CORONA Main Coronavirus thread

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Despite Fauci Reassurance, CDC Advisory Panel Delays Vote On Un-Pausing J&J Vaccine By 10 Days

WEDNESDAY, APR 14, 2021 - 05:33 PM

Update (1730ET): The CDC health advisory panel has made a decision to not make a decision about reinstating the Johnson & Johnson vaccine.

The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, or ACIP, is a panel of independent experts who advise the C.D.C. on its vaccine policies. At the meeting, the experts reviewed and debated data from the rare blood clots, including a seventh case, and heard comments from the public, before voting on how to proceed.

During the panel discussion, one expert reminded the panel that the “risk window” for the condition among vaccine recipients was still open and new cases might emerge, because nearly 3.8 million people had received the shot within the last two weeks.

Bloomberg reports that panelists at this time seem to be divided with some favoring a longer pause - perhaps for weeks - to investigate more vs. others who worry about the effects of not having the J&J vaccine available, especially to the communities it was being targeted toward.

One panelist said an extended pause shouldn’t be interpreted as a concern about the J&J vaccine - yet the public perception would partly be just that.
“The most at-risk will remain at risk,” the panel member said. He notes that the U.S. is still logging high caseloads and deaths. He said the initial reason for the pause was for health-care professionals to get more data.
“I would urge that any pause be counterbalanced with the equity considerations” that would occur because of the pause.
Following the multi-hour discussion today, the panel decided they needed more time to assess the data and risks, and would not vote on a recommendation until they meet again in a week or 10 days.
* * *

There was one figure whose voice was notably absent during the response to yesterday's disconcerting news about Johnson & Johnson's shot causing the same types of rare-but-deadly blood clots that European public health officials have seen caused by AstraZeneca's vaccine (which is based on the same adenovirus vector as the J&J jab): Dr. Anthony Fauci.

Despite spending his days fielding press interview requests, the doctor played only a secondary role in the FDA & CDC's announcement and its explanation for why it would all of a sudden halt the J&J jab. Not that the halt was such a huge surprise, as reporters learned during yesterday's press briefing, which was led by the heads of the CDC and FDA.


After making an appearance at White House Press Secretary's briefing on Tuesday, Dr. Fauci went when he started his latest round of interviews, appearing on MSNBC and CNN to defend the J&J jab, saying that it's still safe and that distribution would soon restart.

The European Medicines Agency's safety committee announced late last week that it is investigating thromboembolic (blood clot) events following vaccination with JNJ’s vaccine. PRAC is investigating these cases and will decide whether regulatory action may be necessary. But experts have been closely watching the AZ and JNJ jabs because of FDA briefing documents on JNJ's Phase 3 vaccine data showed a troubling discrepancy for thromboembolic events (blood clots) between the placebo group and the group that received the vaccine.

thromboembolic events.

Concerns about potentially harmful blood clots have been disrupting COVID vaccine trials since last fall, when the AstraZeneca trial in the US was halted for more than a month. But Dr. Fauci appeared to wave away these risks, told CNN that while it is necessary to see if there are many more cases of clotting tied to the J&J jab, Dr. Fauci doesn’t expect that will be the case.

Speaking on CNN's New Day program on Wednesday, Fauci said: "There’s a twofold reason: one for an abundance of caution of safety, take a quick look, get more details, but also a heads up to the physicians out there that if you see these kinds of cases, don’t treat them with heparin. There are other modalities of treatment that could be used."

Dr. Fauci added "this isn't a cancellation, it's a pause."
"If anyone’s got a doubt that they may not be taking safety very seriously, I think this is an affirmation that safety is a primary consideration when it comes to the FDA and the CDC," he said.
"That’s why it was done and that’s why it’s a pause."
As for the larger issue of vaccine hesitancy, Fauci said that while the wait-and-see approach is “understandable,” there just isn't enough data available to rule out every possible coplication.
"Over 120 million -- close to 130 million people have already received at least one dose of this. That's a lot of people. How long do you want to wait and see? You have almost half the country who's received at least one dose. I think we've had enough wait and see. Let’s do it," he said.
Also, while we're on the subject of safety, just a reminder - don't stop being fearful:

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1381600900263870467
.45 min

And while people can still choose to wait it out, as corporations and even some governments push for vaccine passports as a method to speed up the economic reopening, the freedom of making that choice is being effectively taken away from American citizens.
 

PrairieMoon

Veteran Member
Interesting info...

A provider (DNP) I was working with the other night told us that her husband came down with covid, as well as her young child. She tested negative, but had an interesting call with employee health (large hospital system). Her husband was not vaccinated.

She was asked what type of vaccine she received. Pfizer.

Then she was asked what lot number. She found her vaccine info and rattled off the lot number, to which the employee health nurse finished the last few numbers by memory, and said lots of people who were vaccinated with that particular Pfizer LOT number were developing covid infections! (most were providers who had their vaccines last December/January)

There must be a lot of breakthrough infections for them to figure out the relationship with certain lots of the vaccine.

She's pissed because she was of the understanding the Pfizer vaccine was the top of the line. She was also told she would come down with covid next week....to expect and plan for it.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

California County To Launch Digital Vaccine Passport For Your "Peace Of Mind"

WEDNESDAY, APR 14, 2021 - 08:46 AM
Authored by Tom Ozimek via the Epoch Times

California’s Orange County plans to launch a pilot program for digital CCP virus vaccine and testing passports, according to health officials.

The vaccine and testing credentialing arrangement will be rolled out sometime in April, Orange County Health Care Agency officials said on Twitter.
"The Digital Passport enables individuals to participate safely and with peace of mind in activities that involve interactions with other people, including travel, attractions, conferences/meetings, concerts, sports, school and more," officials added.
While details are scant about how the digital vaccine passport would work, the Orange County health agency’s director and health officer, Dr. Clayton Chau, told the O.C. Register that the county’s existing Othena vaccine scheduling app could be modified to include a credentialing feature.

The Othena app is being used to schedule vaccine appointments at the county’s mass inoculation sites, including at Disneyland.

Chau also told the outlet that printed cards could be issued for use by people who don’t use smartphones.


California Public Health Officer Dr. Tomás Aragón said last week that there are currently no plans to create a state-level vaccination passport system, although health officials are looking into formulating standards and guidelines around the use of such credentials, KTLA reported.

Aragón said that if federal authorities “don’t move fast enough” with developing such guidelines, "we will come up with technical standards that will be expected—really focusing on making sure that privacy is protected and that equity is protected."

It comes amid controversy over vaccine passport-style systems, which have been proposed in some countries, and as some U.S. states and regions have either considered their adoption or moved forward with their deployment.

Hawaii Gov. David Ige’s latest emergency proclamation includes a plan for vaccine passports that would allow travelers to avoid quarantine and COVID-19 testing. While there is no timeline for its adoption and it still needs approval by the director of the Hawaii Emergency Management Agency, Lt. Gov. Josh Green told Hawaii News Now that the plan is to launch a pilot for inter-island travel by May 1.

New York state has also rolled out its “Excelsior Pass” system that would require people to show that they have been vaccinated when trying to enter certain events and locations.

Vaccine passports have been criticized by civil liberties groups, who say they would potentially violate Americans’ privacy rights while denying key services to people who are not vaccinated.

The Biden administration has said that it would not develop a federal vaccine passport system, but that it would come up with guidelines around their use and leave development to the private sector and local authorities.
"The government is not now, nor will we be supporting a system that requires Americans to carry a credential. There will be no federal vaccinations database and no federal mandate requiring everyone to obtain a single vaccination credential," White House press secretary Jen Psaki told reporters at the White House last week.
Psaki last month responded to reports that the administration was working with private firms to create a passport system, saying the administration would only provide guidance.
"Our interest is very simple from the federal government, which is Americans’ privacy and rights should be protected so that these systems are not used against people unfairly," Psaki clarified Tuesday. She again said the government would provide guidance on privacy concerns related to vaccines.
Several governors, including Texas Gov. Greg Abbott and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, both Republicans, have issued executive orders barring the use of vaccine passports.

Rep. Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.) has also introduced legislation that would ban federal agencies from future issuance of any standardized documentation that could be used to certify COVID-19 vaccination status to third parties, like airlines or restaurants.

Biggs’s proposed bill, called the No Vaccine Passports Act (pdf), would also prohibit proof of COVID-19 vaccination from being a requirement to access federal or congressional property and services, Biggs’s office said in a statement.

"My private health care decisions—and yours—are nobody else’s business," Biggs said. "Vaccine passports will not help our nation recover from COVID-19, instead, they will simply impose more Big Brother surveillance on our society."
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Indian Crematoriums Overwhelmed As Country Struggles With Second-Worst COVID Outbreak

TUESDAY, APR 13, 2021 - 10:10 PM
India's crematoriums and burial grounds are working overtime. Even during the worst of the coronavirus pandemic last year, mortuaries in the world's second-most populous country managed to cope - if only barely.

Now, after facing a sharp jump up in daily new infections over the last 10 days, India has retaken its status as the second-worst hit country in terms of COVID. On Tuesday the country reported 161,736 new cases and 879 deaths, more than four times the daily average in January. Some have seen bodies piled up.
“Earlier 15 to 20 bodies were coming in a day and now around 80 to 100 dead bodies are coming daily," said Kamlesh Sailor, the president of a trust that operates a crematorium in Surat, a city in the industry-heavy western state of Gujarat.
"Even after the crematorium doubled capacity when India’s first virus wave struck last year and started operating 24 hours a day, families still needed to wait at least two to three hours to cremate the bodies of their relatives," he added.
Business is booming so much, it has become a problem, per BBG.
"We can’t afford to have long queues of people at the crematorium, as that again increases the risk of spreading infection," Sailor said.
"The situation is likely to worsen going ahead as hospitals across the city are filled to capacity."
The deluge of infections and deaths highlights just how unprepared Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s administration has been to deal with the latest wave of the epidemic. Many of India's neighbors are now struggling with outbreaks of their own after watching India struggle.

Local media has been filled with grim reports of melting furnaces at crematoriums running non-stop, bodies piling up and smoke from continuously burning flesh creating another health risk for locals. Workers at six crematoriums across the country confirmed the scenes in phone interviews, saying they’ve seen Covid-19 deaths climbing.




Source: worldometer

One public health professional warned that long lines at crematoriums could also contribute to higher infection rates. In the capital New Delhi, the largest burial ground and cremation centers reported an average of 8-9 Covid deaths a day, up from one or two a month ago. They are preparing for more after the city on Monday reported a record high of over 11,000 new infections.

The deluge of infections and deaths highlight just how unprepared Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s administration has been to deal with the latest wave of the epidemic, even as India has emerged as a global leader in production of the vaccine, while also winning early praise for its hated national lockdowns.

In the past weeks large crowds have gathered for elections rallies in five states, festivals, and religious pilgrimages -- indicating things could get even worse for the country and its crematoriums.

As Bloomberg pointed out, Media footage of queues at hospitals, critical medicine shortages, and an exodus of migrant workers heading to rural villages in fear of another lockdown has been reminiscent of the strict shutdown roughly a year ago that gave rise to one of the worst humanitarian crises the region has seen in decades.

The High Court in Gujarat on Monday urged the state government to take quick measures to deal with the growing health crisis and demanded an official report in two days. The state's lawyer, Kamal Trivedi, told the court that last week the government compelled some hospitals to set aside facilities for Covid treatment.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Meet the Media’s New Boogeyman: “Vaccine Hesitancy”

by Luis Miguel April 14, 2021

Meet the Media’s New Boogeyman: “Vaccine Hesitancy”
tupungato/iStock/Getty Images Plus

The media’s pressure campaign is working overtime to ensure Americans get their COVID-19 shots.

Mainstream outlets are now calling for Americans to beware of “vaccine hesitancy,” which they characterize as an unjustified fear of vaccines that arises in response to very real considerations about the safety of the coronavirus vaccines.

The Hill on Wednesday, for example, published a piece entitled “The Memo: Specter of vaccine hesitancy rises after J&J blow.”

“The pause in the use of the Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine announced Tuesday is virtually certain to exacerbate vaccine hesitancy, dealing a fresh blow to the nation’s efforts to recover from the pandemic,” writer Niall Stanage laments. Adding, “Vaccine hesitancy is on its way to becoming the main hurdle in the fight against the virus, experts say.”

Over at Axios, a similar article, “The new vaccine threat is fear itself,” argues that there are no legitimate health concerns about the vaccine, that it’s all in the mind of the “vaccine hesitant.”

“The FDA’s decision to pause the use of Johnson & Johnson’s coronavirus vaccine has set off a chain reaction of fear — about the safety of the vaccine, and about whether the FDA is overreacting — that’s causing unnecessary drama just as the vaccine effort is finally picking up speed,” wrote Sam Baker.

These pieces came after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommended a pause on distributing the Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine owing to blood clotting in six women.

Both President Joe Biden and Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), were quick to try to assure the public about the supposed safety of the shot.

The establishment is employing the help of the entertainment industry to convince Americans to get vaccinated. Stars including Jennifer Lopez, Demi Lovato, Matthew McConaughey, and Lin-Manuel Miranda will join Biden, Fauci, and former President Obama for an NBC TV special titled Roll Up Your Sleeves, set to air Sunday, April 18.

The mainstream media has largely ignored reports of adverse reactions and deaths related to the vaccine.

Two weeks after receiving the shot, Dr. Gregory Michael, an OB-GYN in Miami Beach, “died after suffering a hemorrhagic stroke apparently resulting from a lack of platelets,” according to the Palm Beach Post.

Michael’s wife believes the vaccine caused the death of her husband. In a heart-wrenching post on Facebook, Heidi Neckelman blamed the vaccine:
The love of my life, my husband Gregory Michael MD an Obstetrician that had his office in Mount Sinai Medical Center in Miami Beach Died the day before yesterday due to a strong reaction to the COVID vaccine. He was a very healthy 56 year old, loved by everyone in the community delivered hundreds of healthy babies and worked tireless through the pandemic. He was vaccinated with the Pfizer vaccine at MSMC on December 18, 3 days later he saw a strong set of petechiae on his feet and hands which made him seek attention at the emergency room at MSMC.
Social-media platforms are doing their part to encourage everyone to get the shot. Back in December, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg said he would work with Biden to “push” the COVID-19 vaccine. The company also declared that it will enforce a stricter level of censorship related to coronavirus and vaccinations, removing content it deems contains false claims about COVID-19 vaccines.

Even as Americans are injured by these vaccines, federal law shields the drug makers from liability. Specifically, the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, passed by Congress at the behest of Big Pharma lobbyists, protects vaccine manufacturers from litigation for deaths and injuries caused by their products.

Basically, if a vaccine kills your child or permanently disables you, the vaccine manufacturer cannot be held responsible. Instead, the federal government created a special “court,” in which tax-funded federal lawyers defend the makers of the vaccine, placing taxpayers on the hook for any damages. Billions have already been paid out to injured parties. No other industry enjoys such immunity from liability.

Once blasted as the stuff of “conspiracy theories,” we are now getting closer to an implantable, under-the-skin COVID passport.

Already, the Pentagon’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), a secretive agency established at the height of the Cold War and tasked with protecting soldiers from contagious diseases and biological weapons, has created a “subdermal implant” to detect COVID-19 infection.

The implant not only tests the blood for viruses but also assists in removing the viruses from the blood when used together with a dialysis machine.

The threat COVID vaccine passports pose to American liberties is a very clear and present danger. Citizens heeding the warning should not hesitate to contact their local state legislatures to vote against such potentially dangerous state mandates.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

EXCLUSIVE: House Republicans On Doctors Caucus Demand Answers From Fauci On Health Risks Related To Border Crisis

Photo By Bill Clark:CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images 2121231

Photo By Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images

HENRY RODGERSSENIOR CONGRESSIONAL CORRESPONDENT
April 13, 202111:30 AM ET

A group of House Republicans who are physicians and or former health care workers sent a letter to Dr. Anthony Fauci regarding the health risks related to the current border crisis Tuesday, calling on him to express his concerns on the national health emergencies created by the surge in illegal immigration.

The Daily Caller first obtained the letter which was organized by North Carolina Rep. Greg Murphy and signed by twelve other lawmakers, who all serve on the Doctors Caucus. In the letter they ask Fauci, the top infectious disease expert at the National Institute of Allergy & Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and President Joe Biden’s top medical advisor, to call out the health risks associated with the influx of migrants coming across the southern border every day, many of who have not been tested for COVID-19.

“Several of us, who are your fellow physicians and healthcare professionals, recently visited our southern border and have come away with grave concerns over the lack of COVID-19 accountability during this world-wide pandemic. The Border Crisis is a public health emergency as well as an issue of national security.

In your role as Chief Medical Advisor to the President, we feel it is imperative that you use your position to publicly express your concerns over the national health emergencies created by this surge in illegal immigration,” part of the letter states.

Murphy explained his reasoning for sending the letter in a conversation with the Daily Caller, where he said Fauci is neglecting his duties as the chief medical adviser to the president.

“We’re very disappointed… If you look at our southern border, our northern border, you can’t fly into this country without a negative COVID test. But they’re allowing people really across the border to come in who are COVID positive. The Customs and Border Patrol agents are doing the very, very best they can to try to catch these individuals and if they can quarantine them. By the sheer numbers, we know that individuals are coming into this country who are COVID positive,” Murphy said,

“This is in light of the feared fourth surge. So for Dr. Fauci, as the chief medical adviser to the president, to say that he has nothing to do with the border is him neglecting his duties. He should be commenting upon what’s going on at the border and trying to deal with that,” he added.

READ THE LETTER HERE: [Scribd doc on website]

1618462955016.png
Daily Caller Obtained Docs … by Henry Rodgers

The Daily Caller asked Murphy if he believes Fauci will respond to their letter to which he said, he certainly hopes so.

“Well, I hope he will. We’re fellow physicians. This isn’t in any way meant to be an attack, but it is a very big concern and it grows on the fact that he has said it’s not his duty. Well, we think it is his duty to speak on this particular issue because it is a threat to our national security. It’s a threat to the nation’s health during a pandemic. Everybody turns to him for leadership during the pandemic and for him to be silent on this is very disturbing to we as physicians and health care providers,” Murphy said.

Murphy was joined by Georgia Rep. Drew Ferguson, Texas Rep Ronny Jackson, Ohio Rep. Brad Wenstrup, Maryland Rep. Andy Harris, Pennsylvania Rep. John Joyce, Texas Rep. Brian Babin, Georgia Rep. Buddy Carter, Iowa Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks, Tennesse Rep. Diana Harshbarger, Tennessee Rep. Mark Green, Indiana Rep. Larry Bucshon, and Tennessee Rep Scott DesJarlais.

The NIAID did not immediately respond to the Daily Caller about the letter.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

“Here’s How it Works, Dr. Fauci, I Get to Ask You the Questions!” – Rep. Jim Jordan Puts Arrogant Fauci in His Place (VIDEO)

By Cristina Laila
Published April 15, 2021 at 2:21pm
IMG_0129.jpg

Congressman Jim Jordan (R-OH) ripped Fauci apart on Thursday for flip-flopping on Covid mitigation measures.

Rep. Jordan, the ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee, demanded Fauci give him a date for the end of Covid restrictions.

“15 days to slow the spread turned into 1 year of lost liberty,” Jim Jordan said.
To no one’s surprise, Fauci, an unelected, overpaid bureaucrat, said: “I don’t look at this as a liberty thing, Congressman Jordan. I look at this as a public health thing.”

Of course not. Fauci is not beholden to the people and doesn’t take an oath to defend the Constitution.

WATCH:
View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1382722011135361027
1:59 min

Jim Jordan put arrogant Fauci in his place.

“Are we gonna be here two years from now wearing masks …?” Jim Jordan asked Fauci.

“You’re ranting again,” pompous Fauci retorted.

“Here’s how it works, Dr. Fauci. I get to ask you the questions,” Jim Jordan said.

WATCH:

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1382738615990620163
1:11 min
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
First of all, I am not an attorney, but I wanted to discuss the authority that the federal and state government has to order mask wearing, social distancing, lockdowns, business closures.

As far as I know, the "police powers" of government rest with the state, not the federal government. Fauci and the CDC can only issue guidelines and talk about the science.

The police powers are the power to regulate/restrict behavior as it affects the peace, good order, morals, and health of the community. The "sideboards" on this regulation are the natural rights protected by the Constitution from regulation.

The power to regulate stems from the power to prohibit. The individual action must be legitimately identified as inherently "bad," harmful, dangerous or injurious to the public. Legislation may then either:

grngrbut.gif
Prohibit the action entirely;

grngrbut.gif
Require mitigation of its "evils;" or

grngrbut.gif
Regulate or supervise the performance of the action through imposition of rules.

Regulated action is, therefore, "permitted" action that could otherwise be legitimately prohibited, deriving its authority solely as a privilege granted by government.

You cannot regulate a right as that turns it into a conditional privilege.

With this understanding, I could see how a person who is infectious or has been exposed to infection or is awaiting the results of a test could be required to quarantine away from people as a danger to the public health. However, this reasoning would not apply to the suspension of protected liberties such as the freedom to assemble, free exercise of religion or the natural ones such as freedom of movement, or civic rights such as freedom to engage in commerce that is not inherently injurious to the community if the person is not infectious or exposed.

The notion that rights suddenly become conditional privileges because there are individuals with disease in the community doesn't really fit the police powers as established in the US. They do not seem to be preventive powers, unless it pertains to a substantial risk presented by the individual to the community. They do not seem to stretch to regulating the community to protect from a risk presented by an individual. We are not like China where the CCP can top down order everyone into lockdown. At least, we weren't supposed to be.

The notion that the Bill of Rights can be suspended under "emergency" conditions and that, henceforth, everything becomes an emergency to throttle individual rights is a dangerous trend. [We have a "climate emergency," a "gun violence epidemic," an "insurrection at the Capitol," etc.]

The portion of the Constitution that mentions suspension is in regard to the writ of habeas corpus.

ref: Interpretation: The Suspension Clause | The National Constitution Center

"The Suspension Clause protects liberty by protecting the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus. It provides that the federal government may not suspend this privilege except in extraordinary circumstances: when a rebellion or invasion occurs and the public safety requires it.

"Appreciating the significance of this restraint first requires understanding the writ of habeas corpus. This writ, which Americans imported into the Constitution from English common law, is a means by which a prisoner can test the legality of her detention. A person who believes she is being imprisoned illegally can file a petition asking a judge to issue a writ of habeas corpus. When a prisoner files a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, her custodian must explain why the restraint is lawful. If the explanation does not satisfy the court, it will order the custodian to release her. The writ is thus a crucial means by which a prisoner can obtain freedom."

Individual liberty is an essential natural right. Ex parte Virginia, 100 U.S. 366. "By 'liberty,' as thus used, is meant something more than freedom from physical restraint or imprisonment. It means freedom, not merely to go wherever one may choose, but to do such acts as he may judge best for his interest not inconsistent with the equal rights of others; that is, to follow such pursuits as may be best adapted to his faculties, and which will give to him the highest enjoyment...."

What danger does a person who is not ill pose to the community that his liberty should be suspended? Shouldn't the individual assess his own risk and modify his behavior accordingly? If this is not the case, expect perpetual lockdown and regulation for a long series of "emergencies."
 
Last edited:

marsh

On TB every waking moment

SHOCK VIDEO: UK Police BREAK DOWN DOOR and Arrest Man in Front of Family for Violating COVID Quarantine Rules

by Jim Hoft
Published April 15, 2021 at 7:15am
cops-arrest-uk-quarantine.jpg

In an absolutely frightening display, UK police broke through a locked door and arrested a man for violating COVID quarantine rules.

The police are heard bashing the door in and then quickly entering the apartment to arrest the man.

Summit News desribed the scene.
A video shows police in the UK smashing down a man’s door and arresting him for violating COVID quarantine rules.

The shocking clip shows a woman, presumed to be the man’s wife or girlfriend, recording the front door to the property as glass flies into the house while officers break in.
The woman accuses the police of committing criminal damage and threatens to take them to court as a panicked dog runs up the stairs, narrowly avoiding being hit by the glass.
"You're supposed to be here to protect us!” the woman shouts as the police enter the house.
The two officers ask the woman to step out of the way as she demands their badge numbers.
“Where’s your warrant?” she asks them.
“Martin, you’re under arrest for a breach of COVID regulations, you failed to quarantine in a designated hotel when instructed to do so,” the man is told as handcuffs are slapped on him.
Here’s the video.

Rumble video on website 1:02 min
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Where's Dr. Fauci As Another Corona-Myth Dies?

THURSDAY, APR 15, 2021 - 04:38 PM
Authored by John Tamny via RealClearMarkets,

For over a year well-to-do Americans have quite literally been “quarantining” packages shipped to them, and that were dropped off at their residences by “science-denying” untouchables who lacked the means to similarly "shelter-in-place."

The package-terrified have usually waited 48 hours before handling said box and contents.

Health Officials Says J&J Pause Should Boost Confidence

.52 min Video on website

539124.jpg

What about the Clorox wipes that were never in stock thanks to frantic science believers clearing the shelves of them? Some never left their homes.

Of course, when the corona-fearful actually ventured outside, they wore gloves while still not touching anything. They jumped out in the street when passing another human since, well, you know, the very humans who’ve driven all progress for millennia were suddenly a lethal menace to one another. But the main thing is that if they had to risk their lives by being in public, the science reverent more than masked up: they wiped down everything they came near.

Even though airlines were sending out texts ahead of boarding meant to comfort the nail-biting about plane interiors that had been thoroughly scrubbed, passengers still brought their own wipes on planes; that, or they accepted wipes from flight attendants in order to double up on the work done by maintenance.

At present, Hilton essentially co-brands its rooms with Lysol….

Oh well, apparently all that hand wringing about surfaces was a tad overdone. Last week the CDC announced that the risk of contracting the virus by touching a “contaminated” surface was somewhere in the neighborhood of 1 and 10,000. Another myth born of Covid-hysteria has bitten the dust.

Since it has, the reasonable in our midst can only hope that Corona-celebrity Anthony Fauci is asked to comment on the new findings. They’re very telling, and not solely because what was once believed deeply has turned out to be so wrong.

But since all the hysteria about surfaces has been revealed as much ado about nothing, it’s worth starting there. More realistically, it’s worth traveling back in time nearly 40 years to 1983. It was then that Fauci asserted in a paper that “routine close contact, as within a family household” could spread AIDS. To say that Fauci was wrong brings new meaning to understatement.

At the same time, Fauci’s false assumptions in ’83 don’t indict him. Back then little was known about AIDS. Doctors were flying blind as it were, so they worked tirelessly to learn more.

Applied to the present, all-too-many on the left have hysterically criticized the “science-deniers” in their midst who are only deniers insofar as they haven’t always accepted the present consensus about the coronavirus. As opposed to deniers, these skeptics were just being reasonable. Think about it. It’s not “science” if there isn’t doubt.

And as Fauci’s incorrect assumptions from long ago yet again remind us, there’s so much we don’t know. There’s so much we get wrong in the early days as we’re learning. In the 1980s the view from the NHS experts in England was that one in five Brits would contract AIDS for which there was no cure. Even in hyper-lefty Hollywood, homosexual actor Tony Perkins went to great lengths to hide his AIDS diagnosis given his reasonable belief that he would never work again. Hollywood had overreacted. By many miles. How little we knew.

That so many got AIDS so wrong not too long ago should hopefully cause the hysterical of the moment to perhaps dial down their certainty. What you believe likely won’t age well, which is the point. It explains why so many of us were so horrified by lockdowns.

You see, we weren’t solely against lockdowns because we deny science or that we don’t care about the virus, or didn’t believe it existed. In truth, we were against the lockdowns because freedom produces abundant information in addition to being a virtue on its own.

We were also against the lockdowns simply because force is superfluous if something threatens; particularly if the threat is thought to be lethal. About Covid’s lethality, doesn’t the latter explain why some of the science-worshipful were so terrified, and so desperate to “quarantine” packages, wipe down doorknobs, and avoid human contact? OK, but if you were that scared, then what was the point of forced lockdowns?

Indeed, as has been made plain, the fearful were already going to great lengths to do what they thought would protect them from the virus. The latter yet again explains the lack of Clorox wipes, masks, etc. It’s a reminder that people didn’t need to be forced.

No doubt the fear expressed by the scrubbers and washers has proven overdone and unwarranted in retrospect, which speaks to why freedom of action during “crises” is so important. In other words, those who threw caution to the wind and who couldn’t be bothered to disinfect everything were just as important as the corona-obsessed when it came to finding answers. Arguably more important. The “deniers” provided information about virus spread that the “believers” could not. Get it?

In this case, the deniers who lived their lives were correct. Avoiding all contact proved idiotic. The “doubters” had science on their side.

It’s all yet again a reminder that hysterical certitude isn’t the same as knowledge. Emotion is its own form of denial.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Vaccine Passports Versus Freedom Itself

THURSDAY, APR 15, 2021 - 01:04 PM
Authored by Paul Alexander via The American Institute for Economic Research,

To reject the creeping totalitarianism and dictatorship is the lifeblood of all freedom-loving individuals across the world. Those under despotic control yearn for freedom. We need only to look at the failing state of Hong Kong, where once freedom reigned and commerce enjoyed an unprecedented expansion of wealth and enviable quality of life, and now finds its democratic pursuits thwarted while it cowers under the dictates of Chinese Communism.



DeSantis’ ban of vaccine passports could lead to a showdown with businesses in Florida

CS Lewis said, “Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies.”

And it is with that in mind that we find ourselves both stunned and aghast concerning the fact that our Governments are even considering the issuance of what have become known as Covid-19 ‘vaccine passports.’ The very idea is anathema to our democratic principles and rights that are enshrined in the US Constitution as well as the Canadian Charter of Rights. The vaccine passports are being considered and/or introduced by various government bodies which will constrain the rights of citizens under the questionable guise of safety!

The Covid-19 pandemic era we face today has brought out the manifest nature of a government of bureaucrats and technocrats, who invoke safety and security of the public in a sly and unobtrusive manner to promote their agenda of surveillance and control. We have been struggling with unsound, unscientific, illogical, irrational, and specious societal lockdowns, shelter-in-place edicts, masking and mask mandates, and school closures.

Businesses have been shuttered for good, homes lost, and many children and adults have engaged in heavy drug use to cope, self-harm, and even committed suicide. Deaths of despair are on the rise, while economic and related health injuries (many life-threatening and most life-altering), the crushing costs of the lockdowns have been extensive and some argue that the impacts will not be felt for months or years, but for the rest of the 21st century. Even at this point, were the lockdowns stopped instantaneously, we have locked in decades of suffering.

Covid-19 vaccine passports, the latest insult in the unending stream of scientifically inapt actions as outlined above, is already driving extensive anguish and debate. These digital passports linked to one’s entire life experience with geolocated data and one’s personal medical information represents the latest intrusion and attack on our freedoms that have been put before the easily distracted populace. These passports are simply unjustifiable on any grounds, not the least of which is the fact that SARS CoV-2 is no more deadly on a population level than influenza. Ostensibly, the passports are designed to allow individuals to partake in everyday commerce and “life” with freedom.

The same freedoms that each and every individual is entitled to under the Constitution and other bills of rights and freedoms in democratic societies by definition. And yet we now require a passport to exercise our ‘unalienable’ right?

Absurd. While vaccine records were and still are a requirement for international travels where infectious diseases are common, this is as a safeguard for the traveler. But for citizens of the USA, and elsewhere, the requirement of a digital SARS CoV-2 injection passport has taken on a darker and sinister meaning.

These passports are now being touted as a requirement for living a life within the country, our own country. This is simply a shattering idea. Public discourse is already available suggesting that one’s life could be essentially ‘shut down’ if one does not acquiesce to getting vaccinated in order to obtain a vaccine passport. Will these passports now constitute, as they have in the past under the governance of totalitarian regimes, the very currency for free existence?

What are we about to do? There is even talk of immunity passports also known as ‘antibody passports’ with the concept of antibodies as a “declaration of immunity” or “golden passport” so as to return to routine work and travel. Yet, it is well known that insofar as immunity passports are concerned, antibody levels in people who’ve either had Covid-19, or have been vaccinated, wane after weeks to months.

Hence even someone who should be completely eligible not only for a vaccine passport but in fact an ‘immunity’ passport would easily fail the tests required to obtain such a passport. We and others argue that such will drive the development of a heretofore unheard of (in the USA and Canada) caste system of the haves (have vaccine passports) and the have nots (don’t have vaccine passports). Liew stated “the introduction of immunity passports is beset with challenges, not least of which is the potential erosion of civil liberties, as travelers are stratified into the ‘immunoprivileged’ and the ‘immunodeprived.’

Experts have argued that the introduction of vaccine and/or immunization (antibody) passports must entail extensive debate that considers all of the moral, ethical and constitutional issues, including “a comprehensive assessment of benefits and harms, and what would least restrict individual liberties without significantly heightening the threat of Covid-19”.

The ACLU has weighed in, sounding warnings that there are many harms that can arise with the introduction of vaccine passports, particularly the digitization of relevant information associated with the granting of those passports. The ACLU stated, “Given the enormous difficulty of creating a digital passport system, and the compromises and failures that are likely to happen along the way, we are wary about the side effects and long-term consequences it could have.”

Perhaps Kofler has outlined the key troubling issues that include the unreliable nature of serological testing, the extent of erosion of privacy with monitoring, marginalized groups facing much more uneven scrutiny, unfair access, and the inevitable, societal stratification.

The U.S. Government has stated that it will not invoke such a requirement as a Federal Standard, but it is clear that the government is not beyond giving tacit approval relating to the practical uses of such passports by businesses and all forms of commerce including travel. The government appears to be encouraging the private sector to force the requirement of vaccine passports as a mandate before an individual is able to utilize these corporate entity services. Even Dr. Scott Gottlieb, former head of the FDA (2017-2019) advocated for such passports by intimating that “digital proof would allow Americans to visit family in the hospital, not keep folks out of restaurants.” We consider Dr. Gottlieb’s recent op-ed in the Wall Street Journal as being an egregiously harmful commentary that will lead to the coercion of the public into seeking and receiving questionably effective and still experimental vaccines, in order to obtain vaccine passports. This is nothing short of reckless. In this regard, Gottlieb has suggested that “passports would empower consumers by giving them more control over their own health information.” Does he not understand that we already have control over our own healthcare information and do not require oversight by ‘Big Brother?’ Indeed, we believe that even George Orwell would be dumbfounded by such an opinion.

There are many unanswered questions, many troubling ethical and privacy concerns, especially since this type of digitized governmental oversight regarding our health has no precedent (and by the way, it won’t stop there; think about China’s social credit system!). A vaccine passport is unnecessary and unacceptably invasive and represents grave overreach in our opinion. We have already been subjected to vaccines that are causing adverse events and in some instances, deaths, as per the CDC’s own VAERS reporting system. These adverse events and deaths must be thoroughly investigated, and very rapidly, so that the public can get clarity on the risks (the validity of these reports) as the risk information has been held back from the public.

Part 1 of 2
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
Part 2 of 2

Even if the vaccines eventually show themselves to be completely harmless, safe and effective, which we all pray for, it is wholly unethical to require proof of vaccination in the first place as a general principle, and even more so concerning the fact that as of this writing, all vaccinations for SARS-CoV-2 are still considered experimental!

What is even more jarring to our sense of liberty is the additional imposition of censorship of thoughts expressed on paper or social media, particularly of course thoughts that challenge the current narratives. It seems that corporate giants with multibillions of dollars in revenue gained from sharing individual user’s personal data are hard at work to bring the entire society under their umbrella, now including personal health data! Even though a private enterprise is in point of fact free to limit the use of its facilities to anyone, we hold that state governments can still, and are obliged to enact laws to prevent such private enterprise overreaches that are tantamount to mass discrimination, thus also making the vaccine passports discriminatory by their very nature. And as one would imagine, objections to so-called vaccine passports are also mounting in the United Kingdom, where freedom loving individuals are expressing their outrage via podcasts.

The airlines, such as United Airlines, are enthusiastically leaning towards the requirement of a vaccine passport prior to gaining entry to a flight. The cruise line industry , including governments such as Australia, Denmark and other European nations, are actively seeking such mandates as a means to ensure safety with such demands. But in reality this is pure theatre and safety is definitely unimportant insofar as their judgements are concerned.

The folly of these requirements becomes very striking when one considers that we do not require vaccination passports for smallpox, influenzas, tuberculosis (TB; an emerging crisis regarding the development of multidrug resistant TB). Microsoft, meanwhile has developed an Excelsior Pass in New York that would ostensibly be used on a voluntary basis but has run into trouble with regard to reliability and implementation. Its use portends an extreme degree of surveillance of an individual’s freedom by a private enterprise and simultaneously allows the government to accumulate data for its own ‘potentially’ questionable goals.

One wonders whether restaurants will monitor for such a passport from their patrons, a retail store for that matter, or a sporting facility. If such private mandates are allowed, there will of necessity exist two tiers of citizenry, those with and those without such passports. The latter will come under harder scrutiny for all transactional pursuits in their lives and might even be considered as “dissidents,” a societal classification that is generally applied to people who oppose a totalitarian regime. Imagine that! Someone can be accused of being a dissident, or even perhaps an insurrectionist if the person does not have a vaccine passport! The class warfare will then also include those vaccinated versus those unvaccinated added to the repertoire of rich and poor, white and black, privileged versus non-privileged, and other divisive nonsense employed to destroy a society and pit brother against brother, friend against friend, neighbor against neighbor.

The educational industry and other corporations are gearing up legal defenses against any resistance to the launch of vaccine passports. The challenge might come from the courts, as long as the judges have free will and use the Constitution as the founding document of liberty and freedom in the United States for informing and substantiating their decisions.

We suggest that developing countries will suffer the most, economically, from such mandates as lower income countries that do not have the vaccine in supply will be targeted by the developed nations and prohibited from visiting the wealthy countries that have the vaccines. The testing for immune status, pre- and post-travel will create another onerous demand on the traveling public and will have a devastating impact on the travel industry with an equally devastating effect on businesses that thrive as a result of a robust travel industry.

On one hand it seems that many world governments and global corporations are in favour of vaccine passports and yet, the World Health Organization does not support the Vaccine Passports for…now. “We as WHO are saying at this stage we would not like to see the vaccination passport as a requirement for entry or exit because we are not certain at this stage that the vaccine prevents transmission…” It is only a matter of time before international pressures from totalitarian governments before the WHO likely changes this opinion unfortunately.

There are several scientific reasons for arguing against the use of vaccine passports that go beyond the impact such actions will have on our human rights. We bring to the fore some thoughts regarding the vaccines. The vaccines as designed so far do not protect an individual by the provision of “sterilizing immunity.” By sterilizing immunity we mean that there is no further prospect of either getting infected by the SARS-CoV-2 virus after a vaccination nor of passing along the virus to others. It has been suggested that the vaccines will limit the possibility of a (re)infection that might lead to hospitalization and even death. But for those who insist on ‘following the science,’ none of the vaccines have been shown in any way to reduce either hospitalization of death.

On a related front though we point out that in some cases proof of vaccination is the norm. This could apply to individuals who must prove that they’ve been vaccinated against polio before going to a country where polio viral endemicity is for the safety of the individual and for the host country. The individual is deemed to be able to enter the country safely. This is decidedly not the case in the midst of a pandemic where the entire world has a circulating virus!

In this regard, how does a vaccine passport help if the vaccine is impotent in protecting an individual from an infection and its furtherance through transmission, particularly when there is an ever-increasing font of mutant forms of, in our case, SARS-CoV-2 meaning that some vaccines are already being shown to be ineffective against certain variants/mutations? Such concepts are not reckless, but merely bring to fore the need to understand basic concepts of viral transmission in concert with important and in fact sacrosanct human liberties and freedoms. These outcomes have simply not been evaluated!

In addition to the limitations discussed above, there are other sequelae as a consequence of the vaccination that we have alluded to in the past that need consideration. Using this information then to mandate a policy by the airline industry and other private commercial entities is duplicitous at best and discriminatory at worst. Such augury laced with the term “for the public good,” needs a reconciliation of sorts. The future envisioned seems to be more destined to benefit private corporations and their leaders as well as the government, and less to protect the individual. The term “public good” that is currently being bandied about is really tantamount to mere virtue signaling from across various disciplines and in our opinion has little to do with the public good.

Several States in the United States have shown a resolve against the premise of the vaccine passports. These include Texas, Tennessee, Florida, Mississippi at present. But surely more will follow their lead as more information and resistance from the populace comes to bear. The public must be resolute and stand up and say NO. Under no conditions shall we accept this level of government or corporate control of our lives, particularly in light of the harms and lack of benefit!

We raise this issue out of concern for the very basic freedoms we hold so dearly and the potential destruction that waits should this go forward. We urge strong urgent debate on this, but populations must act now as we debate, by standing up against any more draconian intrusions by their governments. The devastating pandemic response by governments and their often illogical, unscientific, unsound, and often absurd expert medical advisors (Task Forces) and television medical experts have left lives and societies in ruin. Children have suffered losses that some argue will never be recovered in their lifetimes. Vaccine passports promise to dwarf what we have witnessed across the last year due to the unintended consequences and collateral damage related to our ill-informed responses to SARS-CoV-2!
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Former FDA Chief Warns US Will "Struggle" To Reach Herd Immunity As Vaccine Refusals Rise

THURSDAY, APR 15, 2021 - 09:50 AM
Across the developing world, 130 countries have yet to receive even a single dose of any of the COVID vaccines, while the US stockpiles hundreds of millions of doses as the Biden Administration announces ever more ambitious targets, currently 200MM jabs in arms by the end of his First 100 Days (which will formally expire at the end of April).

So far, the US has managed its vaccine rollout efficiently relative to the EU, though Washington, unfortunately, didn't manage to avoid the safety scandals that unfolded in Europe with the AstraZeneca jab. Now that federal regulators have raised questions about the safety of the Johnson & Johnson jab, it looks like the entire adenovirus platform is now suspect (which is truly unfortunate for the developing world, since they were the ones who were supposed to get those vaccines).


Former FDA Chief Warns US Will "Struggle" To Reach Herd Immunity As Vaccine Refusals Rise | ZeroHedge
Dr. Scott Gottlieb

According to the latest numbers from Bloomberg, 195MM doses have been distributed in the US already, putting Biden well on track to meet his 200M shot goal.

The US vaccination rate is 3,346,301 doses per day, on average. At this pace, it will take another 3 months to cover 75% of the US population, according to Bloomberg. But some have other ideas. And only 23% of the US population is currently fully vaccinated.

But as we look at the projections for herd immunity...


...at least one former senior public-health figure - former FDA Director Scott Gottlieb - believes the real obstacle might be compliance, despite all those polls proclaiming public confidence in the vaccines has never been higher. Especially as the new questions about potential side effects, and anecdotal reports of the sometimes dayslong post-vaccination symptoms experienced by many, a large number of younger Americans may simply refuse the vaccine.

Seeing as he's a board member of Pfizer, and in theory this should make him a natural cheerleader for the vaccine effort, it's worth listening to what Gottlieb is saying, since it clashes with the administration's official position.

And Gottlieb is saying that the US is reaching a point where supply will outstrip demand.

One in 4 Americans would refuse a coronavirus vaccine if offered, a recent NPR/Marist poll found. Another 5% are "undecided" about whether they would get the shot. And some researchers are growing worried that this reluctance will be enough to prevent the nation from reaching what's known as herd immunity.

A former head of the Food and Drug Administration also has doubts about reaching herd immunity, the point at which the virus can no longer spread easily through the population. Gottlieb, who is on the board of Pfizer, one of the biggest makers of the vaccines, according to NPR's Morning Edition, which invited Gottlieb for a recent interview.
More than 123 million people, or about 37% of the U.S. population, have received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine and Dr. Scott Gottlieb, who was FDA commissioner from 2017 to 2019, says the nation is reaching a point where supply will outstrip demand. Gottlieb is on the board of directors of Pfizer, which makes one of the coronavirus vaccines.
"I think that there's probably 150 million Americans who are eager to get vaccinated. And as we expand into the younger age cohorts and a new eligible population ... you're not going to see the demand be as brisk," Gottlieb says in an interview with NPR's Morning Edition.
"I think we get to 150 million vaccines. I think we struggle to get to 160 million," he says, which is roughly half the U.S. population.
"Beyond that, I think it's going to be difficult. I'm not sure that you have the demand there."

But it's not as bad as that sounds.
“I don't know that we ever get to herd immunity," Gottlieb says. "But I think the combination of vaccinating that many people and having a lot of immunity in the population from prior infections, [is] enough that the level of spread of this virus is going to be substantially reduced."
Despite revelations about rare blood clots tied to the J&J jab, Gottlieb said he expects the pause to be short. The reality, of course, is that the global rollout can't afford to scrap the adenovirus-vector jabs, so patients with low platelet counts may need to make their own decisions. The official US government line is that the risks of vaccine side effects are far outweighed by their benefits.
"I think this is probably a temporary pause where the agency is going to evaluate the information it has, see if there is more cases out there to be reported into the agency, perhaps issue some guidance around the use of the vaccine and what doctors should be alert for and then allow the vaccine to continue to be distributed," he says.
He adds, "I think it's more likely than not that there's going to be a resumption in the use of the vaccine for some portion of the population. That should be reassuring to the public."

To be sure, Dr. Gottlieb believes the US will reach herd immunity, and soon. But he also suspects that COVID likely won't be going away any time soon. Already, cases have surged worldwide over the past month, and numbers are rising even in India.

Of course, herd immunity is a nebulous concept, and projections can vary widely. One Professor at Johns Hopkins penned a WSJ editorial earlier this year claiming herd immunity would arrive by April, and that rising case numbers can be dismissed as deaths continue to decline. "Experts should level with the public," he said.



Already, at least 7 states - South Dakota, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Arizona, Oklahoma, Utah, and Tennessee - are already on the cusp of herd immunity. The real answer, of course, is that projections can vary widely - and nobody knows what the future may hold.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Pfizer CEO: ‘Likely’ Third Coronavirus Shot for Fully Vaccinated People Will Be Necessary
62
In this Wednesday, Dec. 23, 2020 file photo, a Catholic pastor receives the first of the two Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccinations at a hospital in Chicago. In a growing consensus, religious leaders at the forefront of the anti-abortion movement in the United States are telling their followers that the leading vaccines …
AP Photo/Charles Rex Arbogast
HANNAH BLEAU15 Apr 2021228

Individuals who have been “fully vaccinated” with the Pfizer vaccine may need to receive a third shot in the near future, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla stated this month.

“It is extremely important to suppress the pool of people that can be susceptible to the virus,” Bourla told CNBC’s Bertha Coombs, floating the possibility of annual vaccinations for the Chinese coronavirus.

His remarks follow Pfizer and BioNTech outlining their intention to test a third dose of the vaccine — an announcement made in February.

“We believe that the third dose will raise the antibody response 10- to 20- fold,” Bourla said at the time, likening it to the annual flu shot.

“Every year, you need to go to get your flu vaccine,” Bourla said. “It’s going to be the same with COVID. In a year, you will have to go and get your annual shot for Covid to be protected.”

Dr. Anthony Fauci has already previewed the possibility of coronavirus booster shots, explaining people “very well may need to get booster shots to keep up the level of protection.”

“We need to be careful about that six-month number. The study only went out as far as six months. We know for sure it’s effective for six months, but highly likely that it will be effective for considerably longer period of time,” he said during an appearance on The Mehdi Hasan Show.

“So the good news is that it’s at least six months. Hopefully a lot more. But in direct answer to your question, if it turns out a year or a year and a half, we very well may need to get booster shots to keep up the level of protection,” he added:

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1381403959211003905
1:07 min

Over 102 million doses of the Pfizer vaccine, specifically, have been administered in the United States, according to the CDC. Of those, over 38 million are considered to be “fully vaccinated.”
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Steve Scalise Presses Fauci, CDC Director: Tell Biden He Is ‘Violating’ CDC Guidance at Border
Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis

ASHLEY OLIVER15 Apr 202186

House Minority Whip Steve Scalise (R-LA) highlighted the Biden administration’s differing standards of coronavirus guideline adherence for illegal migrants at the southern border versus American citizens during a subcommittee hearing Thursday with members of President Joe Biden’s coronavirus response team.

Scalise, ranking member of the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis, referenced photos that revealed unaccompanied alien children (UACs) awaiting processing in cramped makeshift federal facilities after being apprehended by border officials. UACs are those under the age of 18 who cross the border illegally without a parent or guardian.

Scalise asked Dr. Anthony Fauci, Biden’s chief medical adviser, if he believes the Biden administration’s facilities are in compliance with Fauci’s recommendation that individuals continue to practice social distancing.

“Dr. Fauci, does this look like social distancing to you that you require when you talk about six feet?” Scalise asked, pointing to the photos.
Fauci replied, “No.”

“So in these cells, as you just said, they’re violating the very guidance that you tell Americans to follow,” Scalise clarified. “A restaurant in the United States would be shut down today if they were being run like this, yet the federal government, the Biden administration, is running this facility. You can see all of these young children who are next to each other six inches apart, many without masks by the way. Does that follow your guidance that you’ve issued?”
Fauci again replied, “No.”

“They’re violating every guidance that Americans are required to follow,” Scalise observed.

The congressman also grilled Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Director Rochelle Walensky on her agency’s requirement that Americans who enter the country via air travel must produce a negative coronavirus test prior to boarding their flight into the U.S.

Scalise, who led a congressional delegation on a tour of the border last week in Texas, claimed to Walensky that on his flight from McAllen back to his home state of Louisiana, “about half of the plane were some of the people that are in these pictures who were getting on these flights, not being tested for COVID, in violation of your guidance.”

“Is there an exemption for people who come here illegally to this guidance?” Scalise asked.

Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas confirmed during a hearing in March that the department was releasing illegal migrants it had apprehended into the interior of the country without first testing them for coronavirus.

In some instances, moreover, the federal government is funding air and bus travel for illegal migrants to their final destination within the country.

Walensky said, “Everybody coming into the United States by air is supposed to have a test one to three days before coming—” Scalise interjected, “Well, let me just advise you that the director of Homeland Security has testified that that’s not happening.”

Noting that Biden has not met with Scalise despite his request for a meeting, the congressman asked Walensky, “Can you let [the president] know that he’s violating your own CDC guidance in how he’s running our southern border right now?”

The CDC identifies Mexico as “Level 4: Very High Level of COVID-19 in Mexico.”
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

CDC Identifies Thousands of Cases of Coronavirus Among Tens of Millions of Fully Vaccinated Americans
127
Doses of Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine are prepared for injection on January 14, 2021 at the Christalain nursing home in Brussels with a syringe and a needle that allow one extra dose of vaccine per vial. - EU's medicines watchdog said on January 8, 2021 that six doses instead of five …
KENZO TRIBOUILLARD/AFP via Getty Images
HANNAH BLEAU15 Apr 2021154

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has identified nearly 6,000 cases of the Chinese coronavirus developing in Americans who have been fully vaccinated, reflecting Dr. Anthony Fauci’s recent warning of “breakthrough” cases occurring as vaccination efforts continue across the country.

Roughly 5,800 cases of the virus have been identified among the millions of Americans who have been fully vaccinated. The breakthrough cases represent 0.008 percent of the “fully vaccinated population,” according to the Wall Street Journal:
The CDC earlier this year asked state health departments to track and report breakthrough cases to the federal government. So far, the cases that have been reported come from about 40 states.

Separately, The Wall Street Journal contacted health departments in all 50 states and the District of Columbia to ask how many breakthrough cases had been identified. Twenty-three states responded, reporting a total of 4,172 breakthrough cases.
The CDC told CNN, “So far, about 5,800 breakthrough cases have been reported to CDC. To date, no unexpected patterns have been identified in case demographics or vaccine characteristics.” Some of those who became infected were reported as “seriously ill,” and 74 died.

“It said 396 — 7% — of those who got infected after they were vaccinated required hospitalization,” the outlet added. CNN estimates “about 77 million people in the US are fully vaccinated against coronavirus,” based on its analysis of CDC data.

The statistics, officials say, are not surprising, as no vaccine is 100 percent effective. Fauci, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases director, warned of “breakthrough” cases this week.

“We see this with all vaccines, in clinical trials, in the real world,” Fauci said. “No vaccine is 100 percent efficacious, or effective.”

He used the annual flu vaccine as an example, noting it is never 100 percent effective and largely considered successful if it proves to be 60 percent effective.

“If you get vaccinated, no doubt, you’re less likely to get the flu,” Fauci said. “But even if you do get the flu and get sick, vaccination can reduce the severity and duration of illness, and could help get you out of trouble.”

Over 194 million shots have been administered in the United States, according to the CDC’s April 14 data. Although 23.1 percent of the U.S. population has been “fully” vaccinated, officials have largely refused to loosen restrictions on vaccinated individuals, encouraging them to continue wearing masks and engage in social distancing.

“No, it’s still not ok for the simple reason that level of infection, the dynamics of infection in the community are still really disturbingly high,” Fauci said during an appearance on MSNBC’s Mehdi Hasan Show after being asked if it is acceptable to eat and drink indoors at restaurants or bars:

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1381600900263870467
.45 min

“If you’re not vaccinated, please get vaccinated as soon as vaccine becomes available to you. And if you are vaccinated, please remember that you still have to be careful and not get involved in crowded situations particularly indoors where people are not wearing masks,” Fauci said.

“And for the time being, until we show definitively that a person who’s vaccinated does not get this subclinical infection and can spread to others, you should also continue to wear a mask,” he added.

His remarks prompted further criticism from Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), who branded him a “petty” tyrant:
1618524977485.png
Editor’s Note: This headline has been updated to better represent the proportion of cases compared to the number of fully vaccinated individuals.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Biden Administration CDC Director: We Need ANOTHER Lockdown
Darian Douraghy
Apr 15, 2021

This past weekend, coronavirus cases in Michigan have once again seen a spike, the highest in the nation. Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer used this as the reasoning behind her request to the White House for more supplies for vaccinations – a request that was ultimately denied.

Later on, at a White House briefing, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Rochelle Walensky claimed that the answer to help the people of Michigan was not vaccines, but instead another lockdown.

“We know that if vaccines go in arms today, we will not see an effect of those vaccines — depending on the vaccine — for somewhere between two and six weeks. So when you have an acute situation, an extraordinary number of cases like we have in Michigan, the answer is not necessarily to give vaccines,”

“The answer to that is to really close things down, to go back to our basics. To go back to our basics, to go back to where we were last spring, last summer. and to shut things down. To flatten the curve. To decrease contact with one another,”


In a separate interview with CBS, Walesnky claimed “if we try to vaccinate our way out of what is happening in Michigan we would be disappointed that it took so long for the vaccine to work.”

This messaging may be confusing to some, as The White House has promised that all Americans will be eligible for the COVID-19 vaccination by May 1st, just about two weeks from now. The idea that the vaccine will bring the American people back to normal life has been pushed widely by many across the political aisle, but it mixed messages are emanating from the current people in power.

The idea of having yet another lockdown runs contrary to observable results of the effectiveness of various restrictions that have been enforced in the United States since March 2020. This perhaps most clearly demonstrated in the example of Florida vs. New York, in which the former had far less deaths per capita from COVID-19 despite having a much older average population with few restrictions imposed upon them.

As the coronavirus pandemic and subsequent power grab by various tyrannical figures in the government continues, many Americans are growing tired of the seemingly endless restrictions. Some may wonder if the American people will ever take their rights back, after being trampled upon for so long. As long as the American people continue to accept tyranny, tyranny is what they’ll get. One thing is for certain – the more the people push back, the harder it gets to strip their freedoms away.

Pushing back on yet another lockdown is vital if we’re to avoid the pain and ineffectiveness of draconian controls.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

The mindless mask regime might be here to stay, unless YOU resist it

By David Marcus
April 13, 2021 | 6:46pm | Updated
Sigh. The mask fanatics — some of whom hold advanced degrees that make them no wiser as human beings — can’t be reasoned with.

The mask fanatics -- some of whom hold advanced degrees that make them no wiser as human beings -- can't be reasoned with.STR/AFP via Getty Images

The masks might be forever. We have to come to terms with the fact that a large chunk of the US population will be wearing masks in public for years, maybe even decades to come.

Even if we unquestionably achieve herd immunity, even if 100 percent of the population is vaccinated, even if COVID cases nationwide drop to zero and even if the coronavirus by some miracle learns to communicate in a human language and tells us, forthrightly, “Well, you beat me,” some Americans, especially those in blue metropolises, will continue to cover their faces — and shame you for not going along.

It’s a massively depressing thought.

For more than a year, public-health authorities have urged us to put up with temporary inconveniences, always with the soothing promise that it will be only a little while longer. But recently, NPR cheerfully reported about the growing number of people who see masks as a source of Permanent and Absolute Safety.

Flu and other respiratory illnesses are down this year owing to our ubiquitous face coverings, our state-run news agency tells us, so maybe we should just keep wearing them. Meanwhile, the rapper Will.i.am and Honeywell have introduced a super-duper smart mask that runs $300. The “Xupermask” allows the wearer to chat on the phone or listen to some dulcet music while signaling her virtue.

None of this should give anyone the slightest bit of confidence that the days of ubiquitous mask wearing will soon be behind us.
1618533868196.gif
Fauci defends mixed messaging on masks in early days of pandemic
Yes, masks reduce the transmission of airborne illnesses. You know what else reduces transmission? Staying in a protective plastic bubble in your living room and never venturing into the dirty, filthy, infectious outdoors. And even if it makes sense to wear a mask in tight indoor quarters, it is utterly unscientific and, yes, moronic to wear them outside, and yet blue-state denizens insist.

Sigh. The mask fanatics — some of whom hold advanced degrees that make them no wiser as human beings — can’t be reasoned with.

The awkward moments with double-masked parents at kids’ birthday parties, the ridiculous restaurant rituals, the seething public glares from masked to maskless on our streets — all will continue. They will say it’s but a small price to pay for Health Most Holy and Sacred Safety. Huge swaths of Americans will literally be lost to our sight and recognition.

It’s a sinister phenomenon that runs radically counter to our cultural history.

Many cultures embrace face covering. Western culture, however, isn’t among them. Western culture revels in the human face and form. That is why “Westernization” is so often associated with immodesty in the East (often unfairly, for celebrating the face needn’t entail baring the backside or plunging décolletage).

A future in which millions hide behind protective masks as they wander around is a steep departure from the Western ideal, rooted in both the Greco-Roman celebration of the human form and the Genesis teaching that God formed man and woman in his image.

The typical conservative reaction — to blame government — doesn’t quite apply here. It’s mainly cultural forces that promote masking in needless places. And private actors have lined up eagerly, with Big Tech actively suppressing science that questions the efficacy of mask-wearing.

Yet we still can resist the phenomenon. We can fight against this faceless future with our own refusals. We can proudly display our lipstick, smile at a passerby and even be understood clearly when we speak. Put simply, we can go back to a normal past, when people’s faces brightened our day instead of terrifying us.

Of course, there is some marginal safety upside to wearing a mask; there always has been. But in the more sensible recent past, most people realized that such small protection wasn’t worth hiding our faces night and day.

We should treat with compassion our fellow citizens who sheepishly embrace the forever-mask regime — but not too much compassion. Those of us who value things like basic human interaction shouldn’t feel shy about mocking those who cling to the facial security blankets or who don high-tech, celebrity-endorsed visage eviscerators. It’s OK to acknowledge that a world without faces isn’t one we want to inhabit.

So let’s bare our faces to the nice, fresh air, pucker and smirk at every available opportunity. Don’t be daunted by the masked masses. Plenty of us want to see your face.
Twitter: @BlueBoxDave
 

Jubilee on Earth

Veteran Member
Of course the mask regime is here to stay. How many billions of masks have been sold in the past year??? Maybe even trillions? What are the main companies that manufacture masks? Who are their stakeholders? Follow the money.
 

TammyinWI

Talk is cheap

Pfizer CEO: ‘Likely’ Third Coronavirus Shot for Fully Vaccinated People Will Be Necessary
62
In this Wednesday, Dec. 23, 2020 file photo, a Catholic pastor receives the first of the two Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccinations at a hospital in Chicago. In a growing consensus, religious leaders at the forefront of the anti-abortion movement in the United States are telling their followers that the leading vaccines …
AP Photo/Charles Rex Arbogast
HANNAH BLEAU15 Apr 2021228

Individuals who have been “fully vaccinated” with the Pfizer vaccine may need to receive a third shot in the near future, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla stated this month.

“It is extremely important to suppress the pool of people that can be susceptible to the virus,” Bourla told CNBC’s Bertha Coombs, floating the possibility of annual vaccinations for the Chinese coronavirus.

His remarks follow Pfizer and BioNTech outlining their intention to test a third dose of the vaccine — an announcement made in February.

“We believe that the third dose will raise the antibody response 10- to 20- fold,” Bourla said at the time, likening it to the annual flu shot.

“Every year, you need to go to get your flu vaccine,” Bourla said. “It’s going to be the same with COVID. In a year, you will have to go and get your annual shot for Covid to be protected.”

Dr. Anthony Fauci has already previewed the possibility of coronavirus booster shots, explaining people “very well may need to get booster shots to keep up the level of protection.”

“We need to be careful about that six-month number. The study only went out as far as six months. We know for sure it’s effective for six months, but highly likely that it will be effective for considerably longer period of time,” he said during an appearance on The Mehdi Hasan Show.

“So the good news is that it’s at least six months. Hopefully a lot more. But in direct answer to your question, if it turns out a year or a year and a half, we very well may need to get booster shots to keep up the level of protection,” he added:

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1381403959211003905
1:07 min

Over 102 million doses of the Pfizer vaccine, specifically, have been administered in the United States, according to the CDC. Of those, over 38 million are considered to be “fully vaccinated.”

For me, the first picture here is pretty telling: strong delusion, anyone?
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

The Biden Administration Appears to Ignore Potential Danger of Vaccinating Those Previously Exposed to COVID-19

By Joe Hoft
Published April 16, 2021 at 8:50am
vaccines-600x363.jpg

In some people, COVID-19 vaccination may make the situation worse, especially for those with blood coagulation problems or those, like the elderly, taking “blood thinners,” even mild antiplatelet therapy such as aspirin.

Thrombocytopenia is a condition characterized by abnormally low levels of blood platelets, also known as thrombocytes.

As a result, it can lead to thrombocytopenic purpura, a bleeding disorder causing the immune system to destroy platelets, which are necessary for normal blood clotting.

The symptoms of thrombocytopenic purpura can include bleeding into the skin often around the shins, rash, abnormally heavy menstruation, easy bruising, nosebleed, or bleeding in the mouth.

COVID-Vaccine-Issues.jpg

Already in May 2020, thrombocytopenia was identified as a risk factor for increased morbidity and mortality in patients who had been infected by the new severe acute respiratory syndrome COVID-19.

On April 9, 2021, in a New England Journal of Medicine article, both venous thrombosis (blood clots) and thrombocytopenia were reported 7 to 10 days after receiving the first dose of an adenoviral vector vaccine against Covid-19.
At least anecdotal evidence for COVID-19 vaccination effects on menstruation have been reported by women who have experienced flows that came earlier, felt heavier, or just seemed abnormal.

Adenoviral vector vaccines include Astra-Zeneca and Johnson & Johnson, administration of both having been at least temporarily halted due to blood coagulation adverse events.

The potential for adverse events should have been known to the health authorities because adenovirus-induced thrombocytopenia was already identified in 2007.

The evidence suggests that willy-nilly vaccination by arbitrary government mandate of those who have already been exposed to COVID-19 risks exacerbating adverse effects induced by the virus itself, potentially creating a more dangerous health challenge.

Unlike its claims, the Biden Administration is not following the science. In fact, those responsible don’t seem to be even reading it.

Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. is retired from an international career in business and medical research with 29 years of service in the US Army Reserve and a veteran of Afghanistan and Iraq.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Nearly 200,000 Counterfeit Masks From China Seized By US Officials.

Customs and Border Patrol officials seized nearly 200,000 counterfeit masks entering the U.S. from China.

“U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers working at the Houston Seaport intercepted a shipment of counterfeit N95 masks that with an estimated Manufacturer’s Suggested Retail Price of almost $350,000,” the agency summarized.

The shipment was intercept at the Houston Seaport and contained 171,460 masks with the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health logo on the boxes. “The shipment of counterfeit masks originated in China and were destined to White Plains, N.Y. before CBP officers intercepted it, April 7,” Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) added.

646B970F-BBC4-4AF2-8ECC-1470591B543E.jpeg
COUNTERFEIT MASKS.

“For the Houston area of operations, CBP seized 2.1 million counterfeit PPE masks from January to March of this year which was a stark increase from the 365,000 counterfeit face masks seized in all of 2020,” CBP adds.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Fauci admits Biden administration is flouting CDC guidance in border facilities
"Obviously, everyone would like to see that situation fixed," Fauci said in a tense exchange with House Minority Whip Steve Scalise (R-La.).

By Daniel Payne
Updated: April 16, 2021 - 7:58am

White House chief medical adviser Anthony Fauci on Thursday conceded in a tense exchange with Louisiana Republican Rep. Steve Scalise that the Biden administration is violating major Centers for Disease Control and Prevention coronavirus guidelines by packing countless illegal immigrants into relatively small facilities without enforcing social distancing or masking measures.

The CDC has aggressively pushed those guidelines over the past year, directing that Americans should work to remain six feet apart from each other in public spaces and wear face coverings when away from the home.

Images from U.S. border facilities over the past several weeks, however, have shown little enforcement of those guidelines among illegal immigrants detained amid the current surge of unlawful migration at the southern border.

At a House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis hearing on Thursday, Scalise —the House minority whip and the ranking member of the subcommittee — grilled both Fauci and CDC Director Rochelle Walensky on the Biden administration's COVID enforcement among illegal immigrants.

Holding up pictures of densely packed immigration facilities, Scalise asked Fauci: "Dr. Fauci, does this look like social distancing to you that you require when you talk about six feet?"

"No," Fauci replied.

Holding up more photos of packed facilities, Scalise asked further: "You can see all of these young children who are next to each other six inches apart, many without masks — by the way, does that follow your guidance that you've issued?"

"No," Fauci replied again.

"Do you think that sends the right message to America — [where] people are trying to recover and get back to their way of life — that if you're a citizen, you follow this set of rules, but if you come here illegally, you don't have to follow any of your rules?" Scalise asked further.

"No doubt it's a very difficult situation at the border, Congressman Scalise," Fauci fudged, arguing later that "everyone would like to see the situation get fixed."

View: https://youtu.be/ld9FnQopddc
5:38 min

Fauci did not respond to a request for comment on the Biden administration's lack of guidelines enforcement in immigration facilities, including whether or nor he has advised President Joe Biden on the issue and/or whether or not he believes those facilities are helping spread COVID-19 in the U.S. to any appreciable extent.

The Biden administration in March directed child migrant facilities to expand to their pre-pandemic capacity levels, claiming the "extraordinary circumstances" of the recent surge necessitated such a decision.

The CDC warned the Biden administration at the time that facilities should enforce measures such as masking requirements in an effort to keep COVID levels down in the crowded detention centers.

The failure to enforce coronavirus safety measures has drawn rebuke elsewhere from congressional representatives. New York Rep. Nicole Malliotakis told Just the News editor-in-chief John Solomon this week that the U.S. is experiencing "a flow of individuals coming from the southern border with some displaying the symptoms of COVID, and nothing's being done about it."

"[They're] being jammed in each facilities [with] 250 capacity, there's 4,000 individuals, so it's very dangerous, and many have just been released back onto the streets, where they can go spread COVID," she asserted.

Last month, meanwhile, Texas Sen. Ted Cruz told media that a visit to a migrant facility in Donna, Texas, revealed similar overcrowding conditions.

"There [is] a series of cages in which children are lined up," he said. "They're not six feet apart, they're not three feet apart. They are lying on the floor."
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Slowly But Surely, The Truth Is Coming Out

FRIDAY, APR 16, 2021 - 04:20 PM
Authored by Michael Snyder via TheMostImportantNews.com,

Don’t you hate it when what you get turns out to be far different from what you were promised? In this article, I am only going to share facts that have been documented by corporate media sources. These facts are going to upset a lot of people, because they prove that much of what we had been promised didn’t turn out to be true. So many people that I know were convinced that if they just got their two shots they would be 100 percent protected for the rest of their lives and they would never have to be concerned about getting COVID ever again. In addition, most Americans still seem to believe that if a high enough percentage of the population gets their shots COVID will be defeated and the pandemic will be brought to an end.

Unfortunately, all of those assumptions have turned out to be dead wrong.


If you don’t want to believe me, perhaps you will believe the CEO of Pfizer. This week, he admitted that “fully vaccinated” people will need a third shot of the vaccine within 12 months
Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla said people will “likely” need a third dose of a Covid-19 vaccine within 12 months of getting fully vaccinated. His comments were made public Thursday but were taped April 1.
Bourla said it’s possible people will need to get vaccinated against the coronavirus annually.
From the very beginning of this crisis, I have been warning my readers that any immunity would be very temporary. Natural COVID immunity is very temporary, and immunity conferred by the vaccines is very temporary too.

The CEO of Pfizer is comparing the COVID vaccines to flu shots. Every year millions of Americans rush out to get their flu shots, and the CEO of Pfizer is admitting that it looks like the COVID vaccines will be on a similar schedule
“There are vaccines that’s like polio that one dose is enough, there are vaccines like pneumococcal vaccine that one dose is enough for adults and there are vaccines like flu that you need every year,” Bourla said. “The Covid virus looks more like the influenza virus than the polio virus.”
If people are going to need a new shot every year, that means that COVID will be with us for a very long time to come.

This is essentially an admission that the COVID pandemic will not be ending any time soon.

Needless to say, Pfizer stands to make giant mountains of money if COVID vaccines become a yearly thing, and we need to keep that in mind.

A lot of people that I know are going to be extremely upset when they finally realize that the two shots that they got only provide temporary immunity.

And of course lots of people are still getting sick after being fully vaccinated. According to the CDC, so far there have been almost 6,000 documented cases of people being infected after getting two shots, and dozens of them have died
The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) has reported that roughly 5,800 people who received a coronavirus vaccine still ultimately came down with the disease anyway, according to CNN.
Of those 5,800, 396 of them (roughly 7 percent) were hospitalized; 74 of the vaccinated people ultimately died. The report proves that the vaccines, though frequently touted by the government and the media, are not guaranteed to prevent everyone from contracting the virus.
That wasn’t supposed to happen.

But it is happening.

Meanwhile, there is a lot of uncertainty about how the current vaccines will fare against variants that have already developed and variants that will develop in the future.

At this point we just don’t know how effective the vaccines will be, but the New York Times is assuring us that we don’t have anything to be concerned about…
“I use the term ‘scariants,’” said Dr. Eric Topol, professor of molecular medicine at Scripps Research in La Jolla, Calif., referring to much of the media coverage of the variants.
“Even my wife was saying, ‘What about this double mutant?’ It drives me nuts. People are scared unnecessarily. If you’re fully vaccinated, two weeks post dose, you shouldn’t have to worry about variants at all.”
Really?

I have a feeling that Dr. Eric Topol will end up eating those words.

The reason why a new flu vaccine comes out every year is because the flu is constantly changing and mutating.

The same thing is happening to COVID, and there are already dozens of mutant variations spreading around the globe.

To me, Dr. Eric Topol’s statement was exceedingly irresponsible, especially considering some of the studies that have come out lately. Here is just one example
Two doses of the AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine were found to have only a 10.4% efficacy against mild-to-moderate infections caused by the B.1.351 South Africa variant, according to a phase 1b-2 clinical trial published on Tuesday in the New England Journal of Medicine. This is a cause for grave concern as the South African variants share similar mutations to the other variants leaving those vaccinated with the AstraZeneca vaccine potentially exposed to multiple variants.
In this article, I haven’t even discussed all of the side effects that we have been witnessing. A few days ago, the FDA issued an unprecedented order regarding the Johnson and Johnson vaccine because it was causing blood clots in a number of cases…
This week, the Food and Drug Administration called for a halt in the administration of the single dose vaccine for COVID-19 manufactured by Johnson and Johnson. The halt was ascribed to the rare incidence of blood clots that could potentially be related to the vaccine.
I am glad that the FDA decided to step in, but the order came too late for this guy
When the news broke about the pause of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine Tuesday, one Coast family was already living with a tragedy they believe was caused by the vaccine.
It started out as a normal day for 43-year-old Brad Malagarie of St. Martin. This busy father of seven spent the morning at his D’Iberville office before heading to get a Johnson & Johnson vaccine a little after noon.
He returned to work, and within three hours coworkers noticed he was unresponsive at his desk.
It shouldn’t be controversial to say that rushing experimental vaccines through the testing process was a really bad idea.

We should be putting the safety of the American people first, and nobody knows for sure what the long-term effects of these experimental treatments will be.

In this day and age, we all need to do our own research and we all need to think for ourselves, because the big pharmaceutical companies are more concerned with profits than anything else.

If you are harmed by their experimental therapies, the big pharmaceutical companies won’t be there to pick up the pieces for you if something goes horribly wrong.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
04/16/21

Scientists Warn Pfizer, Moderna Vaccines May Cause Blood Clots, Too
The Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca COVID vaccines are under the microscope for their potential to cause blood clots, but scientists warn Pfizer and Moderna vaccines pose similar risks.
By
Megan Redshaw

Scientist warned FDA in December about COVID vaccines and blood clots.


U.S. and European health officials are scrutinizing the Johnson & Johnson (J&J) and AstraZeneca COVID vaccines for possibly causing blood clots and related blood disorders in vaccine recipients.

But evidence is mounting that the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines cause similar adverse reactions — and U.S. regulatory officials were alerted to that fact as far back as December 2020.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on Wednesday convened an emergency meeting of its Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) to determine whether to lift a ban on the J&J vaccine. The ban was put in place Tuesday, after reports of blood clots.

During the meeting, committee members hailed the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines as great alternatives to the J&J vaccine because there were “no safety signals” — suggesting, unlike the J&J and AstraZeneca adenovirus-based vaccines, mRNA vaccines are not associated with blood clots.

On Tuesday, Peter Marks, director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), said on a call with reporters there had been no reported cases of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) with thrombocytopenia (low blood platelets that can cause dangerous internal bleeding) following Pfizer and Moderna vaccines.

But Mark’s statement contradicts numerous news reports, recent studies and even a scientist’s warning directed specifically to Marks late last year — it also contradicts data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

Utilizing a search criteria that included reports of blood clots associated with blood coagulation disorders, VAERS yielded a total of 795 reports for all three vaccines from Dec. 14, 2020 through April 1, 2021.

Of the 795 cases reported, there were 400 reports attributed to Pfizer, 337 reports with Moderna and 56 reports with J&J — far more than the eight cases under investigation, including the two additional cases added Wednesday.

Study released today links Pfizer, Moderna to blood clots

A study released today by Oxford University found the number of people who developed CVST blood clots after COVID vaccines was about the same for Pfizer, Moderna and AstraZeneca, MarketWatch reported. (J&J is not approved for use in the EU, where the study originated).

According to the study, 4 in 1 million people experienced CVST during the two weeks following vaccination with the Pfizer or Moderna vaccine, versus 5 in 1 million people for the AstraZeneca vaccine.

Although researchers found a significantly higher incidence of blood clots in people who were infected with COVID, the incidence of blood clots following vaccines was still much higher than the background incidence of 0.41, a strong signal that the vaccines pose this specific risk.

“These findings are consistent with what we know about how vaccine-induced spike proteins can on their own cause cell signaling through interactions with the ACE-2 receptors,” said Lyn Redwood, RN, MSN, president emerita of Children’s Health Defense. “When this happens, it can result in inflammation and a host of other potentially pathological events in the epithelial lining of the blood vessels which can then trigger pro-inflammatory cytokines capable of activating coagulation systems and down-regulating anticoagulant pathways resulting in clot formation.”

A study published February in the Journal of Hematology examined thrombocytopenia following Pfizer and Moderna vaccination in response to the death of a 56-year-old Florida physician — the first identified patient who died from a brain hemorrhage after receiving Pfizer’s vaccine.

Researchers examined 20 case reports of patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) following vaccination, including 17 without pre‐existing thrombocytopenia using data from the CDC, FDA, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), published reports, and communications with patients and treating providers.

After analyzing data researchers could not exclude the possibility that the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines had the potential to trigger ITP and recommended additional surveillance to determine the incidence of thrombocytopenia post vaccination.

“While the main concern associated with ITP is bleeding, it may come as a surprise that ITP is also associated with a 20% increased risk for blood clots,” Redwood said, pointing to a March 8 article by Dr. Robert Bird, director of haematology at Princess Alexandra Hospital in Brisbane, Australia.

Physicians weigh in on how vaccines might lead to blood clots
The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) said in an April 5 press release all three vaccines approved for emergency use in the U.S. (Pfizer, Moderna and J&J) cause human cells to manufacture the spike protein, which then induces the immune system to make antibodies to that protein.

When a vaccinated person is then exposed to the virus, the immune system will recognize the threat and mount a defense that should at least minimize symptoms.

The spike protein is just a fragment of a virus, so it — or the mRNA that codes for it — cannot cause an infection. However, there are questions about whether the spike protein itself can cause harm as it binds to tissue receptors, AAPS explained.

AAPS physicians and scientists informed the FDA that mRNA products, through spike proteins, may have “the potential to cause microvascular injury [inflammation and small blood clots called microthrombi] to the brain, heart, liver and kidneys in ways that were not assessed in the safety trials.”The FDA has not responded.

At least 37 people have developed a rare platelet disorder after receiving the Pfizer or Moderna shot, including 56-year-old Florida obstetrician Gregory Michael who developed the disorder three days after receiving the Pfizer product and died 15 days after being vaccinated, AAPS said.

On April 13, Dr. Hooman Noorchashm, a physician-scientist and advocate for ethics who specializes in cardiothoracic surgery, joined Tucker Carlson on his show to discuss blood clots and vaccines.

Noorchashm explained that although it’s a good sign the FDA is taking blood clot complications with J&J seriously, it is missing similar thrombotic complications with Pfizer and Moderna

“I don’t know why this cluster is sort of affecting J&J. There are certainly other examples of thrombotic events with Pfizer and Moderna that have been entered into the VAERS system,” Noorchashm said.

Scientist warned FDA in December about COVID vaccines and blood clots
On Dec. 8, 2020, before any COVID vaccines received Emergency Use Authorization in the U.S., J. Patrick Whelan, M.D., Ph.D., wrote the FDA about the potential for vaccines designed to create immunity to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein “to cause microvascular injury and blood clots throughout the body including the brain, heart, liver and kidneys in ways that were not assessed in the safety trials.”

As The Defender reported in February, Whelan, a Harvard-trained physician with a background in biochemistry, medicine and rheumatology, did not dispute the vaccines’ potential to quickly arrest the spread of the virus — assuming the vaccines prove to actually prevent transmission, which also was not assessed in the clinical trials.

But Whelan cautioned that “it would be vastly worse if hundreds of millions of people were to suffer long-lasting or even permanent damage to their brain or heart microvasculature as a result of failing to appreciate in the short-term an unintended effect of full-length spike protein-based vaccines on other organs.”

The J&J vaccine was paused because six women in the U.S. developed a rare and serious disorder called cerebral venous thrombosis which occurs when a blood clot forms in the brain’s venous sinuses. The clot prevents blood from draining out of the brain. As a result, blood cells may break and leak blood into the brain tissues, forming a hemorrhage.

According to Redwood, cerebral venous thrombosis has also been reported in cases of COVID-19 infections. She explained how the same condition that can occur in someone infected with the virus might also occur in someone who gets a COVID vaccine.

“The science has progressed rapidly and we are now aware that the spike protein alone, without COVID infection, is capable of traveling through the body and binding to ACE-2 receptors and activating a host of cell-signaling pathways capable of triggering a wide range of adverse events,” Redwood said.

A landmark study in Nature Neuroscience documented that commercially obtained COVID-19 spike protein (S1) injected into mice not only crossed the blood-brain barrier into the brain, but also the lung, spleen, kidney and liver of the mice.

A second study published in Neurobiology of Disease reported that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein alone, without the virus, is a potent inductor of endothelial dysfunction through interaction with ACE-2 receptors resulting in a pro-inflammatory response in the vessel linings.

The endothelium is a thin membrane that lines the blood vessels that control vascular relaxation and contraction as well as enzymes that control blood clotting, immune function and platelet adhesion. Following vascular injury that can be caused by inflammation generated by spike proteins the endothelium shifts to a pro-thrombotic/pro-coagulant phenotype resulting in blood clot formation and other untoward events.

According to Redwood, it’s “only logical to assume” that when the vaccine creates the identical spike protein that occurs in infection, and which has been identified as the culprit causing a myriad serious and life threatening injuries, “we are going to see these same injuries in individuals who receive the vaccines.”

Redwood said it’s critical that we thoroughly research these vaccine-related injuries before we resume vaccination with spike protein vaccines, especially in children where we have no real data on safety and effectiveness.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Merck Plans Large Outpatient Trial of COVID-19 Pill, Stops Study in Hospitalized Patients
merck laboratory building

(Dreamstime)
Thursday, 15 April 2021 07:18 AM

Merck & Co Inc on Thursday said it is planning a large study of what could become the first pill to target the coronavirus in people at risk of severe COVID-19, but will no longer pursue use of the experimental antiviral drug in hospitalized patients.

The company said it would study the drug molnupiravir in a Phase 3 trial among COVID-19 patients out of hospitals who have at least one risk factor for poor outcomes, such as advanced age, obesity, or diabetes.

Trial participants can have had symptoms for no more than five days, shortened from seven days in a prior study.

"We had some encouraging signals in the outpatient trial. That was not the case in the inpatient trial, but that was not unexpected," Roy Baynes, Merck's chief medical officer, told Reuters. He said COVID-19 patients who need hospital treatment are often in the "inflammatory" phase of the disease, which is too late for an antiviral drug to provide much help.

Molnupiravir, which Merck is developing with Ridgeback Biotherapeutics, is designed to interfere with the ability of the coronavirus to replicate.

Merck also said it discontinued development of an experimental immune modulator, known as MK-7110, for treating COVID-19 after concluding that clinical trial and manufacturing preparations would take too long.

The drugmaker earlier this year stopped development of two COVID-19 vaccines, citing data showing they were less effective than vaccines being developed by rivals.

Merck said its trials of molnupiravir found no drug-related adverse events that led participants to discontinue treatment and there were no drug-related deaths.

Patients in the Phase 3 trial will be given 800 mg of molnupiravir twice a day for five days.

Merck said it plans to present at an upcoming medical meeting details from earlier studies of the drug in both hospitalized and non-hospitalized patients. Results of the Phase 3 trial are expected by September or October, but interim analyzes are planned.

Baynes said the company has ramped up production of molnupiravir and aims to have at least 10 million courses of therapy on hand later this year.
Merck also plans to study molnupiravir for preventing coronavirus infection in people exposed to the disease, starting in the second half of the year.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Moderna Says Its Booster Shot Could Be Available by Fall
Moderna Says Its Booster Shot Could Be Available by Fall

(Getty Images)
Wednesday, 14 April 2021 06:30 PM

The pharmaceutical giant Moderna may have a booster shot that will neutralize COVID-19 variants by autumn. The company’s CEO, Stephan Bancel, told CNBC's Squawk Box: “I want to make sure there are boost vaccines available in the fall so we can protect people as we go into the next fall and winter season in the U.S.”

According to The Hill, Bancel said that Moderna would submit data on its booster shots to federal regulatory authorities to demonstrate its efficacy against COVID-19 variants.

“COVID-19 is not going away. It’s not leaving the planet,” Bancel said, adding that with the variants mutating, getting a booster shot custom designed to neutralize whatever form of the coronavirus is dominant would be the logical and most effective path to take.

Bancel said that with more vaccinations and more people getting infected, the pace of COVID-19 will naturally slow down, much like influenza. The National Institutes of Health began testing Moderna’s booster shot last months against the virulent South African variant that is causing concern among public health officials.

According to The Hill, the B.1.351 mutation appears to be more contagious and could possibly evade protection from the existing vaccines. But experts say that with mRNA vaccines, such a Moderna’s and the Pfizer drug, the vaccine can be easily updated to accommodate variants, as long as we remain vigilant and screen for mutations before they become too virulent, according to Fast Company.

“With an RNA vaccine, it’s very easy to switch,” said Dr. Drew Weissman, an immunologist at the University of Pennsylvania, who specializes in mRNA technology and vaccine research. To design the current mRNA vaccines, scientists typed in the genetic code of the virus to help our immune cells identify the invader. To revise the vaccines, researchers would then type in the new genetic code of the dominant variant so that our cells would have an updated version of instructions. According to Fast Company, such a revision could be done in around 6 weeks.

Weissman said that the only undetermined factor is how the Food and Drug Administration would view the changes in terms of its approval of the vaccine modification. Officials might say these changes would probably not need additional clinical testing since we currently revise the flu vaccine annually to adjust its effectiveness. On the other hand, regulators may require additional testing, per Fast Company.

Weissman said that for right now, the current virus has only a few mutations and the vaccines can still easily target the spike protein. However, the expert warned that as the mutations become more pronounced, especially in parts of the world where vaccination is going to be delayed for years, the virus may elude our current vaccinations and even reinfect people.

Moderna’s booster prediction comes the day after the company announced that its vaccine was 90% effective for six months after an individual gets both doses, according to the Hill. The company is also working on obtaining full FDA approval for the vaccine as it is currently authorized only for emergency use during the pandemic.
 

zeker

Has No Life - Lives on TB

marsh

On TB every waking moment
IS DR. FAUCI ABOUT TO BE EXPOSED? WaPo Columnist Says Wuhan Lab Investigation Would Expose Dr. Fauci, US Taxpayer Funding of CCP BioLabs (VIDEO)

By Jim Hoft
Published April 17, 2021 at 3:15pm

For months, since May 2020, The Gateway Pundit has been reporting on Dr. Anthony Fauci’s likely illegal funding of coronavirus projects at the Wuhan Virology Center.

It is clear that they successfully isolated the coronavirus in the lab and were actively experimenting with species-to-species transmission.

It’s also important to note that back in 2017 we had solid intelligence about a viral leak in a high security Chinese virology R&D center that resulted in the SARS virus getting out and killing people.

This information provides a basis that contradicts the theory that COVID-19 is a variant that just magically mutated in a bat in the wild and then jumped to a human when they ate a delicious bowl of bat soup.

And then back in May 2020, TGP reported this: The leader of the US task force overseeing the country’s response to the China coronavirus, Dr. Tony Fauci, was the one who funded the Wuhan bat virus work and kept it going.
1618706899125.png

Now the rest of the mainstream media is starting to catch up.

On Saturday Washington Post columnist Josh Rogin joined the Bannon War Room and told the audience that Dr. Tony Fauci needs to provide answers about his involvement with the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Josh Rogin told the War Room:

Rumble video 4;01 min

Rogin said Saturday the only way to move forward from the pandemic is to investigate its origins, including a real independent investigation in Wuhan.
“And then we’ve got to check out all the labs here,” he said. “Turn over some rocks that are going to make some people very uncomfortable.”
Dr. Fauci and the National Institutes of Health were responsible for using taxpayer dollars for gain of function research, to weaponize viruses to make them more contagious and more deadly.


“There’s no statue of limitations on 3 million deaths,” Rogin said. “Every one of those coffins comes with a lawyer.”

“We’re going to need to investigate the lab,” he said. “And that means asking some tough questions of Anthony Fauci, and i’m sure he doesn’t want to be asked those questions, but tough.”
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Stanford study quietly published at NIH.gov proves face masks are absolutely worthless against Covid

The diapers most of us are wearing on our face most of the time apparently have no effect at stopping Covid-19. This explains a lot.
JD Rucker
by JD Rucker

April 17, 2021

Stanford study quietly published at NIH.gov proves face masks are absolutely worthless against Covid



Did you hear about the peer-reviewed study done by Stanford University that demonstrates beyond a reasonable doubt that face masks have absolutely zero chance of preventing the spread of Covid-19? No? It was posted on the the National Center for Biological Information government website. The NCBI is a branch of the National Institute for Health, so one would think such a study would be widely reported by mainstream media and embraced by the “science-loving” folks in Big Tech.

Instead, a DuckDuckGo search reveals it was picked up by ZERO mainstream media outlets and Big Tech tyrants will suspend people who post it, as political strategist Steve Cortes learned the hard way when he posted a Tweet that went against the face mask narrative. The Tweet itself featured a quote and a link that prompted Twitter to suspend his account, potentially indefinitely.

He was quoting directly from the NCBI publication of the study. The government website he linked to features a peer-reviewed study by Stanford University’s Baruch Vainshelboim. In it, he cited 67 scholars, doctors, scientists, and other studies to support his conclusions.

The sentence Cortes quoted from the study’s conclusion reads: “The data suggest that both medical and non-medical facemasks are ineffective to block human-to-human transmission of viral and infectious disease such SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19, supporting against the usage of facemasks.”

Twitter messaged Cortes demanding he delete the Tweet, citing that he broke Twitter rules specifically for, “Violating the policy on spreading misleading and potentially harmful information related to COVID-19.”

Vainshelboim drew many conclusions from the vast information he compiled, but arguably the biggest bombshell in it can be found in the “Efficacy of facemasks” section [emphasis added]:

According to the current knowledge, the virus SARS-CoV-2 has a diameter of 60 nm to 140 nm [nanometers (billionth of a meter)] [16], [17], while medical and non-medical facemasks’ thread diameter ranges from 55 µm to 440 µm [micrometers (one millionth of a meter), which is more than 1000 times larger [25]. Due to the difference in sizes between SARS-CoV-2 diameter and facemasks thread diameter (the virus is 1000 times smaller), SARS-CoV-2 can easily pass through any facemask

This study isn’t the only one out there that demonstrates scientifically the inefficacy and dangers associated with constant use of face masks. One would think that considering the source, this type of information would be acceptable to even Big Tech tyrants. After all, they constantly chide us about following the science. Well, here’s the science.

Leaders in Democrat-led states should rejoice at this information since it explains why their Covid case numbers keep going up despite their ongoing lockdowns while Republican-led states are doing better. The real science gives them the answer that Dr. Anthony Fauci fails to grasp.

We’re posting the study for posterity; one never knows when the government or their puppetmasters in Silicon Valley will determine it needs to come down:

Facemasks in the COVID-19 era: A health hypothesis
Abstract
Many countries across the globe utilized medical and non-medical facemasks as non-pharmaceutical intervention for reducing the transmission and infectivity of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). Although, scientific evidence supporting facemasks’ efficacy is lacking, adverse physiological, psychological and health effects are established. Is has been hypothesized that facemasks have compromised safety and efficacy profile and should be avoided from use. The current article comprehensively summarizes scientific evidences with respect to wearing facemasks in the COVID-19 era, providing prosper information for public health and decisions making.

Introduction
Facemasks are part of non-pharmaceutical interventions providing some breathing barrier to the mouth and nose that have been utilized for reducing the transmission of respiratory pathogens [1]. Facemasks can be medical and non-medical, where two types of the medical masks primarily used by healthcare workers [1], [2]. The first type is National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)-certified N95 mask, a filtering face-piece respirator, and the second type is a surgical mask [1]. The designed and intended uses of N95 and surgical masks are different in the type of protection they potentially provide. The N95s are typically composed of electret filter media and seal tightly to the face of the wearer, whereas surgical masks are generally loose fitting and may or may not contain electret-filtering media. The N95s are designed to reduce the wearer’s inhalation exposure to infectious and harmful particles from the environment such as during extermination of insects. In contrast, surgical masks are designed to provide a barrier protection against splash, spittle and other body fluids to spray from the wearer (such as surgeon) to the sterile environment (patient during operation) for reducing the risk of contamination [1].

The third type of facemasks are the non-medical cloth or fabric masks. The non-medical facemasks are made from a variety of woven and non-woven materials such as Polypropylene, Cotton, Polyester, Cellulose, Gauze and Silk. Although non-medical cloth or fabric facemasks are neither a medical device nor personal protective equipment, some standards have been developed by the French Standardization Association (AFNOR Group) to define a minimum performance for filtration and breathability capacity [2]. The current article reviews the scientific evidences with respect to safety and efficacy of wearing facemasks, describing the physiological and psychological effects and the potential long-term consequences on health.

[rest of article on website]
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Dr. Fauci: ‘Very Frustrating’ To Talk About ‘Infringement’ Of ‘Liberties’ When Discussing ‘Public Health’

By Paul Bois
Apr 16, 2021 DailyWire.com•

Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, speaks during a Select Subcommittee On Coronavirus Crisis hearing in Washington, D.C., U.S., on Thursday, April 15, 2021.
Susan Walsh/AP Photo/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, feels frustrated when having to talk about individual freedoms amid the COVID-19 pandemic.

During an appearance on MSNBC’s “The ReidOut” on Friday, Fauci said that he puts a “higher priority” on public safety and health, arguing that personal freedoms should take a backseat to the number of people who have died from the virus.

“Does it shock you, frustrate you, how do you feel when you are peppered with questions about, you know, restrictions and freedoms — and the dead, the 560,000 dead are not mentioned?” Reid asked Fauci.

“Well, it’s very frustrating, because, you know, as a public health official, I’m very much aware of this issue of COVID-19 fatigue, about people really being worn down and tired of the kinds of restrictions that we have when we do public health guidelines,” he said.

Fauci was responding to an intense line of questioning from Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) that asked Fauci to specifically state when Americans will get their 1st Amendment rights back. During the heated exchange, Fauci continued to press the point that he was more concerned with public safety.

“Congressman Jordan mentioned the people of Ohio,” Fauci told Reid. “I care very much for the people of Ohio. I don’t want to see them get sick or die, because we have 560,000 Americans that have died so far. So, we’re looking at it from different perspectives. I’m looking at it from a public health perspective, and he was talking about the infringement upon liberties. Right now, what we need to do is get this pandemic behind us. And we will do that, and it will not be an indefinite period of time.”

Fauci then turned to the vaccine as a sign of hope.

“The thing that we have so much in our favor is that we now have 80 million Americans fully vaccinated and 127 million have had at least one dose,” he continued. “Each day, we get three to four million people vaccinated, additionally, each day that goes by. So, what we need to do is just hang on there a bit longer until we get the majority, the overwhelming majority, of people vaccinated. And you will see, the level of infection continue to come down. And when it does, then you’ll see a relaxation of the kind of restrictions that people would like to get rid of because they want to get their lives back. I, certainly, want to get my life back. But I also put, as a higher priority, the health and the safety and the lives of the American public.”
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Exclusive – Mike Garcia: The Pandemic Was an ‘Insidious Encroachment on Our Bill of Rights’
17
HARRISBURG, PA - MAY 15: A demonstrator holds a placard with a face mask stating THE NEW SYMBOL OF TYRANNY MUZZLE rallying outside the Pennsylvania Capitol Building to protest the continued closure of businesses due to the coronavirus pandemic on May 15, 2020 in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Governor Tom Wolf …
Mark Makela/Getty Images
JACOB BLISS18 Apr 202124

Congressman Mike Garcia (R-CA) joined SiriusXM’s Breitbart News Saturday to speak about the pandemic being an “insidious encroachment” on the American Bill of Rights throughout the County.

The host Matthew Boyle, brought up the Congressman’s recent op-ed published this past week at Breitbart News, “Time to Re-Embrace the Bill of Rights After the Pandemic’s Encroachment on Our Liberties,” which talked about how the “country consciously trades stability for liberties” and how challenging events makes some want to reexamine the Bill of Rights for what life will be like in a post-pandemic world.

Boyle spoke about Garcia’s state, California, which was one of the hardest hit from the pandemic under the governorship of Gov. Gavin Newsom (D). Newsom restricted Californian’s personal liberties with capacity limits on everything from churches and restaurants to even grocery stores. Boyle asked what Garcia’s post-pandemic world would look like, with the governor announcing the state will be open starting June 15.

Garcia first said, “I don’t believe anything that Newsom says, obviously,” adding that what he believes Americans should really be looking for in the post-pandemic era is “exactly what we should have been looking for frankly, during the pandemic.”

The Congressman thinks Americans are losing out on rights. He feels it “was an insidious encroachment on our Bill of Rights in some states and in California, was pretty flagrant and we saw it effectively on day one through today, and it still continues to exist.”

“I was thinking about what we’d been through in the last thirteen or fourteen months. I was able to do you know of a wire diagram from every single or a policy and regulation that not just California but many states we’re putting in place to directly, infringing on one of the Bill of Rights, and it’s uncanny when you go down one through ten for the bill through the Bill of Rights, is something that we’ve been subjected to, whether it was exercising our religious right,” when talking about the reasons for writing the op-ed. “Whether it’s been this a cancel culture or the censorship during the pandemic, ah for the freedom of speech clouding, the freedom of the press and getting false in a data and information out there in the midst of the pandemic. Ah- and- and you know sacrificing in jeopardizing that.”

The Congressman added that it is a shame that some of our “rights” have already been taken away from the pandemic. He said, “obviously, our rights to peaceably assemble have been jeopardized. In some cases, clean turned completely off and so are you look at it, and you and you literally go down each one of the Bill of Rights. There’s clear examples where we’ve been deprived, and ah well in the title is actually really embrace because I don’t think we as a nation have really lost an allegiance to the constitution.” Garcia noted, this is what every American has seen recently. “In this last thirteen fourteen months, and the pandemic was an excuse, but we should never lose our rights. We should never lose those inherently connotational guaranteed rights.”

Garcia also brought up an argument during a subcommittee hearing Thursday hearing this past week between Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) and Anthony Fauci, a member of President Joe Biden’s coronavirus response team, who was testifying on Biden’s coronavirus response. Garcia wanted to specify bring some attention to what was going on in the back of the room with Rep. James Clyburn (D-SC), who is currently the House majority whip.

The Congressman said, “Clyburn, who is the majority whip, was saying in the background, and he basically said look when ninety percent of members get their vaccination, that’s when Americans will get their liberties back, and that’s shocking to have the majority whip, basically throughout out an arbitrary and capricious number like that at the national level and holding our American. All 330 million of us hostage to what members of congress are going to do relative to their vaccination choice, is staggering and it’s an extension of what we see here in California every day, but ah, we’ve got to really be paying attention here, as Americans and double down on our constitutional rights.”

Breitbart · Rep. Mike Garcia (R-CA) – April 17, 2021

Boyle brought up the one-party rule in Washington and mentioned how California is one of the few states that have to also deal with the Democrats’ majority rule too in Sacramento. Boyle mentioned the Democrats only have a five-seat difference in the House and the Senate is a 50-50 tie, but Vice President Kamala Harris could break the tie. Boyle mentioned how California used to be a Republican state, adding Ronald Reagan and Richard Nixon came from California too.

Boyle said Garcia led the charge in California, having Republicans win back seats previously won by Democrats. He added that Garcia was the first person to flip a congressional seat from Democrat to Republican in roughly 20 years. Garcia flipped the seat during a special election, once the previous Congresswoman, Katie Hill, resigned following allegations of inappropriate sexual relationships with congressional staffers, one of which she openly admitted to.

Garcia said, “absolutely!” Then added he believes, “it’s a testimony of the message I think, as well as the candidate that one of the best campaigns in the nation, if not the best, in my opinion, the best team.” He added Boyle was right about his race. His race “was the first seat in California to go from a blue to red in 22 years, actually and obviously on the heels of the Katie Hill shenanigans. It was a stark contrast and leadership and style, but also principles experiencing in value to their constituents, or I ran on what I called the four “C’s,” and it wasn’t a Republican versus Democrat thing. It wasn’t a left versus right or red versus blue, kind of argument.”

Garcia added that his district is actually a Democrat district with about eight percent more registered voters than the Republicans. He said, because of the district being like that, he said when you run, you cannot just run as a conservative. “Running on as a very conservative republican required me to stay on message then on party and the four “C’s” that I used where the constitution, capitalism, competition and charity, and I am a truly believe that, if we as a party, we as a nation stick to those four “C’s” value those four “C’s” reinvest in those four “C’s” make sure that especially the constitution is held intact and we understand where it came from and why our rights are the way they are. We as a nation can solve pretty much any problem that we face, and the charity pieces a big element.”

The Republican explained that it is important one-party rule does not continue to happen. He said, “one party should not be associated with the constitution. While another party is not associated with the constitution, Americans should have a choice of two parties, where both parties and our nation actually ascribe to the values in our constitution and that that, frankly, is not happening today, and I think to your point when we get to a single-party system, work state like what we have in California and what we have now at the national level. You see these encroachments left unchecked, and there’s a lot of republicans who have been jumping up and down talking about the first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, eighth amendment like, like every day, and we’re not getting the traction, because the left [sic] as a as effectively a taken over the media and allow their narrative to be more important than the constitution.”

“That’s the fight, we’re fighting, I’m in this race, as you know Matt, to make sure that our nation doesn’t turn into what California has become, and we’re going to get California back over the next eight to ten years. But, we can’t lose this nation than the short term right,” he added.

Boyle brought up the current recall effort against California’s Governor, asking what Garcia thought about the effort. If a Republican and truly wins against Newsom after the recall, it is effectively going through to the end.

Garcia said he thinks everyone in California is putting effort into the recall, with their hands already full. He added, “First of all, I think Newsom deserves to be recalled. There are plenty of substantiations for that. He’s the kind of personality you got to hit over the head with a stick in order for him to start doing the right things,” adding, “The threat of the recall has improved his posture relative to the covert shutdowns.”

“So, I definitely support the recall, but the reality, this is still a very blue state,” the Republican mentioned. The Congressman said, if someone was to win, they would need to already have a lot of name ID and money to get started.

Garcia thinks with all the effort to recall Newsom, it still might not be enough to do it. He thinks it might not even happen in the next election. “We need someone to step up when you someone who has good conservative values, I would put very strong air quotes around a Republican. When you talk about Schwarzenegger, I don’t think he was what was good for our state at the time, Garcia said, adding as Californians, “we’ve allowed this state to be run by people who don’t know how to operate a business, who don’t have a conservative, financial and economic values, especially turn the state into one of the worst states, despite being a sitting beside sitting on some of the largest natural resources. The best weather geography and talent.”

Boyle spoke more about the national perspective of the one-party rule in Washington being slim. Boyle mentioned how the Democrats are trying to use every opportunity they can to pass parts of their partisan agenda while they still can before losing the House. Instead of “solving problems for people, addressing the concerns of the pandemic that led to this encroachment on people’s liberties,” Boyle said, they are just passing bills to try and get more power.

Garcia agreed and said, “what they’re really doing that is trying to change the rules right and, and in an attempt to retain power get to permanent power and that’s across the board,” he added, that the Democrats are trying to abuse their power by putting an end to the filibuster rules in the Senate, “which would have basically allowed them to run rampant through” all of their far-left ideas.

The Californian also mentioned some of the far-left ideas that the Democrats are trying to pass in the House and what they will do to America. Garcia said, “whether it’s packing the court, H.R. 1, DC statehood literally trying to change the rules that winch we have election elections, keep people in power.” The Democrats are also trying to “adjudicate our judicial branch, and make rulings on policy issues that are going to change the fabric and trajectory of our nation.”

The Democrats “are trying to change the rules and these bills, whether it’s H.R. 1, H.R. 6, or H.R. 8 they are lies, and the covid bill was an example.” He added the last $1.9 trillion coronavirus relief bill “was not a covid bill.” Garcia said the bill relief package was “more of a social welfare and a[n] infrastructure bill than it was covid with only nine percent going to covid.”

Garcia also brought up the Democrats’ upcoming bill on infrastructure where they are trying to spend $2.3 trillion. Garcia said, “The ‘Biden’s Job Act’ is not an infrastructure bill, it again a way for them to get support, buy votes and effectively run our nation’s debt into the ground even further, so we’ve got to be paying attention here.”

Garcia went as far as to say the legislation “is not serious,” adding, “Thank God we still have the filibuster, and most of this will go nowhere. We got to get the House back, and I’m confident that we will.”

Boyle asked Garcia if conservatives will win the culture war by the end of this.

“Yes, I’m faithful that we will. I have a lot of faith in the American individual, and I think this is one of the core values of the good Reagan conservatives. You value the American individual; you have faith in their ability to understand the issue and make the right decisions,” Garcia said. “We saw that in my district, in a district where on the presidential ballot the republican lost by ten points, I was still able to win it’s because I was very aggressive against an opponent who didn’t understand what she was saying or how she would vote and the implications to our district and to our nation,” he added.

Garcia said currently, what is happening is, Americans in the middle haven’t fallen in love with either party. He believes they understand the Constitution, care deeply about the economy and our national security.

“We are threatened as Americans right now, and I think the average American doesn’t necessarily really want to fall in love with a Republican or a Democrat.

They just want to fall in love with individuals who understand what it means to be an American and how to stay secure as an American without worrying about our national security, our local security, without worrying about our financial future,” Garcia said, adding, Americans “just want to survive and thrive in a nation where we’ve already got the foundation for success in the form of the constitution. So I think we’ve got to be really careful with our messaging, talk about values and principles not necessarily party politics.” This is how Garcia says Republicans will be successful since this is the way he did his campaigning.
 

TammyinWI

Talk is cheap
I do not condone violence, but Menard's is violating peoples' rights, and the Constitution. All of the stupidity and illegal crackdown crap is cutting off peoples' oxygen, not based on science, and is because of an evil agenda, not keeping people well. Masks don't help keep people well, it is a LIE!

Cops should not be enforcing illegal activity. They are supposed to uphold the law.

The evil PTB want us all to comply...comply, comply! satan laughs at all of this.

People have had enough...this stupidity has got to go! It is illegal!

Minnesotan Charged with Attacks Over Mask Demand

April 18, 2021

(Associated Press) Prosecutors have charged a Minnesota man with felony assault and allege that he attacked a home improvement store employee and a police officer after the store worker told him to wear a mask.

The Minneapolis Star Tribune reported that the incident began Wednesday afternoon when a cashier at a Menards in Hutchinson told 61-year-old Luke Oeltjenbruns that he couldn’t check out unless he put on a mask, according to a criminal complaint. Oeltjenbruns tried to leave with his merchandise, prompting the cashier to grab his cart.

The complaint alleges that Oeltjenbruns hit the cashier with a piece of lumber. Police later found Oeltjenbruns sitting in his pickup truck in another store’s parking lot.

After a slow-speed chase, officers surrounded his truck with their squad cars, but he refused to get out. Officer Steven Sickmann got up on the truck’s running board and reached through the window. The complaint says Oeltjenbruns closed the window on the officer’s arm, trapping him, and drove off, crashing into squad cars.

The complaint says Sickmann tried to use a rescue hammer to break the window, but Oeltjenbruns took it from him and hit him on the head with it.

Oeltjenbruns was eventually arrested. The complaint says the officer’s injuries included a head wound.

 
Last edited:

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Pompous Fauci Attacks Jim Jordan, Says Mask Mandates, Endless Lockdowns and Vaccine Passports Have Nothing to do with Restricting Civil Liberties (VIDEO)

By Cristina Laila
Published April 18, 2021 at 2:17pm
IMG_0204-1.jpg


Congressman Jim Jordan (R-OH) ripped Fauci apart last Thursday for flip-flopping on Covid mitigation measures.

Rep. Jordan, the ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee, demanded Fauci give him a date for the end of Covid restrictions.

“15 days to slow the spread turned into 1 year of lost liberty,” Jim Jordan said.
To no one’s surprise, Fauci, an unelected, overpaid bureaucrat, said: “I don’t look at this as a liberty thing, Congressman Jordan. I look at this as a public health thing.”

Fauci appeared on CNN’s “State of the Union” on Sunday and attacked Jim Jordan again.

Dr. Fauci told CNN host Dana Bash that endless lockdowns, vaccine passports and mask mandates has nothing to do with restricting liberties.
Advertisement - story continues below

“But it was very, very clear that [Jim Jordan} was talking about liberties that were being restricted. This has nothing to do with liberties,” Fauci said.
Of course it’s a civil liberties issue.

Fauci also attacked people who refuse to get the experimental Covid vaccine.
“It’s almost paradoxical, that on the one hand, they want to be relieved of the restrictions, but on the other hand, they don’t want to be vaccinated,” Fauci said asserting only vaccinated Americans have the right to move around freely.

WATCH:
View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1383774271093104646
.42 min
 

TammyinWI

Talk is cheap
This is one evil, evil man, a murderer who is in lockstep with a group of mass murderers. He knows; he is in with those that greatly want to decrease the global pop., like Bill Gates, who is just one of the many.


Fauci Says He Expects J&J Vaccine to Resume Later This Week

April 18, 2021

1618791287434.png

(Associated Press) The United States will likely move to resume Johnson & Johnson’s COVID-19 vaccine this coming week, possibly with restrictions or broader warnings after reports of some very rare blood clot cases, the government’s top infectious diseases expert said Sunday.

Dr. Anthony Fauci, in a series of news show interviews, said he expects a decision when advisers to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention meet Friday to discuss the pause in J&J’s single-dose vaccine.

“I would be very surprised if we don’t have a resumption in some form by Friday,” he said. “I don’t really anticipate that they’re going to want it stretch it out a bit longer.”

Fauci, who is President Joe Biden’s chief medical adviser, said he believed that federal regulators could bring the shots back with restrictions based on age or gender or with a blanket warning, so that it is administered in a way “a little bit different than we were before the pause.”

The J&J vaccine has been in limbo after the CDC and the Food and Drug Administration said last week they needed more evidence to decide if a handful of unusual blood clots were linked to the shot — and if so, how big the risk is.

The reports are rare — six cases out of more than 7 million U.S. inoculations with J&J vaccine. The clots were found in six women between the ages of 18 and 48. One person died.

The acting FDA commissioner had said she expected the pause to last only a matter of days. Still, the decision last Tuesday triggered swift action in Europe and elsewhere.

Fauci said he doubted very seriously that the U.S. would permanently halt use of the J&J vaccine.

“I don’t think that’s going to happen,” he said. “The pause was to take a look, make sure we know all the information we can have within that timeframe, and also warn some of the physicians out there who might see people, particularly women, who have this particular adverse event, that they treat them properly.”

“I think it’ll likely say, ‘OK, we’re going to use it. But be careful under these certain circumstances.'”

More than 6.8 million doses of the J&J vaccine have been given in the U.S., the vast majority with no or mild side effects. Authorities stressed they have found no sign of clot problems with the most widely used COVID-19 vaccines in the U.S. — from Moderna and Pfizer.

Fauci appeared on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” CNN’s “State of the Union,” ABC’s “This Week” and CBS’ “Face the Nation.”

 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Doctors Close to Solving Blood Clot Issue, Still Not Sure if Linked to Vaccine

By Jack Davis
Published April 17, 2021 at 10:25am

Researchers are trying to get to the bottom of why rare blood clots have been found in individuals who received some types of coronavirus vaccine.

A small number of people who have received the Johnson & Johnson or AstraZeneca vaccine have suffered rare blood clots. The condition has not been reported with the Moderna or Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine, which was made using a different type of technology.

Due to clotting concerns, the Food and Drug Administration and the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have called for a temporary halt in administering the Johnson & Johnson vaccine. The AstraZeneca vaccine, which has been widely used in Europe, has not received federal approval to be used in the U.S.
Doctors are calling the condition vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia, according to CNN, which implies a link to the vaccines, without saying there is a direct cause.

Some experts think enough of a link has already been shown, according to ABC.

“The AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson vaccines are made in a similar way,” said Dr. William Schaffner, an infectious disease physician at Vanderbilt University.

“I think we shouldn’t be coy about that any longer,” Schaffner said, saying it is time to “accept the fact that these are vaccine-induced but very rare events.”

Dr. Richard Kuhn, Ph.D., a virology expert at Purdue University, was more cautious,

“It’s hard to say if it’s the same problem,” he said, “but it does seem the vaccine triggers an antibody response that activates platelets, leading to clots.”

A study led by Dr. Marie Scully, a hematologist at University College London Hospitals, studied 22 patients who received the AstraZeneca vaccine, and found that the individuals who suffered a clotting reaction produced unusual antibodies most often seen before as a reaction to the drug heparin.

“The risk of thrombocytopenia and the risk of venous thromboembolism after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 do not appear to be higher than the background risks in the general population, a finding consistent with the rare and sporadic nature of this syndrome,” the new study said.

“The events reported in this study appear to be rare, and until further analysis is performed, it is difficult to predict who may be affected. The symptoms developed more than 5 days after the first vaccine dose.”

“In all cases reported to date, this syndrome of thrombocytopenia [low platelet count] and venous thrombosis [blood clot] appears to be triggered by receipt of the first dose of the [AstraZeneca] ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine,” the study said.

“It’s not the vaccine that’s causing it — it’s the body’s immune response to the vaccine,” said Dr. Alex Spyropoulos, a blood clot specialist and professor at the Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, according to ABC News.

In a commentary on the new study, Dr. Douglas Cines of the University of Pennsylvania and Dr. James Bussel of Weill Cornell Medicine noted that some people are at greater risk than others.

“Most of the patients included in these reports were women younger than 50 years of age, some of whom were receiving estrogen-replacement therapy or oral contraceptives. A remarkably high percentage of the patients had thromboses at unusual sites,” they wrote.

The CDC is still looking for more facts ahead of a Friday meeting about the clotting concerns.

“We need to know what the size of the problem is,” said Dr. Kevin Ault, professor and division director with the University of Kansas Medical Center.

“So we’re going to shake the trees in the databases that the CDC has and we also need to know what the denominator is — is it just young women or the whole population that’s been vaccinated?”

“There are still a fair number of people in the United States who have been vaccinated in the last two weeks,” Ault said.

“We’ve seen these reactions within two weeks, so it doesn’t sound like a very long time, but we’ll have a fair amount of data in just those nine or ten days.”
 

TammyinWI

Talk is cheap
A friendly reminder...I am aware that a nearby county walked back one "covid death," as they had recorded one death twice...how many are "covid?" really????. . .

Ok, I give up...this article has been a pain in the dupa to post...please forgive any repeats, the code for the story is messed up, and the cut and paste, too...sigh...

INVESTIGATE

‘It’s like a slap in the face’: Grand Strand family finds COVID-19 mislabeled on mother’s death certificate

Family has spent weeks trying to get the certificate amended

WMBF Investigates: Mislabeled COVID deaths

By Madison Martin | September 2, 2020 at 8:36 PM EDT - Updated September 3 at 6:03 PM

HORRY COUNTY, S.C. (WMBF) - In the aftermath of a loved one’s passing, a death certificate is used for settling legal matters, and perhaps can secure some kind of closure.

But one Grand Strand family has been in limbo for weeks - because their mother’s death certificate blames COVID-19 for her passing, and they say that’s simply not the case.

Georgetown County native Brenda Presley spoke with WMBF Investigates on her mother’s passing.

Mary Miller, described as a gentle and kind woman, died on July 18. She had been in the care of NHC HealthCare Garden City in Horry County for about a year and a half.
WMBF Investigates: Mislabeled COVID deaths

WMBF Investigates: Mislabeled COVID deaths

“The facility was great, was clean; the nurses seemed to be attentive - I would say, very well, she was taken care of,” Presley said.

When COVID-19 hit South Carolina, nursing homes locked visitors out.

“I wasn’t happy that I couldn’t get in there but I understood why they were doing what they were doing,” Presley said.

Still, it was a painful time for Presley, who visited with her mother through FaceTime, or window visits.

“She couldn’t understand why we couldn’t come in, and I think that part of health - that physical touch - is a part of keeping the elderly healthy,” Presley said. “You know, all of us - I think physical touch is very important. And for us to not be able to be with her - it’s just not the same.”

Residents took coronavirus tests, and Presley said the nursing home would rearrange residents in different rooms when a positive case would come about in order to prevent further spread.

Lab results show Miller was tested for the virus three times, each time coming back negative. The last test was taken July 13 - five days before she passed.

In the days leading up to her death, Miller had started to fall more, and one morning, she did not wake up. But Presley said questions soon arose from the family on just what was going to be labeled as the cause of death.

“We had heard of people falsifying death certificates and putting COVID on them, so that was a big concern of ours,” Presley explained.

When she was able to retrieve the certificate nearly a week later, she said her eyes immediately went to the cause of death. What lied there was shocking.


“I immediately wanted to start crying because I was so angry,” she said.

The cause of death listed acute respiratory failure. Underneath it read COVID-19, meaning that was what had led to Miller’s death.

Georgetown County Coroner Kenneth Johnson said DHEC’s Vital Records offices instructed officials to list a progression of what the conditions are.

“For example, you can certainly include respiratory failure; you can include some of those various particular elements as they relate to the question of COVID-19. And of course, once a person has been tested, you can’t put down something you can’t determine, by just thinking it was COVID,” Johnson said. “You put down a symptom, related to the COVID, and of course, your test of COVID is your final authority.”

Johnson said those things preceding the cause of death were because of it.

And Presley said COVID-19 is not what caused it. She began calling the nursing home to get connected with her mother’s doctor in order to correct the certificate.

According to South Carolina state law, a doctor, coroner, or medical examiner certifies a death certificate.


Georgetown County Coroner Kenneth Johnson said DHEC’s Vital Records offices instructed officials to list a progression of what the conditions are.

According to South Carolina state law, a doctor, coroner, or medical examiner certifies a death certificate.

Some days later, Presley missed a phone call from the doctor, who left a voicemail.

“She apologized. She said she thought she was filling out a death certificate for another patient. She said she had doled out three to four that day,” Presley explained. “That concerned me, that she could think that she was filling one out for somebody else and get them confused.”

Presley said the doctor told her she’d get the death certificate amended. But July soon turned into August. August 10 marked yet another day that Presley asked the funeral home to check WebDeath on the amendment - and still nothing.


WMBF Investigates asked Tidelands Health for their statement on the matter. NHC HealthCare Garden City contracts with them to provide a medical director and this particular doctor serves in that role.

“On the day in question, (the doctor) erroneously listed COVID-19 as a cause of death on a death certificate. That same day, almost immediately after submitting the death certificate to the funeral home, she realized her inadvertent error. She immediately contacted NHC, the attending funeral home and SC DHEC to report the mistake and initiate a correction. NHC also contacted and informed the family. Since that time, (the doctor) has worked through both the local and Columbia offices of DHEC to file a paper addendum and update the death certificate. The addendum has been submitted, and DHEC will process the update to the death certificate. (The doctor) sincerely apologizes for the inadvertent error. Both (she) and Tidelands Health understand the importance of accurate public health reporting.”
Tidelands Health

Chase Ridgeway, the family’s funeral home director, spoke with their permission to WMBF Investigates.
He said mistakes can be made and nursing home doctors are oftentimes very busy, but didn’t understand why the changes hadn’t been made.

“What is taking so long to change the death (certificate) for this family? It’s a very simple process as far as filling out the paperwork, getting it sent in,” he said.

Ridgeway explained that when the doctor certifies the certificate, it is forwarded on to Vital Records, who prints the copies for the family. The family did not know that COVID-19 was listed until Ridgeway physically handed the certificate to them.
Amending a death certificate is not unusual and can happen for a variety of reasons. But when it comes to listing COVID-19 on it when it shouldn’t -- Ridgeway said this is the first he’s seen or known of in the area.

“My question is - how many other times has this happened, and families just swept it under the rug and didn’t really care?” Ridgeway asked. “Here we have a family that is very adamant that - you hear about this thing going on, and they’re like, ’You know this isn’t right, and we’re going to put our foot down, and we’re not going to be another number.’”

DHEC told WMBF Investigates that they can’t give a confirmed number of how many certificates have been changed in order to include or exclude COVID-19 from the original death certificate since they said there isn’t a metric easily captured in the database.

DHEC officials said Vital Statistics says the number would be “very low, probably less than 20 since COVID first emerged in the state in March.”

Presley said NHC followed up with her to say the amendment had been submitted to DHEC on August 21, more than a month after her mother passed away.

“If I had made a mistake like that in today’s world, I would’ve had it changed that day. I would’ve been like, ’Oh this is a mistake. And I’m going to stop what I’m doing until this is changed,’” said Ridgeway.

Several days ago, Presley received another phone call from the doctor - exactly one month from the last time she had heard from her. Presley said the doctor apologized again and said she’d never made a mistake like that before.
As of the first of September, Presley was told the system still hasn’t been updated to reflect an amendment.

“I would like truth to be put on a death certificate,” she said. “I would like for it to happen. I would like to be able to close this chapter. And move on.”

Presley told WMBF Investigates she’s heard of an instance of a mislabeled COVID-19 death of another resident of the nursing facility. WMBF Investigates inquired about that case as well.

NHC Care provided the following statement:

“We have contacted the physicians for these two families to help escalate their request for assistance in this issue. One physician shared this clerical error has been corrected and the amended death certificate was mailed last week. This is the first time a family has reported any COVID related issue with death certificates to our center. A physician and the coroner manage the death certificate process and report cause of death. We report all positive confirmations of COVID and deaths with COVID status to the health department. During this pandemic, we want to provide our families and the community with correct information and reporting status per CMS and CDC guidelines. For daily status updates, please visit our website.”

NHC Care

Johnson gave advice on what someone should do if the death certificate is incorrect.
“If there’s a question about what’s on there, I would encourage them to talk to the person that signed it,” he said. “Explain your concerns, explain the question, explain why it is not. They should be able to explain to you why it is, or they certainly could agree and say, ‘you know what? You’re right.’”



WMBF Investigates: Mislabeled COVID deaths
“The facility was great, was clean; the nurses seemed to be attentive - I would say, very well, she was taken care of,” Presley said.
When COVID-19 hit South Carolina, nursing homes locked visitors out.
“I wasn’t happy that I couldn’t get in there but I understood why they were doing what they were doing,” Presley said.


If you’re unable to get to the one who certified the certificate, he says you can also query DHEC Vital Records.
“There’s a method to change, correct, amend, supplement the original death certificate so that it shows the most current and most reliable information,” Johnson said.
Copyright 2020 WMBF. All rights reserved.

 
Last edited:
Top