[pol] What the Democrats Won't Tell You (their stealth "platform")

Safecastle

Emergency Essentials Store
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD>http://frontpagemagazine.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=14518

What the Democrats Won't Tell You

</TD><TD align=right>
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>By Don Feder
FrontPageMagazine.com | August 5, 2004


The Democrats’ cure for insomnia ended a week ago. And, guess what? No Kerry bounce. Nothing. Nada. Zilch.

A post-convention Gallup/CNN/USA Today survey showed that among likely voters, Kerry actually lost ground. The last pre-convention poll had Kerry at 49 percent, Bush with 47 percent. The weekend after the Boston bash, the same survey showed Kerry 47 percent, Bush 50 percent -- a negative bounce.

This is unheard of. Normally, a presidential candidate comes out of his party’s convention picking up 10 to 12 points.

So, what happened? First, not many watched the convention. Second, the rhetoric was stultifying – including Kerry’s acceptance speech, touted by the media as a tour de force on par with the Gettysburg Address and the Sermon on the Mount.

Essentially, the Democrats’ daring message came down to this:

  • Unlike those mean Republicans (who only care about trust-fund Aryans), we don’t think poor people should starve to death.
  • We want to spend more on police and firefighters (Now, that’s controversial.)
  • We like puppies, sunsets and quiet walks on the beach.
Not the sort of tough stands to cause voters to throw out an incumbent president during a national crisis.

There’s a reason the Kerry Democrats are the political equivalent of a general anesthetic. They can’t risk leveling with us. If they told the electorate what they really want, voters would run screaming into the night.

But wouldn’t it be refreshing if, just once, the party of Clinton came clean, laid its cards on the table, and was brutally honest. Their confession of faith might go something like this:

Affirmative Action – We love racial quotas. If you’re white, we’ll see to it that your kid never gets the college admission or job he deserves. We’re willing to sacrifice his opportunities for our political advantage (trawling for minority votes). That’s how committed we really are to equal protection under the law. P.S.: Our message to minorities – You’re too stupid to make it on your own.

Big Government – Our goal is to super-size government until it makes Mt. Everest look like an anthill. The New Deal, Great Society and Hillary’s plan to socialize health care have only whetted our appetite.

We want government to do more, to be more involved in your life, to take more and more decisions out of your hands and turn them over to bureaucrats, who are far more competent than you are.

There’s no problem -- including the common cold -- that we don’t have a program to solve. And you better believe we’ll work overtime to get the government involved in everything, from regulating your diet to controlling the Internet.

Business/Jobs – We don’t like private enterprise. We much prefer public employment to private-sector jobs. We think business is basically corrupt, inefficient and predatory, while government is inherently pure and noble. Bureaucrats are Boy Scouts with rules and regulations. (But we don't like the real Boy Scouts, either.)

We want to see government even more involved with business. We want control over everything – manufacturing, wages, prices, profits, advertising – you name it. If, as a result of our efforts, businesses fail and employees are thrown out of work, no problem. They can always find good jobs in an ever-expanding public sector.

Our goal is to give America an economy that’s stagnant, but compassionate.

Defense – New weapons systems? We don’t need no stinking new weapons systems! We’re pacifists at heart. Haven’t we proved that by opposing everything defense-related that’s come along in the past 20 years? If it were up to us, there would be no MX Missiles, Patriot Missiles, B-2 Bombers, Apache Helicopters, etc.

We’d really like to see the entire defense budget transferred to Health and Human Services. Defense spending is not only (by definition) wasteful, but inherently dangerous. If we have weapons, at some point we might use them. The perception of foreign enemies capable of inflicting harm on us is an illusion. 9/11 really didn’t happen – and Oliver Stone is making a movie to prove it!

Education – We need to spend more on public education, by which we mean shoveling more of your tax dollars to the bureaucrats who are called educators. Spending money in the public sector is always a good idea. Besides, teachers unions are part an important part of our base. We need to demonstrate our gratitude – with your wallet.

Children need to learn – about appreciating other cultures, embracing environmentalist dogma, the practice of safe sex, the benefits of global government and why dead white males are responsible for all of humanity’s problems. By comparison, that other stuff – history, English, math and science – is inconsequential.

We are unalterably opposed to tuition tax credits, vouchers, charter schools, etc. Any challenge to the public-school monopoly is dangerous. The power to educate is the power to inculcate certain ideas. And we intend to see to it that we’re the ones doing the indoctrinating. We don’t want poor, or middle-class, parents to have choices. They might exercise them in ways we find unacceptable.

English – It’s so unreasonable to expect newcomers to our shores to learn English. How dare we impose on them by insisting they learn our language. Instead, we should set an example in tolerance by facilitating retention of their native tongues – they and their children and grandchildren.

We pledge to combat language chauvinism – with bi-lingual education, bi-lingual ballots, regulations requiring the recipients of federal funding to provide interpreters, and government action against employers who ask their workers to speak English on the job.

Think bilingualism has worked well in Canada? Wait ‘till you see what we have planned for America.

Foreign Policy – The foreign policy of the past three Republican administrations turned the world against us. Foreign intervention should only come with the blessings of the French, Germans, Russians, Dutch and Walloons.

At all costs, we should avoid annoying the sophisticated Europeans, who are morally and intellectually superior to vulgar Americans.

One of the chief attributes of national sovereignty – the power to defend our homeland – should be ceded to the wise and benevolent UN. As our nominee, John French Kerry, once put it, "I am an internationalist. I would like to see our troops dispersed through the world only at the directive of the United Nations."

Immigration – We envision what might be called a Wide-Open Door Policy. America has no right to keep anyone out. Illegal immigrants – excuse us, undocumented workers – just want the same opportunities spoiled Americans get at birth. Who cares if they don’t feel any loyalty to this nation, or identify with our history and heritage? So what if they won’t even bother to learn English.

Immigration is a right. If, in the process of receiving a million legal and illegal immigrants a year, we increasingly look like a Third World country, so much the better. As that great Democrat, Jesse Jackson so eloquently put it when he led a protest at Stanford a few years back, "Hey, hey, ho, ho – Western culture’s gotta go!"

Besides, what you call illegal aliens, we call potential voters.

If elected, we promise to abolish the Border Patrol, tear down barriers along the Rio Grande and provide free bus service from Mexico to all points north.

Judges – We want judges to decide everything – the definition of marriage, whether or not to keep God in the Pledge of Allegiance, life and death matters like abortion and euthanasia. It’s so much simpler to have these decisions made by appointed officials than by elected legislators. Besides, judges are impervious to public opinion. And -- since we don’t trust the people -- we want to limit public influence over government as much as possible.

Let’s face it: Our agenda can’t be legislated; it can only be decreed. Judges are our last resort. And our first resort.

Not only do we believe judges should have the final say on everything, but, regardless of who wins elections, they should reflect our values and ours alone. Nominees who believe in judicial restraint, who think the Constitution should be interpreted as written, are a threat to the rights of minorities and women. Give us Cole Porter – "Anything Goes" – jurists.

Religion – We view traditional religion as the enemy. People who take the Bible seriously could interfere with our plans.

Any attempt by evangelical Christians or Catholics loyal to Rome to use the political system to advance their values is a threat to the First Amendment. We favor deploying the IRS to keep uppity churches in line.

Our judges will see to it that Ten Commandments monuments are locked away in the closet, that crèches and menorahs don’t sully public places during the holidays, and that schools remain faith-free zones. To accomplish this, we will re-write American history to make the Founding Fathers secular humanists.

Taxes – We might as well admit it: We’re going to raise your taxes – right through the proverbial roof.

We think you’re an idiot who has no idea of what’s good for you. You can’t be trusted to dispose of your income. Why, you might spend it on something frivolous – like a new car, a vacation or your kids’ education. That’s money that should go to funding (our conception of) the public good – welfare, public works, higher salaries for government workers, more multicultural education and more benefits for illegal aliens.

Don’t be a selfish lout. Let us spend your money for you.

The War on Terrorism – We don’t like the expression "War On Terrorism," which implies that we have implacable enemies who are out to destroy us. We’d prefer to call it: The Policy Initiative To Address the Problem of People Who Need to Learn Better Methods of Conflict Resolution.

Let’s face it: America created terrorism. If we weren’t involved in the Middle East, if we didn’t defend ourselves when attacked, if we ceded our sovereignty to the United Nations, if we weren’t a crusader state, disciples of the Religion of Peace wouldn’t be trying to kill us.

If Democrats are returned to power, we’ll put an end to this insanity, by returning to our tried and true Cold War formula – negotiations with people who want to bury us. Jimmy Carter, Ramsey Clarke and Jane Fonda would sit down with Osama bin Laden and the Iranian mullahs and iron things out. Peaceful coexistence would replace global conflict.

And we’d sit by in our fortress America while militant Moslems overran the world, content in the knowledge that the crocodile will lunch on us last.

Well, that’s our real platform. What do you think?

Why do you have that look of horror on your face? Where are you going? Stop screaming. Wait, we haven’t even told you our plans for gay marriage....

<HR width="100%" color=black noShade>Don Feder is a former Boston Herald writer who is now a political/communications consultant. He also maintains his own website, DonFeder.com.
 

Green

Paranoid in Los Angeles
Real Reason Why There WILL Be A Terrorist Attack This Fall

FOX News/Opinion Dynamics Poll. Aug. 3-4, 2004
Kerry 48%, Bush 43%

Marist College Poll July 30-Aug. 2, 2004
Kerry 47%, Bush 47%

ABC News/Washington Post Poll. July 30-Aug. 1, 2004
Kerry 49%, Bush 47%

American Research Group Poll. July 30-Aug. 1, 2004
Kerry 49%, Bush 46%

CBS News Poll. July 30-Aug. 1, 2004
Kerry 49%, Bush 43%

CNN/USA Today/Gallup Poll. July 30-Aug. 1, 2004
Bush 51%, Kerry 47%

Newsweek Poll July 29-30, 2004
Kerry 49%, Bush 42%

Zogby America Poll. July 26-29, 2004
Kerry 48%, Bush 43%
"Do you think George W. Bush deserves to be reelected as president of the United States”
Yes 42%, No 51% , consistent since 7-16-2003

http://www.pollingreport.com/wh04gen.htm
 

Green

Paranoid in Los Angeles
No, Mike, not the "government." The government is populated by well meaning people like me who try to do their job to the best of their ability, who try to interpret and enforce the laws of this country as best they can, for the benefit of all.

But I do believe that there are those who have usurped the constitution and have back channeled lines of authority who will do anything to keep their man in the highest office of the land.

Now, if you were to ask me if I think that Bush is a psychopath bent on the destruction of the constitution, who WILL do anything to remain in power, who WILL destroy our military, who WILL finish off what is left of the Bill of Rights, who WILL take this country down in flames through his arrogance and incompetence, I can only answer, sadly, yes.
 

Mike 9 or 10

Deceased
Green, I want to make sure I understand what you are saying.

Is it your position that President Bush has participated in or permitted the planning of a terrorist attack on the United States ?
 

Green

Paranoid in Los Angeles
"Is it your position that President Bush has participated in or permitted the planning of a terrorist attack on the United States ?"

Mike, there are some positions which are unwise to take or express. Like yelling fire in a crowded theater. (Unless, of course, the theater is actually on fire).

I do, however, believe that he would do ANYTHING to remain in power.

I will state as a position that I do not find it to be mere coincidence that we are now receiving one warning after the next of an immanent attack on U.S. soil concurrent with the majority of opinion polls showing that Bush is behind in popular support while at the same time the media ONLY reports those polls showing Bush ahead of Kerry.

And as for another position, I do believe and will publically state that Bush has earned a well deserved extended vacation to Crawford.
 

Mike 9 or 10

Deceased
Green, very well.

You have not yet made any flat out statements about Bush worse then what I and many others here have said about Clinton.

In all sincerity, I hope you are a honorable man who just happens to disagree with me politically and not a Troll.

Open debate of issues is one of our greatest strengths. I am not accusing you of this but in the past we have had people post stuff they did not believe to be true just to disrupt and harass TB2K and our membership. That is why I tend to be a bit paranoid.
 

Green

Paranoid in Los Angeles
Mike, I do not have enough experience with this board to hold an opinion about you. I came here to find more stimulation in crafting arguments than the more wacked out board where I regularly post humorous satire on matters political and religious.

While I do not consider myself to be a “troll,” I do enjoy the art of writing and engaging in spirited debate. I earn my living crafting written legal arguments for the government, currently local government in SoCal as an Assistant City Attorney heading a litigation department. Prior to that I served 27 years with the Army, Army Guard and Army Reserve, from buck private to field grade officer, in Signal Corp, Medical Corp, Cavalry (ground and air, tank pilot and helicopter driver), Quartermaster and JAG.

I will acknowledge that I hold a distrust of extremist views from any end of the spectrum, what me being an extremist moderate and religious agnostic.

I am more than willing to state that I honestly do not like Bush or his policies. I am not by any means anti-GOP; I supported McCain and locally I supported Arnold.

If you want to paint me as holding sour grapes in that my man didn't make it to the Oval Office, then I stand guilty as charged.
 

lojoma

Veteran Member
Thats a good article, JC, Im going to forward it on to a few people I know. I watched the broadcast of Kerry in Waterloo, IA last week. Its hard to believe he is the best they could come up with to challenge an incumbent. While, I regret that a lot of voters are overly swayed by charisma, and telegenetic demeanors, his stilted repetition of "America can do better AND help is on the way" basically reflects a candidate who can not make a choice between two slogans so tries to use both.

I don't love W, but I do fear a lot of the dem. principles and how they translate into actual practice in the world of a citizen. This article does a humorous, but believeable job of translation of all this compassion and "bunny hugging." I think Kerry lost my vote once and for all when he discussed actually encouraging HIV infected people to emmigrate to the US. Politics of AIDS aside, why in the name of natural selection would you invite people in who will only invariably die expensive, prolonged deaths while contributing less and less to a country? I don't know. Have you seen This Land is your Land thing from jibjab.com (its pretty funny). T
 
Top