30 October, 2022 I think the Mediocre Pumpkin will show up any day... □ [“John Fetterman posts a photo of his campaign sign still burning in...
2022pamphlet.blogspot.com
Also 30 October, 2022
□ [“Police Change Story, Claim Now Only Attacker David DePape and Paul Pelosi Were in Home”]
"Oh FFS! Lies don’t work if you keep changing them! You should know that! Yet now we’re expected to believe that Police Chief Bill Scott blatantly lied to the press when he informed them that someone else opened the door from inside. Was he making the lie up himself or was he repeating someone else’s?
On Friday, the official story was that there was only one hammer. The 82-year old kept the 42-year old from grabbing it until *someone* opened the door for the police who did *not* enter the residence. They told the men to stop fighting and come outside. Only then could the attacker successfully grab the hammer and start beating Paul with it.
But now nobody else was there, the door magically opened by itself, or else the people struggling over a hammer also opened it, or the police entered without permission.
We still don’t know where the security was. The neighborhood’s other rich people have lots of security cameras and you’d really expect someone to watch over the Speaker of the House’s residence, just in case someone boobytraps it.
Maybe the third person was on the security team, that’s why they want it secret? Or maybe the security team is all-MAGA and they supported the attacker. Maybe Paul told security ‘this guy’s with me. If you see us in our underwear, don’t worry about it.’
Were all the cameras on the house are just to film the orgies in the yard? Were the cameras always ignored because nobody wants to see Nancy Pelosi naked?
Their job description is to keep people from breaking in. Security can call the police before, during or after stopping the intrude, yet the Pelosi’s security couldn’t be bothered to stop the intruder or call the police.
Still waiting for Pelosi supporters to see problems with this. Why would a man who’s been very rich for a long time not have home security? Why would the Speaker of the House, third-in-line for the Presidency of the United States, not have home security?
What’s the alternative?
“Hey, neighborhood security cameras show a guy in his underwear carrying a hammer!”
“Big deal, he’s not hurting anybody. Hit me.”
“Hey, that guy is going up to a house!”
“Not our problem, we’re busy. I said hit me.”
“Hey, isn’t that the place where that lady in Congress lives?”
“She’s only third-in-line for the Presidency, nobody cares. I know you’ve got that straight.”
“Hey, he just broke into the house!”
“Boy, I hope somebody calls the police. You gonna play or fold?
“Hey, wasn’t this the house that was attacked on August 3, 2022 and January 3, 2021?”
“That’s why they hired us as security. Let’s go, Brandon!”
==================================================
Also 31 October, 2022
You keep out of this, he doesn’t have to blow you down!
□ [“Justice Department Files Federal Criminal Charges Against David DePape – Allows Government to Control and Hide Evidence – And Selectively Leak"]
It's not a federal crime to break into someone's house. So far, we haven't been told any federal agents were in the building. Nancy was on the other side of the country so she doesn't count. The more you want to argue it's a federal crime, the more you have to explain why the people involved made it happen.
It is possible there's a law forbidding the harm of certain peoples' family members but not other peoples' family members but no liberals will ever complain about the elite deserving more protection than the peasants.
My security clearance was never more than 'secret' and if I'd ever been stupid enough to try breaking into a location with higher clearance, I would have been stopped before I got there by people whose job it is to keep unauthorized personnel out. Why didn't these rich people have that in their private home?
This is just an excuse to silence anyone who points out obvious facts about this incident. They just want to promote the lie. That gives them an excuse to expand their tyranny.
Over the last two years, there's been a lot of comparison of January 6 to the Reichstag Fire. I've always been dubious of that, just because - I'm not remotely an expert - it seems to have never been clear what really happened in February 1933 Germany. I am starting to believe that, yeah, the Nazis faked it, but either way, January 6 was absolutely a fake and for the same reason.
So the Pelosi house definitely has cameras on the outside. Or at least things that look like cameras. Maybe they're fakes. But I'm curious what they have on inside. I'm sure there are cheap options but would you really want security that if someone successfully breaks in, no one's going to see what they do to you or anything else in your home. The attacker could be helping himself to Nancy's booze collection and that stuff ain't cheap.
The attacker supposedly broke in through a door window. Pictures show that the broken glass landed outside, not inside which is what would happen if the break came from outside. Broken or not, glass goes the direction you push it, not the opposite way.
The story now is that Paul runs to the bathroom and calls 911. Wouldn't he just stay in the bathroom and lock the door if he can? Why would he come out to deal with the person who scared him so much?
From the start, it has been noted that the 911 caller specifically referred to the attacker as a "friend." Now there *may* be something to this oddity but it's not something I'd give much consideration. If you're under attack to the point where you need to call 911 even with your attacker right there, it's technically possible that you'd say something like "friend," maybe it'll throw the attacker off for a moment. Or you just might not be entirely rational at the moment and "friend" is just the first word that came to your mind. Certainly possible there's more to it than that but I don't think it would be a major issue.
By the same token, I'm not all that curious about the attacker going to the hospital along with Paul. It's entirely possible he was injured during the arrest, or that he'd been injured before the police showed up. There may even be some baffling law-enforcement why they took him there, he wasn't vaccinated against Covid or something. But this is a more valid question than the use of "friend."
Don't know if it's true yet but it's been said the attacker was from Canada and his visa has long-expired so he's in the country illegally where he can attack people. Who else does this "sanctuary city" have like that?
□ [“More Questions Than Answers on Pelosi Attacker David DePape’s Charging Documents"]
The FBI has released its list of charges, apparently written by some new employee with nothing more important to do. This article does cite that the number of hammers aren't mentioned, nor what anybody was wearing. It also cites the lack of clarity regarding 'who did what' in the struggle when the police arrived.
For me, I'm wondering how this was done so quickly? Paul's had head-if-not-brain surgery, a guy in his 80s isn't going to be in the best mental shape right now. The attacker is probably not the most believable person to prepare the charges and the "other person" isn't mentioned anywhere so he/she/it can't contribute anything.
The 911 call and the events after that still make no sense. Paul goes to the bathroom, calls 911 and the attacker knows that's what he's done. Then they both go downstairs to the door. What? Hey guy that I've just called the police on, let's hang out together now!
If you came here to attack somebody, learning that the police are closing in would be a good reason to run away. If you came here for some other reason, that reason needs to be included in this description for it to make any sense.
The police knock on the door. Paul opens it. Then he grabs the attackers hammer and the attacker fights back, hitting Paul in the head with the hammer. He already knows the police are coming and doesn't hit Paul with a hammer. He already knows the police are here and doesn't hit Paul with a hammer. The police are watching them right now and they're allowed to arrest people, so that's when he decides to hit Paul with a hammer?
He'd have to be insane to do that. If he was so insane, walking to the house in his underwear or being Paul's boytoy-for-the-evening would be just as believable.
I wanna say this will actually go somewhere but now I'm remembering Congressman Gary Condit and the investigation on the death of his mistress Chandra Levy. That got a lot of attention to and then 9/11 happened and we basically ignored Condit after that.
Odd note, Condit represented District 18 which is where San Francisco is located. Near as I can tell, this was redistricted so it did not include San Fran twenty years ago, but wouldn't that make a neat coincidence if it did?"