POL November 3: The 2020 U.S. ELECTION DAY MAIN THREAD

[Profit of Doom]

My wife has been giving me crap about what Barr was saying, asked me what I feel when I hear what Trump was saying. I responded with, “let’s see how the audit turns out”. Hope we get good results.

 

[marsh]

Obama: Trump's Election 'Hooey' Violated Core Tenet of Democracy

Former President Obama said Monday in a video played on CNN's "Don Lemon Tonight" that former President Donald Trump violated a core tenet of democracy by not accepting the results of the 2020 presidential election. | Clips

www.breitbart.com

Obama: Trump’s Election ‘Hooey’ Violated Core Tenet of Democracy

PAM KEY28 Jun 2021336

Video on website 1:40 min

Former President Obama said Monday in a video played on CNN’s “Don Lemon Tonight” that former President Donald Trump violated a core tenet of democracy by not accepting the results of the 2020 presidential election.

The video was from a Monday morning fundraising call for the National Democratic Redistricting Committee with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and former Attorney General Eric Holder.

Lemon said, “Then there is former president Barack Obama, he warns it could happen again, and it could even be worse the next time.”

Obama said, “In this election, what we saw was my successor, the former president, violate that core tenet that you count the votes and then declare a winner and fabricate and make up a whole bunch of hooey.”

He added, “So that as bad as January 6 was if we had to repeat in future elections in which, let’s say, the Republican-controlled Pennsylvania legislature decided we’re not going to certify all those votes coming out of Philadelphia because we think that those urban votes are shady. Imagine what would have happened. We would have had a worse constitutional crisis than we did.”

Lemon added, “That’s actually the perfect word to describe it, hooey.

 

[marsh]

Billionaire Recruited Election Officials to Accept Grants from Zuckerberg

Pierre Omidyar attempted to recruit local election officials to apply for grants from the Mark Zuckerberg-funded CTCL.

www.breitbart.com

Lawsuit: Silicon Valley Billionaire Recruited Election Officials to Accept Grants from Zuckerberg

Chip Somodevilla/Getty
MICHAEL PATRICK LEAHY28 Jun 202122

A lawsuit filed by Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry in October 2020 alleged that an obscure nonprofit organization operated as part of a larger nonprofit founded and largely funded by Silicon Valley billionaire Pierre Omidyar attempted to recruit local election officials to apply for grants from the Mark Zuckerberg-funded Center for Technology and Civic Life (CTCL).

Landry filed the lawsuit on behalf of the State of Louisiana against CTCL, New Venture Fund DBA Center for Secure and Modern Elections, Dawn Maisel Cole, a private individual; and Full Circle Strategies LLC, “to prevent the injection of unregulated private money into the Louisiana election system.”

The lawsuit alleged:

• The New Venture Fund, operating in Louisiana under the trade name Center for Secure and Modern Elections (CSME), partnered with CTCL to solicit applications and information from Louisiana officials in connection with proposed grants [from CTCL as part of the $350 million in grants made nationwide in the 2020 election].
• CTCL and CSME worked their grant scheme in the State of Louisiana through a lobbyist by the name of Dawn Maisel Cole, owner and operator of Full Circle Strategies, LLC, as their Louisiana representative and agent to target registrars of voters, clerks of court, and local election officials.
• The scheme targeted 13 parishes, some to receive contributions of more than $500,000, accompanied by a request for detailed information about the operations, conduct and expenses of the registrars/clerk’s office.
• Ms. Cole directly solicited registrars and clerks of courts to accept contributions from CTCL and New Venture Fund for the operation of their respective offices.

These practices were prohibited, the lawsuit argued, because:

…private contributions to local election officials are unlawful and contrary to the methods for election funding established by law in the State of Louisiana, and such contributions by these defendants should be declared illegal and permanently enjoined.

The lawsuit was significant in part because it highlighted the role an obscure organization called the Center for Secure and Modern Elections, which describes itself as a “fiscally sponsored project of the New Venture Fund,” played in advancing the efforts of the Mark Zuckerberg-funded CTCL in privately funding the administration of the 2020 election.

The New Venture Fund, in turn, is part of Democracy Fund, whose website says it is “an independent and nonpartisan, private foundation that confronts deep-rooted challenges in American democracy while defending against new threats.”
Pierre Omidyar, a Silicon Valley billionaire who founded Ebay, also founded and financially backs Democracy Fund:

Democracy Fund has committed more than $150 million to support a healthy democracy. Established by philanthropist and eBay founder Pierre Omidyar in 2011 and incubated inside Omidyar Network, Democracy Fund launched as an independent foundation in July 2014 and is a part of The Omidyar Group.

Civitas, a well connected public affairs firm founded and staffed by Democrat activists, counts CSME among its clients, but its website is unclear what services it provides the group.

According to the Form 990 Democracy Fund filed for 2019, the organization provided a $275,000 grant to CTCL that year.

As Breitbart News reported:

Private funding of election administration was virtually unknown in the American political system until the 2020 presidential election, when Facebook CEO and founder Mark Zuckerberg and his wife Priscilla Chan donated $350 million to the Center for Technology and Civic Life (CTCL), which provided funding to county and municipal governments around the country for election administration, and $69 million to the Center for Election Innovation and Research (CEIR), which provided funding to 23 state governments, primarily through the Secretary of State’s office, also for the funding of election administration.

In late October, a Louisiana judge ruled against Landry and in favor of the defendants, as The Advocate reported:

Judge Lewis Pitman, of the 16th Judicial District in St. Martin Parish, ruled against Landry in the lawsuit last week. Landry said in an interview he would appeal the ruling. . .

In Louisiana, the clerks of court and registrars of voters had applied for around $7.8 million [in CTCL grant money], which the local officials said they would use to help pay for additional costs brought on by the pandemic. That includes equipment, personal protective gear and wages for election workers staffing early voting sites for longer hours.
The local officials have since backed off the grant money and won’t be tapping into the funds before the Nov. 3 election. Early voting is already underway.

According to the CTCL website, not a single Louisiana parish or city ended up with funding from CTCL in the November 2020 election.

But the previously obscured relationship between CTCL and CSME highlighted in the October 2020 lawsuit by Louisiana Attorney General Landry suggests that the relationship between these two groups may have extended to many states beyond Louisiana.

The two groups, for instance, delivered a joint presentation on election administration issues in January 2019. Scott Seeborg, the CSME contact in that January 2019 presentation, was hired in April 2020 as the Pennsylvania State Director for All Voting is Local, a non-profit whose mission statement says, “We fight to dismantle barriers to the ballot well before the next election, so that every voter can cast a ballot that counts.”

According to its website, “All Voting is Local Action is a campaign of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights. We fight for the right to vote in eight states with distinct assaults on the right to vote.”

Those eight states are Georgia, Arizona, Florida, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Wisconsin, Nevada, and Michigan.

The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights website states:

The Leadership Conference’s founders came together in 1950 out of the belief that the fight for civil rights could not be won by one group alone, but needed to be waged in coalition.

Our members — which have grown from 30 civil and human rights organizations at our founding to more than 200 today — differ in size, scope, and structure. But what transcends our differences and unites The Leadership Conference coalition is our enduring common purpose: full equality for all.

That common purpose gave our leaders the wisdom to see that civil rights are women’s rights and LGBTQ rights and immigrant rights and workers’ rights and disability rights and human rights. That common purpose is our coalition’s inheritance. It is a living legacy that binds us together — in cause and community.

According to the website of the Leadership Conference Education Fund, “All Voting Is Local [is] housed within Access Democracy, an incubated project of The Leadership Conference Education Fund, [and] fights to protect and expand the right to vote for every American.”

In future stories, Breitbart News will explore the relationship between CTCL, CSME, and All Voting is Local in key battleground states of the 2020 election, including Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia, and Arizona.

 

[marsh]

NBC's Figliuzzi: Trump's Base Includes 'Growing Fringe Element' -- 'Wants to Act Out Violently'

NBC News national security contributor and former FBI Assistant Director Frank Figliuzzi said Monday on MSNBC's "Deadline" that former President Donald Trump criticizing the investigations into his company was a security threat. | Clips

www.breitbart.com

NBC’s Figliuzzi: Trump’s Base Includes ‘Growing Fringe Element’ — ‘Wants to Act Out Violently’

PAM KEY28 Jun 2021453
Video on website 3:30 min

NBC News national security contributor and former FBI Assistant Director Frank Figliuzzi said Monday on MSNBC’s “Deadline” that former President Donald Trump criticizing the investigations into his company was a security threat.

According to Figliuzzi, Trump’s words “inflames” people, who he said were a growing fringe element of his supporters who want to act out violently.

Anchor Nicolle Wallace said, “So, Frank, talk about what happens from the investigative side if the company is criminally charged today or later this week?”

Figliuzzi said, “I think there’s more coming. Let’s pay particular attention to what those charges are. Also, even the announcement, the public reporting that charges are coming, serves a purpose whether it’s intended or not for other people who have knowledge to think this may be the time. ‘I’d better come forward now.’ Let’s watch and see if there’s some evidence of other people coming in to cooperate if Weisselberg won’t.”

He added, “We need to watch from a security standpoint how Trump and his cohorts portray this to their base, whether they will use rhetoric that inflames people toward possible violence or further undermines our criminal justice system.”

Wallace said, “Frank, you just mentioned a security concern, say more.”

Figliuzzi said, “Look, there’s a track record of attacking the investigators, attacking the prosecutors. Anytime you do that, there is this sadly, a growing fringe element in our society that wants to act out violently because they seem to be so loyal to this former guy that when they think he’s being unfairly attacked they act out.”

He added, “He seems to not only relish that but does nothing to contain that by saying, ‘I don’t mean you should be going and hurting people, that you should be attacking the courthouse or people’s homes.’ So this is a track record. I think we should get concerned about that. I think the people responsible for security in and around the D.A.’s office in Manhattan and the courthouse need to understand that kind of intelligence gathering is needed right now because they’re going to start to inflame people.”

[COMMENT: ??? I think he has the wrong party ANTIFA, BLM, Occupy Wall Street, ecoterrorism, PETA, I could go on and on.....]

 

[vector7]

Bill Barr clearly anticipated that Democrats would cheat, yet when we obtained overwhelming evidence of what he claimed could happen, he refused to investigate. Why did he ignore Fulton County, Georgia; and Antrim County, Michigan?
RT 4min

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1409742816041910273

View: https://twitter.com/BernardKerik/status/1409742816041910273?s=20

 

[Jaybird]

Thank you Marsh for all you do.

 

[Jaybird]

 

[marsh]

Barr Says Voter Fraud Allegations are 'Bull****'; Trump Calls Barr RINO - Todd Starnes

Before you read, I want to strongly urge you to sign up for Todd’s free newsletter. It’s your only lifeline […]

www.toddstarnes.com

Barr Says Voter Fraud Allegations are ‘Bull****’; Trump Calls Barr RINO
Jun 28, 2021

Video on website 3:58 min


Former President Donald Trump is roasting his attorney general, Bill Barr, as “a disappointment in every sense of the word,” after Barr dismissed Trump’s repeated claims about the 2020 election as “bull****” in ABC News correspondent Jonathan Karl’s upcoming book “Betrayal.”

“Instead of doing his job, he did the opposite and told people within the Justice Department not to investigate the election,” Trump said in a statement issued late Sunday night, reports The Hill.

“Just like he did with the Mueller report and the cover up of Crooked Hillary and RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA, they don’t want to investigate the real facts. Bill Barr’s weakness helped facilitate the cover up of the Crime of the Century, the Rigged 2020 Presidential Election!”

He also said that Barr, as a former attorney general who spent almost two years in office, “shouldn’t be speaking about the president.”

Barr is quoted, in the excerpt of Karl’s book released in The Atlantic Sunday, describing how his relationship with Trump deteriorated as Trump’s insistence that the results of the 2020 race were fraudulent grew.

“My attitude was: It was put-up or shut-up time,” Barr told the ABC correspondent. “If there was evidence of fraud, I had no motive to suppress it,” Barr told “But my suspicion all the way along was that there was nothing there. It was all bull****.”

Barr’s comment to Karl wasn’t the first time he dismissed Trump’s claims on the 2020 election with the expletive, as he also told Trump and White House counsel Pat Cipollone the same thing during a Dec. 1 meeting in the Oval Office.

Karl also wrote in his book that Barr had told him that Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., who at that time was the chamber’s majority leader, said he should push back against Trump because he was concerned that the then-president’s rhetoric on the election would hurt Republicans in the Georgia runoff races for the Senate, being held in January.

Democrats Jon Ossoff and Raphael Warnock ended up winning the Georgia runoff races, putting the Senate in a 50-50 dead heat.

Trump also on Sunday, continuing his statement, slammed Barr as a “RINO” who had “let down the American people.” Continue reading on Newsmax.

 

[marsh]

Al Gore gives Trump advice and it is LAUGHABLE

Al Gore actually gave Trump advice regarding last year’s election and it is incredible: Gore’s advice should’ve been ‘I don’t have any room to talk’ when …

therightscoop.com

Al Gore gives Trump advice and it is LAUGHABLE
JUN. 28, 2021 1:11 PM BY THE RIGHT SCOOP • 81 COMMENTS

Al Gore actually gave Trump advice regarding last year’s election and it is incredible:

Rumble video on website 1:12 min

Gore’s advice should’ve been ‘I don’t have any room to talk’ when asked about Trump losing the 2020 elections. But instead he proceeded to act as though he were the moral authority on losing an election gracefully:

“Well, I’m not sure that whatever I say to him [TRUMP] would have any impact whatsoever. But just on the off chance that it would, I would say, ‘Please do the right thing, acknowledge reality, stop hurting this country, stop undermining democracy, honor the great and honorable traditions of the United States of America.’ This cannot go on the way it is.”

This guy is a joke. Gore fought tooth and nail to get every hanging chad disqualified so he could steal the election from Bush and he’s telling Trump to “honor the great and honorable traditions” of democracy?

Whatever dude. These leftist idiots hate how the right still loves Trump, but they have been glossing over the major flaws of Bill Clinton and Al Gore for ages. They are everything they claim the right is.

 

[marsh]

EXCLUSIVE! Jovan Hutton Pulitzer Exposes REPUBLICANS Orchestrating FRAUDULENT Audits!

The Stew Peters Show

www.redvoicemedia.com

STEW PETERS SHOW

EXCLUSIVE! Jovan Hutton Pulitzer Exposes REPUBLICANS Orchestrating FRAUDULENT Audits!
The Stew Peters Show
BY STEW PETERS SHOW
JUNE 28, 2021

Rumble video on website 26:02 min

Jovan Hutton Pulitzer exposed the compromised voting machines on LIVE Television, and he’s now exposing REPUBLICANS!

Michigan is compromised, and the efforts for an integrity-filled audit are in jeopardy if those from the Wolverine State fail to RISE UP!

 

[marsh]

Dark To Light: Jovan Hutton Pulitzer – Michigan, You’re Up!

Click Arrow to listen You can also download a PHONE APP to listen without interruption: Subscribe to Dark To Light With F...

uncoverdc.com

Audio on website 51:55 min

We are joined today by Jovan Hutton Pulitzer, who has IMPORTANT information to share about Michigan and the “forensic” audit they are claiming they want to do. We spend the show talking about that and the letter from Michigan House Representative Daire Rendon.

 

[Dobbin]

Inside William Barr’s Breakup With Trump
In the final months of the administration, the doggedly loyal attorney general finally had enough.

Jonathan Karl - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Career

Karl began his career as a researcher and reporter for The New Republic, continued as an investigative reporter for the New York Post, and became a Congressional Correspondent for CNN before joining ABC News in January 2003 as the Senior Foreign Affairs Correspondent covering the State Department.[8] He worked for ABC covering national political news, becoming the Senior National Security Correspondent in December 2005. Karl was the Chief White House Correspondent for ABC News from December 2012[1] through the end of the Trump administration in January 2021. He continues as ABC News' Chief Washington correspondent and plans were announced that he will host an interview show for ABC News Live, the network’s streaming service.[4]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_Karl#cite_note-:0-4

Consider the source...

And:

Controversies

Karl became a controversial figure in May 2013, when he wrote an article that claimed to quote directly from an e-mail sent by a White House advisor.[11] It was later revealed that the quote was inaccurately given to Karl by an unnamed source, and that he himself had never seen the e-mail. Karl apologized for the error, and also for not having stated that the quote was from a detailed summary his source provided, rather than a direct quote from the e-mail.[12]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_Karl#cite_note-12

To paraphrase - Karl Lied. Attributed here to "inaccurately given" - as if Karl had no control.

Karl had "agenda" - and they don't allude to that.

Dobbin

 

[Dobbin]

If Pelosi does choose a Republican member, she will likely choose a Trump-hating RINO like Liz Cheney.

Of course! But attempting to garner "credibility" by including Cheney is like expecting the MEEDIA to tell the truth.

The only thing that makes it work at all is for the OPTICS - and the MEEDIA Propaganda incessant harping on "Bipartisan Committee" - which it is not and never can be.

Its all about optics. And keeping the January 6 claimed umbrage circus at a full three rings.

Those 500 riot participants will never be released as long as the Democrats are in power. Truly political prisoners.

You just know government is TOO STRONG when BS like this happens.

Dobbin

 

[intothatgoodnight]

View attachment 274363View attachment 274365View attachment 274366

The ONLY way forward towards legitimate future (s) elections.

If it takes a state a week, or a month, to manually count the votes, utilizing auditing processes and methods during the vote count that weed out most of the possible fraud, then so be it.


intothegoodnight

 

[marsh]

Georgia's Fulton County Election Board Likely Not Happy with Election Audit Moving Forward - Because Judge Added Them to the Case | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

The Fulton County Elections Board is not so happy with the case brought by Garland Favorito because they have now been added to it.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Georgia’s Fulton County Election Board Likely Not Happy with Election Audit Moving Forward – Because Judge Added Them to the Case

By Joe Hoft
Published June 29, 2021 at 7:45am

The Fulton County Elections Board is not so happy with the case brought by Garland Favorito because they have now been added to it.

Several individuals of the Fulton County Elections Board were added to the case last week by the judge. The order handed down by the Georgia judge dismissed several claims brought against governmental entities of Fulton County of sovereign immunity grounds. However, what is not well know is that the judge allowed the five members of Fulton County’s Board of Registration and Elections to be named in the suit.

Just the News added the following to the announcement in Georgia:

“Sovereign immunity” is a legal doctrine that holds that governmental parties are protected from many or most forms of lawsuits. In Amero’s ruling, he notes that Georgia law stipulates that “no suit alleging violations of due process or equal protection rights under the Georgia Constitution, that seek declaratory or injunctive relief, may be initiated against either the state or county,” barring a waiver from the state legislature or the state constitution.

Yet even as he dismissed the government parties in the suit, Amero subsequently moved to add the five members of Fulton’s elections board as parties pursuant to a request from the petitioners in the case.

TGP interviewed Garland Favorito after the calling last week:



You can bet these members of the Fulton County Board are not happy:

Current Members:
Mr. Alex Wan, Chairman
Email: alexwan@mindspring.com
Advertisement - story continues below

Mr. Mark Wingate (Republican member)
Email: wingate01md@gmail.com
Dr. Kathleen D. Ruth (Republican member)
Email: drkayruth@icloud.com
Ms. Vernetta Keith Nuriddin (Democratic member)
Email: vernettanuriddin@live.com
Mr. Aaron V. Johnson (Democratic member)
Email: aaronvjohnson@yahoo.com

 

[marsh]

Arizona Senate Briefed About CRITICAL Information and Materials Still Being Withheld by Maricopa County Officials - STAY TUNED! | The Gateway Pundit | by Jordan Conradson

The Arizona Senate has been briefed about critical information and materials still being withheld by Maricopa County.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Arizona Senate Briefed About CRITICAL Information and Materials Still Being Withheld by Maricopa County Officials – STAY TUNED!

By Jordan Conradson
Published June 29, 2021 at 8:05am

The Arizona Senate has been briefed about critical information and materials still being withheld by Maricopa County.

On Monday evening the Audit War Room tweeted a breaking update.

The Arizona Senate has been briefed about critical information and materials still being withheld by Maricopa County. Stay tuned!

They must be referring to Dominion routers and administrative passwords.

Maricopa County officials withheld this information and these materials from audit officials in defiance of subpoenas since January 13, 2021.

The forensic report is expected to come out in early August.

They will check to see if there were any fraudulent ballots cast, switching of votes, or deleted databases, but they need the routers and passwords in order to complete this portion.

The Audit count will not be released today. However, Christina Bobb reported that we are hoping to have a statement as early as this week.

Audit Counts Will NOT Be Released Today - Auditors TRIPLE Check Evidence - Coliseum to Be Cleared by Wednesday -- OAN REPORT (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jordan Conradson

The Arizona Audit started to pack up tables and vacate the coliseum floor this weekend but it appears that the audit team is still performing quality control checks and thoroughly rechecking their evidence.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

It appears the Arizona Senate may be forced to take legal action. Stay tuned.

 

[marsh]

Wisconsin Speaker Robin Vos Does Another Head Fake - Why Won't He Order a Forensic Audit of Ballots in the Badger State? | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

We’ve reported on Wisconsin Speaker of the House Robin Vos for some time. Why is he not asking for a full forensic review of all the ballots in the state from the 2020 Election? It’s so clear to all Americans that Wisconsin was stolen for Joe Biden in the 2020 election. After being way ahead of...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Wisconsin Speaker Robin Vos Does Another Head Fake – Why Won’t He Order a Forensic Audit of Ballots in the Badger State?

By Joe Hoft
Published June 29, 2021 at 8:40am

We’ve reported on Wisconsin Speaker of the House Robin Vos for some time. Why is he not asking for a full forensic review of all the ballots in the state from the 2020 Election?

It’s so clear to all Americans that Wisconsin was stolen for Joe Biden in the 2020 election. After being way ahead of Biden on Election night, more than 100,000 ballots all for Biden were dropped giving Biden the lead. This was definitely not a miracle and we knew it the next morning.



But the leaders in the state ignored the obvious fraud and certified the election for Joe Biden. Americans knew this was garbage. Americans across the country are livid with the results in Wisconsin being certified for Biden. We all know that they included massive fraud in many ways.

The Speaker of the House Robin Vos may be afraid of getting into the results of the election because he signed off on the state’s approval of drop boxes even though he had no authority to do so! Why would he do this?



We also now know that there was massive corruption in Green Bay during the election:


As we’ve pointed out numerous times, the results in Wisconsin in the 2020 Election made no sense. In response to the fraud in Wisconsin, this politician announced he was hiring three retired cops to audit the election.

Arizona had around 400 volunteers in the audit in Maricopa. Along with the audit team, they looked at eight or nine truckloads of voting machines and over 2.1 million ballots. They forensically examined every ballot to determine whether it was valid or not. They canvassed thousands of individuals related to the audit.

But Vos hires three cops:



Now to make it sound even better, the Wisconsin Republican leader announced he is having a former Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice oversee the review of the 2020 election!

The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported:

Assembly Speaker Robin Vos is hiring a former conservative Wisconsin Supreme Court justice to oversee the speaker’s review of the results of the 2020 election.


Vos announced the hire of former justice Michael Gableman at the state Republican convention in Wisconsin Dells, though Gableman argued the review “is not a partisan effort.”

“What we’re after is fairness and honesty,” he said.

Following confirmation of President Joe Biden’s victory in the Nov. 3 election, Gableman said the presidency was stolen.

“I don’t think anyone here can think of anything more systematically unjust than a stolen election,” Gableman told a crowd at a pro-Trump rally staged Nov. 7 in a parking lot at American Serb Hall in Milwaukee.

This Vos appears to be playing games. He is a politician for sure. If Vos wanted to get to the bottom of the 2020 Election results in Wisconsin he would do what the Arizona Senate did in Maricopa County. He apparently doesn’t think Arizona’s work is necessary for Wisconsin and if he really thinks this, he’s a fool.

You can reach Vos at his email here Contact (wisconsin.gov)

 

[marsh]

Wisconsin Supreme Court Dismisses Second Drop Box Case - Is Third Time a Charm? | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

Wisconsin’s courts refuse to address the election drop boxes which allegedly are illegal. Just the News reported yesterday (emphasis added): The Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty filed a lawsuit Monday challenging ballot dropboxes and absentee ballot collections in Wisconsin.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Wisconsin Supreme Court Dismisses Second Drop Box Case – Is Third Time a Charm?

By Joe Hoft
Published June 29, 2021 at 10:43am

Wisconsin’s courts refuse to address the election drop boxes which allegedly are illegal.

Just the News reported yesterday (emphasis added):

The Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty filed a lawsuit Monday challenging ballot dropboxes and absentee ballot collections in Wisconsin.

The suit was filed just days after the Wisconsin Supreme Court side-stepped a legal challenge on the same questions.

“Wisconsin voters deserve certainty that elections are conducted fairly and in accordance with state law. But the Wisconsin Elections Commission is giving advice to clerks that is contrary to the law, putting the ballots of countless voters at risk,” WILL’s Rick Essenberg said.

The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled 4-3 on Friday to dismiss a legal challenge to dropboxes and ballot harvesting. Swing justice Brian Hagedorn joined the court’s liberal justices in dismissing the claim for technical reasons.

This isn’t the first time the Wisconsin Supreme Court threw out a case against the legality of the drop boxes in the state. Attorney Karen Mueller from the Amos Center for Justice and Liberty also raised the issue before the 2020 election and the Supreme Court threw her case out as well. We reported on this last December.

Maybe third time is a charm? Let’s hope that the Wisconsin courts will finally address this illegal activity.

 

[marsh]

Arizona Audit: Boxes Rechecked at Center - Spreadsheets Undergo Review - Tabulators Moved Onto Floor | The Gateway Pundit | by Jordan Conradson

The Arizona Audit continues with quality control checks, recounting boxes, and reviewing the re-count spreadsheets.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Arizona Audit: Boxes Rechecked at Center – Spreadsheets Undergo Review – Tabulators Moved Onto Floor

By Jordan Conradson
Published June 29, 2021 at 3:25pm

The Arizona Audit continues with quality control checks, recounting boxes, and reviewing the re-count spreadsheets.

The team will evacuate Veterans Memorial Coliseum tomorrow.

Tabulation machineswere also moved into the far corral seen above, from the designated storage area seen on camera 1 at azaudit.org.

Camera two is the only camera streaming now.

Pallets of completed boxes have been moved to one side of the stadium and are organized in numerical order. The pallets have also been organized in the same sequence as they were delivered, with the same boxes. All ballots have an accurate chain of custody.

AZGOP Chairwoman Kelli Ward retweeted an update from @Jellen805

The completed corral is open for recounting boxes and the previously empty corral is now full of tabulation machines.

Volunteers are recounting boxes with an observer in order to guarantee 100% accuracy and a flawless process. There absolutely will be a legal fight when the results come out.



On one side of the coliseum, more volunteers were trained to review recount spreadsheets.

They are doing these extra checks to ensure that data entry was accurate and corresponds to tally sheets.

Karen Fann insists that they are not in a rush to release any information.

The full forensic audit is about accuracy.

Christina Bobb said that it would be easy for them to deliver a report that says the election was accurate, but ‘not accurate’ is a harder statement. She does hope to see something from the Senate early this week.



Spokesperson Randy Pullen told TGP’s Jordan Conradson that they should be finished today after they complete their spot checks and data reconciliation.

These results will not be easy to present to the public because we all know this was NOT a secure election.

As the Senate finishes passing the budget and new election integrity bills, we hope to hear a statement from the Arizona Senate in the near future.

If you want to see this process in your home state, contact your legislators NOW!

 

[marsh]

Texas Lieutenant Fired By Sheriff (Who Campaigned for Biden) After Attending Trump's Jan. 6 Rally | The Gateway Pundit | by Cassandra MacDonald

A detention lieutenant was fired from the Bexar County Sheriff’s Office in Texas for attending the Trump rally in DC on January 6, even though she never entered the Capitol.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Texas Lieutenant Fired By Sheriff Who Campaigned for Biden After Attending Trump’s Jan. 6 Rally, Despite Never Entering Capitol

By Cassandra Fairbanks
Published June 29, 2021 at 10:53am

A detention lieutenant was fired from the Bexar County Sheriff’s Office in Texas for attending the Trump rally in DC on January 6, even though she never entered the Capitol.

Bexar County Sheriff Javier Salazar, who fired Roxanne Mathai for attending the rally, campaigned for Joe Biden during the 2020 election.

Mathai had posted about being at the rally on social media, but never entered the building. She even specifically posted that she had no desire to enter the building and break the law.

Though she was simply exercising her First Amendment rights and attending a rally hosted by the then-President of the United States, Sheriff Salazar immediately began publicly condemning her.

“A day after the riot, Bexar County Sheriff Javier Salazar said Mathai was under investigation both criminally and administratively and that his intent was to not have Mathai ever return to work for BCSO, where she was promoted to detention lieutenant last summer,” local station KSAT 12 reports.

Mathai and her lawyer recently sat down with One America News to discuss what is being done to her.

Speaking to the Gateway Pundit, Mathai said that “since the interview, I received my arbitration hearing date….the hearing in which I fight for my job back. It’s a process we follow through our Collective Bargaining Agreement. My arbitration hearing is August 25-26, 2021. It’s a slow moving process. I believe this was nothing more than a political move on Sheriff Salazar’s part. And in my opinion there is no room for political bias in the sheriff’s office, in any sheriff’s office. We should remain focused on our actual tasks that we were sworn in to do and nothing else.”

“After my interview with OAN, Sheriff Salazar felt the need to re-run the old story all over again on a local station KSAT12 in which he had it emphasized that he ‘terminated me as promised.’ Since that interview, I have received even more derogatory text messages, voicemail, and messages on social media,” Mathai continued.

 

[marsh]

New Wisconsin lawsuit challenges ballot drop boxes, ballot harvesting

The Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty filed the suit just days after the Wisconsin Supreme Court side-stepped a legal challenge.

justthenews.com

New Wisconsin lawsuit challenges ballot drop boxes, ballot harvesting

The Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty filed the suit just days after the Wisconsin Supreme Court side-stepped a legal challenge.

By Benjamin Yount
Updated: June 29, 2021 - 12:22pm

The Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty has filed a lawsuit challenging ballot drop boxes and absentee ballot collections in the state.

The suit by the nonprofit conservative law firm was filed Monday, just days after the state Supreme Court dismissed a legal a challenge on the issues.

"Wisconsin voters deserve certainty that elections are conducted fairly and in accordance with state law," firm President Rick Essenberg said.

The state's high court on Friday ruled 4-3 on the issues.

The new suit appears to argue state laws are clear on the alternative voting, but the Wisconsin Election Commission is not following them.

"Despite the clarity of the law, WEC sent a memo to municipal clerks regarding the return of absentee ballots dated March 31, 2020,” the lawsuit states. "In paragraph two of the March 2020 WEC Memo it states that third persons other than the voter may return a voter’s absentee ballot. Specifically, the memo says that ‘A family member or another person may also return the ballot on behalf of the voter.' "

Former Dane County Judge Jim Troupis says the lawsuit from is likely one of many that will press the state Supreme Court to decide on the merits of ballot drop boxes and ballot collections before the 2022 election season.

"There have to be simultaneous actions brought in multiple counties, on multiple theories," Troiupis told Vicki McKenna on News Talk 1130 WISN. "And there has to be a motion to the new chief justice to consolidate those actions, and demand that they be resolved within 60 days."

Troupis said Wisconsin clerks need to know what the law is, and voters in the state have to have confidence that the law is being followed.

The Wisconsin Supreme Court "won’t tell us what the law is," Troiupis said. "They won’t tell us how to enforce the law. If you were trying to write a scenario where people would distrust elections, you would do exactly what our state supreme court is doing. And that is so disappointing to me."

 

[marsh]

 

[marsh]

Georgia Attorney General speaks out…

Two quick hits from Chris Carr responding to Merrick Garland and WSJ story ‘Biden DOJ is weaponized by political activists’

citizenfreepress.com

Georgia Attorney General speaks out… [on federal lawsuit against GA voting law]

Posted by Kane on June 29, 2021 5:41 pm

View: https://youtu.be/LJreJy6mpvg
.43 min

Two quick hits from Chris Carr responding to Merrick Garland and WSJ story

 

[marsh]

Pompeo has ‘doubts’ about 2020 election results…

Excellent statement here from Mike Pompeo. Different clip from the same interview

citizenfreepress.com

Pompeo has ‘doubts’ about 2020 election results…
Posted by Kane on June 29, 2021 5:37 pm

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1409966698376138755

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1409966698376138755
1:48 min

Excellent statement here from Mike Pompeo.

 

[marsh]

Did Cops Attack and Provoke Peaceful Protesters on January 6? › American Greatness

Joe Biden’s Justice Department is using every legal maneuver at its disposal to keep under wraps more than 14,000 hours of surveillance footage captured by the United States Capitol Police security…

amgreatness.com

Did Cops Attack and Provoke Peaceful Protesters on January 6?

If the American people deserve the truth about an “attack on our democracy” then they deserve the truth about the way law enforcement handled the crowd on January 6. Release the tapes.

By Julie Kelly
June 28, 2021

Joe Biden’s Justice Department is using every legal maneuver at its disposal to keep under wraps more than 14,000 hours of surveillance footage captured by the United States Capitol Police security system on January 6. Prosecutors insist the recordings are “highly sensitive” material; USCP’s general counsel warns that releasing the videos would provoke another “attack” on the Capitol complex.

But the trove of footage held by USCP isn’t the only video used as incriminating evidence in court proceedings, particularly hearings where prosecutors argue that a January 6 defendant should remain behind bars awaiting trial. The Justice Department also has footage recorded by body cameras worn by D.C. Metropolitan Police officers. (According to the USCP’s general counsel, Capitol police officers don’t wear body cameras. Interesting.)

Federal prosecutors routinely petition the court for pre-trial detention of January 6 defendants; judges have concurred in dozens of cases. Proof that the accused is a “danger” to society largely rests on cherry-picked video clips created by the government from video footage exclusively held by the government.

After news organizations complained their reporters could not see the clips during virtual court hearings, Beryl Howell, the chief judge of the D.C. District Court handling each one of the 500 or so Capitol breach cases, set up a way for journalists to access video evidence on a case-by-case basis.

The Justice Department now is using that ruling to perpetuate the idea that law enforcement officials were savagely attacked by bloodthirsty Trump “insurrectionists” on January 6. Earlier this month, the agency released a brief clip of a former New York City police officer angrily confronting a D.C. cop at around 2:30 p.m. on January 6. CNN, which obtained the clip, described the 56-second video as “horrifying.”

Thomas Webster, a decorated Marine and ex-NYPD officer with no criminal record, was arrested in February and charged with seven counts including assaulting the officer with a flag pole that was attached to his U.S. Marine Corps flag. (He did not hit the officer with the pole.) He’s been behind bars ever since.

So, what provoked Webster’s physical exchange with another cop? In the clip, Webster screams at officers from both USCP and D.C. Metro police who were fortified behind a row of bike racks. “You ****ing piece of shit. You ****ing commie mother****ers, man. You wanna attack Americans? No, **** that.”

Exactly.
Had the government decided to include video of the situation several minutes before Webster’s meltdown, it would have shown, according to court filings, police officers attacking and provoking protesters outside the Capitol who were doing nothing wrong.

In a June 17 court filing asking for his client’s release, here is how Webster’s attorney described part of the body cam footage that wasn’t released to CNN:

For the ten minutes prior to encountering the defendant, Officer N.R. can be seen reaching over the metal barrier and pushing a female protester holding a flag to the ground on two separate occasions. The protesters . . . were by and large peaceful. It was only after tear gas and pepper spray were deployed by police upon this group of peaceful protesters that the crowds changed.

Officer N.R. [the cop Webster allegedly assaulted] was equipped with a helmet, a shield, a gas mask, and a full complement of body armor. [P]rotesters—who did not attend the protest with a mask or face shield—are observed suffering the effects of being gassed and pepper sprayed by police. Officer N.R. can also be observed mocking several protesters who were complaining about this Officer’s excessive use of force.

Angered by the use of police force . . . Webster is heard angrily referring to the police officers as ‘commie mother****ers.’ The video depicts this officer reaching beyond the metal barriers and pushing Webster on the chest. It is at this point that Officer N.R. again reaches over the metal barricade and punches Webster on the left side of his face.

The Justice Department disputes Webster’s account. But he made the same accusation under oath during a February court hearing. In his interview with the FBI, Webster also said the officer “was encouraging me to jump over the barrier . . . like waving me on with his hand.” Webster told agents the officer landed “a big sucker punch” on him.

Why would Webster lie? The fact is, he didn’t. (His bond hearing is Tuesday afternoon.)

One of the most underreported aspects of January 6 is how law enforcement attacked Americans doing nothing wrong. Covering up the fact that police officers, including federal USCP officers, incited violence on January 6 is very likely a key reason why the government refuses to release security footage.

And cherry-picked body cam footage released by the Justice Department tells only one side of the story, of course.

But more emerging evidence seems to support the idea that police intentionally agitated protesters to provoke bad behavior, including verbal and physical attacks on law enforcement.

Video obtained by American Greatness last month shows Capitol police throwing flashbangs into a crowd of protesters outside the building. The device, also known as a stun grenade, emits flashes of light and a sound louder than a jet engine. It can cause temporary blindness and disorientation; some flashbangs contain rubber pellets, which some protesters claim were the ones used by police on January 6.

“They’ve been throwing flashbangs, shooting us with bullets,” Kash Kelly said on the video. “These are Americans protesting the right way . . . and we’re getting treated like we’re not even citizens.” (Kelly has been charged and currently is detained in the D.C. jail used to house January 6 defendants.)

Micajah Jackson, charged last month with four misdemeanors for his involvement in the January 6 protest, also witnessed violent attacks by police against protesters. “When I was walking to the Capitol, I saw cops dressed in riot gear and it didn’t make any sense to me,” Jackson told me in a phone interview Monday. Law enforcement, Jackson told me, were dressed in all black like “paramilitary” uniforms.

Jackson said cops waved protesters up the steps near the inauguration stage. “Next thing I know, a riot squad comes out of nowhere and starts attacking people, hitting them with batons and their closed fists. People are getting tackled. That’s when people got turned up and started to get agitated.”

Older women, teenagers, and some children, Jackson said, were getting attacked with flashbangs. “The crowd started yelling, what are you guys doing? That’s why you see people cussing and swearing at police.” (Another recently-released video shows protesters yelling at D.C. Metro cops for attacking them. “We’ve always supported you!” one man can be heard saying to the officers. The USCP inspector general confirmed D.C. Metro police used sting balls during the protest.)

This was the same area where Robert Sanford, a retired firefighter from Pennsylvania, allegedly threw a fire extinguisher at three USCP officers calling them “traitors” and “cowards.”

An infuriating video included in Jackson’s charging documents shows when police started throwing the flashbangs into a crowd assembled outside. The attack, which started at around 1 p.m., begins at the one minute mark in this YouTube video. People, most holding Trump or American flags and shouting “USA,” react with shock and anger. They start swearing at the assaulting officers; some complain about getting hit in the legs and buttocks with rubber pellets.

“That got me good,” one man is heard saying.

Another recording in Jackson’s complaint shows how the situation escalated with more aggressive behavior by police. At the 15-minute mark in this video, a line of both D.C. Metro and USCP officers started to move metal racks into the crowd, knocking people over. As people resist and fight back, officers start hitting protesters with their batons and spraying them with a chemical irritant.

The aggression prompted more altercations between protesters and police; at the 20 minute mark, a woman climbing steps in front of the line of police is shoved three times by a cop with a riot shield, once directly in the face, and knocked down.

There is no question that some protesters behaved badly on January 6—but it’s time to examine the conduct of USCP and D.C. Metro police to determine if they did, too.

Why did police start launching explosive devices into peaceful protesters outside the building at 1:00 p.m. on January 6 when no one was doing anything wrong?

Why did police use “super soaker” sprayers to attack the crowd with pepper spray and tear gas? Why did they arrive on the scene in full riot gear, including gas masks and weapons? Did any police officers assault nonviolent protesters with batons or riot shields or fists?

Seeing the surveillance video from January 6 would answer a lot of these questions, which is another reason why USCP does not want the public to see the footage. While USCP and D.C. Metro officers seek martyr status on Capitol Hill and cable news interviews, the reality of their conduct on January 6 would certainly undermine the public image they’ve tried hard to create.

But, as we’ve been told by everyone including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), the American people deserve the truth about what they consider an “attack on our democracy.” If so, then this should also apply to the way law enforcement handled the crowd on January 6. Who attacked whom?

For a year, the public was told President Trump ordered police to pepper spray violent protesters occupying Lafayette Square to clear the way for a photo op at a church they had set on fire. Democrats and even some Republicans demanded an investigation. But an inspector general report confirmed U.S. Park Police cleared the area so a contractor could install security fencing.

“This report does not address allegations of individual use-of-force incidents, as those are the subject of separate inquiries as well as ongoing lawsuits,” Mark Lee Greenblatt disclosed in his report.

Shouldn’t we know the same about law enforcement’s role in the January 6 protest?

Release the tapes.

 

[marsh]

Trump's Alabama Rally is *Canceled* - The Reason Why is Making His Supporters Furious

This is a big blow to Trump supporters' hopes for Fourth of July weekend...

beckernews.com

Trump’s Alabama Rally is *Canceled* – The Reason Why is Making His Supporters Furious

June 29, 2021
by Kyle Becker

Written by Kyle Becker

The Alabama rally slated to be held by 45th President of the United States Donald Trump appears to be canceled. Trump was scheduled to be the keynote speaker this Saturday at the USS Alabama Battleship Memorial Park.

“Former President Trump‘s upcoming rally in Alabama has been canceled over partisan political concerns, NBC News affiliate WMTV reported Tuesday,” the Hill reported.

“USS Alabama Battleship Memorial Park commission chairman Bill Tunnell told the NBC News affiliate that the Republican party contacted them worried about the patriotic event turning into a ‘partisan political event’ instead,” the report said.

“After the request was made, then there was contact with the Republican Party, they contacted us and then it became apparent that it was going to be a partisan political event, rather than just a patriotic event planned for that evening,” Tunnell told WMTV.

“Tunnell says commissioners sought an opinion from the attorney general’s office in late May,” WMTV reported. “NBC 15 News obtained Attorney General Steve Marshall’s response which stated there was little time for a formal opinion to be rendered but did note the park may be used for political events provided access is ‘available for all political parties and candidates on an equal basis.’ The state park has been used for political events previously. In 2012, presidential hopeful Rick Santorum used the park for a rally.”

“Rick Santorum was the, was the straw that broke the camel’s back. And that’s when the commission went to the no partisan politics open to the public,” Tunnell said.

“I’ll be honest, I feel some people just didn’t want it, not just it but President Trump,” local Tea Party activist Pete Riehm remarked.

“If people can’t assemble in public places. Where can we assemble?” Riehm added.

“The chairman of the Alabama Republican Party John Wahl told NBC 15 news that Donald Trump had committed for Saturday night, was excited to speak to the Port City and he’s disappointed the event is not moving forward,” the report stated.

 

[marsh]

AUDIO: Biden Campaign Oversaw Theft of Living And Dead Identities For Absentee Ballots In 2020 Election

Identities of living and dead people were stolen in Harris County, Texas to fraudulently vote in the 2020 election, according to bombshell audio obtained by NATIONAL FILE. A convicted forger who mailed the fraudulent ballot applications in Democrat Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee’s district...

nationalfile.com

AUDIO: Biden Campaign Oversaw Theft of Living And Dead Identities For Absentee Ballots In 2020 Election

Sheila Jackson Lee Campaign Assistant, A Convicted Forger, Mailed In False 2020 Ballot Applications

by PATRICK HOWLEY
June 29, 2021

Identities of living and dead people were stolen in Harris County, Texas to fraudulently vote in the 2020 election, according to bombshell audio obtained by NATIONAL FILE. A convicted forger who mailed the fraudulent ballot applications in Democrat Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee’s district worked as a campaign assistant for Sheila Jackson Lee’s 2020 campaign, and has gotten paid by Jackson Lee’s campaign efforts in the past. The Joe Biden campaign’s 2020 Texas political director Dallas Jones oversaw this alleged voter fraud operation and he was interrogated by the FBI in the last weeks of the 2020 election according to insiders. The audio below includes phone calls in which people confirm that their identities or the identities of their dead relatives were stolen in Harris County. This information has been provided to the Texas Secretary of State for the purpose of aiding Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s office in formal investigations.

AUDIO CLIP 1: WOMAN SURPRISED TO FIND OUT SHE HAS BEEN VOTING: “They’ve got a Sylvia Thomas…voting in Harris County,” said private investigator and former FBI Special Surveillance Group member Charles Marler, who called Sylvia Thomas and correctly cited her February 19, 1940 birth date. Sylvia Thomas says “I’ve been away from Harris County” and confirmed that she has not voted in Harris County in recent years even though someone has been obtaining absentee ballots on her behalf. The woman does not recognize the name of Tomar Bishop, who obtained the absentee ballots associated with Thomas’ identity, or Gloria Palmer, the recent Sheila Jackson-Lee campaign PAC vendor who oversaw Tomar Bishop. Sylvia Thomas wonders “What else are they doing?” in addition to fraudulently voting on her behalf. Here is Sylvia Thomas’ absentee ballot application in the 2020 election (with her address obscured), which is just one of the fraudulent absentee ballot applications in the possession of NATIONAL FILE:

Rumble audio on website 5:45 min

AUDIO TWO: A DEAD MAN APPLIES TO VOTE: In this call, private investigator Charles Marler confirms with a woman in Harris County that a man who applied to “vote” in the election named Jesse Burks passed away on November 4, 2015. The woman confirms this death. The dead Burks’ address matches the address of the “voter.” The woman does not recognize Tomar Bishop, who obtained the absentee ballot, or Gloria Palmer, who mailed the dead man’s ballot application in.

Rumble video on website 4:22 min

AUDIO THREE: A DEAD MOTHER APPLIES TO VOTE: Private investigator Charles Marler confirms with a woman in Harris County that her mother Gloria Chambers, born in 1946, voted in the election despite dying in 2010. The daughter of the deceased voter does not know Tomar Bishop, who obtained the absentee ballot, or Gloria Palmer, who mailed the dead woman’s vote in. “That’s fine, because we don’t know either one of those people,” said the daughter of the dead voter, consenting to cooperate with Marler’s investigation.

Rumble link not working

Sheila Jackson Lee’s campaign paid convicted forger Gloria Palmer as a “campaign assistant” multiple times in 2020, according to Sheila Jackson Lee’s campaign financial disclosures. Investigator Charles Marler confirms that the Gloria Palmer, who was paid by Jackson Lee’s campaign, is the same Gloria Palmer who mailed in the absentee ballot applications in 2020.

A record shows Sheila Jackson Lee For Congress PAC paying Gloria Palmer for canvassing and campaign work in 2018. Here is a record of Sheila Jackson Lee’s campaign paying Gloria Palmer to be a “campaign assistant” in 2020.

Investigator, Charles Marler, tells NATIONAL FILE that “The vast majority of victims are people who are not aware their vote was stolen. In Harris County the first ballot in from ballot harvesters is counted, all second votes are discarded for that individual.”

Patrick Howley @HowleyReporter 8:47 min
Democrat political strategist Damien Thaddeus Jones, who served as regional political director for Beto O’Rourke’s U.S. Senate campaign, has come forward to blow the whistle on a massive voter fraud ring in Harris County, Texas. The voter fraud ring is overseen by Dallas Jones, who served as Texas Political Director for the Joe Biden presidential campaign. In this stunning audio obtained exclusively by NATIONAL FILE, Damien goes into detail about Dallas Jones’ fraudulent activity and work for Biden. On the tape, “Sheila” refers to Sheila Jackson-Lee. This article below delves into the massive evidence of voter fraud — including photographic evidence and sworn affidavits — that emerged in Harris County in 2020, and how its direct link to the Biden campaign provides even more justification for President Donald Trump’s ability to claim victory in the presidential election.

View: https://youtu.be/nBWtLEXpa9s
29:12 min

LET’S BREAK DOWN THE FACTS ON WHAT HAPPENED IN THE FRENZIED FINAL WEEKS OF THE 2020 ELECTION:

View: https://youtu.be/BkcS0z7ZKqs
5:44 min

Harris County, Texas conducted 24-hour voting in the 2020 election, even as the county became engulfed in a voter fraud scandal that ensnared the Joe Biden campaign’s recent Texas political director Dallas Jones. A well-placed insider named Constance Stanton tells NATIONAL FILE that Dallas Jones was interrogated by the FBI and fired by the Biden campaign after he was implicated in an illegal Ballot Harvesting operation in sworn affidavits first reported by NATIONAL FILE. This scandal has since been picked up by various news outlets across the nation, including by Fox News. Vote count discrepancies are reported in Harris County.

Sources within the FBI told NATIONAL FILE that Dallas Jones was interrogated but was not necessarily “picked up,” implying that Jones voluntarily submitted to FBI interrogation. Multiple sources tell NATIONAL file that Jones was fired by the Biden campaign.

Here is what Constance Stanton told NATIONAL FILE in October: “Harris County Clerk’s Office in Harris County, Texas is intending to conduct an illegal polling operation on Thursday, October 29th, 2020. Harris County, home to Houston Texas, is the third largest voting county in the country with approximately 2.5 million voters. As Harris County goes, so goes Texas. As Texas goes, so goes the nation. Harris County did not allow the GOP State Conversation to take place this past summer and it seems the socialist Democrats took complete control of Harris county when they won offices in 2018, by a 200,000 vote margin.

20 private investigators have uncovered a great deal. What has been uncovered is a group of masterminds wanting to destroy the Texas voting voice. Some of the masterminds include Democrat County Commissioner Rodney Ellis and Democrat State Senator Boris Miles. They have two captains, Gerald Womack and Dallas Jones.

Jones was hired by the Biden campaign to run the Biden Texas operation. These captains have scores of paid vote harvesters working for them. Vote harvesting is a second-degree felony under the Texas Election Code. This is a criminal operation that these Democrat elected officials are running. Dallas Jones was picked up by the FBI, the weekend before last, for 2 days of interrogation. He was subsequently fired by the Biden campaign.

They harvest ballots by mail from nursing homes, homeless centers, door to door in poor neighborhoods, often dressed as Census workers. They offer $50 gift cards in front of stores asking people to take ballots by mail, acquired from the above, to sign and mail at a local post office. They hold ballots by mail in several locations where people forge signatures on the collected ballots by mail.

Evidence has been presented to the local DA, Kim Ogg, who received a substantial amount of political contributions from Soros funded organizations in her election in 2018. The evidence included an affidavit and other evidence, including photographs, from a 30 year black police officer who was serving as a poll watcher and saw the election judge use a table full of IDs to vote unregistered people that were voting by drive through. This is a criminal act according to the Texas Election Code. The district attorney’s office did not even want to entertain our criminal complaint. This information along with other affidavits of harassment of poll watchers and alternate election judges was sent to the office of Republican Atty. General Ken Paxton.

The Democrat County clerk, Chris Hollins, instituted drive-through voting by anyone for any reason which is in violation of the Texas Election Code. A petition for writ of mandamus before the Texas Supreme Court last week to stop this illegal activity and they voted 7 to 1 to deny the petition. The County clerk has now opened up the early voting polling locations until 10 PM for the rest of the week until the last day of early voting, when eight polling places will be open 24 hours. Of the 120 early voting locations, the vast majority are in Democrat areas of the county. In violation of the Texas Election Code, Hollins independently mailed ballots by mail to all individuals 65 and older, in violation of Texas Election Code, which requires an individual to request a ballot by mail before it can be sent. Hollins planned on sending every registered voter a ballot by mail, but the Texas Supreme Court granted our petition and stopped this. The Harris County voter files have not been purged since 2016 when the Democrats took charge. We can document that dead people have voted in this election and people who have moved out of state. No arrest warrants have been issued and we do not expect them to issue any. In the meantime, the Democrats are implementing their massive election voter fraud scheme, mostly in open sight.

One arrest would go miles in stopping this election fraud scheme. The drive through locations are located in primarily in Democrat areas. This also violates the 14th Amendment.”

Constance Harris’ statement concludes



At Harrisvotes.com, clicking on “Polling Locations” and then the clock icon for “Hours of Operation” show that beginning on Thursday October 29 there were EIGHT polling locations that had 24-hour voting rolling into Friday morning.

Texas poll watcher Raymond T. Stewart, a retired police officer, submitted a sworn affidavit Thursday that was provided to the Harris County District Attorney’s Office. That affidavit, first obtained by NATIONAL FILE, alleges that a Houston precinct judge and staff illegally used a stack of driver’s licenses in their possession to allow people to vote illegally in the 2020 election at a drive-through voting window created by the Coronavirus pandemic. Stewart’s affidavit and photos of the scheme are presented below. The acting precinct judge’s identity has been confirmed by the Harris County Clerk’s Office and insiders identify her as a Democrat.

Harris County, where Houston is located, is also the site where the Joe Biden campaign’s Texas political director Dallas Jones is accused of running an illegal ballot harvesting operation, according to two separate affidavits submitted to the Texas Supreme Court by former law enforcement officials. Here is the GoFundMe page for private investigators who are busting what insiders say is one of the largest voter fraud rings in the United States. Here is a photo from the scene of the stack of driver’s licenses.

Here Is The Sworn Affidavit, Under Oath, of Raymond T. Stewart:
“My name is Raymond T. Stewart. I am above the age of eighteen years and am fully competent to make this affidavit. The facts stated in this affidavit are within my personal knowledge and are true and correct.

“I am a 30+ year veteran Texas Peace Officer. I am a volunteer poll watcher for Candidate Andre Hines. On 10/13/2020, at 8:40am, I arrived at polling location Northeast Multi-Services Center, PRCT ID SRD141C, 9720 Spaulding Street, Houston, Texas 77016.”

“I informed the staff that I was a poll watcher for a candidate and had my paperwork. I asked for the precinct judge to sign my required paperwork so I could start work. The precinct judge is identified as April Elmore (Gibson) and she was there but refused to sign my paperwork and she instead directed me to someone inside named Madonna. Madonna signed the paperwork but not in the designated signature line. I then began my work as a poll watcher.”

“I observed several oddities but the most concerning was a table in-between the sign-in tables One and Three. At that table was a large stack of Texas Driver’s Licenses. Staff would come inside from the drive-through voting booth and scan a driver’s license from someone outside and get a ticket and return outside. But sometimes a staff member would search through the stack of driver’s license on the table, then scan it, receive a ticket and also go outside to the drive-through booth. As a Police Officer, I quickly became suspicious that they were committing a crime by having the unattended D.L.’s just sitting on the table and that possible voting crimes were being committed using these forms of ID. Also during this time-frame an employee of the Harris County Attorney’s Office came by and he conversed with April but nothing changed and he departed. Since I was there as a poll watcher and not there as a Police Officer, I just continued to observe and considered how to deal with this situation. About that time a Precinct 1 Constable (Deputy W. Schultz) arrived at the polling location and he happened to be someone I knew professionally. I spoke with the Deputy outside and informed him of what I had observed. He was amazed and asked for evidence which I provided to him.”

“Unfortunately our conversation was overheard by a staff member in the parking lot. The Deputy went inside the polling location but at this time the driver’s licenses were removed and hidden from the table. The Deputy departed the area apparently to consult with the election taskforce and supervisors. A spoke with him several times that day via phone and in person regarding my observations.

At 1:00pm April commanded me to leave the polling location because I had observed and collected evidence and she informed me that ‘I couldn’t.’ I have not received any call from any Federal, County nor State official investigating these serious actions and crimes.”

Raymond T. Stewart’s Affidavit Concludes

NATIONAL FILE RECENTLY REPORTED:
The Joe Biden campaign’s Texas Political Director has been formally accused of helping to run an illegal ballot harvesting operation, according to two separate affidavits filed Monday at the Texas Supreme Court.

Two private investigators, including a former FBI agent and former police officer, testify under oath that they have video evidence, documentation and witnesses to prove that Biden’s Texas Political Director Dallas Jones and his cohorts are currently hoarding mail-in and absentee ballots and ordering operatives to fill the ballots out for people illegally, including for dead people, homeless people, and nursing home residents, in the 2020 presidential election.

The affidavits were filed as part of the class-action lawsuit against Harris County and the state of Texas, filed by citizens, called Steven Hotze, M.D. et al. Journalist Patrick Howley of NATIONAL FILE has exclusively obtained this testimony and much more evidence will be coming out in the case. Dallas Jones was named the Biden campaign’s Texas Political Director in early September.

HERE IS THE AFFIDAVIT OF PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR AND RETIRED HOUSTON POLICE OFFICER MARK A. AGUIRRE, SUBMITTED UNDER OATH.

Part 1 of 2

 

[marsh]

Part 2 of 2

READ IT HERE: AFFIDAVIT OF MARK A. AGUIRRE “My name is Mark A. Aguirre. I am above the age of eighteen years and am fully competent to make this affidavit. The facts stated in this affidavit are within my personal knowledge and are true and correct.

“I am a retired captain with the Houston Police Department I am now a private investigator.

“I am currently involved in an investigation related to a wide-ranging and fraudulent ballot harvesting scheme in Harris County intended to rig the elections in the Houston/Harris County area. This scheme involves voter fraud on a massive scale.

“Based on interviews, review of documents, and other information, I have identified the individuals in charge of the ballot harvesting scheme. These individuals includes political consultant Dallas Jones who was recently hired by the Joe Biden for President campaign to oversee their Harris County initiative.

District 13 Texas State Senator Borris Miles, who is the handler of Mr. Jones, political consultant Gerald Womack, and Precinct 1 Harris County Commissioner Rodney Ellis. One of the companies these individuals are using as a front for this operation is AB Canvassing, although there are others that have been identified that we are investigating.”

“I have in my possession video-taped interviews of witnesses attesting to the aforementioned people having groups of people completing thousands of absentee and mail-in ballots, including completing ballots for deceased individuals; illegally going into nursing homes, with the complicity of the nursing home staff, and filling out and forging the signatures of nursing home residents; signing up homeless individuals to vote using the ballot harvester’s address then completing the ballot and forging the homeless individual’s signature.

“This entire operation is being run by the elite politicians of the Democrat Party in Houston/Harris County. FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT.

HERE IS THE AFFIDAVIT OF PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR AND FORMER FBI AGENT CHARLES MARLER, SUBMITTED UNDER OATH. READ IT HERE: 2020-09-27_Charles F. Marler Affidavit:

“My name is Charles F. Marler. I am above the age of eighteen years and am fully competent to make this affidavit. The facts stated in this affidavit are within my personal knowledge and are true and correct.”

“I formerly worked for the Federal Bureau of Investigations where I was an Investigative Specialist conducting undercover operations on espionage and terrorist targets. I am now a private investigator.”

“In December of 2019, I was approached by two individuals who witnessed activity from an illegal ballot harvesting operation in Harris County. Since that date, I have been investigating the illegal ballot harvesting operation.”

“During my investigation, a core group of names continued to surface regarding the organization and operation of the voter fraud scheme. Witnesses have stated to me that Precinct 1 Harris County Commissioner Rodney Ellis and District 13 Texas State Senator Borris Miles are leading the illegal ballot harvesting operation in Harris County, Texas. Their chief lieutenants are Houston businessman Gerald Womack and political consultant Dallas Jones who work directly under them in executing the ballot harvesting operation in Harris County, Texas.”

“Witnesses have shown me and described to me how the ballot harvesters take absentee ballots from the elderly in nursing homes, from the homeless, and from unsuspecting residences’ mailboxes. The ballot harvesters then complete the ballots for their preferred candidate and forge the signature of the “voter”. Two witnesses stated to me that there are two individuals employed at the Harris County Clerk’s Office who are aware of the illegal ballots and help facilitate and mask the processing of the ballots into the legal stream of ballots.”

“I have been made aware of a law enforcement investigation in the Spring of 2020 regarding illegal ballot harvesting. Several interviews of individuals were conducted. After the interviews became public, former Harris County Clerk Diane Troutman, resigned alleging health concerns due to COVID-19. However, witnesses have told me that Ms. Troutman was arguing with Commission Rodney Ellis about the legality of the mass purchasing and mailing of mail-in ballots and that Troutman was concerned she would be included in the eventual arrest pertaining to illegal ballot harvesting. Instead of coming forward and exposing the scheme, Ms. Troutman abruptly resigned. Witnesses have stated that Commissioner Ellis was not deterred and continued to move forward with the plan to mass mail ballots and expand the illegal ballot harvesting scam. Another witness stated to me that an employee of Commission Ellis, Tyler James, has bragged that he could guarantee that the illegal ballot harvesting operation, with the help of mass mail-in ballots, could harvest 700,000 illegal ballots.”

“It appears that law enforcement agencies are currently investigating these alleged crimes and I will provide them with the evidence that I have already collected and am continuing to collect. Sadly, these law enforcement agencies will be working to prosecute these crimes well after the November 3, 2020 election.”

Here Is The GoFundMe Page for the ongoing private investigation which is working with law enforcement. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton recently announced 134 felony charges against four defendants stemming from an alleged 2018 Democrat primary scheme to use fake disabilities provide mail-in ballots to people who were not disabled. The Democrat claim that fear of Coronavirus constitutes a disability has been only partially successful in Texas.

Harris County is sending mail-in ballot applications to county voters 65 and over, so nursing homes remain a hotspot for potential fraud. Texas began mailing absentee ballots to voters for the presidential election on September 19.

NATIONAL FILE RECENTLY REPORTED
Citizen journalist Colleen Vera has discovered evidence of what appears to be a massive voter fraud ring operating in the state of Texas involving mail-in voting and Democrat political campaigns. Evidence presented below includes a video of a Democrat campaign surrogate harvesting mail ballots from a nursing home, audio of a Democrat campaign worker admitting to harvesting ballots from a nursing home, and mail-in ballots from Harris County that all have the same handwriting and envelope process.

Vera alleges that the campaign of Democrat Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee recently paid two convicted forgers, and that other Democrat campaigns have also paid convicted forgers for canvassing efforts. I spoke to Collen Vera regarding her findings as well as longtime Democrat Party operative Gerry Monroe, who knows full well what is happening in Harris County:

Patrick Howley @HowleyReporter 22:14 min

Colleen Vera of Texas Trash Talk Reports…
After the 2016 Democratic Primary, a candidate for Harris County Constable (Pct 3), Jasen Rabalais, filed a lawsuit claiming that a campaign worker for another candidate,Michel Pappillion, “deliberately falsified, illegally completed or unlawfully influenced the ballots and early voting applications of elderly residents in Harris County.”

The lawsuit was dismissed. But the following audio tapes had been made by the Rabalais campaign after he found out that an “alleged harvester” was working for an opponent’s campaign.

Link to Audio #1: Gives name of “alleged harvester”
Link to Audio #2: “Alleged harvester” explains the services provided (phone # redacted)

Then during the 2018 Primary, the following video was posted by Direct Action Texas. It appeared to show a campaign worker for Texas State Rep Harold Dutton Jr harvesting ballots of 400 elderly voters.

View: https://youtu.be/xhQ7ngFqLSc
.25 min

After viewing the video, I decided to do some research. I figured, if there was any evidence of mailed ballot voter fraud to be found in Harris County, the more recent one – Dutton’s race – was the best place to start.
I filed a request for public information covering the 1359 voters who voted by mail in Harold Dutton’s race. I requested electronic copies of the voters’:

1. applications for ballots by mail and
2. returned ballot carrier envelopes.

My first thought was to match each voter’s mailed ballot application with the voter’s ballot envelope and compare signatures to find those which may not match. But as I reviewed the documents, something else jumped off the page…

32 hand written applications for mailed ballots – all from different voters – but all written in the exact same handwriting.

Looking closer, something else jumped off the page.

All 32 returned their application for a ballot by mail in the same pre-printed envelope with the same style stamp.

… But then I printed out the envelopes which carried their returned ballots and the BIGGEST COINCIDENCE of ALL jumped off the page…ALL THESE VOTERS LIVED IN THE SAME PRECINCT! Precinct #259…Additional research showed this same handwriting on multiple ballot by mail applications from precinct #259 every year going back to 2008…If that wasn’t enough to cause concern, I had to title this set of applications “Alleged Harvester A” because I found two more sets of multiple applications with similar handwriting, envelopes and stamps from varying precincts. I titled those “Alleged Harvester B” and “Alleged Harvester C.”…

30 ballots from Precinct #259 – in which the voters voted for ALL the same candidates – and they ALL used the same style “X” to mark their ballots.

…I filed another public information request and received a handwritten sign out sheet for persons who had picked up packages of 50 or more applications for mailed ballots in 2018. Two concerning issues from that list.

1. The FIRST PERSON to pick up multiple applications for ballots by mail in 2018 is the SAME WOMAN from the 2016 audio tape who explained how she accesses nursing homes to acquire mailed ballots for candidates.
2. TWO of the first three persons who picked up multiple applications for ballots by mail in 2018 have FORGERY convictions…

Federal Election Commission records show that US Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee did make multiple payments to convicted forger Gloria Palmer in 2016:

Texas Trash Talk passage ends

(Collen Vera alleges that Sheila Jackson Lee’s campaign has paid two convicted forgers, Gloria Palmer and Sheree Harris Fisher, as recently as February 2020. Records show that Sheila Jackson Lee vendor Gloria B. Palmer is the same age as Texas convicted forger Gloria B. Palmer. Vera alleges that Fisher is also a convicted forger)

 

[marsh]

Supreme Court Likely to Issue Major Ruling on Ballot Harvesting Soon

www.theepochtimes.com

Election workers count ballots in Philadelphia, Penn., on Nov. 4, 2020. (Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

Supreme Court Likely to Issue Major Ruling on Ballot Harvesting Soon

BY JACK PHILLIPS
June 29, 2021 Updated: June 29, 2021

The Supreme Court is poised to issue a major ruling that could impact the practice of “ballot harvesting” across the United States.

The court’s justices are set to hand down their last opinions of their current session on Thursday, perhaps including on a voting rights case that calls into question Arizona’s law that bans ballot harvesting—or the practice of collecting ballots for delivery. Also under consideration is the state’s law that mandates the dismissal of ballots that were cast in the wrong voting district.

After the Democratic National Committee filed a lawsuit against the laws, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the Democrats and overturned them.

Later, Arizona state Attorney General Mark Brnovich, a Republican, appealed that decision to the Supreme Court.

The GOP-controlled Arizona Legislature passed a ballot harvesting bill in 2016 that made the practice—typically carried out by Democratic-aligned groups—of going door-to-door asking people to take their ballots to a local polling place unlawful. The law makes exceptions for family members, caregivers, and people living in the same household. Republicans have said this would eliminate fraud and other irregularities.

In a divided ruling, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals’s majority argued that the law was a bid to suppress minority voters.

“The district court found that, in contrast, the Republican Party has not significantly engaged in ballot collection as a Get Out the Vote strategy,” Justice William Fletcher wrote for the majority last year. “The base of the Republican Party in Arizona is white,” Fletcher added. “Individuals who engaged in ballot collection in past elections observed that voters in predominantly white areas were not as interested in ballot-collection services.”

However, Brnovich argued (pdf) to the Supreme Court that the law barely impacted minority groups’ ability to vote and cited “slight statistical differences.”

“No one was denied the opportunity,” he said in his arguments before the court earlier this year.

Brnovich further stipulated there are a “plethora of options” for voters to cast ballots in elections, saying that the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals used that small statistical difference and then “tried to extrapolate that somehow that Arizona’s laws were racist or unconstitutional.”

Also during his arguments, the attorney general said that the law is a sensible election rule that exists in dozens of other states. Meanwhile, if the court strikes down Arizona state law, it would erode the public’s trust in elections, Brnovich contended.

Michael Carvin, an attorney for the Arizona GOP, said during questioning that the law creates difficulties for Republicans during elections.

“It puts us at a competitive disadvantage relative to Democrats,” he told Justice Amy Coney Barrett. “Politics is a zero-sum game. And every extra vote they get through unlawful interpretations of Section 2 hurts us. It’s the difference between winning an election 50 to 49 and losing an election.”

 

[marsh]

Is The Entire Democratic Party Compromised By China?

From corporate donors to Biden investments to a spy compromising a sensitive position, the Democrat Party is clearly in bed with America's top adversary.

thefederalist.com

Is The Entire Democratic Party Compromised By China?
From corporate donors to Biden family investments to a Chinese spy compromising a sensitive intelligence position, the Democrat Party is clearly in bed with America's top adversary.

By Tristan Justice
JUNE 29, 2021

House Democrats shot down a GOP motion earlier this month that sought to bar corporate cooperation with Chinese slave labor.

The Motion to Recommit proposed by Kentucky Republican Rep. Andy Barr amending a Democrat bill on corporate disclosure would have required businesses to report to the Treasury Department if they discover a supplier or other business partner was found using forced labor.

Two-hundred and seventeen Democrats rejected the measure and the amendment failed. A look at their corporate donors might reveal why.

Slave Labor Profits to Campaign Coffers
In March last year, the Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI) published a report credibly accusing 82 major brands of profiting, either directly or indirectly, from Chinese slave labor by minority Uyghur workers from the northern Xinjiang province. According to the report, investigators estimate more than 80,000 Uyghurs were taken from their native provinces to work in factories across China between 2017 and 2019, with thousands more sent straight to concentration camps.

Using open-source Chinese-language documents, satellite imagery, academic research, and on-the-ground reporting, ASPI linked 82 brands with forced labor operations among 27 factories across nine Chinese provinces. A Federalist analysis drawing on financial disclosure reports published in OpenSecrets found at least 44 of the 80 companies named made U.S. campaign contributions in last year’s election cycle.

A vast majority went to Democrats, who raked in three-quarters of all federal donations from companies credibly accused of harnessing Chinese slave labor, while less than 12 percent flowed to Republicans. Of the nearly $40 million that went to congressional candidates between the two major parties, Democrats took home more than 85 percent, as opposed to Republicans, who received less than 15.

Meanwhile, 39 out of the 42 companies that made donations gave more than half to Democrats, with nearly a dozen skyrocketing contributions in last fall’s contest compared to previous cycles. Apple and Nike, for example, which deployed high-powered Washington lobbyists to fight the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act barring importing products from Chinese slave labor, each spiked their donations to Democrats by more than 400 percent in a year Republicans embraced a tough stance on China.

The chart from OpenSecrets below outlines Apple’s contributions to federal candidates, showing the company’s affiliates gave upwards of $7.5 million to Democrats in 2020 as opposed to less than $2 million in 2018.

Nike’s contributions graph shown below, again from OpenSecrets, shows the company’s affiliates gave more than $1.2 million to Democrats in 2020, a jump from less than $300,000 in 2018. The company also plummeted in contributions to Republicans at the same time, giving nearly $700,000 to Republicans three years ago and giving less than $150,000 to GOP candidates in 2020, a more than 350 percent decrease.

Nike, headquartered in Oregon, has shown particular loyalty to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to retain access to its lucrative Chinese markets. Just last week, the company’s Chief Executive Officer John Donahoe declared Nike “a brand that is of China and for China.”

In a statement to ASPI investigators, the company denied it employed workers from the Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region (XUAR) and said it was cooperating with industry leaders to avoid such links. Its Washington activism, however, says otherwise.

The three companies that gave a majority of their campaign contributions to Republicans meanwhile — Carter’s Inc., Haier, and BMW — Republicans only marginally benefitted. BMW’s donations were near-evenly split, with 50.3 percent of donations going to the GOP and 49.7 percent in Democrat coffers. Haier spent nearly $57,000 on Republicans and nearly $40,000 on Democrats. Carter’s Inc. gave less than $20,000 in federal contributions total.

Coca-Cola, on the other hand, which also deployed its team of Washington lobbyists to defeat anti-slave labor legislation in November, upped its Democrat donations to more than $700,000 in 2020 from less than $500,000 in 2018. The company lowered its contributions to Republicans by nearly $250,000, giving $600,000 to Republicans in 2018 and around $350,000 to GOP candidates in last year’s cycle.

The Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act never received a vote in the upper chamber. Florida Republican Sen. Marco Rubio reintroduced the bill in the Senate earlier this year.

Eric Swalwell As An Emblem Of Chinese Influence Within The Democratic Party
Concerns over Chinese influence corrupting the Democratic Party came into full bloom last fall.

In December, California Democrat Rep. Eric Swalwell, who sits on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence with access to the nation’s top secrets, was reported as cultivating a close relationship with a Chinese spy. The since-vanished Chinese national, Christine Fang, or Fang Fang, was tasked with developing intimate relationships with U.S. politicians to gain proximity to political power.

Throughout 2011 to 2015, Fang Fang’s targets included California Bay Area politicians, including Swalwell, for whom she fundraised in 2014. Swalwell’s office refused comment on whether the relationship became sexual.

House Republican Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy called on Swalwell to be removed from the Intelligence Committee after an FBI briefing with Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

“He should not be on Intel,” McCarthy said as he left the meeting with intelligence officials. “I just think there are definitely 200 other Democrats that I know could fill that place.”

Democrats, however, came to Swalwell’s defense, and he remains on the Intelligence Committee today. A senior staffer on Capitol Hill told The Federalist the level of concern related to Chinese influence infiltrating the Democratic Party is an “eight and a half” on a scale of one to ten.

“When you have Pelosi and the DNC having a fundraiser where you have CCP members at the fundraiser, [it’s] just not good,” said the person, who asked to remain anonymous to discuss matters of intelligence openly.

Beijing Bidens
Chinese influence over the Biden family has remained a primary area of concern since the new president entered the crowded Democratic primary in the spring of 2019.

While President Joe Biden was vice president, his son, Hunter, had been leveraging the family name to engage in potentially criminal business ventures with Chinese leaders. In 2013, Hunter flew aboard Air Force Two on a trip to Beijing with his vice president father. Then followed a series of meetings with powerful Chinese businessmen while Hunter built a global private equity firm that included approval for a Chinese business license for a firm known as BHR. Hunter was one of its nine directors.

A Wall Street Journal analysis of the firm’s finances show the company channeled at least $2.5 billion into automotive, energy, mining, and technology deals on behalf of its investors, prioritizing overseas projects. One included a joint acquisition of the Michigan motor company Henniges in 2015, marking “the biggest Chinese investment into U.S. automotive manufacturing assets to date.”

Interest in the Biden family’s connections with China peaked in the final weeks of the presidential campaign last fall however when a business partner-turned-whistleblower named Tony Bobulinski declared the Democratic nominee is “compromised” by the Chinese Communist Party.

Bobulinski was recruited by Hunter to serve as the CEO of Sinohawk Holdings, another firm in partnership with the Chinese firm CEFC China Energy Co. Ltd (CEFC), led by Ye Jianming. In September, Senate investigators wrote Ye held “significant connections” to the CCP and previous affiliations with the People’s Liberation Party.

Bobulinski spoke on the heels of a blockbuster exposé series in the New York Post that detailed an arrangement securing millions for the Biden family, with 10 percent set aside for Joe Biden himself for “introductions alone.”

“I just don’t see, given the history here and the facts, how Joe can’t be influenced in some manner based on the history that they have here with CEFC,” Bobulinski told Tucker Carlson on Fox News while he outlined in detail how Joe Biden was intimately involved with Hunter’s overseas ventures.

Senate investigators had also flagged as potential criminal activity a six-figure shopping spree arranged by Ye for Hunter Biden, Joe Biden’s brother James, and James’ wife Sara Biden that included extravagant items from airplane tickets to Apple products.

Chinese Influence Hampers Probe Into COVID Origin
Wisconsin Republican Rep. Mike Gallagher said earlier this month he’s concerned Chinese influence within the Democratic Party on Capitol Hill could prevent a genuine investigation into the origins of the novel Wuhan coronavirus.

“I’m sensing that we’re going to hit this big roadblock,” Gallagher told Federalist Publisher Ben Domenech on a Fox News podcast, “which is the concern within a wing of the Biden administration and on the left about provoking the Chinese Communist Party.”

Gallagher said the risk aversion he’s sensing could be a product of corporate Chinese dollars flowing into Democratic campaign coffers.

“I don’t know if there’s a financial incentive behind that or just a, ‘Hey we don’t want to wind up in a World War III,’ thing behind that,” Gallagher said, but “at the same time we’re getting very good at constantly bashing America and broadcasting to the world what an evil racist hellscape of a country this is.

There’s reticence to criticize the Chinese Community Party, which by the way is perpetuating a genocide right now.”

The disproportionate funds benefitting his Democrat colleagues, however, raise the likelihood that financial incentives are key to the Democratic Party’s protection of the murderous CCP and its corporate allies’ interests.

 

[marsh]

Dirtbag Bill Barr Said Driving Vanloads of Ballots into Detroit's TCF Center Late at Night was "Entirely Normal" - Blocking GOP Observers from Counting Room Was Acceptable | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

On Tuesday, November 3rd President Trump was ahead of Joe Biden in the swing state of Michigan by over 100,000 votes. This appeared to be another solid win for President Trump in Michigan with a greater margin than his 2016 victory.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Dirtbag Bill Barr Said Driving Vanloads of Ballots into Detroit’s TCF Center Late at Night was “Entirely Normal” – Blocking GOP Observers from Counting Room Was Acceptable

By Jim Hoft
Published June 29, 2021 at 7:14pm

On Tuesday, November 3rd President Trump was ahead of Joe Biden in the swing state of Michigan by over 100,000 votes. This appeared to be another solid win for President Trump in Michigan with a greater margin than his 2016 victory. The ballot counting in Detroit, Michigan on election night took place at the TCF Center, formerly known as Cobo Hall.

This is the site where Detroit City Officials put cardboard over the windows to prevent the GOP observers from seeing in, where poll workers were militantly hostile to the GOP observers, and where hundreds of affidavits by election observers claim they witnessed voter fraud.

At least three election observers testified in sworn affidavits that they witnessed vehicles delivering fraudulent ballots to the TCF Center early in the morning on November 4th.

Michigander Shane Trejo witnessed the 3:30 am Biden Ballot Drop that gave Joe Biden an outstanding lift. “There were thousands of ballots in each box,” Trejo says. “There were at least 50 boxes that I saw unloaded at 3:30 am, well after the 8:00 pm deadline for ballots to show up.”

The 3:30 am was the first ballot delivery since 10:30 pm when 138,000 ballots showed up suddenly. Shane later testified that he noticed that the city of Detroit Clerk’s Office and its emblem were written on the white van that showed up with the ballots. City Clerk Janice Winfrey‘s name was on the van and a number presumably for Janet Winfrey’s office. Trejo says the ballots could not be processed when they arrived, so by the time they were counted, a new shift of poll workers had come in for the day.

After these ballot drops Joe Biden took the lead in Michigan.

Shane Trejo explained how the timing was important. The Biden Ballot Drop took place at the end of one shift. The ballots were left uncounted. So when the new shift came to count ballots they didn’t know where the ballots had come from.

Trejo repeatedly asked about this truck to site supervisors and was STONEWALLED.

Former Michigan State Senator Pat Colbeck was also present at the TCF Center on the morning of November 4th. Senator Colbeck also witnessed the 3:30 am Biden Ballot Drop. Colbeck spoke with The Gateway Pundit back in November, “I went back there and I witnessed a mini-panel truck if you will with a Detroit Election Bureau regalia all over the side and a vehicle ID number on it… And inside of it, and this gets into some chain of custody discussions, there was no indication that there was a Republican and a Democrat (present) during transfer. We don’t know if they stopped by a sidestreet in Coney Island and picked up a few more ballots during transfer. We have no way of verifying any of that information.”

Here is our video on the election fraud in the Detroit TCF Center on election night:

Rumble video on website 7:21 min

But Bill Barr was not interested in this event.

He told President Trump this was “entirely normal” and acceptable practice.

Bill Barr also disregarded the hundreds of signed affidavits from election observers who observed fraud at the TCF Center or were prevented from performing their duties as an observer.

Bill Barr also completely ignored the fact the GOP Observers were banished and blocked from entering the ballot counting room.

Bill Barr was crooked as hell.

Via The Detroit Free Press:

Trump, who had cursed at Barr after hearing he had knocked down his claims of fraud publicly, apparently continued to rant about what he viewed as his Justice Department letting him down and called the attorney general worthless.

The meeting was on Dec. 1, a short time after Barr had told a correspondent for the Associated Press that the Justice Department had looked into Trump’s allegations and told him “we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election.”

Key to that conclusion was a conversation Barr had with former Detroit U.S. Attorney Matthew Schneider involving claims that tens of thousands of votes delivered after the polls closed on Election Day somehow mysteriously swung the election to President Joe Biden.

But as Schneider apparently explained to Barr, Detroit’s ballots, from its hundreds of precincts, are tabulated at one location, the TCF Center. As such, it wasn’t unusual that ballots from the precincts were still being brought in well after polls had closed. In fact, it was entirely normal.

“In every other county, they count the ballots at the precinct, but in Wayne County, they bring them into one central counting place,” Barr told Karl. “So the boxes are coming in all night. The fact that boxes are coming in — well, that’s what they do.”

 

[marsh]

BREAKING! MI Rep Daire Rendon (R): "I Am in Receipt of Evidence Reflecting Systemic Election Fraud in MI that Occurred in the November 2020 Election" | The Gateway Pundit | by Patty McMurray

Eclusive report by 100 Percent Fed Up- Unlike most of her fellow Republican and Democrat lawmakers in the Michigan legislature, MI Rep.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

BREAKING! MI Rep Daire Rendon (R): “I Am in Receipt of Evidence Reflecting Systemic Election Fraud in MI that Occurred in the November 2020 Election”

By Patty McMurray
Published June 29, 2021 at 8:22pm

Exclusive report by 100 Percent Fed Up- Unlike most of her fellow Republican and Democrat lawmakers in the Michigan legislature, MI Rep. Daire Rendon (R-Lake City) has chosen not to cherry-pick evidence of voter fraud in Michigan but instead, to look at all of the evidence presented to the lawmakers in an objective and open-minded manner. Rendon also refuses to ignore the will of Michigan citizens she represents, who are calling for a full and conclusive investigation into the November 2020 election.

Yesterday, in a phone conversation, Rep. Rendon told 100 Percent Fed Up that she’s very disappointed in the MI Senate Oversight Committee’s report on the November 2020 election in Michigan.

MI Rep. Daire Rendon (R)

Last week, the MI Senate Oversight Committee Chair Ed McBroom and MI Senate Majority Leader Mike Shirkey, who have both admitted they would consider a forensic audit if Arizona finds meaningful evidence of voter fraud in their forensic audit, released a report stating that they could find no evidence of “widespread or systemic fraud” in Michigan’s November election.

Why would these two MI Republican Senators say they’d consider a forensic audit if they already claim they’ve found no evidence of widespread or systemic voter fraud in the election? Why would Senate Majority Leader Mike Shirkey say he’s been talking to the Arizona officials and would consider a forensic audit after telling the media last week, “I believe what we’ve done in our oversight process is equal to, or more robust than what they’ve been doing.”?

On December 16, House and Senate Oversight Committees sent subpoenas to Detroit and Livonia city clerks, demanding they surrender surveillance video from the TCF Center, hard drives, emails, absentee voter counting board laptops, and other election-related materials. Recently, 100 Percent Fed Up reported about how the House and Senate Oversight Committee chairs are making members of the MI state legislature sign an NDA (Non-Disclosure Agreement) to look at the subpoenaed evidence? So why have committee chairs refused to allow the public to see what they found in the subpoenaed evidence?

The MI Senate report completely ignores the threats and intimidating behavior hundreds of GOP and Independent poll challengers endured at the hands of paid election workers, supervisors, and outside, leftist agitators.

The report never mentions Jessy Jacob, a City of Detroit employee who bravely came forward to testify about the fraud she witnessed while working on the elections as a paid employee.

In their report, the MI Senators attempt to discredit Mellissa Carone, a Dominion contract worker who signed a sworn affidavit regarding the multiple ballots she watched being re-run through the tabulators multiple times by paid election workers at the TCF Center. However, they are unable to prove her claims are untrue. They claim that workers cannot restart the stack unless they first clear the partial count and start from zero by pressing a button, while Carone has sworn testimony that claims she witnessed the act of re-submitting the same ballots over and over again after the error code appeared.

The Senate report admits there were chain of custody issues, including but not limited to the city of Detroit’s refusal to replace broken or poorly constructed (vulnerable) ballot boxes.

In their report, the MI Senators mention the ruling by a MI judge that Michigan’s dishonest Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson broke the law when she directed city clerks to ignore the signature matching law on absentee ballots in the 2020 election but refuse to admit the highest-ranking election officials lawbreaking activity had any effect on the outcome of the election.

Finally, the report by the feckless Republican Senators criticizes the report on the evidence obtained by Constitutional Attorney Matt DePerno, who was able to obtain a ruling from Judge Elsenheimer in Antrim Co. MI to allow a team of IT experts to perform a forensic audit on one of the Dominion machines used in the November election in Antrim County where 5,000 votes were switched from Trump to Biden.

On June 24th, Constitutional Attorney Matthew DePerno, representing Antrim County Plaintiff William Bailey in his voter fraud case, responded to the MI Senate Oversight Committee’s report. Here is a portion of his blistering response:

The Michigan Senate has refused to meet with our attorneys and team of forensic experts to review actual evidence of election fraud.

Reportedly, Senator McBroom (who has been accused in the past of violating people’s constitutional rights) has gone so far as to instruct the Republican caucus to not review evidence for themselves. If they don’t review the evidence, they can continue to say they have seen no evidence.

Nevertheless, we have so far released 19 reports on election fraud through multiple legal briefs filed with the 13th Circuit Court in Antrim County. We are not done.

Additional reports will be released soon. The Michigan Senate failed to properly address any of the evidence submitted in the 19 reports available for everyone to review at www.depernolaw.com. You can also see a great deal of the evidence at LetsFixStuff.org. These reports expose the inherent vulnerabilities and weak or nonexistent security protocols of voting machines. But more importantly, these reports also expose how the voting system and election in Antrim County was actually and definitively subverted through fraud and intentional manipulation of the voting machines; and by extrapolation, the State of Michigan.

Constitutional Attorney Matthew DePerno isn’t the only one calling the validity of the MI Senate Oversight Committee’s report into question.

On Friday, only 3 days after fellow Republican State Rep. Steve Carra called for a forensic audit in the state of Michigan, another Republican MI lawmaker is bravely standing up and claiming she “has evidence reflecting systemic election fraud in Michigan that occurred in the November 2020 election,” and is calling on elected leaders in Michigan to continue their investigation into voter fraud.

Rendon told 100 Percent Fed Up on Sunday that she believes the MI Senators should consider all of the evidence, including reports by highly qualified experts, who claim there was massive voter fraud in the November election.

Rep. Daire Rendon (R) sent a letter addressed to “The Citizens of the United States of America.”

MI State Rep. Daire Rendon (R-Lake City)

In her letter (see image below), Rep. Daire Rendon wrote:

I have read and considered the June 23, 2021 report titled “Report on the November 2020 Election in Michigan” from the Michigan Senate Oversight Committee.

The Michigan Senate Oversight Committee concluded their investigation without examining appropriate evidence, expert reports, and requesting testimony from qualified experts. The report concludes that there was “no widespread or systemic fraud in Michigan’s prosecution of the 2020 election”. And yet, the Oversight Committee Chair stated in his Executive Summary that “this investigation should not be considered exhaustive’ and that “every possible investigative avenue was not undertaken.”

I am in receipt of evidence reflecting systemic election fraud in Michigan that occurred in the November 2020 election.

Many Michigan voters believe that the Michigan Senate Oversight Committee conclusion was formed without a proper investigation, and so I encourage attorneys in Michigan and beyond to pursue legal avenues that will reveal truth and transparency to the citizens of the United States.

On Sunday 100 Percent Fed Up spoke with Rep.Rendon by phone. During our conversation, Rendon said she’s disappointed that her fellow lawmakers have refused to even consider looking at “credible evidence” from “highly qualified experts.”

Rendon said that she became especially concerned about the integrity of the November election after she reviewed the Assessment of Halderman Expert Report dated March 26, 2021, by James Thomas Penrose, IV and Jeffrey Lenberg (see below).

Rep. Rendon explained that the Penrose-Lenberg report details wireless modems that were allegedly installed in the voting machines they examined. According to the MI lawmaker, the wireless modems could be connected by a “hot-spot” on a mobile phone. The report also identifies two foreign IP addresses that were found on the hard drive of the voting machine they examined. One of the IP addresses was from a learning center in Taipei, Taiwan, the other was from Nuremberg, Germany. Daire told us that she’d like to see her fellow lawmakers take this report and other similar, credible reports seriously, as she believes it’s their responsibility to safeguard the integrity of our elections.

Scribd doc on website


JPenrose JLenberg Assessmen… by 100PercentFedUp

It’s refreshing to see a lawmaker like Rendon, who actually took the time to evaluate evidence of voter fraud by experts and is willing to stand up to her fellow lawmakers who would rather dismiss the evidence in front of them and wait for another state to prove election fraud before they agree to act.

 

[marsh]

Federal Protection of “Oath Keepers” Kingpin Stewart Rhodes Breaks The Entire Capitol “Insurrection” Lie Wide Open - Revolver News

Is the FBI protecting “Oath Keeper” kingpin Stewart Rhodes from federal charges because he's one of theirs? Did Rhodes entrap his people?

www.revolver.news

Federal Protection of “Oath Keepers” Kingpin Stewart Rhodes Breaks The Entire Capitol “Insurrection” Lie Wide Open

June 30, 2021 (1h ago)

Hey Republicans, you can crack open the entire story of January 6, 2021 (“1/6”) with one simple, relentless question: what is the FBI and Army Counterintelligence’s relationship with Stewart Rhodes?

Yale Law School ‘04 graduate Elmer “Stewart” Rhodes, III.

Stewart Rhodes is the founder, boss and kingpin of the Oath Keepers.

The Oath Keepers, we are told, are America’s largest militia, the most prominent antigovernment group in the United States, and the preeminent right-wing domestic extremist insider threat to the entire U.S. military.

Whatever the truth of these hyperbolic claims, the fact remains: the Oath Keepers are the most extensively prosecuted paramilitary group alleged to be involved in 1/6. Indeed, it was the alleged “pre-planned assault” on the Capitol by Stewart Rhodes’s alleged Oath Keepers lieutenants that was used as the key talking point to try to convert the day’s events from a protest into an “insurrection.”

But Stewart Rhodes is not simply a key figure in the Oath Keepers. Stewart Rhodes is the Oath Keepers, according to Oath Keepers board member Richard Mack.

Elmer Stewart Rhodes III — a one-time Army paratrooper, disbarred Yale lawyer, constitutionalist, gun enthusiast, and far-right media star — founded the group called the Oath Keepers in 2009. Since then, he has ridden crosscurrents of American anger and strife that ran from scrubby Western deserts to angry urban protests right into the Capitol rotunda.
…
Mack said he and others also raised concerns about the Oath Keepers’ participation in violent protests…

He said it had become clear that the board had no real power. “[Stewart Rhodes] is the Oath Keepers. It’s hard to separate the two,” Mack said. “It’s his organization, and he can do what he wants to do.”

Other dissenting voices found that they were no longer welcome. Jim Arroyo, the vice president of the Arizona chapter, said relations began to fray over Rhodes’ insistence on total control... [Buzzfeed]

A mere indictment of Stewart Rhodes, today, for the same conspiracy charges alleged against his underlings, would collapse the entire “threat” of the Oath Keepers that the country has heard so much about:

Rhodes is the central figure of the organization. He is the founder, leader and center of gravity for the group. In theory, then, an indictment against Rhodes could lead to the group’s collapse. [NPR]

The Justice Department argues that Stewart Rhodes both substantially organized and activated an imputed plan to use violence, on 1/6, in real-time, through a series of encrypted Signal messages beginning at 1:38 p.m., as Trump concluded his rally speech on the National Mall, and 62 minutes before Oath Keepers lieutenants allegedly formed a “military stack” to rush the Capitol doors. [Filing, pp.10-12]

These facts alone, as alleged, are more than legally sufficient to secure an indictment of Stewart Rhodes. We will walk you through the mountains of direct and circumstantial evidence built on top of this fact pattern, but readers must understand this: the only reason Stewart Rhodes is not in jail *right now* is because of a deliberate decision by the Justice Department to protect him.

Indeed, it is unclear whether the FBI has even sought to search Stewart Rhodes’s residence, personal belongings, or electronic devices, other than a single iPhone allegedly seized on the streets from agents in unmarked FBI vehicles in late April (since returned). For reasons discussed below, there is good reason to suspect the FBI will pursue a tightly controlled and very limited scope of investigation into Stewart Rhodes,. Beyond that narrow scope, they may not want the information they are likely to find.

Why doesn’t anyone at the FBI or DOJ want him?

If 1/6 was an “insurrection,” why protect the one man who, more than any other individual referenced in the charging documents of the 530+ open criminal cases, comes closest to the media’s ravenous description of a “lead insurrectionist?”

Is it possible that the Oath Keepers, the most prominent antigovernment group in the United States, has been run, in effect, by the United States government itself — and nobody has mentioned it until now?

Revolver News generated tremendous discussion and controversy with our previous piece exploring the possibility that some of the unindicted individuals referred to in the 1/6 charging documents may be undercover agents or informants.

With this piece, we intend to focus this discussion on a single individual, Person One; i.e., Stewart Rhodes — the leader of the Oath Keepers.

If it turns out that Stewart Rhodes has had a relationship with the federal government, the implications would be nothing short of staggering.

For Stewart Rhodes is not just a senior member of the Oath Keepers, he is the Oath Keepers. Given the fact that the Oath Keepers are the major paramilitary organization imputed (by government and media alike) to be responsible for the most serious and egregious elements of the so-called 1/6 insurrection, it follows that it would not only be fair, but necessary to conclude that in an essential respect the 1/6 event was planned and orchestrated by elements of the government itself.

In other words, 1/6 was not the result of an intelligence failure as FBI Director Christopher Wray, the US Senate, and the media tells us. Rather, 1/6 was the result of an intelligence set-up.

The following questions should be shouted from every megaphone, every street corner, and every Congressional lectern until the American people get full and complete answers:

• Does the FBI now, or has it ever, maintained a formal or informal relationship or point of contact with Stewart Rhodes, whether directly or indirectly, including through intermediaries?
• Do any other Federal counterintelligence equities, whether in military, intelligence or law enforcement, including but not limited to Army Counterintelligence, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) the Joint Terrorism Task Force (JTTF), or otherwise, maintain or have they ever maintained a formal or informal relationship with Stewart Rhodes, whether directly or indirectly, including through intermediaries?
• If such a confidential relationship did exist between Stewart Rhodes and one or more U.S. counterintelligence equities, how do the FBI and other responsible agencies reconcile the enormous gravity of this omission from their previous deflections, non-answers, and boilerplate that they had “no actionable intelligence” before 1/6?
• If such a confidential relationship did exist between Stewart Rhodes and one or more U.S. counterintelligence equities, does this explain the FBI and Justice Department’s failure to pursue criminal actions against Stewart Rhodes in similarly high-profile “right-wing conspiracy plots” in which Rhodes appears to have played a similarly driving role?
• More specifically, did the FBI or any other U.S. counterintelligence equities maintain a discrete or confidential relationship with Stewart Rhodes during the 2014 Bundy Ranch standoff? Was this fact dispositive in the Justice Department’s decision to charge 19 defendants — including certain of Stewart Rhodes’s alleged Oath Keepers underlings — for conspiracy to obstruct a legal proceeding, and to spare Rhodes of similar charges?
• Has the FBI even procured a search warrant for Stewart Rhodes’s personal residence and home electronics? If so, on what dates and what specific categories of evidence were sought?
• If Stewart Rhodes is subsequently arrested after the date of this report (given the pressure these revelations are likely to generate), how does the Justice Department explain its failure to indict Stewart Rhodes on conspiracy charges for nearly six months, when its declared purpose for seeking bail denial for simple trespassers was the DOJ’s stated need to prevent “the immediate danger to the community” defendants allegedly posed? Given that multiple Oath Keepers were charged before the January 20th inauguration citing the need to stop their “immediate danger,” why did the DOJ not file immediate charges against Rhodes, and then make a superseding indictment later in time, as is their routine practice in 1/6 cases?

Stewart Rhodes and the “Shock and Awe” Standard
Before we turn to Stewart Rhodes’ statements and behavior leading up to and during 1/6, it is important to keep in mind the so-called “shock and awe” standard of prosecution applied to those actually indicted for 1/6 related crimes.

Lead 1/6 prosecutor Michael Sherwin explains this “Shock and Awe” standard in his own words:

Here is a partial transcript of Shwerin’s interview above:

Sherwin: I wanted to ensure, and our office wanted to ensure, that there was shock and awe. That we could charge as many people as possible before [January] 20th. And it worked because we saw through media posts that people were afraid to come back to D.C., because they were like, ‘If we go there, we’re going to get charged.’
…
We wanted to take out those individuals who were thumbing their noses at the public for what they did…

Narrator: Sherwin told us that the most serious cases so far focus on about two dozen members of far right militias.

In this article we focus our scrutiny and our suspicion on one individual, Person One, otherwise known as Stewart Rhodes, the leader of the paramilitary Oath Keepers group. In keeping with the structure of our previous report, we will examine the as-of-yet unindicted Mr. Rhodes’ actions and statements in light of the Shock and Awe standard of prosecution described above.

But we emphasize a caveat from our previous report:

It is essential here to make an important note of clarification. The purpose of this analysis here is not to aid in the prosecution of any of these unindicted co-conspirators. Rather, our aim is to point out that, given the standards of indictment applied to those actually indicted, it is very strange and indeed suspicious that certain unindicted co-conspirators have managed to avoid indictment. This does not necessarily mean that we approve of the standard of indictment itself. Quite the contrary, the aggressive standard of indictment and prosecution, through an unimaginably broad application of “conspiracy” charges, is immoral, unjust, and absurd.

The same applies to this piece, and to Mr. Rhodes himself. Revolver harbors no ill-will toward Mr. Rhodes and we are not interested in calling for his indictment. Our interest in Mr. Rhodes is limited solely to our interest in the question of Federal foreknowledge of and possible involvement in the events of 1/6.
Finally, to get a more concrete sense of what the Shock and Awe prosecutorial standard looks like in practice, we once more offer the case of George Tanios.

Though in truth we could just as easily have picked one of the several hundreds of political prisoners being detained and subjected to third-world level abuse in prison.

Readers may recall from an earlier Revolver report that George Tanios and his companion Julian Khater have been charged with nine criminal counts for actions taken on 1/6 just outside the steps of the U.S. Capitol building.

The most serious charge was assault on an officer with a dangerous weapon, arising from Khater’s alleged use of Tanios’s chemical spray to tag Officer Sicknick and two other officers in the face.

There, Tanios: (1) did not go in the Capitol; (2) did not use any bear spray himself; (3) had bear spray in his backpack and when his buddy Khater reached in to take it out, Tanios actively tried to stop him; and (4) in the end, it turns out, as prosecutors now acknowledge, his buddy never even used the bear spray.

And still, the DOJ has slapped this 39-year-old sandwich shop owner, George Tanios, with 60 years worth of stacking “conspiracy” charges because he said, “Hold on, hold on, not yet, not yet.”

As we proceed to consider the case of still unindicted Stewart Rhodes, keep in mind this George Tanios “Shock and Awe” standard of prosecution.

Stewart Rhodes’s Alleged Overt Acts
We will now chronicle Stewart Rhodes’s path from Election Day to so-called “Insurrection Day,” as alleged by the Justice Department.

The first cited event comes from a November 9th video conference on the platform GoToMeeting. According to the Oath Keepers indictment, Rhodes (Person One) said the following to his Oath Keeper followers in the meeting:

We’re going to defend the president, the duly elected president, and we call on him to do what needs to be done to save our country. Because if you don’t guys, you’re going to be in a bloody, bloody civil war, and a bloody – you can call it an insurrection or you can call it a war or fight.

The DOJ alleges that Rhodes (Person One) “called upon his followers to go to Washington D.C,” in order to let the President know “the people are behind him” and to prepare for, among other things, fights against Antifa:

Remainder of article on website Federal Protection of “Oath Keepers” Kingpin Stewart Rhodes Breaks The Entire Capitol “Insurrection” Lie Wide Open - Revolver

 

[marsh]

New American Hero: Dr. Douglas G. Frank (UPDATED)

UPDATE July 17, 2021 Dr. Frank is now posting regularly on Telegram, which you can find by clicking here (or search under “Telegram – Follow the Data with Dr. Frank”). His posts …

americacanwetalk.org

NEW AMERICAN HERO: DR. DOUGLAS G. FRANK

29 JUN NEW AMERICAN HERO: DR. DOUGLAS G. FRANK

Posted at 06:31h in A C W T Statements by admin
When the story of the stolen election of 2020 is finally told, Dr. Douglas G. Frank will be featured prominently. He may even find a special place in the broader story of American history.

Dr. Frank discovered the mathematical algorithms used in the hacking and fixing of election results throughout the USA in November 2020. He presents his data and analysis in many forums; a recent explanation can be found here. And another at the June 26 Ohio Trump rally, here.

We’ve yet to see anyone refute Dr. Frank’s findings; they really can’t be refuted, because they are not a matter of opinion, they are a matter of mathematical calculation. Precisely predicting the plot of voter turnout against census demographics and voter registration is not a naturally occurring capability–i.e., it can’t be done absent deployed tools of manipulation. The election results had to have been programmed, fixed.

Dr. Frank discovered the tools of manipulation–the programming which gave him the ability to do the precise prediction that could not otherwise be done. The only possible conclusion, stated in the simplest of terms: Dr. Frank has irrefutably demonstrated that the 2020 election was rigged and stolen.

But the point of this post is not to dissect or regurgitate Dr. Frank’s analysis, but to honor his character. He’s a self-proclaimed mathematics geek; an affable, gee-whiz kind of a man, who happens to have a special needs daughter whom he clearly holds dear. But underneath it all is a traditional American patriot who smelled a rat, applied his talents to find it, and then stood up without fear to proclaim what he found…

…because he loves America. Because he knows how exceptional America is. Because he knows exposing and reversing the 2020 election fraud is the calling of these times; it is the pivotal issue for determining the survival or collapse of America as a constitutional Republic.

American patriots have been right all along to demand full audits of the 2020 election results; and the hysterical resistance of the left to audits(!) has been the ‘tell’ all along that the results were and are fraudulent. Dr. Frank has delivered the missing piece: the proof of what was done and how it was done (and Mike Lindell has presented evidence of who did it).

What’s left is the ultimate test of the American character. The fraudulent result CAN’T be allowed to stand, or a self-governing republic of free men and women is over. And so incumbent elected American officials—Republican, Democrat and independent—must rise as one to stop the lies, call out the fraud, and demand it be overturned for the sake of the country. And the American people must rise as one to insist: each and every incumbent who refuses to do so in the face of Dr. Frank’s analysis alone, deserves to be ousted from office at the next available election opportunity. There is no excuse for turning a blind eye to the fraud evidence now assembled; there is no way to justify a ‘water under the bridge’ ‘move along’ non-response.

The next great American hero will be the person or persons who can generate a symbolic collective ‘hug’ by which all those Americans who cannot or will not see the election fraud because of their certainty that removing the evil Trump was a righteous result and therefor the actual result (the ‘tragically blind’)…can see the bigger picture: what’s happening in America today isn’t about Donald Trump at all. It’s about today’s iteration of the thinking that is determined to destroy the idea of human freedom inspired, guided and protected by almighty God.

Communism is one word for that thinking; abject materialism is another; the ‘radical left’ of 2021 are a representation of both. They want the Constitution and ‘one nation under God’ overturned by the rule of men; Donald Trump was merely an untimely and inconvenient obstacle to implementing their plan.

Resisting and defeating that thinking has been the unspoken calling of every American generation, and the successful answering of that call throughout America’s history has blessed every American, whether they know it or not.

Because living in freedom under the American Constitution is infinitely better than any alternative.

Many of the hate-Trumpers will insist on holding onto their rage and refuse to look at the evidence of a stolen election. And many others, especially in the millennial group, may be psychological unable to handle the truth of what that evidence represents about the magnitude of evil in the world. But if even a small portion of tragically blind Americans can come around to seeing the truth of what happened and of what is really at stake–and maybe even if they don’t–overturning the election fraud of 2020 will take on unstoppable momentum and urgency. Preserving freedom is that important…to all.

Here’s to Dr. Douglas G. Frank for doing his part to help the tragically blind to see; here’s hoping that once they begin to see, that there will be a new and different Dr. Frank to help them again love and serve the cause of preserving America and freedom.

 

[marsh]

According to a non-linkable video on Jovan Pulitzer's Telegraph account, Maricopa County Board of Elections did not turn over 40% of the voting machines to the auditors for examination. This was in contravention of court and Senate orders. They also have refused to turn over the routers and access codes.

 

[marsh]

EXCLUSIVE: USB DRIVES Were Suspiciously Stolen, Transferred and Inserted Into Voting Systems Used in Swing States in 2020 Election | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

In multiple swing states flash drives (USBs) used in the 2020 Election process were reported either missing or suspiciously inserted into the voting systems used in the election.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

EXCLUSIVE: USB DRIVES Were Suspiciously Stolen, Transferred and Inserted Into Voting Systems Used in Swing States in 2020 Election

By Joe Hoft
Published June 30, 2021 at 9:25am

In multiple swing states flash drives (USBs) used in the 2020 Election process were reported either missing or suspiciously inserted into the voting systems used in the election.

Arizona
In Arizona, on November 5th a home was raided and USBs were obtained along with hard drives and computers.

What was an individual doing with these items only a couple of days after the election?


Georgia
In the State Farm Arena in Fulton County Georgia we identified numerous activities where USBs were transferred suspiciously between election personnel.

One was a strange pass between a mother and her daughter, two elections workers made famous due to their suspicious activities during the election.


Georgia (Continued)
Another suspicious pass occurred with a guy we labeled the “USB Guy”.


Georgia (Continued)
In Gwinnett County an official admitted to taking data from the Election Management System, plugging it into a laptop, then filtering it with Excel. This circumvented the rules that external software isn’t allowed on election machines.

However, rather than being upset with this activity, Georgia election COO (or whatever his title is) Gabe Sterling went off on the media for reporting this.



Pennsylvania
On October 1, 2020, it was reported that an election laptop and memory sticks (USB’s) were stolen in Pennsylvania.


Pennsylvania (Continued)
On November 12th, only a few days after the election, a report was released from the Trump team stating that outsiders with USBs and VCards were allowed in Pennsylvania counting areas with no observers present.



Pennsylvania (Continued)
In late November in Pennsylvania, a very credible witness described how he personally observed dozens of USB cards being uploaded to voting machines which resulted in 50,000 votes for Joe Biden in a short period of time. (This may be the same individual who was referenced in the report above.)



Wisconsin
We reported on a missing flash drive in Milwaukee at the same time the city recorded 120,000 votes, all for Joe Biden, on the morning of November 4th.


In Summary
One IT expert reached out to us a few days after the election and shared some information on the voting systems used in US elections. This IT expert located a previous audit report from an audit of the Dominion voting system in California.

In the audit report the state of California showed a high-level diagram of the Dominion system which is likely similar to the set up in Pennsylvania and other locations:

This diagram showed that there are laptops or workstations onsite that some of the workers can access after the ballot images are scanned in. Our expert stated that he kept thinking about the USB drives and immediately noticed this is where election data (i.e. forged/faked images) could be inserted or changed.

When a number of USBs in a location go missing or are lost, the proper response would be for the location or district where the USBs went missing to replace all USBs in the locations or districts with similar credentials as the missing USBs.

There is no indication that this happened in the 2020 Election.

In addition, per a discussion with one top security expert, the protocol related to the transfer of USBs in Arizona and other states appears to have changed for this election. Rather than individuals from each location transporting the USB to the tabulation centers and signing off on their activities which provides the proper chain of control, this year something different took place. Individuals from the state or from some election-related entity picked up the USBs at all locations and transported them to the location where the results were tabulated. The reason for this change was blamed on COVID or rather, COVID was used to make this change.

This whole scenario opened the door to manipulation of votes through the USBs before they were delivered to the location where they were to be counted.

The safekeeping and security of USBs used in the 2020 Election were very weak or even absent. There is evidence showing a pattern of USB abuse in swing states where Biden was eventually awarded the win.

 

[marsh]

BREAKING: NYC Board of Elections Admits Leaving 135,000 "Test Ballots" in System Prior to Election | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

This is what happens when corrupt Democrats run elections.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

BREAKING: NYC Board of Elections Admits Leaving 135,000 “Test Ballots” in System Prior to Election

By Jim Hoft
Published June 30, 2021 at 10:53am

This is what happens when corrupt Democrats run elections. The power-hungry jackals eventually turn on each other and it becomes a complete cluster.

First, it was the Iowa Democrat caucuses, then the New York state primary, and now it’s the 2021 mayoral race in New York City.

But they want us to believe the 2020 election was safe and secure?

The New York City Board of Elections admitted on Tuesday that they left 135,000 test ballots on their machines prior to the election. These votes were included in the election night results.

But this would surely NEVER happen in a national election, right?

If you needed more proof that voting machines should be outlawed, there it is.

Paper ballots won’t do this.

View: https://youtu.be/Y7R7QckOA9c
.52 min

 

[marsh]

Flashback: Sidney Powell Says Thousands of Votes Were Added to Every Arizona Democrat Candidate - "I'd Be Willing to Bet It Happened Everywhere" | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

The New York City Board of Elections admitted on Tuesday that they left 135,000 test ballots on their machines prior to the election.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Flashback: Sidney Powell Says Thousands of Votes Were Added to Every Arizona Democrat Candidate – “I’d Be Willing to Bet It Happened Everywhere”

By Jim Hoft
Published June 30, 2021 at 11:23am

The New York City Board of Elections admitted on Tuesday that they left 135,000 test ballots on their machines prior to the election. These votes were included in the election night results.

But this would surely NEVER happen in a national election, right?

So was this an isolated incident?

Sidney Powell joined Newsmax back in November to discuss the developments in the 2020 election investigations.

During the interview Powell said 35,000 votes were added to every Democrat candidate in the state of Arizona.

Sidney Powell: We have other testimonial evidence that appears to be coming in now that indicates the Democrats literally added 35,000 votes to every Democrat candidate to begin with… Definitely, all over one state and I’d be willing to bet it happened everywhere.

To be clear, there was NEVER any proof presented that this took place.
However, in light of today’s announcement from the New York Board of Elections, it certainly raises questions.

 

[marsh]

WAS IT RACKETEERING/RICO? Many of the Same Fraudulent Election Activities in 2020 Election Took Place Across Six Counties in Six States | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

We know that the 2020 Election came down to six counties in six swing states. What’s really interesting is that there were many of the same activities in these counties that were present in many of them if not all of them. Dr.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

WAS IT RACKETEERING/RICO? Many of the Same Fraudulent Election Activities in 2020 Election Took Place Across Six Counties in Six States

By Joe Hoft
Published June 30, 2021 at 12:15pm

We know that the 2020 Election came down to six counties in six swing states. What’s really interesting is that there were many of the same activities in these counties that were present in many of them if not all of them.

Dr. Peter Navarro, President Trump’s Director of the Office and Trade and Manufacturing Policy, provided some excellent charts in the latter days of President Trump’s first term related to the 2020 Election. In the six swing states in 2020, there were many of the same activities that occurred across multiple states.

He listed absentee ballot abuses in these states.

In addition, Navarro listed numerous other fraudulent activities that took place across multiple states.

Dr. Navarro then listed the various estimated and the actual number of ballots associated with the fraud activities embedded in the election and compared the estimated and known fraud to the margins given to Biden in the election:

Navarro’s list is excellent. Since these lists were created we identified some additional activities that appear across these swing states during the 2020 Election.

Lost, Stolen, and Suspiciously Transferred USBs
USBs were lost or stolen and suspiciously transferred between individuals during the election. In Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin before or during the election, USBs were reported stolen or suspiciously transferred during the election.


SQL Software
Suspicious SQL Software was found on machines in Michigan and Pennsylvania and is likely on machines in Arizona and Georgia.



Missing Chain of Custody Documentation
We know that legally required chain of custody information is missing in Georgia.

We also know that chain of custody documentation was requested in the audit in Maricopa County Arizona and it has not been provided. It is likely that it is not available in all these states and numerous others across the country.



Coordinated Ballot Drops
The timing of ballots recorded after Election Day was synchronized between Pennsylvania and Georgia after the election.



Does this indicate a RACKETEERING/RICO case involving numerous individuals coordinating together to steal our elections?

 

[marsh]

Steve Bannon: There's Going to Be a BIG DEVELOPMENT Coming Out of AZ in Next Couple of Days | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

Steve Bannon invited Sidney Powell on his War Room this morning and announced there is big news coming out of Arizona in the next couple of days.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Steve Bannon: There’s Going to Be a BIG DEVELOPMENT Coming Out of AZ in Next Couple of Days

By Jim Hoft
Published June 30, 2021 at 2:10pm

Steve Bannon invited Sidney Powell on his War Room this morning and announced there is big news coming out of Arizona in the next couple of days.

Bannon pushed for full forensic audits at all the battleground states and Powell agreed. Powell shared:

We must audit the vote. American people are entitled to the truth. I don’t care how far back it goes. We have got to find out, we have to protect our sacred vote.”

Rumble video on website 1:33 min