WHY EVERY WOMAN SHOULD VOTE

lectrickitty

Great Great Grandma!
Just got this in email and thought I'd pass it along. It should be on the front page of every newspaper and mag in America. Women suffered to give us the right to vote and many women set home or have some lame excuse to avoid voting because they just don't care who wins the elections or they think their vote won't make a difference.

Somewhere online is a list of the times when 1 vote changed history. I think I'll try to find it, print it out, and submit it to my local paper to see if they'll print it, along with a copy of this email.

WHY EVERY WOMAN SHOULD VOTE
This is the story of our Grandmothers, and Great-grandmothers, as they
lived only 90 years ago. It was not until 1920 that women were granted
the right to go to the polls and vote.

Thus unfolded the 'Night of Terror' on Nov. 15, 1917, when the warden at
the Occoquan Workhouse in Virginia ordered his guards to teach a lesson
to the suffragists imprisoned there because they dared to picket Woodrow
Wilson's White House for the right to vote. The women were innocent and
defenseless. And by the end of the night they were barely alive. Forty
prison guards wielding clubs and their warden's blessing went on a
rampage against the 33 women wrongly convicted of 'obstructing sidewalk
traffic.'

They beat Lucy Burn, chained her hands to the cell bars above her head
and left her hanging for the night, bleeding and gasping for air. They
hurled Dora Lewis into a dark cell, smashed her head against an iron bed
and knocked her out cold. Her cell mate, Alice Cosu, thought Lewis was
dead and suffered a heart attack. Additional affidavits describe the
guards grabbing, dragging, beating, choking, slamming, pinching,
twisting and kicking the women.

For weeks, the women's only water came from an open pail. Their
food--all of it colorless slop--was infested with worms. When one of the
leaders, Alice Paul, embarked on a hunger strike, they tied her to a
chair, forced a tube down her throat and poured liquid into her until
she vomited. She was tortured like this for weeks until word was
smuggled out to the press.

So, refresh my memory. Some women won't vote this year because--why,
exactly? We have carpool duties? We have to get to work? Our vote
doesn't matter? It's raining?

Last week, I went to a sparsely attended screening of HBO's new movie
'Iron Jawed Angels.' It is a graphic depiction of the battle these women
waged so that I could pull the curtain at the polling booth and have my
say. I am ashamed to say I needed the reminder.

All these years later, voter registration is still my passion. But the
actual act of voting had become less personal for me, more rote.
Frankly, voting often felt more like an obligation than a privilege.
Sometimes it was inconvenient.

My friend Wendy, who is my age and studied women's history, saw the HBO
movie , too. When she stopped by my desk to talk about it, she looked
angry. She was--with herself. 'One thought kept coming back to me as I
watched that movie,' she said. 'What would those women think of the way
I use--or don't use--my right to vote? All of us take it for granted
now, not just younger women, but those of us who did seek to learn.' The
right to vote, she said, had become valuable to her 'all over again.'

HBO released the movie on video and DVD. I wish all history, social
studies and government teachers would include the movie in their
curriculum. I want it shown on Bunco night, too, and anywhere else women
gather. I realize this isn't our usual idea of socializing, but we are
not voting in the numbers that we should be, and I think a little shock
therapy is in order.

It is jarring to watch Woodrow Wilson and his cronies try to persuade a
psychiatrist to declare Alice Paul insane so that she could be
permanently institutionalized. And it is inspiring to watch the doctor
refuse. Alice Paul was strong, he said, and brave. That didn't make her
crazy. The doctor admonished the men: 'Courage in women is often
mistaken for insanity.'

Please, if you are so inclined, pass this on to all the women you know.
We need to get out and vote and use this right that was fought so hard
for by these very courageous women. Whether you vote democratic,
republican or independent party - remember to vote.

History is being made.
 

FREEBIRD

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Alice Paul also said, "Abortion is the ultimate exploitation of women", so the women's vote, properly understood, doesn't necessarily mean voting for people like Obama (or McCain, for other reasons).

We have no idea how our foremothers suffered for us to be able to vote.
 

ShyGirl

Veteran Member
None of us, male or female regular people, have the right to vote any more. All we are allowed to do is choose between the evils our betters have selected for us. We should all be as brave and courageous as those women and take back our rights.
 

fruit loop

Inactive
All true.

And a woman was partially responsible for getting us that vote. She called her son, a representative, and told him to please vote FOR the 19th Amendment. He had been planning to vote no, but changed his mind out of respect for his mother.
 

SouthernGal

"Don't retreat...reload"
Well, shoot, as a woman, I demand reparations for what these women endured (but of course, make out the check to ME). :whistle:
 

amarilla

Veteran Member
If you ever get to Dearborn, Michigan, the Henry Ford Museum has part of an exhibit on them. It's very interesting. They even have a "cell."

A
 

sassy

Veteran Member
"So, refresh my memory. Some women won't vote this year because--why,
exactly? We have carpool duties? We have to get to work? Our vote
doesn't matter? It's raining?"

Maybe, they are not voting because they don't have anyone worth voting for?
 
D

Dazed

Guest
Of course, were it not for women voters, we'd never have had the likes of Carter, Clinton and their ilk in the white house, the supreme court, and in lower offices....Liberals have gotten in BECAUSE of the women voters.

But I agree that EVERYONE should vote.

I just wish that they'd think before doing so. Not with emotion, but with logic.
 

fruit loop

Inactive
Yeah, Dazed, women don't think. We don't have brains, only emotions. We aren't capable of reason, weighing issues, listening to debates, and considering a candidate's abilities vs our values.

I hope you aren't married.

I disagree that only women vote liberal. That's the funniest thing I've heard all year.
 

Loon

Inactive
About fifteen years ago I had a customer at the beauty shop I ran in a nursing home who was 108 years old at the time. She talked to me one day about how she was a suffraget and worked for women's right to vote. She was living in Minnesota at the time. It was like talking to history and I'll never forget her. Mind sharp as a tack. She is the oldest person I've ever met.
 
D

Dazed

Guest
Yeah, Dazed, women don't think. We don't have brains, only emotions. We aren't capable of reason, weighing issues, listening to debates, and considering a candidate's abilities vs our values.

I hope you aren't married.

I disagree that only women vote liberal. That's the funniest thing I've heard all year.

Many don't. Lets not forget that Bill Clinton was voted for by many women because they thought he looked better than his opponents....Besides, he "felt their pain"....

Not all women vote from emotion. Many aer intelligent individuals. But many do vote because of looks or emotions.

No matter who you are, that's a bad way to make a choice.

and the country Has gone more liberal since women were given the vote.

Sorry if I pissed you off.
 

Digital Omnivore

Veteran Member
Women suffered to give us the right to vote

and America has suffered ever since.

Every Republican since FDR would have been elected if not for the female vote.

So when you wonder why the Republican party has gone to the left, and the democrats have gone way to the left, they're simply responding to market forces.
 

FREEBIRD

Has No Life - Lives on TB
"I disagree that only women vote liberal."

Or that women vote only for liberals. There are as many reasons for women to vote a certain way as there are women, same as for the men.

And for those who think the government has gone down the tubes because women got the vote, the Federal Reserve was created in 1913, when women could not vote yet. The men gave us that one.

"I'm not denying the women are foolish---God Almighty made 'em to match the men."
 

Moggy

Veteran Member
Of course, were it not for women voters, we'd never have had the likes of Carter, Clinton and their ilk in the white house, the supreme court, and in lower offices....Liberals have gotten in BECAUSE of the women voters.

But I agree that EVERYONE should vote.

I just wish that they'd think before doing so. Not with emotion, but with logic.

It isn't the women voters who have brought this country to its knees, it is the overwhelming greed of the men who comprised the group that met on Jekyll Island and who then, in 1913, forced an unworkable monetary system on the country...and the blood lust of men in military who keep us in forever wars.

Moggy
 

fruit loop

Inactive
Ape Lincoln: elected exclusively by male voters

U.S. Grant: another crappy president, elected exclusively by male voters

George Bush: supposedly elected by mostly male voters
 
Because in theory, property owners are the more responsible citizens. Lots of apartment dwellers are welfare bums, not so many are property owners.
 

ceeblue

Veteran Member
Why should only property owners be able to vote? People who live in apartments still pay taxes.
In general, renters are supported by property owners.

Property owners provide the jobs renters need.

Property owners have a bigger stake are are much more likely to run for office, serve on committees, join service organizations.

Renters are more likely to whine away about their lot in life and less likely to get involved in any system capable of producing change.

Having a body, even if it's in a grave, shouldn't be the only qualification for voting.
 

David Nettleton

Veteran Member
Did you know that in Pilgrim society no more than two women could, by law, congregate and converse without a man being present? Gimme the good-ol'-days!
 

fruit loop

Inactive
Property ownership is not indicative of either intelligence or responsibility. Look at all the property George Bush owns.

Property owners DO NOT "support" renters. It's the other way around. The renters are PAYING to live there, which is why they are called "renters." The property owners are making THEIR living off the renters.

The vast majority of people renting are NOT on welfare. They're single people, married couples who can't afford a home, or people who just don't want the responsibility of the expense and upkeep a home entails.

Plenty of people who rent run for office and even HOLD office (legislators usually rent in the capitol city), perform community service, and such.

The fact that someone rents their residence indicates merely one thing...that they are renting their residence rather than owning it.

Having a living body and being a citizen of this country are the criteria for voting. As they should be. Voting should not be limited to someone because of their income, education or gender. That's a big reason why so many people choose to live in America.
 

ceeblue

Veteran Member
Property ownership is not indicative of either intelligence or responsibility. Look at all the property George Bush owns.
I disagree. It takes intelligence and responsibility to acquire and keep property. You might think Bush is stupid. But he's President, elected for two terms. Who are you?

Property owners DO NOT "support" renters. It's the other way around. The renters are PAYING to live there, which is why they are called "renters." The property owners are making THEIR living off the renters.
Property owners provide a place for renters to live. That is a form of support for which the owners are compensated. Owning and providing housing is expensive, labor intensive and risky.

The vast majority of people renting are NOT on welfare. They're single people, married couples who can't afford a home, or people who just don't want the responsibility of the expense and upkeep a home entails.
The only blanket classification that applies to renters is they are not living in housing they own.

Plenty of people who rent run for office and even HOLD office (legislators usually rent in the capitol city), perform community service, and such.
Exceptions do not prove the rule. Most own their primary residence.

The fact that someone rents their residence indicates merely one thing...that they are renting their residence rather than owning it.
Uh, yeah.

Having a living body and being a citizen of this country are the criteria for voting. As they should be. Voting should not be limited to someone because of their income, education or gender. That's a big reason why so many people choose to live in America.
So you would give the vote to mental incompetents, the severely retarded, convicted child molesters, convicted thieves, robbers, murderers, and people who can't even name their current mayor or the form of our government. I prefer a system where the inmates do not run the asylum.
 

fruit loop

Inactive
It doesn't take intelligence or responsibility to acquire property. It takes money, and sometimes not even that...a lot of people inherit property.

The fact that someone does not own property does not mean that they are intelligent or irresponsible.

Bush is an incompetent, and he's proven that. As for me, I'm Fruit Loop. Read the name on my posts next time.

Property owners DON'T 'provide' a place for renters to live. The renters pay for that. The upkeep of the property is therefore the responsibility of the property owner (although a lot of them fail to meet that, which is a reason for tenant lawsuits)

Convicted felons and the mentally incompetent do not have the same civil rights. That's absurd.

Limiting the vote to property owners has been tried and rightly ruled to be unconstitutional for the same reason that literacy tests, race, and sex were ruled to be wrongful criteria.
 
Top