DISASTER Want Boiling Blood? Watch TSA Screener Accost 3 Year Old Girl at Security Checkpoint

mandatroy

Member
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article26809.htm

Those of you who have children or grandchildren might need to go from boycott to PROACTIVE after viewing this.

It shows a U.S. TV station news report where the reporter's three year old daughter is terrorized by 'full hands-on' treatment by a TSA employee to ALL areas of her body while she screams out in total terror.

In the news report, her father/the reporter tells us there has to be some 'sacrifice' by us when it comes to security at the airport.

TSA official's response is that TSA employees "need to come up with some kind of game that you are trying to play with the child. It makes it a lot easier for us".

Better pass this on. There's power in numbers you know.--No further comment.



"If tyranny and oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy." -- James Madison
 

Maranatha

Redeemed
Da*n it! This has got to stop! :ld: I'd be about ready to slap the TSA employee into next week. Of course that would get me arrested for assault and battery and permanently on the "no fly" list. :shk:

MARANATHA!
 

MDINMT

Veteran Member
"need to come up with some kind of game that you are trying to play with the child. It makes it a lot easier for us".

Exactly how pedophiles work.
 

JM8174

Contributing Member
Why don't we agree to go thru the same security restrictions that our congress critters go thru when they travel? Since they work for us (yeah right), then why should we be subjected to any worse circumstances than they have to endure?
 

Dozdoats

On TB every waking moment
I'd be about ready to slap the TSA employee into next week. Of course that would get me arrested for assault and battery and permanently on the "no fly" list.

I'm on the "no fly" list anyway.

I put myself on there on my own- I drew the line when they started the 'take off your shoes' BS. I refuse to fly as long as this invasive nonsense goes on. All this sickening display of state domination means is that the terrorists have won this one.

And the terrorists I mean are agents of the government... no way would I subject a child to that abuse.

dd
 

brokenwings

Veteran Member
You have to ask yourself. Why all of a sudden has TWA become child molesters and perverts?? It seems like this has all been set up for some reason. Nothing happens by accident you know.
 

MaureenO

Another Infidel
You have to ask yourself. Why all of a sudden has TWA become child molesters and perverts?? It seems like this has all been set up for some reason. Nothing happens by accident you know.

What happened was security holes in air transport were exploited on 9/11 and blew those holes wide open.

At first, the public were a bit peeved at the "minor" inconveniences they were subjected to (for their own and their kids' lives sake) then the truly paranoid amongst us latched on like a flock of Jim Jones's and all hell broke loose. The more creative jihad joe became, the more security had to be tightened, much to all of our dismay and inconvenience.

This gave birth to the Michael Moore mentality that spread like wildfire. Then more and more people screamed about how their rights were being stripped by "big brother" yet no one has yet to state what liberties they have actually lost. Even to the point that some folks TRULY believe that the US of A ORCHESTRATED 9/11 in some smokey back room for the sole purpose of feeling up old ladies knickers in an airport.

Those jihad joes had been researching our weaknesses for years and finally got Joe Q. Public's attention on 9/11.

It gets no simpler than that. Those who prefer the "comfort" of conspiracy and intrigue can cling to it all they want but it won't ever make those thought aberrations correct.

Maureen :dstrs:
 

undead

Veteran Member
These same Feds now want to join public employee unions so they can become even more thuggish and protected.


:kk2:
 

FREEBIRD

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Well, the father seems OK or at least resigned to "sacrificing " his child. The cult-like obedience expected from subjects (we are no longer citizens, as citizens have recognized rights) toward our government masters has obvious historical precedents.

That will not be happening here. I refuse to fly as long as the barbarians are in charge.
 

helen

Panic Sex Lady
One of the terrorism arrests was for a guy named Chesser, who was getting on an airplane with his infant son.

On the thread about bombs being sewn into dogs, one poster commented that terrorists might use children.

Just a thought.

We had something similar come up with a toddler's overalls. The TSA worker was very apologetic when asking for the overalls to go through an x-ray machine. He asked our toddler if he could borrow the overalls to test his machine, to see if it would beep. He told the toddler that the toddler himself was too big to go through the x-ray machine. This particular child didn't have a shy bone in his body and was delighted to strip to his underoos. I held him up so he could watch his overalls make the x-ray machine trip. The other people in line cheered the toddler, and he was very pleased with himself. One of our other children would have freaked out. It depends on the child's temperment and how much time the TSA has to screen.

 

Dozdoats

On TB every waking moment
It's OBVIOUSLY too dangerous to fly commercial at all, if all that "security" is truly justified.

dd
 
What happened was security holes in air transport were exploited on 9/11 and blew those holes wide open.

At first, the public were a bit peeved at the "minor" inconveniences they were subjected to (for their own and their kids' lives sake) then the truly paranoid amongst us latched on like a flock of Jim Jones's and all hell broke loose. The more creative jihad joe became, the more security had to be tightened, much to all of our dismay and inconvenience.

This gave birth to the Michael Moore mentality that spread like wildfire. Then more and more people screamed about how their rights were being stripped by "big brother" yet no one has yet to state what liberties they have actually lost. Even to the point that some folks TRULY believe that the US of A ORCHESTRATED 9/11 in some smokey back room for the sole purpose of feeling up old ladies knickers in an airport.

Those jihad joes had been researching our weaknesses for years and finally got Joe Q. Public's attention on 9/11.

It gets no simpler than that. Those who prefer the "comfort" of conspiracy and intrigue can cling to it all they want but it won't ever make those thought aberrations correct.

Maureen :dstrs:

Maureen, you must be NEW to this country . . . many of my forbearers LEFT the "British Isle" BECAUSE of an autocratic government intent upon intruding into personal areas where they had no business.

They came to "the colonies" prior to the American Revolution, and subsequent generations/family members have fought to defend and promote the letter and intent of the U.S. Constitution -- aka known as "the American way" -- militarily and politically.

What you are promoting in your commentary is in direct opposition to what my ancestors have fought for, down through the last 370+ years that our family has been here on the American continent.

Do you understand this?


intothegoodnight
 

OddOne

< Yes, I do look like that.
Sorry, not flying anywhere anytime soon... Not gonna feed this beast.

To add to the blood boil...

TSA screening computer:
TSA-Kids.jpg


Desktop wallpaper on said computer:
TSA-Kids-Closeup.jpg
 

NC Susan

Deceased
ITS CHILD ABUSE.


There is not way i would have allowed that to continue to my child without backslapping the "cop"
 

juco

Veteran Member
Video pulled

If it's the same clip as I saw on tee-vee, the child was struggling and screaming something like "don't touch me" and the parent was restraining the kid.

Nobody would paw my child like that without drawing back a bloody stump.
 

MaureenO

Another Infidel
Maureen, you must be NEW to this country . . . many of my forbearers LEFT the "British Isle" BECAUSE of an autocratic government intent upon intruding into personal areas where they had no business.

They came to "the colonies" prior to the American Revolution, and subsequent generations/family members have fought to defend and promote the letter and intent of the U.S. Constitution -- aka known as "the American way" -- militarily and politically.

What you are promoting in your commentary is in direct opposition to what my ancestors have fought for, down through the last 370+ years that our family has been here on the American continent.

Do you understand this?


intothegoodnight

Dear Sir or Madam,

In response to your reply to my post I must respectfully submit that I am an American. I was born on this holy ground of the USA whilst my family were on holiday from Ireland and for that I will be forever grateful. At 3 months of age my family brought myself and my elder sisters back to Ireland and after some time we emigrated here permanently and it was the month of November.

One of the first things my mum did after moving house to the USA was to celebrate Thanksgiving. Her reason to celebrate a holiday not "ours?"

"I will celebrate anything that commemorates the defeat of the Brits." Those were her words. I agree with her sentiment and, basically, for the same reasons as she, God rest her soul.

As a Catholic in the Republic of Ireland, we were taught that every bite of freedom we wanted we would have to fight and bleed for. And so we have. I have fought and bled here in America for the same freedoms as my family fought, bled and died for in Ireland and I will continue to do so. Unless you don't have that blaze burning in your belly, all you can do is die on your knees.

I could tell you stories...but I won't but for to say my belly's on fire to keep the freedoms we have. That's what's makes me a good woman, a good cop, and a proud American.

If you have nothing worth dying for, you have nothing worth living for. I understand THAT. I have forgotten more about freedoms lost that you may ever learn in your lifetime.

If I need to strip naked to pass inspection to board an aircraft, I will. YOUR safety means that much to me.

Maureen :dstrs:
 
Dear Sir or Madam,

In response to your reply to my post I must respectfully submit that I am an American. I was born on this holy ground of the USA whilst my family were on holiday from Ireland and for that I will be forever grateful. At 3 months of age my family brought myself and my elder sisters back to Ireland and after some time we emigrated here permanently and it was the month of November.

One of the first things my mum did after moving house to the USA was to celebrate Thanksgiving. Her reason to celebrate a holiday not "ours?"

"I will celebrate anything that commemorates the defeat of the Brits." Those were her words. I agree with her sentiment and, basically, for the same reasons as she, God rest her soul.

As a Catholic in the Republic of Ireland, we were taught that every bite of freedom we wanted we would have to fight and bleed for. And so we have. I have fought and bled here in America for the same freedoms as my family fought, bled and died for in Ireland and I will continue to do so. Unless you don't have that blaze burning in your belly, all you can do is die on your knees.

I could tell you stories...but I won't but for to say my belly's on fire to keep the freedoms we have. That's what's makes me a good woman, a good cop, and a proud American.

If you have nothing worth dying for, you have nothing worth living for. I understand THAT. I have forgotten more about freedoms lost that you may ever learn in your lifetime.

If I need to strip naked to pass inspection to board an aircraft, I will. YOUR safety means that much to me.

Maureen :dstrs:

It is clear that you do not understand the point made in my previous comment.

We will have to agree to disagree, Maureen. Daniel O'Connell would have preferred otherwise.


intothegoodnight
 

mandatroy

Member
I have fought and bled here in America for the same freedoms as my family fought, bled and died for in Ireland and I will continue to do so. Unless you don't have that blaze burning in your belly, all you can do is die on your knees.

I could tell you stories...but I won't but for to say my belly's on fire to keep the freedoms we have. That's what's makes me a good woman, a good cop, and a proud American.

If you have nothing worth dying for, you have nothing worth living for. I have forgotten more about freedoms lost that you may ever learn in your lifetime.

If I need to strip naked to pass inspection to board an aircraft, I will.

Maureen :dstrs:

Aye! The OP wishes to thanks you for that thought provoking reply. My imagination's afire. Tickets for two?!

M.-Troy


"Here's to a long life and a merry one

A quick death and an easy one

A pretty girl and an honest one

A cold beer and another one!

-- Irish Saying
 

Hansa44

Justine Case
Dear Sir or Madam,

In response to your reply to my post I must respectfully submit that I am an American. I was born on this holy ground of the USA whilst my family were on holiday from Ireland and for that I will be forever grateful. At 3 months of age my family brought myself and my elder sisters back to Ireland and after some time we emigrated here permanently and it was the month of November.

One of the first things my mum did after moving house to the USA was to celebrate Thanksgiving. Her reason to celebrate a holiday not "ours?"

"I will celebrate anything that commemorates the defeat of the Brits." Those were her words. I agree with her sentiment and, basically, for the same reasons as she, God rest her soul.

As a Catholic in the Republic of Ireland, we were taught that every bite of freedom we wanted we would have to fight and bleed for. And so we have. I have fought and bled here in America for the same freedoms as my family fought, bled and died for in Ireland and I will continue to do so. Unless you don't have that blaze burning in your belly, all you can do is die on your knees.

I could tell you stories...but I won't but for to say my belly's on fire to keep the freedoms we have. That's what's makes me a good woman, a good cop, and a proud American.

If you have nothing worth dying for, you have nothing worth living for. I understand THAT. I have forgotten more about freedoms lost that you may ever learn in your lifetime.

If I need to strip naked to pass inspection to board an aircraft, I will. YOUR safety means that much to me.

Maureen :dstrs:


With your shape I would too, but in my case I will fight to my dying day and last breath to keep my clothes on.:D
 

MaureenO

Another Infidel
With your shape I would too, but in my case I will fight to my dying day and last breath to keep my clothes on.:D

I'd much prefer NOT to prance round in my pelt at the airfield, but if it meant keeping someone alive, Hansa, here hold my coat...;) I'll keep my red high heels on, though...

Mo :dstrs:
 

Chair Warmer

Membership Revoked
If I need to strip naked to pass inspection to board an aircraft, I will. YOUR safety means that much to me.

Maureen :dstrs:

The problem is YOUR permissiveness to "feel you up" is also giving your passive permission to feel up 3 year olds screaming "DON'T TOUCH ME THERE!" And doing that shit AIN'T RIGHT!!!!!!!!


Mrs.Cw
 

The Traveler

Veteran Member
Maureen, I am sorry but this is all about control of the masses and that is what bothers me. TSA feeling up children and searching nuns, ( i have seen that personnally) is bullshit and anyone saying that keeps us safe is full of shit. We need to profile people to keep this country safe. I know that pisses people off too, but feeling me up at an airport because I dont want to be exposed to high levels of radiation isnt keeping us safe. Check the people that cause these problems and leave the Americans alone that make this country safe.
 

Technomancer

Inactive
The amount of explosive material needed to put a hole in an airplane at a door or window could be carried in a body cavity.

The amount of material needed to fill a section of an airplane enough poisonous gas to kill or disable the majority, maybe kill the pilots if in the front section, likewise would fit into a body cavity. They don't keep much fresh air coming in.

A plastic or ceramic weapon, the pieces to assemble a gun of alternative design, also could be carried in a body cavity.


Even actual strip searches wouldn't find these things, much less the virtual strip, so are those who feel the scans and feel-ups are neccessary willing to be checked internally before each flight as well? And don't forget your adolescent and teenage children.
 

Chair Warmer

Membership Revoked
Maureen, I am sorry but this is all about control of the masses and that is what bothers me. TSA feeling up children and searching nuns, ( i have seen that personnally) is bullshit and anyone saying that keeps us safe is full of shit. We need to profile people to keep this country safe. I know that pisses people off too, but feeling me up at an airport because I dont want to be exposed to high levels of radiation isnt keeping us safe. Check the people that cause these problems and leave the Americans alone that make this country safe.

Maureen,

I'm sorry for the way I had an outburst and want you to know I wasn't trying to be mean to you. I wish I could have formatted my words as eloquently as The Traveler did here, it's just that hearing about what happened to this 3 year old puts me over the edge and is so disturbing to me. That should have never happened to a child at the hands of our government and I feel it's all of our responsibility to make sure the children aren't treated that way.

Mrs.Cw
 

FREEBIRD

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Maureen---I get where you're coming from, so where is your "line in the sand"? Is there any possible behavior by TSA officials that you would refuse (cavity search, anything else)?
 

Technomancer

Inactive
Something to add regarding selective enforcement or profiling:
Just checking a particular kind of person or those with records isn't enough for real security. It would be easy for them to use a bystander. A terrorist just has to find the right profile for a victim and either pick someone out ahead of time to put on the plane, or find someone who is planning to be on the plane that day. They just make the ruels clear to the person they kidnap, trap, etc: the person will die no matter what happens, whether they agree to go along with it or not, but their kids at home (or sick/disabled loved one, etc) will live (obvious lie, but would work on the right person) if they go along with it. They'd just make it part of the rules that if ANYTHING suspicious happens the hostages die, to prevent the person from trying to get the attention of a guard or interfering at the last minute. If the victim is convinced that X plane will go down no matter what, that if they help noone would ever know they helped anyway, then the only thing that can change based on whether they cooperate or not is their kids living or dying.

My point in this scenerio is that even now, in a post 9/11 world where everyone will risk their life and fight back rather than give in to hijackers, an unrelated person could be coerced to act as a storage compartment for a terrorist just the same as someone can be forced to serve as a drug mule.
-And there's no reason a terrorist wouldn't just lie to someone and say they're only smuggling drugs and not an explosive or other weapon.

To create the super security some want, you have to treat innocent bystanders the same as you would a suspected terrorist.
---------

Myself, I can't agree with anything near what would actually be needed to make every flight fully secure.

You have to draw a line somewhere and say you aren't going to live in terror/fear, that the terrorists haven't won. There is a certain amount of risk that has to be accepted if you want to live anything approaching a normal life.

The idea of mandatory security scanners with certain modifications for privacy/safety is acceptable to me, if a safer technology can be found. The aggressive feel-up/pat-down on the other hand, does cross a line in my opinion.
 

Ragnarok

On and On, South of Heaven
If I need to strip naked to pass inspection to board an aircraft, I will. YOUR safety means that much to me.

You have GOT to be kidding me?

:screw:

OK... For "my safety", I need you to take an RFID implant to prove you aren't a "terrorist". For "my safety", I need you to trot on down and enter the nearest FEMA camp when instructed to do so. For "my safety", I need you to give up all your constitutional rights ....

I have news for you, my safety does not depend on someone playing the knight in shining armor and sacrificing their God given rights in some pseudo-martydom.

My safety depends on people standing up to this progressive tyranny and saying "ENOUGH"!

" "And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?... The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If...if...We didn't love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation.... We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward."
—- Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago

News flash - These checkpoints aren't about "safety" they are about control.
 

Blastoff

Veteran Member
Rent and watch "Schindler's List." Watch how the Jews go from standing in a line to "register" - to running through the yard of the concentration camp naked for "health screenings" - to obediently stripping to enter the "showers."

All in the name of surviving.

Isn't that why you allow yourself to be subjected to TSA?

We are being conditioned. Nudged step by step to accept what we would never have accepted in the past. Shut up and submit.
 

Perpetuity

Inactive
The amount of explosive material needed to put a hole in an airplane at a door or window could be carried in a body cavity.

The amount of material needed to fill a section of an airplane enough poisonous gas to kill or disable the majority, maybe kill the pilots if in the front section, likewise would fit into a body cavity. They don't keep much fresh air coming in.

A plastic or ceramic weapon, the pieces to assemble a gun of alternative design, also could be carried in a body cavity.


Even actual strip searches wouldn't find these things, much less the virtual strip, so are those who feel the scans and feel-ups are neccessary willing to be checked internally before each flight as well? And don't forget your adolescent and teenage children.
My thoughts as well. Every "security" measure has been reactive and not proactive. As soon as a wannabe Johnny Jihadi stuffs his anal cavity with the threat d'jour, mandatory cavity searches would be a reality in reaction to the threat. Do we REALLY want or need to go there? Following TSA logic, yes.

A three year old getting molested does absolutely nothing for security. Period. I don't care about any made up schmuck about how AQ is looking at packing the innards of kids and animals to prove a point, other then it's a prefabricated load of crap for self serving means. And the TSA needs every threat at their disposal in order to justify their existence, and ever growing budget.

And lets cut to the chase. A three year old has NEVER, EVER commandeered planes and flown into buildings, loaded their Pull-Ups full of explosives like a numbnut, or turned their Spongebob shoes into a half arsed bomb nor loaded their Play Doh playsets with a C4 element and put it in the mail (oh jeez, now that I've said that, do we need to ban Play Doh because of the potential?) It does seem Middle Eastern descent younger men have though. Not seventy year old grannies, nuns, or toddlers.

And a line has been drawn over privacy. People have had enough. People are coming out of the woodwork as well talking about their treatment. Yet if you watch CNN and other nooze outlets, the spin is that most people don't mind. I'm sure they won't mind a cold gloved finger sliding past their sphincter for their "safety" either.
 
Last edited:

pops88

Girls with Guns Member
Since the majority of terrorism is from muslims, we should just put pig fat on every plane and be done with this idiocy. (I know "muslims" should be capitalized, but I refuse to do it.)
 

Ragnarok

On and On, South of Heaven
Here are the true patriots, not the people who are .gov lap-dogs and tools who will roll over and "take it up the arse" ( quite literally, if we don't stop this now ).



TSA Hit With Lawsuits As Revolt Explodes
November 17, 2010





The TSA has been hit with a number of lawsuits as the revolt against Big Sis, naked body scanners, and invasive groping measures explodes, with one case involving a woman who had her blouse pulled down in full public view by TSA goons who then proceeded to laugh and joke about her exposed breasts.

Nationwide outrage against the TSA is not only bringing to light new cases of airport abuse, it’s throwing fresh attention on previous incidents that have been going on for years.

One of the most disturbing, which is subject to an ongoing lawsuit, involved a 21-year-old college student from Amarillo Texas. The woman was passing through security at Corpus Christi airport on May 29 2008 when she was subjected to “extended search procedures” by the TSA.

“As the TSA agent was frisking plaintiff, the agent pulled the plaintiff’s blouse completely down, exposing plaintiffs’ breasts to everyone in the area,” the lawsuit said. “As would be expected, plaintiff was extremely embarrassed and humiliated.”
http://amarillo.com/news/local-news/2010-10-11/lawsuit-airport-search-indecent

TSA workers continued to laugh and joke about the incident “for an extended period of time,” leaving the woman distraught and needing to be consoled. After the woman re-entered the boarding area, TSA workers continued to humiliate her over the incident.

“One male TSA employee expressed to the plaintiff that he wished he would have been there when she came through the first time and that ‘he would just have to watch the video,’” the suit said.

The woman filed an administrative claim against the TSA but was forced to launch a full lawsuit after the agency failed to respond.

The incident bears similarities to a 2002 case involving a pregnant woman who had her breasts exposed by TSA agents in public. Her husband was thrown in the airport jail for complaining about the treatment of his wife.
http://lewrockwell.com/orig3/monahan1.html

Another lawsuit against the TSA involves Ron Corbett, a businessman and frequent traveler who is so infuriated by the plethora of cases where TSA workers have sexually groped passengers, squeezing breasts and genitals, that he has filed a lawsuit in federal court in Miami requesting an injunction against the TSA to prevent them from touching private areas without reasonable suspicion.

Corbett writes about his lawsuit on a blog entitled TSA Out Of Our Pants.
http://tsaoutofourpants.wordpress.com/

“Having grown up in New York and personally seeing the smoke rise from the towers that morning in 2001, I know the threat of terrorism is real, and I know we must defend ourselves. This does not mean that the Constitution should be ignored, and indeed, the TSA has plenty of alternative screening procedures that are less invasive. Besides the privacy issue, there have been health issues raised as to the radiation produced by the imaging devices, as well as efficacy issues, with no good studies having been done to show that this imagery makes us any safer,” writes Corbett.

Yet another lawsuit involves The Rutherford Institute, which is suing the feds on behalf of two pilots over the use of full body scanners.

“Those pilots recently refused to go through a controversial whole body imaging scanner, and also refused the alternative, the TSA’s new, more invasive pat downs,” reports CBS 6. http://www.wtvr.com/news/wtvr-ruthe...awsuit-full-body-scan-airport,0,6766717.story

The lawsuit, which personally names both TSA chief John Pistole and DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano, argues that the scanners violate the Constitution’s protection against unreasonable searches and seizures under the 4th Amendment.

The TSA could also be hit with a fourth lawsuit if they pursue an $11,000 claim against John Tyner, otherwise known as “don’t touch my junk guy”. Speaking on The Alex Jones Show yesterday, Tyner insisted he would file a counter lawsuit if the TSA continued to pursue him over his refusal to submit to an airport groping.

Another victim, radio host Owen JJ Stone, who had a TSA agent put his hand inside his pants and touch his backside and genitalia, has not indicated he will pursue charges, but has vowed instead to use his treatment as an example of why the TSA needs to be stopped in its tracks or abolished altogether.

Pistole faces another grilling from lawmakers today on Capitol Hill at a Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation. http://edition.cnn.com/2010/TRAVEL/11/17/airport.security/
 

Kronos

Veteran Member

Wow.

What a douchebag slime of a 'parental-unit' that male is.
His child for a rah-rah 15 minutes of fame in the spotlight.

I wonder as well about the 'mother'...
restraining that wretched, hysterical child; exposing her to 'stranger abuse'.

I also wonder... the child's (entirely appropriate) reaction:

Has she, perhaps, been abused before,
and (reasonably, desperately) expected her 'parents' to protect her this time?

That child is a candidate for CPS (if ever there was one: won't happen) and counselling, FOR SURE.

She has, waaay too young, discovered that
those whose mission in life Ought Be to Keep her Safe and to Love her,
just WON'T and DON'T.

Not only that, but in addition, NOBODY ELSE in the World
(this was fully in public, with many other people watching)
Cares, either.

That poor, beautiful child. :(

Aside: Neither CPS nor 'counseling' would be worth a turd, IMO.
 

Barry Natchitoches

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Please tell me:

How am I supposed to teach my first grade daughter to protect herself from pedophiles inappropriately touching her, when TSA agents are allowed to do the very same thing?


How is a first grader supposed to be able to distinguish between behavior that would land one in jail and on the infamous Sexual Offender Registry, on the one hand, and the so-called "acceptable" touching by a TSA official?


IS THERE A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE ACTIONS OF SEX OFFENDERS CURRENTLY IN JAIL AND THE ACTIONS OF THE TSA IN THE CASE OF THIS CHILD?


And if your answer to the last question is "yes," then please explain to me how you come up with your answer.

Cuz I don't get it.


 
Top