GOV/MIL Leftists Call For New "Secret Police" Force To Spy On Trump Supporters (AN ABSOLUTELY MUST-READ THREAD)

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Judicial Watch files lawsuit supporting teacher fired over anti-Critical Race Theory posts

Judicial Watch filed a federal civil rights lawsuit in support of a Massachusetts high school teacher, who was fired over online posts against Critical Race Theory (CRT).

Updated: November 29, 2021 - 6:28pm

Conservative legal group Judicial Watch has filed a federal civil rights lawsuit in support of a Massachusetts high school teacher, who was fired over social media posts expressing her opposition to Critical Race Theory (CRT).

The teacher, Kari MacRae, taught math and business at Hanover High School. The lawsuit "asks for damages against Hanover School Superintendent Matthew Ferron and Hanover High School Principal Matthew Mattos for retaliating against MacRae," according to Judicial Watch.

MacRae was fired in September, less than a month after she was hired.

“I got fired specifically for a social media post I made," she told the Cape Cod Times in October 2021.

The posts were created months before she became a teacher at the high school. MacRae ran for Bourne School Committee in May 2021. In one TikTok video, MacRae stated, "So pretty much the reason I ran for school board and the reason I’m taking on this responsibility is to ensure that students, at least in our town, are not being taught critical race theory. That they’re not being taught that the country was built on racism. So they're not being taught that they can choose whether or not they want to be a girl or a boy. It’s one thing to include and it’s one thing to be inclusive. And it’s one thing to educate everybody about everything. It's completely another thing to push your agenda. And, with me on the school board, that won’t happen in our town."

Principal Mattos investigated six memes and two videos from MacRae. He fired her because the posts "would have a significant impact on student learning," despite the fact that no parent or student had expressed concerns over MacRae's beliefs.

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said the lawsuit is looking to hold school officials accountable. "Kari MacRae was viciously targeted and unlawfully fired as a teacher because she exercised her First Amendment rights to criticize critical race theory," he commented.

This case is MacRae v. Mattos, No. 11917, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts.

The legal watchdog is also involved in other education cases across the nation. Last month, Just the News reported on Judicial Watch's Freedom of Information Act requests that revealed a "coordinated effort to advance Critical Race Theory initiatives" in Loudoun County, Virginia, "despite widespread public opposition to the curriculum."
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Watch – Detroit School Superintendent: ‘Our Curriculum Is Deeply Using Critical Race Theory’
42
Detroit Public Schools Community District Superintendent Nikolai Vitti talks at Gardner Elementary School in Detroit, Tuesday, Sept. 4, 2018. (AP Photo/Paul Sancya)
AP Photo/Paul Sancya
ASHLEY OLIVER29 Nov 2021155

Detroit public schools are “deeply using critical race theory (CRT),” and school administrators are relying on Democrat Gov. Gretchen Whitmer to veto a bill that would ban them from continuing to use it, according to Detroit’s top education official.

Nikolai Vitti, superintendent of Detroit Public Schools Community District (DPSCD), the largest public school district in Michigan, touted that CRT was a part of Detroit’s social studies, English, and language arts curriculums as he spoke during a regular school board meeting this month.

“Our curriculum is deeply using critical race theory, especially in social studies, but you’ll find it in English, language arts, and the other disciplines,” Vitti said on November 9. “We’re very intentional about creating a curriculum, infusing materials, and embedding critical race theory within our curriculum.”

Watch:
View: https://youtu.be/o-M4pvZZ18o
2:52:45 min

Vitti’s comments come after the Republican-controlled Michigan House passed H.B. 5097, which would, in part, ban curriculums from including “the promotion of any form of race or gender stereotyping or anything that could be understood as implicit race or gender stereotyping.”

A Senate version of the bill also passed through the education committee and is now awaiting Senate approval. The Michigan Senate is controlled by Republicans, 22 to 16.

“I think our best strategy politically is to lean on the governor to veto it as she has done with other legislation that has passed in Michigan over the last couple of years,” Vitti said. “I don’t believe the Senate— we might be able to convince the Senate not to pass it, but this looks like a pure Republican feature of legislation for this year.”

In a meeting a few days later, on November 15, Vitti detailed school officials’ efforts to fight the bill, saying, “We have done quite a bit on the legislative side in lobbying to prevent the bill to move forward,” such as writing “dozens” of letters to legislators and encouraging parents to do the same. Vitti concluded, however, that a “more realistic” approach to defeating the legislation will be to urge Whitmer to veto it [Vitti’s comments occur at the 42:18 minute mark here].

In a pool photo provided by the Michigan Office of the Governor, Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer addresses the state during a speech in Lansing, Mich., Wednesday, June 17, 2020. The governor says she is optimistic about a return to in-person instruction at K-12 schools in the fall, announcing she will release further guidance on June 30. The governor said she will issue an executive order that will provide details on what will be required and what will be recommended. Schools were closed in March due to the coronavirus pandemic. (Michigan Office of the Governor via AP, Pool)
Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer addresses the state during a speech in Lansing, June 17, 2020. (Michigan Office of the Governor via AP, Pool)

Several Republican-controlled states across the country have passed similar bills to prevent school officials from incorporating tenets of CRT into their teaching strategies. The highly popular Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) articulated after his Board of Education banned CRT, “If you look at things that have grown out of critical race theory, it’s much more about trying to craft narratives about history that are not grounded in facts,” citing the New York Times’s widely debunked 1619 Project. DeSantis condemned CRT in schools as bringing “ideology and political activism into the forefront of education.”

In Virginia, Governor-elect Glenn Youngkin (R) characterizes CRT as dream-crushing and divisive to students. Youngkin ran his successful gubernatorial campaign this year largely on education reform, forcefully vowing to ban CRT in schools during his stump speeches and rallies.

Democrats, for their part, have tended to dismiss CRT in schools as nonexistent, despite the topic creating national buzz and energizing parents nationwide.

In Michigan, State Rep. Laurie Pohutsky (D-Livonia), who represents an area in Metro Detroit, said last week in a livestream on social media about H.B. 5097, “I want to be very, very clear. CRT is not taught in any of our K–12 schools.”

She added, “What this bill would end up doing if it was signed into law is limiting what teachers can discuss and how they can discuss it.” She claimed it would restrict lessons on topics like slavery, Jim Crow, Reconstruction, and the Holocaust.

Her comments run counter to Vitti’s from earlier this month and speak to the struggle politicians and school leaders have had with messaging on the topic. When Vitti spoke on November 15, he navigated in and out of his definition of CRT, ultimately settling on saying that while CRT “itself” is not taught in schools, “on the surface, one might say it is.”

The Detroit superintendent pointed to DPSCD’s “culturally and historically responsive” priorities — several of which incorporate race — for K-12 students as he explained:
So someone from the outside could look at this and say, “Well this should be banned because it’s critical race theory.” It is and it’s not. It’s really what you actually do in the classroom, the questions you ask, and how you structure the content. But what this is is a commitment to anti-racist instruction in teaching and curriculum. It’s also more culturally responsive to where our students are. Where a lot of people think that is critical race theory, in and of itself it’s not — but on the surface one might say it is.
Vitti also said that from a political standpoint, he thinks Republicans are uniting against CRT in schools as a “reaction” to the 2020 election.

He said, “I think it’s a reaction to President Biden’s victory, former President Trump’s loss, the increase in voting numbers in communities of color that led to President Biden’s victory, and a fear of loss of control of power.”
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

1638310606055.png

Leaked materials from the California Teacher’s Association Conference (CTA) in Palm Springs have shown how teachers are attempting to subvert parents on their children’s inclusion in LGBTQ+ clubs, and tactics for tracking their internet use.

The documentation and audio files from California’s largest teacher’s union meeting at CTA were sent to Abigail Shrier, who confirmed their authenticity with three participants from the conference.

The event was held from October 29th – 31st, 2021, and entitled “2021 LGBTQ+ Issues Conference, Beyond the Binary: Identity and Imagining Possibilities.

Topics ranged from advising teachers on best practices for subverting parents, handling conservative communities, and discussions of school principals of gender identity and sexual orientation.

The workshops provided at the conference encouraged teachers to “create a safe environment that fosters bravery to explore sexual orientation, gender identity, and expression,” while others taught teachers on how to form Gay-Straight Alliance clubs and other forms of LGBTQ+ clubs for middle schoolers.

Such clubs were promoted as answering questions on how to deal with “meddlesome parents” who might not want their child participating in such a club. One speaker noted that the clubs are “not official” so do not hold a roster of members or keep any records.

In the audio files, a Buena Vista Middle School teacher and LGBTQ+ club leader, Lori Caldeira, described how the lack of record-keeping allows for a legal loophole so she can lie to parents about their children’s whereabouts and attendance of such clubs.

Another middle school teacher named Kelly Baraki noted that she refers to her club “The Equity Club” or “You Be You” rather than GSA in order to further prevent parents from knowing what their children are attending.

Bakari spoke of mitigating any decline in LGBTQ+ club membership:
“…we started to try and identify kids. When they were doing virtual learning – we totally stalked what they were doing on Google, when they weren’t doing school work.”
Shrier further revealed that speakers at the conference were proud to share their tactics for tracking their student’s Google searches and other internet activity. Bakari described how she and fellow teachers, “make note of those kids and the things that they bring up with each other in chats or email or whatever.”

Others described eavesdropping on hallway conversations to target sixth grades, who were then sent personal invites to LGBTQ gatherings and clubs. This information was then withheld from the participants parents.

Bakari said, “we use our observations of kids in the classroom, conversations that we hear, to personally invite students, because that’s really the way we kinda get the bodies in the door, right?”

In order to create trust with her students, Caldeira said that she volunteered to read the morning announcements. She notes that this allows her to “control the information that goes home… this year, students have been allowed to put openly LGBT content in our morning announcement slides.”

Caldeira went on to describe how the principal of her school “flinches” because of the three-member team the teacher has assembled in her middle school: two “non-binary” and one “fluid” student.

When it comes to handling parental push-back, Caldeira and Bakari described doing a “mind-trick on our sixth graders,” wherein the anti-bullying presentations they provide will detail the gender stuff first. They hope that this will ensure their students go home and discuss the latter aspects of the presentation with their parents.

Both teachers went so far as to mock a parent who pushed back on this type of information being provided to their child. When another parent pushed back, Caldeira’s principal told the parent to send their child to a private school, which she described as a “win.”

Caldeira noted that she and her colleagues have “acted with great integrity in the past several years that we have run [their LGBTQ+ clubs]. We never crossed a line. We’ve wanted to, but we never have.”
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

“Put You White Opossums in a Gas Chamber” – Black Man on Live Audio Stream ‘Twitter Space’ Advocates for ‘White Genocide’

By Jim Hoft
Published November 30, 2021 at 4:45pm
8FFD0F04-E1A7-48AB-9321-D706FACD993C.jpeg
(Enhanced photo)

A black man went on a racist tirade against white people calling for a “White Genocide” during their live audio conversation with the name #MAYOMONKEYSGOTTAGO on Twitter’s new feature called ‘Space’.

The main topic of the conversation was about ‘white supremacy’ and the belief that everyone who is white is liable for reparations to blacks.

A guy with the Twitter handle “Jolly Twunk” and username “dagoonchmonsta” went on an anti-white rant directed at “LibsofTiktok” account who was listening to their conversation and is a white woman.

Gateway Pundit did some digging and it looks like his name is “Manuel Franklin” based on his Instagram account linked to his Twitter profile.

54719FC7-3664-4C76-B118-5ABD396433FD-scaled.jpeg


Here’s what he said during the live audio conversation:
I am for the white genocide. I am for the total erasure of the white race. You don’t have to chop this up. Yes, for all you white bitches dying like flies. I am for it. I am for it. I support it. I am for putting all your white opossums in a gas Chamber.

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1465484595005067266
1:17 min

Another video:

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1465686448007491588
.17 min

His Twitter account is now suspended.

012D9DC9-B857-477E-9C06-3E7D552C67AE.jpeg


The discussion has brought mixed reaction even from the black community. Here are some of the responses on Twitter:

1638314953875.png
This is the most racist shit I’ve ever seen, they talking about white people being racist men while they’re talking like Hitler #MAYOMONKEYSGOTTAGOhttps://t.co/EQW68Z8ckd
— M (@NotNotM1) November 29, 2021
1638314883411.png
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQHk1W_xb64
32:18 min

Twitter Announces INSANE New Censorship Not Even A DAY After Jack Dorsey Replaced By New Woke CEO

Nov 30, 2021


Tim Pool


Twitter Announces INSANE New Censorship Not Even A DAY After Jack Dorsey Replaced By New Woke CEO. The new policy bans media that is shared without consent specifically to protect women, activists, and minorities. There is no way Twitter means right wing or republican activists mind you. The tendency for these woke far left companies has always been to target anti establishment voices and support Democrats. A good example is the Hunter Biden laptop story The new policy will silence independent media or work towards it and no one is surprised.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Doctors Warn New Medical School Guidance Would Lead to Unqualified Physicians and Unscientific Medicine

Accreditation guidelines call meritocracy 'malignant,' suggest genetic screening is racist

pjimage-29.jpg

ama-assn.org and aamc.orgAaron Sibarium• November 29, 2021 5:00 am

The two accrediting bodies for American medical schools now say that meritocracy is "malignant" and that race has "no genetic or scientific basis," positions that many doctors worry will lower standards of care and endanger lives by discouraging vital genetic testing.

The Liaison Committee on Medical Education, which accredits all medical schools in North America, is cosponsored by the American Medical Association (AMA) and the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC)—the same groups that on Oct. 30 released a controversial guide to "advancing health equity" through "language, narrative, and concepts."

Those concepts include the ideas that "individualism and meritocracy" are "malignant narratives" that "create harm," that using race as a proxy for genetics "leads directly to racial health inequities," and that medical vulnerability is the "result of socially created processes" rather than biology.

Integrating these ideas into medicine, five professors and practicing doctors told the Washington Free Beacon, would be a catastrophe, resulting in underqualified doctors, missed diagnoses, and unscientific medical school curricula.

The guidance won't just influence the way doctors talk, these practitioners said, but also what they know and how they treat patients. It could even make them unwilling to screen racial minorities for serious conditions—including many types of cancer—that they are more likely to inherit, on the mistaken belief that genes play no role in racial health disparities.

"Some vulnerability isn't about economic or social marginalization," said Jeff Singer, a general surgeon in Arizona. "A lot of conditions"—such as Tay-Sachs, which disproportionately impacts Ashkenazi Jews, and triple-negative breast cancer, which disproportionately affects black women—"vary based on genetics. We’re talking about matters of life and death here."

Singer's warning echoes the argument that five black professors in March made in the New England Journal of Medicine, where they described genetic denialism as "a form of naive ‘color blindness'" that would "perpetuate and potentially exacerbate disparities."

The guide is part of an ongoing and controversial effort to institutionalize progressivism as public health's lingua franca. It was "deeply informed" by the "Inclusive Communication" guide that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention published in September, as well as by the AMA's "Strategic Plan to Embed Racial Justice and Advance Health Equity" published in May. A few members of the AMA this month spoke out against that plan, arguing that it amounted to racial discrimination, while others said the AMA's focus on language would alienate patients and inject ideology into medicine.

That ideological injection has been administered by an incestuous network of nonprofits that supply and legitimize the language of activist physicians. The guide's citations include Race Forward, which lobbied against the Trump administration's executive order on critical race theory, and the Narrative Initiative, which promotes "durable narrative change" to "make equity and social justice common sense."

These groups in turn receive support from some of the largest and best-financed foundations in the country. Race Forward is funded by the W.K. Kellogg Foundation, while the Narrative Initiative, per the group's website, "was conceived and funded by The Atlantic Philanthropies and Ford Foundation."

Such nonprofits have played a pivotal role in turning medical accreditation against genetics.

The guide cites a report from George Soros's Open Society Foundations that says the practice of DNA testing "weaves together dominant narratives of racism and individualism into a biological determinism." The chief medical officer of New York City, Michelle Morse, participated in the creation of that report, as did critical race theorist Kimberlé Crenshaw and anti-Israel activist Linda Sarsour.

"They're trying to superimpose social science onto medical science," Singer said. "But as a consumer of health care, I'd just like to know that whoever is treating me is qualified. Because my life is on the line."

Several doctors also sounded the alarm about how the guide would impact admissions standards and curricular content at medical schools, which, in one professor's words, "are at the total mercy of" their accreditors.

The guidance potentially implicates every stage of a doctor's education: where they get in, what they're tested on, how they're graded, and who gives them residencies. In effect, it could change the way medicine measures merit—from objective criteria like grades and test scores to subjective criteria like diversity statements, which are increasingly common at medical schools.

One doctor predicted that the guide would result in a "disastrous" reluctance to flunk low-performing medical students and a "tripling down on affirmative action." Another was even blunter: "This can kill people."

The AMA and AAMC did not respond to requests for comment.

The guide is the latest move by medical school accreditors to sideline merit in favor of diversity.

The AMA and AAMC in 2012 implemented diversity standards that effectively mandated racial preferences at all medical schools. And in March 2020—as the coronavirus began to strain hospital services in New York City—the "Step 1" medical licensing exam moved from numerical scoring to pass-fail, a change many doctors said would make it harder to objectively evaluate residency applications.

One reason for the shift, a report explaining the change said, was that numerical scoring "negatively impacts diversity based on known group differences in performance"—with whites and Asians significantly outscoring blacks and Hispanics. The AMA and AAMC both contributed to that report.

According to some doctors, these pressures have already lowered the quality of medical care. "I've certainly seen residents' intellectual capability dropping over time," said one professor who belongs to the AMA and who told the Free Beacon he would be fired if he went on the record.

"Residents are just not as capable of caring for patients as they were 20 years ago."

A professor at one Ivy League medical school agreed, telling the Free Beacon that the curriculum has gotten easier over time because administrators want to avoid failing less qualified admittees. "In order to get them through, the standards for everyone have been lowered," the professor said.

Mistakes in medicine can be deadly: According to a 2018 study by Johns Hopkins medical school, medical error is the third leading cause of death in the United States.

In light of such grim statistics, some doctors see the guide as a distraction. "It strikes me as a waste of time," said Sally Satel, a psychiatrist who's written extensively about the opioid epidemic. "Yes, trainees need to appreciate the life context of their patients, but it's not clear how many of these social justice-based innovations will help medical students be better doctors."

Update 11/30/21, 10:30 AM: An earlier version of this piece incorrectly stated that the AAMC made the decision to change the "Step 1" medical licensing exam from numerical scoring to pass-fail. The AAMC and AMA, along with several other groups, recommended the change to the United States Medical Licensing Examination, which made the final decision.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Facebook's 'Race Blind' Algorithm Found 90% Of Hate Speech Directed Toward White People And Men

Chris Menahan
InformationLiberation
Nov. 27, 2021


facebook-geedc46eda_640.jpg













We now know why Facebook decided to change its "race-blind" hate speech detection algorithm last year to allow more anti-white hatred.

The Washington Post reported last week that an "April 2020 document said roughly 90 percent of 'hate speech' subject to content takedowns were statements of contempt, inferiority and disgust directed at White people and men."

They viewed this as a failure of the system because white people are supposed to be the targets of all hate.

From The Washington Post, "Facebook's race-blind practices around hate speech came at the expense of Black users, new documents show":
Facebook spokesman Andy Stone defended the company's decisions around its hate speech policies and how it conducted its relationship with the civil rights auditors.

"The Worst of the Worst project helped show us what kinds of hate speech our technology was and was not effectively detecting and understand what forms of it people believe to be the most insidious," Stone said in a statement.

He said progress on racial issues included policies such as banning white nationalist groups, prohibiting content promoting racial stereotypes — such as people wearing blackface or claims that Jews control the media — and reducing the prevalence of hate speech to 0.03 percent of content on the platform.

[...] These findings about the most objectionable content held up even among self-identified White conservatives that the market research team traveled to visit in Southern states. Facebook researchers sought out the views of White conservatives in particular because they wanted to overcome potential objections from the company's leadership, which was known to appease right-leaning viewpoints, two people said.

Yet racist posts against minorities weren't what Facebook's own hate speech detection algorithms were most commonly finding. The software, which the company introduced in 2015, was supposed to detect and automatically delete hate speech before users saw it. Publicly, the company said in 2019 that its algorithms proactively caught more than 80 percent of hate speech.

But this statistic hid a serious problem that was obvious to researchers: The algorithm was aggressively detecting comments denigrating White people more than attacks on every other group, according to several of the documents. One April 2020 document said roughly 90 percent of "hate speech" subject to content takedowns were statements of contempt, inferiority and disgust directed at White people and men, though the time frame is unclear.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Loudoun County Moms Set Out to Protect Their Children, Now They’re Trying to Save America

Faced with hit-lists, intimidation, and the FBI, parents risk all for their children's future
By Terri Wu

November 30, 2021 Updated: December 1, 2021

LOUDOUN COUNTY, Va.—In December 2020, Shawntel Cooper, a mother of two in northern Virginia, noticed something new in her fourth-grade daughter’s morning class routine. Cooper had just switched roles in her company and was able to work from home, and her daughter, like most of America’s schoolchildren, was remote learning due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

That morning, Cooper saw that the teacher had introduced a new learning segment: playing clips of topical news items of the day. What was shown was a mainstream media news broadcast covering riots connected with the Black Lives Matter movement.

“Why are they showing that?” Cooper recalled thinking. “They were going against the way that I want my child to be. She was brought up without thinking, ‘I’m white and I’m black.’”

Cooper is African American, while her husband is white.

Epoch Times Photo
Shawntel Cooper. (Lisa Fan/The Epoch Times)

“She hasn’t been raised based on colors. She has been raised based on loving human beings just for being human beings, of their characters, not putting them in categories on color, or what color their parents are,” Cooper added. So she asked the teacher to exclude her daughter from the morning news segment, a request that was granted.

A few months later, her daughter, while working on a school project for Black History Month, asked Cooper why people would say that there would be “no justice, no peace” until every white person was slaughtered. The girl recalled the news clips she had watched and was confused, especially because her father is white. She also started asking questions about whether she should be making friends based on skin color.

This crossed the line for Cooper.

“Our world went upside down when we had to explain to our daughter what was going on,” she told The Epoch Times.

“There’s nothing wrong with seeing through someone else’s lens. But to deceive someone into thinking that you are bad because of the color of your skin; because of your color, we are going to cut you some slack,” she said. “I will not teach my children that.”

“I believe you overcome challenges through your own journey. It’s not because someone felt sorry for me. I had to learn on my own; it was just part of life. It didn’t matter what color I was.”

So the mother started to look into the Black Lives Matter movement and critical race theory (CRT). She was shocked by what she found: that CRT, traditionally something taught in colleges, is an analytical framework underpinned by quasi-Marxist doctrines. It breaks down society into two camps: oppressors and the oppressed. Simply for being born white, one is an oppressor.

Meanwhile, Black Lives Matter, a left-wing activist group that promotes racial justice in law enforcement and other domains, was the embodiment of CRT principles being put into practice.

Epoch Times Photo A protester waves a Black Lives Matter flag during racial justice protests in Seattle, Wa., on Nov. 3, 2020. (David Ryder/Getty Images)

She thought it was “crazy” to “try to bring these [CRT] college courses into our children’s school.” Though, in schools, the theory appears under different banners, in ideas such as “diversity,” “equity,” and “inclusivity.”

Fast forward to May, when Cooper had some quiet time while recovering from major surgery. It was then that she decided she needed to do something about what was being taught in her child’s school.

“I see people fighting racism with more racism,” she said. “Critical race theory now is trying to take the children away from the parents to make them social justice warriors. CRT is Marxist ideology. And the last thing I want is my family to be breaking apart.”

She used the time to write a speech protesting CRT at the next school board meeting.

“CRT is racist. It is abusive. It discriminates against one’s color,” she told the Loudoun County School Board on May 11. “Today, we don’t need your agreement. We want action and a backbone for what we asked for today: to ban CRT.

“You cannot tell me what is or is not racist. Look at me. I had to come down here today to tell you to your face that we are coming together. We are strong. This will not be the last greet and meet, respectfully,” Cooper said as she left the podium.

The video of her speech went viral.

Cooper is from Loudoun County, a wealthy area in northern Virginia known for its good schools.

By the time she spoke up, Loudoun County Public Schools (LCPS) had been on the equity journey for at least two years. In the spring of 2019, the county hired an equity-focused educational consultancy to conduct a “systemic equity assessment” of the school’s policies.

The result was the LCPS comprehensive equity plan, which states, “A diverse, inclusive, equitable, and socially-just teaching and learning community is a priority in LCPS.” Its equity impact statement highlights LCPS’ commitment to “a racially-conscious, identity-affirming, and culturally responsive learning space.”

A primary recommendation in the equity plan was to publish on schools’ web pages a superintendent’s message “defining and condemning White supremacy, hate speech, hate crimes, and other racially motivated acts of violence,” and for this message to be communicated to parents twice a year. This same message was included in the Loudoun County School Board’s equity resolution adopted on Sept. 24, 2019.

Cooper said that the principal and teachers at her daughter’s school were transparent and helpful when she raised her concerns about CRT. However, “no one could promise me that critical race theory would not be taught,” she said. That’s because, Cooper said, CRT isn’t packaged as such when it’s transmitted in school classrooms. Rather, it’s disseminated under different guises that have evolved over time, from “culturally responsive learning” to “equity” to now “social-emotional learning.”

As a result, Cooper pulled her daughter out of school after she finished fourth grade in June, and began homeschooling her in July.

Loudoun County Public Schools has repeatedly said that CRT isn’t taught in its classrooms, and that it presents a standard curriculum designated by the Virginia Department of Education. This refrain is repeated by other school administrators across the country, who contend that parents opposing CRT have been misinformed about what’s being taught.

Many parents in Loudoun, however, disagree, arguing that the school, through its policies, training to teachers, and teachings to students, transmits the tenets of CRT without using its actual name.

Domino Effect
Cooper was among the first parents to take a stand on CRT to the school board, and was ready to go solo in her endeavor.

“I thought I was going to be fighting alone after I spoke on CRT.”

Not after Ian Prior heard her speech.

He heard it in the hallway outside the school board room; he didn’t know who Cooper was but remembered saying to himself, “This is an amazing speech.”

Prior, who runs his own public relations firm and was a Justice Department spokesperson during the Trump administration, had just founded Fight for Schools, a local advocacy group, a month earlier. The next day, Prior called Cooper and told her that Fox News host and commentator Sean Hannity wanted to speak to her.

Subsequently, more parents started speaking out at school board meetings. On May 25, a Loudoun physical education teacher named Tanner Cross denounced a pro-transgender policy, saying he wouldn’t use a child’s preferred pronoun because that would involve “lying to a child” and “sinning against our God.”

On June 8, Xi Van Fleet, a Chinese American mother whose son had graduated from a Loudoun County public school and who grew up through the upheaval during communist China’s Cultural Revolution five decades ago, spoke up.

Epoch Times Photo Xi Van Fleet, a Virginian mother who survived China’s Cultural Revolution, in Washington on Oct. 5, 2021. (Tiffany Coutris/Conservative Partnership Institute)

“I’ve been very alarmed by what’s going on in our schools. You are now teaching, training our children to be social justice warriors and to loathe our country and our history,” she told the school board.

“The communist regime used the same critical theory to divide people. The only difference is they used class instead of race,” she added.

Epoch Times Photo
10-year-old Xi Van Fleet (R) and her friends hold the “little red book,” also known as “Quotations from Chairman Mao Zedong,” in 1969 during the Cultural Revolution. (Courtesy of Xi Van Fleet)

People heard others and began saying their own pieces, Fight for Schools’ Prior told The Epoch Times. “That just brings more and more people and further creates that collective zeitgeist of courage that now exists among parents, grandparents, citizens of Loudoun County.”

Two days after speaking at the board meeting, Cross, the physical education teacher, was suspended. He sued the school board and Superintendent Scott Ziegler in June, alleging that they had violated his rights to the free exercise of religion and free speech. By mid-November, Cross was permanently reinstated to his job after settling with the school board on this issue.
He’s still asking the court to strike down Loudoun’s transgender policy, a decision expected to be handed down before Christmas.

‘Hit List’ on Anti-CRT Parents
Prior moved to Loudoun four years ago, looking for a house in a neighborhood with good schools.

Unexpectedly, he was “activated” in March 2021 when he found out that he was on a “hit list” compiled by members of a private Facebook group “Anti-Racist Parents of Loudoun County (ARPLC).” In response, he formed Fight for Schools in April.

In the ARPLC Facebook group, a post on March 12 called for volunteers to gather information about anti-CRT parents and “expose these people publicly.” Loudoun County Sheriff’s Office opened an investigation, and obtained the names on the “hit list” through social media search warrants and conducted interviews.

The sheriff’s office closed the case four months later without pressing any criminal charges. The case’s executive summary indicated that the investigation didn’t find any personal identifying information posted in the ARPLC Facebook discussion. The FBI’s public corruption investigative unit conducted a parallel probe and also decided not to pursue the case criminally. However, the sheriff’s office informed all those on the hit list that they had an option to “pursue misdemeanor criminal charges or other civil remedies if they chose to do so,” according to the executive summary.

Jessica Mendez, who has two daughters who attend Loudoun’s public schools, is a good friend of Prior’s.

Epoch Times Photo Jessica Mendez at her residence in Aldie, Va., on Nov. 21, 2021. (Graeme Jennings for The Epoch Times)

“You come for my friend; you come for me. People shouldn’t just be making lists,” she said, adding that she also felt a duty to call everyone on the list to inform them that they had been targeted.

The attempted doxxing campaign on her friend galvanized Mendez to further action. She became a founding member of Fight for Schools, and in May started efforts to collect signatures to recall school board members who were a part of the private ARPLC Facebook group.

Fight for Schools filed recall petitions against school board member Beth Barts, a member of the private Facebook group ARPLC, on Aug. 25. On Oct. 5, the court denied Barts’s motion to dismiss the removal action. Ten days later, Barts resigned with an effective date of Nov. 2.

At a rally outside the Loudoun County Public Schools administration building on Nov. 9, Prior announced that Fight for Schools had collected enough signatures to start the recall process on all four targeted board members. The group filed recall petitions against Brenda Sheridan, chairwoman of the school board, on the same day. On Nov. 18, it filed a petition to remove school board Vice Chair Atoosa Reaser from office.

Over six months, Fight for Schools volunteers, working at community events across the county, collected more than 25,000 signatures.

“The first day that we got signatures was on May 8, and it hailed. It was windy; it was rainy, and then it was sunny and warm, and then the cycle would repeat itself,” Prior said at the Nov. 9 rally, recalling the dedication of local volunteers.

“The last day we got signatures was on Election Day [Nov. 2], and it was nasty out—it was raining, freezing, but people stayed out there from 6 a.m. to 7 p.m.”

Part 1 of 3
 
Last edited:

marsh

On TB every waking moment
Part 2 of 3

‘Courage Is Contagious’

The Loudoun parents’ fight has taken them to places far from the school board meeting room. Cooper and Van Fleet have both spoken on national television broadcasts to millions.

Cooper recalled being “scared” before her appearance on Fox’s “Hannity” program.

“I don’t have that confidence in speaking in front of a million people. I am just a mother. I can only teach my kids how to be successful, to learn to think for themselves, learn from their mistakes, and learn right from wrong.”

But she overcame her fear through meditation.

“I would just sit back and look at my husband and children. I would let everything pause for the moment, just take it all in how much I love them.

“It really all came down to … that our children trust in our decision to send them to school. Teachers become role models, as our kids learn to trust them in our absence, teachers play a major role in building our kids’ self-esteem, especially during their most impressionable years.”

Cooper says that some teachers who think they are doing good are actually “causing harm interfering with the parents’ morals and beliefs pertaining to family, political opinions, nationality, health, religion, ethnicity, sex, and personal characteristics.”

As for Van Fleet, who also got an invitation to Hannity the day after she spoke at the June 8 school board meeting, she also had to work to overcome her apprehension. Immediately, anecdotes of conservatives being doxxed and persecution episodes during the Cultural Revolution flashed in her mind.

At the beginning of the Cultural Revolution in 1967, children in Van Fleet’s neighborhood in China wanted to organize their own “little red guards.” Red Guards were radicalized high school and university students who roved around the country persecuting those deemed by Chairman Mao Zedong as “counter-revolutionaries” or “class enemies.”

Van Fleet, who was 8 at the time, told the leader, who was also her friend, that she wanted to join too. However, upon finding out that Van Fleet’s grandmother was a landowner—a class enemy—the friend immediately announced that to all the children in the neighborhood. They treated her like she was evil.

Epoch Times Photo
David and Jessica Mendez with daughters Deanna and Shelby at their residence in Aldie, Va., on Nov. 21, 2021. (Graeme Jennings for The Epoch Times)

“And I felt evil,” Van Fleet recalled.

This demonization was being felt by school children across the country, Van Fleet told The Epoch Times, pointing to an anecdote shared by a mother at Oct. 26 Loudoun school board meeting.

“It was in the early spring of 2020 when my 6-year-old somberly came to me and asked me if she was born evil because she was a white person, something she learned in a history lesson at school.”

Still, the naturalized American worried that if she spoke out, she’d become a target all over again, even after having long escaped the suppressive environment in communist China. But, in the end, Van Fleet thought, “It’s a calling. I have to take on this. It’s not even my decision to make.”

The fear didn’t subside, though, even after her appearance on “Hannity.” She recalled that a local club invited her to an anti-CRT meeting and told her they would send a car for her. As she was waiting for the ride, her thoughts were racing—in her imagination, a black car came and took her to nowhere, and she would never see her family again.

But reading online feedback of her interview on Hannity helped Van Fleet conquer her demons.
“I cried.”

Two early comments stood out for her. One person said it was a blessing to have Van Fleet as a fellow American.

“China sent us a gift to save America, and that is Xi Van Fleet,” said another.'

“I just felt so empowered and encouraged,” she said. Over the months, she identified precisely that as her mission: to help save American values by giving back.

“As an immigrant, I have been enjoying the freedom fought for by America’s forefathers and generations of the patriots. Now it’s my turn to fight the fight,” she said during her speech at the Heritage Action Sentinel Summit 2021 in Orlando, Florida, on Nov. 13.

But this fight hasn’t been without cost. Van Fleet has lost friends, people she thought were good friends but distanced themselves from her due to her advocacy. Meanwhile, she has also gained new friends, like Cooper, who she has become close to.

“Courage is contagious because we encourage each other,” said Van Fleet.

The mother considers herself a soldier in the Loudoun “army.” While she had seen so many “heroes” speaking up at school board meetings in other counties, they weren’t able to find traction. Yet, for some reason, the momentum carried forward in Loudoun.

What made Loudoun different was teamwork, Van Fleet says. And it’s turned Loudoun into ground zero in the fight for children’s education and America’s future.

Escalated Tensions and Arrests
It was at a heated school board meeting on June 22 that tensions between Loudoun parents and the school board escalated to a new level. It also was the first meeting that pro-CRT and anti-CRT sides both organized attendance.

By June 22, the CRT and pro-transgender policies in Loudoun had attracted national attention, following a series of interviews with parents on television. The agenda for that meeting included discussion of the transgender policy that would require teachers and staff to call students by their preferred pronouns and allow students to use the bathroom of their self-identified gender.

Before the meeting, a campaign on ActBlue.com, a fundraising platform for Democratic candidates and progressive organizations, called for donations to bus supporters of the policy to a “Loudoun for All” rally to “stand up against hate and intolerance in our school system.”

Some parents were concerned that the board might adopt the transgender-friendly policy, even though it wasn’t on the agenda for a vote. Many were concerned that the policy might jeopardize the safety of students as it would allow biological males to self-identify as girls to use girls’ bathrooms and locker rooms.

Eventually, 289 people signed up to speak in person at the meeting. The board room was packed with parents against CRT and the transgender policy. About a dozen supporters of the transgender policy sat on one side of the front row.

The audience burst into louder and louder cheers as former Virginia state Sen. Richard Black, the 50th speaker, began his comments.

“This board has a dark history of suppressing free speech. They caught you red-handed with an enemies list to punish opponents of critical race theory. You’re teaching children to hate others because of their skin color. And you’re forcing them to lie about other kids’ gender,” Black said. “. I am disgusted by your bigotry.”

The crowd cheered more, and many stood up to express their agreement.

The school board members quickly voted to end the public comment period and retreated from the dais, making Black the last speaker allowed out of the total 289 registered.

After chanting “shame on you” to the empty stage and singing the national anthem, the crowd decided to press on with their speeches. Jon Tigges, a local agritourism business owner, took the lead in organizing the speakers. after about a half-hour, Superintendent Ziegler declared the meeting an “unlawful assembly,” and called for everyone to leave the premises.

Epoch Times Photo Jon Tigges at Zion Springs, his wedding and bed-and-breakfast venue, in Hamilton, Va. (Caleb Spencer for The Epoch Times)

Tigges refused to leave the room and was arrested for trespassing. Another Loudoun father, Scott Smith, was arrested for disorderly conduct and obstruction of justice after getting into an argument with a woman who supported the transgender policy. The school board later resumed the meeting with other items on the agenda.

Smith was at the meeting because his ninth-grade daughter was sexually assaulted by a male student in the girls’ school bathroom a month earlier. He told local media that he had never been to a school board meeting before, and wanted to see “what all the nonsense was about.”

“I wanted to see it in real life because my family has unfortunately been pulled into this nightmare,” Smith told 7news on Oct. 28.

Smith said he was talking to a woman, an acquaintance of his wife, who insisted that his daughter wasn’t assaulted.

“[The woman’s] husband put his hands on me first and the next thing I knew, I was wrestled to the ground by the sheriffs’ department,” Scott told The Epoch Times, pointing to video footage of the incident.

Scott added that the woman had also threatened to ruin his plumbing business via social media.

During the meeting, board member Beth Barts had asked if there were assaults happening regularly in bathrooms or locker rooms—a key concern for opponents of the policy.

“To my knowledge, we don’t have any record of assaults occurring in our restrooms,” Ziegler responded, adding later that “the predator transgender student or person simply does not exist.”

But emails made public in October showed that Ziegler knew about the sexual assault of Smith’s daughter on May 28, and informed the school board on the same day. Ziegler also knew about the 15-year-old’s arrest on July 9, but decided to send him to another high school, where another girl became his victim on Oct. 6.

After the disclosure of the emails, Ziegler acknowledged on Oct. 15 that his June statement before the school board meeting was false, but explained that he had misunderstood the question. On Nov. 5, Ziegler announced that an external law firm would be investigating Loudoun County Public Schools’ handling of the two sexual assault cases.

Ziegler’s handling of the assaults has sparked calls for his resignation.

The teenage boy in October was found guilty on one count of forcible sodomy and one count of forcible fellatio, both felonies, in relation to the May incident. And in November, he pleaded no contest—that is, he wouldn’t challenge the charges—related to the October assault. The Loudoun County Juvenile Court will announce sentencing in both cases in mid-December.

Ziegler, at an Oct. 15 press conference, said the school system handled the sexual assaults in compliance with Title IX federal laws. He also admitted that the schools had “inadvertently” failed to properly report incidents in the past due to a “lack of oversight.” The Superintendent’s office did not respond to a request for comment from The Epoch Times.

Smith’s family is currently in the process of filing a Title IX civil case in federal court against the Loudoun County School Board over its handling of his daughter’s sexual assault case.

Declining Trust
After the events of June 22, “trust”, or rather the lack of, became a major theme to emerge from parents’ remarks.

“The parents of Loudoun trusted that the members of the board would have our children’s best interests in mind when making decisions; that trust is lost,” said one parent at the next school board meeting on Aug. 10. Another, at a rally before the meeting, suggested that he wanted his children to start wearing a body cam to school.

The June 22 board meeting was the last of the 2020-2021 school year. As of the next meeting on Aug. 10, the first of the 2021-2022 school year, Loudoun County, citing the events of June 22, changed the public comment rules: public viewing during the public comment period was no longer allowed.

Speakers were allowed into the Loudoun County Public Schools administration building in groups of 10 and allowed into the board room one by one. Speakers also were told to take shelter in their cars when a severe thunderstorm hit during the August meeting. Still, more than 170 people signed up to speak in person.

“Thank you for letting us in after three and a half hours of damp and heat, and humidity and storms. It’s nice to be finally let into the building that my tax dollars paid for,” one parent said at the Aug. 10 meeting.

The meeting also saw tightened security, including the use of handheld metal detectors. Before the meeting, Ziegler requested the sheriff’s office to provide a K-9 explosive sweep, undercover officers, and a five-person onsite quick reaction force.

Sheriff Michael Chapman responded, “Your request is extraordinary and would likely constitute LCSO’s [Loudoun County Sheriff’s Office] commitment of a minimum of approximately 65 sworn deputies. Despite this, you fail to provide any justification for such a manpower-intensive request.”

An Aug. 6 memo by Loudoun County Public Schools’ chief operations officer noted a complaint from the sheriff, that the “School board is firing people up and calling LCSO to clean it up.”

Even though most of the in-person speakers and written comments voiced objections to the transgender policy, the school board adopted it on Aug. 11. Parents’ concerns that the pro-transgender approach would lead to sexual assaults in the school restrooms were brushed off by some board members as groundless.

“The fears of nefarious activity happening in bathrooms and any sort of scale due to policies that protect transgender students is simply not what occurs in reality,” school board member Ian Serotkin said during a discussion before the adoption of the policy on Aug. 11.

Parents were angry. The call for the resignations of the superintendent and school board members grew louder and louder at subsequent school board meetings.

Into the new school year, the number of registered in-person speakers consistently hovered at above 50. Other than the June 22 meeting, at which about a dozen pro-transgender speakers spoke, very few supported the school board during public comment in school board meetings since August. Parents also held rallies before almost every school board meeting; no crowd supporting CRT or transgender-friendly policies was seen.

By late November, Loudoun had reinstated public viewing during the public comment section of school board meetings. Restrictions on using the restrooms and access to the building have also been lifted, Loudoun County Public Schools Public Information Officer Wayde Byard told The Epoch Times. Security measures, including hand-held metal detectors, remain in place.

On Sept. 28, the school board started requiring speakers to show proof of residency in the county, a move meant to prevent “out-of-town agitators,” School Board Chair Brenda Sheridan said at the time.
 
Last edited:

marsh

On TB every waking moment
Part 3 of 3

‘We Are Not Domestic Terrorists’
The heated interactions in Loudoun County were unexpectedly thrust into the national spotlight again in late September after the National School Boards Association (NSBA) sent a controversial letter to President Joe Biden requesting “federal assistance to stop threats and acts of violence” against public school board members, administrators, teachers, and staff.

The Sept. 29 letter, for which the NSBA has since apologized, said that “acts of malice, violence, and threats” against school board members over issues such as masking policies, the critical race theory could be equivalent to “a form of domestic terrorism.” It further said that the FBI and federal agencies should use the PATRIOT Act and other tools to go after parents.

NSBA cited 30 news stories in support of its claims, most of which related to disruptive and disorderly conduct at school board meetings. Three arrests over conduct at school board meetings, including the arrests of Smith and Tigges at the Loudoun meeting in June, were included. The organization didn’t reach out to Smith or Tigges before sending the letter.'

The letter also cited instances of threatening letters, an alleged attack on a teacher, and a parent using a Nazi salute at a board meeting. According to local media, many members of the Loudoun school board have also received death threats via social media, emails, and phone messages.
Five days after NSBA’s letter, Attorney General Merrick Garland issued a memo directing the FBI to address an alleged “spike in harassment, intimidation, and threats of violence” against school board officials, and create “dedicated lines of communication for threat reporting” on the matter. In a separate statement, the Justice Department also announced the creation of a task force, which includes the agency’s National Security Division, to deal with such threats.

Epoch Times Photo U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland delivers a statement at the Department of Justice in Washington on April 26, 2021. ( Mandel Ngan-Pool/Getty Images)

Garland, later testifying at a House Judiciary Committee hearing, said that the DOJ hadn’t been told by the White House to issue the memo. He also denied assertions that his agency would label concerned parents as domestic terrorists.

“Justice Department supports and defends the First Amendment right of parents to complain as vociferously as they wish about the education of their children, about the curriculum taught in the schools,” he told lawmakers on Oct. 21.

Some parents have hit back at Garland’s memo.

Four Loudoun parents, including Van Fleet and Cooper, together with a group of parents from Saline, Michigan, on Oct. 19 filed a lawsuit against Garland alleging that his memo violated parents’ rights to free speech.

For Cooper, joining the suit was about trying to set the record straight.

“The main discussion is that we’re not domestic terrorists; we’re just parents,” she said. “How do we not back down to bullying, to being pushed in a corner when we’ve done nothing but protect our children and what is in our rights as parents?”

Amid the blowback over its letter to the White House, the NSBA issued an apology to its members on Oct. 22, saying: “There was no justification for some of the language included in the letter. We should have had a better process in place to allow for consultation on the communication of this significance.”

Since the NSBA’s initial letter, some 26 of its state chapters have distanced themselves from the national federation, with 15 of them terminating their membership or halting payment of dues. The Virginia School Boards Association decided on Nov. 18 to end its membership with NSBA, citing a “persistent pattern of dysfunction” within the organization.

On Nov. 16, Republican lawmakers on the House Judiciary Committee revealed that an unnamed whistleblower had disclosed documents suggesting the FBI was using counterterrorism resources to investigate parents or individuals who threaten school board members or other individuals.

The leaked document was an email containing an Oct. 20 “joint message” from the FBI’s Criminal and Counterterrorism divisions. Referring to Garland’s memo, the message said that the Counterterrorism and Criminal Divisions had “created a threat tag, EDUOFFICIALS, to track instances of related threats,” and asked offices to start using that tag to investigations into threats against school administrators and staff.

Judiciary Committee Republicans, in a Nov. 16 letter to Garland, argued that this email appeared to contradict the attorney general’s previous testimony before the committee, during which he said the FBI and DOJ weren’t using counterterrorism resources to target threats against school board members.

In response to the whistleblower’s disclosure, an FBI spokesperson told The Epoch Times that the bureau “has never been in the business of investigating parents who speak out or policing speech at school board meetings, and we are not going to start now.”

Make-or-Break Election Issue
The issue of parents’ rights in education propelled Republican gubernatorial candidate Glenn Youngkin to a historic win in Virginia on Nov. 2.

Epoch Times Photo Republican gubernatorial candidate Glenn Youngkin speaks to members of the press after casting an early ballot in Fairfax, Va., on Sept. 23, 2021. (Win McNamee/Getty Images)

Virginia hadn’t had a Republican governor for 12 years. Once a swing state, it hasn’t voted for a Republican presidential candidate since 2004. While the majority of the counties are still red, the more heavily populated areas of northern Virginia, including Arlington, Fairfax, Loudoun, and Prince William counties, as well as the cities of Richmond and Virginia Beach have consistently trended blue.

Youngkin thanked Loudoun County at his post-election rally on Nov. 13, held outside the Loudoun County Public Schools administration building—the same location where he announced five months earlier that he would ban CRT on day one if elected.

“We’re going to make sure that we’re focused on our entire history—the good and the bad.

This is not about hiding our past. This is about knowing where we have come from, so we will know where we are going. But I will tell you that we will not be teaching critical race theory in our schools!” Youngkin said at the rally, reiterating his campaign promise.

In a race won by 64,000 votes, three larger northern Virginia counties—Fairfax, Prince William, and Loudoun— gave Youngkin a total of 78,000 more votes versus the previous gubernatorial election, even though all three counties still voted Democratic.

Youngkin’s campaign also capitalized on Democratic candidate Terry McAuliffe’s misstep on the issue.

“I don’t think parents should be telling schools what they should teach,” McAuliffe, who served as governor from 2014 to 2018, said in a debate with Youngkin on Sept. 28. That comment put McAuliffe on defense.

Invigorated by the election results, Loudoun parents pressed their demands at the school board meeting a week after, where all of the nearly 100 in-person speakers, with the exception of one, criticized the school board or urged the board and superintendent to resign.

Epoch Times Photo A crowd is seen at a Loudoun County School Board meeting in Ashburn, Va., in a file photograph. (Evelyn Hockstein/Reuters)

“This has always been about our children, not an election,” said one mother. “Never underestimate the determination of a mama bear when her cubs are under attack.”

Over nearly a year and a half of challenging the school board’s initiatives, Fight for Schools’ Mendez had doubted the utility of making public comments at meetings because the board wasn’t listening.

“I had it all wrong. It wasn’t the school board members who needed to hear us, it was everyone at home. It was the parents, grandparents, and neighbors,” she told The Epoch Times at Youngkin’s rally on Nov. 13.

Indeed, people far and wide have been listening.

Scott Mineo, founder of local advocacy group Parents Against Critical Theory (PACT), previously told The Epoch Times that other counties in Virginia and across the United States have contacted him for help addressing this issue in their own communities.

The grassroots efforts in Loudoun County have emerged as a template movement to be exported across the country. And there’s already a new term for it.

“We are going to ‘Loudounize’ this country because it doesn’t stop here,” Tiffany Polifko, PACT’s vice president of education and outreach, told the Loudoun school board members during the Nov. 9 meeting.

Tigges, who also founded the Patriot Pub Alliance, a digital platform for secure collaboration and communication for parents and teachers, has drafted a business plan to replicate what Loudoun residents have done in other counties.

“We’re encouraging local communities to start meeting together face-to-face, grow in trust, and form a coalition united in purpose,” he previously told The Epoch Times.

Gov.-elect Youngkin was “impressed” that “Loudoun County parents didn’t sit on the sidelines and complain. They actually recognized that they needed to make change, and they got fully engaged.”

He was also excited about the “Loudounize” project. When asked about the term at the rally on Nov. 13, he told The Epoch Times, “It’s a good word. I love it! I love it!”

‘The Fight of Our Lives’
Now, more than one year into their quest for a greater say in their children’s education, the Loudoun parents say there’s no turning back.

Van Fleet acknowledged the “selfish” reasons for her fight.

“I understand that if America falls, there is no place for me to go. My whole life is for this moment,” she said.

Fight for Schools’ Mendez echoed that sentiment.

“I always say we are in the fight of our lives. A lot of people don’t understand. But we feel strongly about what we’re doing.”

It’s about “maintaining our democracy and maintaining our way of life,” and communism will be fended off as a natural result, she says.

While Mendez wasn’t on the original hit list on the Facebook group, she has since been targeted after becoming involved in Fight for Schools. Her employer got two anonymous letters, one in June and another in September, accusing her of being a “racist,” and shaming them for employing her. She said her manager understood what she was doing and that she was being harassed because she was taking a stand.

After her employer received the first letter in June, Fight for Schools’ founder Prior asked Mendez if she needed to scale back.

“No, this is exactly what they want. It’s exactly what they’re trying to accomplish. I’m not going to be intimidated,” Mendez said. “These other parents are out here fighting and getting signatures, working day in and day out, and going to school board meetings. I’m not going to back down.”

She says Fight for Schools is seeking accountability. She has a problem with “the lying and the cover-up in order to pass a policy because of an agenda,” referring to the process leading to the adoption of the transgender-friendly policy in August.

Mendez recently read a media report about a school board recall effort in Wisconsin, where parents were asked why they decided to do this. Their answer was “Loudoun.”

“One of the most rewarding parts of this whole thing is that they’re learning that it’s not just one voice anymore, that they can make a difference, too,” she said.

The movement is a “parents’ revolution,” says Fight for Schools’ Prior.

“It’s a revolution that uses the civil tools in the arsenal of democracy to push back against massive government overreach that involves our children,” he said.

Cooper’s wish is for all sides, the left and the right, to come together.

“In the old days, they always came to the middle, and they worked it out.”

She also shares the commitment of her band of “warriors.”

“My fight is to save America from going communist. This will be the hill I die on,” she said.

“I love everything that God gave me: my family, my country, the land, our freedom. So I’m blessed to be able to have the team, the warriors. I’m happy to stand beside them.”
 
Last edited:

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Superintendent says Detroit schools 'deeply using critical race theory'

The superintendent claimed students must learn about 'the injustices that have occurred in this country'

Video on website 4:32 min


By Jon Brown | Fox News

Critical race theory is in public schools despite denials from the left

Tony Kinnett, owner and executive director of 'Chalkboard Review,' explains how CRT is implemented in schools and the impact on Glenn Youngkin's Virginia victory
The superintendent of Detroit Public Schools Community District (DPSCD) said earlier this month that schools in his district are "deeply using critical race theory," claiming students must learn about historical injustice in the United States "to better understand who they are."

Superintendent Nikolai Vitti made the remarks during a Nov. 9 school board meeting, footage of which went viral Tuesday after being disseminated on Twitter by Manhattan Institute senior fellow Christopher Rufo.

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1465752991827382272
.25 min

"Our curriculum is deeply using critical race theory, especially in social studies, but you’ll find it in English, language arts, and the other disciplines," Vitti said. "We’re very intentional about creating a curriculum, infusing materials and embedding critical race theory within our curriculum."

Angry parents and community members protest after a Loudoun County School Board meeting was halted by the school board because the crowd refused to quiet down, in Ashburn, Virginia, June 22, 2021.

Angry parents and community members protest after a Loudoun County School Board meeting was halted by the school board because the crowd refused to quiet down, in Ashburn, Virginia, June 22, 2021. (REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein/File Photo)

"As was stated by speakers today, it's because students need to understand the truth of history, understand the history of this country to better understand who they are and about the injustices that have occurred in this country," Vitti added.

Vitti also criticized HB 5097, which Michigan House lawmakers approved this month to ban "implicit race or gender stereotyping" in the state's K-12 schools. The bill has since been referred to the state Senate Committee on Education and Career Readiness.

Amy Carney speaks on behalf of parents during a protest against critical race theory being taught at Scottsdale Unified School District before a digital school board meeting at Coronado High Schoo in Scottsdale on May 24, 2021.


Amy Carney speaks on behalf of parents during a protest against critical race theory being taught at Scottsdale Unified School District before a digital school board meeting at Coronado High Schoo in Scottsdale on May 24, 2021. (Reuters)

PSAKI INSISTS BIDEN NOT PUSHING CRITICAL RACE THEORY, SAYS CURRICULUM LEFT TO LOCAL SCHOOLS'

Referring to Democratic Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, Vitti said, "I think our best strategy politically is to lean on the governor to veto it, as she has done with other legislation that has passed in Michigan over the last couple of years."

Republicans in the state House approved the bill in a 55-0 vote, but Democrats refused to vote on the bill at all because not every lawmaker who wanted to speak against the measure was allowed to do so.

Some schools in Gov. Gretchen Whitmer’s state are keeping students at home ahead of Thanksgiving.

Some schools in Gov. Gretchen Whitmer’s state are keeping students at home ahead of Thanksgiving. (AP Photo/Al Goldis, File)

"A yes vote means taking a firm stance against the absurd claim that individuals bear collective guilt for historical wrongs committed by those who happen to share their race or their gender," said Republican state Rep. Andrew Beeler, who was the main sponsor of the bill.

Vitti did not respond to Fox News' request for comment in time for publication.

Sponsored Stories You May Like
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

FBI’s Internal ‘Lawful Access’ Doc Reveals Bureau’s Real-Time Surveillance Of Encrypted Messaging Services

By Alicia Powe
Published December 1, 2021 at 6:08pm

FBI-encryption-breach.jpg


As the Federal Bureau of Investigations continues its manhunt on Americans who protested the stolen election at the nation’s Capital in January, the bureau ramped up its assault on the First Amendment by targeting journalists in pre-dawn, knock-the-door-down raids and unconstitutional threats of jail time.

Muckrakers and activists who effectively expose government malfeasance and fail to use secure messaging tools or may find themselves directly in the federal government’s wrath as the Biden Justice Department chills dissent and prosecutes political dissidents.

To protect private data and secure the integrity of private communication, billions around the globe now use services encrypted messaging services like Signal, Telegram and WhatsApp, platforms that are sold to the public under the guise of “securing privacy.”

People feel more confident that what they discuss on these service providers remains secure.

Meanwhile, the FBI has the ability to legally access vast amounts of data from the popular “encrypted” messaging accounts of those subject to its probes.

According to the bureau’s internal guide on surveillance titled “Lawful Access,” law enforcement relies more on Facebook’s WhatsApp and Apple’s iMessage to surveil its targets than any other messaging apps in the tech domain.

Despite Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s insistence that his encrypted messaging service was built around a “privacy-focused vision,” WhatsApp provides law enforcement officials with more real-time information about a user and their activities than nearly any other major messaging tool.

With a subpoena, the bureau can only legally access its target’s basic subscriber information on WhatsApp. With a search warrant, however, law enforcement agencies can legally use WhatsApp to access its target’s address book contacts and the contacts of other WhatsApp users associated with the targeted individual.

While law enforcement cannot legally obtain message content from WhatsApp, the metadata allows law enforcement to identify which users communicate with one another, how often they correspond and a list of every user in their address book – a security breach that could devastate a whistleblower or reporter with confidential sources.

A “pen register” surveillance tracks the specific source and destination of each message sent and received from a targeted individual. In response to a pen register, WhatsApp provides the feds exceptional, nearly real-time surveillance of its target, producing and sending metadata to law enforcement agencies every 15 minutes.

“Return data provided by the companies listed below, with the exception of WhatsApp, are actually logs of latent data that are provided to law enforcement in a non-real-time manner and may impact investigations due to delivery delays,” the FBI guidance states.

fbi-lawful-access-doc-scaled.jpg


On the other hand, the content of messages exchanged on Apple’s iMessage text service, which is used by 1.3 billion people worldwide, is easily obtainable by the FBI.

Apple turns over swaths of data from the phones of targets to law enforcement from its iMessaging text service, the default service on iPhones. With a subpoena, Apple hands over basic subscriber information of the target and a 25-day backlog of correspondence exchanged on iMessage. Apple also provides law enforcement with a list of people who searched for its target on its iMessage app.

A target who communicates on an iPhone or an Apple product backs up their iMessage activity to an iCloud, law enforcement is able to request back-ups of the surveilled device and access the content sent and received in messages.

To make matters worse, the process in which the FBI and National Security Agency obtain search warrants is ripe for abuse. Big brother gets nearly unanimous approval from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court court to surveil its targets.

The FBI relies on the FISC for approval of wiretaps, data collection, and government requests that allow the agency to monitor suspected terrorists, spies and American citizens and the court approves more than 99 percent of the domestic electronic surveillance requests the deep state brings to its vaulted door.

A 2016 Justice Department report shows the FBI and the National Security Agency made 1,457 requests for permission to the FISA court to conduct electronic surveillance in 2015 and just one application was rejected by the government in all of 2015.

The FISA court also issues “national security letter” subpoenas used by intelligence agencies to compel private companies to turn over personal data on customers.

“These subpoenas contain everything from Americans’ billing information to their browsing histories,” World Net Daily reports. “In most cases, ‘national security letters’ are accompanied by gag orders, legally forcing companies to give up customer data and prohibiting the companies from telling anyone about the process.”

In 2016, the weaponized intelligence agencies illegally obtained FISA warrants to surveil Trump campaign operatives and smeared the president with lies surrounding alleged Russian collusion.

After targeting President Trump throughout his presidency, the FBI began abusing the FISA system in January by raiding and arresting Americans, who witnessed electoral theft in real-time, for protesting the stolen 2020 election.

Now, as the Justice Department takes aim at journalists and media, even the far-left American Civil Liberties Union and mainstream media journalists are rebuking the dangerous precedent set by the federal government infringement on free speech.

The left-wing troll site Rolling Stone first reported on the FBI’s “Lawful Access” guidance on Monday after receiving the document from the Property of the People. Property of the People, an anti-Trump non-profit organization, obtained the Jan. 7 document via a Freedom of Information Act request.

“Privacy is essential to democracy,” Property of the People’s executive director Ryan Shapiro told Rolling Stone. “The ease with which the FBI surveils our online data, mining the intimate details of our daily lives, threatens us all and paves the way for authoritarian rule.”
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Chicago Public Schools make all bathrooms gender neutral…
Posted by Kane on December 2, 2021 9:15 pm

View: https://youtu.be/Yk4mXwkzhKY
1:24 min
Thank goodness they are focusing on the most important part of an education – the bathroom.

75 percent of Chicago elementary students can’t read

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1466528257201692676
1:24 min
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Rantz: WSU amplifies claim that farmers markets, food charity are ‘white supremacy’ in action

Dec 1, 2021, 5:55 PM | Updated: Dec 2, 2021, 11:45 am
WSU...

(Washington State University)

BY JASON RANTZ
The Jason Rantz Show, 3pm-6pm on KTTH

Washington State University is amplifying claims that farmers markets and food charities are examples of “white supremacy” and “white dominant culture.” It has nothing to do with helping farmers thrive. This is about creating left-wing social justice activists.

The agriculture program coordinator for WSU’s San Juan County Extension Ag Program promoted a webinar event titled: “Examining Whiteness in Food Systems.” During the hour-long presentation, attendees learned that “white supremacy culture” creates food insecurity by “center[ing] whiteness across the food system.”

The materials claim that “whiteness defines foods as either good or bad” and that farmers markets are merely white spaces.

This webinar is the latest example of a critical race theory lens framing noncontroversial issues as racist. And given WSU operates a 4-H program, it’s worth wondering how much of this will eventually get in front of young kids.

View: https://youtu.be/oULlqts_ytY
6:47 min

‘White supremacy’ culture in agriculture
The webinar was originally produced by Duke University and featured two speakers from WSU’s 2021 San Juan Islands Ag Summit on the same topic.

Jennifer Zuckerman of the Duke World Food Policy Center led the discussion. She framed the webinar around her identity as a white woman who has “benefited from whiteness for my entire life at the expense of other people.” With that in mind, she explored the “really specific ways in which whiteness shows up in the food system and particularly in the work of food insecurity.”

Promoting the belief that “whiteness permeates the food system” and that “it specifically articulates these white ideals of health and nutrition,” Zuckerman chided the “whitened dreams of farming and gardening.”

She took particular aim at farmers markets as being too white. She uses a quote from Rachel Slocum (“a preeminent researcher on whiteness and food”) as a jumping-off point.

“What that does is it erases the past and present of race and agriculture. What whiteness also does is ‘mobilizes funding to predominantly white organizations who then direct programming at nonwhite beneficiaries,'” she said. “And we’ll talk about that a little bit more when we talk about communities that can’t take care of themselves. Also, what this does is it creates inviting spaces for white people. Then program directors or farmers market directors are scrambling because they’re trying to add diversity to a white space. So what whiteness does is center whiteness.”

Food charity is white supremacy, too
Zuckerman is particularly offended by white groups bringing mobile food banks to communities of color.

Efforts to offer food free of charge presumes “that low income and or BIPOC communities and individuals (and that’s not necessarily one in the same) cannot provide or make decisions for themselves.” She says it comes out of the “white supremacy culture” of individualism and neo-liberalism.

“What this does is it pathologizes people and makes the assumption that they need to be helped,” Zuckerman notes. “And these assumptions are based on negative racial and class stereotypes. They dictate who’s given power and decision-making in food policy and programming. And then what happens, as a result, is that organizations prescribe solutions to the community without consulting them, assuming that they know better. And there’s so much in our systems that reinforce this narrative that communities can’t take care of themselves.”

Luckily, these communities have a privileged white lady to tell them they don’t need any help.

She says the focus should not be about handing out food to help the hungry. Instead, the priority should be on “providing economic assistance, increasing wages, or providing direct capital for BIPOC owned food and agriculture businesses.”

Ironically, white savior Zuckerman says food charity promotes “a savior mentality over mutual aid.”

Zuckerman said she needed “to step back to de-center myself” as a privileged white person so that in-need people of color can speak. Yet she only gave the two women of color on the panel roughly 21 minutes between them.

View: https://youtu.be/lDhaJY86hJU
1:00:54 min

This isn’t an anomaly
The CRT-framing around food systems wasn’t a one-off. It appears to be the very basis of the work this WSU extension course offers.

At the race-obsessed 2021 San Juan Islands Ag Summit in May, the focus was also centered on whiteness. Alison Conrad of Duke Sanford World Food Policy Center was the keynote speaker.

She addressed the “white-dominant narratives in food movements and food policy.” The speech focused on the same talking points — almost word for word — presented by Zuckerman.

It offered a series titled “Black Agrarianism: Past, Present, and Future,” and also focused on “Indigenous land management, animal husbandry, crop cultivation, past and present.”

WSU’s extension program also operates a 4-H program where kids can start learning the basics around global food security, climate change, and sustainable energy. But if the adult-geared program is intent on pushing left-wing views on race, what are the kids learning?

View: https://youtu.be/dA0z4AIDA38
1:31:24 min

What is the point of this toxic garbage?
There are certainly valid concerns around food insecurity that can and should be addressed. But that’s not really the point of these types of seminars.

Activists like Zuckerman are more interested in strutting their left-wing, woke bona fides than creating real change. She’s quite proud of telling us about her white privilege but does little to get rid of it. This white woman seemed awfully interested in talking rather than letting women of color present their ideas and experiences. Yet Zuckerman tells us how she’s there to de-center her own whiteness — which doesn’t actually mean anything.

Too many left-wing, faux academics are more interested in rhetorical self-love. They try to one-up each other with meaningless terms and theories meant to telegraph their own wokeness. It’s precisely why these issues around food security are not improving.

If the focus is to help minority communities gain better access to food, one could do that without labeling everything white supremacy culture. But when your goal is to attack white people, instead of helping minority communities, you get ridiculous seminars like this. And the audience are people who already agree with the nonsense being spouted. It’s not bringing anyone to the table to help solve actual problems.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

December 2, 2021
The Frogs Have Begun Fleeing the Government's Boiling Pot

By J.B. Shurk

The federal government spies on every email, text, and call you make. It uses your phone's location services to pinpoint where you are at all times. It knows which I.P. addresses are associated with online comments that have been deemed "politically incorrect." Its partnerships with Amazon and Walmart let it know what you're reading and buying. Its partnerships with Google and Facebook let it know what you're thinking. Its partnerships with Twitter and Hollywood allow it to censor unapproved messages before too many brains have the opportunity to consider new thoughts. Its alliance with credit card companies allows it to track all your financial transactions and thereby understand your habits, preferences, choices, and addictions. Its alliance with cellular companies allows it to monitor all your movements, contacts, and associations. And all of these consumer comforts that are used by the "national security" surveillance state to watch everyone in real time constantly measure every American's potential for subversiveness, even when that American is engaged in the most mundane things during the course of an ordinary day.

Now, whom does the government fear most under these conditions? Hint: It is not the millions of illegal aliens who pour through our uncontrolled borders (during supposedly the greatest pandemic threat in a century), or foreign governments that bankroll American elected officials (How else could Biden and other lifelong politicians be millionaires?), or the threat of an electromagnetic pulse attack taking out America's aging electrical grid (because Congress's "infrastructure" spending won't bother fixing actual infrastructure when there are so many campaign donors and special interest groups to pay off).

Rather, it is the person who has no problem walking away from the government's panopticon to go hunting in the woods, who decides to pay in cash, or who has woken up to the reality that the federal government is in the business of control. It is the solitary American capable of questioning the government's official State narrative and willing to think for himself who scares the bejesus out of the powers that be. It is the patriotic grandmother who has the temerity to show up at the nation's capitol after a heavily disputed election to wave a Trump flag while drinking hot chocolate. It is the parent who has the gall to believe that the public should be in charge of public education. It is the humble police officer publicly outed and fired for privately giving a word of encouragement to an innocent teenager politically persecuted for defending his life against a State-sanctioned Antifa mob. It is the health care worker, firefighter, blue-collar worker, or soldier who refuses to let Big Brother pump him full of experimental gene therapies for the remainder of his life just because people who wear their prestige like crowns proclaim, "You must because we say." In other words, governments pretending to protect freedom are most afraid of individuals who insist on being free.

Does this seem like a system that is destined to survive?

Although I am deeply sympathetic with those Americans who throw up their arms in hopelessness and fatigue at the growing authoritarian State that is visible everywhere, I would point out that self-sustaining human systems function best when individual, voluntary acts interchange organically and invisibly to keep the societal machine running from the bottom up.

When coercion and surveillance are required to artificially keep society intact through a top-to-bottom tyrannical squeeze, the whole system is at risk of collapse from a single dissenting voice that chooses to throw sand into the rusting, brittle cogs. When the social fabric is knit together with individual free will, you get an American flag for which people are willing to die. When governing elites choose to push their sinister interests upon the masses through the threat of punishment and the attractiveness of cheap rewards, you get a meaningless, multicultural ball of yarn that free-thinking people learn to kick around for sport.

Authoritarianism has taken root in America? Yes. The police state is beginning to enforce its will at the expense of dissent? Certainly. All hope is lost because the political left's "long march through the institutions" is heading up the front drive toward total victory? Au contraire! The State's slow yet relentless takeover of society may have achieved success this last century by dedicating its enormous energy to rounding up all the independent-minded frogs and throwing them into the same barely simmering pot under close watch until those in power became hungry enough to feast, but now our totalitarian cooks have begun boiling the societal pot with such intemperance that the more slippery frogs have begun squirming to safety and threaten to topple over the whole cauldron, leaving the tyrants with nothing to eat.

Watching the government lay down fresh mandates and executive orders demanding that citizens submit to its will or suffer the consequences should be seen not as a sign of unstoppable power, but rather as evidence that its grip on power is spinning out of control. For the time being, even its most important objectives — training Americans to accept forced injections and digital passports — have been put on hold because too much of the workforce has said, "No." What's the lesson here? That pushing back on the immoral and unconstitutional dictates of a government exercising illegitimate power works! And, even more importantly, that the government is more afraid of the people than the people should ever be of their government!

Let me be clear. We have had a three-body problem in the United States since World War II: (1) the Democrats have been steadily pushing Marxist socialism upon the American people while claiming to liberate them; (2) with the exception of small reprieves provided by Presidents Reagan and Trump, Establishment Republicans have falsely presented themselves as stewards of the inalienable rights and liberties defended by our Founding Fathers while actually providing aid and comfort to the Democrat's Big Government conquest of America; and (3) a nefarious shadow bureaucracy made up of the permanent D.C. Leviathan, multinational firms, and a financial aristocracy controlling and manipulating the dollar's value and therefore each American's personal wealth has pushed unprincipled elected "leaders" to do what's in its sinister interests while actively harming the best interests of the people they purport to represent. This was as true thirty years ago as it is true today. What is the difference now? The cat's out of the bag, and more and more Americans are acutely aware that the U.S. government works against their self-determination.

On this side of the battlefield, our banners proclaim, "free speech," "freedom of conscience," and "free will." Our warriors cherish liberty; the right to own property through the efforts of one's own labor; the right to approach the world with an open mind capable of seeking universal truths; and the certainty that they, and not some king or queen, are responsible for their own destiny. On the other side is a crumbling system dependent on State propaganda, censorship, threats of force, and total control. Those are all fearsome tools of government, to be sure, but they don't look so attractive when held high atop banners for all to see, nor do they rally the hearts of men to charge forth against some enemy army, especially when that might mean willingly sacrificing themselves in defense of the intangible virtues of glorious ideas that sometimes require the "last full measure of devotion" to persevere.

So the world is waking up to the reality that only one real conflict exists — that between individual liberty and total State domination. Thanks to decades of taxation and money-printing, states sure do have a lot of pretty toys. But with history as a guide, I'll bet every time on those poor souls who choose to defend freedom.

234213_5_.jpg

Image via Pxhere.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Taxpayer-funded critical race theory training program draws criticism
“Critical Race Theory is inherently bigoted, and it is a lie,” Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, says.

By Casey Harper
Updated: December 2, 2021 - 11:22pm

Critics are questioning a taxpayer-funded program that trains students in critical race theory.

The backlash comes after The Center Square uncovered federal grant documents from the Department of Education that showed the federal government has awarded millions of dollars to a program that trains future educators in critical race theory.

Experts said the program disproves claims that critical race theory is not being pushed at K-12 schools.

“Critical Race Theory is inherently bigoted and it is a lie,” Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, said in response to news about the grant funding. “The federal government should not be funding the training for a Marxist ideology that teaches people to hate America. That’s why I introduced legislation earlier this year to block federal funding for CRT.”

Cruz’s legislation is one of several Republican efforts to stymie the spread of critical race theory, a school of thought which teaches that American history is best read through the lens of racism.

The New York Times' "1619 Project" captured and popularized the idea, reframing the history of the U.S. as not beginning in 1776 with the signing of the Declaration of Independence, but in 1619, when the the first enslaved Africans arrived in what was then the colony of Virginia.

“This is exactly why Governor Noem signed an executive order this year to block federal civics and history grants in South Dakota,” said Ian Fury, spokesman for South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem. “We will continue working to ensure that our students learn America's true and honest history.”

Department of Education grant records show that in 2016 under the Obama administration, the federal government awarded its first five-year grant of $1,116,895 to North Carolina Central University (NCCU) for training college students in critical race theory.

That program is named, “The Research Institute for Scholars of Equity," or RISE. As part of the federally-funded program, participating students receive a $5,000 stipend, travel allowance, and money for food and housing. According to promotional materials and grant documents, RISE students are taught to use critical race theory as a framework by which to evaluate teacher quality, among other things.

Many of the participating students will likely go on to be teachers. The program also emphasizes training students with "research careers that will inform policy and practice in education" on a wider scale, helping spread critical race theory ideas into policy-making conversation nationwide.

NCCU has partnered with several colleges around the country in the program, which provided one-year fellowships to about 60 students.

The "principal investigator" for the RISE program, NCCU faculty member Wynetta Lee, was approved for another five-year grant of $1,533,384 under the Biden administration in July of this year. This second grant puts RISE at over $2.6 million in taxpayer funding.

Pennsylvania State University has partnered with Lee for the second grant, called RISE 2.0, though other educational institutions will likely send students or faculty to participate.

Lee did not answer repeated inquiries about RISE and the role of critical race theory in her program.

From the 2016 grant:

“One core feature of the fellowship is the eight-week summer research institute in which fellows will be introduced to critical race theory (as well as mixed-methods research techniques) as a means of studying issues such as teacher quality, education policy, and race and social justice in education,” the 2016 grant reads. “In addition to coursework, fellows will conduct several short research projects and begin conducting research related to the RISE theme as part of research interest groups (RIGs) under the supervision of their faculty mentors. Fellows will continue to conduct research through their RIGs during the academic year.”

The later 2021 grant has the same wording but omits "critical race theory." Program documents and webpages promoting RISE repeatedly use the phrase.

"This is an example of federal funding for CRT at the post secondary level that also has an impact on K-12 schools based on the goals and activities of the fellowship," said Jonathan Butcher, an education expert at the Heritage Foundation. "This directly exposes the claims that CRT is not used in K-12 schools as false."
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

This Is A Leading Indicator Of A Civilization In Decline

FRIDAY, DEC 03, 2021 - 03:20 PM
Authored by Simon Black via SovereignMan.com,

In early 2007, the brand new District Attorney for Milwaukee County, Wisconsin gave an interview to a local newspaper spelling out his ‘progressive’ approach to crime.

He told the reporter:
“Is there going to be an individual I divert [i.e. release back onto the street] or I put into treatment program, who’s going to go out and kill somebody? You bet. Guaranteed. It’s guaranteed to happen. It does not invalidate the overall approach.”
(Actually his approach is invalidated by the data; rape, homicide, arson, aggravated assault, and other violent crime have risen dramatically in Milwaukee. His approach is clearly not working…)

But last Sunday, one such criminal– Darrell Brooks– who benefited from this prosecutor’s legendary clemency, drove his SUV into a crowd of people, killing six… including an 8-year old child.

Brooks is a classic repeat offender; he had just been arrested a few weeks prior for runing over his ex. And his numerous felony convictions go back two decades.

The only reason he was on the streets was because of this District Attorney’s outrageous progressive policies.

One HUGE problem in the United States is how ambitious people see prosecutor jobs like District Attorney and Attorney General as stepping stones to higher political offices.

Kamala Harris, for example, got her start as a prosecutor, first winning the office of San Francisco District Attorney back in 2003. She later became California Attorney General in 2010, then Senator in 2016.

Jumping from prosecutor to politician is extremely common. But it creates bad incentives for ambitious prosecutors to abuse the system for their own political gain.

We’ve seen this a lot lately– prosecutors bringing up ridiculous, dubious charges in high profile cases simply to increase their national name recognition.

Other prosecutors will use their offices to make noise about their ‘progressive’ approach to crime, in an effort to win broad support from the left. Or they’ll often NOT prosecute prominent individuals to gain political favor.

This is extremely unethical. The criminal justice system is supposed to keep bad people off the streets.

Clearly there are way too many laws criminalizing non-violent acts. And the system should ample room for discretion to give people a second chance. But not 20 years of second chances.

People like Darrell Brooks are on the streets because prosecutors, oftentimes for personal and political gain, simply refuse to follow the law.

I’ve written about this concept a lot lately– the rapid deterioration of America’s ‘Rule of Law’.

Rule of Law is an idea that goes back thousands of years to the days of Hammurabi’s Code. It suggests that you can’t simply change the law whenever you want. Clear rules should be applied and followed equally across society, without exception.

A strong Rule of Law was once a major cornerstone of western civilization… right alongside capitalism, individual liberty, and a sense of community.

Each of these is vanishing at an astonishing pace. And with respect to Rule of Law, we constantly see new examples where government officials will either ignore the rules, or simply invent new rules, to do whatever they want.

Several months ago, for example, the CDC Director invented the authority to take control of the entire $10+ trillion US housing market.

Obviously nothing under the Constitution or US federal law grants her that power. But she arbitrarily decided that housing fell within her jurisdiction… and hence she felt entitled to issue a moratorium on evictions.

Last week the Federal Trade Commission (whose new chairwoman is a hardcore Marxist) announced they would “identify additional legal theories” to stop mergers in the energy sector.

In other words, they don’t actually have the legal authority. So they’re just going invent some new legal concept that gives them the power to do whatever they want.

Last week’s verdict in the Kyle Rittenhouse trial was another obvious example; Hunter Biden’s dad raged that he was “angry and concerned” after the jury decided Rittenhouse was NOT guilty.

Yet when another jury delivered guilty verdicts against all three defendants in the death of Ahmaud Arbery, Biden proudly announced that “the guilty verdicts reflect our justice system doing its job.”

It’s amazing that the President of the United States publicly opines on the health of the justice system based on whether the jurys’ verdicts meet with his personal approval.

And this is an extraordinary testament to the declining Rule of Law in America.

Not to be outdone, the Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee said Rittenhouse’s acquittal was a “gross miscarriage of justice and sets a dangerous precedent. . .” He also called for the US Department of Justice to “review” the case.

It’s no longer OK for a jury to hear evidence and deliver a verdict.

If that verdict doesn’t conform to what the woke mob wants, the government will ignore the law, legal tradition, and the entire system of justice, to demand the outcome that it wants.

As a final example, several months ago workers at an Amazon facility in Alabama voted whether or not to organize and form a union.

The vote made national news, because government officials all the way up to Hunter Biden’s dad were pleading with the workers to unionize.

The workers, however, had different plans. And they voted by an overwhelming margin to NOT unionize.

But yesterday afternoon the US National Labor Relations Board decided to invalidate that April vote.

And they are now requiring the workers to hold a new election.

If you say anything about an election being unfair or fraudulent, then you’re a conspiracy theorist who is a threat to democracy.

Yet if the government doesn’t like the outcome of union election, they’ll just invalidate the vote until they get the outcome they want.

I cannot overstate the importance of this issue; strong nations have a strong Rule of Law.

And history is full of examples, from Rome to medieval Venice to the Ottoman Empire, which show that a deteriorating rule of law is a leading indicator of a civilization in decline.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Declassified Military Report Exposes Hidden Links Between Wokeness and The American Regime

November 29, 2021 (4d ago)
2021.11.27-08.27-revolvernews-61a2949ba10b1.jpg


A spectre is haunting America — the spectre of “wokeism.” Seemingly out of nowhere, a mass “woke” hysteria of racial and gender grievance has come not only to dominate, but to define every single major institution in the country. Wokeness is so deeply ingrained in our body politic that even its detractors can easily underestimate the extent and nature of its influence.

In a popular discussion between Glenn Greenwald and Revolver’s Darren Beattie, Beattie suggests that there is an important relationship between wokeness and how the United States projects power internationally. According to this view, wokeness is not merely some extraneous ideological nuisance sitting on top of an otherwise non-woke military and national security apparatus. On the contrary, wokeness is more essentially connected to the specific manner in which the United States exercises its power and influence domestically and overseas:

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1447754434809933835
2:17 min

As explained above, when the US government wants to destabilize a target institution or regime it typically resorts to the following formula:
  • identify and inflame ethnic or gender tensions in target regime
  • leverage NGOs and civil-society groups to mobilize mass protests on basis of such tensions
  • leverage local and international media to cover protests and further inflame tensions
As it so happens, an interesting example of precisely this formula appears in a recently published document discussing the capabilities and practices of Army special operations and psychological warfare units. The document in question is an unclassified white paper for 1st Special Forces Airborne Command (SFAC) titled “A Vision for 2021 and Beyond.” The SFAC motto “First to Observe, First to Influence, First to Compete,” sums up its primary purpose: influencing target populations through psychological operations and infiltrating local populations.
2021.10.21-12.44-revolvernews-6170b7f523c84.jpg


The Army’s special warfare teams boasts of being “masters of the art of resistance” who use a combination of Civil Affairs offices to work with civil society groups to legitimize or delegitimize preferred political groups, along with information warfare to make target populations desire to mobilize for or against the preferred political group.

From the SOC handbook:
As masters of the art of resistance, Army Special Operations Forces work with partners to anticipate, prepare for, and defeat threats ranging from insurgencies to occupying foreign powers. To accomplish this, Civil Affairs, Psychological Operations, and Special Forces conduct activities to support or defeat resistance movements.

The Special Forces Airborne Command is kind enough to present a hypothetical example of what their operations look like in action, in what is surely the most interesting part of the entire white paper.

Set in the fictional African nation of Naruvu, the vignette begins with civil affairs soldiers on their way to meet a local official noticing signs advertising a Chinese infrastructure project.

Alarmed at the prospect of Chinese infrastructure development in a strategic port city, the soldiers transmit information about the building project to the Fort Bragg psychological warfare team, which then goes on to develop a plan to “converge SOF capabilities on the problem.”

Their plan is as follows:
Relying on civil-economic information provided by the CMSE, the IWC’s approach empowered IWTF’s, in coordination with the JIIM, to enflame long-standing friction between Naruvian workers and Chinese corporations. Within days, protests supported by the CFT’s ODA, erupted around Chinese business headquarters and their embassy in Ajuba. Simultaneously, the IWC-led social media campaign illuminated the controversy to a global audience.

Immediately we see key elements of the tried and true soft-power regime change playbook of the US government. Identify and inflame ethnic tensions, leverage civil society NGOS to effect mass protests, and use media assets (including social media) amplify said protests and grievances. Of course, no US government operation would be complete without either misattributing or mysteriously discovering incriminating weapons stashes.
One week later, Naruvian security forces discovered an illegal weapons cache which it traced back to a subsidiary of the construction company. To further investigate the matter, they partnered with 3rd SFG (A)’s Hard Target Defeat Company (HTD) to surveil the construction company’s headquarters. Enabled by the HTD, Naruvian security forces accessed the building and, while searching it, recovered blueprints for the proposed port facility.

Naruvu sent the recovered blueprints to DIA analysts who identified plans for concrete footings specifically designed for CSA-9 surface-to-air and DF-25 shore-to-ship missiles. These missiles, if emplaced in Naruvu, would challenge America’s air and sea lanes across the Atlantic. Armed with this information, the US Ambassador explained if China emplaced those weapons at the port, Naruvu would become a strategic target and potential war zone between great powers.

China’s true intent illuminated, the Naruvian government seized the Chinese-purchased land.

One more victory for the good guys! While the vignette provided here is of course fictional, it reflects a very standard operating procedure for US government operations overseas. As Beattie mentioned in the interview with Greenwald above, we see a very similar pattern in terms of how the US and US-aligned interests identify and exacerbate ethnic and gender cleavages in China with Uyghurs, in Malaysia with Rohingya, and in Belarus, Ukraine and other Eastern European theaters with aggravation of gay rights and women rights issues.

Western media was sure to amplify and support women’s mass protest movements, for instance, in its recent spat with Russia-aligned geopolitical rival Belarus.

View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1293893734124392449
.55 min

1638580258744.png

If the prominent use of women as demonstration props seems familiar, it’s because US-government and US-government linked Non-Governmental organizations (NGO)s have explicitly identified tactical “feminism” as a leverage point in undermining target regimes.

Here’s one such acknowledgement from the German Marshall Fund, a key node in the State Department-linked NGO Axis:
First, the EU must end its geopoliticking in Belarus. Rather than pretending that its recent warming of ties with the Lukashenko regime has bolstered the country’s sovereignty, the EU must return to putting its fundamental values front and center.
For as long as democracy and human rights are trampled by the government in Minsk, there can be no continued, much less deepened, political engagement.

Second, Europe must immediately demonstrate its solidarity with the people of Belarus. Thousands have fallen victim to political repression and police violence. They urgently need legal assistance, material and medical help, and rehabilitation. A generous solidarity package for Belarusian democrats, civil society, independent media, and engaged citizens should be launched instantly.

Third, the EU should strategically direct its assistance at Belarusian society.
Long-term programs to support young people and students, European education, independent media, free entrepreneurship, women political engagement, civil-society development, and cross-border contacts are needed.

Long article - see website Declassified Military Report Exposes Hidden Links Between Wokeness and The American Regime - Revolver
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
(Long article - see website for entirety)


The Genealogy of Woke Capital
From compliance to diversity
Charles Fain Lehman
Autumn 2021

American companies’ embrace of radical ideas appears both sudden and inexplicable. In internal trainings, companies from Disney to Lockheed-Martin ask their employees to “challenge colorblind ideologies” and “deconstruct their white male privilege.” Firms spend vast sums of money on such trainings, on diversity-related speakers, and on maintaining a progressive image. Employees find themselves wondering why their workplace has transformed into a progressive propaganda center.

Much has been made of the propagation of certain ideas—call them social-justice ideology, critical race theory, or wokeness—in American institutions. But surprisingly little attention has been paid to the question of why institutions “go woke.” Some address this question in philosophical or ideological terms, noting the continuity between these ideas and the work of certain twentieth-century intellectuals, from the Frankfurt School in the 1920s to the critical race theorists of the 1980s. But a historical and sociological analysis can help explain why institutions accepted these ideas as legitimate in the first place.

Race-conscious policy has become a self-sustaining force in the modern workplace. Where companies once adhered to a paradigm of “compliance,” in which they adopted affirmative action to satisfy a new legal regime, they now follow the rule of “diversity,” which encourages race-consciousness as an end in itself. If social-justice ideology is the food that universities and businesses give to their students and employees, diversity is now the air that they breathe, the set of taken-for-granted assumptions without which woke ideas would be ignored. The story of diversity’s institutionalization in American corporate culture tells us much about how we got to this current moment—and how we can move beyond it.

The story starts in the civil rights era—not with marches, sit-ins, and the broader social movement, but with the sprawling bureaucracy that this movement produced. Lyndon B. Johnson’s landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964 dramatically expanded the responsibilities of the executive and judicial branches, compelling regulators to intervene in education, housing, and welfare. It also created new regulatory entities, such as the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), to carry out its mandates. “Civil rights ideology,” writes journalist Christopher Caldwell, “especially when it hardened into a body of legislation, became, most unexpectedly, the model for an entirely new system of constantly churning political reform.”

The new regime, however well intentioned, came with a complexity that private enterprise struggled to understand. As sociologists Frank Dobbin and John Sutton have argued, the machinery of civil rights suffered from many of the problems that plague the rest of the U.S. regulatory state. It was ambiguous, in that it broadly prohibited discrimination without clearly articulating what that meant; it was continuously expanding, so corporations constantly had to update their awareness of relevant rules; and it was fragmentary, in that it was carried out by redundant and often conflicting agencies at different levels of government. Such terms as “affirmative action” and “discrimination” were rarely defined, their meanings always in flux.

Still, enforcement took off in the 1970s as both political parties embraced the new apparatus. The doctrine of disparate impact, enshrined by the Supreme Court’s unanimous 1971 decision in Griggs v. Duke Power Co., lowered the burden of proof for bias. Richard Nixon set up “goals and timetables” for corporate affirmative-action commitments and established hiring quotas for federal contractors, Gerald Ford promulgated regulations mandating bilingual education, and Jimmy Carter consolidated enforcement power under the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP), while welcoming “hundreds of complaints” against employers for various violations. Under all three presidents, the EEOC aggressively targeted some of America’s biggest employers, including AT&T, General Electric, and Ford.

Facing the dual challenges of inscrutable regulation and aggressive regulators, businesses responded by complying with the new mandates for race-consciousness under the Civil Rights Act’s Title VII. They implemented race-conscious policies to avoid the ire of regulators and the risk of lawsuits or federal investigations. Diversity consultants Rohini Anand and Mary-Frances Winters note that corporate trainings were primarily legalistic affairs, “a litany of dos and don’ts and maybe a couple of case studies for the participants to ponder.” As civil rights regulations grew, so did corporations’ tools for complying. In 1970, Dobbin observes, fewer than 20 percent of firms had written equal-employment or affirmative-action rules; by 1980, after a decade of heavy-handed enforcement, nearly half had done so.

Yet large majorities of the country opposed affirmative action, which became a chief target of Ronald Reagan. On the campaign trail in 1980, he identified affirmative action as an example of government overreach and micromanagement, promising to roll back “bureaucratic regulations which rely on quotas, ratios, and numerical requirements.” Once Reagan took office, an entrenched bureaucracy, a hostile Congress, and courts frequently thwarted his ambitious agenda. He did, however, ease compliance pressures for a time. William Bradford Reynolds, Reagan’s appointee to run the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, publicly opposed the use of quotas and endorsed colorblindness in hiring. Then–EEOC chairman Clarence Thomas shifted the focus from big systemic cases to individual instances of discrimination and tried to minimize the use of “goals and timetables.” The OFCCP downshifted, and both agencies saw their staffing and funding levels slashed.

If corporations were still complying with affirmative action merely because of legal pressures, this regulatory relaxation should have induced them to reverse course. But, astonishingly, they strengthened their commitment to affirmative action, even filing amicus briefs and sending telegrams to Reagan in support of it. A 1985 survey of Fortune 500 companies that Dobbin cites found that 95 percent would “continue to use numerical objectives to track the progress of women and minorities,” even if such objectives were no longer imposed. A 1986 survey found that despite reduced enforcement, 90 percent of firms planned to keep their affirmative-action programs unchanged, while the other 10 percent planned to expand them. Once a product of compliance with government regulation, race-conscious corporate policy had taken on a life of its own.
“The doctrine of disparate impact, enshrined in a 1971 Supreme Court decision, lowered the burden of proof for bias.”
Corporations were not going to give up race-conscious policy just because Reagan told them to, but they needed a rationale for continuing to pursue it. The Reagan administration unwittingly handed them one with Workforce 2000, a 1987 report commissioned by the Department of Labor and authored by two fellows at the Hudson Institute that unexpectedly became a bestseller. The report’s blockbuster finding: by the end of the millennium, only 15 percent of those entering the workforce would be white men, while the large remainder would be women and minorities. This pending demographic tidal wave gave business leaders a new reason to care about race- and sex-conscious policy—namely, the need to create a workplace that could cater to a wide variety of workers.

(Long article - see website for entirety)

 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Exclusive — Vivek Ramaswamy: ‘Wokeness’ Creates ‘Existential Crisis of Identity in America’

Video on website 3:32 min

ROBERT KRAYCHIK3 Dec 202128

America is facing an “existential crisis of identity” from “woke” ideology, Vivek Ramaswamy, author of Woke, Inc.: Inside Corporate America’s Social Justice Scam, told Breitbart News Editor-in-Chief Alex Marlow.

Ramaswamy identified the left’s political paradigm of framing people’s primary identities based on race, sex, and sexual preference.

“This is what the heart of the book is about,” Ramaswamy stated, “the existential crisis of identity in America, right now. America is going through an identity crisis, and I don’t think we have a good answer to the question of what it means to be American in 2021.”

Ramaswamy alluded to civic nationalism as a means to unify Americans across varying demographic strata.

He continued, “The America that I came to know as a child who was born here … is that America wasn’t even a place. It is a vision of what a place can be. It is an idea that, 250 years ago, brought together a divided polyglot group of people, and we have forgotten what those common ideas were.”

He described “wokeness” as a “new group identity-based fixation on race, gender, and sexual orientation.”

One of Woke Inc.‘s goals, Ramaswamy concluded, is to render irrelevant the left’s “fractious, group-identify conception” of status in modern America.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Critical Race Trove From California District Tells Students How To Use Witchcraft On People Who Say ‘All Lives Matter’

Critical race theory has been fully institutionalized at the California high school district that tried to reeducate me six years ago when I first pushed back.

Spencer Lindquist

By Spencer Lindquist
DECEMBER 6, 2021

While documenting my former high school’s attempt to indoctrinate me with critical race theory six years ago, I remarked that now, several years later, “the situation has undoubtedly worsened.” Worsened it has. Now, Campbell Union High School District has promoted more than 100 “equity resources” to students and staff, including a document that taught students how to put a curse on those who say “all lives matter.”

Colorblindness, Cops, and Curses
The page serves as a vast library for CRT resources and features 60 different links, including a Google Drive folder with 45 different documents. The list made sure to include the full range of CRT buzzwords, with links like Raising Race Conscious Children, the infamous 1619 Project, Anti-Racism for Beginners, and Social Identities and Systems of Oppression, among others.

One link takes you to an “Anti-Racism Resource List,” which teaches about “white fragility” and claims that racism can only be perpetrated by white people. One of the “resources” provided was a Trevor Noah speech labeled “Why rioting makes sense,” followed by an unhinged anti-white rant from Sonya Renee Taylor, demanding that white people “throw your white body” on police officers and “put their bodies on the line for the purpose of justice.”

The list also addresses white people when it says, “We are socialized into white supremacy from the moment we are born” before going on to say “It is about completely dismantling how you see yourself and how you see the world, so that you can dismantle … white supremacy.”

Samuel Martin graduated from CUHSD’s Branham High School in 2019 and was appalled by the district’s actions. He told The Federalist, “The idea that white students must ‘dismantle themselves’ in the context of their personality is cultish. Not only is it cultish, but it is deliberate in that this school system wants its’ white students to hate themselves. Do these people honestly think that drilling racial identitarianism into childrens’ heads from a young age is going to make them less racist?”

CUHSD also links to the Black Lives Matter Resource Guide, specifically their section labeled “high school,” which itself includes 45 different texts. Amid a wide variety of CRT inspired assignments is a document that includes writing prompts on police brutality and racist violence.

One section titled “Hex” tells the reader, “Hexing people is an important way to get out anger and frustration.” It becomes increasingly deranged, suggesting that those who say “all lives matter” or commit “microaggressions,” should be targeted. “Write your own hex poem, cursing that person,” it instructs.

When asked her thoughts on the document that instructed K-12 students to use witchcraft on political opponents, Branham teacher Meredith Allen told The Federalist she hasn’t read the documents her district recommends, so she “can’t comment,” but that she is generally “opposed to the ‘all lives matter’ message.”

Another section labeled “A World With No Police” cites police and military as “systems or institutions that … contribute to oppression.” It asks “What would the world be like without them?” before telling the reader to write a poem discussing “a world without these institutions.”

The Black Radical Tradition,” is a 565-page e-book that includes articles from the Communist League and Noel Ignatiev under the pen name Noel Ignatin. Ignatiev was a Marxist who argued that “abolishing the white race is … so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white supremacists.”

Then there’s a slide show entitled “What is the Black Lives Matter Movement?” which is made for children and was produced in part by teachers at LAUSD. It includes a glossary of terms like “white supremacy,” the definition of which includes the line, “systems, like schools and jails, have white supremacy built into them because white people have had so much power for so long.”

The ADL’s linked document “George Floyd, Racism, and Law Enforcement” defines racism as “the … oppression of people of color based on a socially constructed racial hierarchy that privileges white people,” a definition that reinforces the malicious lie that white people can’t be the victims of anti-white racism.

Another ADL resource condemns colorblindness and provides carefully crafted methods to indoctrinate white students with the idea that they have privilege without incurring backlash while a “Racial Equity Resource Guide” advertises the White Privilege Conference.

Top-Down Pushing Critical Race Theory On Students
The district’s equity resources page is just the most visible result of a series of steps in support of CRT that started long ago. In fact, the district was a testing ground for CRT before it spread throughout the nation. The book “Research Studies on Educating for Diversity and Social Justice” was published in 2018 and describes the process. An entire chapter, written in part by my former teacher, is dedicated to discussing how CRT was used at my high school so it could be replicated.

The book noted the use of the theory, saying, “CRT is used here to centralize the discussion of race and racism at Branham High School.” It went on to describe an “equity advisory” class that I was placed in as a sophomore, where “Students learn about the different types of oppression along with the privilege it affords the oppressors.” The authors hoped their tactics would spread, writing, “the intent behind sharing the process Branham underwent is to provide a model that could be followed by other schools across the nation.”

The district’s Board of Trustees supports this agenda, recently offering unanimous support for a resolution resolving to “dismantle institutionalized racism in our society and our school district” and is “committed to … implicit bias training, Ethnic Studies, and resources that foster dialogue around the guiding principles of #BlackLivesMatter.”

Note the district’s adoption of the term “equity” rather than “equality.” Here’s superintendent Robert Bravo two hours and 39 minutes into a board meeting saying he believes “equity is about equity of outcomes.”

CUHSD even established an Anti-Racism Team, which is divided into eight Equity Teams that include teachers, principals, administrators, and even two students who must be “BIPOC.” That means white students are banned from the “Equity” Teams. They’re tasked with “challenging imbalances of power and privilege,” among other roles.

Michael Espinoza is a member of one such Equity Team and a teacher at Branham High School who won the district’s teacher of the year award. Here he is calling a Native American tribe the “rightful stewards of the lands our schools and district offices stand on” and telling teachers to recognize “the power of critical race theory and use it in our lesson plans.”

He also gave a speech to the class of 2021, where he levied leftwing complaints against America and quoted Huey Newton, imploring students to engage in revolution instead of “conforming to the machine that is the United States.” On his Instagram account, Espinoza celebrates mandates for ethnic studies classes and complains of living under “white supremacist, heteropatriarchal rule” in a plea to his “co-conspirators.”

Screen-Shot-2021-11-28-at-9.30.55-PM.png


If this is CUHSD’s model teacher, what does their model student look like? Espinoza’s students created a variety of leftwing posters in his ethnic literature class. One poster demanded “Dear White PPL: Start Listening, Stop Talking” and others that said “Wear UR F-cking Mask” and “Give us back our land.” Principal Lawton took down the posters amid outcry before caving in and apologizing to the leftwing agitators.

Co-Conspirators? Or A Conservative Counter Culture?
The full ramifications of our education system’s descent into leftwing radicalism is yet to be fully realized, although we can be certain that many of the students it doesn’t lose to homeschooling will be successfully transformed into “co-conspirators.” But as the rhetoric of revolution becomes standard for stodgy school administrators, its appeal to youth might wane.

Conversely, they run the risk of creating a small but clever cadre of conservative youth who understand from firsthand childhood experiences the consequences of toxic racial grievance politics. Don’t be surprised if the propagandizers who intend to give permanency to left-wing hegemony instead give rise to a nascent conservative political force that will uproot it.

Spencer Lindquist is an intern at the Federalist and a senior at Pepperdine University where he studies Political Science and Rhetoric and Leadership and serves as Pepperdine’s College Republicans President.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
Fort Worth ISD Racial Equity Committee defends member who doxxed parents, sent profane voicemail 5:53 min

Fort Worth ISD Racial Equity Committee defends member who doxxed parents, sent profane voicemail
Dec. 06, 2021 - 5:53 - Members of the Fort Worth ISD Racial Equity Committee speak at a press conference defending Norma Garcia-Lopez, who released personal information of parents and encouraged people to shame them, and who left a profanity-laced voicemail for one mother.

Fort Worth School Board Racial Equity Committee co-chair owns up to attacks on parents

Garcia-Lopez admitted she cursed out parent on the phone, but insisted her voicemail included 'no threats'

Tyler O'Neil

By Tyler O'Neil | Fox News

Fort Worth ISD Racial Equity Committee defends member who doxxed parents, sent profane voicemail
Members of the Fort Worth ISD Racial Equity Committee speak at a press conference defending Norma Garcia-Lopez, who released personal information of parents and encouraged people to shame them, and who left a profanity-laced voicemail for one mother.


A member of the Fort Worth, Texas, school board's Racial Equity Committee has defended her actions releasing the personal information of parents online and leaving a profanity-laced voicemail attacking a mother who sued the school district over a COVID-19 mask mandate. The committee also held a news conference standing by the woman, while the targeted parents called for her removal.

"Some people consider my actions doxxing," Norma Garcia-Lopez, the committee's co-chair, said in a statement to the Fort Worth Star-Telegram. "It’s not doxxing when you expose someone who filed a public motion in a public court of law that impacts public school children."

As Fox News previously reported, Garcia-Lopez shamed the parents who had sued the Fort Worth Independent School District (ISD) over its mask mandate, securing a temporary injunction in August.

"It's astounding what the ‘White Privilege’ power from Tanglewood has vs a whole diverse community that cares for the well being of others," Garcia-Lopez wrote. "These are their names: Jennifer Treger, Todd Daniel, Kerri Rehmeyer and a coward Jane Doe. Internet do your thang."

Twitter screenshot of a message from Norma Garcia-Lopez

Twitter screenshot of a message from Norma Garcia-Lopez (Twitter)

Garcia-Lopez went on to share the phone number and address of Treger, along with Rehmeyer's employer, her phone number, and her work email address (this sensitive personal information has been blurred from the photo below). When a local activist thanked her for sharing the information, Garcia-Lopez wrote, "They definitely need to be called out."

Facebook screenshot of a message from Norma Garcia-Lopez

Facebook screenshot of a message from Norma Garcia-Lopez (Facebook)

Garcia-Lopez also acknowledged calling one of the parents who sued the district and leaving a profanity-laced voicemail. "F--- you, you stupid b----. F--- you with your White privilege, not caring about the well-being of others, f--- you," Garcia-Lopez said in the voicemail, according to a recording provided to Fox News.

"My message contained harsh language — no threats," Garcia-Lopez said in her statement.

"Some people find my choice of words in that message offensive. But what’s really offensive is that four white parents could hold so much power."

In the committee meeting on Thursday, Garcia-Lopez characterized her support for mask mandates as a vital aspect of advocating for children. "When we’re advocating for their health and safety, for mask mandates, for vaccines, for everything, for all the equity in the classrooms, that’s because we care, not because we don’t," she said.

Max Krochmal, a history professor at Texas Christian University and a member of the committee, announced on Thursday that he had filed a resolution urging the school district to affirm "support for Norma Garcia-Lopez as co-chair of the Racial Equity Committee, with a note of appreciation and thanks."

Fort Worth ISD Racial Equity Committee defends Norma Garcia-Lopez.

Fort Worth ISD Racial Equity Committee defends Norma Garcia-Lopez. (A concerned citizen, sending it via Carlos Turcios)

The Fort Worth Star-Telegram reported that Garcia-Lopez had received "racist and fat-shaming statements," demands that she "go back to Mexico," and messages calling her "a great candidate for having a stroke." Some messages reportedly threatened her life and the safety of her family.

"They sent a lynch mob to attack me," Garcia-Lopez said. "They want to silence me from advocating for equity, by pressuring me into resigning as co-chair of the Racial Equity Committee."

Rehmeyer, one of the mothers Garcia-Lopez targeted, told Fox News she did not release Garcia-Lopez's personal information. She noted Garcia-Lopez's claim about sending a "lynch mob" after her and said, "No we didn’t. All we did was go to the media with what she had done to us."

The targeted mother also condemned any threats or racist messages the committee co-chair has received. "That's just totally uncalled-for," she said.

While Rehmeyer conceded that the names and addresses of the parents who sued the school district are available on legal documents, she noted that Garcia-Lopez "told people to go after us, said where I worked."

"I received 17 voicemails at work from one person," Rehmeyer said. She noted that some of the parents' businesses have gotten negative reviews online from critics who "don't even try to pretend that they were clients."

"I had a previous client who said she hoped that I died," the mother added.

Fort Worth Independent School District

Fort Worth Independent School District (Google Maps)

Rehmeyer said that the criticism "has nothing to do with equity work" and everything to do with how Garcia-Lopez treated her and other parents. "She's not holding to the standards that they have for teachers and students." She said that she and other parents had forwarded screenshots of Garcia-Lopez's actions to the school board, but they did not receive a response.

"It's unacceptable to me that they're not holding her accountable," she said.

Carlos Turcios, a former member of the Racial Equity Committee, condemned the school district for failing to take action against Garcia-Lopez.

"It is unacceptable that the ISD is not holding the co-chair accountable for her actions," Turcios told Fox News. "She doxxed parents and financially impacted one of the parents' businesses.

What type of leadership is the committee and FWISD showing to its students? That bullying and intimidation are OK? That it's fine to leave voicemails harassing parents if they disagree with you?"

"Superintendent [Kent] Scribner should resign for allowing this environment of bullying," Turcios added.

Neither Garcia-Lopez nor the school board nor the district immediately responded to Fox News' requests for comment.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Report: Rockwood School District Admits to Calling the FBI on Parents …UPDATED: With Response from Rockwood School District

By Jim Hoft
Published December 7, 2021 at 4:04pm
rockwood-school-district.jpg

Guest post by Bill Hennessey

The great Mark Reardon invited me onto The Mark Reardon Show (3:00 p.m. weekday, on 97.1 FM KFTK) today to talk about the goings on at Rockwood School District.

Mark is fired up about revelations of lewd, sexually explicit books found in some Rockwood high school libraries in a story we broke last week.

During the interview, Mark revealed that Rockwood’s public relations director admitted that the district has contacted the FBI. When Reardon asked for specifics, the district went dark, providing no additional information. But that might change soon.

On December 3, 2021, I submitted a formal request to the district for all communications of any kind between employees of Rockwood schools or members of its board of directors and the National School Boards Association. (Thanks to my premium subscribers for offsetting the cost of that Sunshine request, btw.)

records-rockwood.jpg


I will work with Mark Reardon to keep you up-to-date on this developing story.

Beginning in August, members of the United States executive branch, including the White House, the Department of Justice, and the FBI, helped the National School Boards Association (NSBA) draft a letter to Joe Biden requesting the federal government to declare parents who attend school board meetings “domestic terrorists.”

From the NSBA letter to President Joe Biden:
NSBA requests a joint expedited review by the U.S. Departments of Justice, Education, and Homeland Security, along with the appropriate training, coordination, investigations, and enforcement mechanisms from the FBI, including any technical assistance necessary from, and state and local coordination with, its National Security Branch and Counterterrorism Division, as well as any other federal agency with relevant jurisdictional authority and oversight. Additionally, NSBA requests that such review examine appropriate enforceable actions against these crimes and acts of violence under the Gun-Free School Zones Act, the PATRIOT Act in regards to domestic terrorism, the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act, the Violent Interference with Federally Protected Rights statute, the Conspiracy Against Rights statute, an Executive Order to enforce all applicable federal laws
As you can see, the NSBA hates parents and taxpayers who interfere with the indoctrination and corruption of children.

The NSBA has since repudiated its own letter. Moreover, at least 26 states have cut all ties to the NSBA. And researchers found that the NSBA owes the IRS over $20 million for back taxes.
We want to know all of Rockwood’s interactions with the NSBA and whether anyone in the Rockwood School District was involved in that heinous letter that brought the jack boots of the Justice Department down on the necks of concerned parents and taxpayers.

More to come . . .

** The Gateway Pundit contacted Rockwood School District for comment and will update this post when we have more information.

UPDATE—
We received this response from the Rockwood School District this afternoon.
Hello Mr. Hoft,
I never said we contacted the FBI on parents specifically. I simply acknowledged that we had contacted the FBI more than once since the beginning of the pandemic, as well as our local authorities. In response to questions Mr. Reardon raised after we shared the Department of Justice’s letter during a Board of Education meeting and asking if parents should contact the FBI directly, I shared the following:
There are multiple ways people can report threats in Rockwood. They can report it to a building or district administrator, on our district tip line; they can contact our district safety officer; they can call their local police; or, yes, they can report it via the FBI tip line. If someone feels unsafe or threatened, they should report it to the authorities who will determine if it is considered harassment, intimidation or a threat.

Rockwood has contacted the local police and the FBI more than once over the past two years over disturbing social media posts, threatening phone calls, emails and verbal attacks directed toward both staff and students. That information is confidential and we are not at liberty to share it because it involves records of individual Rockwood personnel and/or legal matters of the district.

Thank you for reaching out for clarification.
Mary
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Hundreds Of Mathematicians, Scientists, Sign Open-Letter Against Social-Justice-Based Curriculum

TUESDAY, DEC 07, 2021 - 06:45 PM
Authored by Isabel van Brugen via The Epoch Times,

More than 700 mathematicians and scientists have signed an open letter denouncing recent “trends” in K-12 mathematics education that proponents argue will close achievement gaps and damage America’s global competitiveness.
“We write to express our alarm over recent trends in K-12 mathematics education in the United States,” the “ Open Letter on K-12 Mathematics,” which has 746 signatories as of Dec. 6, says.
Signatories include several public school math teachers from California, numerous professors at University of California schools, including UC-Davis and UC-Berkeley, and staff at leading U.S. universities for hard science, including Stanford, Berkeley, CalTech, and MIT.


It comes after the California Department of Education this year postponed implementation of a new math framework that aims to keep students learning at the same level, citing equity, following widespread opposition to the curriculum. Opponents have said the reforms would discourage students who speak English as a second language.

The letter cites the California Mathematics Framework as particularly concerning, describing the recent reforms as “well-intentioned approaches to reform mathematics education,” but warns they may have “unintended consequences.”

While the California Mathematics Framework may superficially reduce disparities at the high school level, the efforts are merely “kicking the can” to college and will ultimately place K-12 public school students at a disadvantage compared with their international and private-school peers, the letter says.
“Such frameworks aim to reduce achievement gaps by limiting the availability of advanced mathematical courses to middle schoolers and beginning high schoolers,” the open letter says.

“Such a reform…may lead to a de facto privatization of advanced mathematics K-12 education and disproportionately harm students with fewer resources.”
The letter calls on national, state, and local governments to involve college-level STEM educators and STEM professionals in the design of K-12 mathematics and science education curriculum with three key goals.

The first goal states that all students, regardless of background, should have access to a math curriculum “with precision and rigor” and that would enable them to pursue STEM degrees and careers if they choose to do so.
“Far from being deliberately held back, all students should have the opportunity to be nurtured and challenged to fulfill their potential,” the second goal states.

“This is not only for their own benefit but also for society and the nation’s economic competitiveness.”
The third goal states that there cannot be a “one size fits all” approach to K-12 mathematical education.
“Students should be offered multiple pathways and timelines to explore mathematics,” it says.
“Reducing access to advanced mathematics and elevating trendy but shallow courses over foundational skills would cause lasting damage to STEM education in the country and exacerbate inequality by diminishing access to the skills needed for social mobility,” the letter concludes.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

When Idiocy Becomes Hardwired

TUESDAY, DEC 07, 2021 - 05:25 PM
Authored by Jeff Thomas via InternationalMan.com,

At this point, virtually all of us over the age of forty have encountered enough “snowflakes” (those Millennials who have a meltdown if anything they say or believe is challenged) to understand that, increasingly, young people are being systemically coddled to the point that they cannot cope with their “reality” being questioned.


The post-war baby boomers were the first “spoiled” generation, with tens of millions of children raised under the concept that, “I don’t want my children to have to experience the hardships that I faced growing up.”

Those jurisdictions that prospered most (the EU, US, Canada, etc.) were, not coincidentally, the ones where this form of childrearing became most prevalent.

The net result was the ’60s generation – young adults who could be praised for their idealism in pursuing the peace movement, the civil rights movement, and equal rights for women. But those same young adults were spoiled to the degree that many felt that it made perfect sense that they should attend expensive colleges but spend much of their study time pursuing sex, drugs, and rock and roll.

Flunking out or dropping out was not seen as a major issue and very few of them felt any particular guilt about having squandered their parents’ life savings in the process.

The boomer generation then became the yuppies as they hit middle age, and not surprisingly, many coddled their own children even more than they themselves had been coddled.

As a result of ever-greater indulgence with each new generation of children, tens of millions of Millennials now display the result of parents doing all they can to remove every possible hardship from their children’s experience, no matter how small.

Many in their generation never had to do chores, have a paper route, or get good grades in order to be given an exceptional reward, such as a cell phone. They grew to adulthood without any understanding of cause and effect, effort and reward.

Theoretically, the outcome was to be a generation that was free from troubles, free from stress, who would have only happy thoughts. The trouble with this ideal was that, by the time they reached adulthood, many of the critical life’s lessons had been missing from their upbringing.

In the years during which their brains were biologically expanding and developing, they had been hardwired to expect continued indulgence throughout their lives. Any thought that they had was treated as valid, even if it was insupportable in logic.

And, today, we’re witnessing the fruits of this upbringing. Tens of millions of Millennials have never learned the concept of humility. They’re often unable to cope with their thoughts and perceptions being questioned and, in fact, often cannot think outside of themselves to understand the thoughts and perceptions of others.

They tend to be offended extremely easily and, worse, don’t know what to do when this occurs.

They have such a high perception of their own self-importance that they can’t cope with being confronted, regardless of the validity of the other person’s reasoning. How they feel is far more important than logic or fact.

Hypersensitive vulnerability is a major consequence, but a greater casualty is Truth. Truth has gone from being fundamental to being something “optional” – subjective or relative and of lesser importance than someone being offended or hurt.

Of course, it would be easy to simply fob these young adults off as emotional mutants – spiteful narcissists – who cannot survive school without the school’s provision of safe spaces, cookies, puppies, and hug sessions.

Previous generations of students (my own included) were often intimidated when presented with course books that had titles like Elements of Calculus and Analytic Geometry. But such books had their purpose. They were part of what had to be dealt with in order to be prepared for the adult world of ever-expanding technology.

In addition, it was expected that any student be prepared to learn (at university, if he had not already done so at home), to consider all points of view, including those less palatable. In debating classes, he’d be expected to take any side of any argument and argue it as best he could.

In large measure, these requirements have disappeared from institutions of higher learning, and in their place, colleges provide colouring books, Play-Doh, and cry closets.

At the same time as a generation of “snowflakes” is being created, the same jurisdictions that are most prominently creating them (the above-mentioned EU, US, Canada, etc.) are facing, not just a generation of young adults who have a meltdown when challenged in some small way. They’re facing an international economic and political meltdown of epic proportions.

Several generations of business and political leaders have created the greatest “kick the can” bubble that the world has ever witnessed.

We can’t pinpoint the day on which this bubble will pop, but it would appear that we may now be quite close, as those who have been kicking the can have been running out of the means to continue.

The approach of a crisis is doubly concerning, as, historically, whenever generations of older people destroy their economy from within, it invariably falls to the younger generation to dig the country out of the resultant rubble.

Never in history has a crisis of such great proportions loomed and yet, never in history has the unfortunate generation that will inherit the damage been so unequivocally incapable of coping with that damage.

As unpleasant as it may be to accept, there’s no solution for idiocy. Any society that has hardwired a generation of its children to be unable to cope will find that that generation will be a lost one.

It will, in fact, be the following generation – the one that has grown up during the aftermath of the collapse – that will, of necessity, develop the skills needed to cope with an actual recovery.
So, does that mean that the world will be in chaos for more than a generation before the next batch of people can be raised to cope?

Well, no. Actually, that’s already happening. In Europe, where the Millennial trend exists, western Europeans have been growing up coddled and incapable, whilst eastern Europeans, who have experienced war and hardship, are growing up to be quite capable of handling whatever hardships come their way. Likewise, in Asia, the percentage of young people who are being raised to understand that they must soon shoulder the responsibility of the future is quite high.

And elsewhere in the world – outside the sphere of the EU, US, Canada, etc. – the same is largely true.

As has been forever true throughout history, civilisation does not come to a halt. It’s a “movable feast” that merely changes geographic locations from one era to another.

Always, as one star burns out, another takes its place. What’s of paramount importance is to read the tea leaves – to see the future coming and adjust for it.
* * *
Polls suggest that a majority of Millennials now favor socialism. And a growing number favor outright communism. Sometime this year, Millennials are expected to surpass Baby Boomers as the nation’s largest living adult generation. This is one of the reasons Bernie Sanders and other socialists are soaring in popularity. And when the next crisis hits, the situation will likely reach a tipping point. That’s exactly why Doug Casey and his team just released this urgent video outlining exactly what’s going to happen… and how you can protect yourself and even profit from the situation. Click here to watch it now.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Former Harvard President Says ‘Antiracist’ Math Curricula Poses a National Security Threat
By Eric Lendrum
ag-mark_90833ec2.svg

December 7, 2021
On Monday, economist and former President of Harvard University Larry Summers shared a letter declaring that the rising trend of “antiracist” mathematical education in America is a threat to the American economy and national security, according to the Washington Free Beacon.

Summers, who also served as Secretary of the Treasury in the final years of the Clinton presidency, cosigned the letter with 600 other academics, all condemning this new form of education in K-12 schools. The letter says that efforts to force racial awareness into math have sacrificed the value of a strong education in mathematics in order “to reduce achievement gaps.”

Summers described mathematical education as “an economic and national security imperative,” contrasting the current approach in the United States to the one currently taken by China, where “math standards are not subject to continued erosion by social justice warriors who can’t themselves define exponential growth or solve quadratic equations.”

The bizarre push to make math about race has been funded by billionaire leftists such as Bill Gates, who used the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to fund “A Pathway to Equitable Math Instruction,” a nationwide nonprofit initiative asking teachers and schools across the country to consider the possibility that math “is used to uphold capitalist, imperialist, and racist views.”

Among other things, this and other similar efforts have tried to declare that some of the foundational tenets of math in education, such as students showing their work and how they arrived at the correct answer, are racist.

The coalition behind the letter signed by Summers and 600 others, “K12MathMatters,” says that this politicization of math only reduces “access to skills needed for social mobility.”

“While the U.S. K-12 system has much to improve,” the letter reads in part, “the current trends will instead take us further back. Reducing access to advanced mathematics and elevating trendy but shallow courses over foundational skills would cause lasting damage to STEM education in the country.”
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

900+ US professors blast efforts to abolish advanced math in schools to level playing field
8 Dec, 2021 06:06

900+ US professors blast efforts to abolish advanced math in schools to level playing field

School buses line up outside Woodrow Wilson Senior High School as students return to in-person classes in Los Angeles, California, August 30, 2021 © Reuters / Mike Blake

Hundreds of American college professors have signed an open letter criticizing the campaign to get rid of advanced mathematics in schools, as activists attempt to create more equality by reducing student “achievement gaps.”

Warning that the US would be put at a disadvantage internationally, 911 professors in math, science, and engineering – including professors from Ivy League universities such as Harvard and Yale – expressed their opposition to proposed policies that would make all students take the same level of mathematics regardless of their skills.

“We are deeply concerned about the unintended consequences of recent well-intentioned approaches to reform mathematics education, particularly the California Mathematics Framework,” the open letter said, claiming that “such frameworks aim to reduce achievement gaps by limiting the availability of advanced mathematical courses to middle schoolers and beginning high schoolers.”

California unveils new woke math program, encouraging teachers to punish good students by holding them back READ MORE: California unveils new woke math program, encouraging teachers to punish good students by holding them back

Since the beginning of the year, the proposed changes in California have caused a wave of debate in the US, with campaigners calling for similar reforms in other states.

The professors pointed out that “while such reforms superficially seem ‘successful’ at reducing disparities at the high school level, they are merely ‘kicking the can’ to college,” where students will have to spend more time catching up on introductory mathematics, delaying their graduation.

They also warned that the reforms would disadvantage public school children “compared with their international and private-school peers,” and could result in a “de facto privatization of advanced mathematics K-12 education” which shuts children from less wealthy families out.
Subjecting the children of our largest state to such an experiment is the height of irresponsibility… While the US K-12 system has much to improve, the current trends will instead take us further back
Efforts to reform the California Mathematics Framework (CMF) by getting rid of advanced mathematics pathways from middle and high schools have proved extremely controversial.

Campaigners in favor of the reforms have argued that it is a necessary change to address the underrepresentation of black and Latino students in advanced math programs, while campaigners in opposition have argued that they hold students back and set a lower standard.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

EXCLUSIVE LEAKED VIDEO: Coast Guard Collaborate with Leftwing Hack to Indoctrinate Guardsmen on Leftist Propaganda in Forced 2-Hour Zoom Meeting Training

By Jim Hoft
Published December 8, 2021 at 2:00pm
9F7349F2-BB2D-44FE-8B13-6E098DE9AFBF-scaled.jpeg


The Gateway Pundit obtained an exclusive video from a US Coast Guard training.

In the video high-ranking Admiral Brian Penoyer, who oversees District 11 Unit in the Coast Guard, uses taxpayer money to force Coast Guardsmen in this district to undergo 2 hours of politically one-sided and biased indoctrination under the guise of “identifying misinformation on social media” during a Zoom meeting.

The Eleventh Coast Guard District encompasses the states of California, Arizona, Nevada, and Utah, the coastal and offshore waters out over a thousand miles, and the offshore waters of Mexico and Central America down to South America.

Members of the US Coast Guard who are stationed in California were given mandatory training last December 3rd. The training was given to them via Zoom. The 11th Coast Guard District Commander teamed up with the News Literacy Project (NLP) on how to identify misinformation/disinformation on the internet. The training was presented by NLP’s senior director of professional learning, John Silva.

News Literacy Project (NLP) describes itself as “a nonpartisan national education nonprofit, provides programs and resources for educators and the public to teach, learn and share the abilities needed to be smart, active consumers of news and information and equal and engaged participants in a democracy.” At least that’s who they claim to be on their website.

NLP’s website claims to be non-partisan. Yet, a quick search through their website and you can find documentation of their media partners and regular donors throughout the years including CNN, Reuters, AP, WaPo, MSNBC, NPR, Washington Post, Rockefeller Foundation, and many other fake news mainstream media outlets.

How ironic, they’re partnering with the same media who gave zero skepticism to the Russiagate hoax or the obviously fake Trump dossier or Jussie Smollett or Nick Sandmann’s accuser or Kyle Rittenhouse’s prosecutors or “Let’s Go Brandon” chant or any number of fake news media episodes that left-wing outlets pushed on the gullible American public and never apologized for.

According to the whistleblower, most of the training was about identifying obvious fake news memes on the internet, etc.

However, towards the middle of the training, John Silva switched gears and started spewing propaganda without displaying facts or research to back up his claims.

According to our whistleblower source:
“It soon became obvious that this “training” was set up by the D11 Commander to pressure/shame military members who are vaccine-hesitant into getting the Covid-19 jab. The speaker claimed it was dangerous that this misinformation has gotten to military members which prevented them from willingly taking this vaccine. He also stated misinformation has compromised national security by us not getting vaccinated. All of the fact-checking examples were one-sided and blatantly left-leaning.”

“It seems that military leadership is attempting to indoctrinate their subordinates into only having the views/beliefs that they possess by teaming up with an obviously left-leaning organization and require us to sit through two hours of propaganda under the guise of “news and social media literacy”.”

“Overall, it’s worrisome that a high-ranking admiral who is in charge of District 11 (California mostly) in the Coast Guard is using taxpayer money to force Coast Guardsmen in this district to undergo 2 hours of politically one-sided indoctrination under the guise of “identifying misinformation on social media.”
At the 1:39 mark, John Silva was saying that because of misinformation, there are now members of the Armed forces who are refusing to be vaccinated. He added that misinformation on the safety and efficacy of vaccines can be a threat to unit security and national security.

At the 14:00 mark, Silva said that some of the disinformation is trying to erode our trust in our elections, in our political system, in our government, and our elected officials.

At the 20:00 mark, he said that there’s a lot of disinformation and conspiracy theories about the security of the 2020 election.

At 22:10, he showed a screenshot of a “homeopathic doctor who is trying to gain business by posting misinformation on Instagram about efficacy off face masks, vaccines” He accused the doctor of sharing misinformation just to rise up as an influencer.

At mark 23:23, he said that America’s Frontline Doctors are not all medical doctors some of them are chiropractors, homeopathic doctors, etc. And as a group, they are generating anti-vaccine disinformation and pushing alternative treatments like Ivermectin, the Horse Paste, as well as HCQ, treatments that do nothing to treat COVID-19 or provide any kind of immunity.

He accused them that everything they do is about raising their prominence.

At mark 25:41, he presented two screenshots of two people claiming that Ivermectin is a legitimate cure and how it helped them beat COVID-19 as an example of altruistic people.

He accused Tik-Tok of having a major conspiracy theory problem.

There are more interesting topics John Silva mentioned on the training that are all leftist propaganda until the end.

This is the filth they are using to indoctrinate our military today.

Disgusting.

Rumble video on website 56:59 min
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Minnesota Family Is Threatened by Wicked Leftist Neighbor for Putting Up Christmas Lights

By Jim Hoft
Published December 8, 2021 at 7:45am
christmas-lights-1-e1638941694121.jpg

File image of Christmas lights

This photo was just sent to a prominent Republican from Minnesota. She forwarded it to The Gateway Pundit.

The letter shows what a St. Anthony resident received in the mail.

st.-anthony-minnesota-threat.jpg


Saint Anthony was a lovely, quiet neighborhood near Minneapolis.

This disgusting letter represents pure intolerant Marxism seeking to overthrow the Christian religion.

Our friend told them to send a copy of the letter to local law enforcement, the county attorney, the Minnesota State Attorney General’s office, the Governor’s office and claim this is hate speech, harassment, and intimidation.

This Minnesota family should demand protection for their free speech rights.

If we don’t resist, this intimidation will become reality.

I’m thankful you can still tell the truth.

1639011058784.png
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Conservatives Flex Muscles to Kill Woke Provisions from Defense Bill
3
WASHINGTON, DC - AUGUST 23: U.S. Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX) speaks during a news conference on the infrastructure bill with fellow members of the House Freedom Caucus, outside the Capitol Building on August 23, 2021 in Washington, DC. The group criticized the bill for being too expensive and for supporting …
Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images
KRISTINA WONG8 Dec 202115

Conservatives took a victory lap this week after flexing their muscles to kill progressive provisions in the defense bill that authorizes the Pentagon’s yearly budget and activities.

During negotiations with the Senate on a final version of the National Defense Authorization Act, conservatives were able to extract key concessions from Democrats that would have been huge victories for the Biden administration’s woke military agenda.

As it originally stood, the 2022 National Defense Authorization Act would have required women to register for the draft, allowed military courts to confiscate firearms from service members without due process, and created a new office in the Pentagon to focus on “extremists” in the military.

And although there was a provision authored by Rep. Mark Green (R-TN) to ban service members from being dishonorably discharged for declining the COVID-19 vaccine, the Biden administration had called for it to be removed.

But conservatives in Congress succeeded in killing those provisions and maintaining the ban on dishonorable discharges during negotiations with the Senate on the compromise version of the bill, which was released Tuesday evening and passed by House.

Freedom Caucus member Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX) has been credited for leading the fight against the draft provision in the House.

He said in a statement Tuesday evening that the bill still “contains and extends far too many troubling provisions that advance wokeism at the expense of military excellence,” but said he is “extremely grateful for the hard work of my Republican colleagues to dramatically improve this bill.” He said:
In particular, I am grateful that the provisions that would draft my daughter along with other young women across the country were removed from the legislation. This is a drastic improvement and I want to thank Senators [Josh] Hawley, [Mike] Lee, & [Tom] Cotton, [Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy and [House Armed Services Committee Ranking Member Mike] Rogers, and a number of my other colleagues, particularly those in the House Freedom Caucus who are always willing to do the hard work of fighting for the people while some others often just talk about it.
Credit is also due to those who worked to remove the so-called ‘office of extremism,’ as well as gun-grabbing ‘red flag’ laws that would trample upon our service members’ Second Amendment rights. A nation founded on certain unalienable rights should never seek to infringe those rights.
He also said he was grateful to Green for his provision to eliminate dishonorable discharges for troops declining the vaccine.

Green, another member of the House Freedom Caucus and a combat veteran, said in a statement, “We must always stand for our brave men and women in uniform all around this world. These victories are a testament to everyday Americans all across the nation who made their voices heard in the halls of Congress.”

The House Freedom Caucus officially urged its 49 members to vote against the NDAA as early as September.

Heritage Action, the advocacy arm of the conservative think tank Heritage Foundation, also played a large role behind the scenes in getting the draft provision scrapped, tapping a network of two million grassroots activists across the country who made calls to members, drafted letters to the editor, and showed up to events.

Heritage Action Executive Director Jessica Anderson said:
We have been advocating against really any provision around Draft our Daughters as far back actually as 2013. What made the effort this year different than years in the past, are really two things. One, you had grassroots Americans, moms, women…speaking out against this. That wave of opposition from the grassroots made this become a priority issue for the negotiators.

Two, a lot of members waking up that they can’t allow any form of a woke agenda to interject in places it doesn’t need to be. This was clearly a woke effort that did nothing for the military, it did nothing for women, it was entirely a social engineering ploy from the left to get it into the NDAA. It had nothing to do with supporting our troops, bolstering our national defense, and it hadn’t even really been properly debated.
Anderson credited Roy for his efforts. “He was sounding the alarm bells against this for as long as we have.” She also credited Sens. Josh Hawley (R-MO) and Mike Lee (R-UT) for leading the fight against the provision in the Senate. She credited groups including Concerned Women for America, Family Research Council, and Eagle Forum. She said:
When you actually have all the forces lining up, grassroots and a willing champion or lawmaker on Capitol Hill, like we had with our partners Hawley, Lee and Chip Roy, that’s when we actually have the ability to get something done, and that’s a huge takeaway for conservative activists, because this is how we can get stuff done while Republicans are in the minority.
The defense bill caused a row between some Republicans in Congress.

Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-TX) called the House Freedom Caucus “grifters” during an event on Sunday and defended his support for the original House version of the NDAA, which included the red flag provision, arguing that “everyone knew” there was already a deal to take it out of the final version of the bill and that he was the “only member of Congress” with a bill to outlaw federal red flag laws.

After the Lincoln Project highlighted his remarks in a tweet and tagged some members of the Freedom Caucus, Crenshaw accused them of trying to “stir shit up” and said he did not name any members.

Rep. Warren Davidson (R-OH) fired back at Crenshaw, tweeting:
Who told you this was a good idea @DanCrenshawTX? Neo-conservative is just another way of saying ‘not conservative.’ Every actual conservative scorecard exposes these lies. Actual conservatives oppose bankrupting America, spying on Americans, and crony surveillance capitalism.
Who told you this was a good idea @DanCrenshawTX?

Neo-Conservative is just another way of saying “not conservative”

Every actual conservative scorecard exposes these lies. Actual conservatives oppose bankrupting America, spying on Americans, and crony surveillance capitalism. https://t.co/Uu7dqiBsWc
— Warren Davidson (@WarrenDavidson) December 7, 2021

Several House Freedom Caucus members still voted against the final bill for not taking out more woke provisions, including Roy, who said, “While these egregious provisions were rightfully stripped, I still could not support the final version of the bill.”

“Rather than focusing solely on its core purpose to strengthen our national security, this NDAA fails to hold the Pentagon accountable in any meaningful way for the disaster in Afghanistan and thirteen killed marines, advances [Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity] and gender identity policies and programs while continuing to fund CRT and diversity officers, and continues to fund and advance climate literacy trainings,” he said.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Alito Raises Critical Race Theory in Supreme Court Argument over Maine
1
Samuel Alito (Erin Schaff-Pool / Getty)
Erin Schaff-Pool / Getty
JOEL B. POLLAK8 Dec 202171

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito raised the issue of Critical Race Theory during oral arguments in the case of Carson v. Makin, which tests a Maine law that provides subsidies for parents to send children to school, except “sectarian” schools.

The existing law provides that the subsidy can only be used for tuition in a school if that school is “a nonsectarian school in accordance with the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.”

During oral argument, the justices questioned Chief Deputy Attorney General Christopher Taub about the meaning of the word “sectarian” (as opposed to “religious”) and about whether there were any other restrictions on the use of state funding to provide subsidies or vouchers to hypothetical schools.

Taub argued the law should be upheld because the state government of Maine is allowed to promote “religious neutrality.” Alito questioned that premise, and asked whether the state could fund a school that “inculcates a purely materialistic view of life. Taub admitted: “Now it’s possible that, you know, down the road some school might pop up that is teaching something else, not religion but something else, say, Marxism or Leninism or, you know, white supremacy.
Clearly, those kinds of schools would be doing something completely inconsistent with a public education.”

Taub also admitted that the current law would not prevent such schools from being funded, but that “if a white supremacy school tried to participate in Maine’s program, the legislature would swiftly act to say, no, you know, beyond being religiously neutral, you also can’t teach principles of — of — of hatred.”

Alito then asked whether a school that taught religious tolerance would be ineligible, since it was a belief that involved religion. Justice Elena Kagan then asked whether Taub was confident that a school that taught white supremacy would never be funded; Taub reiterated that he was certain the legislature would act in that situation.

The following exchange then took place:
JUSTICE ALITO: Would you say the same thing about a school that teaches critical race theory?
MR. TAUB: Whether that school would be eligible?
JUSTICE ALITO: Yeah.
MR. TAUB: So I think that that is something that the legislature would have to look at. I mean, that one’s closer because, frankly, I don’t — I don’t really know exactly what it means to teach critical race theory. So I think — I think the Maine legislature would have to look at what that actually means. But — but I — I will say this, that — that if — that — that if teaching critical race theory is — is — is antithetical to a public education, then the legislature would likely address that.
As Breitbart News has explained for nearly a decade, Critical Race Theory is the belief that race is fundamental to American society, and that white supremacy is deeply ingrained in American institutions, including the Constitution. As such, efforts to establish legal racial equality cannot possibly eliminate racism.

Only transforming American society itself, possibly through the addition of socioeconomic rights to the Constitution, can the U.S. redeem itself from the original sin of white supremacy.

The plaintiffs are a pair of parents in Maine, as their petition to the Supreme Court explained:
Both families live in a school district that neither operates a public secondary school nor contracts with a particular secondary school for the education of its resident secondary students. Accordingly, the Carsons and Nelsons are entitled to the tuition assistance benefit. Because of the sectarian exclusion, however, neither family can use the benefit at the school they believe is best for their child.
The First Circuit upheld Maine’s law.

The case is Caron v. Makin, Docket No. 20-1088.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Monday, December 06, 2021
NYT publishes a racist screed

RXgbfcGJ

Erin Aubry Kaplan is a journalist and author who grew up in the South Central section of Los Angeles and nearby Inglewood. She doesn't want any white people moving to Inglewood. She is OK with Latinos moving in.

But white people, stay out.

She doesn't want white people coming into her neighborhood with their white people ways and their white people's food and their white people smell.

In a column in the New York Times, Kaplan wrote of building "one of those little free-standing library boxes that dot lawns in bedroom communities around the country."

Her reasoning behind the friendly library was rather unfriendly.

She wrote, "Why not? A library is not so much a marker of wealth and whiteness as it is an affirmation of community and cozy, small-town camaraderie that Inglewood, a mostly black and Latino city in southwestern Los Angeles County, has plenty of. We deserved no less.

"Pre-pandemic, Inglewood was gentrifying, another reason I’d been inspired to do the library: I wanted to signal to my longtime neighbors that we had our own ideas about improvement, and could carry them out in our own way."

Gentrification means white people moving in.

Liberals never quite say that, but it is what they mean.

Stick to your own kind.

She wrote, "one morning, glancing out my front window, I saw a young white couple stopped at the library. Instantly, I was flooded with emotions — astonishment, and then resentment, and then astonishment at my resentment. It all converged into a silent scream in my head of, Get off my lawn!

"The moment jolted me into realizing some things I’m not especially proud of. I had set out this library for all who lived here, and even for those who didn’t, in theory. I would not want to restrict anyone from looking at it or taking books, based on race or anything else. But while I had seen white newcomers to the neighborhood here and there, the truth was, I hadn’t set it out to appeal to white residents."

She is like a Klansman putting up a basketball hoop and watching a black player show up.
Oh the horror!

She wrote, "By bringing this modern cultural artifact here from white neighborhoods, had I set myself up, set up the neighborhood? Was I contributing to gentrification and sending the wrong message about how I wanted the neighborhood to be?

"What I resented was not this specific couple. It was their whiteness, and my feelings of helplessness at not knowing how to maintain the integrity of a black space that I had created. I was seeing up close how fragile that space can be, how its meaning can be changed in my mind, even by people who have no conscious intention to change it. That library was on my lawn, but for that moment it became theirs. I built it and drove it into the ground because I love books and always have. But I suddenly felt that I could not own even this, something that was clearly and intimately mine."

Black space.
A lending library that is clearly and intimately hers.

She may be a nice lady, but she (or at least this column) is racist. I know, some of her best friends are white.

Kaplan used long ago sins by long dead people against equally dead people to rationalize the hatred of white people she described in her column.

She wrote, "As the couple wandered on, no books in hand, I thought about how fragile my feeling of being settled is. It didn’t matter that I own my house, as many of my neighbors do.

Generations of racism, Jim Crow, disinvestment and redlining have meant that we don’t really control our own spaces. In that moment, I had been overwhelmed by a kind of fear, one that’s connected to the historical reality of black people being run off the land they lived on, expelled by force, high prices or some whim of white people.

"One of the most famous examples of that displacement happened several miles south of Inglewood. Bruce’s Beach, a black-owned resort, once thrived along the coast of tony Manhattan Beach, until it was seized by eminent domain in 1924 by white city officials."

Kaplan was not around 97 years ago.

Her hatred of white people is remarkably sad for a woman who is so accomplished in life.
I kept hoping for a happy ending, where she comes to grips with the fact that she views white people as a monolithic group whose sole purpose is to make her life miserable.

But she just kept on a-hating.

As I read her piece, I started hearing the Temptations singing, ""Ball of Confusion (That's What the World Is Today)."
People moving out, people moving in
Why, because of the color of their skin
Run, run, run but you sure can't hide
Kaplan ended her piece, "My little library, affirming as it is, is also an illusion; it can’t save our neighborhood. Still, in 2021, it has become increasingly important to maintain and grow black space, on its own terms. As I watched the white couple peruse my little library, the most complicated feeling of all was the brief, bittersweet satisfaction I took in watching them drawn to my lawn, and to my idea. It felt empowering and hopeful on the one hand, defeating on the other.

"So what message do I hope they took from my library? The same message I wanted to send to the rest of my neighbors, my community: Black presence has value — in every sense of the word, and on its own terms.

"That value should make the casual displacement of black people untenable, even immoral. And that will take much more than a little library to rectify."

If you cannot handle having a white couple using a little library you set up, then maybe you have not matured as a person. Maybe you are the female black Archie Bunker who is hellbent on not living next door to a person of another color.

Whether she meant to or not, she made the segregationist's argument.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

EXCLUSIVE: North Carolina Parents Identify Over 100 Book Titles Containing Obscene Content, File CRIMINAL Charges Against Wake County School Board (PHOTOS)

By Jordan Conradson
Published December 9, 2021 at 8:30am
AC868EAF-5F3A-47CC-ACC5-9F221DB17729.jpeg


“George” about a biological boy who wants to “remove his genitals,” Found In 60 Wake County K-12 Schools

Parents in Wake County, North Carolina have filed charges against school board officials for the lewd content that they have discovered in children’s school books.

The parents paid a visit to the Wake County District Attorney’s office today, “to follow up on the criminal complaints against the Wake County Public School System”.

The same leftist mob that canceled Dr. Suess is forcing sexually explicit content onto children as young as four.

The Gateway Pundit reported on one of these school books, “Lawn Boy”, which references 10-year old fourth-graders engaging in homosexual actions and using language like “his little salamander between my fourth-grade fingers rapidly engorging with blood”.


A concerned mother told her school board, “Who normalizes sex acts between fourth graders? I’ll tell you who. Pedophiles.”

Lt. Governor of North Carolina Mark Robinson recently exposed this trash in public schools.


Robinson calls out the book titled ‘George,’ which is about a biological boy who wants to “remove his genitals,” ‘Lawn Boy’, referenced above, and, a book called ‘Genderqueer’ that shows disgusting images of oral sex.

Obviously, none of these books should be in the classroom with young children.

Outraged leftists have called for Robinson’s resignation after he exposed the disgusting content that is forced onto children.

Rightfully outraged parents have called for an investigation into the disgusting school board members.


They released this press release, yesterday.
December 08, 2021
Contact: Michele Morrow
(984) 223-1567
michelemorrow2013@gmail.com
OBSCENITY CHARGES FILED AGAINST WCPSS

Parents submit complaint for distribution of pornographic materials to students
A group of concerned citizens paid an unannounced visit to the Wake County’s District Attorney’s office today, to follow up on the criminal complaints against the Wake County Public School System (WCPSS) for providing obscene materials to school children as young as five. Today, the group met with both a representative for the District Attorney’s office as well as the Sheriff’s office to present additional evidence and several physical copies of the books in questions.
“It should be shocking and alarming to everyone to know that sexually explicit material including graphic pictures, is available through Wake County Public Schools, digitally and in hard copy. Our school children are being exploited, and this is considered grooming,” said Michele Morrow. “We must remove every sexually explicit material from our public school system and fire every adult who was responsible for those books being placed in our libraries, or has presented them in our classrooms.”
WCPSS offers school children digital and hard copy access to books such as George, Lawn Boy, Gender Queer, and Blankets – A Graphic Novel, which contain text passages and/or illustrations that meet the definition of North Carolina State Statute 14-190.1 on obscene literature and exhibitions, including explicit oral sex. Their dissemination to minors further violates both this statute and US Federal Law (US Code 18 Section 1470) in reference to the transfer of obscene material to minors. The content of the books ranges from descriptive to illustrated portrayals of sexual acts involving minors and other obscene acts including children urinating on one another.
These books, as well as other titles found, cover various topics including but not limited to heterosexual, homosexual, incestuous, and violent sexual acts, often depicting children. Books available to children as young as 5 years old are introducing terms such as pornography.
On Tuesday November 30, this group of concerned parents and citizens filed criminal complaints with the Wake Sheriff’s Office regarding the dissemination of obscene literature in WCPSS including elementary, middle and high schools.
A total of 8 complaints on this matter were filed, not on the basis of sexual orientation in the books, but because of the obscene content.
“The obscene nature of these books is a dangerous tool in our school system which leaves our children vulnerable to sexual exploitation. The portrayals of sexual acts involving minors in these books serves to normalize this type of behavior,” said Beatrice Setnik. “There is no educational merit to this type of material and one must conclude this is a grooming tool to sexualize our most innocent and vulnerable members of society. It is the duty of all citizens, public servants, and elected officials including Superintendent Cathy Moore and the Wake County School Board, to protect all children in our communities.”
Over 100 book titles containing obscene content have been identified and the group is diligently working with the Sheriff’s office to document the content. Concerned citizens are encouraged to provide evidence and raise awareness.
A parent shared a Wake County School book catalog with The Gateway Pundit that shows what schools in Wake County are carrying these books.

Below are photos of the profane and sexually obscene content.

(Long list - see website for the rest EXCLUSIVE: North Carolina Parents Identify Over 100 Book Titles Containing Obscene Content, File CRIMINAL Charges Against Wake County School Board (PHOTOS) )
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

PARENTS UNITE! Rockwood District Parents Walk Unmasked Children Into School

By Jim Hoft
Published December 9, 2021 at 2:50pm

Attorney General Eric Schmidt called on Missouri families to report on schools that are violating the state’s ruling by continuing to enforce a mask mandate on children.

Eric Schmidt sent this out earlier this week.

eric-schmitt-school.jpg


According to Local 5News.
Schmitt sent letters Tuesday with details about last month’s ruling. Cole County Circuit Judge Daniel Green ruled that health orders issued by local health authorities in Missouri are illegal and should be lifted. He said the orders violate the Missouri Constitution’s separation of powers clause affecting the executive, legislative and judicial branches of government.

Green ordered all existing health orders issued by local health officials are “null and void.”

Schmitt’s letter to health departments and schools demands they “rescind and cease enforcement and publicizing of public health orders, mask mandates, quarantine orders, or other orders that were declared null and void by the recent decision.”
On Thursday a group of parents escorted their maskless students into a local St. Louis County school.

The parents have had enough of the tyranny.


stl-students-mask-school.jpg
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

  • Home
  • 2021
  • December
  • 9
  • BOMBSHELL: In court filing, Facebook admits ‘fact checks’ are nothing more than opinion

BAD SCIENCE JOURNALISM
BOMBSHELL: In court filing, Facebook admits ‘fact checks’ are nothing more than opinion

1 day ago
Anthony Watts
Facebook has admitted in a court of law that such fact checks are not factual at all, but merely opinions.

People send me stuff.

As we have previously reported, journalist John Stossel is suing Facebook after Facebook’s ‘fact checkers’ labeled climate change information that Stossel posted as “false and misleading”. In the middle of all this is the nefarious website “Climate Feedback” which has a bunch of climate zealots that write up what they claim are “fact checks” for articles, videos, and news stories they disagree with.

Facebook just blew the “fact check” claim right out of the water in court.

In its response to Stossel’s defamation claim, Facebook responds on Page 2, Line 8 in the court document (download it below) that Facebook cannot be sued for defamation (which is making a false and harmful assertion) because its ‘fact checks’ are mere statements of opinion rather than factual assertions.

Opinions are not subject to defamation claims, while false assertions of fact can be subject to defamation. The quote in Facebook’s complaint is,

“The labels themselves are neither false nor defamatory; to the contrary, they constitute protected opinion.”

Facebook-fact-check-is-simply-opinion-Screenshot-2021-12-09-720x285.png


So, in a court of law, in a legal filing, Facebook admits that its ‘fact checks’ are not really ‘fact’ checks at all, but merely ‘opinion assertions.’

This strikes me as public relations disaster, and possibly a looming legal disaster for Facebook, PolitiFact, Climate Feedback and other left-leaning entities that engage in biased “fact checking.”

Such “fact checks” are now shown to be simply an agenda to supress free speech and the open discussion of science by disguising liberal media activism as something supposedly factual, noble, neutral, trustworthy, and based on science.

It is none of those.

Here is the court filing:

Facebook-admits-its-fact-check-is-opinion-page-2Download
 
Top