COMMUNISM Why would the Democrats want their cities destroyed?

The Cub

Behold, I am coming soon.
Question: Given that the Communist Party (aka Democrats) want to remove Trump from office by any means necessary, why would they allow their Democrat-controlled American cities to be looted and pillaged, and to go up in smoke?

The following is from 2015. You will recall that the Obama Administration ceded certain sovereignty of the US to the UN. (It is difficult to post all of it in this software.):

 

blackjeep

The end times are here.
why would they allow their Democrat-controlled American cities to be looted and pillaged, and to go up in smoke?
My opinion is that the governors and mayors are being threatened, blackmailed or paid off the allow this destruction. They are probably being paid off or threatened by Soros and foreign governments, IE China, Russia, etc. The deep state wants a One World government, and what we are seeing shows how desperate they are to accomplish it.

We are dealing with very evil people.
 

vector7

Dot Collector
I think too that the city leaders believe that they will successfully be able to lay the blame for the destruction at Trump's feet in some way.

Put 'Deep' in front of State below...

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”

SOURCE: Nazi propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels
 

The Cub

Behold, I am coming soon.
Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch Announces the Launch of the Strong Cities Network at the United Nations General Assembly

JUSTICE.GOV - Office of the Attorney General - New York, NY, United States - September 29, 2015 -- "…We gather today at a crucial moment of challenge and opportunity for the security of our nations and the well-being of humankind. Fourteen years ago, not far from where we stand today, terrorists carried out a vicious assault on democratic values and inclusive societies everywhere. Their brutal attack claimed the lives of thousands of innocent victims – including citizens from 90 nations. And in the years since that morning when terror rained from the sky, we have continued to see violent extremists emerge from within our own communities - from terrorists inspired by groups like [ISIS] to fanatics motivated by hatred against religious or ethnic factions. Some aspire to travel overseas to train or to fight. Others plot attacks on targets within their homelands. But all are antithetical to the shared vision and common cause that joins us here today in this renowned international forum: commitment to collaboration; dedication to peace; and devotion to the cause of justice within our nations and throughout the world.

It is clear that the challenge of building resilience against violent extremism - a challenge that spans vast oceans and borders while impacting our most tightly-knit cities and towns - requires a response that is both wide-ranging and highly focused. National governments have a crucial role to play in ensuring the safety and security(6) of the nations they serve - and here in the United States, it is our highest priority. Neither the Justice Department I lead nor the administration in which I serve will ever back down from our commitment and our responsibility to safeguard our citizens and defend our homeland. But as a lifelong prosecutor and as a former United States Attorney here in New York, I have also seen firsthand how local authorities can serve as the front lines of our defense against violent extremism. As residents and experts in their communities, local leaders are often best positioned to pinpoint sources of unrest and discord; best equipped to identify signs of potential danger; and best able to recognize and accommodate community cultures, traditions, sensitivities and customs. By creating a series of partnerships that draws on the knowledge and expertise of our local officials, we can create a more effective response to this virulent threat. …

…Until now, we have lacked that mechanism. We haven't had the benefit of sustained or coordinated cooperation among the growing number of cities and municipalities that are confronting this ongoing challenge. Communities have too often been left isolated and alone. But through the Strong Cities Network that we have unveiled today, we are making the first systematic effort in history to bring together cities around the world to share experiences, to pool resources and to forge partnerships in order to build local cohesion and resilience on a global scale. Today we tell every city, every town and every community that has lost the flower of its youth to a sea of hatred - you are not alone. We stand together and we stand with you.

This is a truly groundbreaking endeavor. By connecting municipal leaders, facilitating information-sharing and providing training and other assistance whereappropriate, the Strong Cities Network will help to fashion a global response to a global issue, without losing sight of its inherently local roots. It will offer city leaders a way to learn from one another about successful initiatives and productive programs. It will provide a platform for discussing community policing and prevention strategies that safeguard the individual rights of citizens. And it will support the practical delivery of community resilience programs in cities that are taking a new look at this evolving issue.

I want you to know that the Obama Administration is deeply committed to ensuring that the Strong Cities Network is as strong, vibrant and resilient as the cities it unites - because we know this model works. Here in the United States, we have joined with local partners to bring down far-flung human trafficking rings, to strengthen trust in law enforcement, to thwart cybersecurity threats and to combat official and international corruption. Our experience tells us that partnering with city-level officials and the communities they represent extends the reach and deepens the perspective of national governments and international alliances. And connecting those localities to one another - as the Strong Cities Network is doing - is not only a powerful way to lift up our communities worldwide. It also sends a message about who we are and what we aspire to be - as an alliance of nations and as a global community. When the representatives of the Strong Cities Network join together for their first Annual Summit in Paris in Spring 2016, they will be making a strong and clear statement to their citizens and to the world: we stand united against violence, united against fear and united in the pursuit of a better and brighter future. …"

For the complete article, see:
justice.gov/opa/speech/attorney-general-loretta-e-lynch-announces-launch-strong-cities-network-united-nations
 

20Gauge

TB Fanatic
They actually do not care about the cities. They are stepping stones to greater power. They are sources of income. They are merely a point of leverage against others.

Anything beyond that is silly as they do not care. If they did?

Chicago would have a police cruiser on every corner of the city and 2 in the bad parts. They would have 3 times the police force they actually have. They would cut to the bone every perk, and priviledge they have in order to protect the citizens of the city. As they do not and even allow for large numbers of citizens (black in particular) to die each weekend, it would show you how little they actually care.
 

Murt

Veteran Member
why?

because no price is too high to get rid of trump --he is their kryptonite
as long as they do not have to personally endure any pain they are willing to sacrifice "their" cities and states for "the cause"
you have to break a few eggs to make an omelette
 

The Cub

Behold, I am coming soon.

LoupGarou

Ancient Fuzzball
Everybody might want to listen to the following two Ferfal / Bracken Podcasts, especially the first one. It explains a LOT about what will happen next once they get into power.

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WVeXMDy6PSU

TMS Live Stream with Matt Bracken - 3PM EST 25th of July
1:48:30 (But WELL worth the time)

and

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c1fhK7NY_rM

The Three Stages of America's Collapase
18:01

The issue at hand with the coming election is that they know that if Trump loses, he will be a lame duck and could try to do a lot to hurt the Marxists position and progression, so they will scale up their activities before and after the election. If Trump wins, then they will radically ramp up their attacks afterwards to the point of obvious revolution. We don't have much time either way folks. They are already pushing for "NoNovember".

Loup
 

mikeabn

Finally not a lurker!
The Democrats of today cannot build, they can only destroy; flawed as FDR's policies may have been at least things got built, and his followers never would have listed after such wanton destruction.
 

The Cub

Behold, I am coming soon.
I saw this posted elsewhere.....did not know what to think about it. Decided to discount it.

Now this.

Still wondering why this is not being covered in the True News.....Alt News.

#WhiteHouseSiege – Tactical Briefing #1

 

Blacknarwhal

Let's Go Brandon!
When it gets cold in October,
and there is no money for jobs to rebuild
and the unemployed have no money for heat
they will blame Trump
The only people who will blame Trump in October are those who would have blamed him in September. Or June. Or any OTHER time.
 
Top