There was a member here that pointed out the Nuremberg Code does not apply or useless, but this whole list of things does go along with that Nuremburg Code (see doctors trials 1947) and forcing someone to take what the makers and doctors know is an unsafe drug or treatment that will do harm to a person.
I think the trouble, Publius, is that many Doctors believe
Trusted Authorities provide them with accurate and unbiased evidence and recommendations - and therefore
do believe that the drug / treatment / Gene Therapy / Vacc(notavacc)
does work and is
Safe and effective and "worth the risk"
At question (at least among some here) is whether the those Trusted Authorities are in fact trustworthy. That analysis gets deep and in some cases personal, and heated, as we can see on several threads here.
Myself, I know the data is munged, fouled and at least from the perspective of having a precise understanding of the effects of this bug in our nation, unreliable. I don't know if it was done through incompetence or planning, but without a doubt in informs my outlook regarding
Trusted Authority.
I don't think corporate HR departments have by and large given this as much thought as we have in our discussions here. They're more concerned with what Legal tells them, and what published guidelines from the CDC and other
Trusted Authorities have proffered.
Keep trying to inform; it does seem to be making a difference in the World - folks are at least giving consideration to differing opinions.
Best to you - best to everyone.