EDUC UC Santa Cruz fires 54 graduate student workers wanting pay covering more than their housing

MinnesotaSmith

Membership Revoked
A good example of "Higher ed doesn't work, California doesn't work, and higher ed + California REALLY doesn't work" Department.


UC Santa Cruz fires 54 graduate student workers striking for higher pay

UC President Janet Napolitano

UC President Janet Napolitano discusses UC Santa Cruz at a 2017 event.

By SUHAUNA HUSSAINSTAFF
FEB. 28, 2020

UC Santa Cruz fired 54 graduate student workers who were on strike demanding higher pay to afford the area’s high cost of living.

As part of a “wildcat strike,” about 200 teaching assistants decided in December to withhold fall quarter grades after months of back and forth with campus administrators. They demanded an increase in pay of $1,412 a month. The strike is not backed by the union that represents the university’s graduate student employees.
Tension between student workers, the campus and University of California administrators heightened dramatically in recent weeks as talks floundered. Students escalated the grade strike in early February to a full work stoppage, declining to teach, hold office hours, conduct research or post grades. Seventeen students were arrested at a campus protest Feb. 12, and UC Santa Cruz and the UC president published a series of letters online over the last month warning student workers they would be disciplined if they failed to submit grades.
On Monday, UC Santa Cruz told teaching assistants it would check for the withheld grades later in the week. The campus sent letters of intent to dismiss Friday around noon to 54 students. An estimated 30 other students who had yet to secure spring teaching jobs were told they would not be eligible for the positions, student activists said.

Housing is expensive in Santa Cruz, and student workers have a difficult time living on the typical stipend of $2,400 a month before taxes, said Veronica Hamilton, vice president of UC Santa Cruz’s graduate student association and chair of the campus’ unit of UAW Local 2865, the union for more than 19,000 student workers at the UC system.

The cost-of-living-adjustment movement has spread to other UC campuses.

UC Santa Barbara graduate students voted Monday for a full strike, and UC Davis students decided Thursday to withhold student grades for the winter quarter until the university raises their housing supplement. Students from across the 10-campus UC system have held rallies in support of student workers at UC Santa Cruz.
UC Santa Cruz spokesman Scott Hernandez-Jason said in a statement that 96% of grades were submitted and the “vast majority” of graduate students have returned to work, but 54 students continued to “disrupt campus by withholding grades for undergraduate students in a way that unfairly impairs their education.”


Among those fired Friday was Brenda Arjona, a third-year doctoral student in anthropology who has a 10-year-old son and lives in student family housing. She’s still trying to figure out what being fired will mean for her status as a student. [On her Facebook or Twitter or something she's proudly unmarried, with no kid's dad around.]

As a teaching assistant, she doesn’t pay tuition, and Arjona said there’s no way she can pay thousands of dollars of tuition out of pocket, so she may have to withdraw or take a leave of absence from the school.
“I’m struggling for basic needs such as toilet paper, buying my son milk,” said Arjona, who pays about $1,700 a month in rent out of the $2,200 she receives after taxes. “If there’s an emergency, I have truly nothing to fall back on.”

She had known losing her job was a possibility but wanted to keep pushing on with the strike. “I should not have to live this way,” Arjona said.
Hernandez-Jason said UC Santa Cruz’s administration has worked to hear and address teaching assistants’ concerns.

“UCSC leadership is well aware of the housing crisis in Santa Cruz and has made numerous good faith efforts to offer solutions and assist our TAs,” Hernandez-Jason said in an email.

Those efforts include an annual $2,500 housing supplement until more campus housing becomes available for graduate students and two temporary housing assistance programs for graduate students. The campus’ chancellor also announced a joint working group to develop “appropriate and sustainable” graduate student support, Hernandez-Jason said.

Hamilton said the $2,500 supplement offered by the university after negotiations this year provides students with only an extra $200 a month, which does not do much to fix the problem. She said students shouldn’t have to relinquish their only leverage for the university to come to the table.

“They shouldn’t fire anybody,” said Hamilton, who is a graduate student teaching assistant but was not among those fired. She pays $1,800 a month to live a 40-minute drive away from campus in a cabin with no heat. “People are telling them they’re homeless, and they won’t have a substantive conversation.”

The UC system’s four-year contract with the union, which expires in 2022, includes “fair pay and excellent benefits,” UC spokesman Andrew Gordon said in a statement.
“Reopening the contract would defeat the purpose of a signed agreement and would be unfair to all the other UC unions as well as nearly 90,000 represented employees at the University who do adhere to collective bargaining agreements,” he said.

Hamilton said that the contract’s terms were inadequate and that although it was ratified UC-wide, 83% of student employees at UC Santa Cruz voted against it at the time.
On Feb. 14, the campus’ provost sent an message saying that the student workers participating in the grading strike had until Feb. 21 to submit missing grades and that those who did not would not receive spring quarter jobs as teaching assistants, or would be dismissed from their spring quarter appointments.
On the same day, UC President Janet Napolitano sent a letter addressed to faculty, staff and students saying teaching assistants would be fired if they continued to withhold grades.

“Holding undergraduate grades hostage and refusing to carry out contracted teaching responsibilities is the wrong way to go. Therefore, participation in the wildcat strike will have consequences, up to and including the termination of existing employment at the University,” Napolitano wrote. “We urge the striking TAs to turn in their grades and return to the classroom.”

The UC system filed an unfair-labor-practice charge against UAW 2865 on Tuesday alleging the union failed to take the steps required by the collective bargaining agreement to stop the strike by teaching assistants at UC Santa Cruz.

In response, UAW 2865 filed its own unfair-labor-practice charge Thursday against the UC system alleging that it refused to meet with the union to negotiate a cost of living adjustment that has been the focus of actions across the state and the wildcat strike at UC Santa Cruz.
“I’m staying optimistic that we can continue to galvanize people on other campuses and spread this movement,” Arjona said."
 
Last edited:

undead

Veteran Member
uhhh, well that's California for ya - that $1,800 a month she pays is better than the typical mortgage anywhere else in the middle of the country
 

ShadowMan

Designated Grumpy Old Fart
Graduate Teaching Assistants are often the "indentured servants" or worse to the tenured university professors. They are the actual people doing the real work, teaching, grading and lecturing undergraduate students, etc., for spoiled, overpaid egotistical aloof professors. They work on their PhD professors pet projects, attend their own classes and then take care of all the tenured professors teaching, grading needs, etc., basically they are at those professors beck and call.
 

Blastoff

Veteran Member
LOL Ms. Arjona's Twitter handle is literally @ms_self_dstruct

Seems like she's good at that

And graduate assistants are indentured servants, funny how the liberal ivory tower is a feudal system rather than a socialist paradise
 

Ratfink

Just passin' thru
I understand the housing is expensive but the graduate students do get their tuition costs paid while they are working, so if you count the tuition cost plus the stipend it is quite a bit of money. Yes, they do all the work, but they are getting paid for it.
 

Melodi

Disaster Cat
What Shadow Man said and more, I have no idea if this woman is herself an entitled "snowflake" but I can tell you the desperate situation of many graduate students and the majority of new professors on "contracts" is terrible and if I ran the world would be illegal.

Basically, almost the entire educational-financial-industrial complex these days is run on the basis of barely paid higher-level students and desperate P.h.d's who work for wages that are lower even than food service, have no job protections or benefits and who TEACH huge portions of the undergraduate classes.

So even if a family may THINK they are sending Jr. or Missy to a good University to study with a mix of professors as was the case when they or their grandparents went to school while instead, the family is spending (or borrowing) thousands upon thousands of dollars to have them taught by students who have yet to qualify in their field and teachers who have no offices and no time for student meetings because they teach at three different schools in the area and never know if they will be employed each semester or where they will teaching.

This is unfair to students, parents and the people being essentially used as near-slave labor, which given the current costs of a so-called university degree these days are simply undefendable.

And yeah, there are issues with a subject like anthropology but this is a problem for STEM subjects too, they just have more doctoral and post-doctoral STUDENTS teaching the basic classes because those with advanced degrees can get better jobs in the industry than pretended to work for three different colleges.

This means the future engineers, scientists, mathematicians, biologists, and others are being taught by students, probably not what the parents think they are paying for (or the bank is paying for).
 

Faroe

Un-spun
Graduate Teaching Assistants are often the "indentured servants" or worse to the tenured university professors. They are the actual people doing the real work, teaching, grading and lecturing undergraduate students, etc., for spoiled, overpaid egotistical aloof professors. They work on their PhD professors pet projects, attend their own classes and then take care of all the tenured professors teaching, grading needs, etc., basically they are at those professors beck and call.

I agree, it is a VERY bad deal - so why sign up for it?
 

Melodi

Disaster Cat
I agree, it is a VERY bad deal - so why sign up for it?
Most people when they get to this stage of their studies are already in very deep debt and need to finish, they get these "offers" and it looks to be better than quitting without a degree (and still owing all the money).

Also, there is still the "myth" out there, that be a good little drone and do all the work and maybe, just maybe you will get one of those very-rare tenured positions that still exist. This happens just often enough (I'm guessing one in one-hundred people or so) that many still believe it, though that is fading fast.

As for the P.h.d.'s many are desperate to work in their field and they also get the "you must do this for a few years and have both a teaching history and a publishing history and then we may let you apply for one of those very few full-time jobs with benefits."

I've had a number of friends fall into this trip and I don't think any of them is still teaching - the other trap is that while they can teach college, they find they are unqualified to teach highschool without going back to get another "degree" in education taking on more debts.

That is true even for STEM subjects though some States and school districts have exemptions or allow for getting that second degree at night and during the Summers while already teaching.

This system is starting to fall apart (which it should) but it has been destroying lives for nearly 30 years now.

Again, we ask kids at ages 17 or 18 to make a decision they don't really often understand and if they are "good" kids often every adult they respect is telling them to do "go to college" and by the time they discover the game, they are already so loaded with debts it is actually better to finish at least a first-level degree than to quit.

Many then find, they can't get work but they can get their loans deferred if they go for a higher-level degree (and take on more debt) so they do that and then find their employment to be of the sort we are describing.
 

mzkitty

I give up.
I've mentioned this before -- my friend here was teaching at a nearby FL university, and all the TA's or whatever they were calling them, got together and told the university they needed more money to survive. The university fired all of them.

This was a few years ago.

:(
 

Josie

Has No Life - Lives on TB
DS worked as a TA at a university while studying for his masters. YES! You are slaves to the profs. Being a biochem grad student, he had to doing their testing, grading, teaching and lab work while working/studying for his own degree. Absolutely no free time. He figured out in a spare moment that the "wages" he was earning were below minimum wages. By wages he got tuition, books and a housing stipend. But all of this was in the contract he signed every sememster. All other fees (He had to pay things like a transportation fee even though he lived well off campus and had to drive in everyday...including weekends and entertainment fee ...like he had time!), food, gas and car were on his own dime. He also shared an apartment with a friend (who ended up be a super slob) to cut his housing down.

Actually I don't know what professors do for the exorbitant salaries they are paid.
 

Hermantribe

Veteran Member
Very timely. My DD is graduating in May with her bachelor's degree. She's looking into a masters program/teaching credential starting in the summer, including TA and RA programs. I need to talk to her about this.
 

The Snack Artist

Membership Revoked
Among those fired Friday was Brenda Arjona, a third-year doctoral student in anthropology who has a 10-year-old son and lives in student family housing.

Single Mom grifting off the system with a degree no one can use. Perfect! Where's the baby daddy? Does she even know who's it is?

Her twatter feed or whatever says she's, "brown and proud". Sounds like a way to order food.
 

MinnesotaSmith

Membership Revoked
Always apt on this topic:

The Ph.D. Glut Revisited
By Gary North
January 24, 2006


"The economist rarely uses the words “glut” and “shortage” without adding: at some price. Other scholars are not equally wise.

A free market theory of pricing rests on the supposition that gluts and shortages are temporary phenomena. Prices adjust so as to clear a market. If this does not take place, the free market economist goes looking for evidence of state intervention.
Consider the problem of excess inventory. It is better to get something for unused and unwanted inventory than to pay for storage. So, selling prices adjust downward. This eventually eliminates the glut. The unpleasant experience also warns the producer not to do this again.
Why does a glut exist? Because of an error in prior forecasting. Suppliers believed that there would be buyers at a specific price. It turned out that there was an insufficient number of buyers at that expected price.

Then why does a glut persist? One answer: ignorance on the part of suppliers. But why should this ignorance persist? Why don’t suppliers get the picture?
Experienced sellers do get the picture. The problem is a continuing supply of new sellers who are unfamiliar with the market and ignorant of the past supply-demand conditions. Or, as has been said so often, there’s a sucker born every minute. There is no evidence that P. T. Barnum ever said this, but it is nonetheless true.

In the worldwide suckers’ market, gamblers are the only people who are slower to learn than young adults with masters’ degrees. Bright graduate students possess a pair of non-marketable skills: the ability to write term papers and the ability to take academic exams. They are also economic illiterates and incurably naïve. So, they become the trusting victims of the professorial class.

THE ECONOMICS OF THE PROFESSORATE

No one ever sits down and tells a newly minted college graduate about the economics of the professorate. No one tells the student about the crucial and neglected work of the person who first blew the whistle on the economics of the Ph.D., David W. Breneman. He is the Dean of the Curry School of Education at the University of Virginia. He wrote his Ph.D. dissertation on the economics of the Ph.D. It was accepted in 1970 by the University of California, Berkeley. It was based on research completed in 1968, the year prior to the beginning of the Ph.D. glut. Its title: “The Ph.D. Production Process: A Study of Departmental Behavior.” Of all Ph.D. dissertations ever written, this is the only one that one that should be read by every college student who is contemplating graduate school. Of course, no one tells him. Few people have ever heard of it.
I read it in 1970. I do not recall how I came across it. I was completing my Ph.D., so I was facing the Ph.D. glut personally, which had begun in the fall of 1969. It had been predicted for the sciences by Allan Cartter of New York University in 1964. Sometime around 1966, Clark Kerr, President of the University of California, had mentioned this looming problem to a group of us in an elite student organization called the California Club. But I was naïve. I figured, “It won’t happen to me.” Ha!

As they say in those late-night Ronco ads, “Here’s how it works!” Academic departments grow in terms of the number of students enrolled. We know from Parkinson’s Law that growth is an institutional imperative. Administrators advance their careers by expanding the number of subordinates in their department. So, every academic department wants more students — students of a special kind.
Students are not of equal value to a department. The lower-division student (freshman or sophomore) does not rate highly in the currency of academic resource allocation: the full-time enrollment, or FTE. The FTE figure is what justifies the hiring of a full-time faculty member. The lower the ratio, the better. It may take 15 lower-division students to generate one FTE. It may take only eight Ph.D.-level graduate students to generate an FTE.
The more Ph.D. students a department can attract, the faster the growth of that department. This is the iron law of academia. All other economic laws are sacrificed for it, as the economist says, other things being equal.
This fact of academic economic life creates an incentive for departments to enroll lots of graduate students. It also rewards those departments that persuade M.A. students to go into the Ph.D. program.
Also, the brightest graduate students may be asked to do unpaid or grant-paid research for senior professors. The professors then publish the results of this research under their own names, thereby advancing their careers. It’s the division of labor at work.
“GLUT? WHAT GLUT?”
The Ph.D. glut has existed ever since the fall of 1969. The number of entry-level full-time professorial positions has remained stagnant. Few new universities have been constructed. Legislatures have resisted additional funding.
This has led to a reduction of the number of tenure-level positions. Universities and community colleges have been able to staff their entry-level positions with inexpensive instructors.
Those few Ph.D.s who receive a full-time position at a university find that they are paid much less than tenured members of the department. They are assigned the lower-division classes, which are large — sometimes 200 to 1,000 students. These mega-classes require lecturing skills that most professors do not possess. Those untenured faculty members who perform well in mega-classes are kept on until the day of reckoning: the decision to grant them tenure, usually eight years after they go on the payroll. They are usually not re-hired unless they have published narrowly focused articles in professional journals. But mega-class professors do not have much time to do the required research.
The assistant professor is now 35 years old or older. He has not made the cut. He is now relegated to the academic underworld: the community colleges. But here there is fierce competition. Community colleges hire part-time instructors at $10 to $15 an hour. These people seek a full-time position at the community college. They need that initial foot in the door: night school courses for worn-out adults who are trying to earn an A.A. degree. Their natural enemies are the newly dismissed assistant professors from universities.
Who gets an entry-level position at Boonsdocksville State University, which in 1960 was a public schools teacher training college? New graduates with Ph.D.s from the two-dozen major universities.
Then what happens to graduates with Ph.D.s issued by Boonsdocksville State? They go straight into the community college circuit.
This has been going on ever since the fall of 1969. It is great for community college administrators, who have a never-ending supply of optimistic Ph.D.-holding graduates of all but the top two-dozen universities, plus a never-ending supply of burned-out, terrified assistant professors from top universities who did not receive tenure.
If you want to understand this process, watch Ghostbusters: the scene after the parapsychology team has been dismissed from the university. Dan Ackroyd speaks for tens of thousands of Ph.D.-holding rejects who did not make the cut.
For over three decades, all it has taken to generate 1,000 applicants was this ad in a professional journal in the humanities:

Tenure-track position
Ph.D. requiredTeach 12 hours of the freshman course
The salary has been almost irrelevant: not more than the average salary of the average American worker with a high school diploma.

If the ad said “Ph.D. or ABD required,” it would generate 2,000 applicants. ABD stands for “all but dissertation.”

Graduate students do not learn about supply and demand, and it does not pay senior professors to teach them. Here is evidence. In response to the ever-growing glut of Ph.D.’s, the American university system turned out about 30,000 Ph.D. graduates per year, 1969 to about 1975. Since then, it has increased the output. In 1980, it was 33,615. In 1990, it was 38,371. In 2000, it was 44,808. In 2003, it was 46,024. (Statistical Abstract of the United States, 2006, Table 290.) Despite this, we read on a website devoted to selling “how to get higher learning degrees” materials,
The Bureau of Labor Statistics currently predicts that the job outlook for postsecondary teachers (a job commonly sought by Ph.D. graduates) should be much brighter than it has been in recent years. Employment in that area is expected to grow by almost 40 percent by 2012, whereas overall employment is expected to grow by only 15 percent! So, if you’re just starting down the track to a Ph.D. and hope to take root in the world of academia, your timing may be just right!
There’s one born every minute . . . and two who will relieve him of his funds.

STATE SUBSIDIES

Most degree-granting universities are funded by taxpayers. A university used to be an institution of higher learning that was authorized by a college-accrediting agency to grant the Ph.D. Employees of all but the most prestigious four-year colleges want to be called a university. So, title inflation has matched degree inflation and grade inflation over the last 35 years.

The supply of college graduates with ever-lower academic abilities is funded by money coerced from taxpayers. The American higher education system is structured by the professorate to reward those professors who teach small classes of graduate students. So, year after year, decade after decade, the supply of Ph.D.-holding students increases, despite an academic market that does not hire most of them, and hires a minority at wages that do not compensate them for the money and time invested in earning their degrees.

They cannot teach at the high school level because their advanced degrees force the school districts to pay them too much. A teacher with a B.A. is paid a fraction of what a Ph.D. or Ed.D. is paid. The teacher unions have negotiated payment so that existing employees who attend night school and summer school at Boonsdocksville State can work their way up within the system. Being tenured, they cannot be fired. Earning a graduate degree is a guaranteed way to earn a larger salary. But no district goes looking for Ph.D.s to hire. That financial affliction is entirely generated from inside the union-dominated, tax-funded public schools.

HOPE SPRINGS ETERNAL

Ph.D. students are a lot like gamblers. They expect to beat the odds. The gambler personifies odds-beating as Lady Luck. The Ph.D. student instead looks within. “I am really smart. These other people in the program aren’t as smart as I am. I will get that tenure-track job. I will make the cut. I will be a beneficiary of the system.”
If wishes were horses, beggars would ride. Also, if ego were marketable, all Ph.D. graduates would get tenure.

Why does any Ph.D. student at any but the top graduate schools believe that he will get tenure at any university? The odds are so far against him, and have been for a generation, than he ought to realize that he is about to waste his most precious resource — time — on a long-shot. Investing five or more years beyond the B.A. degree, except in a field where industry hires people with advanced degrees, is economic stupidity that boggles the imagination. Yet at least 200,000 graduate students are doing this at any time. Of the 46,000 who earned a Ph.D. in 2003, an equal number (or more) got to ABD status and quit. Probably more than half of the others quit before they got to ABD status.

At $20,000 or more per year in tuition and living expenses, plus the $35,000+ not earned in the job market, trying to earn a Ph.D. is a losing proposition.
In some departments, the years invested are horrendous. Breneman’s dissertation went into the grim details, department by department. Anyone seeking a degree in philosophy was almost doomed to failure, yet the Ph.D. degree took on average over a decade beyond the B.A. to earn. There were almost no college teaching jobs when they finished. That was before the glut.

CONCLUSION

749e36c97eecab432bfe0652895e85e5.jpeg
Earning a Ph.D. may pay off if your goal is status, although I don’t understand why anyone regards a Ph.D. as a status symbol that is worth giving up five to ten years of your earning power in your youth, when every dime saved can multiply because of compounding. If the public understood the economics of earning a Ph.D., people would think “naïve economic loser” whenever they hear “Ph.D.”
A word to the wise is sufficient."
 

Squib

Veteran Member
Get a 2 year tech diploma, or start a journeyman program, and work.

This is the rubber meeting the road! Real life intruding! “You can be anything you want!” But make sure what you want and do is valuable.

Gender studies, Black studies, Feminine studies, Queer studies, Native America studies...seriously?
 

Hawke

Veteran Member
Golly gee, who'd've thought a socialist utopia like a public university, would have turned so.....capitalist....when it came to THEM having to offer a "living wage"?
 
Top