BRKG TRUMP CAMPAIGN TAKES WISCONSIN CONSTITUTIONAL FIGHT TO SUPREME COURT--New filing

somewherepress

somewherepress

Has No Life - Lives on TB
This is a new filing:

TRUMP CAMPAIGN TAKES WISCONSIN CONSTITUTIONAL FIGHT TO SUPREME COURT. Asks for expedited hearing.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE
In key jurisdictions across our nation, with respect to the presidential election held on November 3, 2020, state and local election officials and courts altered or ignored state election laws, in violation of the federal Constitution’s Article II assignment to State Legislatures of the plenary authority over the “Manner” of choosing electors, a matter of undoubted importance. See, e.g., Republican Party v. Boockvar, 208 L.Ed.2d 266, 267, 2020 U.S. LEXIS 5188, 2020 WL 6304626 (2020) (Statement of Alito, J., joined by Thomas and Gorsuch, JJ.) (“[T]he constitutionality of the [Pennsylvania] Supreme Court’s decision [in Pennsylvania Democratic Party v. Boockvar, 238 A.3d 345 (Pa. Sep. 17, 2020)] . . . has national importance, and there is a strong likelihood that the State Supreme Court decision violates the Federal Constitution.”).2 This case presents in stark relief several of the violations that occurred in Wisconsin. Together, those violations affected more than the current margin of difference between petitioners and former Vice President Biden and Senator Harris.

Link to SC 223 page filing document

Loading…

cdn.donaldjtrump.com
 

Attachments

  • 1609271249582.png
    1609271249582.png
    140.4 KB · Views: 4
  • 1609271691656.png
    1609271691656.png
    463.1 KB · Views: 4
somewherepress

somewherepress

Has No Life - Lives on TB
TRUMP CAMPAIGN TAKES WISCONSIN CONSTITUTIONAL FIGHT TO SUPREME COURT. Asks for expedited hearing.
@RudyGiuliani announced that the campaign filed a petition for a Writ of Certiorari with #SCOTUS challenging the Wisconsin Supreme Court decision that allowed over 50,000 illegal absentee ballots in violation of Article II of the U.S. Constitution and Wisconsin law.

"The filing seeks expedited consideration before the January 6 Congressional review of the Electoral College votes. This marks the second Constitutional challenge to illegal mail voting filed by the Campaign, following a petition from Pennsylvania filed on December 20"

"According to Trump’s attorney, Jim Troupis: 'Regrettably, the Wisc Supreme Court, in their 4-3 decision, refused to address the merits of our claim. This ‘Cert Petition’ asks them to address our claims, which, if allowed, would change the outcome of the election in Wisconsin.

’“Three members of the Wisconsin State Supreme Court, including the Chief Justice, agreed with many of the President’s claims in written dissents from that court’s December 14 order.’"

"Professor John Eastman, a constitutional scholar at the Claremont Institut noted: 'The petition challenging the decision of the Wisc Supreme Court to allow partisan state and local election officials to ignore key anti-fraud provisions of Wisconsin law is extremely persuasive.’

"'The federal constitutional issues raised by the case cannot be more clear. Article II of the Constitution, as interpreted in Bush v. Gore, assigns to the ‘legislature’ the plenary power to determine the manner of choosing presidential electors,'"


"'not executive officials, un-elected bureaucrats, or even the state’s judiciary. That authority was eviscerated in Wisconsin, resulting in more than 50,000 illegal ballots being cast and counted.’"

"The Trump Petition raises a number of issues, including: - More than 28,000 votes were counted from people who failed to provide identification by abusing the state’s 'indefinitely confined’ status, including two Biden electors.”

"- Nearly 6,000 absentee ballots were counted that were contained in incomplete and altered ballot envelopes that the Wisconsin statutes expressly forbid."

Read the petition here: https://cdn.donaldjtrump.com/public-files/press_assets/trump-v-biden-petition-appendix-final.pdf
https://twitter.com/gayletrotter/status/1344056166838628357
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top