ENER Uranium Seawater Extraction Makes Nuclear Power Completely Renewable

Housecarl

On TB every waking moment
Hummm.....

For links see article source.....
Posted for fair use.....
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesco...lear-power-completely-renewable/#70db979b46e2

Jul 1, 2016 @ 06:00 AM 41,040 views The Little Black Book of Billionaire Secrets

Uranium Seawater Extraction Makes Nuclear Power Completely Renewable

James Conca, Contributor
I write about nuclear, energy and the environment

America, Japan and China are racing to be the first nation to make nuclear energy completely renewable. The hurdle is making it economic to extract uranium from seawater, because the amount of uranium in seawater is truly inexhaustible.

And it seems America is in the lead. New technological breakthroughs from DOE’s Pacific Northwest (PNNL) and Oak Ridge (ORNL) national laboratories have made removing uranium from seawater within economic reach and the only question is – when will the source of uranium for our nuclear power plants change from mined ore to seawater extraction?

Nuclear fuel made with uranium extracted from seawater makes nuclear power completely renewable. It’s not just that the 4 billion tons of uranium in seawater now would fuel a thousand 1,000-MW nuclear power plants for a 100,000 years. It’s that uranium extracted from seawater is replenished continuously, so nuclear becomes as endless as solar, hydro and wind.

Specifically, this latest technology builds on work by researchers in Japan and uses polyethylene fibers coated with amidoxime to pull in and bind uranium dioxide from seawater (see figure above). In seawater, amidoxime attracts and binds uranium dioxide to the surface of the fiber braids, which can be on the order of 15 centimeters in diameter and run multiple meters in length depending on where they are deployed (see figure below).

After a month or so in seawater, the lengths are remotely released to the surface and collected. An acid treatment recovers the uranium in the form of a uranyl complex, regenerating the fibers that can be reused many times. The concentrated uranyl complex then can be enriched to become nuclear fuel.

This procedure, along with the global effort, was described in a special report in Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. The scientists from PNNL and ORNL led more than half of the 30 papers in the special issue, involving synthesizing and characterizing uranium adsorbents and marine testing of these adsorbents at facilities like PNNL’s Marine Sciences Laboratory in Sequim, Washington.

Gary Gill, deputy director of PNNL’s Coastal Sciences Division who coordinated the marine testing, noted, “Understanding how the adsorbents perform under natural seawater conditions is critical to reliably assessing how well the uranium adsorbent materials work.” In addition to marine testing, PNNL assessed how well the adsorbent attracted uranium versus other elements, how durable the adsorbent was, how buildup of marine organisms might impact performance, and which adsorbent materials are not toxic.

This marine testing shows that these new fibers had the capacity to hold 6 grams of uranium per kilogram of adsorbent in only about 50 days in natural seawater. A nice video of U extraction from seawater can be seen on the University of Tennessee Knoxville website.

And later this month, July 19 to 22, global experts in uranium extraction from seawater will convene at the University of Maryland-College Park for the First International Conference on Seawater Uranium Recovery.

Stephen Kung, in DOE’s Office of Nuclear Energy, says that “Finding alternatives to uranium ore mining is a necessary step in planning for the future of nuclear energy.” And these advances by PNNL and ORNL have reduced the cost by a factor of four in just five years. But it’s still over $200/lb of U3O8, twice as much as it needs to be to replace mining uranium ore.

Fortunately, the cost of uranium is a small percentage of the cost of nuclear fuel, which is itself a small percentage of the cost of nuclear power. Over the last twenty years, uranium spot prices have varied between $10 and $120/lb of U3O8, mainly from changes in the availability of weapons-grade uranium to blend down to make reactor fuel.

So as the cost of extracting U from seawater falls to below $100/lb, it will become a commercially viable alternative to mining new uranium ore. But even at $200/lb of U3O8, it doesn’t add more than a small fraction of a cent per kWh to the cost of nuclear power.

However, the big deal about extracting uranium from seawater is that it makes nuclear power completely renewable.

Uranium is dissolved in seawater at very low concentrations, only about 3 parts per billion (3 micrograms/liter or 0.00000045 ounces per gallon). But there is a lot of ocean water – 300 million cubic miles or about 350 million trillion gallons (350 quintillion gallons). So there’s about 4 billion tons of uranium in the ocean at any one time.

However, seawater concentrations of uranium are controlled by steady-state, or pseudo-equilibrium, chemical reactions between waters and rocks on the Earth, both in the ocean and on land. And those rocks contain 100 trillion tons of uranium. So whenever uranium is extracted from seawater, more is leached from rocks to replace it, to the same concentration. It is impossible for humans to extract enough uranium over the next billion years to lower the overall seawater concentrations of uranium, even if nuclear provided 100% of our energy and our species lasted a billion years.

In other words, uranium in seawater is actually completely renewable. As renewable as solar energy. Yes, uranium in the crust is, strictly speaking, finite. But so is the Sun, which will eventually burn out. But that won’t begin to happen for another 5 billion years. Even the wind on Earth will stop at about that time as our atmosphere boils off during the Sun’s initial death throes as a Red Giant.

According to Professor Jason Donev from the University of Calgary, “Renewable literally means ‘to make new again’. Any resource that naturally replenishes with time, like the creation of wind or the growth of biological organisms for biomass or biofuels, is certainly renewable. Renewable energy means that the energy humans extract from nature will generally replace itself. And now uranium as fuel meets this definition.”

So by any definition, solar, wind, hydro and nuclear are all renewable. It’s about time society recognized this and added nuclear to the renewable portfolio.

Dr. James Conca is a geochemist, an RDD expert, a planetary geologist and professional speaker. Follow him on Twitter @jimconca and see his book at Amazon.com
 

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
Now what about the waste (depleted) uranium?

Mebbe the best solution to pollution is dilution? So you can put it back where it was headed originally?

I mean there is a finite quantity of Uranium that Maker created in the earth. The article says as much. And it is ALL in a race with itself to become lead.

Given enough time.

Your only trick is to stay out of the way while it happens.

Dobbin
 

NoDandy

Has No Life - Lives on TB
I hear that there's a ton of gold in every cubic mile of sea water. Make energy and create wealth as well.
 

BadMedicine

Would *I* Lie???
I hear that there's a ton of gold in every cubic mile of sea water. Make energy and create wealth as well.

how the hell hard can it be to extract any HEAVY METAL that is found in high enough amounts in sea water? Is it in SUCK SMALL PARTICULATES that is evaporates with the air at even the lowest temps, then it should be everywhere around oceans building up on land as well..


and I guess I could look it up but, race to become lead? So maybe there's a way to make our spent fuel in to harmless non-raioactive lead?


I always understood nuclear to be "endless" figuratively, a small generator could power all your home and car needs for ever. It's the waste product, pollution risk, and weaponization risk that makes it too dangerous to be widespread.. or so "They" say...

Wind, tidal/river and solar are truly endless and can be harnessed to the grid. The major thing now is all the different grids. If ALL the rath tied in to the same grids we could have lightnight rods on all the highest hills That "called" lightning bolts to them when storms were in the area. If we had these ll ove the country, there would CONSTANTLY be thunderstorms SOMEWHERE and we would have those lightning rods "CALLING" endless power on the the grid disbursed world wide.

Call *BAM* Call *BAM* call *BAM* T-t-t-t-t-t-t-t-t-t--t-t-t- It'd almost be endless bolts, going on to the grid and being use SIMULTANEOUSLY grid wide.

Yeah, I invented this system in my head. Would work in Alaska canada great. All you need it lightning rods, and transformers, and a big enough netwok to have lightning ALWAYS at anytime.
 

Meadowlark

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Ok, calm down and have some dip with your wheaty crackers. How is this exactly supposed to work?
 

Possible Impact

TB Fanatic
Adventures of Superman: Peril By Sea (Season 4: Ep. 4) (1956)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0506584/

"Daily Planet" editor Perry White (John Hamilton) decides to flex his scientific muscles
and develops "Formula U183", which will enable him to extract uranium from sea water.


Villainous submarine commander Ace Miller (Claude Akins) decides to steal the formula
and eliminate not only White but also the entire "Planet" staff
--namely, Clark Kent (George Reeves), Lois Lane (Noel Neill) and Jimmy Olsen (Jack Larson).

As Miller prepares to torpedo White's seaside laboratory, the editor's only hope for survival
rests with Superman (who of course is also Clark Kent, but Perry doesn't know that!)
 

Possible Impact

TB Fanatic
THE MAN WHO PLOUGHED THE SEA (1957)
by Arthur C. Clarke
http://arthur-clarke-fansite.blogspot.com/2007/05/man-who-ploughed-sea-mine-metals-from.html

This is the story of a machine that can extract any specified metal from the waters of the seas
without consuming awful amounts of energy & in large quantities.
The machine is fitted at the bottom of ordinary sea going vessels.
So one run across Atlantic can collect a lot of metal for owners of sea liners, e.g.
Or a mining company could set the ships moving through the seas,
& they can return to the docks when full.

Molecular Sieve
A device that can extract any element from seawater.
http://www.technovelgy.com/ct/content.asp?Bnum=806

I put some of my young men to work and they have made what we call a 'molecular sieve.'
... It depends on very advanced wave-mechanical theories for its operation,
but what it actually does is absurdly simple. We can choose any component of sea water we like,
and get the sieve to take it out. With several units, working in series,
we can take out one element after another. The efficiency's quite high, and the power consumption negligible.

From Tales from the White Hart, by Arthur C. Clarke.
Published by Ballantine Books in 1957



THE MAN WHO PLOUGHED THE SEA
(goto page 52)
https://archive.org/stream/AnthonyP...C Clarke - Tales From The White Hart_djvu.txt
 

Ractivist

Pride comes before the fall.....Pride month ended.
That's awesome. We should patent it, now, before it's too late.
 

Publius

TB Fanatic
I fail to see how its renewable. Maybe we should ask if it posable to clean up the ocean around japan's nuke site thats leaking big time into the ocean and can it be recycled, I don't think so.
 

Possible Impact

TB Fanatic
I fail to see how its renewable. Maybe we should ask if it posable to clean up the ocean around japan's nuke site thats leaking big time into the ocean and can it be recycled, I don't think so.

From OP:

Uranium is dissolved in seawater at very low concentrations,
only about 3 parts per billion (3 micrograms/liter or 0.00000045 ounces per gallon).
But there is a lot of ocean water – 300 million cubic miles
or about 350 million trillion gallons (350 quintillion gallons).
So there’s about 4 billion tons of uranium in the ocean at any one time.

However, seawater concentrations of uranium are controlled by steady-state,
or pseudo-equilibrium, chemical reactions between waters and rocks on the Earth,
both in the ocean and on land. And those rocks contain 100 trillion tons of uranium.

So whenever uranium is extracted from seawater, more is leached from rocks to replace it,
to the same concentration.
It is impossible for humans to extract enough uranium
over the next billion years to lower the overall seawater concentrations of uranium,
even if nuclear provided 100% of our energy and our species lasted a billion years.
 

hiwall

Has No Life - Lives on TB
Is this something like the nuclear fusion reactors that have been promised for the last 30 or 40 years?
Or like the solar panels that are so cheap and durable that they will be used as building siding and roofing that has been promised for the last 30 or 40 years?
Or like the wind turbines that were the wave of the future?
The tidal turbines that used the power of the tides?
 

Dobbin

Faithful Steed
I think the issue of ANY power source is that it competes with OTHER power sources.

True there is Uranium dissolved in seawater - and it is possible to recover it and use it - but at what financial cost?

And can that cost compete with ALL the other power sources in the world, both renewable and non-renewable?

For all effective human purposes nuclear power in its present mining, processing, using, storing the waste long term is inexhaustible. But not so favorable financially as it is being undercut price wise by fracked non-renewable finite supply oil and gas.

Increased regulations of fracking (promised in 2015 by the Obama EPA) will change that marketplace balance. As will an accident in a Nuclear power plant - and the increased regulations springing therefrom.

This competition between power sources has been going on since humans invented fire (NO FIRE IN THE BARN - EVER.)

What is sad is that it is government regulations which are driving the energy marketplace - NOT the true cost of production, transfer of energy, capitalization, protection, remediation. Thus some power sources can be given an "edge" depending on government decree - and others given a social "thumbs down." "For the environment", or safety, or conservation, or - name your regulatory excuse. And of course politics and influence, not the human condition or lack thereof, or the marketplace, drive this thumb up-thumb down.

Wouldn't it be nice if there was some "independent" means of getting your power - one that the government can't or won't touch?

Renewables DO come close to this. Solar particularly (hydro & wind both suffer from land use/environmental governmental lawmaking.)

I think it was Richard Perez of Homepower:tm: who commented that should the efficiency of solar photovoltaic panels be doubled (from then about 7 percent) one would see coal and nuclear fueled plants closing and "solar power farms" spring up to replace them.

This is in fact happening now with SEVERAL solar power projects already built here in the Northeast. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/11/15/largest-solar-power-plant_n_783502.html There is one not far off from here down in Salisbury, MA. http://www.kearsargeenergy.com/true-north-solar/

And these only the "large scale" photovoltaic projects. Many are doing the solar panels on the roof and "net metering" scheme of Solar City and others. Richard Perez was prescient. But his prediction to "individualize" and "democratize" has been around since before the Model T. He just applied the observation.

These (individualize & democratize) are just human nature, I guess. Nobody has your own interest - like yourself.

And meanwhile nuclear power as a sum total of all power produced is dropping. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_power_phase-out

Every dog and every power source has its day, at least in a free market. No entrenched and self-serving government protected venture capitalists here? Solyndra notwithstanding.

As does every horse.

Dobbin
 
Top