ADMIN PROSCRIBED and BANNED SITES LIST

Dennis Olson

Dennis Olson

Chief Curmudgeon
_______________
This is the list of websites which are either not allowed to be mentioned or referenced on TB, or sites whose content is subject to being moved:


DO NOT POST OR REFERENCE:

UB (hate site)

SQ (legal threats): Note this includes posting articles from other sites that mention this person and/or his website.

GodLikeProductions

AboveTopSecret

StormFront (white supremacist website)

Telegraph.co.uk (copyright infringement)

Creditnews,com (copyright infringement)

POSTS FROM THESE SOURCES WILL BE MOVED OR REMOVED IMMEDIATELY (normally within 1-3 hours):

Any Sorcha Faal material: WhatDoesItMean.com, beforeitsnews, IBTimes and eutimes, redstatewatcher.com

PressTV (Iranian propaganda outfit)

now.mmedia.me

veteranstoday

Hagmann (associated with SQ)

HalfPastHuman.com (Widely debunked and inaccurate future viewing site.) (Clif High)

George Ure at urbansurvival.com

presscore.ca

ANY LaRouche site

Dave Hodges (The Common Sense Show - thecommonsenseshow.com - associated with SQ)

z3news.com (woo site)

thelastlineofdefense.org (satire/hoax site)

now8news.com (fake news / satire)

dailypostfeed.com (hoax site)

Yournewswire.com

Realrawnews.com

Newspunch.com

POSTS FROM THESE SOURCES ARE SUBJECT TO BE MOVED OR REMOVED (depending on article content), AND INFORMATION FROM THEM SHOULD BE RELIED ON AT YOUR OWN RISK

Youtube sourced videos.
Canadian Prepper
Full Spectrum Survival


Hal Turner

Russia Today

Debka

InfoWars/Alex Jones

Mike Adams or material from his many sites.
naturalnews.com​
brighteon.com (video sharing platform)​
adams.news​
healthrangerreport.com​
counterthink.com​
healthranger.com​

KNOWN HOAX SITES. MATERIAL FROM THESE SITES IS EITHER SATIRE OR DELIBERATE HOAX. DEPENDING ON WHICH, THIS MATERIAL IS ALSO SUBJECT TO BEING MOVED OR REMOVED IMMEDIATELY, AND SHOULD UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES, BE BELIEVED AS FACTUAL

dailybuzzlive.com

nationalreport.net

dailycurrant.com

Christiantimesnewspaper.com

theonion.com

babylonbee.com

dailyleak.org

empirenews.net

witscience.org

civictribune.com

mericapost.com

worldnewsdailyreport.com

nbc.com.co

abcnews.com.co

freewoodpost.com

realnewsrightnow.com

foxnews3.com

superstation95.com, redstatewatcher.com

In the posts below on this thread, several other sites have been identified by our members. These should be treated as if they fall into this list as well.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Countrymouse

Countrymouse

Country exile in the city
At least the mods are being very careful to put a notice that they've been moved, so we can find them in the new place, and I am grateful to you all for that.
 
Y

Y6K

Inactive
Oops. We missed one. LarouchePAC.com or any LaRouche site. Probably should go in the second list - moved immediately.
 
2

2redroses

Senior Member
Question: what's your take on Lamecherry.blogspot.com? I don't know what to make of her/them. Someone on Ulsterman said Lamecherry was a psyops site?
 
Dennis Olson

Dennis Olson

Chief Curmudgeon
_______________
Look, I'm like the mayor of a town. We create an ordinance that says "no littering". You don't like that ordinance and ask why we have it. My answer is "so people don't litter." You, still unsatisfied, go off in a huff.


Exactly what answer would MAKE YOU HAPPY? Please be specific.
 
M

mythreemonkeykids

Contributing Member
Dennis, I have no problem with rules. I was asking why? As in what is wrong with those sites. I asked a question and got a snide response. I am trying to learn what sources are trustworthy and what are not and what constitutes a trustworthy site. Is it possible for you to just explain the differences in the sites without attacking me?
 
Dennis Olson

Dennis Olson

Chief Curmudgeon
_______________
There has been multiple discussion over the preceding months and years as to which sites were absolute BS, which sites were woowoo, and which sites needed to be taken with a large grain of salt. The list was a compilation based on staff discussion as well as member input. If you want to reopen the discussion, please feel free to post a thread to do so. I'm sure people will be only too happy to assist you in your quest for knowledge.

If you have a SPECIFIC question on a SPECIFIC site, I can try and answer it.
 
Cardinal

Cardinal

Chickministrator
_______________
Ulsterman is conservative, and though in the past he has claimed to have "insider" info, I do not believe he is woo.
 
Be Well

Be Well

may all be well
Dennis, I just posted part of an article by Hagmann on the thread about the death of Loretta Fuddy, I should have checked here first. It's from the Canada Free Press and is not woo, but a sourced and non-speculative account of the plane accident. Can I leave it up or should I delete it? It's got what seems to be useful and sourced information.

ETA - I won't be able to check back on TB2 later this afternoon but I will check as often as I can so if I need to delete that article I will, just let me know.
 
Last edited:
Dennis Olson

Dennis Olson

Chief Curmudgeon
_______________
No need to overanalyze. If it's not on the list, you're good, unless a new site ends up being exposed as a hoax site or something.
 
Kris Gandillon

Kris Gandillon

The Other Curmudgeon
_______________
And a site HAS BEEN exposed as a hoax site and added to the list accordingly: dailyleak.org

We have had 2-3 recent instances of people posting articles from this site as it they were legitimate.
 
L

lili

Senior Member
Be Well asked about Hagmanns:

Dennis Olson said:
No need to overanalyze. If it's not on the list, you're good, unless a new site ends up being exposed as a hoax site or something.
Click to expand...
Hagmann is on the list. The reason I bring up Hagmanns is because they should not be on the list, IMO. They do not promulgate woo and BS. They are sincere truth-seekers, and have guests with valuable information.
 
K

Keesha

Contributing Member
What about The Onion? I've run across their things from time to time and at first they seem credible but they are absolutely not. Maybe one of these names above is where it comes from. I don't know but I do know The Onion is not a good source!
 
Dennis Olson

Dennis Olson

Chief Curmudgeon
_______________
The Onion is a lampoon site. It is clearly understood that they do what they do to provide laughs. That is not the case with many of the sites on our list, who do what they do to deliberately inflame and/or mislead people. That's called "trolling".
 
P

Possible Impact

Inactive
KNOWN HOAX SITE Alert:

http://dailybuzzlive.com/contact-us/
DISCLAIMER
Daily Buzz Live is a news web publication with news articles.
Most are inspired by real news events,
And just a few stories are works of complete fiction.

Those few articles are for entertainment purposes only.
The articles and stories may or may not use real names,
always a semi real and/or mostly, or substantially, fictitious ways.

Therefore, just a few articles contained on this website Daily Buzz Live are works of fiction.
Any truth or actual facts contained in those stories or posts are purely incidental
or coincidental and not intended to be, or be construed as, facts.
Click to expand...

Tx turkey farm contaminated with ebola?
http://www.timebomb2000.com/vb/showthread.php?459309-Tx-turkey-farm-contaminated-with-ebola
 
pauldingbabe

pauldingbabe

The Great Cat
Dennis Olson said:
The Onion is a lampoon site. It is clearly understood that they do what they do to provide laughs. That is not the case with many of the sites on our list, who do what they do to deliberately inflame and/or mislead people. That's called "trolling".
Click to expand...



The onion is for sale IIRC
 
2Trish

2Trish

Veteran Member
Found this thread, seen it before and hadn't read it. Sadly, I didn't know what the word proscribed meant so I never bothered to read it. Could you add "/banned" to the thread title for some of us less knowledgeable?
 
packyderms_wife

packyderms_wife

Neither here nor there.
Anything from dutchinse really ought to be on this list! I realize there are members who love him and think that I'm hostile debunking but anyone who cannot tell the difference between a brush/scrub fire and a volcanic eruption should not be taken seriously! At least put his threads in the woo woo section of Unexplained!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top