GOV/MIL Main "Great Reset" Thread

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Are We Headed For An "Auto Loan Crisis" As Delinquencies Begin To Rise?

THURSDAY, JUL 07, 2022 - 09:05 AM

Automobile affordability worsens as Americans are saddled up with monthly payments topping $1,000, and loan delinquencies are creeping higher thanks to increasing economic pressures thanks to the Federal Reserve's aggressive monetary tightening regime to rein in the highest inflation in 40 years. A Fed-induced downturn in the economy could end up bursting the auto bubble.
"We are seeing delinquencies start to increase," Ford Chief Financial Officer John Lawler told the Deutsche Bank 2022 Global Automotive Conference last month.

"We're looking for every indication and every data point we can to get a read on where the consumer is, where they're headed given everything that we see out there, the inflationary pressures, the economic issues, et cetera," Lawler said.

He continued: "So we are seeing some headwinds there a little bit when it comes to delinquencies as maybe a leading indicator."
Edmunds' executive director of insights Jessica Caldwell also noted, "auto loan delinquencies are expected to rise," adding consumers must "understand the risks associated with financing more than what they can afford."

Meanwhile, June data from Edmunds shows monthly auto payments topped $1,000. Cox Automotive showed the average monthly car payment reached $712 in May. These auto payments are higher than rent for one-bedroom apartments in Wichita, Kansas, and Akron, Ohio.

Combine auto, shelter, energy, and food costs that are soaring, and no wonder consumers have maxed out their credit cards and drained savings as they struggle to survive the worst inflationary storm in 40 years. This situation is expected to worsen as the Fed is determined to hike into a downturn and may trigger a recession in the middle of the second half of 2022, according to a note from Nomura.

What's surprising to Jack Liebersohn, an economics professor at the University of California, Irvine, is that auto payments are topping shelter costs for some consumers.
"Normally housing is the thing people struggle to pay — autos are typically an optional expense you can delay, so the phenomenon of car payments exceeding rent is surprising to me," Liebersohn told Bloomberg.
Given the souring macro economic backdrop, auto delinquencies are beginning to trend higher following a plunge in early 2020 and another in early 2021, thanks to auto loan deferment programs and stimulus checks. Now the safety nets are gone as consumers with insurmountable debts, paying the highest ever monthly payments, become financially paralyzed by the high inflation. This won't end well and could trigger a tsunami of delinquencies.



Banks have begun modeling possible scenarios in the event of an economic downturn and increasing delinquencies, leading to an increasing rejection of credit applications (this is broad, not just autos).



What's even more concerning are Google search trends for "voluntary repossession of car" have surged to the highest level since the summer of 2008. This can only suggest consumers with high monthly payments contemplate surrendering their vehicle to the bank to avoid falling behind on payments.



The last time search trends for "voluntary repossession of car" were this high, the stock market was halved in the second half of 2008 and didn't find a bottom until March of 2009.



The "strong consumer" narrative that President Biden and Fed Chair Jerome Powell pedal could be 'smoke and mirrors' as a wave of auto loan delinquencies could be nearing as recession risks soar.

For more color on what could happen next. Auto expert Lucky Lopez warns an "auto loan crisis" is about to unfold.

Besides an auto loan crisis, eight million Americans are behind on rent payments and face eviction.

Storm clouds are gathering.

View: https://youtu.be/LsyQANaM8-M
18:17 min
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Mortgage Rates Crash Most 'Since Lehman' As Loan Demand Collapses

THURSDAY, JUL 07, 2022 - 08:30 AM

It appears the laws of supply and demand have once again miraculously re-appeared - this time in the home mortgage market.

The average rate for a 30-year loan plunged to 5.3%, the lowest in a month and down from 5.7% last week. That is the largest weekly drop (40bps) since the Lehman collapse in 2008...



Judging by the total collapse in mortgage applications, it is clear that as the 'price' of loans rose (rates) then the 'demand' for loans evaporated. Simply put, if you were writing mortgages at such high rates (amid near record low levels of affordability) you are doing no business at all...



So you lower the price of the loan (rates) to encourage demand. With the 40bps crash in rates this week, it appears the fecal matter really hit the rotating object in the mortgage providers.
“Because of falling mortgage rates, homes may be more affordable than they were three weeks ago,” Holden Lewis, home and mortgage spokesperson at NerdWallet said in a statement. “There were few, if any, times you could have said that in the first half of 2022.”
Good luck with that idea. Rates are still up massively from levels a year ago - and home prices are at ever higher levels too.

At the current 30-year average, a borrower with a $300,000 mortgage would pay roughly $1,665 a month, about $383 more than at the end of last year, when rates hovered around 3.11%.
“While the drop provides minor relief to buyers, the housing market will continue to normalize if home-price growth materially slows due to the combination of low housing affordability and an expected economic slowdown,” said Sam Khater, Freddie Mac’s chief economist.
Of course, the big question is - Will Powell be pleased? Because prices are not really coming down much on the homes themselves (yet). This market-driven rate-cut stimulting demand is not what the inflation-battling folks in the Marriner-Eccles building are hoping for.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

David Stockman On Why The Great Reckoning Has Begun

THURSDAY, JUL 07, 2022 - 05:45 AM
Authored by David Stockman via InternationalMan.com,

Well, that should have been a wake-up call. The 30-year mortgage rate soared by 24 basis points recently to 6.18%. So the latter now stands at well more than double the 2.65% rate which prevailed just 18 months ago in January 2021, and at the highest level since the tail end of the Great Financial Crisis in 2009.



In a word, the Fed’s fake economy based on ridiculously unsustainable ultra-low interest rates is coming to a thundering end. And far more abruptly and violently than the Fed and its Wall Street megaphones ever remotely imagined.



Not surprisingly, the eruption of the mortgage rate depicted above has sent housing “affordability” into the drink. In fact, housing affordability is now at the lowest point on record going back to the late 1980s.

Needless to say, household budgets are about to get hammered and the housing market is fixing to experience another great implosion. It would actually take a 30% drop in average home prices to reverse the affordability plunge just since the pre-Covid levels.

Homebuyer Affordability Index, 1988-2022



Alas, the surge in homeowners’ carry cost especially during the last six months is truly startling.

A simple back of the envelope calculation reveals that the jump in mortgage rates from 3.25% to 6.13% during that brief period means that new homebuyers face an average monthly payment on a typical new $350,000 mortgage (at the median price) that has gone up from $1,523 to $2,128. That’s a 40% increase in 6 months!

So whether it was intended or not, the Fed is about to unleash the biggest housing crisis since the bursting of the 2007 bubble. And there should be no doubt: The housing price bubble this time is even more egregious than back in 2005-2007.

House Price Index, 2000-2022


Likewise, junk bond yields have gone from 4% at the end of Dec (i.e. just 6 months ago) to 8.4% today. That’s another lightening fast doubling of rates.

So with junk bond yields at their highest level since 2015, the myth of low defaults is about to be monkey-hammered. That’s because the “refi” game which papered over bad credits is now over: When you rollover your leveraged debt to a 2X higher interest rate, rather than to a lower one compliments of the Fed money printers as per the last decade, the jig is up.

As the excellent bond maven, Stephanie Pomboy, tweeted recently:
Prepare to see an absolute ONSLAUGHT of corp defaults and downgrades. The myth of corp B/S strength is about to be shattered spectacularly.
She got that right. And that’s also the true economic evil of the Fed’s financial repression policies. It causes the financial signalling system to go wildly askew, thereby generating massively falsified financial values.

For instance, the market cap of the FANG stocks went from $3.0 trillion to $5.1 trillion and then back to $3.0 trillion, all in the space of hardly two years. But that’s not honest price discovery in any sense of the word; it’s just the consequence of liquidity fueled bubbles being inflated and then deflated by speculative forces.

Indeed, at the individual company level, the bubble dynamics as between the Covid-19 stock rally from March 23, 2020 to January 3, 2022 and then what is now being labelled the subsequent “bear market” is truly astounding.

Covid-19 Bull Market Versus Plunge Since January 3, 2022 Peak:
  • Nividia: Up 466%, Down 48%;
  • Apple: Up 224%, down 28%;
  • Google: Up 175%, Down 27%;
  • Microsoft: Up 145%, Down 28%;
  • Facebook/Meta: Up 129%, Down 51%.
There is one constant, of course, which was ever cheaper overnight money (red line) supplied by the Fed that provided the carry traders with the wherewithal for massive, sustained momentum driven speculation.

Indeed, as indicated by the chart, the Fed’s mistakes were systemic: As rates peaked lower and lower with each cycle, the financial bubbles got larger and larger.



At the same time that the bejesus was being inflated out of Wall Street, the planking was being laid for a new bout of goods and services inflation on main street. And this gets us to the May PPI index released this AM.

There are various measures of producer prices, but the index that requires special attention at the moment is the All Commodities PPI. It was up a red hot 21.5% versus prior year.

More importantly, the 20%+ Y/Y readings of the last few months exceed almost all prior inflation peaks since 1950. For instance, the July 2008 peak posted at 17.4% versus prior year, and even at the top of the inflation blow-off in November 1974, the Y/Y gain came in only slightly higher at 23.4%. Even the Korean War induced inflation-surge in 1951 peaked at just 18.4% on a Y/Y basis.

In other words, producer inflation is roaring down the pipeline at rates seen less than 0.01% of the time during the past three-quarters of a century. The Fed belated attempt to cope with it, therefore, will not end well or soon.

Y/Y Change In All Commodities PPI, 1950-2022


Even if we look at May’s readings for PPI finished goods as opposed to commodities, there is no evident relief in sight. The Y/Y gain was 16.4%, the largest advance since December 1974 when the finished goods PPI posted at 18.5%.

That was 48 years ago, of course, but the mechanics of inflation transmission do not change. That is, producer prices fuel the costs of production of goods and services in the business sector, which, in turn, work their way into the retail price level with a lag.

Accordingly, we are not yet even close to “peak inflation”. The only scenario in which these soaring producer level price increases do not show-up in the CPI is in the event of a thundering recessionary collapse in which producer profit margins are crushed on the way down.

The latter is always a possibility, but the issue is timing and sequence: What buckles first—output and employment or producer profits margins?

Currently, we are in such uncharted waters that it is difficult to know. But no matter: Both outcomes are on the way, and in the not too distant future, too.

Y/Y Change In Producer Price Index For Finished Goods, 1974-2022


In the case of the final demand for consumer foods, the index was up nearly 14%, and that was the seventh straight month of double-digit gains. We have a hard time seeing how household budgets will survive the grocery bill assault coming down the inflation pipeline or how the idea that inflation has peaked has any basis in the facts conveyed by the May PPI release.

Indeed, the chart below conveys quite pointedly that we are in a wholly new inflation ball game.

After the Fed adopted inflation targeting in January 2012 it took to lamenting that it was missing its 2.00% target from below, thereby justifying its madcap money-printing.

One of the reasons, however, was that the global foods market was in temporary surplus, causing food inflation to oscillate between +2.5% and -2.5%. That had nothing to do with the monetary policies being cranked out in the Eccles Building, save for the license it provided other central banks to flood their economies with cheap capital and thereby generating a temporary abundance of agricultural investment.

But that era was never sustainable, and was always at risk for exogenous disruptions like the Ukraine based global Sanctions War now roiling the global commodities and food markets.

Accordingly, the idea that the Fed had license to print money with reckless abandon because headline inflation was being temporarily pulled lower by deflation in foods, energy and manufactured goods will surely rank as one of the great follies of all time.

Y/Y Change In PPI For Finished Consumer Foods, 2012-2022


Another sign that inflation has a growing head of steam was the 21.0% Y/Y rise in the PPI for transportation and warehousing. As shown below, that’s off-the-charts of recent history, and more than double the surge that occurred during the inflationary blow-off top in mid-2008.

Needless to say, these are services industries that are being hit by the double whammy of rising energy and wage costs, neither of which is likely to be abating any time soon. Nor would resolution of current global supply chain dislocations make much difference—the problem in this instance is shortages of capacity across a broad spectrum of modalities, from railroads to trucking and the ocean ports.

Y/Y Change In PPI For Transportation And Warehousing Industries, 2008-2022


For want of doubt, here are the PPI indices for energy and for transportation and warehouse wages. In the latter case the wage gain (purple line) was 7.8% on a Y/Y basis, a figure more than triple the 2.5% per annum trend that prevailed prior to February 2020.

Similarly, the gain in the PPI for energy during May was 45%, a Y/Y level which has prevailed since the spring of 2021. That is, there is nothing in the black line below that says the worst is over.

Y/Y Change, Transportation And Warehousing Costs And Energy, 2016-2022


In short, the central banks have unleashed an inflationary whirlwind that has left the false pricing of the stock and bond markets high and dry. That’s why the very benchmark security of the global financial system has nearly gone parabolic in recent weeks.

At today’s 3.48% closing yield, the 10-year US Treasury yield was up 50 basis points from 5 days ago, 130 basis points from mid-March, and is in a totally different universe than prevailed when the Fed went berserk buying government bonds after March 2020.

But here’s the thing. Out of anti-inflation desperation, the Fed has pivoted to QT, but the impact of Fed held-bonds flooding into the trading pits has barely begun. And that’s to say nothing of the $95 billion per month bond shrinkage rate which will commence in September.

10-Year Treasury Yield, February 2020-June 2022


So the Great Reckoning has now commenced. The soaring red line below tells you all you need to know. It means that the artificially low cap rates of the last decade or more have reached their sell-by date and that the great money bubble the fostered is now heading for the wall.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Initial & Continuing Jobless Claims Accelerate As Layoffs Soar

THURSDAY, JUL 07, 2022 - 05:34 AM
The number of Americans who filed for unemployment claims for the first time rose to 235k last week, up from the 231k the prior week. The 4-week average is now at 232.5k - the highest since the first week of December...


Source: Bloomberg

Additionally as the chart above shows, continuing claims - some have said the most important recession indicator - has started to accelerate higher (from 1.324mm to 1.375mm last week - well above the 1.328mm expected)

New York, Michigan, and California saw the largest rise in claims while Illinois and Kentucky saw the largest drops last week...



Something snapped in the labor market last month, as Challenger's data shows US Job Cuts rose a stunning 58.8% YoY...


Source: Bloomberg

And if the ISM surveys (from both the Services and Manufacturing sides of the economy) are to be believed, things are about to get rather ugly for claims data... and the labor market overall...


Source: Bloomberg

And yet tomorrow's payroll print is still expected to be +250k?
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
Ben Bergquam Joins The War Room For Border Update After Gov. Abbott Executive Order 4:02 min

Ben Bergquam Joins The War Room For Border Update After Gov. Abbott Executive Order
RealAmericasVoice Published July 7, 2022

Gov. Greg Abbott’s executive order falls short of declaring an invasion at the southern border.
Ben Bergquam joins the #WarRoom and reports live from Austin, TX with the latest from this announcement.

(Abbot has declined to declare an invasion but has granted additional funds. Bergquam says that won't do diddly. )
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
Eat bugs, get bugs 8:31 min

Eat bugs, get bugs
Rebel News Published July 7, 2022

From the World Economic Forum to the Canadian government, the money-grubbing bug pushers want you to abandon meat for the creepy crawling alternatives under the auspices of fighting climate change and bettering human health. If you eat the bugs, you might have more bugs than you bargained for: parasites.
►FULL REPORT by Sheila Gunn Reid: Gross! Eating bugs may give you parasites
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
2:33 min

Nigel Farage Says The 'Liberal World Order' Is Undemocratic
RealAmericasVoice Published July 7, 2022

"I still believe we have right and moral right on our side."
Charlie Kirk and Nigel Farage discuss the 'Liberal World Order' and how it might have some cracks in it.

(Farage: It is aimed at benefitting large multi-national corporations. It does not benefit ordinary people and it doesn't wok. It is almost and updated Marxist ideology of the Soviet Union. Human nature says it doesn't work. You can't defeat it by being complacent. You can only defeat it by winning election after election. He still believes, in spite of their influence, money and power, that we have right and moral right on our side and we can win this battle. The battle is Western civilization. It is the same battle across the entirety of the western world.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
Netherlands… Dutch farmers tow away the unwanted police vehicles .15 min

NETHERLANDS… DUTCH FARMERS TOW AWAY THE UNWANTED POLICE VEHICLES
^^^^^
Dutch Police Pull an Antifa! 1:00 min

DUTCH POLICE PULL AN ANTIFA!

^^^^
German farmers join Dutch farmers on the border to block Heerenberg roundabout! .17 min

GERMAN FARMERS JOIN DUTCH FARMERS ON THE BORDER TO BLOCK HEERENBERG ROUNDABOUT!
^^^^^
Ordinary people now joining the protest to support their farmers against the globalist policies .58 min

ORDINARY PEOPLE NOW JOINING THE PROTEST TO SUPPORT THEIR FARMERS AGAINST THE GLOBALIST POLICIES
^^^^^
LOCAL BUSINESSES SUPPORTING THE FARMERS PROTEST IN AMSTERDAM 1:41 min

LOCAL BUSINESSES SUPPORTING THE FARMERS PROTEST IN AMSTERDAM
^^^^
Polish farmers are rising up in Solidarity with Dutch Farmers! .18 min

POLISH FARMERS ARE RISING UP IN SOLIDARITY WITH DUTCH FARMERS!
 
Last edited:

marsh

On TB every waking moment

marsh

On TB every waking moment

REVEALED: Biden sold 1 MILLION barrels of oil from US Strategic Reserves to Chinese company Hunter Biden invested in
In 2015, a private equity firm cofounded by Hunter Biden bought a stake in the Sinopec Marketing valued at $1.7 million.

REVEALED: Biden sold 1 MILLION barrels of oil from US Strategic Reserves to Chinese company Hunter Biden invested in

Hannah Nightingale
Hannah NightingaleWashington DC

July 7, 2022 5:01 PM2 Mins Reading

Following Wednesday’s news that millions of barrels of oil released from America’s Strategic Petroleum Reserves were shipped overseas to China, India, and Europe, it has been revealed that nearly one million barrels of oil were sent to a Chinese energy company in which President Joe Biden’s son, Hunter Biden, had a stake as recently as 2015.

On Wednesday, Reuters revealed that more than five million barrels of crude oil that were expected to be put into use in the US to bring down skyrocketing prices at the pump were instead sent to European nations, India, as well as China.

Karine Jean-Pierre says " the lower gas prices that we're seeing, the prices starting to come down, is a good thing ... but we believe that more work still remains..." .32 min

In April, the Biden administration announced that 950,000 Strategic Petroleum Reserve barrels would be sold to Unipec, the trading arm of the China Petrochemical Corporation. Formerly known as Sinopec, this company is wholly owned by the Chinese government, according to the Washington Free Beacon.

The sales of these barrels, as well as others as part of the sales of 30 million barrels in total, "will support American consumers and the global economy in response to Vladimir Putin’s war of choice against Ukraine," the Department of Energy said in a statement, as well as "address the pain Americans are feeling at the pump as a result of Putin’s Price Hike and to help lower energy costs."

Speaking with the Washington Free Beacon, Power the Future founder Daniel Turner blasted the Biden administration for selling "raw materials to the Communist Chinese for them to use as they want."

"We were assured Biden was releasing this oil to America so it could be refined for gasoline to drive down prices at the pump. So right off the bat, they're just lying to the American people," Turner told the Washington Free Beacon. "What they're saying they did and what they did are not remotely related."

Turner noted that the decision to sell to Unipec highlights the Biden family's "relationship with China."

In 2015, a private equity firm cofounded by Hunter Biden bought a stake in the Sinopec Marketing valued at $1.7 million.

According to the Washington Free Beacon, "Sinopec went on to enter negotiations to purchase Gazprom in March, one month after the Biden administration sanctioned the Russian gas giant."

In addition, Unipec has stated it would purchase "no more Russian oil going forward" once "shipments that have arrived in March and due to arrive in April" were fulfilled, but it was revealed that in May, the company "significantly increased the number of hired tankers to ship a key crude from eastern Russia," according to Bloomberg.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Bill Gates: Let them eat bugs!
Bill Gates, co-chair, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, speaks at a news conference during the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Wednesday, May 25, 2022. The sale of prime North Dakota farmland to a group tied to Gates has stirred emotions over a Depression-era law meant to protect family farms and raised questions about whether the billionaire shares the state’s values. (AP Photo/Markus Schreiber, File)
Bill Gates, co-chair, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, speaks at a news conference during the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Wednesday, May 25, 2022. The sale of prime North Dakota farmland to a group tied to Gates has stirred ...

By Cheryl K. Chumley - The Washington Times - Thursday, July 7, 2022

OPINION:
The attorney general of North Dakota just cleared the way for Bill Gates to buy a couple thousand acres of farmland — adding to his already impressive level of property holdings across America.

The question, of course, is why would a former Microsoft executive who has spent the last two years chiding Americans to be more like China when it comes to coronavirus protections and forced COVID-19 shots want to own prime farmland at all?

Good question.

Let’s explore.

Gates is also a guy who’s sparked headlines like this, from The Post, in February — “Bill Gates wants you to eat artificial meat” — and this, from SurvivingTomorrow.org, in March: “Billionaire Elites Want You to East Bugs — And You Will.” Think that’s silly blogosphere clickbait?

Think again.

This, from the World Economic Forum, in September of 2019: “Burgers, bugs and the shift to a new way of eating.” Contained beneath that rather gross headline was this even grosser bit of news: “All Things Bugs, another US start-up, raised $100,000 in initial seed funding from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to develop an eco-friendly, ready-to-use therapeutic food product made from insects for children in famine-stricken countries.”

Bill Gates really does want us to eat bugs.

Back to his farmland deal.

Gates,” The Associated Press wrote in June, “is considered the largest private owner of farmland in [this] country with some 269,000 acres across dozens of states, according to last year’s edition of the Land Report 100, an annual survey of the nation’s largest landowners.”
That’s less than 1 percent of all of America’s total farmland.

But still.

But still: Land plus desire to develop bug-based food equals — eventual manufacturing? Again with the gross.

Red River Trust, a firm linked to Gates, spent $13.5 million on acreage owned by potato farmers in North Dakota. Concerned farmers raised questions about the purchase, citing a decades-old state law that protects individual farming operations by barring corporations, trusts and limited liability companies from farming. Attorney General Peter Headley investigated but gave the OK to the purchase after it was revealed the trust was going to lease the land back to farmers — therefore, keeping intact the laws of the state.

But that still leaves the question of why Gates wants the property.

Bill Gates: Rich nations should shift entirely to synthetic beef,” MIT Technology Review reported in February 2021, about topics Gates covered in his then-new book, “How to Avoid a Climate Disaster.”

And from his own GatesNotes post a few months earlier, in December 2020, hewrote this: “There’s another global disaster we also need to try to prevent: climate change … We need breakthroughs in the way we generate and store clean electricity, grow food …”

At least hestopped shy of calling for the eating of babies.

Remember this — from an Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez gathering in Queens, New York? “‘Get rid of the babies!’: Distraught woman at AOC town hall urges ‘eating babies’ to fight climate change,” a Fox News headline rang in October of 2019.

Obviously — off her rocker. But one has to wonder: At what point do elites and control freaks like Gates consider such hysterics sound solutions for climate matters?

“Where do greenhouse gas emissions come from?” Gatesasked in his 2018 GatesNotes post. “Agriculture — 24%. Cattle are a huge source of methane; in fact, if they were a country, they would be the third-largest emitter of greenhouse gases!”

Get rid of the cattle — get rid of 24% of greenhouse gas emissions.

Get rid of the cattle grazing lands — get rid of the cattle.

“In addition, deforestation — clearing land for crops, for instance — removes trees that pull CO2 out of the air, and when the trees are burned, they release all their carbon back into the atmosphere,” Gates also wrote in this same GatesNote.

Message received.

Farming bad; cattle badder. Gates, on a long-running crash course to zero emissions, thinks he’s the man with the plan to solve all. Let them eat bugs! It’s good for the environment.

Gates’ land purchases make perfect sense.

(COMMENT: Regarding forests and carbon sequestration, only young trees sequester carbon. Old growth releases carbon as do dead and dying trees. )
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Biden’s Swamp Brings Back ‘Sue And Settle’ To Hide Behind Courts As It Stomps Out Fossil Fuels

BY: TRISTAN JUSTICE
JULY 07, 2022
Washington Monument

IMAGE CREDITMIKE MAGUIRE / FLICKR/CC BY 2.0

The case, led by 10 environmental groups, includes all the trademarks of a ‘sue and settle’ suit.
Author Tristan Justice profile

TRISTAN JUSTICE

Anew lawsuit brought against the Department of the Interior last week by a series of left-wing interest groups is raising questions about the return of “sue and settle” cases as a signature feature of the Beltway swamp.

Led by the Dakota Resource Council, 10 environmental groups including the Center for Biological Diversity and the Sierra Club are suing the Interior Department, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), and their executives to put an end to federal lease sales for oil and gas drilling on public lands. Despite an 18-month suspension in lease sales and an overhaul of the leasing program that discourages drilling, the plaintiffs allege that the federal government failed to consider the global consequences of emissions from more oil and gas extraction.

“Federal Defendants acknowledge the fundamentally incremental nature of the climate crisis and the small and shrinking window that remains to avoid the most catastrophic effects of climate change,” the legal complaint states. “Federal Defendants also admit that their Federal Oil and Gas Leasing Program contributes significantly to the global climate crisis, and that the Lease Sales at issue here will collectively cause billions of dollars in social and environmental harm to people and the planet.”

The case includes all the trademarks of a “sue and settle” suit: Friendly interest groups present a legal challenge to a federal policy with proposed changes that are endorsed by the administration, which in turn voluntarily settles and enacts the preferred policy outcome behind the cover of the courts. The allied interest groups, meanwhile, pocket a handsome payout of taxpayer dollars in the process.

Administration officials have left no room for doubt in their desire to shut down the nation’s oil and gas program, following through on a pledge from the president made repeatedly on the campaign trail to “end fossil fuels.”

“No more drilling on federal lands,” Biden said on a CNN debate stage. “No more drilling, including offshore. No ability for the oil industry to continue to drill. Period.”

Indeed, Biden ordered the suspension of lease sales for oil and gas exploration on federal lands almost immediately upon his inauguration. The suspension remained in place until a federal judge in Louisiana ordered their resumption. The Biden administration, however, has dragged its feet on new sales while pledging to resist compliance, with White House climate adviser Gina McCarthy saying on MSNBC that “President Biden remains absolutely committed to not moving forward with additional drilling on public lands.”

Gary Lawkowski, an attorney at the Dhillon Law Group who specializes in administrative law and used to serve at the Department of the Interior, told The Federalist that while it was “too soon to say definitively” the current lawsuit brought by the Dakota Resource Council fit the exact criteria of a “sue and settle” case. The filing possesses “all the hallmarks of being one that would be hard to challenge a settlement in.”

The Trump administration tried to put an end to the practice in 2018 when the Interior Department established an online database to make the details of administrative settlements publicly accessible. According to the order, the department entered into more than 460 settlement agreements and consent decrees between Jan. 1, 2012, and Jan. 19, 2017, dishing out more than $4.4 billion in taxpayer dollars, more than a third of which was paid in the final year of the Obama White House.

Last month, however, Biden Interior Secretary Deb Haaland revoked her predecessor’s order and scrubbed the administrative website that placed settlements and consent decrees in the public eye. While the department “is committed to fair, transparent, and efficient resolution of all claims brought against it,” Haaland wrote, she said the requirements under the previous order presented “limitations” that “are burdensome, duplicative, and hinder the effective resolution of complex litigation matters.”

Biden’s Environmental Protection Agency also revoked a 2017 memo from former Administrator Scott Pruitt demonizing the “sue and settle” practice as a tactic that “undermines the fundamental principles of government.”

“The days of this regulation through litigation are terminated,” Pruitt wrote, only for them to return after the 2020 election.

Pete McGinnis of the Functional Government Initiative told The Federalist that the current suit before the Department of the Interior and the BLM was a prime example of “sue and settle” back in action.

“Last month, Interior rolled back the public webpage that provided transparency on these precise types of lawsuits,” McGinnis said. “With record gas prices and administration officials in full panic attempting to show the public they are doing something about it, the timing of this suit appears to seek the exact goals of Secretary Haaland and President Biden but without having to put their name on it.”

“And they won’t even have to tell the public about their settlement if it gets to that point,” McGinnis added.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Firefighters warn: Electric-car fires require 10 times more water to put out, up to 10,000 gallons

Warner Todd Huston, The Western Journal
By Warner Todd Huston, The Western Journal
Published July 6, 2022 at 8:55pm

As electric vehicles continue to be pushed on the nation by the Biden administration, certain facts are coming to light about them, and this time we are hearing warnings from the nation's firefighters.

As the number of electric car owners grows, so too are the problems peculiar to EV ownership.
From lack of charging stations, to unexpected expenses for repairs and now to water waste.

You read that right. Water waste.

According to News Nation firemen are warning that electric car fires are far more problematic than fires that engulf gas-powered vehicles.

Lt. Tanner Morgan with the Grand Prairie Fire Department near Dallas told News Nation that fire departments are not exactly ready to deal with EVs.

"We’re at that critical point where the consumer-driven world we live in is pushing these vehicles out and the fire department is playing catch up," he said.

Lt. Morgan went on to say that a gas-powered car typically takes less than 1,000 gallons of water to douse it when it catches on fire. But EVs are a bigger problem, he said. When an electric vehicle catches on fire, firemen are faced with a "thermal runaway."

Morgan added that the lithium-ion batteries in an EV fuel a fire to a much higher degree than gasoline. And firefighters are having to learn that they need different tactics to fight an EV fire.
Fremont Fire Department Battalion Chief Gary Ashley said, "The protocol is to start using copious amounts of water, up to 3,000 gallons, so that’s what we started doing."

Unfortunately, 3,000 gallons wasn't enough for a recent EV fire in Sacramento. News Nation reported that firefighters on that case didn't start getting the fire under control until 4,500 gallons were sprayed onto the flames. Authorities said that even when firefighters sprayed water directly on the battery compartment, the fire kept reigniting.

Even Tesla warned about the huge amount of water needed to douse an EV fire.

"Tesla’s own emergency response guide for the Model S warns that battery fires can require between 3,000 to 8,000 gallons of water to fully extinguish the flames," News Nations wrote. So, obviously, 10,000 gallons is not out of the question.

Officials are also warning rural fire departments -- in areas where fire hydrants are not available -- could face very dangerous conditions with EV fires, especially when many fire trucks cannot hold that much water.

"In rural areas, especially on interstates where there are no hydrants, this is going to create a logistical issue for emergency response agencies as they’re going to have to shuttle the water up that they need," the National Volunteer Fire Council's Tom Miller said.

Still, some advocates say EV fires are far less common than fires in other types of vehicles.
News Nation added that AutoInsuranceEZ finds that there were only 25 EV fires for every 100,000 electric vehicles sold. But there are more than 1,500 fires per 100,000 gas-powered vehicles sold.

Fires, of course, are only one heightened issue that electric vehicle owners are faced with. There are many new issues that car owners did not expect when becoming an EV owner.

President Joe Biden and his administration sell EVs as the miracle cure to the woes of rising gas prices. But what the administration doesn't note is that EVs have issues of their own.

There are much higher vehicle registration fees -- sometimes two and three times higher. And speaking of taxes, many states are considering per-mile taxes for EVs. And then there are the plans to place surcharges on homes with EV charging stations.

Then there is the problem with finding parts and service. Car dealers may be selling more EVs, but their service departments are not staffed with the needed number of trained mechanics and service personnel, nor do they have the needed stockpile of parts in stock to fix what has broken.

And this isn't even to mention the environmental issues and high costs with the massive batteries that make these cars go.

These are just some of the new troubles intrinsic to owning an electric vehicle. And we will continue learning about the pitfalls of these cars as more of them hit the road.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

As We’ve Warned About for Months, Fertilizer Price Hikes Prompt Soaring Food Prices and Global Shortages
Belle Carter
July 7, 2022

Fertilizer Shortage



Farmers are going through a fertilizer crisis caused by skyrocketing fossil fuel prices and industry consolidation. Liquid nitrogen, potash and phosphorus, three of the world’s most commonly used fertilizers, have more than doubled in price over the past two years.

A survey conducted by Minnesota-based data analysis firm DTN revealed that fertilizer prices are hitting all-time highs. As of May 1, the average price of liquid nitrogen was $730 per ton, diammonium phosphate was $1,050 per ton and urea was $1,012.

“Fertilizer makes up about 30 percent of the cost of growing an acre of corn,” said Gregory Ibendahl, who teaches farm management at Kansas State University. “But with the fertilizer price increase, now it is closer to 35 percent.”

On March 11, President Joe Biden pledged to tackle the problem in a press conference. He promised that his administration will create a $100-million program to support innovative American-made fertilizers to give U.S. farmers more choices in the marketplace. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) will invest $500 million to try to lower fertilizer costs by increasing production.

“But since this probably isn’t enough money to construct new fertilizer plants, it is not clear how the money will be spent,” said Kathleen Merrigan, Swette Center for Sustainable Food Systems executive director at Arizona State University.

Also, according to Gary Schnitkey, soybean strategy chair for the Agriculture and Consumer Economics Department at the University of Illinois, farmers don’t have realistic substitutes for fertilizer.

“Nitrogen can be supplied by livestock manures, but those were being used before and there’s not going to be more of a supply of manure,” he said.

Schnitkey further stated that last year, China cut exports of nitrogen fertilizer and Europe shut down nitrogen fertilizer production. He said high natural gas prices in both places made fertilizer production too expensive and several New Orleans-area nitrogen fertilizer plants shut down in the wake of Hurricane Ida, which hit Louisiana last August.

Jason Grant, director of the Center for Agricultural Trade at Virginia Tech, said the massive demand surge and a surge in the price of fuel and natural gas trickled down into fertilizer.
The supply chain was also greatly impacted by the war in Ukraine. Rabobank analysts said Russia exports nearly 20 percent of the world’s nitrogen fertilizers and, combined with Belarus, 40 percent of the world’s exported potassium. (Related: Global food and fertilizer supply crisis gives Russia significant leverage.)

“If fertilizer prices persist, food shortages will undoubtedly follow as farmers cut back to save money,” Grant pointed out.

He further lamented that wealthy countries like the U.S. will surely have the food they need. However, low-income countries that are already experiencing food shortages could see their food supply dwindle even more.

Farmers may turn to recycled urine amid fertilizer shortage
Due to the current global shortages, scientists have been looking for other ways to source fertilizers.

Merrigan, who has held senior positions at the USDA, including deputy secretary of agriculture from 2009 to 2013, stated on her website that producing more synthetic fertilizer should not be the only answer to this serious challenge.

“The U.S. should also provide support for nature-based solutions, including farming practices that help farmers reduce or forgo synthetic fertilizers, and biological products that substitute for harsher chemical inputs,” she said.

This presents an opportunity for a more sustainable way of growing nutrient-rich crops. French researchers found that peecycling (urine recycling) could be the liquid gold alternative to chemical fertilizers.

“Urine could be a nutrient-rich alternative to commercial fertilizers considering that pee is filled with nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium,” said Fabien Esculier, engineer and coordinator of the French OCAPI research program.

It is a well-known fact that synthetic nitrogen fertilizers boost agricultural production, but they go to river systems and other waterways when they are used in large quantities. This may cause blooms of algae that can kill fish and other aquatic life.

The engineer stated further that human waste is less polluting than synthetic fertilizers, which contain ammonia.

The Rich Earth Institute (REI) is a non-profit organization in Vermont and it has been working on how urine can be recycled and used as a fertilizer in farming for over 10 years now. The workers of the organization collect about 10 thousand gallons a year from volunteers who bottle it at home and then bring it to a “urine depot.”

They also rent out urine-collecting portable toilets for events and supply free funnels in Brattleboro.

Abe Noe-Hays, founder of REI, said using urine as fertilizer is a better approach because it is sustainable. “There is no doubt that urine can be a safe fertilizer for growing any kind of crop,” Noe-Hays narrated in a video produced by University of Michigan researchers.

Visit FertilizerWatch.com for more news related to fertilizer shortages.

Watch the below video that talks about a Biden administration official celebrating the rise in fertilizer prices because it will hurt farmers.

Environmental War- Biden Official Celebrates Fertilizer Prices Because It’ll Hurt Farmers 6:38 min
This video is from the NewsClips channel on Brighteon.com.

(Comment: Ironic that in the Netherlands ammonia and nitrogen from manures are deemed "toxic" climate change emissions that must be eliminated. )
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

A Decade Later: How DACA Eroded the Rule of Law in America
William Davis
William Davis

Posted: Jul 07, 2022 12:01 AM

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.

A Decade Later: How DACA Eroded the Rule of Law in America

Source: AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana

Ten years ago last month, President Barack Obama launched the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, a benefits program for illegal aliens who were brought to the U.S. as minors. A decade later, the damage DACA has done to the country and the rule of law is clear.

The DACA program currently shields over 800,000 illegal aliens and rewards them with perks typically reserved for American citizens, including driver’s licenses and social security numbers. The creation of DACA further polarized the immigration debate in the U.S., and started an anti-borders project that threatens to bring the U.S. to its knees.

Right now, America is dealing with a crisis of historic proportions on our border. In the first year of Joe Biden’s administration, the U.S. allowed roughly one million illegal aliens to cross our border at a taxpayer expense of $10 billion, according to an analysis from the Federation for American Immigration Reform. During that time period, we’ve seen a record surge in fentanyl crossing the border, which has killed tens of thousands of Americans, as well as a record number of migrant deaths. All of this would have been unthinkable ten years ago, and all of it became possible because of the slippery slope of lawlessness the country has been riding since the creation of DACA.

Just nine months before creating DACA, Obama acknowledged that he didn’t have the power to do so.

"I just have to continue to say this notion that somehow I can just change the laws unilaterally is just not true,” Obama said at the time.

Obama had long advocated for amnesty, but appeared to understand that he didn’t have the authority to do so by executive fiat. That all changed with DACA, and led to the creation of the Deferred Action for Parents of Americans (DAPA) just two years later. DAPA extended the legal protections and benefits in DACA to certain parents of illegal aliens. DAPA and DACA served as a one-two punch against the rule of law, rewarding millions of illegal aliens with amnesty without an act of Congress.

Around that same time period, the number of cities and counties designating themselves as sanctuaries for illegal aliens exploded. While sanctuary cities existed long before 2014, a map of sanctuary counties shows that the number of sanctuaries spiked in 2014, and continued to increase during the Trump Administration as liberal jurisdictions ferociously pushed back against the administration’s enforcement policies.

While politicians in both parties had advocated amnesty for decades, no previous president had tried to force through amnesty using executive action when they didn’t have the votes in Congress. By enacting DACA, despite admitting he lacked the authority to do so, Obama crossed a line, and set the stage for the Biden Administration’s lawlessness.

DACA represented the first major step in a long-term strategy to erase America’s borders and end our nation’s sovereignty. It’s unsurprising that the anti-borders movement chose DACA as their first frontier, given the sympathetic nature of some of the program’s beneficiaries.

“Think of the children!” is a useful rallying cry for any political movement, and the anti-borders movement is no different. Activists love to showcase DACA recipients who go on to be valedictorians or have great careers as examples of why the U.S. should provide a blanket amnesty for all of the program’s recipients.

What these advocates routinely fail to mention is that just 22 percent of DACA recipients have earned a college degree. A significant number of DACA recipients have also become involved with gangs, and gone on to live lives of crimes. In 2017, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services acknowledged that nearly 1,500 DACA recipients had their status revoked for committing crime, including over 500 for gang-related activities. Even if every DACA recipient was a valedictorian who went on to have a great career, that still would not justify rewarding millions of people in the country illegally with amnesty through unilateral executive action.

Lawlessness only begets more lawlessness, and there is no greater example of that reality than DACA. If one wants to understand how illegal immigration became normalized in the U.S., they only have to go back ten years to see how anti-borders activists used sympathetic children as pawns for a larger, more insidious agenda.

(COMMENT: W. VA vs EPA?)
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

“We Are Not Slaves, We Are Farmers!” – Polish and Italian Farmers RISE UP Against Government Elites Destroying Their Family Businesses

By Jim Hoft
Published July 7, 2022 at 9:15am

italy-farmers.jpg


Farmer protests continued in The Netherlands on Thursday. And now the movement is spreading.

Farmer protests were launched in Italy and Poland on Thursday.


Farmers in The Netherlands blocked supermarket distribution hubs on Monday, July 4th.

The farmers are outraged over new government regulations that force them to reduce their nitrogen fertilizer compounds and limit their number of livestock. The farmers argue that these policies will bankrupt their family business.

Reuters reported:
Reductions are necessary in emissions of nitrogen oxides from farm animal manure and from the use of ammonia in fertilizer, the government says, estimating a 30% reduction in the number of livestock is needed.
High-intensity farming of cows, pigs and other animals has made the Netherlands Europe’s leading emitter of the substances. Construction and traffic also contribute.
Dutch and European courts have ordered the Dutch government to address the problem. Farmers say they have been unfairly singled out and have criticised the government’s approach.
Traffic jams were reported on the highways.

In the Netherlands, the supermarkets are starting to run out of food on their shelves.

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1545037508152414214
.16 min

Farmers in Poland are now rising up against the elites.

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1545006265415368704
.19 min

Italian farmers are also rising up in protest against the stifling regulations against their livelihood.

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1544982392301129728
.43 min

Mass protests of farmers in Poland.

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1545000438902169601
.17 min
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Journalists Tow Camper Behind Electric Truck, End in Stunning Failure When They Only Make it 85 Miles


By Mike Landry July 6, 2022 at 3:44pm

Maybe you’ve seen the bumper sticker on a truck that says “Yes, this is my pickup. No, I won’t help you move.”

If you have an electric pickup, you may want to think about reversing the idea of that bumper sticker. Because helping someone make a short-distance local move may be about all you can do.

That’s an exaggeration, of course, but not by much. Because if you want to tow a trailer or a boat, your destination had better be close; otherwise you’ll be making frequent stops to recharge your battery system.

YouTube publisher Fast Lane Truck did a comparison between an electric and a gas-powered pickup to determine how far each could tow a 3-ton box trailer.

The contestants were an electrified Ford F150 pickup vs. a GMC Denali Ultimate Edition with a 6.2-liter V-8 gas engine.

View: https://youtu.be/-e55Vued028
22:30 min

Each towed an identical new “toy hauler” trailer about 25 feet in length that, while empty, was large enough to transport an entirely-sheltered automobile.

The vehicles began their test in Longmont, Colorado, heading southbound on Interstate 25 toward Denver, about 33 miles away.

The F150 charged up and the GMC filled up before taking to the road. The electric truck’s computer estimated 160 miles of range, which included calculating for the size and weight of the trailer. The gas-powered GMC’s computer, also taking the trailer into account, estimated 264 miles of range.

Off they went, with the goal of the F150 getting 147 miles down the road to a fast-charging station in Pueblo, Colorado.

But that estimate was optimistic. The electric truck had only traveled 6 miles when the computer recalculated range from 160 to 150 miles, cutting things very close if it was to reach Pueblo. That called for a change of plans — the new charging stop was Colorado Springs, about 45 miles closer.

After going 50 miles, the electric truck recalculated its range to indicate it couldn’t even make Colorado Springs. South of Denver, the truck was down to a 20 percent battery charge and, concerned about being stranded with a dead battery, the driver had to turn around and drive the F150 back north to the Denver exurb of Castle Rock to find a fast charger.

With low battery warnings blazing, and power automatically reduced to 90 percent, the electric truck, with 9 percent left on its battery, hobbled into a Target parking lot in Castle Rock.

But that caused another problem. Battery chargers tend to be lined in rows on the edge of parking lots. Because they do not provide a drive-through like a traditional gas pump, they cannot accommodate a vehicle with a trailer.

As a result, the F150 test vehicle and trailer were blocking a major portion of Target’s parking lot. “They’re probably not going to sponsor us in the future,” quipped one of the test participants.

The gas truck? Its computer showed 129 miles of remaining range, so that driver had enough range to return to their starting point in Longmont.

Then came an analysis of costs, which favored the electric vehicle.

In the end, the GMC, after returning to Longmont, traveled 156 miles and used 17.3 gallons of premium gasoline, costing $93.79. That comes to 60.1 cents per mile energy costs. And it still had 65 miles of range remaining.

At Castle Rock, the electric F150, after 45 minutes, was charged 74 percent; it was not fully charged due to time limits in needing to return the trailer at a point halfway back to Longmont. Cost of the 74 percent charge was $27.

At $27 for 74 percent of a charge, the electric F150 would have been fully charged at about $36.49. Subtract its remaining 9 percent charge valued at about $3.28 and its total energy cost was about $33.21. As a result, its 86-mile trip cost 38.6 cents per mile.

So the electric truck had the energy cost advantage.

An argument against electric vehicles is their cost. But in this case, vehicle cost comparisons are difficult to make –the GMC Denali Ultimate Edition is about $80,000; an electric Ford F150 can range anywhere from $40,000 to $90,000.

The electric F150 in the Fast Lane Truck video seemed to have a lot of options, indicating it might be a higher-priced model, but test participants didn’t say.

But the electric truck has a serious problem with range, especially when towing. Its computer was unable to accurately calculate its distance and the driver had to stop for a charge about 85 miles earlier than initially estimated. Indeed, efforts to get a charge became urgent when the battery became hazardously low.

There is a place for electric vehicles — high-density urban areas with perhaps lighter loads.

But attempting to electrify a classic brand like a Ford F150 and use it in its traditional duties makes it very out of place.

And there are the egregious efforts by the Biden administration to raise gas prices so we can all save the planet by buying electric vehicles.

Unrealistic — there’s more to practicality than nice-sounding ideas.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Spain Admits Spraying Chemtrails as Part of Secret UN Program

by Dr. Joseph Mercola
July 7, 2022
in Opinions

Chemtrails

STORY AT-A-GLANCE
  • A Royal Decree published by the Spanish government declared a state of emergency due to the COVID-19 pandemic, authorizing the use of biocide chemicals
  • The government order also details the intended application of the chemicals, which is via “aerial” techniques, not manual application
  • The Spanish government authorized the spraying of chemtrails under the guide of the “state of emergency” declared during the pandemic
  • An estimated 17% of people worldwide believe that chemicals are intentionally sprayed into the air as part of a secret large-scale atmospheric program (SLAP), also sometimes referred to as covert geoengineering or chemtrails
  • In a survey of experts on atmospheric chemistry, one scientist answered “yes” when asked whether they have ever encountered evidence that indicates the existence of SLAP, due to a remote location with unusually high levels of barium in the atmosphere
Chemical trails, commonly known as chemtrails, refer to the white trails sometimes left behind as airplanes fly through the sky. An estimated 17% of people worldwide believe that these trails are actually toxic chemicals that are intentionally sprayed into the air as part of a secret large-scale atmospheric program (SLAP), also sometimes referred to as covert geoengineering.1

Public officials have generally denied the existence of chemtrails, and a document published in 2000 by the U.S. EPA suggests “condensation trails,” or “contrails,” that are visible behind jet aircraft engines are “composed primarily of water (in the form of ice crystals) and do not pose health risks to humans,” but noted “they do affect the cloudiness of the Earth’s atmosphere, however, and therefore might affect atmospheric temperature and climate.”2

An order released by the Spanish government tells a different story, however, suggesting that it authorized its military to spray dangerous chemicals into the skies as part of a defense against COVID-19.3

Spanish Order Authorizes Biocide Spraying for Disinfection
A Royal Decree published April 16, 2020, a by the Spanish government in the Official State Gazette4 declared a state of emergency due to the COVID-19 pandemic, authorizing the use of biocide chemicals:5
“Order SND/351/2020, of April 16th, which authorizes the Armed Forces and Units and Military Emergency Units to use biocide chemicals authorized by the Ministry of Health for disinfection in order to deal with the Covid 19 Health Crisis.
Royal Decree 463/2020, of March 14th, hereby declares a state of emergency for the management of the health crisis situation caused by COVID-19, which includes a series of measures aimed at protecting the welfare, health and safety of citizens and the containment of the progression of the disease and strengthen the public health system.”
The decree granted the minister of health, Salvador Illa Roca, the authority to dictate said orders:6
“Order SND/351/2020, of April 16th, which authorizes the Armed Forces and Units and Military Emergency Units to use biocide chemicals authorized by the Ministry of Health for disinfection in order to deal with the Covid 19 Health Crisis.
Royal Decree 463/2020, of March 14th, hereby declares a state of emergency for the management of the health crisis situation caused by COVID-19, which includes a series of measures aimed at protecting the welfare, health and safety of citizens and the containment of the progression of the disease and strengthen the public health system.”
Use of ‘Aerial Media,’ ‘Nebulization’ Requested
In addition to acknowledging that the Ministry of Health had been evaluating the virucidal capacity of antiseptics and chemical disinfectants, the government order also details the intended application of the chemicals, which is via “aerial” techniques, not manual application:7
“Among the most effective disinfection techniques are the use of aerial media, then through them, with techniques of nebulization, thermo nebulization and micro nebulization, all surfaces are reached quickly, avoiding depending on manual application, which is slower, and sometimes does not reach all surfaces because there are obstacles that prevent reaching them.
The CBRN defense units of the Armed Forces and the Military Unit of Emergencies (UME) have personal means, materials, procedures and the sufficient training to carry out aerial disinfection, since they are operations that they execute regularly, with the exception that instead of using biocidal products do it with other decontaminating chemicals.
It is therefore that, in view of the foregoing and the effect of improving and streamlining the operations of disinfection of all types of facilities that the Armed Forces personnel come to carrying out, it is considered appropriate to authorize, exceptionally and for the duration of the state of alarm, the CBRN Defense Units of the Armed Forces and the UME, the use of disinfectants and biocides from main group 1 described in article 1.1 of Royal Decree 830/2010, of June 25, which establishes the regulations.”
In short, Planet Today reported, “The Spanish government ordered the military to quietly spray lethal chemtrails on its citizens with UN authorization under the cover of the ‘state of emergency for the management of the health crisis situation caused by Covid-19,’”8 and it’s not the first time they’ve done so.

According to the news outlet, in 2015 four whistleblowers from Spain’s meteorological agency told the European Parliament that chemicals were regularly being sprayed over the country to alter the climate:9
“On May 19, 2015, MEP Ramon Tremosa i Balcells (ALDE) announced in the European Parliament that four workers from the State Meteorological Agency had confessed that Spain is being sprayed entirely from planes that spread lead dioxide through the atmosphere, silver iodide and diatomite.
The objective, according to the same MEP, would be to ward off the rains and allow temperatures to rise, which creates a summery climatic environment for tourism and, at the same time, helps corporations in the agricultural sector. This, in turn, is producing cold drops of great intensity.”
Geoengineering Is Going Mainstream
Large-scale manipulation of the Earth’s climate, known as geoengineering,10 is becoming increasingly mainstream. The United Nations is among those now considering a controversial form of geoengineering, involving spraying sulfate aerosols into the Earth’s stratosphere in order to modify climate11 — with unknown, and potentially disastrous, effects.

Sulfate aerosols are tiny reflective particles that can reflect more sunlight back into space when they’re sprayed into the stratosphere 12 to 16 miles above Earth’s surface. This leads to lower global temperatures — as well as lower average precipitation,12 highlighting one significant potential downside.

A report by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), published in August 2021,13,14 mentions solar radiation management and greenhouse gas removal as forms of geoengineering.15 Sulfate aerosols fall into the solar radiation management category, but additional geoengineering techniques — such as thinning out cirrus clouds in the upper atmosphere — would be necessary to counteract the decrease in precipitation caused by their use.

What’s more, different regions could face severe outcomes from geoengineering techniques used in other parts of the world, to the extent that their ability to grow food could be affected. Report author Govindasamy Bala, from the Indian Institute of Science, said “the science is there”16 to use geoengineering, but it’s far from an exact one.

“I think the next big question,” Bala told Reuters, “is, do you want to do it? … That involves uncertainty, moral issues, ethical issues and governance.” As Reuters reported, “That’s because every region would be affected differently. While some regions could gain in an artificially cooler world, others could suffer by, for example, no longer having conditions to grow crops.”17 Paulo Artaxo, environmental physicist at University of Sao Paulo and another report author, added:18
“Basically the message is more or less the same as (the previous report): The science is not mature enough. The side effects of any of the known geoengineering techniques can be very significant … Society has to consider if these side effects are too big to try any strategy.”
Cloud Seeding Has Been Going on for Decades
It should be noted that certain forms of geoengineering are already in use. It was the middle of the 20th century when geoengineering was first developed, using World War II technologies.
Cloud seeding is one such example that’s been used for decades19 and involves “seeding” clouds with silver iodide or solid carbon dioxide to promote rain and snow or weaken tropical storms. At least eight western U.S. states and dozens of countries use cloud seeding to enhance precipitation.20

“In addition, the U.S. military suggested that nuclear weapons might be used as tools to alter regional climates and make certain areas of the world more favorable for human habitation. This proposal, however, was not tested,” Britannica reported.21

Other ideas to alter Earth’s climate have also been discussed. Proposed methods to reflect more sunlight to reduce global warming have included floating billions of golf balls in the oceans, sending a giant mirror into orbit, removing cirrus clouds, planting shinier crops and buildings and releasing microbubbles to make the ocean’s surface more reflective.22

The possibility of floating giant spaceships over the Earth to reflect sunlight has even been considered.23

Geoengineering as a Gateway for Social Control
Bill Gates is heavily invested in geoengineering techniques. In 2010, he funded research to develop machines that would spray seawater into the clouds with the goal of increasing the ability to reflect sunlight into space, and therefore reduce global temperatures.24

In 2018, Gates also helped fund experiments for Harvard scientists, who proposed spraying the stratosphere with calcium chloride to help slow the Earth’s warming by blocking out the sun.25'

But as Vandana Shiva, Ph.D. explained in our past interview,26 weather modification via geoengineering could be used as a weapon of control, including control of agriculture.
Writing in The Defender, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. also warned that Gates’ forays into climate control could easily be a guise for social control:27
“His investment history suggests that the climate crisis, for Gates and his cronies, is no more than an alibi for intrusive social control, ‘Great Reset’-scale surveillance, and massive science fiction geoengineering boondoggles, including his demented and terrifying vanity projects to spray the stratosphere with calcium chloride or seawater to slow warming, to deploy giant balloons to saturate our atmosphere with reflective particles to blot out the sun, or his perilous gambit of releasing millions of genetically modified mosquitoes in South Florida.”
Single Scientist Holdout Cites Barium in Atmosphere
Scientific research looking into chemtrails is unsurprisingly sparse, but one study does exist. Published in the journal Environmental Research Letters in 2016, it includes a survey in which experts on atmospheric chemistry and atmospheric deposition were asked to “scientifically evaluate the claims of SLAP theorists.”28

Nearly all — 76 out of 77 — of the scientists concluded that they had not encountered evidence of SLAP and believed chemtrails could be explained by other factors, “including well-understood physics and chemistry.”29 But there was one scientist who couldn’t rule them out and, in fact, answered “yes” when asked whether they have ever encountered evidence that indicates the existence of SLAP.30

They cited a remote location where barium levels in the atmosphere were unusually high compared to the levels of barium in the soil.31 Barium levels in the environment are typically very low32 — and abnormal concentrations of elements like barium are suggested to be one form of evidence of sprayed chemicals.33

 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YEkUSK0U2W0
11:41 min

EXPOSED: Biden is HIDING federal plans to ‘expand voting’



Glenn Beck


Soon after President Biden entered the White House, he issued an executive order declaring that all 600 federal agencies must ‘come up with a plan to expand voting,’ The Federalist’s Mollie Hemingway tells Glenn. She details in her recent article, ‘Yes, Biden Is Hiding His Plan To Rig The 2022 Midterm Elections,’ why this order was ‘alarming’ for many: ‘The executive branch does NOT have authority over our election systems,’ she tells Glenn. And, even more alarming? Those federal agencies had to submit their voting plans to SUSAN RICE. Hemingway tells Glenn the government refuses to release ANY detail concerning those agencies’ plans, seemingly until after the midterms are over. So what can be done? Listen to this clip to find out…
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
(Now they are after the water PFAS)

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0jdz1kUcdlM


If You Thought Empty Shelves Was Serious The EPA Just Put Out A Warning (On drinking water)


The Economic Ninja


Our drinking water has toxins in it and it is hurting us more than empty shelves we need to think about water. Lake Mead water levels are dropping fast. The Lake Mead Water level is getting critical for Las Vegas. Start Prepping for a problem with drinking water.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0jdz1kUcdlM&t=0s
^^^^^

The Disturbing Reason The EPA Issued A Warning About Drinking Water

BY HOPE NGO/JUNE 17, 2022 8:51 AM EDT

Most people are aware of the chemical substance that give cooking pans their non-stick quality, keep our outdoor gear waterproof, and our soft furnishings stain-proof. It's even in our fast food packaging. As a result, the substance has been making its way into our lives for, what seems like, a very long time.

But it has only been in the last few years that we've become much more aware of the dangers posed by PFAS, or poly and perfluoroalkyl substances, per NPR, and because they have been used for decades, they've made their way into our soil and our drinking water. As the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and the National Toxicology Program Director Linda Birnbaum points out, "We're finding them contaminating many rivers, many lakes, many drinking water supplies. And we're finding them not only in the environment, but we're finding them in people."

Now the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has released new warnings involving PFAS, saying that the chemical which has been linked to health problems, including certain types of cancer and liver disease, can contribute to these issues even when exposed to barely detectable amounts. This is significant because they are contaminating our drinking water (per Reuters). As a result, the EPA will be issuing new rules and guidelines to regulate the chemical. The agency is also taking action against PFAS in drinking water by earmarking $1 billion to help states with water quality testing and by installing centralized treatment systems.

EPA's new rule may be a case of better late than never

The action against PFAS could well be seen as "better late than never" for non-profit organizations, like the Environmental Working Group (EWG), which in 2020 warned that the chemical was detected in major water supplies across the country. In one study, EWG found that out of samples taken from 44 localities in 31 states, only one area had no detectable PFAS.

The American Chemistry Council — which counts big chemical firms 3M and DuPont as its members — says the EPA had "rushed the notices" about PFAS in water without waiting for a review from the Council's Science Advisory Board (per Reuters). But as far as the EPA's Administrator Michael Regan is concerned, there seemed to be no time like the present.

"People on the front-lines of PFAS contamination have suffered for far too long. That's why EPA is taking aggressive action as part of a whole-of-government approach to prevent these chemicals from entering the environment and to help protect concerned families from this pervasive challenge," Regan said in a statement (per NPR). The new rules replace advisories that had been issued in 2016, and they now warn that lifetime exposure to PFAS, regardless of amount, could trigger health problems.

The EPA is targeting the release of updated drinking water regulations before the end of this year, with"a final rule expected in 2023." This new information begs the question, is there a real difference between bottled and tap water?
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

88% Of Americans Believe Country On "Wrong Track" Amid Inflation Storm, Poll Says

THURSDAY, JUL 07, 2022 - 05:00 PM

The number of Americans in financial distress continues to soar, as the latest Labor Department report shows the consumer-price index at a 40-year high of 8.6% annually. The Monmouth University Polling Institute commissioned a new study that found a majority of Americans believe the nation is on the "wrong track" because of President Biden's economic policies.

Monmouth conducted the survey in late June and asked eleven questions to 978 adults age 18 and older. One question that piqued our interest was Question Six. It asked: "Would you say things in the country are going in the right direction, or have they gotten off on the wrong track?"

Not surprisingly, considering the inflation situation and impending economic downturn, 88% of respondents answered "wrong track."



"Economic concerns tend to rise to the top of the list of family concerns, as you might expect, but the singular impact of inflation is really hitting home right now," Patrick Murray, director of the Monmouth University Polling Institute, wrote in the study.

Murray added: "And most Americans are blaming Washington for their current pain."

When respondents were questioned about their "current financial situation," 42% said they were "struggling."



The study results mirror the weak performance of Biden's job approval data, at a record low of around 38%.

Even with 22 straight days of gasoline declines at the pump, the president's approval rating has yet to turn higher meaningfully -- and suggests failed "Bidenomics" has scarred many working-class folks.



The state of the consumer is concerning. Many have maxed out their credit cards and drained savings to survive the inflation storm. Millions are on the verge of eviction as they can no longer pay rent. Inflation has crippled many households, and the cure to inflation is a recession, which may inflict even more pain with increasing job loss.

High inflation is becoming hard to ignore, and the administration continues to scapegoat Russia for the highest inflation rate in 40 years.
"We've got a long way to go because of inflation, because of – I call it the Putin tax increase – Putin because of gasoline and all that grain he's keeping from being able to get to the market," Biden said on Wednesday in a speech to a union group in Ohio.
Monmouth's newest survey is a wake-up call for the Biden folks who assured everyone inflation "transitory" had been one of the worst calls in decades. The result is crushing the middle class (or whatever is left). People will take their anger out on "Bidenomics" at the polls and vote with their empty wallets come midterm elections.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Victor Davis Hanson: The Disappearing American?

THURSDAY, JUL 07, 2022 - 06:00 PM
Authored by Victor Davis Hanson,

“Help wanted”
and “Now hiring” signs are everywhere.

Flights, construction projects, and healthcare services are delayed – or unavailable – due to labor shortages.

Hourly and monthly wages spiral.

There is a growing disequilibrium between the number of available jobs and the declining pool of workers needed to fill them.



What is going on?
During the nearly two-year-long COVID-19 shutdown and economic downturn, firms cut costs by laying off millions of employees.

As a result, some in their early- or mid-60s simply retired early and never came back to work.

Federal and state governments also vastly expanded financial support to the unemployed.

Other workers figured they would not make all that much more by working and so are staying home on government checks.

Still other former full-time employees became used to the new, more leisurely lifestyle and are loath to return to a full 40-hour work week.

Employers also are now convinced that a hard recession is on the early 2023 horizon when the trillions of dollars of newly printed money run out. Many are willing to put up with worker shortages now, rather than hire too many employees only to have them idle when consumer demand soon crashes.

Still other workers fear yet another COVID pandemic and are not eager to return to daily contact with the public.
The government has no idea how some Americans remain sick with the mysterious “long COVID” chronic aftermath of the infectious phase of the disease.

Well over 100 million Americans have likely had COVID. An estimated 10-30 percent do not recover for months — or even years.

So, millions of COVID long haulers remain either unable to work or can only work part-time.

Yet no one yet has fully calibrated the effect of newly disabled millions on the American economy.

Add up all these dark clouds and America is experiencing a perfect storm, in which only 61% of the able workforce is currently officially employed.

Unfortunately, there are also even longer-term, structural labor problems for the U.S. economy that make it unlikely that a new larger generation of workers will soon surge into the labor force. And for now, Silicon Valley has not produced its long promised artificially intelligent robots that would allow machines to do much of the work of people.

True, there are more potential parents than ever before. And the American population has soared to over 330 million.

But our population is radically leveling off.
In just 14 years the fertility rate has crashed from 2.12 to 1.64 — meaning that both citizens and resident aliens in America are not replacing themselves.

While past demographic momentum has led to an all-time population high, the United States has already peaked demographically. And it will soon shrink and further age.

Thirty years ago, America had 80 million fewer people, but a quarter-million more annual births.

What explains the disappearing American?

Historically, as Westernized cultures become more affluent and leisured, whether it’s ancient Rome or modern America and Europe, they birth fewer children — even as their appetites for more household and personal help spike.

Life apparently is seen as too enjoyable to invest years in raising children. Americans are certainly marrying later. They are having fewer children — and in their 30s rather than 20s.

Women now make up nearly 60% of undergraduate college students. Female professional careers and delaying or avoiding birth are seen as essential to future family incomes.

Given that men who pass on college now account for 70% of enrollment declines in undergraduate education, there are far too few college-educated males for the new majority cohort of college-educated women.

The real gender crisis in America are these listless and stalled 20-something men. Too many are still living at home, not fully employed, often in debt, hooked on social media, video games, or satisfying their appetites — and with scant interest in marrying, much less raising children.

Figures on annual abortions remain hotly disputed. But the number of annual reported abortions still ranges between somewhere from more than 600,000 to just under 900,000.

There may be almost 20 abortions for every 100 American pregnancies — or one in five pregnancies that are terminated.

Our popular culture reflects this multifarious growing reluctance to raise children. And currently only 65% of children grow up in families with both parents.

The 2012 Obamacare ad, “The Life of Julia,” fixated on the new ideal American woman: a single parent of one child, unmarried, and utterly reliant on nearly 65 years of government support.

The 2013 follow-up bookend ad fetishized “Pajama Boy.” He was supposed to be a typical prolonged-adolescent, man-child — sitting at home in his child-like footie pajamas, sipping hot chocolate.

“Pajama Boy” was likely the sort that “Julia” had no intention of marrying.

There are historical downsides — economic, cultural, social, and military — to nations that shun child-raising.

They shrink in size, age, no longer believe in transcendence, become mostly agnostic or atheistic, and obsess on the self.

And sometimes they eventually become dysfunctional — and slowly disappear.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
4:33 min

Why Is Biden Sending U.S. Oil Reserves To The CCP?
Prime Time with Dr. Gina Published July 7, 2022

“Why in the world would [Biden] take oil from the United States and send it overseas?”

Ed Butowsky joins Dr. Gina to discuss the confounding news that Biden’s sending U.S. strategic oil reserves to Europe and the CCP.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
1:35 min

AMERICA LAST | American Oil Reserves Lowest Since 1986
Just the News - Not Noise Published July 7, 2022

American oil reserves are the lowest since 1986 as Biden sends 5 million barrels overseas.

Rep. Austin Scott: “When congress flips and the Republicans take control of congress. One of the first investigations we need to have is, what was done and why it was done, on this issue.”

(Comment: Perfect timing for a CCP Taiwan invasion.)
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
Facebook
Netherlands Farmers protest
1657263779977.png

^^^^
1657265231309.png

Feeding the farmers.

There are 2 locations where the farmers are . They are taken great care of . Yesterday at ter Apel, pizzas were delivered to the people, in Coevorden a company offered fries . A lot of thought is put into it . The photos from this morning .
Gr John,

^^^^
Im Kölner Norden 12... - Lohnunternehmen Markus Wipperfürth | By Lohnunternehmen Markus Wipperfürth | Im Kölner Norden 12 Schlepper auf 3 Brücken .20 min
In the north of Cologne, Germany 12 tug trucks on 3 bridges
 
Last edited:

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Germany's Largest Landlord To Restrict Heating At Night

FRIDAY, JUL 08, 2022 - 03:55 AM
Two days ago, Germany's second-largest town of Hamburg told residents to prepare for hot-water rationing during certain times of the day due to "an acute gas shortage."

Now, Germany's largest landlord has warned tenants that when the heating season starts in autumn, they will only be able to turn their heat up to 17C (62.6F) between the hours of 11pm and 6am.

A thermostat on a radiator. Photo /u/
krrad123

In a Thursday announcement, Vonovia said the move was intended to save energy and gas use during the current crisis. The company added that the change won't affect daytime temperatures, and that access to hot water won't be affected, meaning tenants can wash and shower as usual according to The Local.

Workers will modify the heating system during routine maintenance, and is expected to save around 8% on heating costs once the change comes into force.
Vonovia’s announcement comes after it emerged that a housing co-op in Saxony had taken drastic steps to minimise energy use in its buildings – including turning off the hot water for several hours a day.

The move means tenants of Dippoldiswalde Housing Cooperative can only take warm showers in the early mornings and late afternoons on the weekdays. The heating systems are also set to remain off until September. -The Local
Meanwhile, Germany's Federal Network Agency has been pushing for a change in the legal minimum temperatures for tenants - with president Klaus Müller telling the Rheinische Post last month that tenants should face pressure to reduce their energy usage ahead of winter.

"In tenancy law, there are specifications according to which the landlord must set the heating system so that a minimum temperature of between 20C and 22C is achieved," he said, adding "The state could temporarily lower the specifications for landlords. We are discussing this with politicians."

Right now the legal minimum temperature is currently 16-17C in the night, and 20-22C (68-71.6F) during the day.

With Germany scrambling to replenish its energy supply for the winter, Economics Minister Robert Habeck (Greens) has set strict legal targets for gas storage facilities - with just 40% of the usual deliveries flowing through the Nord Stream 1 pipeline from Russia.

If the situation continues to deteriorate, caps on energy usage or other measures - such as reducing temperatures in apartment complexes, may be ordered at the federal level.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Big Tech Isn't Woke... It's Totalitarian

FRIDAY, JUL 08, 2022 - 12:30 AM
Authored by Michael Senger via 'The New Normal' Substack,

In the mid-18th century, a secretive political group began spreading dangerous conspiracy theories throughout Britain’s colonies. British subjects had long enjoyed the freedom of expression, but these radicals abused novel communication platforms to churn out seditious literature not often grounded in fact, even resorting to threats and violence that endangered those around them.

According to their wild theories, a series of modest taxes levied by Parliament actually represented an incremental process to strip away their rights. They had no evidence to back their claims. After they arranged one of the costliest acts of vandalism in the history of the Empire, Parliament very reasonably invoked a state of emergency to protect the public. Yet, characteristically, rather than raising their objections through proper legal channels, these extremists co-signed a document penned by one of their most wily and manipulative agitators, falsely claiming to speak for all the colonists in declaring themselves above the law.

In a helpful rebuttal, Governor Thomas Hutchinson thoroughly debunked the document, outlining the many “false and frivolous” claims in this “list of imaginary grievances,” its signatories relying on spurious overtures to “what they called the natural rights of mankind” to evade substantive argument. Hutchinson noted the signers’ racism, “depriving more than a hundred thousand Africans of their rights to liberty,” discrediting their appeals to so-called “natural rights,” as well as “the absurdity of making the governed to be governors,” a laughable contradiction. Moreover, the document was misleading. “The real design was to reconcile the people of America to that Independence.” The signers even referred to their sovereign as a “tyrant,” a profanity for which “indignant resentment must seize the breast of every loyal subject.” The Empire had always been about saving lives, after all—even if it occasionally fell a bit short.


In this story, most readers now recognize the birth of the world’s oldest democracy and the modern constitutional republic. But perhaps those who presently govern the mega-platforms collectively referred to as “Big Tech,” on which most online discourse now takes place, take it as a warning of what can go wrong if citizens are permitted to freely express their beliefs.



As strangely low an ethical standard as it was, the days of “Don’t be evil” appear to have been left far behind. Big Tech platforms now routinely side with raw state and corporate power, showing a disregard bordering on outright disdain for the rights and welfare of the human beings whom their actions affect. The recent history of Big Tech is a history of repeated usurpations, all demonstrating as their direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over the people.

Big Tech platforms openly disavow any role in abiding by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, to which all American citizens owe a duty and to which any person who chooses to become an American citizen must swear an oath to uphold and defend. They censor centuries-old news organizations for publishing true, factual, and timely information.

Big Tech platforms routinely censor the legal speech of citizens, concealing the rationale behind their decisions and applying their terms of service selectively, if at all. They mislead the public as to the scale and scope of this censorship, systematically silencing the most articulate voices on one side of any given debate unbeknownst to the vast majority of the public.

Big Tech platforms openly collude with governments to suppress the speech of their own people, while overtly abusing the legal system and paying massive settlements to conceal the evidence of their collusion. They craft the false illusion of consensus on political issues of their own choosing, a power unprecedented in our democracy and historically held only by the most despotic regimes, promising in every instance to wield it for good, but falling short every time.

Big Tech platforms deploy artificial intelligence to censor and de-boost citizens and opposing viewpoints with increasingly inhuman detachment and efficiency. They retain as leading AI experts—on their boards of directors—personnel with deep and well-documented ties to the militaries of the world’s worst dictatorships.

Big Tech platforms routinely apply fact-check labels to true stories and information based on unrelated contextual issues, manipulating political narratives by deceiving the public into believing that the pertinent information is itself false. Meanwhile, they ignore large-scale bot and astroturf campaigns affecting political outcomes all over the world—despite harrowing accounts from whistleblowers—while misleading the public as to the frequency, scale, and purpose of these bot and astroturf campaigns.

Big Tech platforms censor the voices of the most well-qualified citizens under the Orwellian pretext of combatting “misinformation,” drowning out their views with those of disinformation agents and bots. Meanwhile, they anoint as “experts” those who hold no relevant qualifications in the designated field other than a groveling deference to the viewpoints of Big Tech, who then regularly publish falsehoods without retribution.

Big Tech platforms employ managers who accept bribes to censor political dissidents fighting against the world’s deadliest regimes, to whom they show obsequious deference. They bear a growing resemblance to organized crime syndicates, submitting false statements to the highest courts of law while hiding behind an unlimited legal budget and cutesy PR campaigns replete with amorphous birds and round, lower-case letters to escape legal scrutiny.
This is no far-off dystopia. As rapidly as they’ve transpired, these things are already happening, and this is the reality of the world that Big Tech has created today. Given their systematic suppression of dissent against lockdowns, which ultimately killed over 170,000 Americans and countless millions more around the world, it’s hard to think of any ostensibly-private enterprise since the British East India Company that’s been responsible for more widespread human suffering. Much of this behavior is surely being coerced by the federal government, just as the East India Company was largely doing the bidding of the British Government. But Big Tech might want to ask how well “just following orders” worked as a defense in 1945.

I conclude with the words of another individual who ultimately came to sign that radical 18th-century document, but other than whom no man ever fought harder for peace.

“Look upon your Hands! They are stained with the Blood of your Relations! You and I were long Friends. You are now my Enemy—and I am Yours.”

 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Greta Fumes As EU Declares Nuclear & NatGas 'Green'

THURSDAY, JUL 07, 2022 - 11:00 PM

Members of European Parliament (MEPs) voted on July 6 not to reject adding nuclear and natural gas activities to the European Union taxonomy for sustainable investments, paving the way for the EU to include such projects in its so-called “green” investments.



As OilPrice.com's Tsvetana reports, in a vote on Wednesday, most members of the European Parliament did not support a motion to block the Commission’s proposal. A total of 278 MEPs voted in favor of the resolution to block the proposal, 328 voted against, and 33 abstained. The vote failed to reach an absolute majority of 353 MEPs which was needed for Parliament to veto the Commission’s proposal.

If neither Parliament nor Council object to the proposal by July 11, 2022, the act will enter into force and apply as of January 1, 2023, the European Parliament said.

The EU could reject the “green” status for gas and nuclear if 20 out of the EU’s 27 member states reject it, which is highly unlikely, analysts say.

The European Commission updated earlier this year its Taxonomy Complementary Climate Delegated Act on climate change mitigation and adaptation covering certain gas and nuclear activities. Under the new taxonomy, some gas projects, including several pipelines, were given a “sustainable investment” status. Gas projects are “transitional” if they contribute to the transition from coal to renewables, the EU says.

The bloc is accelerating its efforts to reduce dependence on Russian pipeline gas after Russia invaded Ukraine, cut off the gas supply to several EU members that refused to pay in rubles, and most recently, slashed supply to major customers, including Germany and Italy.

The “green status” for gas and nuclear has stirred a lot of controversy in EU institutions and among officials.

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1544698246848716801
.13 min

Some have argued supporting gas is now of critical importance with an unreliable major supplier, Russia. Others have said that the war in Ukraine and the Russian behavior in energy supply should be a wake-up call for the EU and the world to look to renewables and ditch dependence on fossil fuels.

And Greta is mad...

1657278951733.png

As Brad Palumbo writes at The Washington Examiner, Thunberg is not the only supposed climate activist who has shunned nuclear power.



Here in the United States, far-left Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) took major flack because her so-called “Green New Deal” did not mention the word “nuclear.” Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and Bernie Sanders (I-VT) actually campaigned for president in 2020 on the stance that we should not build new nuclear plants and should “phase out” nuclear energy.

So Thunberg’s viral stance is just the latest in a long history of the green Left opposing nuclear power. But this blind spot is utterly unsupported by the actual evidence and reveals that these activists' true priority is not protecting the climate from carbon emissions. If that was really their priority, they’d be pushing nuclear power like crazy.

According to the U.S. Department of Energy , nuclear energy is a “zero emissions clean energy source” that also “keeps the air clean by removing thousands of tons of harmful air pollutants each year that contribute to acid rain, smog, lung cancer and cardiovascular disease.”

Indeed, as of 2017, nuclear energy produced 57% of America’s clean energy, per DOE.

Of course, left-wing activists cite the waste produced by nuclear power generation as what makes it supposed not really “green.” But this isn’t a legitimate argument. As the DOE explains,

“All of the used nuclear fuel produced by the U.S. nuclear energy industry over the last 60 years could fit on a football field at a depth of less than 10 yards.”

Surely, we can manage to store that amount of waste safely, and it’s undoubtedly worth the trade-offs in terms of the enormous reduction in other pollutants. Indeed, DOE says that nuclear energy in the U.S. since 1995 has had the carbon dioxide emissions prevention equivalent of taking 3 billion cars off the road!

So why do so many left-wing activists still oppose nuclear energy and support the status quo, under which many countries’ governments make nuclear energy development incredibly difficult?

Some are undoubtedly well-intentioned and just misinformed about the facts regarding nuclear. Others may remain understandably but unduly scared by the word “nuclear” and one-off tragedies such as the Fukushima, Japan, meltdown , which happened using long-outdated nuclear technology.

But the truth is that many left-wing activists, such as Ocasio-Cortez, oppose nuclear energy because their real climate agenda is a backdoor for radical socialist economic overhaul and the destruction of capitalism. You don’t have to take my word for it. Ocasio-Cortez’s former chief of staff openly said that the “Green New Deal” actually “wasn’t originally a climate thing at all,” adding, “We really think of it as a how-do-you-change-the-entire-economy thing.”

So, the real antipathy against nuclear stems from the fact that nuclear energy is an efficient, zero-emissions, safe form of energy production that can address climate change through deregulation rather than a sweeping socialist overhaul of the economy.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

RON PAUL: What We’re Facing Today Is ‘A Lot Worse’ Than The Depression (VIDEO)

By Mike LaChance
Published July 8, 2022 at 12:16am
Ron-Paul-Vaccine-Passports.jpg


During a recent interview, Dr. Ron Paul, the former Texas Congressman and presidential candidate, made some grim predictions about the economy and where we are headed.

He basically suggested that what we are facing now is possibly on par with the Depression and other massive economic downturns.

This is made all the more scary by how right Paul has been about other things.

Breitbart News reports:
Ron Paul: What We’re Facing Today ‘a Lot Worse’ than the Depression, Recent Downturns

Tuesday, during an appearance on Newsmax TV’s “American Agenda,” former Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) warned the country was worse off than it had been in some of the most challenging economic times in its history, including the Great Depression of the last century.
Paul decried the economic policies of inflating the money supply and the U.S. debt as the causes.
“[T]he founders understood exactly what we’re talking about,” he said. “They had the runaway inflation with the Continental Dollar. So they put in the Constitution that only gold and silver could be legal tender. And if we had followed that, we wouldn’t have had the welfare-warfare state with these huge deficits and what we’re facing because I think what we’re facing today is a lot worse than what we’ve had in the past, whether it was the Depression or whether it was the downturns we’ve had in recent years.”
Watch the video below:

View: https://youtu.be/TN__SttGuVM
6:05 min

Ron Paul has been talking about this stuff for years.

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1544652392758738944
.40 min

1657279348668.png

The United States is in a dark place.

Let’s hope Biden doesn’t somehow manage to make it even worse.


Cross posted from American Lookout.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
Become Ungovernable: Eva Vlaardingerbroek Breaks Down Why the Dutch Farmers' Protests Are So Pivotal 2:41 min

Become Ungovernable: Eva Vlaardingerbroek Breaks Down Why the Dutch Farmers' Protests Are So Pivotal
The Vigilant Fox Published July 7, 2022

(Notes - Eva: The Dutch government using this "nitrogen crisis" to steal the farmers land. The farmers realize that most of them will be put out of business and they're not having it. They've blocked roads and food distribution sites. They are fighting back and it is their right to do so. This is their life's work. They are at their wits end and are devastated by what the government is doing.

It is quite obvious that the government is not doing this because of a nitrogen crisis. They're doing it because they want the farmer's land. They want it to house new immigrants. They want it because the farmers are standing in the way of the Great Reset 0plans they have for us. Farmers are hard working, God fearing self-sufficient people that are standing in the way of their globalist agenda. It is driving some farmers to suicide.

There is only one word for what the government is driving us to and that is Communism.

Carlson: Messing with the food supply tends to cause food crisis and then famine. You are seeing this in the developing world because of climate activism and Ukraine. Are normal Dutch citizens worried about what happens when you shut the farms down?

Absolutely they understand it - no farmers, no food. That's why the farmers blocked the food distribution centers, because in a matter of hours we saw the grocery shop shelves were empty. The people understand this. The problem is that the state doesn't understand this - or it is what they want.

The police have responded in an incredibly violent way. As you have seen, they have even shot at a 16 year old boy. These are things you should not see in a free western country, especially against peaceful protesters. Everyone from around the world should be supporting the farmers -especially in America, because this could be happening to you. The farmers are doing it so courageously and they really are doing it and have the power to do it, so they deserve your full support.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
Rebel's Lincoln Jay joins Laura Ingraham to discuss the Dutch farmer rebellion 3:47 min

Rebel's Lincoln Jay joins Laura Ingraham to discuss the Dutch farmer rebellion
Rebel News Published July 7, 2022

(Lincoln: A group of farmers protesting 1 1/2 hours from Amsterdam. There are several groups. What we are seeing is very similar to the trucker in Ottawa, Canada. These are everyday people who are sick and tired of government and globalists trying to take more control over our lives.

Laura: One farmer you interviewed thinks there is a larger goal as pertains to agriculture and land.

Dutch Farmer:...we believe it's part of a bigger plan. They need our land. They don't need our nitrogen.

Lincoln: Farmers who have had their land in their bloodline for generations are now at risk of potentially losing it. He thinks the bottom line is the farmers believe this is going to destroy their livelihoods. but in the government's eyes it is about combatting climate change. These climate change regulations are going to make it impossible for the younger generation here in the Netherlands to get into farming.

He thinks the rest of the world is watching what is happening here and is scared that this is going to come to their country.

Laura: We have a lot of large landowners in America, with hundreds of thousands of acres that have been taken out of agriculture and a lot of people want to know why.

FarmerRebellion.com
 

raven

TB Fanatic

Greta Fumes As EU Declares Nuclear & NatGas 'Green'

THURSDAY, JUL 07, 2022 - 11:00 PM

Members of European Parliament (MEPs) voted on July 6 not to reject adding nuclear and natural gas activities to the European Union taxonomy for sustainable investments, paving the way for the EU to include such projects in its so-called “green” investments.



As OilPrice.com's Tsvetana reports, in a vote on Wednesday, most members of the European Parliament did not support a motion to block the Commission’s proposal. A total of 278 MEPs voted in favor of the resolution to block the proposal, 328 voted against, and 33 abstained. The vote failed to reach an absolute majority of 353 MEPs which was needed for Parliament to veto the Commission’s proposal.

If neither Parliament nor Council object to the proposal by July 11, 2022, the act will enter into force and apply as of January 1, 2023, the European Parliament said.

The EU could reject the “green” status for gas and nuclear if 20 out of the EU’s 27 member states reject it, which is highly unlikely, analysts say.

The European Commission updated earlier this year its Taxonomy Complementary Climate Delegated Act on climate change mitigation and adaptation covering certain gas and nuclear activities. Under the new taxonomy, some gas projects, including several pipelines, were given a “sustainable investment” status. Gas projects are “transitional” if they contribute to the transition from coal to renewables, the EU says.

The bloc is accelerating its efforts to reduce dependence on Russian pipeline gas after Russia invaded Ukraine, cut off the gas supply to several EU members that refused to pay in rubles, and most recently, slashed supply to major customers, including Germany and Italy.

The “green status” for gas and nuclear has stirred a lot of controversy in EU institutions and among officials.

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1544698246848716801
.13 min

Some have argued supporting gas is now of critical importance with an unreliable major supplier, Russia. Others have said that the war in Ukraine and the Russian behavior in energy supply should be a wake-up call for the EU and the world to look to renewables and ditch dependence on fossil fuels.

And Greta is mad...

View attachment 349087

As Brad Palumbo writes at The Washington Examiner, Thunberg is not the only supposed climate activist who has shunned nuclear power.



Here in the United States, far-left Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) took major flack because her so-called “Green New Deal” did not mention the word “nuclear.” Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and Bernie Sanders (I-VT) actually campaigned for president in 2020 on the stance that we should not build new nuclear plants and should “phase out” nuclear energy.

So Thunberg’s viral stance is just the latest in a long history of the green Left opposing nuclear power. But this blind spot is utterly unsupported by the actual evidence and reveals that these activists' true priority is not protecting the climate from carbon emissions. If that was really their priority, they’d be pushing nuclear power like crazy.

According to the U.S. Department of Energy , nuclear energy is a “zero emissions clean energy source” that also “keeps the air clean by removing thousands of tons of harmful air pollutants each year that contribute to acid rain, smog, lung cancer and cardiovascular disease.”

Indeed, as of 2017, nuclear energy produced 57% of America’s clean energy, per DOE.

Of course, left-wing activists cite the waste produced by nuclear power generation as what makes it supposed not really “green.” But this isn’t a legitimate argument. As the DOE explains,

“All of the used nuclear fuel produced by the U.S. nuclear energy industry over the last 60 years could fit on a football field at a depth of less than 10 yards.”

Surely, we can manage to store that amount of waste safely, and it’s undoubtedly worth the trade-offs in terms of the enormous reduction in other pollutants. Indeed, DOE says that nuclear energy in the U.S. since 1995 has had the carbon dioxide emissions prevention equivalent of taking 3 billion cars off the road!

So why do so many left-wing activists still oppose nuclear energy and support the status quo, under which many countries’ governments make nuclear energy development incredibly difficult?

Some are undoubtedly well-intentioned and just misinformed about the facts regarding nuclear. Others may remain understandably but unduly scared by the word “nuclear” and one-off tragedies such as the Fukushima, Japan, meltdown , which happened using long-outdated nuclear technology.

But the truth is that many left-wing activists, such as Ocasio-Cortez, oppose nuclear energy because their real climate agenda is a backdoor for radical socialist economic overhaul and the destruction of capitalism. You don’t have to take my word for it. Ocasio-Cortez’s former chief of staff openly said that the “Green New Deal” actually “wasn’t originally a climate thing at all,” adding, “We really think of it as a how-do-you-change-the-entire-economy thing.”

So, the real antipathy against nuclear stems from the fact that nuclear energy is an efficient, zero-emissions, safe form of energy production that can address climate change through deregulation rather than a sweeping socialist overhaul of the economy.
What source of energy generation has been regulated to death because the catastrophic failures associated with it?
Nuclear Power Generation.
What source of power is the only "non-fossil fuel" powered source of energy generation that has any possibility of replacing fossil fuels?
Nuclear Power Generation.

They have accomplished the first step - villainizing fossil fuels.
Now they have to create enough hardship to accomplish the second step - convince you nuclear is safe enough.
Nuclear Power is wonderful - it can be completely controlled by the government and provide a steady income stream to politicians.
 

raven

TB Fanatic

Big Tech Isn't Woke... It's Totalitarian

FRIDAY, JUL 08, 2022 - 12:30 AM
Authored by Michael Senger via 'The New Normal' Substack,

In the mid-18th century, a secretive political group began spreading dangerous conspiracy theories throughout Britain’s colonies. British subjects had long enjoyed the freedom of expression, but these radicals abused novel communication platforms to churn out seditious literature not often grounded in fact, even resorting to threats and violence that endangered those around them.

According to their wild theories, a series of modest taxes levied by Parliament actually represented an incremental process to strip away their rights. They had no evidence to back their claims. After they arranged one of the costliest acts of vandalism in the history of the Empire, Parliament very reasonably invoked a state of emergency to protect the public. Yet, characteristically, rather than raising their objections through proper legal channels, these extremists co-signed a document penned by one of their most wily and manipulative agitators, falsely claiming to speak for all the colonists in declaring themselves above the law.

In a helpful rebuttal, Governor Thomas Hutchinson thoroughly debunked the document, outlining the many “false and frivolous” claims in this “list of imaginary grievances,” its signatories relying on spurious overtures to “what they called the natural rights of mankind” to evade substantive argument. Hutchinson noted the signers’ racism, “depriving more than a hundred thousand Africans of their rights to liberty,” discrediting their appeals to so-called “natural rights,” as well as “the absurdity of making the governed to be governors,” a laughable contradiction. Moreover, the document was misleading. “The real design was to reconcile the people of America to that Independence.” The signers even referred to their sovereign as a “tyrant,” a profanity for which “indignant resentment must seize the breast of every loyal subject.” The Empire had always been about saving lives, after all—even if it occasionally fell a bit short.


In this story, most readers now recognize the birth of the world’s oldest democracy and the modern constitutional republic. But perhaps those who presently govern the mega-platforms collectively referred to as “Big Tech,” on which most online discourse now takes place, take it as a warning of what can go wrong if citizens are permitted to freely express their beliefs.



As strangely low an ethical standard as it was, the days of “Don’t be evil” appear to have been left far behind. Big Tech platforms now routinely side with raw state and corporate power, showing a disregard bordering on outright disdain for the rights and welfare of the human beings whom their actions affect. The recent history of Big Tech is a history of repeated usurpations, all demonstrating as their direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over the people.

Big Tech platforms openly disavow any role in abiding by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, to which all American citizens owe a duty and to which any person who chooses to become an American citizen must swear an oath to uphold and defend. They censor centuries-old news organizations for publishing true, factual, and timely information.

Big Tech platforms routinely censor the legal speech of citizens, concealing the rationale behind their decisions and applying their terms of service selectively, if at all. They mislead the public as to the scale and scope of this censorship, systematically silencing the most articulate voices on one side of any given debate unbeknownst to the vast majority of the public.

Big Tech platforms openly collude with governments to suppress the speech of their own people, while overtly abusing the legal system and paying massive settlements to conceal the evidence of their collusion. They craft the false illusion of consensus on political issues of their own choosing, a power unprecedented in our democracy and historically held only by the most despotic regimes, promising in every instance to wield it for good, but falling short every time.

Big Tech platforms deploy artificial intelligence to censor and de-boost citizens and opposing viewpoints with increasingly inhuman detachment and efficiency. They retain as leading AI experts—on their boards of directors—personnel with deep and well-documented ties to the militaries of the world’s worst dictatorships.

Big Tech platforms routinely apply fact-check labels to true stories and information based on unrelated contextual issues, manipulating political narratives by deceiving the public into believing that the pertinent information is itself false. Meanwhile, they ignore large-scale bot and astroturf campaigns affecting political outcomes all over the world—despite harrowing accounts from whistleblowers—while misleading the public as to the frequency, scale, and purpose of these bot and astroturf campaigns.

Big Tech platforms censor the voices of the most well-qualified citizens under the Orwellian pretext of combatting “misinformation,” drowning out their views with those of disinformation agents and bots. Meanwhile, they anoint as “experts” those who hold no relevant qualifications in the designated field other than a groveling deference to the viewpoints of Big Tech, who then regularly publish falsehoods without retribution.

Big Tech platforms employ managers who accept bribes to censor political dissidents fighting against the world’s deadliest regimes, to whom they show obsequious deference. They bear a growing resemblance to organized crime syndicates, submitting false statements to the highest courts of law while hiding behind an unlimited legal budget and cutesy PR campaigns replete with amorphous birds and round, lower-case letters to escape legal scrutiny.
This is no far-off dystopia. As rapidly as they’ve transpired, these things are already happening, and this is the reality of the world that Big Tech has created today. Given their systematic suppression of dissent against lockdowns, which ultimately killed over 170,000 Americans and countless millions more around the world, it’s hard to think of any ostensibly-private enterprise since the British East India Company that’s been responsible for more widespread human suffering. Much of this behavior is surely being coerced by the federal government, just as the East India Company was largely doing the bidding of the British Government. But Big Tech might want to ask how well “just following orders” worked as a defense in 1945.

I conclude with the words of another individual who ultimately came to sign that radical 18th-century document, but other than whom no man ever fought harder for peace.

“Look upon your Hands! They are stained with the Blood of your Relations! You and I were long Friends. You are now my Enemy—and I am Yours.”

Once you learn about the phrase "life, liberty, and property" were the original natural rights,
you begin to understand that the Declaration of Independence was in great measure simply good marketing
like the words "Healthy for You" on a can of Crisco.
All men are not equal and no one believes it.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

"Shockingly Naive": Bloomberg's Tom Keene Wrecks Biden Official Over Absurd Gas-Price Blame-Game

FRIDAY, JUL 08, 2022 - 02:20 PM

You know it's bad when...

In a recent interview on Bloomberg TV, Biden official Heather Boushey, who sits on the Council of Economic Advisers, was asked by host Jonathan Ferro about economically illiterate comments from the administration regarding the price of gas at the pump.



Ferro laid out how the Biden admin's latest scapegoat, gas station owners, was so poorly received that Amazon owner Jeff Bezos called them out on it.

1657320771157.png

"Where's that messaging coming from?" asked Ferro, to which Boushey returned word salad.

Unsatisfied with her bullshit, host Tom Keene held her feet to the fire - asking "You didn't answer his important question - everyone in the nation wants to know the answer to the question Mr. Farro just asked you, which is 'who is advising the president on shockingly naive price theory over a gallon of gas.'

To which Boushey robotically returned to the 'time of global crisis' talking points.

"Is this central planning now?" asked Ferro.

Answer? More word salad.

Watch:

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1545041103749095430
2:17 min
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Something Snaps In The US Labor Market: Full, Part-Time Workers Plunge As Multiple Jobholders Soar

FRIDAY, JUL 08, 2022 - 02:05 PM
Something odd emerges when looking at the June payrolls report.

On one hand, the closely followed establishment survey came in red hot, and despite dropping modestly from May, it still printed some 100K above the median consensus expectation, at 372K vs the median consensus of 268K...



... and with wages in line with expectations, rising 0.3% M/M or 5.1% Y/Y, it was enough for many to conclude that calls of a recession are premature because, after all, you can't enter a recession when jobs are rising by almost 400K.

True... but a problem emerges when looking at the more detailed, if less closely watched, Household survey. Here, unlike the Establishment Survey, the June jobs change was actually a striking 315K drop, and after the April plunge of 353K, the June drop was actually the biggest going back to the March 2020 crash.



And since the Household survey also feeds other closely watched ratios, such as the labor force participation rate, it explains why despite the apparent "surge" in June jobs, the LFP declined and is now unchanged since January.



So what's going on here? Well, starting at the top, we find the following discrepancy:
  • Establishment Survey: +372K
  • Household Survey: -315K
But things only get worse after that, because if one goes back a little more, one finds that something appears to have broken a few months ago, around March, when the Establishment Survey kept on rising unperturbed, while the Household Survey hit some unexplained brick wall, and hasn't moved at all.



In fact, since March, the Establishment Survey shows a gain of 1.124 million jobs while the Household Survey shows an employment loss of 347K!



But wait, there's more, because digging in even deeper, we find that this drop in Household Survey employment is the result of both full-time and part-time jobs. In fact, as shown below, since March, the US has lost 70K full-time employees and 462K part-time employees.



This trend has persisted into June, when according to the BLS, the US labor force saw a 152K drop in full-time workers and a 326K drop in part-timers (source). The offset? Multiple jobholders, or people who have more than one job.

As shown below, while the number of total employees (per the Household Survey) has stagnated, the number of multiple jobholders has been growing steadily, hitting a new post-covid high in June of 7,541 million.


The increase for June? 239K, which stands in stark contrast to the decline in individual holders of single part-time and full-time jobs.


And even more remarkable: the number of multiple jobholders whose primary and secondary jobs are both full-time just hit a record high! Hardly the sign of a strong job market, one where people can afford to quit jobs at will.




So what's going on here? The simple answer: Fewer people working, but more people working more than one job, a rotation which picked up in earnest some time in March and which has only been captured by the Household survey.

And since the Establishment survey is far slower to pick up on the nuances in employment composition, while the Household Survey has gone nowhere since March, the BLS data engineers have been busy goalseeking the Establishment Survey (perhaps with the occasional nudge from the White House) to make it appear as if the economy is growing strongly, when in reality all they are doing is applying the same erroneous seasonal adjustment factor that gave such a wrong perspective of the labor market in the aftermath of the covid pandemic (until it was all adjusted away a year ago). In other words, while the labor market is already cracking, it will take the BLS several months of veering away from reality before the government bureaucrats accept and admit what is truly taking place.

We expect that "realization" to take place just after the midterms, because the last thing the Biden administration can afford is admit the labor market is crashing in addition to the continued surge in inflation.
 
Top