I'll preface this by saying I voted for mainly Republicans-although I wasn't feeling so smug. I did vote for some Libs in lesser offices. I'm really interested in your take on the questions, but please don't post any "sheeple" crap, or otherwise denigrate character nor intellect of voters if you answer. Seems like there is a real need for Libs to consider altering their platform, instead of waiting for others to "catch up" if there is ever going to be a third option. Thanks for reading this.
1) Why does it seem that more emphasis is placed on the big campaigns that are sorry to say unwinnable as opposed to local elections that I think are more viable venues at this time? Seems like it's better to build from the ground up, than top-down. Or is my take wrong?
2) Why if as I read here that so many Libertarians are opposed to open borders, there is no change in platform? Or is it such a fundamental tenet that it's non-negotiable?
3) How have Libs failed in your opinion to get their message out? Or in Democratic parlance, "reach out" to the other sides. Or rather given the prevailing majority attitude, is the message incompatible to the majority?
1) Why does it seem that more emphasis is placed on the big campaigns that are sorry to say unwinnable as opposed to local elections that I think are more viable venues at this time? Seems like it's better to build from the ground up, than top-down. Or is my take wrong?
2) Why if as I read here that so many Libertarians are opposed to open borders, there is no change in platform? Or is it such a fundamental tenet that it's non-negotiable?
3) How have Libs failed in your opinion to get their message out? Or in Democratic parlance, "reach out" to the other sides. Or rather given the prevailing majority attitude, is the message incompatible to the majority?