From my observations at various places on the net that were discussing Barrett, the fact that she was quite good looking for her age trumped any suspicion she could be a deep stater. More sadly, is that many think our little horse faced buck toothed brainless wonder, AOC, is hot.
Personally , and no offense intended, I think you have read it all wrong. But that is neither here nor there at the moment. And for the record, I have been saying for for a few months now, I read the tea leaves differently: by April sometime, i think we might be quite sure there will be 3-1/2 years from then to a full resolution of the matter...I see it a different way. I never liked or trusted Trump the person before he came down the escalator and actually started talking.
I made my decision to vote for him because what he was proposing were the very things that I thought needed to be done in a last ditch attempt to turn around or at least slow the death of the country.
Once in power, he tried to do everything he had promised. I still didn't like him as a person and for the life of me couldn't figure out his ego issues. I also saw that he had dreadfully underestimated the deep state (RINO's especially) and was to quick tempered and easily distracted by his ego.
Sometime late his first year or the starting of his second year, I started to realize that the four years was a gift from God, but due to his own failings he was becoming a Saul. As Ryan and the other RINO's played him but always screwed up the real opportunities to expose and destroy the deep state it became clear to me that the four years was a blessing from God to allow those with eyes to see to prepare for the great cataclysm that is here now.
The first two year years ammo was cheap, decent weapons were reasonable, as was food. Land could be bought, built up and readied to 'disappear to'. It was a 'fat time' that was to be used to get ready for the 7 bad years coming. Time to get ready, to store, to prepare, to go as grey as possible and to plan.
Trumps ego, big mouth and his inability to see past the rino's is what cost him the grace that put him in office. He took credit for what he did not do, but that God did for him. IF he would have humbled himself and gave God the glory it would have been different, but alas he choose the ego.
2020's COVID and the stolen elections was the turning point.
Anyone with eyes to see should be clear that the 'fat time' has passed and the 7 bad years are here. There is no hope in the courts, the congress, the president or in any politicians.
As one person here reminds us - our enemy hates us and wants us dead
... and that enemy have now shown they have total and full power of the corrupt federal government at their disposal and will soon stop at nothing to achieve their ends.
No offense taken. My view is that at the least the birth pangs just keep increasing in strength and frequency. What happens between now and the the April-June time frame are important and telling.Personally , and no offense intended, I think you have read it all wrong. But that is neither here nor there at the moment. And for the record, I have been saying for for a few months now, I read the tea leaves differently: by April sometime, i think we might be quite sure there will be 3-1/2 years from then to a full resolution of the matter...
You're damn right we deserve better and expect more.No standing before, during, or after a theft. Our SCOTUS decision is every criminals dream and every law abiding citizen's nightmare.
"One wonders what the Court waits for. We failed to settle this dispute before the election and thus provide clear rules. Now we again fail to provide clear rules for future elections. The decision to leave the election law hidden beneath a shroud of doubt is baffling. By doing nothing we invite further confusion and erosion in voter confidence. Our fellow citizens deserve better and expect more of us"
DominionDid anyone here actually believe that the SCOTUS would overturn a national election? If so, you had better stay away from bridges.
As I chronicled earlier, Trump had his chance but totally botched it (and as we just found out) beyond retrieval. I don't know if he could have prevented the election debacle but the point is he didn't try. People here were positive he was playing 3-4d chess when actually he was not playing at all.
And to compound the felony, I an still puzzled by reports that GOP types failed to vote in the GA election thus assuring Demo control of the Congress.
Does it give anyone else a galloping case of the heebie jeebies to think that out of every conservative SCOTUS justice appointed by a Republican President, that since justice Scalia was murdered ... errr died, only one - Justice Thomas has held rock solid on conservative and constitutional principles?
That 6-3 supposed conservative majority is now a 8-1 bend em over and screw um court
It is now a given that the demon-crats own ever part of the federal government and there is no one in government to stop them --- no one!
For those thinking the final purge isn't coming, you need to wake up soon... the Demon-crats 文化大革命 (Great Cultural Revolution) is fast approaching.
This investigation is a continuation of the greatest political Witch Hunt in the history of our Country, whether it was the never ending $32 million Mueller hoax, which already investigated everything that could possibly be investigated, “Russia Russia Russia,” where there was a finding of “No Collusion,” or two ridiculous “Crazy Nancy” inspired impeachment attempts where I was found NOT GUILTY. It just never ends!FULL TEXT: ‘STATEMENT ON THE CONTINUING POLITICAL PERSECUTION OF PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP’
I sure would like to hear how you read the tea leaves - I like considering several viewpoints. The conclusion, or real direction, will likely have pieces of a few. If you've already spelled it out somewhere, I'd be happy to look for it with a few clues.Personally , and no offense intended, I think you have read it all wrong. But that is neither here nor there at the moment. And for the record, I have been saying for for a few months now, I read the tea leaves differently: by April sometime, i think we might be quite sure there will be 3-1/2 years from then to a full resolution of the matter...
Yes Tristan, and Seeker 22, I also have not heard or read that before, and would like more detailed info.
There is this standard joke, or so I believe it is, that we all lost our guns in a boating accident. Here it's a river. Maybe some take this serious. Add to the discussion ground penetrating radar, or whatever.Okay, that's great and all, but where will they look? It's a river. It's constantly moving until it hits a larger body of water. And how much time will they devote to trying to find the guns you allegedly lost in that waterway?
For the others, I bumped a thread in the religion sub forum with a few clues...I sure would like to hear how you read the tea leaves - I like considering several viewpoints. The conclusion, or real direction, will likely have pieces of a few. If you've already spelled it out somewhere, I'd be happy to look for it with a few clues.
I considered that when I first heard about this today. But think about it. The end result of their going along with the deep state in their recent decision and letting the deep state pack the court is one in the same for the people. Meaning the people are screwed either way.Just ran across this and thought it might be a reason for the decision-
"While it is never a good idea to look into the background of the court for motives, one cannot easily dismiss that Roberts, Kavanaugh and Barrett may have voted against the writ because they were concerned such a decision would cause the senate to start a process of “packing the court.” Retaining the current number of justices within the court is more likely if the justices avoid triggering the consequences from the previous threat. "
IMO the demon-crats will pack the court way before the 2022 midterms no matter what to ensure they still have control in the case they would somehow lose the house and senate.
The two cases the Court declined to hear challenged the last-minute changes to election law in Pennsylvania. Never mind that the U.S. Constitution explicitly gives state legislatures the power to prescribe "The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives"; the Supreme Court just allowed the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to change the rules for the November 2020 federal election by declaring the case moot.Before the inauguration: Not timely
After the certification: Moot
This means that SCOTUS has deep-sixed every election challenge, according to Julie Kelley:Thomas argued that the cases Republican Party of Pennsylvania v. Veronica DeGraffenreid (2021) and Jake Corman v. Pennsylvania Democratic Party (2021) presented "a clear example" of election law issues that the Supreme Court should put to rest. "The Pennsylvania Legislature established an unambiguous deadline for receiving mail-in ballots: 8 p.m. on election day. Dissatisfied, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court extended that deadline by three days."
"That decision to rewrite the rules seems to have affected too few ballots to change the outcome of any federal election. But that may not be the case in the future," Thomas argued. "These cases provide us with an ideal opportunity to address just what authority nonlegislative officials have to set election rules, and to do so well before the next election cycle. The refusal to do so is inexplicable."
Alito also wrote a dissent, which Justice Neil Gorsuch joined. Alito argued that these cases "present an important and recurring constitutional question: whether the Elections or Electors Clauses of the United States Constitution... are violated when a state court holds that a state constitutional provision overrides a state statute governing the manner in which a federal election is to be conducted. That question has divided the lower courts,* and our review at this time would be greatly beneficial."
For whatever reasons, the Roberts Court is shying away from change, from exercise of the Court's authority and duty to enforce the Constitution. The emphasis on following precedent through the doctrine of stare decisis is helping to ratify abuses.Looking at order list now. It looks like SCOTUS killed every election lawsuit filed by Trump and other parties. Only Thomas, Gorsuch, Alito dissented in rejecting PA GOP v PA SOS case. We have no institution to protect our elections. Thanks Barrett and Kavanaugh! https://t.co/PL7hJnI1a7
— Julie Kelly (@julie_kelly2) February 22, 2021
Yeah...the MSM does not report actual news . That is not their job.I didn't see ANYTHING about this on the national news.. but, of course they reported on President Trump's tax return ruling...
And his duds are going to be on the court for quite awhileEXACTLY !!!!!
I guess Thomas is the only one there worth keeping. All Trumps picks were duds.
Actually, I do not think Trump picked them, I think someone else made the pick, and told him who he was picking.
I know some will be offended by that, but that is sure what it looks like !
Keep in mind the Biden-Harris/Obama Administration is quickly stacking more leftist operatives in key leadership roles in government to further weaponize federal agencies to apply double standards against conservatives.It’s time to fight back the Commie way.
I too think their lives were threatened as was Trumps and that's why he didn't do anything. Probably threatened his family.I agree with this. I believe the remaining SCJs have been compromised and/or threatened into going along with the plan.
I've often wondered, though, how they are able to come to terms with their legacy being the selling out of the country of their children's children (and so on).