BREAKING- OBAMA MAY GO TO PRISON AND BE IMPEACHED KILLING OUR OWN; GLENN BECK

Ender

Inactive
Does that include RP?

If one guy (GB) can undermine RP and all of his followers, then maybe they weren't all that credible? One person can't start a "hoopla" on his own unless he has the truth to back him up.

Truth matters.

Is GB perfect? Nope. Is RP perfect? Nope.

Do I agree with everything that GB says? Nope. Do I agree with everything that RP says? Nope.

I just want the truth. I can make up my own mind when I have all of the facts.
RP was never a politician- he is a statesman.

And Glenn Beck, with his special guest Wolf Blitzer, made a HUGE deal out of RP and his supporters being terrorists. It was pretty obvious that Beck's trainers were calling the shots.

So, if it's truth you want, better get the facts from sources other than Beck.

And the Libya thing is no different than the Iran-Contra episode but everyone loves to love Reagan and loves to hate Obama, so they try to make it "different"- which it ain't.
 

Samsmom

The Bees Know
Glenn Beck....Glenn Beck.... oh yeah!

The guy that said Ron Paul followers were terrorists because they had a "money bomb" on Guy Fawkes Day and raised a few million dollars.

Beck started all the hoopla about Ron Paul & his followers that many of you still spout today- but now we are supposed to think he's credible?

Politicians and media are the same:

How do you know they are lying?

They're lips are moving.

I found the video you were talking about, I think, from almost 5 years ago at CNN. When I listened to it, he said that RP's supporters themselves called it a money bomb. GB didn't say anything about them being terrorists. Guy Fawkes was a terrorist. Here is the link.

http://videosift.com/video/Glenn-Beck-Ron-Paul-supporters-are-terrorists

GB likes RP's domestic policies, he's said that many times. He just doesn't like RP's foreign policies.

Like I said, one man by himself can't change the course of an election or anything for that matter. When the people have the facts and know the truth for themselves, that's when things change. People who don't know all of the facts or refuse to acknowledge the truth, for whatever reason, they will be deceived every time.

That's all. This thread isn't about RP. BTW, RP may be a statesman, but he is also a politician.
 

Satanta

Stone Cold Crazy
_______________
Well,since people want to bring RP innto it-exactly where is he talking about the Benghazi debacle again?

I just heard CNN talkig about how Fox mislead everyone on Benghazi and so on.

The cover-up is holding.
 

BertaBurtonLake

Veteran Member
Here is a clip from last night's GB show. The video in the article won't embed.

A couple of major networks are sitting on new Benghazi evidence that they won't release until after the election next week. If they don't release the evidence, GB will expose them.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/glenn-beck-to-media-outlets-sitting-on-damning-benghazi-emails-release-them-or-be-exposed/
So, has Glenn Beck exposed the major media networks' cover-up yet? Time is getting real short here. His 'advance knowledge' does no good if the 'advance' part is after the fact.
 

undead

Veteran Member
I'm always amused by the ... "nobody should say shit about Barack Hussein, cuz "X" did something similar "Y" years ago."


kinda pathetic
 

Samsmom

The Bees Know
So, has Glenn Beck exposed the major media networks' cover-up yet? Time is getting real short here. His 'advance knowledge' does no good if the 'advance' part is after the fact.
I only got to listen to part of his radio show this morning. Last week his news team was talking about some info that Fox had just released but it's all running together now and hard to keep everything straight. I haven't heard him say anything specific about the cover-up yet. But GB is expecting a Romney landslide tomorrow, so maybe he doesn't feel the urgency to blow the whistle yet. I really don't think it's going to matter one way or another. If Obama wins tomorrow, then Benghazi will be the least of our worries. If Romney wins, then Benghazi will be the least of our worries. People have already started to focus on another shiny object.
 

BertaBurtonLake

Veteran Member
I only got to listen to part of his radio show this morning. Last week his news team was talking about some info that Fox had just released but it's all running together now and hard to keep everything straight. I haven't heard him say anything specific about the cover-up yet. But GB is expecting a Romney landslide tomorrow, so maybe he doesn't feel the urgency to blow the whistle yet. I really don't think it's going to matter one way or another. If Obama wins tomorrow, then Benghazi will be the least of our worries. If Romney wins, then Benghazi will be the least of our worries. People have already started to focus on another shiny object.
Then he is part of the problem, not part of the solution. IF he has that information, that 'whistle should be blown' no matter who he 'thinks' is going to win the election and that is part of the problem I have.

You (and I am not picking on you) and many others may not think it matters and we DO have massive problems to be addressed as a Nation, but treason committed by an acting President while in office should not be allowed to stand. The problem, as I see it, was very succinctly stated in your response: "People have already started to focus on another shiny object.".

National ADD will be the death of us as a Nation, and I am not talking about kids who cannot sit still.
 

Dennis Olson

Chief Curmudgeon
_______________
Beck is nothing more than yet another tool of the elites. If that were NOT true, he would never have been allowed a media outlet. The elites control ALL media except SW radio, and I'm starting to wonder about THAT.
 

Samsmom

The Bees Know
GB knows that if HE is the one who blows the whistle, no one will believe him. The networks who are holding the info need to step up and do the right thing themselves. If they can't or won't do that, then we are doomed anyway, no matter what GB does or doesn't do.

GB owns his own TV network and employs all of his own people, so he doesn't answer to anyone that I know of. His radio show is hosted by Clear Channel, I believe. So he would have to answer to them, probably with regard to FCC regulations, etc.
 

Samsmom

The Bees Know
Ask yourself this: If you had the outlet he does coupled with the information he says he has, wouldn't you blow the whistle from the rooftops?

GB has been blowing the whistle on Obama for the last 4 years. No one has listened to him yet. Why should this time be any different?

MSM will destroy themselves. They don't need GB's help for that.
 

Dennis Olson

Chief Curmudgeon
_______________
He's said what he's ALLOWED to say by his masters. If he were really in a position to draw blood, he'd have been Palin'd
 

BertaBurtonLake

Veteran Member
GB has been blowing the whistle on Obama for the last 4 years. No one has listened to him yet. Why should this time be any different?
I disagree. He is "all sound and fury, signifying nothing". He has alluded to blowing the whistle but stops short of actually committing the deed. He is very carefully controlled 'opposition'.

The original post stated Obama (and others) may go to prison and be impeached and cited video from Glenn Beck as evidence....."staggering evidence" even. He then stated later he would "out" the main stream media for sitting on evidence of his assertions regarding Benghazi if they did not broadcast what they had and knew. They didn't and he has done nothing.
 

Samsmom

The Bees Know
I disagree. He is "all sound and fury, signifying nothing". He has alluded to blowing the whistle but stops short of actually committing the deed. He is very carefully controlled 'opposition'.

The original post stated Obama (and others) may go to prison and be impeached and cited video from Glenn Beck as evidence....."staggering evidence" even. He then stated later he would "out" the main stream media for sitting on evidence of his assertions regarding Benghazi if they did not broadcast what they had and knew. They didn't and he has done nothing.

Your post justifies my argument that people will not take GB seriously.

I didn't start this thread. I only posted that I had watched the show where he said he would blow the whistle if the information was not forthcoming. That's all I know. I'm not going to call GB and ask him if he's going to rat them out or not.

There are things going on in the background that we don't know about. This will all play out the way it was intended to.

If Obama wins tomorrow, with the information on Benghazi that has already been presented to the voters, then presenting more information wouldn't make any difference to the messiah's followers.

It's not GB's job to police the MSM. He's not out for revenge like Obama is.
 

Publius

TB Fanatic
Top of Page #1 and We can compare what was discovered and disclosed to what being said now, so how much different is it from the released documents?
 
Top