Indictments Forthcoming shortly .. is there ANY honesty in bush admin?

stillprepping

Membership Revoked
i think not.


WHITE HOUSE KNOWS ABOUT INDICTMENTS

Friday, October 21, 2005 - FreeMarketNews.com

The Wayne Madsen Report states that the White House is now fully informed about the nature and scope of the indictments handed down by Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald this week. He cited a report of Attorney General Albert Gonzalez holding a meeting with Fitzgerald on Wednesday, at which the AG was briefed on the prosecutor's findings, and the Grand Jury was released after brief questions.

Madsen quotes "informed sources in Washington," as saying that Vice President Dick Cheney's Chief of Staff, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, is expected to resign after his indictment, for his role in outing a covert CIA agent, Valerie Plame Wilson, wife of Ambassador Joseph Wilson. He points to the phony terrorist threats in New York City and Baltimore as examples of how "the Bush White House is hopelessly diverting the public's attention away from the inevitability of a major October political scandal involving high level resignations following indictments of key administration officials."

He also notes the successful manipulation of the beginning of Saddam Hussein's trial in Iraq, as one more effort "to divert attention from Leakgate," with the postponement of those sessions to the end of November, leaving, as he puts it, "a story waiting on the shelf to be pulled off again when pre-trial hearings may begin in Leakgate." - ST

staff reports - Free-Market News Network
 

CeeBee

Inactive
I'd like to know why the perps have to wait until they are caught, before they do the "honorable" thing and resign. I mean, if what they did was illegal and wrong and they feel they now must resign, would it be OK if they stayed on (even if they knew they did the "bad thing" anyway), if they didn't get caught?
 

RobinYyes

Deceased
CeeBee said:
I'd like to know why the perps have to wait until they are caught, before they do the "honorable" thing and resign. I mean, if what they did was illegal and wrong and they feel they now must resign, would it be OK if they stayed on (even if they knew they did the "bad thing" anyway), if they didn't get caught?


Now that's interesting....Did you make the same statement about Clinton and perjury...he too was a 'perp'. :rolleyes: Funny to see the sharks trolling around for any drop of blood they can find.
 

BigDog

Membership Revoked
RobinYyes said:
Now that's interesting....Did you make the same statement about Clinton and perjury...he too was a 'perp'. :rolleyes: Funny to see the sharks trolling around for any drop of blood they can find.

As Dennis would say "you mam or a complete ass and a PoS Putz"
 

BoneDaddy

Membership Revoked
RobinYyes said:
Funny to see the sharks trolling around for any drop of blood they can find.

Hmmmmm.....So you condone sleep overs with GAY MALE PROSTITUES?
Nice......
 

stillprepping

Membership Revoked
"Now that's interesting....Did you make the same statement about Clinton and perjury...he too was a 'perp'. Funny to see the sharks trolling around for any drop of blood they can find."

what even funnier is to see people attempt to distract from a thread by always bringing up other officials who may or may not have been indicted. as if that has anything to do with whats currently going on in the white house.


why was a thread on the madsen report moved off the main forum?
 

F.Drew

Membership Revoked
Nice to see that for major national-level crimes involving the GOP, fellow politicians (ie criminals) get all the breaks... nice treatment at your choice of booking facilities, at your convenience, nice photographs, and of course, lots of advance notice of being indicted, so they can "clean" their houses (and computers...).

Everyone else gets the JBT kicking in their door at 4:30 am, pictures in their pajamas, no comb to fix your hair, remodeled home interior after the JBTs "search" their houses, and lots-o-publicity and wanton speculation.

Hmmmm....
 

HeliumAvid

Too Tired to ReTire
Just think, we tossed Spiro and Nixon and got Ford, maybe we will get Rice and Powel, now wouldn't that be interesting.

HeliumAvid
 

Dixielee

Veteran Member
HeliumAvid said:
Just think, we tossed Spiro and Nixon and got Ford, maybe we will get Rice and Powel, now wouldn't that be interesting.

HeliumAvid

I think who we "get" is less important than the message we send that crime and corruption will not be tolerated in the US highest office. If we let it go, it only says we condone it. I would say that no matter who was in office or what office it was.

Our "leaders" do need to be held to a higher standard. Yes, they live under a microscope, all the more reason to be sure we elect people of character, integrity and a spirit of service. Maybe I am living in a dream world.
 

ferret

Membership Revoked
Dixielee said:
I think who we "get" is less important than the message we send that crime and corruption will not be tolerated in the US highest office. If we let it go, it only says we condone it. I would say that no matter who was in office or what office it was.

Our "leaders" do need to be held to a higher standard. Yes, they live under a microscope, all the more reason to be sure we elect people of character, integrity and a spirit of service. Maybe I am living in a dream world.


A voice of reason. Thank you.
 

stillprepping

Membership Revoked
Is Fitzgerald running an impeachment probe next?

we're getting closer and closer ... i can feel it in my bones. i just want to know:

why is MY post about possible white house indictments any MORE political than others of the same subject being posted???

this aint political at all .. THIS IS NEWS!!!


Is Fitzgerald running an impeachment probe next?
Dems Tap Patrick Fitzgerald for Impeachment Probe

Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee are so pleased with reports that Leakgate prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald is about to indict senior White House officials that they want him to lead an impeachment investigation into whether President Bush lied to Congress about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction.

"The CIA leak issue is only the tip of the iceberg,” House Judiciary Democrat Jerrold Nadler complains in a message posted to his web site.

In a letter asking the Justice Department to expand the scope of Fitzgerald's investigation, Nadler says: "We now have reason to believe that high crimes may have been committed at the highest level [and] wrongdoing that may have led us to war and imperiled our national security.”

If there is evidence that Bush or Cheney authorized aides to deliberately mislead lawmakers, Nadler told Congressional Quarterly: "That would be an impeachable offense.'"


The Manhattan Democrat is asking Acting Deputy Attorney General Robert McCallum to direct Fitzgerald to probe efforts by the White House to discredit critics of the Iraq war like former Ambassador Joe Wilson.

Nadler wants Fitzgerald to determine whether attacks on Wilson were part of a "broader conspiracy knowingly to mislead Congress into authorizing a war."

Even before leaks from Fitzgerald's investigation indicated he planned indictments, Rep. Maurice Hinchey let slip the Democrats' plan to impeach Bush for alleged Iraq war lies.

In quotes picked up by the Ithaca Journal, Hinchey said in August: "My greatest hope is that all of these things will be revealed, they will be revealed in a very direct and legal context, and that in 2006 a Democratic majority will be elected to the House of Representatives, and in February of [2007] impeachment proceedings will begin."

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/...22/234208.shtml
 

SouthernGal

"Don't retreat...reload"
Sitting on pins and needles here. Maybe Jorge's smirking will be toned down a bit now.

Dixielee - once again I agree with everything you wrote.
 
Top