WAR Main Persian Gulf Trouble thread

northern watch

TB Fanatic
Iran’s use of Iraq as a missile base: Threats and logistics - analysis
Tensions with Iran appear underpinned by similar discussions about deterrence

By SETH J. FRANTZMAN
Jerusalem Post
FEBRUARY 18, 2021 17:09

AN IRANIAN FLAG is pictured near in a missile during a military drill, with the participation of Iran’s air defense units in October.  (West Asia News Agency/Reuters) (photo credit: WEST ASIA NEWS AGENCY/REUTERS)

AN IRANIAN FLAG is pictured near in a missile during a military drill, with the participation of Iran’s air defense units in October. (West Asia News Agency/Reuters)
(photo credit: WEST ASIA NEWS AGENCY/REUTERS)

Iran could move up to 200 long-range missiles to Iraq, a report noted earlier this week, a move that would be designed to put in place missiles that could reach Israel. The reason Iran might do this is to prevent a direct IDF retaliation against targets within Iranian territory if there is a confrontation with Iran or Hezbollah in Syria or Lebanon.

In a sense, Iran’s concept of using ballistic missiles based in Iraq is similar to the planning concepts that underpinned US-Soviet tensions over missile bases and strike capability during the Cold War. There was a question in the 1950s over the military logic of using preemption, according to a documentary on US strategic nuclear policy. There was pressure to preempt war through a first strike, which Curtis LeMay called anticipatory retaliation. The notion was that since war was unavoidable one must get the first blow in. Later the doctrine changed to examine how nuclear weapons might be used. Deterrence became a key word in the debate. The development of ballistic missile submarines ensured strategic stability because it was survivable in the case of war.

Tensions with Iran appear underpinned by similar discussions about deterrence. Iran’s use of Iraq provides the country not only with strike capabilities, but deterrence as well. However, this is not as simple as it may look on paper. Iran has been sending weapons for Iraq for years. In the 1980s, it mobilized Iraqi Shi’ites alongside its Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps to fight Saddam Hussein’s Iraq. The Badr corps and leaders – like Hadi al-Amiri and the late Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis – learned their trade in the 1980s. Later, Iran sent explosive device technology to Iraq. These were called “explosively formed penetrators,” which killed at least 196 Americans. In 2014, when Iran began advising the Iraqis to fight ISIS, they also sent weapons and know-how. Drones, missiles and other munitions followed.

IRAN USED the weakness of Iraq’s state structure to build a militia army in Iraq called the Hashd al-Shaabi, or PMU. This group includes the Badr Organization, Asaib Ahl al-Haq, Harakat Hezbolah al-Nujaba, Kataib Hezbollah and other groups. In 2017, Qais Khazali, head of AAH, went to Lebanon to showcase Iraqi militia support for Hezbollah. By the summer of 2018 a Kataib Hezbollah headquarters, in a villa near Albukamal, was coordinating Iranian weapons trafficking from Iraq to Syria. This was part of the road to the sea network that links Iran to Lebanon: first through Iraq, then to Syria via Deir Ezzor and T-4 airbase and finally reaching Hezbollah in Lebanon. Iran also moves weapons via Damascus airport and has tried to set up weapons factories. Iran has also sought to provide Hezbollah with precision guided munitions. Iran also moved drones to T-4 and, in April 2018, tried to move its 3rd Khordad air defense there as well. An airstrike destroyed the 3rd Khordad, according to Ynet. An airstrike also destroyed the KH villa in Albukamal in June 2018. Pro-Iran voices in Iraq have blamed the US-led coalition and Israel for some airstrikes. In July and August 2019, a series of airstrikes hit pro-Iranian militia warehouses in Iraq. These included Camp Falcon near Baghdad.

IN AUGUST 2018, Iran moved ballistic missiles to Iraq, according to Reuters. Iran secretly moved more missiles to Iraq in November 2019, reports indicate. Iran also constructed the Imam Ali base near Albukamal. In May 2020, it built new storage tunnels at the Imam Ali base. Iraqi-based militias linked to Iran have also vowed to support Hezbollah in a war with Israel. In February 2018, as the PMU was being incorporated into the Iraqi Security Forces, Akram al-Kaabi of Harakat Hezbollah vowed to support Hezbollah. After the US killed IRGC Quds Force head Qasem Soleimani, Hezbollah sent Sheikh Mohammed Kawtharani to Iraq to help coordinate the PMU in February 2020.

This is the complete picture of Iranian involvement in Iraq and potential Iraqi militia support for Hezbollah. This picture is also how the pro-Iranian militias in Iraq have helped festoon Syria with their networks and supporters. The ballistic missile issue has been raised in the past. Iran has moved 107 mm. short-range Katyusha rockets to Iraq to target American forces. It has also moved 122 mm. grad rockets and the Fajr 1 rocket, which have a range of nearly 60 km. The Fajr 5 has also been moved to Iraq, with a range of 75km. We also know the Fateh 110 was sent to Iraq in 2015. Iran has supplied Hamas in the past with technology such as the 240 mm. Fajr 3 rocket that has a 43km range. A CSIS report noted that Iran has shipped the Zelzal, Fateh 110 and Zolfagher to Iraq. These have ranges of 150 km. to 700 km. Iran has used precision rockets against Kurdish dissidents in Koya in 2018, against ISIS in Syria and against the US in Ayn al-Assad base in January 2020 in Iraq. Its latest attack was likely against US forces in Erbil using short range 107 mm. rockets fired near Erbil at US forces at the airport.

IRAN’S ARSENAL of rockets is well known. It has a plethora of them and keeps increasing their abilities. A quick rundown, aside those mentioned above, include the solid-fueled Fateh 313, the liquid-fueled Shahab 1 and Qiam, as well as the Shahab 3, and the solid-fueled Sejjil. There are also the Ghadr, Khorramshahr and Emad missiles. Many of these can be mounted on trucks, making them mobile. The rockets that are solid fueled can be wheeled out and fired immediately, such as from a Transporter Erector Launcher (TEL). Iran has a large arsenal of missiles to choose from as it seeks to move some to Iraq.

The past indicates the threat the missiles in Iraq can pose to Israel. During the ‘Great Scud Hunt’ of 1991, US-led Coalition air power flew 2,493 missions trying to find Scud missiles that were supposedly out in Iraq’s western desert. 42 Scuds were launched at Israel from Iraq. At the time it was believed they were being moved on large trucks that require some time to disassemble before or after launch in order to be hidden from airstrikes. Overall the mission to find the Scuds was a disaster. Iraq’s fleet of TELs was able to disperse and the use of F-15s and U-2 spy planes, as well as A-10s, didn’t work in finding the launchers. That was back in 1991, and technology has improved since.

The Iranian base at Albukamal is around 540 km. from Israel. Missiles in Iran’s inventory with that range include the Fateh 313, the Zolfagher, Ghadr, Khorramshahr, Sejjil, the Shahab 3 and perhaps the Shahab 2 if its range can be extended. Iran has vastly increased the precision of its missiles over time, and it has added drones and other munitions to its arsenal. This makes the setup very different from 1991. Iran has shown sophisticated capabilities in the past, such as the drone and cruise missile swarm attack on Saudi Arabia in September 2019. However, it has also proved that in Syria the rockets it supplied to groups intended to be used against Israel – such as in the salvo in May 2018 or the four rockets fired in November 2019 – were not as sophisticated.

Iran’s use of Iraq as a missile base: Threats and logistics - analysis - The Jerusalem Post (jpost.com)
 

jward

passin' thru
Joint Statement by the Secretary of State of the United States of America and the Foreign Ministers of France, Germany, and the United Kingdom

Media Not
Office of the Spokesperson
February 18, 2021


The following statement was released by United States Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken, French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian, German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas, and UK Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab following today’s ministerial meeting:

Begin text:
The Foreign Ministers of France, Germany and the United Kingdom and the U.S. Secretary of State held a virtual meeting, for the second time in this format since Secretary Blinken took office, to discuss Iran and other pressing issues. They reaffirmed the centrality of the transatlantic partnership in dealing with the security, climate, economic, health and other challenges the world faces.

Regarding Iran, the E3 and the United States expressed their shared fundamental security interest in upholding the nuclear non-proliferation regime and ensuring that Iran can never develop a nuclear weapon. In this context, the conclusion of the JCPOA was a key achievement of multilateral diplomacy. The E3 welcomed the United States’ stated intention to return to diplomacy with Iran as well as the resumption of a confident and in-depth dialogue between the E3 and the United States. The Ministers affirmed strong interest in continuing their consultations and coordination, including with China and Russia, on this key security issue, recognizing the role of the High Representative of the European Union as Coordinator of the Joint Commission. 

The E3 and the United States affirmed their shared objective of Iran’s return to full compliance with its commitments under the JCPOA. Secretary Blinken reiterated that, as President Biden has said, if Iran comes back into strict compliance with its commitments under the JCPOA, the United States will do the same and is prepared to engage in discussions with Iran toward that end. 
In this context, the E3 and the US called on Iran not to take any additional steps, in particular with respect to the suspension of the Additional Protocol and to any limitations on IAEA verification activities in Iran. The E3 and the United States are united in underlining the dangerous nature of a decision to limit IAEA access, and urge Iran to consider the consequences of such grave action, particularly at this time of renewed diplomatic opportunity. They reiterated their full support for the professional and impartial role of the IAEA and its Director General and their efforts to implement the necessary verification and monitoring of Iran’s nuclear commitments under the JCPOA.

The E3 and the United States also expressed their shared concerns over Iran’s recent actions to produce both uranium enriched up to 20% and uranium metal. These activities have no credible civil justification. Uranium metal production is a key step in the development of a nuclear weapon.
The E3 welcomed the prospect of a U.S. and Iranian return to compliance with the JCPOA. The E3 and the United States affirmed their determination to then strengthen the JCPOA and, together with regional parties and the wider international community, address broader security concerns related to Iran’s missile programs and regional activities. We are committed to working together toward these goals.

The Ministers also called on Iran to release all our arbitrarily detained nationals and reunite them with their families. They also expressed deep concern about the continuing grave human rights violations in Iran.
The E3 and the United States look forward to engaging with partners in order to work together toward these key objectives.
They expressed their joint determination to work toward de-escalating tensions in the Gulf region. They stressed in particular the urgency of ending the war in Yemen, while reaffirming their steadfast commitment to the security of their regional partners. On Yemen, the Ministers agreed to work closely together to support United Nations Special Envoy Griffiths’ efforts to end the war and to address the humanitarian crisis. They expressed concern about the recent Houthi offensive against Marib and strikes against civilian infrastructure in Saudi Arabia, calling upon the Houthis and all Yemeni parties to engage constructively in the political process.

On Iraq, the Ministers reiterated their condemnation of the February 15 rocket attack in Erbil. They expressed their condolences for the victims, their families, and the Iraqi people and emphasized that attacks on U.S., Coalition and NATO personnel and facilities will not be tolerated. Ministers reiterated their support for the Iraqi Government.
Discussing the evolving challenge posed by ISIS, ministers re-committed to continuing critical efforts to target and eliminate the ISIS threat in Iraq and Syria, including efforts via the 83-member Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS. They also emphasized the growing importance of coordinating efforts to target the threat posed by ISIS branches and networks worldwide.
The Ministers agreed to closely coordinate to address the global challenges posed by China, as well as the need for cooperation across a range of issues, including climate change. 

On Myanmar, they condemned the military coup. They called on military leaders to immediately end the state of emergency, restore power to the democratically elected government, refrain from violence, release all those unjustly detained, and respect human rights and the rule of law.
The Ministers agreed on the importance of further strengthening NATO and ensuring it is positioned to address today’s strategic realities building on the NATO Reflection Group’s Recommendations.
Ministers agreed that strong international and multilateral cooperation was essential to ending the COVID 19 pandemic and building back better collectively. They reviewed efforts on the global response, including support for rapid deployment of vaccines globally, primarily through the ACT-A/COVAX facility.

They agreed to work with urgency to address the climate crisis ahead of the 26th UN Framework Convention on Climate Change Conference of the Parties in Glasgow in November. They agreed that significant collective action was needed to implement the Paris Agreement, including keeping a 1.5 degree Celsius temperature rise within reach. They look forward to the upcoming U.S.-hosted Leaders’ Climate Summit as an important forum to for enhanced climate ambition.
End text.

 

jward

passin' thru

jward

passin' thru
Evan Kohlmann
@IntelTweet

9m

Iraq's Shiite militia umbrella group has claimed responsibility for killing the ISIS official in charge of the Al-Tarmiyah area and the alleged death of the ISIS "Shariah Mufti" following heavy clashes with militiamen and allied security forces north of the Iraqi capital Baghdad.
At least 3 Shiite militiamen were killed during the clashes, with 3 others wounded--and an estimated 7 ISIS militants were killed, including "Shukr Sahi Dawood Salman al-Mashhadani, also known as Abu Hani."
View: https://twitter.com/IntelTweet/status/1363199665164976136?s=20
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Evan Kohlmann
@IntelTweet

9m

Iraq's Shiite militia umbrella group has claimed responsibility for killing the ISIS official in charge of the Al-Tarmiyah area and the alleged death of the ISIS "Shariah Mufti" following heavy clashes with militiamen and allied security forces north of the Iraqi capital Baghdad.
At least 3 Shiite militiamen were killed during the clashes, with 3 others wounded--and an estimated 7 ISIS militants were killed, including "Shukr Sahi Dawood Salman al-Mashhadani, also known as Abu Hani."
View: https://twitter.com/IntelTweet/status/1363199665164976136?s=20

In effect Tehran is using the same playbook in Iraq that they have been using in Lebanon to place Hezbollah there where it is now.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Posted for fair use.....

Russian air assault kills 21 Daesh militants in Syria

Russian air assault kills 21 Daesh militants in Syria

A wave of air strikes by government ally Russia killed at least 21 Daesh militants in the Syrian desert over the past 24 hours. (File/AFP)
Short Url


  • The 21 were killed in at least 130 air strikes carried out over the past 24 hours by the Russian air force targeting Daesh
  • Daesh overran large parts of Syria and Iraq and proclaimed a cross-border “caliphate” in 2014, before multiple offensives in the two countries led to its territorial defeat
Updated 20 February 2021
AFP
February 20, 2021 08:48
1039
Follow @arabnews

BEIRUT: A wave of air strikes by government ally Russia killed at least 21 Daesh militants in the Syrian desert over the past 24 hours, a monitor said Saturday.

The 21 were killed in at least 130 air strikes “carried out over the past 24 hours by the Russian air force targeting Daesh in an area on the edge of the provinces of Aleppo, Hama and Raqqa,” the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said.

The raids, which continued into Saturday, follow a series of Daesh attacks Friday on government and allied forces that killed at least eight members of a pro-Damascus militia, the Britain-based monitor said.

In recent months, the vast desert, know in Arabic as the Badia, has been the scene of increasingly frequent fighting between the extremists and government forces backed by Russian air power.

Daesh overran large parts of Syria and Iraq and proclaimed a cross-border “caliphate” in 2014, before multiple offensives in the two countries led to its territorial defeat.
The militants continue to launch attacks, mostly in the Badia desert which stretches from the central province of Homs to the border with Iraq.

More than 1,300 government troops have been killed in these clashes, as well as 145 pro-Iran militia members and more than 750 Daesh militants, according to the Observatory.

Since Syria’s civil war broke out in 2011, more than 387,000 people have been killed and millions forced from their homes.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Posted for fair use.....

Iran’s New Space Launcher: Zoljanah
by ACW Podcast | February 18, 2021 | No Comments

RT 30:16
Iran unveiled a new (mostly) solid-propellant space launcher, the Zoljanah!
But it looks….different than the other space launchers. Besides having a new fuel type, the Zoljanah may not have many IRGC or military fingerprints on it, indicating that the Iranian solid-propellant programs are robust and expansive.
Jeffrey and Aaron talk Iranian space programs, civilian vs. military control of research programs, and, of course, why a solid-propellant launcher makes a difference.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
..How many pallets to moderate this bunch.. :whistle:

Ali Al-Sakani
@Alsakaniali


#Houthi top military official Abdullah al-Sharafi: The fight now (their offensive against #Marib) is not with our brothers ,but it is between us and infidelity, America and its allies and Jews and their allies. #Yemen
View: https://twitter.com/Alsakaniali/status/1363299662678081537?s=20

Just like the PLO, these guys seen to not be able to miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity. Especially to be someone else's cannon fodder.
 

The Snack Artist

Membership Revoked
Reading a really good book right now. "Walk in My Combat Boots" by James Patterson, Matt Eversman, with Chris Mooney.

The book is vignettes of soldiers during the recent past. In one it is explained that these moozies are for alla first, everything else comes a distant second. They are fanatics. Nothing but the death of infidels and their service to their pedophile prophet do they care about. In one instance a villager asks, "Why are you here? We've been fighting each other for centuries and will forever." Good read.

These sand ******s will not stop until they nuke us. Take that to the bank.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Hummm.......

Posted for fair use.....

Israel's strategy as the US reaches out to Iran - analysis
Israel has already begun to shape its strategy in relation to the new administration in Washington.

By LAHAV HARKOV
FEBRUARY 21, 2021 22:15

Israel’s strategic leaders are expected to hold their first dialogue on Iran Monday, a full month after US President Joe Biden assumed the US presidency.

Yet recent Israeli responses to US actions show that Israel has already begun to shape its strategy in relation to the new administration in Washington.



The dialogue will include Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Defense Minister Benny Gantz and Foreign Minister Gabi Ashkenazi, as well as National Security Adviser Meir Ben-Shabbat and Mossad chief Yossi Cohen.

The Biden administration has taken several steps concerning Iran in recent days. Together with the European states that are party to the 2015 Iran deal – France, Germany and the UK, known as the E3 – the US announced its willingness to return to diplomacy with Iran. It reiterated its position that it will return to the Iran deal if Tehran returns to strict compliance with it. The E3 and the US hoped to strengthen the agreement to address broader security concerns related to the Islamic Republic.

Washington also sent a letter to the UN Security Council saying that it does not regard “snapback sanctions” as being in effect. Last year, when the UN arms embargo on Iran was set to expire, then-secretary of state Mike Pompeo announced he was halting that process as any party to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, as the Iran deal is known, may do. Now, America does not recognize the action taken by the Trump administration less than six months ago.

However, this act was largely symbolic. The rest of the Security Council never recognized the embargo as having been snapped back, because the US left the Iran deal in 2018.

None of Washington’s signals that it wants to de-escalate seems to have made a big impression on Iran. Tehran threatened to scale back International Atomic Energy Agency inspections if the US does not remove all post-2018 sanctions by Sunday – and in recent months, it drastically increased its enrichment of uranium and began developing uranium metals.

Iranian politicians and spokespeople have repeatedly said the US must lift sanctions before they will make any kind of move towards complying with the JCPOA – and even then, they won’t negotiate any changes to the deal.

IN ISRAEL, preventing Iran from getting nuclear weapons and its position on the nuclear agreement has not changed. Israel believes that going back to the old agreement will pave Iran’s path to a nuclear arsenal. Israel is in close contact with the United States on this matter.”

There are two key messages in that statement.

First is that “Israel believes that going back to the old agreement will pave Iran’s path to a nuclear arsenal.”

The US and E3 want to go back to the existing JCPOA, and then add to it. Their message says their goal is to “address broader security concerns related to Iran’s missile programs and regional activities,” and they would do so with “regional parties and the wider international community.”

The PMO is pointing out that the Iran deal would eventually allow Tehran to build a nuclear bomb, and addressing Iran’s other malign behavior will not fix the deal’s core problem.

One example that illustrates Israel’s problem with the JCPOA is uranium metal. Iran announced it would start producing the metal earlier this year, and the IAEA confirmed it. The E3 immediately opposed the move.

On Thursday, the E3 and US statement “expressed their shared concerns over Iran’s recent actions to produce both uranium enriched up to 20% and uranium metal.

“These activities have no credible civil justification. Uranium metal production is a key step in the development of a nuclear weapon,” they said.

BUT THE JCPOA would allow Iran to do the very thing that the E3 and US say is “a key step in the development of a nuclear weapon” – develop uranium metal that has “no credible civil justification” in 2030 – and they can do it with an international imprimatur.

Why is uranium metal offensive in 2021 but kosher in nine years?

At the same time, the Israeli statement gives some hope for a better US-Israel dialogue on Iran than under the Obama administration.

“Israel is in close contact with the United States on this matter,” the Prime Minister’s Office said.

And, in fact, The Jerusalem Post has learned that Netanyahu was apprised of the Biden administration’s plans before they went forward with them in recent days.

This is a drastic change from the Obama policy, which as former national security adviser Ya’acov Amidror recently said, “tricked [Israel]. In conversations between [the US and Israel], they hid the negotiations and went to an agreement with Iran.”

Now, even if the US is making moves Jerusalem views as dangerous, knowing about it is advantageous. Israel is able to brace itself for any adverse impact. Plus, the fact that the Biden administration is not openly trying to put “daylight” between itself and Israel, as the Obama administration did, puts Israel in a stronger position in the region and the world.

When Netanyahu, Gantz, Ashkenazi, Cohen and Ben-Shabbat meet on Monday, these elements will surely come up as they set their strategy going forward – and the US seeks to renew negotiations with Iran.
 

Pinecone

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Reading a really good book right now. "Walk in My Combat Boots" by James Patterson, Matt Eversman, with Chris Mooney.

The book is vignettes of soldiers during the recent past. In one it is explained that these moozies are for alla first, everything else comes a distant second. They are fanatics. Nothing but the death of infidels and their service to their pedophile prophet do they care about. In one instance a villager asks, "Why are you here? We've been fighting each other for centuries and will forever." Good read.

These sand ******s will not stop until they nuke us. Take that to the bank.
DH just ordered the book. It arrived, but he hasn't had a chance to read it yet.
 

jward

passin' thru
UN nuclear chief in Iran as it threatens watchdog’s cameras
By AMIR VAHDAT and JON GAMBRELL2 hours ago


800.jpeg

Director General of International Atomic Energy Agency, IAEA, Rafael Mariano Grossi speaks in a meeting with Iran's atomic chief Ali Akbar Salehi in Tehran, Iran, Sunday, Feb. 21, 2021. Grossi met with Salehi ahead of Iran's plans to partly suspend United Nations inspections of the country's nuclear facilities. (Atomic Energy Organization of Iran via AP)
TEHRAN, Iran (AP) — The head of the United Nations’ nuclear watchdog met Sunday with Iranian officials in a bid to preserve his inspectors’ ability to monitor Tehran’s atomic program, even as authorities said they planned to cut off surveillance cameras at those sites.

Rafael Grossi’s arrival in Tehran comes as Iran tries to pressure Europe and the new Biden administration into returning to the 2015 nuclear deal, which President Donald Trump unilaterally withdrew America from in 2018.
Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, who under President Hassan Rouhani helped reach the nuclear deal, said the cameras of the International Atomic Energy Agency would be shut off despite Grossi’s visit to follow a law passed by parliament.
“This is not a deadline for the world. This is not an ultimatum,” Zarif told the government-run, English-language broadcaster Press TV in an interview aired before he was to meet Grossi. “This is an internal domestic issue between the parliament and the government.”
“We have a democracy. We are supposed to implement the laws of the country. And the parliament adopted legislation — whether we like it or not.”

Zarif’s comments marked the highest-level acknowledgement yet of what Iran planned to do when it stopped following the so-called “Additional Protocol,” a confidential agreement between Tehran and the IAEA reached as part of the nuclear deal. The IAEA has additional protocols with a number of countries it monitors.
Under the protocol with Iran, the IAEA “collects and analyzes hundreds of thousands of images captured daily by its sophisticated surveillance cameras,” the agency said in 2017. The agency also said then that it had placed “2,000 tamper-proof seals on nuclear material and equipment.”
In his interview, Zarif said authorities would be “required by law not to provide the tapes of those cameras.” It wasn’t immediately clear if that also meant the cameras would be turned off entirely as Zarif called that a “technical decision, that’s not a political decision.”

“The IAEA certainly will not get footage from those cameras,” Zarif said.
The Vienna-based IAEA did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Zarif’s comments. The agency last week said the visit was aimed at finding “a mutually agreeable solution for the IAEA to continue essential verification activities in the country.”
There are 18 nuclear facilities and nine other locations in Iran under IAEA safeguards.
Grossi met earlier Sunday with Ali Akbar Salehi, the head of Iran’s civilian nuclear program. Iran’s ambassador to the IAEA, Kazem Gharibabadi, later tweeted that “Iran and the IAEA held fruitful discussions based on mutual respect, the result of which will be released this evening.”

Iran’s parliament in December approved a bill that would suspend part of U.N. inspections of its nuclear facilities if European signatories do not provide relief from oil and banking sanctions by Tuesday.
Already, Iran has slowly walked away from all the nuclear deal’s limitations on its stockpile of uranium and has begun enriching up 20%, a technical step away from weapons-grade levels. It also has begun spinning advanced centrifuges barred by the deal, which saw Iran limit its program in exchange for the lifting of economic sanctions.
An escalating series of incidents since Trump’s withdrawal has threatened the wider Mideast. Over a year ago, a U.S. drone strike killed a top Iranian general, causing Tehran to later launch ballistic missiles that wounded dozens of American troops in Iraq.
A mysterious explosion also struck Iran’s Natanz nuclear facility, which Iran has described as sabotage. In November, Iranian scientist Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, who founded the country’s military nuclear program some two decades earlier, was killed in an attack Tehran blames on Israel.

Zarif brought up the attacks in his interview with state TV, saying the IAEA must keep some of its information confidential for safety reasons.
“Some of them may have security ramifications for Iran, whose peaceful nuclear sites have been attacked,” Zarif said. “For a country whose nuclear scientists have been murdered in terrorist operations in the past — and now recently with Mr. Fakhrizadeh — confidentiality is essential.”

Posted for fair use
 

jward

passin' thru
hmm.

Iran: increased executions are a manifestation of the regime’s impasse ARTICLES
Executions in Iran
Executions in Iran

Reporting by PMOI/MEK
Iran, February 20, 2021—On Wednesday, Iranian authorities executed seven prisoners in Gohardasht prison, Karaj. Among the executed prisoners was a 42-year-old mother of two. On Monday, February 15, the regime carried out two other executions in Birjand. Two days earlier, a prisoner was hanged in Meshginshahr. Therefore, in only five days, the Iranian regime has executed at least ten prisoners across Iran. It is worth noting that the regime carries out many executions in secret, and the real number of executions might be much higher. According to reports obtained from inside Iran, many prisoners have been transferred to solitary confinement in preparation of their execution.

One might ask, why would the regime further exacerbate an already-tenuous situation for millions of Iranians who are faced with poverty, unemployment, unpaid wages, skyrocketing prices, and rampant inflation. The people already have much to deal with. Why add to their suffering with a sudden spike in executions?
The reason is that, in fact, the regime already knows that Iran’s society is in a state of turmoil and on the verge of explosion. Instead of responding to the just demands of the people, it aims to further intimidate the public and prevent the eruption of nationwide protests by ratcheting up its repressive measures. Signs of this strategy have been seen as the regime has increased executions, arrests and persecution of political activists, and public display of force and violence by its security forces.

At the same time, the regime is faced with growing international pressure to address human rights conditions in Iran. But it knows that if it stops torture and executions for a single day, it will be swept away by the millions of angry Iranians whose rage it has only kept in check through sheer brutality. That is why by ramping up executions, the regime is sending a signal to the international community that this is a red line it is not willing to cross.
The regime’s dependence of violence can be seen in remarks made by its officials and analysts.
During a convention of the Provincial Judiciary Council on December 28, judiciary chief Ebrahim Raisi called on judges to be “political” in their decision-making and to “have an evaluation of the situation,” to “understand the necessities of the society,” and to give verdicts that “are proportionate to the situation.” And the example he gave the judges was the regime’s slain terror master Qassem Soleimani, whom he described as “being very able in knowing the situation and understanding the needs.”

Therefore, in stark contrast to all the known and respected principles that call for the separation of judicial processes from political considerations, Raisi clearly instructed judges to give their verdicts based on the political needs of the regime.
Even more outrageous than Raisi’s remarks were those of Qassem Rezai, the deputy chief of the State Security Forces, who openly told his subordinate commanders, “If you arrest someone in a clash and I see him standing here healthy and sound, you’ll have a lot to answer for.” Rezai’s comments were aired on national television on January 1.
The necessities and conditions that Raisi referred to in his remarks are being amply discussed by analysts on state-run media these days.
On February 14, the state-run Mardom Salari daily reported that the “food poverty line per individual” has reached 6.7 million rials and warned, “If the economic situation doesn’t change and continues to worsen, we will problems in the society… and these problems will gradually turn into chaos and will engulf all classes of the society.” By chaos, Mardom Salari was referring to widespread protests such as the November 2019 nationwide uprising, which brought the regime to its knees and on the verge of collapse.

On February 15, the government-run Iran newspaper reported that inflation is destroying the lives of the low-income and middle classes of the society and warned, “This trend is polarizing the society, and the results, such as insecurity and riots, will encompass everyone in the society.”
These are just two examples of the many warnings by the regime’s own officials that Iran is on the verge of another revolution and the people are fed up with the regime. Therefore, the sudden increase in executions is the regime’s temporary response to the explosive state of the society. Plagues by corruption, the ruling mullahs don’t have an answer to the problems of the people. At the same time, they know that the deterioration of the economic conditions will only increase the likelihood of another round of nationwide protests happening soon. Therefore, their only answer is to further intimidate the public by ratcheting up executions and violence. But they also know that by doing so, they will further increase public hatred of their rule. Therefore, they are caught in an impasse that will, sooner or later, result in their ultimate downfall.

Posted for fair use
 

jward

passin' thru
Jason Brodsky
@JasonMBrodsky


New: #SouthKorea has agreed to release “a part” of billions of dollars of #Iran's money it had blocked in its banks for years because of U.S. sanctions. If true, this will raise serious questions in Washington. 1/2
Senator Risch told Blinken at his confirmation hearing he didn't think frozen funds should be released to get #Iran to the table, and Blinken at the time said he agreed. 2/2
View: https://twitter.com/JasonMBrodsky/status/1363802776866807814?s=20
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Jason Brodsky
@JasonMBrodsky


New: #SouthKorea has agreed to release “a part” of billions of dollars of #Iran's money it had blocked in its banks for years because of U.S. sanctions. If true, this will raise serious questions in Washington. 1/2
Senator Risch told Blinken at his confirmation hearing he didn't think frozen funds should be released to get #Iran to the table, and Blinken at the time said he agreed. 2/2
View: https://twitter.com/JasonMBrodsky/status/1363802776866807814?s=20

What's not made clear in the MSM is the domestic political situation in South Korea is about as dicey as it is in the US and the rest of the "West".
 

jward

passin' thru
asualtiesOfTheDay
@Ayei_Eloheichem


State Department on #Erbil attack: "We will hold #Iran responsible for the actions of its proxies that attack *Americans.* The rockets fired in recent attacks ... are Iranian-made and Iranian-supplied."
State Department on #IRGC rocket attacks: "What we will not do is lash out and risk an escalation that plays into the hands of #Iran and contributes to their attempts to further destabilize #Iraq... any response will be done in coordination with [Iraq] and [the coalition]."
1614051418694.png
Iran International English
@IranIntl_En

8m

US State Department Spokesman Ned Price said the #rockets


used in the recent attacks on American forces, the coalition against ISIS, and the Iraqi people were made in Iran and #Iran had provided them. He promised a calculated and timely response by the US.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Posted for fair use.....

US Aims To Extend, Strengthen Iran Nuclear Pact Despite Khamenei Defiance

February 23, 2021 Arab News 0 Comments

By Arab News

The United States will seek to strengthen and extend the agreement between world powers and Iran aimed at curbing its nuclear program, Secretary of State Antony Blinken said on Monday.


It’s a new sign of Washington’s ambition to revive the 2015 nuclear deal rejected by former President Donald Trump even as Tehran appears to be backing further away from it.


The UN nuclear watchdog said on Sunday it had struck a deal with Iran to cushion the blow of steps Tehran plans to take this week that include ending snap inspections, with both sides agreeing to keep “necessary” monitoring for up to three months.


The announcement by International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) chief Rafael Grossi, made at Vienna airport after a weekend trip to Iran, confirmed that Tehran would go ahead with its plan to slash cooperation with the agency on Tuesday.


Blinken, addressing the UN-sponsored Conference on Disarmament in Geneva, said in a pre-recorded speech: “The United States remains committed to ensuring that Iran never acquires a nuclear weapon. Diplomacy is the best path to achieve that goal.”


US President Joe Biden has said that if Iran comes back into “strict compliance” with the 2015 pact, his administration will do the same, Blinken said.



“Working with allies and partners, we will also seek to lengthen and strengthen the JCPOA (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action) and address other areas of concern, including Iran’s destabilizing regional behavior and ballistic missile development and proliferation,” Blinken said.


“Iran must comply with its safeguards agreements with the IAEA and its international obligations,” he added.
White House press secretary Jenn Psaki said USallies in Europe are still waiting a response from Iran on the European Union’s offer to host an informal meeting between current members of the nuclear deal and the US.


Iran has slowly walked away from all the nuclear deal’s limitations on its stockpile of uranium and has begun enriching up 20%, a technical step away from weapons-grade levels.


Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said on Monday Iran might enrich uranium up to 60% purity if the country needed it and would never yield to US pressure over its nuclear activity, state television reported.


Iran’s 2015 nuclear deal with six powers caps the fissile purity to which Tehran can refine uranium at 3.67%, well under the 20% achieved before the agreement and far below the 90% suitable for a nuclear weapon.


“Iran’s uranium enrichment level will not be limited to 20%. We will increase it to whatever level the country needs…We may increase it to 60%,” the TV quoted Khamenei as saying.


Khamenei also repeated a denial of any Iranian intent to weaponize uranium enrichment.


“Our respected government did not abandon its commitments and gradually reduced some of them, which are still reversible in the case that they return to their responsibilities,” he said.


Moreover, Iran said on Monday it will end at 2030 GMT the implementation of the Additional Protocol that allows the UN nuclear watchdog to carry out snap-inspections at sites not declared to the agency, the semi-official Tasnim news agency reported.


“As of midnight tonight (2030 GMT), we will not have… commitments beyond safeguards. Necessary orders have been issued to the nuclear facilities,” Tasnim quoted Kazem Gharibabadi, Iran’s envoy at the IAEA as saying.


US State Department spokesman Ned Price said Khamenei’s comment about uranium enrichment “sounds like a threat” and declined to respond to what he described as “hypotheticals” and “posturing.”


Price also reiterated US willingness to engage in talks with Iran.


French Foreign Affairs Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian told his EU colleagues during a meeting in Brussels that the situation regarding Iran’s nuclear program is “worrying,” his ministry said on Monday.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Well this is interesting from the MSM........

Posted for fair use.....

Politics & Policy
Biden squanders leverage Trump stockpiled on Iran in pursuit of a defective nuclear deal
The administration’s strategy for getting Iran to play ball clearly involves making upfront concessions to Tehran for nothing in return.
Image: Members of the security forces gather as medics evacuate the body of prominent Lebanese activist and intellectual Lokman Slim from the spot where he was found dead in his car

Medics evacuate the body of prominent Hezbollah critic Lokman Slim from El-Aaddousiye in Lebanon on Feb. 4, one of a string of recent attacks with Iranian fingerprints.Mahmoud Zayyat / AFP - Getty Images file

Feb. 22, 2021, 5:01 PM PST
By Mark Dubowitz, CEO of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies and Behnam Ben Taleblu, senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies

“We’re not going to prejudge.” State Department spokesperson Ned Price deployed this classic Washington euphemism last week to avoid responding to a question over how much culpability Iran and its Shiite militias bear for recent rocket attacks against a U.S. military base in northern Iraq. The strikes killed one contractor and wounded several other service persons, including Americans.

Biden’s approach draws directly from Obama’s playbook: turning a blind eye to regional aggression and offering economic relief to signal support for engagement.

Twice since then, rockets have been fired at positions affiliated with the U.S. presence in Iraq: a military base on Saturday and at the area around the U.S. Embassy complex in Baghdad on Monday. These strikes are not new. Since May 2019, Iran-backed militias have been behind at least 83 such strikes on U.S. positions, a damning pattern consistent with almost two decades of Iran-linked attacks against the U.S. in Iraq.

The administration’s refusal to directly call out this time-tested method of Iranian escalation also follows its public unwillingness to blame Hezbollah — Iran’s most deadly proxy group — when condemning the assassination of Lokman Slim, a prominent anti-Hezbollah activist, in an attack in Lebanon this month.

Why is the Biden administration not connecting the dots between the Islamic Republic of Iran and its proxies — and not doing more to publicly deter this behavior? Is it simply that the new administration is still finding its feet after just one month in office?
Related

Opinion
Why Biden would be wrong to re-enter the Iran deal, whatever his fellow Democrats say
Possibly. But there is a better explanation.

President Joe Biden is actively signaling a change in approach from his predecessor. He wants to find a way back into the nuclear deal aimed at curbing Iran’s nuclear program that his former boss, Barack Obama, concluded in 2015 only to have Donald Trump abandon in 2018.

The Biden administration’s strategy for getting Iran to play ball clearly involves making upfront concessions to Tehran, including de-linking the nuclear and regional threats it poses. In contrast, Trump’s “maximum pressure” policy was characterized by forthright condemnations and more direct responses to Iran-backed aggression. Team Trump also believed that sanctions relief should occur only in exchange for a wholesale change in behavior by the Islamic Republic that included nullifying its regional threats.



Biden administration agrees to nuclear talks with Iran
Feb. 19, 202102:42

Biden’s approach draws directly from Obama’s playbook: turning a blind eye to regional aggression and offering economic relief to signal support for engagement to get back to the negotiating table. And it’s unfortunate, because the result is sure to be the same as before as well: an overly deferential and defective deal that offers Iran patient pathways to nuclear weapons because its restrictions eventually sunset, while handcuffing Washington from using its most powerful economic punishments and doing nothing to stop the improvement of the clerical regime’s warfighting abilities or that of its proxies.

It’s not just the willingness to overlook Iran’s role in recent attacks in the region that makes this clear. It’s that the Biden administration has done this while going out of its way to tempt Tehran to talk through a policy of unilateral concessions while continuing to declare American interest in renewed nuclear negotiations.

Related

Opinion
Trump has avoided a truly major national security crisis. Iran killing may change that.
Absent any reciprocity, the Biden administration reversed the Trump administration’s restoration of U.N. penalties on Iran’s military-related procurement and proliferation activity. Moscow and Beijing will now be able to arm Tehran free of international censure and the Islamic Republic’s weapons proliferation activities will face fewer impediments. Also at the U.N., the State Department is easing travel restrictions on Iranian diplomats in New York. The regime in Iran has used its diplomatic personnel and facilities in the past to support terrorism.

Furthermore, the administration signaled that it doesn’t oppose a $5 billion International Monetary Fund loan to Iran. While ostensibly for Covid-19 relief, this windfall will fill the regime’s coffers with little accountability at a time when it’s down to less than $10 billion in foreign exchange reserves. The more cash Iran has on hand means the more it can fund its regional proxies and bolster its missile, military and nuclear programs, regardless of what the IMF money is designated for.

Related

Opinion
We want to hear what you THINK. Please submit a letter to the editor.
Price did speak of “consequences” for the recent rocket attack, and to be fair, Washington so far has maintained the bulk of the penalties Trump imposed on Iran. But Secretary of State Antony Blinken’s press release on the attack contained zero mentions of Iran, or any other indication of what type of concrete action would be taken.

Similarly, in Yemen, where Houthi rebels continue to fire drones and missiles at Saudi civilian targets, a recent State Department press release urging the rebels to end their assaults failed to mention Iran despite it providing the rebels with weapons and training. The Biden team even decided to remove the group from the State Department’s list of foreign terrorist organizations — another missed opportunity for demanding reciprocity.

Recommended

OpinionHow a made-up word for citrus spray helped me process my dad's death from Covid

OpinionTrump's 'big lie' has become the GOP's newest voter suppression weapon
Unfortunately, we’ve seen this movie before. As the Obama administration courted Tehran for nuclear talks from 2012 to 2015, it restricted its counterterrorism and counternarcotics policies toward the regime’s proxies like Hezbollah. As Politico exposed in 2017, U.S. efforts against Hezbollah lessened as the importance of getting a nuclear deal with Iran grew.

The desire to achieve and maintain the Iran nuclear deal also had other negative regional effects. Some of those in the Obama administration arguing for a more robust Syria policy in support of protestors and against the atrocities of President Bashar al-Assad — Tehran’s man in Damascus — were overridden since targeting his regime would have necessarily aggravated the Islamic Republic.

Absent any reciprocity, the Biden administration reversed the Trump administration’s restoration of U.N. penalties on Iran’s military-related procurement and proliferation.

The Biden administration’s eagerness for diplomacy will likely be read by Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, as a vulnerability to exploit. And in response, Tehran will do what it has done for decades: intensify its aggression and only back down if presented with no other alternative.

Iran is watching Washington begin to dismantle maximum pressure in favor of “maximum diplomacy.” Absent a willingness to add to or even maintain existing sanctions, as well lacking broader efforts to tackle the clerical regime’s regional threat network, such an approach is indeed possible to prejudge: It will end in failure.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Posted for fair use.....

Special Report


Why pro-Iran militias are targeting US forces in Iraq
With Trump, it ended in disaster for militias with Solemani killing. What will Biden do?

Published: February 22, 2021 14:46 Ramadan Al Sherbini, Correspondent and Seyyed Llata, Senior Designer



Badr fighters-1613990775775
Shiite militia fighters of the Badr Organisation celebrating in Diyala Province after defeating Daesh militants. Founded by Mohammed Baqr Al Hakim in 1982, Badr Organisation first existed under the name the Badr Brigade as a major Iran-allied opposition group to the regime of Saddam Hussein. Image Credit: AFP
Also in this package

Cairo: Less than a month after the inauguration of Joe Biden as the US president, a complex housing US-led forces in Iraqi Kurdistan came under a heavy rocket attack, the toughest test yet to the new administration. The attack against the Erbil airport in the capital of the autonomous region of Iraqi Kurdistan killed one non-American civilian contractor and injured a US service member and several American contractors.

A little-known militia, calling itself Saraya Awliya Al Dam (Custodians of the Blood) claimed responsibility for the attack that outraged the White House.

US reserves the right to respond

“As always, the president of the United States and the administration reserves the right to respond in the time and the manner of our choosing, but we’ll wait for the attribution to be concluded first before we take any additional steps,” White House press secretary Jen Psaki said.

The February 15 attack was the first targeting US military personnel in Iraq since Biden took office on January 20. However, it was one in a series of such attacks that have surged in recent years in different Iraqi areas including Baghdad’s fortified Green Zone, home to the US embassy.

IRAQ Saddam statue 1-1613990760126
The 2003 US invasion and occupation of Iraq was a traumatic event for the region whose reverberations are being felt to this day. Image Credit: AP



How has America reacted in the past?

On December 27, 2019, a US contractor was killed and several military personnel were injured in a rocket attack in northern Iraq. The US blamed Iran-backed Iraqi paramilitaries for the attack. In retaliation, the US mounted a string of air strikes against military facilities belonging to Kat’aib Hezbollah, a faction of Iraq’s Al Hashd Al Shabi (the Popular Mobilisation Forces), the umbrella grouping of pro-Iran Shiite militias in Iraq. Some 25 militiamen were killed and 50 others injured in that attack, according to the militia.

Whether a scenario can play out along the same lines from either side (Iran proxies or the US) remains to be seen.

IRAN Qasim Soleimani killing-1613990768932
The remains of a vehicle after a US airstrike killed top Iranian commander Qasim Soleimani and Abu Mahdi Al Muhandis, the deputy commander of Al Hashd Al Shabi, near the Baghdad airport. Image Credit: AFP

On Saturday, a military base housing US contractors in Balad in northern Iraq was the target of a salvo of Katyusha rockets. While there was no immediate claim of responsibility, the attack, like the previous ones, is believed to have been mounted by pro-Iran militias, who have been more pugnacious towards the US since Biden’s predecessor, Donald Trump, abandoned a 2015 international nuclear pact with Iran and reimposed sanctions on it. Biden campaigned on reengaging Tehran and restoring the contested deal aimed at limiting Iran’s capability to develop nuclear weapons.

IRAN Abu Mahdi Al Muhandis-1613990770838
Abu Mahdi Al Muhandis was killed in a US drone strike. Image Credit: AFP



How Iran’s proxies strengthened foothold in Iraq

After the 2003 US-led invasion of Iraq, Iran established a strong clout in the Arab country through allied politicians and armed militias. These groups, mainly the Iran-aligned Al Hashd Al Shabi or the Popular Mobilisation Forces, gained more influence in Iraq during the fight against Daesh terrorists who had grabbed large swathes of the country in 2014. Repeated pledges by Iraqi authorities to disarm the militias and re-establish state control have largely failed to translate on the ground. Evidence are frequent attacks, blamed on Iran-allied militias, targeting military bases in Iraq hosting US-led forces. The attacks are regarded as part of a proxy war between Washington and Tehran.
The paramilitaries linked to Iran-allied political parties have emerged a major tool in Tehran’s attempts to strengthen its foothold in Iraq and counter-balance the US influence.

Image Credit: Seyyed Llata/Gulf News

Biden reaches out to Iran

To this end, the Biden administration last week offered to restart talks with Iran along with the European nations to revive the nuclear accord, in a reversal of Trump’s tough line or maximalist approach. The offer has failed to impress Iran, which insists that the US sanctions are lifted first. The latest attacks on US military personnel in Iraq are an early test of Biden’s rapprochement towards Iran. Delicate US quandary in Iraq

“Whether Iran intends such a test or not, the result is the same — the Biden administration must now either craft a response that looks firm and able to deter, or suffer an early loss of credibility in the eyes of regional partners,” said Michael Knights, a fellow of the Washington Institute.

“The decision on the departure of foreign troops from Iraq is an Iraqi issue If the political efforts of the government did not succeed in getting them out, we would resort to resistance to evict them."

- Mohammed Al Bildawi, MP linked to Asa'aib Al Haq militia



“The US government faces a delicate quandary in Iraq … The administration wants to deter attacks on US persons and US partners, while setting a different tone from the Trump administration’s frequent recourse to military threats, occasional lethal retaliation, and imposition of new sanctions. Such goals set the bar very high for the new administration, and will certainly test its ingenuity and creativity,” he added.

Military response unlikely

Apparently keen to reengage Iran and placate its proxies in the region, Biden is unlikely to make a military response in Iraq unless the attacks cause such major casualties among the US citizens there that would compromise his public credibility. Earlier this month, the Biden administration significantly revoked terror designation of Yemen’s Al Houthi rebels, another proxy group of Iran, despite a surge in the militia’s cross-the-border attacks on Saudi Arabia, traditionally a key regional ally of the US.

The uptick in the attacks on US military personnel is seen as a measured tactic by the Iran-allied militias in Iraq to put Biden under more pressure to make more concessions to Iran. Given the resulting limited casualties, Iran’s proxies look careful that such attacks would not push the situation to the brink of major military escalation.

Key Iran-aligned militias in Iraq

KATAIB HEZBOLLAH
Created in 2007 to fight US troops in Iraq, Kataib Hezbollah is now led by an unknown commander after its chief Abu Mahdi Al Muhandis was killed in January last year in a US air strike in Baghdad.
The militia is currently a faction of Iraq’s influential state-sanctioned umbrella group Al Hashed Al Shabi. In its ideology, Kataib Hezbollah defines itself as an Islamic resistance and jihadist movement espousing Islamic principles. The group sees Iran’s mullah-based governance as the “ideal way” to establish Islamic rule. Kataib Hezbollah is believed to be also linked to Lebanon’s pro-Iranian Hezbollah movement. In 2009, the US put Kataib Hezbollah on its terror list and subjected the group to financial sections.

ASA’AIB AHL AL HAQ
Founded in 2006, As’aib Ahl Al Haq is a political mainly Shiite political group with a military wing. It emerged as a militia with the avowed aim of fighting foreign troops in Iraq after the 2003 US-led invasion of the country. Currently led by Qais Al Khazali, the militia is noted for its fiery anti-US rhetoric. The group is strongly linked to Iran and its ally the Lebanese Hezbollah movement. It has 15 representatives in Iraq’s current parliament. In January last year, the US placed As’aib Ahl Al Haq and Al Khazali on its terror list

BADR ORGANISATION
Founded by Mohammed Baqr Al Hakim in 1982, Badr Organisation first existed under the name the Badr Brigade as a major Iran-allied opposition group to the regime of Saddam Hussein. Many members of the Badr Brigade took refuge in Iran after their comrades were assassinated allegedly on orders of Saddam. The group’s membership swelled after Saddam’s toppling when Al Hakim announced disbanding the military group and replacing it with a civil one named the Badr Organisation. Currently led by Hadi Al Amri, the organisation is an affiliate of Al Hashed Al Shabi.

Iran and America fight their battles in Iraq

Over recent years, Iraq, a neighbour of Iran, has been the venue for score-settling tensions between Tehran and Washington. Iran sponsors a multitude of proxy groups in Iraq led by the powerful Al Hashd Al Shabi blamed for hindering the government’s efforts to re-establish stability in the country that is roiled by a combination of economic hardships and an outbreak of the novel coronavirus.



“What is happening in Iraq gives rise to feelings of sadness and sarcasm as much as the coronavirus claims more Iraqi lives,” wrote Ali Hussain, the editor of the Iraqi newspaper Al Mada. “The scene appears extremely contradictory and sarcastic. Armed groups insist on having the right to continue the game of firing rockets and terrifying entire cities, while the citizen is looking for a remedy to keep the corona evil at bay,” he added.

Missile strike at Al Assad air base in Iraq-1613990782221
US soldiers and journalists inspect the rubble at a site of Iranian bombing, in Ain Al Asad air base, Anbar, Iraq on January 13, 2020. Image Credit: Agencies

“They’ll tell you that these rockets aim at expelling the Americans, but you must know they are liars. The Americans here are the mere tree behind which lies the ultimate aim, namely to finish off any dream to build a state of citizenship, stability and welfare,” Hussain argued.

Pro-Iran Iraqi leaders have repeatedly demanded the withdrawal of approximately 2,500 US military personnel who are still in the country as part of an international alliance fighting Daesh terrorists.

“What is happening in Iraq gives rise to feelings of sadness and sarcasm as much as the coronavirus claims more Iraqi lives. The scene appears extremely contradictory and sarcastic. Armed groups insist on having the right to continue the game of firing rockets and terrifying entire cities, while the citizen is looking for a remedy to keep the corona evil at bay.”
- Ali Hussain, editor of Iraq's Al Mada newspaper.



Determined to end US military presence

“We confirm the right of the resistance [groups] to terminate the presence of the US military forces while preserving the state authority by not targeting diplomatic missions,” said Qais Al Khazali, the leader of the Iran-allied Iraqi group As’aib Ahl Al Haq or the League of the Righteous.

Early last year, the Iraqi parliament voted for the departure of the US-led coalition forces from the country. The step came after a US airstrike killed top Iranian commander Qasim Soleimani and Abu Mahdi Al Muhandis, the deputy commander of Al Hashd Al Shabi, near the Baghdad airport.

IRAN-MOURNING FOR Soleimani AND Abu Mahdi-1613990767113
Iraqi women attend the funeral top Iranian commander Qasim Soleimani and Abu Mahdi Al Muhandis, the deputy commander of Al Hashd Al Shabi, after they were killed in a US drone strike near Baghdada airport on January 3, 2020. Image Credit: AP

Soleimani was the chief of Iran’s self-styled Quds Force affiliated with the Revolutionary Guard that has forged strong links with Tehran’s proxy militias in Yemen, Iraq, Lebanon and Syria.

“The decision on the departure of foreign troops from Iraq is an Iraqi issue,” said Mohammed Al Bildawi, an Iraqi lawmaker linked to the League of the Righteous militia. ”If the political efforts of the government did not succeed in getting them out, we would resort to resistance to evict them,” he added.



Claiming a “relation of understanding” with Biden, ex-Iraqi premier Nuri Al Maliki this week told a local TV station that he expects the new US administration will initiate negotiations with Iran, a step he said will be to Iraq’s benefit by descalating US-Tehran tensions.

Recent developments in Iraq-US relations

January 2020: The Iraqi parliament votes for the departure of US-led coalition forces from Iraq. The move comes after a US air strike killed top Iranian general Qasim Soleimani and Abu Mahdi Al Muhandis, an Iran-allied militia leader, near the Baghdad airport.

June 2020: Iraqi and US officials kick off strategic dialogue talks online, discussing the future of US forces in Iraq.

August 2020: Iraqi Prime Minister Mustafa Al Kadhimi visits Washington and announces that the US will withdraw its forces from his country in the next three years. The same month, the US-led forces handed over a military site, north of Baghdad, to the Iraqi army.

September 2020: Al Kadhimi says neither the US nor Iran wants to make Iraq a battleground for their rivalries.

November 2020: The US declares reducing its troop levels in Iraq from about 3,000 to 2,500 by mid-January. Al Kadhimi congratulates Joe Biden on winning the US presidential election, saying he looks forward to stronger “strategic relations based on mutual respect”.

February 2021: A complex housing US-led forces in Erbil in Iraqi Kurdistan comes under a rocket attack, killing one civilian contractor and injured a US service member and several American contractors. A little-known group aligned with Iran claims responsibility. Following the attack, US Secretary of State calls Al Kadhimi, pledges support for investigations and holding accountable those responsible.
 

jward

passin' thru
James Landale
@BBCJLandale

24m

Breaking: new statement from E3 (UK, France, Germany) saying they "deeply regret" Iran's latest breaches of the JCPOA nuclear deal, noting the "dangerous nature of the decision" & urging Iran "to stop and reverse all measures that reduce transparency".
 

jward

passin' thru
Heshmat Alavi
@HeshmatAlavi

8m

#BREAKING Feb 25—Town of Manzelab near Zahedan, SE #Iran Reports indicate protesters have taken control of a local base belonging to the regime's security forces, killing one member of their units. Internet is down in many southern cities of Sistan & Baluchistan province.
View: https://twitter.com/HeshmatAlavi/status/1364842171082420227?s=20

+++++++++++++++++++++++++





Yossi Mansharof
@Yossi_Mansharof


Due to lack of information in the Western media, here is my thread regarding the recent escalation in Iran's Sistan and Baluchestan province
The current crisis has erupted from local opposition to a government reform that seeks to control fuel sales in the province, although these sales are the sole source of income for many of the province's residents.
View: https://twitter.com/Yossi_Mansharof/status/1364666789393752070?s=20
 
Top