223shootersc
Veteran Member
Bad construction and cheap construction are the problem, China you mess with the bull you get the horns and this storm definitely has horns
Agree. Cement doesn't bent like that. That much distortion and the dam would have collapsed already. Those photos aren't legitimate.The satellite shots appear to show significant movement, but it might be image stitching. The closeup in Doug's video above shows huge apparent distortion. If the dam has distorted that much, the concrete in the area should be a heap of rubble, because concrete structures don't bend like that. I suspect that's all photoshopped. But the whole question could be settled by a few shots taken near ground level viewing along the dam. We saw them when it was being built and when it was new, but we aren't seeing any such views now. Curious.
CONCRETE "is curing" , getting harder, foreverI was watching a video of the Hoover dam and was surprised when they said there are parts of the dam where the.concrete is still curing.
Is that even possible?
If it is, I wonder about this dam and why it does not have a shape like the Hoover dam.
That is one thing I don't understand with these huge engineering projects. Nothing lasts forever, yet no contingencies ever seem to be made with that in mind. Not an "if" but a "when," and the life-spans of these projects seem to be best measured in decades, not centuries.Over the years, I have tamped down my psychic side. Knew too many bad or unhappy things. But you don't have to be a psychic or RV to see that this dam will fail. I have known it since it was first being built. I have always thought when that thing lets go, it is going to be unimaginable destruction and loss of life. It is just a matter of when and it looks like the RVs may have narrowed it down somewhat.
That is one thing I don't understand with these huge engineering projects. Nothing lasts forever, yet no contingencies ever seem to be made with that in mind. Not an "if" but a "when," and the life-spans of these projects seem to be best measured in decades, not centuries.
This dam isn't that old. Sooner or later, about 100 million could get washed away, along with all the industry and infrastructure out to and inc. Shanghai. Worth it?? Lately, the Chinese have seemed more short-sighted than the West.
I was just thinking the same thing from a different angle: What if China immediately goes to a war footing if this happens? I would expect them to anticipate an attack from their enemies at the moment it happens. I'm not suggesting overt war. What sort of preemptive action(s) would China be likely to take, if any?
Or, they say we used our rain machines to flood it out. Weaponized weather, HAARP.What happens if they claim we nuked the dam as a reason for the failure and then go to a war footing? That would get the CCP leadership off the hook from all the angry people and put that anger onto us. When the 66 reactors go, how would it be possible to check whether the dam failed from shoddy workmanship or a "nuke strike" with all that radiation floating around?
What happens if they claim we nuked the dam as a reason for the failure and then go to a war footing? That would get the CCP leadership off the hook from all the angry people and put that anger onto us. When the 66 reactors go, how would it be possible to check whether the dam failed from shoddy workmanship or a "nuke strike" with all that radiation floating around?
Or
Or, they say we used our rain machines to flood it out. Weaponized weather, HAARP.
Likely true imho.
I have found in my life many situations that appear to be black swan type events really are not. It is not a Black Swan event when a system fails catastrophically due to design flaw, construction flaw, defective materials, corruption and incompetence. Nope, that falls into the category of STUFF Happens.
I grieve for the Chinese people who will pay dearly for the lies, deceit and treachery of the Marxist scum now ruling them. However, China must harvest the evil that it has sown. Actions have consequences, and you really do reap what you sow. China has had dozens of corruption scandals for DECADES.
I don't see how the 66 nuclear reactors can avoid melting down when the dam fails. Fukushima on streroids and on a scale that defies description. I look around me, at all this chaos and I have to accept that God has a plan, although he hasn't bothered to explain it to me yet.
We have six months left till the end of the year. I firmly think that however bad 2020 has been, it will pale into insignificance when 2021 starts, assuming any of us are alive that is.
More likely to receive a conventional missile from India. They are currently at war. It is not going to take much to break that dam. It seems to be doing a pretty good job on its own.
Heck you wouldn't have to even "break" the dam, just the shipping locks.
There's a reason for the PLA having a ton of IADS/ADA/BMD assets covering the area.
Would there be a different radiation signature between a power plant and a nuclear weapon?What happens if they claim we nuked the dam as a reason for the failure and then go to a war footing? That would get the CCP leadership off the hook from all the angry people and put that anger onto us. When the 66 reactors go, how would it be possible to check whether the dam failed from shoddy workmanship or a "nuke strike" with all that radiation floating around?
Would there be a different radiation signature between a power plant and a nuclear weapon?
I would think cloud seeding from India would get the job done. India could seed on in their own country providing the winds are correct. Torrential downpours in the upper areas would work its way down with a real slam.
All dams and levees eventually fail. Some are taken down in a controlled fashion before they fail, but none last forever. This is why nobody should ever live in the path of a failed dam or levee. Those paths aren't all that hard to predict.That is one thing I don't understand with these huge engineering projects. Nothing lasts forever, yet no contingencies ever seem to be made with that in mind. Not an "if" but a "when," and the life-spans of these projects seem to be best measured in decades, not centuries.
This dam isn't that old. Sooner or later, about 100 million could get washed away, along with all the industry and infrastructure out to and inc. Shanghai. Worth it?? Lately, the Chinese have seemed more short-sighted than the West.
CONCRETE "is curing" , getting harder, forever
HOOVER DAM IS SHORT AND TALL....AND GOES TO BEDROCK ON THE SIDES AND BOTTOM...A BIG PLUG
THE MORE WATER YOU HAVE..............THE TIGHTER THE PLUG
AN ARCH IS STRONGER THAN A STRAIGHT WALL
THIS DAM IS LONG AND JUST SITS ON THE GROUND SO IT IS PUSHED AROUND BY THE WATER......
WHEN THE WATER PUSHES WITH MORE FORCE THAN THE DAM WEIGHTS
THE DAM WILL MOVE MORE
Lately, the Chinese have seemed more short-sighted than the West.
They see the dam breaking. Can't remember if it was July or Aug.
I do think they could choose to scram the reactors now and power them down and make them inert. Before the flood arrives there. However, they need the energy to meet the current 5 year plan. This is part of what happened at Chernobyl. They could shut them down in time, but they WON'T. Their arrogance and stupidity has yet to crescendo to its maximum. And the ironic thing is, they think we are the barbarians…I have found in my life many situations that appear to be black swan type events really are not. It is not a Black Swan event when a system fails catastrophically due to design flaw, construction flaw, defective materials, corruption and incompetence. Nope, that falls into the category of STUFF Happens.
I grieve for the Chinese people who will pay dearly for the lies, deceit and treachery of the Marxist scum now ruling them. However, China must harvest the evil that it has sown. Actions have consequences, and you really do reap what you sow. China has had dozens of corruption scandals for DECADES.
I don't see how the 66 nuclear reactors can avoid melting down when the dam fails. Fukushima on streroids and on a scale that defies description. I look around me, at all this chaos and I have to accept that God has a plan, although he hasn't bothered to explain it to me yet.
We have six months left till the end of the year. I firmly think that however bad 2020 has been, it will pale into insignificance when 2021 starts, assuming any of us are alive that is.
Where are you reading these? Thanks for posting links or a PM.
I believe that even a scrammed reactor needs active cooling for some time. If the floods hit the pumps and gennies, they’re toast.I do think they could choose to scram the reactors now and power them down and make them inert. Before the flood arrives there. However, they need the energy to meet the current 5 year plan. This is part of what happened at Chernobyl. They could shut them down in time, but they WON'T. Their arrogance and stupidity has yet to crescendo to its maximum. And the ironic thing is, they think we are the barbarians…
It takes a long time to take a reactor to cold shutdown. Plus they would have to de-fuel them and transport the fuel rods to somewhere safe. I doubt they would have time to accomplish the operation if they started today. However just getting them to a cold shutdown would help but they are never going to do this. It would be an admission that they are never going to make.I believe that even a scrammed reactor needs active cooling for some time. If the floods hit the pumps and gennies, they’re toast.
.The Yangtze River runs through cities in which 400-600 million people live. 66 nuclear power plants are in the path of massive floods that will only increase and could turn into giant tidal waves should the dam fail.
Should this dam burst...it may well be the worst natural disaster in human history.
66 reactors....think long and hard about that
Are all those cities downstream of the dam? Those upstream are already getting flooded. Dam collapsing will get the others, as well.The Yangtze River runs through cities in which 400-600 million people live.
Doctor-fungcool, understand that I'm not singling you out, but you are making the same mistake that many other posters in this thread have made. Posters keep referring to "66 nuclear reactors" being downstream of the dam.
There are 66 nuclear power plants downstream from Three Gorges, not 66 reactors. It may be safely assumed that many, if not most of the plants have more than one reactor onsite. The radiological disaster which would ensue from a Three Gorges collapse would almost certainly be much worse than many believe.
Best
Doc
Wow, I feel so much better now.Doctor-fungcool, understand that I'm not singling you out, but you are making the same mistake that many other posters in this thread have made. Posters keep referring to "66 nuclear reactors" being downstream of the dam.
There are 66 nuclear power plants downstream from Three Gorges, not 66 reactors. It may be safely assumed that many, if not most of the plants have more than one reactor onsite. The radiological disaster which would ensue from a Three Gorges collapse would almost certainly be much worse than many believe.
Best
Doc