Fauci led NIAID
• Trump’s December 2017 National Security Strategy specifically mentions pandemics that “Take lives, generate economic losses, and contribute to the loss of confidence in government institutions”
• Trump’s September 2018 NSPM 14 was specifically geared toward supporting national biodefense and was issued in conjunction with the National Biodefense Strategy
• The National Biodefense Strategy discusses deliberate biological threats and outlines support and preservation of continuity of operations
• NSPM 14 established a committee chaired by the Secretary of Health and Human Services that was tasked with implementing the National Biodefense Strategy
• NSPM 14 established the National Security Advisor as the lead for policy coordination and review to provide strategic input and facilitate policy integration for Federal biodefense efforts

All the above show circumstantial evidence of a Deep State plan to release a pandemic on the world and evidence of Trump taking actions to prepare for such an attack. Now the timeline surrounding the “escape” of COVID-19:

• September 10th, 2019 - John Bolton is fired as the National Security Advisor
• September 12th, 2019 (on or before) - Covid-19 is thought to have “escaped” the Wuhan Institute of Virology lab based on a report by the House Foreign Affairs Republicans
• September 12th, 2019 - The WIV’s virus and sample database was removed in the middle of the night
• September 18th, 2019 - Robert O’Brien took office as the National Security Advisor. The National Security Advisor is the lead for policy coordination for National Biodefense Efforts and would later become a central figure to devolution under Executive Order 13961
• September 19th, 2019 - EO 13887 is issued

It is no coincidence that EO 13887 was issued the very day after Robert O’Brien took office as the National Security Advisor. It has a similar feeling to Christopher Miller being appointed Acting Secretary of Defense the day after the Associated Press declared Joe Biden the winner of the 2020 election. Trump knew a pandemic was coming. He started to prepare the battlefield and as we can clearly see, EO 13887 plays a major role in that preparation. I believe this is only part of the bigger picture.

I’ve said before that if Donald Trump knew the election was going to be stolen and did nothing about it, then I would consider him complicit in the destruction of America. I’m going to say the same thing here regarding COVID-19. If Donald Trump knew there was going to be a pandemic, which I believe he did, and he didn’t take steps to fight it, then I would consider him complicit in the destruction brought about by the pandemic as well.

I believe EO 13887 and the military vaccine that stemmed from it goes hand-in-hand with something Trump has been consistently touting as one of his greatest achievements - Operation Warp Speed (OWS).

Operation Warp Speed
I believe EO 13887 and OWS are the two primary steps Donald Trump took to fight Covid-19 and the plan of control brought about by the Deep State. I think we need to look at OWS a little closer for some context. Here are some screenshots from the Operation Warp Speed plan:

Operation Warp Speed established a partnership between DoD and HHS to support the development, manufacture, and distribution of vaccines. Remember why the DoD and HHS are so important:

• The Secretary of HHS is the chair of the Biodefense Steering committee tasked with implementing the National Biodefense Strategy that was established by NSPM 14
• The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of HHS co-chaired the National Influenza Vaccine Task Force.
• EO 13887 allowed the Secretary of Defense to implement vaccine development within the DoD

Within the framework of OWS, the DoD and HHS are assisting Big Pharma in fast-tracking their vaccine development, manufacturing, and distribution. We know Big Pharma is part of the Deep State and would love to keep us in a perpetual state of vaccines and variants. If Trump hadn’t issued EO 13887 and then implemented OWS, it could have taken years upon years before we ever saw a vaccine, and that perpetual nightmare of variants and vaccines would have become a reality. Just how long would they have kept us locked down? Instead, EO 13887 paved the way for fast-tracked vaccines and the DoD and HHS helped get these Big Pharma vaccines to the public ASAP. This heroically sabotaged the Deep State’s original plan. Their entire timeline was overhauled and replaced with Trump’s timeline.

Now this is where some minor speculation comes into play but I’m only speculating based on the evidence I have put forth.

I believe Operation Warp Speed to be two-fold.

1. Trump not only moved the timeline of their plan up by many years, but he allowed them to get their first vaccines distributed ASAP. That necessitated the acceleration of their phase two variant which brought about the need for new vaccines and boosters. This accelerated rollout made their plan obvious to the whole world. Endless variants and endless vaccines and the ostracization of anybody who didn’t comply. Exposes Fauci, Big Pharma, the Biden administration, Media, etc.

2. The second part is the behind-the-scenes production of an effective single vaccine that works against all future variants. This catch-all vaccine destroys their plan in one blow. While they are gearing up for a “Dark Winter” and more lockdowns, we get news of a vaccine that ends the current virus and all future viruses they could throw at us.

The point here is that while the DoD and HHS were helping to rush the ineffective Big Pharma vaccines to market, they were working on their own vaccine in secret. There were zero leaks and that tells me it was a White Hat operation. Part of the mandate for the DoD and HHS under OWS was to “assist in the development” of the Big Pharma vaccines but clearly Big Pharma wasn’t in the loop about this new military vaccine that could end the pandemic outright.

Everything we covered further solidifies that devolution is in play. Many of the same players we know to be involved with devolution based on what we discuss in Devolution - Part 13 also play significant roles in Trump’s pandemic countermoves. The operation Trump set in motion surrounding the pandemic and the devolution operation discussed in the Devolution Series are one in the same.

Closing
I posted a few polls to my telegram channel and we are able to come to some logical conclusions based on the data gathered:

When I look at the above results, it tells me that Trump’s pro-vaccine stance isn’t geared towards his base. A majority of his supporters will still vote for him regardless, and those same supporters still won’t get the jab even though Trump supports it. Trump knows all of this. Trump has taught his base to question what the mainstream media and government officials tell us. Trump has taught us to do our own research and use our freedom of choice to make the decision we feel is best. So if his pro-vax stance isn’t geared towards his supporters, we can logically determine it’s for those who don’t support him.

Clif High has presented what I would consider to be the best explanation of Trump’s pro-vaccine stance. This brief 15 minute video outlines it. It’s a great theory that fits the facts available to us.

When Trump talks about the vaccines, we simply can’t take him at face value. EO 13887 and OWS dramatically accelerated all timelines, causing the Deep State to panic and go all-in on increasingly unhinged mandates, variants, and vaccines. Don’t forget what Trump’s ultimate goal here is - he is trying to unite America against those who seek to control and destroy us. He is engineering a mass awakening and he has to do so while carefully navigating the COVID and vaccine situation. How do you reach the half the population who have been savagely indoctrinated by the leftist universities and mainstream media? They believe the vaccines are literally the only solution to ending the pandemic. How would the media react to Trump coming out against the vaccine?

We can speculate all day long as to why Trump is doing what he is doing but we won’t have the answers until the dust settles. If you’re looking for why he has been so consistent in his pro-vax stance, you won’t find the answer here but this is what I can tell you - Donald Trump knew a pandemic was coming and he took steps to prepare for it.

What his military vaccine news demonstrates to us is that we still don’t have the full picture of what is truly going on behind the scenes in the war against the Deep State. You know who does have the full picture?

President Donald John Trump

Let’s not lose faith in him now.

I don’t mention this very often, but prior to starting the Devolution series I was posting my content on a small social media platform. I’d like to show you how I ended one of my first ever threads from February 11th, 2021, because my feelings haven’t changed in the slightest:

THE BEST IS YET TO COME!

 

[Buick Electra]

Bumping for afternoon crowd....

I just got notification of Devolution - Part 16, which means I missed parts 14 and 15 but just bringing one part over is a lot of work so I'm not hunting down and bringing over parts14 and 15. Someone else can do this or you can read on your own.

(Post 1 of 3)

eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjo0MjI3MjAwMSwicG9zdF9pZCI6NDU4ODU3NDksIl8iOiIzSE9XMiIsImlhdCI6MTY0MDYxNDk1NiwiZXhwIjoxNjQwNjE4NTU2LCJpc3MiOiJwdWItMzk2NzY0Iiwic3ViIjoicG9zdC1yZWFjdGlvbiJ9.6wq0j8rJEhfrPSeQClz_

Devolution - Part 15
Vaccine Bewilderment

I’ve said from day one that I wanted to stay away from discussing the vaccine because it’s such a divisive topic and there is still so much we don’t know. I’m finally going to discuss this topic in my devolution series because there was a bombshell dropped in the news recently. I’m not saying I have all the answers, but there is a picture starting to emerge.

One thing I will state for certain: Trump’s pro-vaccine stance is directly related to devolution and his dismantling of the Deep State.

How is it possible for a regime to successfully steal an election, only to fail so completely at implementing their agenda?

I certainly didn’t coin the term, but it’s appropriate to use it now: Trump and his team have installed Judas Goats among the enemy. What is a Judas Goat?

The idea that Trump’s Judas Goats have infiltrated the enemy helps us to understand some of Trump’s actions. Not only do Judas Goats guide the enemy into poor decisions, but they can also provide intel to the good guys. Judas Goats or no, Trump and his team have been ten steps ahead of the enemy. They always seem to know what the enemy is going to do next. COVID is a perfect example of this orchestrated foreknowledge.

I’m going to prove to you that Trump knew the enemy’s pandemic plans in advance. That advanced knowledge made Trump and team able to make appropriate countermoves. Let’s see what we can piece together.

Foreshadowing
On January 9th of 2017, while still under the leadership of Barack Obama, the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) released their “Recommended Policy Guidance for Departmental Development of Review Mechanisms for Potential Pandemic Pathogen Care and Oversight (P3CO).” Here is a screenshot of what I wrote on this topic in Devolution - Part 14:

Just two days later, during a forum on pandemic preparedness at Georgetown University, Anthony S. Fauci, MD, made this statement:

It’s obviously the timing between the lifting of the moratorium on gain-of-function research and Fauci’s statements that are intriguing to me but this isn’t the only instance of foreshadowing we have seen. Here are just a few of the many examples of our medical experts “preparing and planning” for a pandemic:

• Harvard Global Health Institute - “The theme for the Fall 2017 seminar series was “Pandemic Preparedness: Improving Science, Technology, & Access.”
• Clade X - “Clade X was a day-long pandemic tabletop exercise conducted by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security on May 15, 2018, in Washington, DC.”
• Event 201 - “The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation hosted Event 201, a high-level pandemic exercise on October 18, 2019”

We have also recently seen some direct evidence of the United States government funding gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology based on this article from The Intercept published September 9th 2021. The article shows that money used to fund the gain-of-function research originated from the Anthony Fauci-led National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID):

Trump and team would have known all of these publicly available facts. Couple this information with the likely idea that Trump has Judas Goats among the enemy, and I have no doubt they anticipated the release of some sort of virus. So naturally, if Donald Trump and his team anticipated the release of a virus, they would have taken steps of their own to counter it. Let’s look at what steps they took.

The Countermoves
National Security Strategy
On December 18th of 2017, Donald Trump released his National Security Strategy.

There is one section of the National Security Strategy that gives us our first glimpse of Trump addressing the potential threat of a pandemic. Notice how prescient this section is:

This screenshot from the December 2017 NSS describes the COVID pandemic we have been living through almost perfectly - “demonstrated the impact of biological threats on national security by taking lives, generating economic losses, and contributing to a loss in confidence in government institutions.” It’s as if Trump knew then that a pandemic would be used to steal an election and contribute to the loss in confidence in our government.

National Biodefense Strategy
On September 18, 2018, Donald Trump issued National Security Presidential Memorandum 14 (NSPM 14): Support for National Biodefense:

(Cont'd)

 

[Toosh]

Devolution Part 15 is now out: Devolution - Part 15

 

[Griz3752]

Well I know what I'm doing between now and Jan 04-5 - reading this whole thing again in one contiguous piece and link-clicking until my hand goes numb.

Thanks for the task

 

[Knoxville's Joker]

Just one obvious fact. It could be they did install a puppet government, but they forgot rule numero uno. They are so inept they can never accomplish their plans. Never pass on a simpler explanation even if we want one that supports a stolen election.

 

[Buick Electra]

Bumping for the evening crowd....

I just got notification of Devolution - Part 15, which means I missed part 13 but just bringing one part over is a lot of work so I'm not hunting down and bringing over parts14 and 15. Someone else can do this or you can read on your own.

(Post 1 of 3)

eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjo0MjI3MjAwMSwicG9zdF9pZCI6NDU4ODU3NDksIl8iOiIzSE9XMiIsImlhdCI6MTY0MDYxNDk1NiwiZXhwIjoxNjQwNjE4NTU2LCJpc3MiOiJwdWItMzk2NzY0Iiwic3ViIjoicG9zdC1yZWFjdGlvbiJ9.6wq0j8rJEhfrPSeQClz_

Devolution - Part 15
Vaccine Bewilderment

I’ve said from day one that I wanted to stay away from discussing the vaccine because it’s such a divisive topic and there is still so much we don’t know. I’m finally going to discuss this topic in my devolution series because there was a bombshell dropped in the news recently. I’m not saying I have all the answers, but there is a picture starting to emerge.

One thing I will state for certain: Trump’s pro-vaccine stance is directly related to devolution and his dismantling of the Deep State.

How is it possible for a regime to successfully steal an election, only to fail so completely at implementing their agenda?

I certainly didn’t coin the term, but it’s appropriate to use it now: Trump and his team have installed Judas Goats among the enemy. What is a Judas Goat?

The idea that Trump’s Judas Goats have infiltrated the enemy helps us to understand some of Trump’s actions. Not only do Judas Goats guide the enemy into poor decisions, but they can also provide intel to the good guys. Judas Goats or no, Trump and his team have been ten steps ahead of the enemy. They always seem to know what the enemy is going to do next. COVID is a perfect example of this orchestrated foreknowledge.

I’m going to prove to you that Trump knew the enemy’s pandemic plans in advance. That advanced knowledge made Trump and team able to make appropriate countermoves. Let’s see what we can piece together.

Foreshadowing
On January 9th of 2017, while still under the leadership of Barack Obama, the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) released their “Recommended Policy Guidance for Departmental Development of Review Mechanisms for Potential Pandemic Pathogen Care and Oversight (P3CO).” Here is a screenshot of what I wrote on this topic in Devolution - Part 14:

Just two days later, during a forum on pandemic preparedness at Georgetown University, Anthony S. Fauci, MD, made this statement:

It’s obviously the timing between the lifting of the moratorium on gain-of-function research and Fauci’s statements that are intriguing to me but this isn’t the only instance of foreshadowing we have seen. Here are just a few of the many examples of our medical experts “preparing and planning” for a pandemic:

• Harvard Global Health Institute - “The theme for the Fall 2017 seminar series was “Pandemic Preparedness: Improving Science, Technology, & Access.”
• Clade X - “Clade X was a day-long pandemic tabletop exercise conducted by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security on May 15, 2018, in Washington, DC.”
• Event 201 - “The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation hosted Event 201, a high-level pandemic exercise on October 18, 2019”

We have also recently seen some direct evidence of the United States government funding gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology based on this article from The Intercept published September 9th 2021. The article shows that money used to fund the gain-of-function research originated from the Anthony Fauci-led National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID):

Trump and team would have known all of these publicly available facts. Couple this information with the likely idea that Trump has Judas Goats among the enemy, and I have no doubt they anticipated the release of some sort of virus. So naturally, if Donald Trump and his team anticipated the release of a virus, they would have taken steps of their own to counter it. Let’s look at what steps they took.

The Countermoves
National Security Strategy
On December 18th of 2017, Donald Trump released his National Security Strategy.

There is one section of the National Security Strategy that gives us our first glimpse of Trump addressing the potential threat of a pandemic. Notice how prescient this section is:

This screenshot from the December 2017 NSS describes the COVID pandemic we have been living through almost perfectly - “demonstrated the impact of biological threats on national security by taking lives, generating economic losses, and contributing to a loss in confidence in government institutions.” It’s as if Trump knew then that a pandemic would be used to steal an election and contribute to the loss in confidence in our government.

National Biodefense Strategy
On September 18, 2018, Donald Trump issued National Security Presidential Memorandum 14 (NSPM 14): Support for National Biodefense:

(Cont'd)

 

[Buick Electra]

I'm not posting all the past history Patel Patriot reviews at the beginning of this post. Most of us know it and if you don't, please go to the link. I'm also not bringing over all attachments which can be seen at the site, only some as this is time consuming.

(Post 1 of 2)

Devolution - Part 17

From Ukraine, With Love

patelpatriot.substack.com

Devolution - Part 17
From Ukraine With Love

We’re all trying to make sense of the madness in Ukraine right now. It’s nearly impossible to do so without a free and fair press as well as a legitimate administration calling the shots. One thing we do know for certain, is that Ukraine is the epicenter of decades-long political corruption.

Trump entered office knowing Ukraine would be a major battleground in his war against the Deep State. As he did many times before, he made the proper moves and implemented the executive order necessary to dismantle the corrupt network. In this article, I will give you a clear idea of how Trump defeated all this fraud and corruption.

First, a recap.

Remember the timeline surrounding Ukraine that I discussed in Devolution - Part 14:




The EU spent the better part of a decade trying to lure Ukraine into a free-trade pact but instead they decided to make a deal with Putin and Russia. So, what did the EU do? They used their playbook, implemented a color-revolution, and installed a leader - Poroshenko - who would play ball. Shortly after the regime change, Biden became the public face of the Obama administration’s handling of Ukraine, and his son Hunter joined the board of Burisma.

Ihor Kolomoisky

Before we get into the really juicy stuff, let’s familiarize ourselves with Ihor Kolomoisky. Look at this twitter thread recently posted by @DawsonSField regarding a story published in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette:

From 2006 - 2015, Ihor Kolomoisky stole $4.45 Billion dollars from PrivatBank (A bank he owned) and laundered it through the United States through purchasing mass amounts of real estate. What Dawson is referring to by “banks looked the other way as Ukraine was looted while US taxpayers bailed them out” was the money given to Ukraine through the IMF.

A gentleman named John Helmer has done extensive research on this topic and has multiple articles you can find at his site with sourced information. Here is a pretty good synopsis from one of those articles:

This is merely the tip of the iceberg, but it has led me to believe there is a much larger connection being glossed over surrounding the 2014 regime change in Ukraine and the Biden Family.

That connection is this: is it possible that Kolomoisky’s money laundering is the real reason for the Bidens getting involved in Ukraine?

It is rumored that Privatbank (and therefore Kolomoisky) are the actual owners of Burisma.

[…]So it’s rumored that Kolomoisky (Through PrivatBank and PrivatGroup) is the actual owner of Burisma. How much circumstantial evidence can we find that lends to that conclusion?

As mentioned in the Dawson Field thread earlier, Ihor Kolomoisky is under investigation here in the United States. The US DOJ currently has two complaints opened against him: “Louisville Properties Complaint” and “Dallas Properties Complaint”. These complaints provide us with some great insight into how Kolomoisky has been operating his money laundering schemes.

[…]So let’s catch our breath.

Burisma is registered in the Cyprus Registry database to the same address as multiple Shell companies used by Kolomoisky referenced in two US DOJ complaints

Christina Sofocleous is the “Director” of Burisma as listed on the Cyprus Registry database

Christina Sofocleous works for her father Andreas at the “Andreas M. Sofocleous & Co LLC”

Andreas is one of the owners/shareholders of PrivatBank, just like Kolomoisky

So far we have some interesting connections but haven’t really made anything definitive. After spending nearly two weeks trying to find something concrete, this was the best I was able to do.

[…]From a deleted article written in August of 2012, it is reported from “first-hand sources” that Ihor Kolomoisky, through his controlling stake in Privat Group, owns Burisma. I can’t show you purchase agreements for the transfer of ownership but there are 3 interesting connections now (including the “first-hand source”) linking Kolomoisky to Burisma.

Doesn’t this make a little bit more sense of the Ukrainian situation we’ve seen unfold since 2014?

Clinton Scandals
As I said earlier, this is just the tip of the iceberg regarding corruption in Ukraine and the United States government. Viktor Pinchuk and George Soros are known to be involved with the political establishment as well.

[…]Trump told us he was going to “drain the swamp”. Part of that would involve cleaning up the corruption in Ukraine as well. That is why he brought up two different scandals in the July 2019 phone call that led to his impeachment.

The first scandal he brought up was Spygate by mentioning Crowdstrike and the DNC server:

The second scandal Trump mentioned was the firing of the prosecutor looking into Bursima:



[...] The day after it’s reported that Durham assumed parts of the Huber investigation into the Clinton Foundation, we get confirmation that Durham is also “exploring the extent to which a number of countries, including Ukraine, played a role in the counterintelligence investigation directed at the Trump campaign.” Given what we know about the Ukrainians and the Clinton Foundation, the timing of these revelations is interesting.

Ukraine is clearly one of the primary battlegrounds in Trump’s war against the Deep State. How does he intend to defeat his enemies?

Executive Order 13818

Executive Order 13818: Blocking the Property of Persons Involved in Serious Human Rights Abuse or Corruption is similar in structure to one of the other most important Executive Orders we will see put to use in the future - Executive Order 13848: Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States Election. Both are wide in their scope and both will be used to dismantle the Deep State and all its accomplices.

[…]So the first two subsets of individuals this EO affects are those listed in the Annex and then those specific foreign individuals (keyword: foreign) “who the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General” have determined to have perpetrated the actions described above.
So far, this executive order applies only to foreign individuals. That is where this third subset comes in and this executive order gets really good.

In this third subset of individuals, the word “foreign” is left off. So this could pertain to anybody at home or abroad.

Hypothetical: Let’s pretend somebody steals taxpayer dollars and launders it through the United States, then goes on to hire a politician’s son through a corrupt company, and then that politician gets the prosecutor investigating it all fired by withholding $1 Billion.

Executive order 13818 would come in to play against (not exhaustive, just spitballing):

The one stealing and laundering the money

The politician

The politician’s son

Any and everybody who was aware of the scheme

Anybody who benefitted from any of the money that was stolen or paid to the politicians

Executive order 13818 is truly a catch-all for corruption and its perpetrators. The last key section here is the one that preserves the element of surprise in apprehending the criminals:

[attach image]

This executive order could easily take down the entire corrupt political establishment if and when it is properly used, but there is one aspect to this that needs to be addressed.

(Cont'd)

 

[Buick Electra]

(Part 17- Post 2 of 2)

Sunset
Just like all Executive Orders, 13818 draws upon specific authorities to allow the President to put it into effect. Here are the authorities Trump used in the issuance of executive order 13818.

[…]The one we need to look closer at is the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act. Here is some background from the Congressional Research Service:

Here is where it gets concerning. The Act was implemented through the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal year 2017, and it was issued with a “Sunset”. This means the authority to use this Act and therefore, to use executive order 13818 would terminate “6 years after the date of enactment of this act”.

Here is the intro to the NDAA for 2017 and the effective date is highlighted at the bottom.

This means 6 years from December 23, 2016, the authority for the Act and executive order 13818 would terminate. That sunset date is December 23, 2022. Here is confirmation from the Congressional Research Service of the Sunset date:

Now this is concerning. One of the broadest executive orders Trump implemented to take down the corrupt political establishment has a looming sunset date attached to it. Not only that, but Biden would need to re-authorize the executive order as well to make sure it remains in play. How do we know this will continue to be in effect when we need it?

Remember how it made no sense that he [Biden] extended EO 13848 - A “president” who won an election using foreign interference extends the Executive Order that directly affects him? Biden did the exact same thing with executive order 13818, even though it’s obvious to everybody with a pulse (no offense Biden voters) that what he and his family have done falls within the scope of the order.

Then there is our National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). Every year, Congress “works together” to pass the coming year’s NDAA and appropriations bill. The process behind this is pretty interesting, especially when you look at what was included related to the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act.

This process is relevant because the initial NDAA that passed the house (H.R. 4350) included a repeal of the Global Magnitsky sunset:

[…]This means the original NDAA formulated by our DOD included the sunset repeal. When it went to the Senate, however, they removed that section from the bill and S. 1605 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 passed and was signed into law leaving the sunset in place.

Closing
What Trump did with executive order 13818 was brilliant. It’s another example of Trump and his team issuing a tool that will be used to dismantle the corrupt political establishment. The sheer scope of this executive order explains exactly why they were so desperate to get Trump out of office by any means necessary.

I’m looking at the sunset attached to the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act rather optimistically. It’s logical to think that the Deep State would want this executive order to go away. So why did Biden re-authorize it in the first place? Just like executive order 13848, it made no sense for him to do so.

We know the mainstream media turns a blind eye to the corruption of the political establishment. We also know they have turned a blind eye to the election theft of 2020. You could easily go as far as to say they are complicit in the cover up of both. That doesn’t mean the corruption doesn’t exist, and it doesn’t mean the election theft didn’t happen. Both are genuine realities.

Here’s another genuine reality: Joe Biden isn’t the one running the country. His handlers are calling the shots. He is just the dementia-laden face of the Deep State. Even so, it makes absolutely zero sense for two of the most impactful executive orders Trump issued to still be in play. Executive orders 13818 & 13848 are all Trump needs to destroy his enemies and get America back on the path of greatness.

And this is the only conclusion I can draw from the re-authorization of these two powerful executive orders: the handlers aren’t running the country, either. How could they be?

To me, this is powerful circumstantial evidence that devolution is happening, and somebody is forcing their hand. Nothing else explains it.

That is why I’m not concerned with the sunset attached to the GMHRAA. For all we know, Trump could have issued a PEAD to continue the GMHRAA authorization regardless of congressional approval. The PEADs give Trump nearly limitless power so it’s not out of the realm of possibility. I’m already of the opinion that Trump will be back before the midterms, so maybe the sunset date is irrelevant.

However this unfolds, you can rest assured that Trump was well aware of the corruption that was enriching the political establishment, so he took the steps to rid us of it.

THE BEST IS YET TO COME

Patel Patriot

[Again, I excluded a lot of Burisma stuff and some other players that might come up in the near future for the sake of time constraints and eating up memory here with a lot of attachments. If you're interested in reading those, please go to the link]

 

[Buick Electra]

I'm not posting all the past history Patel Patriot reviews at the beginning of this post. Most of us know it and if you don't, please go to the link. I'm also not bringing over any writings and attachments on COLOR REVOLUTIONS which you all can view at the link as this is very time consuming. If you see THIS ellipsis -> [...] it means I've skipped some writing or attachments.

(POST 1 of 2)
Devolution - Part 18
The Proof is in the Putin

There has been endless speculation on the topic of whether or not Trump could be working with Putin to take down the deep state. I’ve become somewhat annoyed over the constant media lies about Putin and his invasion of Ukraine. It’s also difficult to combat the mainstream narratives when we don’t have the full picture of what’s really going on.

I am not trying to use this article to convince you that Putin is a good guy. He has done some questionable things as a leader. What I can tell you is that he is extremely patriotic to the country he rules over.

He’s not a good guy, but he’s done extraordinary things. He’s a new tsar of Russia and he’s dangerous in the sense that he doesn’t care about civil liberties; he doesn’t care about free speech; he cares about stability. But stability is what Russia needed and that’s why Russians adore him.
- Time Magazine managing editor Richard Stengel (2007)

He is, first and foremost, the leader that Russia needs, just as Trump is the leader America needs. Allow me to show that Putin and Trump may indeed have a mutual interest in working together.

As always, we need some context first.

Color Me Surprised
It shouldn’t surprise you that Putin, much like Trump, has had a run-in with the color revolution playbook throughout his tenure at the helm of Russia. What is a color Revolution?

[...] I covered the topic of color revolutions in Devolution - Part 12 and laid out how our own State Department was at the center of numerous, if not all, color revolutions around the world. Keep in mind that Barack Obama had two Secretaries of State - Hillary Clinton (January 21, 2009 - February 1, 2013) and John Kerry (February 1, 2013 – January 20, 2017).

Most of what I discuss in part 12 is how a color revolution was perpetrated against President Donald Trump. For the purposes of this article, we need to understand how such revolutions have affected Russia.

[...] In Devolution - Part 17 I covered the timeline of the 2014 Color revolution in Ukraine but let’s take another look at it.

[...] Remember, Ukraine is at the epicenter of the deep state corruption. Reread Devolution - Part 17 to get an idea of how that corruption unfolded, but Yanukovych was a pro-Russian President of Ukraine and after he made a deal with Russia, he was overthrown and Putin was not pleased.

Putin and the Russian military viewed the US and Europe as attempting to destabilize the world for their own agendas. Anthony Cordesman, the Emeritus Chair in Strategy for the Center for Strategic & International Studies wrote an article in May of 2014 titled Russia and the "Color Revolution" which detailed their views on the threat of color revolutions.

Putin clearly had a very negative view towards color revolutions. He even accused some high level United States officials of attempting one against him.

For that story, we need to fully dig into the individual of which this article is focused.

Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin.
Somebody has already provided us with some great information regarding Putin and it comes from a substack article written by a gentleman named Biernutz_71. Biernutz_71 has written numerous articles and his analysis is brilliant. I highly recommend you give his work a proper read. The article of his I will be sharing screenshots from is titled “Trump’s Winter Soldier”.

I’ll come back to reference more of this article again multiple times but we need to get more context first. It may surprise you to hear this, but the Mainstream Media (MSM) has not been telling us the truth about Vladimir Putin. They tell the stories that make him out to be a villain because that is what benefits the political establishment, and since the MSM is the propaganda wing of the political establishment, it makes sense for them to paint Putin in a negative light. But the media respected him at one time.

Stablemates
Now Trump and Putin have had an interesting and almost playful relationship. As you’ll see, Trump even considered themselves “stablemates”. I’m going to focus on Trump’s comments on Putin prior to the summer of 2016 when the accusations of Trump colluding with Russia began to circulate. This CNN article has 80 total quotes from Trump regarding Putin so I will narrow it down quite a bit.

[...] These are just a few examples from well before Trump became president. More recently, we’ve seen the reports of Trump commenting on what Putin is doing currently in Ukraine.



Trump has a level of respect for Putin and it seems as though that respect is mutual.

The Great Reset
Lets continue on with more from Biernutz_71 article - “The Winter Soldier”.

I want to focus on one section from above because it’s where we get the first glimpse of the foundation of a Trump/Putin alliance - both despise globalism and the global elite.

We know Trump is all about putting America first and you can easily find numerous articles on that topic. Here is just one of his anti-globalism quotes featured in Devolution - Part 16. This came in his address to the United Nations on September 22nd 2020:



This November 2015 article from Euromaidan Press explains Putin’s stance on globalism the best:

[...] So we know both Trump and Putin share a common ground in their belief in anti-globalism. This is how we know they share a common enemy. The global elite want nothing more than to pursue a globalist agenda in what they call a “great reset”. Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum openly promote this agenda on their website:

[...] The method used by the deep state to achieve their global ambitions, is to use color revolutions to install leaders who will further their agenda. Putin and Trump stand vigorously opposed to that agenda, which is why they are seen as such threats. It also explains the Russian collusion story. Biernutz_71 said it best:

The Wild West
First this from Wikipedia:

The 2012 election in Russia plays a major role in this story. Putin served as President of Russia from 2000-2008, and stepped away due to the Russian constitutional limit preventing him from serving more than two consecutive terms. After serving as prime minister from 2008-2012, he once again ran for President of Russia when “chaos” ensued.



Here is screenshot from July of 2017 Politico article on the topic:

 

[Buick Electra]

(Devolution 18- Post 2 of 2)

The “moment for payback” referred to here is the discredited Russian Collusion Hoax. It’s important for you to understand that President Vladimir Putin blamed Hillary Clinton and the U.S. State Department for trying to force regime change in Russia during the 2012 election. This led Putin to despise Hillary and the United States interfering in Russian affairs, but his hatred began even before the 2012 election.

[...] The Deep State
Putin sees the deep state for what they are, for who they are. He knows exactly how they operate. He has been making moves against them long before Trump became President, and he was successful in removing some major cogs of the deep state machine from his own country. In September of 2014, Putin arrested a Russian oligarch to prevent a coup, and it wasn’t the first time he had gone after a Russian oligarch.

[...] The Russian Oligarchs can be compared to the Mark Zuckerbergs of America, and those American Oligarchs played a major role in stealing the 2020 election from Trump.

So when Putin was going after those oligarchs in Russia, he was stopping the same kind of political interference that the American oligarchs perpetrated against Trump.

In November of 2015, Putin banned George Soros’ Open Society foundation from Russia.

In February of 2019, Putin flat-out asserted that there was a deep state working against Trump:

[...] Putin was right. In Devolution - Part 12 I covered the deep state and the color revolution they perpetrated against Trump during his Presidency. Putin sees color revolutions as a threat to national security and in January of 2022 stated they will not allow “outside forces” to interfere “in the internal affairs of our states”.

Frenemies
It’s clear that both Presidents Trump and Putin have been fighting the same enemy. But have we answered the question this article is focused on? Is it possible that both Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin are working together to defeat their shared enemy - the deep state?

They have aligned to defeat a shared enemy before.

It’s hard to know the full scope of their alliance to defeat ISIS. We aren’t privy to classified information. This next article discusses who contributed the most to the defeat of ISIS.

[...] It’s irrelevant to me which country contributed the most to defeating ISIS. The most important takeaway is that Trump and Putin set out to defeat a threat common to both their countries. If they have worked together to fight a common enemy before, it’s easy to draw the conclusion that they could do so again.

This brings us to the current situation. Let’s listen to what Mike Pompeo and Donald Trump said of Vladimir Putin after he initially invaded Ukraine (Video from Feb 23, 2022 - Play until 3 minute mark when Trump finishes talking). [Go to link to watch video]

[...] Trump and Pompeo clearly respect Putin. So what is really happening in Ukraine? It’s impossible to know, but I’m happy to add to the general speculation. The circumstantial evidence I laid out in Devolution - Part 17 allows us to surmise that Ukraine is the epicenter of deep state corruption. Here is Biernutz_71’s take on it:

On February 24th, 2022, Putin announced the launching of his forces into Ukraine:

[...] Here Putin chooses an interesting word. He specifically says he is striving for “denazification” in Kyiv. This comment was further solidified by a statement put out on twitter by the Russian embassy in Canada. This account is verified on twitter and listed as a “Russia government organization”.

[...] They again state that their goal is to “denazify” Ukraine. They call out the “fake news” and “Goebbels-style western propaganda”. The line at the very end also stuck out to me. “Russia is not starting wars. Russia is ending them”. Doesn’t that sound familiar?

Trump repeatedly discussed “ending endless wars”. Here is what he said on September 7th, 2020.

[...] The final thing we’ll focus on from the Russian embassy statement is the first neo-Nazi group listed - “Azov”. Here is a little background on the Azov group:

View attachment 325583

The Azov group is where we find another interesting connection.

One more article:

Remember what we learned about Kolomoisky in Devolution - Part 17:

[...] So let’s connect all the dots here.

• Putin says he is striving for the demilitarization and denazification of Ukraine
• The Russian embassy in Canada releases a statement saying they are ending wars rather than starting them, in similar manner to Trump.
• The Russian embassy statement reinforces that Russia’s goal is the denazification of Ukraine, and specifically names the neo-Nazi group “Azov”.
• Azov was funded by Kolomoisky.
• Kolomoisky is almost certainly the owner of Burisma.
• Burisma hired Hunter Biden.
• Joe Biden as VP withholds $1 billion in loan guarantees to get the prosecutor looking into Burisma fired.

Putin’s denazification of Ukraine connects to Joe Biden’s entire Ukraine scandal. Think about how significant this connection is. Putin has declared war on Nazism in Ukraine, and I believe this is a common enemy he shares with Trump.

Closing
There is a fascinating Substack series titled “Prussia Gate” that makes an extremely compelling argument for who Trump’s hidden enemy really is.

View attachment 325584
View attachment 325585

Has Trump been hinting at a war against fascism and Nazism this whole time? The Prussia Gate series makes a convincing argument for that being the case and it sheds light on the reality of Ukraine.

If Ukraine is truly the deep state epicenter, at some point, somebody has to go in and remove the rot from within. Sometimes to remove a cancer you have to go in and cut it out. Maybe that is exactly what Russia is doing.

The timing of this effort is so important. Putin has sought to liberate the post-Soviet countries from Nazi Fascism for decades. He invaded such countries during the tenure of every President we have had going back to the year 2000, except for one - Trump.

Putin’s goals of liberating post-Soviet countries didn’t change during Trump’s time as President. So why didn’t he invade Ukraine earlier? Could it actually be that in Trump, Putin finally found an ally to fight against the deep state and the hidden enemy? Invading Ukraine on Trump’s watch would have been a political disaster. Trump told us he was going to get us out of wars. Publicly, that’s exactly what he did.

Remember, the most important aspect of the 2020 election was that Donald Trump won in a massive landslide. If it hadn’t been a landslide, the deep state wouldn’t have had to cheat so brazenly, and the fraud wouldn’t be so obvious. If Trump needed a landslide, then he couldn’t afford any major political setbacks. He was already up against constant attacks and lies from the MSM, the democrats, big tech, social media etc.

He got his landslide anyway.

Even Russia says the election was stolen. Clicking this link Patel Patriot takes you to a video of the Russian Ambassador to the UN saying, “and with the support of the United States where the legitimately elected president of the country was overthrown”.

A Russian incursion into Ukraine on Trump’s watch would have certainly been a political nightmare that could have derailed that landslide. Now, with Biden in office, there is no better time to deliver a critical blow to the enemy, a massive red pill to the masses, while annihilating the deep state in the process.

I’m merely making connections trying to figure out what I think is happening in Ukraine. I still don’t have all the answers, but I do know this. The MSM has lied to us about:

• Russian Collusion
• Spygate
• Impeachment
• Covid-19
  • 2 weeks to slow the spread
  • Masks work then don’t work
  • Trump tried killing people pushing HCQ
  • Vaccines Work
  • Vaccines are effective
  • and much more
• Biden Corruption
• Hunter Biden Laptop
• Election Fraud
• January 6th
• Every single aspect of Joe Biden’s Presidency

I could go on and on. So when the MSM is telling us that Russia and Putin are the enemy, I can be almost certain that they are not.

I can’t tell you definitively that Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin are working together. I am not privy to their private conversations. However, they have a shared goal, and they share a common enemy. This wouldn’t be the first time these two have set out to defeat a common enemy to reach such a shared goal.

The deep state is the greatest enemy of the United States of America. The deep state is also the sworn enemy of Russia.

The enemy of my enemy is my friend.

THE BEST IS YET TO COME

Patel Patriot

 

[Buick Electra]

Juliette Engel MD on Gab: 'ANOTHER CLUE THAT WE ARE IN DEVOLUTION The US g…'

Juliette Engel MD on Gab: 'ANOTHER CLUE THAT WE ARE IN DEVOLUTION The US government has begun seizing the assets of Russian and Ukrainian oligarchs including yachts, properties and bank accounts. The Ukrainian militias are funded by these very same oligarchs and currently have more of a...

gab.com

 

[Buick Electra]

Looks like we skipped Part 19. Oh well. On to part 20.