WAR Regional conflict brewing in the Mediterranean

jward

passin' thru
ELINT News

@ELINTNews

·=
10m

Is that an S-300 TEL and associated early warning and acquisition radar on the hill there?!
View: https://twitter.com/ELINTNews/status/1291055951714357253?s=20

Eyes


Face with monocle
 

jward

passin' thru




EndGameWW3

@EndGameWW3

·
2m

Update: To simplify whats fixing to happen between Turkey,Egypt and Greece. They are fixing to throw down over oil drilling rights in the Aegean and Eastern Med Seas. Turkey claims that area is theirs,Egypt and Greece signed an agreement saying it's theirs yesterday.
EndGameWW3

@EndGameWW3

·
18m

Major update: All eyes on the Eastern Med and Aegean Sea in the next few days. Turkish media reporting something big is fixing to go down with Egypt and Greece.
 

jward

passin' thru
gNwGYwPA_normal.jpg



TurkishFacts4u
@TurkishFacts4U
· 48m
Turkish Navy vessels have been ordered to withdraw from Standing NATO Maritime Group 2 (SNMG2) upon orders from Ankara. They are heading to the Aegean and Mediteranean Sea. Big things to occur over the next 24 hours.
 

northern watch

TB Fanatic
I suspect that if Greek-Turkish conflict is imminent, then the US Dept of State will issue warnings for US citizens and will issue NOTAM's for US airlines.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Posted for fair use.....

NATO Air Power
Libya is turning into a battle lab for air warfare

By: Tom Kington   1 day ago




FGBWDHP5JVDDFGSTVNWEG3E7RY.jpg
The U.S. military in June published imagery that officials said show Russian aircraft being used to support private military companies sponsored by the Russian government to fight in the Libyan war. (U.S. Defense Department)



ROME — During Libya’s proxy war this year, the skies over the North African country have filled with Turkish and Chinese drones, Russian MiG 29s and Sukhoi 24s and Emirati Mirage 2000s — reportedly — with Turkish F-16s and Egyptian Rafales waiting in the wings.

Russian air defense systems have taken down drones while fighters, civilians and air bases have been bombed by jets as C-130s and Turkish A400M aircraft keep up deliveries of new weaponry and fighters into the country.

In short, Libya has been transformed this year into something of an air warfare laboratory, begging the question, what exactly is going on, who is winning and what has this conflict taught generals about modern air combat?

“On one level, Libya yet again simply underscores the value of air power – you do not want to get in a fight without it,” said Douglas Barrie, Senior Fellow for Military Aerospace at the International Institute for Strategic Studies in London.

The conflict in lawless Libya began to escalate in April 2019 as local strongman General Khalifa Haftar launched his campaign to take the capital Tripoli. Backed by Egypt, the United Arab Emirates, Russia and France, he felt confident going up against the UN-recognized government in Tripoli backed by Turkey, Italy and Qatar.



In April last year, Chinese Wing Loon II drones operated by the UAE bombed civilian targets in the city, reflecting the recent, and rapid, procurement of Chinese drones around the Middle East.

“The Chinese have been adept at selling drones in the Middle East, including to Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Egypt and Iraq. With the US previously constrained in selling systems, the Chinese saw a gap in the market,” said Barrie.

Men walk past a Chinese-made CAIG Wing Loong II medium-altitude, long-endurance UAV, on display during the Dubai Airshow on Nov. 18, 2019. (Karim Sahib/AFP via Getty Images)
Men walk past a Chinese-made CAIG Wing Loong II medium-altitude, long-endurance UAV, on display during the Dubai Airshow on Nov. 18, 2019. (Karim Sahib/AFP via Getty Images)

Sign up for our Early Bird Brief
Get the defense industry's most comprehensive news and information straight to your inbox




Turkey has proved the exception. Around May 2019, it introduced its own TB2 drone into the fray, attacking Haftar’s forces, knocking out Russian Pantsir air defense systems supporting him and helping end his ambitions to take Tripoli.

“Turkey has majored in UAV design and manufacture and likely used Libya in part as a test and adjust battle lab, and its systems are now ‘combat proven’. Its industry, like Roketsan, has also developed small, precision-guided munitions for UAVs,” Barrie said.

A second analyst said Turkey’s use of its TB2 in Libya had been a game changer. “Turkey decided it was okay to lose them from time to time, that they were semi-disposable, and that novel approach caught their enemy off guard,” said Jalel Harchaoui at the Clingendael Institute in Holland.



The reason? Cost. “They used to cost the Turks $1-1.5 million apiece to build, but thanks to economies of scale as production volumes rose, the cost has dropped to below $500,000, excluding the control station,” said Harchaoui.

He added that software and other technical changes had boosted the TB2′s efficiency and reconnaissance capabilities, which allowed them to find the right altitude to avoid the Russian Pantsir systems.

“The performance of the Wing Loon II’s in the hands of the UAE has meanwhile been largely static. They didn’t evolve, so they have been much less impressive,” he said.

Barrie said Libya was another example of the normalization of drone use in modern warfare.

“UAVs are a capability now pursued by state and non-state actors alike. Obviously states can afford more capable, larger systems, while non-state actors may have to make do with home-built systems akin to being made with Radio Shack-like components, or acquiring systems from state sponsors.”



He added, “In Libya UAVs have suited this kind of ugly, attritional warfare against small, lightly armed units.”

The use of manned fighters in Libya has meanwhile been characterized by major powers sending them in on the quiet, with no announcement.

Last July, a missile strike on a migrant center near Tripoli which killed 53 was likely the work of the UAE, the BBC has reported, quoting a confidential UN investigation.



Italy confirms military drone crashed in Libya

Italy confirms military drone crashed in Libya
After reports of the incident began to circulate on the internet Wednesday, the Italian military general staff confirmed that “contact was lost with an Italian Air Force drone, which subsequently crashed in Libyan territory.”

By: Tom Kington

Analyst Harchaoui alleged that UAE Mirage 2000-9 aircraft flying out of an Egyptian base had been supporting Haftar periodically since June 2019.

“Misrata airbase, which has hosted Turkish TB2 drones, was bombed multiple times last year by Emirati drones and jets until the Turks brought in Korkut and MIM-23 Hawk air defense systems. The raids over Misrata stopped in 2020 – probably because the UAE did not want to see a captured pilot show up tortured on Facebook,” he said.

On July 4, fighter jets attacked Al-Watiya air base, just after Turkey had brought in its MIM-23 Hawk air defense missiles there.



“Sonic booms heard over Sebha, in southwest Libya, suggest the aircraft took off from Egypt then flew to Libya via the Sahara to avoid being spotted by Turkish frigates off the Libyan coast,” said Harchaoui.

“Could it have been Egyptian Rafales? They are good but don’t have enough experience for an ultra-precise mission like this. French pilots flying Egyptian Rafales is unlikely in case one was captured, leaving the UAE Mirages as most likely,” he said.

“Of all the Gulf states, the UAE is the most capable of this kind of mission – they have the combat experience and could do this,” added Barrie.

The Turkish Bayraktar TB2 drone is shown Dec. 16, 2019, at Gecitkale Airport in Famagusta in the self-proclaimed Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus. (Birol Bebek/AFP via Getty Images)
The Turkish Bayraktar TB2 drone is shown Dec. 16, 2019, at Gecitkale Airport in Famagusta in the self-proclaimed Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus. (Birol Bebek/AFP via Getty Images)

Meanwhile, the U.S. military command in Africa reported in late May that satellite imagery showed Russian aircraft arriving in Libya to support Haftar.

USAFRICOM said, “At least 14 MiG-29s and several Su-24s were flown from Russia to Syria, where their Russian markings were painted over to camouflage their Russian origin.”

The aircraft are reportedly being used to support the Wagner Group, a Russian-sponsored mercenary operation on the ground in Libya which Moscow denies links to.

The American command warned the aircraft might be flown by “inexperienced” mercenaries who “will not adhere to international law.”

According to Harchaoui, eye witnesses in Libya reported a number of misses notched up during bombing raids by the aircraft. “That suggests they were not Russian air force pilots,” he said.

This summer the conflict has slowed, as Haftar’s forces retreat from Tripoli and take up position to fight for the coastal city of Sirte, which is key to controlling Libya’s oil trade. With Al-Watiya airbase now repaired and back in business after the July air raid, Turkey may be considering basing its F-16s there, finally giving it a beach head for fighters in Libya.

Bringing in American-built aircraft could however rely on the say-so of the U.S.

“Is the U.S. so concerned about Russia’s intervention in Libya it would support the deployment of Turkish F-16s to stop it?” said Harchaoui. “Or will it come down on the side of Egypt, which is a US ally? The ball is in its court.”










Recommended for you




Boeing wins $265 million to build more special ops Chinook helos





Pentagon nominee slams the US Navy’s fleet plans as ‘not a credible document’





UK facilities for American F-35 jets are delayed and over budget





Senate hearing canceled for controversial Pentagon nominee Anthony Tata
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Hummm.....

Posted for fair use.....

Libyan crisis is an opportunity to stir the Arab Maghreb Union from its slumber

Author
Zaid M. Belbagi

August 07, 2020 21:01
358

Follow @arabnews
Short Url
2220556-1596823416-1005366.jpg
A soldier loyal to the GNA after taking control of Al-Watiya Air Base, southwest of Tripoli, Libya, on 18 May, 2020. (Reuters)

On a crisp February evening in Marrakech in 1989, the impossible seemed to happen. Amid wrangling and rivalries, the leaders of five countries in northwest Africa — Algeria, Libya, Mauritania, Morocco and Tunisia — appeared on a balcony, arm in arm, and the Arab Maghreb Union was established.

Designed to coordinate the economic and political efforts of its members, the union was welcomed as an opportunity for the once borderless Maghreb peoples to reacquaint themselves with each other following the colonialism that had divided them. Within a decade, however, it appeared their political differences were too profound to overcome, with Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi infamously describing the grouping as “frozen.”

Now, with Libya in the grip of civil war and the winds of revolution having blown through Tunisia and Algeria, instability has invited a host of outside interests to attempt to dictate events in the region. Amid such chaos, the need for regional cohesiveness could not be greater.

At the outset of the NATO campaign that ousted his father, Qaddafi’s son, Seif Al-Islam, warned the West of the futility of hoping for a quick exit from what has become a post-revolutionary Libyan quagmire. Chastising a mindset that had become accustomed to quick wins, he said “Libya is not McDonald’s” and victory was unlikely.

His words, which seemed bizarre at the time, proved to be prophetic. Following the overthrow of his father, Libya’s uprising morphed into a civil war that was exploited by foreign powers and quickly became an intractable proxy war.

The Libya of today is a far cry from the docile dictatorial society it once was; the deaths of some 25,000 people and the displacement of a larger number, compounded by an economy on the verge of collapse, tell the tale of a country on the brink.

Libya is divided between the elected Government of National Accord and the Libyan National Army led by Field Marshall Khalifa Haftar. Each side has the support of a number of international powers, while vast parts of the country remain ungovernable and in the hands of tribal militia and other military groups.

As a result, a country that has the largest oil reserves in Africa (and the 10th largest reserves in the world) suffers shortages of everything, from fuel to cash, medicine to food. No amount of foreign mercenaries, indiscriminate drone attacks or international sanctions are able to ameliorate the situation.

The one glimmer of hope for the country lies in a potential settlement driven by its Maghreb neighbors, which have a vested interest in Libya’s long-term stability.

The Maghreb of today is unrecognizable from that which embarked upon a union 31 years ago. The departure of all the leaders that originally threw their respective hats into the ring has provided an opportunity for a recalibration of the bloc. Despite the changes, however, the challenges remain considerable.

In Libya, the only constant amid the shifting sands of revolution and counterrevolution is the unmistakable aspiration of its people to govern themselves. In Tunisia, embattled elected governments have struggled to steer a course toward fiscal independence, and a further influx of Libyan refugees is a burden the nation can ill afford.

A spirited popular uprising in Algeria amazed the world, as the flaws of the country’s creaking governing junta were exposed. In Mauritania, no amount of international aid has been able to markedly improve the country’s developmental challenges, and its economy faces another year of negative economic growth.

Morocco, however, provides a glimmer of hope. Despite its dangerous neighborhood, it has forged ahead as an island of stability in its region, combining its traditions with a bold domestic and foreign policy aimed at improving the old kingdom’s future prospects.

It is in the Libyan context in particular that Morocco can seek to put its positive political and economic experience and aspirations to good use. In 2015 it brokered the Libyan Political Agreement, or Skhirat Agreement, with the aim of “ensuring the democratic rights of the Libyan people, the need for a consensual government based on the principle of the separation of powers.”

The most realistic of the plethora of international efforts to bring about peace in Libya, the agreement fell apart amid the outbreak of a second civil war. The recent escalation of hostilities in Libya worries Morocco and its neighbors, particularly in light of the presence of foreign mercenaries on one side and Turkey’s continual threats that it will attack the city of Sirte and Libya’s oil facilities. These were met by Egyptian threats that it would also intervene militarily.
The countries of the Maghreb will not find peace until they seek a local resolution to their region’s problems, the need for which has never been more pressing.
Zaid M. Belbagi
Given that Egypt’s recent “Cairo Initiative” to resolve the Libyan crisis did not win widespread support, internationally or regionally, there is a real opportunity for Morocco, with the support of its neighbors, to seek a return to the terms agreed at Skhirat.

Morocco is poor in terms of natural resources and relatively stable in comparison with its troubled neighbors. The same is true of Tunisia and Mauritania. This provides a clear opportunity to combine a political solution in Libya with economic incentives.

The countries of the Maghreb will not find peace until they seek a local resolution to their region’s problems, the need for which has never been more pressing. Algerian President Abdelmadjid Tebboune’s recent declaration that “we have no problem with our Moroccan brothers” came at the right time. Should it be his intention to do so, resolving the region’s longest-standing rivalry and ending Algeria’s support for the rebels opposing its neighbor will go some way to bringing the nations of the Maghreb closer together.

Countless studies have shown that seamless regional trade provides incremental opportunities for growth and stability. The countries of the Maghreb, already united by language and religion, must now harness their shared potential.
  • Zaid M. Belbagi is a political commentator and an adviser to private clients between London and the Gulf Cooperation Council. Twitter: @Moulay_Zaid
Disclaimer: Views expressed by writers in this section are their own and do not necessarily reflect Arab News' point-of-view
 

jward

passin' thru
Turkey issues new NAVTEX for area between Rhodes and Kastellorizo


Turkey responded to the signing of a maritime demarcation agreement between Greece and Egypt, by issuing a Navigation Telex (NAVTEX) reserving the area between the islands of Rhodes and Kastellorizo for military exercises.
The exercises are scheduled to take place on August 10 and 11.
It is recalled that the Greek Armed Forces are on high alert on land, sea and air, and are closely monitoring Turkish movements.
#BREAKING Turkey declares null and void recent so-called agreement between Greece, Egypt to limit maritime jurisdictions
— ANADOLU AGENCY (ENG) (@anadoluagency) August 6, 2020

Ankara also reacted to the news of the agreement on the demarcation of the maritime borders between Greece and Egypt.
“For us, the agreement is non-existent,” the Turkish Foreign Ministry said in a statement, adding: “There is no maritime border between Greece and Egypt. For Turkey, the alleged border demarcation agreement announced today was non-existent. This view of ours will be done both on the front and on the table.”
The announcement also stated that “the alleged area of responsibility is located within the Turkish continental shelf that has been declared to the United Nations.”
“Egypt, which evacuated an area of 11,500 square kilometres with the agreement it signed with the Greek Cypriot administration in 2003, now with the so-called agreement it signed with Greece, loses maritime responsibility areas,” the same statement continued.
In conclusion, it stressed that it will “not allow any activity in the region and there is no doubt that it will resolutely support its legitimate interests and rights in the Eastern Mediterranean as well as the rights of the Turkish Cypriots.”
Meanwhile, Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis hailed the agreement signed between Greece and Egypt, saying that it had “restored legality in the region.”
Mitsotakis said the agreement had recognised the Greek islands’ lawful rights to all maritime zones, while attacking last year’s contentious Turkey-Libya maritime boundaries agreement. “[The deal] creates a new reality in the Eastern Mediterranean as it restores legality in the region, a legality that the illegal and groundless Turkey-Libya memorandum sought to challenge.”
“With Egypt, like we did with Italy a few months ago, we showed that abiding with international law is the only path to security, peace, stability and good neighbourly relations,” he added.
Advertisment.
Tags: Ankara, Eastern Mediterranean, greece, greek news headlines, Kastellorizo, military, Navigation Telex, Navtex, Rhodes, Turkey, Turkish continental shelf, Turkish Foreign Ministry

1596848405518.png
posted for fair use
 

jward

passin' thru
Greece ready for military action if Turkey sends research vessel again


Greece ready for military action if Turkey sends research vessel again

Greece will defend its sovereign rights by all means, including military, if Turkey sends the research vessel Oruc Reis to the Greek Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). This was made clear on Friday evening by Greek Foreign Minister Nikos Dendias on the Open TV channel. The text of his speech was circulated by the press service of the Greek Foreign Ministry.





When asked if Greece's response would include the use of the military if Ankara sent Oruc Reis to the Greek EEZ, Dendias replied that the country would defend its sovereignty and its sovereign rights by all means. “I think that no one in the European Union, none of our partners and friends, expects something different from the Greek government,” the Foreign Minister said.

Then the journalists asked Dendias to comment on the statement of the Greek Prime Minister's Security Advisor Alexis Diakopoulos, who said in the same news release: “If they (the Turks) enter the Greek continental shelf, we will respond, including by military means.” “You know, I do not distinguish the Greek armed forces from the whole complex of the country's law and order and its government,” Dendias replied. “The Constitution gives the Greek armed forces, like all of us, the duty to protect the sovereignty and sovereign rights of our homeland.”

“We do not threaten anyone, we do not make loud statements, and we do not have such a hysterical reaction, which is typical for other countries in the region. We are simply saying that as a sovereign country we are constitutionally obligated to defend ourselves, and we will do this by whatever means our constitution and our capabilities provide. And we say this to everyone calmly so that it is known from the very beginning so that there is no misunderstanding, ” the Foreign Minister stressed.

logo.jpg

posted for fair use
Source: Greece ready for military action if Turkey sends research vessel again
 
Top