SOFT NEWS 400,000 yr old remains REVEAL our Israeli/not African Origin

[MissyFlex]

Humans would have compared and refined concepts of higher powers when they began to speak, perhaps 4-6 million years ago. By 400,000 years ago we had vocabularies of a hundred thousand words.

Even to this day, the average professor of English has a vocabulary of about 10,000 to 11,000 words. Shakespeare was thought to have a vocabulary of around 29,000 words, and that was because he invented so many words that have become commonplace.

 

[bw]

Even to this day, the average professor of English has a vocabulary of about 10,000 to 11,000 words. Shakespeare was thought to have a vocabulary of around 29,000 words, and that was because he invented so many words that have become commonplace.

We are getting dumber.

 

[PHD]

we cannot date rocks, no-one has any idea, no history exists

No Evolutionary History? That is correct.

We are talking about the Upper, Middle and Lower Paleolithic Epochs. The first observation is that these three epochs are not divided by evolutionary date. They are divided by the presumed appearance in the fossil record of a new species of evolutionary sub-human man (so the evolutionists say).

The first appearance of the genus homo in the lower Paleolith is Homo Erectus. They say that Homo Erectus is related to the Australopithecinces via Homo Habilis except Homo Habilis is not viable anymore and is considered an Australopithecine. Homo Habilis also was thought to be highly encephalized until they found out that they were comparing male skulls with the sexually dimorphic female. So now there is no common ancestry to get from Australopithecines to homo Erectus.

From Homo Erectus, the evolutionists are happy to get the larger brained Homo Neanderthalensis. The evolutionists were slapping themselves on the back because the middle Paleolith Epoch showed a larger brained sub-human evolution from a smaller brained homo erectus. That is until they get to homo sapiens which are smaller brained than Homo Neandethalensis.

So since all good scientists will tell you that every good scientific theory has a predictive quality the first question to ask is why did the brains get bigger. The evolutionist will defiantly answer well it was natural selection. So then you ask then why did the brains get smaller. The evolutionist will defiantly answer again that it was natural selection.

Now anyone with critical thinking skills will say wait a minute. There is not prediction here. The evolutionist will respond with a little sarcasm and then say well we believe something happened which cause this........ So the response by the people who question common ancestry at this point is to say this is beginning to sound like a bunch of B.S.

Then there will be a discussion about lack of transitional forms in the fossil record. The evolutionist will say that the fossil record is incomplete. The questioner of evolution will respond by saying, so if the fossil record is incomplete then how do you know that all of these so called creatures did not live all the same time. The evolutionist will say that there is no evidence of that in the fossil record. The questioner of evolution will say...I thought you just said the fossil record was incomplete. The evolutionist will say...but this is the best we have. The questioner of evolution just laughs and moves on.

Yes and that is our history in the Paleolithic Epoch.

 

[BadMedicine]

lol

 

[mistaken1]

Evolution is the creation story for the humanist religion. The humanists cling to it with a faith that causes the faith of Abram to pale in comparison.....