ALERT What to expect in the first days of the Biden Democracy

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Biden’s foreign policy team the 'return of the Washington establishment'

by Joel Gehrke, Foreign Affairs Reporter |

| November 24, 2020 09:52 AM

President-elect Joe Biden’s foreign policy team is taking a conventional shape, one that might irritate some progressives and likewise reassure Republican analysts.

“This the return of the Washington establishment,” retired Marine Corps Col. Mark Cancian, a senior adviser at the Center for Security and International Studies and self-identified Republican, said of Biden’s cast of national security officials.

Biden began the unveiling of his national security team on Monday, with a clear preference for familiar faces with “centrist” reputations: former Deputy Secretary of State Antony Blinken will succeed outgoing Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, while former Hillary Clinton adviser Jake Sullivan emerges as the incoming White House national security adviser — one of the better possible tandems, even from the perspective of conservative observers.

“Antony Blinken and Jake Sullivan are thoughtful, experienced, open-minded and honorable patriots,” Foundation for Defense of Democracies Senior Vice President Toby Dershowitz wrote in an emailed appraisal. “I have no doubt they are mindful of and ready to address the many national security challenges and opportunities in front of them.”

That kind of bipartisan praise proved hard to find during President Trump’s term; the unconventional administration’s hostility to former President Barack Obama’s foreign policy legacy — the 2016 Paris climate agreement and the 2015 Iran nuclear deal were both scrapped by Trump — combined with the contempt for Trump felt by Democratic lawmakers and primary voters to make an acrimonious brew.

“We must meet the world as it is today, not as it was before President Trump’s destruction,” the 2020 Democratic Party platform stated.

That outlook could prove key to transcending some of the other campaign talking points, such as the Iran deal. Although Trump’s team was condemned roundly for withdrawing from the pact and renewing economic sanctions on Tehran, even the most ardent Iran hawks doubt that Biden will surrender the “leverage” accumulated by Trump’s sanctions policy by simply returning to the deal.

“The Iran nuclear deal has proven its failure to the entire world,” Saudi Arabian Ambassador to the United Nations Abdallah Al-Mouallimi said in a televised interview Sunday. “And I don’t think that anybody is going to be naive enough to go back to the same deal.”

Dershowitz, whose team at FDD leveled some of the sharpest criticism of the Iran deal in recent years — and even furnished Trump’s White House National Security Council with a key Iran policy adviser — expressed confidence in Blinken and Sullivan.

“I am certain they don’t underestimate one of these challenges — an Iran that may assume things will pick up exactly where they left off in the prior administration,” she said.

“In the ensuing years, Iran had the opportunity to reverse its abysmal human rights practices, adhere to nuclear caps required under multilateral agreements and use its finite resources to support its population rather than engage in destabilizing malign activities beyond its own borders,” Dershowitz added. “Iran’s failure to change its behavior will surely not be lost on the new Biden team.”

Biden’s nominee to lead the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, Avril Haines, could face some political headwinds from the Left and the Right. Code Pink founder Medea Benjamin lamented this month that “Haines provided legal cover ... [for] Obama’s tenfold expansion of drone killings” in her tenure as his deputy CIA director. Republicans might bristle at the fact that she worked under then-CIA Director John Brennan, given their anger over Brennan’s allegations concerning Russia investigation spawned by the 2016 election interference.

Yet most Democrats will rally to her nomination — “Avril’s experience, intellect, values, and work ethic will make her an exceptional DNI,” New Jersey Sen. Bob Menendez, the ranking member on the Foreign Relations Committee, said Monday — and conservative supporters will quietly provide bipartisan ballast.

“What I'll be telling people on the hill is, I think, Avril Haines is incredibly capable,” said a conservative foreign policy expert who has worked with members of Biden’s team. “I cannot imagine her having a real serious problem on the hill.”

Cancian agreed. “None of them are going to have significant numbers of Republicans voting against them,” he said.
 

Doomer Doug

TB Fanatic
I once read a famous Internet essay called Leaderless Leadership a while back. The essay was originally designed to deal with Communist insurgency, ie Cold War era, 1960's but has been flopping around for several decades now. At any rate, it makes the statement that leaderless resistance is all about not having a command and control chain etc,
It is/was designed for a situation like this where: you have a whole series of events that result in an outcome that results in a so called trigger event. And this event simply happens. And as it happens various people, individuals all make the same decision, nationwide with no plan, or focus. They have been watching for some time, individually, small groups or whatever and then when the event happens, they all respond.
Slow Joe and Harris being sworn in would be such an event in my view. There would be no "response. "There would simply be MILLIONS OF PEOPLE who decided to do something, or not do something, based on whatever thoughts they had or analysis they had already made. And this is the metaphor he used. They would be like the fog, or mist forming on a river. The conditions must be correct, and then all things would come together and that would be that.
Now I have watched these antifa/ blm SCUM for months now and here when either Trump gets sworn in or biden harris is they are going to riot and try to collapse the system within hours. And you know what: THIS TIME THEY WILL GET ARMED PUSHBACK AND ANTIFA WILL BE BLEEDING OUT ON STREET CORNERS. And you know what else? Nobody told the people shooting them to shoot them. And nobody told the massive attacks on liberals nationwide. It will just happen and the Deep state and the whore media, who will also be getting shot dead nationwide won't have seen it coming.

And that is what will happen if Joe Biden tries to have a swearing in ceremony for POTUS on 1-20-2021
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

REPORT: GOP Plans To Block Certain Biden Cabinet Picks, Dems May Offer ‘Sacrificial Lamb’

Senate Republicans Plan To Reject Certain Biden Cabinet And Judicial Nominees

(Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)

DYLAN HOUSMANCONTRIBUTOR
November 23, 20204:56 PM ET

Members of the GOP Senate majority are discussing the possibility of not confirming certain nominations President-elect Joe Biden will make to both his cabinet and the judiciary, according to a new report from Axios.

Senate aides involved in the discussions reportedly say that the top targets will be appointees who were loud critics of Trump or played a key part in impeachment hearings, according to Axios. Some names that were mentioned include Sally Yates, Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman and Susan Rice, Axios reports.

New: Republicans are quietly preparing to torpedo some of Joe Biden’s prospective Cabinet, agency and judicial nominees if the GOP keeps its majority, aides involved in the discussions tell me Republicans plot to sink potential anti-Trump nominees including Vindman, Yates
— Alayna Treene (@alaynatreene) November 22, 2020
Republicans are also reportedly concerned about lower-profile nominees to judicial positions or solicitor general who could erase conservative gains on deregulation and social policy. GOP staffers are already conducting opposition research and planning hearing questions for some of the more objectionable leaked candidates, Axios is reporting.

Democrats are floating the possibility of nominating a “sacrificial lamb” that they know Republicans will refuse to confirm in hopes that such a move would ease the process for other appointees, Axios reports. However, sources tell Axios that a move like that isn’t one Biden would typically make. Former Senate historian Don Ritchie said to Axios that most Presidents have typically gotten roughly 95% of their nominees approved.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Biden Transition Fails To Disclose Tony Blinken’s Involvement In Lucrative Consulting And Private Equity Firms

SEOUL, SOUTH KOREA - JANUARY 20: U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Tony Blinken (L) and South Korean First Vice Foreign Minister Lim Sung-Nam (R) speak to the media after their meeting on January 20, 2016 in Seoul, South Korea. U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Blinken is visiting Seoul to discuss the countermeasures to the North Korea's latest nuclear testing. (Photo by Chung Sung-Jun/Getty Images)

Chung Sung-Jun/Getty Images

Daily Caller News Foundation logo


ANDREW KERRINVESTIGATIVE REPORTER
November 23, 20203:51 PM ET

President-elect Joe Biden announced Monday that he would nominate his longtime aide Tony Blinken to serve as his secretary of state.
  • Blinken’s bio on the Biden transition website does not disclose that he co-founded a corporate consulting firm in 2018 that he allegedly used to cash in on his experience working in the Obama administration.
  • Over 275 delegates to the Democratic National Convention urged Biden in a letter in August to cut his ties with Blinken.
President-elect Joe Biden’s transition website does not disclose that his secretary of state pick, Tony Blinken, co-founded a corporate consulting firm in 2018 that he allegedly used to cash in on his experience working in the Obama administration.

Blinken co-founded WestExec Advisors in 2018 following his service as Biden’s national security advisor from 2009 through 2013 and former President Barack Obama’s deputy national security advisor and deputy secretary of state from 2013 through 2017. WestExec’s co-founder Michèle Flournoy told The Intercept in 2018 the firm was staffed with “people recently coming out of government” who can help corporations “figure out how to sell in the public sector space, to navigate [the Department of Defense], the intel community, law enforcement.”

Blinken’s biography on Biden’s transition website does not mention his involvement with WestExec, nor does it mention Blinken’s work with the private equity firm Pine Island Capital Partners, which was also founded in 2018.

Blinken’s role as a partner with Pine Island was to capitalize on his “influential networks” and work in tandem with the firm’s investment professionals to “source deals, conduct analyses, win bids, close transactions, and directly advise the companies” it invests in, according to the company’s website.

In August, the progressive wing of the Democratic Party urged Biden to cut ties with Blinken.

“We ask you not to rely on foreign policy advice from those who may have a conflict of interest as a result of their relationships and lobbying on behalf of merchants selling weapons and surveillance technology,” said a letter signed by more than 275 delegates to the Democratic National Convention, according to HuffPost. The letter specifically mentioned Blinken and his work with WestExec.
The Biden transition team did not immediately return a request for comment.

Blinken-Bahrain-scaled.jpg


US Deputy Secretary of State Tony Blinken, speaks to the press during the 11th Manama Dialogue Regional Security Summit organized by the International Institute for Strategic Studies in the Bahraini capital, Manama, on October 31, 2015. (MOHAMMED AL-SHAIKH/AFP via Getty Images)

WestExec’s website states its name is derived from the closed street that runs between the West Wing of the White House and the Eisenhower Executive Office Building. The firm tells prospective clients they will be able to harness the “expertise and insight” that its practitioners gained from their work in the White House to help guide their business decision-making process.

“What really makes us different is that all of us have been at the front lines of working at the highest levels of government so what we try to do is bring that experience and some of the methodologies that we’ve used in the situation room to the board room,” Flournoy said in 2018 after the firm’s launch.

WestExec does not publicly disclose its clients, but the progressive magazine The American Prospect reported that the firm has consulted for the Google-affiliated think tank Jigsaw and a philanthropy run by Google founder Eric Schmidt.

The firm has also acknowledged doing work in China. WestExec boasts on its website helping a “leading American pharmaceutical company” and a multi-billion dollar American technology firm expand their market access in China by identifying and facilitating American and Chinese stakeholders to engage as part of a targeted communications strategy.

The Prospect also reported that WestExec built a clause into the lease for their Washington D.C. office situated near the White House that allows the lease to be terminated without penalties if Blinken or the firm’s other principals secured jobs in a Democratic administration in 2021.

Blinken was placed on a leave of absence from WestExec and Pine Island around August, according to the Prospect.

The executive director of the government watchdog group Project on Government Oversight, Danielle Brian, told The New York Times that corporate consultants like Blinken are “exactly the kind of people who should not be in an administration.”

“Those kinds of consulting shops take advantage of weaknesses in current laws, so there is no transparency in their clients and how they are trying to influence public policy for them,” Brian said.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Biden’s Pick For National Security Adviser Sent Classified Emails On Clinton’s Server, Hyped Fake Trump-Russia Collusion Story

Jake Sullivan (Youtube screen capture/CBS This Morning)

(Youtube screen capture/CBS This Morning)

Daily Caller News Foundation logo


CHUCK ROSSINVESTIGATIVE REPORTER
November 23, 202011:24 AM ET

Joe Biden has reportedly picked Jake Sullivan to serve as his national security adviser.
  • Sullivan was a central figure in the Hillary Clinton email saga, having sent and received hundreds of emails housed on the server that contained classified information.
  • As an adviser to Clinton’s presidential campaign, Sullivan hyped a since-debunked story accusing the Trump Organization of having a covert line of communication with Alfa Bank.
Joe Biden’s likely choice for national security adviser sent more than 200 classified emails found on Hillary Clinton’s private email network, and touted a now-debunked allegation before the 2016 election which fueled the conspiracy theory that Donald Trump was in cahoots with Russian leaders.

Biden will select Jake Sullivan to serve in the White House role, The New York Times and Bloomberg reported.

Sullivan, 43, was one of Clinton’s top policy advisers when she served as secretary of state from 2009 through 2013. After Clinton left Foggy Bottom, Sullivan served as national security adviser to then-Vice President Joe Biden. He was a senior foreign policy adviser to both the Clinton and Biden campaigns.

Sullivan was a key figure in the saga surrounding Clinton’s use of a private email network for government business. Clinton exclusively used the private server, eschewing guidance from the State Department to use government networks.

Clinton and her group of top aides, including Sullivan, Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills, exchanged thousands of emails that the FBI and other agencies found to have contained classified information.

As of March 2016, the State Department and FBI had determined that Sullivan sent 215 emails that were deemed to contain classified material. Politico reported in February 2016 that Sullivan sent emails to Clinton that contained information classified at the “top secret” level, the highest classification category.

Screen-Shot-2020-11-23-at-8.44.56-AM.jpg


Email from Jake Sullivan to Hillary Clinton, Oct. 2, 2010, containing classified information (via State Department)

The FBI investigated whether Clinton mishandled classified information, but declined to recommend charges to the Justice Department.

Sullivan was never accused of any criminal wrongdoing related to his email exchanges with Clinton and other State Department officials.

Screen-Shot-2020-11-23-at-8.48.37-AM.jpg


Email from Jake Sullivan to Hillary Clinton, May 21, 2012, containing classified information (via State Department)

James Comey admonished Clinton and her aides during a press conference on July 5, 2016, saying that she was “extremely careless” to send and exchange sensitive government documents on a private email network.

Sullivan was involved in another saga related to email servers in the 2016 presidential campaign.

As an advisor to Clinton’s campaign, Sullivan hyped a since-debunked story that alleged the existence of a covert email server that connected Trump’s real estate company, the Trump Organization, to Alfa Bank, one of Russia’s top private banks.
Computer scientists have apparently uncovered a covert server linking the Trump Organization to a Russian-based bank. pic.twitter.com/8f8n9xMzUU
— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) November 1, 2016
“This could be the most direct link yet between Donald Trump and Moscow,” Sullivan said in a statement responding to a story published by Slate on Oct. 31, 2016.

“This secret hotline could be the key to unlocking the mystery of Trump’s ties to Moscow.”

The Alfa Bank allegation has since been debunked.

A Justice Department inspector general’s report released in December 2019 said that the FBI investigated the allegation but found no evidence of a covert server arrangement between Alfa Bank and the Trump Organization.

Robert Mueller, who investigated Trump’s possible links to Russia as special counsel, testified to Congress on July 25, 2019 that the Alfa Bank allegation was “not true.”

Undisclosed in the Slate story was that a key source for the article was Michael Sussmann, a lawyer who represented the Clinton campaign and DNC at the law firm Perkins Coie.

Perkins Coie hired the opposition research firm Fusion GPS in April 2016 to investigate Donald Trump’s possible links to Russia. Fusion in turn hired former British spy Christopher Steele, who produced a largely discredited dossier that the FBI later used to obtain warrants to surveil Trump campaign aide Carter Page.

Sussmann shared allegations about Alfa Bank with reporters at The New York Times, then-FBI general counsel James Baker, and Christopher Steele, the author of the infamous dossier alleging collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian government to influence the 2016 election.

John Durham, a U.S. attorney in Connecticut, has reportedly presented evidence to a federal grand jury as part of an investigation into the origins of the inaccurate Alfa Bank allegation.

Attorney General William Barr tapped Durham in 2019 to investigate the origins of the Trump-Russia investigation.

President-elect Joe Biden has not said whether he will allow the Durham probe to continue once he takes office.

The Biden transition team did not respond to request for comment.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Biden’s National Security Adviser Wants To ‘Encourage China’s Rise’
JAKE SULLIVAN, JOE BIDEN’S PICK FOR NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISER, HAS REPEATEDLY PRAISED CHINA’S RISE – AN IDEOLOGICAL POSITION THAT HAS NECESSARILY RELATED TO AMERICAN DECLINE.

Sullivan, formerly a Senior Adviser to Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign and an alum of the Obama administration.

While speaking with CBS News Senior National Security Contributor Michael Morell on the Intelligence Matters podcast he insisted that the U.S facilitating China’s rise is a “success”:

In full, the remarks from September 11th, 2018 read:

“We helped create the conditions of stability and security in East Asia that allowed China to have this remarkable economic rise. So that it’s rising, in a way, is not the failure of American foreign policy; it’s the success of creating those stable conditions.”

Sullivan peddled a similar sentiment while speaking at the Lowy Institute in 2017.

View: https://youtu.be/OsXDrT30sf8
1:11:15 min

When his fellow panelist Owen Harries insisted that “containment” of China was a self-defeating policy, Sullivan emphasized he was “right” to warn against the policy.

“Let me be clear, that’s not about containing China it’s about reinforcing the very foundation of regional stability that has among other things facilitated China’s remarkable rise over the past several decades,” he added.

He continued, noting U.S. policy towards China ought to “encourage China’s rise”:

“We need to strike a middle course – one that encourages China’s rise in a manner consistent with an open, fair, rules-based, regional order. This will require care and prudence and strategic foresight, and maybe even more basically it will require sustained attention. It may not have escaped your notice that these are not in ample supply in Washington right now.”

Later in the lecture, Sullivan noted the U.S. and China relationship needs to be broader than bilateral ties, noting “it needs to be about our ties to the region that create an environment more conducive to a peaceful and positive-sum Chinese rise.”

Sullivan’s comments are not far off from his potential boss, as Biden said in 2011:
“I’ve held the view for so many years and continue to hold the view that a rising China is a positive development.”

And in 2019, he insisted China is “not bad” and “not competition” for the U.S., even adding the U.S. “should be helping China” in 2020.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Biden's National Security Adviser Appointee Criticized Trump's Jerusalem Decision

sign in jerusalem

(Lior Mizrahi/Getty Images)
By Solange Reyner | Wednesday, 25 November 2020 05:35 PM

Jake Sullivan, Joe Biden’s national security adviser appointee, in 2017 criticized President Donald Trump’s decision to recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital.
Sullivan made the comments during an interview with CGTN, a media company based in Beijing and owned by China Central Television, a state-owned broadcaster.

Trump in December of 2017 announced the United States’ recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel along with plans to move the U.S. Embassy there.

Sullivan called the move ''a political decision, not a foreign policy decision.''

''This was about Trump and his supporters. It was not about moving the peace process forward,'' he said.

''It’s hard to find a good argument for this decision with respect to advancing the cause of peace in the Middle East.''

Sullivan, a vocal critic of Trump’s foreign policy, played a key role as policy adviser to the presidential campaigns of Hillary Clinton in the 2008 Democratic primaries and the 2016 elections and to Barack Obama in the 2008 general election.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Biden’s Pentagon Transition Team Members Funded by the Arms Industry

Investigation found one third of the team worked for organizations that receive funding from weapons makers

Dave DeCamp Posted onNovember 11, 2020

On Tuesday, Joe Biden released a list of transition teams for the various departments in his future White House. The Pentagon transition team for Biden consists of 23 people, many of whom hail from hawkish think tanks.

The team is led by Kathleen Hicks, who worked in the Pentagon under the Obama administration. Hicks most recent employer is the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), a think tank that receives contributions from arms makers like Northrop Grumman, Boeing, Lockheed Martin, and Raytheon, to name a few.

CSIS also receives contributions from governments. The think tank’s top government donors are the US, the UAE, Taiwan, and Japan. Two other CSIS employees are on the transition team; Andrew Hunter and Melissa Dalton, who both worked in the Pentagon under the Obama administration.

CSIS employees author policy papers and Op-Eds that generally call for more US involvement around the world. In August, Hicks co-authored an Op-Ed in The Hill titled, “Pentagon Action to Withdraw from Germany Benefits Our Adversaries,” a piece that slammed Trump’s plan to draw down troops from Germany, which Biden could to call off.

Two members of the transition team come from the Center for a New American Security (CNAS), Susanna Blume, a former Pentagon employee, and Ely Ratner, who served as deputy national security advisor to then-vice president Joe Biden from 2015 to 2017.

CNAS is another think tank that enjoys hefty donations from weapons makers, major corporations, and governments. From 2019 to 2020, CNAS received at least $500,000 from the US State Department and at least $500,000 from Northrop Grumman. Other donors include Google, Facebook, Raytheon, and Lockheed Martin.

Three more team members list their latest employer as the RAND Corporation, Stacie Pettyjohn, a wargaming expert, Christine Wormuth, who held a few roles in the Obama administration, and Terri Tanielian, a behavioral scientist.

RAND is another hawkish think tank that receives the bulk of its funding from the US government, including the US Army, Air Force, and Department of Homeland Security. RAND is also funded by the UAE, Qatar, and NATO.

A report from In These Times found at least eight out of the 23 team members come from organizations that receive funding from US weapons makers (not including RAND). Besides the CSIS and CNAS employees listed above, In These Times includes Sharon Burke, who works for New America, Shawn Skelly, from CACI International, and Victor Garcia, from Rebellion Defense.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Activist Erin Brockovich Rails Against Joe Biden's EPA Transition Team Pick for Skirting Regulations in the Past

BY NATALIE COLAROSSI ON 11/19/20 AT 3:02 PM EST

Environmental activist Erin Brockovich slammed president-elect Joe Biden on Thursday for choosing Michael McCabe, a former DuPont consultant, to join his Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) transition team.

In an article titled Dear Joe Biden: are you kidding me? published in The Guardian, Brockovich argued that McCabe helped skirt regulations against PFOA, a perfluorinated toxic chemical which has been used by DuPont since the 1950s to make its famous nonstick coating, Teflon.

Citing an article by The Intercept, Brockovich said that McCabe helped the company dodge regulations against the chemical, which has been linked to illnesses, including kidney and testicular cancer, ulcerative colitis, thyroid disease, pregnancy-induced hypertension and high cholesterol.

"It should go without saying that someone who advised DuPont on how to avoid regulations is not someone we want advising this new administration,"

Brockovich wrote.

"PFOA pollutes the blood of nearly every American and can pass from mother to unborn child in the womb. This toxic product of industry is a stable compound not easily broken down in the environment or in the human body, giving it the nickname 'forever chemical,'" she added.

McCabe previously served as Biden's communications and projects director between 1987 and 1995, and as deputy administrator of the EPA at the end of the Clinton administration.

But in 2003, McCabe began managing DuPont's communications with the EPA regarding PFOA, a relationship, which, Brockovich wrote, helped the company avoid regulations of its moneymaking chemical.

At that time, DuPont faced massive litigation after dumping 7,100 tons of PFOA-filled waste near a company plant in Parkersburg, West Virginia. That pollution made its way into the drinking water of 100,000 people, leading to "debilitating illness" within the community, Brockovich wrote.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Erin Brockovich pens op-ed hitting Biden over EPA transition board
Joseph Choi 6 days ago

The Hill logo Erin Brockovich pens op-ed hitting Biden over EPA transition board


1606363259474.png
a person holding a wine glass: Erin Brockovich pens op-ed hitting Biden over EPA transition board
© Getty Images

Erin Brockovich pens op-ed hitting Biden over EPA transition board
Environmental activist Erin Brockovich slammed President-elect Joe Biden's picks for his Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) transition team in an op-ed published on Thursday.

In the opinion piece published by The Guardian, Brockovich wrote, "I had hopes that this new administration would usher in the dawning of a new day. As picks for President-elect Joe Biden's Environmental Protection Agency transition team were announced, I felt concerned and disheartened about a chemical industry insider being on the list. Are you kidding me?"

Brockovich specifically calls out Michael McCabe, who previously worked for Biden and for the EPA, for his work with DuPont as their communications consultant.

In an Intercept article Brockovich cites, McCabe reportedly used his government connections to help the chemical giant avoid EPA regulations, particularly those placed on perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), the chemical used to make nonstick coatings.

According to the EPA, the detrimental health effects caused by PFOA include harm to the endocrine and immune systems, as well as to healthy fetal development and cancers. Brockovich notes that Harvard public health professor Philippe Grandjean warned such chemicals could potentially reduce the effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccine.

"It should go without saying that someone who advised DuPont on how to avoid regulations is not someone we want advising this new administration," she writes.
"Are we the people supposed to trust a former DuPont man in a transition team tasked with reviewing the Chemical Safety Board? Is this how the newly elected leadership wants to start what is supposed to be a healing and unifying administration?" asks Brockovich in her article. "Are we already falling back on the old and antiquated, hide-and-seek, conceal, dodge and deny leadership or are you going to come out and be the change and the hope needed when it comes to the environment?"

Brockovich ends her piece by saying, "DuPont executives should have no place in the Environmental Protection Agency. I call on Joe Biden to do the right thing."

The Biden transition team did not immediately respond when asked for comment.
 

Farmgal

Senior Member
I'm sure they will be screaming about Climate Change. They will rejoin the Paris Accord.......A redistribution of trillions of dollars will happen......
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

The Biden transition team has hired at least 40 lobbyists: report
By Emily Jacobs
November 12, 2020 | 3:39pm | Updated

President-elect Joe Biden

President-elect Joe BidenREUTERS

At least 40 people working for President-elect Joe Biden’s transition team are or were registered lobbyists, a new analysis found.

The report, published Wednesday by the Wall Street Journal, was done by searching the congressional lobbying databases for the over 500 appointees to the Biden transition team.

In late September, as a Biden transition team was beginning to come together, the Democrat opted to allow lobbyists to join the transition effort, but only in circumstances where the group’s general counsel Jessica Hertz signed off.

The decision was slammed by progressive advocacy groups, but Team Biden held firm, arguing that some of the experts being excluded because of their lobbying experience were experts on issues related to the pandemic response.

“We have granted a handful of authorizations, including for individuals with expertise in pandemic response who recently advocated on behalf of their public interest, nonprofit employers,” a transition official said in a statement at the time.
Still, of the over 40 lobbyists joining the team, five are currently registered as lobbyists or were registered within the last year, the Journal found.

The five are Andrea Delgado, currently registered as a lobbyist for the United Farm Workers Foundation; Celeste Drake, currently registered as a lobbyist for the Directors Guild of America; Joss Nassar, currently registered as a lobbyist for the United Auto Workers; LaQuita Honeysucker, who was registered as a lobbyist for the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union until earlier this year; and Scott Frey, who was registered as a lobbyist for the American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees until earlier this year.

None of the five responded to the Journal’s requests for comment.
A Biden transition official told the outlet that all five were approved and each was given a written waiver approving their work.

While the transition’s ethics rules were being formed, Biden’s team was divided on the issue of lobbyists joining the team, according to Axios.

Biden, the outlet reported, tried to find a compromise by not imposing a blanket ban.

The move would allow his administration to call on individuals with years of expertise on critical issues who would otherwise have been shot down by progressives.

A Biden official also told the Journal, “Agency review team members are well-respected in their fields and for their extensive experience in the federal agencies they review.”

The official added that other transition members had received waivers, but did not name them or specify the number.

The Democratic and Republican parties have both had their share of debate on the issue of lobbyists.

President Trump, following a 306-electoral vote victory with a “Drain the swamp” message, faced criticism during his 2016 transition for hiring lobbyists.

More than 280 lobbyists have served in positions in the Trump administration, an analysis in October 2019 by ProPublica and the Columbia Journalism School found.

A Biden campaign spokesperson did not immediately respond to The Post’s request for comment.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Wall Street’s hostile takeover of Biden transition team should alarm everyday Americans (op-ed)
Posted by: James E. Lewis|November 13, 2020 |

MANHATTAN, NY – As we reported previously, while Joe Biden was casting stones at other candidates about being tied to Wall Street, donation records proved that it was he who gained the most favor among big banks and stock investment companies.

Now, it appears that several people with close ties to Wall Street are getting key positions promised to them in the Biden administration, provided Biden’s claimed win is certified.

Biden has devised his transition team before the election has been certified by the Government Services Administration (GSA) or the Electoral College meeting in December.
"Biden’s list of transition team members includes former Wall Street employees and those with close ties to Wall Street. Many of the big banks with links to Biden transition team members were major donors to the former vice president."
Is this what they called "The Resistance"?
— Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) November 12, 2020
Yet, The New York Times entails his planned personnel strategy:

“Biden’s list of transition team members includes former Wall Street employees and those with close ties to Wall Street. Many of the big banks with links to Biden’s transition team members were major donors to the former vice president.”

The Times goes on to explain:

“Commerce Department: The review team is led by Geovette Washington of the University of Pittsburgh, who previously served as general counsel and senior policy adviser at the Office of Management and Budget.

Other members include Anna Gomez, a partner at the law firm Wiley Rein; Arun Venkataraman, who works in government relations at Visa (and was director of policy at the Commerce Department under Mr. Obama); and Ellen Hughes-Cromwick of the think tank Third Way, who served as chief economist at Mr. Obama’s Commerce Department and held a similar role at Ford.

“Treasury Department: The team is led by Don Graves, who heads corporate responsibility at KeyBank and previously worked as director of domestic and economic policy for Mr. Biden.

Others include Nicole Isaac of LinkedIn and Marisa Lago, who works at the New York City Department of City Planning and previously oversaw global compliance at Citigroup.

“Federal Reserve, Banking and Securities Regulators: The team is led by Gary Gensler, a top Wall Street regulator in the Obama administration who is now a professor at the MIT Sloan School of Management.

The team also includes Dennis Kelleher of Better Markets, long a proponent of tougher rules for banks.”

Gensler previously worked at Goldman Sachs.
Gary Gensler and Don Graves are on the Biden transition’s Wall Street regulatory work. Gensler is an Elizabeth Warren ally who built a Rep as a tough regulator at CFTC. Graves is a longtime Biden adviser and current KeyBank exec. Ex-CFTC Chief Gensler and Banker Advising Biden on Wall Street
— Jennifer Epstein (@jeneps) November 6, 2020
The Wall Street Journal has also reported on persons strongly considered for roles in a would-be Biden cabinet and/or administration:

Roger Ferguson, chief executive of retirement manager TIAA-CREF (a Wall Street annuity and retirement plan firm) is in the mix for a cabinet post, according to people familiar with the matter.

And financial executives like Morgan Stanley executive Tom Nides and former hedge-fund manager and presidential candidate Tom Steyer publicly backed Mr. Biden and could emerge with influence, or jobs, in his administration.

“Some who are active in the party or who held positions in past Democratic administrations— such as finance veteran Jeffrey Zients, co-chairman of Mr. Biden’s transition team, and Goldman Sachs Group Inc.’s Jake Siewert, who served as press secretary in the Clinton White House and in the Treasury Department under President Obama — could join the new administration, Democratic fundraisers say.

“Another Goldman executive who could head to Washington is Margaret Anadu, the 39-year-old head of Goldman Sachs’s urban-investment initiatives, whose name is said to have been floated for an economic policy position.”


President Trump continually slammed Biden on the campaign trail, linking him to Wall Street executives and financiers, and now we see the proof in the pudding, so to speak.

Wall Street donated heavily to Biden’s campaign, while Trump’s donors were mostly working-class people with smaller donations, although with larger numbers of people donating.
AOC' interview discusses the internal division within the Dems. This is an old issue because the Dems consist of multiple interest groups plus the Big Wall street backers. We must have this conversation openly and honestly. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on Biden’s Win, House Losses, and What’s Next for the Left
— Prof Emeritus C Omowale Simmons (@charles97564117) November 8, 2020
The far-left wing of the Democratic Party has pushed back against Wall Street’s involvement in the Biden campaign, but clearly not strongly enough to impact Biden’s donations and sources.

Biden is potentially setting himself up for a grand upheaval when the mega-donors to his campaign, and those on the far left he made promises to, collide ideologically.

 
“ What to expect in the first days of the Biden Democracy?”
Wailing and gnashing of teeth, that’s what! Except Biden and Blowhole won’t be there.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Six Disastrous Obama-Era Foreign Policies Set to Return Under Biden

5,248
SOUTH GATE, CA--February 17, 2012--U.S. Vice President Joe Biden and Chinese Vice President Xi Jinping were joined by Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, during a visit to International Studies Learning Center in South Gate, Feb. 16, 2012. Following a Chinese Dragon dance performance, Vice President's Xi and Biden visited the …
Jay L. Clendenin/Los Angeles Times (via Getty Images)
FRANCES MARTEL26 Nov 2020577

Reports began to surface this week of potential cabinet appointments and priority government projects for Democrat Party presidential challenger Joe Biden should he take office in January.

Many of these, both the individuals and the policies, are not new – they are vestiges of the departed Obama administration that Biden was part of as vice president. In foreign policy, particularly, Biden has promised a return to a status quo under his former boss that fueled global instability, wasted American tax dollars, and hurt the American worker.

Below, five policies Biden has promised to resurrect from their political death under President Donald Trump and the setbacks they represent to policies that, for the past four years, have helped make the world a more peaceful place.

Returning to the Iran Nuclear Deal
As a candidate in September, Biden wrote in a CNN column that he would seek to offer Iran, the world’s top state sponsor of terrorism, a “credible path back to diplomacy.”

“If Iran returns to strict compliance with the nuclear deal, the United States would rejoin the agreement as a starting point for follow-on negotiations,” Biden vowed.

The “nuclear deal” is the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), signed by the Obama administration, Iran, and four guarantor nations – China, France, Germany, Russia, and the United Kingdom – with the goal of convincing the rogue state to cease its illegal nuclear weapons development. In exchange for reducing uranium enrichment capacities and very loose inspections that the deal did not allow America to conduct, Iran made billions of dollars. One estimate placed the value of sanctions relief at $150 billion for Iran. President Obama also paid the Islamic regime $1.7 billion in cash, suspiciously timed with the release of U.S. hostages in the country. The administration insisted the money was not a ransom.

Much of that money, as Obama administration officials openly stated, went to funding terrorist activities around the world. The Obama era saw astronomical growth of Iranian influence in both neighboring states like Iraq, Syria, Yemen, and Lebanon, and in distant allied nations like Venezuela. The money also did nothing to stop Iran from nuclear development; at some point, the Iranian government began to argue that violating the deal was a valid way to honor the deal.

Trump withdrew from the nuclear deal in 2018, fulfilling a campaign promise, and reinstated sanctions. The sanctions have significantly limited the activities of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), Iran’s state terrorist organization, and curtailed its influence in neighboring nations, particularly Syria and Iraq.

Returning to the Paris Climate Agreement
The Washington Post reported shortly after November’s election that Biden is planning the use of executive orders to rapidly reverse critical Trump policies.

On that list was America’s withdrawal from the Paris Climate Agreement, an Obama-era non-treaty (a treaty wouldn’t get past the Senate) aimed at limiting the world’s carbon emissions. The agreement allows rogue states like China to increase carbon emissions while punishing the United States with strict limits.
Biden has made climate alarmism a core part of his campaign.

“Vice President Biden knows there is no greater challenge facing our country and our world. Today, he is outlining a bold plan – a Clean Energy Revolution – to address this grave threat and lead the world in addressing the climate emergency,” his campaign website promised.

Reports this week indicated that Biden would bring failed Democrat Party candidate and secretary of state John Kerry, whose Islamic State policy consisted of hiring James Taylor to perform a soft rock concert, back on board as a “climate czar.”

Trump withdrew from the agreement in 2019, noting that its provisions required America to actively hurt its industrial sectors while not requiring similar carbon limits on nations like China and India. The Chinese Foreign Ministry to this day boasts that the agreement allows them to “peak” in carbon emissions – meaning continue to increase their percentage of global pollution year-over-year – in some distant future.

Under Trump, the United States dropped its carbon emissions 12 percent from 2005 to 2017. The Paris agreement required America to drop its share of global carbon emissions to 2005 levels by 2025.

Refunding the World Health Organization
The same Washington Post article noting the Paris Agreement policy suggested that Biden would also restore America’s position as the most prolific funder of the World Health Organization (W.H.O.).

President Trump withdrew America from the W.H.O. in July, in response to its hyper-partisanship in favor of the Communist Party of China and its prodigious failure in handling the Chinese coronavirus pandemic. The W.H.O. had reason believe as early as December 2019, when the nation of Taiwan sent an emergency message to W.H.O. leadership about a respiratory disease from China, that what would later become known as the Chinese coronavirus was contagious. The Taiwanese message stated that doctors were isolating patients on the island, an unnecessary move if the disease was not transmissible from person to person. The W.H.O. does not allow Taiwan to join the organization due to pressure from China, which refuses to accept Taiwan’s sovereignty.

A month later, the W.H.O. published a message on Twitter telling the world that the Chinese coronavirus was not contagious.

The W.H.O. also regularly applauded China’s response to the outbreak, which largely consisted of persecuting doctors, welding families shut in their homes, and misdirecting the world. Confidential documents later revealed W.H.O. experts feared that Chinese officials would imprison or disappear its doctors and scientists if the U.N. agency publically criticized the communist state.

“China has total control over the World Health Organization despite only paying $40 million per year compared to what the United States has been paying, which is approximately $450 million a year,” President Trump said this year, explaining his reasons for departing.

Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, the head of the W.H.O., became the organization’s leader despite being accused of covering up three separate cholera outbreaks in Ethiopia, his native country, where he is a member of the radical separatist Tigray People’s Liberation Front. His predecessor as director-general, Margaret Chan – now the dean of Tsinghua University’s school of public health – was responsible for the W.H.O.’s response to the 2014-2016 Ebola outbreak in West Africa, which experts called an “egregious failure.”

Reverse Trump’s Policy of Withdrawal from Afghanistan
In 2012, during Vice President Biden’s campaign for a second term, he promised of America’s oldest war, “we will leave in 2014.” America remained in Afghanistan, where an estimated 4,500 American soldiers are serving today.
President Trump, like Obama before him, campaigned on getting out of Afghanistan. Unlike Obama, however, Trump has not indicated that he seeks any conventional military victory against the enemy President George W. Bush initially attacked, the Taliban. Instead, Trump’s policy has focused on peace talks with the Taliban leaders that America vowed to remove. The goal, diplomats insist, is to get the Taliban to agree not to attack Americans or harbor terrorist groups, like al-Qaeda, that attack Americans. In exchange, America will leave.

Reports indicate that Trump will reduce the number of troops in Afghanistan to 2,500 by January, with a goal of withdrawing entirely.

Biden, once a proponent of ending the war, told Stars & Stripes in September that he does not see any possible way America could leave Afghanistan.
“I think we need special ops capacity to coordinate with our allies,” Biden said, suggesting a maximum of “1,500 to 2,000” ground troops, but not offering a timeline for them to come home. Those troops are needed, he contended, to “take out terrorist groups who are going to continue to emerge.”

Rejoining the U.N. Human Rights Council
The Human Rights Council is nominally the United Nations’ agency for confronting threats to the dignity of individual human beings around the world.

In practice, it is a rogue’s gallery of some of the world’s most bloodthirsty states, using their leverage to accuse Israel and the United States of crimes similar to those they actually commit. Currently on the council or ready to take their seats in 2021 are nations such as China, the world’s premier operator of concentration camps; Cuba, which the U.N. itself has certified as a systematic human rights violator; its colony, Venezuela; Eritrea; Somalia; Afghanistan; and Sudan. Trump withdrew the United States from the Council in 2018, citing an insurmountable failure to fulfill its core mission.

“We will rejoin the UN Human Rights Council and work to ensure that body truly lives up to its values,” Joe Biden wrote in a Medium post a year ago.

Restoring Friendly Trade Ties with China
President Trump’s policy of enacting tariffs on Chinese goods, increasing law enforcement activities against intellectual property theft and espionage by Chinese government agents, and fighting to shrink the trade deficit with the communist state may well be remembered as his administration’s hallmark policy. Biden – who won the presidency despite multiple reports linking him and his family to suspect business dealings with the rogue state – has repeatedly stated that he opposes Trump’s approach and prefers to allow China greater influence in America’s economy.

“We make up 25 percent of the world’s economy, but we poked our finger in the eyes of all of our allies out there,” Biden has said of Trump’s trade policy. “The way China will respond is when we gather the rest of the world … That’s when things begin to change. That’s when China’s behavior is going to change.”

Biden has not quite clarified which “allies” are supposed to help America achieve this goal. Most of them in the Pacific region – Australia, Japan, and South Korea, to name a few – joined the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), a China-led trade bloc specifically designed to grow China’s influence on other state economies at America’s expense.

Biden has also reportedly chosen in career diplomat Antony Blinken a secretary of state that has vocally called economic independence from China a “mistake.”
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
Joe Biden: Return Of The CFR

Thu, 11/26/2020 - 22:05
Submitted by Swiss Policy Research,

A Joe Biden presidency means a “return to normality” simply because it means a return of the US Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).



In 2008, Barack Obama received the names of his entire future cabinet already one month prior to his election by CFR Senior Fellow (and Citigroup banker) Michael Froman, as a Wikileaks email later revealed. Consequently, the key posts in Obama’s cabinet were filled almost exclusively by CFR members, as was the case in most cabinets since World War II. To be sure, Obama’s 2008 Republican opponent, the late John McCain, was a CFR member, too. Michael Froman later negotiated the TPP and TTIP international trade agreements, before returning to the CFR as a Distinguished Fellow.

In 2017, CFR nightmare President Donald Trump immediately canceled these trade agreements – because he viewed them as detrimental to US domestic industry – which allowed China to conclude its own, recently announced RCEP free-trade area, encompassing 14 countries and a third of global trade. Trump also canceled other CFR achievements, like the multinational Iran nuclear deal and the UN climate and migration agreements, and he tried, but largely failed, to withdraw US troops from East Asia, Central Asia, the Middle East, Europe and Africa, thus seriously endangering the global US empire built over decades by the CFR and its 5000 elite members.

Unsurprisingly, most of the US media, whose owners and editors are themselves members of the CFR, didn’t like President Trump. This was also true for most of the European media, whose owners and editors are members of international CFR affiliates like the Bilderberg Group and the Trilateral Commission, founded by CFR directors after the conquest of Europe during World War II. Moreover, it was none other than the CFR which in 1996 advocated a closer cooperation between the CIA and the media, i.e. a restart of the famous CIA Operation Mockingbird. Historically, OSS and CIA directors since William Donovan and Allen Dulles have always been CFR members.

Joe Biden promised that he would form “the most diverse cabinet” in US history. This may be true in terms of skin color and gender, but almost all of his key future cabinet members have one thing in common: they are, indeed, members of the US Council on Foreign Relations.

This is the case for Anthony Blinken (State), Alejandro Mayorkas (Homeland Security), Janet Yellen (Treasury), Michele Flournoy and Jeh Johnson (candidates for Defense), Linda Thomas-Greenfield (Ambassador to the UN), Richard Stengel (US Agency for Global Media; Stengel famously called propaganda “a good thing” at a 2018 CFR session), John Kerry (Special Envoy for Climate), Nelson Cunningham (candidate for Trade), and Thomas Donilon (candidate for CIA Director).

Jake Sullivan, Biden’s National Security Advisor, is not (yet) a CFR member, but Sullivan has been a Senior Fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (a think tank “promoting active international engagement by the United States”) and a member of the US German Marshall Fund’s “Alliance For Securing Democracy” (a major promoter of the “Russiagate” disinformation campaign to restrain the Trump presidency), both of which are run by senior CFR members.

Most of Biden’s CFR-vetted nominees supported recent US wars against Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria and Yemen as well as the 2014 regime change in Ukraine. Unsurprisingly, neoconservative Max Boot, the CFR Senior Fellow in National Security Studies and one of the most vocal opponents of the Trump administration, has called Biden’s future cabinet “America’s A-Team”.

Thus, after four years of “populism” and “isolationism”, a Biden presidency will mean the return of the Council on Foreign Relations and the continuation of a tradition of more than 70 years. Indeed, the CFR was founded in 1921 in response to the “trauma of 1920”, when US President Warren Harding and the US Senate turned isolationist and renounced US global leadership after World War I. In 2016, Donald Trump’s “America First” campaign reactivated this 100 year old foreign policy trauma.

Was the 2020 presidential election “stolen”, as some allege? There are certainly indications of significant statistical anomalies in key Democrat-run swing states. Whether these were decisive for the election outcome may be up to courts to decide. At any rate, Joe Biden may well be the first US President known to be involved in international corruption before even entering office.

Why are most US and international media hardly interested in this? Well, why should they?


 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Politico Exposes Secretive Consulting Firm Set To Dominate Biden Cabinet

Thu, 11/26/2020 - 16:15

A shadowy consulting firm which openly brags about its ability to connect clients to the White House is set to prominently feature in the Biden administration, according to Politico.

Vice President Joe Biden and former Deputy National Security Advisor Tony Blinken
Founded in 2017 by Tony Blinken - Joe Biden's pick for Secretary of State - WestExec Advisers advertises itself as "quite literally, the road to the Situation Room," adding "and it is the road everyone associated with WestExec Advisors has crossed many times en route to meetings of the highest national security consequences."



Another WestExec executive, Michèle Flournoy, is a top contender for Secretary of Defense, while former WestExec principal, Avril Haines, is Biden's pick for director of national intelligence.

Meanwhile, WestExec's client list is just as secretive.
Because its staffers aren’t lobbyists, they are not required to disclose who they work for. They also aren’t bound by the Biden transition’s restrictions on hiring people who have lobbied in the past year.

Such high-powered Washington consulting firms are “the unintended consequence” of greater disclosure requirements for registered lobbyists, said Mandy Smithberger, director of the Center for Defense Information at the Project on Government Oversight.
By not directly advocating for federal dollars on behalf of their clients, they don't have to publicly divulge who is paying them and for what activities, such as the connections they make with government agencies, she said. But it is also impossible to assess the influence they have on federal expenditures. -Politico
"They avoid becoming registered lobbyists or foreign agents and are instead becoming strategic consultants," said Smithberger.

What's more, WestExec employs a ton of former Democratic national security and foreign policy officials who have been involved in fundraising for Biden's campaign, have joined his transition team, or have acted as unofficial advisers. In fact, 21 of the 38 WestExec employees listed on the firm's website donated to the Biden campaign - with Flournoy raising over $100,000 alone.
Five WestExec staffers — all veterans of the Obama administration — are on leave from the firm to help staff Biden’s review teams for the Pentagon, the Treasury Department, the Council of Economic Advisers and other agencies, which are charged with coordinating the transfer of power between outgoing Trump officials and Biden’s appointees.

Two other WestExec principals were among those who briefed Biden last week on national security: Bob Work, who served as deputy secretary of defense in the Obama administration and was asked to remain on for the first few months of the Trump administration, and David Cohen, a former deputy director of both the CIA and the Treasury Department who is also in the running for a top post.
Former Obama White House communications director Jen Psaki - also a WestExec employee - is also advising Biden's transition team, while two former WestExec'ers - Lisa Monaco and Julianne Smith - are under consideration for potential Biden administration hires.

The firm was so well positioned to take over in a Democratic administration that they negotiated a clause in their office lease that they can break it if members are called back to public service, according to American Prospect.

WestExec isn't the first DC consulting firm staffed by former administration officials who "serve as the government in waiting for the party that’s out of power" according to Meredith McGehee - executive director of Issue One, a Washington good government group (per Politico), adding that while there's nothing wrong with it - Blinken and other potential Biden Cabinet picks who have worked for firms such as WestExec should go further than the law requires and publicly disclose any clients for whom they've done significant work.

Read the rest of the report here.
 

northern watch

TB Fanatic
Israel And Saudi Arabia Could Derail Biden’s Middle East Plans

By Cyril Widdershoven- Nov 23, 2020, 6:00 PM CST
Oil Price

After weeks of speculation over how the new Biden Administration will approach U.S. relations in the Arab Gulf, the first real hurdles for a new JCPOA Iran agreement are already emerging. The pro-Biden Europeans, the majority of whom appear very happy with the President-elect, are all looking forward to a realignment of U.S.-European geopolitical powers in the Arab Gulf. Most analysts expect that in addition to Biden’s promise to rejoin the Paris Agreement, Washington will also attempt to re-enter the JCPOA discussions with Iran. Oil and gas markets appear to have incorporated into their 2021-2022 assessments a re-emergence of Iranian oil exports to global markets. There is also an expectation of a more active pro-democratic positioning by the U.S. in the case of Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and even the UAE. Unrest is mounting in those countries that Trump’s legacy may be dismantled by the incoming administration. At least that is the main tenor in assessments at present. When looking at developments on the ground, the situation is not as pro-Biden as some expect. Trump’s legacy is more intertwined with the ongoing political and economic developments in the region than most want to admit.

There was an unexpected development this weekend. If media reports in Israel and the Arab world are to be believed, Israel’s Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu and Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman met for a bilateral discussion in the well-known City of the Future NEOM, a central piece of MBS’s Saudi Vision 2030. During the well-reported visit of U.S. Secretary of State Pompeo to the Kingdom, Nethanyahu and his security chiefs were reportedly present. Based on flight-tracking, which has been confirmed by numerous sources, Netanyahu and the head of the Israeli Mossad, Yossi Cohen, flew to NEOM to take part in the meeting between MBS and Pompeo. No confirmation has been given of the meeting, but an Israeli minister acknowledged the fact to the press. The unexpected move is a further sign of the deepening cooperation between Tel-Aviv and Riyadh, even if both countries are not yet openly reporting on the discussions. The current rapprochement was expected, especially after that the UAE, Bahrain, Sudan, and Israel signed diplomatic agreements, followed by a multitude of technical, economic, and even defense meetings. Saudi Arabia has remained very quiet throughout these developments, keeping to official Saudi statements about the rights of Palestinians.

However, a possible deal between Riyadh and Tel-Aviv appears to be in the works, breaking through decades of long-term rivalry and outright conflict. Whatever the Trump Administration’s history will be elsewhere, it appears to have been successful in bringing GCC countries and Israel closer together. Saudi Arabia would be the jewel in the crown for Trump, and could even lead to a new strategic reality on the ground.

The possibility of a full-scale Red Sea-GCC alliance has the potential to transform the region. Combined military-economic cooperation between Egypt, Sudan, GCC leadership, and parties in the East Med, would be a major stumble-block for any ambitions Biden may have to unite the U.S., EU, Turkey, Qatar, and Iran after January 2021.

By setting up a Saudi-UAE-Israeli entente would confront the Biden Administration with a very strong faits-a-compli with regards to Iran or the Turkey-Qatar issues. The Democratic Administration will not be able to bulldozer through its possible changes planned in the MENA region without taking into account the strong backing of Israel or the Saudi-UAE groups in Washington’s political circles. The same is true for European powers in the region. In recent days, Biden’s ambitions to rejoin the JCPOA deal are looking increasingly unrealistic.

The Israeli-Saudi discussions also need to be seen in the light of a struggling Saudi-Emirati rentier-state economic environment. Israeli technology and defense knowledge could become a major part of the bargaining power for official relations with Riyadh in the coming weeks. A more anti-MBS stand by Biden and his cohorts would likely only lead to a deepening of the Tel-Aviv-Riyadh-Abu Dhabi axis. Mohammed bin Salman’s dream of setting up NEOM, one of the cornerstones of his Vision 2030 legacy, will be easier with Israeli technology, start-ups and investments are available. Don’t forget, NEOM is almost bordering Israel, so distance is not an issue.

As always, geopolitics will bleed into oil markets if this regional power shift does take place. A stronger and bolder Saudi Arabia, supported by the UAE, will be able to block OPEC Iran issues much more easily. Israel’s deep relations with Vladimir Putin, somehow overlooked by a majority of analysts, is another asset of influence for MBS and MBZ. OPEC+ could be revived by Israeli peace treaties, as it will be a large and increasingly strong front against Iran. All Arab parties also appear eager to block Turkish expansion and power projections in their own backyard. Security and energy again are at play, but the U.S. is becoming an increasingly unimportant force in the region.

The new developments have already stirred anxiety in Ankara and Iran, with proxies already taking action. The latest Yemeni Houthi attacks on Saudi Aramco assets in Jeddah are just a sign of what could be coming. Iran is speeding up all its capabilities, while there appears to be a re-shaping of IRGC forces in the Persian Gulf region. Turkey’s strategy of putting oil on the fire in the East Med continues, while the Libyan conflict appears to be flaring up again. In the coming months, stability in the region is far from assured, and oil and gas markets should keep an eye on the Middle East.

It is truly remarkable that Israeli security officials and Prime Minister Netanyahu have taken a plane to NEOM. If this meeting was meant to be kept strictly confidential, taking a Netanyahu designated plane would have been out of the question. Taking the road to NEOM or a boat would have been much easier. Jordan’s King Hussein used to go to the beach in Tel Aviv on his own Harley Davidson for years. Tracking is sometimes a diplomatic move to increase pressure, something that is worth remembering.

By Cyril Widdershoven for Oilprice.com

Israel And Saudi Arabia Could Derail Biden’s Middle East Plans | OilPrice.com
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Biden Labor Candidate Oversaw Fraudulent Payments to California Prison Inmates
  • Joe Biden
    Joe Biden / Getty Images
Graham Piro - NOVEMBER 25, 2020 4:20 PM

A frontrunner to be president-elect Joe Biden's labor secretary oversaw the payment of nearly $1 billion in fraudulent benefits to California prison inmates.

Julie Su is the secretary of California's Labor and Workforce Development Agency, which operates the state's pandemic unemployment system. The system paid out hundreds of millions of dollars in fraudulent unemployment payments to prison inmates and convicts, prosecutors announced on Tuesday.

The fraud involved over 35,000 unemployment claims filed between March and August under the names of California state prison inmates. The inmates included two serial killers responsible for the deaths of at least eight people, as well as the well-known murderer Scott Peterson, who was convicted in 2004 for killing his pregnant wife. The Sacramento County district attorney called the scandal "one of the biggest fraud of taxpayer dollars in California history."

A spokeswoman for the agency's Employment Development Department told the Washington Free Beacon the department has been working with the U.S. Labor Department to identify fraudulent claims from inmates and is "pursuing how to integrate such cross-matches moving forward as part of enhanced prevention efforts during this unprecedented time of pandemic-related unemployment fraud across the country."

The agency's logistical problems also resulted in the delay of unemployment payments for as many as 1.8 million Californians during the initial stages of the state's shutdown over the coronavirus pandemic.

Su took responsibility for the agency's logistical delays in April. She said she needed to "own the things that we are not doing right" and fix the agency's problems. The Employment Development Department still experienced delays and fraud throughout the year, however, and faced demands from lawmakers for an audit in September.

President-elect Biden's transition team did not respond to a request for comment on Su's candidacy for labor secretary.

One of the district attorneys leading the task force investigating the fraud said the "vast majority" of the money will never be repaid.

California is not the only state to be plagued by unemployment fraud amid the coronavirus pandemic. The Labor Department's inspector general said a total of $26 billion in federal aid programs could be lost to fraud by the end of the crisis.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Biden National Security Adviser Pick Said “Al-Qaeda Is On Our Side” in Syria
by Matt PalumboPosted: November 25, 2020

Biden National Security Adviser Pick Said “Al-Qaeda Is On Our Side” in Syria

Joe Biden’s pick for National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan already has more red flags than a communist parade.

Sullivan previously served as an adviser for Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign, and worked as Deputy Chief of Staff to Hillary when she served as Secretary of State.

Sullivan has appeared on China State TV in the past to criticize President Trump, and in a 2017 lecture he argued that we should support China’s rise economically as a way to improve relations between our two countries. Biden has denied the economic threat that China poses to the U.S.

Sullivan also helped negotiate the disastrous Iran Nuclear deal, and played a large role in shaping the Obama administration’s policies in Syria and Libya. Libya would become a failed state not long after the failed intervention there.

Obama himself said his failure to plan after the death of Moammar Gadhafi was his biggest mistake.

As for policy in Syria, one of Sullivan’s emails to Hillary Clinton takes the logic of “the enemy of my enemy is my friend” to an absurd extreme and he refers to Al-Qaeda as an ally.

In an email to Hillary on February 12, 2012, Sullivan begins the email “See last item – AQ [Al-Qaeda] is on our side in Syria.”

The email contained a spot report on activity in Syria, with the last item reading: “AL-ZAWAHIRI URGES MUSLIM SUPPORT FOR OPPOSITION (U) Al-Qaida leader al-Zawahiri called on Muslims in Turkey and the Middle East to aid rebel forces in their fight against supporters of Syrian President Assad in an interne video recording. Al-Zawahiri also urged the Syrian people not to rely on the AL, Turkey, or the United States for assistance.euters).

His supposed logic here is that because America had backed rebel groups fighting Assad in the Syrian Civil War, and Al-Qaeda was also fighting against Assad, that they’re “on our side.”

The other two people Biden chose to lead his foreign policy team are Antony Blinken and Linda Thomas-Greenfield. All three are alumni of the Obama administration.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Taliban: War with America ‘Will Resume’ if Biden Undoes Trump Peace Deal

106
Taliban fighters gather in Surkhroad district of Nangarhar province, east of Kabul, Afghanistan, Saturday, June 16, 2018. A suicide bomber blew himself up in eastern Afghanistan on Saturday as mostly Taliban fighters gathered to celebrate a three-day cease fire marking the Islamic holiday of Eid al-Fitr, killing 21 people and …
AP Photo/Rahmat Gal
FRANCES MARTEL27 Nov 202090

A spokesman for the Taliban told Afghanistan’s Khaama Press in an interview published Thursday that the terrorist group’s “war against the United States will resume … until they leave Afghanistan” if Joe Biden walks back President Donald Trump’s attempts to withdraw U.S. forces from the country.

Trump initiated talks including both the Taliban and the legitimate government of Afghanistan this year to come to an agreement that would result in the end of the American military presence in the country. Afghanistan is America’s longest war, launched in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. The Trump administration has sought assurances from the Taliban that it would not harbor terrorists seeking to harm American interests – such as the architects of the 9/11 attacks, al-Qaeda – in exchange for America not continuing to attack the jihadist group.

Civilian casualties in Afghanistan dropped to their lowest level in eight years in 2020, as peace talks in Doha, Qatar – where the Taliban’s political offices are headquartered – marched on. Attacks on American troops have also declined, though the Taliban has become more prolific in attacking the Afghan military.
Joe Biden has indicated that he does not support a full withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan. The Afghan war is not listed as a “priority” on Biden’s administration website, or is any other foreign policy issue.

Taliban spokesman Mohammad Naeem Wardak told Khaama Press that he does not anticipate the peace talks with the United States will change under Biden but that the Taliban was prepared in the event that they did.
“The peace agreement was a big change and it stopped the war, it was not with Donald Trump, but with the United States government,” he told the outlet. “We believe that Biden administration will respect this agreement; but if the Biden administration does not accept this agreement, our war against the United States will resume and will continue until they leave Afghanistan.”

Wardak did not indicate that he expected the peace agreements to result in any productive relationship with the Afghan government anytime soon. The Taliban considers itself the legitimate government of Afghanistan, not the presidency in Kabul, and formally refers to itself as the “Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan.” Afghanistan is technically an Islamic republic.

“We reached an agreement after two years of negotiations with the United States, so it will take some time to resolve the issue between the Afghans, because the war in the country has been going on for 20 years,” Wardak said.
Wardak also made bizarre claims about the purported progressivism of the Taliban.

“Twenty years ago, the Taliban gave the people their rights. During the Taliban regime, women were educated and served in the police force. The Taliban are still ready to give women their rights under Islamic law, but only when the Islamic system is established,” the spokesman claimed.

In reality, the Taliban implemented brutal jihadist rules that prevented women from functioning as human beings in society, largely denying them the right to show their faces, to an education, or to property.

“The assault on the status of women began immediately after the Taliban took power in Kabul. The Taliban closed the women’s university and forced nearly all women to quit their jobs, closing down an important source of talent and expertise for the country,” a U.S. State Department reported detailed in 2001. “It restricted access to medical care for women, brutally enforced a restrictive dress code, and limited the ability of women to move about the city.”

“The Taliban perpetrated egregious acts of violence against women, including rape, abduction, and forced marriage. Some families resorted to sending their daughters to Pakistan or Iran to protect them,” the report noted.

Afghanistan’s Ministry of Defense protested on Friday that the Taliban had dramatically increased attacks on Afghan forces in the past week; attacking in 23 of the nation’s provinces in just the past day.

“The Taliban has kept violence very high, which is against the will of the people of Afghanistan, but members of the Afghan National Security and Defense Forces are retaliating harshly to all these attacks to ensure their safety and the security of the people,” Fawad Aman, the deputy spokesman for the Afghan Ministry of Defense, said on Friday, according to Tolo.

A military analyst, Assadullah Sikandar, told Tolo that the Taliban had “escalated the level of violence to score points in the view of the peace process.”

While attacks on the Afghan military have increased, attacks on U.S. troops have dropped, as have civilian casualties. The United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) published a report in October finding a 30-percent drop in civilian casualties comparing the first nine months of 2020 to the first nine months of 2019. Comparing the entire decade, the numbers were the lowest since 2012.

While civilian casualties caused by the Taliban dropped 32 percent, civilian casualties caused by the Afghan military increased 70 percent between 2019 and 2020.

President Donald Trump recently announced he would reduce troops numbers to 2,500 by January 2021, a move Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who has been heavily involved in the peace talks, defended this week.

“President Trump has been very clear we’re going to protect and secure the homeland, but we’re not going to have our young men and women in harm’s way when it doesn’t deliver real security benefits for the United States and for our allies,” Pompeo said in a Fox News interview. “We have the force posture right today. We’re going to keep it right. We’ll get our troops home when we can, and we’ll do the things we need to do.”

Biden has hinted that he would not support a full troop withdrawal from Afghanistan, which Trump has openly stated he is working toward as an ultimate goal.

“I think we need special ops capacity to coordinate with our allies,” Biden said in September.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

House Democrats Have Begun Drafting an Amnesty Plan to Send to Joe Biden

by John HawkinsPosted: November 27, 2020

House Democrats Have Begun Drafting an Amnesty Plan to Send to Joe Biden


House Democrats have already started working on a plan to provide amnesty to the 11-22 million (depending on which estimates you believe) illegals living in the United States. Unsurprisingly, bringing in millions of potential new voters is a high priority for Democrats in the House and Joe Biden has previously indicated that he would bring up his own amnesty bill in the first 100 days of his administration. Given that Biden has publicly embraced open borders like no President before him, you can expect he will do everything in his power to get an amnesty bill through if Donald Trump’s court challenges fail and he becomes the President.

Although Republicans in DC are surprisingly soft on amnesty because of all the donations they get from pro-amnesty business groups, most of them can be expected to oppose an amnesty bill out of fear of the voters. That makes it unlikely, but not impossible, that an amnesty bill could get past a filibuster in the Senate. If it comes to that, keep the pressure on the GOP.

However, if Donald Trump loses his court challenges, Biden becomes President AND Democrats win both run-off elections in Georgia, then it’s possible that the Democrats could end the legislative filibuster in the Senate and push through an amnesty on a party-line vote. That is also unlikely, but not impossible.

What all of this comes down to is that Democrats love the idea of amnesty because they see it as a way to add millions of new voters. The Republicans that support it mostly do so either because they’re in a business that makes money off of illegal immigration or they’re getting campaign contributions from those people. On the other hand, people whose first concern is looking out for America oppose illegal immigration because it’s bad for the country. Long-term, it’s hard to say which side will win that fight, but it is a hill worth dying on if you want America to continue to be a great nation.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment
I refuse to even try and speculate on something that is never going to happen...
I have found that it is very revealing about all the things the Trump Admin. has NOT been. Biden truly will bring the 4 horsemen back through the gates, while Trump managed to push them back.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

5 ways Joe Biden can advance his tax agenda (without a Senate majority)
Published: Nov. 27, 2020 at 7:14 a.m. ET
By
Andrew Keshner

With two Senate seats up for grabs, what does this mean for families thinking about their tax bill in a Biden era?

MW-IT501_biden__20201111154840_ZQ.jpg

What does a Biden administration, without a ‘blue wave,’ mean for people eyeing their tax bill.

Joe Biden campaigned for president on a vow to raise taxes for the rich and corporations so that they’d pay their “fair share” — a vow that made some affluent families game out various investment and estate planning scenarios.

That pledge was premised on a “blue wave” where Democrats kept the House of Representatives and established a newfound majority in the Senate, which would go along with tax hikes.

One week after Election Day, Biden is the projected winner in the presidential race. Yet Republican Senators fill 50 Senate seats and Democrats have 48 (including two independents who caucus with them). A Jan. 5 runoff elections for Georgia’s two spots.

Democrats will keep control of the House of Representatives, albeit in a smaller margin after GOP candidates flipped several seats.

So what does this political churn mean for families thinking about their tax bill in a Biden era?

Not as much as a clear Democrat sweep, some observers say, but still possibly plenty — like more audits for the rich, Internal Revenue Service rule changes and some legislative deals relating to retirement savings and families with kids.
‘Sure, Biden might not get his laundry list of tax legislative priorities. But there is so much he can do just with staffing change at the IRS and Treasury, and regulations that move the ball forward on his agenda.’
— Caroline Bruckner, tax professor at American University’s Kogod School of Business

“Sure, Biden might not get his laundry list of tax legislative priorities,” said Caroline Bruckner, a tax professor at American University’s Kogod School of Business. “But there is so much he can do just with staffing change at the IRS and Treasury, and regulations that move the ball forward on his agenda.”
Others doubt Biden would rip up the rules, or they say he would do so at his peril.

But Jason Cain, chief wealth strategist with Boston Private, a private bank with almost $15 billion in assets under management, isn’t playing a guessing game.
The man with most of his clientele worth north of $50 million spent the fall and summer talking people “off the edge of the proverbial cliff.” At this point, “I think everybody’s taken a deep breath.”

But Cain expects more audits for top earners. “My advice to clients is, in that type of environment, we sure as heck better not be pressed up at the line between black and white.”

This means portfolios and tax planning built on “established positions supported by regulations, IRS procedure or case interpretation,” Cain said. “I don’t want my clients to be establishing precedent one way or another.”

Here are five ways Biden can still attempt to bring in more tax dollars from businesses and the well-off, while using the tax code to help those farther down the income ladder, with their benefits and pitfalls.

Expanding tax credits for companies, individuals and 401(k) contributions
“I think there are some very real opportunities,” said Mark Everson, a former IRS Commissioner who led the agency from 2003 to 2007, during George W. Bush’s administration. The coronavirus pandemic has underscored the importance of a domestic supply chain, said Everson, now vice chairman of alliantgroup, a tax consulting firm.

That means both sides of the aisle will weigh how they can expand company tax credits on research and development, as well as added incentives for manufacturing on American soil, he said.

Bipartisan deals might also come on expanded tax credits for families juggling work and kids, he said. That includes provisions like the Child Tax Credit, currently paying up to $2,000 per qualifying child, and the Child and Dependent Care Credit, now offering up to $3,000 in care expenses for kids and dependent adults or $6,000 for two or more qualifying dependents.

New tax laws could pertain to families juggling work and kids, and retirement savings.

“Things that promote work will be seen as worth considering,” Everson said.
The same goes for long-term financial planning. “There’s a lot of interest in both parties to do something to encourage people to save more for retirement,” said Howard Gleckman, a senior fellow in the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center.

There are already two bills with sponsors on both sides of the aisle. The “Securing a Strong Retirement Act” would, among other things, push the required minimum distribution to age 75. The “Retirement Security and Savings Act” would do the same in its list of provisions.

Then there’s Biden’s call for a 26% refundable tax credit kicking in for each dollar contributed to an IRA or 401(k).

Between all that, it’s possible Biden and lawmakers can find some common ground, he said. “Best case, some modest changes in 2021. Worst case is nothing, but I think that’s unlikely.”

Redefining who’s eligible for a tax break for low-income families
After Congress passes tax legislation and the president signs it into law, it falls on the Treasury Department and the IRS to develop the regulations that flesh out these laws.

That’s another place where the Biden administration could tinker — for better or worse depending on the perspective.

‘There could be greater efforts at settling some the longstanding questions on the definition of a child for [Earned Income Tax Credit] purposes. There is room for substantial progress.’
— Pete Sepp, president of the National Taxpayers Union

There could be greater efforts to settle some the longstanding questions on the definition of a child for Earned Income Tax Credit purposes. “There is room for substantial progress,” said Pete Sepp, president of the National Taxpayers Union, a conservative-leaning non-partisan think tank.

The credit for low- and moderate-income working families has been hailed as a powerful anti-poverty measure, but Sepp said there are unclear definitions on who can claim a child and get the credit. That results in too many audits, Sepp said, gumming up the payments for too many people in bad need of money.

That’s a place where some added direction could do some good, he thinks.

There are places the Biden administration should leave alone, Sepp thinks.

The Trump administration’s Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 lowered the corporate income-tax rate and temporarily decreased most income tax brackets. It also established tax laws surrounding the money U.S. multinational companies made on intangible assets held abroad, like patents and copyrights. The Treasury Department spent three years after that crafting rules on the tax’s specifics, according to Sepp.

‘It’s important to retain the independence of the IRS. For that reason I think the administration will tread carefully. I don’t think there will be a lot of regulatory changes.’
— Mark W. Everson, vice chairman of alliantgroup and a former IRS Commissioner

Biden wants to raise the corporate rate from 21% to 28%, but if he can’t do that, Sepp said his Treasury Department could theoretically rip up the rules on multinationals and go tougher.

But that would be ill-advised, he said. In the face of uncertain tax rules, companies might hoard cash they’d otherwise use on new hires. “Wherever the tip of the spear is aimed, the wound spreads to many more taxpayers,” he said.
Everson stressed the IRS is a non-partisan agency following the laws as written.

“It’s important to retain the independence of the IRS. For that reason I think the administration will tread carefully. I don’t think there will be a lot of regulatory changes.”

Making taxes simpler for gig workers
Some regulations are ripe for change and can make a real difference for gig workers, said Bruckner.

For example, the Treasury Department has a rule saying platform companies that connect consumers seeking a service and sellers offering their service (like a car trip) have to provide the seller with tax paperwork on earnings. But Bruckner says the Treasury Department insists on a rule saying the companies only have to pass along the tax documentation for payment that exceeds $20,000 and 200 transactions.

‘It’s a really complicated issue, but it boils down to: The IRS can fix this. It doesn’t need an act of Congress.’
— Caroline Bruckner, tax professor at American University’s Kogod School of Business

That leaves a lot of workers in the dark on their tax obligations, Bruckner said, opening them up to audits and not giving the feds an accurate read on what the gig worker is paying into incomes taxes — and Social Security taxes, a number that, years later, will be used to determine the size of the worker’s Social Security checks.

“It’s a really complicated issue, but it boils down to: The IRS can fix this. It doesn’t need an act of Congress” to address a problem that’s “to the detriment of millions and millions of workers,” she said.

A Government Accountability Office (GAO) report dug into the issue earlier this year, and recommended a change in the rule at issue. IRS officials said they had to address “other priorities,” like rules and guidance on the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, according to the GAO report.

Adding staff to an IRS that’s ‘limping’
Another way Biden can fit the tax code with his campaign visions: Helping the IRS itself, an agency that acknowledges it’s been losing staff over the years. The IRS had 78,004 workers in fiscal year 2019, which includes almost 1,600 more full-time workers than the year before, but that’s still “well below” staff levels in decades past, the IRS noted.

“You can pass all the policies you want. If the IRS can’t administer them, then you’ve just undermined your policy,” said Nina Olson, the former National Taxpayer Advocate within the IRS.

‘If there’s one thing the CARES act has shown, it’s that the IRS is central to any economic recovery. Period. And we better make sure it can operate.’
— Nina Olson, former National Taxpayer Advocate within the IRS

The IRS distributed more than 160 million stimulus checks after March’s $2.2 stimulus bill. “If there’s one thing the CARES act has shown, it’s that the IRS is central to any economic recovery. Period. And we better make sure it can operate,” said Olson, the executive director and founder of the Center for Taxpayer Rights, a non-profit organization promoting due process for taxpayers.
The IRS didn’t respond to a request for comment, but Olson said the agency is “limping” on matters like customer support and IT systems.

She said the tax-collecting agency needs a budget that slowly but surely increase over the years — and a breather after a 35-day government shutdown from 2018 to 2019 disrupted operations, and then the coronavirus’s complications this year.

In July, lawmakers in the House earmarked $12.1 billion for the IRS in fiscal year 2021, up from $11.5 billion a year earlier. The Senate’s Appropriations Committee has put aside $11.5 billion. The chambers will have to hash out the differences.

MW-IQ317_rettig_20201007135329_ZQ.jpg


IRS Commissioner Charles Rettig at a House Committee on Oversight and Reform hearing in October.
TONI L. SANDYS-POOL/GETTY IMAGES

Some observers told MarketWatch they wouldn’t be surprised if the Biden administration wanted to stick with Charles Rettig, the IRS commissioner and a Republican who started in 2018 after a legal career defending individuals and businesses with tax disputes.

“If Biden wants more money for the IRS, better to have a Republican commissioner ask for it than a Democratic IRS commissioner ask for it,” said Gleckman.

Conducting more audits on wealthy taxpayers
More audits for the rich are likely a way the new administration will try to bring in more money, observers told MarketWatch. The government could have an extra $535 billion if audit rates return to their 2010 point and honed in on society’s 1%, according to one estimate.

Over the summer, the IRS announced plans to audit more wealthy taxpayers. But people like Olson and Everson say any future staff build-ups aren’t just a matter of more funding. It takes time and training, they said.
Someone auditing EITC claims might need to have the social skills to talk with taxpayers and understand family dynamics, said Olson. But someone scrutinizing the super-rich’s returns might have to know about forensic accounting and tax laws — and accounting firms will pay a lot to hire these types of people.

One thing Biden “can do is start talking about public-service jobs, and have it look valuable that you do a stint in IRS for a time. Yes, you take a hit on salary, you have but benefit of a government job,” Olson said.

It is wise for affluent households to keep thinking about additional tax planning in the years ahead, Cain said. Who knows what tax laws could come after the 2022 midterm elections, the 2024 presidential race and the 2025 expiration of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, he added.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Would A Biden Administration Be An Economic Savior To Iran?

Seth Griffin November 27, 2020
Share this article:

Reading Time: 4 minutes

This is the first of a three-part series from The Liberty Loft on the economic impact a Biden administration will likely have on Iran, China, and the United States of America.

Charlotte, NC — No nation will gain more from the apparent election victory of former Vice President Joe Biden than Iran. Iran’s gloating response to that event sounds a lot like a gangster selling “protection.”

One of my favorite movies is the 1987 classic “The Untouchables.” There’s a great and powerful scene where Eliot Ness is coming home one night. Ness doesn’t see Capone henchman, Frank Nitti, in a parked car across the street until Nitti yells, “NICE HOUSE!” Nitti asks if Ness’ daughter is having a birthday party. Ness acknowledges that she is, to which Nitti responds, saying, “Nice to have a family. Man should take care. See that nothing happens to them,” and drives away.

On Nov. 8, Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif tweeted, “Trump’s gone in 70 days. But we’ll remain here forever. Betting on outsiders to provide security is never a good gamble. We extend our hand to our neighbors for dialog to resolve differences. Only together can we build a better future for all.”

Perhaps Mr. Zarif was channeling his inner Capone henchman mentality. This tweet is neither subtle or different in style.

Zarif’s threat is aimed at the Arab states — the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, and Sudan. Arab states that have all engaged in meaningful and massive peace deals with Israel under the leadership and guidance of President Trump. Strong diplomatic successes that will likely be enough to do more than tempt Saudi Arabia to join them.

Additionally, Zarif’s threat is also aimed at Israel, which Iran has often threatened to destroy. President Trump has been a faithful ally to Israel, but Joe Biden — even if he doesn’t take as hard an anti-Israel stance as Barack Obama did — will be an inconstant and unreliable ally of Israel at best. Democrats are obsessed with a two-state solution. However, as long as one of those so called “states” is intent on murdering every single citizen of the other, that “two-state” solution is a myth and should never be entertained.

In fact, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was one of the most prominent critics of the U.S. Iranian Nuclear Deal. Netanyahu’s relationship with former President Obama was rocky at best. President Obama called the agreement a breakthrough, while Netanyahu called it a “historic mistake.”

That inconsistency will ruin Israeli politics and probably result in the downfall of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, a man leading his people who has benefited considerably from Mr. Trump’s support.

One of the first things Biden intends to do as president is to rejoin the Joint Cooperative Plan of Action (JCPOA), commonly known as the Iran Nuclear Deal or, as I like to call it, one of the worst and most dangerous foreign policy mistakes that former President Obama has ever made! By so doing, Biden will abandon Mr. Trump’s “maximum pressure” campaign of peace through strength and economic sanctions against Iran, which has delivered Iran’s economy to the trash heap.

However, last week Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif told CBS News Iran will under no circumstances renegotiate the terms of the JCPOA.

“If we wanted to do that, we could have done it with President Trump four years ago,” he said. The smugness and self-righteous indignation that statement suggests is truly terrifying, appalling, and arrogant.

Against this background, Henry Rome, senior Iran analyst at the US-based political risk consultancy firm Eurasia Group, expects both Iran and the US to proceed cautiously in the early months of a Biden presidency.

While Biden’s chief focus should be domestically dealing with COVID, he should tread lightly with Tehran and not appear to be over-eager to negotiate and give away any leverage, especially before the presidential election in Iran. President Hassan Rouhani is nearing the end of his second four-year tenure, will be leaving office in August.

Rome believes the two countries could reach a “freeze-for-freeze” interim agreement in 2021, likely in the second half of the year, while broader negotiations will likely have to wait until 2022.

There seems to be a delicate balance in negotiations and agreements moving forward. The Biden administration will need to proceed with caution while resisting the urge to blow up any and all achievements the Trump administration has had simply because they detest him and his supporters so very much despite their bogus and illegitimate calls for “unity.”

Regardless, things are looking somewhat promising for Iran, especially in the wake of the news Biden is slated to announce Antony Blinken as his Secretary of State should the election results stay the same.

Why is this important? Because the Biden Family and a potential Biden administration is ripe for shady deals, illegitimate business dealings, and kowtowing to the wrong nations all because it benefits the Biden family personally.

What proof? Here it is…After Hunter Biden joined the board of Burisma, Hunter requested meetings with Antony Blinken according to State Department emails.

I’m sure Blinken and Biden aren’t going to be on their “best behavior” moving forward, especially when they have a complicit media in their back pocket, as evidenced by the lack of their defiance and difficult questions they’ve asked the Biden transition team since election night on November 3rd.

There will be more on this as we discuss how this will be of significant benefit to China in Part 2 of this three-part series.
 
Last edited:

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Trump’s leaving Biden a Christmas gift of Middle East peace — will Joe throw it in the trash?

By John Podhoretz
November 26, 2020 | 5:41pm | Updated
Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, U.S. President Donald Trump and United Arab Emirates (UAE) Foreign Minister Abdullah bin Zayed display their copies of signed agreements


Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, US President Donald Trump and UAE Foreign Minister Abdullah bin Zayed display their copies of signed agreements.REUTERS/Tom Brenner/File Photo

Will Joe Biden and his foreign-policy team accept the extraordinary gift Team Trump is leaving for them under the Christmas tree — or is their hatred for the president so all-consuming that they will toss it in the garbage?

I’m talking about the Abraham Accords, peace deals between Israel and various Arab states — the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Sudan — that have sought the Jewish state’s destruction since its founding in 1948. Normalization has proceeded so quickly, Dubai already has a kosher restaurant, and its supermarkets are stocking Israeli agricultural products festooned with Stars of David — a science-fictional sight only a year ago.

Over the weekend, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met with Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman — the first face-to-face contact we know about between leaders of Israel and Saudi Arabia. There is no way the UAE and Bahrain made peace without Riyadh’s nod, and so Sunday’s meeting gave rise to the idea that Saudi Arabia might be the next nation to follow suit.

The establishment of diplomatic ties between the two would represent the fulfillment of a key US diplomatic goal dating back seven decades — and the end of the hopeless but destructive Sunni war against Israel’s existence.

It’s unlikely the Saudi-Israeli deal will happen in the 55 days before President Trump leaves office, especially since the Saudis have officially denied the meeting took place. But who knows? Bin Salman is impulsive and incautious, his behavior unpredictable.

Riyadh realized more than a decade ago that its greatest enemy isn’t Israel, but Iran — and that, in fact, the Jewish state and the House of Saud found themselves under the same existential threat once it became clear the Iranians were hell-bent on nukes.

Plus, the two countries found themselves in the same boat when President Barack Obama struck his 2015 nuclear deal with Iran, which not only supplied Tehran with hundreds of billions of dollars, but also acknowledged the regime’s ultimate right to nukes.

This is where the Biden team and its attitude toward these extraordinary developments may play a decisive role.

Incoming Secretary of State Antony Blinken and incoming National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan were senior officials during the Obama administration, both deeply involved in negotiating the Iran deal. Both have spoken of their interest in renewing the deal despite Trump’s formal exit from it in 2018. The hunger to do so may reveal a mindset that views the Abraham Accords not as a US triumph, but a sideshow.

First, there is a general sense among all Democrats that anything and everything Trump has touched is corrupted and diseased and must be discarded.

The Abraham Accords are in part an outgrowth of the Trump administration’s clear tilt toward Israel from the moment it took office and the move of the American embassy to Jerusalem. That may alone may render the accords suspect in Obamian eyes.https://nypost.com/2020/11/18/new-york-wont-really-live-again-until-broadway-is-back/

At the same time, Biden now presides over a Democratic Party whose antipathy toward Israel is growing, as represented by the left-wing activists in the House who have made their loathing of the Jewish state a key element of their Squad’s cheerleading. Ironically, the Squad is committed to a Palestinian cause that its Arab sponsors have now largely abandoned.

The Arab signatories have grown tired of, and uninterested in, the Palestinian cause, and they seem eager to move on and deal with the world as it is. As they change course, the Democratic Party writ large may be eager to take up the cudgels of Palestinian nationalism more openly than ever before.

Perhaps even more painful for the Biden team, the ultimate success of the accords would be a history-making achievement for two leaders detested by the administration in which they served — Netanyahu, the subject of some of the ugliest score-settling jabs in Obama’s new memoir, and MBS, who has more than earned the opprobrium of all civilized people due to his apparent role in the literal dismemberment of his critic Jamal Khashoggi.

A Middle East in which Israel and Arab states find they can live together, trade together and move into the 21st century in a normal way is an international blessing. The Biden team doesn’t have to do anything but reap the fruits of this new reality. It’s the easiest thing in the world. Let’s see if they screw it up.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Paris Climate Treaty Puts America Last
.
By Stephen Moore
November 24, 2020

Here we are in the midst of the second wave of a once-in-a-half-century pandemic, with the economy flattened and millions of Americans unemployed and race riots in the streets of our major cities. And Joe Biden says that one of his highest priorities as president will be to ... reenter the Paris Climate Accord.

Trump kept his America First promise and pulled America out of this Obama-era treaty. Biden wants us back in -- immediately.

Why? Paris is an unmitigated failure. You don't have to take my word for it. National Geographic, a supporter of climate change action, recently ran the numbers and admits in its recent headline: "Most Countries Aren't Hitting 2030 Climate Goals." That's putting it mildly. Most haven't even reached half their pledged target for emission reductions.

Robert Watson, the former chair of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, laments: "Countries need to double and triple their 2030 reduction commitments to be aligned with the Paris target."

Gee, this sounds like a treaty we definitely should be part of and pay the bills for.

The one country making substantial progress in reducing carbon emissions is the U.S. under President Donald Trump. Even though our gross domestic product is way up over the past four years, our carbon dioxide emissions are DOWN. Our air pollution levels and emissions of lead, carbon monoxide and other pollutants are at record-low levels.

Meanwhile, Beijing is far and away the largest polluter. Year after year, it makes hollow promises to stop climate change while they build dozens of new coal plants. India and its 1 billion people are hooked on coal, too.

Here is Paris in nutshell: We put our coal miners out of their jobs and cripple our $1 trillion oil and gas industry while China and India keep polluting and laugh at us behind our back.

These nations have bigger and more immediate development priorities than worrying about climate change models and their guestimates of the global temperature in 50 years.

China has much deeper and sinister ambitions. Those don't involve cleaning up the planet. The communists in Beijing's are obsessed with seizing world superpower status away from the U.S. The China 2025 plan for technology domination doesn't involve switching to expensive and unreliable energy sources. Their plan is to goad the U.S. into doing that.

The tragedy of all this is that we have a clean and efficient source of energy.

Thanks to the shale oil and gas revolution, the cost of fossil fuels has fallen by 70% to 80% -- and the costs will continue to fall, thanks to the superabundance of these energy sources. The U.S. has more fossil fuel energy than virtually any other nation. We are technologically ahead of the rest of the world in drilling productivity and have become a net exporter.

Gas is the planet's wonder-fuel. It should be the 21st-century power source. It makes no sense economically or ecologically to switch to windmills and solar panels, unless you are an investor in these expensive 19th-century energy sources.

Across the globe, world leaders are overjoyed that under a Biden administration, the U.S. will reenter the Paris Accord. Why wouldn't they be? We pay the bills. We hang our booming free market economy on a cross of climate change regulation. We pretend that the world is complying -- when their actions speak much louder than their words. We trust, but we don't verify.

If Paris is one of Biden's first official acts as president, he will be announcing to the world that putting America First has been replaced with putting America Last.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Chinese State Media Feels Biden’s Personnel Picks ‘Good For China,’ ‘Softer’ Than Trump
biden
CHINESE STATE-RUN MEDIA OUTLET CHINA DAILY INSISTED THAT JOE BIDEN’S PICKS FOR HIS FOREIGN POLICY TEAM WERE “GOOD NEWS FOR CHINA.”

The paper, a registered foreign agent in the U.S., serves as a mouthpiece for the Chinese Communist Party. Therefore, its glaring endorsement of Joe Biden’s foreign policy team is cause for concern.

The piece – “Let’s hope Biden fixes blunders of predecessor” by European Bureau Chief Chen Weihua – insists “Biden’s announcement of his foreign policy team on Tuesday is good news for China”:

US president-elect Joe Biden’s announcement of his foreign policy team on Tuesday is good news for China and the world which have suffered dearly from the incumbent US administration’s disruptive and destructive “America first” policy.

The Chinese Communist Party-funded outlet also expresses approval of Tony Blinken for Secretary of State:

By appointing people such as veteran diplomat Tony Blinken as secretary of state, Biden seems to be bidding farewell to the unpredictability of the outgoing US administration.

Another state-run outlet, Global Times, shared a similar sentiment about Blinken’s potential to be “softer” on China, amplified by professors at Chinese Communist Party-run universities:

“Given his [Blinken’s] previous rhetoric on China-related issues and his past experience, his stance is softer than that of the current administration, which is likely to create a positive environment for the China-US relationship,” Diao Daming, an associate professor at the Renmin University of China in Beijing, told the Global Times on Monday. Blinken recently pledged to build stronger economic ties with the island of Taiwan and he said full decoupling from China was “unrealistic,” in contrast to the approach from President Donald Trump. “He won’t be as provocative as the Trump administration on some of the issues of concern, like the Taiwan question, but the Democrats may take the island as an example on ideological matters,” Diao said.

China Global Television Network peddled a similar narrative, drawing a stark contrast between Blinken and “shrill hawkish bully” Mike Pompeo:

Unlike Mike Pompeo, the shrill hawkish bully he will succeed, Blinken is decidedly more win-win than zero-sum. Last summer he said that while the U.S. and China were definitely competitors, he’d like them to have a race to the top and not the bottom.

The China Daily article also notes “China welcomes the Biden team’s pledge to return to multilateralism” and offering praise for his selection of John Kerry as climate envoy. It also expresses hope that a Biden administration would reverse President Trump’s tough approach to the Chinese Communist Party:

In this sense, the new US administration has a lot to do to fix Trump’s blunders, from punitive tariffs on Chinese goods and bans on Chinese tech companies to persecution of Chinese news outlets and journalists based in the US and the Confucius Institutes that teach Chinese language and culture.

“The US under Biden’s leadership and China should work together to usher in a new era of bilateral relations for the betterment of the two countries and the world beyond,” it concludes.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

What A Biden Administration Means For Border Security

Sat, 11/28/2020 - 00:00
Authored by Chris Farrell via The Gatestone Institute,

A Biden administration means two dramatic and dangerous reversals on Trump policies that will endanger the American public: 1. Termination of President Trump's signature 2016 campaign issue -- The Wall; and 2. Loosening of immigration restrictions.
"There will not be another foot of wall constructed on my administration, No. 1," Biden told National Public Radio earlier this year.
"I'm going to make sure that we have border protection, but it's going to be based on making sure that we use high-tech capacity to deal with it."
Biden is not really promising any border protection at all. It sounds good, but it is a hollow falsehood. Most of the American public does not know about or has forgotten the $30 billion dollar disaster known as "SBInet." We have been down this "high-tech virtual wall" road before. The only winners were defense contractors. The virtual wall does nothing to deter or prevent unlawful entry across the border. It merely provides surveillance and recording of the illegal activity. Thousands of hours of video recordings of such crossings are available on the internet right now. Technology contractors are encouraged that a Biden administration would like to continue watching and recording millions of people entering the country illegally.

The Americans paying the very high price for Biden/Harris reckless open borders policy are in border communities. Biden's reversals spell doom for overloaded (and closed) hospitals, schools, public housing, and courts. Remember: Biden (and the rest of the Democratic presidential field) promised free healthcare to all illegal aliens.

Biden will reverse Trump policies and rules governing legal immigration. He will -- no doubt -- cancel Trump's so-called "Muslim ban" that barred immigrants from certain countries and curtailed legal immigration, including restrictions on asylum claims.

Biden has a long public record, so you will not be surprised to learn that a few years ago he was proudly in favor of building 700 miles of border fence. Biden had a border hawk position back on November 27, 2006 at a Q&A with a Columbia, SC Rotary Club meeting. Notably, Biden has faced criticism for his past track record on immigration issues. Obama/Biden deported 3 million illegal aliens. The Trump administration deported fewer than 1 million over the last 3+ years.

Court battles will continue, of course. Some Trump administration initiatives are still working their way through the judicial process. Biden has committed to restoring the Obama-era Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, which gives deportation relief and work permits to those brought illegally to the U.S. as children. Please remember, many of those "children" are now in their early 30s. The Trump administration tried to end the program, but that effort was blocked by the Supreme Court.

Biden has also glommed onto the "Comprehensive Immigration Reform" mantra, and vowed to initiate a complete system overhaul not accomplished since Reagan's well-intentioned error of 1986. While making that pledge, Biden disavowed workplace enforcement raids and sees no reason why illegal aliens cannot immediately begin receiving public assistance from taxpaying Americans.

Setting aside big national policy considerations, let us focus again on the border communities and the Americans directly at risk. Almost seven years into a Judicial Watch investigation dealing with Mexican Cartel penetration of federal, state and municipal law enforcement organizations in the El Paso, Texas region, we uncovered facts that resulted in the Department of Justice Inspector General taking direct action. Corrupt law enforcement officials at the federal, state and municipal level were removed. Other corrupt officials were effectively "neutralized" through exposure and pressure, even if they were not publicly acted against criminally or administratively. We also uncovered and exposed an El Paso-based narco-terror ring headed by Al Qaeda's director of operations for North America, Adnan El Shukrijuma (deceased), targeting Chicago landmarks. A 48-minute documentary explaining the plot, "The Sun City Cell," can be found on YouTube.

What are Americans in El Paso, Texas, Nogales, Arizona, and San Diego, California concerned about with respect to Biden administration border security? Over the past two weeks, in emails and phone interviews, border residents provided the following observations:
  • "Whenever Obama was in there, drug cartels were so bad that it didn't seem like anybody was fighting the drug cartels... the cartels ruled everything. They ran the dope, they trafficked the young girls, and there were so many more killings."
  • "Trump had more Customs and Border Patrol agents at the border. Cattle crossings from Mexico were checked, inspected and limited. The cartels have used cattle to move dope for years. Now they'll go back to moving cattle and laundering money back through the crossing here [Santa Teresa, NM] with less law enforcement. It will be a serious step backwards."
  • "What happens when the next 'caravan' from Honduras and Guatemala shows up? Does everyone gain immediate access to the country and get free healthcare, no questions asked? That's what they promised. They show crying women and children on the news, but that is a tiny percentage of the people in the 'caravans' -- they are almost all young men -- but the media lies about that and doesn't show the real story. God, help us!"
U.S. Customs Service Officer Patricia Cramer, president of the Arizona chapter of the National Treasury Employees Union, revealed in an interview that persons crossing into the United States from Mexico are not health-screened in any way. No temperature taken, no cursory visual exam, nothing. The "locked-down border" under President Trump is a lie. Now, imagine the health and safety conditions under a Biden administration. Remember: In "COVID-world," you cannot go to the gym, and you must "social distance" in absurd ways -- but the border is open, and no one is screened.



The (purportedly incoming) Biden administration is promoting a 4 to 6 week national lockdown. The country is in the midst of an "Alice in Wonderland" public health crisis -- and the Biden administration is promoting border security and immigration policies that are completely contradictory to what American citizens are enduring.

Is this what we all have to look forward to over the next four years?
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Report: Joe Biden Plans to Pick Cindy McCain as U.K. Ambassador

272
In this Jan. 13, 2020, file photo Cindy McCain, wife of former Arizona Sen. John McCain, waves to the crowd after being acknowledged by Arizona Republican Gov. Doug Ducey during his State of the State address on the opening day of the legislative session at the Capitol in Phoenix. Democratic …
AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin, File
KATHERINE RODRIGUEZ28 Nov 2020778

Former Vice President Joe Biden is reportedly planning to pick Cindy McCain, the wife of the late Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), to be the U.S. Ambassador to the U.K.
McCain, 66, a lifelong Republican and Anglophile, is credited with delivering the state of Arizona during the 2020 elections to the Democrats in the state where her husband served as Arizona’s senator from 1987 until his death from cancer in 2018, the Times of London reported.

“It’s hers if she wants it,” a Biden insider told the Times. “She delivered Arizona. They know that.”

Cindy McCain was one of the most outspoken Republicans against President Donald Trump during the election:
My husband John lived by a code: country first. We are Republicans, yes, but Americans foremost. There's only one candidate in this race who stands up for our values as a nation, and that is @JoeBiden.
— Cindy McCain (@cindymccain) September 22, 2020
“My husband John lived by a code: country first. We are Republicans, yes, but Americans foremost. There’s only one candidate in this race who stands up for our values as a nation, and that is @JoeBiden,” McCain tweeted in her endorsement in September.

She also created a video for the virtual Democratic National Convention in August, highlighting her late husband’s friendship with Biden while endorsing the Democrat nominee.

It is unclear if McCain, who currently serves on the board of trustees of the McCain Institute for International Leadership at Arizona State University, wants the job.

Tony Gardner, former President Barack Obama’s ambassador to the EU, is also in the running for the post.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Biden’s win means some Guantanamo prisoners may be released

This undated image provided by the counsel to Saifullah Paracha shows Paracha at the Guantanamo Bay detention center. Paracha the oldest prisoner at the Guantanamo Bay detention center went to his latest review board hearing with a degree of hope, an emotion that has been scarce during his 16 years …

AP28 Nov 2020528

President-elect Joe Biden has said little about the Guantanamo Bay detention center except that he supports closing it

Biden’s win means some Guantanamo prisoners may be releasedBy BEN FOXAssociated PressThe Associated PressWASHINGTON

WASHINGTON (AP) — The oldest prisoner at the Guantanamo Bay detention center went to his latest review board hearing with a degree of hope, something that has been scarce during his 16 years locked up without charges at the U.S. base in Cuba.

Saifullah Paracha, a 73-year-old Pakistani with diabetes and a heart condition, had two things going for him that he didn’t have at previous hearings: a favorable legal development and the election of Joe Biden.

President Donald Trump had effectively ended the Obama administration’s practice of reviewing the cases of men held at Guantanamo and releasing them if imprisonment was no longer deemed necessary. Now there’s hope that will resume under Biden.

“I am more hopeful now simply because we have an administration to look forward to that isn’t dead set on ignoring the existing review process,” Paracha’s attorney, Shelby Sullivan-Bennis, said by phone from the base on Nov. 19 after the hearing. “The simple existence of that on the horizon I think is hope for all of us.”

Guantanamo was once a source of global outrage and a symbol of U.S. excess in response to terrorism. But it largely faded from the headlines after President Barack Obama failed to close it, even as 40 men continue to be detained there.
Those pushing for its closure now see a window of opportunity, hoping Biden’s administration will find a way to prosecute those who can be prosecuted and release the rest, extricating the U.S. from a detention center that costs more than $445 million per year.

Biden’s precise intentions for Guantanamo remain unclear. Transition spokesman Ned Price said the president-elect supports closing it, but it would be inappropriate to discuss his plans in detail before he’s in office.

His reticence is actually welcome to those who have pressed to close Guantanamo. Obama’s early pledge to close it is now seen as a strategic mistake that undercut what had been a bipartisan issue.

“I think it’s more likely to close if it doesn’t become a huge press issue,” said Andrea Prasow, deputy Washington director at Human Rights Watch.

The detention center opened in 2002. President George W. Bush’s administration transformed what had been a sleepy Navy outpost on Cuba’s southeastern tip into a place to interrogate and imprison people suspected of links to al-Qaida and the Taliban after the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.

U.S. authorities maintain the men can be held as “law of war” detainees, remaining in custody for the duration of hostilities, an open-ended prospect.
At its peak in 2003 — the year Paracha was captured in Thailand because of suspected ties to al-Qaida — Guantanamo held about 700 prisoners from nearly 50 countries. Bush announced his intention to close it, though 242 were still held there when his presidency ended.

The Obama administration, seeking to allay concerns that some of those released had “returned to the fight,” set up a process to ensure those repatriated or resettled in third countries no longer posed a threat. It also planned to try some of the men in federal court.

But his closure effort was thwarted when Congress barred the transfer of prisoners from Guantanamo to the U.S., including for prosecution or medical care. Obama ended up releasing 197 prisoners, leaving 41 for Trump.
Trump in his 2016 campaign promised to “load” Guantanamo with “some bad dudes,” but largely ignored the issue after rescinding Obama’s policies. His administration approved a single release, a Saudi who pleaded guilty before a military commission.

Of those 40 remaining, seven men have cases pending before a military commission. They include five men accused of planning and supporting the Sept. 11 attacks. Additionally, there are two prisoners who were convicted by commission and three facing potential prosecution for the 2002 Bali bombing.
Commission proceedings, including death penalty cases related to the Sept. 11 attacks, have bogged down as the defense fights to exclude evidence that resulted from torture. Trials are likely far in the future and would inevitably be followed by years of appeals.

Defense attorneys say the incoming administration could authorize more military commission plea deals. Some have also suggested Guantanamo detainees could plead guilty in federal court by video and serve any remaining sentence in other countries, so they wouldn’t enter the United States.

Detainee advocates also say Biden could defy Congress and bring prisoners to the U.S., arguing that the ban wouldn’t stand up in court.

“It’s either do something about it or they die there without charge,” said Wells Dixon, a lawyer for two prisoners, including one who has pleaded guilty in the military commission and is awaiting sentencing.

The remaining detainees include five who had been cleared for release before Trump took office and have languished since. Advocates want the Biden administration to review the rest, noting that many, had they been convicted in federal court, would have served their sentences and been released at this point.
“Whittle it down to the folks who are being prosecuted and either prosecute them or don’t, but don’t just hang on to them,” said Joseph Margulies, a Cornell Law School professor who has represented one prisoner. “At great expense, we walk around with this thing around our necks. It does no good. It has no role for national security. It’s just a big black stain that provides no benefit whatsoever.”
Over the years, nine prisoners have died at Guantanamo: seven from apparent suicide, one from cancer and one from a heart attack.

Paracha’s attorney raised his health issues, which include a heart attack in 2006, at his review board, speaking by secure teleconference with U.S. security and defense agencies.

She also raised an important legal development. Paracha, who lived in the U.S. and owned property in New York City, was a wealthy businessman in Pakistan. Authorities say he was an al-Qaida “facilitator” who helped two of the Sept. 11 conspirators with a financial transaction. He says he didn’t know they were al-Qaida and denies any involvement in terrorism.

Uzair Paracha, his son, was convicted in 2005 in federal court in New York of providing support to terrorism, based in part on the same witnesses held at Guantanamo that the U.S. has relied on to justify holding his father. In March, after a judge threw out those witness accounts and the government decided not to seek a new trial, Uzair Paracha was released and sent back to Pakistan.

Had his father been convicted in the U.S., his fate might have been the same. Instead, it will likely be in Biden’s hands and, Sullivan-Bennis said, time is of the essence. “It could be a death sentence.”
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Congressman warns: Biden oil industry transition could soon halt new plants, hike energy costs

Biden’s plan “doesn't get the fact that cheap and abundant natural gas is good for families because they pay less in power and utility bills.” - Rep. Guy Reschenthaler (R-Pa.)

By Carrie Sheffield
Updated: November 27, 2020 - 10:46pm

A Biden administration’s push to “transition from the oil industry”--as Biden called for on the final presidential debate stage last month--could quickly soon halt new energy plants, hike energy costs for families and manufacturers, according to a Pennsylvania Congressman from a shale energy-rich region.

“When he was on that debate stage, and he said that he wanted to phase out fracking, as soon as you say you want to phase out fracking as soon as you say ‘we're going do away with it, 15 years 10 years what have you,’ then guess what stops going into the fracking industry? Investment, because you can't get a return on your investment if you're going to phase it out” Rep. Guy Reschenthaler (R-Pa.) told “Just the News AM” television program last Tuesday. “So cracker plants will not get built, you'll stop having drilling, because it takes a period of decades to extract the natural gas once you start to drill. So he simply does not get the industry and the mechanics.”

In a post titled “The (Long) Timeline for Building an Ethane Cracker Plant,” Marcellus Drilling News, which covers the shale industry in the Marcellus Shale Formation region of Pennsylvania, reported about the plans of Chevron Phillips for natural gas and ethane drilling in new plants that the company estimated will cost $5 billion to $6 billion to build. Those costs accumulate over a process of years that first takes years of exploration to ascertain whether a region is compatible with production.

“So if it takes another two years to make a decision on ‘go/no go,’ and then if a ‘go’ decision is made, another 10 years to build it—sure looks like it’s going to be a while before we see the economic benefits from such a plant,” Marcellus Drilling News reported.

Reschenthaler said that Biden’s plan also “doesn't get the fact that cheap and abundant natural gas is good for families because they pay less in power and utility bills.” Multiple studies have shown that poorer families pay a higher proportion of their income toward energy, so an energy price hike is more pronounced than among wealthier families.

Reschenthaler also argued that affordable fuel costs “leads the way for advanced manufacturing and it paves the way for our supply chains to come back to the United States from places like China … Joe Biden and the far left Democrats, simply do not understand this industry.”

President Trump has refused to concede the election to Joe Biden, though he did announce Monday that the General Services Administration would be releasing millions of dollars for the Biden transition team to begin the process of governance.

The Biden transition team did not respond to request for comment from Just the News.

"For the first time ever there will be a principal on the National Security Council who can make sure climate change is on the agenda in the Situation Room,” Biden said Tuesday while announcing John Kerry’s appointment as a climate envoy for the incoming Biden administration.

Some progressives were upset over Biden’s selection of Rep. Cedric Richmond (D-La.) to be his senior adviser because of Richmond’s donations from the fossil fuel industry,

“Joe Biden just tapped Cedric Richmond to serve as liaison between the business community and climate activists,” progressive activist Jordan Uhl last week. “He is one of the largest recipients of oil & gas money. Richmond's district has 7 of the 10 most air-polluted census tracts in America and he still won't address it!”

Reschenthaler told Just the News that even though that and other possible appointees have also been criticized for the business and hedge fund industry ties, he thinks “that Joe Biden is not going to be calling the shots. It's going to be the far left progressives that are now running the Democrat Party making the decisions.”
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Mnuchin plans to move $455B in coronavirus relief out of Biden's reach
Moving the money into the General Fund would make it harder for Biden administration to access it

By Megan HenneyFOXBusiness

Council of Economic Advisers Acting Chairman Tyler Goodspeed said while 'significant' issues remain, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi are 'getting closer' to making a coronavirus stimulus deal.

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin is expected to move $455 billion in unspent coronavirus stimulus money into a fund that the incoming Biden administration cannot deploy without congressional approval, Bloomberg reported.

The CARES Act funding will be placed in the agency's General Fund, a Treasury Department spokesperson told Bloomberg. If Mnuchin's successor — Biden is widely expected to pick former Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen to fill the role — wants to access that money, she will need to receive Congress' blessing.
The Treasury Department did not respond to a FOX Business request for comment.

Last week, Mnuchin said he would not extend several emergency loan programs set up with the Federal Reserve, prompting a rare criticism from the U.S. central bank. While the lending facilities have been little used so far, they were viewed as a vital backstop for the pandemic-ravaged economy.

The money is part of the $500 billion Treasury Department fund created at the end of March by the CARES Act. The Treasury Fund set aside $46 billion for loans and loan guarantees to the airline industry, and the remainder was designated to support Fed lending programs to businesses, states and municipalities.

Shifting the money to the General Fund leaves just under $80 billion available in the Treasury’s Exchange Stabilization Fund.

Democrats quickly condemned the move, with Bharat Ramamurti, a former adviser to Sen. Elizabeth Warren, who now serves as a member of the congressional commission charged with overseeing the funds, calling it "illegal."
"This is Treasury’s latest ham-handed effort to undermine the Biden administration," he tweeted Tuesday. "The good news is that it’s illegal and can be reversed next year. For its part, the Fed should not go along with this attempted sabotage and should retain the CARES Act funds it already has."

A Treasury spokesperson, however, rejected that analysis and said Mnuchin's decision was legal under the CARES Act, which provided the original funding.
Republicans on the Senate Banking Committee applauded Mnuchin, saying that he was following both the law and Congress' intent.

"These facilities were to be temporary, to provide liquidity, and to cease operations no later than the end of 2020,” GOP lawmakers said in an open letter led by Committee Chairman Sen. Mike Crapo and Sen. Pat Toomey. "With liquidity restored, we strongly support Treasury Secretary Mnuchin’s decision to close these facilities by year-end, as Congress intended and the law requires, and the Federal Reserve’s decision to return unused CARES Act funds to Treasury.”

The lawmakers said Congress could "revive" the facilities if needed. But for months, Congress has remained deadlocked over additional coronavirus relief measures, even as provisions in the CARES Act expired.
 

marsh

On TB every waking moment

Biden's Leading CIA Director Pick Backed Torture
Biden's Leading CIA Director Pick Backed Torture

Michael Morell (Getty Images)
By Sandy Fitzgerald | Saturday, 28 November 2020 03:05 PM


Former Acting CIA Director Michael Morell, one of the two leading candidates expected to be nominated by Joe Biden to head the agency, could face opposition from Democrats for being an outspoken defender of the CIA's interrogation program, including torture.

"Mike Morell wrote that torture was effective and moral," Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore, said on Twitter, reports The New York Times. "He’s wrong on both counts. He’s wrong on both counts. Before John Brennan decided to claim that Morell isn't a torture apologist, he should have read his book."

Wyden, a key Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee that will vote on any nominee's confirmation, has also warned Biden that Morell should not be nominated because his record as a "torture apologist" will make him a "nonstarter" for confirmation, reports CNN.

Morell has in the past called the CIA's "enhanced interrogation" of terrorists moral and effective, in claims that went further those of other officials, including current Director Gina Haspel and former Director John Brennan, who have been scrutinized over how the CIA handles detainees at black sites.

Several sources told CNN that the decision on the CIA director is still up in the air. Earlier this week, Biden did not name his nominee for the spot, even though he unveiled picks for several other key national security leadership positions.
Avril Haines, his choice for Director of National Intelligence, has also been criticized by progressives, who say she's complicit in the CIA's use of torture after the 9/11 attacks.
 

NoDandy

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Joe Biden: Return Of The CFR

Thu, 11/26/2020 - 22:05
Submitted by Swiss Policy Research,

A Joe Biden presidency means a “return to normality” simply because it means a return of the US Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).



In 2008, Barack Obama received the names of his entire future cabinet already one month prior to his election by CFR Senior Fellow (and Citigroup banker) Michael Froman, as a Wikileaks email later revealed. Consequently, the key posts in Obama’s cabinet were filled almost exclusively by CFR members, as was the case in most cabinets since World War II. To be sure, Obama’s 2008 Republican opponent, the late John McCain, was a CFR member, too. Michael Froman later negotiated the TPP and TTIP international trade agreements, before returning to the CFR as a Distinguished Fellow.

In 2017, CFR nightmare President Donald Trump immediately canceled these trade agreements – because he viewed them as detrimental to US domestic industry – which allowed China to conclude its own, recently announced RCEP free-trade area, encompassing 14 countries and a third of global trade. Trump also canceled other CFR achievements, like the multinational Iran nuclear deal and the UN climate and migration agreements, and he tried, but largely failed, to withdraw US troops from East Asia, Central Asia, the Middle East, Europe and Africa, thus seriously endangering the global US empire built over decades by the CFR and its 5000 elite members.

Unsurprisingly, most of the US media, whose owners and editors are themselves members of the CFR, didn’t like President Trump. This was also true for most of the European media, whose owners and editors are members of international CFR affiliates like the Bilderberg Group and the Trilateral Commission, founded by CFR directors after the conquest of Europe during World War II. Moreover, it was none other than the CFR which in 1996 advocated a closer cooperation between the CIA and the media, i.e. a restart of the famous CIA Operation Mockingbird. Historically, OSS and CIA directors since William Donovan and Allen Dulles have always been CFR members.

Joe Biden promised that he would form “the most diverse cabinet” in US history. This may be true in terms of skin color and gender, but almost all of his key future cabinet members have one thing in common: they are, indeed, members of the US Council on Foreign Relations.

This is the case for Anthony Blinken (State), Alejandro Mayorkas (Homeland Security), Janet Yellen (Treasury), Michele Flournoy and Jeh Johnson (candidates for Defense), Linda Thomas-Greenfield (Ambassador to the UN), Richard Stengel (US Agency for Global Media; Stengel famously called propaganda “a good thing” at a 2018 CFR session), John Kerry (Special Envoy for Climate), Nelson Cunningham (candidate for Trade), and Thomas Donilon (candidate for CIA Director).

Jake Sullivan, Biden’s National Security Advisor, is not (yet) a CFR member, but Sullivan has been a Senior Fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (a think tank “promoting active international engagement by the United States”) and a member of the US German Marshall Fund’s “Alliance For Securing Democracy” (a major promoter of the “Russiagate” disinformation campaign to restrain the Trump presidency), both of which are run by senior CFR members.

Most of Biden’s CFR-vetted nominees supported recent US wars against Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria and Yemen as well as the 2014 regime change in Ukraine. Unsurprisingly, neoconservative Max Boot, the CFR Senior Fellow in National Security Studies and one of the most vocal opponents of the Trump administration, has called Biden’s future cabinet “America’s A-Team”.

Thus, after four years of “populism” and “isolationism”, a Biden presidency will mean the return of the Council on Foreign Relations and the continuation of a tradition of more than 70 years. Indeed, the CFR was founded in 1921 in response to the “trauma of 1920”, when US President Warren Harding and the US Senate turned isolationist and renounced US global leadership after World War I. In 2016, Donald Trump’s “America First” campaign reactivated this 100 year old foreign policy trauma.

Was the 2020 presidential election “stolen”, as some allege? There are certainly indications of significant statistical anomalies in key Democrat-run swing states. Whether these were decisive for the election outcome may be up to courts to decide. At any rate, Joe Biden may well be the first US President known to be involved in international corruption before even entering office.

Why are most US and international media hardly interested in this? Well, why should they?


BINGO BINGO BINGO BINGO BINGO BINGO BINGO !!!!!!!

Very well presented !!!!

The CFR contols everything, and everybody on the stage !!!!

The CFR is the Deep State !!!

:ld: :gaah: :mad: :dstrs:
 

Catnip

Veteran Member
In the first days the Biden machine (Harris administration) will act to suppress free speech as never before seen. "Unqualified" sources will be prompltly eliminated including primarily internet based sources. We will all hear how the purge is for the benefit of the democracy, and that the deleted systems were spreading fake news, and intentional misinformation. This will not affect Google, Twitter, Facebook or Instagram.
This will affect US.

Get ready. Print what you need or buy hardcover references. Download to USB or SD media.
Because one morning you'll wake up, go to your favorite website and this is what you'll see:

View attachment 232537
AIN'T GONNA HAPPEN!
 
Top