Apparently you misinterpreted my posts: I never said cooling causes changes in volcanic eruptions. It is caused by a weakening solar wind which defects less incoming cosmic rays from reaching the Earth. Both effects [cooling and eruptions] tend to occur at about the same time due to reduced solar irradiance.
FA
So doe the new minimum have a name yet?
So doe the new minimum have a name yet?
Right now it's: Second hottest of the modern era; first hottest was 2016. Actually it's kind of close; 2017 may have been the third hottest.
Judging from this Great Blizzard of 1899 map, all of the USA was affected; it was just a matter of degrees!
FA
There probably is SOME connections, things do cool down after large eruptions and a gigantic one like Tambora was an enough to create The Year Without a Summer in 1816 [not 1916]; but that effect only lasted a few years; I suspect it is a complicated dance with volcanoes, solar cycles, the position of the Earth's Tilt towards away from the sun, the Earths 25,000 year procession of the Equinoxes, ocean currents and possibly a few other "members of the chorus" that sometimes make a "full" Ice Age.
I suspect it takes only two or three dance partners to make a "mini Ice Age" of 20 to 500 years.
79 A.D.? As in when Mount Vesuvius erupted? That kind of interesting we could do without......For example, in 2024 there will be a rare astronomical alignment that will occur when the orbits of the four gas giant planets will pull the Earth further away from the Sun and its warmth. Last time this happened was in 79 A.D.
It's going to be interesting.
FA
In north America, along with the ice age may come a huge ice dam at the front of the sheet that melt water builds up behind until it gives way periodically. I've wondered if that is what did in the Clovis People?Ice ages can come on as suddenly as five years with massive ice build up around 15-20 years. So you are still young enough that it could affect you.
This is funny you people are worring about something you can do nothing about, don't you think their are more importain this to worring about that you can actually do something about, like putting food away, buying bullets like their is know tomorrow and others.
This is funny you people are worring about something you can do nothing about, don't you think their are more importain this to worring about that you can actually do something about, like putting food away, buying bullets like their is know tomorrow and others.
For example, in 2024 there will be a rare astronomical alignment that will occur when the orbits of the four gas giant planets will pull the Earth further away from the Sun and its warmth.
79 A.D.? As in when Mount Vesuvius erupted? That kind of interesting we could do without.
In north America, along with the ice age may come a huge ice dam at the front of the sheet that melt water builds up behind until it gives way periodically. I've wondered if that is what did in the Clovis People?
I'm not taking that comment seriously unless you have credible math from credible sources to back up the implied suggestion that the 2024 "alignment" orbital change will significantly cool the Earth. Not to mention that alignments in the past have often been claimed when it was just planets being on the same side of the Sun (and not literally in anything like a line). Which is apparently the case with the 2024 claim as I used the Solar System charting at this site (www.heavens-above.com/planets.aspx?lat=0&lng=0&loc=Unspecified&alt=0&tz=UCT) and stepped through all twelve months of 2024 but could not get anything approaching what I'd call an "alignment" of the gas giants.
You are correct in the sense that there is nothing that humanity can do to stop or reverse global cooling BUT that doesn't mean that you as an individual are completely helpless. You might decide to move to a warmer climate, build cold frames, greenhouses, store food, etc. Sadly most people are unaware of these natural cooling cycles and will simply be blindsided when they happen.
FA
See this video starting at the 6:37 minute time-stamp for the comparison to the 79 A.D. event.
FA
See this video starting at the 6:37 minute time-stamp for the comparison to the 79 A.D. event.
Can you post the text about it I have vey limited bites of internet and can't really watch you tube videos.
THANKS IF YOU CAN
There's no text to reproduce; it's a visual image.
FA
For example, in 2024 there will be a rare astronomical alignment that will occur when the orbits of the four gas giant planets will pull the Earth further away from the Sun and its warmth. Last time this happened was in 79 A.D.
FA
The gravitational force between the Sun and the Earth is about 3.54x1022 N. This force keeps the Earth orbiting around the Sun. The gravitational force from the other planets does slightly affect the Earth’s orbit, but the gravitational pull from the other planets and the Moon is still very small. The gravitational pull of the Moon on the Earth is only 0.55% (one half of one percent) of the gravitational force between the Sun and the Earth. When they are closest to the Earth, Jupiter only exerts 0.0062% of this force and Mars only 0.00023%.
You have no idea how insignificant the gravity effect of the gas giants is upon the earth...but, most folks just don't have the science background or education. ... Folks just can't get their heads around how large our solar system actually is and how with distance gravitational effects wain quickly.
Guy Sajer (his nom de plume) was a Franco-German conscript in the Wehrmacht in Word War Two who wrote the superb book, The Forgotten Soldier. He served multiple tours on the Eastern Front and was there during record-setting Russian cold periods. He profoundly described the suffering that cold temperatures cause and at one point stated "Metal broke with astonishing ease." Temperature-related embrittlement of steel (and other materials) is a very real phenomenon.
Best regards
Doc
You bring up moving to a warmer climate and I could see a mass exodus (abandon their homes) headed to warmer southern states. My area it could come down to heat or eat and not being able to keep up with it, that may leave only a few people here, almost like living in a small Alasken village where only the few that has what it takes to live there.
Writers sometimes blame the Vikings dying off in Greenland on their inability to change their diet and food sources. They write that if the Norse had only been willing to eat more seafood (which in fact they actually did, but it doesn't make for as neat a book or article selling a morality tale) then all would have been well in the Greenland colonies. But what those writers usually don't mention is that the same time the Vikings were declining their hunting parties were also finding settlement after settlement of Innuit (unquestionably better attuned to survive in those conditions) that had starved to death. Indians further south in supposedly more hospitable regions were also regularly beset by mass starvation when times were tough. My point is not to get too smug that just because you're not an urban dweller vulnerable to supply chain disruptions you're somehow safe from the same disasters. Sometimes you can do everything right and still fail, and sometimes you can do everything wrong and still survive. The thing to take to heart is that Mother Nature doesn't give a rat's ass either way.
Writers sometimes blame the Vikings dying off in Greenland on their inability to change their diet and food sources. They write that if the Norse had only been willing to eat more seafood (which in fact they actually did, but it doesn't make for as neat a book or article selling a morality tale) then all would have been well in the Greenland colonies. But what those writers usually don't mention is that the same time the Vikings were declining their hunting parties were also finding settlement after settlement of Innuit (unquestionably better attuned to survive in those conditions) that had starved to death. Indians further south in supposedly more hospitable regions were also regularly beset by mass starvation when times were tough. My point is not to get too smug that just because you're not an urban dweller vulnerable to supply chain disruptions you're somehow safe from the same disasters. Sometimes you can do everything right and still fail, and sometimes you can do everything wrong and still survive. The thing to take to heart is that Mother Nature doesn't give a rat's ass either way.
Writers sometimes blame the Vikings dying off in Greenland on their inability to change their diet and food sources. They write that if the Norse had only been willing to eat more seafood (which in fact they actually did, but it doesn't make for as neat a book or article selling a morality tale) then all would have been well in the Greenland colonies. But what those writers usually don't mention is that the same time the Vikings were declining their hunting parties were also finding settlement after settlement of Innuit (unquestionably better attuned to survive in those conditions) that had starved to death. Indians further south in supposedly more hospitable regions were also regularly beset by mass starvation when times were tough. My point is not to get too smug that just because you're not an urban dweller vulnerable to supply chain disruptions you're somehow safe from the same disasters. Sometimes you can do everything right and still fail, and sometimes you can do everything wrong and still survive. The thing to take to heart is that Mother Nature doesn't give a rat's ass either way.