SCI JWST – Cosmic Dust Proves Arp Invariably Right (foundational red-shift axiom at basis of big bang theory is thus disproved)

bw

Fringe Ranger
If those distant galaxies were speeding away, you’d have two dimming effects. The red shift and the ever-increasing distance.
I confess to being ignorant in this area. I don't see why red shifting should cause dimming. Red shifting causing dimming seems to be saying that light from red shifted objects is going slower relative to us, and I thought the speed of light in a vacuum was a constant.
 

jward

passin' thru
I confess to being ignorant in this area. I don't see why red shifting should cause dimming. Red shifting causing dimming seems to be saying that light from red shifted objects is going slower relative to us, and I thought the speed of light in a vacuum was a constant.
I too happen to be in mid-review o' the cosmology of the origins o' the universe, and will need a quiet, stressfree moment or three to digest these arguments and sort the wheat from the chaff.

As per your precise point/? re: why red shift would cause dimming, this is the article I'm mulling at the moment (tho I'm not certain it answers my own, let alone your, questions):

Cosmology, cosmic dust, and stellar dimming​


Author: Chuck. S. Matthias csmphysics9@gmail.comAuthors Info & Affiliations
Publication: Canadian Journal of Physics
23 March 2016
https://doi.org/10.1139/cjp-2015-0732 Cosmology, cosmic dust, and stellar dimming


4. Conclusion

Equations are derived that describe the space–time behaviour of our universe from its origin at t = 0 to the present. In early cosmic time, the universe was small and photons circled it rapidly and randomly, as did BAO, maintaining a thermodynamic equilibrium, negating the need for “inflation”, and possibly the need for “dark matter”. A third postulate, “dark energy”, is also negated because the supernovae stellar dimming is readily explained by cosmic dust. (Dark matter and dark energy are so far undetectable, even though they are purported to make up 95% of the universe energy content.)


The concept and the equations are simple and show excellent agreement with BAO Hubble parameter data. The agreement is such that there is no need to seek corrections in either the data or the model. We also have good agreement with the large NED-D data set of which we used 27 000 records of luminosity distance and redshift. When the model is modified to include photon quenching by cosmic dust, the agreement with the core data are excellent. All stellar variables have been described as analytical functions of redshift alone. The simplicity and accuracy of the models suggest that the universe is well behaved, finite, unbounded, and in a steady expansion. Even signals from the most remote stars, receding at superluminal speeds, can be received and interpreted.


Occam, Newton, Leibniz, and others concluded that of two reasonable explanations, the one requiring the fewest assumptions is most likely to be correct. This principle favours dimming by cosmic dust over dimming by expansion acceleration.


The universe is closed, with positive curvature, but will continue to expand forever because the universe mass has no effect on the growth of space.

This cosmology structure gives a lucid description of the universe topology, growth, stellar recession, and photon pathways not from stars “far out in an infinite universe”, but from stars “deep within a finite universe”.
 
Last edited:

Double_A

TB Fanatic
Just too bad that TV series Big Bang whatever ... is not still around, I'd like to see how they would have Sheldon handle this news.
 
Top