Donald Trump Booed By Conservative Crowd After Attacks on Ted Cruz

JohnGaltfla

#NeverTrump
Donald Trump Booed By Conservative Crowd After Attacks on Ted Cruz

by Alex Jaffe
NBC NEWS
01.16.2016 7:48 PM

MYRTLE BEACH, S.C. — Among conservatives, Donald Trump can typically do no wrong — until he attacks Ted Cruz.

On Saturday, Trump drew boos from a grassroots conservative crowd during remarks at the South Carolina Tea Party Coalition Convention for his attack on Cruz's previously undisclosed loans.

"You give a campaign contribution to Ted Cruz, you get whatever the hell you want," he said, before boos erupted from the crowd.

Trump went on as the boos grew louder: "Say whatever you want, it's okay, he didn't report his bank loans. He's got bank loans from Goldman Sachs, he's got bank loans from Citibank, folks, and then he acts like Robin Hood?"


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UknWbQSV9CI


One man in the crowd, 71-year-old Air Force veteran Joe Bates, stood up and shouted angrily, wagging his finger at the candidate.

Trump continued: "You know, say whatever you want, but it doesn't work that way."
It was a stark illustration of the political perils the two candidates face in attacking each other as they sprint toward the early primary contests. Each risks losing ground among conservatives that haven't yet made up their minds between the two candidates, or inflaming their opponent's base against them.

With that in mind, Cruz had, up until last week, carefully avoided taking on Trump directly.

But with two weeks till the high-profile Iowa caucuses, and the two candidates just points apart in most polls of Republicans there, this week the gloves came off — culminating in a number of explosive exchanges between the two at Thursday's debate over Cruz's claim to U.S. citizenship and Trump's "New York values."

The feud boiled over to the weekend, with both Cruz and Trump trading jabs on the campaign trail — Cruz saying in upstate South Carolina that Trump had flip-flopped on key issues, and Trump previewing his Robin Hood line in New Hampshire.

But in front of a crowd of grassroots conservatives, many activists who had driven for hours to see one or the other, Trump went on the attack while Cruz left Trump out of his remarks just hours before.

It's a risky bet for Trump, as even some conservatives have criticized Trump for his attacks on Cruz in recent days.

Influential conservative talk-radio host Mark Levin told Trump in a Facebook post to "either cut the crap — your accusations this morning that Cruz is Canadian, a criminal, owned by big banks, etc. — or you will lose lots and lots of conservatives."
Some at Saturday's event said Trump's attacks on Cruz had turned them off from him.

Kathy Hughes, a 68-year-old retired teacher from Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, said she was "so excited" to see Trump until he trained his fire on Cruz, and now she's sitting his speech out.

"He has degraded himself now to me," she said.

Hughes said she felt like Trump had done away with his commitment to telling it like it is in part because he took Cruz's attacks on New York personally.

"I was pleased that he has put issues forward that many of the candidates did not want to talk about and they've been forced to talk about. He has kicked political correctness to the curb — until Ted said something about New Yorkers — and then suddenly Mr. Trump became very sensitive," she said.

But even if some conservatives are fed up with the attacks, there was evidence at the convention that they work.

Joe Bates, the man that wagged his finger at Trump, declined to be interviewed but his wife, Annie, said that the both of them were sick of the attacks.

"You just state what you can do! Each person does something different. There's no need knocking the other person," she said.

They were also undecided. But while they were frustrated with the sparring, Annie Bates said they wouldn't turn her off from one candidate or the other.

And she said she planned to go home and research what Trump had said about Cruz's loans.

"It makes me look at what they're saying about each other," she said. "That'll be a factor in what I decide."
 

Dozdoats

On TB every waking moment
"Conservative crowd" and "Cruz" is an oxymoron.

For that matter "conservative crowd" and "Republican" is an oxymoron ... at least since Goldwater.
 

Silent Knight

Inactive
manurespreader_newholland_example.jpg
 

Dozdoats

On TB every waking moment
A conservative crowd wouldn't have been within two counties of Cruz.

Rinos, sure. Lee Greenwood types, sure. Glenn Beck teaparty dupes, of course. But real conservatives? Not hardly.

Waving a US flag does not a conservative make ... any more.
 

TerryK

TB Fanatic
"Conservative crowd" and "Cruz" is an oxymoron.

For that matter "conservative crowd" and "Republican" is an oxymoron ... at least since Goldwater.

Goldwater was as close to being an atheist as you can get without carrying a card. He believed, and rightly so that religion started moving into the Republican Party, to it's detriment, in the 50s. I'm glad you like him.
He railed and campaigned against the influence of religion on the conservative movement always. He had nothing against people practicing their religion but he was fed up with religious people trying to insert their own particular religion beliefs and morals into the law of the land. You are right in one respect. Goldwater was one of the last true conservative political figures.
As Goldwater’s political career wore on, religious conservatives were overtaking the party (Ronald Reagan for example) and Goldwater’s opposition to the combination of church and state caused some of his party members to call him a liberal.6 But it wasn’t Goldwater that changed–he was quite consistent throughout his political career–society just changed around him.


Barry Goldwater On religious issues there can be little or no compromise. There is no position on which people are so immovable as their religious beliefs. There is no more powerful ally one can claim in a debate than Jesus Christ, or God, or Allah, or whatever one calls this supreme being. But like any powerful weapon, the use of God's name on one's behalf should be used sparingly. The religious factions that are growing throughout our land are not using their religious clout with wisdom. They are trying to force government leaders into following their position 100 percent. If you disagree with these religious groups on a particular moral issue, they complain, they threaten you with a loss of money or votes or both.
I'm frankly sick and tired of the political preachers across this country telling me as a citizen that if I want to be a moral person, I must believe in "A," "B," "C" and "D." Just who do they think they are? And from where do they presume to claim the right to dictate their moral beliefs to me? And I am even more angry as a legislator who must endure the threats of every religious group who thinks it has some God-granted right to control my vote on every roll call in the Senate. I am warning them today: I will fight them every step of the way if they try to dictate their moral convictions to all Americans in the name of "conservatism."
-- Barry Goldwater, speech to the US Senate (September 16, 1981).
 

JohnGaltfla

#NeverTrump
A conservative crowd wouldn't have been within two counties of Cruz.

Rinos, sure. Lee Greenwood types, sure. Glenn Beck teaparty dupes, of course. But real conservatives? Not hardly.

Waving a US flag does not a conservative make ... any more.

Sigh. You too? See you in September. :shk:
 

Dozdoats

On TB every waking moment
I will fight them every step of the way if they try to dictate their moral convictions to all Americans in the name of "conservatism."

And so nowadays we get people dictating their equivalent of moral convictions legislatively and regulatively in the name of LIBERALISM. Boy, that's sure an improvement, isn't it?
 

OldArcher

Has No Life - Lives on TB
A conservative crowd wouldn't have been within two counties of Cruz.

Rinos, sure. Lee Greenwood types, sure. Glenn Beck teaparty dupes, of course. But real conservatives? Not hardly.

Waving a US flag does not a conservative make ... any more.

Concur, 100%. A goat is not a sheep... Time to separate them...

OA
 

TerryK

TB Fanatic
Fox released poll results after the debate.
The polls say that in a two way race between Trump and Cruz, Cruz wins, but in a 3 way race between Trump, Cruz and Rubia, Trump wins.
So before they get rid of Rubio, Trump has to attack Cruz enough to lower his poll numbers. That is why Trump started the attacks on Cruz, however he isn't figuring on the possibility of his actions backfiring.

Trump understands the anger that is permeating among Americans. Anger that Obama mostly fueled and the inaction of the RINOs actually helped along.
What he doesn't understand is the stubborn bullheadedness of most of the people who call themselves hardcore conservatives. They tend to get upset, and take their ball home if you piss them off too much. Kind of like the Ron Paul people. He needs to realize that he needs every damn one in the Repub party who are conservative. He will not win otherwise. Hundreds of thousands of conservatives support Cruz but will go to Trump as long as Trump isn't the one to kill Cruz's chances. If they perceive Trump as the one who killed the only other conservative choice, their choice, they will sit this out. The hardcore conservative block will be split and hello Hillary. :shk:

Either that or Trump will move his platform more to the left to pick up disaffected Democrats, and many people here who call themselves conservatives will end up supporting a moderated Trump who suddenly "evolves" his feeling to pick up more centrist Dems. Please tell me you really don't think that Trump is a true conservative ideologue and not a simple business oriented pragmatist.

Surely you aren't that naive.

He will do what ever he thinks he has to in order to win. If you don't believe me just look at his statements and interviews from a few years ago. He said the things he had to in order to survive in the "New York" environment.
What makes you think he suddenly found God now?


Both Cruz and Trump need to win the primary with positive campaigns. The time to go negative is after the primary win it becomes conservatives against Dems.
 

TerryK

TB Fanatic
I will fight them every step of the way if they try to dictate their moral convictions to all Americans in the name of "conservatism."

And so nowadays we get people dictating their equivalent of moral convictions legislatively and regulatively in the name of LIBERALISM. Boy, that's sure an improvement, isn't it?

Sorry Dozd, you got that bas akwards.
It is the religious groups that are trying to influence government to subscribe to their views and only their views.
You should read more Goldwater. Religions trying to insert themselves into the government was his biggest bitch.
In fact Cruz's rather fanatic religious convictions is one reason I like Trumps pragmatic approach to government.
But I'd vote for either of them, and will vote for which ever one comes out on top after the primary.
They will both breakup the RINO republican power structure.
 

Dozdoats

On TB every waking moment
http://www.timebomb2000.com/vb/showthread.php?481474-I-haven-t-seen-any-Trump-bumper-stickers-...

Pretty well represents MY attitude about Trump too. Best thing about him in my mind is how much he rattles the professional politicians and pundits. Cruz? One more professional politician. Who needs 'em?

At this point it is TOO LATE to 'fix things' - at least by elective political means. And if voting COULD fix it, it wouldn't be allowed. Billy Beck nailed it years ago - We are not gonna vote our way out of this one.

Got ammo?
 

TerryK

TB Fanatic
A conservative crowd wouldn't have been within two counties of Cruz.

Rinos, sure. Lee Greenwood types, sure. Glenn Beck teaparty dupes, of course. But real conservatives? Not hardly.

Waving a US flag does not a conservative make ... any more.

And you know this because you and only you can define a real conservative, right :shk:
Waving a Bible also does not a conservative make. You forgot about the Bible thumpers.
They were Goldwater's main complaint and in his opinion they were destroying true conservatism.
 

TerryK

TB Fanatic

Wise Owl

Deceased
I see the infighting is still going on. Cruz supporters against the Trump folk........

Let me know when you get it all out of your systems. K?

Back to my book.
 

Dozdoats

On TB every waking moment
You forgot about the Bible thumpers.

No. I IGNORED them. The same way I usually do. Same way I usually ignore politicians, except when they are more interesting than the run of the mill.

You seem to have mistaken me for someone who still thinks politics, politicians and votes actually matter :D No sense in arguing with me about politics...
 

TerryK

TB Fanatic
I see the infighting is still going on. Cruz supporters against the Trump folk........

Let me know when you get it all out of your systems. K?

Back to my book.

As I said. I will vote for either one. What the people who are all emotional over one of the other don't realize is that if either Trump or Cruz is the one to kill the other, half the conservative who were for that candidate will sit it out. Just like the Ron Paul folks.

If Cruz get taken out by the Dems, so be it. If Trump is the one to kill Cruz's chances, he just lost that many voters.
If Trump somehow got seriously wounded by Cruz, the same thing would happen.
Cruz knows this and that's why he was so reluctant to go negative on Trump.
Trump knows it too, but all he's worried about right now is the upcoming primaries. Problem is, voters for either candidate have long memories and will not forgive of forget. Each candidate will need the support of the other candidates supporters after the primary.
I smell another Ron Paul sit out coming on. :lol:
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
I had read that he did declare the loan in one of his 2012 Senate filings. It was apparently omitted on a second filing. The other was a line of credit. I have done a mini version of those when I ran for office several times and they are a confusing bitch to fill out. I would imagine if you looked hard enough, Trump's have some error and omissions in his as well. He has a lot of irons in the fire.

People are going to find reasons to self validate their choice of candidates as they gell in preparation for the primary. The ones I have heard against Cruz are less about his character, abilities and positions on the issues and more about someone's justification for choosing Trump over Cruz.
 
Last edited:

Foothiller

Veteran Member
I didn't hear Trump say anything that wasn't true; he did state his opinion that Cruz is bought. I agree with that.

Not disclosing $1 Million in loans is a red flag. Loans from Goldman and Citi. Two not so honest companies who've made more off the government than a legion of inner city welfare queens -- who's alumni stalk the halls of the USTREAS and the Federal Reserve.

Cruz's wife is or was a Managing Director for Goldman Sachs. We're not talking about an analyst or bank teller folks.
 
Top