CORONA Main Coronavirus thread

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

COVID-19 Vaccine Booster Effectiveness Quickly Wanes: Study
By Zachary Stieber
July 15, 2022

The effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccine booster doses dropped well under 50 percent after four months against subvariants of the virus that causes COVID-19, according to a new study from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

The Moderna and Pfizer vaccines provided just 51 percent protection against emergency department visits, urgent care encounters, and hospitalizations related to COVID-19 during the time BA.2 and BA.2.12.1, subvariants of the Omicron virus variant, were predominant in the United States, CDC researchers found.

Both vaccines are administered in two-dose primary series.

After 150-plus days, the effectiveness dropped to just 12 percent.

A first booster upped the protection to 56 percent, but the effectiveness went down to 26 percent after four months, according to the study, which drew numbers from a network of hospitals funded by the CDC across 10 states called the VISION Network.

The subvariant was predominant between late March and mid-June.

Pfizer and Moderna did not respond to requests for comment.

The effectiveness was lower against BA.2 and BA.2.12.1 than against BA.1, which was displaced by BA.2.

Against BA.1, the vaccines provided 44 percent protection against the healthcare visits linked to COVID-19 initially and 39 percent after 150 days. A first booster increased the protection to 84 percent, and the protection barely decreased for patients 50 years or older after four months. But for people aged 18 to 49, the protection plummeted to 29 percent after 120 days.

Underlining the waning effectiveness against severe illness, the majority of patients admitted to the hospitals between December 2021 and June 2022 had received at least two doses of the vaccines.

Further, the percentage of unvaccinated patients dropped during the later period, going from 41.6 percent to 28.6 percent (hospitalized patients) and from 41.4 percent to 31 percent (emergency department and urgent care patients), researchers found.

The researchers, some of whom work for the CDC, theorized that the protection—known as natural immunity—many unvaccinated people enjoy from having had COVID-19 could be a factor in the drop in effectiveness of the vaccines, even though adults with documented prior infection were excluded from the study.

“If unvaccinated persons were more likely to have experienced recent infection, and infection-induced immunity provides some protection against re-infection, this could result in lower VE observed during the BA.2/BA.2.12.1 period,” they wrote.
VE stands for vaccine effectiveness.

“Although adults with documented past SARS-CoV-2 infection were excluded, infections are likely to be significantly underascertained because of lack of testing or increased at-home testing. In addition, although time since receipt of the second or third vaccine dose was stratified by time intervals, on average the time since vaccination was longer during the BA.2/BA.2.12.1 period,” they added.

SARS-CoV-2, also known as the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus, causes COVID-19.

The CDC published the research in its quasi-journal, the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. Most articles it publishes are not peer-reviewed, and the articles are shaped to reflect CDC policy.

Top U.S. officials are considering authorizing second booster doses, or fourth doses, for all Americans. They’re currently only available to Americans aged 50 and older.

A second booster increased protection for that age group from 32 percent to 66 percent, according to the new study. But those who received a fourth dose were only followed for a median of 27 days. Other research has indicated that the protection from a fourth dose quickly wanes as well.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

COVID-19 Health Emergency Extended Across US
By Jack Phillips
July 15, 2022

The Biden administration announced Friday it has extended the COVID-19 public health emergency for three more months.

Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra officially renewed the emergency declaration. The order was extended to Oct. 13, 2022, “as a result of the continued consequences of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic,” Becerra said in the order.

The health emergency declaration—which allows some Americans to get free COVID-19 testing, vaccines, and treatment—was widely anticipated. Unnamed officials earlier this week told Bloomberg and other news outlets that the White House would extend the order.

“The Public Health Emergency declaration continues to provide us with tools and authorities needed to respond,” a Biden administration official told CNN this week. “The [order] provides essential capabilities and flexibilities to hospitals to better care for patients, particularly if we were to see a significant increase in hospitalizations in the coming weeks.”

Those reports prompted pushback, including from the Wall Street Journal’s editorial board, which accused the administration of wanting a “perpetual emergency” to maintain and expand its powers.

“The Biden Administration claims the declaration provides critical regulatory flexibility. But emergency-use authorizations for vaccines and treatments are governed by a separate statute. The Health and Human Services Department could also make permanent other regulation flexibility such as Medicare coverage for telehealth services,” the editorial board wrote.

Republicans have called on the Biden administration to end the emergency declaration.

“Today we call on your administration to do what so many states and other countries already have: accept that COVID-19 is endemic, recognize that current heavy-handed government interventions are doing more harm than good, and immediately begin the process by which we unwind the PHE so our country can get back to normal,” GOP members of Congress wrote in a letter in February.

And in March, the Senate passed a bill to terminate the national emergency by a 48 to 47 party-line vote, which Biden threatened to veto. The effort was backed by Republican lawmakers.

“The robust powers this emergency declaration provides the federal government are no longer necessary and Congress must debate, and ultimately repeal them, in order to begin the process of unwinding the powers the government took hold of during the peak of the crisis,” Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.), who sponsored the measure, said on the Senate floor at the time.

Some health care groups such as the American Hospital Association, meanwhile, urged the administration two months ago to keep the emergency intact.

The administration previously said it would give states 60 days’ notice before ending the COVID-19 emergency declaration.

According to data provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), COVID-19-related deaths in the United States have remained steady, hovering between 300 and 350 per day. That’s down significantly from the Omicron variant-related peak in February 2022, where the U.S. reported 3,000 daily deaths on several occasions, the data show.

COVID-19 is the illness caused by the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

Hong Kong Team Found a Broad-Spectrum Antibody Capable of Neutralizing Omicron and Delta Variants
By Shawn Lin
July 15, 2022

A joint study by multiple laboratories in two Hong Kong universities found a broadly neutralizing antibody ZCB11. Isolated from local mRNA vaccine recipients, ZCB11 showed potent antiviral activity against all SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern. In live virus challenge experiments, administration of ZCB11 protects from lung infection by Omicron in golden Syrian hamsters.

In this study, a research team at University of Hong Kong’s (HKU) medical school established an antibody replication technology platform, which is capable of antibody gene amplification of a single memory B cell. Using this technology, the researchers screened blood samples from 34 BNT162b2 vaccine recipients in Hong Kong, and found ZCB11, a potent and broad-spectrum antibody, in the blood of the vaccinees.

Through live virus challenge experiments, the researchers confirmed that ZCB11 is able to neutralize all SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs), including Alpha variant (B.1.1.7), Beta (B.1.351), Gamma (p1), Delta (B.1.617.2), and Omicron (B.1.1.529).

They only tested single ZCB11 for prophylactic and therapeutic efficacy in the hamster model.

The Golden Syrian hamster model of SARS-CoV-2 infection was performed to determine ZCB11’s prophylaxis (prevention of an infection) and therapeutic efficacy. ZCB11 administration was shown to protect lung infection against both Delta and Omicron BA.1 variants viral challenge in golden Syrian hamsters.

The other research team, from Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST), used single-particle cryo-electron microscopy to analyze ZCB11-spike protein complex, revealing an atomic-resolution image of ZCB11, laying the foundation for vaccine improvement.

Professor Chen Zhiwei, director of the Institute of AIDS at the University of Hong Kong and head of the Department of Microbiology, School of Clinical Medicine, HKU Faculty of Medicine, who led the research, said the findings showed that ZCB11 is a very promising therapeutic antibody that could be administered to fight against SARS-CoV-2 variants.

The research was published in the June 23 issue of Nature Communications.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

Long COVID affects 23% of positive cases, causing symptoms in 'long haulers' that may last for months
by Leigh Hopper, University of Southern California
July 15, 2022

A new USC study finds that 23% of people infected with COVID will become "long haulers," and identifies predictors of who is likely to develop the sometimes-debilitating symptoms that can last for months.

The research, which appears in Scientific Reports, is unique because it accounts for preexisting symptoms such as fatigue and sneezing that are common to other conditions and may be mistaken for COVID symptoms.

"Long COVID is a major public health concern. Twenty-three percent is a very high prevalence, and it may translate to millions of people," said first author Qiao Wu, a doctoral candidate at the USC Leonard Davis School of Gerontology. "More knowledge on its prevalence, persistent symptoms and risk factors may help health care professionals allocate resources and services to help long haulers get back to normal lives."

The work finds that obesity and hair loss at the time of infection are predictors of long COVID, but that other underlying conditions—such as diabetes or smoking status—have no discernable link to long-lasting symptoms.

Long COVID: Symptoms last 12 weeks or longer

While SARS-CoV-2 is typically an acute illness lasting about three weeks, some people with COVID have symptoms that last months or longer. The World Health Organization defines long COVID as symptoms that last 12 weeks or longer, a definition that the study's authors also used. Estimates of the prevalence of long COVID range from 10% to 90% due to evolving diagnostic criteria and differences in study design.

For example, some studies have focused on hospitalized patients, which provided a limited perspective on long COVID in the broader population.

USC researchers used an internet-based national survey—the Understanding Coronavirus in America tracking survey, conducted by the Center for Economic and Social Research (CESR) at the USC Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences—with an estimated 8,000 respondents from across the country.

From March 2020 to March 2021, researchers invited participants to answer biweekly questions about COVID. Their final sample included 308 infected, non-hospitalized individuals who were interviewed one month before, around the time of infection and 12 weeks later.

Who will get long COVID? 'Long-haulers' describe symptoms

After accounting for preexisting symptoms, about 23% of the participants reported that they had experienced new-onset symptoms during infection which lasted for more than 12 weeks, meeting the study's definition of long COVID.

The new-onset, persistent symptoms most commonly experienced by long COVID patients were:
  • Headache (22%).
  • Runny or stuffy nose (19%).
  • Abdominal discomfort (18%).
  • Fatigue (17%).
  • Diarrhea (13%).
In addition, the researchers found that people had significantly higher odds of experiencing long COVID if, at the time of infection, they:
  • Were obese
  • Experienced hair loss
  • Experienced headache
  • Experienced a sore throat
Unexpectedly, the odds of long COVID among people who experienced chest congestion were lower. There was a lack of evidence relating the risk of long COVID to preexisting health conditions such as diabetes or asthma, or age, gender, race/ethnicity, education or current smoking status.

"The significant association between long COVID and obesity is consistent with previous studies," said University Professor Eileen Crimmins, a demographer at the USC Leonard Davis School. "We differ from some existing studies in that we didn't find a link between long COVID and any sociodemographic factors."
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

Scientists identify what makes Delta variant dangerous and explain recent surge in COVID infections
by Julia Milzer, CU Anschutz Medical Campus
July 15, 2022

Since June, the number of COVID-19 infections started rising again, as the most transmissible omicron variant started picking up delta variant mutations leading to new subvariants BA.4/BA.5 and Deltacron variants. Out of all the five known variants of concern, which have been shown to evade therapeutic antibodies and vaccines developed against unmutated, original SARS-CoV-2 virus, delta is the most virulent leading to severe symptoms and increased mortality among infected people. A new peer-reviewed study provides answers to why delta is the most lethal variant of SARS-CoV-2.

To answer this critical question, researchers at the University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences performed robust biophysical analyses on the delta variant and individual mutations that comprise the delta variant.

The study was published in today's issue of the Journal of Molecular Biology and featured on the journal's cover.

"Our findings help explain why patients who have been vaccinated are still able to be infected by the new variants and why patients who have contracted the delta variant are more likely to be hospitalized," said author Krishna Mallela, Ph.D., professor in the department of pharmaceutical sciences at the CU Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences located on the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus.

Researchers Casey Patrick, Vaibhav Upadhyay and Alexandra Lucas from Mallela's lab identified the effect of mutated residues in the receptor binding domain (RBD) through which SARS-CoV-2 binds to ACE2 receptors that decrease the neutralization capacity of approved antibodies and polyclonal plasma from recovered patients.

"Due to the fact that we know vaccines are becoming less effective against emerging variants of SARS-CoV-2, it is important to understand what mutations are causing this decrease in neutralization capacity," Mallela said.

The scientists outline crucial information on mutated residues that are now frequently occurring in variants of SARS-CoV-2.

"Since we have performed individual analyses on these mutations, we have a foundational understanding of how some residues are affecting immune escape and infectivity of SARS-CoV-2," Mallela said.

The researchers found delta displayed unique biophysical characteristics unlike the previous variants alpha, beta and gamma. The human immune system generates antibodies to neutralize the virus in response to virus infection. These neutralizing antibodies have been classified into different classes, depending on their epitope location on the RBD, and some of these antibodies have previously been approved for emergency use by the FDA. Results from Mallela's lab indicated the delta variant has evolved towards escape from Class 2 and Class 3 antibodies, rather than enhancing the receptor binding or escape from Class 1 antibodies. Class 1 antibodies bind to RBD only in up conformation where RBD is accessible to ACE2 binding, whereas Class 2 and Class 3 antibodies bind to RBD irrespective of whether it is in up conformation (accessible to ACE2) or down conformation (inaccessible to ACE2). Delta also shows higher protein expression. One mutation in the delta variant, T478K, is believed to have evolved from patients who were infected with earlier variants of SARS-CoV-2. This mutation has been shown to escape antibodies generated from previous COVID-19 infections.

The results indicate that the immune escape from neutralizing antibodies is the main biophysical parameter that is determining the fitness landscape of the emerging variants.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFgOeWhN8BQ
Pandemic record numbers of new infections
12 min 09 sec
Jul 15, 2022
Dr. John Campbell

UK latest, another week another record number of new covid infections https://health-study.joinzoe.com/data https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dAyUJ... New symptomatic cases, 345,856 per day All-time record, historic wave 23% increase in past 2 weeks R = 1.1 Scotland and Wales first, now England Prevalence, 4,556,818 UK, 1 in 15 Scotland, 1 in 13 ONS latest https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulati... 5.27% in England (1 in 19 people) 6.04% in Wales (1 in 17 people) 5.86% in Northern Ireland (1 in 17 people) 6.34% in Scotland (1 in 16 people) Scotland starting to level off Children and young adults, 1 in 10 0 to 17 year olds highest increase All UK regions Much milder disease on average than it was Lots of reinfections, mostly over 3 months after last infection Younger people, 30% of current infections are reinfections Older people, 10% of current infections are reinfections Summer colds, twice as likely to have covid as any other type of virus 2,005 hospitalizations per day Certified deaths continue to fall https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulati...

ONS, re-infection Seven times higher in Omicron versus delta 2 July 2020 and 4 June 2022

People were more likely to be re-infected if they: were unvaccinated had a "milder" primary infection with a lower viral load did not report symptoms with their first infection were younger

List of covid symptoms
Sore throat, 58%
Headache, 49%
Blocked nose, 40%
Cough, no phlegm 40%
Runny nose, 40%
Cough with phlegm, 37%
Hoarse, 35%
Sneezing, 32%
Fatigue, 27%
Muscle pains 25%
Dizzy, 18%
Swollen neck glands, 15%
Sore eyes, 14%
Altered smell, 13%
Chest pain / tightness, 13%
Fever, 13%
Chills or shivers, 12%
Shortness of breath,11%
Earache, 11%
Loss of smell, 10%
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zyYq93YtScE
Vaccinated Vs. Unvaccinated Qatari Cohort (New Studies)
35 min 19 sec
Streamed live 7 hours ago
Drbeen Medical Lectures


Vaccinated Vs. Unvaccinated Qatari Cohort (New Studies) As promised, here is the lecture for the comparison of protection offered by vaccine vs., natural infection in Qatar's population. Let's review. If you like this content and want more, I am doing a special one-time membership offer. Click here: https://www.drbeen.com/yt-special/
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5aXBK1FYZnE
Do mRNA vaccine lipid nanoparticles circulate in the blood?
12 min 44 sec
Premiered 15 hours ago
Vejon Health

Have adequate biodistribution studies been done on mRNA vaccines? This study suggests that possibly we have not done the due diligence on the potential impact of circulating lipid nanoparticles. Is it even relevant? Link to paper here: Fertig TE, Chitoiu L, Marta DS, Ionescu V-S, Cismasiu VB, Radu E, Angheluta G, Dobre M, Serbanescu A, Hinescu ME, Gherghiceanu M. Vaccine mRNA Can Be Detected in Blood at 15 Days Post-Vaccination. Biomedicines. 2022; 10(7):1538. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines1... https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9059/10/7/1538 Join on Substack to see more innovative COVID-19 research: https://philipmcmillan.substack.com/



Here is his substack on the same topic:

(fair use applies)

Is it relevant that mRNA vaccine lipid nanoparticles circulate for over 2 weeks?

Dr Philip McMillan
16 hr ago

This very important question has not been answered until this research was done in Romania in 2021. The paper was not published until June 2022 although it is very relevant to potential side effects of mRNA vaccines.

Read paper here >

If mRNA lipid nanoparticles circulate in the blood stream, where are they deposited? Once these particles are taken up into cells, the cell will automatically make spike protein to trigger an immune response.

Heart muscle - Myocarditis and pericarditis

Nervous system - Guillain-Barre Syndrome

As mentioned on the CDC website >

Could this also explain the pattern of menstrual bleeding for up to 44% of women after vaccination?


Watch my other video on menstrual bleeding here >

Why would vaccine lipid nanoparticles circulate if injected into the muscle of the deltoid? The paper below demonstrates that cells share material, using exosomes, by circulating in the body.


de la Torre Gomez, Carolina, et al. "“Exosomics”—A review of biophysics, biology and biochemistry of exosomes with a focus on human breast milk." Frontiers in genetics 9 (2018): 92.

Informed consent and thorough research requires that these important questions are fully answered.
 
Last edited:

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
MALONE, URSO, KORY: “STOP VACCINATING”
The HighWire with Del Bigtree
Published July 15, 2022
37 min 48 sec

Round table general Covid discussion between Del Bigtree, Dr. Malone, Dr. Urso and Dr. Kory about latest covid news. In Las Vegas this week, had the discussion for the video in front of a live audience, before hitting the stage for their presentations. Interestingly at around the 20 minute mark, Dr. Malone disagrees with Geert about what is causing immune escape. He thinks it's the immunocompromised. I would love to see a Geert rebuttal:)!


 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
Latest interview with Geert. I haven't watched it yet so can't give a summary. But anything with Geert is worth the watch imho. Here he's being interviewed by one of the reporters from New American. You'll see in their summary they say the are the first media to speak to him. hello????? Not sure what they mean because they are most definitely not the first. I think Dr. McMillan was the first actually, but not sure. And that was over a year ago...


Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche: Covid Mass Vaccination Triggering New Pandemics and Epidemics
33 min 44 sec
July 14, 2022
The New American

In his first interview with The New American, renowned scientist Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche described why mass vaccination with non-sterilizing (“leaky”) vaccines could not lead to herd immunity, and why he expected the Covid infection and disease to aggravate in the vaccinated individuals.

The New American is proud to become the first media to speak with Dr. Vanden Bossche about his latest research dedicated to the issue of Covid mass vaccination initiating a chain reaction of new pandemics and epidemics with a potentially catastrophic impact on global health. In addition to that, the doctor explained how the constant Covid reinfections trigger relapse or metastasis of certain cancers in vaccinated people.

If the antiviral treatments are not made massively available to the vaccinated people, the highly vaccinated countries will likely experience a tsunami of hospitalizations and deaths among the vaccinated, especially the elderly and those vaccinated early on, said Dr. Vanden Bossche.

The doctor pleaded with the parents NOT to vaccinate their children against Covid. The vaccination would irreparably damage their innate immune system and leave them vulnerable to infection and re-infection by Covid and a range of other deadly pathogens. That would result in a massive loss of children's lives.

Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche is a world-class certified expert in microbiology and infectious diseases. He also has a Ph.D. in virology and a longstanding career in human vaccinology.

To follow Dr. Vanden Bossche’s work, please go to Home | Voice for Science and Solidarity

To read Dr. Vanden Bossche’s paper, please go to https://www.voiceforscienceandsolid...chain-reaction-of-new-pandemics-and-epidemics

To watch his first interview with The New American, go to Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche: Covid Infection, Disease to Aggravate in Vaccinated - The New American


 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

Excellent SHORT educational videos on the COVID shots
The CDC should be distributing these videos because they help people understand how the COVID shots work and the science behind them. But I seriously doubt that will ever happen.
Steve Kirsch
8 hr ago




Videos for your friends

Here are two excellent videos to consider watching and sharing with your friends. In fact, the second video was so good that sharing it got Dr. Robert Malone banned from Twitter:
  1. Stop the shots (15 minute video and slide deck)
  2. More harm than good (video slides)
I wish the CDC would re-distribute these videos so that the American public is informed as to how the shots work.
But as you know, they don’t want anyone to know that for obvious reasons.

Videos for you

If you’d like a better understanding of how the shots work, I recently ran across some videos from Wishcraft8121 who is one of my followers on Truth Social. He’s been banned from Twitter multiple times which means he’s telling the truth.

The material is excellent and the videos are both just a few minutes long (you’ll likely need to stop the video because it does go FAST):


  1. Lethal by Design (3 minutes)
  2. The use of PEG in the COVID vaccines (2 minutes)
  3. Excess deaths caused by the COVID vaccines (3 minutes)
  4. Lethal by Design (17 minutes)
You’ll need a Truth Social account to view the first 3 videos because Wishcraft hasn’t figured out Rumble permissions, but you can expand the screen once you start the video. The last video is a direct Rumble link. This is Wishcraft’s Rumble channel where you can also view his videos on both COVID and Ukraine.

I love the PEG video because we talked about this in the DarkHorse podcast video with Bret Weinstein and Robert Malone. PEG is required to get the mRNA into the cell. But the problem is that it gets it into cells everywhere in your body, including inside your brain (it allows the vaccine to penetrate the blood-brain barrier).

How did this happen?

We now know the FDA colluded with Moderna to bypass the normal safety checks. See Moderna colluded with the FDA to bypass the normal safety testing.

Are you surprised?
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

The UK government's official data shows they made a huge mistake
They should EITHER admit their data is garbage or that the vaccines should be IMMEDIATELY halted for ages 10 to 14. Ideally, they admit BOTH. Practically speaking, they will do NEITHER.
Steve Kirsch
Jul 15




UH OH!!!

The UK government now has a huge problem. A triply vaxxed child is 45 times more likely to die than an unvaccinated child. That makes the vaccine the biggest child killer ever deployed by any government and makes COVID deaths look like rounding error (45X vs. 0.05X).

Executive summary

I was inspired by this article in the Expose to take a look at the latest UK numbers.

The numbers can be found by downloading the latest dataset (the May 2022 numbers) found on the official UK ONS site.
When I did that, two things jumped out at me:
  1. The “UK numbers are garbage” is confirmed once again by this dataset.
  2. If you believe the UK numbers are right, then you should be jumping up and down and IMMEDIATELY BE DEMANDING a halt to the vaccines for ages 10 to 14.
Details of both claims are explained below.

But here’s the punchline: there is simply no way out of this for the UK government. They must pick either 1 or 2. They must either confirm their numbers are garbage or they must call an immediate halt to the vaccines for 10 to 14.

The UK press should force them to choose which way they want to have their credibility decimated.

My suggestion: They should come clean and admit to both.

Here are the details for each of my assertions.

The UK numbers are garbage

First of all, compliments are due to the UK government for exposing the data. The US government doesn’t expose any data nearly this detailed so it’s impossible to do the proper analyses on the US data because there is no data to use.

The UK government seems to be not including the most interesting metrics to assess safety and efficacy. The Expose points this out; it seems when the numbers work against them, they either stop reporting the data entirely, stop breaking it out, or in this case, not doing the calculation of the deaths per 100K person years so that only more motivated people will take the time and see that there is a huge problem.

For your convenience, you can download my annotated version here. Go to Table 6. My annotations are in Column G. The important numbers that we’ll use below are in red.

We see that the all-cause mortality (ACM) rate for ages 20-24 is reduced by a factor of 2 (compare G21 vs. G28).
That’s impossible! The vaccine isn’t a fountain of youth. It is only claimed to reduce death from COVID, not eliminate deaths from all known diseases.

According to the unvaccinated Row 21, only (43/378) = 8.3% of the deaths are from COVID. So if you have a PERFECT vaccine, ACM can only go down by 8.3%. It cannot go down by 50%.

This is similar to what Professor Norman Fenton has pointed out in his July 13, 2022 article: the COVID vaccines aren’t a fountain of youth but that’s exactly what his analysis found as well.

This is no surprise and isn’t new. I noted this in my May 5, 2022 article when I tried to use the UK data in calculations I found most of the UK ONS data was unusable because it simply made no sense. This is why I chose the row that I did in that particular analysis.

Producing garbage data and then using that garbage data as a basis for public policy is a huge embarrassment for the UK government.

So therefore, their official response will be to label me and Professor Fenton as misinformation spreaders and ignore us. Problem solved!

Well, not so fast.

Because if the UK data is accurate then…

Kids aged 10 to 14 are dying at a rate 45 times higher than normal

If the UK numbers are accurate, they need to halt the vaccines for ages 10 to 14 immediately because it is raising ACM for kids by a factor of 45 (G12/G5).

In other words, the vaccines are the most dangerous intervention in human history for this age group. It makes COVID look like rounding error:

COVID: 5% ACM increase

COVID vaccine: 4400% ACM increase

Some “experts” could “explain” this by claiming that only the kids who were most at risk opted for the third shot and that explains the higher ACM. Only those with an AVERAGE of a 45X higher rate of death opted for the third shot? Show me the evidence please!

And while you’re at it, show me the evidence that ONLY kids with a 15X higher rate of death decided to stick with just 2 doses.

Some people could say “oh the numbers are small for dose 3.” Fine, even if we combine all the numbers for Dose 2 and Dose 3, the ACM death rate doubles for the vaccinated kids. It is supposed to slightly decrease (and for 20-24 year olds it was cut in half as we noted above). Instead it doubled.

Then the excuse will be that the Dose 3 data “skewed” the result… you should only look at the Dose 2 data.
But that doesn’t work either. Kids who just took Dose 2 are also much more likely to die than kids in the unvaccinated group.

There is only one conclusion you can draw from this:

Someone made a huge mistake in approving these vaccines for kids

They had insufficient data to approve these vaccines in the first place since there were no child deaths FROM COVID, there cannot ever be a positive risk benefit.

But now they HAVE data from the real world and it is clearly negative. So what do they do? They ignore it because it makes them look bad.

There is no way you can spin this data as supportive of the vaccine.

The UK government and all governments throughout the world will ignore this because it is inconvenient to talk about it.

Similarly, nobody in the mainstream media will write about it. I’d be willing to bet big money on it (and I’d be thrilled if I lost the bet). Any takers?

If you thought that was bad, it gets even worse

Read this article showing they found the same issues in Israel with excess deaths for young kids who took the vaccine. The Israeli government buried the data, the scientists who did the work though that was unethical to not inform the public, so it was leaked by whistleblowers.

Or watch this video talking about bulk ordering of caskets for babies in the UK.

Also, Fenton just updated his article which now shows the ACM numbers from 2011 to 2019. The ACM numbers for 2020 were 1043 (which seems reasonable due to the increased death from COVID). So how is it possible that the unvaccinated are now dying at a rate of 1474 (40% higher than in 2020) while the vaccinated are dying at a rate of 892.9 (which is 5% less than any normal year)? Both numbers are highly improbable: the 1474 is too high and the 892 is too low.

And I think the true numbers would show the vaccinated are dying at a higher rate than the unvaccinated; it’s pretty unlikely you’re better off if you’re vaccinated.

Why am I pointing this out to you instead of the UK government?

They didn’t. So I did.

Summary

The UK government can’t have their cake and eat it too.

They have to make a decision. They must decide whether their numbers are garbage or whether to stop the vaccine for ages 10 to 14. Either way they decide, it’s a huge embarrassment for the UK government.

The right decision is to admit the truth that both are true: their numbers are fraudulent and they shouldn’t be vaccinating kids without data showing a clear benefit and their data shows the opposite.. That’s what I would do if I were in charge.

What will they do? I know exactly what they will do. They will ignore my analysis and hope that nobody finds out about it. For sure, the mainstream media will never ask them about this data.

That is why it’s important for you to share this article everywhere on all your social media platforms. I adjusted the headline to reduce the risk of censorship.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

Stunning official Canadian data show vaccines now RAISE the risk of death from Covid
Alex Berenson
20 hr ago

Vaccinated people are now more likely to be hospitalized or die from Covid, even after adjusting for fact they're older than the unvaccinated, according to official government estimates from the Canadian province of Manitoba.

In May, the most recent month for which figures are available, only 9 percent of Covid deaths and 14 percent of hospital admissions in Manitoba occurred among unvaccinated people, even though they are 17 percent of the population.

Manitoba, which has about 1.4 million residents, also provides figures that are adjusted for the fact that vaccinated and boosted people tend to be older.

Those show that in May, vaccinated but unboosted people were about 50 percent more likely to be hospitalized or die of Covid than unvaccinated people. People who had received boosters had roughly the same risk of hospitalization or death as the unvaccinated.

(Red is unvaccinated, green is vaccinated, blue is boosted. See how the green bar is higher? That means vaccinated people are more likely to die of Covid. Otherwise, everything is fine.)





SOURCE


These figures and estimates differ markedly from those the Centers for Disease Control have provided for American Covid deaths. But they are likely to be far more accurate. American hospitals and health authorities classify Covid deaths and hospitalizations as occurring in the unvaccinated until proven otherwise.

Countries with national health insurance can match their vaccination registries more easily against hospital admissions and deaths, and they have consistently shown much higher percentages of Covid deaths in vaccinated people.

Still, the data from Manitoba appear to mark the first time that any government agency has actually found a higher risk of death in vaccinated people.
.
 

Zoner

Veteran Member
I pick the ones I think are most important. I wonder if posting pages of posts a night is too much for someone who wants to quickly check into the thread and they may just close it up and miss the important ones which to me means my time posting all of it was actually counterproductive. So I'm trying something new - posting fewer posts, but more important ones, so that if someone checks the thread they don't get bored and actually see all the ones posted. This saves me time and it may work better to not have reader's eyes glaze over, especially with the longer more scientific substacks which take a while to format. If you see something I haven't posted, please do post it if you think it's important!

HD
Thanks HD. There is a LOT of info out there on COVID and the vaccines etc. I have a question for you. I recently heard Dr. Naomi Wolf say that everything is coming from China. All the parts of the Pfizer vaccine, all their pills, everything, even the testing. She believes there are nano particles on the swabs. What do you think? The unvaxxed think they're safe because they don't get jabbed. But what about the testing? What's your take?
Not sure if this works if you don't have telegram.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
Thanks HD. There is a LOT of info out there on COVID and the vaccines etc. I have a question for you. I recently heard Dr. Naomi Wolf say that everything is coming from China. All the parts of the Pfizer vaccine, all their pills, everything, even the testing. She believes there are nano particles on the swabs. What do you think? The unvaxxed think they're safe because they don't get jabbed. But what about the testing? What's your take?
Not sure if this works if you don't have telegram.

I don't have telegram but I've heard her say that on other videos. I don't know, I am as much at loss on this as you are. If someone has covid symptoms and is reluctant to take the test, then they should assume they are positive and behave accordingly. Not taking the test and then going around spreading it is not an answer. Then again tests are only 50% accurate - so, even if you do test, and it comes back negative - you should assume you are sick with BA5 and stay home. I am reading post after post right here on TB of people being sick, getting others sick and using the excuse they got a negative test. BA5 is more contagious than measles (scroll up for that article). I blame this on the media and the CDC not doing their job letting folks know that if you're sick you have covid. Period, end of sentence. Which John Campbell just said in the video I posted tonight - in the first minute basically he said it. My thoughts again (not Dr. Campbell): They'll push vaccines, they'll push masks - but they won't come out and just say STAY THE FREAK HOME IF YOU'RE SICK AND STOP GETTING OTHERS SICK. Politically incorrect I guess because it may wake people up to the fact that the vaccines are not going to stop this, nor are the boosters. Which of course they don't want to do when they are getting ready to push another booster...

HD
 

Zoner

Veteran Member
I don't have telegram but I've heard her say that on other videos. I don't know, I am as much at loss on this as you are. If someone has covid symptoms and is reluctant to take the test, then they should assume they are positive and behave accordingly. Not taking the test and then going around spreading it is not an answer. Then again tests are only 50% accurate - so, even if you do test, and it comes back negative - you should assume you are sick with BA5 and stay home. I am reading post after post right here on TB of people being sick, getting others sick and using the excuse they got a negative test. BA5 is more contagious than measles (scroll up for that article). I blame this on the media and the CDC not doing their job letting folks know that if you're sick you have covid. Period, end of sentence. Which John Campbell just said in the video I posted tonight - in the first minute basically he said it. My thoughts again (not Dr. Campbell): They'll push vaccines, they'll push masks - but they won't come out and just say STAY THE FREAK HOME IF YOU'RE SICK AND STOP GETTING OTHERS SICK. Politically incorrect I guess because it may wake people up to the fact that the vaccines are not going to stop this, nor are the boosters. Which of course they don't want to do when they are getting ready to push another booster...

HD
Thank you and what you’re saying about just staying home if you’re sick is so important so others don’t get sick.
I have an upcoming trip to Guatemala that requires testing to get into the country and I’m thinking about bringing my own swab and see if they’ll use that. I just don’t know if there’s anything on the swabs that they’re using especially if they’re coming from China.
 

jward

passin' thru
Deborah Birx’s “Silent Invasion”: a Guide to Destroying America From Within
If she did do it, this is how it would have happened…

Michael P Senger
Jul 14




Part of the fun of reading Snake Oil: How Xi Jinping Shut Down the World is that you get to put yourself in the dictator’s shoes. In the book, Xi is an allegory for the Chinese Communist Party in the 21st century. Xi’s “lines” break up the writing with dark humor, a satirical jab at western elites’ blasé attitude toward an advanced, totalitarian regime with overtly-manipulative goals. The book invites you to see through the bad guy’s eyes and imagine just how easy it was to subvert the free world into totalitarianism using the response to a perfectly banal virus.
Alas, to that end, my book has been upstaged by the work of Deborah Birx, White House Coronavirus Response Coordinator, one of the “Trifecta” of three leading officials behind Covid lockdowns in the United States. Virtually every page of Birx’s monstrosity of a book, Silent Invasion, reads like a how-to guide in subverting a democratic superpower from within, as could only be told through the personal account of someone who was on the front lines doing just that.
Notably, though Birx’s memoir has earned relatively few reviews on Amazon, it’s earned rave reviews from Chinese state media, a feat not shared even by far-more-popular pro-lockdown books such as those by Michael Lewis and Lawrence Wright.



The glowing response from Chinese state media should come as no surprise, however, because every sentence of Birx’s book reads like it was written by the CCP itself. Chapter 1 opens with what she claims was her first impression of the virus.
I can still see the words splashed across my computer screen in the early morning hours of January 3. Though we were barely into 2020, I was stuck in an old routine, waking well before dawn and scanning news headlines online. On the BBC’s site, one caught my attention: “China Pneumonia Outbreak: Mystery Virus Probed in Wuhan.”
Indeed, as recounted in Snake Oil, that BBC article, which was posted at approximately 9:00 AM EST on January 3, 2020, was the first in a western news organization to discuss the outbreak of a new virus in Wuhan. Apparently, Birx was scanning British news headlines just as it appeared. What are the odds!
Birx wastes no time in telling us where she got her philosophy of disease mitigation, recalling how she immediately thought Chinese citizens “knew what had worked” against SARS-1: Masks and distancing.
Government officials and citizens across Asia knew both the pervasive fear and the personal response that had worked before to mitigate the loss of life and the economic damage wrought by SARS and MERS. They wore masks. They decreased the frequency and size of social gatherings. Crucially, based on their recent experience, the entire citizenry and local doctors were ringing alarm bells loudly and early. Lives were on the line—lots of them. They knew what had worked before, and they would do it again.
Birx spends countless pages tut-tutting the CCP for its “cover-up” of the virus (though Chinese state media apparently didn’t mind, as they gushed about her book anyway), which is funny because then she tells us:
On January 3, the same day the BBC piece ran, the Chinese government officially notified the United States of the outbreak. Bob Redfield, the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, was contacted by his Chinese counterpart, George F. Gao.
Note, January 3 is also the same day the hero whistleblower Li Wenliang was supposedly admonished by authorities for sending a WeChat message about a “cover-up” of the outbreak. So on the same day Li was “admonished,” the head of China’s CDC literally called US CDC Director Robert Redfield to share the exact same information Li supposedly shared.

Off to a strong start. But from here, Birx’s abomination of book only gets worse. Much worse.
A page later, she tells us how traumatized she still is at seeing all those videos of Wuhan residents collapsing and falling dead in January 2020, and praises the “courageous doctor” who shared them online.
The video showed a hallway crowded with patients slumped in chairs. Some of the masked people leaned against the wall for support. The camera didn’t pan so much as zigzag while the Chinese doctor maneuvered her smartphone up the narrow corridor. My eye was drawn to two bodies wrapped in sheets lying on the floor amid the cluster of patients and staff. The doctor’s colleagues, their face shields and other personal protective equipment in place, barely glanced at the lens as she captured the scene. They looked past her, as if at a harrowing future they could all see and hoped to survive. I tried to increase the volume, but there was no sound. My mind seamlessly filled that void, inserting the sounds from my past, sounds from other wards, other places of great sorrow. I had been here before. I had witnessed scenes like this across the globe, in HIV ravaged communities— when hospitals were full of people dying of AIDS before we had treatment or before we ensured treatment to those who needed it. I had lived this, and it was etched permanently in my brain: the unimaginable, devastating loss of mothers, fathers, children, grandparents, brothers, sisters.
Staring at my computer screen, I was horrified by the images from Wuhan, the suffering they portrayed, but also because they confirmed what I’d suspected for the last three weeks: Not only was the Chinese government underreporting the real numbers of the infected and dying in Wuhan and elsewhere, but the situation was definitely far more dire than most people outside that city realized. Up until now, I’d been only reading or hearing about the virus. Now it had been made visible by a courageous doctor sharing this video online.
As a reminder, Birx’s book was published in April 2022. The videos Birx is recalling were all proven fake by the spring of 2020.

In the next paragraph, Birx tells us how she grew even more determined after seeing that the Chinese had built a hospital in 10 days to fight the virus.
Dotting it were various pieces of earth-moving equipment, enough of them in various shapes and sizes that I briefly wondered if the photograph was of a manufacturing plant where the newly assembled machines were on display. Quickly, I learned that the machines were in Wuhan and that they were handling the first phase of preparatory work for the construction of a one-thousand-bed hospital to be completed in just ten days’ time… The Chinese may not have been giving accurate data about the numbers of cases and deaths, but the rapid spread of this disease could be counted in other ways—including in how many Chinese workers were being employed to build new facilities to relieve the pressure on the existing, and impressive, Wuhan health service centers. You build a thousand-bed hospital in ten days only if you are experiencing unrelenting community spread of a highly contagious virus that has eluded your containment measures and is now causing serious illness on a massive scale.
This hospital construction, again, was proven fake literally days after Chinese state media posted it.

So just to recap, here we have Deborah Birx—the woman who did more than almost any other person in the United States to promote and prolong Covid lockdowns, silencing anyone who disagreed with her, to the incessant praise of mainstream media outlets—telling us she’d been inspired by all those images of Wuhan residents falling dead and constructing a hospital in 10 days, and still didn’t realize they were fake two years after they’d been proven fake.
And that’s just Chapter 1.
 

jward

passin' thru
continued

Birx then spends hundreds of pages recounting her clandestine political maneuvers—from the day she stepped foot in the White House—to get as much of America as possible to stay in lockdown for as long as possible, without making it look like a “lockdown.”
At this point, I wasn’t about to use the words lockdown or shutdown. If I had uttered either of those in early March, after being at the White House only one week, the political, nonmedical members of the task force would have dismissed me as too alarmist, too doom-and-gloom, too reliant on feelings and not facts. They would have campaigned to lock me down and shut me up.
Birx proudly recalls using “flatten-the-curve guidance” to manipulate the President’s administration into consenting to lockdowns that were stricter than they realized.
On Monday and Tuesday, while sorting through the CDC data issues, we worked simultaneously to develop the flatten-the-curve guidance I hoped to present to the vice president at week’s end. Getting buy-in on the simple mitigation measures every American could take was just the first step leading to longer and more aggressive interventions. We had to make these palatable to the administration by avoiding the obvious appearance of a full Italian lockdown. At the same time, we needed the measures to be effective at slowing the spread, which meant matching as closely as possible what Italy had done—a tall order. We were playing a game of chess in which the success of each move was predicated on the one before it.
Never mind that this kind of manipulation by a presidential advisor is probably not legal. Birx doubles down, inadvertently admitting where that arbitrary number “ten” came from for her guidance as to the size of social gatherings, while admitting her real goal was “zero”—no social contact of any kind, anywhere.
I had settled on ten knowing that even that was too many, but I figured that ten would at least be palatable for most Americans—high enough to allow for most gatherings of immediate family but not enough for large dinner parties and, critically, large weddings, birthday parties, and other mass social events.… Similarly, if I pushed for zero (which was actually what I wanted and what was required), this would have been interpreted as a “lockdown”—the perception we were all working so hard to avoid.
Birx divulges her strategy of using federal advisories to give cover to state governors to impose mandates and restrictions.
The White House would “encourage,” but the states could “recommend” or, if needed, “mandate.” In short, we were handing governors and their public health officials a template, a state-level permission slip they could use to enact a specific response that was appropriate for the people under their jurisdiction. The fact that the guidelines would be coming from a Republican White House gave political cover to any Republican governors skeptical of federal overreach
Then, Birx recalls with delight as her strategy led the states to shut down one by one.
[T]he recommendations served as the basis for governors to mandate the flattening-the-curve shutdowns. The White House had handed down guidance, and the governors took that ball and ran with it…With the White House’s “this is serious” message, governors now had “permission” to mount a proportionate response and, one by one, other states followed suit. California was first, doing so on March 18. New York followed on March 20. Illinois, which had declared its own state of emergency on March 9, issued shelter-in-place orders on March 21. Louisiana did so on the twenty-second. In relatively short order by the end of March and the first week of April, there were few holdouts. The circuit-breaking, flattening-the-curve shutdown had begun.
All that’s missing is the maniacal laugh.
In what may be the most damning quote of the entire US response to Covid, in one paragraph, Birx tells us that she’d always intended “two weeks to slow the spread” as a lie and immediately wanted those two weeks extended, despite having no data to show why that was necessary.
No sooner had we convinced the Trump administration to implement our version of a two-week shutdown than I was trying to figure out how to extend it. Fifteen Days to Slow the Spread was a start, but I knew it would be just that. I didn’t have the numbers in front of me yet to make the case for extending it longer, but I had two weeks to get them. However hard it had been to get the fifteen-day shutdown approved, getting another one would be more difficult by many orders of magnitude.
This is one of several quotes in which Birx refers to “our version” of a lockdown, though she never makes it clear what the original “version” of a lockdown is. As a matter of fact, though Birx spends hundreds of pages boasting about her scorched-earth crusade for lockdowns across America, she never once explains why she wanted this or why she felt it was a good idea, other than some brief asides about China’s supposed success using social distancing during SARS-1.
Birx’s apparent plan to almost singlehandedly destroy the world’s primary democratic superpower is going swimmingly until she meets the book’s leading antagonist: Dr. Scott Atlas. To Birx’s disgust, Atlas takes a strong stand for all the things she loathes most—things like human rights, democratic governance, and, most of all, freedom.
Birx lists Atlas’s “dangerous assertions”:
That schools could open everywhere without any precautions (neither masking nor testing), regardless of the status of the spread in the community.
That children did not transmit the virus.
That children didn’t get ill.
That there was no risk to anyone young.
That long Covid-19 was being overplayed.
That heart-damage findings were incidental.
That comorbidities did not play a critical role in communities, especially among teachers.
That merely employing some physical distance overcame the virus’s ill effects.
That masks were overrated and not needed.
That the Coronavirus Task Force had gotten the country into this situation by promoting testing.
That testing falsely increased case counts
in the United States in comparison with other countries.
That targeted testing and isolation constituted a lockdown, plain and simple, and weren’t needed.
That every word of Atlas’s assertions was obviously 100% true only made them all the more dangerous. As Alexandr Solzhenitsyn said, “One word of truth shall outweigh the whole world,” and nothing would derail the world’s communist destiny faster than letting these self-evident truths spread freely.
In particular, CNN’s Sanjay Gupta was a key component of my strategy… He specifically spoke about a mild disease—another way to describe silent spread. I saw this as a sign that he got it. As a doctor himself, he could see what I was seeing. He could serve as a very good outside-government spokesperson, echoing my message that family members and others they were in close contact with could unknowingly bring the virus home, resulting in a catastrophic and deadly event.
Birx frequently emphasizes her fixation with the concept of “asymptomatic spread.” In her mind, the less sick a person is, the more “insidious” they are:
Asymptomatic, presymptomatic, and even mildly symptomatic spread are particularly insidious because, with these, many people don’t know they are infected. They may not take precautions or may not practice good hygiene, and they don’t isolate.
As Scott Atlas recalls in his own book, A Plague Upon Our House:
Birx commented on the importance of testing asymptomatic people. She argued that the only way to figure out who was sick was to test them. She memorably exclaimed, “That’s why it’s so dangerous—people don’t even know they’re sick!” I felt myself looking around the room, wondering if I was the only one who had heard this.
Birx spends roughly the next 150 pages of her book recalling her anguish as Atlas thwarted her plans to keep America in a near-permanent state of lockdown. As Atlas recalls:
She threw a fit, right there, in front of everyone, as we stood near the door before leaving the Oval Office. She was furious, screaming at me, “NEVER DO THAT AGAIN!! AND IN THE OVAL!!” I felt pretty bad, because she was so angry. I had absolutely no desire for conflict. But did she actually expect me to lie to the president, just to cover up for her? I responded, “Sorry, but he asked me a question, so I answered it.”
Indeed, Birx’s memoir corroborates the testimony in Atlas’s book of the outsized role he played in bringing lockdowns in the United States to an end. More than anything, this involved standing up to Birx who, contrary to popular belief, did more than even Fauci to promote and prolong lockdowns across the United States. As Atlas explains:
Dr. Fauci held court in the public eye on a daily basis, so frequently that many misconstrue his role as being in charge. However, it was really Dr. Birx who articulated Task Force policy. All the advice from the Task Force to the states came from Dr. Birx. All written recommendations about their on-the-ground policies were from Dr. Birx. Dr. Birx conducted almost all the visits to states on behalf of the Task Force.
Unlike the vast majority of our leaders and institutions, Atlas did not shrug this responsibility, and for that, our entire nation owes him a special thanks. I vividly recall reading Atlas’s articles in early 2020, correctly predicting that “The COVID-19 shutdown will cost Americans millions of years of life,” a rare light in that dark, dystopian period.
Still, I don’t want to give anyone in this story too much credit. How is it possible that the woman who did more than any other person to shut down the United States doesn’t know that all those videos from Wuhan were fake, two years after FBI Director Christopher Wray publicly stated, on July 7, 2020:
We have heard from federal, state, and even local officials that Chinese diplomats are aggressively urging support for China’s handling of the COVID-19 crisis. Yes, this is happening at both the federal and state levels. Not that long ago, we had a state senator who was recently even asked to introduce a resolution supporting China’s response to the pandemic.
What has the FBI been doing this whole time? As Atlas recalls:
Seema laughingly related that she was frantically looking around as the usual outlandish nonsense was being put forth, knowing that I would have been the one to push back.
Then she got to the point. “Scott, we need to get rid of Birx. She is a disaster! She keeps saying the same things over and over; she’s incredibly insecure; she doesn’t understand what’s going on. We need to eliminate her moving forward.”
Well no wonder Birx was “insecure.” She’d just spent the better part of a year in the White House orchestrating unprecedented crimes against humanity on her own people. These lockdowns ultimately killed tens of thousands of young Americans while failing to meaningfully slow the spread of the coronavirus everywhere they were tried. Whether she did so wittingly or unwittingly, it’s absolutely unseemly that no one around her put a stop to it.
Atlas recalls being baffled as to why Birx had ever been appointed to her role in the first place:
I also asked how she had been appointed—that seemed to be a bit of a mystery to everyone. I was told by Jared, more than once, “Dr. Birx is 100 percent MAGA!”—as if that should make all the other issues somehow less important. Secretary Azar denied appointing her during his stint running the Task Force. I was told by the VP’s chief of staff, Marc Short, that Pence “inherited her” when he took over as chair of the Task Force. No one seemed to know.
Jared Kushner’s reaction is ironic, given Birx’s later admission that she “had a pact with medical bureaucrats—Anthony Fauci, Robert Redfield, Stephen Hahn and perhaps others—that all would resign if even one were removed by then-President Donald Trump.” Democrats in Congress are now defending Birx from scrutiny for the role she played in lockdowns in the United States.

As it turns out, Birx was not “100% MAGA.” She wasn’t even 10% MAGA.
Now, I’m not saying Deborah Birx is a CCP agent. I’m just saying that if she was an agent for Xi Jinping’s stated goal of gradually stripping the world of “independent judiciaries,” “human rights,” “western freedom,” “civil society,” and “freedom of the press,” then every word of her book would read like that of Silent Invasion. If she did do it, this is how it would have happened.
But in researching this topic for over two years, few things have made my hair stand on end more than the clues Birx gives about the man who did appoint her to her role. This man, who will be the subject of my next deep dive, is a little-known, clean-cut, Mandarin-fluent intelligence operative who arguably played a greater role than even Fauci or Birx in bringing China’s totalitarian virus response to the United States, acting as a direct liaison between Chinese scientists and the White House on key items of pseudoscience including asymptomatic spread, universal masking, and remdesivir: Matthew Pottinger.
Michael P Senger is an attorney and author of Snake Oil: How Xi Jinping Shut Down the World. Want to support my work? Get the book. Already got the book? Leave a quick review.
The New Normal is a reader-supported
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
Thank you and what you’re saying about just staying home if you’re sick is so important so others don’t get sick.
I have an upcoming trip to Guatemala that requires testing to get into the country and I’m thinking about bringing my own swab and see if they’ll use that. I just don’t know if there’s anything on the swabs that they’re using especially if they’re coming from China.

Do they test you or do you bring them a test result? If you test yourself I've read that some are getting themselves to sneeze and then testing the snot that comes out, the deeper it comes from the better if you want an accurate test and don't want to stick it up your nose. If they test you I don't know if they'll allow you to do it that way. As for using your own cotton swab, I think there is something on the swab that is part of the test, you can't subtsitute a normal qtip, but I could be wrong about that. Try googling it and see what comes up and if you find anything out. let us know, I'm curious now too if you can use your own swabs.

HD
 

Zoner

Veteran Member
Do they test you or do you bring them a test result? If you test yourself I've read that some are getting themselves to sneeze and then testing the snot that comes out, the deeper it comes from the better if you want an accurate test and don't want to stick it up your nose. If they test you I don't know if they'll allow you to do it that way. As for using your own cotton swab, I think there is something on the swab that is part of the test, you can't subtsitute a normal qtip, but I could be wrong about that. Try googling it and see what comes up and if you find anything out. let us know, I'm curious now too if you can use your own swabs.

HD
Will do
 

bracketquant

Veteran Member
Thank you and what you’re saying about just staying home if you’re sick is so important so others don’t get sick.
I have an upcoming trip to Guatemala that requires testing to get into the country and I’m thinking about bringing my own swab and see if they’ll use that. I just don’t know if there’s anything on the swabs that they’re using especially if they’re coming from China.
Figuratively, Klaus Schwab is on the swab.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
I did a little research. You can not use a cotton swab. If you find a polyester one or a rayon one you might be able to use one of those. You may have to go to a medical warehouse type place to find it. And then maybe it's made in China which you are trying to avoid, so make sure to ask where it's manufactured. And of course, the person testing you still may not let you use your own, but if you want to try bringing your own that's where I'd start.

HD
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

As U.S. COVID Hospitalizations Climb, a Chronic Nursing Shortage Is Worsening
Christine Chung - NYT
Sat, July 16, 2022, 10:23 AM

American hospitals are once again filling up with coronavirus patients — but not with nurses to care for them. The nation’s chronic shortage of registered nurses is as bad in some parts of the country as it has ever been, experts say, and it is showing signs of getting worse.

Hospitalizations have risen steadily in recent weeks, and the daily average number of people in hospitals who are infected with the coronavirus now exceeds 39,000, the highest it has been since the waning days of the first omicron surge in early March. The rise is being driven largely by BA.5, a rapidly spreading omicron subvariant that is the best yet at evading some antibodies from previous infections or vaccines.

But in the face of the growing need, hospitals across the country say they still cannot find enough nurses.
Sign up for The Morning newsletter from the New York Times

In New York state, the shortage is at an “all-time high,” said Matthew Allen, a registered nurse at Mount Sinai Hospital in New York City and a board member of the New York State Nurses Association. “It’s just historic, more than it’s ever been before,” Allen said, noting that as of last week, Mount Sinai’s hospital network alone had 771 unfilled registered nurse and nurse practitioner positions.

Nearly 14% of nursing jobs at acute care hospitals in Massachusetts are unfilled, a shortfall that has doubled in size since 2019, according to a recent survey by the Massachusetts Health and Hospital Association. The association found more than 5,000 unfilled nursing positions at hospitals in the state.

To close the gaps, hospitals are offering financial incentives for new hires, bringing in more freelance nurses and in some cases cutting services that they cannot adequately staff to provide.

Martin General Hospital, a 49-bed facility in eastern North Carolina, said this week that it would temporarily shut down its intensive care unit starting in August because of the difficulty of finding nurses.

“The critical shortage levels are even more challenging in rural areas,” hospital CEO John Jacobson said in a statement.

At Johnson Memorial Hospital in Stafford Springs, Connecticut, inpatient and outpatient surgery has been halted since June 9. The hospital said Wednesday that it would seek to discontinue inpatient surgical services permanently, and would shut down its labor and delivery unit, in part because of staffing shortages, according to Mary Orr, a hospital spokesperson.

The shortage of nurses in Florida is “probably the worst” that hospitals have experienced in decades, said Mary Mayhew, CEO of the Florida Hospital Association, which represents more than 200 hospitals and health systems in the state.

Part of the problem, Mayhew said, was the large number of nurses who were leaving regular hospital jobs to earn more money as temporary and contract nurses. “We have a turnover rate that is 25 to 30%, the highest we have ever seen in the decades we’ve been tracking that data,” she said.

The reliance of the association’s member hospitals on temporary nursing staff, once minimal, has soared more than fivefold since 2019, Mayhew said.

Broward Health, a health care system in Florida, is trying to fill 400 vacant nursing positions by offering bonuses of up to $20,000 and other incentives, a hospital spokesperson said.

Demand for nurses is projected to keep growing significantly in the United States. The McKinsey consulting firm projected in a report in May that the nation could face a shortage of up to 450,000 nurses by 2025.

Demand for travel nurses, who are brought in from out of town by staffing agencies to fill gaps at hospitals for a few weeks or months, climbed to a record high in 2021, and after receding somewhat earlier this year, has been rising steadily again since May, according to April Hansen, group president at Aya Healthcare, one of the nation’s major providers of travel nurses.

“It’s been like a roller coaster,” Hansen said. “We are at a point in time now where demand is more than double the steady-state demand that existed in pre-pandemic times.”

She said wages for travel nurses were 20% higher now than before the pandemic took hold, and at one point had spiked to about double the pre-pandemic average.

While Aya Healthcare declined to be specific about the wages, another staffing company, Vivian Health, said in a June report that the national average for travel nurse pay was $3,004 a week, a 23% increase from the previous year’s average of $2,450.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
More babies getting sick with viruses that are on the rise now. We know what Geert and Dr. Alexander would say :(


(fair use applies)

Virus that can cause severe illness in babies seen in multiple states, CDC cautions
Tim Stelloh
Fri, July 15, 2022, 12:39 AM

Health care providers in multiple states have reported a virus that can cause seizures, meningitis and other severe illnesses in infants under 3 months old, federal officials said Tuesday.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued an alert notifying doctors and public health departments that cases of parechovirus have been seen in newborns and young infants since May.

The alert doesn't say which states have seen infections in young children or how many cases have been reported.

The advisory notes that because there is no systematic surveillance for parechovirus it isn't clear how the number of cases compares to earlier seasons. But increased testing in recent years could account for a higher number of cases, the agency said.

Every positive case recorded by the agency has involved PeV-A3, the type of parechovirus that most often causes severe disease, the CDC said.

The virus, a common childhood pathogen that circulates in the summer and fall and spreads through sneezing, coughing, saliva and feces, causes less serious illness in children older than 6 months, the agency said. Symptoms include a rash, an upper respiratory tract infection and fever.

Experts who have examined the spinal fluid of babies with severe parechovirus infections have found that their white blood cells have vanished or nearly disappeared.

There is no treatment for the virus.

The alert encourages doctors to test for the virus and to keep infants hospitalized with infections together to avoid spreading the disease to nurseries or neonatal intensive care units.

CORRECTION (July 15, 2022, 12 p.m. ET): A previous version of this article misstated when the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued an alert about cases of parechovirus. It was Tuesday, not Thursday.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

How Many Times Can You Get COVID-19? Experts Discuss Coronavirus Reinfections
Sarah Jacoby - TODAY
Fri, July 15, 2022, 3:52 PM

Now in the midst of yet another COVID-19 surge in the U.S., some people may find themselves recovering from a coronavirus infection or even reinfection.

As the virus mutates and your protection from a previous infection wanes, you can be reinfected by the coronavirus. So even if you got sick during the previous delta, omicron or BA.2 waves, that doesn’t mean you’re immune from the other coronavirus variants and subvariants that are taking over now.

Right now, the BA.5 variant is fueling the majority of cases in the U.S., according to data from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention. But other related variants — including BA.4 and BA.2.12.1 — are still out there.

While getting COVID-19 can provide some protection against a future coronavirus infection for a short time, experts say it's much safer to rely on vaccines and boosters for that protection instead. And if you got COVID-19 previously, you should still get vaccinated to protect yourself and those around you in the future.

Can you get reinfected with the coronavirus?

Yes, it's definitely possible to get COVID-19 more than once.

"Even before the virus started to turn into different variants, even with the original strain that was circulating, there were already many documented cases of people getting reinfected," Dr. Otto Yang, professor of medicine in the division of infectious diseases and of microbiology, immunology and molecular genetics at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, told TODAY.

That's not particularly surprising considering that you can be infected and reinfected within a year by pre-COVID coronaviruses that cause the common cold, he said.

As more variants emerge, including the BA.5 strain, reinfections only become more likely because those variants can potentially evade the immune protection you already have.

"If you had delta, you can get omicron — definitely," Dr. Bernard Camins, medical director for infection prevention at the Mount Sinai Health System, told TODAY. And the reverse is true as well; if you had an infection with the omicron variant, you can still get delta. That's because "the spike protein of the delta variant is very different from the spike protein of omicron," Camins said.

The coronavirus spike protein is what the virus uses to infect human cells. Antibodies that you might develop after a previous COVID-19 infection "have to bind to a really specific area of the spike protein to block the virus," Yang explained.

If the spike protein keeps changing in significant ways, antibodies aren't as able to do their jobs to protect you from infection. So, if more coronavirus variants emerge, that makes reinfections more likely.

How many times can you get infected with the coronavirus?

Whether or not you'll be reinfected — and how many times you'll be reinfected — depends on a few factors, Michael Gale, Ph.D., an immunologist at the University of Washington, told TODAY.

The first key is variants. As mutations arise, especially in the coronavirus's spike protein, they can help the virus evade the natural defenses that the body builds up after an infection. Next is the community level of protection and spread. If the virus is able to spread widely within a community, there's a better chance you'll be exposed.

But whether the exposure will lead to another infection can come down to individual differences in biology and behavior. Some people naturally develop a more robust response after vaccination or an infection, which will provide more protection down the line, Gale explained.

If it feels like reinfections are becoming more common, there is some data to back that up: Researchers in South Africa recently found that the omicron wave made reinfections significantly more likely than they were during the previous delta and beta waves. And with new omicron subvariants taking over, reinfections could become even more frequent.

The original omicron variant is similar enough to its subvariants that “immunity to BA.1 might offer you some protection against the others,” Gale said. “But they’re different enough that, depending on the individual, you could also you could get reinfected with a different omicron variant.”

In fact, other recent research, published to a preprint server, found that it was possible for people get BA.2 infections after an omicron infection — and that the two infections could occur less than 60 days apart. Other research, published in Nature, found that an omicron infection doesn’t necessarily protect against infections with emerging variants BA.2.12.1, BA.4 or BA.5.

So, will COVID-19 eventually be like the common cold, infecting us multiple times in a year? "It could be, as long as it keeps changing," Gale said.

And we may reach a point where people can get infected within a few weeks rather than months, he said. "It just depends on the individual." Those individual biological and behavioral differences, combined with the dynamics of a virus that's still changing rapidly, may make it possible for some people to become infected more frequently than we're used to.

In fact, experts told TODAY that the BA.5 variant is better than previous strains at getting around the protection we have from vaccines and past infections. But the norm will likely still be for people to have at least a few months in between infections, they said.

"Typically, it would be a few months as your antibodies from the previous infection start to wane and you get exposed to a new variant," Gale explained. "(At that point), you have lesser antibody protection, and the virus is different enough that it could confer a new infection."

One thing that would help prevent that is for the entire population to develop immunity to omicron, Gale said, ideally through a variant-specific booster or second-generation COVID-19 vaccine. Just last month, the Food and Drug Administration directed manufacturers to include protection against subvariants BA.4 and BA.5 (along with the original strain) in new COVID-19 vaccines. And the FDA anticipates those new vaccines becoming available in the fall.

We can also continue to use those familiar public health tools (such as vaccines, boosters, tests and masks) which will prevent infections and reduce the chances for more variants to develop.

How severe are coronavirus reinfections?

Generally, reinfections are milder than the initial infection regardless of which variants you're infected with, the experts said.

That's partly because, even if your antibodies aren't able to muster enough protection against getting infected, the protection from your T-cells — another major player in the immune system — will still help protect you from the most severe consequences of the disease even if you get infected, Yang said.

"T-cells are not restricted by recognizing any one area of the spike," he said. "They're not really affected as much or at all by different variants. They should act just as well against omicron as against delta as against the prior variants."

But Camins noted that what experts may define as a "mild" infection can still feel subjectively awful — and, of course, cause disruptions in your daily life. "In most cases, the symptoms are less severe, meaning your likelihood of death or severe disease is lower," he said. But if your symptoms cause you to miss work for a prolonged period of time or it takes you a few weeks to recover, "that's still pretty significant" even if it doesn't send you to the hospital.

And there is still the small chance that you may experience severe symptoms or complications — or that you'll spread the virus to someone with a weakened immune system or other underlying condition that puts them at a higher risk.

How long does immunity from a previous COVID-19 infection last?

Having had COVID-19 in the past will protect you to some degree from reinfection in the future. But you may have less protection against other strains of the virus, especially if emerging variants have mutations that make them significantly different from the version you were originally infected with, Gale said.

In general, the experts said that you'll have some protection for about three to six months after a COVID-19 infection. But the protection you’ll get from this type of “natural immunity” can be unpredictable, Yang said, meaning there's no guarantee you won’t be reinfected in this time frame.

People who have more severe bouts of COVID-19, meaning people who were hospitalized, typically end up with more robust protection from the virus, he explained. But on the other hand, that also probably means they have a risk factor that made it more likely for them to get COVID-19 once — and people in that situation really don't want to get it again.

A CDC study published in November underscores just how much better it is to get protection through vaccination than infection: Among 7,300 patients hospitalized with COVID-like symptoms, those who were unvaccinated but had previously had the illness were five times more likely to test positive for the infection than those who were vaccinated (and didn't have any record of a previous COVID-19 infection).

Of course, getting that protection via infection also comes with the risks of long COVID, as well as hospitalization and even death. So, if you had COVID-19 and aren't vaccinated, it's still worth getting the shots to protect you in the future.

What can you do to protect yourself from COVID-19 reinfections?

To prevent COVID-19 reinfections, you can use the same public health strategies that we know can help prevent an initial coronavirus infection. That includes getting vaccinated and boosted, wearing a mask in public (especially an N95 or KN95 respirator, Camins said), getting tested when appropriate and focusing on ventilation.

But some people are more likely to get COVID-19 and therefore to get it more than once. That includes those with certain underlying conditions or who are taking medications that suppress the immune system, such as those with uncontrolled diabetes or autoimmune diseases, as well as those undergoing chemotherapy.

Reducing the amount of the virus that's circulating in your community will keep you and those around you safer, including those who might have risk factors that could make COVID-19 more severe for them.

"It's not necessarily just about you," Yang said. "It may be that you had mild COVID and that if you get infected again, it will be mild COVID. But we should be thinking as a society about everybody."
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

The BA.5 'ninja' COVID-19 variant is now dominant in Florida. What that means, and what to do

C. A. Bridges, Palm Beach Post
Fri, July 15, 2022, 10:52 AM

Remember COVID?

After two years of warnings, testing, vaccinations, masking, isolating, boosters, political back-and-forths and just general pandemic fatigue it's understandable that people want to get on with their lives and forget about the whole ordeal.

But people are getting sick again thanks to the newest, highly transmissible omicron subvariant BA.5. And, worse, many of them are people contracting the virus again despite vaccinations or immunity from previous infections.

According to the latest report from the Centers for Disease Control, the BA.5 variant now accounts for 65% of all reported COVID cases in the U.S. and 66.5% of all reported cases in Region 4, which includes Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North and South Carolina, and Tennessee.

What is the new BA.5 'ninja' coronavirus variant?

Dr. Eric Topol, head of the Scripps Research Translational Institute, called BA.5 “the worst variant yet.”

The omicron strain of COVID-19 is a relatively mild version of the COVID-19 virus in that symptoms and the chances of disease and death are lower than with the original virus or the delta strain.

But the omicron variant and its subvariants like BA.4 and BA.5 are much easier to spread around, and BA.5 is the most contagious yet with an increased ability to get around vaccinations and immunity from previous infections.

Remember, the rising counts we have are based on the official COVID case numbers and hospitalizations. Most people are testing themselves at home now and those numbers, more often than not, are not counted in the official tally. The actual number of COVID cases is almost certainly many times larger than we know.

Can I get COVID from BA.5 if I've had it already?

Yes. Variants are caused by mutations that make the virus more adaptable, and the BA.5 is able to at least partially get around some of the immunity people may have from vaccinations and previous infections.

"Not only is it more infectious, but your prior immunity doesn't count for as much as it used to," Dr. Bob Wachter, the chair of the Department of Medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, told NPR. "And that means that the old saw that, 'I just had COVID a month ago, and so I have COVID immunity superpowers, I'm not going to get it again' — that no longer holds."

Is the BA.5 variant of coronavirus more dangerous?

Not really, according to studies. It's just much easier to catch and pass on. While cases have been up again, hospitalizations and deaths haven't been anywhere near the heights of the initial omicron surge and the majority of people catching it again are not seeing severe illness, especially if they've been vaccinated.

But because cases are spreading again, that increases the chances for more mutations and more variants, and some of them might get stronger and more infectious. Any COVID infection, even asymptomatic ones, may lead to Long COVID issues. And, as we discovered during the pandemic, resources that go to COVID patients can't be used for others and healthcare centers can be overworked and overstressed.

"We need to keep the levels of virus to the lowest possible level, and that is our best defense," Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said Tuesday. "If a virus is not very robustly replicating and spreading, it gives it less of a chance of a mutation, which gives it less of a chance of the evolving of another variant."

Currently, we are seeing roughly 300-350 people dying from COVID in the U.S., on average, per day. A big drop from the summers of 2020 and 2021, but still too many preventable deaths. Florida’s CDC-reported death toll climbed by 302 people since the state Health Department’s last biweekly COVID report published July 1.

Do vaccines work against the BA.5 variant of COVID?

Yes, but.

BA.5 seems to be able to evade some of the vaccines and immunity from previous cases but vaccines and boosters still help keep the virus from being too serious, preventing hospitalizations and death and reducing the chances of Long COVID. And the more people up-to-date on their vaccines and boosters, the fewer places for BA.5 to spread and mutate.

In June, an FDA panel approved companies reformulating COVID-19 boosters to more directly target the omicron variants, including BA.5, in time for an expected increase in the fall.

What are some symptoms of the new omicron variant?

The reported symptoms of the BA.5 variant are similar to the other COVID variants: fever, coughing, sore throat, runny nose, headaches, muscle pain and fatique. Some health care providers have reported seeing more patients complaining about loss of smell, which till now was lessening with every variant.

How long are you contagious with the BA.5 variant?

"A person with COVID-19 is considered infectious starting two days before they develop symptoms, or two days before the date of their positive test if they do not have symptoms," according to the CDC.

If you test positive, stay home for at least five days and isolate from other people. Wear a mask if you must be around other people. After five days, if you are fever-free for 24 hours without medicine you can end your isolation. If you don't have symptoms, you can stop isolating five days after your positive test. You still should avoid people or wear a mask for ten full days and do not travel. If you got very sick or have a weakened immune system, you should isolate for ten full days and talk to your doctor before ending it.

Is it more dangerous to get COVID more than once?

COVID attacks all the systems and organs in the body so repeated bouts of it increase the chances of complications including stroke, heart attack, diabetes, digestive and kidney disorders and long-term cognitive impairment.

Reinfections also increase the chances for Long COVID, a syndrome of ongoing COVID symptoms that can reemerge and last for weeks, months or longer.

How can I avoid getting COVID?

This part hasn't changed. Keep your vaccinations and boosters up-to-date. Now that vaccines have been cleared for children under five, get your children vaccinated to protect them and help prevent spread. Wear a mask (well-fitting, with nose and mouth covered) if you're not feeling well, if you have family members who are immunocompromised, if you're indoors around strangers, or if you're in public areas of high-risk transmission which, as of July 15, is nearly all of Florida according to the CDC's COVID tracker.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

How the FDA and CDC Are Failing Us on BA.5, the Worst Covid Variant Yet
David Axe - Rolling Stone
Sat, July 16, 2022, 11:02 AM

The latest subvariant of the novel-coronavirus is spreading fast. And the federal government is struggling to keep up.
There’s a lot the Food and Drug Administration and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention can do to slow the BA.5 subvariant and prevent deaths.

But both the FDA and CDC have dragged their heels. The FDA still hasn’t taken arguably the most important steps — approving both second boosters for Americans under age 50 and new booster formulations for subvariants such as BA.5. The CDC meanwhile isn’t clearly communicating to the public just how serious BA.5 is.

The delays are hard to explain, experts say. “We have known for a while that this variant was coming and that it seemed to be more transmissible,” says Cindy Prins, a University of Florida epidemiologist.

BA.5, an offshoot of the basic Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2, first turned up in viral samples in South Africa back in February. Three months later it was dominant in Israel and across Europe, displacing earlier forms of the pathogen while also driving an increase in global daily Covid cases from around 477,000 a day in early June to 940,000 a day this week.

In late June, BA.5 became dominant in the United States, too. For months before BA.5, daily new U.S. Covid cases had hovered around 100,000. This week cases jumped a third to 130,000 a day. Daily Covid deaths in the U.S. also increased a third, to 400.

BA.5’s dominance is baked into its RNA. Where the mutations that produced many earlier variants and subvariants largely affected the spike protein — the part of the pathogen that helps it to grab onto our cells — BA.5 has mutations all over its structure.

BA.5’s broad mutations make the subvariant less recognizable to our antibodies, whether they’re from vaccines, boosters, past infection, or a mix of all three. BA.5 is skilled at sneaking past our immune systems, contributing to rising rates of reinfections and breakthrough cases in fully-vaccinated people.

Still, practically no U.S. experts expect a fresh round of mask mandates or new restrictions on business or travel. Public-health measures such as these have become politically toxic in the U.S. “It’s a tough atmosphere right now,” Prins concedes.

But that doesn’t mean we’re powerless against BA.5 — or that the federal government doesn’t have a role to play.
One of the most helpful things the CDC can do is promptly communicate where the risk is greatest and where people should consider voluntarily masking up and limiting their exposure to crowds.

It’s not doing a great job, Prins says. “I do think that the messaging about BA.5 has been slower than what I would have expected.”

One of the CDC’s main tools for communicating Covid risk is an interactive map it maintains that displays COVID data on a county level. “The CDC’s community-specific model for assessing current transmission levels is an excellent compromise to keep the public vigilant that we are still amidst a pandemic, while adapting the recommendations to the local level,” says Anthony Alberg, a University of South Carolina epidemiologist.

But the map in its default setting displays somewhat old data. Joaquín Beltrán, a Congressional candidate in California, called the map “intentionally misleading.” The CDC didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment.

The CDC’s Covid map includes a default “community levels” setting that appears to show a quarter of America’s 3,223 counties with low Covid rates and 40 percent with medium rates, leaving just 35 percent of counties in the high category.

That might seem to imply that most of the country is weathering BA.5 without a big increase in cases. But that’s not true.

Click on the map’s “community transmission” setting and the problem is apparent: 92 percent of countries are in the “high” transmission category.

The devil is in the definitions. The CDC defines the “community levels” on its default map as “new admissions” to hospitals in a given county. In other words, the “levels” map is all about Covid hospitalizations: how many people have been admitted to hospitals for serious infections.

The “transmission” map is more comprehensive and immediate. It depicts all reported Covid cases in a county — even ones that haven’t landed someone in the hospital yet. It even counts cases that might be pretty serious, but where the infected person chose to recuperate at home.

Hospitalizations are what epidemiologists call a “lagging indicator.” Hospitals start filling up days or weeks after a local surge in infections. If you’re watching hospitals for signs a Covid wave, you’re way behind the curve. But that’s the data the CDC shows you first.

The FDA is struggling to keep up, too. Vaccines, boosters and past infection still offer meaningful, if somewhat reduced, protection against BA.5. The best protection comes from two prime doses of the messenger-RNA vaccines from Pfizer or Moderna plus two boosters.

The problem is that regulators have only approved Americans 50 years old or older, or younger adults with certain immune disorders, for a second booster. “They need to allow all adults to get a second booster,” said Ali Mokdad, a professor of health metrics sciences at the University of Washington Institute for Health.

But the FDA won’t say whether, or when, it might authorize second boosters for younger people. “I have nothing to share at this time,” an FDA spokesperson said when asked about boosters for under-50s.

Pfizer and Moderna meanwhile have developed new boosters that they’ve tailored specifically for Omicron subvariants including BA.5. An FDA advisory panel endorsed these subvariant-specific boosters on June 30. The FDA announced it might finally approve them for emergency use for some Americans starting this fall. But the BA.5 surge is here now.

The FDA needs to move faster on various boosters, says Eric Bortz, a University of Alaska-Anchorage virologist and public-health expert. “It’s not hard to make [a booster] and shouldn’t need a long approval process.”

The agency already has methods for speedily approving new vaccine formulations. After all, it signs off on fresh flu vaccines every year without a top-to-bottom review process, Mokdad pointed out.

Regulators could apply the same fast-track process to Covid boosters. “The FDA should be able to rapidly assess the efficacy and safety of a new formulation,” Bortz said. But it’s stuck doing things the slow way.

The bureaucratic sloth is a bad omen as the Covid pandemic grinds into its 32nd month. It’s looking increasingly likely that the virus will be with us, well, forever — surging from time to time as more-transmissible new variants and subvariants evolve.

To help manage the virus, the feds must keep pace with its evolution. But they’re already falling behind.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

FBI Launched Inquiry Into NIH Funding of Wuhan Lab, Emails Show
By Eva Fu
July 15, 2022 Updated: July 16, 2022

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) launched an inquiry into the National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding of bat research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology, newly released emails show.

The interest from the top U.S. intelligence agency adds to the international scrutiny on the Wuhan facility, which houses one of China’s highest-level biosecurity labs that has been considered a possible source of the COVID-19 pandemic.

“In preparation for our call on Tuesday, Erik [Stemmy] (cc’d) has provided responses to your initial questions below (also attached),” wrote Ashley Sanders, an investigation officer at the NIH’s division of program integriy, in an email (pdf) dated May 22, 2020 with the subject “Grant Questions – FBI Inquiry,” and directed to FBI agent David Miller.

The email was obtained by government transparency watchdog Judicial Watch through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, which asked for records of communications, contracts, and agreements with the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV).

The scope of the inquiry is unclear because the rest of the email correspondence, five pages in total, are entirely redacted.

But the name of the email attachment “SF 424 AI110964-06 (received date 11/05/2018),” corresponds to the NIH grant “Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence.”

The project in question is headed by Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance, which then funnels money to the lab in Wuhan. From 2014 to 2019, the New York nonprofit received six yearly grants totaling $3,748,715 from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases under the NIH to fund the project, which was expected to end in 2026.

The FBI inquiry had focused on at least two of the grants, in 2014 and 2019 respectively, the email subject line suggests.

The 2014 grant aimed to “understand what factors increase the risk of the next CoV emerging in people by studying CoV diversity in a critical zoonotic reservoir (bats), at sites of high risk for emergence (wildlife markets) in an emerging disease hotspot (China),” according to the project description. Specifically, the researchers would assess the coronavirus spillover potential, develop predictive models of bat coronavirus emergence risk, and use virus infection experiments as well as “reverse genetics” to test the virus’s transmission between species.

In the project summary for the 2019 grant, EcoHealth stated that they had found that “bats in southern China harbor an extraordinary diversity of SARSr-CoVs,” and some of those viruses can “infect humanized mouse models causing SARS-like illness, and evade available therapies or vaccines.”

Recently disclosed documents show that, under one grant, the WIV had conducted an experiment that resulted in a more potent version of a bat coronavirus.

In the project that took place under the fifth grant, from June 2018 to May 2019, the researchers infected two groups of laboratory mice, one of which with a modified version of a bat coronavirus already existing in nature, and another with the original virus.

Those infected with the modified version became sicker, Lawrence Tabak, a principal deputy director at the NIH, wrote in a letter in response to a Congressional inquiry. (not sure if we need to specify who it’s from)

“As sometimes occurs in science, this was an unexpected result of the research, as opposed to something that the researchers set out to do,” wrote Tabak. He acknowledged that EcoHealth had violated the grant terms by failing to notify the NIH “right away” about the finding.

The experiment appears to fit the definition of gain-of-function research regardless of its intentions, according to some experts.

“The genetic manipulation of both MERS and the SARS conducted in Wuhan clearly constituted gain-of-function experiments,” Jonathan Latham, executive director of The Bioscience Research Project, previously told The Epoch Times.

He said the NIH’s wording choice “unexpected” was “absurd,” “when clearly these experiments were expressly designed to detect increased pathogenicity.”

An April 2020 memo (pdf) reveals that the State Department assessed lab leak as the most likely origin of COVID-19.

“The Wuhan labs remained the most likely yet least probed. All other possible places of virus’ origin have been proven false,” the memo stated, citing circumstantial evidence such as safety standard lapses, experiments on bats by WIV researchers, and the lab’s role in a “deliberate coverup, especially destruction of any evidence of leaks and disappearance of its employees as Patient Zero.”

The Epoch Times has reached out to the FBI for comments.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

Natural Immunity From Omicron Strong Against Virus Subvariants: Study
By Zachary Stieber
July 16, 2022

The protection afforded by surviving COVID-19 was strong against the latest virus subvariants, including the one currently dominant in the United States, scientists in Qatar found.

People who were infected with Omicron, a variant of SARS-CoV-2, had 76.1 percent protection against symptomatic reinfection from BA.4 and BA.5 and 80 percent shielding from any reinfection, regardless of symptoms, according to the preprint study.

SARS-CoV-2, also known as the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus, causes COVID-19.

Omicron became the dominant virus strain in many countries in late 2021. Since then, a number of subvariants have taken hold. BA.5 is the strain currently dominant in the United States.

While protection from an Omicron infection provided robust shielding against reinfection, those who contracted a pre-Omicron strain had little protection, according to the Qatari scientists, who were led by Dr. Laith Abu-Raddad with Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar.

Pre-Omicron infection provided just 15.1 percent effectiveness against symptomatic BA.4 and BA.5 reinfection and just 28 percent infection against any reinfection.

The scientists analyzed data from national COVID-19 databases.

Infections before Omicron were those that occurred before Dec. 19, 2021, when the variant wave started in Qatar.

Protection ‘Strong’

“Protection of a previous infection against BA.4/BA.5 reinfection was modest when the previous infection involved a pre-Omicron variant, but strong when the previous infection involved the Omicron BA.1 or BA.2 subvariant,” the scientists wrote.

Natural immunity has long been found to be superior to the protection from COVID-19 vaccines, and the new study is no exception. Vaccines provide little protection against Omicron infection and perform worse against infection and severe illness from the BA.4 and BA. 5 subvariants, studies have shown.

Natural immunity also waned against BA.4 and BA.5, highlighting how the subvariants are better at evading protection, the Qatari researchers found.

The group has been studying natural immunity for years and recently discovered that the protection from prior infection against severe disease showed no signs of waning, regardless of what strain infected the person.

Among the listed limitations for the new study was the young population of Qatar, where just 9 percent of residents are 50 years of age or older. That means the findings “may not be generalizable to other countries where elderly citizens constitute a larger proportion of the total population,” researchers wrote.

Some experts, including Abu-Raddad and U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky, continue recommending vaccination for people with natural immunity, pointing to studies that indicate one or more doses increase protection, but others say vaccination isn’t needed for people who survive COVID-19, since some research suggests the elevated protection is minimal and that the naturally immune are at higher risk of vaccine side effects.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3QMGtM5y-U
TWiV 918: COVID-19 clinical update #123 with Dr. Daniel Griffin
41 min 46 sec
Jul 16, 2022
Vincent Racaniello

In COVID-19 clinical update #123, Dr. Griffin discusses rapid diagnostic testing in response to the monkeypox outbreak, leading causes of death in the US during the COVID-19 pandemic, antibody evasion by subvariants, broadly-neutralizing antibodies against emerging variants, factors associated with severe outcomes among hospitalized immunocompromised adults, measurement of the burden of hospitalizations during the pandemic, parental vaccine hesitancy in diverse communities, evaluating saliva sampling to improve access to diagnosis in low-resource settings, oral sabizabulin for high-risk hospitalized adults, lower-risk of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, and neurovascular injury with complement activation and inflammation during infection.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

Vaccine protection against COVID-19 short-lived, booster shots important, new study says
by Yale School of Public Health
July 16, 2022

Since COVID-19 vaccines first became available to protect against infection and severe illness, there has been much uncertainty about how long the protection lasts, and when it might be necessary for individuals to get an additional booster shot.

Now, a team of scientists led by faculty at the Yale School of Public Health and the University of North Carolina at Charlotte has an answer: strong protection following vaccination is short-lived.

The study is the first to quantify the likelihood of future infection following natural infection or vaccination by the Moderna, Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, or Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines. The findings are published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The risk of breakthrough infections, in which a person becomes infected despite being vaccinated, depends on the vaccine type. According to the study, current mRNA vaccines (Pfizer, Moderna) offer the greatest duration of protection, nearly three times as long as that of natural infection and the Johnson & Johnson and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines.

"The mRNA vaccines produce the highest levels of antibody response and in our analysis confer more durable protection than other vaccines or exposures," said Jeffrey Townsend, the Elihu Professor of Biostatistics at Yale School of Public Health and the study's lead author. "However, it is important to remember that natural immunity and vaccination are not mutually exclusive. Many people will have partial immunity from multiple sources, so understanding the relative durability is key to deciding when to provide a boost to your immune system."

Dependable protection against reinfection requires up-to-date boosting with vaccines that are adapted to address changes in the virus that occur as part of its natural evolution over time, the researchers said.

"We tend to forget that we are in an arms race with this virus, and that it will evolve ways to evade both our natural and any vaccine-derived immune response," said Alex Dornburg, assistant professor at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte, who led the study with Townsend. "As we have seen with the Omicron variant, vaccines against early virus strains become less effective at combating new strains of the virus."

The researchers' data-driven model of infection risks through time takes advantage of the striking similarities of reinfection probabilities between endemic coronaviruses (which cause "common colds") and SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. These similarities allowed the scientists to make longer-term projections than studies focused solely on current-day infections. Furthermore, the model placed antibody responses following natural and vaccine-mediated immunity into the same context, enabling comparison.

"SARS-CoV-2 mirrors other endemic coronaviruses that also evolve and reinfect us despite natural immunity to earlier strains," said Townsend. "Continual updating of our vaccinations and booster shots is critical to our fight against SARS-CoV-2."
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

Second mRNA booster significantly effective against Omicron variants
by Regenstrief Institute
July 16, 2022

In one of the first investigations of the effectiveness of a second mRNA booster against COVID-19 Omicron variants, a study from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has found that a second booster shot significantly improved effectiveness against widespread variants Omicron BA.1 and BA.2/BA.2.12.1.

With the first booster, vaccine effectiveness against these variants was only 68 percent (lower than against previous variants) and declined to 52 percent effectiveness after six months. With the second vaccine, effectiveness against these variants climbed to 80 percent within the first six months. Data is not yet available for effectiveness after six months.

The study looked at effectiveness of the second booster in reducing COVID Omicron BA.1 and BA.2/BA.2.12.1 related hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits and found the shot protected against both hospitalizations and ED visits.

"The findings of this study are important because they provide an answer to a question that many people are asking: Should I get the second booster shot? The data clearly show that a second booster significantly increases vaccine effectiveness against these variants—which while no longer dominant in many areas, are still present," said study co-author Shaun Grannis, M.D., M.S., vice president for data and analytics at Regenstrief Institute and professor of family medicine at Indiana University School of Medicine. "As we go into the fall, when viruses typically pick up, we want to encourage people who are eligible for a second booster to be proactive and to strongly consider getting one because it will provide greater protection. It will reduce the need for COVID-19-related emergency department visits and hospitalizations.

"From a population health perspective, the protection supplied by the second booster helps ensure that healthcare resources are capable of responding to the full spectrum of medical needs, reducing the chance of overwhelming health systems with COVID-19-related disease."

Current CDC recommendations for a second booster (fourth shot of the vaccine) are for people 50 and older as well as for moderately or severely immunocompromised individuals who are 12 and older.

"Effectiveness of 2, 3, and 4 COVID-19 mRNA vaccine doses among immunocompetent adults during SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 and BA.2/BA.2.12.1 sublineage periods—VISION Network, 10 states, December 2021–June 2022" is published in the CDC's Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) collaborated with seven U.S. healthcare systems plus the Regenstrief Institute, to create the VISION network to assess COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness. In addition to Regenstrief Institute, other members are Columbia University Irving Medical Center, HealthPartners, Intermountain Healthcare, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, University of Colorado and Paso Del Norte Health Information Exchange (PHIX). Regenstrief contributes data and expertise to the VISION Network.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

China Covid outbreak grows with millions under lockdown
July 16, 2022

China on Saturday reported its highest number of coronavirus cases since May, with millions in lockdown this weekend as authorities persist with their zero-Covid policy.

Using snap lockdowns, long quarantines and mass testing, China is the last major economy still pursuing the goal of eliminating outbreaks, even as the strategy takes a heavy toll on the economy.

China reported 450 local infections on Saturday, up from 432 a day earlier. Most cases were asymptomatic.

The rising wave of cases led to fresh restrictions this week in some parts of the country.

Lanzhou, the capital of northwestern Gansu province, ordered its 4.4 million residents to stay home starting Wednesday, and a county in Anhui province went into lockdown from Friday.

Beihai in the southern Guangxi region on Saturday also announced lockdowns in parts of two districts that are home to more than 800,000 people.

"Currently, the epidemic prevention and control situation in Beihai city is severe and complicated, and the risk of hidden transmission in the community is relatively high," said a government notice announcing the restrictions.

Earlier in the week, the steelmaking hub of Wugang in central Henan province announced a three-day lockdown over a single Covid case.

The fast-spreading Omicron variant of the virus has been a major challenge for Chinese authorities, as they try to limit the economic damage caused by Covid restrictions.

China logged its slowest second-quarter growth rate since the initial Covid outbreak, with GDP expanding just 0.4 percent on-year.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

How we could end the COVID pandemic almost instantly
Any government in the world could do this. It's easy and obvious. But none of them will do it. Do you want to know why?
Steve Kirsch
17 hr ago

Executive summary
  1. Use a competitive process to identify the most effective early treatment protocol and in-patient protocol based on actual patient outcomes
  2. Deploy it
My common sense plan to end the COVID pandemic

If nobody dies from COVID anymore and any informed person has access to a treatment protocol that reliably turns COVID into a mild cold, the pandemic mandates, restrictions, and other mitigation policies should all come to an end.

So suppose Elon Musk (or some other high profile individual or institution like Harvard) offers an X-Prize for:
  1. the best early treatment protocol ($1M reward)
  2. the best in-patient (hospital) treatment protocol ($10M reward)
The protocol with the best stats in real-life treatment of COVID patients wins. There would be two winners: one for the early treatment protocol, the other for the in-patient protocol.

Then you find a country, state, or county willing to deploy these best practices in their area somewhere in the world.

So when someone comes down with COVID, they can get a free “early treatment kit” from their doctor’s office.

And if they don’t get the kit and end up in the hospital, they get a treatment protocol that will save at least 95% or more of them. This in-patient protocol would be very different from what we do today since we already know that protocol is a huge failure.

People then see it is working in that county, state, or country, and then it gets picked up by other areas.

Why it won’t work

I used to be a lot more optimistic about people adopting best practices to solve big problems. Now, I’m much more realistic.

The drug companies clearly don’t want an end to the pandemic and they control everything, so they will ensure that this idea fails.

This plan won’t work for several reasons:

1. Nobody will offer the prize to find out the best protocols because either 1) they don’t want to waste money finding a solution that they know nobody will dare to deploy or 2) they don’t want to be seen as questioning the narrative or the incompetence of the public health officials. Not even Elon Musk or Jeff Bezos will do it. No medical school will sponsor such a contest (even with funding) because they don’t want to lose their government grant money.​
2. No hospital in the world will dare to deviate from the gold-standard ineffective CDC in-patient protocol so they won’t even test new options, not even under a clinical trial protocol. So there won’t be an in-patient protocol submitted, even if the prize were $1B. There will only be early treatment protocol entries. This just shows you how “centralized” the control is. Paul Marik would happily supply an in-patient protocol to any hospital willing to to deploy it and split the prize, but no hospital would want to risk it, even as a clinical trial. The clinical trial would never be approved since most IRBs will only allow you to test one thing at a time in these trials EVEN THOUGH every drug is safe and the combinations have been used before with great success. Since all of these drugs and supplements are approved, you don’t need a clinical trial, but hospitals don’t allow doctors to be doctors: they must follow the approved protocol or they will be fired.​
3. Even if the two best life-saving protocols were identified, no county, state, or government in the world will dare to deploy it since it would challenge the incompetency of the CDC and WHO or disrupt payments to government officials from the drug companies. Ron DeSantis wouldn’t even do it in Florida. Individual countries rarely display any independent thought on medical interventions. They all simply follow whatever the WHO says. No critical thinking skills required. Whatever the WHO says goes. It is not about saving lives. It is about saving face. No leader of any country has enough courage to go against the WHO (maybe there are a few exceptions like North Korea and China, but I doubt either country will do anything innovative like this because it makes too much sense).​

I’d be absolutely delighted to be proven wrong on all these points.

The fact this plan won’t work anywhere in the world shows how truly messed up the medical system is today. That’s the real problem.
 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

Global infection/case rates COVID July 16th 2022; shows us that pandemic is expanding & due not to the VIRUS, but due to the failed non-neutralizing vaccine & antibodies that enhance VAXXed infection
This is catastrophic if these idiots at NIH & CDC & Pfizer & Moderna such as Fauci & Francis Collins & Walensky & Albert Bourla & Bancel who have no clue, no idea what they are doing, DO NOT stop this
Dr. Paul Alexander
14 hr ago

The graphs below tell us, both the infections and cases today and the vaccine rates, that the vaccinated appear at risk of infection and illness. We knew this, we told them this and the graphs tell us this. They are not listening! Why? The more vaccinated you are as a nation, more infection and cases you have post mass vaccination! It is clear the COVID injections, mRNA, are facilitating and enhancing infection in the vaccinated. Not the virus!

The key worry is that by vaccinating with the COVID vaccine, we will damage the innate immune system of children (prevent training of innate antibodies and innate antibodies educating NK (natural killer) cells) and this will leave them vulnerable in their innate immune system not recognizing ‘self’ from ‘non-self’. This is the key. If innate Abs are not trained and do not instruct the NK cells in their role to clear out infected cells (if innate Abs are breached and virus enters the cells), then our children will be in deep trouble, especially if a lethal variant comes. Consider too, at some point, this virus will go away, but we will be left with vaccine inside of us producing spike and antibodies life long. Life long, it will not stop. They did not ensure this. Did not study the implications. The FDA failed is in ensuring this! Consider that we have no idea what will happen immunologically.

We cannot vaccinate them, our children, with these COVID injections!!!! Under no condition!!!

Look at South Africa (SA) below 2nd to last graph (then look at the vaccine rates in selected nations I plotted)…SA is one of the lowest vaccinated nations yet omicron BA 4 and BA 5 has been gentle…a rise and clear plunge. I, Geert, we argue it is the delay of the vaccine, that has allowed African nations to withstand omicron and it’s infectiousness. It bought time for young South African persons and children to train their innate antibodies and innate immune system. It is the innate immune system of children and young persons that sterilizes the virus and plays a key role in protecting the society. Key player on the immunological battle field. Helps that Africa is young as is South Asian nations. We have to defend this immune system, the innate in children with our might.

Again, ‘it is the vaccine, stupid’, it is NOT the virus, it is the sub-optimal non-neutralizing vaccinal antibodies that are placing the spike antigen under immune pressure but not eliminating the virus, while causing increased infectiousness to the vaccinated. It is the vaccine, the COVID vaccine that is causing infection in vaccinated and the expansion now of this pandemic that was over in Feb 2021. If this vaccine is not stopped, this pandemic will continue for 100 years.



















 

Heliobas Disciple

TB Fanatic
(fair use applies)

July 16, 2022 - Is there a medical emergency?
The US HHS Administrative state has extended the COVID medical emergency. Let's look at the data.
Robert W Malone MD, MS
10 hr ago




Senator Rand Paul has accused Dr. Fauci and the White House (which is captured by the HHS Administrative State) of “emotionalism and sensationalism” leading up to the renewal of the determination of a continuing medical emergency attributable to COVID-19 disease and SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Is this medical emergency justified, or does it reflect yet more mis- dis- and mal-information from the HHS Administrative state acting in coordination with corporate media to propagate Fearporn to justify the continuing suspension of medical ethics, normal regulatory process, censorship, and war profiteering by the medical-pharmaceutical industrial complex?

Per Epoch Times reporting:

“After White House adviser Dr. Anthony Fauci and Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra issued warnings about a new COVID-19 subvariant, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) said they are not providing key facts about the latest strain.
“How come the flu vaccine changes every year and they’re not willing to change this vaccine?” Paul told Fox News on Tuesday. “Now, you might have me with an argument. I’ll listen to you if you tell me, ‘We’ve got a new vaccine that actually has something to do with the current virus,'” he said.
It came after Fauci, who has given hundreds of media interviews since the start of the pandemic, told CNN this week that the Omicron subvariant BA.5 is concerning due to its high transmissibility. People infected in the first COVID-19 waves “really don’t have a lot of good protection” against the latest subvariant, Fauci also said at a White House briefing several days ago.
But Paul, himself a doctor, told Fox that Omicron “was about 90 percent less likely to put you in the hospital than the first variant,” saying that Americans should “discount” what both Fauci and Becerra are saying about the latest subvariant.
“So if no one’s telling you any information, how can you make any judgment other than the emotionalism and the sensationalism of the government?” he asked.”

Let’s look at the data using the slide format that so many seem to find useful. Minimal interpretation, mainly just data. I give you the tools, you make your own assessment and determination. What do you think is going on here?

Slide 1


Slide 2


Slide 3


Slide 4



Slide 5


Slide 6


Slide 7


Slide 8


Slide 9


Slide 10


Slide 11


Slide 12


Slide 13


Slide 14


Slide 15
 

Zoner

Veteran Member
I did a little research. You can not use a cotton swab. If you find a polyester one or a rayon one you might be able to use one of those. You may have to go to a medical warehouse type place to find it. And then maybe it's made in China which you are trying to avoid, so make sure to ask where it's manufactured. And of course, the person testing you still may not let you use your own, but if you want to try bringing your own that's where I'd start.

HD
Good stuff HD.
I’ll let you know what I find out
 

psychgirl

Has No Life - Lives on TB
More babies getting sick with viruses that are on the rise now. We know what Geert and Dr. Alexander would say :(


(fair use applies)

Virus that can cause severe illness in babies seen in multiple states, CDC cautions
Tim Stelloh
Fri, July 15, 2022, 12:39 AM

Health care providers in multiple states have reported a virus that can cause seizures, meningitis and other severe illnesses in infants under 3 months old, federal officials said Tuesday.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued an alert notifying doctors and public health departments that cases of parechovirus have been seen in newborns and young infants since May.

The alert doesn't say which states have seen infections in young children or how many cases have been reported.

The advisory notes that because there is no systematic surveillance for parechovirus it isn't clear how the number of cases compares to earlier seasons. But increased testing in recent years could account for a higher number of cases, the agency said.

Every positive case recorded by the agency has involved PeV-A3, the type of parechovirus that most often causes severe disease, the CDC said.

The virus, a common childhood pathogen that circulates in the summer and fall and spreads through sneezing, coughing, saliva and feces, causes less serious illness in children older than 6 months, the agency said. Symptoms include a rash, an upper respiratory tract infection and fever.

Experts who have examined the spinal fluid of babies with severe parechovirus infections have found that their white blood cells have vanished or nearly disappeared.

There is no treatment for the virus.

The alert encourages doctors to test for the virus and to keep infants hospitalized with infections together to avoid spreading the disease to nurseries or neonatal intensive care units.

CORRECTION (July 15, 2022, 12 p.m. ET): A previous version of this article misstated when the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued an alert about cases of parechovirus. It was Tuesday, not Thursday.
I’ve never even HEARD of this virus before!
More and more illnesses are popping up.
Unless, it’s just because the media is reporting on them more, that we’re now seeing them?
 
Top