POL November 3: The 2020 U.S. ELECTION DAY MAIN THREAD

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Trump-Allied Republicans Mobbing Election Processes At Grassroots Level in Bid to Remake Party

by Jonathan Davisabout 4 hours ago
shutterstock_1846767061-758x374.jpg


A growing number of Republicans allied with former President Donald Trump and who have never before been involved in politics are taking over grassroots-level election processes following the hectic 2020 presidential contest rife with allegations of vote fraud.

While proof of such claims has never been reliably produced, many Trump-allied GOP voters remain concerned about changes to voting rules and procedures in several key battleground states ahead of the Nov. 3 election due to the coronavirus pandemic that involved, among other things, widespread use of mail-in balloting for the first time.

As such, in many instances, local Republican activists and election officials are reporting record numbers of new volunteers whose objective, they say, is to take over the GOP machine’s control over local processes, ProPublica reported this week.

The effort, according to the left-leaning media outlet, was spearheaded by former Trump adviser-turned-top podcaster Steve Bannon, who urged the former president’s supporters to get more involved at the local level as a means of shoring up voter integrity.

“It’s going to be a fight, but this is a fight that must be won, we don’t have an option,” Bannon said on his show in May. “We’re going to take this back village by village … precinct by precinct.”

Added ProPublica: “Precinct officers are the worker bees of political parties, typically responsible for routine tasks like making phone calls or knocking on doors. But collectively, they can influence how elections are run. In some states, they have a say in choosing poll workers, and in others they help pick members of boards that oversee elections.”

The outlet noted that in short order, people who had never before gotten involved in politics at any level began flooding into local party offices to volunteer their services in ways that are unprecedented, according to a number of local GOP officials.

“In Wisconsin, for instance, new GOP recruits are becoming poll workers. County clerks who run elections in the state are required to hire parties’ nominees. The parties once passed on suggesting names, but now hardline Republican county chairs are moving to use those powers,” ProPublica added.

“We’re signing up election inspectors like crazy right now,” said Outagamie County party chair Matt Albert, using the state’s formal term for poll workers. He went on to say that Bannon’s shout-out made all the difference.

“I’ve never seen anything like this, people are coming out of the woodwork,” added J.C. Martin, the GOP chairman in Polk County, Fla.

He told ProPublica he has enlisted 50 new committee members since January.

Martin had hoped that House Republicans would move to overturn the results of the election Jan. 6, so he is grateful to see a wave of like-minded newbies.

“The most recent time we saw this type of thing was the Tea Party, and this is way beyond it,” he added.

“They feel President Trump was rightfully elected president and it was taken from him,” added Michael Barnett, the Republican Party chairman in Palm Beach County, Fla., who has added 90 executive committee members this year. “They feel their involvement in upcoming elections will prevent something like that from happening again.”

The outlet said that it’s too early to tell what impact the influx of Trump-aligned grassroots volunteers will have, but “these up-and-coming party officers have notched early wins.”
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Here’s Why the Capitol Police a.k.a. ‘Pelosi’s Stasi’ Deserve Zero Respect From American Patriots

BLP Staff |
Sep 4, 2021
pjimage-2021-09-04T131827.269-750x422.jpg


On a recent episode of Big League Politics Live, former Liberty Conservative Podcast hosts Shane Trejo and Rocco Lucente explained why the U.S. Capitol police do not deserve the same level of respect as local and state law enforcement.

The hosts explained that local and state police defend the rights of the people while the U.S. Capitol police, perhaps better described as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s personal stasi, defends the tyrannical swamp government and punishes the people in order to protect their illicit authority.

“Local police are totally different than Pelosi’s stasi at the Capitol,” Trejo noted, adding that “alphabet soup agencies” in Washington D.C. like the FBI, NSA, CIA, CDC and others are rapidly losing favor among conservatives nationwide.

“The deep state and other criminal aspects of the federal government are freaking out right now because they see millions and millions of people rising up.

They thought that the election fraud, the vote steal last year, would crush these people, would make them atomized, would make them feel like they had no power,” he explained.

“But the exact opposite has happened. People saw the corruption happen in a way that they never thought it could where every institution went along with the fraud, and they realized that the time is now to get involved and to stand up,” Trejo said, speaking of the grassroots uprising in his home state of Michigan.

Lucente is seeing the same things on the ground in New York where ordinary people have had enough.

“We had 50-60 people turn out to a school board meeting the other night in a town where the vote for the mayor might get 150-160 people voting in the election total,” Lucente said to describe the awakening that is occurring throughout upstate New York.

“I think that we can set the example. I think that we can show people across the country in places like Oregon, in places like Illinois, Washington, California, that actually you don’t have to put up with these people,” he continued.

“We’re at the point where I would say that the county sheriff should be deputizing citizens if need be because we are in a soft civil war right now,” Lucente added.

Big League Politics has reported extensively about the left-wing agenda to overthrow the rule of law that has institutional support from the top levels of government:

U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) is having her Capitol Police goon squad arrest everyone at the U.S. Capitol – whether they are a staffer or a visitor – if they do not submit to force masking.

With the COVID-19 experimental vaccines failing to live up to expectations, the country is turning back to mask submission, and this time, it will be enforced through incarceration if Pelosi has her way.

“On July 27, 2021, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued new mask guidance that all individuals, vaccinated and unvaccinated alike, should wear a mask in indoor spaces to reduce the spread of the Delta variant of COVID-19,” a bulletin to the Capitol police reads.

The bulletin continues: “According the CDC, the Delta variant has become “the dominant coronavirus in the United States and continues to challenge aspects of disease control, public health, and the urgency to complete vaccination for unvaccinated individuals.”’

“Based on this information, the Office of Attending Physician (OAP) advised that Congress follow the CDC’s guidance to require mask wearing in interior spaces to help reduce the risk of COVID-19 infection,” the bulletin adds.

Later in the memo, the call for visitors or staffers to be arrested if they refuse to comply with the regime of forced masking is made.

“If a visitor or a staff member fails to wear a mask after a request is made to do so, the visitor or staff shall
be denied entry to the House Office Buildings or House-side of the U.S. Capitol. Any person who fails to comply or leave the premises after being asked to do so would be subject to an arrest for Unlawful Entry,” the bulletin reads.”

As long as Pelosi’s stasi a.k.a. the U.S. Capitol police continue to enforce this tyranny against We the People, they deserve no respect from conservatives, Republicans, and Trump-supporting patriots who want to preserve the Bill of Rights and Constitution.

The full BLP Live episode can be seen here:

Rumble video on website 51:32 min
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

anuary 6 Committee Refutes Claims DOJ Cleared Any Trump Connection
1
(L-R) US Representatives Stephanie Murphy, Elaine Luria, Liz Cheney, Adam Schiff, Zoe Lofgren, Jamie Raskin and Chairman Bennie Thompson, speak to the media following testimony during the Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the US Capitol adjourned their first hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, on …
OLIVIER DOULIERY/AFP via Getty Images
JACOB BLISS4 Sep 2021161

The chair and vice chair of the January 6 select committee released a statement Saturday claiming House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) is spreading misinformation when saying former President Donald Trump was cleared of any wrongdoing by the Justice Department.

Committee chair Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-MS) and vice chair Rep. Liz Cheney (R-WY) — whom House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) placed on the committee in an attempt to counter accusations the committee was partisan — stated the minority leader’s claims are “baseless” and “misinformation.” Thompson and Cheney claim to have received reports to refute McCarthy without citing any evidence:
Minority Leader McCarthy has recently made statements regarding the January 6th investigation. He has suggested, based on an anonymous report, that the Department of Justice has concluded that Donald Trump did not cause, incite, or provoke the violence on January 6th. When this anonymous report was first published, the Select Committee queried the Executive Branch agencies and congressional committees involved in the investigation. We’ve received answers and briefings from the relevant entities, and it’s been made clear to us that reports of such a conclusion are baseless. We will continue to pursue all elements of this investigation in a nonpartisan and thorough manner. We also remind Minority Leader McCarthy of his statements following January 6th, including his statement from the House Floor on January 13th—which are inconsistent with his recent comments.
Their statement comes after McCarthy appeared on KGET, a local news affiliate of NBC in his district, talking about a report from Reuters that said the FBI found “scant evidence” that January 6 was coordinated:
That’s where law enforcement comes. The FBI has investigated this. The Senate had bipartisan committees and come back. And you know what they’ve found — that there’s no involvement. But this is purely political in how Nancy Pelosi has handled this.
Reuters reported:
The FBI has found scant evidence that the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol was the result of an organized plot to overturn the presidential election result, according to four current and former law enforcement officials.

Though federal officials have arrested more than 570 alleged participants, the FBI at this point believes the violence was not centrally coordinated by far-right groups or prominent supporters of then-President Donald Trump, according to the sources, who have been either directly involved in or briefed regularly on the wide-ranging investigations.
Last week, McCarthy responded to the committee’s request for telecommunication companies to provide the private communications of people the committee associates with January 6, saying the committee was trying to turn every private company into a “surveillance state run by Democrat politicians.”

McCarthy claimed that if the companies turn over information, the “Republican majority will not forget and will stand with Americans to hold them fully accountable under the law.”
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

1630818251410.png

True The Vote may soon publicly release their alleged video evidence of ballot harvesting in the 2020 election. An Aug. 29 statement from Catherine Engelbrecht says the ballot trafficking initiative is “one of three investigations undertaken by True the Vote and … is just the beginning.” UncoverDC referred to the ballot trafficking project in an article on Aug. 24.

The updated message on the True The Vote website explains that “a select team of contractors and set out to determine whether widespread ballot trafficking was occurring as part of an organized criminal enterprise.” Suspicions of purposeful and planned ballot trafficking capitalizing on mass mail-in voting and the “harried installation of ballot drop boxes” prompted the group to “focus on the grifts that would necessarily leave trackable, provable data trails.”

They used a tracking methodology explained in a series written by the NYTimes, called The Privacy Project, explains Engelbrecht. Per Breitbart reporting, a yet-to-be-publicly-released document says that True The Vote has spent the last several months since late last year collecting more than 27 terabytes of geospatial and temporal data—a total of 10 trillion cell phone pings—between Oct. 1 and Nov. 6 in targeted areas in Georgia, Arizona, Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Texas. The data includes geofenced points of interest like ballot drop box locations, as well as UPS stores and select government, commercial, and non-governmental organization (NGO) facilities…[including] precise patterns of life for 242 suspected ballot traffickers in Georgia and 202 traffickers in Arizona.

The updated statement from Engebrecht explains:
Screen-Shot-2021-09-03-at-12.58.43.png
Catherine Engelbrecht/AP Photo

To test our trafficking theory, we acquired over ten trillion location-based cell signals in major metropolitan areas across six states. Initially, we worked with whistleblowers and witnesses, but soon enough, the data alone told the tale. Using mobile and GPS data, we mapped the travel patterns of ballot traffickers to ballot drop boxes…

All our research, including suspected locations where ballots were delivered, processed, and distributed, along with the individual devices associated, has been submitted in the form of a formal complaint, along with all data, to the FBI.

Briefings have been provided to state law enforcement and political leadership in several states. These conversations will continue to broaden in the coming days.

We’ve also acquired over a petabyte of video surveillance data. The quality of this video is inferior overall; lighting is bad, cameras are poorly positioned, timestamps are manipulated, key timeframes are often missing. Nevertheless, we are working video by video, using proprietary AI-based code we’ve written to screen the over 100,000 clips in our possession. The result? We are successfully finding video evidence that corroborates the digital data and supports the need for full investigations by law enforcement.

Our novel approach offers never before seen insights into the exploitation of America’s elections.


Pictured below, from the website, is one example of a route tracked with their cell-phone ping data:

Screen-Shot-2021-09-03-at-12.24.08.png

True the Vote/Engelbrecht Update/Aug. 29

True The Vote says it is an ongoing, “massive undertaking” tracking six states and one which they have reported to law enforcement. Engelbrecht emphasizes that they did “nothing untoward” because “all of this data is regularly bought and sold, about all of us.”

Engelbrecht mentions that if law enforcement fails to act, True The Vote will “release all data, all video, publicly.” The hope, she says, is to expose ballot trafficking “on a massive scale.”

Of note is their work on developing an “app to automate citizen-led voter roll clean-up efforts called IV3.” Its release has been delayed “to first share all of the above information with you.” They hope to launch it in the second week of September. The app will help citizens participate actively in the mission to secure honest elections.

Engelbrecht’s message concluded with a reminder to “stay engaged.”

Friends, this is it. It’s time to roll up our sleeves and work. Set your mind now to serve in elections in your county. Once that’s in order, reach out to others. True the Vote will be here to offer help every step of the way.

We’re all in this together – and working together, we really can true the vote. All is not lost. Stay engaged.

For Freedom. Ever onward
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
Before you Canvass - Use the Election Data Analyzer!!! 50:34 min

Law Professor David Clements Interview
Rumble — Meet Matt and Jeff. They work with US Election Integrity Plan "USEIP."
Matt created the Election Data Analyzer. Import voter roll data, and the analyzer will set you up for an effective ground game canvas.
Jeff has been leading the way in Colorado with Canvas efforts.
To access the tool and learn more, visit U.S. Election Integrity Plan
You can find me at theprofessorsrecord.com
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
[COMMENT: This is a long article with many many other referenced articles in it. It is too much cut and paste for the software limits and my patience. Please read on website, if interested]

Leftist "Watchdog" American Oversight: FOIA Requested AZ Audit Text Messages - NOTHING To See But They Say It Is HUGE: It's NOT

Leftist “Watchdog” American Oversight: FOIA Requested AZ Audit Text Messages – NOTHING To See But They Say It Is HUGE: It’s NOT

By Jordan Conradson
Published September 5, 2021 at 3:00pm
DCD82B50-4E25-4A71-A105-64842858F745.jpeg

American Oversight, “a nonpartisan oversight watchdog” that uses FOIA and litigation to target Republicans recently received requested documents from the Arizona audit.


American Oversight is a tool for the Democratic party and it has targeted the audit of the 2020 election.

Influence Watch reports:
American Oversight (AO) is an activist and litigation organization focusing on filing open records requests targeting Republican interests, especially the administration of President Donald Trump. The organization was launched in March 2017, following and in response to the election of President Trump’s inauguration and is headquartered in Washington, D.C.[1] As of January 2019, all of its investigations and litigation are directed at Republicans; it claims to be “the top Freedom of Information Act litigator investigating the Trump administration,” with more than 1000 open records requests and 56 lawsuits filed in 2018.[2]

While promoting itself as a “non-partisan” watchdog, American Oversight frequently appears explicitly partisan in its choice of investigative projects.[7]

As of the end of 2018, at least 11 of American Oversight’s 17 staffers and three of its four board members have known career histories with major left-wing organizations, Democratic Party campaigns, or Democratic officials.

on Wednesday, American Oversight released a biased review of the messages in an attempt to discredit the audit process. The report focuses on five different topics of their findings.

They used the messages to skew the truth by leaving out key conversation details and creating all sorts of conspiracy theories about the process.

1) PROMINENT REPUBLICANS
Here, they attack Congressman Paul Gosar for inquiring about the ongoing investigation and having knowledge of some privileged information. They mention his involvement with Jan. 6 Trump rally.

They have nothing on Congressman Gosar.

They go on to say the former National Committeeman of the Arizona Republican Party Bruce Ash emailed Tommy Hicks, the co-chair of the Republican National Committee,
asked that the RNC help finance the defense against Democrats’ legal challenges to the “audit.” The latest records include more instances of audit allies attempting to get help from the national party: On July 17, audit spokesman Randy Pullen sent a text to Ash saying, “Need guns, lawyers, and money. Have any?”
1) Ash’s email said, “The pressure the Democrats are [p]utting in the process are quite extraordinary. They need assistance… I hope you might be able to source some much needed financial and legal assistance.”, after mentioning that the RNC hadn’t provided a dime.

Democrats have dumped all of their resources into stopping this audit and covering up the crime. Remember the DNC’s Russia collusion hoax, too? Where is the issue in asking the RNC to help with an election integrity investigation?

2) Below, see the full messages from Randy Pullen to Bruce Ash. AO portrays a false image of Pullen based on a joke that he made. AO makes him sound like a criminal.

6DF3D53D-9CD8-413C-AE78-90552480FAF2.jpeg


These people literally have no sense of humor. This isn’t a bank robbery scheme. He then said “Fun is about to start. Looks like AG going to step in.” followed by “we will see”.

Three days prior on July 14, Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich requested evidence of illegal double voting in the 2020 election from Secretary of State Katie Hobbs. He later was notified by Arizona State Senator Sonny Borrelli that Maricopa County was in violation of the law, which required him to open an investigation into whether or not their noncompliance with subpoenas violated the law. He decided that Maricopa County is in violation of the law. They now have until September 25th to comply or they will lose 10% in state shared revenues, which amounts to tens of millions of dollars.

They’re hollering “Fire!” when there isn’t even smoke.
AO: The new records also indicate that Pullen was in touch with Reince Priebus, Trump’s first chief of staff and the former head of both the national and the Wisconsin Republican Party, as far back as December, before Pullen was officially involved in the “audit.” That month, Pullen texted Priebus to tell him about the potential for a “Forensic audit,” and in March asked Priebus for “suggestions on election audit firms.”
(Priebus said he would check.) Another text from Pullen to Ash, sent on March 8, appears to reference Priebus: “I texted Reince and ask if he would like to help out on the audit,” Pullen said, then followed up to say they were speaking later that morning.

[Please read the rest at website.]
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Registered Democrat Caught Storming US Capitol, Attacking Police Pleads with Court for Light Sentence Because He Is Not Trump Supporter

By Jim Hoft
Published September 5, 2021 at 11:03am
robert-maurice-reeder.jpg


Robert Maurice Reeder was arrested after he was caught inside the US Capitol on January 6th.

Robert Maurice Reeder is a:
** Registered Democrat
** Wore a Covid mask to the Trump rally
** Lied about his actions

Reeder was about to get a light sentence this week after telling the judge he is “not a Trump supporter” and because of this he demanded a light sentence. And he was about to get a very small sentence with an excellent plea deal because of this.

But then a video turned up before his sentencing of Robert Reeder attacking police on Jaunary 6th.

It turns out he was shouting at the crowd extremely violent rhetoric while loosely wearing a MAGA hat to make the real Trump supporters appear violent by association. Reeder was the typical Biden agitator who wanted to interrupt the Republican objections inside the Capitol. And he wanted to frame Trump supporters as violent insurrectionists.

Robert Reeder told authorities:

He was watching television coverage of a pro-Trump crowd which had gathered for a speeches on the Ellipse when he made a spur-of-the-moment decision to hop a train into Washington, D.C., to join the event. After listening to the oratory on the Ellipse, he says he visited various area monuments before arriving at the U.S. Capitol and joining the “initially festive” events which by then were transpiring… He pleaded guilty to one of those counts — count four — and was due to be sentenced Wednesday.

Then video was discovered of Democrat Robert Reeder shows him attacking a police officer on Jan. 6.

For the record, there were Antifa gatherings at the various monuments on Jan. 6 that were organized by John Sullivan.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Experts Want Audit To Protect California Recall Against 'Cyberattack'

SUNDAY, SEP 05, 2021 - 04:30 PM
Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times,

Cybersecurity experts are urging California’s top elections official to conduct an audit of ballots cast in the recall election to ensure no problems occurred.

The recent disclosure of binary images of the Dominion Voting Systems’ election management system boosts the risk of nefarious action against the state’s election system, the group of experts warned in a Sept. 2 letter to California Secretary of State Shirley Weber.

The software versions shown in the images are not the same ones as those used in California, but the differences are relatively minor, they added.
“The release materially elevates threats to the trustworthiness of the ongoing California recall election and to public trust in the election.
We urge you to address the issue by taking one critical action–a statewide risk-limiting audit (RLA) of trustworthy paper ballots—which can substantially mitigate these threats,” Mustaque Ahamad, a professor at Georgia Tech’s school of cybersecurity and privacy, Philip Stark, professor at the University of California, Berkeley’s Department of Statistics, and the other experts wrote.
Dominion, whose systems are used across more than half of the states in the nation, did not return a request for comment, nor did the office of Weber.

Jenna Dresner, a spokeswoman for Weber, told The Associated Press that the version of Dominion’s system used in 40 California counties is different from the one referenced in the letter and said there are a range of security measures in place that protect against attacks.
“California has the strictest and most comprehensive voting system testing, use, and requirements in the country, and it was designed to withstand potential threats,” Dresner said.
A Dominion spokesperson told the outlet that the company had become aware of the reported release of images of its system and reported it to the authorities but that the release isn’t seen as boosting the risk to election security.

Mail in ballots run through a sorting machine at the Sacramento County Registrar of Voters office in Sacramento, Calif., on Aug. 30, 2021. (Rich Pedroncelli/AP Photo)

The images were allegedly made public at a cyber symposium on elections held in South Dakota last month.

The experts said one image came from Antrim County in Michigan while two came from Mesa County in Colorado. The images were made available online and “have been widely downloaded,” they said.
“While it is prudent to assume that other nation states have had that software for a long time, thousands of other people with unknown affiliations, motives, and physical access to voting systems now have it also. That increases the risk of undetected outcome-changing cyber-attacks on California counties that use Dominion equipment and the risk of accusations of fraud and election manipulation which, without rigorous post-election auditing, would be impossible to disprove,” they wrote.
Stark, one of the experts, introduced the concept of risk-limiting audits in 2007. The process includes manually checking a sample of ballots, or other paper records, until the amount of evidence is sufficient to prove the reported outcome is correct, according to the U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

Absentee ballots for the recall election, which presents voters with the choice of whether to remove California Gov. Gavin Newsom and who to replace him with if he is recalled, were sent out last month. Voters can also go to the polls on Sept. 14.

Nearly a quarter of all registered voters in the state had returned ballots as of Thursday, according to Weber’s office. The bulk returned ballots by mail, with many others using drop boxes.
 

Publius

TB Fanatic

Registered Democrat Caught Storming US Capitol, Attacking Police Pleads with Court for Light Sentence Because He Is Not Trump Supporter

By Jim Hoft
Published September 5, 2021 at 11:03am
robert-maurice-reeder.jpg


Robert Maurice Reeder was arrested after he was caught inside the US Capitol on January 6th.

Robert Maurice Reeder is a:
** Registered Democrat
** Wore a Covid mask to the Trump rally
** Lied about his actions

Reeder was about to get a light sentence this week after telling the judge he is “not a Trump supporter” and because of this he demanded a light sentence. And he was about to get a very small sentence with an excellent plea deal because of this.

But then a video turned up before his sentencing of Robert Reeder attacking police on Jaunary 6th.

It turns out he was shouting at the crowd extremely violent rhetoric while loosely wearing a MAGA hat to make the real Trump supporters appear violent by association. Reeder was the typical Biden agitator who wanted to interrupt the Republican objections inside the Capitol. And he wanted to frame Trump supporters as violent insurrectionists.

Robert Reeder told authorities:

He was watching television coverage of a pro-Trump crowd which had gathered for a speeches on the Ellipse when he made a spur-of-the-moment decision to hop a train into Washington, D.C., to join the event. After listening to the oratory on the Ellipse, he says he visited various area monuments before arriving at the U.S. Capitol and joining the “initially festive” events which by then were transpiring… He pleaded guilty to one of those counts — count four — and was due to be sentenced Wednesday.

Then video was discovered of Democrat Robert Reeder shows him attacking a police officer on Jan. 6.

For the record, there were Antifa gatherings at the various monuments on Jan. 6 that were organized by John Sullivan.


Well that evidence should kill the law suit filed by a few DC cops.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

AZ State Senator Wendy Rogers: “The Audit Is Coming Guys, I Promise You… This Is Real. Keep The Faith.”

By Jordan Conradson
Published September 5, 2021 at 7:51pm

54BFB549-38BE-49EE-9D1F-E7ABBC7809E3.jpeg


Wendy Rogers Audit The Vote Rally – Pennsylvania

Arizona State Senator Wendy Rogers shared a message assuring the Country that the Arizona audit report is coming.

The audit report has been delayed all this time by enemies of the audit. Now members of the team are still recovering from COVID-19.

Once all team members are healthy and able to focus on the task, they will finish the report and it will be presented to the public.

1630903621486.png

We can also expect the signature analysis report to be released at the same time.

Audit Spokesman Randy Pullen said that the signature analysis should be completed by Tuesday.

Arizona State Senator Wendy Rogers has kept supporters fighting with her messages on Twitter and her nationwide tour.
The audit is coming guys, I promise you. I get a lot of comments asking and people think I can speed it up but I can’t speed it up. It is a process and it is coming. Also – other information is coming out I can’t disclose. Just know that it is all going to happen and this is real.
Keep the faith. Make sure YOUR state is doing an audit because when our audit comes out the next steps are to get this done in other states. Start pushing that now. – Wendy
1630903479677.png

1630903520828.png

This months-long delay was caused by Maricopa County, RINO State Senators, and Democrats. Democrats and The County have tried to stop this process every step of the way.

For months now, Maricopa County has refused to comply with legal and enforceable subpoenas for election equipment. In February, RINO State Senator Paul Boyer killed a resolution to hold them in contempt for noncompliance.

Finally, Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich stepped in and enforced the subpoenas, giving the County 30 days to comply or lose funding.

1630903369662.png

While patriots await the Arizona audit report, they need to be taking action in their home state and fighting for full forensic audits.

This report is expected to shock the world and fuel the Freight Train of Audits across America.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Pennsylvania Senate panel wants citizens to testify if they witnessed election malfeasance

Testimony being sought must be firsthand accounts in which the resident witnessed impropriety or directly experienced it themselves.

By Christen Smith
Updated: September 5, 2021 - 11:44pm

The Pennsylvania Senate committee tasked with investigating instances of election malfeasance asked residents this week to submit their testimony for its review.

Intergovernmental Operations Committee Chairman Cris Dush, R-Wellsboro, said residents should only submit their stories if they are willing to sign an affidavit and potentially testify under oath, under penalty of perjury, before the panel during forthcoming hearings.

The testimony must also include firsthand accounts in which the resident witnessed impropriety or directly experienced it themselves. The information will “help lawmakers develop potential improvements to state law to bolster election security.”

Dush took over the committee earlier this month after Senate Republican leaders removed former Chairman Doug Mastriano, R-Gettysburg, following an internal battle over the direction of the probe.

Mastriano said Senate President Pro Tempore Jake Corman, R-Bellefonte, stonewalled the investigation and undermined his efforts to extract information from voting machines in Tioga, York and Philadelphia counties.

Corman said Mastriano acted on his own accord when he sent letters to county commissioners that ultimately prompted the Department of State to threaten to decertify voting equipment should local officials’ comply with the request.

The machines cost millions to replace, commissioners in York and Tioga counties told The Center Square earlier this month.

The Senate leader also denied blocking the investigation or canceling a committee hearing in which members were expected to subpoena the counties for the information.

“If we are going to give Pennsylvanians an election system they can believe in, we need to remove any doubt about whether the system is fair,” Corman said in an Aug. 23 op-ed that reaffirmed his commitment to the forensic audit.

He insisted the Senate’s probe will go “much further” than other state-mandated reviews that have focused more on the accuracy of votes tabulated.

“The goal of the Senate’s investigation will not be to conduct a recount, but to find any flaws in the system that could be exploited by bad actors and take action to correct those flaws through legislative changes to our Election Code,” he said.

Dush said the committee will soon schedule public hearings, create a website that contains updates about the audit and request documents from both counties and the state.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
Col. John Mills - The Deep State, Up Close and Personal 1:45:20 min

Rumble — [Professor David Clements interviews] Retired Col. John Mills has seen it all. Including the transition of the Presidency from Barack Obama to Donald Trump. Hear his account of how the corrupt DOJ, military industrial complex, and others lied in creating the Russia Hoax, and their attempts to frame Donald J. Trump.

We also explore the ramifications of his work in relation to John Durham, and the 2020 election.

You can find more about Col. John Mills and his work below:

National Election Integrity Association Website

WWW.NEIA.US

FOIA, File, Settle, and Sue (FS2©) A citizen’s model on how to re-assert control over the county election process

View: https://vimeo.com/584494897 4:59 min
The trailer - if this doesn't move you, I don't know what will.

View: https://vimeo.com/585035651 30:25 min

Col John Mills Talks About Marco Polo Report "China + Italy = Rat King"

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKYFq2IS_qg 16:09 min

Afghanistan in Context: Xi Jinping Has Occupied the Sudetenstan

Japan’s Defense of Taiwan a Response to CCP ‘Mortal Threat,’ Expert Says

Look to John Paul Jones to Restore the Navy’s Fighting Spirit

Why Do Retired (and Now Active Duty) Generals and Admirals Behave the Way They Do?

150 To 1 - Trump Enthusiasm Reverberates Across America - CD Media

Moms Will Win This War - CD Media
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

(VIDEO) Bannon’s War Room – Arizona Gubernatorial Candidate Kari Lake – “This Isn’t A Piece Of Candy… This Is an Election”

By Jordan Conradson
Published September 6, 2021 at 12:45pm
7D8A622B-B9D5-46B2-976D-F4DC7EF12871.jpeg


Arizona Gubernatorial Candidate Kari Lake joined Steve Bannon’s War Room to provide updates on the Arizona audit, Arizona’s southern border, and her campaign against the radical left.


Kari Lake has a plan to secure Arizona’s southern border and take care of the thousands of children that are missing after being smuggled into the United States.

In addition to finishing the southern border wall, Kari Lake says that she would use a chunk of the $1.6 billion in COVID relief money to fund border security.

With hundreds of thousands of immigrants invading our southern border and bringing diseases with them, this is a real COVID issue that requires real solutions.

Steve Bannon also asked Lake about the coming Arizona audit report.

Bannon: When the report comes out in, you know, next week or the week after about the full forensic audit that’s going on in Maricopa County, regardless of the details of it, I think it’s going to show pretty obviously, that the Secretary of State was not on top of things, along with certain individuals and supervisors in Maricopa County. She clearly looks like she’s going to be the Democratic nominee, and she already seems like a contributor on MSNBC and CNN because she’s on there every night. Walk us through, what these are is going to show, how are we going to use that to confront Katie Hobbs, as far as what she’s done, her breach of fiduciary responsibility as a senior elected official in the state of Arizona, right now?

Lake: Well you know you’re talking about her being my, my competition, or who I’m running against but maybe not. I mean, if we find out, Steve from this report from the Forensic audit report that there was fraud or any criminal wrongdoing, I hope to God that our attorney general Mark Brnovich files indictments against people and perhaps there was criminal activity. And I hope that Katie Hobbs is praying every night that she wasn’t involved in that because if that were the case then we’re looking at possibly indictments coming down and I think that should be what happens. I think she should right now recuse herself from her duties because she’s running for Governor. And we’ve already seen how hyper partisan she is, calling basically any Trump supporter any Republican in this state, a Nazi. And now she wants to be in charge of this election it’s malpractice what she’s already done and I don’t think that she can really do her duties as Secretary of State, especially while she’s running against a bunch of conservative Republicans. So I plan to go against her, but I’m thinking that when this report comes out, she could be in more trouble than just having to deal with me on the campaign trail.

Bannon:
Do you support it and this report comes out it’s only Maricopa County. Do you support that we go to Pima and Pinal, and what about getting in all the federal elections? I mean, where should this full forensic audit in Arizona, where should it end up? should just stop in Maricopa? Or are you a supporter of let’s take the whole thing and find out exactly what happened throughout the whole state?

Lake: I’ve talked to you a little bit about this before and I’m touring the whole state of Arizona. Everywhere I go, this is issue number one. This, and the vaccine mandates, issue number one, and people want this audit to be in their county as well. Even counties where, you know, the Republicans won. They want, this is not necessarily a Republican and a Democrat issue this is a get our elections under control and make sure they’re honest issue and people in every county of Arizona, want to make sure their elections are being run honestly, and that they know that their vote counts. So everyone in Arizona I talked to wants to expand this, but if it’s determined and I fear that it may be determined that we were not told the truth about who won the election, I believe we’re going to find out that Joe Biden didn’t win the election that’s what, what I’m feeling is going to happen. I think we need to decertify the election results in Arizona, right away. And you know in other states, I won’t be the governor of other states, the people of those states have to decide what they want to do, but I don’t think there was just fraud in Arizona, I think we could see that it spread through many other states possibly all of them.

Bannon: But you’re comfortable, if you see that this report shows the evidence and points in certain directions, you’re comfortable supporting a decertification of the electors? That would be a pretty extraordinary move, you’re prepared to support that?

Lake: Absolutely, absolutely. If we find out that these investigators, with the forensic audit here in Arizona, if their report shows that Joe Biden did not win this election, we must decertify this election. Are you kidding me? This isn’t a piece of candy that was stolen from the counter of a drugstore. This is an election, and if we find out fraud was involved, and there were misdeeds involved, we can’t just let that happen. We can’t, it’s too important.
If the audit report proves that Joe Biden stole Arizona, this fraudulent election must be decertified immediately!

They continued to talk about the Texas Heartbeat Law, which outlaws abortion after six weeks in the state of Texas, and Kari Lake’s plan to replicate this law in Arizona if Governor Doug Ducey cannot protect the unborn.

If we do not secure our elections now, we may never have a free and fair election again.

Rumble video on website 17:17 min
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

AZ Secretary of State Katie Hobbs Tries to Cheat Again: EZAZ Civic Action Group Finds 170 Issues with Her Elections Manual

By Jordan Conradson
Published September 6, 2021 at 2:37pm
8735448A-2857-483A-BE9F-E8139816CE2F.jpeg


Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs released the Arizona 2021 election procedures manual draft for public review and comment last month.


EZAZ.org, a civic action group based in Phoenix, Arizona organized volunteers to review the new manual.

They found over 170 issues and it looks like radical leftist Katie Hobbs may even be violating election integrity statutes with her new procedures.

EZAZ called Arizona voters to action with this message:
Submit Public Comment to Secretary Hobbs on the Draft Election Manual

The Arizona Election Manual draft is created by the Secretary of State before an election cycle. The Election Manual is meant to supplement the Arizona Revised Statute laws created by the Legislature.
As we saw in the last election, the Election Manual is treated nearly equal to law by the courts. EZAZ.org organized 60 volunteers to review the Election Manual and find the anomalies that impact the integrity or transparency of the elections.

From September 5th to September 8th, EZAZ.org will update the issues in the spreadsheet below. Public comment is due before 5 pm on September 8th.

We need your help to submit public comment!
Instructions:

Review the items listed below. Copy the statement in the last column of each row. Adjust the wording to your liking. Email your public comment by 5 pm on September 8th to proceduresmanual@azsos.gov and azelectionmanualdraft@ezazpie.org.

We will also be sending public comments to the Arizona Attorney General, Arizona Legislature, and the County Recorders.


On the EZAZ webpage, you can see the spreadsheet below which lists the page number, language used, and the issues that create more risk for fraud.

They found over 170 issues!

It is clear that Secretary of State Katie Hobbs is preparing for another fraudulent election.
Election Manual Draft Concerns
27DB74C9-AF4E-413F-A692-AC790B315066.jpeg

CF209FCA-0D18-425B-A08F-CE71BEA639D1.jpeg

E6E957C5-3D0D-4444-AF03-26F9B6081E9A.jpeg

CB04CE19-421D-427F-A0FB-C4805E68E540.jpeg
Katie Hobbs is running for Governor of Arizona and she will be supervising her own election as Arizona Secretary of State.

Over the next two days, batches of problems will be released on EZAZ.org.

If you are an Arizona resident, you can visit the page and take action now.


After this was announced, The Gateway Pundit’s Jordan Conradson spoke to EZAZ’s founder, Merissa Hamilton.
Conradson: Please tell me again about the grassroots operation, how they executed it, and who was involved/their experience.

Hamilton: EZAZ.ORG organized over 60 volunteers, many previously volunteering at the Arizona Senate Election Integrity Audit, to review the Arizona Secretary of State draft 2022 Election Manual. After the volunteers submitted their documents of concerns, the concerns were reviewed and categorized as an issue from the manual or the Arizona Revised Statutes. A third review was conducted by volunteers with more advanced knowledge and experience on election procedures and statute to confirm the concerns.The final concerns were then compiled into a public page on EZAZ.ORG. Our volunteers found over 170 preliminary issues. The most alarming concerns are where Secretary Hobbs appears to be using the election manual to bypass or violate the existing election integrity statute.

Conradson:
What can the AG do about this?

Hamilton: The AG is responsible for reviewing the manual and instructing Secretary Hobbs on revisions.

Conradson: Where do we go from here?

Hamilton: If Hobbs does not address voters’ concerns in the election manual, EZAZ.ORG will pursue the concerns with the Arizona Legislature.

Patriots in Arizona need to make their voices heard before Hobbs steals another election.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Heeding Steve Bannon’s Call, Election Deniers Organize to Seize Control of the GOP

The stolen election myth inspired thousands of Trump supporters to take over the Republican Party at the local level, exerting more partisan influence on how elections are run.

by Isaac Arnsdorf, Doug Bock Clark, Alexandra Berzon and Anjeanette Damon

Sept. 2, 5 a.m. EDT


Heeding Steve Bannon’s Call, Election Deniers Organize to Seize Control of the GOP — and Reshape America’s Elections

by Isaac Arnsdorf, Doug Bock Clark, Alexandra Berzon and Anjeanette DamonSept. 2, 5 a.m. EDT
The stolen election myth inspired thousands of Trump supporters to take over the Republican Party at the local level, exerting more partisan influence on how elections are run.

One of the loudest voices urging Donald Trump’s supporters to push for overturning the presidential election results was Steve Bannon. “We’re on the point of attack,” Bannon, a former Trump adviser and far-right nationalist, pledged on his popular podcast on Jan. 5. “All hell will break loose tomorrow.”

The next morning, as thousands massed on the National Mall for a rally that turned into an attack on the Capitol, Bannon fired up his listeners: “It’s them against us. Who can impose their will on the other side?”

When the insurrection failed, Bannon continued his campaign for his former boss by other means. On his “War Room” podcast, which has tens of millions of downloads, Bannon said President Trump lost because the Republican Party sold him out. “This is your call to action,” Bannon said in February, a few weeks after Trump had pardoned him of federal fraud charges.

The solution, Bannon announced, was to seize control of the GOP from the bottom up. Listeners should flood into the lowest rung of the party structure: the precincts. “It’s going to be a fight, but this is a fight that must be won, we don’t have an option,” Bannon said on his show in May. “We’re going to take this back village by village … precinct by precinct.”

Precinct officers are the worker bees of political parties, typically responsible for routine tasks like making phone calls or knocking on doors. But collectively, they can influence how elections are run. In some states, they have a say in choosing poll workers, and in others they help pick members of boards that oversee elections.

After Bannon’s endorsement, the “precinct strategy” rocketed across far-right media. Viral posts promoting the plan racked up millions of views on pro-Trump websites, talk radio, fringe social networks and message boards, and programs aligned with the QAnon conspiracy theory.

Suddenly, people who had never before showed interest in party politics started calling the local GOP headquarters or crowding into county conventions, eager to enlist as precinct officers. They showed up in states Trump won and in states he lost, in deep-red rural areas, in swing-voting suburbs and in populous cities.

In Wisconsin, for instance, new GOP recruits are becoming poll workers. County clerks who run elections in the state are required to hire parties’ nominees. The parties once passed on suggesting names, but now hardline Republican county chairs are moving to use those powers.

“We’re signing up election inspectors like crazy right now,” said Outagamie County party chair Matt Albert, using the state’s formal term for poll workers.

Albert, who held a “Stop the Steal” rally during Wisconsin’s November recount, said Bannon’s podcast had played a role in the burst of enthusiasm.

ProPublica contacted GOP leaders in 65 key counties, and 41 reported an unusual increase in signups since Bannon’s campaign began. At least 8,500 new Republican precinct officers (or equivalent lowest-level officials) joined those county parties. We also looked at equivalent Democratic posts and found no similar surge.

“I’ve never seen anything like this, people are coming out of the woodwork,” said J.C. Martin, the GOP chairman in Polk County, Florida, who has added 50 new committee members since January. Martin had wanted congressional Republicans to overturn the election on Jan. 6, and he welcomed this wave of like-minded newcomers. “The most recent time we saw this type of thing was the tea party, and this is way beyond it.”

Bannon, through a spokesperson, declined to comment.

Tracking a Wave of New GOP Officers

1630961568282.png1630961622484.png

After Steve Bannon called on “deplorables” to take over the Republican Party from the bottom up, ProPublica interviewed county chairs in competitive states to find out if they’ve seen a sudden increase in local-level party officers. Forty-one out of 65 key counties surveyed reported an unusual increase in precinct officers or the local equivalent.

Note: Hover over the pins for details on the increase or for information about other GOP activism there.

While party officials largely credited Bannon’s podcast with driving the surge of new precinct officers, it’s impossible to know the motivations of each new recruit.

Precinct officers are not centrally tracked anywhere, and it was not possible to examine all 3,000 counties nationwide. ProPublica focused on politically competitive places that were discussed as targets in far-right media.

The tea party backlash to former President Barack Obama’s election foreshadowed Republican gains in the 2010 midterm. Presidential losses often energize party activists, and it would not be the first time that a candidate’s faction tried to consolidate control over the party apparatus with the aim of winning the next election.

What’s different this time is an uncompromising focus on elections themselves.

The new movement is built entirely around Trump’s insistence that the electoral system failed in 2020 and that Republicans can’t let it happen again. The result is a nationwide groundswell of party activists whose central goal is not merely to win elections but to reshape their machinery.

“They feel President Trump was rightfully elected president and it was taken from him,” said Michael Barnett, the GOP chairman in Palm Beach County, Florida, who has enthusiastically added 90 executive committee members this year. “They feel their involvement in upcoming elections will prevent something like that from happening again.”

It has only been a few months — too soon to say whether the wave of newcomers will ultimately succeed in reshaping the GOP or how they will affect Republican prospects in upcoming elections. But what’s already clear is that these up-and-coming party officers have notched early wins.

In Michigan, one of the main organizers recruiting new precinct officers pushed for the ouster of the state party’s executive director, who contradicted Trump’s claim that the election was stolen and who later resigned. In Las Vegas, a handful of Proud Boys, part of the extremist group whose members have been charged in attacking the Capitol, supported a bid to topple moderates controlling the county party — a dispute that’s now in court.

In Phoenix, new precinct officers petitioned to unseat county officials who refused to cooperate with the state Senate Republicans’ “forensic audit” of 2020 ballots. Similar audits are now being pursued by new precinct officers in Michigan and the Carolinas. Outside Atlanta, new local party leaders helped elect a state lawmaker who championed Georgia’s sweeping new voting restrictions.

And precinct organizers are hoping to advance candidates such as Matthew DePerno, a Michigan attorney general hopeful who Republican state senators said in a report had spread “misleading and irresponsible” misinformation about the election, and Mark Finchem, a member of the Oath Keepers militia who marched to the Capitol on Jan. 6 and is now running to be Arizona’s top elections official. DePerno did not respond to requests for comment, and Finchem asked for questions to be sent by email and then did not respond.

Finchem has said he did not enter the Capitol or have anything to do with the violence. He has also said the Oath Keepers are not anti-government.

When Bannon interviewed Finchem on an April podcast, he wrapped up a segment about Arizona Republicans’ efforts to reexamine the 2020 results by asking Finchem how listeners could help. Finchem answered by promoting the precinct strategy. “The only way you’re going to see to it this doesn’t happen again is if you get involved,” Finchem said. “Become a precinct committeeman.”

Some of the new precinct officers were in the crowd that marched to the Capitol on Jan. 6, according to interviews and social media posts; one Texas precinct chair was arrested for assaulting police in Washington. He pleaded not guilty.

Many of the new activists have said publicly that they support QAnon, the online conspiracy theory that believes Trump was working to root out a global child sex trafficking ring. Organizers of the movement have encouraged supporters to bring weapons to demonstrations. In Las Vegas and Savannah, Georgia, newcomers were so disruptive that they shut down leadership elections.

“They’re not going to be welcomed with open arms,” Bannon said, addressing the altercations on an April podcast. “But hey, was it nasty at Lexington?” he said, citing the opening battle of the American Revolution. “Was it nasty at Concord? Was it nasty at Bunker Hill?”

https://assets-d.propublica.org/v5/...precincts-chapter-party-takeover-reexport.mp4 .20 min

Part 1 of 3
 
Last edited:

marsh

On TB every waking moment
Part 2 of 3

Bannon plucked the precinct strategy out of obscurity. For more than a decade, a little-known Arizona tea party activist named Daniel J. Schultz has been preaching the plan. Schultz failed to gain traction, despite winning a $5,000 prize from conservative direct-mail pioneer Richard Viguerie in 2013 and making a 2015 pitch on Bannon’s far-right website, Breitbart. Schultz did not respond to repeated requests for comment.

In December, Schultz appeared on Bannon’s podcast to argue that Republican-controlled state legislatures should nullify the election results and throw their state’s Electoral College votes to Trump. If lawmakers failed to do that, Bannon asked, would it be the end of the Republican Party? Not if Trump supporters took over the party by seizing precinct posts, Schultz answered, beginning to explain his plan. Bannon cut him off, offering to return to the idea another time.

That time came in February. Schultz returned to Bannon’s podcast, immediately preceding Mike Lindell, the MyPillow CEO who spouts baseless conspiracy theories about the 2020 election.

“We can take over the party if we invade it,” Schultz said. “I can’t guarantee you that we’ll save the republic, but I can guarantee you this: We’ll lose it if we conservatives don’t take over the Republican Party.”

Bannon endorsed Schultz’s plan, telling “all the unwashed masses in the MAGA movement, the deplorables” to take up this cause. Bannon said he had more than 400,000 listeners, a count that could not be independently verified.

Bannon brought Schultz back on the show at least eight more times, alongside guests such as embattled Florida congressman Matt Gaetz, a leading defender of people jailed on Capitol riot charges.

The exposure launched Schultz into a full-blown far-right media tour. In February, Schultz spoke on a podcast with Tracy “Beanz” Diaz, a leading popularizer of QAnon. In an episode titled “THIS Is How We Win,” Diaz said of Schultz, “I was waiting, I was wishing and hoping for the universe to deliver someone like him.”

Schultz himself calls QAnon “a joke.” Nevertheless, he promoted his precinct strategy on at least three more QAnon programs in recent months, according to Media Matters, a Democratic-aligned group tracking right-wing content. “I want to see many of you going and doing this,” host Zak Paine said on one of the shows in May.

Schultz’s strategy also got a boost from another prominent QAnon promoter: former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn, who urged Trump to impose martial law and “rerun” the election. On a May online talk show, Flynn told listeners to fill “thousands of positions that are vacant at the local level.”

Precinct recruitment is now “the forefront of our mission” for Turning Point Action, according to the right-wing organization’s website. The group’s parent organization bussed Trump supporters to Washington for Jan. 6, including at least one person who was later charged with assaulting police. He pleaded not guilty. In July, Turning Point brought Trump to speak in Phoenix, where he called the 2020 election “the greatest crime in history.” Outside, red-capped volunteers signed people up to become precinct chairs.

Organizers from around the country started huddling with Schultz for weekly Zoom meetings. The meetings’ host, far-right blogger Jim Condit Jr. of Cincinnati, kicked off a July call by describing the precinct strategy as the last alternative to violence. “It’s the only idea,” Condit said, “unless you want to pick up guns like the Founding Fathers did in 1776 and start to try to take back our country by the Second Amendment, which none of us want to do.”

By the next week, though, Schultz suggested the new precinct officials might not stay peaceful. Schultz belonged to a mailing list for a group of military, law enforcement and intelligence veterans called the “1st Amendment Praetorian” that organizes security for Flynn and other pro-Trump figures. Back in the 1990s, Schultz wrote an article defending armed anti-government militias like those involved in that decade’s deadly clashes with federal agents in Ruby Ridge, Idaho, and Waco, Texas.

“Make sure everybody’s got a baseball bat,” Schultz said on the July strategy conference call, which was posted on YouTube. “I’m serious about this. Make sure you’ve got people who are armed.”

https://assets-d.propublica.org/v5/video/20210901-local-precincts-chapter-cawthorn-reexport.mp4 .20 min

The sudden demand for low-profile precinct positions baffled some party leaders. In Fort Worth, county chair Rick Barnes said numerous callers asked about becoming a “precinct committeeman,” quoting the term used on Bannon’s podcast. That suggested that out-of-state encouragement played a role in prompting the calls, since Texas’s term for the position is “precinct chair.” Tarrant County has added 61 precinct chairs this year, about a 24% increase since February. “Those podcasts actually paid off,” Barnes said.

For weeks, about five people a day called to become precinct chairs in Outagamie County, Wisconsin, southwest of Green Bay. Albert, the county party chair, said he would explain that Wisconsin has no precinct chairs, but newcomers could join the county party — and then become poll workers. “We’re trying to make sure that our voice is now being reinserted into the process,” Albert said.

Similarly, the GOP in Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, is fielding a surge of volunteers for precinct committee members, but also for election judges or inspectors, which are party-affiliated elected positions in that state. “Who knows what happened on Election Day for real,” county chair Lou Capozzi said in an interview. The county GOP sent two busloads of people to Washington for Jan. 6 and Capozzi said they stayed peaceful. “People want to make sure elections remain honest.”

Elsewhere, activists inspired by the precinct strategy have targeted local election boards. In DeKalb County, east of Atlanta, the GOP censured a long-serving Republican board member who rejected claims of widespread fraud in 2020. To replace him, new party chair Marci McCarthy tapped a far-right activist known for false, offensive statements. The party nominees to the election board have to be approved by a judge, and the judge in this case rejected McCarthy’s pick, citing an “extraordinary” public outcry. McCarthy defended her choice but ultimately settled for someone less controversial.

In Raleigh, North Carolina, more than 1,000 people attended the county GOP convention in March, up from the typical 300 to 400. The chair they elected, Alan Swain, swiftly formed an “election integrity committee” that’s lobbying lawmakers to restrict voting and audit the 2020 results. “We’re all about voter and election integrity,” Swain said in an interview.

In the rural western part of the state, too, a wave of people who heard Bannon’s podcast or were furious about perceived election fraud swept into county parties, according to the new district chair, Michele Woodhouse. The district’s member of Congress, Rep. Madison Cawthorn, addressed a crowd at one county headquarters on Aug. 29, at an event that included a raffle for a shotgun.

“If our election systems continue to be rigged and continue to be stolen, it’s going to lead to one place, and it’s bloodshed,” Cawthorn said, in remarks livestreamed on Facebook, shortly after holding the prize shotgun, which he autographed. “That’s right,” the audience cheered. Cawthorn went on, “As much as I’m willing to defend our liberty at all costs, there’s nothing that I would dread doing more than having to pick up arms against a fellow American, and the way we can have recourse against that is if we all passionately demand that we have election security in all 50 states.”

After Cawthorn referred to people arrested on Jan. 6 charges as “political hostages,” someone asked, “When are you going to call us to Washington again?” The crowd laughed and clapped as Cawthorn answered, “We are actively working on that one.”

https://assets-d.propublica.org/v5/video/20210901-local-precincts-chapter-AZ-reexport.mp4 .07 min

Schultz has offered his own state of Arizona as a proof of concept for how precinct officers can reshape the party. The result, Schultz has said, is actions like the state Senate Republicans’ “forensic audit” of Maricopa County’s 2020 ballots.

The “audit,” conducted by a private firm with no experience in elections and whose CEO has spread conspiracy theories, has included efforts to identify fraudulent ballots from Asia by searching for traces of bamboo. Schultz has urged activists demanding similar audits in other states to start by becoming precinct officers.

1630962067888.png

“Because we’ve got the audit, there’s very heightened and intense public interest in the last campaign, and of course making sure election laws are tightened,” said Sandra Dowling, a district chair in northwest Maricopa and northern Yuma County whose precinct roster grew by 63% in less than six months. Though Dowling says some other district chairs screen their applicants, she doesn’t. “I don’t care,” she said.

One chair who does screen applicants is Kathy Petsas, a lifelong Republican whose district spans Phoenix and Paradise Valley. She also saw applications explode earlier this year. Many told her that Schultz had recruited them, and some said they believed in QAnon. “Being motivated by conspiracy theories is no way to go through life, and no way for us to build a high-functioning party,” Petsas said. “That attitude can’t prevail.”

As waves of new precinct officers flooded into the county party, Petsas was dismayed to see some petitioning to recall their own Republican county supervisors for refusing to cooperate with the Senate GOP’s audit.

“It is not helpful to our democracy when you have people who stand up and do the right thing and are honest communicators about what’s going on, and they get lambasted by our own party,” Petsas said. “That’s a problem.”

https://assets-d.propublica.org/v5/video/20210901-local-precincts-chapter-SC-reexport.mp4 .06 min

This spring, a team of disaffected Republican operatives put Schultz’s precinct strategy into action in South Carolina, a state that plays an outsize role in choosing presidents because of its early primaries. The operatives’ goal was to secure enough delegates to the party’s state convention to elect a new chair: far-right celebrity lawyer Lin Wood.

Wood was involved with some of the lawsuits to overturn the presidential election that courts repeatedly ruled meritless, or even sanctionable. After the election, Wood said on Bannon’s podcast, “I think the audience has to do what the people that were our Founding Fathers did in 1776.” On Twitter, Wood called for executing Vice President Mike Pence by firing squad. Wood later said it was “rhetorical hyperbole,” but that and other incendiary language got him banned from mainstream social media. He switched to Telegram, an encrypted messaging app favored by deplatformed right-wing influencers, amassing roughly 830,000 followers while repeatedly promoting the QAnon conspiracy theory.

Asked for comment about his political efforts, Wood responded, “Most of your ‘facts’ are either false or misrepresent the truth.” He declined to cite specifics.

Typically, precinct meetings were “a yawner,” according to Mike Connett, a longtime party member in Horry County, best known for its popular beach towns. But in April, Connett and other establishment Republicans were caught off guard when 369 people, many of them newcomers, showed up for the county convention in North Myrtle Beach. Connett lost a race for a leadership role to Diaz, the prominent QAnon supporter, and Wood’s faction captured the county’s other executive positions plus 35 of 48 delegate slots, enabling them to cast most of the county’s votes for Wood at the state convention. “It seemed like a pretty clean takeover,” Connett told ProPublica.

In Greenville, the state’s most populous county, Wood campaign organizers Jeff Davis and Pressley Stutts mobilized a surge of supporters at the county convention — about 1,400 delegates, up from roughly 550 in 2019 — and swept almost all of the 79 delegate positions. That gave Wood’s faction the vast majority of the votes in two of South Carolina’s biggest delegations.

Across the state, the precinct strategy was contributing to an unprecedented surge in local party participation, according to data provided by a state GOP spokeswoman. In 2019, 4,296 people participated. This year, 8,524 did.

“It’s a prairie fire down there in Greenville, South Carolina, brought on by the MAGA posse,” Bannon said on his podcast.
 
Last edited:

marsh

On TB every waking moment
Part 3 of 3

Establishment party leaders realized they had to take Wood’s challenge seriously.

The incumbent chair, Drew McKissick, had Trump’s endorsement three times over — including twice after Wood entered the race. But Wood fought back by repeatedly implying that McKissick and other prominent state Republicans were corrupt and involved in various conspiracies that seemed related to QAnon. The race became heated enough that after one event, Wood and McKissick exchanged angry words face-to-face.

Wood’s rallies were raucous affairs packed with hundreds of people, energized by right-wing celebrities like Flynn and Lindell. In interviews, many attendees described the events as their first foray into politics, sometimes referencing Schultz and always citing Trump’s stolen election myth. Some said they’d resort to violence if they felt an election was stolen again.

Wood’s campaign wobbled in counties that the precinct strategy had not yet reached. At the state convention in May, Wood won about 30% of the delegates, commanding Horry, Greenville and some surrounding counties, but faltering elsewhere. A triumphant McKissick called Wood’s supporters “a fringe, rogue group” and vowed to turn them into a “leper colony” by building parallel Republican organizations in their territory.

But Wood and his partisans did not act defeated. The chairmanship election, they argued, was as rigged as the 2020 presidential race. Wood threw a lavish party at his roughly 2,000-acre low-country estate, secured by armed guards and surveillance cameras. From a stage fit for a rock concert on the lawn of one of his three mansions, Wood promised the fight would continue.

Diaz and her allies in Horry County voted to censure McKissick. The county’s longtime Republicans tried, but failed, to oust Diaz and her cohort after one of the people involved in drafting Wood tackled a protester at a Flynn speech in Greenville. (This incident, the details of which are disputed, prompted Schultz to encourage precinct strategy activists to arm themselves.) Wood continued promoting the precinct strategy to his Telegram followers, and scores replied that they were signing up.

In late July, Stutts and Davis forced out Greenville County GOP’s few remaining establishment leaders, claiming that they had cheated in the first election. Then Stutts, Davis and an ally won a new election to fill those vacant seats. “They sound like Democrats, right?” Bannon asked Stutts in a podcast interview. Stutts replied, “They taught the Democrats how to cheat, Steve.”

Stutts’ group quickly pushed for an investigation of the 2020 presidential election, planning a rally featuring Davis and Wood at the end of August, and began campaigning against vaccine and school mask mandates. “I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery,” Stutts had previously posted on Facebook, quoting Thomas Jefferson. Stutts continued posting messages skeptical of vaccine and mask mandates even after he entered the hospital with a severe case of COVID-19. He died on Aug. 19.

https://assets-d.propublica.org/v5/video/20210901-local-precincts-chapter-GA-reexport.mp4 .06 min

The hubbub got so loud inside the Cobb County, Georgia, Republican headquarters that it took several shouts and whistles to get everyone’s attention. It was a full house for Salleigh Grubbs’ first meeting as the county’s party chair.

Grubbs ran on a vow to “clean house” in the election system, highlighting her December testimony to state lawmakers in which she raised unsubstantiated fraud allegations. Supporters praised Grubbs’ courage for following a truck she suspected of being used in a plot to shred evidence. She attended Trump’s Jan. 6 rally as a VIP. She won the chairmanship decisively at an April county convention packed with an estimated 50% first-time participants.

In May, Grubbs opened her first meeting by asking everyone munching on bacon and eggs to listen to her recite the Gettysburg Address. “Think of the battle for freedom that Americans have before them today,” Grubbs said. “Those people fought and died so that you could be the precinct chair.” After the reading, first-time precinct officers stood for applause and cheers.

Their work would start right away: putting up signs, making calls and knocking on doors for a special election for the state House. The district had long leaned Republican, but after the GOP’s devastating losses up and down the ballot in 2020, they didn’t know what to expect.

“There’s so many people out there that are scared, they feel like their vote doesn’t count,” Cooper Guyon, a 17-year-old right-wing podcaster from the Atlanta area who speaks to county parties around the state, told the Cobb Republicans in July. The activists, he said, need to “get out in these communities and tell them that we are fighting to make your vote count by passing the Senate bill, the election-reform bills that are saving our elections in Georgia.”

Of the field’s two Republicans, Devan Seabaugh took the strongest stance in favor of Georgia’s new law restricting ways to vote and giving the Republican-controlled Legislature more power over running elections. “The only people who may be inconvenienced by Senate Bill 202 are those intent on committing fraud,” he wrote in response to a local newspaper’s candidate questionnaire.

Seabaugh led the June special election and won a July runoff. Grubbs cheered the win as a turning point. “We are awake. We are preparing,” she wrote on Facebook. “The conservative citizens of Cobb County are ready to defend our ballots and our county.”

Newcomers did not meet such quick success everywhere. In Savannah, a faction crashed the Chatham County convention with their own microphone, inspired by Bannon’s podcast to try to depose the incumbent party leaders who they accused of betraying Trump. Party officers blocked the newcomers’ candidacies, saying they weren’t officially nominated. Shouting erupted, and the meeting adjourned without a vote. Then the party canceled its districtwide convention.
The state party ultimately sided with the incumbent leaders. District chair Carl Smith said the uprising is bound to fail because the insurgents are mistaken in believing that he and other local leaders didn’t fight hard enough for Trump.
“You can’t build a movement on a lie,” Smith said.

https://assets-d.propublica.org/v5/video/20210901-local-precincts-chapter-MI-reexport.mp4 .07 min

In Michigan, activists who identify with a larger movement working against Republicans willing to accept Trump’s loss have captured the party leadership in about a dozen counties. They’re directly challenging state party leaders, who are trying to harness the grassroots energy without indulging demands to keep fighting over the last election.

Some of the takeovers happened before the rise of the precinct strategy. But the activists are now organizing under the banner “Precinct First” and holding regular events, complete with notaries, to sign people up to run for precinct delegate positions.

“We are reclaiming our party,” Debra Ell, one of the organizers, told ProPublica.

“We’re building an ‘America First’ army.”

Under normal rules, the wave of new precinct delegates could force the party to nominate far-right candidates for key state offices. That’s because in Michigan, party nominees for attorney general, secretary of state and lieutenant governor are chosen directly by party delegates rather than in public primaries. But the state party recently voted to hold a special convention earlier next year, which should effectively lock in candidates before the new, more radical delegates are seated.

Activist-led county parties including rural Hillsdale and Detroit-area Macomb are also censuring Republican state legislators for issuing a June report on the 2020 election that found no evidence of systemic fraud and no need for a reexamination of the results like the one in Arizona. (The censures have no enforceable impact beyond being a public rebuke of the politicians.) At the same time, county party leaders in Hillsdale and elsewhere are working on a ballot initiative to force an Arizona-style election review.

Establishment Republicans have their own idea for a ballot initiative — one that could tighten rules for voter ID and provisional ballots while sidestepping the Democratic governor’s veto. If the initiative collects hundreds of thousands of valid signatures, it would be put to a vote by the Republican-controlled state Legislature. Under a provision of the state constitution, the state Legislature can adopt the measure and it can’t be vetoed.

State party leaders recently reached out to the activists rallying around the rejection of the presidential election results, including Hillsdale Republican Party Secretary Jon Smith, for help. Smith, Ell and others agreed to join the effort, the two activists said.

“This empowers them,” Jason Roe, the state party executive director whose ouster the activists demanded because he said Trump was responsible for his own loss, told ProPublica. Roe resigned in July, citing unrelated reasons. “It’s important to get them focused on change that can actually impact” future elections, he said, “instead of keeping their feet mired in the conspiracy theories of 2020.”

https://assets-d.propublica.org/v5/video/20210901-local-precincts-chapter-NV-reexport.mp4 .05 min

Jesse Law, who ran the Trump campaign’s Election Day operations in Nevada, sued the Democratic electors, seeking to declare Trump the winner or annul the results. The judge threw out the case, saying Law’s evidence did not meet “any standard of proof,” and the Nevada Supreme Court agreed. When the Electoral College met in December, Law stood outside the state capitol to publicly cast mock votes for Trump.

This year, Law set his sights on taking over the Republican Party in the state’s largest county, Clark, which encompasses Las Vegas. He campaigned on the precinct strategy, promising 1,000 new recruits. His path to winning the county chairmanship — just like Stutts’ team in South Carolina, and Grubbs in Cobb County, Georgia — relied on turning out droves of newcomers to flood the county party and vote for him.

In Law’s case, many of those newcomers came through the Proud Boys, the all-male gang affiliated with more than two dozen people charged in the Capitol riot. The Las Vegas chapter boasted about signing up 500 new party members (not all of them belonging to the Proud Boys) to ensure their takeover of the county party. After briefly advancing their own slate of candidates to lead the Clark GOP, the Proud Boys threw their support to Law. They also helped lead a state party censure of Nevada’s Republican secretary of state, who rejected the Trump campaign’s baseless claims of fraudulent ballots.

Law, who did not respond to repeated requests for comment, has declined to distance himself from the Las Vegas Proud Boys, citing Trump’s “stand back and stand by” remark at the September 2020 presidential debate. “When the president was asked if he would disavow, he said no,” Law told an independent Nevada journalist in July. “If the president is OK with that, I’m going to take the presidential stance.”

The outgoing county chair, David Sajdak, canceled the first planned vote for his successor. He said he was worried the Proud Boys would resort to violence if their newly recruited members, who Sajdak considered illegitimate, weren’t allowed to vote.

Sajdak tried again to hold a leadership vote in July, with a meeting in a Las Vegas high school theater, secured by police. But the crowd inside descended into shouting, while more people tried to storm past the cops guarding the back entrance, leading to scuffles. “Let us in! Let us in!” some chanted. Riling them up was at least one Proud Boy, according to multiple videos of the meeting.

At the microphone, Sajdak was running out of patience. “I’m done covering for you awful people,” he bellowed. Unable to restore order, Sajdak ended the meeting without a vote and resigned a few hours later. He’d had enough.

“They want to create mayhem,” Sajdak said.
“People Will Lose Their Lives”: Texas Isn’t Doing Enough to Prevent Carbon Monoxide Deaths, Critics Say
Soon after, Law’s faction held their own meeting at a hotel-casino and overwhelmingly voted for Law as county chairman. Nevada Republican Party Chairman Michael McDonald, a longtime ally of Law who helped lead Trump’s futile effort to overturn the Nevada results, recognized Law as the new county chair and promoted a fundraiser to celebrate. The existing county leaders sued, seeking a court order to block Law’s “fraudulent, rogue election.” The judge preliminarily sided with the moderates, but told them to hold off on their own election until a court hearing in September.

To Sajdak, agonizing over 2020 is pointless because “there’s no mechanism for overturning an election.” Asked if Law’s allies are determined to create one, Sajdak said: “It’s a scary thought, isn’t it.”
 
Last edited:

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Biden and the Left-wing Standard of Attacking Presidents

In just a few months Joe Biden has wrought a series of disasters that will invoke outrage that dwarfs the concocted anger directed at Donald Trump.

By Victor Davis Hanson
Vth441YH_400x400-160x160.jpeg

September 5, 2021

As Joe Biden entered office in January 2021, there still roared a left-wing revolution, a woke madness spreading through popular culture and Congress, much of which he indirectly has aided and abetted. It has redefined not just politics but the rules of the presidency. And the eventual casualty of these radical shifts in protocols and customs will be—Joe Biden.

Take impeachment, which heretofore had been rare and has still never led to a Senate conviction. Prior to Trump, Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton were the only presidents to have been impeached (Richard Nixon resigned to avoid it), and both were acquitted in the Senate.

Yet leftist congressional representatives introduced articles of impeachment the very first week Trump was in office, on the absurd allegation of profiting from his office (the presidency cost the Trump corporations hundreds of millions). The House later went on to impeach him twice, without writs of “treason” and “bribery” or even “high crimes and misdemeanors” as set out by the Constitution.

Instead, Trump was, first, successfully impeached for supposedly abusing his power and obstructing Congress. I don’t think the average American has ever been pulled over by the police for the high crime “of obstructing Congress” (historically a presidential pastime) or has been charged with “abuse of power” (said of every president from Thomas Jefferson to Barack Obama).

Trump’s second impeachment was even flimsier. He was accused of “incitement of insurrection” concerning disturbances on January 6 that supposedly led to the violent death of Officer Brian Sicknick, the fatal shooting of an unarmed Ashli Babbitt, and the entire fable of an “armed insurrection.” Post-impeachment, we would learn that Sicknick died of natural causes. Strangely, for months no information about the shooter of Ashli Babbitt or the inquiry into that fatal act was ever fully released to the public. No one was charged with armed insurrection, largely because none of the buffoonish rioters were found either to have carried or used a firearm that day or were exposed as master plotters with plans to destroy the U.S. government. They may well have been guilty of felonies, but armed insurrectionary conspiracy was not one of them.

No matter, the precedent had been set that serial impeachments now will be normative when a president in his first term loses party control of the House. Charges may not follow constitutional definitions. There will be no need to appoint a special counsel, to build a case on evidence, or to hold a formal hearing where witnesses present testimonies and are subject to cross-examination. There will be no expectation that the Senate will even come close to convicting an impeached president. Impeachment is simply now a political gambit to embarrass a party or a president before a reelection. Biden and future presidents as private citizens could be hounded after exiting office with a Senate impeachment trial.

Joe Biden by such new standards would then be in jeopardy should the Democrats lose the House in 2022, on the precedent that the Republicans could bring up anything they wished—unwillingness to enforce existing federal immigration law, deliberately misleading the American public on the growing catastrophe in Afghanistan, leveraging a foreign leader to lie with threats of withholding U.S. airpower to enhance his own political agenda, or empowerment of and collusion with his son Hunter Biden in past efforts to massage foreign governments for cash on the expectation of future advantageous U.S. government treatment. These may be flimsy charges for traditional impeachment; they are certainly not under the new Democratic model.

When Donald Trump’s confidential phone calls with foreign leaders were leaked to the press it was celebrated by the media and the Left as a sort of blood sport. Now are we to think the same of the embarrassing leaked phone call between Biden and the Afghan president?

Donald Trump was impeached over a phone call with the Ukrainian president for supposedly pressuring Ukraine, by the threat of holding up foreign aid, to conduct an investigation of the Biden family syndicate’s shenanigans. So, what are we to make then of Biden’s demand that the Afghan president lie to the world so that his fragile government did not appear in jeopardy, even if, Biden acknowledged, it, of course, was—with the added insinuation that Biden’s commitment to support the Afghan government with U.S. military power was predicated on his compliance with parroting such lies?

We saw from 2017 to 2021 the precedent that both active and retired top Pentagon brass would either leak derogatory assessments of the commander-in-chief to the press, or overtly declare him to be morally unfit to hold office—all in violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. What then is the country to do, amid the Afghanistan catastrophe, when lots of retired generals are now going public with calls for their president’s key military and civilian office holders to resign for culpability for a series of foreign policy disasters? Is it a good thing for our generals and admirals to become editorialists and critics of an elected president’s administration or ill-conceived, both, neither—or sometimes, depending on who is president?

In the Trump years, the Left institutionalized the new idea that threatening to invoke the 25th Amendment was a casual affair, a strategy appropriate to harming or removing a president. So the acting heads of the FBI and Justice Department apparently discussed plots to wear eavesdropping equipment to entrap Trump in recorded conversations that might reveal his alleged dementia.

An Ivy League psychiatrist was called to Congress to swear that the president was non compos mentis and in need of a forced intervention. The media demanded proof of Trump’s sanity to the point he took—and aced—the Montreal Cognitive Assessment.

Joe Biden is obviously suffering from some sort of organic illness that has reduced his mental faculties to the point he is often dazed. When he is rarely able to craft complete sentences, he says things that are incoherent, offensive, and occasionally racist. He seems to have no knowledge of current events and so reassures trapped Americans in Kabul that they can simply go to the besieged airport, show their passports, and waltz on in.

Under the new protocols, are we to expect high Justice Department officials to record stealthily Biden’s private conversations, to subpoena an appropriate ivy league psychiatrist, or to ask the president to take a simple cognitive assessment test?

Under Joe Biden, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Mark Milley, sought to ingratiate himself to the woke movement, to his woke Secretary of Defense, and to Joe Biden by assuring Congress he would get to the root of “white rage” and in general recommend to his troops the relevant woke texts such as those of Professor Ibram X. Kendi.

Milley produced no evidence that there were lots of insurrectionary white supremacists in the military. He cared little in his virtue signaling that “white” male soldiers had died in Iraq and Afghanistan at twice their numbers in the general population—a cardinal sin under woke disparate impact and proportional representation canons.

Again, fine. But given the sometimes violent nature of Black Lives Matter, and its apparently proud Marxist origins, is it now equally OK for some future chairman to testify that he will go through the ranks to understand black rage as his Pentagon roots out would-be BLM extremists?

These hypocrisies are endless, given the pernicious precedents that so casually have now been embraced for cheap political advantage.

Will the next Speaker of the House ritually tear up Biden’s State of the Union address, as he hands the text to him on national television?

Will the Congress appoint a special counsel, allot him 22 months and $40 million to scour the Biden team to find the causes, origins, and those culpable of the greatest foreign policy debacle since the last days of Vietnam—with occasional side trips along the tortured family money trail and indifference to the IRS of Hunter Biden’s international grifting?

Will retired Trump-era CIA and high-ranking intelligence officials go on cable television to wink and nod about their privileged security clearance information to accuse Biden of treasonous behavior?

Will they tweet that he and his policies are similar to those of the German death camps, or stamp him as Mussolini or Hitler-like?

And will some “brave” disillusioned Democratic “loyalist” be canonized in the media as he falsely reassures the nation, as “Anonymous II,” that he is both high-ranking and representative of a large, dissident, and grassroots resistance to Biden within his own administration and party? Will the New York Times print his warning that an army of idealists is ready and willing to resist any Biden presidential order that it finds distasteful? Is that the political culture that Biden should now operate under?

Did the NATO allies find Trump’s brashness—which resulted in a considerable increase in alliance military funding and readiness—as bad as Biden’s soothing words that betrayed our European partners and have all but ruined the alliance?

Was all this hypocrisy predicated on the idea that the Left will never lose power, or that its atrocious behavior was defensible for the moment given the accident of Donald Trump? Or do Democrats really believe there must be one standard for leftist moralists and another for their supposed inferiors, on their blinkered assumption that there would never be a Democratic president as controversial and disliked by the Right as Donald Trump was by the Left?

The truth is that in just a few months Joe Biden has wrought a series of disasters that will invoke outrage that dwarfs the concocted anger directed at Donald Trump. And it may be vented through the very protocols that the Left invented for its own short-term advantage.
 

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
The truth is that in just a few months Joe Biden has wrought a series of disasters that will invoke outrage that dwarfs the concocted anger directed at Donald Trump. And it may be vented through the very protocols that the Left invented for its own short-term advantage.
But but. Orange Man BAD.

It makes all the difference.

Dobbin
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Motion Filed for Reduction of Proud Boys Leader’s Sentence, Alleges Politically-Motivated Judge Acted Deeply Inappropriately

By Cassandra Fairbanks
Published September 6, 2021 at 6:23pm
enrique-tarrio-1.jpg

Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio is set to turn himself in for his 155 day sentence over burning a Black Lives Matter flag and attempting to bring an unloaded commemorative ammunition clip into the District of Columbia in December.

Tarrio was harshly sentenced by Judge Harold Cushenberry for the misdemeanors of a mostly peaceful act of protest and having an ammo clip that was not even functionally able to fire bullets. The sentence was higher than what the prosecution even requested.

A motion filed for his release and for the judge to be recused, obtained by the Gateway Pundit, paints a grim portrait of the judge’s actions during the sentencing — and the potential outcome for cases for other Proud Boys like Joe Biggs, who are currently imprisoned while awaiting trial for being present on January 6.

Scribd doc on website
1630990949944.png

“I’m happy to go through what God is about to put me through. Not because it’s just…but because it’s part of his plan. What’s happening to me is peanuts compared to what others are going through when we’re talking about political persecution. But we must never let evil take root. I plan on fighting the DOJ every step of the way. The judge in my case had an extreme bias that showed through every step of the process,” Tarrio told the Gateway Pundit.

Indeed, three times the judge had to change his sentencing because he was attempting to give him more times than was allowed. Two days after the sentencing of Tarrio, the same judge gave Irun Warner, an accused pedophile, zero jail time.

Tarrio continued on to say, “the most BASIC of functions a judge has is to at least know what crimes the defendant is charged with. Not twice but THREE times he sentenced me because he had not a single clue of what my charges were. For a misdemeanor he gave me the max sentence available. But this judge in two recent cases allowed a pedophile accused of touching underage children to ZERO jail time.”
“I don’t believe this Judge will recuse himself out of pride and extreme prejudice. This is an injustice and if it is allowed to go unchecked…what chance do the J6 protestors have? I’m facing months…they’re facing decades,” he concluded.
It turns out, the judge previously attended the church where the banner was taken from and asserted based on unclear video that Tarrio knew where it had come from. The judge’s eldest daughter was baptized there. Tarrio maintains that he did not know where the flag had came from.

“At the plea hearing, this Court took no issue with Mr. Tarrio’s statement that he did not know that the banner came from a church when he participated in burning it. During the plea hearing, Mr. Tarrio agreed to waive recusal when this Court announced that it had a personal connection with Asbury United Methodist Church after consulting with undersigned counsel. This Court accepted Mr. Tarrio’s factual proffer and guilty plea,” the motion explains. “Later, at the sentencing hearing, this Court completely change positions, proclaiming that Mr. Tarrio had lied about his knowledge that the flag came from a church, and that this Court was going to aggravate his sentence accordingly based on its belief that Mr. Tarrio’s supposed lie was evidence that he had not truly accepted responsibility or demonstrated genuine remorse. This gave rise to the appearance of impropriety.”

The motion asserts that Judge Cushenberry, Jr.’s impartiality “might reasonably be questioned” because he allowed the church to not only submit a written victim impact statement but to then read, in open court, another version of the statement and make highly inflammatory statements about the Ku Klux Klan.

“This Court, on the other hand, prohibited Mr. Tarrio from presenting even one character witness to briefly speak on his behalf. This Court essentially called Mr. Tarrio a liar and a manipulator and then proceeded to sentence him to more than a year when the maximum combined legal sentence for both offenses was 360 days in jail,” the motion states.

“When the prosecutor pointed this out to the Court, the Court relented but then sentenced Mr. Tarrio to more than 180 days for one of the counts, mistakenly believing that Mr. Tarrio had pled guilty to two counts of possession of an extended ammunition feeding device. After being corrected again, the Court finally imposed a legal sentence but one that exceeded the already extremely harsh sentence that the government had requested,” the motion continued.

Those who wish to follow updates in his case you can do so here.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
Bobby Piton: Finance Wizard. Election Fraud Fighter. U.S. Senator? 1:29 51 min

Bobby Piton: Finance Wizard. Election Fraud Fighter. U.S. Senator?
The Professor's Record with David K. Clements Published September 6, 2021

Rumble — Meet Bobby Piton, a Chicago wise, financial genius. After Bobby evaluated raw election data, like he did countless times with the stock market, his eyes were open to a massive election scheme. Hear about his work, what makes him tick, and why he should be Illinois's next U.S. Senator.

 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

marsh

On TB every waking moment

AZ State Senator Wendy Rogers and U.S. Senate Candidate Eric Greitens Meeting In St. Louis Today for Media Tour – Petition To Decertify The Election Reaches 663,458 SIGNATURES

By Jordan Conradson
Published September 7, 2021 at 6:45am

Arizona State Senator Wendy Rogers’ Petition to decertify the fraudulent 2020 election is nearing 1 Million Signatures!

State Senator Wendy Rogers has been a champion of election integrity since starting a big role in the historic Arizona audit.

Last month, Rogers started a petition to decertify the election after findings that proved serious election irregularities were presented in a July hearing.

When Maricopa County refused to answer the questions raised or comply with legal and enforceable subpoenas for routers, Splunk logs, and system access keys, Rogers saw no other choice but to take action on decertification.

1631050820669.png

Two weeks ago, we reported that the petition had reached 204k signatures. That number has more than tripled and Rogers is now close to her goal of 1 million signatures!

More states are now online for full forensic audits.

Sign on here!
Rogers: Holy smokes. We are at 663,458 signatures now. Things are really taking off! Let’s get to 1 million ASAP. Audit results are coming soon, more states are coming online.
1631050899431.png

At Mike Lindell’s Cyber Symposium, Rogers told The Gateway Pundit that she will be touring the country to fight for full forensic audits in every county.

1631050952541.png

Since then, Rogers has been traveling the nation, headlining Audit The Vote rallies and inspiring supporters to take action!

She is in St. Louis today for another election integrity tour with former Missouri Governor and current MAGA U.S. Senate candidate Eric Greitens.

1631051028371.png

Eric Greitens is a MAGA former Navy SEAL. He visited Arizona in June to see how a proper audit is performed.

1631051081352.png

Election integrity starts with the candidates. We need candidates who are focused on fixing 2020.

Sign the petition NOW.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

“Election Integrity is Now Law in the State of Texas” – Gov. Abbott Signs GOP Election Integrity Bill Into Law (VIDEO)

By Cristina Laila
Published September 7, 2021 at 11:49am
IMG_5003.jpg

exas Governor Greg Abbott on Tuesday signed the GOP election integrity bill into law after Democrats fled to DC in a failed stunt.

The law added new ID requirements for mail-in voting and banned some early voting.

Abbott railed against ballot harvesting as he signed the new bill into law.

“Election integrity is now law in the state of Texas,” Abbott said.

VIDEO:

View: https://youtu.be/k0zrLic1QcA
24:05 min

At least 60 Democrat members of the state House of Representatives fled Texas to Washington DC to block Republicans from advancing new voting laws through a special session of the legislature.

Democrat lawmakers were seen packed on a private plane, maskless, flying from Texas to DC.

IMG_2997-1.jpg


The voting integrity bill was signed into law anyway proving this to be a failed stunt.

The only thing the Democrat lawmakers accomplished was spreading Covid all over DC.

AT LEAST six of the Democrats have tested positive for Covid and spread the virus to White House staffers and Pelosi aides.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

EXCLUSIVE: Lawyer for January 6 Clients Released From Hospital, Says Reports That He Was ‘Missing’ Are False
By Cassandra Fairbanks
Published September 7, 2021 at 12:15pm
7DA779FC-8AA6-4DB9-A2DC-EE38E919FBB4.jpeg


John Pierce of Pierce Bainbridge, the law firm representing seventeen January 6 protesters has finally recovered after an 12 day stint in the hospital.


The media spread endless conspiracy theories about Pierce and his firm, while he was ill and unable to defend himself.

The statement from Pierce reads as follows in full:
On Sunday, September 5, 2021, I was released from an LA-area hospital following a 12-day stay. I was not “missing” or anything of the sort. I am greatly appreciative of the many expressions of prayer and support. And I am deeply grateful for the amazing care I received from the doctors, nurses, and staff who cared for me. While I am doing very well, my doctor has advised that I not resume a full-time schedule until Monday, September 13th, as my recuperation continues this week. Next week, I expect to be fully operational.


While I respect every American’s choice in the matter, I have not taken any vaccination for COVID-19, nor do I plan to do so.
Thank you. And God Bless!
Reports from multiple outlets had claimed that Pierce was “unresponsive” and on a respirator, with Newsweek even going so far as to use a photo of a random person to imply it was him.
It is unclear if these reports were malicious or if the reporters actually misunderstood people being unable to reach him as him being “unresponsive” medically.

The Hill reported, federal prosecutors in a court filing said Pierce was “reportedly ill with COVID-19, on a ventilator, and unresponsive.”

“Unfortunately, it seems that Mr. Pierce may be hospitalized and unable to communicate, and it is unclear when Mr. Pierce will recover,” prosecutors wrote in the filing, scaring many of his clients.

Pierce is now recovering at home and said that he feels great.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

1631055598765.png

Wisconsin awaits the resolution of multiple ongoing election integrity efforts. An election processes audit by its Legislative Audit Bureau that Republicans had ordered in February, an investigation initiated by Republican Speaker of the State Assembly Robin Vos, and a battle over attempts to subpoena election materials for a full forensic audit are ongoing. The state government has enacted legislation for election reform, and the Wisconsin Elections Commission (WEC) has removed ~200,000 inactive voters from the rolls.

Republican Representative Timothy Ramthun describes the differences between the three audit efforts on episode 28 of his Ramthun Report. He warns that “there are major efforts to cloud the truth” of the various audits, described in his video as “a genuine effort to mislead and confuse everyone.” He calls State Representative Janel Brandtjen’s subpoena effort “the one true AZ style transparent full cyber and forensic audit that people are demanding.”

Rumble video on website 23:07 min

Rep. Brandtjen, who is chair of the Assembly Campaigns and Elections Committee, provided a press release update on the subpoenas she issued to Brown and Milwaukee counties that come due on September 7 in which she stated,

“With the overwhelming amount of questionable election activity in Green Bay and Milwaukee, it is clear that a thorough investigation of the physical ballots, equipment, and other election materials is warranted. Both Brown and Milwaukee counties need to be aware that they are bound by statute to preserve all election materials for twenty-two months.”

That came the same day that AP reported both counties as having rejected the subpoenas in letters to Brandtjen. The counties hold that Wisconsin Statute §13.31 requires that Speaker Vos sign them to be valid. Brandtjen does not deny this, and in fact, pre-empted that argument on August 9. The authority to subpoena that she is claiming instead rests on Wisconsin Statute §885.01(4) and 2021 Assembly Resolution 15.

Speaker Vos has said that he will not sign Brandtjen’s subpoenas, nonetheless. However, he traveled with President Trump by private plane to attend his Alabama rally in August after Trump had said in June that Vos was “working hard to cover up election corruption.” Vos followed up on that visit to release a statement about expanding the investigation by former Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman:

“Assembly Republicans have been working with Justice Gableman to conduct a swift, complete and thorough investigation. Part of our discussion has been focused on hiring independent contractors to enhance our efforts. We believe a cyber-forensic audit is necessary to ensure issues did not happen in 2020. We have allocated additional resources to Justice Gableman to ensure this investigation gets to the truth.”



Joe Biden won Wisconsin by about 20,000 votes, approximately the margin of Donald Trump’s 2016 victory. Governor Tony Evers certified that result soon after it was received, which awarded 10 Electoral College votes. Mike Lindell’s Cyber Symposium numbers claimed that Trump would have won Wisconsin by ~250,000 votes if it had been counted correctly.

Wisconsin Senate Bills 203-214 were introduced as election reforms in March. Five of the bills have been vetoed by Democrat Governor Tony Evers, one has been signed into law, and the rest are still in consideration by the legislature. Wisconsin law allows for override of the vetoes with a two-thirds vote in both houses. Speaker Vos commented that he interprets the vetoes as showing Evers “is satisfied with the status quo and refusing to improve future elections.”

The following bills are the ones that have been passed by the Wisconsin legislature but vetoed by Governor Evers:

– SB 203 would have restricted ballot harvesting for non-election clerks to 2 ballots.

– SB 204 would have required voter ID and tightened rules for obtaining an absentee ballot as well as require they be sent only to voters who request them.

– SB 205 is related to absentee voting by the indefinitely confined from residential care facilities and retirement homes.

– SB 210 would have required that the municipal clerk, chief inspector, and board of canvassers provide election observers “uniform and nondiscriminatory access to all stages of the election process, including recounts.”

– SB 212 would have explicitly prohibited election officials from intentionally assisting knowingly invalid votes to be counted or to assist knowingly valid votes to go uncounted while making a crime of failing to report election fraud committed by another election official promptly.

As UncoverDC reported in June, SB 208 is the bill signed into law by the governor. It is related to the publication of Elections Commission meeting minutes.

Rep. Brandtjen provided a list of election reform legislation on June 24 that included SB 203 and SB 210 as well as several Wisconsin Assembly bills, all of which have been tabled in favor of other business:

– AB 179 would “Prohibit[] employees of long-term care facilities from influencing a resident’s decision to vote or which candidate to vote for. It also requires administrators to notify the resident’s family of when Special Voting Deputies will be conducting in-person absentee voting at the facility.”

– AB 198 would “Prohibit[] clerks from fixing any errors on absentee ballots. If there is an incomplete certificate envelope, the clerk must mail the ballot back to the voter and post notification of the error on the voter’s MyVote page. It also includes penalties for election fraud committed by election officials.”

– AB 201 would “Require[] the Elections Commission to create a standard absentee ballot request form, requires municipalities to post updates on absentee ballots, and requires voters to enclose a copy of their ID when applying for absentee ballots. It also addresses absentee ballots by indefinitely confined voters, automatic receipt of absentee ballots, and unsolicited mailings of absentee ballot applications and ballots.”

– AB 271 would require that “Any municipality that broadcasts their canvassing procedures must treat it as a public record by recording it and retaining it for 22 months.”

Wisconsin’s Elections Commission announced the deactivation of over 200,000 voters last month in “two separate voter list maintenance processes.”

The first deactivation group included ~174,000 voters who have not voted in the past four years and did not respond to the Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC) postcard mailings approved in April and sent out in June. ~12,000 voters did respond, requesting to remain active.

Meagan Wolfe, an administrator for the WEC, said, “Many of the deactivated voters have moved and can re-register at their new address. Some of the voters had died, and a few others asked to have their registrations canceled.”

The second group of ~31,000 voters from a similar mailing from 2019 were also deactivated. The WEC had been sued for not removing these voters at the time, but the Wisconsin State Supreme Court ruled that the law applied only to municipal clerks and cities, not the WEC as a state entity. WEC was, therefore, determined to be acting properly in waiting until this July 31 deadline to remove them from the rolls.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

State GOP leaders push new 2020 election reviews as Arizona report looms

Republican legislative leaders in Pennsylvania and Wisconsin are putting new weight behind Trump’s push to investigate and discredit 2020 results.

Ballots are examined and recounted by contractors working for Florida-based company, Cyber Ninjas.


Maricopa County ballots cast in the 2020 general election are examined and recounted by contractors working for Florida-based company, Cyber Ninjas, Thursday, May 6, 2021 at Veterans Memorial Coliseum in Phoenix. | (Matt York, Pool/AP Photo)

By ZACH MONTELLARO
09/07/2021 04:30 AM EDT

GOP legislative leaders in key battleground states are increasingly embracing 2020 election investigations that they once held at arm’s length, as Arizona Republicans await a long-delayed final report from their own conspiracy-tinged “audit.”

Top Republicans in Pennsylvania and Wisconsin have recently thrown their support behind new hunts for fraud or irregularities in the last election.

Pennsylvania state Senate President Jake Corman sidelined a prominent Republican backbencher who had tried to lead an investigation and instead empowered a committee chair to launch one with his support. That effort is hiring vendors and scheduling hearings.

There is no mechanism to actually overturn the certified results of the 2020 election. But what these investigations could do is fuel former President Donald Trump’s lies about the election or prompt new efforts to enact state voting restrictions. Corman — who has called for a 2020 election review since November — recently told a conservative radio host that he had spoken with Trump about the efforts, describing the former president as “comfortable where we’re heading.”

It’s the next stage in GOP efforts to export the Republican election review in Arizona elsewhere, after state legislators from around the country made pilgrimages to Arizona to see the Republican state Senate’s process there.

Though local Republican officials in Maricopa County, as well as Democrats in the state, have derided the Arizona “audit” as a conspiracy-tinged sham seeking to undermine the 2020 election results, GOP leaders in other states are now giving their blessing to similar investigations, offering significantly more heft than earlier pushes from rank-and-file legislators, including more public funding, more staff time and potentially more legal weight.

“It’s disappointing, because part of the burden of leadership is killing bad ideas that might be popular with the base,” said former Kentucky Secretary of State Trey Grayson, a Republican who has been sharply critical of the Arizona review and other efforts to discredit the 2020 election. “When they put their imprimatur on it, it's a signal to everybody that they think that this is important.”

Trump has cranked up the pressure on GOP legislative leaders to take these actions this year: He has previously attacked both Corman and Wisconsin state House Speaker Robin Vos for being insufficiently supportive of his drive to undermine the 2020 election. The "stolen election" myth remains an animating factor among Republican grassroots across the country.

In Wisconsin, Vos’ GOP-controlled state House recently approved $676,000 in taxpayer funding for a 2020 election investigation led by a former state Supreme Court justice. Vos, too, has spoken with Trump and promised to keep him “updated on our investigation.”

“Hopefully the results [in Arizona] … will be a springboard for us,” Corman said in the recent interview with the pro-Trump radio host Wendy Bell. “Give us momentum, make it harder for courts to shoot us down, if results have happened in other states that have seen this.”

As other state Republicans start their work, though, their counterparts in Arizona are bogged down in significant delays, infighting and conspiracy theories.

A final report from the reviewers looking at Maricopa County’s ballots was initially expected to be delivered to the state Senate on Aug. 23, months behind the original schedule. Critics of the review — including the state’s Democratic secretary of state and the top elections official for the county, a Republican — published a series of prebuttals days before the expected arrival of the report, arguing that the entire review was poisoned and any conclusions couldn’t be trusted.

“Procedures have been modified and changed throughout, observer and media access has been inconsistent and limited, and the process has been opaque,” read the prebuttal from Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs, a Democrat. “It was unnecessary and has undermined public confidence in accurate and secure elections that were conducted in 2020.”

But a final report was not delivered on Aug. 23. That day, Republican state Senate President Karen Fann issued a statement announcing delays due to contractor Doug Logan — the CEO of Cyber Ninjas, the previously little-known firm tasked with running the Arizona effort — and two other members of Logan’s team testing positive for Covid-19 and becoming “quite sick.”

Fann did not respond to an interview request seeking details about when the report might come. But an attorney representing the Arizona state Senate suggested in a Wednesday court hearing that the report is not imminent, the Arizona Republic noted. The attorney, Kory Langhofer, said that one volume of a planned three-volume report has yet to be written, and it will be “at least two weeks” before a final report is completed.

The Republic also reported that an election conspiracy theorist was hired at the end of August to review signatures on ballot envelopes. According to a contract reviewed by the Republic, the contract for that work called for $25,000 paid up front and $25,000 on Sept. 20, when work is completed.

Maricopa County has also been engaged in a battle over state Senate subpoenas, which the county says are unnecessary. Attorney General Mark Brnovich, also a Republican, said the county must comply by late September or lose some state funding.

In Pennsylvania, Corman put state Sen. Cris Dush in charge of a “full investigatory audit of recent elections.” Dush chairs the state Senate Intergovernmental Operations Committee, which has opened a website to encourage “voters to come forward if they have witnessed voter irregularities or other election improprieties firsthand,” and is in the process of scheduling a hearing with the Pennsylvania Department of State “to examine the impact of last-second guidance sent to counties before the 2020 General Election,” according to a statement.

Dush’s office directed an interview request to Corman’s office, and Corman was not made available for an interview. But a Corman staffer, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said the process in the state would be two-pronged: a review similar to what was done in Arizona, which included hiring an outside vendor to look at ballots and potentially voting equipment; and a second prong that would investigate the decision-making of the Pennsylvania Department of State during the election.

Pennsylvania Senate Majority Leader Jake Corman speaks.

Pennsylvania Senate Majority Leader Jake Corman speaks in Harrisburg, Pa., Tuesday, Feb. 5, 2019. | Matt Rourke/AP

In an interview with former Trump adviser Steve Bannon on Thursday, Corman said the investigation would be willing to use subpoenas to get information from the state elections officials, expecting them to be uncooperative. Corman said the first hearing would be held Thursday.

The Corman staffer stressed there would be distinctions between the Arizona effort and the one in Pennsylvania. The staffer said that the process to select a vendor for the ballot review is ongoing, but that he was “100 percent certain” Cyber Ninjas will not be selected and that the “expectation” is that the state Senate will pay for it — as opposed to nonprofit groups backed by Trump allies, which funded the Arizona review. The staffer said there is no hard timeline for the Pennsylvania GOP effort, but the hope is that it would be wrapped up by Christmas.

In Wisconsin, the investigation backed by Vos, who did not respond to an interview request, is one of three digging into the 2020 election. The Republican-led elections committee and the state’s Legislative Audit Bureau are also attempting their own reviews.

The recently approved contract in Wisconsin, which was first reported by the Associated Press, indicated that the Vos-blessed review would also be looking at voting machines. The contract includes $325,000 set aside for a “data analysis contractor,” under the heading “voting machines.”

Former Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman, who is leading the investigation, has previously said he traveled both to the Arizona review and to a “cyber symposium” hosted by Mike Lindell, the close ally of Trump who has become one of the nation’s most prominent election conspiracy theorists since 2020. “I learned a lot there that will be helpful to my investigation,” Gableman told the AP.

Text messages from leaders of the Arizona effort, which were released as part of an open-records lawsuit from the watchdog group American Oversight, also appear to confirm that Gableman was in contact with the Arizona team.

Inside and outside of Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, Republican lawmakers and party leaders remain under intense pressure from Trump and his supporters.

Corman was repeatedly chided by Bell, the conservative radio host, throughout their interview for not moving fast enough.

The former president is also speaking with leaders in other states. The Detroit News reported that Meshawn Maddock, the Michigan Republican Party co-chair, told a meeting of local Republicans that party Chair Ron Weiser had spoken with Trump about a review in the state.

"President Trump called and spoke to Chairman Weiser, and they had a conversation," Maddock told the group, according to a recording posted by the News. "And Chairman Weiser said that he's going to pay close attention to what happens coming out of Arizona.”

Maddock noted that President Joe Biden’s margin of victory was significantly larger in Michigan compared with Arizona. “I think it was a fair thing for the chairman to say to the president, 'Let's see what happens in Arizona and we'll look at it again,’” she said.

Earlier this year in Michigan, a Republican-controlled state Senate committee also looked into fraud allegations. The committee published a report in June saying they were unsubstantiated. “At this point, I feel confident to assert the results of the Michigan election are accurately represented by the certified and audited results,” state Sen. Ed McBroom, the chair of the committee, wrote in a letter accompanying the report.

The former president made his displeasure apparent: He called McBroom and state Senate Majority Leader Mike Shirkey “RINOs” who “will pay at the polls, especially with primary voters and expected challenges.”
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Right-Wing Street Artists Take Aim at ‘Vaccine Supremacist’ Gavin Newsom (Photos)

By Cassandra Fairbanks
Published September 7, 2021 at 4:11pm
00-211.jpg


An anonymous right-wing street art group called The Faction has plastered Pacific Palisades with posters depicting Governor Gavin Newsom with a Hitler mustache, holding a hypodermic needle, with a swastika made of hypodermic needles.


The wealthy beach community in Los Angeles is filled with liberal celebrities.

“Dummies on the right whine about Gavin’s French Laundry hypocrisy while ignoring the fact that he’s caused a trillion dollars in damage to California, destroying lives and small businesses. Newsom is a Vaccine Supremacist that rules by fiat, demanding a faithful following of his edicts while ignoring the law, actual science, and judicial orders,” a spokesperson for The Faction told the Gateway Pundit.
00-210.jpg


When asked about their preferred replacement candidate, The Faction said “we don’t care who you vote for… Rigged elections are a way for the Power Elite to fool the People into believing they have agency. In reality, the government is selected through media manipulation and fraud, and it’s been like that for generations. The fix is in on this election. Anyone that thinks Nancy Pelosi’s nephew won’t beat a black-white supremacist, a transvestite, and a guy with a bear is fooling themselves.”

00-212.jpg


The artist collective took over a Hollywood billboard in October and replaced it with “Swamp Thing” Joe Biden. In 2019, they hijacked a billboard across from the CNN studio in Los Angeles. They have also replaced a John Oliver billboard with an “orange man bad” meme — and these are just a few examples of their antics.

00-213.jpg
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

AZ State Rep. Mark Finchem: Arizona Ballot Integrity Project – CURRENCY GRADE Fraud Measures – UV Reactive, QR Codes, Microprint, Holographic Watermark

By Jordan Conradson
Published September 7, 2021 at 7:29pm
E578B8F4-F759-4D6A-9EE2-07A7CFE16B38.jpeg

Future Arizona Ballot

Arizona State Representative Mark Finchem announced his Arizona Ballot Integrity Project on Saturday.

State Rep. Mark Finchem is running for Arizona Secretary of State in the 2022 election and he is focused on solving Arizona’s election integrity crisis today.

Finchem announced his new ballot prototype that he is going to use to secure our elections and restore integrity.
Finchem: Making ballots as secure as currency is a structural change solution that I’ve introduced in AZ, and which is now considered by a majority of states. Focus on solutions = leadership. Watch “Ballot Integrity Project”
Ballot Integrity Project 3:09 min
1631073644048.png

Rep. Finchem showed the prototype to other elected officials and candidates from around the country, who came to Arizona for a tour of the election audit.

vernon-jones-ballot.jpg


Former Georgia State Rep. and current Georgia Gubernatorial Candidate Vernon Jones shared this image on Instagram while receiving a brief from the Arizona Senate when he toured the Arizona audit in June.

Mark Finchem is leading by example and promoting ballot integrity nationwide.

5ADCCE2D-4482-4E31-BB30-380B6EDC1870.jpeg

Secure Ballot Microprint
Finchem: Hi, this is Arizona Representative Mark Finchem, Candidate for Secretary of State. I’d like to talk to you for a moment about a project we’ve been working on at the Capitol, called the Arizona ballot integrity project. It’s a full spectrum transparency project to give Arizona voters confidence in their election. Ballot integrity is part of the election process. Ballot integrity relies on fraud countermeasures, that’s to keep the fakes out of the system. Election integrity relies on full spectrum transparency. Putting sunshine on something is a great disinfectant. We can have full spectrum transparency by making every ballot image a public record, available to everyone all the time. There’s no reason not to do this.

The US. Treasury relies on currency grade fraud countermeasures, meaning they have UV light reactive bills. From the dollar bill, to the five, to the 10, even to the 100, you’ll notice stripes fluorescents, all manner of countermeasures. And after all, Aren’t our ballots just as valuable as our money? This is an Arizona ballot replica, but there’s been a change, and you’ll notice that this is the future state of our ballots. A watermark that is also UV light reactive, but there’s more. A QR code and the upper left-hand corner will give every ballot, a unique voter number. Only the voter will know that number. You can track your ballot through the entire system to ensure that your ballot is counted, and that it was counted the way you cast it. At the same time, you’ll be able to look at your ballot in future days online after it’s been tabulated and stored on the system.

Now let’s talk about the microprint. You notice waves on the watermark, you notice the “valid” word. But what you might not have seen is the 500 micron printing that says “Arizona State”.

We’re not endorsing ASU. It’s simply the state of Arizona. You’ll also notice a ballot hologram. This is translucent mylar on the lower left hand corner of the ballot and it’s built into the holographic watermark. So how much will all this cost, to have cost-effective, ballot security, voter privacy protected, public record protection? A trust but verify system that supports ballot integrity voter integrity, and election integrity. That’s right, 25 cents a ballot. By making every ballot image available to everybody all the time we come close to making the forensic audit obsolete. Voting should not be a question mark. Voting should be in secret, but the counting should never be. Let’s put innovation to work for the people. My name is Mark Finchem, and I asked for your vote.
B6EE8FCB-CEF8-4687-84F7-EB22C315762E.jpeg

Micro Print Magnified

These new secure ballots and ballot tracking privileges will secure Arizona’s elections and make it almost impossible to cheat.

No matter what changes Katie Hobbs makes to the election procedures, this ballot is unhackable.

1631074228393.png

This ballot would only cost the taxpayer 25 cents. The $3 million Zuckerbucks that Maricopa County received can cover the cost of all ballots in the state.

A secure election is priceless.

In addition to this fraud countermeasure, Finchem has been conducting an investigation into the 2020 election in Pima County, alongside the Maricopa County full forensic audit.

Every state needs to follow Mark Finchem’s lead.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

2021 AZ Elections Procedures Draft Analysis: OVER 170 Fraud Concerns Found By EZAZ – 45 Issues Published As Of This Morning

By Jordan Conradson
Published September 7, 2021 at 9:40pm

8735448A-2857-483A-BE9F-E8139816CE2F.jpeg


Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs has already been busted trying to cheat in the 2022 midterm election.


EZAZ.org has orgnaized volunteers to examine the 2021 Elections Procedures Manual Draft and they are finding serious fraud capabilities.

Yesterday, The Gateway Pundit reported that EZAZ found over 170 preliminary concerns with the 2021 Election Manual Draft.

1631083302146.png

Today, EZAZ released more batches of problems that were identified.

The issues are posted on EZAZ.org, with instructions on how to leave a public comment.

Submit Public Comment to Secretary Hobbs on the Draft Election Manual

Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs, running for Governor, released her new Election Manual draft, which will govern election operations in 2022.

Nothing in the law prevents Katie Hobbs from inserting new requirements she invented into her Manual to change the operation of our 2022 election significantly! As we saw in the last election, the Election Manual is treated nearly equal to law by the courts, so we must catch the shenanigans NOW!

EZAZ.org organized nearly 60 volunteers to review the Election Manual and find the anomalies that impact the integrity or transparency of the elections.

Until September 8th, EZAZ.org will release the issues in batches on our website.

45 Issues Published as of This Morning!

A Summary of NEW Major Concerns:

Arbitrary Hand Count Requirement of ONLY 400 per Batch

Stacking Hand Count Requirement to Mis-Align Ballots

Inconsistent Voter ID Requirements

Lack of Procedures to Stop Duplicate Voting

Voter Name & Address Changes During Closed Books Period


Inconsistent Voter Assistance Requirements Asking Who the Voter Wants to Vote for Including Policy Preferences

Curbside Voting with Incomplete Instructions

Transport of Ballot Concerns

Residency Requirements for Transient Voters

Insufficient Election Close-Out Instructions including Chain of Custody and Bi-Partisan Board Concerns

Lack of Transparency on Official Ballot Reports by Voting Location

No Daily Voting Location Close-Out Procedures

Open USB Ports

Insufficient and Inconsistent Voter Notices

Public comment is due before 5 pm on September 8th.

We need your help to submit public comment!

Click the link below!
Click the link to make your voice heard and prevent these fraudulent election measures from taking effect.


Katie Hobbs is running for Governor of Arizona in the next election. After her role in the 2020 crime of the century, she must be stopped!

Leaders in every state need to review their elections proceedures to prevent another big lie.
 
Last edited:

marsh

On TB every waking moment

New U.S. guidelines ban network-connected voting systems, acknowledging vulnerability to attack

Some want wireless ports banned as fears grow about state-sponsored meddling in elections.

Updated: September 7, 2021 - 11:46pm

After years of warnings about state-sponsored hackers and the contentious end of the 2020 election, the federal commission that sets the standards for American voting machines has made a major change rather quietly: Going forward, vote systems cannot be connected to any digital networks, and wireless technology must be disabled too.

The Election Assistance Commission's Voluntary Voter System Guidelines 2.0 were released earlier this year without much fanfare and nominal media coverage, even though they were the first major revisions since 2015 and the first complete overhaul since VVSG 1.0 was issued 16 years ago.

The last guidelines from 2015 permitted connectivity to what was called "public telecommunications networks," provided that any data transmitted was encrypted and network-connected machines were able to "preserve the secrecy of voter ballot selections and prevent anyone from violating ballot privacy."

Outside the guidelines, however, EAC urged election administrators and voting machine makers through certification reviews to avoid direct connections to the internet to have the best practices.

The new requirements provide a much more draconian ban on external access to the Internet or other computer networks, a security provision otherwise known as an "air gap." The commission specifically cited the potential threat posed by foreign adversaries to meddle in elections.

"VVSG 2.0 does not permit devices or components using external network connections to be part of the voting system," the commission wrote in its new guidelines. "There are significant security concerns introduced when networked devices are then connected to the voting system. This connectivity provides an access path to the voting system through the Internet and thus an attack can be orchestrated from anywhere in the world (e.g., nation state attacks). The external network connection leaves the voting system vulnerable to attacks, regardless of whether the connection is only for a limited period or if it is continuously connected."

The commission cited a variety of potential hacking threats it was trying to thwart, including malware, eavesdropping and ransomware attacks, in which hackers hold data hostage until ransom is paid. Its press release identified the air gap requirement as one of the "major updates" in its guidelines.

The commission also addressed wireless connectivity ports which allow devices like Bluetooth mice, optical pens or WiFi printers to connect remotely to a voting machine. It ruled that voting machines can have such ports but they must always be disabled.

"The VVSG 2.0 requires that a voting system be incapable of broadcasting a wireless network ... Instead, a voting system could use wired technology, e.g., Ethernet cables, to connect devices such as printers," the guidelines stated.

Some policymakers don't believe that prohibition goes far enough, citing cybersecurity experts who say even a disabled wireless port can be maliciously attacked.

Nearly two dozen prestigious cybsersecurity experts decried the EAC's decision to allow disabled wireless ports, saying it "profoundly weakens voting system security and will introduce very real opportunities to remotely attack election systems."

Rep. Bob Gibbs (R-Ohio) wrote an op-ed this spring saying the EAC was leaving a major vulnerability in systems by allowing them to have even disabled wireless ports.

"Unfortunately, the EAC recently passed new provisions that allow election systems to have wireless connection components so long as they are 'disabled,'" he wrote in the the Canton Repository. "The inclusion of this provision was added to the proposal at the last minute.

"This is a serious mistake, as it needlessly adds an attack vector that could be utilized by foreign threats. A group of cybersecurity experts warned the EAC not to include this provision, saying it is 'recklessly naive to allow election systems with wireless capability.'"

Gibbs alleged the provision was included "at the request of companies that manufacture and sell voting machines who consider it a cost-saving measure."

After Gibbs' commentary, the state of Ohio this summer issued state guidelines that adopted much of the EAC's 2.0 guidelines but went further in banning any wireless ports on voter machines.

"A voting machine shall not be connected to the Internet.  A voting system or voting machine is prohibited from containing any wireless communication hardware or software components," the bipartisan Ohio Board of Voting Machine Examiners wrote in the new state guidelines.

A spokesman for the EAC did not return a call seeking comment Tuesday.

Nicolee Ambrose, a Republican National Committeewoman from Maryland who led one of the GOP's key election integrity panels this year, strongly criticized the EAC for waiting to formally impose the new internet ban until after the 2020 election was over.

"Because the EAC allowed certified voting machines to be connected to the internet while Americans voted in 2020, our elections were at significant risk of cyber-attack," she said. "Where voting machines were online, these system vulnerabilities exposed the integrity of Americans' votes to all forms of cyber-attack, both foreign and domestic. With nearly 80% of Americans supporting ballot integrity, this vulnerability in our systems was inexcusable."

U.S. intelligence officials said there is no evidence that foreign or other hackers compromised election vote counting systems or changed vote tallies in either 2016 or 2020, but they did acknowledge both Russia and Iran were able to obtain voter registration data from election servers last year in an effort to try to influence American voters.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Appeals court halts voting rights restoration for North Carolina felons

A North Carolina law that bars former felons from voting will stay in place after an appeals court temporarily blocked a lower court's ruling that reversed the law.

By Nyamekye Daniel
Updated: September 8, 2021 - 12:01am

A North Carolina law that bars former felons from voting will stay in place after an appeals court temporarily blocked a lower court's ruling that reversed the law.

The Wake County Superior Court ruled last month the state's 1973 law that blocked North Carolinians who have been released from prison and placed on parole or probation from voting was unconstitutional.

The Wake County court ruled the law violated the Equal Protection Clause and the Ban on Property Qualifications in the North Carolina Constitution. Plaintiffs and their lawyers argued a person's right to vote depended on their ability to pay debts associated with a previous felony conviction.

The North Carolina Court of Appeals blocked the lower court's ruling from going into effect Friday until the appeals case is heard. Attorneys for the General Assembly, defendants in the case, argued that North Carolina's Constitution states felons cannot vote unless the Legislature adopts a law to re-enfranchise them.

"The decision to block the lower court's ruling affirms that judges can't just replace laws they don't like with new ones," Sen. Warren Daniel, R-Burke, said in a statement.

Lawyers for the North Carolina NAACP, Community Success Initiative, Justice Served NC and Wash Away Unemployment said the Wake County ruling would have resulted in the state's largest expansion of voting rights since the Voting Rights Act of 1965. More than 50,000 North Carolina felons were slated to regain their voting rights.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
Judicial Watch Asks Federal Court for Discovery in Lawsuit against U.S. Capitol Police for January 6 Videos - Judicial Watch

SEPTEMBER 07, 2021|JUDICIAL WATCH

Judicial Watch Asks Federal Court for Discovery in Lawsuit against U.S. Capitol Police for January 6 Videos

JudicialWatch_Social_PressRelease-Jan6_1200x627_v1-768x401.jpg

(Washington, DC) Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a motion for discovery in its lawsuit against the United States Capitol Police (USCP) for videos and emails and videos concerning the disturbance at the U.S. Capitol on January 6 (Judicial Watch v. United States Capitol Police (No. 1:21-cv-00401)).

Congress exempts itself from the Freedom of Information Act. Judicial Watch therefore brings this case pursuant to the common law right of access to public records. The Capitol Police declined to produce any records about the disturbance to Judicial Watch, however, arguing that the requested videos and other records are not “public records” and the public interest doesn’t warrant their release.

Judicial Watch requested the court grant it the ability to gather evidence from the US Capitol Police about the preservation and use of the January 6 videos:
This case concerns whether the public has a right of access to records about what Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi has describe as “one of the darkest days in our nation’s history,” “an attack on our very democracy[,]” and “an attack on the peaceful transfer of power.” Speaker Pelosi also has stated, “It is imperative that we find the truth of that day and ensure that such an assault on our Capitol and Democracy cannot ever again happen.”

To find out the truth about what took place at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021 and to understand how Defendant United States Capitol Police and other government entities responded on that day, Plaintiff Judicial Watch requested access to certain communications and video recordings.
***​
(Judicial Watch) therefore moves for limited discovery to seek evidence to prove that the requested records are public records subject to the common law right of access and that the public’s interest in disclosure outweighs the government’s interest in keeping the records secret.

Judicial Watch initially filed the lawsuit under the common law right of access after the USCP refused to provide any records in response to a January 21, 2021 request for:
  • Email communications between the U.S. Capitol Police Executive Team and the Capitol Police Board concerning the security of the Capitol on January 6, 2021. The timeframe of this request is from January 1, 2021 through January 10, 2021.
  • Email communications of the Capitol Police Board with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the U.S. Department of Justice, and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security concerning the security of the Capitol on January 6, 2021. The timeframe of this request is from January 1, 2021through January 10, 2021.
  • All video footage from within the Capitol between 12 pm and 9 pm on January 6, 2021
“As the Pelosi House seeks the confidential phone and social media records of countless Americans concerning January 6, its U.S. Capitol Police is covering up 14,000 hours of video about what really happened that day,” stated Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “The U.S. Capitol Police should be required to explain under oath its reasons for refusing to turn over even one second of January 6 video to the American people.”
 

Southside

Has No Life - Lives on TB
“If a visitor or a staff member fails to wear a mask after a request is made to do so, the visitor or staff shall be denied entry to the House Office Buildings or House-side of the U.S. Capitol. Any person who fails to comply or leave the premises after being asked to do so would be subject to an arrest for Unlawful Entry,” the bulletin reads.”
Oh, unlawful entry into the Capitol Building.
How quaint.
 
Top