Obama's Global Tax

Martin

Deceased
Obama's Global Tax
By INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY | Posted Tuesday, July 29, 2008 4:20 PM PT

Election '08: A plan by Barack Obama to redistribute American wealth on a global level is moving forward in the Senate. It follows Marxist theology — from each according to his ability, to each according to his need.




We are citizens of the world, Sen. Obama told thousands of nonvoting Germans during his recent tour of the Middle East and Europe. And if the Global Poverty Act (S. 2433) he has sponsored becomes law, which is almost certain if he wins in November, we're also going to be taxpayers of the world.

Speaking in Berlin, Obama said: "While the 20th century taught us that we share a common destiny, the 21st has revealed a world more intertwined than at any time in human history."

What the 20th century really showed was a series of totalitarian threats — from fascism to Nazism to communism — defeated by the U.S. military. Hitler's Germany, Mussolini's Italy, Tojo's Japan and the Soviet Union offered destinies we did not share.

Our destiny of peace and freedom through strength was not achieved by a transnationalist fantasy of buying the world a Coke and singing "Kumbaya."

Obama's Global Poverty Act offers us a global socialist destiny we do not want, one that challenges America's very sovereignty. The former "post-racial" candidate obviously intends to be a post-national president.

A statement from Obama's office says: "With billions of people living on just dollars a day around the world, global poverty remains one of the greatest challenges and tragedies the international community faces. It must be a priority of American foreign policy to commit to eliminating extreme poverty and ensuring every child has food, shelter and clean drinking water."

These are worthy goals, but note there's no mention of spreading democracy, expanding free trade, promoting entrepreneurial capitalism or ridding the world of despots who rule and ravage countries such as Zimbabwe and Sudan.

Obama would give them all a fish without teaching them how to fish. Pledging to cut global poverty in half on the backs of U.S. taxpayers is a ridiculous and impossible goal.

His legislation refers to the "millennium development goal," a phrase from a declaration adopted by the United Nations Millennium Assembly in 2000 and supported by President Clinton.

It calls for the "eradication of poverty" in part through the "redistribution (of) wealth of land" and "a fair distribution of the earth's resources." In other words: American resources.

It's a mantra of liberals that the U.S. is only a small portion of the world's population yet consumes an unseemly portion of the planet's supposedly finite resources. Never mentioned is the fact that America's population, just 5% of the world's total, also produces a stunning 27% of the world's GDP — to the enormous benefit of other countries. Nonetheless, their solution is to siphon off the product of our free democracy and distribute it.

We already transfer too much national wealth to the United Nations and its busybody agencies. Obama's bill would force U.S. taxpayers to fork over 0.7% of our gross domestic product every year to fund a global war on poverty, spending well above the $16.3 billion in global poverty aid the U.S. already spends.

Over a 13-year period, from 2002, when the U.N.'s Financing for Development Conference was held, to the target year of 2015, when the U.S is expected to meet its part of the U.N. Millennium goals, we would be spending an additional $65 billion annually for a total of $845 billion.

During a time of economic uncertainty, the plan would cost every American taxpayer around $2,500.

If you're worried abut gasoline and heating oil prices now, think what they'll be like when the U.S. is subjected in an Obama administration to global energy consumption and production taxes. Obama's Global Poverty Act is the "international community's" foot in the door.

The U.N. Millennium declaration called for a "currency transfer tax," a "tax on the rental value of land and natural resources," a "royalty on worldwide fossil energy production — oil, natural gas, coal . . . fees for the commercial use of the oceans, fees for the airplane use of the skies, fees for the use of the electromagnetic spectrum, fees on foreign exchange transactions, and a tax on the carbon content of fuels."

Co-sponsors of S. 2433 include Democrats Maria Cantwell of Washington, Dianne Feinstein of California, Richard Durbin of Illinois and Robert Menendez of New Jersey. GOP globalists supporting the bill include Chuck Hagel of Nebraska and Richard Lugar of Indiana.

Lugar has worked with Obama to promote more aid to Russia to promote nuclear nonproliferation. Lugar also promotes the Law of the Sea treaty, which turns over the world's oceans to an International Seabed Authority that would charge us to drill offshore and have veto power over the movements and actions of the U.S. Navy.

Obama's agenda sounds like defeated 2004 Democratic candidate John Kerry's "global test" for U.S. foreign policy decisions where "you have to do it in a way that passes the test — that passes the global test — where your countrymen, your people understand fully why you're doing what you're doing and you can prove to the world that you did it for legitimate reasons."

Obama has called on the U.S. to "lead by example" on global warming and probably would submit to a Kyoto-like agreement that would sock Americans with literally trillions of dollars in costs over the next half century for little or no benefit.

"We can't drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on 72 degrees at all times . . . and then just expect that other countries are going to say OK," Obama has said. "That's not leadership. That's not going to happen."

Oh, really? Who's to say we can't load up our SUV and head out in search of bacon double cheeseburgers at the mall? China? India? Bangladesh? The U.N.?

In an Obama White House, American sovereignty will become an endangered species. The Global Poverty Act is the first toe in the water of global socialism



http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=302222641317480
 

SpiritBear

Senior Member
And, yet, there are people who will vote for this Socialist/Marxist.

They must be the ones who want to be on the receiving end of the free goodies.

Unbelievable.
 
Marxist Redistributionist prevaricator.

Dark Days ahead if Pres. Elect (in his own mind) BO actually assumes office.

He's got Scary written all over him.

Gotta hope that things change and that "Dewey Wins" - if you recall what happened in '48
 

Richard

TB Fanatic
look at what happened to Africa post colonial days, more recently Zimbabwe, wars, genocide, corruption, bad Government, you name it its happening there
 

Troke

On TB every waking moment
"...look at what happened to Africa post colonial days, more recently Zimbabwe, wars, genocide, corruption, bad Government, you name it its happening there.."

And the Cultural Left will look you straight in the eye and tell you that all that is the residue left by colonialism. Just as they claim that the Blacks in this country involved in murder and mayhem are doing so because of the residue of slavery.
 

Tisha

Inactive
Myths and facts:
The Truth About the Global Poverty Act (S. 2433)
April 2008
MYTH: The Global Poverty Act would commit the U.S. to spending 0.7 percent of its gross national product on foreign aid. This would require a new tax on all Americans.
TRUTH: The legislation neither authorizes nor obligates the federal government to spend more money. Rather, it seeks to put our current foreign aid programs into a comprehensive strategy involving trade policy, debt cancellation, and private sector efforts to ensure that existing U.S. programs are more effective and efficient. The legislation calls for a strategy to determine the right mix of aid, trade and debt policies and investment. The strategy also includes the private sector, civil society organizations, and the developing countries themselves as critical components in global development. The Congressional Budget Office has estimated the bill would cost less than $1 million to implement.
MYTH: The bill subordinates U.S. foreign policy and foreign aid spending to the United Nations.
TRUTH: The Global Poverty Act would ask U.S. agencies and departments headed by the Secretary of State, to develop a comprehensive strategy for U.S. programs and policies to eliminate extreme global poverty. This would be a U.S. strategy for U.S. agencies. The legislation does not prejudge what the details of the strategy should be—only what components should be included in its creation. Decisions on U.S. policy and spending would remain exclusively with the U.S. government.
MYTH: U.S. development efforts have not been effective in reducing poverty.
TRUTH: The U.S. should be proud of its efforts on behalf of the world’s poor and hungry people. The U.S. partnered with the Rockefeller Foundation to launch the Green Revolution in Asia that quadrupled food yields and prevented predicted famine and widespread hunger. Assistance from the U.S. and other donors eradicated smallpox and is close to wiping out polio. Twenty-nine million more children in sub-Saharan Africa are in school than a decade ago. The U.S. is currently providing HIV/AIDS treatment for approximately 1.45 million men, women, and children worldwide, allowing them to help build their communities and countries. The Global Poverty Act would build on this record of success to help our efforts be even more efficient.
MYTH: The Global Poverty Act is only about foreign aid.
TRUTH: The Global Poverty Act seeks to bring greater coherence to our development policy by integrating U.S. foreign aid programs with U.S. trade policy, debt cancellation, and public-private partnerships. Each of these areas is critical to the fight against extreme poverty. Currently, U.S. global development policies and programs are implemented by 12 departments, 25 different agencies, and almost 60 government offices. Increased coordination is sorely needed to be effective. The Global Poverty Act does not establish any new foreign aid programs.
MYTH: The Global Poverty Act would make the eradication of extreme poverty the exclusive goal of U.S. foreign policy or U.S. foreign assistance.
TRUTH: The Global Poverty Act states that it would be “the policy of the United States to promote the reduction of global poverty, the elimination of extreme poverty, and the achievement of the Millennium Development Goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of people worldwide, between 1990 and 2015, who live on less than $1 per day.” The legislation does not state that the eradication of extreme poverty would become the exclusive goal of U.S. foreign assistance or seek to change other existing U.S. foreign assistance goals.
MYTH: The Global Poverty Act would place pressure on the U.S. to ban small arms and weapons, and ratify the International Criminal Court Treaty, the Kyoto Protocol, the Convention on Biological Diversity, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, and the Convention on the Rights of the Child.
TRUTH: The Global Poverty Act addresses only the eradication of extreme poverty and the first Millennium Development Goal (MDG), which aims to halve the proportion of people worldwide who live on less than $1 per day. The treaties referenced are from another document, the Millennium Declaration, signed by the U.S. in 2000 along with all the countries of the world. The Global Poverty Act does not address the issues in the Millennium Declaration and only focuses on U.S. efforts to alleviate extreme poverty
For more information, call 800-82-BREAD
or visit www.bread.org
 

SpiritBear

Senior Member
Tisha - that's some real word parsing doublespeak there.

Read it again. THOROUGHLY.

If you can't read between the lines, I'm afraid the rest of us can't help you.

Now, go pull the big (R) lever in November, OK? That is - unless you're a big fan of Marxism/Socialism on a GLOBAL scale.

We are SO screwed if "O" gets in. Done. Kaput. Finito. America as we know it will CEASE TO EXIST, to be replaced by a far left, whacko land of socialism, government control, and yes, Virginia - MORE taxes, sent OUTSIDE of the US to those who contribute NOTHING in return. (Gee..welfare on a Global scale, funded by our hard work and sweat. What a SWELL idea!)

NEVER has a Pres candidate scared the blue bajeebus out of me as "O". I thought Kerry was a communist. He looks like freakin Rush Limbaugh compared to the Obamination.

God help us all.
 

mbo

Membership Revoked
Myths and facts:
The Truth About the Global Poverty Act (S. 2433)
April 2008
MYTH: The Global Poverty Act would commit the U.S. to spending 0.7 percent of its gross national product on foreign aid. This would require a new tax on all Americans.
TRUTH: The legislation neither authorizes nor obligates the federal government to spend more money. Rather, it seeks to put our current foreign aid programs into a comprehensive strategy involving trade policy, debt cancellation, and private sector efforts to ensure that existing U.S. programs are more effective and efficient. The legislation calls for a strategy to determine the right mix of aid, trade and debt policies and investment. The strategy also includes the private sector, civil society organizations, and the developing countries themselves as critical components in global development. The Congressional Budget Office has estimated the bill would cost less than $1 million to implement.
MYTH: The bill subordinates U.S. foreign policy and foreign aid spending to the United Nations.
TRUTH: The Global Poverty Act would ask U.S. agencies and departments headed by the Secretary of State, to develop a comprehensive strategy for U.S. programs and policies to eliminate extreme global poverty. This would be a U.S. strategy for U.S. agencies. The legislation does not prejudge what the details of the strategy should be—only what components should be included in its creation. Decisions on U.S. policy and spending would remain exclusively with the U.S. government.
MYTH: U.S. development efforts have not been effective in reducing poverty.
TRUTH: The U.S. should be proud of its efforts on behalf of the world’s poor and hungry people. The U.S. partnered with the Rockefeller Foundation to launch the Green Revolution in Asia that quadrupled food yields and prevented predicted famine and widespread hunger. Assistance from the U.S. and other donors eradicated smallpox and is close to wiping out polio. Twenty-nine million more children in sub-Saharan Africa are in school than a decade ago. The U.S. is currently providing HIV/AIDS treatment for approximately 1.45 million men, women, and children worldwide, allowing them to help build their communities and countries. The Global Poverty Act would build on this record of success to help our efforts be even more efficient.
MYTH: The Global Poverty Act is only about foreign aid.
TRUTH: The Global Poverty Act seeks to bring greater coherence to our development policy by integrating U.S. foreign aid programs with U.S. trade policy, debt cancellation, and public-private partnerships. Each of these areas is critical to the fight against extreme poverty. Currently, U.S. global development policies and programs are implemented by 12 departments, 25 different agencies, and almost 60 government offices. Increased coordination is sorely needed to be effective. The Global Poverty Act does not establish any new foreign aid programs.
MYTH: The Global Poverty Act would make the eradication of extreme poverty the exclusive goal of U.S. foreign policy or U.S. foreign assistance.
TRUTH: The Global Poverty Act states that it would be “the policy of the United States to promote the reduction of global poverty, the elimination of extreme poverty, and the achievement of the Millennium Development Goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of people worldwide, between 1990 and 2015, who live on less than $1 per day.” The legislation does not state that the eradication of extreme poverty would become the exclusive goal of U.S. foreign assistance or seek to change other existing U.S. foreign assistance goals.
MYTH: The Global Poverty Act would place pressure on the U.S. to ban small arms and weapons, and ratify the International Criminal Court Treaty, the Kyoto Protocol, the Convention on Biological Diversity, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, and the Convention on the Rights of the Child.
TRUTH: The Global Poverty Act addresses only the eradication of extreme poverty and the first Millennium Development Goal (MDG), which aims to halve the proportion of people worldwide who live on less than $1 per day. The treaties referenced are from another document, the Millennium Declaration, signed by the U.S. in 2000 along with all the countries of the world. The Global Poverty Act does not address the issues in the Millennium Declaration and only focuses on U.S. efforts to alleviate extreme poverty
For more information, call 800-82-BREAD
or visit www.bread.org



Tisha,

You just won top prize for biggest sack of total B.S. ever displayed.


The lie is shown by the statement that the bill would cost $1 million dollars, which is so laughable on its face that one is blown away by the sheer audacity of the "Bread.org" web site to make it. One million dollars would barely cover the cost of the Congressional Printing Office to print out and distribute the bill.


.
 
Top