WAR 04-30-2016-to-05-06-2016_____****THE****WINDS****of****WAR****

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
(213) 04-09-2016-to-04-15-2016_____****THE****WINDS****of****WAR****
http://www.timebomb2000.com/vb/show...15-2016_____****THE****WINDS****of****WAR****

(214) 04-16-2016-to-04-22-2016_____****THE****WINDS****of****WAR****
http://www.timebomb2000.com/vb/show...22-2016_____****THE****WINDS****of****WAR****

(215) 04-23-2016-to-04-29-2016_____****THE****WINDS****of****WAR****
http://www.timebomb2000.com/vb/show...29-2016_____****THE****WINDS****of****WAR****

_____

Merde.........I can't take a night off apparently.....

Thanks MzKitty, Possible Impact and Almost Ready for jumping on this developing mess in Iraq.

Vestige, your two word succinct analysis, "It's gone" is unfortunately spot on.....

Iraq-IS War (30 March 2016) Obama to decide on increasing troop levels in Iraq soon
http://www.timebomb2000.com/vb/show...on-increasing-troop-levels-in-Iraq-soon/page2

US System In Iraq Collapsing: Protesters Storm Parliament, State of Emergency Declared
Started by Possible Impactý, Today 08:10 AM
http://www.timebomb2000.com/vb/show...-Storm-Parliament-State-of-Emergency-Declared

For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
https://pjmedia.com/trending/2016/0...ic-than-usual-as-protesters-storm-parliament/

Iraq Even More Chaotic Than Usual as Protesters Storm Parliament

By Rick Moran April 30, 2016

Hundreds of Iraqi protesters demanding political reforms broke through the security cordon in the heavily fortified Green Zone in Baghdad and stormed the parliament building, sending terrified lawmakers fleeing for their lives.

As of Saturday afternoon there were still politicians in the building, hiding from hundreds of protesters who were occupying the building.

The protest leader is an old friend of the U.S.: Muqtada al-Sadr, the firebrand Shia cleric whose Mahdi Army fought on and off with the U.S. army in the slum known as Sadr City. Just prior to the takeover of parliament, Sadr appeared on TV.

The Washington Post:

The session had been postponed until the afternoon, but before it was held, Sadr, a leader in the resistance to the American troop presence in Iraq following the U.S.-led invasion, held a news conference from the southern city of Najaf.

“They are against reform, they hope to behead the will of the Iraqi people,” he said of the country’s politicians. “I’m with the people, no matter what they decide. I’m standing and waiting for a major uprising of the Iraqi people.”

Shortly afterward, protesters, many of whom are Sadr loyalists, pushed through the multiple security cordons around parliament.

Considering that parliament is a broken institution anyway, it is of little consequence that it is currently occupied.

But the problem at the root of the protests was caused by America's good intentions.

The surge of protesters into the secure area, which is off limits to most Iraqis, was the culmination of months of street protests. Under huge political pressure, Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi has attempted to reshuffle his cabinet and meet the demands of the demonstrators, who have been spurred on by the powerful Shiite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr. But he has been hampered by a deeply divided parliament, where sessions have descended into chaos as lawmakers have thrown water bottles and punches at one another.

The political unrest has brought a new level of instability to a country that is facing multiple crises, including the fight against the Islamic State militant group and the struggling economy.

“This is a new era in the history of Iraq,” screamed one demonstrator in the main lobby of the parliament, in footage on Iraqi television. Another said, “They have been robbing us for the past 13 years.”

At the heart of the protesters demands is an end to the political quota system, which was put in place after the U.S.-led invasion in 2003 and sees positions shared out between sects. Sadr has demanded a new technocratic government.

“This is an end to the political system put in place after 2003,” said Shwan al-Dawoodi, a Kurdish lawmaker. “A big part of the blame for this is on America, which left Iraq without solving this crisis it created.”

Earlier in the day, not enough lawmakers had turned up in parliament to officially convene a session in which Abadi was due to present names for a cabinet reshuffle

Sectarian divisions were so bad in 2003 that the Bush administration believed that the optimum solution was divvying up the spoils of government among Shia, Sunni, and Kurdish parties.

This is not unusual in the Middle East. Lebanon has a similar system where the presidency goes to a Christian, the prime ministership to the Sunnis, and the speaker of parliament to the Shias.

But while easing sectarian tensions, it also frustrates reformers and democrats because the ruling party rarely has the kind of majority that allows it to govern. Given the factions within factions in Iraq, it's not surprising the political system is broken.

The Obama administration exacerbated the problem by leaving the country just as our help was most needed. While surely there's enough blame to go around for this state of affairs, ultimately, it is the Iraqis themselves who are responsible and must find the courage and the will to see their way through this crisis.
 
Last edited:

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://www.ktvq.com/story/31855134/protesters-target-iraqs-parliament-following-clerics-call

35 minutes ago

Protesters target Iraq's parliament following cleric's call

By Mohammed Tawfeeq, Alanne Orjoux and Jomana Karadsheh CNN

(CNN) -- The situation was tense in Baghdad by nightfall after hundreds, if not thousands, of protesters angry at government inaction stormed the city's green zone and parliament building -- the first time that fortified zone housing government buildings and the U.S. Embassy has been penetrated since 2003.

The protests Saturday were sparked by a fiery speech from Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr, who was speaking from the city of Najaf, about 100 miles south of the Iraqi capital. He's been railing against the Iraqi government for months now, warning that his supporters would enter the green zone if the Iraqi government didn't take steps to deal with the economic crisis the country is facing, as well as eradicate corruption and make reforms.

Images broadcast on state-run news channel Al-Iraqiya showed protesters carrying Iraqi flags walking freely in the green zone and gathering in the halls and meeting rooms in parliament.


The green zone was delineated shortly after U.S. troops invaded Iraq in 2003, forcing out then-President Saddam Hussein and overtaking Baghdad. The zone was strongly secured while U.S. troops were in charge of Iraq's security, and while the occasional mortar or grenade was lobbed into it and a handful of suicide attackers slipped inside, no large-scale protests have managed to get through.

But now, many Iraqi security forces and Shiite militias have been diverted to fight the terror group ISIS elsewhere in the country, and the security situation in the capital may not be as strong.

Saad Maan, the spokesman for Baghdad's Operations Command, told Al-Iraqiya earlier Saturday Iraqi security forces are present in the green zone and are in full control of the situation.

Some lawmakers beaten

No large-scale violence has been reported in the protests, although Hoshiar Abdullah, a Kurdish member of parliament, told Kurdish television network Rudaw that the deputy speaker of parliament and five other Kurdish lawmakers were trapped inside the parliament building and had been attacked by protesters who also smashed their cars.

Shiite lawmaker Ammar Taama -- also the head of the Shiite Fadhila faction in parliament -- was reportedly beaten by some protesters, possibly a target due to his past comments criticizing Sadr.

A statement on the website of Iraqi President Fuad Masum called on protesters to remain calm, "abide by the law, not to attack any lawmaker, government employees, public or private properties and to evacuate the building."

It also urged "the cabinet, lawmakers, and head of the political blocs to implement the desired ministerial amendment, execute the political and administrative reforms, and fight corruption. We believe that burying partisan and factional quota system is a task that can no longer be postponed."

According to Iraq's Defense Ministry, Defense Minister Khalid al-Obeidi has contacted military commanders in all sectors, urging them to be cautious and vigilant and not allow terrorist elements to exploit the situation.

Security had already been heightened in Baghdad due to a planned Shiite pilgrimage to Kadumiya Monday and Tuesday.

Rumors flew that some politicians were trying to flee the protests, but an official at the Baghdad airport told Al-Iraqiya no Iraqi officials were at the airport trying to leave the country.

And the U.S. Embassy tweeted that reports that officials from the Iraqi government or another party are in the American Embassy are not true.


The United Nations Assistance Mission for Iraq (UNAMI) issued a statement saying it was "gravely concerned" by the protests and "the storming of the Council of Representatives premises by demonstrators after they entered the International Zone.

"The Mission condemns the use of violence, including against elected officials, and urges calm, restraint and respect for Iraq's constitutional institutions at this crucial juncture. UNAMI calls on the Government, all political leaders and civil society to work together to immediately restore security and engage in dialogue that will ensure the implementation of the reforms necessary to draw Iraq out of its political, economic and security crisis," the statement said, adding that the group continues to operation from its headquarters in the green zone and "is in constant contact with parties to facilitate a solution that meets the demands of the people for reform."

Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi is working to bridge sectarian divides, but his government has been plagued in recent months by protests and opposition from predecessor Nuri al-Maliki, as well as Sadr.

U.S. Vice President Joe Biden made a brief, unannounced visit to Baghdad Thursday for meetings with political leaders to encourage Iraqi national unity and steps to take to help Iraq's economic woes.

"The more the political system in Baghdad is consumed with everybody keeping their job, or figuring out how to rearrange the government, the more difficult it is for everybody to be on the same page as it relates to the next step in the counter-ISIL campaign," said one senior administration official traveling with Biden. "The bigger danger you have to hedge against is that."


A deadly bombing east of Baghdad

Earlier Saturday, at least 24 people were killed and as many as 38 wounded when a car bomb exploded at a busy livestock market in Nahrawan, east of Baghdad, police said.


ISIS claimed responsibility for the bomb through its media group, Amaq Agency.

The Amaq Agency said "around 100" people had been either killed or injured in the blast. The bomb targeted Shiites, the agency said. ISIS is a Sunni group.

Sectarian violence has been rife in the country since the U.S, invasion in 2003, that toppled Saddam from power, and it has pitted Sunnis and Shias against each another, with the Kurds gaining a measure of autonomy in the north of the country.


CNN's Merieme Arif, Mohammed Tawfeeq and Hamdi Alkhshali contributed to this report.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...1f2dd8-0dad-11e6-90b7-92f16a8501d9_story.html

Asia & Pacific

Japan calls for international help as North Korea stonewalls on abductions

By Anna Fifield
April 30 at 12:22 PM

TOKYO — After years of wrangling with North Korea, Japan is appealing to the international community to help bring back Japanese citizens abducted by North Korea several decades ago.

Pyongyang agreed two years ago to reopen an investigation into the abductions of 12 people kidnapped to train North Korean spies. But Japan has been frustrated by Pyongyang’s refusal to return or adequately explain what happened to the abductees, an issue that has bedeviled relations between the two countries for years. After stalling for a year, North Korea angrily declared in February that it was stopping its investigation.

Katsunobu Kato, Japan’s minister in charge of the abduction issue, will deliver an address in Washington this week and then at the U.N. to ask the international community to help “extract and induce” cooperation from North Korea’s leader, Kim Jong Un.

“Our position is to strongly demand that the judgment is made [to resume discussions],” Kato said in an interview in his office, adorned with posters of the most famous abductee, Megumi Yokota, a 13-year-old who was taken on her way home from school in 1977.

During the 1970s and early 1980s, North Korea operated a state-sponsored abduction program in which it snatched young Japanese and put them on a boat to North Korea, where they were used to train spies to speak their language and pass for Japanese.

In a surprise development, North Korea admitted in 2002 that it had been abducting Japanese and agreed to return five of the people on Japan’s list of 17. But it said that eight of the others on the list, including Megumi, had died in North Korea and that the other four never entered the country.

The issue was dormant until an agreement in 2014 in which Tokyo agreed to ease sanctions on North Korea and Pyongyang agreed to investigate what had happened to the abductees.

But Pyongyang never submitted the reports it promised or made further progress and the negotiations stalled. Then, after this year’s nuclear and missile tests, Japan reinstated old sanctions and imposed new ones on North Korea, and supported multilateral measures.

In response, North Korea’s investigation committee said its work “will be totally stopped.”

Kato said that in his speeches in the United States, he will ask the global community to work together and will “strongly demand” that North Korea cooperate.

But as international efforts to curtail North Korea’s nuclear and missile programs have shown, a “strongly demand” that Pyongyang do something does not work, and North Korea holds all the cards on this issue.

Analysts say that Japan’s pleas are falling on deaf ears. As with denuclearization discussions, North Korea expects to be rewarded for negotiating and will probably insist that sanctions be dropped — and billions of dollars in humanitarian aid be promised — for cooperation on the abduction issue. That is impossible given the current crackdown on North Korea for its recent provocations, analysts say.


Read more:

Japanese women who have escaped from North Korea find little sympathy at home

U.N. adopts sweeping new sanctions on North Korea

Global powers condemn North Korea’s nuclear weapons test
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Hummm......

For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...3ac980-0e91-11e6-bc53-db634ca94a2a_story.html

Asia & Pacific

China lays out firm conditions for improved ties with Japan

By Christopher Bodeen | AP

April 30 at 9:18 AM

BEIJING — China laid out firm conditions Saturday for improved ties with Japan, telling Tokyo’s visiting foreign minister that there could be “no ambiguity or vacillation” in meeting Beijing’s demands over historical interpretation, relations with Taiwan and other key matters.

Beijing portrayed the visit by Fumio Kishida as an act of outreach to an angry China, as the two sides try to repair relations bedeviled by disputes over territory, history and competition for influence in East Asia.

Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi told Kishida that the ties must be based on “respect for history, adherence to commitment, and on cooperation rather than confrontation.”

Relations have gone through “twists and turns in recent years due to reasons best known by Japan,” Wang said, adding that China desires “healthy and stable relations” with its neighbor and key economic partner.

Japan needs to “turn its words into deeds,” Wang said.

In an elaboration on Wang’s comments, the Foreign Ministry quoted him as saying that Japan must adhere to commitments laid down in previous agreements, “face up to and reflect upon the history and follow the one-China policy to the letter,” the last part a reference to Beijing’s insistence that self-governing Taiwan is Chinese territory.

“No ambiguity or vacillation is allowed when it comes to this important political foundation of the bilateral ties,” the ministry quoted Wang as saying.

As part of what the ministry termed a “four-point requirement on improving bilateral ties,” Wang also demanded that Japan “have a more positive and healthy attitude toward the growth of China, and stop spreading or echoing all kinds of China threat or China economic recession theories.”

Kishida was making the first formal visit to China by a Japanese foreign minister in more than four years, part of an effort to revive a relationship that for years has been economically vital but politically dormant. He also met Saturday with Chinese Premier Li Keqiang and senior foreign policy adviser Yang Jiechi.

Kishida’s spokesman Masato Otaka described the discussions as frank and candid, and said the atmosphere throughout the visit was “forthcoming.”

Otaka said he believed ties were on the uptick, partly as a result of increased contacts between leaders of the two sides at multinational gatherings.

“Basically, the two countries are trying to find ways to improve the relationship,” Otaka said.

High-level ties between the two countries have been largely frozen since Japan nationalized a string of uninhabited East China Sea islands claimed by China in 2012, sparking deep anger among Chinese. Kishida’s visit was the first formal one to China by a Japanese foreign minister in more than four years.

Despite their crucial economic relationship, many Chinese harbor deep animosity toward Japan dating from its brutal invasion and occupation of much of China during the 1930s and 1940s. Meanwhile, distrust toward Beijing runs deep among the Japanese public, who see their country’s economic and political influence being overshadowed by a rising China.

China is also deeply critical of Japan’s alliance with the U.S. and has warned Tokyo to keep out of a festering dispute over China’s moves to cement its claim over virtually the entire South China Sea. Beijing has also lambasted moves by Japanese conservatives seen as whitewashing Japan’s militaristic past and minimizing World War II atrocities committed in China and elsewhere.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Pentagon says Russian SU-27 came within 25 feet of USAF RC-135 over Baltic earlier today
Started by mzkitty‎, Yesterday 11:56 AM
http://www.timebomb2000.com/vb/show...feet-of-USAF-RC-135-over-Baltic-earlier-today


For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...t-us-air-force-reconnaissance-plane/83753554/

Russia defends intercept of U.S. Air Force reconnaissance plane

Ledyard King, USATODAY 2:59 p.m. EDT April 30, 2016

Moscow defended its intercept of a U.S. reconnaissance plane over the Baltic Sea on Friday, saying it took the action because the aircraft turned off its transponder.

Russian Defense Ministry Spokesman Igor Konashenkov dismissed Pentagon claims that the maneuver by the Russian SU-27 against the U.S. Air Force RC-135 was “unsafe and unprofessional.”

"We’re already getting used to claims of Pentagon representatives regarding alleged 'non-professional' maneuvers of our fighters when intercepting the U.S. scout planes on the Russian borders," he said in a statement carried by the state-run ITAR-TASS news agency. "At the same time, we want to note that the RC-135U surveillance plane tries to sneak up to the Russian border with the transponder turned off each time. Therefore, the air defense forces on duty have to lift the fighter to visually identify the type of aircraft and its tail number.”


USA TODAY
Defense official: Russians buzzed U.S. plane in Baltic Sea


All flights of Russian aircraft are performed in compliance with international regulations, Konashenkov told ITAR-TASS. U.S. military planes should either not perform flights close to the Russian border or turn the transponder on so they can be tracked by radar, he said.

It was the latest in a series of incidents where Russian aircraft have buzzed American planes or ships operating in the region. The United States has expressed concerns that the dangerous maneuvers could lead to mishaps and escalate tensions between the two countries.


USA TODAY
Russian war planes buzz U.S. destroyer in Baltic


The Pentagon statement on Friday's incident did not detail the type of maneuver the Russian pilot performed, but a senior defense official said the Russian aircraft flew along the U.S. aircraft and then did a "barrel roll" over the top of the aircraft, closing within 100 feet of the American RC-135. The official asked not to be named since he was not authorized to discuss the issue publicly.

Earlier this month, Russian attack planes buzzed the guided missile destroyer USS Donald Cook during the U.S.' joint exercises in the Baltic Sea.

Contributing: Jim Michaels, USA TODAY

Twitter: @ledgeking
 

Possible Impact

TB Fanatic
Scowcroft Center ‏@ACScowcroft Apr 28
We're forging relationships b/w DC & LA.
Learn more about our "Art of the Future" project:

http://artoffuturewarfare.org/2016/03/creativity-takes-flight/
ChINCPmWgAErLzk.jpg




AtlanticCouncil ‏@AtlanticCouncil Apr 29
NOW: New Threats and Challenges to European Security?
Moderated by @FredKempehttp://buff.ly/26AuyL4 #CSDP2016
ChNsJyKU4AAFOCx.jpg



.Damon M. Wilson ‏@DamonMacWilson Apr 29
We must marshall our strength & resources

to deal Daesh a decisive defeat says @JeanineHennis #CSDP2016
ChNm9L9UUAAI25U.jpg


^^^ A decisive and bold #Hashtag will be needed to convey our strength and determination,
it must also be nonviolent and inclusive, to bring the parties in conflict to the negotiating table...
(:rolleyes:)



Marcel Sardo ‏@marcelsardo 2h
Darüber lacht Russland: Verteidigungsminister Russland vs. NATO
- Holland - Deutschland
ChTlv2FXEAAVmQz.jpg


ChTlxUHXEAAfGew.jpg


ChTlytAWIAAkyCX.jpg
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2016/04/30/world/middleeast/ap-ml-syria.html?_r=0

Middle East

Fighting Rages in Aleppo Amid Calm in Other Parts of Syria

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
APRIL 30, 2016, 8:54 A.M. E.D.T.

BEIRUT — The Syrian government launched new airstrikes Saturday on insurgent-held neighborhoods in Aleppo while rebels shelled government-held parts of the northern city, as a truce in other parts of the country appeared to be holding on its first day.

Contested Aleppo, Syria's largest city and former commercial center, has been the scene of intense shelling and air raids, killing nearly 250 civilians over the past nine days, according to the Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights.

The surge in fighting has caused the collapse of a two-month cease-fire brokered by the U.S. and Russia. It also has raised fears of an all-out government assault on Aleppo.

The International Committee of the Red Cross warned that the intensification of fighting threatens to cause a humanitarian disaster for millions of people. A statement issued late Friday said four medical facilities on both sides of the city were hit earlier that day, including a dialysis center and a cardiac hospital. ICRC appealed to all parties in the conflict "for an immediate halt in the attacks."

"There can be no justification for these appalling acts of violence deliberately targeting hospitals and clinics, which are strictly prohibited under international humanitarian law," said Marianne Gasser, head of the ICRC in Syria. "People keep dying in these attacks. There is no safe place anymore in Aleppo."

"For the sake of people in Aleppo, we call for all to stop this indiscriminate violence," Gasser said.

Friday's attacks on the medical centers came after government airstrikes damaged a main hospital supported by Doctors Without Borders late Wednesday, killing more than 50 people, according to the international aid group.

Syrian opposition activists said Saturday's airstrikes on Aleppo killed four people and wounded many others, mostly in the neighborhood of Bab al-Nairab.

The Observatory and the Local Coordination Committees, another activist-run group, reported more than 20 separate air raids on rebel-held parts of the city, where an estimated 250,000 people remain.

State media said rebel shelling of government-held parts of Aleppo killed one man and wounded others.

Aleppo-based activist Bahaa al-Halaby said warplanes and helicopter gunships are launching very "intense bombardments."

Another activist in the city, who spoke on condition of anonymity out of safety concerns, said schools have been ordered closed in rebel-held parts of Aleppo.

Aleppo was excluded from a brief truce declared by the Syrian army on Friday. The truce went into effect after midnight Saturday in the capital Damascus and its suburbs as well as the coastal province of Latakia. Activists said the truce appeared to be holding in both areas on Saturday.

Anas al-Abdeh, the head of the opposition Syrian National Coalition, told reporters in Turkey that Aleppo should not be excluded from the truce. He added that his group has asked U.S. officials to contact Russia in order to make the government to stop its operations in the northern city.

"The United States noticed that the regime is not abiding by the truce," al-Abdeh said, without elaborating.

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry is leaving for Geneva on Sunday, where he plans to hold meetings the following day with the U.N. envoy to Syria to discuss efforts to halt the violence and increase deliveries of humanitarian aid to besieged communities. Kerry spoke to Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov on Friday.

Government supporters say Aleppo should not be part of the truce brokered by the U.S. and Russia because al-Qaida's branch in Syria, known as the Nusra Front, is active there and in nearby areas.

In neighboring Lebanon's capital, Beirut, more than 100 people marched in the city center to protest Syrian government attacks, mainly those on Aleppo, calling them "war crimes." Lebanon is split between supporters and opponents of the rebellion against Syrian President Bashar Assad.

In Damascus, ICRC spokesman Pawel Krzysiek said that despite the difficult situation in Aleppo, which hinders humanitarian operations in the city, aid deliveries elsewhere continued. Humanitarian convoys entered separate areas besieged by rebels and government forces, he said.

The convoys, a joint operation between the ICRC, the United Nations and the Syrian Arab Red Crescent, began delivering aid to Madaya and Zabadani — two mountain resorts near Damascus that have been besieged by government forces.

Krzysiek added that 20 other trucks entered the northwestern villages of Foua and Kfarya, which are being besieged by insurgents.

The ICRC delivers food parcels and wheat flour, medicines, bed nets, crutches and anti-lice shampoo to all locations, he said.

The U.N. Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs said on its Twitter account Saturday that the aid delivery in the four areas will be large enough to serve 61,000 people.

____

Associated Press writers Albert Aji in Damascus, Syria, and Matthew Lee in Washington contributed to this report.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Scowcroft Center ‏@ACScowcroft Apr 28
We're forging relationships b/w DC & LA.
Learn more about our "Art of the Future" project:

http://artoffuturewarfare.org/2016/03/creativity-takes-flight/
ChINCPmWgAErLzk.jpg




AtlanticCouncil ‏@AtlanticCouncil Apr 29
NOW: New Threats and Challenges to European Security?
Moderated by @FredKempehttp://buff.ly/26AuyL4 #CSDP2016
ChNsJyKU4AAFOCx.jpg



.Damon M. Wilson ‏@DamonMacWilson Apr 29
We must marshall our strength & resources

to deal Daesh a decisive defeat says @JeanineHennis #CSDP2016
ChNm9L9UUAAI25U.jpg




Marcel Sardo ‏@marcelsardo 2h
Darüber lacht Russland: Verteidigungsminister Russland vs. NATO
- Holland - Deutschland
ChTlv2FXEAAVmQz.jpg


ChTlxUHXEAAfGew.jpg


ChTlytAWIAAkyCX.jpg




Yeah, for those political systems, those cabinet posts are for the most part handed out in terms of political alliance building in coalition governments or ranking within majority party governments. The big prize is the interior ministry or human services (biggest budget and influence on things in prep for the prime minister/chancellor job). IIRC at least the Swedish Defense Minister was a commissioned officer in their army at one point.
 

Possible Impact

TB Fanatic
Yeah, for those political systems, those cabinet posts are for the most part handed out in terms of political alliance building in coalition governments or ranking within majority party governments. The big prize is the interior ministry or human services (biggest budget and influence on things in prep for the prime minister/chancellor job). IIRC at least the Swedish Defense Minister was a commissioned officer in their army at one point.

:dot5: :lol: Didn't get my snark added in time for your reply:

[FONT=Verdana,Arial].Damon M. Wilson ‏@DamonMacWilson Apr 29
We must marshall our strength & resources

to deal Daesh a decisive defeat says @JeanineHennis #CSDP2016
ChNm9L9UUAAI25U.jpg


^^^ A decisive and bold #Hashtag will be needed to convey our strength and determination,
it must also be nonviolent and inclusive, to bring the parties in conflict to the negotiating table...
(:rolleyes:)
[/FONT]
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
:dot5: :lol: Didn't get my snark added in time for your reply:

[FONT=Verdana,Arial].Damon M. Wilson ‏@DamonMacWilson Apr 29
We must marshall our strength & resources

to deal Daesh a decisive defeat says @JeanineHennis #CSDP2016
ChNm9L9UUAAI25U.jpg


^^^ A decisive and bold #Hashtag will be needed to convey our strength and determination,
it must also be nonviolent and inclusive, to bring the parties in conflict to the negotiating table...
(:rolleyes:)
[/FONT]

"Decisive and bold"......What's that line from a particular western or was it John Wayne in "The Green Berets", "Justice here is a bullet"... None of these fools wants to admit that this is a "war of the black flag", declared by the Jihadis; no quarter asked for or given. Such a concept is beyond their preconceived notions of how things are supposed to work.

The manpower, treasure, Second World War ROE and application of firepower that this mess truly deserves should make anyone pause if for no other reason than the sheer compounded implications of it all. But true leaders shouldn't run away from it either.

Adding to that, those capabilities have secondary impacts upon the rest of the issues on the planet, just like a .45 and a Bowie knife laid next to a poker player's table stakes.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://www.latimes.com/world/la-fg-iran-election-20160430-story.html

Iran's moderates make gains in runoff but fail to clinch a parliamentary majority

Associated Press
April 30, 2016, 10:17 AM |Reporting from Tehran

Iranian moderates and reformists who support President Hassan Rouhani and last year's landmark nuclear deal failed to secure a parliamentary majority after runoff elections, but the bloc will have the highest number of seats, followed by hard-liners and independents.

Iranian State TV announced the results for the remaining 68 contested seats on Saturday, the day after the runoff.

The new assembly, which will convene next month, will be far friendlier to Rouhani, but his supporters will have to ally with independents — whose views vary depending on the issue — in order to push through legislation.

Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, remains the top decision-maker in the country and would have to support any major policy changes.

Thirty-seven seats were won by moderates or reformists in the runoff. The bloc needed to win 40 for an outright majority in the 290-seat chamber.

The moderates and reformists will have 143 seats in the assembly, making them the largest bloc, followed by hard-liners, with 86, and independents, with 61. Twenty-two hard-liners and nine independents won seats in the runoff.

The assembly will convene after the Guardian Council, a constitutional watchdog, confirms the results. The council is in charge of vetting candidates and supervising elections.

The failure to achieve an outright majority could complicate the moderate-reformist bloc's efforts to name a parliament speaker. The speaker plays a significant role in passing or rejecting bills and also serves on several important decision-making bodies, including the Supreme National Security Council.

In February, the moderate-reformist bloc dominated the vote in Tehran, securing all 30 seats there. But their support is less strong outside the capital.

Deputy Interior Minister Hossein Ali Amiri told state TV that turnout in the runoff elections was 59%, compared with 62% in the first round of voting in February. Some 17 million Iranians were eligible to cast ballots.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://www.dw.com/en/afd-party-congress-starts-in-stuttgart-despite-demonstrations/a-19226479

AfD party congress starts in Stuttgart despite demonstrations

Left-wing protesters tried to prevent people from entering the party congress of the right-wing Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) in Stuttgart. Police detained hundreds of demonstrators.

Date 30.04.2016

Video

The party congress of the right-wing Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) in the German city of Stuttgart started on Saturday after a one-hour delay, amid protests by about 1,000 left-wing demonstrators.

The protesters tried to block the entry to the venue of the party congress, shouting slogans such as: "Keep refugees, drive Nazis away!" and "We'll get you all."

According to a police spokesperson, demonstrators blocked a road to the venue with burning tyres for half an hour. They also temporarily blocked traffic on highway A8 in both directions near Stuttgart Airport, trying to prevent AfD members who arrived by plane from attending the congress.

Hooded demonstrators lit firecrackers and threw them at police officers. The police used tear gas and a water cannon amid the clashes with the protesters. About 400 people were detained, police said.

More than 1,000 police officers were deployed on Saturday to prevent clashes between the protesters and AfD party participants.

The AfD's two-day meeting will focus on the right-wing party's policies. It is expected to adopt an anti-Islam manifesto.

The AfD has protested against German Chancellor Angela Merkel's liberal migration policy. The party has also managed to channel popular anger against the political establishment and the media.

das/jm (dpa, AFD, Reuters)


DW recommends

Party congress will determine what the AfD really wants

Europe's far-right welcomes Austrian election result
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://www.stripes.com/news/pacific...e-flexing-australian-think-tank-says-1.407189

Analysis

Nations must resist China's maritime flexing, Australian think-tank says

By David Tweed
Bloomberg
Published: April 30, 2016

The professionalism displayed by China's navy in some of the world's most contested seas is masking an underlying challenge to the existing order in the East China Sea and South China Sea that must be resisted, according to a report by an Australian security think tank.

"Beijing's newly acquired taste for maritime 'rules of the road' is lowering the risk of accidental conflict," wrote Ashley Townshend and Rory Medcalf in a report published Friday by the Sydney-based Lowy Institute for International Policy. "In turning away from tactical aggression, Beijing has refocused on passive assertive actions to consolidate a new status quo in maritime Asia."

China's strategy is based around its island-building program, which has created more than 3,000 acres of land on seven features it occupies in the Spratly Islands of the South China Sea. Though its actions have sparked tensions with other claimants including the Philippines and Vietnam, and prompted the United States to carry out naval transits to defend freedom of navigation in the waters, China has still managed to expand its maritime influence.

"As it is virtually impossible to compel China to roll back its outposts, the current policy imperative -- aside from defending freedom of navigation -- is to deter further militarization or the creation of a new air defense identification zone, particularly in relation to the Spratly Islands," the authors wrote.

China declared an air defense identification zone in November 2013 over part of the East China Sea covering islands contested with Japan, and said its military would take "defensive emergency measures" if aircraft enter the area without reporting flight plans or identifying themselves. While China has rarely attempted to enforce the restrictions, analysts speculate that China may attempt to establish a similar zone above the South China Sea.

U.S. Rear Adm. Marcus Hitchcock this week underlined one of the themes of the Lowy report, praising the People's Liberation Army Navy for abiding by a code set up for unplanned encounters at sea, "no matter what their nations are going through diplomatically."

Even as China's navy adheres to those rules of conduct, U.S. officials are concerned that China may start creating an island on Scarborough Shoal, which it seized from the Philippines in 2012. On April 19 the U.S. sent six U.S. Air Force planes into the vicinity of the shoal, which lies about 143 miles from the Philippines coast.

An airstrip there would add to China's existing network of runways and surveillance sites that Adm. Harry Harris, head of U.S. Pacific Command, said last year "creates a mechanism by which China would have de facto control over the South China Sea in any scenario short of war."

The authors dub Beijing's current strategy as "passive assertion," where China uses the cover of the region's relative stability to push ahead with island building, militarization, and the expansion of its naval and law enforcement patrols to create new zones of military authority.

Part of the strategy is to portray the U.S. and its allies as the aggressors, the authors wrote. That tactic was displayed Thursday at the monthly press conference of China's Ministry of Defense. "It is the so-called 'freedom of navigation' operations of the U.S. that have plunged the situation in the South China Sea into disorder, undermined regional stability and harmed the security interests of littoral states," ministry spokesman Wu Qian said.

"China's statement is the latest example of its public relations efforts to portray the U.S. as Asia's main maritime provocateur," said Townshend, a research fellow at the United States Studies Centre at the University of Sydney. "By consistently portraying the United States and its partners as destabilizing forces, China's public relations campaign could muddy the international narrative about who is actually driving Asia's maritime tensions."

To combat China's strategy, interested nations should adopt measures aimed at imposing direct and indirect costs on China. The recommendations include:
◾ Strengthening and widening maritime and aerial confidence-building measures to bring China-Japan and China-Association of Southeast Asian Nation codes to the same level as China-U.S. rules. Codes on unplanned encounters at sea should also include coast guards and other civilian maritime law enforcement agencies.
◾ Countries should execute freedom of navigation flights and voyages within the 12-mile zones of the islands China claims and its 230 miles exclusive economic zone.
◾ Maritime capacity building should also be expanded to enable all countries to respond to China's growing presence. This should involve the transfer of ships, aircraft and surveillance technologies to allow countries like the Philippines and Malaysia to patrol their regional waters.
◾ Expansion of diplomatic criticism to target its reputation as a good international citizen, including strengthening support for the Philippines' case against China at the Permanent Court of Arbitration.

Townshend is also currently a visiting fellow at the Asia-Pacific Center at Fudan University, Shanghai. Medcalf is head of the National Security College at the Australian National University in Canberra.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_northkorea/741961.html

[Analysis] North Korea�'s first Workers�' Party Congress in 36 years

Posted on : Apr.30,2016 14:11 KST
Modified on : Apr.30,2016 14:11 KST

The North�fs most important political event could see latest plans on two-track approach of developing economy and nukes

On May 6, the 7th Congress of the Korean Workers' Party (KWP) will be held in Pyongyang, North Korea, 36 years after the 6th Congress in Oct. 1980.

The long hiatus and the years of silence imply that there will be much to say at the congress. The outside world is keenly interested in the congress, given the high-stakes confrontation with North Korea and the international community following the North's fourth nuclear weapons test on Jan. 6 and its long-range missile launch on Feb. 7.

Understanding North Korea is impossible without first understanding the KWP, which �gleads the Democratic People's Republic of Korea," according to Article 11 of the North Korean constitution. Furthermore, there is no way to understand the KWP without taking a closer look at its congress, which is the KWP�fs "supreme leadership organ," according to Article 14, Clause 1, of the KWP rules.

The KWP Congress is both the essence of understanding North Korea and a shortcut to achieving that understanding.

"The political bureau of the KWP�fs Central Committee has decided to hold the 7th Party Congress in the revolutionary capital of Pyongyang on May 6, 2016,�h read one phrase in the official announcement of the decision made by the politburo of the KWP�fs Central Committee that was carried in North Korea's state-run Rodong Sinmun newspaper and the Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) on Apr. 27.

The press and experts in and outside of South Korea have unleashed a torrent of analysis and predictions in regard to the 7th KWP Congress. The South Korean government along with the governments of other major countries in Northeast Asia are following these events closely and mobilizing various agencies to collect information about the direction of the congress. Such actions reflect the fact that the previous congress was held no less than 36 years ago and that this congress is taking place in the fifth year of Kim Jong-un's rule.

In order to gratify this curiosity, it is necessary to know what the status and role of the KWP and the KWP Congress are in North Korea.

North Korea's KWP may be called a party, but it functions differently from South Korean political parties such as the Saenuri Party, the Minjoo Party of Korea, the People's Party and the Justice Party. This is evident from a comparison of the relevant sections in the two constitutions.

The 11th article of North Korea�fs "socialist constitution," the one currently in force following a revision in 2012, states that "The Democratic People's Republic of Korea carries out all of its activities under the leadership of the Korean Workers' Party." What this means is that the party leads the state, an arrangement that is known as a party-state system. This is a system in which a single party establishes the state according to the principle of the dictatorship of the proletariat and takes precedence to the state in leadership.

Center of the party-state system

Some instructive historical precedents are the establishment of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) by the Communist Party, which was centered on the Bolsheviks led by Vladimir Lenin, and the establishment of the People's Republic of China by the Communist Party of China (CPC) under Mao Zedong.

In contrast, Article 8, Clause 1, of the constitution of the Republic of Korea states that "the establishment of political parties shall be free, and the plural party system shall be guaranteed." Clause 4 of the same article goes on to say that "if the purposes or activities of a political party are contrary to the fundamental democratic order, the Government may bring an action against it in the Constitutional Court for its dissolution, and the political party shall be dissolved in accordance with the decision of the Constitutional Court."

In South Korea, every political party must respect and abide by the "fundamental democratic order" specified in the constitution. Parties that do not do so may be dissolved. Thus, in South Korea, the state is above the party.

In the majority of countries that have adopted multi-party systems, the ruling party can change during periodic elections. But in the surviving socialist countries such as North Korea, China, Vietnam and Cuba that maintain the party-state system, the ruling party is in theory the only party, and thus cannot be changed. Historically speaking, such a handover of power has never occurred.

The KWP Congress is the KWP's "supreme leadership organ" that "leads the Democratic People's Republic of Korea," according to Article 14, Clause 1, of the KWP rules. As such, the KWP Congress is the most important political event in North Korea.

The KWP Congress is on a different level from the national conventions of political parties in South Korea at which parties select their leader or their presidential candidates. The closest comparable event would perhaps be South Korea's presidential election.

But presidential elections in South Korea have already taken place 18 times despite a long military dictatorship, while North Korea's KWP Congress has only been held six times.

What�fs on the agenda?

What is discussed and decided at the KWP Congress? While there have been a plethora of analyses and predictions on this question, sticking to the basics is the safest way to go about trying to understand a system like North Korea's in which there is so little transparency in the political process.

The kinds of business done at the KWP Congress are specified in Article 21 of the KWP rules: "‡@ harmonize the business of the KWP Central Committee and the KWP Central Auditing Commission, ‡A adopt, revise and augment the KWP rules and regulations, ‡B debate and decide basic issues about the KWP's course, policies, strategies and tactics, ‡C appoint the KWP general secretary, ‡D and elect the members of the KWP Central Committee and the KWP Central Auditing Commission."

These five types of business can be summarized as assessing the KWP's business and results from the time of the previous congress until the present, providing the KWP with its future direction and policies and reorganizing the KWP's organizations and power structure.

While this may all sound very unfamiliar, don�ft close the window just yet: all you need to know is that this is how the congress works.

All right, so much for the basics. Before moving on to analysis and predictions, we need a refresher on what happened between Oct. 30, 2015, when the decision was made to convene the congress, and Apr. 27, 2016, when the final decision to hold the congress was announced.

The decision to convene the congress was made immediately after an elaborate commemoration of the 70th anniversary of the KWP's establishment on Oct. 10, 1945. A certain confidence can be detected in the draft of the statement of decision: "The political bureau of the Party's Central Committee has decided to convene the 7th Congress of the Korean Workers Party at the beginning of May in Juche Year 105 [2016], to reflect the demand for development in the Party and the revolution, in which an epochal change is taking place in regard to carrying out the great deeds of the Juche Revolution and the formation of a strong and prosperous socialist state." This is the self-satisfaction of a state that has risen above 36 years of hardship that were marked by many concerns and crises to convene a KWP Congress.

But after the decision to convene the KWP Congress, external conditions deteriorated considerably.

First of all, a concert by North Korea's Moranbong Band and the State Merited Chorus in Beijing, which was expected to accelerate the improvement of relations between China and North Korea, fell through when North Korea abruptly withdrew the band on Dec. 12 of last year. And the first round of deputy minister-level talks between North and South Korea that took place at the Kaesong Industrial Complex on the same day could have been a turning point for improving inter-Korean relations, but these broke down as well.

North Korea's simultaneous attempts to improve relations with China and South Korea in advance of the KWP Congress both went nowhere, while the gulf in attitudes between North Korea and South Korea and between North Korea and China grew wider.

If the Moranbong Band's concert in Beijing had gone off without a hitch and if the inter-Korean government talks had also gotten some results, North Korea's subsequent actions would have been, and the situation on the Korean Peninsula today would be, quite different.

According to reports by North Korea's Korean Central News Agency (KCNA), it was immediately after this that North Korean leader Kim Jong-un gave orders on Dec. 15 for the fourth nuclear test to go ahead and signed the final order on Jan. 3. Since then, there has been a spate of strategic military actions by North Korea, including the fourth nuclear test on Jan. 6 and the rocket launch on Feb. 7.

The threat index on the Korean Peninsula has skyrocketed. The UN Security Council took action against North Korea by adopting Resolution No. 2270, the strongest non-military action it has taken in the 70 years since the UN was founded.

It is unconfirmed whether Kim Jong-un was planning to carry out a fourth nuclear test before the KWP Congress when he decided to convene the congress. Whatever the case, it is clear that the deteriorating external environment will affect what is discussed at the 7th KWP Congress and what is achieved there.

What could Kim Jong-un�fs �gresplendent blueprint�h be?

Now, let's take a closer look at the five kinds of business that the KWP rules state will take place at the congress.

First is "business harmonization." This is something akin to a performance evaluation. Without exception, the person who gave the business harmonization reports during the first six KWP Congresses was Kim Il-sung, who was North Korea's supreme leader at the time. Given this precedent, it stands to reason that the business harmonization report at the 7th KWP Congress will be delivered by Kim Jong-un.

Kim will need to evaluate the KWP�fs work in the areas of politics, the economy, South Korean affairs and foreign affairs during the past 36 years when the congress could not be held and derive from this a new vision and policy directions. During the previous congress, Kim Il-sung delivered a business harmonization report that lasted for no less than five hours.

The business harmonization report, which will be delivered on the first or seconds day of the congress, is the heart of the congress. The report sets the tone for the content and direction of the rest of the congress.

The entire idea of business harmonization presumes that the KWP has some achievements to review. This is why previous North Korean leader Kim Jong-il (who died in 2011) was unable to convene a party congress even once during his rule, which lasted for more than a decade.

A substantial portion of Kim Jong-il's time in power overlapped with the collapse of the remaining socialist states and the "arduous march," referring to a time of deadly shortages in food and energy in the 1990s. During this time, Kim responded to the crisis with the Songun policy, meaning "military first," an emergency governance strategy in which the National Defense Commission took priority to the KWP.

In his New Year's address this year, Kim Jong-un predicted that "a resplendent blueprint will be unfurled at the 7th Congress of the Korean Workers' Party." While we will have to wait and see what this "resplendent blueprint" is, at least two predictions can be made: namely, that Kim will emphasize the "two-track" dual approach of building both the economy and nuclear weapons and that he will herald party leadership that has been strengthened in every way. Logically speaking, the North Korean constitution's statement that the party is to lead the state implies that strengthening the party's leadership will allow the party, and consequently the state, to perform their proper functions.

How to develop the economy

Second, one of the most crucial policy issues for the congress concerns economic development strategy. Not only does the preamble to the party regulations list �gconstant improvement of the people�fs lives�h as the �gparamount principle of party activity,�h but Kim Jong-un also declared in his 2016 New Year�fs address that the �gpeople�fs livelihood issue�h was �gnumber one among myriad state affairs.�h

The third, fourth, and fifth party congresses all saw the presentation of medium-term economic plans: the Third New Economic Development Five-Year Plan, Fourth People�fs Economic Development Seven-Year Plan, and Fifth People�fs Economic Development Six-Year Plan. For the sixth, a somewhat abstract framework of �gTen Predicted Goals for Building a Socialist Economy�h was offered instead of a medium-term plan. With the seventh congress taking place amid heavy sanctions from the international community, a medium-term economic plan is unlikely to be presented there.

Another focus of interest is whether Kim moves to make official two systems introduced since he came to power: the �gnew economic management system�h introduced on Jan. 28, 2012, and the �gsocialist corporate responsibility management system�h - often called the �gNorth Korean-style economic management approach�h - introduced on May 30, 2014. Noting the stronger autonomy, responsibility, and incentives for local economic units, experts have described both as �gseedlings�h for a North Korean approach to economic reform.

But hanging too many hopes on them appears unwise. Symptomatic of this is the �g70-day battle�h declared at a meeting of the KWP Central Committee�fs political bureau sometime around Feb. 23. The name is reminiscent of another 70-day battle in 1974, which brought the first application of the �gspeed battle�h strategy of mass movement-based economic development introduced by Kim�fs father, Kim Jong-il. Speed campaigns aimed at achieving results in a specific number of days have typically met - and even exceeded - goals through the channeling of human and material resources over a set period of time. But they have also resulted in serious distortions in resource distribution, undermining the economy�fs base. Adopting the slogan of �gMallima speed�h - the times faster than the �gChollima speed�h of the 1950s, named after a mythical winged horse capable of galloping 400 km in a single day - the 70-day battle is a kind of morphine, with a focus squarely on short-term results. For this reason, the seventh KWP congress is unlikely to produce any economic development strategy of note. And because of the heavy sanctions from the international community, any particular reference to external economic openness is also unlikely.

Any concrete proposals for external relations?

In terms of South Korean relations, Pyongyang will need to follow Kim�fs call in the New Year�fs address to �gshow a willingness to respect and faithfully implement the three main principles of reunification of the fatherland [autonomy, peace, and solidarity of the Korean people, as named in the July 4 Joint Statement], the June 15 Joint Declaration, and the October 4 Summit Statement.�h

But the likelihood of any new dialogue proposals to South Korean President Park Geun-hye appear slim. While the prospects are similarly low, North may move beyond bland generalities about the importance of �gpeace,�h or a peaceful outside environment, and presents concrete suggestions in terms of external relations.

A third area concerns revisions or additions to the party rules, which typically take place in the later stages of congresses. Here, two specific areas require attention. In 2012, North Korea amended its Constitution to identify itself as a �gnuclear state,�h and in 2013 it formally adopted a KWP strategic course of parallel economic and nuclear development at a Mar. 31 Central Committee plenary meeting and enacted its Nuclearization Law at an Apr. 1 Supreme People�fs Assembly session. Given the trend, it could amend its party regulations to specify itself as a �gnuclear state�h there as well. A second question concerns possible revision to prevision in the regulations�f preamble regarding revolution in the South, which currently state that the KWP�fs �gimmediate task . . . lies in performing the duty of revolution for democracy and liberation of the people at the national scale.�h Doing so would hold greater practical significance than the presentation of a new reunification plan - another focus of attention for the conference. Also remaining to be seen is the influence of new perceptions on inter-Korean relations as expressed in the North�fs announcement of a separate time zone for Pyongyang, which created a 30-minute time difference between South and North as of Aug. 15, 2015, and appeared geared more two setting the two sides apart than strengthening commonalities.

Possible changes to KWP organization and power structure

A fourth matter involves possible changes to the KWP organization and power structure. Given the way the party has operated since Kim came to power, the Central Committee�fs politburo is expected to enjoy a stronger role. A changing of the generational guard to bolster the regime is expected to back this up, with a mixture of older and newer faces.

Ultimately, all the events of the seventh KWP congress will be geared toward firmly establishing a system of unitary party leadership centering on Kim Jong-un. Just as the preamble to the party regulations declares the KWP to be �gparty of Kim Il-sungism and Kim Jong-ilism, with Kim Il-sungism and Kim Jong-ilism as its only guiding philosophies,�h so the KWP, as the guiding force in the Democratic People�fs Republic of Korea, requires the leadership of a single person - known as the �gbrain of the revolution.�h Like grandfather Kim Il-sung, called the �geternal President�h in the Constitution�fs preamble, and father Kim Jong-il, called the �geternal National Defense Commission Chairman�h in the same preamble and the �geternal General Secretary�h in the preamble to the KWP regulations, Kim - who was already declared the �gsun in the sky�h in a Feb. 23 Supreme Command statement, is expected to become that leader at the seventh congress. At the same time, he is unlikely to ascend to the position of president, general secretary, or NDC chairman, where he would be forever working alongside his departed grandfather and father.

By Lee Je-hun, staff reporter
Please direct questions or comments to [english@hani.co.kr]
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://www.militarytimes.com/story/...s-against-us-troops-unsubstantiated/83749454/

UN says North Korea accusations against U.S. troops 'unsubstantiated'

Hyung-Jin Kim, The Associated Press 12:56 p.m. EDT April 30, 2016

SEOUL, South Korea — The American-led U.N. command on Saturday dismissed as unsubstantiated accusations from North Korea that U.S. troops at a border village tried to provoke its frontline troops with "disgusting acts."

A North Korean military statement Friday warned U.S. soldiers to stop what it called "hooliganism" at the inter-Korean border village of Panmunjom or they'll meet a "dog's death any time and any place."

It said U.S. troops pointed their fingers at North Korean soldiers and made strange noises and unspecified "disgusting" facial expressions. It also said that American troops encouraged South Korean soldiers to aim their guns at the North.

A statement from Christopher Bush, a spokesman for the U.N. command, said they looked into the allegations and determined they were unsubstantiated.


MILITARYTIMES
North Korea accuses U.S. soldiers of provoking border troops


North Korea occasionally accuses South Korean and U.S. troops of trying to provoke its border troops and vice versa. After North Korea's first nuclear bomb test in 2006, the U.S. accused North Korean troops of spitting across the border's demarcation line, making throat-slashing hand gestures and flashing their middle fingers.

The latest North Korean accusation came a day after South Korean and U.S. officials said two suspected medium-range missile launches by North Korea ended in failure. In recent weeks, North Korea fired a barrage of missiles and artillery shells into the sea in an apparent response to annual South Korea-U.S. military drills that ended Saturday.

About 28,000 American troops are deployed in South Korea to deter potential aggression from North Korea, a legacy of the 1950-53 Korean War, which ended in an armistice and not a peace treaty.


MILITARYTIMES
China UN ambassador: North Korean proposal to halt nuclear program merits study


Panmunjom, located inside the 4-kilometer- (2.5-mile-) wide Demilitarized Zone that bisects the Korean Peninsula, is where the 1953 armistice was signed. It remains one of the world's most dangerous flashpoints, but Panmunjom — jointly overseen by North Korea and the American-led U.N. Command — is also a popular tourist spot drawing visitors on both sides.

Visitors from the southern side are often told by tour guides to be extremely careful about what gestures they make so as not to antagonize the nearby North Korean soldiers.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://nextbigfuture.com/2016/04/all-quiet-on-russian-ukraine-front-as.html

April 30, 2016

All quiet on the Russian-Ukraine front as deaths continue with trench war 2.0

At least five people including a pregnant woman were killed and more than 10 injured early Wednesday on the front line in eastern Ukraine in the worst civilian loss of life there in months, separatist officials said.

The 2-year-old war has ravaged eastern Ukraine, killing more than 10,000 and displacing more than 1 million.

The war is not over.

Along the front lines, Ukrainian troops are dug in and ready for combat. As one soldier put it: “This is my life now.”

Russia–Ukraine barrier – also known as Ukrainian Wall or European Wall – is a fortified border barrier currently under construction by Ukraine on the Russia–Ukraine border. The aim of the project is preventing Russian military and hybrid warfare intervention in Ukraine

On 20 August 2015, it was announced that Ukraine has completed 10% of the fortification line, stating that roughly 180 km of anti-tank ditches had been dug, 40 km of barbed wire fence and 500 fortification obstacles had been erected. 139 million hryvnia out of 300 million allocated has been used for construction of the wall at this point, and that another 460 million hryvnia were budgeted for 2016.

Combined Russian-separatist artillery, tank, mortar and small arms attacks occur daily at hot spots near Donetsk, capital of the Donetsk People’s Republic, one of two breakaway territories.

“It’s like this every day,” John Slobodyan, 23, a soldier in the Ukrainian army’s 93rd Brigade, said. He spoke as the bass notes of artillery cut through the air at a Ukrainian outpost near the town of Karlivka, about six miles from Donetsk.

“There is no cease-fire,” Slobodyan said.

Combined Russian-separatist forces attack Ukrainian positions in the area every day. They said the attacks usually comprise 120 mm and 82 mm mortars, small arms and sniper fire, although larger caliber artillery and Grad rockets sometimes are used. They also said tanks routinely fire at their positions in the town of Pisky, just outside the Donetsk airport.

The soldiers said the military supply chain has improved, but civilian volunteers still meet food and water shortfalls, and uniforms remain a hodgepodge from different countries. With no common uniform, soldiers attach colored tape to their helmets and body armor to distinguish themselves from their enemies.

At night, soldiers on watch in a blacked out observation post took turns peering through a single night-vision scope to scan separatist positions across 1,200 meters of no man’s land.

Night-vision technology is still scarce within Ukrainian ranks, largely limiting combat to daylight hours. Lack of encrypted communications is another challenge. Ukrainian soldiers often communicate with off-the-shelf Motorola walkie-talkies, sharing frequencies with their enemies. The two sides sometime taunt each other over the open airwaves.

ukrainetrench.jpg

https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-SENQ5736...IiwaJ7dLUUHkygbMywCLcB/s640/ukrainetrench.jpg

The War in Donbass (also called the War in Ukraine, War in Eastern Ukraine) is an armed conflict in the Donbass region of Ukraine. From the beginning of March 2014, demonstrations by pro-Russian and anti-government groups took place in the Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts of Ukraine, together commonly called the "Donbass", in the aftermath of the 2014 Ukrainian revolution and the Euromaidan movement.

Following months of ceasefire violations, the Ukrainian government, the DPR and the LPR jointly agreed to halt all fighting, starting on 1 September 2015. This agreement coincided with the start of the school year in Ukraine, and was intended to allow for another attempt at implementing the points of Minsk II. By 12 September, German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier said that the ceasefire had been holding, and that the parties to the conflict were "very close" to reaching an agreement to withdraw heavy weaponry from the line of contact, as specified by Minsk II. The area around Mariupol, including Shyrokyne, saw no fighting. According to Ukrainian Defense Minister Stepan Poltorak, violence in the Donbass had reached its lowest level since the start of the war. Whilst the ceasefire continued to hold into November, no final settlement to the conflict was agreed. The New York Times described this result as part of a "a common arc of post-Soviet conflict, visible in the Georgian enclaves of South Ossetia and Abkhazia, Nagorno-Karabakh in Azerbaijan and in Transnistria", and said that separatist-controlled areas had become a "frozen zone", where people "live in ruins, amid a ruined ideology, in the ruins of the old empire". This state of affairs continued into 2016, with a 15 April report by the BBC labelling the conflict as "Europe's forgotten war". Minor outbreaks of fighting continued along the line of contact, though no territorial changes occurred

ukrainewar.png

https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-yrcKVB-H...kh-1VUY1xXDLWF6dzU51ACLcB/s640/ukrainewar.png
 

Possible Impact

TB Fanatic
For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://www.militarytimes.com/story/...s-against-us-troops-unsubstantiated/83749454/

UN says North Korea accusations against U.S. troops 'unsubstantiated'

Hyung-Jin Kim, The Associated Press 12:56 p.m. EDT April 30, 2016

SEOUL, South Korea — The American-led U.N. command on Saturday dismissed as unsubstantiated accusations from North Korea that U.S. troops at a border village tried to provoke its frontline troops with "disgusting acts."

A North Korean military statement Friday warned U.S. soldiers to stop what it called "hooliganism" at the inter-Korean border village of Panmunjom or they'll meet a "dog's death any time and any place."

It said U.S. troops pointed their fingers at North Korean soldiers and made strange noises and unspecified "disgusting" facial expressions.
It also said that American troops encouraged South Korean soldiers to aim their guns at the North.

A statement from Christopher Bush, a spokesman for the U.N. command, said they looked into the allegations and determined they were unsubstantiated.


MILITARYTIMES
North Korea accuses U.S. soldiers of provoking border troops


North Korea occasionally accuses South Korean and U.S. troops of trying to provoke its border troops and vice versa. After North Korea's first nuclear bomb test in 2006, the U.S. accused North Korean troops of spitting across the border's demarcation line, making throat-slashing hand gestures and flashing their middle fingers.

The latest North Korean accusation came a day after South Korean and U.S. officials said two suspected medium-range missile launches by North Korea ended in failure. In recent weeks, North Korea fired a barrage of missiles and artillery shells into the sea in an apparent response to annual South Korea-U.S. military drills that ended Saturday.

About 28,000 American troops are deployed in South Korea to deter potential aggression from North Korea, a legacy of the 1950-53 Korean War, which ended in an armistice and not a peace treaty.


MILITARYTIMES
China UN ambassador: North Korean proposal to halt nuclear program merits study


Panmunjom, located inside the 4-kilometer- (2.5-mile-) wide Demilitarized Zone that bisects the Korean Peninsula, is where the 1953 armistice was signed. It remains one of the world's most dangerous flashpoints, but Panmunjom — jointly overseen by North Korea and the American-led U.N. Command — is also a popular tourist spot drawing visitors on both sides.

Visitors from the southern side are often told by tour guides to be extremely careful about what gestures they make so as not to antagonize the nearby North Korean soldiers.




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A8yjNbcKkNY
French Taunter - Monty Python and the Holy Grail
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://nationalinterest.org/feature/china-claiming-okinawa-japan-claiming-hawaii-15996

China Claiming Okinawa Is Like Japan Claiming Hawaii

Unless you are nostalgic for the last two world wars, let's hope it’s nothing more than posturing.

Michael Peck
April 29, 2016
Comments 333

Hawaii belongs to Japan, the Japanese press suddenly proclaims. Tokyo publishes ancient maps and documents that purport to show that the Hawaiian islands were historically part of the Japanese homeland until they were illegally annexed by the Americans. To hammer the point home, a Japanese warship sails into Hawaiian waters.

Does this sound totally insane? It's no more crazy than Chinese claims that the Ryukyu Islands—which include the island of Okinawa—belong to China rather than Japan.

In 2013, the world let out a collective "Say what???" when Chinese officials, scholars and journalists suggested that the Ryukyus belong to China. The claims, based on the fact that the Ryukyu islanders paid tribute to China more than six hundred years ago, were not officially endorsed by the Chinese government, but neither were they denied.

Analysts suggested that questioning Japanese sovereignty over the Ryukyus was just a way to pressure Japan over the Senkaku Islands, a chain of uninhabited islands in the East China Sea that are administered by Japan and claimed by China. Chinese and Japanese aircraft have confronted each other near the Senkakus, while Chinese coast-guard vessels entered Japanese territorial waters around the islands last October. The Chinese moves have sparked a Japanese military buildup.

World attention has been focused more on Chinese claims in the South China Sea, and to a lesser extent on the Senkakus. But disputing sovereignty over the Ryukyus and Okinawa, even if it’s only a negotiating gambit, is far more dangerous. Until recently, major powers demanding territory from each other was not uncommon. Go back just one hundred years ago, and France and Germany contesting Alsace-Lorraine would have raised a sigh but not an eyebrow.

But since 1945, the territorial integrity of major powers has not been questioned. The thought that Russia might declare its 1867 treaty with America invalid and demand Alaska back is so inconceivable as to be satire or lunacy. The fact is that major powers don't directly fight each anymore, but instead use proxies (China and the U.S. battling in the Korean War might be an exception, though China arguably was not a major power in 1950).

Whether the Ryukyus really belong to China or not isn't the point. Granted that Okinawa is not a contiguous part of the Japanese home islands, any more than Alaska and Hawaii are part of the continental United States, which doesn't make those two states any less American. Nonetheless, whether China likes it or not, the Ryukyus are considered to be Japanese territory right now. China can no more claim it now than Japan can claim Manchuria and Korea again.

Claiming territory from another major power in the nuclear age is not a smart idea. Though Japan is not as powerful as China, it is a major power, with the world's third-largest economy and a powerful—if nonnuclear—military. Japan is also backed by the United States, which is the world's most powerful nation, is committed by treaty to the defense of Japan, and has a big military base on Okinawa.

No U.S. president could allow China to seize Japanese territory without America being totally humiliated in Asia and around the world. No Japanese government could give back Okinawa and hope to stay in office, and more than Putin could accede to Chinese demands to give back Siberia to China. A conflict over the Ryukyus would inevitably spiral into a larger, multi-state conflict.

Unless you are nostalgic for the last two world wars, let's hope that the Chinese bid for Okinawa is nothing more than posturing.

Michael Peck is a contributing writer for the National Interest. He can be found on Twitter and Facebook.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Hummm......

For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://www.politico.eu/article/angr...ve-for-germany-national-convention-stuttgart/

Angry 8: Inside Germany’s far-right AfD

The party is on the rise, if it can hold itself together.

By Janosch Delcker | 4/27/16, 5:35 AM CET

BERLIN — The far-right Alternative for Germany has turned German politics on its head, but leadership squabbles threaten to derail the party’s rapid rise.

Founded in 2013 as a protest party calling for the abolition of the euro and an end to bailouts given to EU members, it has developed into a far-right force to be reckoned with and now takes aim at Chancellor Angela Merkel’s refugee policy and the role of Islam in Germany.

It’s a strategy that’s working, with opinion polls putting the AfD at 12 percent support. In March it had its best-ever results in three state elections.

This weekend, the AfD holds its national convention in Stuttgart and party members will try to flesh out its manifesto amid bitter internal squabbles. Here are the major players:

Frauke Petry | Carsten Koall/Getty Images

The figurehead — Frauke Petry (party leader)

Dubbed the AfD’s Audrey Hepburn by the ultraconservative Compact magazine, the 40-year-old former chemist and mother of four became party chief last summer when she toppled co-founder Bernd Lucke, who quit the party in protest over its surge to the right.

For a time, she had strong support within the party, but her power base has been crumbling.

In October 2015, Petry irritated the party faithful who support traditional family values by announcing that she and her husband had separated and she was in a relationship with Marcus Pretzell, an MEP and senior party official.

Petry and Pretzell did not keep a low profile, declaring their love in a widely criticized interview with the glossy magazine Bunte.

Ahead of the national convention, her opponents are trying to take advantage of the unrest, spreading rumors about Petry being unable to take criticism and calling her leadership style increasingly authoritarian.

The summit could well be make-or-break for Petry who is likely to push an anti-Islam rhetoric, a stance popular across the party.

Alexander Gauland | Axel Schmidt/Getty Images

The elder statesman — Alexander Gauland (deputy party chief)

Petry is the face of the party, but its most influential figure is 75-year-old Gauland, a decidedly old-school politician with experience and a contacts book unrivaled in the AfD, partly thanks to the 40 years he spent as a member of Merkel’s Christian Democratic Union (CDU).

The wily political operator believes the time is right to expand the party’s horizons and will use the convention to push for cooperation with France’s National Front and other European far-right movements.

He is well aware that some in the party are against such pacts, particularly with Marine Le Pen’s National Front, which they see as being too far to the left on economic policy, and is instead likely to emphasize the common ground between the AfD and the NF when it comes to the role of Islam in Western Europe.

Beatrix von Storch | Carsten Koall/Getty Images

The enfant terrible — Beatrix von Storch (MEP, deputy party chief)

Coming from a long line of aristocrats, the 44-year-old lawyer (full name Duchess Beatrix Amelie Ehrengard Eilika of Oldenburg) is the maverick of the party.

Whether suggesting on prime time television that Merkel should retire to Chile — an apparent reference to the widow of former East German leader Erich Honecker, who moved to Chile after the fall of the Berlin Wall — or advocating shooting at women and children who try to illegally enter Germany, von Storch’s strategy is to break taboos and get people talking, and damn the consequences.

Within the party, she occupies the middle ground — advocating a liberal pro-market economic policy but being a hardliner when it comes to social issues, backing traditional family values and campaigning against marriage equality (what she calls “gender madness.”)

At this weekend’s convention, she will insist that the party manifesto says Islam is incompatible with the German constitution, and has apparently secured Gauland’s support for such a move.

Bjoern Hoecke | EPA/Peter Gercke

The shouter — Björn Höcke (regional party chief)

The 44-year-old teacher rose to fame in the city of Erfurt in Thuringia, where he slammed Merkel’s refugee policy, accused her of breaking the law, and encouraged the police “not to follow this woman.”

Head of right-wing populist Alternative for Germany (AfD) Frauke Petry attends a press conference in Berlin


Also On Politico
Germany’s far-right AfD is here to stay
Konstantin Richter


German Chancellor and Chairwoman of the German Christian Democrats (CDU) Angela Merkel prepares to speak to the media following elections in three German states on March 14, 2016 in Berlin, Germany.


Also On Politico
Angela Merkel says AfD ‘a problem, not a threat’
Ivo Oliveira


Höcke is the most prominent member of the ultra-nationalist camp within the party, making no secret of his links to the extreme-right PEGIDA movement, and he likes to provoke the more moderate wing that surrounds Petry, most recently by suggesting Germany leave NATO “as a last consequence” – a statement that caters to anti-American and pro-Russian sentiment among his supporters, but could scare off more moderate voters, other AfD officials fear.

At this weekend’s convention, it’s in Höcke’s interest to make sure that the AfD remains on its far-right course.

Joerg Meuthen | Nigel Treblin/Getty Images

The canny economist — Jörg Meuthen (regional party chief)

While Höcke is known for screaming from the rooftops, Meuthen, who leads the AfD in Baden-Württemberg, prefers to explain his positions calmly during panel discussions.

Although the 54-year-old economics professor might seem like a holdover from the AfD’s early days under Lucke, he makes it clear he backs the party’s current stance, including its anti-Islam rhetoric, warning of “insidious Islamization” of the country — while at the same time stressing that freedom of religion is guaranteed in the German constitution.

In the top tier of AfD politicians, Meuthen’s role is to make sure that those voters who came to the AfD from the Christian Democrats in protest over Merkel’s handling of the euro crisis and her refugee policy are not scared off by the likes of Höcke.

Meuthen will likely stress this weekend that it’s important for the AfD not to forget about its voters from the early days, the high- and medium-earning professionals who were drawn to the AfD because of frustration at Merkel’s economic policies.

Marcus Pretzell | Clemens Bilan/AFP via Getty Images

The other half — Marcus Pretzell (MEP, regional party chief)

If the AfD were to stage a William Shakespeare play, Pretzell, a 42-year-old lawyer, would be well suited to the role of Lady Macbeth.

The head of the largest regional AfD association, in North Rhine-Westphalia, is known as a pugnacious ultra-conservative and excerpts his influence on the party through his partner, Petry. He’s the only advisor she really listens to, party members say, and is the reason Petry’s rhetoric became noticeably sharper since last summer.

In a similar fashion to von Storch, Pretzell is known for breaking taboos in interviews.

His private life is no exception: When he and Petry gave their eye-catching interview to Bunte, he went into raptures about Petry’s “demonic beauty.”

Markus-Frohnmaier | Frank Thiele via Young Alternative http://www.politico.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Bild-Markus-Frohnmaier.jpg

The young pretender — Markus Frohnmaier (head of the young wing)

The head of the party’s youth organization Young Alternative, Frohnmaier is considered the AfD’s next big star. Most recently he made headlines for his connections to Russia and the youth organization of Vladimir Putin’s United Russia.

The 25-year-old law student, who was born in Romania and adopted by a German couple when he was two, was a member of the youth organization of the CDU before joining the AfD, because of the “social democratization” he observed within Merkel’s party.

Like few others, Frohnmaier is pushing his party’s closeness to Russia, fiercely defending the annexation of Crimea as an “achievement of independence.”

Marc Jongen | © Robin Krahl, Creative Commons 4.0 via Wikimedia Commons. Source: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/...n_(Landesparteitag_AfD_Baden-Württemberg).jpg

The intellectual — Marc Jongen (deputy regional head)

Jongen, a 48-year-old university lecturer and deputy party leader in Baden-Württemberg, once said that his ideal for the AfD was to manage the transition from “protest to … an established party.”

A former student of German philosopher Peter Sloterdijk, Jorgen is the AfD’s unofficial party philosopher, setting him apart from the screaming slogans of Höcke and the provocative statements of von Storch.

In his view, Germany’s current problem is a lack of pride, self-respect and self-confidence; he believes the country has to fundamentally change “if we want to have a future.”

More than anything else, Jongen’s role within the AfD is to provide intellectual weight. This weekend, his job is, at least in part, to make sure the party manifesto contains well thought-out policies and not just rhetoric.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Hummm......

For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/26/opinion/manufacturing-chinas-future.html?_r=1

The Opinion Pages

Manufacturing China’s Future

Op-Docs
By QI ZHAO and HAO ZHOU APRIL 26, 2016
Comments 39

Video
A mayor tries to secure his city’s future… by tearing it down.
By QI ZHAO and HAO ZHOU on Publish Date April 26, 2016. Photo by Qi Zhao and Hao Zhou. Watch in Times Video »

It is human nature to seek out information that confirms beliefs and biases we already have; that approach can be much easier than having to seek deeper, more complicated truths. We find this tendency to be particularly common when it comes to our country, China, where appearances often tell a very different story from the reality they conceal. So when we had a chance to explore the story of a controversial mayor in the ancient city of Datong, we knew we had a chance to go far beyond traditional reporting on China, and challenge ourselves to see more.

We are pleased to have made a rare film that captures a Chinese mayor as authentically and intimately as possible. In this Op-Doc, he is not a poker-faced bureaucrat or a talking head. Instead we see him as a real man, with dreams, emotions, dilemmas and ego. Here he exposes both his triumphs and failures, and notably has allowed us to capture them on film — and we see how his leadership leads to striking success and failure in terms that are uniquely Chinese. And we see how his decisions affect both his relationship with his government and with his family. We followed him to the front line of endless pleas and appeals on the streets, which reveal a China that defied years of what we’d thought about our nation, and challenged our opinions about many issues. This is a country with great dynamics, complexity and classes of people, with various wants and needs. The capacity for different points of view is so large that it is impossible to generalize.

Now it is time for us, as citizens, to understand China in different perspectives, between preservation and progress, individuality and collectivism, government and people, present and future. The world should take note. With this film, we are sharing everything we’ve learned about our society and its government with you — and we hope it makes you think, and talk.


Qi Zhao and Hao Zhou are Emmy- and Golden-Horse-Award-winning documentary filmmakers who focus on China. This film is inspired by their feature film “The Chinese Mayor,” which won a special jury award at the Sundance Film Festival.

Op-Docs is a forum for short, opinionated documentaries, produced with creative latitude by independent filmmakers and artists. Learn more about Op-Docs and how to submit to the series.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/04/29/iraq-isis-sunni-shiite-kurds-fight-mosul/

Who Will Rule Mosul?

The operation to recapture the Iraqi city from the Islamic State has turned into a high-stakes political contest for power. And the shooting hasn’t even started.

By Dan De Luce, Henry Johnson
April 29, 2016
Dan.DeLuce@dandeluce

The battle to liberate Mosul from the Islamic State has begun. But so far all the fighting is taking place in the political arena, with Iraq’s rival ethnic and religious factions mired in a power struggle over how to recapture the country’s second-largest city.

Virtually every major armed group in Iraq and their foreign patrons, including local Sunni Arabs backed by Turkey, Shiite militias supported by Iran, and American-equipped Kurdish forces are jockeying for a piece of the action.

The contest over who marches into Mosul will shape who controls the city once — or if — Islamic State militants are forced out. But despite a campaign more than a year in the making, Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi has yet to forge a coherent political plan that can bridge the divide between the rival groups, all but certainly pushing back a military operation yet again, U.S. officials and experts said.

Obama administration officials are closely watching the political intrigue over Sunni-majority Mosul, which borders the semi-autonomous Kurdish region in Iraq’s north and is only a few hours’ drive from the Iranian border. U.S. officials are wary of any scenario that skews the balance too far in favor of any one group — particularly proxies answering to Iran or Kurdish forces intent on carving out more territory.

“Who takes Mosul matters a lot,” said a senior administration official, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

Shiite militias with links to Iran (known as Popular Mobilization Forces), Kurdish Peshmerga troops, Sunni tribal leaders, and Iraqi Army commanders “have a different vision for how we get there,” the official told Foreign Policy. “If there’s too much PMF or Peshmerga elements, we’re going to have a problem.”

U.S. Vice President Joe Biden paid a visit to Iraq this week, his first since 2011, and high on the agenda in his talks in Baghdad on Thursday and Erbil on Friday was an appeal to political leaders to arrive at a consensus on how to retake Mosul.

The Islamic State seized Mosul in June 2014, shocking Obama administration officials who had turned their focus elsewhere after U.S. troops left Iraq in December 2011 after more than eight years of war and the deaths of nearly 4,500 American forces. The ongoing power struggle over who will rule the sprawling, dusty city shares some similarities with a dispute that plagued an offensive to take back Saddam Hussein’s hometown of Tikrit, in central Iraq, in March 2015. In that case, American military commanders initially refused to carry out bombing raids against Islamic State militants in Tikrit until Iranian-linked Shiite militias pulled back and allowed the Iraqi government army to take the lead.

U.S. officials said they are prepared to stand down on lending artillery fire and air power once again if plans for Mosul failed to give Baghdad’s army a central role.

Despite misgivings from Iraqi Army commanders and U.S. military advisors, the leader of one of the most powerful Shiite militias, Hadi Amiri, has insisted that his forces will be a part of any fight for Mosul. He leads a political organization once known as the Badr Brigades, which for years targeted U.S. troops in Iraq with so-called EFP bombs from Iran.

“In the battle for Mosul, we will be playing the essential role,” Amiri told the Financial Times in March.

But he said his militia would not enter the city and instead would “isolate and surround” the area, allowing local fighters and security forces to move into Mosul.

Iraqi leaders on March 24 declared they had launched an assault on Mosul. But more than a month later, apart from some fighting in rural areas southeast of the city, near Makhmour, a major operation to push the Islamic State from Mosul has yet to get underway and there is no sign of imminent military action.

The U.S. military has also jumped the gun on the timing of a Mosul offensive. Last year, a senior officer predicted an operation would be underway by the spring of 2015, in remarks that reflected the Pentagon’s bid to push Iraqi leaders to respond faster to the Islamic State. Baghdad bristled at the perception that Washington was directing the fight, and senior U.S. officers backed down. Since then, the Pentagon has resisted rushing Baghdad into an offensive until Iraqi forces are ready.

Sectarian feuding over which forces will lead the military offensive is not the only factor complicating a Mosul offensive. For the past two months, Abadi has been preoccupied with his own political survival, as he struggles to defuse a challenge to his authority in Baghdad from a fellow Shiite, firebrand cleric Muqtada al-Sadr.

Exploiting popular anger over corruption and unemployment among impoverished Shiites, Sadr has orchestrated massive protests across Baghdad and outside the Green Zone, where government offices and diplomatic posts are located behind an array of concrete blast walls.

Abadi, attempting to get ahead of Sadr’s demands but hampered by a weak political hand, proposed a new cabinet of technocrats. But the prime minister has failed to win parliamentary backing for the move, partly because fellow Shiite politicians are reluctant to give up their privileges.

“He’s consumed by this,” said Ben Connable, a retired U.S. Marine Corps intelligence officer and now senior analyst at the RAND Corp., who recently returned from a visit to Baghdad. “He’s distracted. And it’s harder to fight a war when you are distracted by near-term security and political threats right outside your front gate.”

Both the United States and Iran are supporting Abadi and his Shiite-led government, as neither country wants to see the Iraqi government fall when the campaign against the Islamic State has gained some momentum. U.S. officials expect Abadi will survive the political turmoil but analysts warn he may emerge scarred and weakened, possibly leaving him more vulnerable to pressures from harder-line Shiite militias.

“Abadi will feel tremendous pressure from Iran” to give the PMF an important role in the operation to recapture Mosul, the senior administration official said.

While political conflict threatens to delay the Mosul operation indefinitely, mounting sectarian and ethnic tensions are coming to a head on the ground, threatening the fragile coalition fighting the Islamic State.

Even as the extremists have been forced to retreat, Kurdish troops and Shiite militia have clashed in contested areas. Last weekend, the two sides battled in Tuz Khormato, a small city with mixed ethnicity in northeast Iraq, in a firefight over two days that left at least 27 soldiers dead.

In the meantime, increasing numbers of Sunni Arabs are fleeing Mosul and its environs, walking through a dangerous no man’s land between front lines to reach Kurdish-controlled territory.

This past Tuesday, 25 families crossed the Tigris River overnight and arrived at dawn in Makhmour, according to the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees. After security checks, the families were directed to a nearby camp for displaced persons that is already home to more than 6,400 civilians, well past its maximum capacity.

Aid workers and experts say most of the people fleeing from Mosul in recent weeks appear to be motivated by fears for their safety, given the Iraqi government’s public statements about an upcoming offensive.

They have good reason to fear the war coming to Mosul — and not only because of the explosions and gunfire that will envelop the city once the fighting starts in earnest.

Mosul is the capital of Nineveh province, which borders Syria and Iraqi Kurdistan, and is the largest community in the ethnically mixed region. Sunni Arabs there are wary of how they will be treated once Islamic State extremists are kicked out, particularly given concerns of harassment and abuse by some Kurdish Peshmerga units and Shiite militia.

Human rights groups have documented abuses against Sunnis carried out by Kurdish troops and Shiite militia units in areas where Islamic State militants have been rolled back, including in Nineveh province. Amnesty International said in January that Peshmerga forces bulldozed and burned the homes of Sunnis in northern Iraq, purportedly in retaliation for their alleged support of the extremists.

In a report last year, Human Rights Watch found that Kurds had barred Arabs from returning to their villages in Nineveh province for months at a time, allowing Kurdish civilians to seize the land. The Peshmerga stopped the Arabs from returning to their homes by holding them in “security zones,” allegedly denying them basic services and preventing them from checking on their property.

Bruno Geddo, the UNHCR’s representative in Iraq, said the refugee agency will be present on the front lines during a future Mosul offensive to ensure displaced Arabs are not mistreated on the pretext of security concerns.

“We will monitor the conditions of treatment so that there’s food, water, and shelter at the screening center and no arbitrary detentions,” Geddo told FP by phone from Erbil.

Given Mosul’s sectarian and ethnic sensitivities, U.S., Arab, and Western governments would prefer to see a Sunni militia leading the charge into the city. But despite an 18-month concerted effort by Washington and its allies to arm and train Sunni Arab units, there are limited numbers of capable Sunni fighters. As a result, the Iraqi government army, which is mostly made up of Shiite soldiers and commanders, will have to bear the brunt of the offensive, with its elite counterterrorism force spearheading the operation, U.S. officials and experts said.

But the Iraqi Army remains a fragile institution, and does not enjoy the trust or loyalty of many Iraqi Sunnis who remain alienated from the Shiite-led government in Baghdad. Experts and former U.S. military officers said the Iraqi Army will face a daunting challenge to assert its authority in Mosul if rival factions refuse to disarm and agree on a power-sharing deal that has proved elusive for years.

During last year’s military operation in Tikrit, U.S. officials worried about the behavior of Shiite militias toward Sunni residents of the city. Those concerns were realized when the militias torched and looted homes in Tikrit’s southern and eastern suburbs. But in Mosul, the historical rivalries between Kurdish forces and Sunni Arabs could present the biggest problem. Kurds claim much of the territory east of the city, where they were forcibly removed by Saddam during his “Arabization” policies in the 1970s and ’80s.

“The Kurds are quite open about how anything they take becomes part of Kurdistan forever, which obviously has residents of Mosul slightly concerned, not to mention Baghdad,” said Douglas Ollivant, a former U.S. Army officer who served in Iraq and later in the White House during the Bush administration and early years of Obama’s first term. “What’s really going on here is much more political than military.”

During constitutional debates after the fall of Saddam in 2003, Kurdish leaders argued for including parts of Mosul and surrounding areas within the Kurdistan Regional Government that is seated in Erbil and extends through Iraq’s three northernmost provinces. They lost that argument but never abandoned it, and the looming battle for Mosul has breathed new life into the idea among political leaders in Kurdistan, said Osama Gharizi, a fellow with the U.S. Institute for Peace based in Erbil.

Kurdish and Iraqi government leaders, however, cannot even agree on an estimate of the ethnic composition of Mosul before the Islamic State took over the city in 2014, Gharizi told FP. That’s because Iraq has for decades avoided conducting a nationwide census that would ultimately settle territorial claims in bitterly divided Arab, Kurd, and Turkomen communities. And Baghdad has yet to embark on a genuine political dialogue to try to work out what Mosul should look like if the Islamic State is defeated.

“There’s no serious discussion on what the day after should look like,” Gharizi said.

Neighboring Turkey is also keenly interested in “the day after” in Mosul, a city that was ruled by the Ottoman Empire for nearly 400 years.

Last December, without asking Baghdad for permission, Turkey deployed several hundred troops and an armored battalion of some 20 tanks to a military base in Mount Bashiqa, 10 miles northeast of Mosul. The troops are still there, despite the Iraqi government’s repeated demands to leave.

Before Turkey sent in troops, a small number of Turkish military advisers stationed at the base trained a 6,500-strong militia organized and equipped by Atheel al-Nujaifi, the scion of a powerful landowning family from Mosul. Analysts say Nujaifi, who governed Nineveh province until Iraqi members of parliament sacked him last year for corruption and alleged complicity with the Islamic State, has designs to return as the provincial governor, or possibly to become mayor of Mosul. His brother, Osama al-Nujaifi, also formerly served as speaker of Iraq’s parliament and vice president as one of the highest-elected Sunnis in the country.

Ostensibly, the Turkish troops are protecting the base at Mount Bashiqa from Islamic State mortar attacks as advisers train the mostly Sunni militiamen in month-long courses in basic combat and marksmanship. But analysts say that Turkey’s actual motive in sending reinforcements is to better secure its interests during the political free-for-all that will follow Mosul’s liberation. Given how much Baghdad resents Ankara’s unilateral training camp, it’s unlikely Turkey would participate directly in a Mosul offensive.

The Nujaifi family and its Turkish-backed private army are “part and parcel to Turkey’s plans for post-conflict Mosul,” said Aaron Stein, a senior fellow and Turkey expert at the Atlantic Council.

“The Nujaifi brothers are close Turkish allies. … They argue the tribal forces that Turkey is training should be the holding force in a post-conflict Mosul. That’s why Turkey’s tanks are deployed across the front line,” he said.

Ankara is also playing the president of Iraqi Kurdistan off his rivals, and Turkey’s sworn enemies, in the Kurdistan Workers’ Party, which has made sweeping gains in Syria and established a foothold in Iraq’s northwestern Sinjar area. Erbil reportedly leased Ankara the rights to the Bashiqa military camp, and participated in a joint operation with Turkish troops and their Arab allies to free two villages north of Mosul. It’s a delicate strategy of exploiting intra-Kurdish rivalries while papering over other Kurdish-Arab grievances.

During the 2003-2011 U.S. occupation, Mosul was one of the last major strongholds for al Qaeda in Iraq, the terror group that eventually morphed into what is now the Islamic State. The Sunni extremist group regained strength after American troops left Iraq and was further fueled by the Shiite-dominated central government’s sidelining of Iraqi Sunnis from power. Analysts in and outside of Iraq have warned that as long as Sunnis feel disenfranchised, violent extremism will be impossible to stamp out in Mosul and elsewhere in Iraq.

Not only do Iraqi authorities lack a coherent political plan to restore security and some semblance of government in Mosul, neither Baghdad nor the international community appears prepared to confront the vast humanitarian and reconstruction task once the Islamic State is forced out. Moreover, plunging oil prices have created a fiscal crisis for Iraq’s government, prompting urgent appeals for donor aid.

In a depressing turn of events for the thousands of Iraqis still living under the Islamic State’s brutal rule in Mosul, the country’s political leaders and rival militias have little incentive to move quickly against the extremists in the city, some experts said.

Delaying the liberation of Mosul — possibly until this fall or even the spring of 2017 — has its advantages for the Iraqi government and every other player in the country, said Robert Blecher, deputy director of the Middle East and North Africa Program at the International Crisis Group.

“One of the most important things delaying the campaign is that leaving the city under Islamic State control is, for the time being, the least bad option for everyone, certainly less costly than the city falling into the orbit of a regional competitor,” he said.

“For just about everyone other than the U.S., the Islamic State is a secondary concern. Better Islamic State than someone else in Mosul.”
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://38north.org/2016/04/punggye043016/

Update on North Korea’s Nuclear Test Site

By 38 North
30 April 2016

A 38 North exclusive with analysis by Jack Liu and Joseph S. Bermudez, Jr.

Recent commercial satellite imagery from April 28 shows signs of continued low-level activity at the Punggye-ri nuclear test site. Based on available evidence, it is not possible to determine whether these activities are related to continued maintenance or reflect that Pyongyang has completed test preparations and a detonation is imminent. It is worth noting that the January 2016 nuclear test demonstrated that North Korea has the ability to slow-roll test preparations relatively unnoticed and is able to conduct a new test with little or no warning.

Imagery indicates that there are two possible vehicles or trailers as well as a few mining carts visible at the North Portal. The spoil piles at both the North and West Portals appear to have undergone some recent activity but it is not possible using current imagery to determine whether this is maintenance on the mine rail system or the depositing of small amounts of fresh spoil. No personnel are observed at either location.

Figure 1. Vehicle and carts seen at the North Portal.

Image includes material Pleiades © CNES 2016. Distribution Airbus DS / Spot Image, all rights reserved. For media licensing options, please contact thirtyeightnorth@gmail.com.
Image includes material Pleiades © CNES 2016. Distribution Airbus DS / Spot Image, all rights reserved. For media licensing options, please contact thirtyeightnorth@gmail.com.

Figure 2. Activity seen at the North and West Portal spoil piles.

Image includes material Pleiades © CNES 2016. Distribution Airbus DS / Spot Image, all rights reserved. For media licensing options, please contact thirtyeightnorth@gmail.com.
Image includes material Pleiades © CNES 2016. Distribution Airbus DS / Spot Image, all rights reserved. For media licensing options, please contact thirtyeightnorth@gmail.com.

There is no apparent activity observed at the South Portal.

Figure 3. No activity at the South Portal.

Image includes material Pleiades © CNES 2016. Distribution Airbus DS / Spot Image, all rights reserved. For media licensing options, please contact thirtyeightnorth@gmail.com.
Image includes material Pleiades © CNES 2016. Distribution Airbus DS / Spot Image, all rights reserved. For media licensing options, please contact thirtyeightnorth@gmail.com.

In the Main Support Area, while there are no vehicles present, personnel are visible. From their placement and distribution it appears they may be playing a game of soccer.

Figure 4. Group of personnel seen in the Main Support Area.

Image includes material Pleiades © CNES 2016. Distribution Airbus DS / Spot Image, all rights reserved. For media licensing options, please contact thirtyeightnorth@gmail.com.
A 38 North exclusive with analysis by Jack Liu and Joseph S. Bermudez, Jr.

Recent commercial satellite imagery from April 28 shows signs of continued low-level activity at the Punggye-ri nuclear test site. Based on available evidence, it is not possible to determine whether these activities are related to continued maintenance or reflect that Pyongyang has completed test preparations and a detonation is imminent. It is worth noting that the January 2016 nuclear test demonstrated that North Korea has the ability to slow-roll test preparations relatively unnoticed and is able to conduct a new test with little or no warning.

Imagery indicates that there are two possible vehicles or trailers as well as a few mining carts visible at the North Portal. The spoil piles at both the North and West Portals appear to have undergone some recent activity but it is not possible using current imagery to determine whether this is maintenance on the mine rail system or the depositing of small amounts of fresh spoil. No personnel are observed at either location.

Figure 1. Vehicle and carts seen at the North Portal.

Image includes material Pleiades © CNES 2016. Distribution Airbus DS / Spot Image, all rights reserved. For media licensing options, please contact thirtyeightnorth@gmail.com.
Image includes material Pleiades © CNES 2016. Distribution Airbus DS / Spot Image, all rights reserved. For media licensing options, please contact thirtyeightnorth@gmail.com.

Figure 2. Activity seen at the North and West Portal spoil piles.

Image includes material Pleiades © CNES 2016. Distribution Airbus DS / Spot Image, all rights reserved. For media licensing options, please contact thirtyeightnorth@gmail.com.
Image includes material Pleiades © CNES 2016. Distribution Airbus DS / Spot Image, all rights reserved. For media licensing options, please contact thirtyeightnorth@gmail.com.

There is no apparent activity observed at the South Portal.

Figure 3. No activity at the South Portal.

Image includes material Pleiades © CNES 2016. Distribution Airbus DS / Spot Image, all rights reserved. For media licensing options, please contact thirtyeightnorth@gmail.com.
Image includes material Pleiades © CNES 2016. Distribution Airbus DS / Spot Image, all rights reserved. For media licensing options, please contact thirtyeightnorth@gmail.com.

In the Main Support Area, while there are no vehicles present, personnel are visible. From their placement and distribution it appears they may be playing a game of soccer.

Figure 4. Group of personnel seen in the Main Support Area.

Image includes material Pleiades © CNES 2016. Distribution Airbus DS / Spot Image, all rights reserved. For media licensing options, please contact thirtyeightnorth@gmail.com.
Image includes material Pleiades © CNES 2016. Distribution Airbus DS / Spot Image, all rights reserved. For media licensing options, please contact thirtyeightnorth@gmail.com.

Found in section: Satellite Imagery

Found in section: Satellite Imagery
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Hummm......

For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/defense/278118-why-obamas-cold-peace-with-iran-will-turn-hot

April 29, 2016, 07:30 am

Why Obama's 'cold peace' with Iran will turn hot

By Andrew L. Peek, contributor
Comments 108

There will probably be no more fruitless gesture of President Obama's lame-duck term than his fourth and likely final visit to Saudi Arabia last week. It was intended to reassure America's ancient Persian Gulf ally that despite the president's interviews, policies, personnel and speeches to the contrary, he was deeply concerned about Saudi Arabia's security. Obama is not, but he should be.

For the past five years, the Saudis have been dismayed by virtually every aspect of the president's Middle East policy, from American inaction in Syria to dumping Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak to his nuclear deal with Iran. All of these decisions, in the Saudi view, have served to strengthen Iran and weaken the existing Sunni Arab order. As, of course, they were supposed to. The president has been very frank in his belief that the U.S. has been spent too much money artificially inflating that order, and maintaining it for the benefit of half-friends. And so he has begun to pull back, in favor of a new balance between the Saudis and Iran he calls a "cold peace." But it is a fantasy. That peace will get hot, and in a hurry.

The first great problem with Obama's rebalancing is that our Sunni allies will hedge against it in unpredictable ways, reducing stability in the region. Second, over the long run, that balance will inevitably collapse in favor of Iran. And then we are in totally unknown territory: No single state has dominated the Persian Gulf since the advent of oil, and we have no idea how such a great power would behave. But it will not happen overnight, and if President Obama had listened, King Salman could have offered a lesson on preventing it. Starting in Yemen.

For an America wholly consumed by the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) and Syria, Yemen has been something of a forgotten war. It is not entirely a proxy war, since actual no-kidding Saudi troops are bombing the Iranian-allied Houthi rebels on behalf of Yemen's former government. In that sense it is Syria in reverse, where Iranian troops are battling Saudi-backed rebels on behalf of the Syrian government.

When the Yemen war began in earnest in 2014, the Houthis looked invincible. They looked as invincible as Hezbollah in Lebanon or Syrian President Bashar Assad and Hezbollah, or the Black Hand of Iran's intelligence services throughout the region. It's not clear, in fact, if modern Iran has ever lost a war. Just as all of America's recent wars have ended in middling draws-***-losses, Iran's have ended in draws-***-wins. The Americans were exhausted by Iraq, and under fire left it in the hands of a friendly Shiite government. Hezbollah threw Israel out of Lebanon and remains the only undefeated Arab fighting force. Hamas overran the remnants of the Palestinian authority in Gaza and created its own fiefdom.

But the Houthis were not invincible. The Yemen war's fourth cease-fire began on April 10, and their offensive ground to a halt last year. If it holds, Yemen would be the first time Iran was defeated by indigenous forces in the Middle East since the oldest Iraq War in the 1980s. There is really no deep-seated cultural or diplomatic mystery about when the Iranians make peace. They make peace and buy into the existing order when they are stopped. This is a lesson the Obama administration never seems to learn, no matter how many fruitless meetings of the Syrian peace talks in Geneva that Secretary of State John Kerry attends.

The president had better learn it soon. Because the second great problem with the rebalancing is that a cold peace between Iran and Saudi Arabia cannot over the long run be equal. Shorn of the United States, the Sunni coalition is fantastically weak. For one thing, two of the region's three traditional Sunni heavyweights, Egypt and Turkey, have dropped out of this fight. Turkey is more concerned about its Kurds than about Shiites, and Egypt is consumed — as always — with its struggle to keep the peace domestically. Iraq was once a Saudi bodyguard, but Iraq was lost to former Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki and the other side. And by the scorecard, there's no reason why Saudi Arabia should be able to resist Iran, Iraq, Syria and Hezbollah all by itself. There will be no balance.

Obama's policy is a waypoint not to a sharing of the hegemony but a hegemony of one, and that in Tehran. The United States and its foreign policy establishment has never quite internalized what an Iranian-dominated Persian Gulf would look like. It would be one in which Iran can set the price of oil, by diplomacy or threats. It would be one where Palestinian rejectionism once again becomes the main theme of the Israel-Palestine conflict, and not the idea of the Oslo Accords. It would be one where Oman and Qatar are increasingly deferential to Iran, if not allies. And it would be one in which Russia has outsized say in the new order, and military influence, and American desires are hardly felt.

Against all odds, the Saudi intervention in Yemen should be a stark lesson for the president. Because his brave new order is not yet a reality, and peace sometimes requires war. He should have listened to King Salman.

Peek is a professor at Claremont McKenna College and was a former adviser to the top U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-iraq-politics-idUSKCN0XR0CR

World | Sat Apr 30, 2016 4:32pm EDT
Related: World, United Nations

Sadr followers dig in inside Baghdad's Green Zone, political crisis deepens

BAGHDAD | By Stephen Kalin and Ahmed Rasheed

Hundreds of supporters of Shi'ite Muslim cleric Moqtada al-Sadr stormed parliament inside Baghdad's Green Zone on Saturday and camped out nearby after Sadr denounced politicians' failure to reform a political quota system blamed for rampant corruption.

The protesters, who had gathered outside the heavily fortified central district housing government buildings and many foreign embassies, crossed a bridge over the Tigris River chanting: "The cowards ran away!" in apparent reference to departing lawmakers.

The initial breach was mostly peaceful, but around sunset security forces fired teargas and bullets into the air in an effort to stop more protesters from entering. Around a dozen people were wounded, police sources said.

A United Nations spokesman and Western diplomats said their compounds inside the Green Zone were locked down. A U.S. embassy spokesman denied reports of evacuation.

Iraqi security personnel and Sadr's militiamen formed a joint force to control crowds of protesters, most of whom had left parliament, a source in Sadr's office told Reuters.

All entrances of Baghdad were temporarily shut "as a precautionary measure to maintain the capital's security," another security official said.

As night fell, demonstrators set up tents at a nearby parade ground under triumphal arches made from crossed swords held by hands modelled on those of Saddam Hussein, who was toppled by the U.S.-led invasion in 2003.

Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi has warned that the months-long political crisis prompted by his efforts to overhaul the cabinet could hamper the war against Islamic State, which controls vast swathes of northern and western Iraq.

Earlier in the day, the ultra-hardline Sunni militants claimed responsibility for a suicide bomb attack against Shi'ite pilgrims in the southeastern Baghdad suburb of Nahrawan, killing 19 people and wounding 48 others.


Related Coverage
› Iraqi forces fire tear gas, bullets in air at Green Zone protesters: sources

Following the breach, Abadi inspected security forces inside the Green Zone, discrediting earlier reports that he had fled. He called on protesters to return to areas set aside for demonstrations and not to infringe on public property.

Such a breach is unprecedented, though only a few years ago mortars frequently rained down on the 10-square-kilometre Green Zone, which once housed the headquarters of the U.S. occupation and before that one of Saddam's palaces.

Checkpoints and concrete barriers have blocked bridges and highways leading to the neighbourhood for years, symbolising the isolation of Iraq's leadership from its people.

Videos showed protesters on Saturday attacking a white, armoured SUV with sticks and beating a man in a grey suit.

The source in Sadr's office said a Sadrist MP had escorted out several deputies, the last ones holed up in parliament, in his motorcade.

Members of the Peace Brigades, Sadr's paramilitary group, had earlier conducted cursory checks of protesters as government security forces who usually make careful searches with bomb-sniffing dogs stood by the side, a Reuters witness said.

More protesters remained at the gates chanting "Peaceful!". Some stood atop concrete blast walls that form the district's outer barrier.

President Fuad Massoum called on demonstrators to leave parliament, but urged politicians to implement the cabinet reform: "Burying the regime of party and sectarian quotas cannot be delayed."


"GREAT POPULAR UPRISING"

Inside parliament hundreds of protesters danced, waved Iraqi flags and chanted pro-Sadr slogans. Some appeared to be breaking furniture.

Local television showed them chanting and taking pictures of themselves inside the main chamber where moments earlier lawmakers had met.

Parliament failed to reach quorum on Saturday afternoon to complete voting on a cabinet reshuffle first urged by Abadi in February. A handful of ministers were approved on Tuesday despite disruptions by dissenting lawmakers.

Political parties have resisted Abadi's efforts to replace some ministers - chosen to balance Iraq's divisions along party, ethnic and sectarian lines - with technocrats in a bid to combat corruption.

Supporters of Sadr, whose fighters once controlled large areas of Baghdad and helped defend the city from Islamic State in 2014, have been demonstrating in the capital for weeks, responding to their leader's call to put pressure on Abadi to follow through on months-old reform promises.

Moments before the Green Zone breach, Sadr seemed to offer an ultimatum: "Either corrupt (officials) and quotas remain or the entire government will be brought down and no one will be exempted."

In a televised speech from the holy city of Najaf announcing a two-month withdrawal from public life, Sadr said he was "waiting for the great popular uprising and the major revolution to stop the march of the corrupt."


(Additional reporting by Saif Hameed, Kareem Raheem and Ahmed Saad; Writing by Stephen Kalin; Editing by Richard Balmforth and Ros Russell)
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Classic example of "asymmetric"/"hybrid" warfare.....

For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-southchinasea-china-fishingboats-idUSKCN0XS0RS

World | Sat Apr 30, 2016 10:10pm EDT
Related: World, China

China trains 'fishing militia' to sail into disputed waters

BAIMAJING, China | By Megha Rajagopalan

The fishing fleet based in this tiny port town on Hainan island is getting everything from military training and subsidies to even fuel and ice as China creates an increasingly sophisticated fishing militia to sail into the disputed South China Sea.

The training and support includes exercises at sea and requests to fishermen to gather information on foreign vessels, provincial government officials, regional diplomats and fishing company executives said in recent interviews.

"The maritime militia is expanding because of the country's need for it, and because of the desire of the fishermen to engage in national service, protecting our country's interests," said an advisor to the Hainan government who did not want to be named.

But the fishing militia also raises the risk of conflict with foreign navies in the strategic waterway through which $5 trillion of trade passes each year, diplomats and naval experts say.

The United States has been conducting sea and air patrols near artificial islands China is building in the disputed Spratlys archipelago, including by two B-52 strategic bombers in November. Washington said in February it would increase the "freedom of navigation" sail-bys around the disputed sea.


BASIC MILITARY TRAINING

The city-level branches of the People's Armed Forces Department provide basic military training to fishermen, said the Hainan government advisor. The branches are overseen by both the military and local Communist Party authorities in charge of militia operations nationwide.

The training encompasses search and rescue operations, contending with disasters at sea, and "safeguarding Chinese sovereignty", said the advisor who focuses on the South China Sea.

The training, which includes exercises at sea, takes place between May and August and the government pays fishermen for participating, he said.

Government subsidies encourage fishermen to use heavier vessels with steel - as opposed to wooden - hulls.

The government has also provided Global Positioning Satellite equipment for at least 50,000 vessels, enabling them to contact the Chinese Coast Guard in maritime emergencies, including encounters with foreign ships, industry executives said.

Several Hainan fishermen and diplomats told Reuters some vessels have small arms.

When "a particular mission in safeguarding sovereignty", comes up government authorities will coordinate with the fishing militia, the advisor said, asking them to gather information on the activities of foreign vessels at sea.


ROW WITH INDONESIA

That coordination was evident in March, when Indonesia attempted to detain a Chinese fishing vessel for fishing near its Natuna Islands in the South China Sea. A Chinese coast guard vessel quickly intervened to prevent the Indonesian Navy from towing away the fishing boat, setting off a diplomatic row. Beijing does not claim the Natunas but said the boats were in "traditional Chinese fishing grounds".

China claims almost all of the South China Sea. The Philippines, Malaysia, Vietnam, Taiwan and Brunei also have conflicting claims over the islets and atolls that constitute the Spratly Archipelago and its rich fishing grounds.

State-controlled fishing companies dominate the fleets that go regularly to the Spratlys and are recipients of much of the militia training and subsidies, industry sources said.

China has by far the world's biggest fish industry, but depleted fishery resources close to China's shores have made fishing in disputed waters an economic necessity, fishermen and industry executives say.

State-owned Hainan South China Sea Modern Fishery Group Company says on its website it is "both military and commercial, both soldiers and civilians". One of its aims, the company says, is to let the "Chinese flag fly" over the Spratlys.

"Defending sovereignty is primarily the government's concern," said Ye Ning, the company's general manager, in an interview at his office in Haikou. "But of course, regular folks being able to fish in their own countries' waters should be the norm. That goes for us too."

The company provides fishermen who sail to the Spratlys with fuel, water, and ice, and then purchases fish from them when they returned, according to a written introduction to the company's work executives provided to Reuters.


'LOT MORE RISKY'

"It's gotten a lot more risky to do this with all kinds of foreign boats out there," said Huang Jing, a local fisherman in the sleepy port town of Baimajing, where a line of massive steel-hulled fishing trawlers stretches as far as the eye can see.

"But China is strong now," he said. "I trust the government to protect us."

Chen Rishen, chairman of Hainan Jianghai Group Co. Ltd, says his private but state subsidized company dispatches large fleets of steel-hulled trawlers weighing hundreds of tonnes to fish near the Spratly Islands. They usually go for months at a time, primarily for commercial reasons, he said.

"If some foreign fishing boats infringe on our territory and try to prevent us from fishing there ... Then we're put in the role of safeguarding sovereignty," he said in an interview in Haikou, the provincial capital of Hainan.

China does not use its fishing fleet to help establish sovereignty claims in the South China Sea, foreign ministry spokesman Lu Kang said: “This kind of situation does not exist.”

China had taken measures to ensure the fishing fleets conduct business legally, he told a ministry press briefing last month.


RULES OF ENGAGEMENT

Chen said his fishermen stop at Woody Island in the Paracel islands, where China recently installed surface-to-air missiles, to refuel and communicate with Chinese Coast Guard vessels.

They look forward to using similar facilities China is developing in the Spratly Islands, he said.

China has been pouring sand from the seabed onto seven reefs to create artificial islands in the Spratlys. So far, it has built one airstrip with two more under construction on them, with re-fuelling and storage facilities.

"This all points to the need for establishing agreed protocols for ensuring clear and effective communications between civilian and maritime law enforcement vessels of different countries operating in the area," said Michael Vatikiotis, Asia Director of the Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue, which is helping claimant states design such confidence building measures.

A regional agreement on communications and procedures when rival navies meet at sea applies only to naval ships and other military vessels, he said.


(Additional reporting by Greg Torode in HONG KONG. Editing by Bill Tarrant)
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Hummm.....

For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world...tremely-worrying-civil-unrest-crisis-training

EU military police carry out ‘extremely WORRYING’ civil unrest crisis training

A MILITARY police unit have carried out European Union-funded special training, ready to be deployed in the event of civil unrest or war.

By Vincent Wood
PUBLISHED: 06:24, Sat, Apr 30, 2016 | UPDATED: 19:14, Sat, Apr 30, 2016

The training, which took place in the German North Rhine-Westphalia province was designed to prepare troops as part of the EU’s Lowlands Gendarmerie programme.

Breitbart London reported that the exercise was attended by 600 members of various European police and military forces, in a bid to prepare the united troops of the European Gendarmerie Force.

The military police group is made up of seven European nations, including Spain, Romania, Poland and Germany, and aims to quell post conflict scenarios within EU member states.

The group’s website reported that: “The aim of the [2016, April 15th] Comprehensive Live Exercise will be capacity building of police and gendarmes who will participate in international stabilisation missions and projects with a police component.”

It went on to describe the exercises carried out, including “carousel training, with attention being given to all policing skills, including community policing and social patrols, crowd and riot control, SWAT teams and forensic investigation”.

European affairs spokesman for the German Government Andrej Huko asked to attend, but was blocked from coming close to the site.

He claimed that the military force was preparing to shut down “political meetings” and “protests”.

He went on to argue that the, “militarisation of the police” is, “extremely worrying and contrary in Germany to the principle of separation of police and military”.

It comes as fears rise that the European Union could form its own army, with one ex-commander of British troops in Afghanistan claiming it could undermine NATO and UK defences.

Colonel Richard Kemp claimed Brussels' "ultimate plan" was to bring the national armies of the bloc's 28 member states under one umbrella.

The highly-criticised prospect of an EU army was re-energised in March 2015 when European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker called for an international force.

Politicians in the UK have since poured cold water on the idea, saying it would be undeliverable, would weaken Britain's standing in the world and would be blocked by the UK's veto powers.

But Col Kemp, who formerly worked for the Joint Intelligence Committee, which advises the British Government on issues of national security, said: "If we left the EU, we would undermine the EU's ultimate plan of forming an EU army, and that is exactly what they are going to be doing.”


Related articles:

- EU in stealth plan to set up ARMY by merging German and Dutch forces
- EU ARMY? Fallon calls for greater INTEGRATION with BRUSSELS
- End of the British Army? EU plots ‘scandalous’ military merger if UK votes to stay in
- Brussels could deploy own ARMY within the EU as Greece crisis deepeens
- Plot to exploit migrant chaos as 'an EXCUSE' to rush through EU Army
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://www.afr.com/news/world/asia/...s-nuclear-attack-capabilities-20160501-goj9tn

May 1 2016 at 2:01 PM
Updated May 1 2016 at 2:06 PM

North Korea vows to rapidly advance its nuclear attack capabilities
by Cynthia Kim

North Korea vowed to make rapid advancements on nuclear attack capabilities if South Korea and the US continue with joint military drills, with the warning coming days before predictions that the nation may conduct its fifth nuclear test for the Worker's Party Congress on May 6.

"Our capability to make nuclear attacks will make fast advancement every time enemies conduct war exercises," the regime's official news agency reported, citing an unidentified spokesman at its foreign ministry. North Korea called a joint military drill between South Korea and the US "the worst military provocation".

The statement came after North Korea's failed attempts to fire missiles this week, and days before Kim Jong Un's regime is scheduled to hold its first ruling party congress in decades. South Korean President Park Geun Hye said Pyongyang has completed preparations to conduct its fifth nuclear test and vowed to seek stronger sanctions against North Korea if it conducts the test.

North Korea have offered to halt its nuclear test if the US and South Korea would suspend defensive drills. US President Barack Obama dismissed the proposal.

Bloomberg
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Well this is set to go real stupid and loud.....

For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://www.theguardian.com/world/20...of-protesters-who-stormed-baghdads-green-zone

Iraqi PM orders arrest of protesters who stormed Baghdad's green zone

Haider al-Abadi’s comments come as thousands of demonstrators remain in the green zone demanding political reform

Associated Press in Baghdad
Sunday 1 May 2016 07.15 EDT

The Iraqi prime minister, Haider al-Abadi, has ordered authorities to arrest and prosecute the protesters who attacked security forces and legislators and damaged state property after breaking into Baghdad’s heavily fortified green zone to protest delays in reform plans.

Abadi’s statement came a day after hundreds of angry followers of the influential Shia cleric Moqtada al-Sadr tore down blast walls and poured into the parliament building, exacerbating a long-simmering political crisis.

Videos on social media showed a group of young men surrounding and slapping two Iraqi legislators as they attempted to flee the crowd, while other protesters mobbed motorcades. Protesters were also seen jumping and dancing on the parliament’s meeting hall tables and chairs and waving Iraqi flags.

The protesters eventually left the parliament on Saturday night and rallied in a nearby square.

Sadr and his supporters want the political system, put in place following the US-led invasion in 2003, to be reformed. As it stands, entrenched political blocs representing the country’s Shias, Sunnis and Kurds rely on patronage, resulting in widespread corruption and poor public services. The major blocs have until now blocked Abadi’s reform efforts.

On Sunday, protesters vowed to continue their sit-in inside the green zone until their demands are met.

“We are fed up, we are living a humiliated life,” Rasool Hassan, 37, said from the square inside the green zone where thousands of protesters had gathered. “We’ll leave here only when the corrupt government is replaced with another of independent technocrats that serves the people not the political parties.”

“We need new faces, not the old ones,” said Shatha Jumaa, 58, a surgeon. Jumaa, who identified herself as secular, said she wanted the government dissolved and replaced by a small interim administration whose job would be to amend the constitution and to prepare for an early election.

Iraq has been mired in political crisis for months, hindering the government’s ability to combat Islamic State, which still controls much of the country’s north and west, or address a financial crisis largely prompted by the plunge in global oil prices.

Iraqi security forces initially responded to Saturday’s events by tightening security across the capital, sealing off checkpoints leading to the green zone and stopping traffic on main roads into the city.

The UN mission to Iraq said it was gravely concerned. It issued a statement condemning violence against elected officials and urging “calm, restraint and respect for Iraq’s constitutional institutions at this crucial juncture”.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...4efa856caf2a_story.html?wpmm=1&wpisrc=nl_draw

Protests in Baghdad throw administration’s Iraq plan into doubt

By Greg Jaffe
April 30 at 9:40 PM
Comments 1.2K 

President Obama’s plan for fighting the Islamic State is predicated on having a credible and effective Iraqi ally on the ground in Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi.

And in recent days, the administration had been optimistic, despite the growing political unrest in Baghdad, about that critical partnership.

But that optimism — along with the administration’s strategy for battling the Islamic State in Iraq — was thrown into severe doubt after protesters stormed Iraq’s parliament on Saturday and a state of emergency was declared in Baghdad. The big question for White House officials is what happens if Abadi — a critical linchpin in the fight against the Islamic State — does not survive the turmoil that has swept over the Iraqi capital.

The chaos in Baghdad comes just after a visit by Vice President Biden that was intended to help calm the political unrest and keep the battle against the Islamic State on track.

As Biden’s plane was approaching Baghdad on Thursday, a senior administration official described the vice president’s visit — which was shrouded in secrecy prior to his arrival — as a “symbol of how much faith we have in Prime Minister Abadi.”

After 10 hours on the ground in Baghdad and Irbil, Biden was hurtling toward his next stop in Rome. The feeling among the vice president and his advisers was that Iraqi politics were on a trajectory to greater calm and that the battle against the Islamic State would continue to accelerate. Some hopeful advisers on Biden’s plane even suggested that Abadi might emerge from the political crisis stronger for having survived it.

No one is talking that way now. “There’s a realization that the government, as it’s currently structured, can’t hold,” said Doug Ollivant, a former military planner in Baghdad and senior fellow at the New America Foundation. “It’s just not clear how the Iraqis get out of this. I just don’t see how they will.”

It is equally unclear how the administration will move forward if Abadi is unable to consolidate his tenuous grip on power. For much of the past year, the Iraqi prime minister’s survival was taken as a given by senior White House officials who were far more focused on the military fight against the Islamic State.

The president and his top aides have pointed to battlefield gains against the group in Iraq as proof that the administration’s much-criticized strategy was working. In the past 18 months, the Islamic State has lost more than 40 percent of its territory in Iraq, according to U.S. officials.

Attacks on the group’s banks in Mosul have blown up cash totaling from $300 million to
$800 million, according to Pentagon estimates.

“Militarily, the momentum is clearly in the coalition’s favor against [the Islamic State],” said a senior administration official traveling with Biden to Baghdad who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the White House’s strategy. “Every objective fact speaks to the fact that [the Islamic State] is losing.”

Obama has sought to accelerate the military campaign by sending more than 200 U.S. military advisers to Iraq and giving commanders authority to use lethal Apache attack helicopters in support of Iraqi forces. In a recent interview, the president said that by the end of the year he expected that the United States and its Iraqi partners will have “created the conditions whereby Mosul will eventually fall.”

Another senior administration official said that U.S. counterterrorism efforts “always benefit from a stable partner on the ground” and that the Abadi government continues to have the administration’s full support. Even with the current instability in Baghdad, the campaign against the Islamic State will continue, said the official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive counterterrorism operations.

The political crisis in Baghdad began when Abadi made a bold push to replace politically connected members of his cabinet with technocrats and reformers. The prime minister said that his moves were intended to stamp out corruption.

But the proposals alienated powerful blocs and provoked raucous debates within the Iraqi parliament. Thousands of protesters threatened to storm the heavily fortified Green Zone, which is the seat of Iraqi power, but then seemed to back off in the days before Biden’s arrival.

Biden’s meetings Thursday with Abadi and other senior Iraqi officials focused primarily on making sure that the political strife in Baghdad was not interfering with military preparations to retake Mosul, Iraq’s second largest city, from the Islamic State.

“We talked about the plans that are in store for Mosul and the coordination that’s going on with all of our friends here,” Biden told reporters after his meeting with the Iraqi prime minister. “And so, I’m very optimistic.”

As he spoke, the vice president was standing next to Salim al-
Jubouri, the Iraqi parliament speaker. He pointed to Jubouri and noted that they last talked in Biden’s office in Washington. “This is an old friend,” Biden said.

Less than 36 hours later, the protesters were dancing and stomping on Jubouri’s desk in front of the parliament chamber. Jubouri had fled the building.

The dramatic turn of events, some analysts said, points to the critical flaw in the Obama administration’s approach to the battle against the Islamic State, which has prioritized defeating the militant group over the much tougher task of helping Abadi repair Iraq’s corrupt and largely ineffective government.

“The message to the Iraqis has been to focus on the short-term problem that this president would like solved by January,” Ollivant said. “The focus is on the symptom and not the root cause of the problem.”

Other analysts said that the Obama administration’s campaign against the Islamic State was, from the outset, too dependent on Abadi, a weak prime minister who is trying to survive in a political system overrun by cronyism and competing sects.

“We get seized with individual personalities,” said Ali Khedery, who served as special assistant to five U.S. ambassadors in Baghdad from 2003 to 2009. “We fall in love with them. I agree that Abadi is generally speaking a good ally of the United States, but there isn’t much under his control.”

Because Iraqi society is so fractured along ethnic and sectarian lines, Khedery said the U.S. administration should adopt a more decentralized approach, working directly with individual Sunni, Shiite and Kurdish leaders. “What you have is a society that is deeply polarized between communities and even polarized within those communities,” Khedery said. “We need a radical new formula.”

There is no indication at the moment that the White House is considering such a radical change in approach. For now, the hope is that the current unrest in Baghdad is just a blip. The protests were sparked by Shiite cleric *Moqtada al-Sadr, who is now under pressure from Iran and his fellow Shiites to rein in the demonstrations, said a senior U.S. official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal Iraqi politics.

“Maybe [Sadr] will realize he took a step too far and will dial it back,” the official said. “That could give Abadi more space.”

It is also possible that the protests, spurred by the Iraqi government’s failure to provide basic services such as clean water and electricity, could grow worse. This time, demonstrators broke chairs and smashed windows in the parliament building. They berated lawmakers and chanted slogans for TV cameras.

“Iraq is becoming increasingly ungovernable,” said Emma Sky, who served as a senior political adviser to the U.S. military prior to the withdrawal of U.S. troops in 2011. “Non-state actors are stronger than the state. The government is paralyzed and corrupt.”

Greg Jaffe covers the White House for The Washington Post, where he has been since March 2009.  Follow @GregJaffe
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://thehill.com/policy/defense/2...rinking-between-us-and-competitors-russia-and

Experts warn weapons gap is shrinking between US, Russia and China

By Kristina Wong - 04/30/16 02:03 PM EDT
Comments 257

Competitors like Russia and China are closing the advanced weapons gap with the United States, aiming to push the U.S. out of areas on their front doorstep.

Experts say they're improving their ability to target U.S. aircraft and ships, pushing the U.S. military farther away from potential conflict zones and constraining its ability to use force in regions such as the Baltic Sea and the South China Sea.

"Since the end of the Cold War, the U.S. military has never really had to fight an enemy that had its own arsenal of precision-guided weapons," said Mark Gunzinger, senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments.
"It was able to use air bases and other bases located fairly close to the borders of an enemy because there wasn't that much of an air and missile threat to those bases,” he said. “That’s changing.”

Experts say Russia and China are improving their ballistic and cruise missile technologies and hoping to create what they call “anti-access area-denial bubbles” where they can threaten U.S. air and ground operations.

Russia is in particular presenting a challenge to the U.S. in the Baltics region, where it has recently been harassing U.S. aircraft and ships.

”You’ve seen some advanced air-to-air technologies that the Chinese and Russians are developing, not just in stealth technology, but in terms of the advanced aerodynamics, advanced air-to-air radars, advanced air-to-air weapons, advanced air-to-ground weapons," said Chris Harmer, senior naval analyst at the Institute for the Study of War.

Experts say Russia and China are also making inroads into the U.S.’ undersea dominance.

"Chinese nuclear attack submarines are just in absolute overdrive, how quick they're building and how fast the technology is developing,” Harmer said. "And we've seen a significant increase in Russian naval activity, Russian long-range naval activity, Russian ships conducting port calls to Bandar Abbas in Iran.”

Iran, too, is making progress, experts say.

“They still lack a precision in their offensive weapons, and they're still trying to obtain and develop more effective air missile defenses, but they're making progress and their weapons are getting more accurate and their capabilities are increasing in their range, as well as in their numbers,” Harmer said. “The Iranian navy is getting a lot bigger a lot quicker than anybody expected.”

To keep ahead of those advances, the Pentagon is focusing on developing high-end weapons systems that can avoid detection even in close quarters, like the B-21 long-range stealth bomber.

It is also seeking to develop the high-end capabilities of allies like the United Kingdom in order to extend its reach.

Deputy Defense Secretary Bob Work and British Defense Procurement Minister Philip Dunne earlier this month toured U.S. military bases where the two nations are working closely together on advanced weapons systems.

That includes the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, a fifth-generation stealth fighter; the P-8 Poseidon, a maritime patrol aircraft designed to detect foreign submarines and ships; and the Trident Class II D5 missile, which deploy from U.S. and Royal Navy ballistic missile submarines.

"I wouldn't say that these are specific towards any countries, but they're against high-end capabilities," Work said. "Countries like Iran are buying the most advanced air defense systems in the world … Advanced air defense systems are proliferating around the world. Submarine technology is proliferating around the world. They're becoming quieter, hard to find."

Work said the U.S. and the U.K.’s 25-year defense plan released last year would allow the two nations to be "interoperable in these high-end fights."

"If we ever projected power around the globe and the U.K. government said, 'We're with you,' we'd be interoperable from the top to the bottom," he said.

Some experts say the U.S. is not spending enough on weapons research and development.

"At the same time, the Russians and the Chinese — the Chinese more so than the Russians — are spending an awful lot of money on research and development,” Harmer said.

And cyber theft, particularly by the Chinese, is a problem, they add.

“Today, we're capable of losing in 10 seconds via cybercrime 10 years worth of research and development,” Harmer said. "And especially for the Chinese that's been a big help to them in closing the gap.”

But they agree the main solution is fixing a wasteful and burdensome weapons buying system that can take decades to field a platform.

"The main issue for us is overcoming a very sclerotic system of acquisition," said defense analyst Norman Friedman. "It's not fast enough, and it's extremely poor judgment about the costs of programs, how much they should run, lack of ruthlessness ... an ability for someone at the top for many years to stand back and say, this is stupid."

Experts warn that in the meantime, competitors can make up in numbers what they can't make up in technology.

"As the Russians used to say during the Cold War, quantity has a quality all of its own," Harmer said. "Because the Chinese can put so much quantity into the water in a relatively small space and small time, they can more than overwhelm our technological advantage.”

Experts say they don't see any fixes to the shrinking technological gap anytime soon.

Defense Secretary Ash Carter, House Armed Services Committee Chairman Mac Thornberry (R-Texas) and Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman John McCain (R-Ariz.) have introduced reforms to fix the acquisition system, but experts say it’s too early to tell if their reforms are working.

“I find it worrisome that we can't seem to fix the procurement system but many very hard working people have tried,” Friedman said. “I mourn for what I see.”

Harmer added: “The Department of Defense would like to move faster. Of course, change is hard. Change is slow.”
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
http://www.timebomb2000.com/vb/show...Erdogan-want-his-own-Islamic-state-Al-Monitor

For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2016/04/turkey-does-erdogan-aim-islamic-state.html

Does Erdogan want his own Islamic state?

Author Mustafa Akyol
Posted April 29, 2016
Comments 42

Parliament Speaker Ismail Kahraman unexpectedly sparked controversy in Turkey when on April 25 he declared that Turkey’s new constitution should forgo mention of “secularism” and instead be a “religious constitution” referencing God. His words reignited Turkey’s always tense “secularism debate,” which has been amplified since 2002 when the Justice and Development Party (AKP) came to power. Kahraman's remarks led to protests in a number of cities, a call by the main opposition leader for him to resign and allegations by secular pundits that the Speaker had shown the AKP’s “true face,” its “real intentions.” Because Kahraman is a known confidant of President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, many also suspected that his statement was part of a scheme being orchestrated by Turkey's leader.

In the next two days, however, the major figures in the AKP disowned Kahraman’s position on a “religious constitution.” The AKP’s Mustafa Sentop, chairman of parliament's constitutional commission, said that Kahraman’s view was not a “party stance” and that “secularism is preserved in our constitutional draft.” Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu asserted, “In the new constitution that we are preparing, the principle of secularism will be included.” He added that it would be a “liberal interpretation” of secularism, not an “authoritarian” version. In also addressing the controversy, Erdogan not only professed support for secularism, but even offered an inspired defense of the principle.

Defining secularism as the state's “obligation to stay at an equal distance to different faith groups,” he explained why it is a good idea: “If the faith of all religious groups in this country is guaranteed in the constitution, and the state’s equal distance to all religious groups is a foundation, why do you need to emphasize Islam? If I can live my faith as a Muslim the way I want to, the issue is over. If a Christian can live his/her Christianity, if a Jew can live his/her Jewishness or an atheist can live his/her atheism, the issue is also over for them.”

Will Erdogan's powerful statement ease the tensions over secularism? Probably not, because many secularists fear that they have not yet seen the AKP’s “true face.”

A common view in opposition circles is that Kahraman’s statement on doing away with secularism and introducing a religious constitution did not reflect his “personal views,” as he claimed, but was in fact part of a plan cooked up by Erdogan. Accordingly, Erdogan wanted to test the waters by having Kahraman float the idea of a religious constitution, but then defended secularism after the reaction it elicited. An “Islamic state,” however, remains Erdogan's long-term goal in their thinking. Another, more persuasive interpretation of events would be as follows.

Erdogan’s ambitions are more about power than doctrine. For power, he needs to sustain popular support, and for popular support, he needs to use religion, but only to a certain extent. While religious symbolism has broad appeal in Turkey, a Quran-thumping Islamic state does not. Various polls bear this out. The most recent survey of the political inclinations of Turkish society was conducted in 2013 by the Pew Research Center, which found that only 12% of all Turks support “making Sharia the official law in their country.” In contrast, 84% of Pakistanis and 74% of Egyptians supported the idea.

Erdogan likely has the support of this hardcore, Islamist minority of 12%, who probably do expect him to create their utopia. At the same time, he also has the support of a much larger block of “conservative” voters who are religious and like reference to religion, but who still prefer to live under secular law. This is why Erdogan would want to retain secularism in the Turkish constitution, albeit while not shying from venerating religion in the public square or perhaps even in the constitution.

A journalist with access to the AKP recently wrote in an insider report that there is a chance that the new constitution will preserve secularism — “laiklik,” from the French “laïcité” — but the preamble might make reference to “Allah and the religion of Islam,” along with some historical figures such as Rumi and Atatürk — in other words, something for everybody. Another rumor is that the preamble will make reference to “the Creator,” a possible inspiration from the US Declaration of Independence.

The more likely future for Turkey is not a Sharia-imposing Islamic state, but a more conservative state re-designed in the image of the AKP. Keep in mind that the latter-day ideology of the party is not simply “Islamism” after all, but “Erdoganism,” in which Islamism is indeed an important theme, but not the only theme. This would not put Turkey on the path to becoming another Iran or Saudi Arabia, as Turkey’s secularists fear, but it could lead in the direction of another Russia, where a similar ideology, “Putinism,” rules.

As the journalist Fareed Zakaria astutely observed, Putinism consists of five fundamentals: religion, nationalism, social conservatism, state capitalism and government media control. “Returning to the values of religion” — in particular Orthodox Christianity — is a powerful theme in Putin’s agenda, with a global vision of “protecting persecuted Christians all over the world.” Replace “Christian” with “Muslim,” and one has Turkey’s ruling ideology.
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/war-isis-b...tm_campaign=rss&utm_content=/rss/yahoous/news

War on Isis: British Special Forces ambushed by Islamic State suicide bombers in Libya

By William Watkinson
May 1, 2016 13:14 BST

British Special Forces in Libya have been ambushed by Islamic State (Isis) suicide bombers in an attack that may also have killed Italian troops. An Israeli news agency report suggests that Daesh (Isis) extremists attacked a convoy travelling from the northwestern city of Misrata towards the IS stronghold of Sirte – the birthplace of former dictator Muammar Gaddafi.

The attack on 27 April, targeted the convoy carrying Special Boat Service (SBS) operatives and Italian troops. The suicide mission was said to resemble similar terrorist attacks by Islamic State in the Sinai Peninsula operations against Egyptian forces.

Earlier in April reports suggested that the SBS and Special Air Service (SAS) were preparing to launch a two-pronged attack on IS strongholds in Mosul in Iraq and Sirte in Libya. Several hundred troops were said to be planning to join French, Italian and US Special Forces to mount the huge offensive within weeks, sources say.

A joint force consisting of officers from the UK, France, Italy, Germany and the US are said to be planning the invasion of Libya. Earlier in April, Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond travelled to Libya to meet the leaders of the new Libyan Government of National Accord (GNA) where he pledged British support.

Despite losing ground in Iraq and Syria, IS has been gaining ground in Libya but lost the key town of Derna on 21 April. Now, on the verge of an invasion by foreign troops, IS in Libya, have seemingly begun a fightback.

"Vehicles packed with explosives drew up alongside the convoy transporting the Italian and British troops and blew themselves up," reported the Debka news website. "Other ISIS fighters shelled the convoy with mortars and strafed it with heavy machine gun fire. The Western force was only able to escape after Italian and French warplanes and attack helicopters intervened."

Concerns have been expressed by UK foreign secretary Philip Hammond that Libya could be a springboard for attacks on Europe by IS jihadists. Troops have been on the ground in Libya for months and the Ministry of Defence (MoD) is said to be considering deploying to up 1,000 personnel to north Africa.

The Ministry of Defence said in a statement: "The MoD neither confirms nor denies claims about Special Forces activity."
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/storie...ME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2016-05-01-16-51-26

May 1, 4:51 PM EDT

US once again forced to turn to Russia for help on Syria

By MATTHEW LEE
AP Diplomatic Writer

GENEVA (AP) -- Scrambling to resuscitate a nearly dead truce in Syria, the Obama administration has again been forced to turn to Russia for help, with little hope for the desired U.S. outcome.

At stake are thousands of lives and the fate of a feeble peace process essential to the fight against the Islamic State group, and Secretary of State John Kerry has appealed once more to his Russian counterpart for assistance in containing and reducing the violence, particularly around city of Aleppo.

"We are talking directly to the Russians, even now," Kerry said on his arrival in Geneva as he began talks with Jordanian Foreign Minister Nasser Judeh. "The hope is we can make some progress, but the UN Security Council Resolution calls for a full country, countrywide, cessation and also for all of the country to be accessible to humanitarian assistance. Obviously that hasn't happened and isn't happening."

"These are critical hours. We look for Russia's cooperation. We obviously look for the regime to listen to Russia and to respond to the international communities' powerful statement to the UN Security Council."

Kerry spoke at length on Friday with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov to that end, and had been hoping to meet with Lavrov soon, according to U.S. officials.

In Geneva, Kerry met with Judeh and was to meet U.N. envoy Staffan de Mistura and Saudi Foreign Minister Adel al-Jubeir on Monday before returning to Washington.

But Lavrov was not expected to be in Geneva, complicating Kerry's efforts to make the case directly to the Russians for more pressure on their Syrian government allies to stop or at least limit attacks in Aleppo.

The State Department said Kerry, in his meetings, would "review ongoing efforts to reaffirm the cessation of hostilities nationwide in Syria, obtain the full humanitarian access to which the Syrian government committed and support a political transition."

Specific, viable options to achieve those broad goals are limited, and Friday's announcement of a new, partial cease-fire that does not include Aleppo underscored the difficulty Kerry faced.

U.S. and other officials described that initiative, brokered mainly by Russia and the United States as co-chairs of the International Syria Support Group, as a "reinforcement" of the February truce, now largely in tatters, that they hope to extend from Damascus and the capital's suburbs and the coastal province of Latakia to other areas.

"This is an agreement within the task force, but certainly on the part of the U.S. and Russia that there would be a reinforcement of the cessation of hostilities in these specific areas as a start, with the expectation that this ... would be then extended elsewhere," State Department spokesman Mark Toner said.

Syria's military extended a unilateral cease-fire around the capital for another 24 hours on Sunday, and relative calm set in across much of the country after days of heavy fighting concentrated in Aleppo.

For that city, the U.S. is considering drawing up with the Russians a detailed map that would lay out "safe zones." Civilians and members of moderate opposition groups covered by the truce could find shelter from persistent attacks by Syrian President Bashar Assad's military, which claims to be targeting terrorists.

One U.S. official said "hard lines" would delineate specific areas and neighborhoods. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly.

It was not immediately clear whether Russia would accept such a plan or if Moscow could persuade the Assad government to respect the prospective zones. Some U.S. officials are skeptical of the chances for success, but also note that it is worth a try to at least reduce the violence that has wracked Aleppo for the past week, with hundreds killed and thousands wounded.

Kerry discussed the deteriorating situation in calls over the past days with de Mistura and the head of a Syrian opposition negotiating committee. "We are working on specific initiatives to de-escalate the increased fighting and defuse tensions and hope to make tangible progress on such initiatives soon," State Department spokesman John Kirby said in a statement.

For the administration, Friday's announcement about the partial cease-fire is largely a means to measure the commitment of the warring parties to the concept of a truce that could lead to serious peace talks.

"It's a test for the Russians and for the regime, as well as for the Syrian opposition," Toner said.

The administration's problem is that the Russians, the Assad government and the opposition backed by the U.S. and its partners have all failed that test in the past.

In particular, the administration has been routinely disappointed that Russia has not lived up to pledges that U.S. officials think it has made. From the start of the conflict, the administration has sought numerous times for Moscow to use its influence with Damascus to bring about an end to the violence and to advance a political transition. At each turn, those hopes have been dashed with Russia continuing, and even increasing, its support for Assad.

U.S. officials concede there is little to suggest that will change.


Latest Syria News

Calm returns to much of Syria as government extends truce
AP EXPLAINS: Why Aleppo is Syria's fiercest battleground

The Latest: MSF says Syria hospital bombing killed 50

UN: More aid deliveries in Syria, but people still starving

American state senator meets with Syrian President Assad
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Hummm.....

For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-saudi-security-islamic-state-idUSKCN0XS1EJ

World | Sun May 1, 2016 12:32pm EDT
Related: World

Saudi Arabia kills two militant suspects in southwest, arrests third

Saudi security forces killed two militant suspects and arrested a third in a two-day operation in southwestern Bisha province, the Ministry of Interior said on Sunday, accusing them of involvement in deadly attacks claimed by Islamic State.

Security personnel killed two men in an exchange of gunfire during a chase to thwart an "imminent" attack on Friday, said ministry spokesman Mansour al-Turki in a televised statement.

They found explosive belts and machine guns in the men's car, he added.

A third suspect, named as Oqab al-Otaibi, escaped the scene and was arrested the following day.

The statement said the three men were suspects in the killing of a senior security officer outside the capital Riyadh in April. Two of them, including Otaibi, were also allegedly involved in a suicide bombing last August of a security forces mosque in Abha, capital of southwestern Asir province, in which 15 people died.

Islamic State claimed responsibility for both attacks, but the ministry did not directly implicate the group in its statement on Sunday.

Saudi Arabia, the world's top oil exporter, has been hit by a spate of deadly shootings and bombings targeting security forces or its Shi'ite Muslim minority since last year. Islamic State's local branches have claimed many of them.

The group views Shi'ites as heretics but is also bitterly opposed to the wealthy Gulf kingdom's Sunni Muslim rulers, whom it regards as having betrayed Islam through close ties with the West.


(Reporting By Raissa Kasolowsky)
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-afghanistan-taliban-idUSKCN0XS17Y

World | Sun May 1, 2016 9:15am EDT
Related: World, Afghanistan

Afghan forces battle to push Taliban from southern highway

KANDAHAR, Afghanistan | By Sayed Sarwar Amani


Afghan security forces have been battling to push back Taliban fighters seeking to cut off the capital of the southern province of Uruzgan, officials said on Sunday as army units worked to clear roadside bombs from the main highway into the town.

The insurgents have in the past month stepped up their offensive aimed at taking control of Uruzgan, which straddles one of Afghanistan's main opium and gun-smuggling routes. NATO commanders view the rural province as a key battleground as, if it fell, the Taliban could use it as a springboard to launch attacks on Helmand and Kandahar further to the south.

The Taliban is seeking to isolate the provincial capital Tarin Kowt from outlying districts and over the past week has been fighting Afghan forces for control of the road between the town and Shawali Kot in Kandahar province.

The battle has added to the pressure on stretched security forces engaged in heavy fighting from Helmand in the south to Kunduz in the far north.

A spokesman for the Afghan army's 205th Corps said troops had reopened the route but the situation was still unstable and the road was threatened by improvised explosive devices (IEDs) planted by the insurgents.

"We launched a counter-attack that inflicted heavy casualties to the Taliban and reopened to the highway but it is heavily mined and our engineers are working to clear IEDs off the road," army spokesman Mohammad Mohsen Sultani said.

Underlining the extent of the threat, General Abdul Raziq, the Kandahar police chief who gained a fearsome reputation fighting the insurgents in his home province, has joined the battle, according to Zia Durani, a spokesman for the head of Uruzgan's provincial police.

Brigadier General Charles Cleveland, spokesman for the NATO-led Resolute Support mission in Kabul, said the situation in the province was "serious" although there did not appear to be any immediate prospect of Taliban victory.

"We're watching it closely and there is concern about Uruzgan," he said. "We don't think either the province of Uruzgan or the provincial capital Tarin Kowt is about to fall but we're watching it closely," he said.


'TALIBAN ARE EVERYWHERE'

Uruzgan neighbors the Taliban heartlands of Helmand and Kandahar and is among the least-developed areas of Afghanistan, with only 8 percent of the population having access to electricity. Its mix of flat and mountainous terrain has been fertile ground for insurgents who fought Australian, Dutch and U.S. troops for years.

So far no additional foreign troops have been sent to bolster the defense, as they were in Helmand earlier this year, and coalition aircraft have not carried out air strikes in support of Afghan troops fighting the Taliban, Cleveland said.

But the fighting in Uruzgan underlines how difficult ensuring security in remote areas has been for the Western-backed government in Kabul, which is estimated to control only about two-thirds of the country.

"The Taliban have not been defeated. They are everywhere," said provincial council chief Abdul Karim Khademzai. "Apart from one district, all roads from the district centers to the provincial capital have been cut off and the government only control the provincial capital," he said.

The districts of Deh Rawod, to the west of Tarin Kowt and Khas Oruzgan, to the east, have long been targeted by the insurgents, who say they have control of large parts of the province and now threaten Tarin Kowt.

"If the provincial center is captured and liberated, it will inevitably be a huge blow for the enemy as they will lose their only toehold in the province," Mullah Aminullah Yousuf, identified on the Taliban's website as the insurgent official in charge of Uruzgan province, said in an interview on the site.

With the annual opium harvest now in full swing, Taliban tax collectors have been raising funds from local farmers, who depend heavily on the crop but as fighting has intensified, life has become increasingly difficult, said Amanullah Hotaki, a local tribal elder.

"In some districts where the Taliban are in control, food prices have gone up, there are no hospitals, people die on the way to Kandahar to get treatment," he said.


(Writing by James Mackenzie; Editing by Pravin Char)
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
:dot5:

For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
https://www.yahoo.com/news/wary-chinas-indian-ocean-activities-u-india-discuss-023824103.html

Wary of China's Indian Ocean activities, U.S., India discuss anti-submarine warfare

By Sanjeev Miglani and Greg Torode
Reuters
May 1, 2016

NEW DELHI/HONG KONG (Reuters) - India and the United States are in talks to help each other track submarines in the Indian Ocean, military officials say, a move that could further tighten defense ties between New Delhi and Washington as China steps up its undersea activities.

Both the United States and India are growing concerned at the reach and ambition of the Chinese navy, which is taking an increasingly assertive stance in the South China Sea and is challenging India's domination in the Indian Ocean.

New Delhi, shedding its decades-old reluctance to be drawn into America's embrace, agreed last month to open up its military bases to the United States in exchange for access to weapons technology to help it narrow the gap with China.

The two sides also said their navies will hold talks on anti submarine warfare (ASW), an area of sensitive military technology and closely held tactics that only allies share.

"These types of basic engagements will be the building blocks for an enduring Navy-to-Navy relationship that we hope will grow over time into a shared ASW capability," one U.S. official familiar with India-U.S. military cooperation said, speaking on condition of anonymity.

Indian naval officials say Chinese submarines have been sighted on an average four times every three months. Some are seen near India's Andamans and Nicobar islands that lie near the Malacca Straits, the entry to the South China Sea through which more than 80 percent of China's fuel supplies pass.

India and the United States, which already conduct joint naval exercises, both fly the new version of the P-8 aircraft, making information sharing easier on highly sensitive submarine tracking activities.

The P-8 is Washington's most advanced submarine hunting weapon, equipped with sensors that can track and identify submarines by sonar and other means.

An Indian naval spokesman declined to comment on the proposed anti-submarine warfare cooperation with the United States.

But an Indian naval source, briefed on the discussions, said the focus of the next set of joint exercises to take place in the northern Philippine Sea in June will be on anti-submarine warfare.

Japan, a close U.S. ally whose submarines are believed to track Chinese submarines in the western Pacific, will also be a participant in the exercises.

INTENSE SURVEILLANCE

Two linked factors are driving the co-operation, say regional military attaches and security experts.

The prospect of active patrols by nuclear-armed Chinese submarines has sparked intense surveillance activity around the China's southern submarine base on Hainan Island, and nearby waters.

India, meanwhile, is preparing to launch its first locally-built submarine armed with nuclear tipped missiles.

So just as U.S. attack submarines are seeking to track the Chinese nuclear armed submarines in the Pacific, the Chinese are expected to send their own attack submarines to the Indian Ocean in greater numbers to scrutinize the Indian patrols.

Collin Koh, a submarine expert at Singapore’s S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, said increased U.S. submarine and surveillance activity was being seen across the region.

“We will see the Indian Ocean grow in importance, too, particularly around traditional chokeholds, such as the approaches to the Malacca Straits and the Nicobar islands, so an improved U.S. relationship with the major submarine player in the area, India, is very significant,” Koh said.

BOLSTERING INDIAN CAPABILITIES

Initially, the United States as the world leader in anti-submarine warfare is likely to be bolstering Indian capabilities in the field.

But in time, experts say each country could be covering stretches of the Indian Ocean through which two-thirds of the world's trade moves.

David Brewster, an expert on the strategic rivalry in Indian Ocean at the Australian National University, said anti submarine warfare collaboration may eventually include Australia, another U.S. ally which just ordered 12 new submarines.

"We are likely to ultimately see a division of responsibilities in the Indian Ocean between those three countries, and with the potential to also share facilities."

China for its part is seeking to secure its energy and trade transportation links by building ports and other infrastructure for countries such as Sri Lanka that lie along the vital shipping route.

Asked about collaboration between India and the United States on submarine warfare, Hua Chunying, a spokeswoman for China’s Foreign Ministry, said China had noted countries in the region engaging in military cooperation.

"We hope that the relevant cooperation is normal, and that it can be meaningful to the peace and stability of the region," she said.

(Additional reporting by David Brunnstrom in WASHINGTON and Megha Rajagopalan in BEIJING; Editing by Lincoln Feast)
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...e33d96-0d50-11e6-a6b6-2e6de3695b0e_story.html

Opinions

We ignore Venezuela’s imminent implosion at our peril

By Jackson Diehl Deputy Editorial Page Editor
May 1 at 7:06 PM 
Comments 218

The encouraging news from Latin America is that the leftist populists who for 15 years undermined the region’s democratic institutions and wrecked its economies are being pushed out — not by coups and juntas, but by democratic and constitutional means. Cristina Fernández de Kirchner of Argentina is already gone, vanquished in a presidential election, and Brazil’s Dilma Rousseff is likely to be impeached in the coming days.

The tipping point is the place where the movement began in the late 1990s: Venezuela, a country of 30 million that despite holding the world’s largest oil reserves has descended into a dystopia where food, medicine, water and electric power are critically scarce. Riots and looting broke out in several blacked-out cities last week, forcing the deployment of troops. A nation that 35 years ago was the richest in Latin America is now appealing to its neighbors for humanitarian deliveries to prevent epidemics and hunger.

The regime that fostered this nightmare, headed by Hugo Chávez until his death in 2013, is on the way out: It cannot survive the economic crisis and mass discontent it has created. The question is whether the change will come relatively peacefully or through an upheaval that could turn Venezuela into a failed state and destabilize much of the region around it.

A democratic outcome seemed possible in December, when a coalition of opposition parties won two-thirds of the seats in the National Assembly. Rather than concede or negotiate, however, the Chavista government, now headed by President Nicolás Maduro, dug in. At its direction, a constitutional tribunal stacked with party hacks has issued annulments of every act by the new assembly, including an amnesty for scores of political prisoners.

Gangs of regime thugs now roam the streets on motorcycles and attack opposition gatherings. Meanwhile, the government is essentially shutting itself down: Last week Maduro ordered that state employees, who make up more than 30 percent of the workforce, would henceforth labor only two days a week, supposedly in order to save energy.

Remarkably, most of the Western hemisphere is studiously ignoring this meltdown. The Obama administration and Washington’s Latin America watchers are obsessed with the president’s pet project, the opening to Cuba. As it happens, the Castros turned Venezuela into a satellite state, seeding its security forces and intelligence services with agents. Yet now that it is decreasingly able to supply discounted oil to its revolutionary mentor, Venezuela appears to have become an afterthought even in Havana.

Last week a delegation of senior Venezuelan lawmakers traveled to Washington to make one more effort to call attention to their crisis. They had a simple message: “Venezuela will end with a political change, because there is no other possibility,” said Luis Florido, president of the National Assembly’s foreign affairs commission. “But the government will decide how this change happens.”

At the moment, the slim remaining hopes for a democratic solution rest on a constitutional provision allowing for a referendum to remove Maduro. The obstacles to its success are almost comically steep: The opposition must first persuade some 200,000 people to appear at a government office (now open two days a week) to vouch for their signatures on a petition, then collect the signatures of 20 percent of the electorate, or about 4 million people. If the referendum is held, the vote to remove Maduro would have to be higher than the total reported number of votes he received in his 2013 election.

All this has to happen in the next nine months if a new presidential election is to be triggered. Yet just extracting the necessary forms for the first petition from the regime-controlled electoral commission cost the opposition six weeks. On Wednesday, Venezuelans massively departed from their perpetual lines in front of grocery stores to sign the petitions — the opposition claimed it collected more than 1 million signatures in a day. But, said Carlos Vecchio, an exiled leader of the Voluntad Popular party, “The crisis is moving at 2,000 kilometers an hour, but the potential solution is going at 2 kilometers an hour.”

The Venezuelan lawmakers had some practical and specific requests for the Obama administration, starting with the public release of the names and alleged offenses of top Venezuelan officials included on a confidential U.S. sanctions list. They’d also like help finding the $300 billion to $400 billion they estimate has been stashed in foreign bank accounts by the Chavista elite; the money is desperately needed to import food and stave off a foreign debt default.

Most of all, however, Venezuelans hope for U.S. leadership in pushing Maduro to accept an election. Said Vecchio: “The moment has arrived when you can no longer ignore this. Because what happens in Venezuela is going to affect the whole region.”
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
:dot5:


For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-thailand-japan-idUSKCN0XT0MK

World | Mon May 2, 2016 5:36am EDT
Related: World, Japan

Japan to support Mekong countries with $7 billion over three years


Japan wants to work with countries in the lower Mekong river basin and will help them improve infrastructure and bolster development with 750 billion yen ($7 billion) in aid over three years, its foreign minister said on Monday.

Foreign Minister Fumio Kishida made the pledge to help the Southeast Asian economies in Thailand's capital, Bangkok, where on Sunday he began a week-long visit to the region in which Japan competes with China for influence.

"Japan would like to work with the countries of the Mekong region to create a framework to support efforts by the Mekong countries in a detailed manner, on a region-by-region basis or on a theme-by-theme basis," Kishida said in a speech.

Japan announced the three-year plan last year.

China has offered billions of dollars in infrastructure loans and government aid programs to Southeast Asian countries.

Kishida did not mention China in his speech. He is also due to visit Myanmar, Laos and Vietnam.

On Monday, he met Thai Prime Minister Prayuth Chan-ocha, who has led a military government since the army took power in a May 2014 coup. Thailand has drawn closer to China since the coup which many western countries criticized.

Kishida and Prayuth discussed Thailand's political process, regional terrorism threats and economic challenges, a Japanese official said.

Kishida visited Beijing on the weekend where both China and Japan expressed willingness to improve relations strained over conflicting territorial claims in the East China Sea.

In his speech in Bangkok, Kishida addressed maritime security and renewed a call for countries to respect the rule of law.

He also backed a Southeast Asian bid to draft a code of conduct for the South China Sea, where China's claim to virtually the entire sea clashes with claims to parts of it by Vietnam, Brunei, Malaysia and the Philippines.

"We must establish a regional order whereby the principle of the rule of law is truly upheld and practiced," he said. "I would like to renew my call for the early conclusion of an effective Code of Conduct in the South China Sea."

Japanese Prime Minister Shinto Abe is pursuing a more robust foreign policy but Masato Otaka, deputy press secretary at Japan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, told reporters Kishida's visit was not aimed at counteracting China's influence.

On Sunday, Kishida reaffirmed Japan's economic ties with Thailand, an important base for many Japanese companies, after Japanese investment in the country nosedived in 2015.


(Reporting by Amy Sawitta Lefevre; Editing by Robert Birsel)
 

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-syria-turkey-idUSKCN0XT0CJ

World | Mon May 2, 2016 4:10am EDT
Related: World

Drones, Turkish artillery hit Islamic State in Syria, 34 dead: military

Shelling by Turkish artillery and drones which took off from southern Turkey struck Islamic State targets in Syria on Sunday, killing 34 militants, the Turkish military said.

It said the strikes, in response to Islamic State rocket attacks which hit the southern Turkish province of Kilis, destroyed six vehicles and five Islamic State gun positions.

The border town of Kilis and surrounding area has been hit frequently by rocket fire from Islamic State-controlled Syrian territory in recent months, killing civilians.

In Sunday's strikes, Turkish howitzers and multiple rocket launchers first hit Islamic State targets about 12 km (seven miles) south of the border, then four drones that took off from the Incirlik base in southern Turkey destroyed further targets, the military said.

Turkey has repeatedly fired back at Islamic State positions under its rules of engagement, but has said it needs greater support from Western allies, citing the difficulty of hitting moving targets with howitzers.

Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu was quoted as saying last week that the United States would deploy a rocket launcher system near the stretch of border that has come under attack. A senior U.S. military official confirmed the matter was under discussion but declined to comment further.


(Reporting by Orhan Coskun; Writing by Daren Butler; Editing by Seda Sezer and Andrew Heavens)
 
Top