POL The John Batchelor Show: American civil wars end with one side losing and vanishing. Michael Vlahos.

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
The John Batchelor Show

American civil wars end with one side losing and vanishing. Michael Vlahos. @JHUWorldCrisis
Feb 16 10:35 PM

Run time (19:49)
https://audioboom.com/posts/6679890...g-and-vanishing-michael-vlahos-jhuworldcrisis

US is made up of two sects that have become tribes, both regionally and politically with two different visions of society started in 1776...currently "Blue" v "Red" and elites with the "Blue" being globalists and the "Red" doesn't want that...An interesting conversation...HC
 
Last edited:

homepark

Resist
I heard Mike speak a number of times when I was working at Johns Hopkins. He articulates what a number of us have observed for quite a while. The global elites do have power, but they do not have popular support. The Democrats have aligned themselves with globalism. I like his comparison of the left to the Southern elites. It makes a lot of sense.

The globalists have to shut down free speech. They cannot tolerate dissent. They know what is best for everyone. Notice the similarity to popular communism.
 

cleobc

Veteran Member
The left loves communist dictators because they think people like Castro and Chavez want what's best for their people. But don't most dictators of any stripe think they are doing what's best for their people? Don't they think they know better what their people need? Liberals think they know what's best for everyone because they believe they are superior in intellect. They get frustrated because they can't bully everyone into believing them, and that's when the longing for a leader who can have power comes in.

My favorite Hillary quote comes from when she was trying to change our healthcare system during her husband's presidency: "We don't care what the people want, we care what they need."

To me, that says it all.
 

Dozdoats

On TB every waking moment
"We don't care what the people want, we care what they need."

Brings to mind the punch line from that old Lone Ranger joke: "What you mean WE, white man?"
 

Jeff B.

Don’t let the Piss Ants get you down…
Because if, God forbid, we get into a real internal conflict (Civil War), it will rapidly turn into a nasty fight without the rules and conventions of regular warfare. Irregulars will conduct purges by rounding up those on the other side and make use of excavation equipment to dispose of the bodies. The winners will write the history and the losers will be disappeared.

The side that can drop it's morals, virtues and need for order will have the initial upper hand (the Left/Progs). The side with the deeper bench will need to make up some ground and overcome the inertia of the initial brutality (the "Right").

We need to hope enough come off the bench quickly enough or like the Whites in Russia, the Bolsheviks will pick us apart one group at a time.

Jeff B.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Was listening to this on the way home tonight...the guest specifically named Soros as the money guy and driver of all of this along with the Clinton/Obama cabal....HC

For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
https://audioboom.com/posts/6687097...alists-gregory-copley-defense-foreign-affairs

The John Batchelor Show

The War Between the Americans: Phase 2 of the urban globalists failing to dislodge Trump from his leadership of the rural nationalists. Gregory Copley, Defense & Foreign Affairs.

Feb 21 7:43 PM
Run time (23:41)
AUTHOR.
(Photo: 50th Munich Security Conference 2014)
http://JohnBatchelorShow.com/contact
http://JohnBatchelorShow.com/schedules
Twitter: @BatchelorShow
The War Between the Americans: Phase 2 of the urban globalists failing to dislodge Trump from his leadership of the rural nationalists. Gregory Copley, Defense & Foreign Affairs.
Founded in 1972. Formerly Defense & Foreign Affairs Daily Volume XXXVI, No. 12 Wednesday, February 21, 2018 © 2018 Global Information System/ISSA. ________________________________________ The Battle of Washington The US, a year after the election of a new President, remains deeply engaged in a war between an entrenched “establishment” and that disruptive new President. What is significant is that there are no “war correspondents”, so there is an unin-formed electorate. The outcome will be critical for the entire world. And now the war has entered Phase Two. Analysis. By Gregory R. Copley, Editor, GIS/Defense & Foreign Affairs. The war between the urban globalists and the regional nationalists in the US has moved into a second year, and a second phase. Superficially, the ongoing skirmishes between US Pres. Donald Trump and the com-bined forces of the Democratic Party and much of the US media have seemed merely, well, unseemly. It is intended to appear that way. Each side seeks to belittle, trivialize, and ridicule the other; and the core electoral bases on each side galvanize behind such characterizations. But the reporting is essentially misleading. What is occurring is, in fact, a serious war between an entrenched establishment and a President who was elected to change the status quo.1 The war may not be over until one side or the other is destroyed in some form or other, or unless one side is co-opted. It is likely to be an extremely messy process, in which most of the activities and even causes are obscured by a partisan media. In essence, however, it is difficult for either side to relent. Pres. Trump feels that he has been elect-ed and empowered to act to disrupt an increasingly urban-centric, anti-national estab-lishment. And that “establishment” feels equally that it must stop Pres. Trump from dis-rupting its sense of entitlement and process. And while the visible part of the spectrum appears to be played out in the media on is-sues of style, it is within the discreet areas of the intelligence, security, and justice communities that the war is being truly fought. The outcome, of course, impacts the in-ternational community, given the weight of the US in global power and economic struc-tures. The urban, globalist element of the current war — centering around the media, much of the Democratic Party and some of the Republican Party, and the bureaucracy — based its rationale during the first year of the Trump Presidency around rejection of Pres. Trump on the premise that he had conspired with a foreign power, Russia, to manipu-late the course of the US Presidential election in November 2016. And this became the basis for legal actions indirectly to depose Pres. Trump. But, by early 2018, it was becoming apparent that any Russian attempts to interfere with or influence the US Presidential elections of November 8, 2016 — to the extent that they occurred — may have actually favored Democratic Party candidate Hillary Clinton rather than Republican candidate Donald Trump. At the same time, actual interference in the election process may have more significant-ly occurred as a result of separate — perhaps inadvertent — activities by the British in-telligence services, the Secret Intelligence Service (SIS/MI6) and technical surveillance agency GCHQ (Government Communications Headquarters), to favor Mrs Clinton and disadvantage candidate Trump.2 That phase of “the war against Trump”, however, was over, effectively, as of February 16, 2018. On that date, the Special Counsel Investigation into possible Russian influ-ence in the US 2016 Presidential election, headed by former Federal Bureau of In...
 
Last edited:

BUBBAHOTEPT

Veteran Member
If we lose, we are gone for a thousand years. If they lose (like their loyalist ancestors after the revolution), they just move to Canada and return when it is convienant.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
If we lose, we are gone for a thousand years. If they lose (like their loyalist ancestors after the revolution), they just move to Canada and return when it is convienant.

Yeah, that the guest even said there was the possibility of this going "kinetic" was "interesting" to say the least....
 

Luddite

Veteran Member
"Urban Sophists vs. Regional Hicks" 18 min mark.

I'm wondering what kind of line Vegas would have for this event?
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
The John Batchelor Show

Rehearsing the New American Civil War: PART 1 of 2: in the Secession of Oakland, California. Michael Vlahos. @JHUWorldCrisis
Mar 9 11:27 PM
Run time (13:04)
https://audioboom.com/posts/6716599...land-california-michael-vlahos-jhuworldcrisis

Rehearsing the New American Civil War: PART 2 of 2: by burning books in Berkeley, California. Michael Vlahos, @JHUWorldCrisis
Mar 9 11:34 PM
Run time (5:53)
https://audioboom.com/posts/6716604...jhuworldcrisis?playlist_direction=forward&t=0

http://johnbatchelorshow.com/schedules/friday-9-march-2018
Hour Two
Friday 9 March 2018 / Hour 2, Block A: Michael Vlahos, Johns Hopkins, in re: Civil war. Two sharply different visions of America. Perhaps big cities vs. rural America. Not finding a way to talk with each other. The Oakland mayor replied to AG Jeff Sessions, who said that the sanctuary movement, illegal protection of illegal immigrants, is unacceptable behavior. The mayor spoke back sharply. . . . . To what extent are the states sovereign, and to what extent the federal government? Constitution was unclear about slavery, leading almost inexorably to civil war. Although the Civil War solved the question of slavery and seemed to resolve the questions of federal-vs-state sovereignties, we're still likely to see situations such as today’s erupt with passion. California, as a prime example, considers itself to be virtually an independent jurisdiction. Arrest the mayor of Oakland? At what point does Sacramento decide it has the military means to defend sanctuary movements? The feds can arrest one mayor once, but thereafter the available police and SWAT teams (of which there are 30,00 or so) may be deployed by the state to resist the central government.
Friday 9 March 2018 / Hour 2, Block B: Michael Vlahos, Johns Hopkins, in re: . . . Existential choices obviate compromise. Here, both sides, red and blue, feel that that’s what they're facing. Constitution, immigration law, Second Amendment. The Constitution is scriptural, canonical. When you're reduced to fighting over the [nature] of scripture, you're already in a civil war.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
I came across these comments/replies tonight on this thread from a few years ago while youtube "diving"/"wandering"/"surfing" and I thought I should share them...This thread here at TB2K seemed like the place to do it...HC

An Honor to Walk on American Soil | Instructor Zero

Funker Tactical - Fight Training Videos
Published on Jan 31, 2015
Run time (3:13)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zV8ukROFWA

bill65761
2 years ago
Let me point something out ... his respect for this nation is based on being able to compare it with other nations. Americans who have spent little time abroad ... or who have spent their time abroad sheltered from the realities of the countries they may have visited ... know only this country and they are familiar with only its faults.

I agree that it has plenty (probably far more than I have any knowledge of) and I bristle at many of the ones I DO know about: but it is still a far better place than even some of the more attractive tourist traps. Every time I have gone to Aruba I have truly enjoyed myself ... but, when I considered moving there I learned that I could not own a firearm and that my health insurance would not follow me there. Ditto for Ireland ... lovely place but they would never trust me to arm myself and, under Irish law, I can claim dual citizenship.

We, the people who continue to fight for the Second Amendment, are bucking a tide of unthinking people that would grant ALL rights to the government and retain NONE for themselves.

RJTrezise1983
3 years ago
A lot of Americans are being told that the world hates them now because in the 90's and early 00's, hell maybe even right up to now it has been fashionable to hate on the US because they are stereotyped as arrogant rednecks who just want to shit all over the world. Well, for my part, here in Australia a lot of us love you guys - particularly those of us who are of the libertarian persuasion and will settle for nothing less than true freedom and release from this intrusive, abusive bureaucracy that has weaseled its way into almost every facet of our existence and has removed the heart, soul and balls of the nation's true people. I was born in the wrong country, and if I could I would move from this piece of shit nation over to the US, where my heart belongs.

bill65761
2 years ago
+RJTrezise1983
When my fiance and I were discussing whether to live in NYC or Detroit, she was worried about not getting as good of a job in Detroit as she had in NYC. I had her look up the costs of living for both and, although she would not earn as much in Detroit as she was making in NYC, in Detroit she could afford to buy a home for less than it was costing her in NYC for an apartment ... quite a bit less. As a machinist, there didn't seem to be a lot of work for me in NYC, but her degree would put her in line for a lot of jobs in & around Detroit.

At about the same time, I pointed out a philosophical perspective she was overlooking: everywhere people live, there is a way to earn an income sufficient to provide food, clothing and shelter with a little bit left over for entertainment and the other frills. How much it takes to earn a living depends entirely on what you call "a living". However, in pretty much every case, a person who is intelligent and industrious will always be able to nail down "enough" (by local standards) to care for both himself and his family.

There are a few restrictions on who can (legally) come here ... but not too many. Take a closer look at the US and your own needs and, if you are willing to adapt, you may well find that America is not so far away after all.

RJTrezise1983
2 years ago
+Steve C.
Well, there's a lot of things here that are good. There's public health care where you can go to a good doctor for very little money and sometimes it;s free. There's plenty of everything in terms of making the basics of life easy (food, housing etc). Wages are high, the standard of living is high, the country is beautiful and the people for the most part are kind and welcoming. It's all window-dressing though. The level of control isn't noticed by most people because most people just go to work, have fun on the weekend, go on holiday and to them that's freedom and they're not noticing the small things that are happening to their liberty. There is a tax for everything, a fee and a fine and a license for everything. Things that you work hard for can be taken from you on a whim. I'll give you an example:

I'm a professional shooter over here and I'm one of probably 500 people in the country with what is called a category D license which allows me to have semi-automatic rifles. I only got the license last year and I'm just setting my business up to remove feral animals from farms etc. My state has decided that too many people have obeyed the rules and lawfully obtained their category D's so all people with those licenses have now come under review and have to justify why they should keep the license and their guns. If they don't earn enough or don't fit the requirements they will have their license and guns seized by the police. My state is then going to make it even tougher to get the Cat D.

You see, if the government doesn't like something and they want to control the amount of people doing it they go ahead and put rules in place to make it hard for people to do those things. Then, when people start doing the "right" thing and obeying the rules the government monitors how many people are engaging in that activity. If that number gets too high they put it under review in order to try and stop anyone else from doing it.

Basically, the way things go, is that over here we are not guaranteed any rights. We are basically free to do what we are told. In the state next to mine they have just clamped down on protesters by enacting a law stating that if someone (a business owner for instance) is made to feel a little uncomfortable by a protest going on in the street, the police can remove the protesters and arrest them if they don't leave.

Also, Australia just enacted meta-data laws in order to fight "terrorism" so now our internet activity is being LEGALLY tracked. They don't need a warrant or anything.

I know the US has got its problems but the difference is that the people over there are awakening on a huge scale. The Australian government has learned from the US government's mistakes and will not allow its people to wake up.

Steve C.
2 years ago
I'm not too sure the freedom people perceive in the States is genuine liberty. The advent of the information revolution via the internet has exposed the hoards to endless reserves of misleading and subversive information (and quite often false). Hacker groups like Anonymous and other activist groups I'm sure you're familar with, are largely misinformed and have snowballed into paranoid social insurgents. They believe what they're doing is honorable or a public service, but they cannot or rather they do not put forth sufficient efforts towards an objective analysis of the issues they are so passionate about. This is extremely dangerous to us civilians who realize issues concerning conflicting policy positions are not binary.they are not good or evil. Now, thank god for the NRA and their highly astute lawyers who fight no matter the political climate for all gun rights. Guiding a herd of goats is much simplier and safer than trying to control a swarm of killer bees.

I guess my point is this universe is only getting more complex with technologies and information operations that now have the capacity to convey a facade of "freedom"., Make sure you pay close attention to these "movements" whom purport to be defeating evil government bureaucrats and greedy war mongers. It's these simple and often superficial movements who very may ruin in for us citizens who consider it our duty to a rigorous analysis of all seemingly "simple" things.

RJTrezise1983
2 years ago
+Steve C.
The differences weren't clear for me before I started making friends over in the US and chatting to them regularly on skype or here etc. I didn't realize how much more freedom of choice and how much more POTENTIAL for liberty there is in the US compared to here. Certainly the government is getting too big for its breeches in the US but the PEOPLE are beginning to push back in a real way and are looking to what the country was meant to be rather than what it is now. There is no such potential here in Australia. We were originally a penal colony and for the foreseeable future it will remain my prison too.

calevel florida
3 years ago
I get his words very deeply in my heart, there is no land like the land of the free and the braves, one nation under God. I was born and raised in Cuba and there is no a single day that passes by that I don't thank my creator for the blessing of being part of this great nation. I will give up my life to defend this country and its constitution so that my children get to pass to their children the torch of liberty. God bless the USA.



These are a bit off thread topic/drift but I figured it would be of some interest...HC
Dave Smith
1 year ago
Most deadly guys are nice. They don't need intimidation to win, and assimilate rather than alienate.

(And this is coming from a guy who thinks a lot of Zero's videos are just flourish)

3

Raphael Motta
Raphael Motta
1 year ago
The better you get a fighting the less of it you do. I met a sniper from the brazilian special operations brigade in a barbecue once. One of the most down to earth men in the military I´ve ever seen, I remember he was a NCO I belive, and he said that you have to treat your soldiers with respect because they are your hammer, your fighting tool, and if your cool down with your subordinates you´re cool up with your superiors.

Bruce Lee is a great exemple of this.
and this one...

Legio XXI Rapax
2 years ago (edited)
A living proof that italian soldiers aren't coward or poor skilled, like some people that know nothing about Military life, think.
He is a former instructor of Italian Folgore Paratroopers Brigade.

C M
1 year ago
Also...
All of the French soldiers I ever met or trained with when I was in were really good as well. It was that they had/have bad officers and commanders and their soldiers take the flak for it. But yea Italy and the French have good troops but their officer corp is suspect at best.

1

Legio XXI Rapax
Legio XXI Rapax
1 year ago
+Chad Murphy
True indeed, but today in Italy the situation is much better, the Ministry of Defence have builded up many centralized command for each specific task, as for example the COMFOSE (Comando Forze Speciali dell’Esercito) that is a SOCOM (Special Operation Command). The goal of the army chief of staff is to adopt a unique command able to coordinate various operational capabilities of the regiments as far as possible by standardizing training and creating the necessary interoperability to conduct special operations.

1

C M
C M
1 year ago
+Legio XXI Rapax Well yea the historical bad reputation comes from WW1 and 2 not so much modern day events. But from an American perspective I can tell you the avg person doesn't respect the French or Italian troops and of course they would be wrong.


Legio XXI Rapax
Legio XXI Rapax
1 year ago
+Chad Murphy
WW2 maybe, but it was all anti-italian allies propaganda to soft the belly of the axis alliance.
I suggest you really to read what Rommel think about italians (and his equipment).
And to read what italians was capable to do in the battle of Isbuscenskij. 700 italian of the Savoia Cavalleria (Savoy Cavalry) armed only with swords and hand grenades, was able to defeat, only charging them, 2500 men of Russian 304th Infantry Division armed with american rifles, cannons and mortars.....at their home, and this was remembered as the last world historycal cavalry charge of all time (no one since today have defeated the russian at their home, only Italians).
Battle result: Italy won.

Italy: 32 dead, 52 wounded, 100+ horses killed

Russia: 150 dead, 300 wounded, 600 captured, 4 cannons and 10 mortars destroyed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charge_of_the_Savoia_Cavalleria_at_Isbuscenskij

And not forget what Folgore division did in El Alamein, stopping the english infantry plus mechanized brigade, for 72 hours, outnumbered 10/1. Wasn't a case if English at the end of the battle give them the Honour Salute, called them "Lions".

If you want we would talk about the six italians of the Flottiglia X Mas (first real world seals, and not the SAS how english like to boost over the world) able to destroy in one hour the entire mediterranean fleet of England, in the battle of Alexandria?....(Churchill was so impressed by the italian seals tactics of the human torpedo, that he give the task to his engineer to built an equal torpedoes and build the SAS)

Or we would talk of how Austriacs usually call the italian soldiers of the Sassari brigade in WWI?....Dimonios (means Devils).

So my friend, don't believe at the anti-propaganda that allies (english and australian upon all) did to destabilize the axis, Italy did even to much, whit the equip that he have, in both wars. And at least Italy won the WW1...Germany lost both the wars, so Italians aren't good soldiers but Germans are good?....think with your head, read true historical facts, make your idea, don't believe in easy anti-propaganda.
isn't a case if today USA have a lot of trust in Italy as military allies, so much to give them the permission to arm his Reaper drones with the Hellfire missiles (only USA, UK and Italy have this permission of the USA congress). USA military apparate isn't stupid, they know which EU army is good, and which not.
And sorry if i seem rude with you, isn't my intention, i don't know well english so there's some language barrier from my point.


C M
C M
1 year ago
Yea you went off on a lot of nonsense there and didn't understand what I was saying. I was saying how most Americans think not how I myself think...so 0 of that applies to me.

Also yes the Germans have really good soldiers then and now and it isn't even disputed by anyone. As to them losing...yes Hannibal lost too and no one doubts how good he was...losing is going to happen to someone and the best don't always win.


Legio XXI Rapax
Legio XXI Rapax
1 year ago
+Chad Murphy
Sorry, you don't understand me, the speech i did isn't applied to you, but at the general vision average peoples have when they sopoke of Italy in a military way. So don't get offended, wasn't my intention, that speech is only a proved fact of the bravery (or not-cowardrice) of the italians, that's all.
Germans have really good soldiers?...yes, but their valour was disputed by Rommel itself, and i cite from the Rommel diary of war:

March 2: "The Italian, here in Africa, are good comrades and good and brave soldiers. If they had our means and our discipline, could compete with the best of our troops. The episode of Giarabub (attach a detailed report on the facts and on the figure of Major Castagna, of which the Ministry of Propaganda could use fine) reveals the qualities of courage of the Italians."

About the airforce:
"Flak consists of very old Skoda seventy-five millimeters, even the 1914-1918 war; I saw even antiquated bronze mortars, former Austro-Hungarian army ... The planes are worn and are not reciprocated. The Italian pilots make miracles. The reconnaissance equipment, Zecht tells me, are old Caproni, helpless and slow, deadly for those flying ... The torpedo planes are empirical and rudimentary: the only living thing is the value and courage of the pilots; our german aviator refuse to take off with equipment here called rightly "Totebahren" ("Coffins"). The Italians rifles are called model 91, because they are of the year 1891; The Italians do not possess machine guns, the six-tonne tanks are ridiculous."
Hitler himself admitted, "I would have won the war if I had German officers, but Italian soldiers."

As you see Rommel think all other things about italians as soldiers, and not what peoples would believe. Rommel itself had to admit that his soldiers refuse to fly with the planes of italians, cause they was scared to die.
Italians was almost without a war equip, this was the truth, and Rommel know that very well.

1

Michael Lorenzo
Michael Lorenzo
2 years ago
like for Bruce Lee....
 

Dozdoats

On TB every waking moment
The old joke goes that the Lone Ranger and Tonto are watching a horde of Indian braves bear down on them in full battle fury. "Looks like we're in trouble, Tonto," says the Lone Ranger to his pal. "What you mean 'we,' white man?," Tonto responds.
-- http://rmadisonj.blogspot.com/2006/06/what-you-mean-we-white-man.html

See also http://top40db.net/Lyrics/?SongID=74348

And lots more if you care to search. https://www.bing.com/search?q=what+...09F2136AF9ABC90335C9F5D4F177&ts=1527388201178

Don't see any Joey Bishop connection right off the bat, but he might have told the old joke at one time or another.
 

bw

Fringe Ranger
Don't see any Joey Bishop connection right off the bat, but he might have told the old joke at one time or another.

I suspect if you look further you'll find Joey Bishop originated the line in Texas Across The River. Your link was to someone else misquoting it as a Lone Ranger line. I'm willing to be wrong, but that's what it looks like you've got there.
 

Shooter

Veteran Member
He didnt go into who had the most arms, and knew how to use them,

It may take awhile for us to get into gear, but when the right does, it wont turn out good for the libs,

and what side do you think the military would side with?
 

homecanner1

Veteran Member
those are good links, some thought provoking ideas. I agree Trump is not the end of this, he is merely the standard bearer of a much bigger vanguard or wave coming over the next 25 yrs. A return to our integrity and morality. the me too movement is just a start to clean out the nest of filth and swamp of depravity.
 

Dozdoats

On TB every waking moment
I'm willing to be wrong, but that's what it looks like you've got there.

I'm always willing to learn. But I don't have 101 minutes to watch the movie right now :D
 
Top