Bush Jr - possible coverup

l0kster

Inactive
Most people have never heard of Margie Schoedinger because the story of her accusations against George W and "suicide" somehow never got out through the mainstream controlled press.

http://www.counterpunch.org/carter1220.html

SNIPPET
"According to the complaint, in the fall of 2000, three unknown assailants attempted unsuccessfully to kidnap Schoedinger. When she reported the crime to the Sugar Land Police Department (remember, I'm not making this up), she was harassed by the police. She was treated similarly by the FBI. To make matters worse, her bank accounts were frozen, her husband lost his job, her academic records were expunged and she became the subject of 24-hour surveillance.

According to the complaint, this treatment was orchestrated by none of than the President of the United States. Schoedinger claims that Bush is attempting to pressure her into committing suicide. Of course, you may be asking why would the President do such a thing?

Well, according to the plaintiff, she personally asked Bush the very same question. Bush allegedly replied that he is concerned that Schoedinger may remember the numerous and repeated acts of sexual assault he has committed against her and her husband. His original plan was to simply kill the plaintiff. But since he couldnt go through with it, he decided to simply drive her crazy instead.

Her affadavit can be found here:
http://ccweb.co.fort-bend.tx.us/search.asp?cabinet=civil

select "plaintiff" and enter "Schoedinger Margie" for the name.

According to her affadavit - harassment against her had become so severe that she had a miscarriage - of a child supposedly fathered by rape attacker George W.

Now she could have been just a crazy woman but we will never know the outcome of her case because she is now DEAD!

http://www.rense.com/general44/deaad.htm

another "suicide" victim with gunshot to the head. what a coincidence!

Bush Jrs miliatary records get destroyed. what a coincidence!

This story was pretty much blacked out in the press and only a few non-US papers ran it:
http://www.thoughtcrimenews.com/bushrape.htm

If it were not for the internet, this story would never have seen the light of day.

Even if Margie Schoedinger was a nut and her story a fake, makes you wonder why her suit never got any media attention and she ended up a suicide????
 

FREEBIRD

Has No Life - Lives on TB
When Clinton was accused of sexual misconduct ((Paula Jones and the other one, name escapes me at the moment, the one who accused him of rape), we were told that his "personal life" was nobody's business. Should that principle apply here?

And lest you think I'm soft on rapists, not hardly. I just want them all treated alike regardless of their politics: no free pass for liberal rapists, no free pass for conservatives either.
 

piggyandpeewee

Membership Revoked
The article you cite was published in December 2002, no doubt a part of the Gore...

Loserman nonsense. In politics this is ancient history. Does ANY ONE really think that this story would have been "stalled" on the Ineternet for over 18 months in such
"distinguished" :rolleyes: "journals" as CounterPunch, Rense.com and ThoughtCrime.com if there was even a grain of truth to it?

The Clinton scandals were published in EVERY "credible"
medium of the mainstream press for one reason: The charges
were credible, even under the worshipful scrutiny of the left
dominated mass media. If any of this "poop" about G.W. Bush were true in the slightest, he would have been lynched and hanged a long time ago.

Show me the DNA of President Bush on the lady's dress and
then we can talk. :D
 

l0kster

Inactive
don't confuse people with the facts

Clinton was and is a cheating scum president. I'm not a Dem and I don't like either Party machine candidate.

However to claim there is no truth to the Margie Schoedinger story is delusion.

I suppose the Texas State Court (Bush crime family backyard no less) is in on the big left wing conspiracy too!!!

http://ccweb.co.fort-bend.tx.us/search.asp?cabinet=civil

name type: Plaintiff
name: schoedinger margie

case # 22127

ANyone with an internet connection can go to the site and verify for themselves.

the case is real and Mrs. Schoedinger is DEAD and there was no mainstream press coverage of that. Those are facts. Readers can make their own conclusions.


same with the sex antics of Bush Sr and his buddies when he was pres:

http://www.timebomb2000.com/vb/showthread.php?t=108133

do your own research and figure out your own truth.

Don't let such "distinguished" journalists as Rush "druggie" limbaugh and unfair and unbalanced Fox (Rupert Murdoch) News control your brain.

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/11/magazine/11FOX.html
 

piggyandpeewee

Membership Revoked
Iokster: Get YOUR facts straight!

The FACT that the woman is dead does not establish anything
except the fact that she is dead

I have never listened to Rush Limbaugh in my life.

When I do watch news it IS cable, but alternately Fox, MSNBC,
CNBC and CNN, probably in that order, so sue me.

I'm merely stating that the hysterics and extremes on BOTH
sides are ridiculous and the story that you are promoting is OLD, UNSUBSTANTIATED AND FRINGE, without a doubt...

Let's get real :rolleyes:
 

Troke

On TB every waking moment
Even if Margie Schoedinger was a nut and her story a fake, makes you wonder why her suit never got any media attention and she ended up a suicide????

Maybe because every reporter that looked at it decided that she 'was a nut and her story was a fake.'
 

l0kster

Inactive
I'm not claiming her story is true

I'm not claiming Mrs. Schoedingers court claim is true - just that it DOES exist and the story was NEVER widely spread. What's unreal about that?

I only posted it now because I only discovered this strange story today - same as I discovered the Franklin Bush-Reagan Whitehouse sex story today in my "Bush Sr" post.

Everyone knows the rich and powerful get away with all sorts of crime and coverup all the time - including murder.

Look at the JFK and his womanizing, his drunk brother Ted Kennedy and his famous Chappaquadick bridge incident. Vince Foster with Clinton.

In the ohio Bush-Reagan whitehouse sex scandal, the lead figure in the scandal - Craig Spence - winds up dead of an alleged suicide. One of the investigators dies in a plane crash.

Nobody calls for impeaching or lynching Reagan/Bush and some lower level players get put in jail to appease the masses and the story is smothered.

All I'm saying is that there are these skeletons about the dirty deeds of the Kennedys, Bushes, and other powerful families that get quick damage control and short coverage and/or key people in the scandal somehow die off.

This may be "fringe" to some, but seems obvious to others that if you are powerful and have connections you can get away with pretty much anything in this country. This is true of both left and right.

Because this board is heavily weighted towards the conservative Republic Bush-supporters, I expect detractors and i'm not trying to push Kerry as I'm not voting for him either. He's another skull and bones millionaire party machine robot.

I posted my links for people to check.

Of course, this could be my last post as I may have a car accident or be a gunshot suicide victim tomorrow eh? :)

(just kidding - I do have a sense of humor. I'm just tired that we have to elect criminals to office because we have a 2-party monopoly. If you're wondering, I'll be voting for either the Libertarian candidate or writing in for Ron Paul).
 

piggyandpeewee

Membership Revoked
Iokster: I DO know exactly what you mean...

but my main point stands. If the Kennedys et al couldn't keep
such a thing under wraps for 18 hours then how is it possible
for the Bush family to do so for decades?

This same sort of thing (murders, crime/drugs etc.) circulated
about Clinton until he stained the blue dress. After that, you didn't hear it because there was no need. Something finally stuck to him and it wasn't murder or big time drug dealing...
It was something that ACTUALLY happened.

The difference is that the Bush haters won't be satisfied until they bring one or both of the Bushes down as low as Clinton was lain. So people looking for THEIR 15 minutes of fame continue to intrigue those looking for dirt, until they find something that will stick.

Between them the Bushes are on their eighth campaign for
political office at various levels. Trust me when I tell you,
in this day and age if there was something there (other than
a DUI or bit of "hookey" from the NG) we would have known it long before now.

Friends?

P & P
 

l0kster

Inactive
what role the media plays

Back when the media was actually competitive instead of owned by 5 mega corporations then I would say it would be likely that scandals would be hard to supress.

However I think many Americans only learned about how extensive JFKs philandering was many years after he died. Many americans did not know we almost had nuclear WW3 with the Soviet union over the last big Arab-israeli war until years after. Many didn't find out about FDR and Pearl Harbor until just recently and that was from 1941!

Now we got Viacom, TIme warner, News Corp, Disney and I forgot the other media giant that basically own 95% of the mainstream print and TV media. SCandals are MORE easier than ever to keep quiet.

My case in point is the whole 9-11 attack.

Mainstream coverage has pretty much stuck to the official line about Osama and the Saudi terrorists doing the whole thing. Even Michael Moore does not really stray from the official story.

It is only on the Internet and in alternative media that people are asking hard questions about what really happened.

If people are content to get the news spoon-fed to them from the media monopoly than this country is already lost to the corporate overlords.
 
Top