WAR 07-21-2018-to-07-27-2018___****THE****WINDS****of****WAR****

Lilbitsnana

On TB every waking moment
Palestine Event Agency
@PalHadath
4m4 minutes ago

URGENT Reuters: UAE official denies reports targeting Houthis for Abu Dhabi International Airport


The Intel Crab
‏ @IntelCrab
19m19 minutes ago

Uh oh. This is actually a huge deal. Houthi militants staged a drone attack on the Abu Dhabi International Airport.

If confirmed, this would be the first time the UAE has ever been attacked on their own soil by a foreign entity.



ETA: 10:08 AM CDT

The Intel Crab
‏ @IntelCrab
32m32 minutes ago

The Intel Crab Retweeted Abu Dhabi Airport

Airport confirms the incident.

The Intel Crab added,
Abu Dhabi Airport
Verified account @AUH
Abu Dhabi Airports can confirm that there has been an incident involving a supply vehicle in Terminal 1 airside area of the airport at approximately 4:00 pm today.This incident has not affected operations at AUH and flights continue to arrive and depart as scheduled. (1/2)






https://www.almasdarnews.com/articl...strike-abu-dhabi-airport-for-first-time-ever/

Breaking: Houthi forces strike Abu Dhabi Airport for first time ever
By
Leith Aboufadel -
2018-07-26 0

BEIRUT, LEBANON (5:20 P.M) – For the first time in its existence, the Abu Dhabi International Airport has been bombed by foreign force.

On Thursday, the Houthi force announced that their rocket battalion had attacked the Abu Dhabi International Airport with their armed drones.

According to the official media wing of the Houthi forces, their Sammad-3 armed drone bombed the Abu Dhabi International Airport in retaliation for the UAE’s ongoing role in the Arab Coalition.

The UAE has yet to comment on this claim by the Houthi forces.

If this proves true, this attack by the Houthi forces will mark the first time in its existence that the United Arab Emirates has been bombed by a foreign entity.
 

danielboon

TB Fanatic
Mideast getting hotter by the hour

EndGameWW3
EndGameWW3
@EndGameShowWW3
The United Arab Emirates is ready to deploy more troops across the Middle East to counter its foes as it believes it can no longer rely on Western allies like the United States and Britain, UAE minister Anwar Gargash said on Thursday.
12:28 PM · Jul 26, 2018


·
52s
Replying to @EndGameShowWW3
Erik Prince’s mercenaries will protect oil rich Arabs.
 

Lilbitsnana

On TB every waking moment
Instant News Alerts
‏ @InstaNewsAlerts
54s54 seconds ago

#Breaking: #Assad: Russian military presence in #Syria long-term and not just anti-terrorism. #Russia
 

Lilbitsnana

On TB every waking moment
Guy Elster
‏Verified account @guyelster
3m3 minutes ago

#BREAKING #Turkey says it will never tolerate threats, after US warnings over the fate of the arrested priest
 

Lilbitsnana

On TB every waking moment
Guy Elster
‏Verified account @guyelster
3m3 minutes ago

#BREAKING #Turkey says it will never tolerate threats, after US warnings over the fate of the arrested priest


Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu
‏Verified account @MevlutCavusoglu
32m32 minutes ago

Noone dictates Turkey. We will never tolerate threats from anybody. Rule of law is for everyone; no exception.
 

Lilbitsnana

On TB every waking moment
Guy Elster
‏Verified account @guyelster
2m2 minutes ago

Guy Elster Retweeted Ragıp Soylu

Meanwhile, #Erdogan and #Putin strengthen their ties

Ragıp Soylu
‏Verified account @ragipsoylu

Moments ago Erdogan met Putin.

His comments after receiving threats from Trump:

“Our solidarity with Russia makes some envious”
 

Lilbitsnana

On TB every waking moment
wow even if true, they shouldn't have said anything. So many things are going to be unleashed if true and now whether true or not there is still a chance of something advance/pre-retaliatory by Iran happening just because.

just wow



Intel Doge
‏ @IntelDoge
2m2 minutes ago

Intel Doge Retweeted Kirsten Aiken

��

If this is confirmed it’s undoubtably a MASSIVE destruction of OPSEC and at the same time slightly unnerving strikes could come at any moment.

Intel Doge added,
Kirsten Aiken
��
Verified account @kirstenaiken
Senior figures in the Australian government have told the ABC they believe the United States is prepared to bomb Iran's nuclear capability, perhaps as early as next month, and that Australia is poised to help identify possible targets. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-07-...-prepared-to-strike-iran-sources-say/10037728 … via @abcnews



posted for fair use and discussion
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-07-...-prepared-to-strike-iran-sources-say/10037728

Donald Trump could be ready to order a strike against Iran, Australian Government figures say
Exclusive by political editor Andrew Probyn and defence reporter Andrew Greene

Posted about 2 hours ago
US President Donald Trump points a finger straight ahead
Photo: Australian Government sources believe the US is prepared to strike Iran's nuclear capability. (AP: Markus Schreiber)
Related Story: Trump's men talk of a 'rock solid' US-Aussie relationship, while POTUS shakes things up
Related Story: Iran to respond with 'equal countermeasures' if US tries to block its oil exports
Related Story: 'Never, ever threaten the United States again': Trump lashes out at Iran
Related Story: 'Cesspool of political bias': US pulls out of UN Human Rights Council

Senior figures in the Turnbull Government have told the ABC they believe the United States is prepared to bomb Iran's nuclear capability, perhaps as early as next month, and that Australia is poised to help identify possible targets.
Key points:

Senior Government figures have told the ABC they believe the Trump administration is prepared to bomb Iran
They say Australian defence facilities would likely play a role in identifying possible targets
But another senior source, in security, emphasises there is a difference between providing intelligence and "active targeting"

It comes amid intense sabre-rattling by US President Donald Trump and his Iranian counterpart Hassan Rouhani.

The ABC has been told secretive Australian defence facilities would likely play a role in identifying targets in Iran, as would British intelligence agencies.

But a senior security source emphasised there was a big difference between providing accurate intelligence and analysis on Iran's facilities and being part of a "kinetic" mission.

"Developing a picture is very different to actually participating in a strike," the source said.

"Providing intelligence and understanding as to what is happening on the ground so that the Government and allied governments are fully informed to make decisions is different to active targeting."

The top-secret Pine Gap joint defence facility in the Northern Territory is considered crucial among the so-called "Five Eyes" intelligence partners — the US, UK, Australia, Canada and New Zealand — for its role in directing American spy satellites.

Analysts from the little-known spy agency Australian Geospatial-Intelligence Organisation would also be expected to play a part.

Canada would be unlikely to play a role in any military action in Iran, nor would the smallest Five Eyes security partner New Zealand, sources said.
Middle East braces for Trump
Middle East braces for Trump
As Israel faces off against Iran and its proxies in the Middle East, all eyes are on Donald Trump's next move.

Any US-led strike on Iranian targets would be fraught for a region bristling with tensions. Israel would have reason to be anxious about retaliation, given Iran rejects Israel's right to exist.

That said, Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in April invoked the so-called "Begin Doctrine" that calls on the Jewish state to ensure nations hostile to Israel be prevented from developing a nuclear weapons capability.

"Israel will not allow regimes that seek our annihilation to acquire nuclear weapons," Mr Netanyahu said.

An Australian Government source said when it came to Iran, Australia relied on intelligence sourced from its Five Eyes partners, not Israel.
Government split on whether Trump's tweets are real threats

While some in the Turnbull Government firmly believe Mr Trump is prepared to use military force against Iran, others maintain it might be more bluster, given the consequence of conflict with Tehran might include unpredictable, dangerous responses in the Middle East.

Earlier this week, Mr Trump fired off an all-caps tweet directed at the Iranian President, seemingly warning of war:
Twitter embed

Twitter: Donald Trump tweet: To Iranian President Rouhani: NEVER, EVER THREATEN THE UNITED STATES AGAIN OR YOU WILL SUFFER CONSEQUENCES THE LIKES OF WHICH FEW THROUGHOUT HISTORY HAVE EVER SUFFERED BEFORE. WE ARE NO LONGER A COUNTRY THAT WILL STAND FOR YOUR DEMENTED WORDS OF VIOLENCE & DEATH. BE CAUTIOUS!
View on Twitter

He was responding to Mr Rouhani, who was quoted telling Iranian diplomats: "America should know that peace with Iran is the mother of all peace and war with Iran is the mother of all wars.

"Do not play with the lion's tail or else you will regret it," he said.

Mr Trump has since adjusted his rhetoric, suggesting Washington is ready to go back to the negotiating table with Tehran for a new nuclear deal.

"I withdrew the United States from the horrible one-sided Iran nuclear deal, and Iran is not the same country anymore," he told a convention in Kansas City.

"We're ready to make a deal."
Donald Trump, in the background, gazes at Malcolm Turnbull as he speaks at a podium with his hands gesturing
Photo: Malcolm Turnbull has previously said he and Donald Trump had "different perspectives" on the Iran nuclear deal. (AP: Carolyn Kaster)

Grappling with whether Mr Trump's Twitter missives should be believed has become a global quest — and not just his tweets about Iran or North Korea.

In response to the US President's all-caps tweet on Monday, a high-ranking Iranian army official told the ISNA news agency, a Tehran Government mouthpiece, that Mr Trump's threats were merely "psychological warfare".

General Gholam Hossein Gheibparvar, the chief of the paramilitary Revolutionary Guard's volunteer Basij force, said Mr Trump "won't dare" take military action against Iran.

It was an assessment echoed by Iranian MP Heshmatollah Falahatpisheh, who told Associated Press he doubted the escalating rhetoric would lead to a military confrontation.
Australia is urging Iran to be a force for peace: Bishop

Foreign Minister Julie Bishop has emphasised diplomatic efforts to bring Iran to heel.

"Australia is urging Iran to be a force for peace and stability in the region," she told ABC's AM program on Thursday.

"The relationship between the United States and Iran is a matter for them.

"What we are looking to do is to ensure that all parties embrace peaceful and stable principles to ensure that our region is safe."
Julie Bishop speaking at AUSMIN with Marise Payne, Mike Pompeo, and James Mattis
Photo: Foreign Minister Julie Bishop and Defence Minister Marise Payne have been speaking with US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and US Secretary of Defence James Mattis at AUSMIN in San Francisco this week. (Twitter: Secretary Pompeo)

Defence Industry Minister Christopher Pyne, when asked whether Mr Trump's threats against Iran should be believed, said: "Certainly President Trump has indicated that he's a person who's prepared to act in a way that previous presidents haven't.

"And for that reason, one should always take anything that he says extremely seriously."

US Secretary of Defence James Mattis reinforced America's hard line on Iran while speaking alongside Ms Bishop, Defence Minister Marise Payne and US Secretary of State Michael Pompeo at the AUSMIN meeting in San Francisco mid-week.

Mr Mattis said Iran had been a destabilising influence throughout the region.

"The only reason that the murderer Assad is still in power [in Syria] — the primary reason — is because Iran has stuck by him, reinforced him, funded him," he said.

"We see the same kind of malfeasance down in Yemen, where they're fomenting more violence down there. We've seen their disruptive capabilities demonstrated from Bahrain to the kingdom.

"And it's time for Iran to shape up and show responsibility as a responsible nation.

"It cannot continue to show irresponsibility as some revolutionary organisation that is intent on exporting terrorism, exporting disruption across the region. So I think the President was making very clear that they're on the wrong track."

Is that a tweet or foreign policy?

Australia is still learning how to deal with an unpredictable US President in Donald Trump.

The ABC understands AUSMIN discussed Iran, largely in the context of increasing sanctions on Tehran.

"We're concerned about its ballistic missile program and we talked about ways of constructively engaging with Iran to prevent the development of that program," Ms Bishop told AM.

"But more specifically, we talked about urging Iran to not support proxy groups, whether it's in Syria, Yemen or elsewhere."

Mr Trump withdrew the US from the Iran nuclear deal in May and now seeks complete, verifiable and total denuclearisation, rather than the roll-back and temporary freeze of Iran's nuclear program.

The US plans on reinstating sanctions lifted by the Iran deal by November 4. This includes trade and investment by US firms with Iran and sanctions on Iranian oil exports.
 

Lilbitsnana

On TB every waking moment
Barbara Plett Usher
‏Verified account @BBCBarbaraPlett
21m21 minutes ago

WhiteHouse confirms that the repatriation of war dead from #NorthKorea has begun: says US Airforce plane is transporting the remains of some fallen soldiers from Korean War to Osan air base in SouthKorea
 

Lilbitsnana

On TB every waking moment
Jennifer Griffin
‏Verified account @JenGriffinFNC
27m27 minutes ago

I asked Mattis about report US preparing strikes against Iran:
MATTIS: "I have no idea where the Australian news people got that information. I am confident it is not something that is being considered right now. I think it is a complete, frankly, it's fiction."
 

danielboon

TB Fanatic

UAE ready to take on ‘burden’ of Middle East security
July 27, 2018 at 1:40 pm


The United Arab Emirates (UAE) is ready to deploy more troops across the Middle East as it cannot rely on Western allies, including the United Kingdom and United States, to police the region, Arab News reported yesterday.

The Emiratis are concerned about the divergence between Western powers over the future relations with Iran. “We are ready to take up more of the burden of security in our own neighbourhood,” Minister of State for Foreign Affairs, Anwar Gargash, said during a speech in London.

“We hope that United States pressure on Iran will bring it back to the negotiating table for an agreement wider than the JCPOA [the nuclear deal known as Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action]: one that addresses Iran’s ballistic missiles and regional meddling,” Gargash said at the Policy Exchange think tank event.

The UAE has extended its influence by deploying troops across the Middle East and Africa where it supports local armed forces and the setup of military bases.

“In this current international system, it is no longer ‘write a cheque and someone is going to come and secure the stability in the region.’ You have to do some of the burden-sharing,” Gargash continued.

UAE supports the US position on Iran but is concerned about the difference in views between the US and EU https://t.co/9H51izDZm4

— Janie Hsieh, PhD (@JanieHsieh) July 27, 2018

The UAE is believed to have been expanding its military influence in Africa and the Middle East. Some 5,000 US troops, fighter jets and drones are being hosted by the UAE. Numerous military drills have been held across the desert near the bases outside Dubai amid doubts about Iran’s increasing role in the region.

In Yemen, the UAE has been part of the Saudi-led coalition to reinstate Yemen’s President Abd Rabbuh Mansur Hadi’s rule since March 2015, however the Emirates backed the Southern Transitional Council (STC) to counter Hadi’s authority.

The UAE has already deployed reconnaissance forces in Afghanistan and Yemen. Adding to this, it is a primary member of a quartet – Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Egypt – levying an air, land and sea blockade against Qatar over allegations that it supports terrorism and extremism. Although Qatar categorically denies the claims as baseless, tensions have risen between the neighbouring Gulf States, without any attempts for reconciliation.

READ: Abu Dhabi airport ‘struck’ by drone, say Houthis

Published in: Middle East, News, UAE, US, Yemen

View it on middleeastmonitor.com

https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/2...-east-security/amp/?__twitter_impression=true
© The Middle East Monitor 2006-2018.
 

danielboon

TB Fanatic
Reuters
FRI JUL 27, 2018 / 4:23 PM EDT
Trump seeks to revive 'Arab NATO' to confront Iran
Yara Bayoumy, Jonathan Landay and Warren Strobel





(Reuters) - The Trump administration is quietly pushing ahead with a bid to create a new security and political alliance with six Gulf Arab states, Egypt and Jordan, in part to counter Iran's expansion in the region, according to U.S. and Arab officials.

The White House wants to see deeper cooperation between the countries on missile defense, military training, counter-terrorism and other issues such as strengthening regional economic and diplomatic ties, four sources said.

The plan to forge what officials in the White House and Middle East have called an "Arab NATO" of Sunni Muslim allies will likely raise tensions between the United States and Shi'ite Iran, two countries increasingly at odds since President Donald Trump took office.



The administration's hope is that the effort, tentatively known as the Middle East Strategic Alliance (MESA), might be discussed at a summit provisionally scheduled for Washington on Oct. 12-13, several sources said.

The White House confirmed it was working on the concept of the alliance with "our regional partners now and have been for several months."

Saudi officials raised the idea of a security pact ahead of a Trump visit last year to Saudi Arabia where he announced a massive arms deal, but the alliance proposal did not get off the ground, a U.S. source said.

Sources from some of the Arab countries involved also said they were aware of renewed efforts to activate the plan. Officials from other potential participants did not respond to requests for comment.

"MESA will serve as a bulwark against Iranian aggression, terrorism, extremism, and will bring stability to the Middle East," a spokesperson for the White House's National Security Council said.

The spokesperson declined to confirm that Trump would host a summit on those dates and sources cautioned that it remains uncertain whether the security plan will be finalized by mid-October.


Similar initiatives by previous U.S. administrations to develop a more formal alliance with Gulf and Arab allies have failed in the past.

Washington, Riyadh and Abu Dhabi accuse Iran of destabilizing the region, fomenting unrest in some Arab countries through proxy groups and increasingly threatening Israel.

The alliance would put emphasis on Gulf heavyweights Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates working closer together with the Trump administration on confronting Iran.

It is unclear how the alliance could immediately counter Tehran but the Trump administration and its Sunni Muslim allies have joint interests in the conflicts in Yemen and Syria as well as defending Gulf shipping lanes through which much of the world's oil supplies are shipped.

A senior Iranian official told Reuters that "under the pretext of securing stability in the Middle East, Americans and their regional allies are fomenting tension in the region." He said the approach would have “no result” beyond “deepening the gaps between Iran, its regional allies and the U.S.-backed Arab countries."

Potentially a big obstacle to the planned alliance is a 13-month-old rift pitting Saudi Arabia and the UAE against Qatar, home to the largest U.S. air base in the region. Other Arab nations have accused Qatar of supporting terrorism, which it denies.



While one source said the administration is concerned the quarrel could be an obstacle to the initiative, he and an Arab official both said Riyadh and Abu Dhabi had assured Washington the rift would not pose a problem to the alliance.

The NSC spokesperson denied the rift was a hurdle.

As Trump pursues his "America First" policy, the White House is eager to have U.S. allies worldwide shoulder more of the burden in confronting regional security threats.

The UAE is ready to deploy more troops across the Middle East to counter its foes as it believes it can no longer rely on Western allies like the United States and Britain, UAE minister Anwar Gargash said on Thursday.

Setting up a regional anti-missile defense shield, which the United States and Gulf countries have discussed for years without result, would be a goal for the alliance, a source familiar with the plan said, as well as training to upgrade the countries' militaries.

Tension with Iran has increased since Trump announced in May that the United States was pulling out of a 2015 international deal to limit Tehran's nuclear ambitions.



On Monday, Iran dismissed a warning from Trump that it risked dire consequences "the likes of which few throughout history have suffered before" if it made threats against the United States.

(Additional reporting by Phil Stewart in Washington, Aziz El Yaakoubi in Dubai and Parisa Hafezi in Ankara; Editing by Alistair Bell)


https://mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKBN1KH2IK?__twitter_impression=true
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
I bet President Trump will meet them when they get to Andrews AFB. Thank you, President Trump.

Generally remains go to Dover AFB. Since these are skeletalized and degraded, I'm guessing they'll be sent to the DoD's DNA lab in Hawaii or they could go direct to Dover for a receiving ceremony.
 

danielboon

TB Fanatic
MIDDLE EAST
US Base in Southern Syria Sends ‘Signal’ to Iran
Last updated on: July 26, 2018 1:19 PM


The U.S. base near southern Syria’s al-Tanf border crossing was set up to train local Syrians to fight Islamic State militants, but it also serves as a counterweight to Iranian activities in the war-torn country, U.S. officials and experts tell VOA.

“Our mere presence there accomplishes that, whether it’s a goal or not,” Army Maj. Josh Jacques, a spokesman for U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM), said.

The U.S. military’s primary focus across Syria has been the defeat of Islamic State fighters, and to serve that mission, U.S. soldiers at al-Tanf are training a Syrian group called Maghawir al-Thawra (MaT), Jaques said.

While the military is not directly focused on Iran in Syria, it can still indirectly impede Iran’s “destabilizing acts” in the country, according to CENTCOM commander U.S. Army Gen. Joseph Votel.

“There are opportunities for us to indirectly influence their [Iran’s] activities by our presence, by the pursuit of our ongoing operations, that I think disrupt and make it difficult for them to pursue their unilateral objectives,” Votel told reporters during a July 19 briefing.


Land bridge

Jordan, Iraq, and Syria all meet in the area surrounding the U.S. base, a potential space, officials say, through which Iran could create a continuous land bridge that would stretch to the Mediterranean.

But the U.S. has established a so-called “deconfliction zone” in the area that spans about 55 kilometers around the base. The zone is meant to protect the United States and its allies as they battle the Islamic State militant group, and it essentially prevents any non-U.S. ally from entering the area.

“One quiet rationale for maintaining a presence there is to at least monitor and then perhaps deter some of the Iranian forces, or Iranian-backed forces that may have used that part of the country to transit into Syria,” said Brian Katulis with the Center for American Progress.

The base is not meant to completely block Iran’s involvement in Syria because much of its engagement comes via airplanes.

The U.S. post does, however, protect American military assets, giving the U.S. the ability to mount drone operations, conduct surveillance, and perhaps even create human intelligence networks.

It also helps to reassure U.S. ally Jordan, whose officials have expressed concerns about how secure its border would be if Americans weren’t in southern Syria.

“As small as that [U.S.] presence is, I think it sends a signal,” Katulis said.





Michael O'Hanlon, a senior defense fellow at the Brookings Institution, says defeating IS is the “black and white” goal for American forces at al-Tanf, while all the ways that the U.S. indirectly influences Iran in Syria are “shades of gray.”

He says the base also allows the U.S. to “exercise some influence on parts of the country so that Iran isn’t the only important foreign actor.”

“In the short term, you want to create some alternative power centers,” said O’Hanlon.

Once IS is defeated, however, the United States will need a long-term political transition strategy that clearly explains why the military would stay in Syria.

“We’re sort of in a transition phase, where you can still sustain the current effort on the grounds of it being anti-ISIS, but everyone recognizes that the days of that argument carrying the day are numbered,” O’Hanlon said, using an acronym for the Islamic State terror group.

“Just staying for presence sake is not a good enough reason,” he said.

Related

Analysts Hope US-Iran War of Words Will Lead to Dialogue
Militants Kill Over 200 in Southern Syria Attacks
Intl. Coalition: Islamic State Controls Just 300 Kilometers in Syria
Syria Blasts Evacuation of White Helmets as 'Criminal'
Sources: Russian-Backed Airstrikes Hit Islamic State in Southern Syria

https://www.voanews.com/amp/us-base...o-iran/4499431.html?__twitter_impression=true
 
Top