WAR VIDEO – Gay Man Trapped in Kabul: ‘Taliban Will Enjoy Killing Us,’ ‘It’s Acceptable to Them’

The Snack Artist

The Snack Artist

Membership Revoked
I guess the rainbow fag, I mean flag flying over the embassy wasn't enough to win the hearts and minds of the taliban? That was, an "In your face move" by the President Stupid administration if I ever saw one.

Now the lmnopq people are surprised that President Stupid is not going to help them any more than anyone else? You ain't special sweetheart just because you smoke your date. Now, you will pay with your life. It's not right but it is what it is. Why in the heck didn't these folks bug out while they could?

www.breitbart.com

VIDEO - Gay Man Trapped in Kabul: 'Taliban Will Enjoy Killing Us'

A gay man in Afghanistan said the Taliban "are hunting us" and described what life under its rule would be like for those in his community.
www.breitbart.com www.breitbart.com

VIDEO – Gay Man Trapped in Kabul: ‘Taliban Will Enjoy Killing Us,’ ‘It’s Acceptable to Them’
194

AMY FURR27 Aug 2021647
3:03
A gay man in Kabul, Afghanistan, said the Taliban “are hunting us” and described what life under the terrorist group’s rule is like for those in the LGBTQ community.
During an interview with the Daily Mail, the individual, whose identity was not revealed for his protection, explained members of the Taliban would take pleasure in hunting down and killing LGBTQ people, the outlet reported Friday.
‘They kill us very brutally. Not like the others who they kill with a gun or a bullet. They will use fire, or they will behead or stone us, and they will enjoy it – it’s acceptable to them,” the man said.
He added his best friend committed suicide due to the fact “no one was here to listen to his voice.”
“I tried to encourage him, to give him hope, but he’s not coming back and I can’t forget that moment. He was living like a shadow, and he went like a shadow,” he continued.
In this Monday, Oct. 16, 2016 photo, Rameen, a young gay Afghan, poses with his back to the camera in Kabul, Afghanistan. To be homosexual in Afghanistan is to live in fear. Rameen and Naveed, another young gay man, have lost count of the number of times they've been lured into dangerous situations by men they believed they were meeting for dates. Both men describe being robbed, beaten up and blackmailed, and receiving death threats; they’ve even survived police “honey traps” that could have seen them thrown in prison without charge, simply on suspicion of being gay. (AP Photos/Massoud Hossaini)
In this Monday, October 16, 2016 photo, Rameen, a young gay Afghan, poses with his back to the camera in Kabul, Afghanistan. To be homosexual in Afghanistan is to live in fear. Rameen and Naveed, another young gay man, have lost count of the number of times they’ve been lured into dangerous situations by men they believed they were meeting for dates. Both men describe being robbed, beaten up and blackmailed, and receiving death threats; they’ve even survived police “honey traps” that could have seen them thrown in prison without charge, simply on suspicion of being gay. (AP Photos/Massoud Hossaini)
The return of the radical Islamist Taliban, which has historically persecuted LGBT people, called into question President Joe Biden’s commitment to that particular community, something his administration has often touted, Breitbart News reported August 16:
Biden signed a memorandum in February, shortly after his inauguration, “directing all U.S. government departments and agencies engaged abroad to ensure that U.S. diplomacy and foreign assistance promote and protect the human rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and intersex (LGBTQI+) persons around the world,” according to the State Department.
Click to expand...
“Under  President  Biden’s leadership,  the United States  will work with like-minded governments  and strengthen civil society advocacy to fully support and advance the human rights of LGBTQI+ persons,” Secretary of State Antony Blinken promised at the time. “Our international partners  can be assured  that advancing human rights for all individuals, with no exception or caveat, is a U.S. foreign policy priority.”
Click to expand...
The administration claimed to defend LGBT Afghans in June, and the State Department ordered a rainbow flag accompany the American flag outside the U.S. embassy in Kabul to mark Pride month.


Despite the assurances to American citizens the Biden administration would prioritize LGBT rights, Blinken failed to mention the issue during a visit to Kabul in April.
“The Taliban regularly executed LGBT people during its first term ruling Afghanistan before 2001. Among the more gruesome methods the Taliban used to kill accused homosexuals was crushing them by destroying a brick wall over them,” the Breitbart News report said.
Meanwhile, the number of elected Republicans demanding Biden’s resignation grew to 26 after two suicide explosions killed 13 U.S. service members and approximately 95 Afghans in Kabul on Thursday.
 
H

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
MinnesotaSmith said:
You'd think the queers would figure out that engaging in gay sex in an Islamic nation just isn't worth the risks. That is, that they'd just follow the local law and, like, not do it, but I guess they're largely really stupid b&stards.
Click to expand...

They were lulled into a false sense of security and will now likely pay the price along with everyone else whom the Taliban want to "purify".....
 
The Snack Artist

The Snack Artist

Membership Revoked
Fly that freak flag high. Show the tali where you are and take it like a man! I chuckle at the fact these inbred tali pos's screw little boys and use them as playthings while imprisoning their women until they can bear children. They honestly say it's all a woman is good for.

Meanwhile Ox, sheep, goats, dogs, chickens, mules, ALL are fair game to them. I've seen the night vision videos of these guys in the field. Yep, they're doing it alright. Me so horny! Gives new meaning to the word "Goatee."
 
db cooper

db cooper

Resident Secret Squirrel
I personally do not agree with the fagot lifestyle. However I can see no reason to murder these people. The left exploits them, hoists their flag up high, makes the effort to have all of them appear as normal. However being hypocrites and liars are primary traits of a leftist, and now they are leaving these people high and dry, ready for the slaughter.

Same with Afghan women, given the freedoms of whatever clothes they want to wear, to have a job, to have the same equality a man has in the western world, all down the tubes with leftist hypocrisy.

Yet neither the fagots or leftist women of this country get it, they will still support our fake election and fake regime until some power knocks them out, such as the ChiComs, and puts fagots and leftist women in their place, which will likely be a grave, only not as torturesome. It's communist history to murder non-conformists, and these people are non-conformists.
 
MinnesotaSmith

MinnesotaSmith

Membership Revoked
helen said:
I don't personally care who you bed down with as long as it's consenting adult(s).

These people are going to be tortured to death and suicide is about the only sane way out. This is horrible.
Click to expand...
Asked earlier: why don't they just stop doing fag stuff? It would seems an obvious decision under the circumstances.
 
db cooper

db cooper

Resident Secret Squirrel
Millwright said:
So why aren't the faggots snagging some weapons and taking some haji-bobs with them?
Click to expand...
I'm far from being a psychobabalsit, but near as I can see it, these people are actually suffering from a mental disorder, and prior to the cultural revolution of the 60's, homo's were actually classified as having such a disease by the medical profession and treated for it. They were classified unnatural until political correctness came along.

To fight for one's life is not just a manly thing to do, but a natural instinct whether you are a boy or girl. Yes, they should be killing some haji-bobs as that's the natural thing to do. I think they have been coddled by the left to the point to where they are nothing but a bunch of effeminates with a victim hood mentality that think someone should rescue them. The last thing they would do (literally) is some manly thing like fight for their lives.

The Taliban obviously hates fagots, for the US embassy to have the fag flag flying must have been an absolute pure insult to the Taliban. While this flag gave the homos a false sense of security, it increased the Taliban's hatred for them. With the US gone, I can see them hunted with extra vigor and glee by the Taliban.
 
Melodi

Melodi

Disaster Cat
MinnesotaSmith said:
Asked earlier: why don't they just stop doing fag stuff? It would seems an obvious decision under the circumstances.
Click to expand...
If you suddenly found yourself under a government that said you could never think about touching or loving a woman again, but that only men were proper for sexual and romantic relationships in pain of death.

Would you feel that just not ever having love or a relationship again (or even the hope of it) was just something you would be willing to just "stop doing heterosexual stuff?"

I almost didn't click on this tread, what the man is saying is terrifyingly true and my hope is that at least some of my uber-liberal friends in the Gay Community will realize that Biden, his handlers and the Democratic National Committee that helped bring them to power don't really care a fig about them (or anyone else's rights) - they just want their money and donations.

Meanwhile, a bloodbath is likely in Afghanistan, and it won't just be gay men thrown off of buildings - though that will probably make the news because the Taliban will want to send a message.

There are reports they are already slaughtering Christians by slitting their throats, unconfirmed yet, but I suspect the reports are accurate.
 
jward

jward

passin' thru
As has been discussed on other short sighted and non serious discussions on similar issues,
people will do any number of things to protect them selves, but submit to almost unlimited
indignity, up to and including death, when they know that to do otherwise brings the
punishment down not only upon themselves, but their families, friends, possibly even towns.

As to why they don't just stop, granted there are many trisexuals- who'll try anything or anyone,
as whim dictates, but most humans find sexual expression hardwired, and we've found lil, to no,
success in overriding those needs, regardless of the moral, legal, physical, emotional or (perceived)
spiritual consequences we've presumed attached to said expression in any given time or place.

As to how some are so blind as to support factions that will mete out such hardship to them at the
first opportunities. . . :: shrug :: We've known the ills of communism for generations, yet here they
sit at the helm of all our institutions eh?
 
MinnesotaSmith

MinnesotaSmith

Membership Revoked
Melodi, you asked my perspective on not being able to have sex, ever again. With U.S. women's now-unlimited hypergamy (where in college and on Tinder >80% of the women are only interested in <20% of the men), marriages for men mostly either temporary or soon deadbedding (exploitative of men either way), do you not realize that that having little or no sex is now how most U.S. men live most of their adult lives? I personally have ALREADY had recent multiple very lean years that way, endured for my childrens' sake. Throw in likely getting killed for pursuing some ONSs, and my motivation to live monk would become complete.
 
Last edited:
S

summerthyme

Administrator
_______________
MinnesotaSmith said:
Melodi, you asked my perspective on not being able to have sex, ever again. With U.S. women's now-unlimited hypergamy (where in college 80% of the women are only interested in 20% of the men), marriages for men mostly either temporary or soon deadbedding (exploitative of men either way), do you not realize that that little or no sex is now how most U.S. men live most of their lives? I personally have ALREADY had recent multiple very lean years that way, endured for my childrens' sake. Throw in likely getting killed for pursuing some ONSs, and my motivation to live monk would become complete.
Click to expand...
And you are how old?

Think about what it was like 30 years ago... little different story?!

Although I actually agree with you... if it comes down to sex or survival, in *normal* humans (because we can actually do things like risk-reward analysis), survival will win. Animals... not so much. I've driven around a curve at dusk before and found a nice, 6 point whitetail deer buck breeding a doe in the middle of the road. Paid NO attention to me or my truck!

The reference to them being beaten by men they were meeting for "dates" tells me that were not talking about committed pairs who just want to be left alone yo live quiet, inoffensive lives. They apparently want the whole decadent, promiscuous gay lifestyle... and that is NOT going to happen in a Muslim run country.

Summerthyme
 
Melodi

Melodi

Disaster Cat
No, they will never have a promiscuous gay lifestyle in that country (and I do agree people got used to freedom, not just gay men but many women aged 20 and younger have never known a world like they are about to experience unless they lived way in the countryside), but to have a relationship you have to find someone to have it with.

Gay men, like most of us, tend to be wild (for a given degree of wild) in our youth and then settle down as we get older. Most of my close friends have been paired off for decades with one person or in an extended household.

But my point was not that if people could go to the local pick-up place (straight men will have a harder time doing that under the Taliban though they might be able to buy a slave for the same purpose) but that people will do almost anything for love.

And in my experience after decades of studying this stuff, it is obvious that sexuality in human beings is complicated and seems to be a combination of hard-wired at birth, experiences growing up, and personal choices.

Hence, any adult can choose a life of celibacy, but that doesn't change their natural and often unconscious attractions. Gay and Straight people have been tested while in Scanners and shown sexy pictures of both sexes. Really straight men only reacted to women and the very gay men only reacted to men, a lot of people (even if they didn't know it) reacted to both.

Societies like the Greeks knew this, there's a great comment Nightwolf mentioned the other day about someone in Athens talking about how "weird" some of the big names in the Agora were when it came to sex. It was something like Plato is weird because he only goes for men, and another one (Aristotle maybe?) only had an interest in women.

By saying this I am not saying we all have to go out and be "bisexual" again people can choose to avoid or even engage in certain behaviors, but I'm saying our basic WIRING tends to come with us at birth.

How that is expressed can depend on our society - if we grow up expecting to be a good Spartan and have a wife and a boyfriend, most people will; if the goal is heterosexual monogamy most people will try to comply (or why so many gay men of my generation have children from early marriages).
 
MinnesotaSmith

MinnesotaSmith

Membership Revoked
ST, most gays observably want a decadent lifestyle. U.S. gays in LT relationships still average about 12 sex partners per year outside it. The "quiet, committed pairs" are largely either entirely absent or masquerades.

Re me personally, I've never used tobacco, drink 3 qts of green tea & eat 0.5 lbs. blueberries a day, and I currently go for 4+ mile walks 5x a week, so my cardiovascular system (that supports such ancillary systems) still works just fine at age 60, TYVM. From my late 30s on, I was more worried about family creation and development more so than just ashes hauling, not that that ever left the radar before deep in my mistaken 2nd (& last) marriage choice.

Men in shorter-term schooling plans (no 7-year Master's pursuit) would logically much shorten horizons, and the bulk clearly do.
 
Last edited:
D

Dozdoats

On TB every waking moment
Melodi said:
a bloodbath is likely in Afghanistan, and it won't just be gay men thrown off of buildings - though that will probably make the news because the Taliban will want to send a message.
Click to expand...

It will be because the MSM embraces the message, if one gets sent. Dissenting opinions/truth will be censored.
 
F

Faroe

Un-spun
"In this Monday, October 16, 2016 photo, Rameen, a young gay Afghan, poses with his back to the camera in Kabul, Afghanistan. To be homosexual in Afghanistan is to live in fear. Rameen and Naveed, another young gay man, have lost count of the number of times they’ve been lured into dangerous situations by men they believed they were meeting for dates. Both men describe being robbed, beaten up and blackmailed, and receiving death threats; they’ve even survived police “honey traps” that could have seen them thrown in prison without charge, simply on suspicion of being gay."

Sucks, but WHY is this supposed to still be our problem?
 
artichoke

artichoke

Greetings from near tropical NYC!
Melodi said:
No, they will never have a promiscuous gay lifestyle in that country (and I do agree people got used to freedom, not just gay men but many women aged 20 and younger have never known a world like they are about to experience unless they lived way in the countryside), but to have a relationship you have to find someone to have it with.

Gay men, like most of us, tend to be wild (for a given degree of wild) in our youth and then settle down as we get older. Most of my close friends have been paired off for decades with one person or in an extended household.

But my point was not that if people could go to the local pick-up place (straight men will have a harder time doing that under the Taliban though they might be able to buy a slave for the same purpose) but that people will do almost anything for love.

And in my experience after decades of studying this stuff, it is obvious that sexuality in human beings is complicated and seems to be a combination of hard-wired at birth, experiences growing up, and personal choices.

Hence, any adult can choose a life of celibacy, but that doesn't change their natural and often unconscious attractions. Gay and Straight people have been tested while in Scanners and shown sexy pictures of both sexes. Really straight men only reacted to women and the very gay men only reacted to men, a lot of people (even if they didn't know it) reacted to both.

Societies like the Greeks knew this, there's a great comment Nightwolf mentioned the other day about someone in Athens talking about how "weird" some of the big names in the Agora were when it came to sex. It was something like Plato is weird because he only goes for men, and another one (Aristotle maybe?) only had an interest in women.

By saying this I am not saying we all have to go out and be "bisexual" again people can choose to avoid or even engage in certain behaviors, but I'm saying our basic WIRING tends to come with us at birth.

How that is expressed can depend on our society - if we grow up expecting to be a good Spartan and have a wife and a boyfriend, most people will; if the goal is heterosexual monogamy most people will try to comply (or why so many gay men of my generation have children from early marriages).
Click to expand...
While some are totally hetero and some are totally homo, I would guess the former are far more numerous than the latter. Those who "bred" ineffectively will not have passed their genes forward to this generation, so essentially one just gets one generation's mutations into same-sex orientation, in each generation.

And those who are somewhere in the middle might not have such a hard time unlearning old habits and loves and learning new ones. Anyway, it's not our job to regulate societies all over the globe. There are some international standards and the Taliban have expressed interest in respecting those for the sake of good international relations. Perhaps those expressions were sincere.
 
artichoke

artichoke

Greetings from near tropical NYC!
Meemur said:
Because a number of them just aren't very bright and have few useful life skills. Some are also pedophiles, and their deaths will be no great loss.
Click to expand...
I did see some complaints in a foreign newspaper by Afghans complaining that their prospects are ruined in the new government. Lots of government workers and "journalists". Their meal-ticket just ended. I didn't notice any engineers or tradespeople saying they wouldn't have work.
 
db cooper

db cooper

Resident Secret Squirrel
artichoke said:
I did see some complaints in a foreign newspaper by Afghans complaining that their prospects are ruined in the new government. Lots of government workers and "journalists". Their meal-ticket just ended. I didn't notice any engineers or tradespeople saying they wouldn't have work.
Click to expand...
Bu, bu, but, they neeed government workers and journalists for a health government, geeez! (stated with deepest sarcasm)

Just think what our country would be like if government workers were weeded out leaving only essential employees loyal to the Constitution and all leftist journalists fired. Both groups would be reduced to a mere fraction of what they are and all the hell raising and culture bashing in this country would end. Unfortunately they will be serving ice water in Hell before that happens.
 
C

Coulter

Veteran Member
Maybe they enjoyed flaunting their lifestyle right in front of the Taliban - knowing that big brother Uncle Sam had their back.

Now they are going to pay for that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top