CORONA Main Coronavirus thread

Zoner

Veteran Member
Here is the article from the Guardian Geert refers to in his point 1.


(fair use applies)

Cancer and heart disease vaccines ‘ready by end of the decade’
Exclusive: Pharmaceutical firm says groundbreaking jabs could save millions of lives

Linda Geddes
Sat 8 Apr 2023 06.37 EDT First published on Fri 7 Apr 2023 14.00 EDT

Millions of lives could be saved by a groundbreaking set of new vaccines for a range of conditions including cancer, experts have said. A leading pharmaceutical firm said it is confident that jabs for cancer, cardiovascular and autoimmune diseases, and other conditions will be ready by 2030.

Studies into these vaccinations are also showing “tremendous promise”, with some researchers saying 15 years’ worth of progress has been “unspooled” in 12 to 18 months thanks to the success of the Covid jab.

Dr Paul Burton, the chief medical officer of pharmaceutical company Moderna, said he believes the firm will be able to offer such treatments for “all sorts of disease areas” in as little as five years.

The firm, which created a leading coronavirus vaccine, is developing cancer vaccines that target different tumour types.

Burton said: “We will have that vaccine and it will be highly effective, and it will save many hundreds of thousands, if not millions of lives. I think we will be able to offer personalised cancer vaccines against multiple different tumour types to people around the world.”

View attachment 409163

He also said that multiple respiratory infections could be covered by a single injection – allowing vulnerable people to be protected against Covid, flu and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) – while mRNA therapies could be available for rare diseases for which there are currently no drugs. Therapies based on mRNA work by teaching cells how to make a protein that triggers the body’s immune response against disease.

Burton said :“I think we will have mRNA-based therapies for rare diseases that were previously undruggable, and I think that 10 years from now, we will be approaching a world where you truly can identify the genetic cause of a disease and, with relative simplicity, go and edit that out and repair it using mRNA-based technology.”

But scientists warn that the accelerated progress, which has surged “by an order of magnitude” in the past three years, will be wasted if a high level of investment is not maintained.

The mRNA molecule instructs cells to make proteins. By injecting a synthetic form, cells can pump out proteins we want our immune system to strike. An mRNA-based cancer vaccine would alert the immune system to a cancer that is already growing in a patient’s body, so it can attack and destroy it, without destroying healthy cells.

This involves identifying protein fragments on the surface of cancer cells that are not present on healthy cells – and which are most likely to trigger an immune response – and then creating pieces of mRNA that will instruct the body on how to manufacture them.

First, doctors take a biopsy of a patient’s tumour and send it to a lab, where its genetic material is sequenced to identify mutations that aren’t present in healthy cells.

A machine learning algorithm then identifies which of these mutations are responsible for driving the cancer’s growth. Over time, it also learns which parts of the abnormal proteins these mutations encode are most likely to trigger an immune response. Then, mRNAs for the most promising antigens are manufactured and packaged into a personalised vaccine.

Burton said: “I think what we have learned in recent months is that if you ever thought that mRNA was just for infectious diseases, or just for Covid, the evidence now is that that’s absolutely not the case.

“It can be applied to all sorts of disease areas; we are in cancer, infectious disease, cardiovascular disease, autoimmune diseases, rare disease. We have studies in all of those areas and they have all shown tremendous promise.”

In January, Moderna announced results from a late-stage trial of its experimental mRNA vaccine for RSV, suggesting it was 83.7% effective at preventing at least two symptoms, such as cough and fever, in adults aged 60 and older. Based on this data, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted the vaccine breakthrough therapy designation, meaning its regulatory review will be expedited.

In February, the FDA granted the same designation to Moderna’s personalised cancer vaccine, based on recent results in patients with the skin cancer melanoma.

Burton said: “I think it was an order of magnitude, that the pandemic sped [this technology] up by. It has also allowed us to scale up manufacturing, so we’ve got extremely good at making large amounts of vaccine very quickly.”

Pfizer has also begun recruitment for a late-stage clinical trial of an mRNA-based influenza vaccine, and has its sights set on other infectious diseases, including shingles, in collaboration with BioNTech. A spokesperson for Pfizer said: “The learnings from the Covid-19 vaccine development process have informed our overall approach to mRNA research and development, and how Pfizer conducts R&D (research and development) more broadly. We gained a decade’s worth of scientific knowledge in just one year.”

Other vaccine technologies have also benefited from the pandemic, including next-generation protein-based vaccines, such as the Covid jab made by US-based biotechnology company Novavax. The jab helps the immune system thinking it is encountering a virus, so it mounts a stronger response.

Dr Filip Dubovsky, president of research and development at Novavax, said: “There has been a massive acceleration, not just of traditional vaccine technologies, but also novel ones that hadn’t previously been taken through licensure. Certainly, mRNA falls into that category, as does our vaccine.”

Dr Richard Hackett, CEO of the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness and Innovations (Cepi) said the biggest impact of the pandemic had been the shortening of development timelines for many previously unvalidated vaccine platforms. He explained: “It meant that things that might have unspooled over the next decade or even 15 years, were compressed down into a year or a year and a half …”

Prof Andrew Pollard, director of the Oxford Vaccine Group and chair of the UK’s Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI), said: “There’s no doubt there’s a lot more interest in vaccines. The really big question is, what happens from here?”

With the looming threat of wider conflict in Europe, there is a risk that this focus on vaccines is lost, without capitalising on the momentum and technological insights that have been gained during the pandemic. Pollard, for one, believes this would be a mistake.

He said: “If you take a step back to think about what we are prepared to invest in during peacetime, like having a substantial military for most countries … Pandemics are as much a threat, if not more, than a military threat because we know they are going to happen as a certainty from where we are today. But we’re not investing even the amount that it would cost to build one nuclear submarine.”
Because of the recent vaccine shillery I’ve become hard-core anti-vax.
 

psychgirl

Has No Life - Lives on TB
(fair use applies)


Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. on Lockdowns: Excerpt from the Announcement Speech
By Brownstone InstituteBrownstone Institute
April 22, 2023

On April 19, 2023, Robert F. Kennedy announced his intention to challenge Biden in the Democratic primary for president. As part of his announcement speech in Boston, he spoke bluntly about Covid lockdowns. What follows is the relevant excerpt of that speech. You can read the full text here.


I want to move on to another topic that nobody’s going to want to talk about. But I’m going to talk about lockdowns. Nobody wants to talk about it. But we need to understand.

You know I grew up at a time that economists call the great prosperity. It’s when the American middle class between 1945 and 75. Grew to be the biggest economic engine on the face of the earth.

I mean we were the economy in the globe. We made everything and everybody looked to us not only for goods but for moral leadership and we became the most powerful country in the world. Unrivaled. It was because we had a stable democracy with institutions that people trusted the press that told us the truth.

Everybody knows it’s an economic and political economic rule. You cannot have democracy in a society where there is high concentrations of wealth and widespread poverty. You need a middle class or you don’t get democracy. That is a law. You cannot do it, you cannot do it unless you have a big middle class. We had that. But since the early 1980s there’s been a systematic attack on our middle class.

The coup de grace was a lockdown. Lockdown was the biggest shift in wealth in human history. I’m going to tell you about that in a second. I blame President Trump for the lockdown. President Trump gets blamed for a lot of things that he didn’t do and he gets blamed for some things that he did too. But the worst thing that he did to this country, to our civil rights, to our economy, and to the middle class in this country, was a lockdown.

In fairness let me just make this point. Trump will tell people, well the lockdown wasn’t my idea. It was my bureaucrats. They rolled me on it. I was saying we shouldn’t do it. But that’s not a good enough excuse. He was the president of the United States. As Harry Truman said, the buck stops here.

Six hundred doctors signed a letter to President Trump begging him not to do the lockdowns. They pointed out that at that time, all of the pandemic protocols anywhere in the world, the WHO, the CDC, everywhere, the European health agency, all said you never do mass lockdowns. It causes much worse havoc and deaths and injuries than if you do the standard protocol which is you lock down the sick, you protect the vulnerable, and you let everybody else go back to work.

Otherwise you are going to wreak havoc.

I wrote about it. On Instagram I was writing every day. I was citing these economic studies that showed every point in unemployment you get 37,000 excess deaths from heart attack, suicides, plus imprisonments.

I was writing about this and they dumped me from the platform. They said that’s misinformation. But it was not. People were saying it. People knew it. It wasn’t just me. We now know of course that it’s true. Now study after study and every comparison between the states and nations that locked down compared to those who didn’t has shown the ones who locked down had worse Covid death.

Numbers came out this week for Sweden, which was the only country in Europe that didn’t lock down. It had the lowest excess deaths in Europe, which is very predictable.

The nation that led lockdowns was the US and we had the highest body count of Covid on Earth. We have 4.2 percent of the world’s population yet 16 percent of the Covid deaths. At some point, even the media is going to have to stop saying that this was a success story.

The health issues were almost dwarfed by the economic cataclysm that befell our country. The IMF and Harvard study by Larry Summers showed that the cost of the lockdown to the United States was $16 trillion. $16 trillion for nothing!

We shifted $4 trillion from the middle class in this country to the super-rich. We created 500 new billionaires. The existing billionaires increased their wealth, according to the Oxfam study that came out three days ago, by 30 percent. This was a gift to the rich. And guess what? The ones who got rich were social media companies like Amazon and Facebook and Microsoft that were conspiring with President Trump’s White House to censor people like me.

So the very people who were profiting on those lockdowns were the ones who were strip-mining the wealth from the middle class in this country. Amazon got to close down all of its competitors. 3.3 million businesses shut down.

I’m in a lawsuit involving Amazon for censoring one of my books. They were censoring people who criticized the lockdowns while they were raking in the money from the lockdowns. And unfortunately, President Trump’s White House was colluding with them.

41 percent of black businesses shut down, most of them permanently.

I want to introduce you to somebody. This is Anthony Caldwell. Can you stand Anthony and Yvette? Just wave to people. Anthony Caldwell is from Boston. He was a chef, and a very very successful chef, in this town for 19 years. He saved every penny he had to build their dream, which was that he would have his own restaurant by the time he was 50 years old. It’s called 50 Kitchen.

It was the hottest spot in Dorchester, which is the town that my grandfather and grandmother lived. They were turning away crowds. Boston magazine called them a culinary genius.

It was a mix of Asian fusion food with soul food. Then the lockdowns came. Anthony told me his customers were gone. He was looking out the window staring out all day with this with the chairs stacked in his dining room and no customers.

The federal government gave him $17,000. They told him he had to spend it all within eight weeks or he had to pay it back. He said to me, how do I spend $17,000 with no customers? He had to let go of seven of his servers.

Finally he kept it open for a year without paying for himself. Then he closed it down and went bankrupt. He now owes $250,000.

That story can be told thousands upon thousands upon thousands of times in black communities all over this country. These lockdowns were a war on the poor and they were a war on American children. According to a Brown University study, children in this country, toddlers, lost 22 IQ points. One-third of children, throughout their school careers, are going to need remedial education.

Children all over the country miss their milestones. What is the CDC’s response? The CDC five months ago revised its milestones. Now a child no longer is expected to walk at one year. Now they have 18 months. And now a child does not have to have 50 words in 24 months. It’s 30 months. Instead of fixing the problem they are trying to cover it up.

The only indicia of social decline that actually improved during the pandemic was child abuse. It dropped but it was just an artifact of data gathering. Why? Because child abuse is reported by the schools. And the schools were closed. The kids were locked at home with their abusers. 55 percent of teenagers report being abused during the lockdowns, 13 percent physically abused.

It was also the schools were the places where people had hot lunches, where kids stayed at home watching screens or eating potato chips. We gained on average 29 pounds. And it was the obesity that killed you from Covid. We did the inverse of what you want to do.

Public Health authorities went to every black neighborhood and locked down the basketball courts so people couldn’t exercise. They could not even get in the sunlight. If they couldn’t lock down the courts, they removed the basketball hoops.

All of us suffered from it but the black communities, the minority communities, suffered the worst. 25 percent of teenagers reported going hungry. 20 percent had suicide ideation. 9 percent tried to commit suicide. Suicide is now the largest cause of death among black children.

These are just some of the horrifying data. And I could go on and on. But I’m not going to.

I want to talk about another issue which is the closing down of our rights. Not only did we start censoring people at the very very beginning. Hamilton and Adams said they put freedom of expression as the First Amendment because all the other rights depend on that. If you give a government license to silence its critics, it now has license for any atrocity.

So as soon as they knew they could censor us, they went after every other part of the First Amendment, including the freedom of worship. They closed every Church in this country without any scientific citation for a year.

They did it without any notice or comment. Rule-making democracy was simply abolished. Then they went after freedom of assembly. They told us we had to social distance. They went after our property rights in the Fifth Amendment. They closed 3.3 million businesses with no due process and no just compensation.

They got rid of Seventh Amendment jury trials. They said that if you’re involved with the countermeasure, no matter how egregious the injury you cause, no matter how negligent you are, no matter how reckless, you cannot be sued.

Here’s what the Seventh Amendment says. It says that no American shall be deprived the right of a trial before a jury of his peers in cases or controversies exceeding 25 dollars.

There’s no pandemic exception.

And by the way, the Framers knew all about pandemics. There were two epidemics during the Revolutionary War. One was a malaria epidemic in Virginia that decimated General Washington’s troops. There was a smallpox epidemic that disabled the armies of New England at the very moment they conquered Quebec. They had to withdraw. Otherwise today Canada would be part of the United States.

Between the end of the Revolution and the ratification of the Constitution, over nine years, there were epidemics in every city that killed tens of thousands of people. There were cholera epidemics, malaria epidemics, and smallpox epidemics, in Philadelphia, New York, Boston, and so on.

They knew all about them. But they didn’t put that in the Constitution. The Constitution was built for Hard Times. It wasn’t built for the easy times. During the Civil War, there were 659 000 soldiers who died. That’s the equivalent of 7,200,000 today.

Our country was this close from falling apart. It was a much worse crisis than this pandemic. Yet when Lincoln tried to prohibit habeas corpus, the court said you don’t. You can’t do that. You cannot do it. It doesn’t matter how bad the crisis is. You cannot do it. It’s in the Constitution. It’s the heart and soul of our country.

President Trump said well these bureaucrats came at him from every side. They were all telling him what he had to do. He had the right instincts. He knew that he shouldn’t close down the country. But he did it. He got rolled by his bureaucracy.

I’m going to tell you a quick story. During the Cuban Missile Crisis the ex-com committee – which was all the intelligence officials and military officials, and my father was on there, and so was Bob McNamara but so those are the exceptions – but all of the the doyens and the gurus, the old gray men…and the generals from the Joint Chiefs, all said we got to go in and bomb the the missile sites in Cuba.

My uncle said to them: well wait a minute. What’s going to happen? Who is on those gun crews? Are those Cubans or are they Russians? They said we don’t know. And he said, well if they’re Russians and we kill Russians, isn’t Russia then going to have to go into Berlin? They said, we don’t think they’ll do that.

My uncle said I want to see the aerial photographs.He looked at the aerial photographs and he said who is on the Cuban side? Who gives permission to fire? Does it come from Russia or does it come from Fidel? From the individual gun crews? Because if it comes from Fidel, he is going to fire. If it comes from the individual gun crews, then you’re putting the fate of the world in the hands of those commanders, 64 men.

They didn’t know. He said we’re not doing it. And he did something else.

All I’m saying is you need a president at this time in history who can stand up to his bureaucracy. The bureaucracies are owned by the industries. I’m talking about the NIH and EPA and CDC and FDA and DOC and USDA…..

Our food is terrible because the food companies and the pesticide companies own USDA. We’re in constant wars because the military industrial complex, the big contractors own CIA.

Now, I want to make this clear. I do not. Believe that everybody at the CIA is a bad person. My daughter in law, Amaryllis, who is one of the top officers on this campaign and her entire career is a clandestine agent for the CIA as a spy in the weapons of mass destruction programs in some of the most dangerous parts of the earth. And I have never met anybody with such courage. And that’s how most of the 22,000 people at CIA. They’re people who are patriots or people who are good public servants. And they’re people of enormous courage and idealism, as the same with most of our agencies.

The problem is the people who end up rising in those agencies generally are people who are in the tank with industry. And that’s how they get corrupted. And one of the things that I can do, I think better than any other political candidate, is I know how to fix something because I’ve spent so much time litigating and studying these agencies.

Very quickly, I want to just talk about the chronic disease epidemic, because to me, arguably, this is the worst attack on the middle class in this country. We have the worst health care system in the United States of America. What do I mean by that? I mean that we more on health care by far than any other country, and we have the worst health outcomes. We spend $4.3 trillion annually on health, 4.3 trillion, and about 84% of that goes to treating chronic disease.

And why is that? Because America has the highest chronic disease burden in the world. And we didn’t, we didn’t always in 1950’s and 60’s we had a really healthy population. We had only 6% of our people, of our citizens or children, had chronic disease. In 1988, that became 12.8%. So it doubled. Today, by 2006 it was 54%.

We have the sickest generation in American history. We have the sickest children on earth in this country. And by chronic disease, what do I mean? I mean obesity, but more importantly, neurological diseases, neurodevelopmental, A.D.D., ADHD, speech, language ticks, Tourette’s syndrome, ASD, and autism. Autism went from one in every 10,000 people in my generation to one in every 34 kids today.

Now, one of the talking points that the industry and their crooked legislative regulators will say is, oh, well, we just started noticing it for the first time. Missing autism is like missing a train wreck. So, it’s an absurd—but more importantly. There is study after study after study that shows that this epidemic is real. It is not the result of changing diagnostic criteria. It is not the result of better recognition.

It is an epidemic. And it’s common sense because if it was changing diagnostic criteria, you’d see people my age with full blown autism, 69 years old. I have never seen somebody my age with full blown autism. I mean, stimming, toe walking, head banging, nonverbal, non-toilet trained.

And I’ve been around at the spear tip of people with intellectual disabilities my whole life. My aunt founded Special Olympics. I worked in it from when I was a kid. My cousin, my dear cousin, Anthony Shriver, is the founder of Best Buddies. This has been in the DNA. I spent 200 hours working at (inaudible) home for the retarded in Hudson Valley when I was a teenager. I just I haven’t seen it somebody my age who looks like that and yet my kids’ schools—There are many, many children who look like that.

And why aren’t we asking the question: What happened? And by the way there was a report that came out a couple of weeks ago that shows that the cost of autism alone in the American economy will be—just of caring for people. As this group now ages, it will be $1,000,000,000,000 a year by 2040. The Congress said to EPA, tell us what year the autism epidemic began, and the EPA is a captive agency, but it’s captive by the oil, coal and pesticide industry, not by pharma.

So it actually came out with an honest study. And EPA said it’s a red line, 1989. Oh, something happened in 1989. And we know that it is an environmental insult because genes don’t cause epidemics. And the only thing is we just have to figure out what it is. There’s a limited number of culprits, of chemical toxins that became ubiquitous around 1989. And so, you know, that’s something that NIH is a $42 billion budget.

And by the way, it wasn’t just those neurological disorders that started then, it was all these autoimmune diseases. If you’re my age, you never saw anybody with rheumatoid arthritis or juvenile diabetes when you were younger. You know, the allergic diseases, food allergies, peanut allergies and eczema, anaphylaxis, which are ubiquitous, are at 27% of our school budgets are now going to special education.

This is crippling to the middle class in this country. And we need to figure out what it is. Let me tell you this when I am the President of the United States, I am going to end the chronic disease epidemic in this country. And if I have not significantly dropped the level of chronic disease in our children by the end of my first term, I do not want to get reelected.
Wow.
So much in this where do we even start?!

I….too want to know. WHAT occurred in 1989?? I myself have said NONE of these rampant medical problems were a “thing” when I was growing up!
The answer always given back to me was “ that’s because no one spoke about them the way we do now”….well, I disagree.

I don’t recall a SINGLE CASE during any of my school years, of kids with these illnesses.

***for starters, maybe we should go back to those years and snoop around for the patents being developed by the drug companies and everything things ELSE they were researching and talking about.


We all know who was President at that time now, don’t we.
 
Last edited:

Zoner

Veteran Member
Wow.
So much in this where do we even start?!

I….too want to know. WHAT occurred in 1989?? I myself have said NONE of these rampant medical problems were a “thing” when I was growing up!
The answer always given back to me was “ that’s because no one spoke about them the way we do now”….well, I disagree.

I don’t recall a SINGLE CASE during any of my school years, of kids with these illnesses.

***for starters, maybe we should go back to those years and snoop around for the patents being developed by the drug companies and everything things ELSE they were researching and talking about.


We all know who was President at that time now, don’t we.
Yes, we do know who allowed the lockdown. But it was originally only supposed to be 2 weeks. But Trump was entrapped I think. There was so much we didn't know at the time. Trump was the last one who wanted to lock down the economy. I think he was under pressure from both sides. Kennedy can't blame him for that. What we can blame him for is picking the wrong people to put around him. Swamp creatures. He needed to call for a emergency pandemic conference to discuss the direction of the nation. It's easy looking back.

But what happened in 1989?
 

psychgirl

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Yes, we do know who allowed the lockdown. But it was originally only supposed to be 2 weeks. But Trump was entrapped I think. There was so much we didn't know at the time. Trump was the last one who wanted to lock down the economy. I think he was under pressure from both sides. Kennedy can't blame him for that. What we can blame him for is picking the wrong people to put around him. Swamp creatures. He needed to call for a emergency pandemic conference to discuss the direction of the nation. It's easy looking back.

But what happened in 1989?
Agree with all points.
I will never blame Trump for the lockdown.

The focus of my post, was on what has happened to our country in regards to what Kennedy said.
Very interesting how he is intimating that something occurred in 1989, isn’t it.
 

magnetic1

Veteran Member
I suspect a vaccine was started


1985 - 1994 | Recommended Vaccines​

Diphtheria*
Tetanus*
Pertussis*
Measles**
Mumps**
Rubella**
Polio (OPV)
Hib

(Not sure if I needed to post the whole article or just the pertinent area?)
 

Walkin' Away

Senior Member
RFK Jr wrote a book about Fauci.

Remember the HIV epidemic from the 80’s? What the “good Dr” did back then was to first make this new disease into a deadly thing that you could catch by shaking hands or sitting on a toilet seat.

He hyped it up and tried to get $ for vaccines to combat this new killer virus. That was taking too long, so AZT was used to help. Killed many people but big pharma and the ”good Dr” made a boat load of cash on the unsuspecting masses and failed to use already existing drugs to treat this new virus.

Yes, this was 1989. Do you see any parallels to our recent pandemic? History repeats itself, Yes?

W. A.
 

psychgirl

Has No Life - Lives on TB
RFK Jr wrote a book about Fauci.

Remember the HIV epidemic from the 80’s? What the “good Dr” did back then was to first make this new disease into a deadly thing that you could catch by shaking hands or sitting on a toilet seat.

He hyped it up and tried to get $ for vaccines to combat this new killer virus. That was taking too long, so AZT was used to help. Killed many people but big pharma and the ”good Dr” made a boat load of cash on the unsuspecting masses and failed to use already existing drugs to treat this new virus.

Yes, this was 1989. Do you see any parallels to our recent pandemic? History repeats itself, Yes?

W. A.
Yes.
He truly IS a devil spawn!!
 

Zoner

Veteran Member
RFK Jr wrote a book about Fauci.

Remember the HIV epidemic from the 80’s? What the “good Dr” did back then was to first make this new disease into a deadly thing that you could catch by shaking hands or sitting on a toilet seat.

He hyped it up and tried to get $ for vaccines to combat this new killer virus. That was taking too long, so AZT was used to help. Killed many people but big pharma and the ”good Dr” made a boat load of cash on the unsuspecting masses and failed to use already existing drugs to treat this new virus.

Yes, this was 1989. Do you see any parallels to our recent pandemic? History repeats itself, Yes?

W. A.
Kennedy may well end up like his Uncle and Dad if he keeps telling the truth.
 
Simple measures can help protect you from a COVID-19 infection.

The measures we’ve used for three-plus years to protect ourselves and loved ones from COVID-19 are still the way to protect yourself from an XBB.1.16 infection.

According to Guest, you should stay up-to-date with your vaccinations, wash your hands and take a COVID-19 test if you have any of the symptoms mentioned above. Additionally, mask-wearing remains a good way to control virus spread.

“These are the measures that will protect you and those you might be nearby,” Guest said.
I’d like to get a truckload of this for my garden.
 
He also said that multiple respiratory infections could be covered by a single injection – allowing vulnerable people to be protected against Covid, flu and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) – while mRNA therapies could be available for rare diseases for which there are currently no drugs. Therapies based on mRNA work by teaching cells how to make a protein that triggers the body’s immune response against disease.
FLCCC has protocols for these already. I have them in my drawers.
 
RFK Jr wrote a book about Fauci.

Remember the HIV epidemic from the 80’s? What the “good Dr” did back then was to first make this new disease into a deadly thing that you could catch by shaking hands or sitting on a toilet seat.

He hyped it up and tried to get $ for vaccines to combat this new killer virus. That was taking too long, so AZT was used to help. Killed many people but big pharma and the ”good Dr” made a boat load of cash on the unsuspecting masses and failed to use already existing drugs to treat this new virus.

Yes, this was 1989. Do you see any parallels to our recent pandemic? History repeats itself, Yes?

W. A.
I think one of the drugs to treat the pneumonia was, wait for it, Bactrim. Fauci refused to test it, so doctors could use with insurance.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic


Good point. India's REPORTED numbers are going up, but AS REPORTED are no where near where they were during the height of the pandemic. I emphasize the word 'reported' because of the articles I'm about to post - that the wastewater samples in Wsestern Australia and Switzerland are starting to show completely different data (more accurate) than testing and reporting is showing. I wonder what the wastewater in India would show? Or the UK? Or right here in the USA?

HD
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
Yes, we do know who allowed the lockdown. But it was originally only supposed to be 2 weeks. But Trump was entrapped I think. There was so much we didn't know at the time. Trump was the last one who wanted to lock down the economy. I think he was under pressure from both sides. Kennedy can't blame him for that. What we can blame him for is picking the wrong people to put around him. Swamp creatures. He needed to call for a emergency pandemic conference to discuss the direction of the nation. It's easy looking back.

Luckily we have all the news as it happened on this thread so we can go back and read it. I blame Trump for coming back from his trip abroad (I forget where) in March 2020 after the CDC had their first press conference saying they may need to keep kids from school and Trump immediately countering them and saying COVID was nothing and would be gone in April (which he later admitted to I think Bob Woodward he knew wasn't true at the time he said it.) It was the most insane, ridiculous, stupid remark he could make and I lost so much respect for him when he made it. At least we found out he didn't actually believe something that stupid. But he made his decision - he was going the political route, something he is not good at, instead of the genuine route, which he excels at. And in the end that tripped him up. That and surrounding himself with the worst picks and getting rid of the best picks (Steve Bannon and Michael Flynn), make me hesitate with a full on endorsement of him in 2024. Of course if he's the candidate I'll support him but not with the same enthusiasm I had in 2016.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)


New theories of the possible link between Covid shots and tinnitus are emerging
Erika Edwards - NBC News
Sun, April 23, 2023, 7:00 AM EDT

Thousands of people say they've developed tinnitus after they were vaccinated against Covid. While there is no proof yet that the vaccines caused the condition, theories for a possible link have surfaced among researchers.

Shaowen Bao, an associate professor in the physiology department of the College of Medicine at the University of Arizona, Tucson, believes that ongoing inflammation, especially in the brain or spinal cord, may be to blame.

Bao, a longtime tinnitus sufferer and a representative of the American Tinnitus Association's scientific advisory board, has studied tinniuts for more than a decade.

A Facebook group of people who developed tinnitus after getting a Covid vaccine convinced Bao to look into the possible link. He ultimately surveyed 398 of the group's participants.

The cases tended to be severe. One man told Bao that he couldn’t hear the car radio over the noise in his head while driving.

Along with ringing in their ears, participants reported a range of other symptoms, including headaches, dizziness, vertigo, ear pain, anxiety and depression. Significantly more people first developed tinnitus after the first dose of the vaccine, compared with the second.

This suggests "that the vaccine is interacting with pre-existing risk factors for tinnitus. If you have the risk factor, you will probably get it from the first dose," Bao said.

He is still analyzing the results and has not published any preliminary findings.

Is there a link between vaccines and tinnitus?

As of Sunday, at least 16,183 people had filed complaints with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that they'd developed tinnitus, or ringing in their ears, after receiving a Covid vaccine.

After internal reviews of the reports, the CDC "did not find any data suggesting a link between Covid-19 vaccines and tinnitus," an agency spokesperson said in an email.

The CDC has not, however, made those reviews public, as it did after looking into other possible vaccine side effects, such as inflammation of the heart or myocarditis — frustrating leading vaccine expert Dr. Gregory Poland, founder and director of the Mayo Clinic’s Vaccine Research Group in Rochester, Minnesota.

"Why has the CDC not done all of the research that they should do on this and published it?" Poland said.

Poland, who was stricken with tinnitus after he received his Covid vaccines two years ago, suggested that the CDC remains "unconcerned" about these reports of tinnitus.

In his case, the noise sounds like a constant, shrill whistle. The din has not improved, and it continues to affect his sleep and quality of life.

“There are some days where I’m busy or haven’t been exposed too much in the way of noise, where it’s tolerable. Other days, I could just scream,” he said.

Since speaking publicly about his experience, Poland receives emails from strangers “almost daily” who say they experience the same constant noises and believe it was triggered by the Covid vaccines.

"You don’t ever get over tinnitus," he said.

What causes the human brain to conjure up sound that affects a person’s daily life?

A team at Stanford Medicine Molecular Neurotology Laboratory in California has begun studies to find the potential underlying mechanism of tinnitus. The goal is to find a biomarker that may help identify a person at higher risk of developing tinnitus after receiving a vaccine.

“We think that many forms of tinnitus reflect some damage in the inner ear,” said Dr. Konstantina Stankovic, an otolaryngologist-head and neck surgeon who is leading the new research. “And then the brain tries to compensate for the damage and starts to make sound of its own,” she said.

The study is in its earliest phases. Stankovic’s team has collected blood samples from fewer than 20 patients so far.

“We may not find anything,” she said. “Or it could be a home run. We just don’t know. We are working as hard as we can to answer these questions.”

What is tinnitus?

Tinnitus is common in the United States, affecting as many as 25% of adults, according to the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders. Children can also develop the condition.

It's a phantom noise in a person's ear, meaning that no one else can hear what the patient is hearing.

There are many potential causes, including age-related hearing loss, certain medications, ear infections and high blood pressure. The CDC's Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System has received reports of tinnitus after other vaccines and infections, including Covid, as well.

"It's not surprising for the CDC to receive reports of tinnitus in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System after vaccination, including COVID-19 vaccination," a CDC spokesperson said in an email.

While a study published last fall found the risk of tinnitus after receiving the Covid vaccine is “low,” that doesn’t mean it’s nonexistent.

Poland believes the virus's spike protein may play a role, the same way it could continue to wreak havoc in the body in other ways.

"After mRNA vaccines, there is some level of spike protein that circulates," Poland said. Could it be much like the spike protein in the heart that leads to myocarditis? Could the same thing happen in the inner ear?"

Researchers at Yale University have begun enrolling participants in a study to learn more about symptoms of long Covid, including tinnitus.

"There's a heterogeneity of manifestations of long Covid," Dr. Harlan Krumholz, a professor of medicine at Yale University and clinical long Covid researcher, said. "We really need to be able to map this and organize it in a way that we can understand it."

Anecdotally, people have long reported a link between Covid infection and odd tingling or buzzing in different parts of their body. Krumholz speculates that tinnitus may be caused by internal vibrations in the ear.

"The strategy we’re taking is both to listen very carefully to the experience of people who are suffering and to try to correlate their experiences with what's going on inside their bodies," he said. "These people are suffering."

How to handle phantom sounds

There is no diagnostic test for tinnitus, but experts suggest first seeing an ear, nose and throat specialist to rule out any underlying causes of ringing in the ears, such as an ear infection or high blood pressure.

Otherwise, there are no standard, proven ways of treating tinnitus.

Poland, who is also a minister, finds meditative prayer helpful in quelling the noise. He also listens to calming, classical music or "orange noise" in his air pods.

"Then I can sort of relax," Poland said. "I actually visualize a volume dial turning that noise down. It's always an effort, but it helps, at least temporarily."
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)


Waste Water Monitoring Data Shows That A New COVID-19 Onslaught Is Taking Place In Switzerland As Well
Thailand Medical News
April 23, 2023

While many countries are no longer releasing data on daily or weekly COVID-19 Infections and many are trying to actually conceal that the fact that the SARS-CoV-2 virus is still causing a high level of infections in their respective countries.

The truth remains that COVID-19 is still serious threat globally despite what those controlling the COVID-19 narratives are trying to project and facts, figures and truth will eventually find a way of coming out.

In the case of Switzerland, where COVID-19 testings are literally non-existent now, data from waste monitor monitoring is showing that the country is starting to see a new onslaught of COVID-19 infections.


Worryingly, the data at some of the sewage treatment plants shows the viral load is as high as in the summer wave of 2022 and higher than last autumn.

Its alarming that a country like Switzerland where even the World Health Organization is based in its capital of Geneva is living in denial while waste water data shows that there silent COVID-19 onslaught starting, possibly with new XBB sub-lineages driving this new rise in COVID-19 infections.

While many might experience asymptomatic or mild symptomatic infections, the fact remains that getting exposed to the SARS-CoV-2 virus can lead to long term health and medical complications and in some cases even fatal outcomes, it is important to be transparent about the COVID-19 situation so that individuals can take necessary precautions to prevent getting exposed to the virus or for preventing to getting reinfected.

According to local Swiss COVID-19 News coverages, waste water data shows the regions of Lucerne, Winterthur, Bülach and Bremgarten in Aargau are particularly affected.


Local hospitals are however reporting that they are not witnessing any increase in COVID-19 hospitalizations just yet although waste water COVID-19 monitoring is showing increased viral loads in water samples in many regions in Switzerland.

Local health officials say that the various XBB sub-lineages are the predominant variants in circulation.

Looking at details from the CoV-Spectrum platform, there seems to be more than 60 different types of XBB sub-lineages in circulation in the country including XBB.1.16, XBB.1.9.1, XBB.1.9.2 etc.


There have been no statements from any government officials or health authorities or even by the WHO about the actual situation in the country and the capital even though waste water data is showing potential increase in COVID-19 infections.

It is believed that the similar scenario is also playing out in various countries across Europe but many governments and also health authorities are simply refusing to divulge the real scale of the new SARS-CoV-2 onslaught in their respective countries for fears of economic fallouts and also for potential retaliations against their vaccine and booster policies that seems inadequate and are failing.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)


Wastewater Analysis Reveals Shocking Under-Reporting Of COVID-19 Cases As Problematic XBB.1.16 Variant Arrives In Western Australia
Thailand Medical News
April 24, 2023

A recent wastewater surveillance report has unveiled a disturbing discrepancy between the reported COVID-19 cases and the actual viral concentration in Western Australia (WA). As health officials boast about a decline in active cases, local physicians and wastewater experts counter with alarming claims of an increase in COVID-19 hospital admissions and a growing viral presence in the community.

The latest data released by WA health officials claimed a drop in active cases from 1,945 to 1,839 within a week. They also reported only 13 COVID-19-related deaths in individuals aged between 72 and 101, and a mere two additional hospitalizations compared to the previous week, taking the total to 146.

However, wastewater experts and local physicians are warning of a rapid increase in COVID-19 infections that has remained largely unaddressed.


As if this revelation isn't troubling enough, WA Health recently detected its first cases of the COVID-19 mutation XBB.1.16, also known as Arcturus, which has caused a surge in cases across India. With the World Health Organization (WHO) closely monitoring the spread of this new variant in 31 countries, the situation could become dire. The XBB.1.16 variant poses a significant risk due to its estimated growth advantage and immune escape characteristics, potentially contributing to a global increase in case incidence.

Amidst this brewing storm, according to local COVID-19 News reports, WA Health has also noted a rise in other Omicron XBB sub-variants as well, particularly XBB.1.5 and XBB.1.9. Although there's no evidence suggesting that these sub-variants cause more severe diseases, certain demographics, such as the elderly and immunocompromised individuals, continue to face higher risks.

With the colder months approaching, WA Health has expressed concern about the possibility of people contracting both COVID-19 and the flu simultaneously. A double infection could be far more serious than having either respiratory virus alone. As people spend more time indoors, the transmission of respiratory viruses like COVID-19 and the flu are expected to increase.

To combat this imminent threat, WA Health recommends that anyone who has had their last COVID-19 shot or infection more than six months ago should get a COVID booster dose. The WA Health claimed that all available COVID-19 shots provide protection as a booster dose, with bivalent COVID vaccines being the preferred option. (Thailand Medical News is notable to verify the effectiveness of any of these COVID-19 shots against the new XBB sub-lineages that are more immune evasive and able to cause breakthrough infections. Furthermore Thailand Medical News warns that such information could make those in the vulnerable groups such as the aged, the obese, those immunocompromised and those with existing comorbidities and also those with certain genetic makeups and also the caretakers of such individuals from the vulnerable groups to become complacent after getting the shots w hile emerging actual real life data from many countries are now showing that these booster shots do not prevent disease severity nor deaths for those in the vulnerable groups and more safety precautions should be undertaken for these individuals very susceptible to the newer emerging XBB sub-lineages.)

Although there were only claims of 146 people being hospitalized for COVID-19 in WA and two patients in intensive care by WA Health, the danger is apparent especially if detailed analysis of the excess death rates over the past three weeks are taken in consideration and actual hospitalization data was revealed.

The WA health officials are urging all individuals experiencing cold or flu-like symptoms to stay home and use a Rapid Antigen Test (RAT) to test for COVID-19. Positive results should be immediately registered with WA Health.

As Western Australia faces the dark reality of under-reporting COVID-19 cases and the arrival of the XBB.1.16 variant, it's crucial to take necessary precautions and follow expert advice. The need for NPIs such as masking, social distancing etc has never been more urgent, as the state confronts a viral melting pot that threatens the health and safety of its residents.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)


Miscarriages and Dead Infants Were Described in a Secret FDA Review, but Hidden from The Public
Pfizer Tried to Hide Its Report for 75 Years

Igor Chudov
Apr 24, 2023

A new document was released to ICAN this April, thanks to a FOIA legal action that compelled the government to provide Pfizer documents they tried to keep secret for 75 years. Indeed, they had a good reason to hide it.

That document is called “PREGNANCY AND LACTATION CUMULATIVE REVIEW.” Many findings in it validate several concerns of COVID vaccine skeptics.

Pfizer identified 458 pregnancies where mothers were vaccinated.
Of the 673 case reports identified in the search, 458 involved BNT162b2 exposure during pregnancy (mother/fetus) and 215 involved exposure during breast-feeding.
What happened to those pregnancies?

The Vaccine Does Cross the Placenta​

We were told that the vaccine “stays in the arm.” Was that true?

On Page 3, Pfizer describes two cases (out of 458) of unborn babies affected by transplacental transfer of mRNA Covid vaccine. Pfizer’s own words:



So, instead of staying in the arm, by Pfizer’s admission, the vaccine traveled through the mother’s body, penetrated the placenta, and adversely impacted the unborn fetuses.

One infant in the above report died of “severe respiratory distress.” (AER 2021191405)

Another infant, born at 24 weeks of gestation, was not followed up because Pfizer did not care enough to discover what happened. However, 24 weeks gestation (5 months since conception) is a very premature birth. About half of the infants born at 24 weeks die, and of the remaining ones, 40% end up with health issues. I pray that that specific infant survived and is doing well; however, we cannot know, and Pfizer chose not to disclose what happened.

The “health experts” who guided pregnant women through the pandemic claimed that the vaccine does not cross the placenta:


High Rate of Miscarriages​

Of the 458 pregnancies, 52 ended with pregnancy losses: miscarriage (pregnancy loss under 20 weeks) or spontaneous abortion (pregnancy loss past 20 weeks). That is an 11.3% rate of pregnancy loss.

This did not count the premature infants who died shortly after birth. For example, the above-described premature baby AER 2021191405, died in severe respiratory distress after an emergency C-section following the mother’s COVID vaccination.

Is 11.3% of pregnancies lost normal, or is it abnormally high? Arkmedic explained that answering this question is difficult because the chances of pregnancy loss depend on the week of gestation and are highest in the early weeks. Once pregnant women pass those early weeks, the chance of a loss drops dramatically.

For example, the women who get vaccinated at 23 weeks, like the mom of AER 2021191405, already did not have an early miscarriage, and their chances of pregnancy loss would be low by that moment.

As women of all gestational ages were vaccinated in Pfizer’s population of 458 pregnancies, the expected rate of pregnancy losses (from the moment of vaccination) should be much lower than if the losses were counted from the moment of conception.

If we ask, “What would be a normal pregnancy loss rate of those 458 women if they were injected with a placebo instead of the Covid vaccine,” the precise estimate would be near impossible. However, it is less than 11.3%. Read Arkmedic’s article if you want to know the details.

We also know that the Moderna vaccine (higher dose) increases the chances of pregnancy loss by 42% compared to Pfizer, suggesting a dose-response relationship.

Igor’s Newsletter

The picture below, a blast from the past from two years ago, proved that the concerns of the person demonstrating were prescient:



Pfizer Report Omits Dead Infant

The Pfizer report, listing adverse events to breastfed infants on page 6, does not mention any dead infants who died while breastfeeding. However, the previous Prizer postmarketing report does mention one breastfeeding infant who died soon after his or her mother was vaccinated. I wrote about that infant a year ago.

Igor’s Newsletter

Not sure why Pfizer “disappeared” the dead infant. Maybe they forgot? We can only guess.

In a way, the mothers who received the Pfizer vaccine are the lucky ones. The women who received Moderna were 42% more likely to suffer a miscarriage and 93% more likely to have their infant die after birth.

What do you think?
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)


Vaccine injuries become the dominant theme of German reporting on the mRNA jabs, as the Covid vaccinations face unacknowledged yet ever wider cultural and social repudiation
The number of unflattering press stories has been growing since the bivalents flopped last Fall.

eugyppius
Apr 23, 2023

Last month, German Health Minister and renowned virus pest Karl Lauterbach gave a remarkable interview in which he denounced “exorbitant” pharmaceutical profits, deplored “dismaying” vaccine injuries, and called for the manufacturers to set aside funds for those who have been harmed. He did so amid a growing wave of reporting on vaccine injuries in the German press – a wave which his statements have now turned into a tsunami. In the weeks since, vaccine injuries and side effects have become the dominant theme of German press coverage on the jabs, from local papers to national media.

It’s been a serious shift, the likes of which I’m not sure has unfolded in any other country. To give you a taste of it, I’ve assembled a representative selection of stories from the last eight weeks or so, in roughly reverse chronological order. As you read through them, remember that these are all links to publications read by ordinary people; I’ve excluded all media with overt Covid-sceptic associations.

  • From the national tabloid BILD:
    He lost his sight: Dietmar S. sues Biontech for 150,000 Euros.

    Dietmar S. became as good as blind in his right eye following Covid vaccination. Now the case is going to trial.
  • From Der Spiegel:
    “The problems are hushed up”: Marburg cardiologist Bernhard Schieffer treats people who suffer from long-term symptoms after Covid vaccinations. He criticises the lack of support – and Health Minister Karl Lauterbach.
  • From the Hessische/Niedersäschsische Allgemeine, a regional paper:
    Post-Vac: “My life is no longer like before” – Sick after Covid vaccination.

    Almost five million people in Hesse have been vaccinated against Covid-19. Some have developed serious illnesses afterwards. One of them is Dieter Gebert from Kassel.
  • From the local Frankfurter Neue Presse:
    Lupus after Covid vaccination: A young woman from Hesse is treated in special Cologne clinic.

    19-year-old Juline from Butzbach was severely injured by a Corona vaccination and now requires expensive immunoadsorption.
  • From the state media behemoth ZDF:
    Covid vaccine injury: Do manufacturers face liability? Anyone who has suffered vaccine damage can take action against the vaccine manufacturers and apply for state benefits. But the hurdles for compensation are high.
  • From tagesschau, a major state media news service:
    Soon the first lawsuits will start: Across Germany, there are almost 200 civil lawsuits against Corona vaccine manufacturers like BioNTech. The plaintiffs claim to have been harmed by the vaccination.
  • From the regional Schwäbische Zeitung:
    Injection with an aftermath: A man from Sigmaringen suffered a stroke after Covid vaccination

    Shortly after the second jab, Bernhard Strobel collapsed. He still feels the consequences today. Now he is going to court.
  • Again from BILD:
    VACCINE INJURY! 1ST CASE BEFORE THE COURT: Oxana G. (35) is wheelchair-bound following Covid vaccination.

    Across Germany, 185 civil lawsuits are pending because of damages caused by Corona vaccinations. Oxana G. (35) is one of the injured parties. The fact that the courts are finally dealing with her case is already seen as a success by the woman from Halle: “I have lost my life - as I knew it before. I hope that my family and I will finally receive compensation and help.”
  • From hessenschau, a publication of the regional Hessischer Rundfunk:
    Sick following Covid vaccination: Why official points of contact [for the vaccine injured] are necessary.

    Around 5 million people in Hesse have been vaccinated against Corona. Some have become seriously ill as a result of the vaccination. Those affected often fail in their search for medical expertise; they feel abandoned by the health system and the state.
  • From Die Zeit, Germany’s largest weekly newspaper:
    What we know about Covid vaccine injury: Karl Lauterbach has promised victims of vaccine damage faster help - and caused confusion about how common it is in the first place. The state of the question.
  • From the Berliner Zeitung:
    Covid vaccine researcher: “Allegations must be investigated immediately.” Vaccine researcher Carlos A. Guzmán talks about the benefits, limitations and side effects of the Covid vaccine – as well as allegations of inconsistencies in the approval process.
  • From the Bamberg-based news portal inFranken:
    Pensioner (87) dies eight months after Covid vaccination – his son’s lawsuit fails.

    After an elderly man died within a few months of Covid vaccination, his son filed a lawsuit against the doctor. He has now failed before the Landgericht.
  • Again from ZDF:
    The suffering of Covid vaccine victims: Long-term complaints can occur following a Corona infection. Vaccination is supposed to protect against this – but it can also have side effects. What’s next for the vaccine-injured?
  • From Tagesspiegel:
    Possible heart damage after Covid vaccination: Woman sues BioNTech for damages. The company is facing its first civil lawsuit for alleged damages caused by the Corona vaccine. The trial is scheduled to begin on 15 March at the Frankfurter Landgericht.
The trend is so dominant that it colours all other reporting on Covid and the vaccines. It’s hard to miss the subtle anxiety at work in pieces like this one from the Vienna-based Standard, asking whether we’ll have to vaccinate ourselves against Corona every year from here on out, or the not-so-veiled notes of hope in ZDF reporting on successful Phase 1 trials of the German nasal vaccine. What’s the big deal about regular vaccination and why should we care about new live attenuated vaccines, if the mRNA jabs were God’s gift to man?

There are clear, encouraging patterns here. The reporting originally surrounded lawsuits brought against the vaccine manufacturers, but has steadily assumed a more general focus. Regional and local papers are carrying a big share of these stories, with major state media playing a supporting role. The publications most popular with German biens pensants, meanwhile, like Süddeutsche Zeitung and Die Zeit and even Frankfurter Allgemeine, are pointedly underrepresented. This is a trend driven from the bottom up by popular interest, and in that it is the opposite of much Covid reporting since 2020.

Of course, these stories have always been out there, but until the last few months, enthusiasm for the vaccines was sufficient to suppress them. As with all pandemic policies, mass vaccination exhibits qualities of inertia. Obsession steadily grew through the summer months of 2021, as the jab failed to eradicate Covid, and achieved a frenzied peak around December 2021. There was nothing to do about the insane mania and its manifold irrationality back then, and the steady disenchantment with these products will prove just as inexorable.

This isn’t the repudiation I would have chosen. The focus on isolated stories allows the very same press outlets to recycle WHO propaganda that the vaccines have saved a million European lives, and to repeat uncritically the claims of foolish regulators that “vaccination was the decisive factor” in ending the pandemic. I also have reservations about the emerging discussion of “Post-Vac Syndrome” – not because I doubt that the vaccines have made people sick, but because it seems to be built from the same ill-defined grab-bag of fibromyalgia-adjacent symptoms as Long Covid. This is a continuation of the media-supported myth that vaccine injuries are merely a subset of the long-term sequelae from Covid itself, and it’s a not-so-subtle way to preempt any kind of cost-benefit analysis. But, for a pandemic that was also built largely on innumerate anecdotes, and a media that has proven chronically unable to notice basic patterns or count things, perhaps this is the only repudiation that was ever possible.

The pharmaceuticals have made a lot of money, but their mRNA vaccines have failed. The Robert Koch Institut have stopped updating their vaccine dashboard, after almost four months of totally flatlined uptake; one of the foremost mRNA promoters, Bill Gates, has called the jabs a disappointment and compared them unfavourably to masks, of all things; and BioNTech, facing a revenue decline of 70 percent, have announced an impending return to mRNA-based cancer therapies – their original focus upon their founding in 2008, where they’ve never enjoyed particular success. Perhaps if the vaccinators had proceeded cautiously, limiting their promises and jabbing only the most vulnerable on a strictly voluntary basis, they could’ve preserved some future for their doubtful products. Instead, they oversold and over-administered their snake oil, and two years later most people have decided they don’t like it very much.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)


Secret CDC Report confirms over 1.1m Americans have ‘Died Suddenly’ since the COVID Vaccine Roll-Out; & further Government reports confirm the Vaccines are to blame
"Vaccines" = Slow Kill Bioweapons

2nd Smartest Guy in the World
Apr 23, 2023

by The Exposé

The Covid-19 injections were meant to reduce the sudden surge of deaths the USA recorded in 2020 due to the alleged Covid-19 pandemic. But unfortunately, the official figures prove that the opposite has happened.

Official reports quietly published by the United States Centers for Disease Control (CDC) confirm that over 6 million Americans have died ever since the U.S. Food & Drug Administration granted emergency use authorisation to a Covid-19 vaccine in December 2020; with 2021 being a record-breaking year for deaths.

This sadly means that at least 1.1 million Americans may have ‘died suddenly’ during this time frame because according to the CDC reports there have been 1,106,079 excess deaths compared to the 2015-2019 five-year average.

And with further official Government figures confirming that mortality rates per 100,000 are highest among the vaccinated population in every single age group, it would appear Covid-19 vaccination is almost entirely to blame.



Compared to other countries, the U.S. Government has been terrible at publishing relevant and up-to-date data allowing us to analyse the consequences of rolling out the Covid-19 injections. However, we have finally managed to stumble upon it thanks to an institution known as the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OEC).

The OEC is an intergovernmental organisation with 38 member countries founded in 1961 to stimulate economic progress and world trade. And for some reason, they host a wealth of data on excess deaths. You can find that data for yourself here.

The following chart has been created using the figures found in the OEC database. Figures that have been provided to the OEC by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC). And it shows excess deaths across the USA by week in 2022 up to week 38 (25th September).


Source Data

The above chart reveals that the USA has recorded a significant number of excess deaths every single week throughout 2022. With the grand total equating to 349,398 excess deaths by week 38.


Source Data

This means 1,700 more Americans actually died by week 38 of 2022 than those who died by week 38 of 2020, despite the fact there was a huge wave of alleged Covid-19 deaths during this period.


Source Data

But that’s not the worst of it. Because the official CDC figures reveal that 2021 was a record-breaking year for deaths across the USA, with the country recording over 100,000 more deaths than it recorded in 2020, prior to the roll-out of the experimental Covid-19 injections.


Source Data

According to the CDC, by week 52 of 2020, America had suffered 3,355,807 deaths. But the following year, in 2021, the CDC confirms that America suffered 3,457,518 deaths.

This means 101,711 more people died in 2021 following the Covid-19 vaccine roll-out than they did in 2020 prior to the Covid-19 vaccine roll-out.

It also means America suffered 674,951 excess deaths in 2021 compared to the 2015-2019 five-year average.

The first Covid-19 injection was administered in the USA on December 14th 2020, and according to the quietly published figures provided by the CDC, 6,090,716 Americans sadly lost their lives after this date up until week 38 of 2022.


Source Data

This means America has suffered at least 1,106,079 excess deaths ever since the U.S. Government decided to coerce millions of Americans into getting an experimental gene therapy (Covid-19 injection).


Source Data

So like we said at the beginning, the Covid-19 injections were meant to reduce the sudden surge of deaths the USA recorded in 2020 due to the alleged Covid-19 pandemic. But unfortunately, the official figures prove that the opposite has happened.

The question is, why?

The answer to that question can be found in an official report published by the UK Government.

The report was published in July by the UK Government organisation known as the Office for National Statistics (ONS), and it is titled ‘Deaths by Vaccination Status, England, 1 January 2021 to 31 May 2022‘. It can be accessed on the ONS site here or downloaded here.


Source

Table 2 of the report contains the monthly age-standardised mortality rates by vaccination status by age group for deaths per 100,000 person-years in England up to May 2022.

Here’s how the ONS present the data for 18 to 39-year-olds in May 2022 –


Source

We’ve taken the figures provided by the ONS for January to May 2022 and produced the following charts which reveal the horrific consequences of the mass Covid-19 vaccination campaign.

18 to 39-year-olds​

The following chart shows the monthly age-standardised mortality rates by vaccination status among 18 to 39-year-olds for Non-Covid-19 deaths in England between January and May 2022 –


In every single month since the beginning of 2022, partly vaccinated and double vaccinated 18-39-year-olds have been more likely to die than unvaccinated 18 to 39-year-olds. Triple vaccinated 18 to 39-year-olds however have had a mortality rate that has worsened by the month following the mass Booster campaign that occurred in the UK in December 2021.

In January, triple vaccinated 18 to 39-year-olds were ever so slightly less likely to die than unvaccinated 18 to 39-year-olds, with a mortality rate of 29.8 per 100,000 among the unvaccinated and 28.1 per 100,000 among the triple vaccinated.

But this all changed from February onwards. In February, triple vaccinated 18 to 39-year-olds were 27% more likely to die than unvaccinated 18 to 39-year-olds, with a mortality rate of 26.7 per 100k among the triple vaccinated and 21 per 100k among the unvaccinated.

Things have unfortunately got even worse for the triple vaccinated by May 2022 though. The data shows that triple vaccinated 18 to 39-year-olds were 52% more likely to die than unvaccinated 18 to 39-year-olds in May, with a mortality rate of 21.4 per 100k among the triple vaccinated and 14.1 among the unvaccinated.

The worst figures so far though are among the partly vaccinated, with May seeing partly vaccinated 18 to 39-year-olds 202% more likely to die than unvaccinated 18 to 39-year-olds.

[continued next post]
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
[continued from post above]

40 to 49-year-olds​

The following chart shows the monthly age-standardised mortality rates by vaccination status among 40 to 49-year-olds for Non-Covid-19 deaths in England between January and May 2022 –


We see pretty much the same when it comes to 40 to 49-year-olds. In every single month since the beginning of 2022, partly vaccinated and double vaccinated 40 to 49-year-olds have been more likely to die than unvaccinated 40 to 49–year-olds.

The worst month for mortality rates among the partly and double vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated was February. This month saw partly vaccinated 40-49-year-olds 264% more likely to die than unvaccinated 40-49-year-olds. Whilst double vaccinated 40-49-year-olds were 61% more likely to die than unvaccinated 40-49-year-olds.

By May 2022, five months after the mass Booster campaign, triple vaccinated 40-49-year-olds were 40% more likely to die than unvaccinated 40-49-year-olds, with a mortality rate of 81.8 per 100k among the triple vaccinated and a mortality rate of 58.4 among the unvaccinated.

50 to 59-year-olds​

The following chart shows the monthly age-standardised mortality rates by vaccination status among 50 to 59-year-olds for Non-Covid-19 deaths in England between January and May 2022 –


Yet again we see exactly the same pattern among 50 to 59-year-olds as seen among 40-49-year-olds.

In every single month since the beginning of 2022, partly vaccinated and double vaccinated 50 to 59-year-olds have been more likely to die than unvaccinated 50-59–year-olds.

May was the worst month for partly vaccinated 50 to 59-year-olds, as they were 170% more likely to die than unvaccinated 50 to 59-year-olds.

Whereas January was the worst month for double vaccinated 50-59-year-olds, as they were 115% more likely to die than unvaccinated 50-59-year-olds.

By May 2022, five months after the mass Booster campaign, triple vaccinated 50-59-year-olds were 17% more likely to die than unvaccinated 50-59-year-olds, with a mortality rate of 332 per 100k among the triple vaccinated and a mortality rate of 282.9 per 100k among the unvaccinated.

Therefore, by May 2022, unvaccinated 50-59-year-olds were the least likely to die among all vaccination groups.

60 to 69-year-olds​

The following chart shows the monthly age-standardised mortality rates by vaccination status among 60 to 69-year-olds for Non-Covid-19 deaths in England between January and May 2022 –


The 60 to 69-year-olds show exactly the same pattern as 18 to 39-year-olds. The double and partly vaccinated have been more likely to die than the unvaccinated since the turn of the year, and the triple vaccinated have been more likely to die than the unvaccinated since February.

In January, partly vaccinated 60-69-year-olds were a shocking 256% more likely to die than unvaccinated 60-69-year-olds. Whilst in the same month, double vaccinated 60-69-year-olds were 223% more likely to die than unvaccinated 60-69-year-olds.

By May, triple vaccinated 60-69-year-olds were a troubling 117% more likely to die than unvaccinated 60-69-year-olds, with a mortality rate of 1801.3 per 100k among the triple vaccinated and a mortality rate of just 831.1 among the unvaccinated.

70 to 79–year-olds​

The following chart shows the monthly age-standardised mortality rates by vaccination status among 70 to 79-year-olds for Non-Covid-19 deaths in England between January and May 2022 –


Things are slightly different for 70 to 70-year-olds because the data reveals the unvaccinated have been the least likely to die every month since the turn of the year.

In January, the partly vaccinated were 198% more likely to die than the unvaccinated, whilst the double vaccinated were a shocking 267% more likely to die than the unvaccinated.

The worst figures however come in May, which saw triple vaccinated 70-79-year-olds a disturbing 332% more likely to die than unvaccinated 70-79-year-olds, with a mortality rate of 9417.2 per 100k among the triple vaccinated and just 2181 per 100k among the unvaccinated.

80 to 89-year-olds​

The following chart shows the monthly age-standardised mortality rates by vaccination status among 80 to 89-year-olds for Non-Covid-19 deaths in England between January and May 2022 –


Again we see the same pattern among 80-89-year-olds as seen among 70-79-year-olds, with the unvaccinated the least likely to die every month since the turn of the year.

In April, double vaccinated 80-89-year-olds were 213% more likely to die than unvaccinated 80-89-year-olds, with a mortality rate of 7598.9 per 100k among the unvaccinated and a mortality rate of a troubling 23,781.8 per 100k among the double vaccinated.

But in the same month, partly vaccinated 80-89-year-olds were a terrifying 672% more likely to die than unvaccinated 80-89-year-olds, with a shocking mortality rate of 58,668.9 per 100k among the partly vaccinated.

By May 2022, triple vaccinated 80-89-year-olds were 142% more likely to die than unvaccinated 80-89-year-olds, with a mortality rate of 14,002.3 among the triple vaccinated and a mortality rate of 5,789.1 among the unvaccinated.

90 + year-olds​

The following chart shows the monthly age-standardised mortality rates by vaccination status among 90+ year-olds for Non-Covid-19 deaths in England between January and May 2022 –


Finally, we again see the same pattern among 90+ year-olds, with the unvaccinated the least likely to die every month since the turn of the year.

In April, double vaccinated 90+ year-olds were 244% more likely to die than unvaccinated 90+ year-olds, with a mortality rate of 62,302.7 per 100k among the double vaccinated and a mortality rate of 18,090.6 among the unvaccinated.

During the same month, however, partly vaccinated 90+ year-olds were a shocking 572% more likely to die than unvaccinated 90+ year-olds, with a mortality rate of 121,749.9 per 100k person-years among the partly vaccinated.

By May 2022, triple vaccinated 90+ year-olds were 26% more likely to die than unvaccinated 90+ year-olds, with a mortality rate of 13,761.6 per 100k among the unvaccinated and a mortality rate of 17,272.2 per 100k among the triple vaccinated.

The following three charts show the monthly age-standardised mortality rates by vaccination status for non-Covid-19 deaths in England between January and May 2022 as detailed above but collated together for all age groups –


Click to enlarge


Click to enlarge


Click to enlarge

All of the above is, therefore, indisputable evidence that Covid-19 vaccination increases a person’s risk of death, and is causing more deaths than would have otherwise occurred if the Covid-19 vaccine has not been rolled-out.

So it looks like we’ve found the answer as to why the USA suffered over 1.1 million excess deaths ever since the U.S. Government decided to coerce millions of Americans into getting the experimental Covid-19 injections.
 

psychgirl

Has No Life - Lives on TB
(fair use applies)


Miscarriages and Dead Infants Were Described in a Secret FDA Review, but Hidden from The Public
Pfizer Tried to Hide Its Report for 75 Years

Igor Chudov
Apr 24, 2023

A new document was released to ICAN this April, thanks to a FOIA legal action that compelled the government to provide Pfizer documents they tried to keep secret for 75 years. Indeed, they had a good reason to hide it.

That document is called “PREGNANCY AND LACTATION CUMULATIVE REVIEW.” Many findings in it validate several concerns of COVID vaccine skeptics.

Pfizer identified 458 pregnancies where mothers were vaccinated.
Of the 673 case reports identified in the search, 458 involved BNT162b2 exposure during pregnancy (mother/fetus) and 215 involved exposure during breast-feeding.
What happened to those pregnancies?

The Vaccine Does Cross the Placenta​

We were told that the vaccine “stays in the arm.” Was that true?

On Page 3, Pfizer describes two cases (out of 458) of unborn babies affected by transplacental transfer of mRNA Covid vaccine. Pfizer’s own words:



So, instead of staying in the arm, by Pfizer’s admission, the vaccine traveled through the mother’s body, penetrated the placenta, and adversely impacted the unborn fetuses.

One infant in the above report died of “severe respiratory distress.” (AER 2021191405)

Another infant, born at 24 weeks of gestation, was not followed up because Pfizer did not care enough to discover what happened. However, 24 weeks gestation (5 months since conception) is a very premature birth. About half of the infants born at 24 weeks die, and of the remaining ones, 40% end up with health issues. I pray that that specific infant survived and is doing well; however, we cannot know, and Pfizer chose not to disclose what happened.

The “health experts” who guided pregnant women through the pandemic claimed that the vaccine does not cross the placenta:


High Rate of Miscarriages​

Of the 458 pregnancies, 52 ended with pregnancy losses: miscarriage (pregnancy loss under 20 weeks) or spontaneous abortion (pregnancy loss past 20 weeks). That is an 11.3% rate of pregnancy loss.

This did not count the premature infants who died shortly after birth. For example, the above-described premature baby AER 2021191405, died in severe respiratory distress after an emergency C-section following the mother’s COVID vaccination.

Is 11.3% of pregnancies lost normal, or is it abnormally high? Arkmedic explained that answering this question is difficult because the chances of pregnancy loss depend on the week of gestation and are highest in the early weeks. Once pregnant women pass those early weeks, the chance of a loss drops dramatically.

For example, the women who get vaccinated at 23 weeks, like the mom of AER 2021191405, already did not have an early miscarriage, and their chances of pregnancy loss would be low by that moment.

As women of all gestational ages were vaccinated in Pfizer’s population of 458 pregnancies, the expected rate of pregnancy losses (from the moment of vaccination) should be much lower than if the losses were counted from the moment of conception.

If we ask, “What would be a normal pregnancy loss rate of those 458 women if they were injected with a placebo instead of the Covid vaccine,” the precise estimate would be near impossible. However, it is less than 11.3%. Read Arkmedic’s article if you want to know the details.

We also know that the Moderna vaccine (higher dose) increases the chances of pregnancy loss by 42% compared to Pfizer, suggesting a dose-response relationship.

Igor’s Newsletter

The picture below, a blast from the past from two years ago, proved that the concerns of the person demonstrating were prescient:



Pfizer Report Omits Dead Infant

The Pfizer report, listing adverse events to breastfed infants on page 6, does not mention any dead infants who died while breastfeeding. However, the previous Prizer postmarketing report does mention one breastfeeding infant who died soon after his or her mother was vaccinated. I wrote about that infant a year ago.

Igor’s Newsletter

Not sure why Pfizer “disappeared” the dead infant. Maybe they forgot? We can only guess.

In a way, the mothers who received the Pfizer vaccine are the lucky ones. The women who received Moderna were 42% more likely to suffer a miscarriage and 93% more likely to have their infant die after birth.

What do you think?
That sign!!

(#sadbutstillfunny)
 

Zoner

Veteran Member
Genoside by the hands of our own leaders. Proven once again…after the fact.

Those precious little ones, makes my heart sad.

I just don’t know what to say anymore about the level of evil that is encompassing our world.

I am growing weary of the fight and am ready to go “home”

Stay Safe and Well Everyone.

W. A.
Yes! We are witnessing an evil like in the days of Noah and Lot. There I said it. We are in an evil and adulterous generation that will not be given any signs but the sign of Jonah. That sign is what happened to Nineveh. All they got was a prophet preaching that if they didn't repent they would be destroyed. In great mercy love and grace the Creator is so patient and long-suffering. He is not willing that any should perish, but that they would repent (change their mind about Jesus), and receive Him before He has no choice but to destroy evil once and for all.

We are seeing evil coming from all directions. There is War, Famine, Bio-viruses, Bio-vaccines, Bio-politicians and Bio-billionaires out to reduce humanity and oppress those who survive. The moral compass has been destroyed. The constitution of the USA is not protected and freedoms are lost. I think of Psalm 11, "If the foundations are destroyed, what can the righteous do?" Seriously, it's time to flee to the Refuge. "The Lord is our Refuge and Strength, a very present help in trouble." (Psalm 46:1)

Psalm 11
In the Lord I put my trust;
How can you say to my soul,
“Flee as a bird to your mountain”?
2 For look! The wicked bend their bow,
They make ready their arrow on the string,
That they may shoot secretly at the upright in heart.
3 If the foundations are destroyed,
What can the righteous do?


4 The Lord is in His holy temple,
The Lord’s throne is in heaven;
His eyes behold,
His eyelids test the sons of men.
5 The Lord tests the righteous,
But the wicked and the one who loves violence His soul hates.
6 Upon the wicked He will rain coals;
Fire and brimstone and a burning wind
Shall be the portion of their cup.

7 For the Lord is righteous,
He loves righteousness;
His countenance beholds the upright.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
A negative and imho biased article on Dr. Ladapo, our great surgeon general here in FL and by extension DeSantis.



(fair use applies)


Florida surgeon general appointed by DeSantis cut data from a COVID-19 vaccine safety study
Associated Press,Sarah Gray
Mon, April 24, 2023, 8:18 PM EDT
  • Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo cut data from a COVID-19 vaccine safety study, per multiple reports.
  • Ladapo was appointed by Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis in 2021 to head the Florida Department of Health.
  • He has drawn intense scrutiny over his resistance to COVID-19 mandates for vaccines and masks.
TAMPA, Fla. (AP) — An analysis that was the basis of a highly criticized recommendation from Florida's surgeon general cautioning young men against getting the COVID-19 vaccine omitted information that showed catching the virus could increase the risk of a cardiac-related death much more than getting the mRNA shot, according to drafts of the analysis obtained by the Tampa Bay Times.

The nonbinding recommendation made by Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo last fall ran counter to the advice provided by the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Ladapo, a Harvard-trained medical doctor who was appointed by Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis in 2021 to head the Florida Department of Health, has drawn intense scrutiny over his shared resistance with the Republican governor to COVID-19 mandates for vaccines and masks, and other health policies endorsed by the federal government.

The early drafts of the analysis obtained by the Times through a records request showed that catching COVID-19 could increase the chances of a cardiac-related death much more than getting the vaccine, but that information was missing from the final version put out by the Florida Department of Health last October.

Ladapo said that the risk of men ages 18 to 39 having cardiac complications outweighed the benefits of getting the mRNA vaccine.

Several weeks after the Tampa Bay Times report, Politico published a draft showing Ladapo's notes. The document titled "Dr. L's Edits" shows where the language was changed.

Matt Hitchings, an infectious disease epidemiologist and professor of biostatistics at the University of Florida, told the Times that it seems that sections of the analysis were omitted because they did not fit the narrative the surgeon general wanted to push.

"This is a grave violation of research integrity," Hitchings said. "(The vaccine) has done a lot to advance the health of people of Florida and he's encouraging people to mistrust it."

In a statement on Twitter posted Saturday in response to the Times' story, Ladapo said, "It's not only unfortunate that COVID has corrupted scientists' ability to think clearly about epidemiology but also sad that people rush to defend a vaccine that has shown increased cardiovascular risk in multiple studies."

In a statement to Politico Ladapo said: "To say that I 'removed an analysis' for a particular outcome is an implicit denial of the fact that the public has been the recipient of biased data and interpretations since the beginning of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine campaign. I have never been afraid of disagreement with peers or media."

Last year, Ladapo released guidance recommending against vaccinations for healthy children, contradicting federal public health leaders whose advice says all kids should get the shots. In response, the American Academy of Pediatrics and its Florida chapter issued written statements reiterating support for vaccinating eligible children ages 5 and older against COVID-19.

DeSantis, who is contemplating a GOP presidential bid, also has requested that a grand jury be convened to investigate any wrongdoing with respect to the COVID-19 vaccines. DeSantis' request argues that pharmaceutical companies had a financial interest in creating a climate in which people believed that getting a coronavirus vaccine would ensure they couldn't spread the virus to others.

The Florida Supreme Court agreed to the request last December.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)


Chinese Censorship Is Quietly Rewriting the COVID-19 Story
Mara Hvistendahl and Benjamin Mueller - NY Times
Mon, April 24, 2023, 1:54 PM EDT

Early in 2020, on the same day that a frightening new illness officially got the name COVID-19, a team of scientists from the United States and China released critical data showing how quickly the virus was spreading, and who was dying.

The study was cited in health warnings around the world and appeared to be a model of international collaboration in a moment of crisis.

Within days, though, the researchers quietly withdrew the paper, which was replaced online by a message telling scientists not to cite it. A few observers took note of the peculiar move, but the whole episode quickly faded amid the frenzy of the coronavirus pandemic.

What is now clear is that the study was not removed because of faulty research. Instead, it was withdrawn at the direction of Chinese health officials amid a crackdown on science. That effort kicked up a cloud of dust around the dates of early COVID cases, like those reported in the study.

“It was so hard to get any information out of China,” said one of the authors, Ira Longini, of the University of Florida, who described the backstory of the removal publicly for the first time in a recent interview. “There was so much covered up, and so much hidden.”

That the Chinese government muzzled scientists, hindered international investigations and censored online discussion of the pandemic is well documented. But Beijing’s stranglehold on information goes far deeper than even many pandemic researchers are aware of. Its censorship campaign has targeted international journals and scientific databases, shaking the foundations of shared scientific knowledge, a New York Times investigation found.

Under pressure from their government, Chinese scientists have withheld data, withdrawn genetic sequences from public databases and altered crucial details in journal submissions. Western journal editors enabled those efforts by agreeing to those edits or withdrawing papers for murky reasons, a review by the Times of over a dozen retracted papers found.

Groups including the World Health Organization have given credence to muddled data and inaccurate timelines.

This scientific censorship has not universally succeeded: The original version of the February 2020 paper, for example, can still be found online with some digging. But the campaign starved doctors and policymakers of critical information about the virus at the moment the world needed it most. It bred mistrust of science in Europe and the United States, as health officials cited papers from China that were then retracted.

The crackdown continues to breed misinformation today and has hindered efforts to determine the origins of the virus.

Such censorship spilled into public view recently, when an international group of scientists discovered genetic sequence data that Chinese researchers had collected from a Wuhan market in January 2020 but withheld from foreign experts for three years — a delay that global health officials called “inexcusable.”

The sequences showed that raccoon dogs, a foxlike animal, had deposited genetic signatures in the same place that genetic material from the virus was left, a finding consistent with a scenario in which the virus spread to people from illegally traded market animals.

The Chinese Embassy in Washington did not respond to requests for comment. At a news conference this month, scientists from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention called such criticism “intolerable.”

It is impossible to ascribe a single motive to the crackdown. Beijing controls and shapes information as a matter of course, particularly in moments of crisis. But some of the censorship changed the timeline of early infections, a delicate topic as the government faced criticism over whether it responded to the outbreak quickly enough.

There is no evidence that the censorship is designed to conceal a specific scenario for the origins of the pandemic. Some scientists believe that COVID-19 spread naturally from animals to humans. Others argue that it may have spread from a Chinese laboratory. Both sides have pointed to censored data to support their theories.

But they have come to agree on one point: The Chinese government’s grip on science has stifled the search for truth.

“I think there’s a major political agenda that is impacting the science,” said Edward Holmes, a University of Sydney biologist who was part of the group that analyzed the sequences containing raccoon dog DNA.

Soon after the group alerted Chinese researchers to their findings, the genetic sequences temporarily disappeared from a global database. “It’s just pathetic that we’re in this stage where we’re having cloak-and-dagger conversations about deleted data,” Holmes said.

Ever-Changing Dates

For a brief moment, the coronavirus appeared to challenge China’s notoriously tough hold on information. On Feb. 6, 2020, when averting a pandemic still seemed possible, the Chinese internet lit up with the death of Li Wenliang, a Wuhan doctor who had been punished for warning about the outbreak before falling ill himself.

Anger boiled over. People sensed that officials had withheld lifesaving information. Across China, they asked: How many had caught the virus in December? Who had known? Why hadn’t more been done?

Around that time, researchers confirmed that the virus had been spreading for weeks from human to human, a fact that Chinese officials had initially dismissed.

The Chinese government reacted by tightening online censorship and wresting control of research. The censorship was piecemeal at first. The Ministry of Science and Technology told scientists to prioritize handling the outbreak, not publishing papers. One European scientist recalled his Chinese collaborators asking him to sign a nondisclosure agreement promising not to share data — on research that had already been published.

Soon, Chinese researchers were asking journals to retract their work. Journals can withdraw papers for a number of legitimate reasons, like flawed data. But a review of more than a dozen retracted papers from China shows a pattern of revising or suppressing research on early cases, conditions for medical workers and how widely the virus had spread — topics that could make the government look bad. The retracted papers reviewed by the Times had been flagged by Retraction Watch, a group that tracks withdrawn research.

Among them were a study that included infected children in southern China; a survey of depression and anxiety among Chinese medical workers who had been treating COVID-19 patients; and even a letter published in The Lancet Global Health by two nurses who described the desperation they felt while working in hospitals in Wuhan.

“Even experienced nurses may also cry,” they wrote.

Journals are typically slow to retract papers, even when they are shown to be fraudulent or unethical. But in China, the calculus is different, said Ivan Oransky, a founder of Retraction Watch. Journals that want to sell subscriptions in China or publish Chinese research often bend to the government’s demands. “Scientific publishers have really gone out of their way to placate the censorship requests,” he said.

As the virus spread, China formalized its controls. A government task force was put in charge of all coronavirus research. Officials in the eastern province of Zhejiang discussed “strengthening the management” of scientific results, records show.

Then on March 9, scientists from top Chinese laboratories published a paper about how the coronavirus might be mutating. The research appeared in Clinical Infectious Diseases, a prestigious journal published by Oxford University Press.

The topic was seemingly apolitical, but it relied on samples collected from patients in Wuhan starting in mid-December 2019. That added to evidence that the virus was spreading widely before the Chinese government took action.

The paper landed just as the government formalized its censorship policy. The following day, China’s Ministry of Education ordered universities to submit research topics to the government task force for approval, according to a directive posted on a university’s website.

Those who did not vet their scientific projects or who caused “serious adverse social impacts” would be punished, the directive said.

The move sent a chill through Chinese science. Schools tightened restrictions on faculty media interviews and instructed professors to comply with the directive, university notices show.

The journal retractions continued, and for unusual reasons.

One group of authors noted that “our data is not perfect enough.” Another warned that its paper “cannot be used as the basis for the origin and evolution of SARS-CoV-2.” A third said its findings were “incomplete and not ready for publication.” Several scientists promised in retraction notices to update their findings but never did.

Because Chinese scientists have been muzzled, it is difficult to neatly distinguish between censored papers and those retracted for legitimate scientific reasons.

The censorship helped the government tell a story.

“China emerged from the pandemic as an early winner,” said Yanzhong Huang, a global health expert at Seton Hall University. “They started to present a new narrative on the outbreak, in terms of not just the origin, but also in terms of the government’s role in responding to the pandemic.”

Two months after posting the paper on coronavirus mutations, Clinical Infectious Diseases published an update. The new version said that the Wuhan samples were not collected in December after all, but weeks later, in January.

The paper’s corresponding author, Li Mingkun of the Beijing Institute of Genomics, did not respond to requests for comment.

After Jesse Bloom of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center in Seattle tweeted about the discrepancy, the journal’s editors posted a third version of the paper, adding yet another timeline. This revision says the samples were collected between Dec. 30 and Jan. 1.

A correction merely says that the previous dates had been “unclear.”

In an email to the Times, the journal editors said the correction was “the most appropriate approach to clarify the scientific record.”

An Origin Mystery

Chinese scientists ignored requests for years to release information about swabs taken from surfaces at the Wuhan market. That refusal has hindered efforts to determine how the pandemic began.

Holmes, the University of Sydney biologist, said that as far back as two years ago, he stressed to Chinese researchers the importance of those samples. He even sent them a raccoon dog genome sequence, hoping they would compare it with samples from the market. The researchers did not make the data public until this year.

The World Health Organization, the supposed repository for reliable information about the virus, has only added to confusion about the pandemic’s origins. After errors were found in a major March 2021 report from the organization and China, an agency spokesperson, Tarik Jasarevic, promised that officials would correct the mistakes.

Two years later, they have not. The flawed report remains online, painting an inaccurate timeline of the earliest known cases. Jasarevic now refers questions about the report to the scientists who prepared it.

“That’s a deep and in many ways unforgivable mystery, when the data were demonstrated to be false,” said Lawrence Gostin, the faculty director of Georgetown University’s O’Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law and a longtime WHO adviser. “It either shows that WHO wasn’t insistent enough with China, or that China simply didn’t cooperate.”

Some scientists have become similarly suspicious that China’s censorship has affected the genetic databases that underpin worldwide research.

Bloom, the Seattle evolutionary virus expert, was poring over tables in a scientific paper in June 2021 when he discovered that dozens of gene sequences had been deleted from the Sequence Read Archive, a U.S. government database. The sequences, from early 2020, had been submitted by scientists from Wuhan University. But they had curiously vanished.

The U.S. government’s National Library of Medicine, which manages the database, said at the time that the Wuhan researchers had asked that the sequences be withdrawn — and implied that it was the only instance during the pandemic in which data was removed at the request of scientists in China.

But a March 2022 review by an outside consultant showed that the scientists withdrew another, unrelated sequence on the same day. After Bloom published a paper about the deleted Wuhan University sequences, they reappeared online — but most had been moved to a database affiliated with the Chinese government.

This controversy and the recent dust-up over the discovered-then-deleted-then-recovered raccoon dog DNA from a separate database have prompted calls for transparency from these genetic archives.

Virginie Courtier-Orgogozo, an evolutionary biologist at the French National Center for Scientific Research, said all pandemic-related sequences should be released to global health experts, particularly from early samples. “Among people who were sick in December, we have less than 20 sequences,” she said. (The National Library of Medicine said that sharing withdrawn data was against its policy.)

The Chinese government’s grip on science continues.

The laboratory of a Chinese scientist who studies the wildlife trade was recently shuttered while authorities investigated unfounded concerns that its research related to the origins of the pandemic, according to a scientist outside China who collaborated on the work.

On April 1, Beijing limited foreign access to the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, an academic portal, curtailing insight into research there. Leaders have urged Chinese scientists to publish in domestic journals rather than international publications.

And this month, Chinese government scientists said it was time to start investigating outside China for the virus’s origins.

It was a nod to the widely refuted claim that the pandemic began somewhere else.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)



New Vaccine Printers to Produce COVID-19 mRNA Shots on Demand
Jessie Zhang, Reporter
Apr 25 2023

Researchers have designed a vaccine printer that can produce COVID-19 mRNA vaccines on the go, as part of the intense effort to get more people inoculated.

Published on April 24 in Nature Biotechnology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) scientists said their current vaccine printer prototype can produce 100 thumbnail-sized patches in 48 hours, with the potential to be scaled up to generate up to hundreds of vaccine doses a day.

“We could someday have on-demand vaccine production,” Ana Jaklenec, a scientist from MIT’s Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research said.

“If, for example, there was an Ebola outbreak in a particular region, one could ship a few of these printers there and vaccinate the people in that location.”

There are limitations in the distribution of vaccines, including the infrastructure and expertise needed, such as doctors who can administer the shots, safe needle disposal, and vaccine refrigeration.

“When COVID-19 started, concerns about vaccine stability and vaccine access motivated us to try to incorporate RNA vaccines into microneedle patches,” lead author John Daristotle said.

Microneedle patches contain RNA vaccine molecules—the “ink”—encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles which help them remain stable at room temperature, even in the long-term.

The scientists found the same strong antibody response when they vaccinated mice with microneedle patches that had been stored for up to three months.

The patches can be applied simply by pressing them onto the skin, so no trained health professionals would be needed.

While being left in place for a few minutes, microscopic needles puncture into the skin painlessly and releases the vaccine. The needles self-dissolve so there is no special disposal method required either.


Potential to Print Other Vaccines

Experts said that mobile vaccine printers can help spread RNA vaccines more widely.

“With the possibility of scaling up vaccine manufacturing and improved stability at higher temperatures, vaccine printers can facilitate widespread access to RNA vaccines,” Joseph DeSimone, a professor of translational medicine and chemical engineering at Stanford University said.

While the study focused on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, the team plans to adapt the process to generate other types of vaccines, including those made from proteins or inactivated viruses.

“The ink composition was key in stabilizing mRNA vaccines, but the ink can contain various types of vaccines or even drugs, allowing for flexibility and modularity in what can be delivered using this microneedle platform,” Jaklenec said.

A few years ago, the term “mRNA” was primarily confined to scientific circles and research papers. Today, many more have heard of messenger ribonucleic acid, or mRNA, as most of the COVID-19 vaccines use it as the active ingredient.


Genetic Manipulation of Healthy Cells

Experts have come out to express concerns that the current technology is a modified mRNA rather than real mRNA, and potential negative consequences are still far from being understood.

Molecular biologist and former professor of anatomy and cell biology Klaus Steger said that conventional mRNA teaches cells to create a protein that would initiate an immune response against a specific pathogen.

However, modified RNA-based technology used in COVID-19 vaccines and all vaccines currently in the research and development stages, are gene-based injections that force healthy cells to produce a viral protein, which actually causes a weakening of the immune system.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)


Even as SARS-CoV-2 mutates, some human antibodies fight back
by La Jolla Institute for Immunology
April 25, 2023

An anonymous San Diego resident has become a fascinating example of how the human immune system fights SARS-CoV-2. In a new investigation, scientists from La Jolla Institute for Immunology (LJI) have shown how antibodies, collected from this clinical study volunteer, bind to the SARS-CoV-2 "Spike" protein to neutralize the virus.

Although studies have shown antibodies bound to Spike before, this new research reveals how the original Moderna SARS-CoV-2 vaccine could prompt the body to produce antibodies against the later omicron variants of SARS-CoV-2. The researchers also capture highly detailed, 3D structures of three promising neutralizing antibodies bound to Spike.

This important work shows exactly where Spike is vulnerable to human antibodies—and how future vaccines and antibody therapeutics might exploit these weaknesses. In fact, studies in mice suggest some of these antibodies may help prevent severe cases of COVID-19.

"To blunt the next pandemic and protect people from seasonal re-emergence of this one, we need antibodies of the broadest possible capacity—ones that are not escaped," says LJI President and CEO Erica Ollmann Saphire, Ph.D., senior author of the new Cell Reports study. "We found those in a vaccinated San Diegan."

"Studying that person's immune response in detail uncovered antibodies that are still effective against many omicron variants," adds LJI Instructor Kathryn Hastie, Ph.D., co-leader of the study and Director of the LJI Antibody Discovery Center. "We now have to figure out how to boost these antibodies that we want over others that are less effective."


Taking on viral variants

Throughout the pandemic, scientists at LJI have gathered blood samples here in San Diego, and from labs around the world, with the goal of understanding the roles of different immune cells in fighting SARS-CoV-2.

Antibodies are among the immune system's most elite fighters. These molecules are made by B cells and each antibody has a specific structure meant to bind to a specific target on a pathogen. It's as if B cells see a bullseye on a pathogen and then go to work making their arrows.

For the new study, the antibodies came from a clinical studies volunteer who received two doses of the Moderna SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. The Moderna vaccine works by prompting the body to make the Spike protein—glimpses of the viral bullseye—so it can begin work on its antibodies and other weaponry against the real virus.

The samples from the study volunteer were collected in early 2021—before the emergence of omicron. That means any antibodies made by the volunteer were a result of vaccination, rather than exposure to omicron.

The SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant emerged in late 2021 and spread quickly. Omicron stood out from other variants because it contained mutations that helped it evade immune cell protection. Many antibodies designed to fight earlier SARS-CoV-2 variants couldn't hit their mark on omicron.


Finding winning antibodies

Luckily, not everyone produces the same types of antibodies. In fact, the composition of virus-fighting cells and antibodies varies wildly in each person. For the new study, the researchers began with a pool of antibodies from the San Diego volunteer. Like many people who received the first two Moderna vaccine shots, this individual produced a robust pool of antibodies capable of neutralizing the ancestral D614G variant of SARS-CoV-2.

As new viral variants of concern emerged, the researchers tested this pool to see how many antibodies could still bind to the mutated virus.

"We found that this pool of antibodies could also neutralize other variants, such as delta and omicron," says Hastie.

They found that the subject maintained moderate to high levels of antibodies against beta, delta and omicron lineages BA.1, BA.1.1 and BA.2. Among these surviving antibodies, the researchers uncovered five antibodies that actually decreased the infectivity of BA.1 by more than 85 percent.

The researchers then took these five remaining antibodies through another battery of tests. One antibody, called 1C3, showed promise in blocking part of the infection process (when the virus's receptor binding domain interacts with human protein ACE2) but only against BA.1 and BA.2 lineages. Another antibody, 1H2, could also neutralize some omicron lineages, but did so in a different way than 1C3. Meanwhile, antibody 2A10 was reactive to all SARS-CoV-2 omicron lineages tested, including those that are most common now: XBB and BQ1.


Mapping out antibody targets

The scientists went on to map out these vulnerabilities on Spike using a high-resolution imaging technique called cryo-electron microscopy. "We were really interested to see how these antibodies recognize the Spike protein and structure," says LJI Postdoctoral Fellow Xiaoying Yu, who co-led the new study with Hastie. "This structural work lets us see exactly how the antibodies interact with the protein and how they can neutralize the virus."

The imaging work revealed that two of the promising antibodies bind to the SARS-CoV-2 Spike by latching onto two parts of the protein at once. By capturing Spike in a sort of hug of death, these antibodies lock the viral structure in place to halt infection. This finding is consistent with another recent Cell Reports study from the Saphire Lab showing the importance of bivalent antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 variants.

Could these three promising antibodies be recreated in an antibody therapeutic to treat COVID-19? The results from a mouse model are encouraging. The LJI team found that each antibody by itself could indeed reduce the viral load in the lungs in mice infected with SARS CoV-2 BA.1 and BA.2.

Going forward, the researchers plan to run more human antibodies through this same pipeline at LJI—from antibody isolation to screening, structural analysis, and animal model experiments. "We can carry out the entire pipeline of antibody discovery now," says Yu. "This research will help us combat the variants we have right now and give us targets for future vaccine development and therapeutics."
 

vector7

Dot Collector
@RandPaul Asks Samantha Power: 'Did USAID Fund Coronavirus Research In Wuhan China?' "Should we be funding the Academy of Military Medical Research in China? ...Some of the research proposals in 2018 were the Wuhan Insitute of Virology asking for money to create a virus with a furin cleavage site. A SARS-like coronavirus with a furin cleavage site. That's exactly what COVID-19 turned out to be.

So we want to know if there were other research proposals you either granted or denied that was in the same vain as creating viruses that could have become COVID-19. We can't tell because you won't give us information... I now have 25 Senators that have sent you a letter, and you aren't responding...

You are being dishonest."
RT 6min
View: https://twitter.com/amuse/status/1651415959666655239?s=20
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)


EXC: Fauci, DOD, & CDC Funded Deadly Pathogen Research At Sudanese Biolab Seized By Militants.

By: Natalie Winters
April 26, 2023

Sudan’s National Public Health Laboratory – whose recent seizure by militants has prompted warnings of causing a “huge biological risk” – received financial and personnel support from U.S. government bodies including the Department of Defense, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and Dr. Anthony Fauci’s National Institutes of Health agency, War Room can reveal.

The stunning revelation follows Nima Saeed Abid, the World Health Organization (WHO) representative in Sudan, admitting the situation was “extremely dangerous” because “we have polio isolates in the lab, we have measles isolates in the lab, we have cholera isolates in the lab.” U.S. federal funding has directly supported research conducted by researchers from the high-risk laboratory into cholera.

“There is a huge biological risk associated with the occupation of the central public health lab in Khartoum by one of the fighting parties,” he added.

The lab, which is based in the country’s capital Khartoum, is a recipient of support from a variety U.S. government agencies including the Department of Defense (DOD), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention(CDC), and United States Agency for International Development (USAID). During Dr. Fauci’s tenure as a National Institutes of Health (NIH) agency leader, he also allocated funds to support research involving scientists from the controversial laboratory.

CDC.

A pamphlet titled “CDC In South Sudan,” published in August of 2022, reveals the extent of the government agency’s involvement in the country.

“In May 2018, CDC supported establishment of the first viral load monitoring facility at South Sudan’s National Public Health Laboratory (NPHL),” explains a synopsis of the CDC’s involvement with the lab.

A key feature of the CDC’s involvement with the lab was “Laboratory Systems Strengthening,” with the agency noting:

“Since 2006, CDC has partnered with the Global Fund to support South Sudan’s NPHL by strengthening laboratory infrastructure, staffing, and technical capacity.”
“With technical support from CDC, the Ministry of Health developed and released consolidated national HIV treatment guidelines and five laboratory manuals and standard operating procedures for NPHL staff and HIV/AIDS program staff,” continues the CDC.

Screen-Shot-2023-04-25-at-11.41.06-PM-234x300.png


Moreover, a research paper published in July 2022 – “Viral load scale-up in South Sudan: Strategic implementation of tools to monitor HIV treatment success among people living with HIV” – involving the controversial Sudanese laboratory counts financial support from the CDC through the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief. The paper includes two researchers from the NPHL alongside four CDC researchers from the Divisions of Global HIV & TB and Healthcare Quality Promotion.

Screen-Shot-2023-04-25-at-11.45.41-PM-300x95.png


The paper’s acknowledgment section also identifies the “US Agency for International [and] Development, US Department of Defense” for providing the researchers with “support,” though it fails to provide any further information.

FAUCI/NIH.

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), the NIH agency previously run by Dr. Fauci, has also funded a research paper counting researchers from Sudan’s NPHL. Curiously, the 2017 paper – “Dried Blood Spots for Measuring Vibrio cholerae-specific Immune Responses” – focuses on cholera in Sudan, which is one of the diseases flagged by the WHO as being affected by the seizure.

A researcher listed on the paper, Lul O. Deng, works for the Sudanese NPHL.

“This work was supported by The National Institute of Health (K08 AI100923 to D.T.L., R01 AI130378 to D.T.L., AI106878 to E.T.R., AI099243 and AI103055 to J.B.H.),” explains the paper.


The aforementioned grants all come from the NIAID during Fauci’s tenure and totals over 20 million dollars, as revealed in the breakdown below:
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation were also co-funders of the study.

Screen-Shot-2023-04-26-at-12.09.50-AM-300x139.png


USAID.

USAID increased its collaborations with the lab during COVID-19, with a press release revealing it “funded procurement of COVID-19 tests and provided equipment” and “designated regional laboratories to rapidly scale up testing capabilities.”

A WHO press release from 2018 also reveals the agency’s involvement with the NPHL:

‘Thanks to Global Fund, ECHO, CDC and USAID, South Sudan has made progress in building and strengthening the laboratory capacity to test and report results in a safe, secure, timely and reliable manner for outbreaks and emergencies, the challenging circumstances notwithstanding said Evans Liyosi, WHO Representative for South Sudan. He noted that this development is in line with the expectations of the WHO Laboratory Improvement for Emergencies (LIFE) initiative and the International Health regulations, for vulnerable WHO member states including South Sudan.”

Deja Vu.

The revelations about U.S. government involvement in Sudan’s NPHL follow similar scrutiny over support from a Hunter Biden-linked company for Ukrainian Biolabs working on “extremely dangerous pathogens.” It also follows Dr. Fauci allocating millions of taxpayer dollars to support gain-of-function research on coronavirus strains strikingly similar to COVID-19 at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)


Fresh pandemic fears as virologists discover bird flu spreads 'efficiently' in ferrets - sparking warning that strain could be 100 TIMES worse than Covid if it ever jumps to humans
By Emily Stearn, Health Reporter For Mailonline
Updated: 13:10 EDT, 26 April 2023

  • Scientists in Canada found H5N1 from red hawks spread between ferrets
  • Of all the directly-infected ferrets only a single infected animal survived
  • Globally, 873 bird flu cases in humans have been recorded since 2003
Bird flu spreads 'efficiently' in ferrets, scientists have warned amid growing fears it could spark another pandemic.

Experts called the discovery 'very concerning', claiming it shows that the pathogen is one step closer to spilling over into humans.

It's the first known study to clearly confirm that mammals can not only catch the disease individually but spread it to others as well.

Deaths of infected mammals like mink, foxes, raccoons and bears in recent months have suggested this was possible, however.

H5N1 — the avian influenza strain behind the current outbreak sweeping the world, considered the biggest ever — does not transmit easily between humans.

But mutations to the virus that makes mammal-to-mammal transmission easier could change that, some experts fear.

Globally, fewer than 900 human cases of H5N1, which kills close to 50 per cent of everyone it strikes, have ever been recorded.

The virus is usually picked up through close contact with an infected bird, whether dead or alive.

Now new research, yet to be peer-reviewed found H5N1 could 'cause lethal disease in multiple mammalian species'.

Canadian researchers, including some from Government health bodies, infected ferrets with one of four strains of H5N1.

Ferrets were chosen for the study as they a similar respiratory makeup to humans, providing experts with an idea of how a virus would interact in people.

They found that 'direct contact' with one strain of H5N1 isolated from an infected bird, resulted 'in lethal outcomes', the paper added.

It raises the prospect that the strain may have developed 'certain adaptations that allow for a higher degree of replication, pathogenicity, and transmission'.

They warned that if such a strain made the leap to humans, the consequences could be catastrophic.

'Because there is little to no H5-specific population-wide immunity, if an H5N1 isolate capable of sustained transmission made a species jump into humans, this would likely represent a destructive infection in immunologically naïve population,' they wrote.

John Fulton, a pharmaceutical industry consultant and founder of BioNiagara, told MailOnline H5N1 poses a threat '100 times worse than Covid'.

He added: 'This discovery is very concerning, and governments should take immediate action by seeking out and mobilizing all high-potential production capacity for vaccines and therapeutics for the prevention and treatment of avian influenza H5N1.'

'We need to sound the alarm bells to wake up our governments to the fact that there is a virus that is undergoing mutations that would/ could eventually allow it to become highly transmissible in human (mammals).

'The wakeup call is that we have some of the production capacity needed to produce cell-based vaccines ( no chickens - no eggs) but we must act now and fund the scale up that we have available for cell-based production if we are to be ready if H5N1 mutates further.'

Some nations, including China, have been vaccinating against the H5N1 strain for years.

Birds are vaccinated either via an injection into the egg or a spray onto chicks when they are still in boxes.

Under UK health policy however, vaccinating chickens is currently illegal.

But the Animal and Plant Health Agency, an arm of DEFRA, is currently looking at potential candidate vaccines for humans in the UK, if the virus spills over into people.

'The number of laying hens available to produce eggs for vaccine production has already been compromised and is vulnerable to a complete destruction of the egg producing flock leaving us with limited production capacity,' Mr Fulton said.

Vaccine makers GSK, Moderna, and CSL Seqirus have begun developing new human shots to target the rapidly spreading strain of the virus.

Others such as Sanofi have generic vaccines the H5N1 virus in stock that could be adapted to the currently currently circulating strain.

Like other forms of flu, humans can get infected if the virus gets into their eyes, nose, mouth or is inhaled.

But with bird flu, this usually occurs in people who spend a lot of time with infected creatures, such as bird handlers.

A spate of human bird flu cases have emerged in the early parts of 2023.

Earlier this year, a Cambodian man and his daughter were diagnosed with H5N1.

Their cases sparked international concern, with many experts fearing the infection was proof the virus had mutated to infect people better after tearing through the world's bird population.

Further testing found the Cambodian family did not have the H5N1 strain rapidly spreading among the world's wild birds — but instead a variant known to spread locally in the Prey Veng province they resided in.

There has only been one case of a British person becoming infected with H5N1 since the ongoing outbreak took off in October 2021.

Alan Gosling, a retired engineer in Devon, caught the virus in early 2022 after his ducks, some of which lived inside his home, became infected.

The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) has currently set the threat level to level three, given there is 'evidence' of changes in the virus genome that could trigger 'mammalian infection', it said.

Any 'sustained' mammal-to-mammal transmission of the pathogen would raise the threat level to four, while human-to-human would push it to five.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Bird flu outbreak: Everything you need to know

What is it?


Avian flu is an infectious type of influenza that spreads among birds.

In rare cases, it can be transmitted to humans through close contact with a dead or alive infected bird.

This includes touching infected birds, their droppings or bedding. People can also catch bird flu if they kill or prepare infected poultry for eating.

Wild birds are carriers, especially through migration.

As they cluster together to breed, the virus spreads rapidly and is then carried to other parts of the globe.

New strains tend to appear first in Asia, from where more than 60 species of shore birds, waders and waterfowl head off to Alaska to breed and mix with migratory birds from the US. Others go west and infect European species.

Which strains are currently spreading?

H5N1 and H3N8.

So far the virus H5N1 has been detected in some 80million birds and poultry globally since September 2021 — double the previous record the year before.

Not only is the virus spreading at speed, it is also killing at an unprecedented level, leading some experts to say this is the deadliest variant so far.

Millions of chickens and turkeys in the UK have been culled or put into lockdown.

But earlier this year, on March 27, the World Health Organization (WHO) was also informed that a Chinese woman had become the first person to ever die from the H3N8 strain.

The 56-year-old woman from the southern province of Guangdong was the third person known to have been infected with the H3N8 subtype of avian influenza, according to the WHO.

Although rare in people, H3N8 is common in birds, but it causes little to no sign of disease.

It has also infected other mammals.

Can bird flu infect people?

Yes, but only 873 human cases of bird flu have been reported to the World Health Organization since 2003.

The risk to people has been deemed 'low'.

But people are strongly urged not to touch sick or dead birds because the virus is lethal, killing 56 per cent of people it does manage to infect.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)


A Plague That Could Kill A Billion People Has Been Found To Spread “Efficiently” Among Ferrets

Michael Snyder
April 26, 2023

If you thought that what we have been through the past few years was bad, just wait until you see what happens when a truly deadly virus starts spreading like wildfire all over the planet. For example, scientists have been warning for years that the H5N1 strain of the bird flu has the potential to rapidly kill vast numbers of people. The good news is that H5N1 does not naturally spread easily among mammals, but more than a decade ago scientists in the United States and the Netherlands were conducting “gain of function” research on H5N1 in order to create a version that could spread easily among mammals. And as you will see below, some very familiar names funded that research.

Thankfully, H5N1 was off the radar for a long time, but then about a year ago a massive outbreak suddenly erupted among birds all over the world and it has been “wiping out everything in numbers we’ve never seen before”…

The US is currently experiencing its worst-ever outbreak of bird flu, also known as avian influenza — and a new study has found that the strain could become endemic in the country.
The outbreak is “wiping out everything in numbers we’ve never seen before,” Jennifer Mullinax, an assistant professor of environmental science and technology at the University of Maryland, told Sky News.

Even though millions upon millions of chickens, turkeys and other birds are now dead, most people in the general population have not been too alarmed by this outbreak.

But in recent months, H5N1 has started killing mammals such as foxes, minks, raccoons and bears.

And now researchers in Canada have proven that one strain of H5N1 that is currently circulating can spread “efficiently” among ferrets…

The bird flu virus that is killing millions of animals around the world has been found to “efficiently” spread between ferrets in a laboratory, raising concerns about the potential for the virus to jump to humans.
In a new preprint, scientists in Canada demonstrated that H5N1 samples taken from a red tailed hawk spread efficiently between ferrets – the main “animal model” used by scientists in experiments to analyse how respiratory viruses may impact people.

This is not good.

Ferrets were used in this research because they have “a similar respiratory makeup to humans”…

Ferrets were chosen for the study as they a similar respiratory makeup to humans, providing experts with an idea of how a virus would interact in people.
They found that ‘direct contact’ with one strain of H5N1 isolated from an infected bird, resulted ‘in lethal outcomes’, the paper added.

So where did this strain of H5N1 come from?

More specifically, did it occur naturally, or was it created in a lab?

More than a decade ago, gain of function experiments that were funded by Dr. Francis S. Collins and Dr. Anthony Fauci actually created a version of H5N1 that “had gained the ability to spread through the air between ferrets”…

And yet in late 2011 the world learned that two scientific teams – one in Wisconsin, led by virologist Yoshihiro Kawaoka, and another in the Netherlands, led by virologist Ron Fouchier – had potentially pushed the virus in that direction. Each of these labs had created H5N1 viruses that had gained the ability to spread through the air between ferrets, the animal model used to study how flu viruses might behave in humans.
The ultimate goal of this work was to help protect the world from future pandemics, and the research was supported with words and funding by two of the most prominent scientists in the United States: Dr. Francis S. Collins, director of the National Institutes of Health, and Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the NIH’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

Many of us have been warning for a very long time that such research is extremely dangerous.

If a version of H5N1 that can spread very easily among humans were to get loose, the consequences could be “100 times worse than Covid”…

They warned that if such a strain made the leap to humans, the consequences could be catastrophic.
'Because there is little to no H5-specific population-wide immunity, if an H5N1 isolate capable of sustained transmission made a species jump into humans, this would likely represent a destructive infection in immunologically naïve population,’ they wrote.
John Fulton, a pharmaceutical industry consultant and founder of BioNiagara, told MailOnline H5N1 poses a threat ‘100 times worse than Covid’.

Nobody knows for sure how many would die if a full-blown H5N1 pandemic were to erupt among humans, but it has been projected that the death toll could reach as high as 1.5 billion people.

Since 2003, the death rate for humans that have become infected with H5N1 has been 53 percent.

So we better hope that a version of H5N1 that transmits from one person to another easily does not start spreading any time soon.

Unfortunately, there are signs that time is running out. In fact, it is being reported that six domestic cats have tested positive for H5N1 right here in the United States…

Another cat in the U.S. has died of H5N1 avian influenza, raising the number of domestic cats infected with the virus to at least six, officials say. The new case was reported in Nebraska and two older cases were found in Oregon.

If H5N1 is now even spreading among domestic cats, how long will it be before it makes the jump to humans?

Obviously the big pharmaceutical companies believe that it could be soon, because they are feverishly working on new vaccines…

Vaccine makers GSK, Moderna, and CSL Seqirus have begun developing new human shots to target the rapidly spreading strain of the virus.
Others such as Sanofi have generic vaccines the H5N1 virus in stock that could be adapted to the currently currently circulating strain.

I really, really hope that this thing fizzles out.

Because if millions of people do start getting infected with H5N1, it will make the COVID pandemic look like a Sunday picnic.

As I keep warning my regular readers, we have now entered an era of great pestilences.

Scientists all over the globe are monkeying around with some of the most dangerous bugs known to humanity, and in many cases they are purposely trying to make them even more deadly.

As we have seen, it is way too easy for an “accident” to happen, and the next “accident” that happens could potentially kill millions upon millions of us.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)


COVID-19 Drugs: Spanish Researchers Find That Early Treatment With Antihistamines Like Cetirizine Can Reduce Risk Of COVID-19 Hospitalization
Thailand Medical News
April 26, 2023

A groundbreaking study by Spanish researchers from Servicio de Salud de Castilla-La Mancha (SESCAM) in Toledo, Spain, has unveiled the astonishing potential of antihistamines as an early treatment for COVID-19. This discovery could revolutionize our approach to managing the pandemic, reduce hospitalizations, and possibly prevent the spread of the virus among close contacts.

Between March 2020 and August 2021, the dedicated team of researchers treated 468 COVID-19 patients in Yepes, Spain, with early antihistamines, along with azithromycin in selected cases. The primary goal was to assess the hospitalization rate, while secondary objectives included ICU admission and mortality rates.

The results? A remarkably low hospitalization rate of just 4.3%, ICU admission rate of 1.1%, and a fatality rate of 0.6%. Even more impressive, none of the patients required follow-up treatment, suggesting that they did not develop long COVID.

This COVID-19 Drugs study findings indicate that early antihistamine treatment may significantly reduce the odds of hospitalization (OR: 0.490, CI: 0.313–0.767, p-value: 0.001). However, randomized controlled clinical trials are needed to further confirm these effects.

As the pandemic emerged in 2020, medical professionals worldwide scrambled to find effective treatments for the unknown virus. Over-the-counter antipyretics, analgesics, or antitussives, including antihistamines, were recommended by the U.S. National Institute of Health (NIH) for symptom management in outpatient COVID-19 patients.

Antihistamines, commonly used in primary care, are believed to help dampen mast cell degranulation, thereby reducing the cytokine storm observed in severe COVID-19 cases.

Commonly prescribed antihistamines include cetirizine, loratadine, ebastine, dexchlorpheniramine, bilastine, levocetirizine, fexofenadine, desloratadine, mizolastine and rupatadine.

Two previous clinical studies also demonstrated the potential utility of treating COVID-19 patients with H1 antihistamines.




A key source of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines in COVID-19 is mast cells, which are especially abundant in the lungs. Interestingly, patients who either recovered from or had mild symptoms after COVID-19 exhibited multiorgan symptoms similar to those presented in mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS). This has led experts to hypothesize that COVID-19 hyperinflammation and post-COVID-19 illness may be due to MCAS.

Several antihistamines have been shown to possess inhibitory properties on the production and expression of interleukins, chemokines, and other cytokines, suggesting their potential role in treating a COVID-19 cytokine storm through immunomodulatory properties. For instance, cetirizine has been found to decrease interleukin production.

The study conducted by the Spanish researchers expanded on previous work and compared the outcomes of 468 outpatient SARS-CoV-2 positive subjects treated with antihistamines in Yepes, Spain, to the national COVID-19 statistics. The results suggest that early treatment with antihistamines reduces the odds of hospitalization.

Patients diagnosed with COVID-19 were treated with antihistamines, and their close contacts were also given prophylactic antihistamine treatment. Remarkably, none of the close contacts developed COVID-19 symptoms, implying that antihistamines could play a role in preventing contagion and viral spread among family members.

Despite the limitations of observational studies and the use of national Spanish statistics as a control group proxy, the significant reduction in hospital admission risk among patients treated with antihistamines warrants further investigation in randomized controlled clinical trials.

As COVID-19 continues to challenge our lives, the need for effective drugs for early treatment and prevention is evident. The promising results from this study, along with earlier experiences in treating COVID-19 patients with antihistamines, could provide the breakthrough many have been seeking.

According to the study's findings, early treatment of COVID-19 patients with antihistamines for 30 days at the Primary Health Care level, coupled with azithromycin for 3-6 days in selected cases, yielded excellent outcomes for patients living in the community, regardless of their age and risk factors.

Furthermore, since none of the close contacts who took antihistamines developed the disease, researchers believe that antihistamines may have a preventive effect against COVID-19, which warrants further exploration.

After utilizing this safe, inexpensive treatment protocol in their Health Center for over a year and a half, the researchers reported a significantly lower mortality rate compared to official figures. They strongly recommend initiating this treatment with COVID-19 patients in Primary Care as soon as the first symptoms appear. Antihistamines and azithromycin boast a good safety profile, extensive experience of use, excellent tolerance, low cost, and wide availability. As a result, this treatment regimen could address the global therapeutic needs for COVID-19 for all age groups. However, clinical trials are necessary to determine its true effectiveness.

In conclusion, the discovery of antihistamines' potential role in early COVID-19 treatment and prevention is nothing short of extraordinary. This breakthrough could revolutionize the way the COVID-19 pandemic is approached for achieving a target of fewer hospitalizations and possibly even preventing the spread of the virus among close contacts.

The study findings were published in the peer reviewed journal: Heliyon

 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)


Are The Spawns From The XBB.2.3 Sub-lineage Aka The 'Trans Variant' Such As XBB.2.3.2, XBB.2.3.5 Evolving To Cause T Cell Damage Similar To HIV?
Thailand Medical News
April 27, 2023

Many from a small segment of the general population who are still smart enough to be paying attention to what is developing in terms of the COVID-19 pandemic are more engrossed in the XBB.1.16 sub-lineage (Arcturus) and some of its newer spawns such:

-XBB.1.16.1 (defining mutation-S:T547I)

-XBB.1.16.1.1 designated as FU.1 (defining mutation-T3802C)

-XBB.1.16.1.2 designated as FU.2 (defining mutation-C8692T)

-XBB.1.16.2 (defining mutations ORF3a:V13L, ORF1a:P926H

-XBB.1.16.3 (defining mutation A2893C)

However, we at Thailand Medical News feel that the onslaughts by the XBB.1.16 and its spawns will also be short-lived in many geolocations similar to the XBB.1.5 sub-lineage and will only wreak havoc with those in the vulnerable groups (aged, obese, immunocompromised, those with existing comorbidities and those with certain genetic makeups) irrespective of them possessing so called hybrid immunity or having received the boosters. Past COVID-19 News coverages have showed that the XBB.1.5 was only short-lived and with not much disease severity in the otherwise health and younger populations.

However, in terms of the long-term health complications and long COVID manifestations, we can expect more serious implications from the XBB.1.16 onslaught and the breakthrough infections it causes for the rest of the population.

It is very clear that all the new XBB-sub-lineages are evolving rapidly and spawning mutations at an unprecedented phase to evade all forms of immunity ie immunity from previous infections, induced immunity from vaccines and boosters and even remaining T Cell immunity.

These new sub-lineages besides being highly transmissible and having growth advantages are also better adapted for viral persistence and although many among the more younger and healthy segments are reporting short-lived mild symptoms upon infection with these sub-lineages such as the XBB.1.16, we can expect much more serious long term health complications and the burden from Long COVID will be more apparent. Some are trying to distort the long COVID narratives by making claims and even using manipulated studies to claim that the Omicron variants and the usage of boosters reduces the risk of Long COVID.

We at Thailand Medical News however are warning that the next onslaughts that will be lead by the newer emerging ‘woke’ XBB sub-lineages lead by the XBB.2.3 sub-lineage aka The Trans Variant and its ‘ugly’ spawns will be more worrisome.

We have reasons to speculate that the newer spawns of the XBB.2.3 sub-lineage such as XBB.2.3.2 aka the Dylan Mulvaney variant, the XBB.2.3.3 aka Lia Thomas variant, the XBB.2.3.4 aka the Jeffrey Marsh variant, XBB.2.3.5 aka the Zooey Zephyr variant and the XBB.2.3.6 aka the Thomas Jay White (Tara) variant will not only be more serious due these wretched sub-lineages being more vicious and pathogenic besides being more transmissible, but the many mutations being seen on the ORF1a and even ORf1b proteins are likely to not only further impair immune responses b ut will also cause damage to both CD4 and CD8 T cells via a multiple of ways. Further urgent research is needed on this to validate our speculations.The arising damage is likely to be far worse than that seen in HIV or AIDs.






In fact more attention and studies are urgently required about the newer XBB sub-lineages including the XBB.2.4, , XBB.2.5, XBB.3, XBB.4, XBB.5, XBB.6 and XBB 8 sub-lineages and their spawns.

We envisage that while the next new onslaught lead by the XBB.2.3 sub-lineage aka the 'Trans variants' especially its spawns will also only initially cause havoc among the vulnerable groups irrespective of vaccine or immunity status, the general population while might initially be spared with a mild infection will end up in more serious health conditions and even be at risk of higher mortality weeks after due to a variety of conditions as a result of rapid depletion of their CD4 and also CD8 T Cells. Their conditions will be far worse than HIV and also the risk from secondary opportunistic infections will be extremely high in them.

While we are only speculating here, urgent research is needed to verify our claims.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)


EXCLUSIVE: Scientists launch manhunt for 'longest ever' Covid patient in Ohio who has been infected for two YEARS — as they warn patient's virus is so mutated it could spark 'concerning' outbreak
By Mansur Shaheen Deputy Health Editor For Dailymail.Com
Updated: 13:31 EDT, 26 April 2023
  • An infected person in Ohio has been carrying a 'cryptic' strain of Covid years
  • Researchers have found rare strain in Columbus and Washington Court House

Scientists are trying to track down an Ohio resident who they believe is the longest-standing Covid patient ever, DailyMail.com can reveal.

The patient - thought to live in the Columbus area - is carrying a highly mutated version of the virus that is 'unlike anything' experts have seen.

The virus has been detected through wastewater sampling and traced back to early 2021. It is being repeatedly picked up along a 40-mile area, signaling that one person is carrying and shedding it through their stool.

Dr Marc Johnson, a microbiologist at the University of Missouri, warned the mutations the strain has would be serious enough to make it a 'variant of concern' if it began circulating in the population.

Dr Johnson believes the strain is being shed by the same person who regularly commutes between Columbus and Washington Court House.

The scientist is unsure whether the person is contagious or how they have managed to stay infected so long.

Patients who harbor viruses for exceptionally long periods of time often have weakened immune systems, which means their body struggles to clear the virus. Many scientists believe the Alpha, Delta and Omicron variants all emerged this way.

Dr Johnson is, however, convinced the patient is healthy and may travel for work or school, but he could not rule out a chronically ill person who commutes for hospital care. His team cannot say for certain that it is just one patient, either.

The Missouri team has been analyzing Covid samples from sewage across the US in search of 'cryptic' Covid strains — new variants of the virus that have emerged with unknown origins.

The technique was used as a tool throughout the pandemic. Because the virus shows up in stool before someone suffers symptoms, wastewater data could help detect where outbreaks were going to emerge days in advance.

'We reverse analyze [wastewater] to see if anything in there that doesn't match any lineages,' Dr Johnson told DailyMail.com.

'Very early on there was this [sample] that was different than anything we had seen,' he continued.

Late last year, his team began to scan wastewater data from Ohio.

He found the virus in Columbus, the state's largest city of nearly 1million, and in Washington Court House, a small city of just 15,000 just southwest.

This same lineage has not been detected anywhere else to his knowledge. This specific pattern likely means the person lives in Washington Court House and commutes to Columbus.

It could be for work, but the patient could also be a student, as Columbus is home to Ohio State University — which has more than 66,000 students.

It is unclear how the person has harbored the virus for so long, but it is likely the virus has mutated within him to cause little complications.

The longest confirmed Covid case was logged by British doctors in April of last year when they confirmed a patient had been infected for 505 days — nearly a year and a half.

Overall, there are likely only a few thousand people that meet these guidelines, a relatively small group to be sifted through.

This strain has mutated within this person over time. It has mutated to such a degree that it likely carries traits greatly different from any existing strain — meaning it poses a danger if it spreads.

'If this was circulating, it would immediately be declared a variant of concern,' Dr Johnson said.

However, the virus has likely mutated within this person to the extent that it is not fit to spread.

Instead, the virus has managed to adjust itself in a way that it can live within its host for a long period of time while going relatively undetected.

It is likely a version of the Alpha or Wuhan strain that has significantly mutated within his body.

The virus has managed to hide in the person's body to replicate infinitely without the immune system targeting it.

This can occur when the virus reaches 'immuno-privileged sites' in the body, where the immune system is unlikely to target. These can include the eyes, brain and fertility organs like the testes.

But while unlikely, it could be possible that the virus gains a few mutations necessary for it to begin to spread in the population.

The patient is also likely asymptomatic or potentially experiencing symptoms similar to a bowel condition like Chron's disease — where sufferers experience cramping and diarrhea.

'There is a good chance they do not know they are affected,' he continued.

Dr Johnson hopes to find this patient to first get them medical attention but also to gather samples he can use to learn more about the cryptic strain.

His team has been able to track down the holders of cryptic Covid lineages in the past.

In Spring 2022, Dr Johnson found a cryptic strain in Wisconsin. The afflicted person was shedding viral load at an exorbitant rate.

His team tested water in manholes in the area, and managed to track down where the load was coming from.

In late Summer 2022, they linked the strain to a toilet at a specific building, which employed many people who were coming to work each day. One of those employees is carrying the cryptic strain, Dr Johnson believes.

The business has agreed to allow Dr Johnson to collect stool samples from some employees to determine which one is carrying the strain.

The typical Covid case lasts for only a few days — and the maximum time someone should expect to be sick is two weeks.

However, many people have experienced prolonged symptoms after Covid infection — some being diagnosed with the mysterious condition 'long Covid'.

Dr Johnson fears that in some of these cases, a person is continuing to feel these symptoms because they are actually just suffering a continued infection.
 
Top